Next Article in Journal
1,3-Dichloroadamantyl-Containing Ureas as Potential Triple Inhibitors of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase, p38 MAPK and c-Raf
Next Article in Special Issue
The Apical Endocytic-Lysosomal Apparatus in CLCN5 Mutations with Phenotypic-Genotypic Correlations in Three Cases
Previous Article in Journal
Generation and Characterization of Recombinant Pseudorabies Virus Delivering African Swine Fever Virus CD2v and p54
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenotype–Genotype Correlations in Three Different Cases of Adult-Onset Genetic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Administration of Bevacizumab and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Development in Taiwan Residents: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

1
Department of Medical Research, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
3
Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
4
Department of Medical Laboratory and Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
5
Division of Renal Medicine, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435, Taiwan
6
Department of Post Baccalaureate Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
8
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lukang Christian Hospital, Changhua 505, Taiwan
9
Department of Otolaryngology, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435, Taiwan
10
Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, College of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
11
Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
12
College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
13
School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
14
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
15
Division of Medical Genetics, China Medical University Children’s Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
16
Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
17
Center for General Education, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
18
General Education Center, Jen-Teh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli 356, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(1), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010340
Submission received: 20 October 2023 / Revised: 14 December 2023 / Accepted: 21 December 2023 / Published: 26 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kidney Diseases: Molecular Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies)

Abstract

:
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a significant role as a pro-angiogenic and pro-permeability factor within the kidney. Bevacizumab is a pharmaceutical monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody that inhibits the growth of new blood vessels, which blocks blood supply and thereby restricts tumor growth. Thus, we conducted a nationwide study to explore the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in Taiwan residents after bevacizumab therapy. We drew data from the extensive National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), which encompasses data from >99% of Taiwan’s population from 1995 onwards. Individuals who received bevacizumab between 2012–2018 were identified as the bevacizumab cohort, with the index date set at the first usage. We randomly selected dates within the study period for the control group to serve as index dates. We excluded patients with a history of CKD prior to the index date or those <20 years old. In both cohorts, patients’ propensity scores matched in a 1:1 ratio based on sex, age, index year, income, urbanization level, comorbidities, and medications. We found patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly higher risk of contracting CKD than patients without bevacizumab (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% confidence interval = 1.35–1.73). The risk of CKD was 1.35-fold higher in participants with bevacizumab treatment than those in the control group. These findings suggest that close monitoring of CKD development after bevacizumab administration is needed.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by kidney damage or a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) persistently below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for three months or longer [1,2]. Pre-end stage renal disease (pre-ESRD) causes dangerous levels of fluid, electrolytes, and waste to build up in the patient’s body [3]. Endothelial dysfunction is a significant factor contributing to the increased cardiovascular risk associated with CKD [4]. Angiogenesis, the generation of new blood vessels, is an essential physiological process that is deregulated in various pathological conditions, including cancer [5,6]. Anti-angiogenesis therapies, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting agents, offer an alternative strategy to conventional chemotherapy; they inhibit the growth of new blood vessels, which blocks blood supply and thereby restricts tumor growth [7]. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against VEGF [8,9,10,11]. The drug selectively binds to circulating VEGF and inhibits the binding of VEGF to its cell surface receptor, thereby repressing angiogenic activity [12,13,14]. It is used for various medical conditions and is associated with recognized renal side effects, particularly proteinuria and acute kidney injury (AKI) [15]. A previous study showed that out of the 1506 patients who were administered bevacizumab, the renal events associated with this medication were as follows: 125 instances of acute kidney injury (AKI), which accounted for 8.3% of cases; 110 occurrences of new-onset proteinuria, representing 7.3% of patients; and new-onset CKD in 112 individuals, amounting to 7.4% of the total [16]. However, the authors were unable to calculate the relative risk of CKD because no control group was available for comparison. Hence, limited information is available regarding the extended, or long-term, consequences of its renal adverse effects.
We hypothesized that the anti-angiogenesis effect of bevacizumab may impede the generation of new vessels after renal injury, leading to CKD. Thus, we conducted a nationwide study to explore the risk of CKD development in Taiwan residents after bevacizumab therapy.

2. Results

The demographic characteristics of the study group are listed in Table 1. The dataset included 13,888 individuals within the control group, classified as the non-bevacizumab category, and 13,888 patients within the case group, who received bevacizumab. After propensity score matching, both groups exhibited similar baseline distributions for specific characteristics, such as sex, income, and the comorbidity of alcoholism. The mean follow-up time was 1.7 ± 1.3 years and 2.3 ± 2.0 years with and without bevacizumab, respectively.
In the bevacizumab cohort, 58% were men and the mean age was 62 ± 13 years; 48% were classified as medium income and 53% were categorized as high urbanization level. The three most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (HTN) (47%), dyslipidemia (33%), and diabetes mellitus (DM) (26%). The most frequently prescribed medications included calcium-channel blockers (CCB) (51%), diuretics (48%), alpha-adrenergic blockers (AAB) (32%), and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (31%). In the non-bevacizumab group, 58% were men and the mean age was 62 ± 13 years; 50% were classified as medium income level and 52% were categorized as high urbanization level. The three most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (48%), dyslipidemia (32%), and DM (26%). The most frequently prescribed medications included CCB (52%), diuretics (50%), alpha-adrenergic blockers (33%), and ARB (33%).
Table 2 presents the risk of CKD associated with bevacizumab. Patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly higher risk of developing CKD than patients without bevacizumab (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.18–1.55). Additionally, other risk factors for CKD included male sex (aHR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01–1.38), age between 50 and 64 years (aHR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06–1.89), age >65 years (aHR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.54–2.76), DM (aHR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.58–2.14), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) (aHR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00–1.38), alpha-adrenergic blockers (aHR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.11–1.53), ARB (aHR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.03–1.47), CCB (aHR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.02–1.52), and diuretics (aHR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.51–2.04), all of which also displayed a significantly increased risk of CKD.
Furthermore, we conducted a stratified analysis, as presented in Table 3. Compared to control patients, both males and females of bevacizumab faced a greater risk of CKD. Across all age and income groups, the risks of CKD associated with bevacizumab treatment were higher than control groups. When stratified by comorbidities and medications, patients within the bevacizumab cohort with DM, dyslipidemia, HTN, COPD, alpha-adrenergic blocker usage, ARB usage, beta blocker usage, CCB usage, diuretic usage, and other anti-HTN drugs usage exhibited an increased risk of CKD compared to the non-bevacizumab cohort in these same categories.
Figure 1 shows that the cumulative incidence curves for CKD in the bevacizumab group were significantly higher than those in the comparison group (log-rank test p < 0.001).

3. Discussion

The molecular mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology and progression of CKD and associated complications have been documented in many studies [17]. CKD encompasses a range of diverse disorders that impact both the structure and function of the kidneys [18]. CKD progresses with the accumulation of extracellular matrix, leading to end-stage renal disease. In general, diabetes and high blood pressure are the more common causes of CKD. Other risk factors affecting CKD include heart disease, obesity, a family history of CKD, and inherited kidney disorders [19]. VEGF is the essential growth factor in angiogenesis and is a well-characterized contributor to angiogenesis. VEGF-A and VEGF-C secreted by podocytes are essential for maintaining the physiological functions of glomerular endothelial cells and podocytes via binding to their receptors, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1), VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1), VEGFR-3 (Flt-4), and coreceptors, NRP (Neuropilin) 1 and NRP2 [7]. The dysregulated high circulating level of VEGF is associated with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy [20]. VEGF mRNA level and protein expression in kidney tissue are significantly higher in diabetic patients with nephropathy than those without nephropathy. VEGF expression is closely linked to renal function and the disease progression of diabetic nephropathy and is an independent risk factor of prognostic recurrence [21].
Bevacizumab, a VEGF inhibitor, is a well-known anti-angiogenesis medication [8,9,10,11]. Furthermore, disrupting VEGF signaling activates CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, enhances the antigen presentation function of dendritic cells, facilitates the cytotoxicity of macrophage, and activates the complement cascade [7]. Numerous prior investigations have sought to elucidate the potential pathophysiological process behind renal damage and proteinuria associated with bevacizumab [22,23,24]. This may be attributed to a high dose of bevacizumab [15,25]. The intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in the patients with diabetes increases the concentrations of microalbumin in the urine and the ratio of urinary protein to creatinine [26], and is associated with renal function decline among patients with diabetic retinopathy and advanced CKD [27]. Renal damage occurs in the diabetic macular edema patients with an increase in microalbuminuria and a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, regardless of the number of injections or the type of VEGF inhibitors [28]. Patients with extremely high or low eGFR have greater persistent eGFR decline during the long-term intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF treatment for two years in the patients with diabetic macular edema [29]. Gan et al. reported that a patient with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion has membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after intravitreal vascular growth factor inhibitor injections [30]. However, there is no clinically significant change in the serum markers of renal function during the short-term intravitreal treatment of anti-VEGF drugs for 1 month in the patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration [31]. In addition, there is no association between intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment and renal adverse events based on the data from the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FARES) database [32].
This study focused on CKD development after the administration of bevacizumab. While VEGF targeting offers substantial benefits in the treatment of various tumors, it can also lead to a range of adverse effects, such as wound non-healing, HTN, embolism, bleeding, and phlebitis [33,34,35,36], which typically results in treatment discontinuation [37]. Uys et al. reported that continuous bevacizumab use led to renal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) [38]. In addition, several cases of renal dysfunction and proteinuria have been reported after exposure to bevacizumab [26,27,28,30,32]. A previous study suggested that TMA was associated with a risk of CKD [39]. Based on this nationwide study, we conclude that there is a risk of CKD development after the administration of bevacizumab regardless of sex, most comorbidities, income, and medications. A possible mechanism linking bevacizumab with CKD is vascular microangiopathy caused by bevacizumab [40,41,42]. A study of kidney injury mechanisms in rats indicated that levels of microalbumin, cystatin C, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen in the bevacizumab group were markedly elevated compared to those in the normal control group [15]. Moreover, there is a potential for VEGF inhibitors to exert a toxic effect on podocytes, contributing to their damaging effects [43]. One of the mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction involves less promotion of nitric oxide, leading to higher vascular tone and vasoconstriction, potentially promoting microvascular thrombi formation. Furthermore, the interaction between VEGF-A and VEGFR2 mainly expressed by glomerular podocytes and on the surface of endothelial cells, respectively, is important for the maintenance of the normal function of glomerular and tubular epithelial cells in the kidney [44]. The disruption of VEGF-A/VEGFR2 signaling by VEGF inhibitors, such as bevacizumab, increases RelA (NF-kB transcription factor, also known as p65) and decreases c-MIP (C-Maf-inducing protein) to promote the development of MTA, leading to the activation of the pro-inflammatory cascade and endothelial injuries [45]. The aforementioned nephrotoxicity and injuries in the kidney might contribute to bevacizumab associated risk of CKD.
Although this nationwide study had a well-structured design, there remain some limitations. First, we enrolled control participants by propensity score matching based on sex, age, index year, income, urbanization level, comorbidities, and medications. Thus, the prevalence of comorbidities in the control group may not be representative of the general population. This may have resulted in an underestimation of the risk of CKD development and the non-significant association found between CKD and most comorbidities (Table 2).
Second, different medical conveniences in urbanization may affect willingness to seek medical treatment and reduce the prevalence of comorbidities. This study did not enroll participants from remote areas. Nevertheless, the National Health Insurance (NHI) program covers >99% of Taiwan residents and reduces the gap in medical convenience in remote areas by providing free medical care [46,47], thus minimizing surveillance bias. Third, in the initial phases of CKD (stages 1–2), there are no clinical symptoms, and patients experience a lack of noticeable signs [19]. In addition, its characteristic is a prolonged latent phase [48,49]. Therefore, CKD risk may be underestimated, as we were unable to enroll patients who were diagnosed with CKD outside of the study period. Fourth, as bevacizumab is primarily used as a cancer treatment, establishing whether CKD results from the drug itself or the underlying cancer remains a complex task. Further research is necessary to delineate the connection between medications and CKD.
In conclusion, closely monitoring for CKD development after the administration of bevacizumab is urgently required. Accelerating basic research in this area in order to enable early diagnosis of CKD is critical. Awareness of these complications should be further elaborated to assess the safety profile of bevacizumab administration.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Data Source

Our analysis draws from the extensive National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), which encompasses data from >99% of Taiwan’s population spanning from 1995 onwards. The database encompasses detailed medical records from outpatient visits and hospital admissions, inclusive of diagnostic codes and prescription medications. To safeguard individual privacy, the NHIRD employs rigorous anonymization protocols. While the database contains comprehensive medical information, individual identities are meticulously protected. Researchers, healthcare professionals, and analysts can access de-identified data, ensuring confidentiality and compliance with ethical standards. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), were used for disease classification. This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the China Medical University Hospital (CMUH110-REC3-133-CR-2).

4.2. Study Subjects

The population we included in this study were cancer patients (ICD-9-CM: 140–208; ICD-10-CM: C00-C99). Individuals who received bevacizumab between 2012–2018 were identified as the bevacizumab cohort. Within this cohort, we designated the index date as the date of their initial bevacizumab usage. For the control group, we randomly selected dates within the study period to serve as index dates. We excluded patients with a history of CKD prior to the index date or those who were <20 years old. The two groups were paired using a 1:1 propensity score matching approach, considering factors such as gender, age, index year, urbanization, DM, dyslipidemia, HTN, stroke, CAD, alcoholism, COPD, ACEI, AAB, ARB, beta-blocker, CCB, diuretics, and other anti-HTN drugs.

4.3. Main Outcome and Relevant Variables

The primary focus of this research was to determine the incidence of CKD (ICD-9-CM: 580; ICD-10-CM: N18.4, N18.5, N18.6, and N18.9) for at least two outpatient claims or one inpatient claim. Throughout the study, all enrolled patients were followed up from the index date until the earliest occurrence of one of three events: (1) the onset of CKD, (2) death, or (3) the conclusion of the observation period on 31 December 2019. In our study, we chose the following comorbidities: diabetes mellitus (DM; ICD-9-CM: 250; ICD-10-CM: E08-E13), dyslipidemia (ICD-9-CM: 272; ICD-10-CM: E71.30, E75.21, E75.22, E75.24, E75.3, E75.5, E75.6, E77, E78.0, E78.1, E78.2, E78.3, E78.4, E78.5, E78.6, E78.70, E78.79, E78.8, and E78.9), hypertension (HTN; ICD-9-CM: 401–405; ICD-10-CM: I10-I13, I15, and N26.2), stroke (ICD-9-CM: 430–438; ICD-10-CM: I60-I69), coronary artery disease (CAD; ICD-9-CM: 410–414; ICD-10-CM: 20-I25), alcoholism (ICD-9-CM: 291, 303, 305.0, 571.0–571.3, 790.3, V11.3, and V79.1; ICD-10-CM: F10, K70, R78.0, and Z65.8), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; ICD-9-CM: 490–496, and 504–506; ICD-10-CM: J40-J47, and J64-J68). Furthermore, we conducted an analysis of common medication usage, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), alpha-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), beta blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCB), diuretics, and other anti-HTN drugs.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

We calculated the frequency in percentages for each categorical variable. Continuous variables were presented as the mean with standard deviation (SD). To assess descriptive statistics between the case and control groups, we used standardized mean difference (SMD) analysis. A negligible imbalance in potential confounders between the two groups was indicated by SMD < 0.1. In the univariate Cox proportional hazards model, we computed the hazard ratios (HR) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model accounted for factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. We defined a p-value < 0.05 in two-tailed tests as being statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

5. Conclusions

Accelerating basic research in this area in order to enable the early diagnosis of CKD is critical. Awareness of these complications should be further elaborated to assess the safety profile of bevacizumab administration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-H.C. and W.-L.C.; methodology, K.-H.C. and H.-J.L.; software, K.-H.C. and H.-J.L.; validation, L.-F.L., R.-H.C., T.-K.W., W.-L.C., S.C.-S.T., H.-J.L., F.-J.T. and K.-H.C.; formal analysis, K.-H.C. and H.-J.L.; investigation, L.-F.L., R.-H.C., T.-K.W., W.-L.C., S.C.-S.T., H.-J.L., F.-J.T. and K.-H.C.; resources, F.-J.T. and K.-H.C.; data curation, K.-H.C. and H.-J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-F.L., T.-K.W. and K.-H.C.; writing—review and editing, L.-F.L., R.-H.C. and K.-H.C.; visualization, L.-F.L., T.-K.W., W.-L.C., S.C.-S.T., H.-J.L., F.-J.T. and K.-H.C.; supervision, K.-H.C.; project administration, F.-J.T. and K.-H.C.; funding acquisition, F.-J.T. and K.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported in part by Tungs’ Taichung Metro Harbor hospital research grant (TTMHH-R1130011/TTMHH-R1120013), the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 111-2321-B-039-005), and the China Medical University Hospital (DMR-111-105). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis; in the decision to publish; or in the preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding was received for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The NHIRD secures patient personal data by employing encryption to safeguard privacy. It also provides researchers with anonymous identification numbers that are associated with relevant claims data, including details such as gender, date of birth, medical services, and prescriptions. As a result, patient consent is not required to access the NHIRD for this research project. This research project received approval for exemption from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the China Medical University (Approval Number CMUH109-REC2-031 (CR2)), and the IRB explicitly waived the requirement for informed consent. All the procedures were followed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Information is accessible through the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) provided by the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Administration. However, due to legal constraints stipulated by the Taiwan government under the “Personal Information Protection Act”, the data cannot be released to the public. If you wish to obtain the data, you may submit formal requests to the NHIRD via their website (https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-2506-113.html, accessed on 14 December 2023).

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the Health Data Science Center at China Medical University Hospital for their generous provision of administrative, technical, and financial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Andrassy, K.M. Comments on ‘KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease’. Kidney Int. 2013, 84, 622–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Levey, A.S. Defining AKD: The Spectrum of AKI, AKD, and CKD. Nephron 2021, 146, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cannon, J.D. Recognizing chronic renal failure…the sooner, the better. Nursing 2022 2004, 34, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Di Marco, G.S.; Reuter, S.; Hillebrand, U.; Amler, S.; König, M.; Larger, E.; Oberleithner, H.; Brand, E.; Pavenstädt, H.; Brand, M. The soluble VEGF receptor sFlt1 contributes to endothelial dysfunction in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 2235–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sanz-Cameno, P.; Trapero-Marugán, M.; Chaparro, M.; Jones, E.A.; Moreno-Otero, R. Angiogenesis: From Chronic Liver Inflammation to Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Oncol. 2010, 2010, 272170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, Z.; Dabrosin, C.; Yin, X.; Fuster, M.M.; Arreola, A.; Rathmell, W.K.; Generali, D.; Nagaraju, G.P.; El-Rayes, B.; Ribatti, D.; et al. Broad targeting of angiogenesis for cancer prevention and therapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015, 35, S224–S243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, J.; Li, X.L.; Li, C.Q. Immunoregulation mechanism of VEGF signaling pathway inhibitors and its efficacy on the kidney. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 366, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Simon, T.; Coquerel, B.; Petit, A.; Kassim, Y.; Demange, E.; Le Cerf, D.; Perrot, V.; Vannier, J.-P. Direct Effect of Bevacizumab on Glioblastoma Cell Lines In Vitro. NeuroMol. Med. 2014, 16, 752–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahajan, D.; Miller, C.; Hirose, K.; McCullough, A.; Yerian, L. Incidental reduction in the size of liver hemangioma following use of VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab. J. Hepatol. 2008, 49, 867–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ferrara, N.; Hillan, K.J.; Novotny, W. Bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody for cancer therapy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 333, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garcia, J.; Hurwitz, H.I.; Sandler, A.B.; Miles, D.; Coleman, R.L.; Deurloo, R.; Chinot, O.L. Bevacizumab (Avastin(R)) in cancer treatment: A review of 15 years of clinical experience and future outlook. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020, 86, 102017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Finn, R.S.; Zhu, A.X. Targeting angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma: Focus on VEGF and bevacizumab. Expert Rev. Anticancer. Ther. 2009, 9, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Y.; Fei, D.; Vanderlaan, M.; Song, A. Biological activity of bevacizumab, a humanized anti-VEGF antibody in vitro. Angiogenesis 2004, 7, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zondor, S.D.; Medina, P.J. Bevacizumab: An Angiogenesis Inhibitor with Efficacy in Colorectal and Other Malignancies. Ann. Pharmacother. 2004, 38, 1258–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhao, N.; Xu, Q.; Wang, M.; Fei, X.; Pan, Y.; Chen, X.; Ma, S. Mechanism of kidney injury caused by bevacizumab in rats. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 8675. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Srinivasan, V.; Kfoury, B.; Ahmad, S.; Cohen, J.; Geara, A.S. Long term outcomes of bevacizumab-associated kidney adverse effects. J. Onco-Nephrol. 2023, 7, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Frąk, W.; Kućmierz, J.; Szlagor, M.; Młynarska, E.; Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B. New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms of Chronic Kidney Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Jafar, T.H.; Nitsch, D.; Neuen, B.L.; Perkovic, V. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet 2021, 398, 786–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Evans, M.; Lewis, R.D.; Morgan, A.R.; Whyte, M.B.; Hanif, W.; Bain, S.C.; Davies, S.; Dashora, U.; Yousef, Z.; Patel, D.C.; et al. A Narrative Review of Chronic Kidney Disease in Clinical Practice: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Adv. Ther. 2022, 39, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Gong, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xie, R. The link between diabetic retinal and renal microvasculopathy is associated with dyslipidemia and upregulated circulating level of cytokines. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1040319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.; Zhu, H.; Tang, Q.; Wu, J. Correlation Analysis of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Level with Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: A Biopsy-based Study. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2023, 69, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wu, S.; Kim, C.; Baer, L.; Zhu, X. Bevacizumab increases risk for severe proteinuria in cancer patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Müsri, F.Y.; Mutlu, H.; Eryılmaz, M.K.; Salim, D.K.; Coşkun, H.Ş. Experience of bevacizumab in a patient with colorectal cancer after renal transplantation. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2015, 11, 1018–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Den Deurwaarder, E.; Desar, I.; Steenbergen, E.; Mulders, P.; Wetzels, J.; van Herpen, C.M. Kidney injury during VEGF inhibitor therapy. Neth. J. Med. 2012, 70, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Izzedine, H.; Massard, C.; Spano, J.P.; Goldwasser, F.; Khayat, D.; Soria, J.C. VEGF signalling inhibition-induced proteinuria: Mechanisms, significance and management. Eur. J. Cancer 2010, 46, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chung, Y.R.; Kim, Y.H.; Byeon, H.E.; Jo, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, K. Effect of a Single Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection on Proteinuria in Patients with Diabetes. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ou, S.H.; Yin, C.H.; Chung, T.L.; Chen, H.Y.; Chen, C.L.; Chen, J.S.; Lee, P.T. Intravitreal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor Use and Renal Function Decline in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Del Cura Mar, P.; Carballes, M.J.C.; Sastre-Ibanez, M. Risk of renal damage associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for diabetic macular edema in routine clinical practice. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 71, 3091–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, Y.C.; Lai, I.P.; Lai, T.T.; Chen, T.C.; Yang, C.H.; Ho, T.C.; Yang, C.M.; Hsieh, Y.T. Long-Term Change in Renal Function After Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2023, 12, 2977–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gan, G.; Michel, M.; Max, A.; Sujet-Perone, N.; Zevering, Y.; Vermion, J.C.; Zaidi, M.; Savenkoff, B.; Perone, J.M. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after intravitreal vascular growth factor inhibitor injections: A case report and review of the literature. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2023, 89, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Neffendorf, J.E.; Mare, T.; Simpson, A.R.H.; Soare, C.; Kirthi, V.; Sharpe, C.C.; Jackson, T.L. Effect of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration on renal function. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.-Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2023, 38, 1770–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jiang, L.; Peng, L.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhao, B.; Li, M.; Li, X. Do intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents lead to renal adverse events? A pharmacovigilance real-world study. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1100397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Machado, F.G.; Kuriki, P.S.; Fujihara, C.K.; Fanelli, C.; Arias, S.C.; Malheiros, D.M.; Camara, N.O.; Zatz, R. Chronic VEGF blockade worsens glomerular injury in the remnant kidney model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mayer, G. Capillary rarefaction, hypoxia, VEGF and angiogenesis in chronic renal disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.-Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2011, 26, 1132–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ahn, J.W.; Shalabi, D.; Correa-Selm, L.M.; Dasgeb, B.; Nikbakht, N.; Cha, J. Impaired wound healing secondary to bevacizumab. Int. Wound J. 2019, 16, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, M.; Kroetz, D.L. Bevacizumab-induced hypertension: Clinical presentation and molecular understanding. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 182, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ranpura, V.; Hapani, S.; Wu, S. Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2011, 305, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Uy, A.L.; Simper, N.B.; Champeaux, A.L.; Perkins, R.M. Progressive bevacizumab-associated renal thrombotic microangiopathy. NDT Plus 2009, 2, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ocak, G.; Verduijn, M.; Vossen, C.Y.; Lijfering, W.M.; Dekker, F.W.; Rosendaal, F.R.; Gansevoort, R.T.; Mahmoodi, B.K. Chronic kidney disease stages 1–3 increase the risk of venous thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010, 8, 2428–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Eremina, V.; Jefferson, J.A.; Kowalewska, J.; Hochster, H.; Haas, M.; Weisstuch, J.; Richardson, C.; Kopp, J.B.; Kabir, M.G.; Backx, P.H.; et al. VEGF inhibition and renal thrombotic microangiopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perazella, M.A.; Izzedine, H. New drug toxicities in the onco-nephrology world. Kidney Int. 2015, 87, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hsu, P.-C.; Chen, T.-D.; Tsai, T.-Y.; Yang, C.-T. Bevacizumab-Induced Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Receiving Nivolumab Combined with Bevacizumab, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel: Two Case Reports. Clin. Pract. 2023, 13, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guan, F.; Villegas, G.; Teichman, J.; Mundel, P.; Tufro, A. Autocrine VEGF-A system in podocytes regulates podocin and its interaction with CD2AP. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2006, 291, F422–F428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tanabe, K.; Wada, J.; Sato, Y. Targeting angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020, 16, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hoon, C.; Shanshan, G.; Tulsi, M. The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Pathway Inhibition and Associated Nephrotoxicities. In Chronic Kidney Disease; Ane Claudia Fernandes, N., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2022; Chapter 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, N.; Yip, W.; Chang, H.J.; Chou, Y.J. Trends in rural and urban differentials in incidence rates for ruptured appendicitis under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan. Public Health 2006, 120, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Siroux, V.; Pin, I.; Oryszczyn, M.P.; Le Moual, N.; Kauffmann, F. Relationships of active smoking to asthma and asthma severity in the EGEA study. Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 15, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rajput, S.; Jain, S.; Saha, S.; Mirza, A.; Dakshinamurthy, S. Diagnostic & Clinical Utilities of Serum βeta2 Microglobulin and Urinary Albumin Creatinine Ratio for Identification of Pre-Chronic Kidney Disease. Proteom. Bioinform. 2020, 2, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hwang, S.Y.; Jeong, S.; Choi, S.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.R.; Lee, G.; Son, J.S.; Park, S.M. Association of air pollutants with incident chronic kidney disease in a nationally representative cohort of Korean adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of CKD compared between patients with and without bevacizumab.
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of CKD compared between patients with and without bevacizumab.
Ijms 25 00340 g001
Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristics and comorbidities between patients treated with bevacizumab and controls.
Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristics and comorbidities between patients treated with bevacizumab and controls.
CovariatesNon-
Bevacizumab
(n = 13,888)
Bevacizumab
(n = 13,888)
SMD
Sex <0.001
Female42%42%
Male58%58%
Age
20–4916%17%0.009
50–6443%42%0.013
65+41%41%0.006
mean ± SD62 ± 1362 ± 130.002
Insurance fee
<20,00031%33%0.048
20,000–39,99950%47%0.050
40,000+19%19%0.006
Urban
Low8%8%<0.001
Medium39%39%0.007
High52%53%0.006
Comorbidities
DM26%26%0.011
Dyslipidemia32%33%0.016
HTN48%47%0.019
Stroke11%11%0.012
CAD15%15%0.001
Alcoholism2%2%0.016
COPD22%21%0.028
Medication
ACEI19%19%0.004
AAB33%32%0.019
ARB33%31%0.024
Beta-blocker20%20%0.009
CCB 52%51%0.025
Diuretics50%48%0.042
Others6%6%0.021
Follow up yearsmean ± SD2.2 ± 2.01.7 ± 1.30.342
SMD, standardized mean difference; income: low is <USD 700/month, medium is USD 701–1400/month, high is USD 1400+/month; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; AAB, alpha-adrenergic blockers; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CCB, calcium-channel blockers; others, other anti-HTN drugs.
Table 2. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of CKD development.
Table 2. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of CKD development.
CovariatesCKDaHR95% CI
nIR
Bevacizumab
No41312.81.00(reference)
Yes45618.91.35(1.18, 1.55)
Sex
Female30812.11.00(reference)
Male56118.11.18(1.01, 1.38)
Age
20–49585.61.00(reference)
50–6430011.71.42(1.06, 1.89)
65+51125.02.06(1.54, 2.76)
Income
Low28116.51.00(reference)
Medium43215.30.92(0.79, 1.08)
High15613.90.90(0.74, 1.10)
Urban
Low6815.61.00(reference)
Medium35816.21.08(0.83, 1.40)
High44314.81.05(0.81, 1.36)
Comorbidities
DM40330.21.84(1.58, 2.14)
Dyslipidemia38822.10.92(0.79, 1.07)
HTN61324.51.20(0.96, 1.50)
Stroke13628.51.12(0.92, 1.35)
CAD19025.00.87(0.73, 1.04)
Alcoholism1720.11.04(0.64, 1.69)
COPD22220.00.97(0.83, 1.14)
Medication
ACEI28329.71.18(1.00, 1.38)
AAB40825.11.30(1.11, 1.53)
ARB44728.21.23(1.03, 1.47)
Beta-blocker20519.91.08(0.92, 1.28)
CCB61723.41.25(1.02, 1.52)
Diuretics57024.31.76(1.51, 2.04)
Others8831.31.20(0.95, 1.50)
n, number of patients with CKD; IR, incidence rate ratio (1000 person-years); aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; income: low is <USD 700/month, medium is USD 701–1400/month, high is USD 1400+/month; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; AAB, alpha-adrenergic blockers; ARB, angio-tensin receptor blocker; CCB, calcium-channel blockers; others, other anti-HTN drugs.
Table 3. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of CKD development with and without bevacizumab stratified by age, comorbidities, and medication.
Table 3. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of CKD development with and without bevacizumab stratified by age, comorbidities, and medication.
CovariatesNon-
Bevacizumab
BevacizumabaHR95% CI
nIRnIR
Sex
Female1489.7416015.471.41(1.12, 1.77)
Male 26515.4829621.371.33(1.12, 1.57)
Age
20–49182.89409.772.74(1.55, 4.85)
50–641419.5415914.531.43(1.13, 1.80)
65+25422.5025728.061.20(1.01, 1.43)
Income
Low12913.9015219.701.29(1.01, 1.64)
Medium21613.1521618.281.27(1.05, 1.54)
High6810.308818.871.69(1.21, 2.35)
Urban
Low3514.283317.161.13(0.69, 1.85)
Medium17413.6618419.561.31(1.06, 1.63)
High20411.9223918.581.40(1.16, 1.70)
Comorbidities
DM20327.9520032.831.19(0.97, 1.46)
Dyslipidemia18819.4720025.361.28(1.05, 1.57)
HTN29821.4731528.271.30(1.11, 1.53)
Stroke8031.565624.940.87(0.61, 1.24)
CAD10124.748925.291.10(0.82, 1.48)
Alcoholism922.45818.000.98(0.34, 2.81)
COPD10617.1511623.621.38(1.05, 1.81)
Medication
ACEI14828.7113530.801.09(0.86, 1.39)
AAB19722.2321128.621.29(1.06, 1.57)
ARB21023.8723733.591.37(1.13, 1.66)
Beta-blocker9817.1610723.341.32(1.00, 1.76)
CCB 29220.1432527.361.34(1.14, 1.58)
Diuretics28322.6828726.231.16(0.98, 1.37)
Others3827.785034.661.28(0.83, 1.97)
n, number of patients with CKD; IR, incidence rate ratio (1000 person years); aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; income: low is <USD 700/month, medium is USD 701–1400/month, high is USD 1400+/month; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; AAB, alpha-adrenergic blockers; ARB, angio-tensin receptor blocker; CCB, calcium-channel blockers; others, other anti-HTN drugs.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lye, L.-F.; Chou, R.-H.; Wu, T.-K.; Chuang, W.-L.; Tsai, S.C.-S.; Lin, H.-J.; Tsai, F.-J.; Chang, K.-H. Administration of Bevacizumab and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Development in Taiwan Residents: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010340

AMA Style

Lye L-F, Chou R-H, Wu T-K, Chuang W-L, Tsai SC-S, Lin H-J, Tsai F-J, Chang K-H. Administration of Bevacizumab and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Development in Taiwan Residents: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(1):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lye, Lon-Fye, Ruey-Hwang Chou, Tsai-Kun Wu, Wu-Lung Chuang, Stella Chin-Shaw Tsai, Heng-Jun Lin, Fuu-Jen Tsai, and Kuang-Hsi Chang. 2024. "Administration of Bevacizumab and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Development in Taiwan Residents: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 1: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop