Next Article in Journal
Accelerating the Screening of Small Peptide Ligands by Combining Peptide-Protein Docking and Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Fate of Entosis: From the Beginning to the End in Untreated Advanced Breast Cancer
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Role of Alarmins in Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis: HMGB1, S100B and IL-33

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12143; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512143
by Antonino Palumbo 1, Fabiola Atzeni 1, Giuseppe Murdaca 2,3,* and Sebastiano Gangemi 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12143; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512143
Submission received: 17 June 2023 / Revised: 26 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 29 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Aim of the present revew is to evalue the roles of the three alarmins HMGB1,IL33 and SI00B in the pathogenesis of OA.These objectives of the revew have been obtained through the exhaustive examination of the literature,a very useful insert of the experiments  in the tables,very clear figures and language,resulting a very useful paper for the researchers on the field of OA.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I revised the paper accordingly to your suggestions.

Giuseppe Murdaca

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

It is well reviewed the three HMGB1, S100B and IL-33 alarmins in OA.

Please clarify at Aim of the study that why HMGB1, S100B and IL-33 alarmins from the other alarmin proteins were chosen for this review.  

minor editing of English language is required.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I revised the paper accordingly to your suggestions.

Giuseppe Murdaca

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for the nice review concerning the role of alarmins in osteoarthritis.

I have the following remarks:

L31 Please add : chondrophyte and osteophyte formation. Is angiogenesis really a characteristic? Please reconsider

L41 Prevalence of processes is incorrect. Please adapt

L59 Patterns instead of pattern. PAMPs is prural

L69 the cell. please add ´the´

L71 cell release instead of releasing

L74 it chemoattracts

L108 ST2V is expressed in the ......

L126 The aims of the study (a) to (e ) are not clearly followed in the text. Please clarify the text accordingly or adapt the definition of the aims.

L130-132. Please rephrase

L134 performed instead of effectuated 

L137 arguments of the study meaning??? Please rephrase

L141 Results and discussion. There is considerable overlap and redundancy between the text and tables. Please condense to improve readibility

L201 it is plausible to speculate....? Recruitement of CPC into a damaged ECM with apoptic or necrotic chondrocyte is a very unlikely event. Please adapt accordingly

L209 please include ligaments and menisci

L218 demonstrated instead of explained

L280 has confirmed an improvement activity? Please rephrase

L317 Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy. Please adapt for readibility

L336 Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)

L366 Various instead of Diverse

L389 starts instead of gets starts to

L462-463 IL-33 increases mRNA levels of IL-33? Autostimulation? Please explain or adapt

L474 researchers instead of scholars?

L497 Study of Hong [92] is concerned with rheumatoid arthritis not OA. Hence the difference? 

L544 receptor instead of receptors

L672-683 This section seems completely disconnected from the aims of the study and alarmins & OA data presented. Please address this to bring the conclusion section in line with your study aims

L690 There is HMGB1/miRNA axes. If you mean axes in plural, a proposal could be:  There are several ....axes influencing OA initiation and progression

Please see my previous remarks

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I revised the paper accordingly to your suggestions.

Giuseppe Murdaca

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

excellent review, with details, well - presented to the reader with figures, tables and fluent use of english.

I have noticed some references that according to my opinion should be replaced in the text. For example line 365. I found very interesting this particular information, regarding the potential effect of bleeding in the cascade of inflammation in the joint. However,  the paper that corresponds to reference 87, is not refering in bleeding situation but to an experiment of basic science. As writen in your article, your opinion (or your colclusion, if you want) that is not incorrect of course, should not be presented as the main idea of the referrence number 87. Therefore, replacement of the reference a few lines above, would be better and the reader will not be confused.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I revised the paper accordingly to your suggestions.

Giuseppe Murdaca

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop