Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Dysfunction Associated with mtDNA in Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Next Article in Special Issue
Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Shanlan Landrace Rice for GWAS of Cooking and Eating Quality Traits
Previous Article in Journal
Yeast Bax Inhibitor (Bxi1p/Ybh3p) Is Not Required for the Action of Bcl-2 Family Proteins on Cell Viability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conjunctive Analyses of BSA-Seq and BSR-Seq to Identify Candidate Genes Controlling the Black Lemma and Pericarp Trait in Barley
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Genetic Effects Analysis of QTLs for Rice Grain Size Based on CSSL-Z403 and Its Dissected Single and Dual-Segment Substitution Lines

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12013; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512013
by Guangyi Xu, Keli Deng, Jinjin Yu, Qiaolong Li, Lu Li, Aoni Xiang, Yinghua Ling, Changwei Zhang and Fangming Zhao *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12013; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512013
Submission received: 22 June 2023 / Revised: 19 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research for Cereal Grain Quality 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The presented work on genetic effects analysis of QTL in rice is highly significant for peer rice researchers in advancing knowledge about the genetic effects of QTLs on grain size and how these QTLs may help other genetics aspects (including epistasis effects) for continued breeding improvement. Overall, the presented study is very unique in nature and would certainly add new value to rice genetics research. The authors have presented their work succinctly and the manuscript can be considered to accept after major revision.

Please see the review comments attached herewith and revise the manuscript considering the made suggestions.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The authors have presented their work eloquently; however, there are some grammatical issues that need to address. I would recommend authors seek the help of a native English speaker or an English Editing Service to improve it further.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The research is devoted to the identification of QTLs controlling the grain size, an important character closely related to seed quality in rice. Therefore, the article fits the scope of the Special Issue “Molecular Research for Cereal Grain Quality 2.0”. The material investigated in the study, represents a large group of segment substitution lines, the derivatives of crosses with involving indica restorer line Xihui18 as recipient and various japonica lines as donors. Probably by this reason the experimental design and manuscript structure are very similar to those published in other paper devoted to the studying the analogous material (Sun, S., Wang, Z., Xiang, S. et al. Identification, pyramid, and candidate gene of QTL for yield-related traits based on rice CSSLs in indica Xihui18 background. Mol Breeding 42, 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-022-01284-x).

 In general, the data presented in the reviewed manuscript are completely original and are of special interest for the readers.

 Comments and recommendations:

 

1.       I recommend to extend the paragraph 2.1. Identification of Substitution Segments in Z403. The results of QTL mapping are described superficially. The reference to the source of reference genome is required.

2.       The corresponding section 4.2.3. QTL Mapping should be completed by the information on the source of SSR markers used in the study.

3.       Please give the information for which CMS type the Xihui18 and Jinhui35 being used as restorers and how this trait can be used in breeding programs with involving the newly developed SSSLs and DSSLs with target QTLs?

4.       The manuscript contains numerous grammatical errors and should be carefully edited.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have made significant corrections based on the suggested review inputs and the revised manuscript looks much better than the earlier version. 

Back to TopTop