Next Article in Journal
Aprotinin—Drug against Respiratory Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
A Common Molecular Signature Indicates the Pre-Meristematic State of Plant Calli
Previous Article in Journal
Feruloyl Esterase (LaFae) from Lactobacillus acidophilus: Structural Insights and Functional Characterization for Application in Ferulic Acid Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Somatic Embryogenesis of Banana
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms241311177
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Opposite Auxin Dynamics Determine the Gametophytic and Embryogenic Fates of the Microspore

by
Yolanda Pérez-Pérez
1,
María Teresa Solís
2,
Alfonso Albacete
3,† and
Pilar S. Testillano
1,*
1
Pollen Biotechnology of Crop Plants Group, Biological Research Center Margarita Salas, CIB-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Physiology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Plant Nutrition, Center for Edaphology and Applied Biology of Segura, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Institute for Agroenvironmental Research and Development of Murcia (IMIDA), c/Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 11177; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311177
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 30 June 2023 / Accepted: 4 July 2023 / Published: 6 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Plant Somatic Embryogenesis: Where We Stand and Where to Go?)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The microspore can follow two different developmental pathways. In vivo microspores follow the gametophytic program to produce pollen grains. In vitro, isolated microspores can be reprogrammed by stress treatments and follow the embryogenic program, producing doubled-haploid embryos. In the present study, we analyzed the dynamics and role of endogenous auxin in microspore development during these two different scenarios, in Brassica napus. We analyzed auxin concentration, cellular accumulation, the expression of the TAA1 auxin biosynthesis gene, and the PIN1-like efflux carrier gene, as well as the effects of inhibiting auxin biosynthesis by kynurenine on microspore embryogenesis. During the gametophytic pathway, auxin levels and TAA1 and PIN1-like expression were high at early stages, in tetrads and tapetum, while they progressively decreased during gametogenesis in both pollen and tapetum cells. In contrast, in microspore embryogenesis, TAA1 and PIN1-like genes were upregulated, and auxin concentration increased from the first embryogenic divisions. Kynurenine treatment decreased both embryogenesis induction and embryo production, indicating that auxin biosynthesis is required for microspore embryogenesis initiation and progression. The findings indicate that auxin exhibits two opposite profiles during these two microspore developmental pathways, which determine the different cell fates of the microspore.

1. Introduction

The plasticity of plant cells, specifically their competency to regenerate embryos through in vitro culture, has been extensively exploited for several decades with the purpose of plant propagation, breeding, and conservation of numerous species of interest. This has resulted in significant applications in the fields of agriculture, forestry, and genetic resource preservation [1]. In vitro embryogenesis has been successfully induced in a diverse variety of somatic cell types, including haploid microspores, which are capable of acquiring totipotency and embryogenic competence through the influence of specific inducting factors. This ultimately results in the formation of complete embryos [2]. In vivo, within the anther, microspores follow a strictly regulated gametophytic developmental pathway to produce mature pollen grains capable of fertilization. During this process, the different layers and tissues that compose the anther also play varying roles, with the tapetal cells being particularly important. The tapetum is the anther tissue in closest contact with the developing pollen grains. It is formed by a single layer of cells and acts as an important nurturing tissue that provides nutrients and regulatory molecules to the sporogenous tissue for microspore formation and pollen grain development. Among other functions, tapetum is involved in the synthesis of enzymes that release microspores in a tetrad by degrading the callose wall. It also plays an important role in exine coverage and pollenkit formation [3]. It is known that with the progression of pollen development, the tapetum undergoes a crucial process of programmed cell death (PCD) [4]. On the other hand, in vitro, the microspore, at the responsive stage of vacuolated microspore, can be reprogrammed towards an embryogenic pathway, producing haploid and doubled-haploid embryos and plants. This alteration in the in vivo developmental progression requires specific stress treatments depending on the plant species [5,6]. This process, known as stress-induced microspore embryogenesis, is the most widely used method for producing doubled-haploid plants. It allows for the rapid creation of new isogenic lines and represents a source of new genetic variability fixed in homozygous plants, obtained in a single generation [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Although stress-induced microspore embryogenesis is an important tool in breeding programs, its efficiency is still limited in many economically important species. This limitation arises from the fact that embryogenesis initiation and progression involve a complex network of factors whose roles are still largely unknown [2,14,15]. Several factors, including stress signaling, hormones, and epigenetic mechanisms, have been proposed as essential components in the acquisition of totipotency and the induction of embryogenesis in microspores [2], as well as in somatic embryogenesis from other cell types [16,17].
Hormonal regulation, specifically auxin, has been described as one of the determinant factors involved in the regulation of the embryogenesis process in many species [14,18]. Auxins are recognized as the most significant group of phytohormones involved in plant growth, playing a pivotal role in the regulation of cellular division and differentiation [19]. Many studies have described the involvement of the predominant form of auxin in plants, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), in numerous developmental processes, such as apical dominance of shoots [20], stem and coleoptile growth [21], formation and differentiation of leaf vascular tissue [22], root meristem development [23], and lateral root formation [24]. There are also studies describing the involvement of IAA in the process of zygotic embryogenesis, from the early stages [25] to the embryo polarization and differentiation [18,26]. However, despite the increased knowledge in recent years about hormonal regulation in various developmental processes, the precise role of auxin in initiating and promoting in vitro embryogenesis is still not well understood. It is well described that auxin action primarily depends on its local biosynthesis and differential distribution within plant tissues, which is primarily regulated by its directional transport between cells [27]. The main pathways for auxin biosynthesis, transport, and signaling have been extensively studied over the past few decades in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana [28,29]. Various routes have been identified for the synthesis of auxin, with the indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) pathway being the principal one in most eudicot and monocot species [30,31]. The IPA pathway is a two-step pathway where the enzymes tryptophan aminotransferase of Arabidopsis 1 (TAA1) and tryptophan aminotransferase–related 1 and 2 (TAR1, TAR2) catalyze the conversion of tryptophan amino acid into IPA. In a second reaction, flavin monooxygenases of the YUCCA family (YUC) convert IPA into IAA [31,32]. A useful technique for studying the involvement of TAA1/TAR-dependent auxin biosynthesis is the use of a small molecule called kynurenine (Kyn), which competitively inhibits the activity of TAA1/TAR [33]. The use of Kyn has shown inhibitory effects on auxin biosynthesis and consequently causes defects in many plant developmental processes related to auxin [34,35]. Since auxin biosynthesis occurs locally in the plant, a transport mechanism is necessary to distribute it to its targets in different plant tissues. This process is primarily carried out through a polar cell-to-cell transport mechanism known as polar auxin transport (PAT), which is mainly mediated by the transporters called PIN-FORMED (PIN) [27,36,37,38]. Among the eight PIN proteins described in Arabidopsis, PIN1 plays a central role in the directional control of PAT during zygotic embryo development [21,39].
Usually, data regarding the role of auxin in somatic embryogenesis are obtained through in vitro approaches, often using systems that involve the addition of exogenous auxin concentrations to the culture media [40,41,42]. In contrast, in Brassica napus, microspore embryogenesis occurs from isolated microspores under culture conditions where exogenous auxin is not added at any point [43,44]. This aspect makes the in vitro embryogenesis system of B. napus highly suitable for studying the role of endogenous auxin during microspore reprogramming and embryo development. Specifically, the isolated microspore culture of B. napus is considered the primary model system for stress-induced microspore embryogenesis in dicotyledonous plants [8]. In this system, cell reprogramming to initiate the new developmental process is typically induced by a stress condition involving a mild heat treatment of 32 °C [43].
In the present study, we investigated the dynamics of endogenous auxin during in vivo gametophytic development and compared it with its profile during in vitro microspore reprogramming and embryogenesis initiation and progression in B. napus. We analyzed changes in endogenous IAA accumulation using the technique of HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. We also employed immunofluorescence assays with anti-IAA antibodies and performed confocal microscopy analyses to examine the spatial distribution of auxin. Additionally, we analyzed the expression patterns of the auxin biosynthesis and transport genes (BnTAA1 and BnPIN1). Furthermore, functional analyses were conducted by adding the auxin biosynthesis inhibitor kynurenine to the in vitro culture to assess its effect on embryogenesis efficiency.

2. Results

2.1. Endogenous Auxin Accumulation and Distribution Pattern during Pollen Development and Microspore Embryogenesis

We performed immunofluorescence assays using anti-IAA antibodies to analyze the presence of auxin at the cellular level during the two developmental pathways of the microspore: pollen development and microspore embryogenesis. First, we examined the main stages of these processes at a microscopic level.
Pollen development takes place inside the anthers, which consist of several cell layers. From the outermost to the innermost zone, we observed the exothecium, endothecium, medium layer, and tapetum (Figure 1A). Within the pollen sac, after the male meiosis, a tetrad of microspores is produced, surrounded by a temporary wall of callose (Figure 1B). At this stage, the tapetum appears as a thick layer of large polygonal cells with dense cytoplasm. Subsequently, the microspores are released from the tetrad and undergo development, forming vacuolated microspores characterized by a large vacuole (Figure 1C). During this stage, the tapetum starts undergoing programmed cell death (PCD), with the cells losing their polygonal shape, experiencing cytoplasm shrinkage and vacuolization, and exhibiting nuclei compaction and chromatin condensation. Following an asymmetric division, the vacuolated microspore gives rise to a bicellular pollen grain, with a small generative cell located within the cytoplasm of a larger vegetative cell. After mitosis of the generative cell, the tricellular pollen is formed, consisting of a vegetative cell and two sperm cells (Figure 1D). At this final stage, the tapetum has completely degraded and is no longer observed (Figure 1D).
The natural developmental pathway of the microspore can be changed in vitro under specific conditions. In the in vitro system, an isolated vacuolated microspore (Figure 1E) can be reprogrammed through the application of a heat stress treatment (32 °C), resulting in the acquisition of totipotency and the initiation of the embryogenic pathway. The reprogrammed microspores underwent several divisions that produced proembryos (Figure 1F), which are still surrounded by the exine microspore wall. Then, cell divisions continued and increased cell proliferation, giving rise to globular embryos (Figure 1G). These globular embryos further develop into heart, torpedo, and differentiated cotyledonary embryos (Figure 1H), which are formed after 30 days in culture (Figure 1I).
To analyze the subcellular localization of endogenous IAA during both developmental programs, we analyzed changes in the distribution patterns of endogenous auxin using immunofluorescence assays with a specific IAA monoclonal antibody. Image acquisition was performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy, with consistent excitation and emission capture settings applied to all immunofluorescence preparations. This ensured that fluorescence signal intensity could be accurately compared among different developmental stages throughout each process.
During in vivo pollen development, at the tetrad stage, both microspores and tapetum exhibited an intense immunofluorescence signal localized in the cytoplasm and the nuclei of the cells (Figure 2A′). In later stages, vacuolated microspores showed an immunofluorescence signal of mid intensity in the thin peripheral layer of the cytoplasm, with no signal observed in the large central vacuole of the cell. Additionally, the fluorescence signal in tapetum cells also decreased (Figure 2B′). At the late developmental stage of mature pollen, the results showed a very weak or undetectable signal within the pollen grains, and the tapetum layer had practically disappeared at this stage (Figure 2C′).
To support the specificity of the antibody and the immunolocalization results, negative controls by eliminating the IAA antibody and by immunodepletion assays were performed. In both cases, the negative controls did not show significant labelling in the samples (Figure 2D,E).
The intensity of the IAA signal was quantified using the ImageJ software (version V1.8.0), with separate analysis conducted for microspores or pollen grains and their corresponding tapetum cells. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in IAA signal during the progression of in vivo pollen development. A high signal intensity was observed at the tetrad stage in both tetrad and tapetum cells, followed by a lower signal in vacuolated microspores and tapetum cells at this stage. The signal intensity was much lower in mature pollen grains, where tapetum cells could not be measured due to their advanced PCD state at this late stage of pollen development (Figure 3).
Analyses of the microspore embryogenesis pathway revealed that, before induction, the isolated vacuolated microspore exhibited a very low IAA signal (Figure 4A′). However, after induction, an increase in IAA signal was observed in the proembryo cells (Figure 4B′). Subsequent developmental stages, including globular (Figure 4C), heart (Figure 4D), and cotyledonary embryos (Figure 4E), exhibited a gradual increment in auxin signal intensity with a heterogeneous distribution. During the globular embryo stage, some embryos developed a suspensor, a characteristic structure observed during in vivo embryogenic development that connects the zygotic embryo to surrounding tissues during early seed development. Suspensor cells displayed a very low auxin signal compared with the other cells that constitute the embryo (Figure 4C). The highest intensity of the IAA signal was observed in cotyledonary embryos, with a specific distribution pattern showing the highest signal in the root meristem and the apical zone of cotyledons (Figure 4D). The negative controls performed during the microspore embryogenesis stages did not show any labelling.
The quantitative image analysis revealed a highly significant increase in the immunofluorescence intensity of endogenous auxin during the progression of in vitro microspore embryogenesis progression. The vacuolated microspores exhibited a low auxin signal, which increased notably after the induction of embryogenesis and throughout the subsequent stages of embryo development (Figure 5).

2.2. Endogenous Auxin Concentration during Pollen Development and Microspore Embryogenesis

The analysis of endogenous IAA concentration using the technique of liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI–MS/MS) provided insights into the changes in auxin levels during different developmental stages of both the gametophytic and embryogenic pathways. In the case of pollen development, the results showed a high concentration of endogenous IAA at the early stage of the tetrad, which gradually decreased as the microspores developed, reaching the lowest levels in mature pollen (Figure 6A).
On the other hand, in vitro microspore embryogenesis displayed a different pattern of endogenous IAA concentration. Initially, the isolated vacuolated microspores exhibited low levels of auxin before reprogramming. However, upon embryogenesis initiation, there was an increase in endogenous IAA levels, which further increased as the embryogenesis process progressed. The advanced stages of globular and torpedo embryos showed the highest levels of auxin concentration (Figure 6B).

2.3. Expression Patterns of Auxin Biosynthesis and Transport Genes BnTAA1 and BnPIN1-like during Pollen Development and Microspore Embryogenesis

The expression analysis of auxin-related genes, specifically auxin biosynthesis gene BnTAA1 and auxin transport gene BnPIN1-like, was performed by qRT-PCR during the two microspore developmental pathways. The results revealed similar expression patterns for both auxin biosynthesis (BnTAA1) and transport (BnPIN1-like) genes within each developmental program: both genes were downregulated during the pollen developmental program (Figure 7A,B) and upregulated during microspore embryogenesis progression (Figure 7C,D).
During pollen development, BnTAA1 showed high expression in anthers at the tetrad stage and almost nondetectable levels at later developmental stages, in vacuolated microspore and mature pollen (Figure 7A). Additionally, BnPIN1-like showed higher expression in the tetrad, which reduced by less than half at the stage of vacuolated microspore, and with almost no expression in the most advanced stage of mature pollen (Figure 7B).
In contrast, during microspore embryogenesis progression, the studied genes showed very low expression (in case of BnPIN1-like) (Figure 7D) or no expression (in case of BnTAA1) (Figure 7C) in isolated vacuolated microspore, before embryogenesis induction. However, a significant increase was observed in the proembryo stage, accompanying embryogenesis initiation (Figure 7C,D). At more advanced stages, in globular/torpedo embryos, results revealed a much higher expression of the two auxin-related genes, approximately fourfold than proembryos.
These results indicate the activation of auxin biosynthesis during microspore embryogenesis initiation and its progressive upregulation during embryo development, concomitant with the activation of polar auxin transport (PAT). In contrast, the gametophytic pathway exhibited a decrease in auxin levels as it progressed.

2.4. Effect of the Inhibition of Auxin Biosynthesis on Microspore Embryogenesis Initiation and Somatic Embryo Formation

To analyze the potential involvement of endogenous auxin in microspore embryogenesis, the inhibitor of auxin biosynthesis, kynurenine, was added in the culture media at concentrations of 4, 40, and 100 µM immediately after placing the microspores in culture. The effect of the inhibitor on embryogenesis induction and progression was examined. First, the effect of kynurenine on embryogenesis induction was assessed by quantifying the percentage of proembryos (the first morphological sign of embryogenesis initiation) in both untreated (control) and treated cultures. The cultures treated with kynurenine exhibited a significant reduction in the percentage of proembryos, with approximately a 25% decrease observed at a concentration of 100 µM compared with the control cultures (Figure 8A). No significant differences were observed at lower concentrations tested.
To evaluate the effect of the inhibitor on embryogenesis progression, the production of differentiated cotyledonary embryos was assessed in control and treated cultures after 30 days of culture. At this time point, the control cultures exhibited a significant number of cotyledonary embryos (Figure 8B). However, in cultures treated with the inhibitor, a dose-dependent decrease in the number of differentiated embryos was observed, particularly at concentrations of 40 and 100 µM (Figure 8B). In fact, very few differentiated structures were observed in cultures treated with 100 µM concentration of kynurenine (Figure 8B).
These results indicate that the inhibition of auxin biosynthesis affected both embryogenic induction and subsequent embryo development, suggesting an important role of auxin in both the initiation and progression of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus.

3. Discussion

The aim of this study was to compare the dynamics of endogenous auxin during the two developmental pathways of the microspore, in vivo pollen development and stress-induced microspore embryogenesis, and its possible role during initiation and the whole process of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus, a model system for induced cellular reprogramming in plants. There are several studies that describe the relevant role that auxin plays during floral development [45,46,47]. However, to date, research that reports on the involvement of this hormone in pollen development is very limited. Likewise, the evidence indicates that hormonal regulation plays a crucial role in in vitro somatic embryogenesis from various explants, with auxin being particularly important for reprogramming somatic cells towards embryogenesis [16,48,49]. Most somatic embryogenesis systems typically rely on the application of exogenous hormones, particularly the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), often in combination with stress treatments, to initiate induction [16,17,50,51]. In contrast, many microspore embryogenesis systems, such as in B. napus, do not require exogenous auxin as a trigger for embryogenesis, because just a temporary stress treatment can induce the transition towards embryogenic fate [5,52]. Although the involvement of auxin in early somatic embryogenesis has been documented [2,53], the role of this hormone throughout the entire microspore embryogenesis process is not yet fully understood.

3.1. The Gametophytic Fate of the Microspore: Auxin Decreases during Pollen Development

In vivo, the development of the male gametophyte is closely linked to the dynamics and differentiation of the anther tissues, especially the tapetum. Previous studies have demonstrated that pollen grain formation is accompanied by metabolic and morphological changes in tapetal cells [54]. In a recent study conducted in Arabidopsis [55], the use of the synthetic auxin response promoter DR5: GUS revealed the presence of auxin throughout pollen development, with higher levels detected in microspores and lower levels in tricellular and mature pollen where anthesis has already taken place. Furthermore, using the same technique, auxin signaling activity was detected in tapetal cells during early stages of floral development, specifically during the microspore stage prior to pollen grain formation [55]. In our study, the localization of auxin was performed using immunofluorescence assays with the monoclonal antibody anti-IAA, which demonstrated specificity in our analyses as well as in previous studies with various negative and positive controls [56,57]. This technique enabled precise localization of the IAA signal in different anther tissues during pollen development, providing detailed information on auxin distribution and levels based on fluorescent signal intensity. The observed auxin accumulation patterns during B. napus pollen development are consistent with the findings reported in the aforementioned Arabidopsis study, indicating high auxin levels during early stages of pollen development in both tapetal cells and microspores at the tetrad stage, followed by a gradual decrease in auxin levels as development progress. These immunolocalization results also correlate with the endogenous IAA concentration results obtained in anthers in this study using the LC/ESI–MS/MS technique.
Previous studies have provided evidence of the importance of auxin in tapetal cells for proper pollen grain and stamen development [58,59]. Other studies in Arabidopsis have demonstrated the involvement of auxin in both early and late stages of stamen development [47]. During early stages, the expression of the auxin biosynthesis genes YUC2 and YUC6, which are associated with tapetum differentiation, activity, and fate, has been observed. Similarly, our immunolocalization results have shown a high presence of auxin in tapetal cells during early stages, supporting the role of auxin in the tapetum of B. napus during early stages of anther development. These findings are also consistent with the transcription levels of the auxin biosynthesis gene BnTAA1, which exhibits high expression levels during early stages of development, followed by a decrease in transcripts levels as microspore differentiation progresses. A study conducted by Sundberg and Østergaard (2019) [47] also demonstrated the presence of auxin in later stages of stamen development in Arabidopsis, suggesting its involvement in stamen filament elongation and anther dehiscence. However, our findings do not show the presence of auxin in the pollen grain or other anther tissues during later stages. This leads us to speculate that auxin may be localized in the filament at this stage, a tissue that was not analyzed in our study. Other studies have indicated that both auxin biosynthesis and transport are crucial during early and late stages of stamen development. A study in Arabidopsis [60] revealed the involvement of various members of the PIN-FORMED (PIN) transporter family in the initial stages of stamen formation and development in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. These findings are consistent with our gene expression analyses of BnPIN1-like, which demonstrated high expression in the early stages of pollen development, followed by a decrease in later stages. This expression pattern aligns with the results obtained for the BnTAA1 biosynthesis gene, as well as with the immunolocalization and endogenous concentration of IAA. Our results indicate that auxin, along with the activation of its biosynthesis and transport pathway, is necessary during early stages of pollen development in B. napus. However, as pollen maturation progresses, there is a negative regulation of both auxin biosynthesis and transport, as well as a decrease in cellular auxin concentration in both pollen and tapetal cells.

3.2. The Change of Microspore Fate: Stress-Induced Cell Reprogramming Involve the Activation of Auxin Biosynthesis and Transport

For many years, exogenous hormones have been utilized to induce in vitro somatic embryogenesis and subsequent embryo development. Among all the known growth regulators, auxin is the most employed in culture media for somatic embryogenesis. This hormone plays a crucial role in both direct embryogenesis processes, to initiate embryo development, and indirect embryogenesis, for the formation of proembryogenic masses and the subsequent development of somatic embryos. However, the mechanisms that regulate the triggering of these processes in the presence of auxin remain largely unknown [2,16,48,61]. In various species where indirect embryogenesis is induced, high levels of auxin have been observed during the proliferation of proembryogenic masses and early somatic embryo development [41,62,63,64,65]. Similarly, in direct embryogenesis, specifically microspore embryogenesis, higher auxin levels have been observed in early embryos compared with nonresponsive microspores that have not undergone the stress treatment [43,56,66]. In Brassica napus, microspore embryogenesis is induced and progresses without the addition of exogenous auxin to the culture media at any time. Our results have revealed a high concentration of auxin in proembryos during the early embryogenic divisions, suggesting a role for this hormone in the activation of either cell reprogramming and/or proliferation that follows immediately. Studies conducted on the somatic embryogenesis of other species have shown an increase in endogenous IAA levels throughout the process [17,57,61,67,68,69,70,71], indicating the activation of de novo auxin biosynthesis, polar transport, and signaling pathways, evidenced by high expression levels of the biosynthesis genes YUC, TAA1, and TAR2; the auxin polar transport gene PIN1; and the signaling genes Aux/IAA and ARF. In Arabidopsis zygotic embryogenesis, an increase in auxin levels was observed in ovule tissues after fertilization [72], as well as in zygotic embryo cells from the very beginning of their formation [18,73]. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between IAA levels and localization during somatic embryogenesis and in vivo zygotic embryogenesis in several species [43,74,75]. Regarding the distribution pattern of auxin in the zygotic embryo, several in vitro studies have detected a peak signal in the apical meristem of the stem and root in maize and barley [56,76,77], as well as in the apical zone of cotyledons in several dicotyledonous plants [21,25,43], coinciding with regions of maximum auxin biosynthesis.
The results of the present study demonstrate that in B. napus, at advanced stages, the microspore-derived embryo exhibits an auxin localization pattern with a large accumulation in the same meristematic regions as the zygotic embryo. Specially, there is a significant accumulation of auxin in the most apical zone of the cotyledons where leaf primordia will develop, as well as in the root meristem zone that will give rise to the radicle after embryo germination. Once the embryogenic pathway is activated, the subsequent embryo development involves a further increase in endogenous auxin levels. The results obtained in our work show an upregulation of the biosynthesis gene BnTAA1 and an increase in the immunofluorescence signal and concentration of IAA during embryo differentiation. In the case of B. napus microspore embryogenesis, which initiates without surrounding extraembryonic tissue and in a growth-regulator-free culture medium, our results suggest that the heat stress treatment used to reprogram microspores can induce an endogenous auxin response, increasing its biosynthesis and intracellular levels, which will determine the initiation of the new developmental pathway and cell fate of the microspores. Additionally, the increase in auxin levels in early proembryos may be associated with the activation of proliferative activity in both reprogrammed microspores and proembryo cells. When discussing the action and availability of auxin, it is important to consider its cell-to-cell transport, highlighting the significant role of the family of transporter proteins PIN-FORMED (PIN) [38]. Several studies have demonstrated the auxin transport in early zygotic embryogenesis stages from the suspensor cells to the rest of the embryo by the transporter PIN7, while PIN1 would distribute auxin evenly among the developing embryo cells [27,78]. Moreover, these transporter proteins, along with PIN4, are involved in stablishing auxin gradients necessary for subsequent cell differentiation in advanced stages of embryo development [27,39]. In the present work, gene expression analysis of BnPIN1-like during microspore embryogenesis in rapeseed showed increased transcription at the beginning of embryogenesis in proembryos, and even higher expression levels in differentiating embryos. These results align with the observed polarization of auxin in cotyledonary embryos using immunofluorescence techniques, where a differential auxin accumulation pattern is observed, particularly with higher levels in the apical region of cotyledons and the basal zone of the embryo, areas with higher proliferation activity in the embryo. In several species, it has been also observed that during the early stages of zygotic embryogenesis, there is an auxin flow from the suspensor to the rest of the embryo [18,73,75]. Our results indicate that some embryos derived from microspores in the globular or heart stage can develop while retaining the suspensor structure. Interestingly, these embryos exhibit very little fluorescence signal in the suspensor compared with the rest of the actively proliferating cells that form the embryo. All these results indicate that the synthesis and localization dynamics of auxin in microspore embryogenesis in rapeseed resemble those of zygotic embryogenesis.

3.3. Inhibition of Auxin Biosynthesis by Kynurenine Impaired Microspore Embryogenesis Initiation and Progression

For years, the importance of auxin transport and action in plant development has been extensively studied, performing functional analyses with known auxin inhibitors such as N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA), an inhibitor of auxin transport, and α-(p-chlorophenoxy)-isobutyric acid (PCIB), an inhibitor of auxin action. These inhibitors have been shown to cause defects in the normal vegetative and reproductive growth, including embryogenesis [30,40,57,79,80]. However, efficient and specific inhibitors of auxin biosynthesis have only become available recently [70]. In the present work, functional analyses were carried out by adding kynurenine in the in vitro cultures, a small molecule that selectively inhibits the enzymatic activity of TAA1/TAR, directly affecting the main auxin biosynthesis pathway [33]. The results demonstrated the negative effect of the treatment at two crucial points in the embryogenesis process. On the one hand, cultures treated with the inhibitor showed a lower percentage of proembryos after applying the inductive heat stress compared with control cultures. On the other hand, as the culture progressed, the kynurenine treatment also reduced microspore embryo differentiation. These results indicate that de novo auxin biosynthesis plays a crucial role at the beginning of the culture, in microspore reprogramming, and in the subsequent embryo development and differentiation during microspore embryogenesis in B. napus. In a previous study conducted by our group on the monocot plant Hordeum vulgare (where microspore embryogenesis is induced by cold stress treatment), a similar effect of kynurenine was observed. The inhibitor reduced embryogenesis induction at early stages and decreased the number of coleoptilar embryos produced at advanced stages [56]. Our results, together with those obtained in microspore embryogenesis of H. vulgare [56], indicate that activation of auxin biosynthesis is required for stress-induced microspore embryogenesis in various species, regardless of the type of applied stress (cold or heat), suggesting common hormonal regulation pathways during the process.

3.4. Opposite Auxin Dynamics Determine the Two Distinct Microspore Developmental Pathways and Cell Fate

The comparative study carried out indicate that endogenous auxin participates in the regulation of the two microspore developmental pathways, but would play different roles in each of them. During in vivo pollen development, auxin would have a relevant role in the early stages, associated with the high transcriptional activity of tapetum and microspores, decreasing with pollen maturation (Figure 9). However, endogenous auxin dynamics completely change with microspore reprograming to embryogenesis, showing an opposite profile that involves the increase in both auxin accumulation and the expression levels of the biosynthesis gene TAA1 and the transport gene PIN1 (Figure 9), which show an analogous pattern as described during zygotic embryogenesis.
Taking all the results together, auxin would play a key role in the change of the developmental pathway of the microspore, where an opposite auxin dynamic determines the change of microspore cell fate, with auxin biosynthesis being required for microspore embryogenesis initiation and during subsequent embryo development.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Microspore Embryogenesis In Vitro Culture

Brassica napus L. (rapeseed) cv Topas line DH407 plants were used as donor plants. The seeds were germinated and grown under controlled conditions (relative humidity of 60%, photoperiod of 16 h light at 15 °C and 8 h dark at 10 °C) in a growth chamber (Sanyo MLR-351-H) in pots containing a mixture of organic substrate and vermiculite (2/1, v/v). Flower buds were collected to obtain anthers at different developmental stages and to isolate vacuolated microspores, the most responsive stage for embryogenesis induction. After isolation, microspore cultures were subjected to an in vitro stress treatment at 32 °C, as previously described [43], to induce embryogenesis.

4.2. Processing of Samples for Microscopy Analysis

Anthers and microspore culture samples were collected at different time points. Another samples were selected at the stages of tetrad, vacuolated microspore, and mature pollen. Microspore culture samples were chosen at the stages of isolated vacuolated microspore, proembryo, globular embryo, and coleoptilar embryo. The samples were fixed overnight at 4 °C using 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), washed with PBS, dehydrated in acetone series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%), and embedded in Technovit 8100 resin (Heraeus Kulzer GMBH, Hanau, Germany) at 4 °C. Semithin sections (2 µm thick) were collected on slides using an ultramicrotome (Ultracut E Reichert Jung, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). For cellular structure analyses, sections were stained with 1% toluidine blue in PBS, mounted with Eukitt, and observed under bright field microscopy. For immunofluorescence analyses, some sections were placed on aminopropyl-triethoxy-silane (APTES)-coated slides and stored at 4 °C until further use.

4.3. Immunofluorescence Assays and Confocal Microscopy Analysis

Immunofluorescence was carried out to localize indole-3 acetic acid (IAA) at different in vivo and in vitro developmental stages. The results were obtained from at least three immunofluorescence experiments with three biological replicates. Semithin sections were treated according to the following steps: blocking with 10% (w/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) in PBS for 10 min, incubating for 1 h with anti-IAA mouse monoclonal antibody (Sigma, cat. no. A0855) diluted 1:100 in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, washing three times in PBS for 3 min each, incubating with Alexa Fluor 488–labeled anti-mouse IgG antibody (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) diluted 1:25 in 1% BSA (in darkness) for 45 min, and washing three times in PBS for 3 min each. Finally, sections were stained with 1 mg/mL DAPI (4.6-diamino-2-phenylindole) for 10 min, washed twice in distilled water for 5 min, mounted in Mowiol, and analyzed using confocal laser microscopy (Leica TCS-SP5-AOBS, Vienna, Austria). To ensure accurate comparison among immunofluorescence signal intensities of different developmental stages, confocal microscopy images were captured using the same laser excitation and sample emission settings in all immunofluorescence preparations. Maximum projection images were obtained from 10 optical sections (at 0.2 µm z-intervals) using the confocal microscope software (Leica software LCS version 2.5).
Negative controls were performed in two different ways: by omitting the primary antibody and by immunodepletion. This second negative control consisted of incubating the anti-IAA primary antibody with a 5 mg/mL IAA solution 1:2 (v/v) in PBS, overnight at 4 °C, to block the antibody with its antigen (IAA). Subsequently, this preblocked anti-IAA antibody was used as the primary antibody for immunofluorescence assays, following the same protocol as described above.

4.4. Quantification of Auxin Immunofluorescence Signal

The quantification of IAA immunofluorescence intensity was performed using the ImageJ software on confocal maximum projections, which were obtained as previously described. Regions of interest (ROIs) were outlined for structures at different developmental stages of anthers and microspore culture, and the fluorescence intensity values were obtained in arbitrary units. More than 20 structures from each developmental stage, obtained from over three different immunofluorescence experiments and at least three biological replicates, were measured. Significant differences among stages were tested by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparison test at p ≤ 0.05.

4.5. Quantification of Endogenous IAA Concentration

The quantification of endogenous IAA concentration was measured using HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry as described in [81,82]. Briefly, samples of different developmental stages of microspore embryogenesis and pollen development were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder using a prechilled mortar and a pestle. To proceed with total phytohormone extraction, 100 mg of powdered samples were extracted in ultrapure water using a tissue homogenizer (Ultra-Turrax, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Before extraction, samples were spiked with a standard solution composed of 100 ng of [2H6]-ABA, 100 ng of [2H4]-SA, and 100 ng of [2H6]-JA to assess recovery and matrix effects. After extraction and centrifugation, the pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 3.0 and partitioned twice against diethyl ether (Panreac, San Fernando de Henares, Spain). The organic layers were combined and evaporated in a centrifuge vacuum evaporator (Speedvac CS100, Savant, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The dry residue was thereafter resuspended in a water/methanol (9:1) solution, filtered, and injected into an HPLC system (Alliance 2695, Waters Corp., Milford, CT, USA). Hormones were then separated in a reversed-phase Kromasil 100 C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm 5 μm particle size) using methanol and ultrapure water both supplemented with glacial acetic acid to a concentration of 0.05%. The mass spectrometer, a triple quadrupole (Quattro LC, Micromass Ltd., Manchester, UK), was operated in negative ionization electrospray mode, and plant hormones were detected according to their specific transitions using a multiresidue mass spectrometric method.
A minimum of three biological and three technical replicates were analyzed for each developmental stage. The final IAA concentration found in the analyses was determined by dividing the nanograms of hormone detected by the grams of fresh weight of the starting material. Differences among stages within each developmental process were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test at p ≤ 0.05.

4.6. Expression Analysis by Reverse Transcriptase–Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

Quantitative gene expression analyses were performed using qRT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from anther and culture samples using the RNeasy® Plant Micro and RNeasy® Plant Mini kits (Qiagen Iberica, Las Rozas, Spain) and purified with NucleoSpin® RNA Plant (Macherey-Nagel, Düsen, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNAs were obtained from 1.5 μg of RNA using the Superscript™ II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to Solís et al. (2012). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the SsoAdvancedTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix on the iQ™ 5 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Alcobendas, Spain). For the expression analyses of the BnTAA1 gene, the following oligonucleotides were used: 5′-CGTCACCCAATAACCCAGAC-3′ and 3′-TCTTCCACCGTTTCTTCTAC-5′, from the sequence of the BnTAA1 gene of B. napus (NCBI Reference Sequence: LOC103831591). For the expression analyses of the BnPIN1-like gene, the oligonucleotides used were as follows: 5′-CGACTCCCTCCAGAAAATCA-3′ and 3′-GACTTCGTGGTGCTAGACTT-5′, from the sequence of the BnPIN1-like gene of B. napus (NCBI Reference Sequence: LOC103831832). Serial dilutions of cDNA were prepared to stablish the efficiency curve of each primer pair. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 5 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 58 °C. After each run, a dissociation curve was generated by heating the samples from 65 to 95 °C to verify amplification specificity. As internal control, the reference gene BnActin was selected, and the oligonucleotides used were 5′-TGAAGATCAAGGTGGTCGCA-3′ and 3′-GAAGATTCACAAAGACGGAAGA-5′ (BRAD Reference Sequence: Bra028615). A minimum of three biological and three technical replicates were included in the analyses. The data were analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.1 (3.1.1517.0823) (Bio-Rad) software, employing the Livak calculation method [83]. Transcript levels were normalized to the tetrad stage in case of pollen development and to the proembryo stage in case of microspore embryogenesis. Statistical differences among stages were determined using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test at p ≤ 0.05.

4.7. Treatments with Kynurenine and Evaluation of Its Effect in Microspore Embryogenesis

L-Kynurenine (Sigma), a small compound known for its inhibitory effects on endogenous auxin biosynthesis, was added to the culture media at the beginning of the in vitro microspore culture. For the assay, three different concentrations of the drug were tested: 4, 40, and 100 µM, added to the culture media by filtering a stock solution of 500 µM in DMSO (Sigma) using a sterile Minisart filter (Sartorius Biotech, Goettingen, Germany). In parallel, plates without the drug and with the corresponding volume of DMSO in each case were kept as control of the experiment (untreated cultures). The effects of the drug on embryogenesis initiation and progression were evaluated by quantifying the percentage of proembryos (the first morphological indication of embryogenesis initiation) and comparing the number of cotyledonary embryos formed after 30 days in culture between treated and control cultures. Mean percentages of proembryos were calculated from random micrographs obtained using a stereomicroscope in three independent experiments, with at least three different culture plates in each experiment. A minimum of 10,000 structures (proembryos and microspores) were counted for each condition. Statistical differences between untreated and treated cultures at different concentrations of the drug were determined using ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test at p ≤ 0.05. Images of the plates after 30 days of culture were captured using a Nikon D810 camera to evaluate the production of cotyledonary embryos formed after 30 days.

Author Contributions

Y.P.-P. performed most of the experimental work. M.T.S. contributed to some immunofluorescence and gene expression assays. A.A. performed some of the auxin concentration analyses. Y.P.-P. wrote the manuscript. P.S.T. conceived, designed, and supervised the experimental work; analyzed the results; and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Projects PID2020-113018RB-I00 (funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033), TED2021-129633B-I00 and CPP2021-008750 (funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and NextGenerationEU/PRTR).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas (Univ. Jaume I, Castellón, Spain) for his help with part of the auxin quantification assays.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Germaná, M.A.; Lambardi, M. In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 1359, ISBN 978-1-4939-3060-9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Testillano, P.S. Microspore Embryogenesis: Targeting the Determinant Factors of Stress-Induced Cell Reprogramming for Crop Improvement. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2965–2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stieglitz, H. Role of β-1,3-Glucanase in Postmeiotic Microspore Release. Dev. Biol. 1977, 57, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dickinson, H.G.; Lewis, D. The Formation of the Tryphine Coating the Pollen Grains of Raphanus, and Its Properties to the Relating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 184, 149–165. [Google Scholar]
  5. Touraev, A.; Pfosser, M.; Vicente, O.; Heberle-Bors, E. Stress as the Major Signal Controlling the Developmental Fate of Tobacco Microspores: Towards a Unified Model of Induction of Microspore/Pollen Embryogenesis. Planta 1996, 200, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shariatpanahi, M.E.; Belogradova, K.; Hessamvaziri, L.; Heberle-Bors, E.; Touraev, A. Efficient Embryogenesis and Regeneration in Freshly Isolated and Cultured Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Microspores without Stress Pretreatment. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 1294–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nowicka, A.; Juzoń, K.; Krzewska, M.; Dziurka, M.; Dubas, E.; Kopeć, P.; Zieliński, K.; Żur, I. Chemically-Induced DNA de-Methylation Alters the Effectiveness of Microspore Embryogenesis in Triticale. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maluszynski, M.; Kasha, K.J.; Forster, B.P.; Szarejko, I. Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants: A Manual; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; ISBN 978-90-481-6393-9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Germanà, M.A. Anther Culture for Haploid and Doubled Haploid Production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2011, 104, 283–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Germanà, M.A.; Chiancone, B.; Guarda, N.L.; Testillano, P.S.; Risueño, M.C. Development of Multicellular Pollen of Eriobotrya japonica Lindl. through Anther Culture. Plant Sci. 2006, 171, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Forster, B.P.; Heberle-Bors, E.; Kasha, K.J.; Touraev, A. The Resurgence of Haploids in Higher Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dunwell, J.M. Haploids in Flowering Plants: Origins and Exploitation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 377–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Smýkal, P. Pollen Embryogenesis—The Stress Mediated Switch from Gametophytic to Sporophytic Development. Current Status and Future Prospects. Biol. Plant 2000, 43, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ibáñez, S.; Carneros, E.; Testillano, P.S.; Pérez-Pérez, J.M. Advances in Plant Regeneration: Shake, Rattle and Roll. Plants 2020, 9, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Horstman, A.; Bemer, M.; Boutilier, K. A Transcriptional View on Somatic Embryogenesis. Regeneration 2017, 4, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fehér, A. Somatic Embryogenesis—Stress-Induced Remodeling of Plant Cell Fate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. BBA-Gene Regul. Mech. 2015, 1849, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Díaz-Sala, C. Molecular Dissection of the Regenerative Capacity of Forest Tree Species: Special Focus on Conifers. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Möller, B.; Weijers, D. Auxin Control of Embryo Patterning. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Weijers, D.; Nemhauser, J.; Yang, Z. Auxin: Small Molecule, Big Impact. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Müller, D.; Leyser, O. Auxin, Cytokinin and the Control of Shoot Branching. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Prasad, K.; Dhonukshe, P. Polar Auxin Transport: Cell Polarity to Patterning. In Polar Auxin Transport. Signaling and Communication in Plants; Chen, R., Baluška, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 17, pp. 25–44. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mattsson, J.; Ckurshumova, W.; Berleth, T. Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis Leaf Vascular Development. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Blilou, I.; Xu, J.; Wildwater, M.; Willemsen, V.; Paponov, I.; Frimi, J.; Heldstra, R.; Aida, M.; Palme, K.; Scheres, B. The PIN Auxin Efflux Facilitator Network Controls Growth and Patterning in Arabidopsis Roots. Nature 2005, 433, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Moreno-Risueno, M.A.; Van Norman, J.M.; Moreno, A.; Zhang, J.; Ahnert, S.E.; Benfey, P.N. Oscillating Gene Expression Determines Competence for Periodic Arabidopsis Root Branching. Science 2010, 329, 1306–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, D.; Ren, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhao, J. Auxin Polar Transport Is Essential for the Development of Zygote and Embryo in Nicotiana Tabacum L. and Correlated with ABP1 and PM H+-ATPase Activities. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 1853–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rademacher, E.H.; Möller, B.; Lokerse, A.S.; Llavata-Peris, C.I.; Van Den Berg, W.; Weijers, D. A Cellular Expression Map of the Arabidopsis Auxin Response Factor Gene Family. Plant J. 2011, 68, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Petrášek, J.; Friml, J. Auxin Transport Routes in Plant Development. Development 2009, 136, 2675–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Mironova, V.; Teale, W.; Shahriari, M.; Dawson, J.; Palme, K. The Systems Biology of Auxin in Developing Embryos. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Leyser, O. Auxin Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. McSteen, P. Auxin and Monocot Development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Zhao, Y. Auxin Biosynthesis. In The Arabidopsis Book; The American Society of Plant Biologists: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; Volume 12, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  32. Brumos, J.; Alonso, J.M.; Stepanova, A.N. Genetic Aspects of Auxin Biosynthesis and Its Regulation. Physiol. Plant 2014, 151, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. He, W.; Brumos, J.; Li, H.; Ji, Y.; Ke, M.; Gong, X.; Zeng, Q.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; An, F.; et al. A Small-Molecule Screen Identifies L-Kynurenine as a Competitive Inhibitor of TAA1/TAR Activity in Ethylene-Directed Auxin Biosynthesis and Root Growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3944–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. de Wit, M.; Ljung, K.; Fankhauser, C. Contrasting Growth Responses in Lamina and Petiole during Neighbor Detection Depend on Differential Auxin Responsiveness Rather than Different Auxin Levels. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Nomura, T.; Itouga, M.; Kojima, M.; Kato, Y.; Sakakibara, H.; Hasezawa, S. Copper Mediates Auxin Signalling to Control Cell Differentiation in the Copper Moss Scopelophila cataractae. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ljung, K. Auxin Metabolism and Homeostasis during Plant Development. Development 2013, 140, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Adamowski, M.; Friml, J. PIN-Dependent Auxin Transport: Action, Regulation, and Evolution. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bennett, T. PIN Proteins and the Evolution of Plant Development. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zazimalova, E.; Murphy, A.S.; Yang, H.; Hoyerova, K.; Hosek, P. Auxin Transporters-Why So Many? Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Larsson, E.; Sitbon, F.; Ljung, K.; Von Arnold, S. Inhibited Polar Auxin Transport Results in Aberrant Embryo Development in Norway spruce. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hakman, I.; Hallberg, H.; Palovaara, J. The Polar Auxin Transport Inhibitor NPA Impairs Embryo Morphology and Increases the Expression of an Auxin Efflux Facilitator Protein PIN during Picea abies Somatic Embryo Development. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Abrahamsson, M.; Valledares, S.; Larsson, E.; Clapham, D.; Von Arnold, S. Patterning during Somatic Embryogenesis in Scots ine in Relation to Polar Auxin Transport and Programmed Cell Death. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2012, 109, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Prem, D.; Solís, M.T.; Bárány, I.; Rodríguez-Sanz, H.; Risueño, M.C.; Testillano, P.S. A New Microspore Embryogenesis System under Low Temperature Which Mimics Zygotic Embryogenesis Initials, Expresses Auxin and Efficiently Regenerates Doubled-Haploid Plants in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Custers, J.B.M.; Cordewener, J.H.G.; Niillen, Y.; Dons, H.J.M.; Van, M.M.; Campagne, L. Plant Cell Reports Temperature Controls Both Gametophytic and Sporophytic Development in Microspore Cultures of Brassica napus. Plant Cell Rep. 1994, 13, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aloni, R.; Aloni, E.; Langhans, M.; Ullrich, C.I. Role of Auxin in Regulating Arabidopsis Flower Development. Planta 2006, 223, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cheng, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhao, Y. Auxin Biosynthesis by the YUCCA Flavin Monooxygenases Controls the Formation of Floral Organs and Vascular Tissues in Arabidopsis. Genes. Dev. 2006, 20, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sundberg, E.; Østergaard, L. Distinct and Dynamic Auxin Activities during Reproductive Development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a001628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Nic-Can, G.I.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. The Role of the Auxins During Somatic Embryogenesis. In Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 171–182. ISBN 9783319337050. [Google Scholar]
  49. Méndez-Hernández, H.A.; Ledezma-Rodríguez, M.; Avilez-Montalvo, R.N.; Juárez-Gómez, Y.L.; Skeete, A.; Avilez-Montalvo, J.; De-La-Peña, C.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. Signaling overview of plant somatic embryogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Awada, R.; Campa, C.; Gibault, E.; Déchamp, E.; Georget, F.; Lepelley, M.; Abdallah, C.; Erban, A.; Martinez-Seidel, F.; Kopka, J.; et al. Unravelling the Metabolic and Hormonal Machinery during Key Steps of Somatic Embryogenesis: A Case Study in Coffee. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fan, Y.; Tang, Z.; Wei, J.; Yu, X.; Guo, H.; Li, T.; Guo, H.; Zhang, L.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. Dynamic Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Complex Regulatory Pathway Underlying Induction and Dose Effect by Different Exogenous Auxin IAA and 2,4-D During In vitro Embryogenic Redifferentiation in Cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 931105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hale, B.; Phipps, C.; Rao, N.; Wijeratne, A.; Phillips, G.C. Differential Expression Profiling Reveals Stress-Induced Cell Fate Divergence in Soybean Microspores. Plants 2020, 9, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Smertenko, A.; Bozhkov, P.V. Somatic Embryogenesis: Life and Death Processes during Apical-Basal Patterning. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1343–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Solís, M.T.; Chakrabarti, N.; Corredor, E.; Cortés-Eslava, J.; Rodríguez-Serrano, M.; Biggiogera, M.; Risueño, M.C.; Testillano, P.S. Epigenetic Changes Accompany Developmental Programmed Cell Death in Tapetum Cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Salinas-Grenet, H.; Herrera-Vásquez, A.; Parra, S.; Cortez, A.; Gutiérrez, L.; Pollmann, S.; León, G.; Blanco-Herrera, F. Modulation of Auxin Levels in Pollen Grains Affects Stamen Development and Anther Dehiscence in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Pérez-Pérez, Y.; El-Tantawy, A.A.; Solís, M.T.; Risueño, M.C.; Testillano, P.S. Stress-Induced Microspore Embryogenesis Requires Endogenous Auxin Synthesis and Polar Transport in Barley. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rodríguez-Sanz, H.; Solís, M.T.; Lopez, M.F.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Risueño, M.C.; Testillano, P.S. Auxin Biosynthesis, Accumulation, Action and Transport Are Involved in Stress-Induced Microspore Embryogenesis Initiation and Progression in Brassica napus. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1401–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Feng, X.L.; Ni, W.M.; Elge, S.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Xu, Z.H.; Xue, H.W. Auxin Flow in Anther Filaments Is Critical for Pollen Grain Development through Regulating Pollen Mitosis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cecchetti, V.; Celebrin, D.; Napoli, N.; Ghelli, R.; Brunetti, P.; Costantino, P.; Cardarelli, M. An Auxin Maximum in the Middle Layer Controls Stamen Development and Pollen Maturation in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1194–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Cardarelli, M.; Cecchetti, V. Auxin Polar Transport in Stamen Formation and Development: How Many Actors? Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Carneros, E.; Sánchez-Muñoz, J.; Pérez-Pérez, Y.; Pintos, B.; Gómez-Garay, A.; Testillano, P.S. Dynamics of Endogenous Auxin and Its Role in Somatic Embryogenesis Induction and Progression in Cork Oak. Plants 2023, 12, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Corredoira, E.; Cano, V.; Bárány, I.; Solís, M.T.; Rodríguez, H.; Vieitez, A.M.; Risueño, M.C.; Testillano, P.S. Initiation of Leaf Somatic Embryogenesis Involves High Pectin Esterification, Auxin Accumulation and DNA Demethylation in Quercus alba. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 213, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Vondrakova, Z.; Dobrev, P.I.; Pesek, B.; Fischerova, L.; Vagner, M.; Motyka, V. Profiles of Endogenous Phytohormones over the Course of Norway Spruce Somatic Embryogenesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Caeiro, A.; Caeiro, S.; Correia, S.; Canhoto, J. Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis in Tamarillo (Solanum betaceum Cav.) Involves Increases in the Endogenous Auxin Indole-3Acetic Acid. Plants 2022, 11, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Qi, L.; Zhang, S. Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolic Analyses Provide Insights into the Maintenance of Embryogenic Potential and the Biosynthesis of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids Involving Transcription Factors in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carr. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1056930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rodríguez-Sanz, H.; Manzanera, J.A.; Solís, M.T.; Gómez-Garay, A.; Pintos, B.; Risueño, M.C.; Testillano, P.S. Early Markers Are Present in Both Embryogenesis Pathways from Microspores and Immature Zygotic Embryos in Cork Oak, Quercus suber L. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, D.; Jin, F.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Transcript Profiling Reveals Complex Auxin Signalling Pathway and Transcription Regulation Involved in Dedifferentiation and Redifferentiation during Somatic Embryogenesis in Cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Wójcikowska, B.; Gaj, M.D. Expression Profiling of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR Genes during Somatic Embryogenesis Induction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 843–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Wójcik, A.M.; Wójcikowska, B.; Gaj, M.D. Current Perspectives on the Auxin-Mediated Genetic Network That Controls the Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Uc-Chuc, M.A.; Pérez-Hernández, C.; Galaz-ávalos, R.M.; Brito-Argaez, L.; Aguilar-Hernández, V.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. YUCCA-Mediated Biosynthesis of the Auxin IAA Is Required during the Somatic Embryogenic Induction Process in Coffea canephora. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, M.; Wrobel-Marek, J.; Heidmann, I.; Horstman, A.; Chen, B.; Reis, R.; Angenent, G.C.; Boutilier, K. Auxin Biosynthesis Maintains Embryo Identity and Growth during BABY BOOM-Induced Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 1095–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Robert, H.S.; Park, C.; Gutièrrez, C.L.; Wójcikowska, B.; Pěnčík, A.; Novák, O.; Chen, J.; Grunewald, W.; Dresselhaus, T.; Friml, J.; et al. Maternal Auxin Supply Contributes to Early Embryo Patterning in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Robert, H.S.; Grones, P.; Stepanova, A.N.; Robles, L.M.; Lokerse, A.S.; Alonso, J.M.; Weijers, D.; Friml, J. Local Auxin Sources Orient the Apical-Basal Axis in Arabidopsis Embryos. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 2506–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Supena, E.D.J.; Winarto, B.; Riksen, T.; Dubas, E.; Van Lammeren, A.; Offringa, R.; Boutilier, K.; Custers, J. Regeneration of Zygotic-like Microspore-Derived Embryos Suggests an Important Role for the Suspensor in Early Embryo Patterning. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 803–8014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Pérez-Pastrana, J.; Testillano, P.S.; Bárány, I.; Canto-Flick, A.; Álvarez-López, D.; Pijeira-Fernández, G.; Avilés-Viñas, S.A.; Peña-Yam, L.; Muñoz-Ramírez, L.; Nahuat-Dzib, S.; et al. Endogenous Auxin Accumulation/Localization during Zygotic and Somatic Embryogenesis of Capsicum chinense Jacq. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 258–259, 153333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Forestan, C.; Meda, S.; Varotto, S. ZmPIN1-Mediated Auxin Transport Is Related to Cellular Differentiation during Maize Embryogenesis and Endosperm Development. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1373–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Wang, Y.; Jiao, Y. Auxin and Above-Ground Meristems. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Teale, W.; Palme, K. Naphthylphthalamic Acid and the Mechanism of Polar Auxin Transport. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Xie, Q.; Frugis, G.; Colgan, D.; Chua, N. Arabidopsis NAC1 Transduces Auxin Signal Downstream of TIR1 to Promote Lateral Root Development. Genes. Dev. 2000, 14, 3024–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Wu, X.; McSteen, P. The Role of Auxin Transport during Inflorescence Development in Maize (Zea Mays, Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 1745–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Durgbanshi, A.; Arbona, V.; Pozo, O.; Miersch, O.; Sancho, J.V.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Simultaneous Determination of Multiple Phytohormones in Plant Extracts by Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 8437–8442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Arbona, C.V.; Go, A. Hormonal Modulation of Citrus Responses to Flooding. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 27, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 11177 g001 550
Figure 1. Main stages of in vivo pollen development (A–D) and stress induced-microspore embryogenesis (E–I) of Brassica napus. (A–H) Micrographs of semithin sections stained by toluidine blue observed in bright field. (A) Panoramic view of a longitudinal anther section, showing the different cell layers that form the anther structure. (B–D) Anther at different developmental stages: (B) anther at the tetrad stage with very active tapetum tissue; (C) anther at the stage of vacuolated microspore with tapetum in early programmed cell death (PCD); (D) anther at the stage of mature pollen, where tapetum has been completely degraded; (E) isolated vacuolated microspore, at the beginning of the microspore embryogenesis culture; (F) proembryo, still surrounded by exine, first structural sign of embryogenesis initiation; (G) globular embryo; (H) cotyledonary embryo; (I) panoramic view of a Petri dish of microspore embryogenesis culture after 30 days, showing cotyledonary embryos. Exo: exothecium; Endo: endothecium; ML: medium layer; P: pollen; Tap; tapetum; T: tetrad; VM: vacuolated microspore; TP: tricellular (mature) pollen; Ex: exine; V: vacuole. Bars represent (E,F) 10 µm, (B–D,G) 20 µm, (A,H) 50 µm, and (I) 1 cm.
Figure 1. Main stages of in vivo pollen development (A–D) and stress induced-microspore embryogenesis (E–I) of Brassica napus. (A–H) Micrographs of semithin sections stained by toluidine blue observed in bright field. (A) Panoramic view of a longitudinal anther section, showing the different cell layers that form the anther structure. (B–D) Anther at different developmental stages: (B) anther at the tetrad stage with very active tapetum tissue; (C) anther at the stage of vacuolated microspore with tapetum in early programmed cell death (PCD); (D) anther at the stage of mature pollen, where tapetum has been completely degraded; (E) isolated vacuolated microspore, at the beginning of the microspore embryogenesis culture; (F) proembryo, still surrounded by exine, first structural sign of embryogenesis initiation; (G) globular embryo; (H) cotyledonary embryo; (I) panoramic view of a Petri dish of microspore embryogenesis culture after 30 days, showing cotyledonary embryos. Exo: exothecium; Endo: endothecium; ML: medium layer; P: pollen; Tap; tapetum; T: tetrad; VM: vacuolated microspore; TP: tricellular (mature) pollen; Ex: exine; V: vacuole. Bars represent (E,F) 10 µm, (B–D,G) 20 µm, (A,H) 50 µm, and (I) 1 cm.
Ijms 24 11177 g001
Ijms 24 11177 g002 550
Figure 2. Immunolocalization of IAA during in vivo pollen development. Confocal microscopy images showing IAA immunofluorescence signal (green), DAPI staining of nuclei (blue), and Nomarski’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A,A′) Anther at the tetrad stage with very active tapetum tissue, (B,B′) anther at the stage of vacuolated microspore with tapetum in early programmed cell death (PCD), (C,C′) anther at the stage of mature pollen, without tapetum. (D,E) Negative control experiments of IAA immunofluorescence at the tetrad stage by eliminating the primary antibody (D) and using the anti-IAA antibody preblocked with IAA (immunodepletion) (E). Bars represent 20 µm.
Figure 2. Immunolocalization of IAA during in vivo pollen development. Confocal microscopy images showing IAA immunofluorescence signal (green), DAPI staining of nuclei (blue), and Nomarski’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A,A′) Anther at the tetrad stage with very active tapetum tissue, (B,B′) anther at the stage of vacuolated microspore with tapetum in early programmed cell death (PCD), (C,C′) anther at the stage of mature pollen, without tapetum. (D,E) Negative control experiments of IAA immunofluorescence at the tetrad stage by eliminating the primary antibody (D) and using the anti-IAA antibody preblocked with IAA (immunodepletion) (E). Bars represent 20 µm.
Ijms 24 11177 g002
Ijms 24 11177 g003 550
Figure 3. Quantification of IAA immunofluorescence signal intensity at the cellular level of both pollen and tapetum tissue during pollen development. Histograms represent the level of immunofluorescence intensity, in arbitrary units, as measured by ImageJ software tools over confocal maximum projection images at different microspore and tapetum developmental stages (tetrads/active tapetum, vacuolated microspores/tapetum in early PCD, and mature pollen grains/tapetum degraded). Columns represent the mean fluorescence intensity (±SEM) of images from at least three immunofluorescence experiments and three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Quantification of IAA immunofluorescence signal intensity at the cellular level of both pollen and tapetum tissue during pollen development. Histograms represent the level of immunofluorescence intensity, in arbitrary units, as measured by ImageJ software tools over confocal maximum projection images at different microspore and tapetum developmental stages (tetrads/active tapetum, vacuolated microspores/tapetum in early PCD, and mature pollen grains/tapetum degraded). Columns represent the mean fluorescence intensity (±SEM) of images from at least three immunofluorescence experiments and three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 24 11177 g003
Ijms 24 11177 g004 550
Figure 4. Immunolocalization of IAA during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Confocal microscopy images showing IAA immunofluorescence signal (green), DAPI staining of nuclei (blue), and Nomarski’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A,A′) Isolated vacuolated microspore at the beginning of the culture. (B,B′) Proembryo. (C) Globular embryo conserving the suspensor structure. (D) Heart-shaped embryo. (E) Cotyledonary embryo. Arrows point to the apical zone in cotyledons and root apical meristem, regions with higher IAA accumulation. Bars represent (A,A′) 10 µm, (B,B′,C,D) 25 µm, and (E) 75 µm.
Figure 4. Immunolocalization of IAA during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Confocal microscopy images showing IAA immunofluorescence signal (green), DAPI staining of nuclei (blue), and Nomarski’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A,A′) Isolated vacuolated microspore at the beginning of the culture. (B,B′) Proembryo. (C) Globular embryo conserving the suspensor structure. (D) Heart-shaped embryo. (E) Cotyledonary embryo. Arrows point to the apical zone in cotyledons and root apical meristem, regions with higher IAA accumulation. Bars represent (A,A′) 10 µm, (B,B′,C,D) 25 µm, and (E) 75 µm.
Ijms 24 11177 g004
Ijms 24 11177 g005 550
Figure 5. Quantification of IAA immunofluorescence signal intensity at the cellular level during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Histograms represent the level of immunofluorescence intensity, in arbitrary units (a.u.), as measured by ImageJ software tools over confocal maximum projection images at different developmental stages (isolated vacuolated microspores, proembryos, globular embryos, and cotyledonary embryos). Columns represent the mean fluorescence intensity (±SEM) of images from at least three immunofluorescence experiments and three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5. Quantification of IAA immunofluorescence signal intensity at the cellular level during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Histograms represent the level of immunofluorescence intensity, in arbitrary units (a.u.), as measured by ImageJ software tools over confocal maximum projection images at different developmental stages (isolated vacuolated microspores, proembryos, globular embryos, and cotyledonary embryos). Columns represent the mean fluorescence intensity (±SEM) of images from at least three immunofluorescence experiments and three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 24 11177 g005
Ijms 24 11177 g006 550
Figure 6. Quantification of endogenous IAA concentration during in vivo pollen development (A) and stress-induced microspore embryogenesis (B). Histograms represent the level of endogenous IAA, in nanograms per gram of fresh weight, as measured by using the technique of liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI–MS/MS), using anthers and culture samples at different developmental stages for both microspore developmental programs. Each column represents the mean (±SEM) of at least three biological and three technical replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 6. Quantification of endogenous IAA concentration during in vivo pollen development (A) and stress-induced microspore embryogenesis (B). Histograms represent the level of endogenous IAA, in nanograms per gram of fresh weight, as measured by using the technique of liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI–MS/MS), using anthers and culture samples at different developmental stages for both microspore developmental programs. Each column represents the mean (±SEM) of at least three biological and three technical replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 24 11177 g006
Ijms 24 11177 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression patterns of the genes BnTAA1 (auxin biosynthesis gene) (A,C) and BnPIN1-like (auxin transport gene) (B,D) during in vivo pollen development (A,B) and stress-induced microspore embryogenesis (C,D). Histograms show relative changes of mRNA levels at different developmental stages for both microspore developmental programs, normalized to the tetrad stage in case of pollen development and to isolated vacuolated microspore in case of microspore embryogenesis, as determined by RT-qPCR. Each column represents the mean of at least three biological and three technical replicates. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Different letters indicate significant differences among stages within the expression of each gene according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Expression patterns of the genes BnTAA1 (auxin biosynthesis gene) (A,C) and BnPIN1-like (auxin transport gene) (B,D) during in vivo pollen development (A,B) and stress-induced microspore embryogenesis (C,D). Histograms show relative changes of mRNA levels at different developmental stages for both microspore developmental programs, normalized to the tetrad stage in case of pollen development and to isolated vacuolated microspore in case of microspore embryogenesis, as determined by RT-qPCR. Each column represents the mean of at least three biological and three technical replicates. Bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Different letters indicate significant differences among stages within the expression of each gene according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 11177 g007
Ijms 24 11177 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of kynurenine (inhibitor of auxin biosynthesis) treatments on stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. (A) Quantification of microspore embryogenesis initiation, measured as the percentage of proembryos obtained in untreated cultures and cultures treated with kynurenine at different concentrations (4, 40, and 100 µM). Histograms show the mean percentage of proembryos in untreated (control) and treated cultures. Each column represents the mean of three biological and three technical replicates. Bars in columns indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Different letters on columns indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at p < 0.05. (B) Plates showing the microspore-derived embryos produced after 30 days in untreated and treated cultures with 4, 40, and 100 µM kynurenine. Bars represent: 1 cm.
Figure 8. Effect of kynurenine (inhibitor of auxin biosynthesis) treatments on stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. (A) Quantification of microspore embryogenesis initiation, measured as the percentage of proembryos obtained in untreated cultures and cultures treated with kynurenine at different concentrations (4, 40, and 100 µM). Histograms show the mean percentage of proembryos in untreated (control) and treated cultures. Each column represents the mean of three biological and three technical replicates. Bars in columns indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Different letters on columns indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at p < 0.05. (B) Plates showing the microspore-derived embryos produced after 30 days in untreated and treated cultures with 4, 40, and 100 µM kynurenine. Bars represent: 1 cm.
Ijms 24 11177 g008
Ijms 24 11177 g009 550
Figure 9. Scheme representing the opposite endogenous auxin dynamics during the two developmental pathways of the microspore, pollen development and microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus. Green boxes illustrate changes during pollen development, and orange boxes changes during microspore embryogenesis, in IAA synthesis, accumulation, and expression of TAA1 and PIN1-like.
Figure 9. Scheme representing the opposite endogenous auxin dynamics during the two developmental pathways of the microspore, pollen development and microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus. Green boxes illustrate changes during pollen development, and orange boxes changes during microspore embryogenesis, in IAA synthesis, accumulation, and expression of TAA1 and PIN1-like.
Ijms 24 11177 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Pérez, Y.; Solís, M.T.; Albacete, A.; Testillano, P.S. Opposite Auxin Dynamics Determine the Gametophytic and Embryogenic Fates of the Microspore. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311177

AMA Style

Pérez-Pérez Y, Solís MT, Albacete A, Testillano PS. Opposite Auxin Dynamics Determine the Gametophytic and Embryogenic Fates of the Microspore. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):11177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Pérez, Yolanda, María Teresa Solís, Alfonso Albacete, and Pilar S. Testillano. 2023. "Opposite Auxin Dynamics Determine the Gametophytic and Embryogenic Fates of the Microspore" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 11177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311177

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop