Next Article in Journal
Behavioral Study of 3- and 5-Halocytisine Derivatives in Zebrafish Using the Novel Tank Diving Test (NTT)
Previous Article in Journal
Chronic Liver Disease: Latest Research in Pathogenesis, Detection and Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ion Channels in Multiple Myeloma: Pathogenic Role and Therapeutic Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms241310632
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ECM Composition Differentially Regulates Intracellular and Extracellular pH in Normal and Cancer Pancreatic Duct Epithelial Cells

by
Daria Di Molfetta
1,†,
Stefania Cannone
1,†,
Maria Raffaella Greco
1,
Rosa Caroppo
1,
Francesca Piccapane
1,
Tiago Miguel Amaral Carvalho
1,
Concetta Altamura
2,
Ilaria Saltarella
2,
Diana Tavares Valente
3,
Jean Francois Desaphy
2,
Stephan J. Reshkin
1 and
Rosa Angela Cardone
1,*
1
Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10632; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310632
Submission received: 7 April 2023 / Revised: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 17 June 2023 / Published: 25 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ion Channels as Therapeutic Target in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Intracellular pH (pHi) regulation is a challenge for the exocrine pancreas, where the luminal secretion of bicarbonate-rich fluid is accompanied by interstitial flows of acid. This acid–base transport requires a plethora of ion transporters, including bicarbonate transporters and the Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1 (NHE1), which are dysregulated in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDAC progression is favored by a Collagen-I rich extracellular matrix (ECM) which exacerbates the physiological interstitial acidosis. In organotypic cultures of normal human pancreatic cells (HPDE), parenchymal cancer cells (CPCs) and cancer stem cells (CSCs) growing on matrices reproducing ECM changes during progression, we studied resting pHi, the pHi response to fluxes of NaHCO3 and acidosis and the role of NHE1 in pHi regulation. Our findings show that: (i) on the physiological ECM, HPDE cells have the most alkaline pHi, followed by CSCs and CPCs, while a Collagen I-rich ECM reverses the acid–base balance in cancer cells compared to normal cells; (ii) both resting pHi and pHi recovery from an acid load are reduced by extracellular NaHCO3, especially in HPDE cells on a normal ECM; (iii) cancer cell NHE1 activity is less affected by NaHCO3. We conclude that ECM composition and the fluctuations of pHe cooperate to predispose pHi homeostasis towards the presence of NaHCO3 gradients similar to that expected in the tumor.

1. Introduction

The most common pancreatic cancer is Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is also one of the deadliest of human cancers. PDAC arises in the smaller-caliber ducts in the exocrine compartment of the pancreas [1,2]. During digestion, normal ductal pancreatic cells secrete an alkaline (pH ≈ 8–8.5), NaHCO3-rich fluid [3,4] to neutralize the acidic chyme arriving from the stomach [5]. Alkaline secretion leads to parallel acidification of the pancreatic interstitium [6]. Therefore, due to the alternation between of the digestive and the resting phases, the ductal cells are exposed to variable gradients of extracellular pH (pHe) [7]: alkaline on the apical side and acidic on the basolateral side, which rapidly return to resting state [8]. These pHe gradients translate into specular variations of intracellular pH (pHi), whose homeostasis is ensured by a complex plethora of ion transporters/channels such as: Cl−/HCO3− (SLC26), Na+/H+ (NHE1), Na+/HCO3− (NBCs), the gastric and non-gastric H+/K+-ATPases [9], and CFTR [10,11].
It has been reported that the onset of PDAC changes the expression or the activity of pH-regulatory transporters [6], favoring the reversed acid–base balance typical of cancer cells [12,13,14,15,16]. Indeed, in a data mining study of gene expression profiles of three databases comparing normal tissues with PDAC tissues, there was consistent up-regulation of CAIX and of the basolateral acid extruders MCT4 and the NHEs, especially NHE1 [17,18]. This altered expression could be involved in the combined alkalinization of pHi and the acidification of the tumor microenvironment (TME) [19], which in many cancers, including PDAC, reaches pHe values ranging from 6.4 to 7.0 [20,21]. While this acidic pHe induces apoptosis in normal cells, it activates survival and growth in some premalignant cells, which have greater capacity to adapt to the acidic microenvironment [22]. As PDAC cells arise in an organ already exposed to highly dynamic and cyclically variable pHe landscapes [23] they have an intrinsic ability to survive and take advantage of such an acidic microenvironment, which fosters the aggressive features of PDAC, such as early metastasis, immunosuppression and resistance to immune and chemotherapy [15,24,25,26]. Indeed, acidic pHe promotes the emergence of very aggressive cancer cells with stem-like properties [27,28,29], the cancer stem cells (CSCs) [29,30], with abilities of self-renewal, metastasis and chemoresistance [31,32,33,34]. Moreover, due to the acid adaptation, tumor cells secrete collagen-producing enzymes to remodel their surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) and construct niches in which they can survive and evolve towards malignancy [22]. Indeed, a typical feature of the PDAC TME is its prominent desmoplasia consisting in an increasingly hyperplastic connective tissue, mostly composed of stromal cells and ECM components, in particular collagen I, which is enriched in the tumor stroma as the tumor progresses [27,35,36,37]. This abundant stroma blocks the formation of a vascular meshwork [38] leading to the generation of dynamic areas of hypoxia and low nutrients [39], which boost PDAC pathophysiology. However, how ECM composition interacts with extracellular changes of NaHCO3 and fluxes of acidosis to regulate pHi in normal and tumor cells, including the CSCs, is still unknown. Here, we used a 3D organotypic culture model mimicking the changing ECM composition from the pre-malignant pancreas to an early/invasive tumor (both Matrigel rich) to the more developed PDAC (collagen-I rich) stroma [37,40,41,42,43,44,45] to evaluate the effect of the different ECMs on the ability of normal Human Pancreatic Duct Cells (HPDE), Panc-1 Cancer Parenchymal Cells (CPCs), and their derived Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) to regulate pHi, when both were exposed to various pHes and NaHCO3 concentrations, which reproduce the oscillating extracellular conditions cyclically occurring in the pancreas. We also measured the physio-pathological role of one of the principal pHi regulators, NHE1, in the maintenance of pHi homeostasis when the above cell types were exposed to these transient pHe/ NaHCO3 changes on the different normal/tumor ECMs. Our data indicate that the ECM composition actively drives (i) the resting pHi in normal cells, the Panc1 tumor cells and their derived CSCs, (ii) the pHi response of these cells to the presence of NaHCO3 in both neutral and acidic pHe, (iii) their pHi recovery from an intracellular acid load, and (iv) their NHE1 activity. Altogether, these findings suggest a scenario in which the ECM composition cooperates with the fluctuations of pHe to regulate both pHi homeostasis and the activity of NHE1, which is a known promoter of both tumor initiation and malignant progression in several tumor types, including PDAC.

2. Results

The experiments were performed using a 3D culture system that models the in vivo changes in ECM composition occurring during PDAC progression [40,41,44,46]. For this, we used three different stepwise mixes of Matrigel (M) and Collagen I (C)-based matrices (90M-10C; 70M-30C; 10M-90C), mimicking the spatio-temporal progression from the normal basement membrane (90M) to the increasing stromal reaction (70M and 10M) associated with PDAC development [21,47,48,49,50]. As stromal Collagen I increases during progression from a normal pancreas to PDAC, we grew the normal HPDE cells exclusively on ECMs modeling the transition from a normal ECM to an early-stage disease ECM (90M-10C and 70M-30C, respectively) while we also cultured the tumor CPCs and CSCs on a third, more fibrotic ECM (10M-90C), representative of the most advanced PDAC. Furthermore, to mimic the cycle of digestive hormone-stimulated secretion of NaHCO3 and the subsequent proton release, followed by the resetting of basal conditions, we perfused the cells with Ringers, half of which contained NaHCO3. Perfusing the cells with NaHCO3 recreates the extracellular environment presented during the secretion of the alkaline fluid in the pancreatic duct, which provides the substrate necessary for the activation of Na/HCO3 transporters, which are highly expressed in normal pancreatic duct cells [32].

2.1. ECM Composition, Extracellular NaHCO3 and Acidic pHe Affect Resting pHi in Normal and Tumor Cells

We analyzed the effects of the ECM composition on resting pHi in either the presence or the absence of extracellular NaHCO3 in the normal pancreatic ductal cell line, the HPDE cells, and in the tumor cell CPCs and CSCs. The normal HPDE cells were grown on 90M-10C and 70M-30C, while the tumor CPCs and CSCs were cultured on a third, more fibrotic ECM (10M-90C), representative of the most advanced PDAC. Moreover, in each of these growth conditions, resting pHi was measured at both pHe 7.4 and when cells were exposed to transient fluxes of interstitial acidosis (pHe 6.7), biomimetic of both the pancreatic, periodic pHe oscillations occurring during digestion and the transient intratumoral acidic areas. For this, a spectrofluorometer equipped with a gravity flow-controlled perfusion system permitting an alternating cell perfusion with Ringer with and without NaHCO3, buffered at both pHe 7.4 and pHe 6.7, was used. The cells, grown on the different ECMs, were loaded with the pH-sensitive probe BCECF-AM, inserted in the cuvette and alternatively perfused with the Ringers at both pHes in order to obtain a dynamic measurement of their pHi in response to the changing pHes and the presence of NaHCO3.
We started by comparing the resting pHi values in the HPDE, CPCs and CSCs growing on the different ECMs, first when exposed at pHe 7.4 and then at pHe 6.7. We found that in a physiological ECM composition (90M-10C) and at pHe 7.4, the normal HPDE cells (Figure 1A) were more alkaline than either the CPCs or CSCs (Figure 1B,C), independently of the presence of extracellular NaHCO3. Importantly for the tumor cells growing on 90M-10C, the CSCs were more alkaline than the CPCs. This is in accordance with both their higher aggressiveness and trans-differentiation ability towards a vascular-like phenotype and with their chemoresistant characteristics that drive tumor progression [21,32] However, in line with the well-known reversed acid–base balance of cancer cells [13,51,52], in tumor-like ECMs (70M-30C and 10M-90C) and especially at the tumor-like acidic pHe (pHe 6.7), the cancer cells were much more alkaline than the normal cells. Indeed, of the three cell lines, cell perfusion with Ringers buffered at pHe 6.7 produced the strongest cytosolic acidification in the HPDE cells (Figure 1A), with an acidification of approximately 0.9 pH units in both the absence and presence of NaHCO3. This intracellular acidification was especially higher when HPDE cells grew in the ECMs resembling the normal pancreatic ECM (90M-10C) compared to their growth on a more fibrotic ECM (70M-30C). Unlike HPDE cells, both the CPCs and CSCs (Figure 1B,C), when perfused at pHe 6.7, were acidified by approximately 0.3 and 0.25 pH units, respectively. This confirms that, in conditions that mimic the TME (i.e., Collagen I-rich ECMs and pHe 6.7), pHi regulation mirrors the typical pHi/pHe gradient inversion of the tumor cells compared to normal cells such that CPCs and CSCs have a more alkaline pHi than the HPDE cells.
We then analyzed the effect of NaHCO3 on the cells’ ability to regulate their pHi at both pHe 7.4 and acidic pHe. Interestingly, at pHe 7.4, the HPDE cells reduced their pHi more greatly in the presence of NaHCO3 than the cancer cells, whatever the ECM composition (Figure 1A). Moreover, the CPCs (Figure 1B) were significantly more sensitive to the presence of NaHCO3 than the CSCs (Figure 1C) at pHe 7.4, as the CPCs had a reduction of approximately 0.19 pH units vs. 0.08 pH units in the CSCs. Therefore, pHi regulation was especially dependent on the presence of external NaHCO3 in the normal HPDE cells while this NaHCO3 dependence became ever less pronounced with the increasing cellular aggressiveness (from CPCs to CSCs). Indeed, at pHe 7.4, the CSCs maintained a very alkaline pHi both in the presence and in the absence of NaHCO3 (Figure 1C). This is in line with the data showing that in pancreatic cancer cells, the NaHCO3 –dependent transporters are downregulated and NHE1 is overexpressed compared to normal cells [17,53] delegating pHi regulation to NaHCO3-independent mechanisms. Interestingly, at pHe 6.7, both HPDE cells and CPCs regulated their pHi independently of the presence of extracellular NaHCO3, while CSCs were sensitive to NaHCO3 only in the 90M-10C ECM. Lastly, we analyzed how changes in the ECM composition affected resting pHi in each cell line exposed to the different experimental conditions. We found that the ECM composition was capable of changing pHi especially in the HPDE cells at pHe 7.4 both in the presence and in the absence of NaHCO3 (Figure 1A). Indeed, as Collagen I was increased from 90M-10C to 70M-30C, HPDE pHi decreased by approximately 0.5 pH units independently of external NaHCO3. Collagen I enrichment in the ECM also reduced pHi in cancer cells, but to a much lower extent compared to HPDE cells. Furthermore, while in CPCs the pHi reduction was only detected at pHe 7.4 and in the absence of NaHCO3, in CSCs it occurred at both pHes regardless of the presence of NaHCO3.
The effects of ECM composition on pHi dynamics in the normal cells (HPDE) and the two cancer cell types are reflected on their ability to acidify the extracellular medium (Figure 2). Indeed, the normal HPDE cells had a very low acidification capacity (∆pHe: 0.212 ± 0.005 vs. 0.181 ± 0.01 for 90M-10C vs. 70M-30C, respectively) in line with all non-cancerous cells. This already low acidification ability tended to be further decreased in the presence of higher Collagen I in the ECM, as might be expected since normal pancreatic ductal cells usually do not experience ECM with high levels of Collagen I. Importantly, the CSCs had a greater ability to acidify the extracellular medium and this was increased with the enrichment of Collagen I in the ECM, which reproduces the Collagen I-rich niche in which the CSCs reside in vivo (∆pHe: 0.446 ± 0.03 vs. 0.414 ± 0.02 on 90M-10C; 0.512 ± 0.04 vs. 0.423 ± 0.02 on 70M-30C and 0.602 ± 0.03 vs. 0.466 ± 0.03 on 10M-90C, for CSCs vs. CPCs, respectively).

2.2. Collagen I Enrichment in the ECM Decreases pHi Recovery Ability Mediated by NHE1 in Cancer Cells and NaHCO3 Transport in Normal Cells

To characterize the transport mechanisms that regulate pHi at pHe 7.4 in the three cell lines growing on the different ECMs and in the presence or absence of extracellular NaHCO3, we perfused cell monolayers with Ringers (pHe 7.4), half containing NaHCO3 and we evaluated the pHi recovery rate after an acute acid load with 40 mM NH4Cl, as previously described [54]. Since in most cell types, the NHE1 represents the principal pHi recovery system, NHE1 expression increases in PDAC [55] and it is involved in PDAC progression [56], we explored its contribution to pHi recovery by performing the experiments in both control conditions and in the presence of its specific inhibitor Cariporide (5 µM). Representative examples of the changes in pHi in response to an acid load followed by pHi recovery of cells perfused with either NaHCO3-free or NaHCO3-containing Ringers in the absence or presence of Cariporide are shown in Figure 3A. As reported in Figure 3B, both in the presence and in the absence of NaHCO3, the HPDE cells showed a much higher pHi recovery ability compared to CPCs and CSCs grown in the same experimental setup (Figure 3C,D) and this cytoplasmic re-alkalinization was largely sustained by the activity of NHE1 (see the effect of Cariporide in Figure 4). When HPDE cells growing on 90M-10C and 70M-30C were perfused with Ringer containing NaHCO3, their ability to recover pHi dropped by almost 83% ± 1.7 and 84.98% ± 3.1, respectively, but was still dependent on NHE1 activity only on 90M-10C (Figure 3B). Similarly, we found that both CPCs and CSCs recovered their pHi faster when perfused with NaHCO3-free Ringer than the in presence of NaHCO3 (Figure 3C,D). Moreover, in the absence of NaHCO3, their pHi recovery was mainly operated by NHE1 in all the ECMs, as its specific inhibition reduced the ability to recover pHi by about 80% (Figure 3C,D). On the contrary, in the presence of NaHCO3, pHi recovery required NHE1 activity only for the CPCs growing on 90M-10C, while in CSCs it was totally independent of NHE1 (Figure 3C,D).
To more clearly show the contribution of NHE1 to pHi recovery in the presence or absence of NaHCO3, the data are also presented as the pHi recovery rate obtained in control conditions subtracted from those obtained in the presence of Cariporide (Figure 4 and Table 1). Indeed, in the absence of NaHCO3, HPDE cells had the highest NHE1 activity compared to CPCs and CSCs, and this was dramatically reduced when cells were perfused with NaHCO3-containing Ringers (Figure 4). This set of conditions mimics the cycle of digestive hormone-stimulated secretion of NaHCO3 and the subsequent proton release, followed by the resetting of basal conditions. Indeed, the cyclical absence of NaHCO3, which could be a particularly recurrent situation especially in the juxtatumoral and tumor tissues, would represent a highly unstable situation for HPDE cells, which are forced to strongly activate NHE1 to restore the homeostasis of pHi.
Both CPCs and CSCs had lower NHE1 activity than HPDE cells (Figure 4), but, similarly to HPDE, the contribution of NHE1 to pHi regulation was maximum on 90M-10C and decreased in the Collagen I-enriched ECMs. Moreover, in 90M-10C NHE1 activity was higher in the CSCs in comparison to the CPCs. Interestingly, NHE1 activity in the cancer cells was less affected by the presence of NaHCO3 than in the HPDE cells suggesting that, even if the cancer cells also express Na+/HCO3− transporters, pHi regulation is mainly mediated by NHE1. These functional data are in line with the data-mining analyses of acid-base transporter expression changes in PDAC showing that PDAC has reduced expression of Na+/HCO3 transporters and an increased expression of NHE1 [10,17].

3. Discussion

The physiology of the exocrine pancreas is quite complex and not yet fully understood. Its involvement in digestion is relevant, due to the secretion of an alkaline, NaHCO3 -rich fluid [5,57] that (i) neutralizes the chyme arriving from the stomach and (ii) prevents the aggregation of digestive enzymes in pancreatic lumen [5]. NaHCO3 secretion is guaranteed by a coordinated activity of the NHE1 and Na+/HCO3− co-transporters expressed on the basolateral membrane and the Cl−/HCO3 exchanger (SLC26), the gastric and non-gastric H+/K+-ATPases [9], and CFTR [10,58] on the apical membrane of duct cells. Furthermore, the exocrine secretion of the pancreas is cyclical and is maximal during the digestive phase when luminal NaHCO3− concentration reaches 150 mM [53] During this phase, ductal cells extrude equal amounts of acid across the basolateral membrane, thus acidifying the pancreatic interstitium while activating all the pHi-regulatory proteins to maintain, despite these continuous acid-base fluxes, pHi homeostasis within the physiological range. Importantly, these alternating waves of interstitial acidic pHe might facilitate the onset of certain types of tumors, where the pre-cancer cells are selected under acidic stress and further progress towards malignancy following their prolonged exposition and adaptation to an acidic pHe [29,59,60,61]. Moreover, while an acidic pHe (pHe 6.7) is now recognized as a hallmark of tumor malignancy and metastasis, it also contributes to genetic instability and metabolic rewiring, synergizing with the more alkaline pHi (from pHi 7.4 to pHi 7.7) to promote tumor development [29,37,38,39,59]. In this respect, the most lethal human pancreatic cancer is PDAC, which develops in small ducts disrupting their normal physiology and acid-base regulation [25,62]. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer cells exhibit reduced expression of the NaHCO3 transporters [17] causing defects in NaHCO3 secretion [53]. This could probably serve to maintain a higher alkaline pHi [17,19], which is associated with a decrease in cell death and an increase in proliferation [61]. Moreover, the inhibition of the Na+/HCO3- cotransporter SLC4A4 has been recently demonstrated to attenuate the acidic pHe by accumulating extracellular NaHCO3 and reduce in vivo tumor growth and metastasis while restoring antitumor immunity and increasing response to immunotherapy [26].
In addition, PDAC is associated with a dense stroma, ever more enriched by collagen I during PDAC progression [37], which, by hindering vascularity in the tumor microenvironment, exacerbates the typical tumor extracellular acidosis and creates acidic niches where the more aggressive Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) are supposed to arise and survive [29,59,62]. As a consequence of tumor acidosis, cancer cells remodel the ECM by producing and depositing increasing amounts of collagen I, which stabilize cells under acid stress [63]. However, the role of the ECM composition in the regulation of pHi dynamics in both the normal HPDE cells and in the tumor parenchymal cells (CPCs) and their derived CSCs and its interaction with different amounts of extracellular NaHCO3 and pHes are so far still unknown. Here, we first demonstrated by spectrofluorimetric analysis that both cancer cell lines, and especially the CSCs, were more alkaline when grown on 90M-10C and the presence of NaHCO3, regardless of the external pHe, and the CSCs were more alkaline than the CPCs (Figure 1B,C). This is in accordance with the CSCs ability to transdifferentiate into a vascular-like phenotype [45], since a more alkaline pHi is required for cell differentiation/trans-differentiation [64,65,66]. Further, when grown on Matrigel, CPCs had enhanced invasive ability, which, together with the CSCs’ vasculogenic mimicry, favors the early invasion of CPCs into the aberrant CSC-derived vasculature during the early stage of PDAC progression [45]
Here, we have also identified the fundamental role of ECM composition in determining and maintaining the reversed acid–base balance of the cancer cells with respect to the normal cells [12]. Indeed, when grown on a Collagen I-rich ECM (70M-30C) at pHe 7.4 and in the presence of external NaHCO3, we found that the normal HPDE cells maintained their pHi at the physiological 7.2 value and were always more acidic than the CPCs and the CSCs (Figure 1A). However, during both fasting and PDAC progression, the amount of secreted NaHCO3 decreases until it is completely absent. Thus, when perfusing the cells with Ringer without NaHCO3, we found an increase in the resting pHi in all three cell lines, with the highest pHi observed in the most aggressive CSCs in the presence of a pHe of either 7.4 or 6.7 (Figure 1C). Moreover, the HPDE cells displayed a higher difference in pHi between NaHCO3-containing and NaHCO3-free Ringers, compared to the cancer cells and especially the CSCs (Figure 1A,C). Importantly, the highest pHi of the three cell lines observed in the absence of NaHCO3 at pHe 7.4 (Figure 1) was correlated to a higher pHi recovery rate from an intracellular acidification (Figure 3A–C), which was extremely rapid in the HPDE cells (Figure 3A). Furthermore, cell perfusion with the NaHCO3-containing Ringer slowed the pHi recovery from acid load, especially in HPDE cells (Figure 3A), demonstrating the greater involvement of NaHCO3 transporters in pHi regulation in normal cells rather than in cancer cells and supporting the observation that bicarbonate transporters are dysregulated in PDAC [8,17,18].
To investigate the relative contribution of NaHCO3 transporters or NHE1 in the pHi recovery after acidification, we performed the experiments by perfusing the cells with Ringer’s solutions containing Cariporide, a specific NHE1 inhibitor. We found that in both normal and cancer cells, Cariporide had a greater inhibitory effect on pHi recovery in NaHCO3-free Ringer than in the NaHCO3-containing Ringer (Figure 2). Moreover, the very high NHE1 activity in HPDE cells in NaHCO3-free Ringer was dramatically reduced in the presence of NaHCO3 (Figure 3A). This suggests a compensatory activity between the NaHCO3 and Na+/H+ transporters in normal cells in vivo. During the digestive phase, when the duct cells secrete the alkaline fluid, the same transporters that secrete NaHCO3 simultaneously regulate the pHi homeostasis. Instead, when NaHCO3 secretion is reduced, HPDE cells strongly activate NHE1 to restore the pHi by H+ extrusion. During PDAC progression, the ECM is increasingly enriched with Collagen I [37,65] and cancer cells reduce NaHCO3 secretion [17]. In this respect, we found that both the CPCs and the CSCs had the highest pHi (Figure 1B,C), due to the higher NHE1 activity in Matrigel-rich ECM mimicking the early development of PDAC. In line with this, the NHE1 activity was less affected in the cancer cells by the presence of external NaHCO3, especially in the CSCs (Figure 3B,C and Figure 4), which supports the data-mining analyses of acid–base transporter expression changes in PDAC showing that advanced PDAC has altered expression of NaHCO3 transporters and resulted in an increased expression of NHE1 [8,17,18]. Future experiments will be performed to identify and explore the role of NaHCO3 transporters involved in these conditions.
We hypothesize a dynamic model of PDAC progression in which during the initial phase of the tumor development CPCs and CSCs are close to the normal duct HPDE cells and are exposed to their secreted NaHCO3-rich fluid while they reside in regions with lower amounts of NaHCO3 in the tumor core of the more advanced disease. In line with this model, we found that, when the cells grow on Matrigel, the contemporary presence of Na+ and NaHCO3 in the extracellular milieu permits pHi recovery due to the activation of both NaHCO3 transporters and NHE1, while with higher levels of collagen I, the pHi recovery in those conditions was due almost entirely to NHE1 (Figure 3B,C).
Altogether, these data suggest that the composition of the ECM is sufficient to drive the pH regulatory behavior of the cells towards the presence of an NaHCO3 gradient similar to that expected in the tumor independently of the intrinsic oncogenic background. That is, on Matrigel (mimicking the tumor periphery), the cells utilized both transport systems to recover pHi, whereas on the ECM mimicking the tumor core, the cells principally utilized the NHE1. This is line with work in PDAC that TME extrinsic factors can override intrinsic signaling to regulate progression and chemotherapy resistance [66,67] and with the recent work in non-small-cell lung carcinoma demonstrating that ECM composition can determine prognosis and risk independently of the clonal heterogeneity of the tumor [68] and even educate immunoregulatory macrophages in ovarian cancer metastasis [69].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Lines

Human Pancreatic Duct Epithelial cells (HPDE-H6c7) are used as a model for the benign/normal pancreatic ductal epithelium. It is an immortalized epithelial cell line derived from normal human pancreatic duct epithelial (HPDE) cells. This cell line demonstrates near-normal genotype and phenotype of HPDE cells and is wild type for p53 and KRAS genes. HPDE were grown in a mixture of 50% RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin G, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin and 1% non-essential amino acids 100X solution (Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 50% keratinocyte medium SFM (Gibco, Life Technologies) supplemented with 0.025% bovine pituitary extract and 2.5 mg/L epidermal growth factor (Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The Panc1 human pancreatic adenocarcinoma parenchymal (CPC) cell line and their derived Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs), generated as previously described [69], were grown and maintained in standard conditions as previously described [44,45]. The CSCs were selected from the PDAC cell line Panc-1 (the Parental line) and identified by their ability to form anchorage-independent colonies and by their overexpression of common CSC markers [44,45,69]. All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C and in 5% CO2.

4.2. 3D Organotypic Cultures

Three different mixtures composed of Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (Corning Inc., NY, USA) and collagen I (bovine-Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were prepared as previously described [43,44,45,46]. Matrigel was diluted to a final concentration of 7 mg/mL in serum-free media, whereas collagen I was diluted to the final concentration of 3 mg/mL in distilled sterile water, PBS 10X (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) and 0.015 N NaOH. Then, Matrigel and collagen I were mixed at different percentages, 90% Matrigel-10% collagen I (90M-10C), 70% Matrigel-30% collagen I (70M-30C) and 10% Matrigel- 90% collagen I (10M-90C) as described [45]. In all cases, 12mm glass coverslips placed in 24-well cell culture plates were coated with a thick layer of the mixes, approximately 90–150 µM thick. The cell culture plates were then incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 1 h to allow the mixture to solidify, after which 2 × 105 cells/well were seeded on the matrix and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

4.3. Spectrofluorimetric Measurements of pHi with and without (w/o) NaHCO3 with Cary Eclipse

Cells, cultured on 12 mm coverslips as described above, were incubated with 4 µM 2′,7′-Bis-(2-Carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-Carboxyfluorescein, Acetoxymethyl Ester (BCECF-AM, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) in the dark for 1 h at room temperature and in air without added CO2. The coverslip was then placed inside a perfusion cuvette, where all the solutions were maintained at 37 °C and the cells were perfused at the same rate. Using a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorometer, cells were excited alternatively at 440 and 500 nm, while the BCECF fluorescence emission was collected at 535 nm. The resting pHi was measured with Ringer with and without HCO3 at both pHe 6.7 and 7.4 (solution compositions reported in Supplemental Table S1).
Intracellular pH (pHi) was estimated from the ratio of BCECF fluorescence calibrated by using the K+ nigericin method according to the Boron protocol [54]. The cells were incubated with 4 µM BCECF-AM and 5 µM nigericin in a KCl-rich Ringer for 1 h at room temperature. After the incubation, the cells were perfused with KCl Ringer at different pH values (6.7, 7.0, 7.4, and 8.0).

4.4. Spectrofluorimetric Measurements of NHE1 Activity

The measure of the NHE1 activity was performed using Ringer with and without NaHCO3 at pHe 7.4, according to the Boron protocol [53]. Cells were cultured and loaded with BCECF as described above. Next, 40 mM NH4Cl was added to the Ringer and dissociated to NH3, which readily crosses the cell membrane and, due to binding to H+, leads to a rapid intracellular alkalization. After 7 min, the cells were then perfused with Na+-free Ringer, which causes acidification via the reverse NH3 extrusion process. The pHi recovery was measured replacing the latter Ringer with Na+ Ringer, which reactivates the NHE1. In absence of NaHCO3, Na+ was substituted with an equimolar amount of Tetramethylammonium Chloride (TMA). In contrast, in Ringer with NaHCO3, NaCl was replaced with choline-HCO3 (Sigma-Aldrich, Waltham, MA, USA). To estimate the contribution of NHE1 to measured pHi recovery, the specific inhibitor of NHE1, Cariporide, was added to Na+ Ringer at 5 µM. The pHi recovery rate is expressed in ∆pHi/min and corresponds to the slope of the theoretical line, obtained by the analysis of the least squares, of 15 pH values taken in sequence every 4 s.

4.5. Extracellular pH Measurements

Extracellular pH (pHe) measurements were performed 24 h after medium exchange directly in the medium of cultured cells grown to confluence in 96-well plates using single-barreled H+-sensitive microelectrodes. ∆pHe was obtained by comparing the pH of medium with and without cells. The measurements were performed in bicarbonate-containing medium. pH microelectrodes were fabricated as described previously for double-barreled microelectrodes [70] but adopting the following modifications. Briefly, single-barreled microelectrodes were constructed from filament-containing aluminum silicate glass tubing of 1.5-mm outer diameter and 1.0 mm inner diameter (Hilgenberg, Malsfeld, Germany). Microelectrodes were pulled in a PE2 vertical puller (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan), silanized in dimethyl-dichloro-silane vapor (Sigma Aldrich) and baked in the oven. Then, the tip of the microelectrode was back-filled with a small amount of the proton ionophore cocktail (Hydrogen Ionophore II, Cocktail A; Sigma) and its shaft was later filled with a buffer solution of pH 7.0. The reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl wire connected to ground. Microelectrodes were calibrated before and after each measurement in NaCl solutions containing a mixture of KH2PO4 and Na2PO4 to yield pH values between 6.8 and 7.8 and the measurement was discarded when the measured slope was not within 10% of the calculated slope. The average slope of the electrodes was 58.5 ± 0.3 mV/pH unit (mean ± SEM, n = 19). The pH changes were monitored by lowering perpendicularly the ion-sensitive microelectrode, mounted on a Leitz micromanipulator, in close proximity to the monolayer under oblique (45°) observation through a stereomicroscope (Wild- Heerbrugg, Gais, Switzerland). All measurements were performed with a model FD 223 dual-channel electrometer (World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT) and recorded on a strip chart recorder (Kipp & Zonen, Delft, Holland).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA with Newman–Keuls as post hoc test with GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, version 5), considering significant values to be p ≤ 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241310632/s1.

Author Contributions

S.J.R., S.C., M.R.G., R.A.C. and J.F.D. organized the project and designed the experiments; S.J.R. and R.A.C. wrote the manuscript; M.R.G., S.C., D.T.V. and D.D.M. conducted the pHi experiments while R.C. and F.P. performed the pHe experiments; S.C., C.A., D.D.M., D.T.V., T.M.A.C., I.S. and M.R.G. performed the image analyses and statistical evaluation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the European Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network (ITN) pH and Ion Transport in Pancreatic Cancer–pHioniC (Grant Agreement number: 813834; H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018), by PRIN n. 20174TB8KW002 “Lioness” from Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR) and by the Programma Operativo Complementare Ricerca e Innovazione, Asse I “Investimenti in Capitale Umano”—Azione I.1 “Dottorati innovativi con caratterizzazione industriale” del PON R&I 2014–2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

TME = Tumor Microenvironment; ECM = Extracellular Matrix; CSCs = Cancer Stem Cells; CPCs = Cancer Parenchymal cells; (NHE1) = Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1; 90M-10C = 90% Matrigel-10% Collagen I; 70M-30C = 70% Matrigel-30% Collagen I; 10M-90C = 10% Matrigel-90% Collagen I; CAR = cariporide.

References

  1. Stark, A.; Eibl, G. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Pancreapedia: The Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base. 2015. Available online: https://pancreapedia.org/?q=node/9002 (accessed on 23 May 2015).
  2. Hezel, A.F.; Kimmelman, A.C.; Stanger, B.Z.; Bardeesy, N.; DePinho, R.A. Genetics and Biology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Genes. Dev. 2006, 20, 1218–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lee, M.G.; Ohana, E.; Park, H.W.; Yang, D.; Muallem, S. Molecular Mechanism of Pancre-Atic and Salivary Gland Fluid and HCO 3 Secretion. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92, 39–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dahl-Jensen, S.B.; Yennek, S.; Flasse, L.; Larsen, H.L.; Sever, D.; Karremore, G.; Novak, I.; Sneppen, K.; Grapin-Botton, A. Deconstructing the Principles of Ductal Network Formation in the Pancreas. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2002842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hegyi, P.; Maléth, J.; Venglovecz, V.; Rakonczay, Z. Pancreatic Ductal Bicarbonate Secretion: Challenge of the Acinar Acid Load. Front. Physiol. 2011, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Novak, I.; Haanes, K.A.; Wang, J. Acid-Base Transport in Pancreas-New Challenges. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pedersen, S.F.; Novak, I.; Alves, F.; Schwab, A.; Pardo, L.A. Alternating PH Landscapes Shape Epithelial Cancer Initiation and Progression: Focus on Pancreatic Cancer. BioEssays 2017, 39, 1600253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schnipper, J.; Dhennin-Duthille, I.; Ahidouch, A.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Ion Channel Signature in Healthy Pancreas and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 568993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Novak, I.; Wang, J.; Henriksen, K.L.; Haanes, K.A.; Krabbe, S.; Nitschke, R.; Hede, S.E. Pancreatic Bicarbonate Secretion Involves Two Proton Pumps. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jun, I.; Lee, M.G.; Muallem, S. Molecular Mechanisms of Pancreatic Bicarbonate Secretion. Pancreapedia: The Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base. 2017. Available online: https://www.pancreapedia.org/node/9789 (accessed on 6 June 2023).
  11. Steward, M.C.; Ishiguro, H.; Case, R.M. Mechanisms of Bicarbonate Secretion in the Pancreatic Duct. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2005, 67, 377–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Damaghi, M.; Wojtkowiak, J.W.; Gillies, R.J. PH Sensing and Regulation in Cancer. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Pérez-Herrero, E.; Fernández-Medarde, A. The Reversed Intra- and Extracellular PH in Tumors as a Unified Strategy to Chemotherapeutic Delivery Using Targeted Nanocarriers. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 2243–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boedtkjer, E.; Pedersen, S.F. The Acidic Tumor Microenvironment as a Driver of Cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2020, 82, 103–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Reshkin, S.J.; Greco, M.R.; Cardone, R.A. Role of PHi, and Proton Transporters in Oncogene-Driven Neoplastic Transformation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Swietach, P. What Is PH Regulation, and Why Do Cancer Cells Need It? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019, 38, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kong, S.C.; Giannuzzo, A.; Novak, I.; Pedersen, S.F. Acid-Base Transport in Pancreatic Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Potential. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 92, 449–459, Erratum in Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 93, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cardone, R.A.; Alfarouk, K.O.; Elliott, R.L.; Alqahtani, S.S.; Ahmed, S.B.M.; Aljarbou, A.N.; Greco, M.R.; Cannone, S.; Reshkin, S.J. The Role of Sodium Hydrogen Exchanger 1 in Dysregulation of Proton Dynamics and Reprogramming of Cancer Metabolism as a Sequela. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gorbatenko, A.; Olesen, C.W.; Boedtkjer, E.; Pedersen, S.F. Regulation and Roles of Bicarbonate Transporters in Cancer. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Andreucci, E.; Peppicelli, S.; Ruzzolini, J.; Bianchini, F.; Biagioni, A.; Papucci, L.; Magnelli, L.; Mazzanti, B.; Stecca, B.; Calorini, L. The Acidic Tumor Microenvironment Drives a Stem-like Phenotype in Melanoma Cells. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 98, 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carvalho, T.M.A.; Di Molfetta, D.; Greco, M.R.; Koltai, T.; Alfarouk, K.O.; Reshkin, S.J.; Cardone, R.A. Tumor Microenvironment Features and Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Targeting Physicochemical Barriers and Metabolism as Therapeutic Approaches. Cancers 2021, 13, 6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pillai, S.R.; Damaghi, M.; Marunaka, Y.; Spugnini, E.P.; Fais, S.; Gillies, R.J. Causes, Consequences, and Therapy of Tumors Acidosis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019, 38, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stock, C.; Pedersen, S.F. Roles of PH and the Na+/H+ Exchanger NHE1 in Cancer: From Cell Biology and Animal Models to an Emerging Translational Perspective? Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 43, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, B.; Cui, M.; Yang, G.; Wang, H.; Feng, M.; You, L.; Zhao, Y. Tumor Microenvironment Participates in Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sahin, I.H.; Elias, H.; Chou, J.F.; Capanu, M.; O’Reilly, E.M. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Patterns of Recurrence and Disease Behavior. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cappellesso, F.; Orban, M.P.; Shirgaonkar, N.; Berardi, E.; Serneels, J.; Neveu, M.A.; Di Molfetta, D.; Piccapane, F.; Caroppo, R.; Debellis, L.; et al. Targeting the Bicarbonate Transporter SLC4A4 Overcomes Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer. Nat. Cancer 2022, 3, 1464–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, L.; Neaves, W.B. Normal Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cells: The Niche Matters Is Cancer a Disease of Stem Cells? Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 4553–4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hermann, P.C.; Huber, S.L.; Herrler, T.; Aicher, A.; Ellwart, J.W.; Guba, M.; Bruns, C.J.; Heeschen, C. Distinct Populations of Cancer Stem Cells Determine Tumor Growth and Metastatic Activity in Human Pancreatic Cancer. Cell. Stem Cell. 2007, 1, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Peppicelli, S.; Andreucci, E.; Ruzzolini, J.; Laurenzana, A.; Margheri, F.; Fibbi, G.; del Rosso, M.; Bianchini, F.; Calorini, L. The Acidic Microenvironment as a Possible Niche of Dormant Tumor Cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 2761–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hjelmeland, A.B.; Wu, Q.; Heddleston, J.M.; Choudhary, G.S.; MacSwords, J.; Lathia, J.D.; McLendon, R.; Lindner, D.; Sloan, A.; Rich, J.N. Acidic Stress Promotes a Glioma Stem Cell Phenotype. Cell. Death Differ. 2011, 18, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Stoica, A.F.; Chang, C.H.; Pauklin, S. Molecular Therapeutics of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Targeted Pathways and the Role of Cancer Stem Cells. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 41, 977–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ayob, A.Z.; Ramasamy, T.S. Cancer Stem Cells as Key Drivers of Tumour Progression. J. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 25, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. DiNatale, A.; Kaur, R.; Qian, C.; Zhang, J.; Marchioli, M.; Ipe, D.; Castelli, M.; McNair, C.M.; Kumar, G.; Meucci, O.; et al. Subsets of Cancer Cells Expressing CX3CR1 Are Endowed with Metastasis-Initiating Properties and Resistance to Chemotherapy. Oncogene 2022, 41, 1337–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, H.M.; Zhang, J.G.; Zhang, X.; Li, Q. Targeting Cancer Stem Cells for Reversing Therapy Resistance: Mechanism, Signaling, and Prospective Agents. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cannon, A.; Thompson, C.; Hall, B.R.; Jain, M.; Kumar, S.; Batra, S.K. Desmoplasia in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Insight into Pathological Function and Therapeutic Potential. Genes Cancer 2018, 9, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Whatcott, C.J.; Diep, C.H.; Jiang, P.; Watanabe, A.; Lobello, J.; Sima, C.; Hostetter, G.; Shepard, H.M.; von Hoff, D.D.; Han, H. Biology of Human Tumors Desmoplasia in Primary Tumors and Metastatic Lesions of Pancreatic Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 3561–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shields, M.A.; Dangi-Garimella, S.; Redig, A.J.; Munshi, H.G. Biochemical Role of the Collagen-Rich Tumour Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer Progression. Biochem. J. 2012, 441, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Longo, V.; Brunetti, O.; Gnoni, A.; Cascinu, S.; Gasparini, G.; Lorusso, V.; Ribatti, D.; Silvestris, N. Angiogenesis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Controversial Issue. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 58649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kamphorst, J.J.; Nofal, M.; Commisso, C.; Hackett, S.R.; Lu, W.; Grabocka, E.; vander Heiden, M.G.; Miller, G.; Drebin, J.A.; Bar-Sagi, D.; et al. Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology Human Pancreatic Cancer Tumors Are Nutrient Poor and Tumor Cells Actively Scavenge Extracellular Protein. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zeeberg, K.; Cardone, R.A.; Greco, M.R.; Saccomano, M.; Nøhr-Nielsen, A.; Alves, F.; Pedersen, S.F.; Reshkin, S.J. Assessment of Different 3D Culture Systems to Study Tumor Phenotype and Chemosensitivity in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 49, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Raho, S.; Capobianco, L.; Malivindi, R.; Vozza, A.; Piazzolla, C.; De Leonardis, F.; Gorgoglione, R.; Scarcia, P.; Pezzuto, F.; Agrimi, G.; et al. KRAS-Regulated Glutamine Metabolism Requires UCP2-Mediated Aspartate Transport to Support Pancreatic Cancer Growth. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 1373–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Puls, T.J.; Tan, X.; Whittington, C.F.; Voytik-Harbin, S.L. 3D Collagen Fibrillar Microstructure Guides Pancreatic Cancer Cell Phenotype and Serves as a Critical Design Parameter for Phenotypic Models of EMT. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cannone, S.; Greco, M.R.; Carvalho, T.M.A.; Guizouarn, H.; Soriani, O.; di Molfetta, D.; Tomasini, R.; Zeeberg, K.; Reshkin, S.J.; Cardone, R.A. Cancer Associated Fibroblast (CAF) Regulation of PDAC Parenchymal (CPC) and CSC Phenotypes Is Modulated by ECM Composition. Cancers 2022, 14, 3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Forciniti, S.; Pozza, E.D.; Greco, M.R.; Carvalho, T.M.A.; Rolando, B.; Ambrosini, G.; Carmona-Carmona, C.A.; Pacchiana, R.; Di Molfetta, D.; Donadelli, M.; et al. Extracellular Matrix Composition Modulates the Responsiveness of Differentiated and Stem Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Lipophilic Derivate of Gemcitabine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Biondani, G.; Zeeberg, K.; Greco, M.R.; Cannone, S.; Dando, I.; Dalla Pozza, E.; Mastrodonato, M.; Forciniti, S.; Casavola, V.; Palmieri, M.; et al. Extracellular Matrix Composition Modulates PDAC Parenchymal and Stem Cell Plasticity and Behavior through the Secretome. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 2104–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Weniger, M.; Honselmann, K.C.; Liss, A.S. The Extracellular Matrix and Pancreatic Cancer: A Complex Relationship. Cancers 2018, 10, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Venkatasubramanian, P.N. Imaging the Pancreatic ECM. Pancreatic Cancer and Tumor Microenvironment, Transworld Research Network. 2012; Chapter 2. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schober, M.; Jesenofsky, R.; Faissner, R.; Weidenauer, C.; Hagmann, W.; Michl, P.; Heuchel, R.L.; Haas, S.L.; Löhr, J.M. Desmoplasia and Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers 2014, 6, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ferrara, B.; Pignatelli, C.; Cossutta, M.; Citro, A.; Courty, J.; Piemonti, L. The Extracellular Matrix in Pancreatic Cancer: Description of a Complex Network and Promising Therapeutic Options. Cancers 2021, 13, 4442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. White, K.A.; Grillo-Hill, B.K.; Barber, D.L. Cancer Cell Behaviors Mediated by Dysregulated PH Dynamics at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kobliakov, V.A. The Role of Extra- and Intracellular PH Values in Regulation of the Tumor Process. Cell Tissue Biol. 2022, 16, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hart, P.A.; Conwell, D.L. Secretion of the Human Exocrine Pancreas in Health and Disease. Pancreapedia: The Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base. 2021. Available online: https://pancreapedia.org/reviews/secretion-of-human-exocrine-pancreas-in-health-and-disease (accessed on 6 June 2023).
  53. Boron, W.F.; De Weer, P. Intracellular PH Transients in Squid Giant Axons Caused by CO2, NH3, and Metabolic Inhibitors. J. Gen. Physiol. 1976, 67, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Malinda, R.R.; Zeeberg, K.; Sharku, P.C.; Ludwig, M.Q.; Pedersen, L.B.; Christensen, S.T.; Pedersen, S.F. TGFβ Signaling Increases Net Acid Extrusion, Proliferation and Invasion in Panc-1 Pancreatic Cancer Cells: SMAD4 Dependence and Link to Merlin/NF2 Signaling. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cardone, R.A.; Greco, M.R.; Zeeberg, K.; Zaccagnino, A.; Saccomano, M.; Bellizzi, A.; Bruns, P.; Menga, M.; Pilarsky, C.; Schwab, A.; et al. A Novel NHE1-Centered Signaling Cassette Drives Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Dependent Pancreatic Tumor Metastasis and Is a Target for Combination Therapy. Neoplasia 2015, 17, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Pallagi, P.; Hegyi, P.; Rakonczay, Z. The Physiology and Pathophysiology of Pancreatic Ductal Secretion the Background for Clinicians. Pancreas 2015, 44, 1211–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Czaplinska, D.; Ialchina, R.; Andersen, H.B.; Yao, J.; Stigliani, A.; Dannesboe, J.; Flinck, M.; Chen, X.; Mitrega, J.; Gnosa, S.P.; et al. Crosstalk between Tumor Acidosis, P53 and Extracellular Matrix Regulates Pancreatic Cancer Aggressiveness. Int. J. Cancer 2023, 152, 1210–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Webb, B.A.; Chimenti, M.; Jacobson, M.P.; Barber, D.L. Dysregulated PH: A Perfect Storm for Cancer Progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Audero, M.M.; Prevarskaya, N.; Pla, A.F. Ca2+ Signaling and Hypoxia/Acidic Tumour Microenvironment Interplay in Tumour Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Deer, E.L.; González-Hernández, J.; Coursen, J.D.; Shea, J.E.; Ngatia, J.; Scaife, C.L.; Firpo, M.A.; Mulvihill, S.J. Phenotype and Genotype of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Pancreas 2010, 39, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Damaghi, M.; Mori, H.; Byrne, S.; Xu, L.; Chen, T.; Johnson, J.; Gallant, N.D.; Marusyk, A.; Borowsky, A.D.; Gillies, R.J. Collagen Production and Niche Engineering: A Novel Strategy for Cancer Cells to Survive Acidosis in DCIS and Evolve. Evol. Appl. 2020, 13, 2689–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Boussouf, A.; Gaillard, S. Intracellular PH Changes During Oligodendrocyte Differentiation in Primary Culture. J. Neurosci. Res. 2000, 59, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gao, W.; Zhang, H.; Chang, G.; Xie, Z.; Wang, H.; Ma, L.; Han, Z.; Li, Q.; Pang, T. Decreased Intracellular PH Induced by Cariporide Differentially Contributes to Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentiation. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 33, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ulmschneider, B.; Grillo-Hill, B.K.; Benitez, M.; Azimova, D.R.; Barber, D.L.; Nystul, T.G. Increased Intracellular PH Is Necessary for Adult Epithelial and Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 215, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Parker, A.L.; Bowman, E.; Zingone, A.; Ryan, B.M.; Cooper, W.A.; Kohonen-Corish, M.; Harris, C.C.; Cox, T.R. Extracellular Matrix Profiles Determine Risk and Prognosis of the Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subtype of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Genome Med. 2022, 14, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hsu, S.K.; Jadhao, M.; Liao, W.T.; Chang, W.T.; Hung, C.T.; Chiu, C.C. Culprits of PDAC Resistance to Gemcitabine and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: Tumour Microenvironment Components. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 1020888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hou, P.; Kapoor, A.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Wu, C.J.; Li, J.; Lan, Z.; Tang, M.; Ma, X.; Ackroyd, J.J.; et al. Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling Enables Bypass of Oncogenic KRAS Dependency in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 1058–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Puttock, E.H.; Tyler, E.J.; Manni, M.; Maniati, E.; Butterworth, C.; Burger Ramos, M.; Peerani, E.; Hirani, P.; Gauthier, V.; Liu, Y.; et al. Extracellular Matrix Educates an Immunoregulatory Tumor Macrophage Phenotype Found in Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pozza, E.D.; Dando, I.; Biondani, G.; Brandi, J.; Costanzo, C.; Zoratti, E.; Fassan, M.; Boschi, F.; Melisi, D.; Cecconi, D.; et al. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines Display a Plastic Ability to Bi-directionally Convert into Cancer Stem Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Debellis, L.; Caroppo, R.; Frömter, E.; Curci, S. Alkaline Secretion by Frog Gastric Glands Measured with PH Microelectrodes in the Gland Lumen. J. Physiol. 1998, 513, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 10632 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of the ECM composition (from a less fibrotic to a more fibrotic ECM) and different pHe (pHe 7.4 and pHe 6.7) in the presence (NaHCO3 (+)) or absence of NaHCO3 (NaHCO3 (−)) on resting pHi. The cells were alternatively perfused with Ringer with and without NaHCO3 (see Supplementary Table S1) at both pHes to determine the effect of the changing pHe and the presence or absence of NaHCO3 on resting pHi. (a) The normal HPDE cells (A) were grown on a matrix resembling the normal pancreatic ECM (90M-10C) and a low fibrotic ECM (70M-30C), while the tumor cells (B) CPCs and (C) CSCs, concordant with the increasing level of desmoplasia in fully established PDAC, were also grown on a highly fibrotic ECM (10M-90C). Significance between groups: # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001 compared to 90M in the same NaHCO3/pHe conditions; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 comparing NaHCO3 (+) versus NaHCO3 (−) on the same ECM/pHe; ++ p < 0.01; +++ p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Effect of the ECM composition (from a less fibrotic to a more fibrotic ECM) and different pHe (pHe 7.4 and pHe 6.7) in the presence (NaHCO3 (+)) or absence of NaHCO3 (NaHCO3 (−)) on resting pHi. The cells were alternatively perfused with Ringer with and without NaHCO3 (see Supplementary Table S1) at both pHes to determine the effect of the changing pHe and the presence or absence of NaHCO3 on resting pHi. (a) The normal HPDE cells (A) were grown on a matrix resembling the normal pancreatic ECM (90M-10C) and a low fibrotic ECM (70M-30C), while the tumor cells (B) CPCs and (C) CSCs, concordant with the increasing level of desmoplasia in fully established PDAC, were also grown on a highly fibrotic ECM (10M-90C). Significance between groups: # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001 compared to 90M in the same NaHCO3/pHe conditions; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 comparing NaHCO3 (+) versus NaHCO3 (−) on the same ECM/pHe; ++ p < 0.01; +++ p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 10632 g001
Ijms 24 10632 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of the ECM composition (from a less fibrotic to a more fibrotic ECM) on the ability of the three cell lines to acidify their extracellular NaHCO3-containing medium measured with single-barreled H+-sensitive microelectrodes. Acidification is expressed as ∆pH in the medium of confluent cells over 24 h. The acidification rate of the HPDE cells was significantly less than either the CPCs or the CSCs on all ECMs. Significance between groups: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Effect of the ECM composition (from a less fibrotic to a more fibrotic ECM) on the ability of the three cell lines to acidify their extracellular NaHCO3-containing medium measured with single-barreled H+-sensitive microelectrodes. Acidification is expressed as ∆pH in the medium of confluent cells over 24 h. The acidification rate of the HPDE cells was significantly less than either the CPCs or the CSCs on all ECMs. Significance between groups: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 24 10632 g002
Ijms 24 10632 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Representative traces of the pHi recovery rate from an NH4Cl prepulse-induced acidification in HPDE 3D organotypic cultures labelled with the pH-sensitive probe BCECF. The experiment was performed according to the Boron protocol (please see Materials and Methods) with or without NaHCO3 ((NaHCO3 (+) or NaHCO3 (−), respectively), and in the absence (CAR (−)) and presence (CAR (+)) of Cariporide (5 µM) during the pH recovery to evaluate the contribution of NHE1. In both the normal HPDE cells (B) and in the cancer cells, CPCs (C) and CSCs (D), the pHi recovery is always dependent on NHE1 activity in the absence of NaHCO3. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Significance between groups: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to their own pHi measured without Cariporide on the same ECM; # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001 compared to 90M-10C for each cell line; + p < 0.05; ++ p < 0.01; +++ p < 0.001.
Figure 3. (A) Representative traces of the pHi recovery rate from an NH4Cl prepulse-induced acidification in HPDE 3D organotypic cultures labelled with the pH-sensitive probe BCECF. The experiment was performed according to the Boron protocol (please see Materials and Methods) with or without NaHCO3 ((NaHCO3 (+) or NaHCO3 (−), respectively), and in the absence (CAR (−)) and presence (CAR (+)) of Cariporide (5 µM) during the pH recovery to evaluate the contribution of NHE1. In both the normal HPDE cells (B) and in the cancer cells, CPCs (C) and CSCs (D), the pHi recovery is always dependent on NHE1 activity in the absence of NaHCO3. Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Significance between groups: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to their own pHi measured without Cariporide on the same ECM; # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001 compared to 90M-10C for each cell line; + p < 0.05; ++ p < 0.01; +++ p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 10632 g003
Ijms 24 10632 g004 550
Figure 4. NHE1 activity calculated as the pHi recovery in control condition subtracted from pHi recovery in the presence of Cariporide for HPDE, CPC and CSC cell lines. Significance between groups: # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01 compared to 90M-10C for each cell line; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001; +++ p < 0.001 and ++++ p < 0.0001.
Figure 4. NHE1 activity calculated as the pHi recovery in control condition subtracted from pHi recovery in the presence of Cariporide for HPDE, CPC and CSC cell lines. Significance between groups: # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01 compared to 90M-10C for each cell line; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001; +++ p < 0.001 and ++++ p < 0.0001.
Ijms 24 10632 g004
Table
Table 1. Inhibition of pHi recovery by Cariporide expressed as percentage of control cells in both the presence and the absence of NaHCO3.
Table 1. Inhibition of pHi recovery by Cariporide expressed as percentage of control cells in both the presence and the absence of NaHCO3.
HPDECPCsCSCs
ECMs90M-10C70M-30C90M-10C70M-30C10M-90C90M-10C70M-30C10M-90C
% inhibition NaHCO3 (+)74 ± 3.10
n = 6		35 ± 12.96
n = 4		89 ± 4.08
n = 3		57 ± 6.87
n = 6		21 ± 5.64
n = 5		71 ± 2.55
n = 3		38 ± 12.29
n = 4		43 ± 5.42
n = 6
% inhibitionNaHCO3 (−)81 ± 3.22
n = 10		82 ± 2.16
n = 15		69 ± 4.61
n = 17		76 ± 1.89
n = 8		66 ± 2.61
n = 16		73 ± 3.36
n = 10		56 ± 5.21
n = 17		68 ± 3.69
n = 18
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Molfetta, D.; Cannone, S.; Greco, M.R.; Caroppo, R.; Piccapane, F.; Carvalho, T.M.A.; Altamura, C.; Saltarella, I.; Tavares Valente, D.; Desaphy, J.F.; et al. ECM Composition Differentially Regulates Intracellular and Extracellular pH in Normal and Cancer Pancreatic Duct Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310632

AMA Style

Di Molfetta D, Cannone S, Greco MR, Caroppo R, Piccapane F, Carvalho TMA, Altamura C, Saltarella I, Tavares Valente D, Desaphy JF, et al. ECM Composition Differentially Regulates Intracellular and Extracellular pH in Normal and Cancer Pancreatic Duct Epithelial Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310632

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Molfetta, Daria, Stefania Cannone, Maria Raffaella Greco, Rosa Caroppo, Francesca Piccapane, Tiago Miguel Amaral Carvalho, Concetta Altamura, Ilaria Saltarella, Diana Tavares Valente, Jean Francois Desaphy, and et al. 2023. "ECM Composition Differentially Regulates Intracellular and Extracellular pH in Normal and Cancer Pancreatic Duct Epithelial Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310632

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop