Next Article in Journal
Differential Oxygen Exposure Modulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Metabolism and Proliferation through mTOR Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanistic Insights of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Mediated Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants for Sustainable Agriculture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms23073748
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Innate Lymphoid Cells: Emerging Players in Pancreatic Disease

by
Saimeng Shi
1,2,3,4,†,
Longyun Ye
1,2,3,4,†,
Kaizhou Jin
1,2,3,4,
Zhiwen Xiao
1,2,3,4,
Xianjun Yu
1,2,3,4,* and
Weiding Wu
1,2,3,4,*
1
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
2
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
3
Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China
4
Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3748; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073748
Submission received: 6 February 2022 / Revised: 19 March 2022 / Accepted: 27 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic The Role of Innate Lymphocytes in Infection and Host Immunity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Common pancreatic diseases have caused significant economic and social burdens worldwide. The interstitial microenvironment is involved in and plays a crucial part in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic diseases. Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), an innate population of immune cells which have only gradually entered our visual field in the last 10 years, play an important role in maintaining tissue homeostasis, regulating metabolism, and participating in regeneration and repair. Recent evidence indicates that ILCs in the pancreas, as well as in other tissues, are also key players in pancreatic disease and health. Herein, we examined the possible functions of different ILC subsets in common pancreatic diseases, including diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, and discussed the potential practical implications of the relevant findings for future further treatment of these pancreatic diseases.

1. Introduction

The pancreas is a glandular organ comprised of endocrine and exocrine parts, with a central role in energy homeostasis and metabolism. At a global level, diseases intrinsic to or associated with the pancreas have caused a major economic and social burden. Diabetes mellitus (DM, or diabetes) entered the top 10 global causes of death by 2019 [1], leading to over 4 million deaths a year [2]. Latest data from the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) show that there were 463 million people living with DM in 2019 and this figure is expected to be 700 million by 2045 [2,3]. Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide, and its characteristics of rapid progression, early metastasis and late diagnosis make it the recognized “king of cancer”, with a five-year survival rate of only 9% [4,5].
The interstitial microenvironment is involved in and plays a crucial part in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic diseases. Regardless of whether they are benign or malignant pancreatic diseases, the interstitial microenvironment, in addition to the diseased cells themselves, is involved and plays a crucial role [6,7,8,9,10]. Immune cells are a vital player in the interstitial microenvironment, and the role of common subsets of lymphocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) in pancreatic health and diseases has been studied.
Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are a heterogeneous population of lymphocytes, and their discovery has greatly expanded our understanding over the past 10 years [11,12]. ILCs are produced in the early stages of immune system formation and are mostly tissue-resident cells, exhibiting a tissue-specific subset distribution, phenotype, and functional regulation [13,14,15]. They are strategically located in the barrier tissues of the body, such as the skin, the mucosa of the digestive tract and respiratory tract [16,17,18,19]. When these sites are infected or damaged, ILCs sense them and react promptly to the environmental stress signals. They orchestrate acute inflammation to promote immunity to infection and facilitate the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair, as well as building bridges between the innate and adaptive immune systems, which processes are mainly mediated by their secreting various types of downstream signaling molecules. In addition to the typical immune processes, ILCs have also been demonstrated to be involved in processes not traditionally linked to the immune system, such as regulating metabolic homeostasis, epithelial differentiation and integrity [20,21,22,23].
In recent years, emerging evidence has identified the existence of ILCs in the pancreas, and all ILC subsets have been identified. ILCs resident in the pancreas, as well as in other tissues, may play an important role in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic diseases and will therefore be expected to be applied in the prevention and treatment of these diseases.

2. A Fundamental Overview of ILCs: Phenotype and Functions

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) represent a heterogeneous population of non-B/non-T lymphocytes and they are defined mainly by three unique features: (1) their lymphoid morphology; (2) their lack of genetically rearranged antigen receptors; and (3) their deficiency of cell-surface markers expressed in other immune cell types, such as myeloid cells and dendritic cells.
As a family of innate immune effector cells, ILCs have important roles in tissue homeostasis, metabolism, morphogenesis, repair and regeneration [20,21,22]. In addition to barrier tissues, such as the intestinal mucosa, lungs and skin, ILCs have also been found in adipose tissue (AT) and parenchymal organs. Such as the kidney and liver [24,25,26,27]. When these sites are infected or damaged, ILCs react promptly to environmental stress signals and produce an array of cytokines, promoting the resolution of inflammation and facilitating tissue repair [20]. In addition, ILCs have a direct complex impact on the adaptive immune response and build bridges between the innate and adaptive immune systems [23,28,29]. ILCs are also involved in processes not traditionally linked to the immune system, such as regulating metabolic homeostasis, epithelial differentiation and integrity [22]. However, uncontrolled activation and proliferation of ILCs can also lead to severe inflammation and damage [30,31].
Like all known lymphoid lineages, ILCs originate and develop from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) found within fetal liver and adult bone marrow (Figure 1) [32,33]. Based on their differential development trajectories and functions, the ILC family is categorized into five subsets: natural killer cells (NK cells, or “killer” ILCs), “helper” ILCs (ILC1s, ILC2s and ILC3s) and lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells (Figure 1) [11,12,34]. Many current views regard ILCs as the innate counterpart of helper T cells, due to their strong similarities in the production and output of signature cytokines, and in the expression and production of several key transcription factors (TFs) [35,36]. ILC1s mirror CD4+ T helper (Th)1 cells, ILC2s mirror Th2 cells, ILC3s mirror Th17 cells, while NK cells represent the innate counterpart of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells [12,37]. Despite these similarities, ILCs’ unique epigenetic and transcriptional programs, as well as their crucial impact on health and disease, imply their nonredundant roles [38,39].
NK cells were first discovered in mice and humans in 1975 [40]. They are derived from natural killer cell precursor (NKP) cells, dependent on and characterized by the expression of the TFs Tbx21 (T-bet) and eomesodermin (Eomes) [41,42]. NK cells circulate in the bloodstream and are the counterpart of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. They react to tumors and intracellular pathogens, producing interferon-γ (IFN-γ), granzymes and perforin, to kill tumor cells or normal cells infected by the virus [43,44]. ILC1s are the innate counterpart of Th1 cells and, resembling NK cells, are also involved in the immune response to tumor cells and intracellular pathogens, such as viruses and certain bacteria [45,46]. There are some common features between ILC1s and NK cells, such as requiring either T-bet, Eomes, or both, to achieve development and expressing IFN-γ as their principal cytokine output [47,48]. The difference is their discrepant developmental pathways and functional features. NK cells develop via NKPs, while ILC1s, like the other two “helper” ILCs, develop via ILCPs. In addition, ILC1s are tissue-resident cells and express only low levels of perforin, with less cytotoxicity [13,49]. ILC2s are defined by the expression of TFs GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) and retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor α (RORα), as well as the output of Th2 cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13 and the epidermal growth factor amphiregulin [50,51]. In addition to showing a response to parasitization [52], ILC2s are also involved in tissue repair and metabolic processes by type 2 immune responses [53,54,55]. ILC3s are the innate counterpart of Th17 cells. In mice, ILC3s rely on the TFs RORγt to develop and perform their functions and produce cytokines IL-17 and either IL-22, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, also known as Csf2), lymphotoxin, or a combination [12,56,57,58]. ILC3s are abundant in mucosal tissue, where they perform the innate immune response to extracellular pathogens and develop immune tolerance to intestinal symbionts. Thus, ILC dysfunction may lead to inflammatory diseases in mucosal-related tissues. LTi cells originate from CLPs via LTiPs and are strictly dependent on RORγt [59]. During the stage of embryonic development, LTi cells produce the cytokines of lymphotoxin, which play a key role in the formation of Peyer’s patches as well as secondary lymph nodes [60,61].
Recent evidence suggests the existence of ILCs in the pancreas, and all ILC subsets have been identified. As the role and functions of NK cells in the pancreas have been reviewed in detail elsewhere [62,63,64,65], there is only a brief discussion of their role in some parts. This paper mainly reviews the possible functions of “helper” ILC subsets in common pancreatic diseases, including DM, pancreatitis and PC, concentrating on the potential impact of ILCs on the occurrence and progression of these diseases and their contributions to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

3. ILCs in Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM, or diabetes) is recognized as one of the most significant and daunting public health challenges of the twenty-first century. The latest data from the IDF show that there were 463 million people living with DM in 2019 and this figure is expected to be 700 million by 2045 [2,3]. DM has devastating effects on individuals, societies and countries or territories and leads to over 4 million deaths a year.
Diabetes mellitus is a progressive and complex metabolic disorder, characterized by chronic hyperglycemia, caused by impaired insulin secretion and (or) utilization. It is currently generally classified into four categories, that is type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), specific types of diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus [66,67]. T1DM is usually caused by the autoimmune destruction of β cells, resulting in an absolute deficiency of insulin. T2DM, accounting for 90% of all DM, usually occurs in a context of insulin resistance, with a progressive loss of insulin secretion in β cells [66].
ILCs resident in AT have been proven to limit or promote the development of obesity and obesity-associated T2DM (Figure 2). In healthy lean individuals, AT is enriched with type 2 immune cells, such as ILC2s, eosinophils and alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs, anti-inflammatory or M2 macrophages), to maintain tissue homeostasis and support a metabolically healthy state. During the process of type 2 immunity in AT, ILC2 plays an integral role in communication and regulation, and are therefore indispensable regulators. On the one hand, ILC2s produce cytokines IL-5 and IL-13, promoting the recruitment and accumulation of eosinophils and AAMs to support AT remodeling and to restrict “type 1” inflammatory responses [68,69,70,71,72]. On the other hand, ILC2s promote the beiging of white adipose tissue (WAT), contributing to an increasing of both the quantity and the performance of beige adipocytes in AT [73,74,75]. Through the two known mechanisms above, ILC2s help with the maintenance of AT balance and protect from obesity-associated metabolic dysfunction, insulin resistance and T2DM. In the AT of obese patients, diet-induced obesity initiates the early production of IL-12, which results in selective proliferation and accumulation of ILC1s which requires the IL-12 receptor and STAT4 signaling [76]. ILC1-derived IFN-γ is necessary to accelerate classically activated macrophages (CAMs, proinflammatory macrophages or M1 macrophages) polarization and contributes to obesity-associated insulin resistance. In addition, adipose ILC1s have also been demonstrated to promote AT fibrogenesis by increasing M1 macrophages and activating the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway [77,78]. By recruiting and activating M1 macrophages and inducing AT fibrosis, adipose-resident ILC1s participate in and promote the progression of insulin resistance and obesity-associated diabetes. It is also worth mentioning that AT is an important source of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In the obese state, the AT expands and local chronic inflammation occurs, and ROS production level is also significantly elevated [79]. Poorly protected mitochondrial DNA is sensitive to the oxidative damage and injury of other harmful mutagens. The ROS-mediated oxidative stress can significantly impair the mitochondrial DNA, leading to mitochondrial DNA mutations and epigenetic alterations, thus inducing cancer initiation and progression [80]. As a crucial innate immune cell involved in chronic inflammation of AT under obesity, whether ILCs are involved in ROS production and the subsequent cancer induction may become another issue.
A variety of substances that constitute the diabetic milieu, such as glucose and saturated fatty acids, stimulate the islet to produce various proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines and recruit and activate type 1 immune cells [81,82,83,84]. Therefore, anti-inflammatory drugs for T2DM treatment are under development [85]. Using immunofluorescence analyses, Dalmas et al. confirmed the existence of ILC2s located inside or in the periphery of islets in the mouse pancreas [86]. Under conditions of islet inflammation in T2DM, proinflammatory factors induce mesenchymal cell-derived IL-33. Islet-resident ILC2s expressing the IL-33 receptor (IL-33R) are the major IL-33-responsive cells in islets. ILC2s increase the number of islet myeloid cells and elicit their capacity to promote retinoic acid (RA) production in a manner dependent on the secretion of IL-13 and GM-CSF [87,88]. Ultimately, increased RA in turn enhances insulin secretion in islet β cells. The process above may be associated in part with the phenotypic plasticity shown by ILC2s in response to inflammatory signaling [89,90].
Islet-resident ILC3s have been found to play a role in protecting against autoimmune diabetes in mouse models (Figure 2). This function is mainly achieved by ILC3-induced mouse β-defensin 14 (mBD14) expression, and the activation of the former depends on gut microbiota [91]. Defensin is a kind of antimicrobial peptide whose abnormal expression has been proven to be associated with diseases, including autoimmune diabetes [92,93]. In the gut, the microbiota is known to control IL-22 expression in ILC3s through different pathways. On the one hand, by expressing aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) ligands, some specific gut microbes can directly stimulate ILC3s to produce IL-22 [94,95,96,97]. On the other hand, other gut microbiota indirectly positively affects ILC3s via the induction of IL-23 secretion (a strong inducer of IL-22) by intestinal phagocytes [95]. These pathways also work in islets to stimulate islet-resident ILC3s to secrete IL-22 [91]. In pancreatic islet, ILC3s are the major source of IL-22. ILC3-derived IL-22 induces islet β cells to produce mBD14, preventing autoimmune diabetes through the ILC3-IL22-mBD14 axis. In addition, ILC3s have also been found to produce GM-CSF and thus may play a partial role in regulating insulin secretion and protecting against T2DM [86,87].

4. ILCs (Mainly NK Cells) in Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease of pancreatic tissue. Different etiologies, including pancreatic duct obstruction secondary to gallstones, alcohol abuse, as well as surgical trauma or pharmacological means, cause the dysfunction of cellular pathways and organelles, ultimately leading to acinar cell death and local and systemic inflammation [98]. Pancreatitis is one of the most common causes of hospitalization among all gastrointestinal diseases, with a high morbidity, mortality and socioeconomic burden [99,100].
Despite its complex underlying pathophysiology, the pathogenesis and progression of pancreatitis are recognized to have a great deal to do with immune cells [101]. As a recently discovered immune cell group, the role of ILCs in pancreatitis has not been well studied. Current studies are mainly aimed at NK cells, but the knowledge gained is still relatively limited. There are practical challenges in acquiring human pancreatic tissue during the episodes acute pancreatitis (AP), so researchers often use animal models or human peripheral blood to simulate or infer this process. Several clinical studies have shown that the frequency of peripheral NK cells is significantly reduced in the first few days in patients with AP [102,103,104,105]. This may be due to the migration of peripheral NK cells to the inflammatory sites [106]. Dabrowski’s study suggests that depletion of peripheral NK cells in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) represents the suppressive state of innate immunity, which may be responsible for the secondary infection of AP [103]. Some studies have shown that although the number of peripheral NK cells decreases at the initial stage of SAP, it will subsequently rise back and exceed normal levels, and the over-activation and high-response of NK cells are considered a pathophysiological mechanism for AP progression from local inflammation to systemic inflammatory response syndrome or secondary infection with pancreatic necrosis [105]. There is still no established conclusion whether NK cells play a promoting, inhibitory or irrelevant role in the progression of AP. The lack of human tissue specimens of AP is one of the greatest difficulties. Besides, dynamic monitoring of the number and activity of NK cells, as well as its cytokines, such as TNF-and IL-6, is also necessary. In patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), a decrease in NK cell number and activity in the peripheral blood has also been observed, especially in those with abdominal pain [102,107]. However, considering that NK cells are not resident in a single lymphoid or nonlymphoid tissue, studies in which the immune function of NK cells in patients with pancreatitis is evaluated through the peripheral blood compartment may still be open to questioning. It is also regrettable that there are no conclusive findings about the certain role of NK cells in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis. For CP, it is also worth focusing our attention to the DM that it causes, which is also called pancreatogenic diabetes. A variety of different pancreatic exocrine diseases may lead to different mechanisms of hyperglycemia, and CP is the most common cause of pancreatogenic diabetes. The prevalence of diabetes secondary to CP is ranges from approximately 25% to 80% [108], and understanding the intrinsic link between CP and the onset of DM is necessary to establish accurate diagnostic criteria and develop effective treatments.
Abnormal expression of CD4+ T cells is hypothesized to be responsible for the progression of AP and CP, and is also a critical and sufficient factor for an autoimmune pancreatitis pathogenesis. A Th1 cytokine profile is strongly associated with SAP, while a Th2 profile with mild AP or moderately SAP. Moreover, immune profiles of peripancreatic tissue reveals a Th2 cell-driven anti-inflammatory response [109,110]. Therefore, appropriately reducing the Th1 cell frequency and maintaining the balance of Th1/Th2 ratio may be one of the treatments to prevent the deterioration of AP. During the pathogenesis of AP, IL-17, mainly produced by Th17, is able to recruit neutrophils and macrophages to the inflammatory sites by regulating inflammatory molecules, ultimately leading to a cascade of amplification of inflammatory responses and pancreatic injury [111]. IL-17-induced neutrophils chemoattraction cause pancreatic duct obstruction and subsequent focal inflammation, which also determines the severity of CP [112]. The function of T lymphocytes at the inflammation site and in the peripheral blood has been extensively studied in the development of pancreatitis [113]. As the innate counterparts of helper T cells, whether ILC play a promoting or inhibitory role in the progression of this disease is worth exploration. Therefore, although the knowledge of ILC function in pancreatitis remains unexplored, it is still reasonable to believe studies in this area are meaningful.

5. ILCs in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most fatal malignant tumor whose incidence is only 14th among all cancers, while it remains the 7th most common cause of cancer death worldwide [4]. It has become the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with the lowest 5-year survival rate among all cancers of 9% [114]. Its characteristics of rapid progression, early metastasis and late diagnosis make PC the recognized “king of cancer”.
As crucial participants in innate immunity, ILCs undoubtedly play a role in the early stages of oncogenesis, in the formation of the tumor microenvironment, and in the whole process of tumor progression and metastasis. They sense malignant transformation and promote or inhibit tumor progression by producing an array of cytokines. To date, all known ILC subsets have been identified in PC but are found in different abundances. NK cells are the predominant ILC subset found in PC. They can prevent the growth of pancreatic tumors and induce remodeling of the tumor microenvironment, thus they have recently been targeted for tumor immunotherapy [64,115,116]. In contrast, due the relatively late discovery of them, the inadequate studies on them and the lack of specific markers to identify them, little is known about noncytotoxic “helper” ILCs in pancreatic tumors. In fact, they may play a double-edged sword role in this disease (Figure 3).
The presence of ILCs and ILC2s is detected in specimens from peripheral blood, pancreatic tissue and pancreatic tumor tissues of PC patients using flow cytometry, and higher ILC2 frequency is associated with longer survival [117]. ILC2s may exert an antitumor efficiency in human PC. In KPC mice and orthotopic PC mice established with KPC cell lines, mouse ILC2s with a similar phenotype to human PC ILC2s are also identified, and display a characteristic tissue residency. Studies on the orthotopic mouse models of PC show that ILC2s in the PC microenvironment can activate antitumor immunity and act as targets of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is a T-cell coinhibitory receptor whose overexpression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes correlates with a poor disease outcome and tumor recurrence in many human cancers [118,119,120,121]. Inhibition of the combination and interactions between PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 can potentiate antitumor activity by enhancing T cell functions, which has been developed for cancer immunotherapy. Recently, PD-1 has also been found to be expressed in ILC2s and plays a negative regulation role in controlling cell proliferation and cytokine expression [122,123]. Expanded by IL-33, ILC2s in PC potentially produce chemokine CCL5, which promote the recruitment and accumulation of CD103+ DCs in tumor tissues and further activate antitumor immunity in CD8+T cells [117,124]. Similar antitumor activity has also been described in lung ILC2s, as IL-33-activated ILC2s produce cytokines IL-5 and IL-13, recruiting eosinophils and DCs to the tumor site, respectively, which limits tumor growth and invasion [125,126]. However, PD-1 restrains the cell-intrinsic ILC2 functions described above. Further research suggests that antibody-mediated PD-1 blockade can release this PD-1 inhibition in tumor ILC2s, rather than in T cells, to activate antitumor immunity. That is, ILC2s act as tissue-specific enhancers to boost tumor immunity and amplify the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 in PC [117]. In addition, IL-33 treatment is indicated to upregulate PD-1 expression in a fraction of tumor ILC2s; thus, a combination treatment of recombinant IL-33 and anti-PD-1 may maximally activate and enrich ILC2s in PC and enhance tumor control.
X. Xuan et al. analyzed the data of ILC frequency in pancreas and peripheral blood of PC patients and normal controls by flow cytometry, and they also observed the significantly increased levels of ILC2s and ILC3s in cancer tissues [127]. This phenomenon is consistent with the findings of Moral et al. [117]. By connecting the clinicopathological features of PC patients, it can found that the higher ILC3 frequency in tumor tissue is closely associated with tumor cell proliferation, vascular invasion and distant metastasis in human PC. IL-22, one of the major cytokines by which ILC3s perform their biological and pathological functions, has been found to be associated with the pathogenesis of many cancers, such as lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer [128,129,130,131]. A significantly elevated secretion level of IL-22 is also found in PC tissues, and ILC3s are its important source. ILC3s in the PC microenvironment enhance the potential of PC cells for proliferation, invasion and migration, by the combination of IL-22 with its cognate receptor IL-22R and the subsequent activation of the AKT signaling pathway, as is demonstrated by the in vitro experiments by X. Xuan et al. [127].
Although some studies on the role of ILCs in PC have been undertaken, our understanding of this area is still vague. More data remain to be collected, and several important issues need to be addressed. First, PC mouse models constructed by injecting tumor cell lines or some chemical carcinogens have difficulty reproducing a physiological tumor microenvironment. Therefore, biopsy samples of human PC tissues are needed for detailed analysis of these ILC subsets. Furthermore, it is also necessary to develop better molecular tools or detection devices to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate individual subsets of ILC. In addition, we need to explore the latent power of these cells not merely from their direct impact on PC cells but also from their ability to communicate with different components within the tumor microenvironment [132], which may provide multiple insights into how to effectively manipulate and utilize ILCs for PC therapies.

6. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications

The identification of ILCs associated with human pancreatic diseases, such as DM, pancreatitis and PC, is still in its infancy. It is hard to say whether the regulation of ILCs and the induction or elimination of their cytokine products could be developed and utilized as part of future treatment. However, some experimental evidence available in mouse studies (Table 1) and human clinical trials (Table 2) may give us some guidance. In Table 1, we list the possible role of ILCs in pancreatic disease demonstrated by animal studies, and propose point-to-point conjectures based on these evidences to discuss the potential value of ILCs in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic disease. In Table 2, we present the evidence associated with human clinical trials to discuss the functional and applicable prospects of ILCs.
As mentioned before, adipose-resident ILC2s promote “type 2” inflammatory responses and beiging of WAT [69,70,71,73,74,75], which contributes to the maintenance of the AT balance and protects against obesity-associated diabetes. In contrast, ILC1s strengthen “type 1” inflammatory responses and fibrogenesis in AT, leading to insulin resistance and the development of DM [76,77,135]. Therefore, manipulating ILC subsets in AT, which includes promoting appropriate activation and expansion of ILC2s and inhibiting excessive proliferation of ILC1s may offer new therapeutic avenues for obesity-related diabetes.
Death receptor 3 (DR3) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, and has been found to be expressed on the surface of ILC2s. As a specific modulator of ILC2 effector functions, DR3 is able to induce both naïve or activated ILC2 to express type 2 cytokines, thereby protecting against the onset of T2DM [136]. Thus, DR3 agonists may be a novel therapeutic drug for the prevention and treatment of T2DM.
In addition, circulating ILC1 levels are positively associated with some DM clinical parameters, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum free fatty acids (FFAs), and so on. And higher ILC1 levels indicate a 13.481-fold greater risk of T2DM [135]. Therefore, circulating ILC1 levels may be used as a good indicator of T2DM. ILC2s resident in pancreatic islet can be activated by IL-33 and promote insulin secretion and prevent T2DM by eliciting the ability of myeloid cells to produce RA. In genetic or diet-induced obese mice, a period of IL-33 treatment controlled and improved glucose homeostasis, suggesting its potential role in T2DM therapy [86]. Moreover, whether the promotion of the ILC3-IL22-mBD14 functional axis in islets by the induction of IL-23 secretion or supplementation with an AHR agonist will help to prevent autoimmune diabetes in humans remains a topic worthy of further discussion [91]. Butyrate, a metabolite derived from gut microbiota, which can upregulate the IL-23 production in DCs and macrophages, has recently achieved good results in mice to protect against autoimmune diabetes [137,138,139,140,141]. Whether the therapeutic effect of butyrate treatment is partly realized by islet-resident ILC3s also deserves future research and discussion.
As an approach to β-cell replacement therapy, pancreatic islet transplantation has shown promise as a therapy for insulin-deficient diabetes and it contributes to the reconstruction of glucose homeostasis. However, islet graft rejection remains a main obstacle to successful transplantation. Due to its severe side effects, there are still limitations to the application of immunosuppressive therapies for the long-term tolerance of islet grafts [142]. In mouse models of islet transplantation, short-term IL-33 treatment has been found to inhibit allogeneic immune responses by the augmentation of Tregs and ILC2s in vivo to prolong islet allograft survival. ILC2s play a particularly important role in this process in an IL-10-dependent manner, and the cotransplantation of ILC210 cells (IL-10-producing ILC2s) with islets can lead to long-term survival after islet transplantation [134]. In the near future, the administration of ILC210 cells as an adjunctive therapy for the prevention of allograft rejection may bring novel therapeutics to islet transplantation. Local delivery of ILC210 cells could become a prospective tool to promote the long-term survival of islet grafts.
As a group of innate immune cells that have only recently entered the field of vision of researchers, concrete studies about the function of “helper” ILCs in pancreatitis have not been formally reported. However, as an early source of cytokines responding to various stimuli and the innate counterparts of helper T cells, whether they play a promoting or inhibitory role in the disease development process is worthy of our future exploration.
ILCs may act as a double-edged sword in the oncogenesis and lesion progression of PC. On the one hand, ILC3s are thought to promote the proliferation, invasion and migration of PC cells through the IL-22/IL-22R-AKT signaling pathways, indicating a latent, promising and brand-new intervention target for PC treatment [127]. Using a neutralizing anti-IL-22 antibody, an anti-IL-22R antibody or an AKT inhibitor to block this signaling pathway may be an effective therapy. On the other hand, ILC2s have emerged as antitumor immune cells for PC treatment and they partly enhance the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy [117]. Interrupting the PD-1 signaling pathway that activates tumor-infiltrating ILC2s can promote antitumor effects, and a combination of IL-33 treatment and anti-PD-1 therapy may maximally expand ILC2s and promote their function. In addition, since ILC2s and T cells coexist in human PC and share several immunomodulatory molecules, broader checkpoints can therefore be cotargeted on both ILC2s and T cells in PC. Studies that jointly target ILC2s and T cells in PC immunotherapy are thus warranted.

7. Conclusions

Since their discovery and nomenclature consolidation, ILCs have been widely studied. As an important effector cell of innate immunity, ILCs are key players in withstanding pathogen infection, maintaining metabolic homeostasis and participating in tissue remodeling and repair. Although ILCs primarily function in barrier tissues, recent evidence has also indicated that their roles in pancreatic health and disease are by no means negligible. ILCs resident in adipose and pancreatic islets have been proven to be associated with DM, and circulating ILC levels could be used as a good indicator of disease. Furthermore, ILCs may also be involved in the development of pancreatitis and PC. A number of preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential roles of ILCs in the pancreas. However, knowledge in this area is still extremely limited. To date, the developmental lineages and specific characteristics of ILCs in the pancreas have not been fully studied. Their specific localization in the pancreatic tissue, their potential interaction with surrounding immune and parenchymal cells, and their dynamic changes in cell numbers and functions remain unclear. Therefore, further work is necessary to clarify the above queries. Taken together, profound knowledge of ILCs in the pancreas and other related tissues and their complex interactions with other immune or nonimmune cells may provide new treatments for pancreatic diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S., L.Y. and K.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S., L.Y. and K.J.; writing—review and editing, Z.X.; supervision and project administration, W.W. and X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20374, 82173091, and 81701630), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (21JC1401500), Scientific Innovation Project of Shanghai Education Committee (2019-01-07-00-07-E00057), Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC2020CR1006A), Xuhui District Artificial Intelligence Medical Hospital Cooperation Project (2021-011), Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20214Y0396, 20194Y0375) and Shanghai Pujiang Program (21PJD014). The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. The Top 10 Causes of Death. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed on 26 March 2022).
  2. Federation, I.D. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/en/ (accessed on 26 March 2022).
  3. Zimmet, P.; Alberti, K.G.; Magliano, D.J.; Bennett, P.H. Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: Facts and fallacies. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mizrahi, J.D.; Surana, R.; Valle, J.W.; Shroff, R.T. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2020, 395, 2008–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Almaca, J.; Caicedo, A.; Landsman, L. Beta cell dysfunction in diabetes: The islet microenvironment as an unusual suspect. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 2076–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rhim, A.D.; Oberstein, P.E.; Thomas, D.H.; Mirek, E.T.; Palermo, C.F.; Sastra, S.A.; Dekleva, E.N.; Saunders, T.; Becerra, C.P.; Tattersall, I.W.; et al. Stromal elements act to restrain, rather than support, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 2014, 25, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Dvorak, H.F. Tumors: Wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986, 315, 1650–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Hosein, A.N.; Brekken, R.A.; Maitra, A. Pancreatic cancer stroma: An update on therapeutic targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 487–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haeberle, L.; Steiger, K.; Schlitter, A.M.; Safi, S.A.; Knoefel, W.T.; Erkan, M.; Esposito, I. Stromal heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2018, 18, 536–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Spits, H.; Artis, D.; Colonna, M.; Diefenbach, A.; Di Santo, J.P.; Eberl, G.; Koyasu, S.; Locksley, R.M.; McKenzie, A.N.; Mebius, R.E.; et al. Innate lymphoid cells—A proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vivier, E.; Artis, D.; Colonna, M.; Diefenbach, A.; Di Santo, J.P.; Eberl, G.; Koyasu, S.; Locksley, R.M.; McKenzie, A.N.; Mebius, R.E.; et al. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell 2018, 174, 1054–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gasteiger, G.; Fan, X.; Dikiy, S.; Lee, S.Y.; Rudensky, A.Y. Tissue residency of innate lymphoid cells in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. Science 2015, 350, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, C.H.; Hashimoto-Hill, S.; Kim, M. Migration and tissue tropism of innate lymphoid cells. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Meininger, I.; Carrasco, A.; Rao, A.; Soini, T.; Kokkinou, E.; Mjosberg, J. Tissue-specific features of innate lymphoid cells. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 902–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kobayashi, T.; Ricardo-Gonzalez, R.R.; Moro, K. Skin-resident innate lymphoid cells—Cutaneous innate guardians and regulators. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pearson, C.; Uhlig, H.H.; Powrie, F. Lymphoid microenvironments and innate lymphoid cells in the gut. Trends Immunol. 2012, 33, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Diefenbach, A.; Gnafakis, S.; Shomrat, O. Innate lymphoid cell-epithelial cell modules sustain intestinal homeostasis. Immunity 2020, 52, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barlow, J.L.; McKenzie, A.N.J. Innate lymphoid cells of the lung. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019, 81, 429–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eberl, G.; Colonna, M.; di Santo, J.P.; McKenzie, A.N. Innate lymphoid cells. Innate lymphoid cells: A new paradigm in immunology. Science 2015, 348, aaa6566. [Google Scholar]
  21. Klose, C.S.; Artis, D. Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Branzk, N.; Gronke, K.; Diefenbach, A. Innate lymphoid cells, mediators of tissue homeostasis, adaptation and disease tolerance. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 286, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sonnenberg, G.F.; Hepworth, M.R. Functional interactions between innate lymphoid cells and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 599–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bénézech, C.; Jackson-Jones, L.H. ILC2 orchestration of local immune function in adipose tissue. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Harris, D.C.H.; Cao, Q. Innate lymphoid cells in kidney diseases. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Forkel, M.; Berglin, L.; Kekäläinen, E.; Carlsson, A.; Svedin, E.; Michaëlsson, J.; Nagasawa, M.; Erjefält, J.S.; Mori, M.; Flodström-Tullberg, M.; et al. Composition and functionality of the intrahepatic innate lymphoid cell-compartment in human nonfibrotic and fibrotic livers. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017, 47, 1280–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cuff, A.O.; Sillito, F.; Dertschnig, S.; Hall, A.; Luong, T.V.; Chakraverty, R.; Male, V. The obese liver environment mediates conversion of NK cells to a less cytotoxic ILC1-like phenotype. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. von Burg, N.; Turchinovich, G.; Finke, D. Maintenance of immune homeostasis through ILC/T cell interactions. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Withers, D.R. Innate lymphoid cell regulation of adaptive immunity. Immunology 2016, 149, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ebbo, M.; Crinier, A.; Vely, F.; Vivier, E. Innate lymphoid cells: Major players in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bartemes, K.R.; Kita, H. Roles of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in allergic diseases: The 10-year anniversary for ILC2s. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 1531–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Galy, A.; Travis, M.; Cen, D.; Chen, B. Human T, B, natural killer, and dendritic cells arise from a common bone marrow progenitor cell subset. Immunity 1995, 3, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kondo, M.; Weissman, I.L.; Akashi, K. Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid progenitors in mouse bone marrow. Cell 1997, 91, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Guia, S.; Narni-Mancinelli, E. Helper-like innate lymphoid cells in humans and mice. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 436–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cherrier, D.E.; Serafini, N.; Di Santo, J.P. Innate lymphoid cell development: A T cell perspective. Immunity 2018, 48, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Colonna, M. Innate lymphoid cells: Diversity, plasticity, and unique functions in immunity. Immunity 2018, 48, 1104–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Spits, H.; Di Santo, J.P. The expanding family of innate lymphoid cells: Regulators and effectors of immunity and tissue remodeling. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Koues, O.I.; Collins, P.L.; Cella, M.; Robinette, M.L.; Porter, S.I.; Pyfrom, S.C.; Payton, J.E.; Colonna, M.; Oltz, E.M. Distinct gene regulatory pathways for human innate versus adaptive lymphoid cells. Cell 2016, 165, 1134–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Ercolano, G.; Wyss, T.; Salomé, B.; Romero, P.; Trabanelli, S.; Jandus, C. Distinct and shared gene expression for human innate versus adaptive helper lymphoid cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 108, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kiessling, R.; Klein, E.; Pross, H.; Wigzell, H. “Natural” killer cells in the mouse. II. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells. Characteristics of the killer cell. Eur. J. Immunol. 1975, 5, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Daussy, C.; Faure, F.; Mayol, K.; Viel, S.; Gasteiger, G.; Charrier, E.; Bienvenu, J.; Henry, T.; Debien, E.; Hasan, U.A.; et al. T-bet and Eomes instruct the development of two distinct natural killer cell lineages in the liver and in the bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gordon, S.M.; Chaix, J.; Rupp, L.J.; Wu, J.; Madera, S.; Sun, J.C.; Lindsten, T.; Reiner, S.L. The transcription factors T-bet and Eomes control key checkpoints of natural killer cell maturation. Immunity 2012, 36, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Caligiuri, M.A. Human natural killer cells. Blood 2008, 112, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vivier, E.; Raulet, D.H.; Moretta, A.; Caligiuri, M.A.; Zitvogel, L.; Lanier, L.L.; Yokoyama, W.M.; Ugolini, S. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 2011, 331, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  45. Abt, M.C.; Lewis, B.B.; Caballero, S.; Xiong, H.; Carter, R.A.; Sušac, B.; Ling, L.; Leiner, I.; Pamer, E.G. Innate immune defenses mediated by two ILC subsets are critical for protection against acute clostridium difficile infection. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Weizman, O.-E.; Adams, N.M.; Schuster, I.S.; Krishna, C.; Pritykin, Y.; Lau, C.; Degli-Esposti, M.A.; Leslie, C.S.; Sun, J.C.; O’Sullivan, T.E. ILC1 confer early host protection at initial sites of viral infection. Cell 2017, 171, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fuchs, A.; Vermi, W.; Lee, J.S.; Lonardi, S.; Gilfillan, S.; Newberry, R.D.; Cella, M.; Colonna, M. Intraepithelial type 1 innate lymphoid cells are a unique subset of IL-12- and IL-15-responsive IFN-γ-producing cells. Immunity 2013, 38, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhang, J.; Marotel, M.; Fauteux-Daniel, S.; Mathieu, A.-L.; Viel, S.; Marçais, A.; Walzer, T. T-bet and Eomes govern differentiation and function of mouse and human NK cells and ILC1. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Cortez, V.S.; Colonna, M. Diversity and function of group 1 innate lymphoid cells. Immunol. Lett. 2016, 179, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yagi, R.; Zhong, C.; Northrup, D.L.; Yu, F.; Bouladoux, N.; Spencer, S.; Hu, G.; Barron, L.; Sharma, S.; Nakayama, T.; et al. The transcription factor GATA3 is critical for the development of all IL-7Rα-expressing innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 2014, 40, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Wong, S.H.; Walker, J.A.; Jolin, H.E.; Drynan, L.F.; Hams, E.; Camelo, A.; Barlow, J.L.; Neill, D.R.; Panova, V.; Koch, U.; et al. Transcription factor RORα is critical for nuocyte development. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fallon, P.G.; Ballantyne, S.J.; Mangan, N.E.; Barlow, J.L.; Dasvarma, A.; Hewett, D.R.; McIlgorm, A.; Jolin, H.E.; McKenzie, A.N.J. Identification of an interleukin (IL)-25-dependent cell population that provides IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 at the onset of helminth expulsion. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Moro, K.; Yamada, T.; Tanabe, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Ikawa, T.; Kawamoto, H.; Furusawa, J.-I.; Ohtani, M.; Fujii, H.; Koyasu, S. Innate production of TH2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit+Sca-1+ lymphoid cells. Nature 2010, 463, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Neill, D.R.; Wong, S.H.; Bellosi, A.; Flynn, R.J.; Daly, M.; Langford, T.K.A.; Bucks, C.; Kane, C.M.; Fallon, P.G.; Pannell, R.; et al. Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature 2010, 464, 1367–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Price, A.E.; Liang, H.-E.; Sullivan, B.M.; Reinhardt, R.L.; Eisley, C.J.; Erle, D.J.; Locksley, R.M. Systemically dispersed innate IL-13-expressing cells in type 2 immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11489–11494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Cella, M.; Fuchs, A.; Vermi, W.; Facchetti, F.; Otero, K.; Lennerz, J.K.M.; Doherty, J.M.; Mills, J.C.; Colonna, M. A human natural killer cell subset provides an innate source of IL-22 for mucosal immunity. Nature 2009, 457, 722–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Y.; Koroleva, E.P.; Kruglov, A.A.; Kuprash, D.V.; Nedospasov, S.A.; Fu, Y.-X.; Tumanov, A.V. Lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling in intestinal epithelial cells orchestrates innate immune responses against mucosal bacterial infection. Immunity 2010, 32, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Cupedo, T.; Crellin, N.K.; Papazian, N.; Rombouts, E.J.; Weijer, K.; Grogan, J.L.; Fibbe, W.E.; Cornelissen, J.J.; Spits, H. Human fetal lymphoid tissue-inducer cells are interleukin 17-producing precursors to RORC+ CD127+ natural killer-like cells. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Eberl, G.; Marmon, S.; Sunshine, M.-J.; Rennert, P.D.; Choi, Y.; Littman, D.R. An essential function for the nuclear receptor RORgamma(t) in the generation of fetal lymphoid tissue inducer cells. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mebius, R.E.; Rennert, P.; Weissman, I.L. Developing lymph nodes collect CD4+CD3− LTbeta+ cells that can differentiate to APC, NK cells, and follicular cells but not T or B cells. Immunity 1997, 7, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yoshida, H.; Honda, K.; Shinkura, R.; Adachi, S.; Nishikawa, S.; Maki, K.; Ikuta, K.; Nishikawa, S.I. IL-7 receptor α+ CD3– cells in the embryonic intestine induces the organizing center of Peyer’s patches. Int. Immunol. 1999, 11, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Fraker, C.; Bayer, A.L. The expanding role of natural killer cells in type 1 diabetes and immunotherapy. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2016, 16, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Marca, V.; Gianchecchi, E.; Fierabracci, A. Type 1 diabetes and its multi-factorial pathogenesis: The putative role of NK cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Jewett, A.; Kos, J.; Fong, Y.; Ko, M.-W.; Safaei, T.; Nanut, M.P.; Kaur, K. NK cells shape pancreatic and oral tumor microenvironments; role in inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 53, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Peng, X.; Chen, L.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hao, Z.; Zhan, X. Application of natural killer cells in pancreatic cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 22, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. American Diabetes Association. (2) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015, 38 (Suppl. 1), S8–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. American Diabetes Association. 2. classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 2021, 44 (Suppl. 1), S15–S33. [Google Scholar]
  68. Molofsky, A.B.; van Gool, F.; Liang, H.E.; van Dyken, S.J.; Nussbaum, J.C.; Lee, J.; Bluestone, J.A.; Locksley, R.M. Interleukin-33 and interferon-gamma counter-regulate group 2 innate lymphoid cell activation during immune perturbation. Immunity 2015, 43, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Nussbaum, J.C.; van Dyken, S.J.; von Moltke, J.; Cheng, L.E.; Mohapatra, A.; Molofsky, A.B.; Thornton, E.E.; Krummel, M.F.; Chawla, A.; Liang, H.E.; et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature 2013, 502, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Wu, D.; Molofsky, A.B.; Liang, H.-E.; Ricardo-Gonzalez, R.R.; Jouihan, H.A.; Bando, J.K.; Chawla, A.; Locksley, R.M. Eosinophils sustain adipose alternatively activated macrophages associated with glucose homeostasis. Science 2011, 332, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Molofsky, A.B.; Nussbaum, J.C.; Liang, H.E.; van Dyken, S.J.; Cheng, L.E.; Mohapatra, A.; Chawla, A.; Locksley, R.M. Innate lymphoid type 2 cells sustain visceral adipose tissue eosinophils and alternatively activated macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Martinez, F.O.; Helming, L.; Gordon, S. Alternative activation of macrophages: An immunologic functional perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 451–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Brestoff, J.R.; Kim, B.S.; Saenz, S.A.; Stine, R.R.; Monticelli, L.A.; Sonnenberg, G.F.; Thome, J.J.; Farber, D.L.; Lutfy, K.; Seale, P.; et al. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells promote beiging of white adipose tissue and limit obesity. Nature 2015, 519, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lee, M.W.; Odegaard, J.I.; Mukundan, L.; Qiu, Y.; Molofsky, A.B.; Nussbaum, J.C.; Yun, K.; Locksley, R.M.; Chawla, A. Activated type 2 innate lymphoid cells regulate beige fat biogenesis. Cell 2015, 160, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Nguyen, K.D.; Qiu, Y.; Cui, X.; Goh, Y.P.S.; Mwangi, J.; David, T.; Mukundan, L.; Brombacher, F.; Locksley, R.M.; Chawla, A. Alternatively activated macrophages produce catecholamines to sustain adaptive thermogenesis. Nature 2011, 480, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. O’Sullivan, T.E.; Rapp, M.; Fan, X.; Weizman, O.E.; Bhardwaj, P.; Adams, N.M.; Walzer, T.; Dannenberg, A.J.; Sun, J.C. Adipose-resident group 1 innate lymphoid cells promote obesity-associated insulin resistance. Immunity 2016, 45, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Wang, H.; Shen, L.; Sun, X.; Liu, F.; Feng, W.; Jiang, C.; Chu, X.; Ye, X.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. Adipose group 1 innate lymphoid cells promote adipose tissue fibrosis and diabetes in obesity. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Yadav, H.; Quijano, C.; Kamaraju, A.K.; Gavrilova, O.; Malek, R.; Chen, W.; Zerfas, P.; Zhigang, D.; Wright, E.C.; Stuelten, C.; et al. Protection from obesity and diabetes by blockade of TGF-beta/Smad3 signaling. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Chen, K.; Lu, P.; Beeraka, N.M.; Sukocheva, O.A.; Madhunapantula, S.V.; Liu, J.; Sinelnikov, M.Y.; Nikolenko, V.N.; Bulygin, K.V.; Mikhaleva, L.M.; et al. Mitochondrial mutations and mitoepigenetics: Focus on regulation of oxidative stress-induced responses in breast cancers. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hauck, A.K.; Huang, Y.; Hertzel, A.V.; Bernlohr, D.A. Adipose oxidative stress and protein carbonylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Ehses, J.A.; Perren, A.; Eppler, E.; Ribaux, P.; Pospisilik, J.A.; Maor-Cahn, R.; Gueripel, X.; Ellingsgaard, H.; Schneider, M.K.J.; Biollaz, G.; et al. Increased number of islet-associated macrophages in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2007, 56, 2356–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Böni-Schnetzler, M.; Boller, S.; Debray, S.; Bouzakri, K.; Meier, D.T.; Prazak, R.; Kerr-Conte, J.; Pattou, F.; Ehses, J.A.; Schuit, F.C.; et al. Free fatty acids induce a proinflammatory response in islets via the abundantly expressed interleukin-1 receptor I. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 5218–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Eguchi, K.; Manabe, I.; Oishi-Tanaka, Y.; Ohsugi, M.; Kono, N.; Ogata, F.; Yagi, N.; Ohto, U.; Kimoto, M.; Miyake, K.; et al. Saturated fatty acid and TLR signaling link β cell dysfunction and islet inflammation. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Butcher, M.J.; Hallinger, D.; Garcia, E.; Machida, Y.; Chakrabarti, S.; Nadler, J.; Galkina, E.V.; Imai, Y. Association of proinflammatory cytokines and islet resident leucocytes with islet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2014, 57, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Donath, M.Y. Targeting inflammation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Time to start. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dalmas, E.; Lehmann, F.M.; Dror, E.; Wueest, S.; Thienel, C.; Borsigova, M.; Stawiski, M.; Traunecker, E.; Lucchini, F.C.; Dapito, D.H.; et al. Interleukin-33-activated islet-resident innate lymphoid cells promote insulin secretion through myeloid cell retinoic acid production. Immunity 2017, 47, 928–942.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Mortha, A.; Chudnovskiy, A.; Hashimoto, D.; Bogunovic, M.; Spencer, S.P.; Belkaid, Y.; Merad, M. Microbiota-dependent crosstalk between macrophages and ILC3 promotes intestinal homeostasis. Science 2014, 343, 1249288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Yokota, A.; Takeuchi, H.; Maeda, N.; Ohoka, Y.; Kato, C.; Song, S.-Y.; Iwata, M. GM-CSF and IL-4 synergistically trigger dendritic cells to acquire retinoic acid-producing capacity. Int. Immunol. 2009, 21, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Maedler, K.; Sergeev, P.; Ris, F.; Oberholzer, J.; Joller-Jemelka, H.I.; Spinas, G.A.; Kaiser, N.; Halban, P.A.; Donath, M.Y. Glucose-induced β cell production of IL-1β contributes to glucotoxicity in human pancreatic islets. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ohne, Y.; Silver, J.S.; Thompson-Snipes, L.; Collet, M.A.; Blanck, J.P.; Cantarel, B.L.; Copenhaver, A.M.; Humbles, A.A.; Liu, Y.-J. IL-1 is a critical regulator of group 2 innate lymphoid cell function and plasticity. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Miani, M.; Le Naour, J.; Waeckel-Enee, E.; Verma, S.C.; Straube, M.; Emond, P.; Ryffel, B.; van Endert, P.; Sokol, H.; Diana, J. Gut microbiota-stimulated innate lymphoid cells support beta-defensin 14 expression in pancreatic endocrine cells, preventing autoimmune diabetes. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 557–572.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Diana, J.; Simoni, Y.; Furio, L.; Beaudoin, L.; Agerberth, B.; Barrat, F.; Lehuen, A. Crosstalk between neutrophils, B-1a cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells initiates autoimmune diabetes. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sun, J.; Furio, L.; Mecheri, R.; van der Does, A.M.; Lundeberg, E.; Saveanu, L.; Chen, Y.; van Endert, P.; Agerberth, B.; Diana, J. Pancreatic β-cells limit autoimmune diabetes via an immunoregulatory antimicrobial peptide expressed under the influence of the gut microbiota. Immunity 2015, 43, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Qiu, J.; Heller, J.J.; Guo, X.; Chen, Z.M.; Fish, K.; Fu, Y.X.; Zhou, L. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates gut immunity through modulation of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 2012, 36, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Qiu, J.; Zhou, L. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor promotes RORγt+ Group 3 ILCs and controls intestinal immunity and inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Zhou, L. AHR Function in lymphocytes: Emerging concepts. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Lee, J.S.; Cella, M.; McDonald, K.G.; Garlanda, C.; Kennedy, G.D.; Nukaya, M.; Mantovani, A.; Kopan, R.; Bradfield, C.A.; Newberry, R.D.; et al. AHR drives the development of gut ILC22 cells and postnatal lymphoid tissues via pathways dependent on and independent of Notch. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 13, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lee, P.J.; Papachristou, G.I. New insights into acute pancreatitis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 479–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Peery, A.F.; Crockett, S.D.; Murphy, C.C.; Lund, J.L.; Dellon, E.S.; Williams, J.L.; Jensen, E.T.; Shaheen, N.J.; Barritt, A.S.; Lieber, S.R.; et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the united states: Update 2018. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 254–272.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Petrov, M.S.; Yadav, D. Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Xue, J.; Sharma, V.; Habtezion, A. Immune cells and immune-based therapy in pancreatitis. Immunol. Res. 2014, 58, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wei, X.; Yao, W.; Li, H.; Qian, J.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, H.; Shi, L.; Lin, X. B and NK cells closely correlate with the condition of patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2019, 2019, 7568410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dabrowski, A.; Osada, J.; Dabrowska, M.I.; Wereszczynska-Siemiatkowska, U. Monocyte subsets and natural killer cells in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2008, 8, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mylona, V.; Koussoulas, V.; Tzivras, D.; Makrygiannis, E.; Georgopoulou, P.; Koratzanis, G.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Tzivras, M.D. Changes in adaptive and innate immunity in patients with acute pancreatitis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Pancreatology 2011, 11, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Shen, Y.; Cui, N.Q. Clinical observation of immunity in patients with secondary infection from severe acute pancreatitis. Inflamm. Res. 2012, 61, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Shifrin, A.L.; Chirmule, N.; Gao, G.-P.; Wilson, J.M.; Raper, S.E. Innate immune responses to adenoviral vector-mediated acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2005, 30, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Ockenga, J.; Jacobs, R.; Kemper, A.; Benschop, R.J.; Schmidt, R.E.; Manns, M.P. Lymphocyte subsets and cellular immunity in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Digestion 2000, 62, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hart, P.A.; Bellin, M.D.; Andersen, D.K.; Bradley, D.; Cruz-Monserrate, Z.; Forsmark, C.E.; Goodarzi, M.O.; Habtezion, A.; Korc, M.; Kudva, Y.C.; et al. Type 3c (pancreatogenic) diabetes mellitus secondary to chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 1, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Rodriguez-Nicolas, A.; Martínez-Chamorro, A.; Jiménez, P.; Matas-Cobos, A.M.; Redondo-Cerezo, E.; Ruiz-Cabello, F. TH1 and TH2 cytokine profiles as predictors of severity in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2018, 47, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Sendler, M.; van den Brandt, C.; Glaubitz, J.; Wilden, A.; Golchert, J.; Weiss, F.U.; Homuth, G.; Chama, L.L.d.; Mishra, N.; Mahajan, U.M.; et al. NLRP3 inflammasome regulates development of systemic inflammatory response and compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndromes in mice with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Ni, J.; Hu, G.; Xiong, J.; Shen, J.; Shen, J.; Yang, L.; Tang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Ying, G.; Yu, G.; et al. Involvement of interleukin-17A in pancreatic damage in rat experimental acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Inflammation 2013, 36, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sasikala, M.; Ravikanth, V.V.; Manohar, K.M.; Deshpande, N.; Singh, S.; Kumar, P.P.; Talukdar, R.; Ghosh, S.; Aslam, M.; Rao, G.V.; et al. Bach2 repression mediates Th17 cell induced inflammation and associates with clinical features of advanced disease in chronic pancreatitis. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2018, 6, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Zhou, Q.; Tao, X.; Xia, S.; Guo, F.; Pan, C.; Xiang, H.; Shang, D. T Lymphocytes: A Promising immunotherapeutic target for pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer? Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Gürlevik, E.; Fleischmann-Mundt, B.; Brooks, J.; Demir, I.E.; Steiger, K.; Ribback, S.; Yevsa, T.; Woller, N.; Kloos, A.; Ostroumov, D.; et al. Administration of gemcitabine after pancreatic tumor resection in mice induces an antitumor immune response mediated by natural killer cells. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Jewett, A.; Kos, J.; Kaur, K.; Safaei, T.; Sutanto, C.; Chen, W.; Wong, P.; Namagerdi, A.K.; Fang, C.; Fong, Y.; et al. Natural killer cells: Diverse functions in tumor immunity and defects in pre-neoplastic and neoplastic stages of tumorigenesis. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2020, 16, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Moral, J.A.; Leung, J.; Rojas, L.A.; Ruan, J.; Zhao, J.; Sethna, Z.; Ramnarain, A.; Gasmi, B.; Gururajan, M.; Redmond, D.; et al. ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity. Nature 2020, 579, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Thompson, R.H.; Dong, H.; Lohse, C.M.; Leibovich, B.C.; Blute, M.L.; Cheville, J.C.; Kwon, E.D. PD-1 is expressed by tumor-infiltrating immune cells and is associated with poor outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 1757–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Shi, F.; Shi, M.; Zeng, Z.; Qi, R.-Z.; Liu, Z.-W.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Yang, Y.-P.; Tien, P.; Wang, F.-S. PD-1 and PD-L1 upregulation promotes CD8+ T-cell apoptosis and postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. French, J.D.; Kotnis, G.R.; Said, S.; Raeburn, C.D.; McIntyre, R.C.; Klopper, J.P.; Haugen, B.R. Programmed death-1+ T cells and regulatory T cells are enriched in tumor-involved lymph nodes and associated with aggressive features in papillary thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E934–E943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sun, S.; Fei, X.; Mao, Y.; Wang, X.; Garfield, D.H.; Huang, O.; Wang, J.; Yuan, F.; Sun, L.; Yu, Q.; et al. PD-1+ immune cell infiltration inversely correlates with survival of operable breast cancer patients. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2014, 63, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Yu, Y.; Tsang, J.C.H.; Wang, C.; Clare, S.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Brandt, C.; Kane, L.; Campos, L.S.; Lu, L.; et al. Single-cell RNA-seq identifies a PD-1 ILC progenitor and defines its development pathway. Nature 2016, 539, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Taylor, S.; Huang, Y.; Mallett, G.; Stathopoulou, C.; Felizardo, T.C.; Sun, M.-A.; Martin, E.L.; Zhu, N.; Woodward, E.L.; Elias, M.S.; et al. PD-1 regulates KLRG1 group 2 innate lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 1663–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Araujo, J.M.; Gomez, A.C.; Aguilar, A.; Salgado, R.; Balko, J.M.; Bravo, L.; Doimi, F.; Bretel, D.; Morante, Z.; Flores, C.; et al. Effect of CCL5 expression in the recruitment of immune cells in triple negative breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Ikutani, M.; Yanagibashi, T.; Ogasawara, M.; Tsuneyama, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Hattori, Y.; Kouro, T.; Itakura, A.; Nagai, Y.; Takaki, S.; et al. Identification of innate IL-5-producing cells and their role in lung eosinophil regulation and antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Saranchova, I.; Han, J.; Zaman, R.; Arora, H.; Huang, H.; Fenninger, F.; Choi, K.B.; Munro, L.; Pfeifer, C.G.; Welch, I.; et al. Type 2 innate lymphocytes actuate immunity against tumours and limit cancer metastasis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Xuan, X.; Zhou, J.; Tian, Z.; Lin, Y.; Song, J.; Ruan, Z.; Ni, B.; Zhao, H.; Yang, W. ILC3 cells promote the proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells through IL-22/AKT signaling. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2020, 22, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Carrega, P.; Loiacono, F.; di Carlo, E.; Scaramuccia, A.; Mora, M.; Conte, R.; Benelli, R.; Spaggiari, G.M.; Cantoni, C.; Campana, S.; et al. NCR+ILC3 concentrate in human lung cancer and associate with intratumoral lymphoid structures. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Saalim, M.; Resham, S.; Manzoor, S.; Ahmad, H.; Jaleel, S.; Ashraf, J.; Imran, M.; Naseem, S. IL-22: A promising candidate to inhibit viral-induced liver disease progression and hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour. Biol. 2016, 37, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhuang, Y.; Peng, L.-S.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Shi, Y.; Mao, X.-H.; Guo, G.; Chen, W.; Liu, X.-F.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Liu, T.; et al. Increased intratumoral IL-22-producing CD4+ T cells and Th22 cells correlate with gastric cancer progression and predict poor patient survival. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2012, 61, 1965–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Kirchberger, S.; Royston, D.J.; Boulard, O.; Thornton, E.; Franchini, F.; Szabady, R.L.; Harrison, O.; Powrie, F. Innate lymphoid cells sustain colon cancer through production of interleukin-22 in a mouse model. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 917–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Tugues, S.; Ducimetiere, L.; Friebel, E.; Becher, B. Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Semin. Immunol. 2019, 41, 101270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Mori, T.; Suzuki-Yamazaki, N.; Takaki, S. Lnk/Sh2b3 regulates adipose inflammation and glucose tolerance through group 1 ILCs. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 1830–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Huang, Q.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Niu, Z.; Wang, R.; Yang, F.; Wu, M.; Liang, G.; Rong, P.; Wang, H.; et al. IL-10 producing type 2 innate lymphoid cells prolong islet allograft survival. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e12305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Liu, F.; Wang, H.; Feng, W.; Ye, X.; Sun, X.; Jiang, C.; Chu, X.; Zhang, P.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. Type 1 innate lymphoid cells are associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2019, 45, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Shafiei-Jahani, P.; Hurrell, B.P.; Galle-Treger, L.; Helou, D.G.; Howard, E.; Painter, J.; Lo, R.; Lewis, G.; Soroosh, P.; Akbari, O. DR3 stimulation of adipose resident ILC2s ameliorates type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Berndt, B.E.; Zhang, M.; Owyang, S.Y.; Cole, T.S.; Wang, T.W.; Luther, J.; Veniaminova, N.A.; Merchant, J.L.; Chen, C.-C.; Huffnagle, G.B.; et al. Butyrate increases IL-23 production by stimulated dendritic cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012, 303, G1384–G1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Jia, L.; Cao, M.; Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Dong, X.; Ren, Z.; Sun, J.; Pan, L.L. Butyrate ameliorates antibiotic-driven type 1 diabetes in the female offspring of nonobese diabetic mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3112–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mariño, E.; Richards, J.L.; McLeod, K.H.; Stanley, D.; Yap, Y.A.; Knight, J.; McKenzie, C.; Kranich, J.; Oliveira, A.C.; Rossello, F.J.; et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Guo, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yao, W.; Liao, S.; Yu, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Ren, B.; et al. Sodium butyrate ameliorates streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes in mice by inhibiting the HMGB1 expression. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Jacob, N.; Jaiswal, S.; Maheshwari, D.; Nallabelli, N.; Khatri, N.; Bhatia, A.; Bal, A.; Malik, V.; Verma, S.; Kumar, R.; et al. Butyrate induced Tregs are capable of migration from the GALT to the pancreas to restore immunological tolerance during type-1 diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Rickels, M.R.; Robertson, R.P. Pancreatic islet transplantation in humans: Recent progress and future directions. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 631–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 03748 g001 550
Figure 1. Development and the main features of ILC subsets. ILCs are derived from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) found within fetal liver and adult bone marrow. Dedicated TFs restrain B and T cell fates but guide the development of different ILC subsets. CLPs develop into common lymphoid progenitors (CILPs); then, through a series of transcriptional regulation processes, CILPs differentiate into natural killer cell precursor (NKPs) or common helper innate lymphoid progenitor (CHILPs), and the latter give rise to innate lymphoid cell precursor (ILCPs) and lymphoid tissue inducer progenitor (LTiPs). Each kind of precursor cell involves a branch in the ILC family. Based on the differential development trajectories and functions, the ILC family is categorized into five groups: NK cells, ILC1s, ILC2s, ILC3s and LTi cells. Each ILC subset secretes different effector cytokines that promote important physiological or pathological reactions.
Figure 1. Development and the main features of ILC subsets. ILCs are derived from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) found within fetal liver and adult bone marrow. Dedicated TFs restrain B and T cell fates but guide the development of different ILC subsets. CLPs develop into common lymphoid progenitors (CILPs); then, through a series of transcriptional regulation processes, CILPs differentiate into natural killer cell precursor (NKPs) or common helper innate lymphoid progenitor (CHILPs), and the latter give rise to innate lymphoid cell precursor (ILCPs) and lymphoid tissue inducer progenitor (LTiPs). Each kind of precursor cell involves a branch in the ILC family. Based on the differential development trajectories and functions, the ILC family is categorized into five groups: NK cells, ILC1s, ILC2s, ILC3s and LTi cells. Each ILC subset secretes different effector cytokines that promote important physiological or pathological reactions.
Ijms 23 03748 g001
Ijms 23 03748 g002 550
Figure 2. Role of ILCs in diabetes mellitus. A | ILCs in adipose tissue. In the lean state, IL-33 induces adipose-resident ILC2s to produce the cytokines IL-5 or IL-13, which support the recruitment and accumulation of eosinophils in AT. Eosinophils produce IL-4 to sustain and recruit AAMs. ILC2s produce ample IL 13 and may also directly contribute to AAM recruitment and maintenance. AAM byproducts, such as IL-10, contribute to adipocyte insulin sensitivity and protect against DM. In addition, IL-4, IL-13 and methionine-enkephalin peptides (MetEnk) and catecholamines, produced by eosinophils, ILC2s and AAMs, respectively, promote the proliferation and differentiation of adipocyte precursors into beige adipocytes. Beige fat biogenesis also promotes insulin sensitivity and prevents DM. In the obese state, while IL-12 promotes the selective accumulation of adipose-resident ILC1s. ILC1s drive CAM polarization by IFN-γ production and promote AT fibrosis, contributing to obesity-associated insulin resistance and DM. B | ILCs in pancreatic islets. In diabetic or obese states, the islets are also in an inflammatory background. IL-33 is produced by mesenchymal cells as a stress signal in islets. As the main IL-33-responsive cells in islets, islet-resident ILC2s stimulate the capacity of myeloid cells to produce RA, which in turn enhances insulin secretion in islet β cells and protects against DM. In the gut, the microbiota controls IL-22 expression by ILC3s within pancreatic islets through different pathways. ILC3-derived IL-22 induces islet β cells to produce β-defensin, preventing autoimmune diabetes.
Figure 2. Role of ILCs in diabetes mellitus. A | ILCs in adipose tissue. In the lean state, IL-33 induces adipose-resident ILC2s to produce the cytokines IL-5 or IL-13, which support the recruitment and accumulation of eosinophils in AT. Eosinophils produce IL-4 to sustain and recruit AAMs. ILC2s produce ample IL 13 and may also directly contribute to AAM recruitment and maintenance. AAM byproducts, such as IL-10, contribute to adipocyte insulin sensitivity and protect against DM. In addition, IL-4, IL-13 and methionine-enkephalin peptides (MetEnk) and catecholamines, produced by eosinophils, ILC2s and AAMs, respectively, promote the proliferation and differentiation of adipocyte precursors into beige adipocytes. Beige fat biogenesis also promotes insulin sensitivity and prevents DM. In the obese state, while IL-12 promotes the selective accumulation of adipose-resident ILC1s. ILC1s drive CAM polarization by IFN-γ production and promote AT fibrosis, contributing to obesity-associated insulin resistance and DM. B | ILCs in pancreatic islets. In diabetic or obese states, the islets are also in an inflammatory background. IL-33 is produced by mesenchymal cells as a stress signal in islets. As the main IL-33-responsive cells in islets, islet-resident ILC2s stimulate the capacity of myeloid cells to produce RA, which in turn enhances insulin secretion in islet β cells and protects against DM. In the gut, the microbiota controls IL-22 expression by ILC3s within pancreatic islets through different pathways. ILC3-derived IL-22 induces islet β cells to produce β-defensin, preventing autoimmune diabetes.
Ijms 23 03748 g002
Ijms 23 03748 g003 550
Figure 3. Role of ILCs in pancreatic cancer. ILCs may act as a double-edged sword in pancreatic cancer. In PC tissues, the frequencies of ILC2s and ILC3s are both significantly increased. Expanded by IL-33, ILC2s in PC potentially produce chemokine CCL5, which promote the recruitment and accumulation of CD103+ DCs in tumor tissues and further activate antitumor immunity in CD8+T cells. ILC2s express the PD-1, which restrains antitumor immunity. However, the PD-1 inhibition on ILC2 can be relieved by antibody-mediated PD-1 blockade, identifying ILC2s to be a potential, promising and brand-new target for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Unlike ILC2s, ILC3s promote the proliferation, metastasis and invasion of PC cells through IL-22/AKT signaling.
Figure 3. Role of ILCs in pancreatic cancer. ILCs may act as a double-edged sword in pancreatic cancer. In PC tissues, the frequencies of ILC2s and ILC3s are both significantly increased. Expanded by IL-33, ILC2s in PC potentially produce chemokine CCL5, which promote the recruitment and accumulation of CD103+ DCs in tumor tissues and further activate antitumor immunity in CD8+T cells. ILC2s express the PD-1, which restrains antitumor immunity. However, the PD-1 inhibition on ILC2 can be relieved by antibody-mediated PD-1 blockade, identifying ILC2s to be a potential, promising and brand-new target for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Unlike ILC2s, ILC3s promote the proliferation, metastasis and invasion of PC cells through IL-22/AKT signaling.
Ijms 23 03748 g003
Table
Table 1. Animal studies identifying ILC subsets associated with pancreatic disease and therapy.
Table 1. Animal studies identifying ILC subsets associated with pancreatic disease and therapy.
Pancreatic Disease or TherapyILC SubsetsLocated TissueThe Role of ILCsFuture Perspective for Application and TreatmentReference
Diabetes mellitusNK cell, ILC1Adipose tissueDriven by IL-12 and STAT4 signaling, adipose NK cells and ILC1s proliferate and accumulate, contributing to obesity-related insulin resistance.Blocking the IL-12/IL-12R/STAT4 signaling pathway in adipose NK cells and ILC1s may prevent the occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.[76]
Diabetes mellitusNK cell, ILC1Adipose tissueLnk/Sh2b3 gene regulate the IL-15/JAK3/STAT5 signaling pathway in adipose NK cells and ILC1s to inhibit the cell number and activity, thereby reducing the risk of diabetes mellitus. Missense variants of Lnk/Sh2b3 gene may contribute to diabetes mellitus.Blocking the IL-15/JAK3/STAT5 signaling pathway in adipose NK cells and ILC1s may prevent diabetes mellitus caused by Lnk/Sh2b3 gene missense variation.[133]
Diabetes mellitusILC2Adipose tissueIL-33 is required to maintain the ILC2s in the white adipose tissue, and ILC2s promote the beiging of white adipose tissue and limit obesity and obesity-related diabetes mellitus.Providing or maintaining adequate IL-33 and ILC2s to promote beiging of white adipose tissue may be a novel approach to prevent or treat obesity-associated diabetes mellitus.[73]
Diabetes mellitusILC2Pancreatic isletIL-33-activated islet-resident ILC2s promote insulin secretion. However, IL-33-ILC2 axis is defective in islets during obesity and is activated following acute β cell stress.Selectively activation of IL-33-ILC2 axis in islet may offer therapy for diabetes mellitus.[86]
Diabetes mellitusILC3Pancreatic isletGut microbiota-regulated islet-resident ILC3s secrete IL-22 to support pancreatic endocrine cells to express β-defensin 14, preventing autoimmune diabetes.Increasing the secretion of ILC3-derived IL-22 in islets via the intestinal pathways may prevent autoimmune diabetes.[91]
Pancreatic cancerILC2PancreasILC2s emerge as antitumor immune cells for pancreatic cancer treatment and partly enhance the therapeutic effect of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.Blocking PD-1 signaling pathway on tumor-infiltrating ILC2s may promote antitumor effects and pancreatic cancer immunotherapy.[117]
Islet transplantationILC2Pancreatic isletILC2s prolong islet allograft survival in an IL-10-dependent manner.Local delivery of ILC210 could be a promising tool to promote long-term islet graft survival.[134]
Table
Table 2. Human clinical studies identifying ILC subsets associated with pancreatic disease and their possible roles.
Table 2. Human clinical studies identifying ILC subsets associated with pancreatic disease and their possible roles.
Pancreatic DiseaseILC SubsetsLocated TissueThe Role of ILCsFuture Perspective for Application and TreatmentReference
Diabetes mellitusILC1Adipose tissueILC1s promote adipose tissue fibrosis and diabetes mellitus in obesity.Inhibiting the accumulation of adipose ILC1s may attenuate adipose tissue fibrogenesis and protect against type 2 diabetes mellitus.[77]
Diabetes mellitusILC1Peripheral bloodIn patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, ILC1s are significantly increased in the peripheral blood, and a higher ILC1 level indicates a 13.481-fold greater risk of diabetes mellitus.Circulating ILC1s can be a good indicator of type 2 diabetes mellitus.[135]
Diabetes mellitusILC2Peripheral bloodDR3 induce human ILC2s to express type 2 cytokines and prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus.DR3 agonist may be a novel, promising and worth exploring therapeutic avenue for type 2 diabetes mellitus.[136]
PancreatitisNK cellperipheral bloodIn acute pancreatitis patients, NK cell frequency correlates positively with amylase and lipase concentration, as well as the length of hospital stay.Changes of NK cell level in peripheral blood can act as an auxiliary diagnosis indicator for acute pancreatitis.[102]
Pancreatic cancerILC2pancreasPD-1+ tumor ILC2s and PD-1+ T cells coexist in nearly 60% of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and show a significant correlation.ILC2s may be conducive to the clinical curative effect of PD-1 therapy.[117]
Pancreatic cancerILC3pancreasHigher ILC3 frequency in tumor tissue is closely associated with tumor cell proliferation, vascular invasion, and distant metastasis in human pancreatic cancer. Subsequent in vitro experiments demonstrated that ILC3s promote the pancreatic cancer development through IL-22/IL-22R-AKT signaling pathway.Use of neutralizing IL-22 antibody, IL-22R antibody or AKT inhibitor to block the IL-22/IL-22R-AKT signaling pathway may be an effective therapy for pancreatic cancer.[127]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, S.; Ye, L.; Jin, K.; Xiao, Z.; Yu, X.; Wu, W. Innate Lymphoid Cells: Emerging Players in Pancreatic Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073748

AMA Style

Shi S, Ye L, Jin K, Xiao Z, Yu X, Wu W. Innate Lymphoid Cells: Emerging Players in Pancreatic Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(7):3748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Saimeng, Longyun Ye, Kaizhou Jin, Zhiwen Xiao, Xianjun Yu, and Weiding Wu. 2022. "Innate Lymphoid Cells: Emerging Players in Pancreatic Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 3748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop