Next Article in Journal
Comparison of the Cisterna Maturation-Progression Model with the Kiss-and-Run Model of Intra-Golgi Transport: Role of Cisternal Pores and Cargo Domains
Next Article in Special Issue
Naked and Decorated Nanoparticles Containing H2S-Releasing Doxorubicin: Preparation, Characterization and Assessment of Their Antitumoral Efficiency on Various Resistant Tumor Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Suppression of Cutibacterium acnes-Mediated Inflammatory Reactions by Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 in Skin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ab Initio Insight into the Interaction of Metal-Decorated Fluorinated Carbon Fullerenes with Anti-COVID Drugs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Melissa officinalis: Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Derived Release Systems—A Review

by
Gabriela Petrisor
1,2,3,
Ludmila Motelica
1,2,3,
Luminita Narcisa Craciun
4,
Ovidiu Cristian Oprea
2,3,4,
Denisa Ficai
2,3,4 and
Anton Ficai
1,2,3,5,*
1
Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
2
National Research Center for Food Safety, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
3
National Center for Micro and Nanomaterials, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
5
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073591
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 20 March 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 25 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnology in Targeted Drug Delivery)

Abstract

:
Melissa officinalis is a medicinal plant rich in biologically active compounds which is used worldwide for its therapeutic effects. Chemical studies on its composition have shown that it contains mainly flavonoids, terpenoids, phenolic acids, tannins, and essential oil. The main active constituents of Melissa officinalis are volatile compounds (geranial, neral, citronellal and geraniol), triterpenes (ursolic acid and oleanolic acid), phenolic acids (rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid), and flavonoids (quercetin, rhamnocitrin, and luteolin). According to the biological studies, the essential oil and extracts of Melissa officinalis have active compounds that determine many pharmacological effects with potential medical uses. A new field of research has led to the development of controlled release systems with active substances from plants. Therefore, the essential oil or extract of Melissa officinalis has become a major target to be incorporated into various controlled release systems which allow a sustained delivery.

1. Introduction

Plants are the oldest health remedy, and have been known to people since antiquity. Over the centuries, various cultural groups have developed traditional herbal medical systems to improve health. From the beginning of the 19th century, the isolation of active compounds from plants began; due to the rapid developments in the field of chemistry, from the beginning of the 20th century the production of synthetic compounds increased [1]. Even though the use of synthetic compounds has grown in the drug industry, most developing countries continue to use drugs made from natural compounds [2]. Medicinal plants have a variety of biological properties, which means that they play an important role in preventing and treating various diseases [3]. These plants are a rich source of biological active agents, and can represent raw materials that can be used to develop new, semi-synthetic drugs.
The active substances are found in different parts of the plant, and can be extracted from different types of seeds, roots, leaves, fruits, skin, flowers, or even the whole plant. The active compounds extracted from most medicinal plants have direct or indirect therapeutic effects.
Melissa officinalis L. is a medicinal plant used in traditional medicine around the world. It is an aromatic perennial plant; it commonly grows in the Mediterranean region and Western Asia, being intensively cultivated in Europe [4,5] and, due to its chemical composition and numerous pharmacological effects, it is intensively studied. This plant is also called lemon balm, honey balm, or balm mint; it is an edible medicinal herb belonging to the mint family Lamiaceae and the subfamily Nepetoideae [5]. It is a plant that lives at least three years; it is bushy and upright, reaching a height between 60 and 100 cm [6]. The soft, hairy leaves are 2 to 8 cm long; they are dark green and heart shaped. The leaf surface is coarse and deeply veined, the leaf edge is scalloped or toothed [7], and it is rich in biological active agents; thus, the extracts highlight specific properties (Figure 1). Melissa officinalis has a hairy root system, which makes the plant more adaptable to different environmental conditions, but the upper parts of the plant die out in early winter and reappear in early spring [7]. It is one of the easiest herbs to grow, and spreads so readily that some gardeners consider it a weed [8].
This paper provides an overview of the phytochemical composition of Melissa officinalis, a plant which is rich in volatile compounds and polyphenolic compounds. Research on the determination of its composition and biological activities has led to the discovery of numerous pharmacological agents with different activities, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities, and many others. Given the development of nanotechnology and the desire to create new systems of controlled release, we highlighted systems that contain bioactive compounds such as essential oil or Melissa officinalis extract, and also systems with pure active substances. The diversity of the materials and their dimensions has led to the formation of controlled release systems with many biological effects. This review was especially focused on highlighting studies carried out on different controlled release systems that contain—as bioactive component—essential oil or extract, as well as the pure substances available from Melissa officinalis.

2. Phytochemical Composition

Chemical studies on the composition of the Melissa officinalis have shown that it contains mainly flavonoids, terpenoids, phenolic acids, tannins and essential oil [9]. The main active constituents of Melissa officinalis are volatile compounds (geranial, neral, citronellal and geraniol), triterpenes (ursolic acid and oleanolic acid), phenolic compounds (rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid, and protocatechuic acid) and flavonoids (quercetin, rhamnocitrin, luteolin) [8,10]. Essential oil is usually considered to be the responsible therapeutic principle for most biological activities, but polyphenols are also involved.
Melissa officinalis essential oil—obtained from the fresh or dried flower, leaf, and branches of this plant by water steam distillation or chemical extraction—is characterised by a fresh lemon odor and light yellow color [11].

2.1. Volatile Compounds

The volatile oil extracted from the leaves of Melissa officinalis is important due to its pharmacological effects, and is obtained in small quantities, unlike other plants in the Lamiaceae family. The major and minor components of the essential oil of the dried leaves of Melissa officinalis are volatile compounds that are found in different concentrations (Table 1).
Kowalski et al. [19] reported a 0.17% essential oil content, which was very low, unlike plants in the same family. The study by Seidler-Łożykowska et al. [16] showed that the essential oil content ranged from 0.08 to 0.20% due to fluctuations in weather conditions during the research years. For the variability of the essential oil content and its composition, Kittler et al. [20] studied a set of 28 accessions of lemon balm. They obtained an essential oil content that varied between 0.01 and 0.72%, and found out—based on statistical analysis on the composition of the essential oil—that there are two chemotypes of essential oil: chemotype citral and chemotype germacrene D. As it is known from the literature, there are two subspecies of the plant Melissa officinalis: officinalis and altissima. The difference between the two subspecies is given by the composition of the essential oil, such that the subspecies officinalis contains major amounts of citral and/or neral, but the subspecies altissima contains only traces. Basta et al. [21] reported, in a study on the composition of the essential oil of Melissa officinalis in Greece, the lack of the major constituents citral and citronellal. Souihi et al. [14] reported, in a comparative study between Melissa officinalis from Tunisia (from two different cities), Germany, and France, the lack of citral but the major presence of germacrene D.
The citrus-like aroma of Melissa officinalis is due to the presence of citral isomers, as well as lesser amounts of citronellal and geranyl acetate [10]. Citral is an acyclic monoterpene aldehyde which consists of a racemic mixture of two isomers: geranial (trans-citral or citral A) and neral (cis-citral or citral B); it is the major compound in the essential oil of Melissa officinalis, subspecies officinalis. In a study carried out on plants from the Lamiaceae family, Kowalski et al. [19] reported the highest content of geranial (23.3%), followed by neral (16.0%) and caryophyllene oxide (15.8%) in Melissa officinalis.
Nurzynska-Wierdak et al. [13] investigated changes in the chemical composition of the dried oil of dried leaves of Melissa officinalis, from Poland, in the first and second year of growth. They obtained, by hydrodistillation from air-dried leaves, 0.3% essential oil; by analysis with GC-MS and GC-FID they highlighted 106 compounds, of which the predominant components were geranial (45.2% and 45.1%) and neral (32.8% and 33.8%). Barakat et al. [22] studied the chemical composition of Jordanian Melissa officinalis essential oil, and found that it differed significantly from the composition of Melissa officinalis essential oil from other countries.
In the comparative study performed by Souihi et al. [14], it was found that the essential oil of the French population showed lower levels of geranial (7.12%) and neral (4.29%) than that of the German population, which contains 39.31% geranial, 27.71% neral, and 12.23% β-caryophyllene. Nouri et al. [12] conducted a study on the composition of essential oil and rosmarinic acid in Melissa officinalis grown in southern Iran, and obtained a total yield of 0.37% (v/w), rich in geranial and neral; compared to other research, they discovered a high content of rosmarinic acid.
In another study, the essential oil obtained from leaves of Melissa officinalis growing in Algeria was investigated for its chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity [15]. In the essential oil—obtained by hydrodistillation and analyzed by GC-MS and GC-FID—sixty-three compounds were identified, representing 94.10% of the total oil, and the yield was 0.34%. The major component was geranial (44.20%), and other predominant components were neral (30.20%) and citronellal (6.30%).
Seidler-Łożykowska et al. [16] specified in their study that the main components, neral and geranial, had higher concentrations under higher insolation. The five most active components identified in the essential oils extracted from plant materials were geranial, neral, citronellal, caryophyllene oxide and β-caryophyllene. In this study, the following results were obtained: the amount of geranial ranged from 6.22% to 21.49%, the level of neral ranged from 4.28% to 15.08%, the citronellal content ranged from 2.80% to 19.74%, the level of caryophyllene oxide varied from 20.86% to 41.72%, and high levels of β-caryophyllene were observed, ranging from 12.08% to 29.14%.
Based on the results obtained by Said-Al Ahl et al. [18], it was found that the harvesting time influences the essential oil content and quality of Melissa officinalis. The highest yield of essential oils was obtained when harvested in September, August and October, and the lowest was obtained when harvested in January, February and March. According to these results, it is recommended to harvest in warmer months in order to obtain a high content of essential oil. The geranial (23.8–51.2%) and neral (20.1–35.0%) content of the essential oil extracted from the fresh leaves of Melissa officinalis was highlighted for different months of harvest.
The chemical composition of the essential oil has a high variability, and depends on the origin of the plant, the climatic difference, the geographical conditions, the cultivation conditions, the harvesting time, and the techniques applied for the extractions [10,13].

2.2. Triterpenes

Triterpenes are non-volatile components extracted from plants, and are one of the largest classes of natural plant products, with more than twenty thousand different triterpenes (Table 2) [23,24]. Some triterpenes contain a different number of sulfate groups bound to sugar or glucones [10].
The most common triterpenes in Melissa officinalis extracts are ursolic acid and oleanolic acid. In the studies of Ghiulai et al. [4] and Ibarra et al. [27], ursolic acid and oleanolic acid were extracted together with polyphenolic compounds in order to show the biological properties of the plant. Using different extraction conditions, different extracts can be obtained with different compositions, and thus different activities. The first extraction was obtained by maceration for 9 days in 70% ethanol, the second was obtained by maceration in 96% ethanol for 24 h under continuous stirring, and the third was extracted by sonication in 80% methanol for one hour. In the three extractions, the largest amount of ursolic acid was obtained, followed by oleanolic acid and small amounts of betulinic acid. Comparing the values of the obtained concentrations, the extraction in methanol with sonication is the most favorable, obtaining the best results: ursolic acid (11,234.97 μg/g), oleanolic acid (6151.67 μg/g) and betulinic acid (169.88 μg/g).
There are very few studies on the non-volatile components of Melissa officinalis. Mencherini et al. [24,26] found five disulfated ursene triterpenes and an ursenic glycoside from an extract of dried stems and leaves, and two sulfated triterpenes in an extract of fresh leaves and stems.
In a recent study, Abdel-Naime et al. [25] identified three ursene triterpene glycosides and a known 23-sulfate triterpenoid glycoside ester of niga-ichigoside F1, which was isolated before by Mencherini et al. [24]. The three ursene triterpenes glycoside discovered were Melissioside A-C.
Triterpenes are found in Melissa officinalis in high concentrations, along with numerous polyphenolic compounds.

2.3. Polyphenolic Compounds

Polyphenolic compounds are a group of secondary metabolites which includes flavonoids (e.g., anthocyanins, flavones, isoflavones) and phenolic acids, which have many biological properties (Table 3) [28].
Phenolic acids compose a large group of natural compounds, which exhibit a wide range of biological activities. Flavonoids are a class of polyphenolic compounds, classified according to their chemical structures into flavonols, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, catechins, anthocyanidins and chalcones [31]. Phenolic acids and flavonoids contain chemical structural elements that are responsible for the antioxidant process, and their antioxidant activities have been well established biochemically. Phenolic acids are important bioactive constituents of Melissa officinalis, among which are rosmarinic, caffeic, chlorogenic and ferulic acids. Following the phenolic profiles of the three types of extracts from the study performed by Ghiulai et al. [4], it was observed that rosmarinic acid was obtained in the highest amount (86,637.60 μg/g). The extraction with methanol, by sonication, favored the extraction of all of the phenolic compounds sought; thus, it can be observed that, depending on the extraction technique, some compounds can be in high concentrations and others cannot be detected.
Barros et al. [28] carried out a comparative study on the phenolic profiles of commercial samples and samples grown in the garden, prepared by infusion. In the samples were identified rosmarinic acid, as the main component, and derivatives of caffeic acid (trimers: lithospermic acid, salvianolic acid A, C and F and yunnaneic acid F; tetramers: salvianolic acid B and sagerinic acid). Despite the similar profile observed in all of the studied lemon balm samples, the quantities found of each compound were different. Cultivated and in vitro cultured samples presented the lowest quantities of phenolic compounds (59.59 and 30.21 mg/g infusion), whereas commercial samples showed the highest contents (109.24 mg/g for a tea bag and 101.03 mg/g for a granulate sample).
Through extraction techniques—enzyme-assisted extraction and pressurized liquid extraction—Miron et al. [32] obtained extracts from Melissa officinalis which were very rich in caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid derivatives, some of which were identified for the first time in this plant, such as: salvianolic acid H/I, salvianolic acid E, salvianolic acid L and the salvianolic acid L isomer.
Gallic acid is one of the biologically active phenolic acids that was reported in the study of Perreira et al. [33] as an important phenolic acid for the antioxidant and anticholinesterase activity of Melissa officinalis.
In a study of seven medicinal plants (from five plant families) grown in Slovakia, Gayibov et al. [30] investigated the content of polyphenols and the content of flavonoids, as well as the antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity. This study included three plants of the Lamiaceae family: Melissa officinalis, Salvia officinalis and Thymus pannonicus. The polyphenolic content obtained is quite similar (20.90 ± 1.06, 20.01 ± 0.71 and 23.98 ± 1.37 mg gallic acid equivalents/g sample), but the flavonoid content varied lightly (11.56 ± 0.15, 14.35 ± 0.49 and 19.35 ± 1.22 mg quercetin/g of sample). In this study, it was observed that Melissa officinalis contained the highest content of rosmarinic acid (6914.1 ± 779), but some of the compounds which followed were missing.
Spiridon et al. [34] conducted a comparative study on the polyphenol content of some important medicinal plants in Romania, originating in the southeastern region, such as oregano (Origanum vulgare), lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and lemon balm (Melissa officinalis). In this study, the extraction yield for plants, calculated on the dry weight of the raw material, was as follows: 7.89% for lavender, 11.38% for oregano, and 11.93% for lemon balm. In lemon balm, the total content of phenolic compounds (54.9± 2.14 mg gallic acid equivalents/g) and flavonoids (25.8 ± 6.26 mg rosmarinic acid/g) was identified to be higher than in lavender but lower than in oregano.
In another study conducted on Melissa officinalis grown in Romania, Fierascu et al. [29] highlighted the phytochemical composition of the ethanolic extract from dried leaves, which was obtained by the accelerated extraction of the solvent. In this study, high values were obtained for chlorogenic acid (72.529 ± 0.24 mg/kg), ferulic acid (45.489 ± 0.15 mg/kg), quercetin (153.465 ± 0.32 mg/kg) and rutin (1462.997 ± 1.24 mg/kg).
Melissa officinalis is a plant which is rich in polyphenolic compounds, but depending on the extraction method and the solvent used, different compositions of the extracts can be obtained; this influences the biological activities strongly.

2.4. Other Components

As presented above, Melissa officinalis is a source of active biocompounds such as volatile compounds, triterpenes and polyphenolic compounds, but, in addition to these, it also contains other important biological active agents. Ashori et al. [35] conducted a study on the chemical composition of the stalk of Melissa officinalis. The content of extractive agents, lignin, polysaccharides and ash was determined, with the observation that the results showed a high content of alpha-cellulose and a low content of lignin. Komes et al. [36] reported the content of tannins, phenolic acids and flavonoids in non-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzed extracts from various plants, including Melissa officinalis. Dias et al. [37] performed a comparative study between two commercial samples, an in vitro culture sample and a normal culture sample. After the analysis of all of the samples, they observed the highest levels of proteins (8 g/100 g dw) and ash (12 g/100 g dw) in the in vitro cultured lemon balm content; the highest levels of carbohydrates were found in the granulate commercial sample (85 g/100 g dw), and a bag of commercial lemon balm had the highest energetic value (377 kcal/100 g dw) due to its higher fat content (3 g/100 g dw).
Overall, Melissa officinalis has a complex chemical composition, with many active biocompounds, which differ depending on the way in which the extraction is performed and the part of the plant that is subjected to extraction.

3. Pharmacological Studies

According to many biological studies, plant extracts and volatile oils are known for many beneficial activities for the human body. Melissa officinalis is considered to be a medicinal plant due to the numerous pharmacological effects associated with its chemical composition (Table 4).
Some of the pharmacological activities may be connected with the polyphenolic compounds occurring in Melissa officinalis, which include phenolic acids and flavonoids [45,58]. Most studies have focused on Melissa officinalis leaf extracts, obtaining phenolic profiles correlated with antiproliferative [39], antiangiogenic [4], antiviral [55,59], antioxidant [41,42], anti-anxiety [45], antidepressant [45], anti-Alzheimer [53], neuroprotective [46], cardioprotective [43], antifungal [56,57] and antibacterial [42] effects. Moaca et al. [38] performed a comparative study between extractions from stems and leaves in order to evaluate the antioxidant activity, the total phenolic contents, and the cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects. In this study, a good antioxidant activity was observed to be correlated with the high total polyphenol content of the leaf ethanolic extract (32.76 mg gallic acid equivalents/g) as opposed to the seed ethanolic extract (8.4 mg gallic acid equivalents/g). The extracts obtained showed a different profile of cytotoxic effects on breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231, but with significant antitumor activity for future in vitro studies. Ghiulai et al. [4] investigated the potential for angioprevention and chemoprevention in breast cancer from various extracts of Melissa officinalis. The antioxidant activity and in vitro effect on cell viability were evaluated on two breast cancer cell lines, MCF7 and MDA-MB-231. Based on the evaluation in ovo, using the chorioallantoic membrane test, it was found that 96% ethanolic extract is the strongest chemopreventive agent.
The ethanolic extract of Melissa officinalis showed an antiproliferative effect on the human colon cancer cell line (HCT-116) [39], as well as a strong antitumor effect on the human tumor cell lines MCF-7, AGS and NCI-H460 [40].
Many studies have shown the good antioxidant activity of Melissa officinalis extracts, which is an important step in the identification of the various beneficial effects on the human body. Perreira et al. [41] suggested that this plant could be used as a potential agent for the prevention of various neurological diseases associated with oxidative damage, reporting the best antioxidant activity and the highest content of reducing agents compared to Matricaria recutita and Cymbopogon citratus.
In vitro studies have shown potential pharmacological effects of Melissa officinalis extracts on specific cells or tissues, but in vivo animal studies are needed in order to confirm these effects.
The results of in vivo studies in mice have shown that Melissa officinalis extract can be considered a protective agent in various neurological diseases associated with ischemic brain injury [46], and can inhibit anxiety and depression [45].
In vivo studies have shows the pharmacological effects of doses of Melissa officinalis extracts in animals. In order to develop new drugs, it is necessary to move forward from the equivalent dose for animals to the equivalent dose for humans. There are different calculation models for the estimation of the equivalent dose in humans based on existing studies. The estimation of the human equivalent dose is an important step in the development of a new herbal medicine in order to further evaluate the toxic or safety aspects. In order to facilitate the interpretation of the results of in vivo studies, we converted animal doses to human equivalent doses (HED) with the following formula [60]:
H E D   m g k g = A n i m a l   d o s e   m g k g * A n i m a l   w e i g h t   k g H u m a n   w e i g h t   k g 0.33
Based on the estimated human equivalent doses, it can be concluded that antihyperglycemic activity is assured with 0.38–1.5 mg/human/day, while cardioprotective activity can be assured with 253.8–1014 mg/human/day, and anxiolytic activity can be assured with 234–703 mg/human/day; these values are comparable to the drugs available on the market [61,62,63]. In the case of neuroprotection, the estimated human equivalent dose is 501–4000 mg/human/day, close to the value for phenobarbital, which is administered at 40 mg/kg [64]. Analgesic activity can be assured with only 52–207 mg/human/day, which is many times lower than the daily dose for other available drugs [65]; however, for hypnosis a much higher estimated dose is necessary, such as 888–3554 mg/human/day [66,67,68]. In all cases, the estimation of the daily dose was carried out for an average body weight of 60 kg. However, it must be taken into account that biochemical processes vary between species, and that clinical trials are needed in order to ensure that a new drug is effective and safe.
Table 5 presents some of the most important components of Melissa officinalis extracts, along with their documented antimicrobial, antioxidant or anti-inflamatory activities. The biological profile of the essential oil or extracts from Melissa officinalis is the direct result of these compounds’ presence. One natural successful strategy to enhance a property, be it antioxidant or antimicrobial activity, is to combine multiple compounds with the desired property. The synergy will allow the manifestation of a higher level of antibacterial activity, for example, while keeping the concentration low. This is also a successful strategy to combat microbial acquired resistance.
The synergic activity was well documented in the literature for several classes of drugs/substances, with some of these effects being reviewed already for antibiotics and plant extracts/essential oils even in multidrug-resistant staphylococci [103].
Melissa officinalis and other plant extracts (Iberis amara, Silybum marianum and a mixture of Angelica archangelica and Carum carvi) were evaluated in association with STW5, a well-known fixed herbal multicomponent preparation recommended, at least, by the German treatment guideline for some gastrointestinal diseases under non-inflammatory and inflammatory conditions. It was found that only Melissa officinalis plant extract manifested a strong synergic effect when intestinal smooth muscle cells were considered [104]. The oral administration of a Melissa officinalis infusion can be also beneficial for the radiology staff, as the oxidative stress and DNA damage are reduced [105]. At present, only a few studies have been reported on the synergies between Melissa officinalis and other plants. Due to the volatile compounds in Melissa officinalis essential oil, the following effects have been reported: antifungal, antioxidant, antidiabetic, antibacterial and antimicrobial effects. These effects have also been reported in various extracts of Melissa officinalis.
In some research articles, in vitro and in vivo studies have been done to attribute pharmacological effects to Melissa officinalis, but more studies are needed in order to correlate the biological activity with the presence of certain components, and finally to be able to design specific compositions to obtain the desired biological activity.

4. Controlled Release Systems

Recent medical research has been related to the development of drug delivery systems containing natural or synthetic active substances (including those of herbal origin) with the main aim to provide biological active agents according to a proper kinetic, in order to protect them against harsh conditions or to assure targeted delivery [106]. The use of new drug delivery systems to transport drugs to certain parts of the body is an option that could solve various problems like in vivo instability, poor bioavailability, low solubility, and poor absorption in the body [107]. When a drug is introduced into the human body using traditional methods of administration, there are a lot of biotransformations that occur as a result of the drug’s interaction with the biological environment. Drug delivery systems have been designed to change the pharmacokinetics of drugs; thus, the major objectives of nanomedicine in terms of controlled drug administration are to maximize the bioavailability and efficacy of drugs, and to control their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, nonspecific toxicity, immunogenicity, and biorecognition [108,109].
A drug delivery system refers to a technical system that comprehensively regulates the availability of the drugs in living organisms in terms of the place of delivery, time and dose. The main objectives of a drug delivery system is to ensure the controlled release of drugs and their targeted delivery, to improve solubility and stability, to regulate metabolism and promote absorption, and to transport drugs across biological barriers [110]. These systems are designed to deliver the active content in a predictable in vivo pattern over an expected period of time [111].
The development of nanotechnology has led to the formation of specific nano-carriers of organic or inorganic, natural or synthetic origin. Nano-carriers are materials with nanometric dimensions which are used as vehicles for the transport of the desired biologically active agents [112]. The incorporation of plant extracts in these carriers (such as vesicles, microspheres, nanoemulsions, polymeric nanoparticles, nanocapsules, solid lipid nanoparticles, or phytosomes, etc.) has proven to be a new technology with a lot of advantages for the administration of herbal medicines [113,114].
Drugs typically interact specifically with biological receptors or molecules, such as enzymes, to produce physiological or pharmacological effects, either by activating or inhibiting these biological targets [115]. The main challenge is to develop an effective formulation that combines the active compounds of interest with a suitable delivery system to produce the desired effect [109].
Among recent research studies, Melissa officinalis is one of the medicinal plants from which bioactive compounds are extracted in order to be introduced into controlled release systems (Figure 2). Furthermore, some of the components also found in Melissa officinalis extracts have been used in various research studies as active compounds incorporated into controlled release systems.

4.1. Drug Delivery Systems Based on Pure Components Which Are Available in Melissa officinalis

Depending on the type of delivery system and the encapsulated active substance, numerous controlled release systems with different biological effects have been developed (Table 6).
Nanoparticles used as delivery vehicles consist of various biodegradable materials, such as natural or synthetic polymers (including proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, lactides, polyurethanes, and polyglycols, etc.), ceramic powders, metals and metal oxides, and composites, etc. [131]. The composition and morphology of nanoparticles can be adapted to produce a suitable release profile in order to cross the biological barriers in the body [132].
Caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid are phenolic acids which are naturally present in many plants, and it is known that these phenolic compounds are antioxidants which can be used to fight against many diseases. In the study of Sguizzato et al. [118], it was proposed to load caffeic acid into solid lipid nanoparticles based on polaxamer. Caffeic acid-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles were produced by a method based on lipid fusion, homogenization and ultrasound treatment. The results of this study confirmed the production of a nanoparticulate gel with caffeic acid, following their previous study on the incorporation of caffeic acid into solid lipid nanoparticles [117]. In both studies, the encapsulation of caffeic acid in solid lipid nanoparticles has been shown to be promising in the application of caffeic acid to the skin, and/or for its delivery to the colon. Subsequently, in a study by Hallan et al. [116], a comparison was made between solid lipid nanoparticles and ethosomal vesicles regarding the skin delivery of caffeic acid in which the antioxidant activity and permeability of caffeic acid in the skin were evaluated in vitro, and an in vivo comparative irritation test was performed.
Wani et al. [121] developed rosmarinic-acid-loaded chitosan nanoparticles, and their in vitro and in vivo release properties were evaluated. Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide with versatile biopolymeric properties. Due to its properties, chitosan is recognized for biomedical use as a safe material; it can be used in various applications, including drug delivery [133]. Rosmarinic acid is a polyphenolic compound with biological activity monitored in many studies with plant extracts. da Silva et al. [119,120] studied the encapsulation in chitosan nanoparticles of rosmarinic acid from Salvia officinalis and Satureja montana extracts. In a subsequent study, they showed that the obtained nanoparticles can be used as drug delivery systems for ocular applications in oxidative eye conditions. Chung et al. [122] synthesized nanoparticles from poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and rosmarinic acid, and found that this type of nanoparticle is a promising alternative in the treatment of various inflammatory diseases. The results obtained by Bhatt et al. [123] confirmed that the formulation of solid lipid nanoparticles as a drug delivery system loaded with rosmarinic acid is a non-invasive nose-to-brain drug delivery system, and that it is a promising approach for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles are efficient delivery systems compared to other materials they have demonstrated excellent properties for applications in the biological system. Depending on the synthesis conditions, different types of mesoporous silica with variable pore sizes can be obtained.
Arriagada et al. [124] developed mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with rosmarinic acid and morin hydrate (a flavonoid found in fruits and plants). The results of the encapsulation of rosmarinic acid and morin hydrate in mesoporous silica indicated strong antioxidant effects. After studying the release kinetics of the substances, the authors of the article recommend the incorporation of antioxidant nanosystems into pharmaceutical formulations for the release of the active substances in the intestine.
Citral is the main component of the essential oil of the dried leaves of Melissa officinalis; Nordin et al. [125] loaded it into lipid nanoparticles for the administration of anti-cancer drugs. In this study, the nanoparticles obtained by the loading of citral in a nanostructured lipid carrrier system were characterized, and their safety profiles were examined in vitro and in vivo by observing that they are not toxic. Subsequently, Nordin et al. [126] reported that a citral-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier is an effective delivery system for triple-negative breast cancer treatments.
Hydrogels are a class of materials with multiple properties, including a matrix for the encapsulation, transport and release of drugs. Hydrogels based on polysaccharide, especially those based on chitosan, provide a high degree of biocompatibility. Ailincai et al. [127,128] created a series of drug delivery systems prepared by the hydrogelation of chitosan with citral in the presence of an antineoplastic drug 5-fluorouracil; in the following study, they designed and characterized the hydrogels obtained by reacting PEGylated chitosan derivatives with citral. By following the in vitro and in vivo release kinetics, the efficacy of these drug delivery systems was established.
In a comparative study, Usach et al. [129] studied the loading of the essential oil from the leaves of Citrus limon var. pompia and citral into phospholipid vesicles. The phospholipid vesicles with essential oil were compared with the phospholipid vesicles containing citral, and it was found that they are small in size; both showed antimicrobial activity, but the vesicles with citral were slightly more effective against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans.
β-caryophyllene is a volatile compound with many biological activities; it is found in large quantities in essential oil extracted from various plants. Because β-caryophyllene has a high level of lipophilicity and poor stability in hydrophilic environments, several complex systems have been tried. Di Sotto et al. [130] studied the preparation of liposomes from phosphatidylcholine in soy with β-caryophyllene by the thin-film hydration method, followed by extrusion. The results of the study showed that liposomes loaded with β-caryophyllene are potential effective delivery systems, and that the parameters of the lipid–drug ratio and lamerity are important for the release of β-caryophyllene by liposomes.
Scientific advances are based on research into biomaterials which are compatible with the biologically active constituents of extracts in order to revolutionize drug delivery systems. At present, there is a continuous demand for new biomaterials at the nano scale because the interest for the development of nanomedicine is very high [107].

4.2. Drug Delivery Systems Based on Melissa officinalis Extracts

Regarding the expansion of research into new controlled release systems containing active biocomponents extracted from natural plants, Melissa officinalis is one of the recently studied plants. Different types of Melissa officinalis extracts incorporated into matrices in the form of glycerosomes, films, hydrogels, dispersions and nanocapsules have been used to form controlled release systems (Table 7).
Antiherpetic activity has been demonstrated in two studies. Vanti et al. [134] studied the loading of Melissa officinalis essential oil inside glycerosomes, and they evaluated these vesicles for anti-herpetic activity against HSV type 1. Initially, they tried to obtain liposomal vesicles with phosphatidylcholine (P90G) and cholesterol in different ratios, but they were difficult to reproduce and poorly stable, so they approached the situation differently and made blisters out of a lipid film. The lipid film was composed of P90G and cholesterol, and was then hydrated under various conditions with a 10% v/v glycerol/water solution; it was then loaded into glycerosomes at 10 mg/mL essential oil of Melissa officinalis by the thin-layer evaporation method, in two steps. Analyses and tests showed that they obtained spherical glycosomes with several lamellae, which were nano-sized and able to pass through the pores of the skin, and were also able keep the constituents of Melissa officinalis essential oil from the degradation process during storage. In-vitro research showed that glycerosomes loaded with essential oil have a strong anti-HSV-1 activity, without cytotoxic effects.
In the second study, Rechia et al. [135] studied the properties of a drug administration system for the treatment of labial herpes. Four polymeric films with different concentrations of starch, glycerol and hydroalcoholic extract of Melissa officinalis were trialed. The results of the analysis showed that the increase in glycerol content in the films improved the characteristics of the drug delivery system, and that the films obtained from starch/glycerol/Melissa officinalis extract can be used for the treatment of labial herpes.
Due to the antimicrobial action of the essential oil, Serra et al. [138] found an antifungal drug to inhibit the growth of Candida albicans in the oral cavity. In this study, an attempt was made to encapsulate Melissa officinalis essential oil in methylcellulose hydrogels. Methylcellulose was used to prepare 10% (w/v) hydrogels with 1 and 2% (w/v) essential oil from Melissa officinalis. The analysis showed the use of hydrogels as drug delivery systems because methylcellulose hydrogel (10% (w/v)) with 2% (v/v) essential oil of Melissa officinalis significantly reduced the retention of Candida albicans.
Najafi-Soulari et al. [139] investigated the encapsulation of Melissa officinalis aqueous extract in calcium alginate hydrogel beads. Three significant parameters (extract, sodium alginate, and calcium chloride concentrations) were varied in order to obtain the maximum encapsulation efficiency. It was proven that the antioxidant activity of the extract did not change after encapsulation, and the most effective encapsulation was obtained with the concentration of sodium alginate solution, at 1.84%, the concentration of calcium chloride, at 0.2%, and the concentration of lemon balm extract, at 0.4%. In this study, they tried to cover the alginate beads with chitosan, but the results showed that the extract content is lost due to the immersion of the beads in the chitosan solution. However, the coated beads had better results for the release of the extract in the simulated intestinal fluid, indicating the protective effect of the chitosan layer.
Sani et al. [136,137,146] studied the encapsulation of Melissa officinalis essential oil in microcapsules and bioactive films. In the first study [146], the encapsulation of essential oil in isolated whey proteins and sodium caseinate was investigated using the ultrasonication technique. The results showed that ultrasound intensification had a negative impact, and that the smallest particle size was obtained at higher isolated whey protein levels, and with the lowest ultrasonic power. Sani et al. [136,137] produced bioactive films from chitosan and zinc oxide nanoparticles—respectively, sodium caseinate and zinc oxide nanoparticles—in which Melissa officinalis essential oil was encapsulated, and the antimicrobial properties of the obtained films were tested.
Santamaria-Echart et al. [140] studied different ways of incorporating extracts of Melissa officinalis and Salvia officinalis into water-based polyurethane–urea dispersions. The plant extracts were obtained by infusion, and were incorporated into water-based polyurethane-urea dispersions in different phases of the production process (the post-, in-situ and pre-methods). Regarding the antibacterial properties, the results showed that the properties of the two extracts differed depending on the method of their incorporation into the polyurethane nanoparticles.
In order to create a bioactive surface, Grumezescu et al. [142] functionalized magnetic microspheres with Melissa officinalis essential oil. The magnetic microspheres were composed of nanoparticles of magnetite (8 nm), essential oil, polylactic acid and chitosan using a solvent evaporation method, and were film-coated by MAPLE (Matrix Assisted Pulsed Laser Evaporation). In vitro experiments showed that the prepared surface had anti-staphylococcal properties.
Metallic nanoparticles are used in numerous research studies; as such, Fierascu et al. [29] synthesized silver, gold metallic nanoparticles, and gold–silver bimetallic nanoparticles with ethanolic extract from Melissa officinalis. The analytical results showed that silver nanoparticles with a diameter of about 13 nm, gold nanoparticles with a diameter of about 10 nm, and bimetallic nanoparticles composed of small particles of about 8 nm with a flower-like structure were obtained. The nanoparticles obtained were tested for their antimicrobial properties and mutagenicity, but it was observed that bimetallic nanoparticles have an intermediate biological action, and can be used further in applications.
In the study by Ahmeda et al. [143], Melissa officinalis aqueous extract incorporated into silver nanoparticles had a pharmaceutical potential similar to mitoxantrone (a chemotherapeutic agent). The nanoparticles obtained were spherical, measuring between 5–30 nm, and it was observed that the use of a higher concentration of extract decreases the average size of the silver nanoparticles. By performing in vitro and in vivo experiments, similar results were obtained with mitroxantrone for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, and the excellent antioxidant and cytotoxic properties of silver nanoparticles with Melissa officinalis extract were observed. Ruiz-Baltazar et al. [144,147] performed a study on the synthesis of silver nanoparticles, and in the next study they synthesized a silver-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. In both studies, the extract of Melissa officinalis obtained by infusion was incorporated into the silver nanoparticles. It was observed that the functionalized nanoparticles showed a very good interaction with the hydroxyapatite matrix because its structure allows the substitution of calcium ions (Ca2+) with other metal ions such as silver (Ag+). The antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles functionalized with Melissa officinalis extract were tested, but the silver–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite was characterized only chemically and structurally.
The results of the studies showed the compatibility of Melissa officinalis extracts with different types of carrier materials. Some systems could be enhanced with different substances in order to obtain materials with the best possible properties from systems in which different properties have been demonstrated, including increased stability, increased activity, increased solubility, and decreased toxicity [113].
The incorporation of zinc oxide nanoparticles and Melissa officinalis essential oil greatly improved the physical and mechanical properties of chitosan [136] and sodium caseinate films [137]. In the case of the systems obtained from starch, glycerol and Melissa officinalis extract, an increase of the characteristics of the films obtained was observed with the increase of the glycerol content [135].
There are many examples in the literature, such as those listed, but one needs to know the scope of the materials and the desired characteristics to be improved with different substances.
Controlled release systems offer many advantages in the development of medicine, but most of the findings focus on acute toxicity [148]. In order to evaluate the toxicity and safety of a system, long-term toxicity studies are required, as various interactions may occur between the active substance, the material, and the biological environment, in time. At the cellular level, various reactions may occur as a result of the encounter with the nanomaterial, such that various changes in the balance between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms can be identified [149]. Toxicological analyzes are critical, and play a key role in the development of new systems [150]. Thus, in order to be officially approved as a medicinal product, controlled release systems must be subjected to in vitro and in vivo tests of their toxicology within the preclinical development phase.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

This review summarized the phytochemical composition and pharmacological effects of Melissa officinalis, as well as the controlled release systems which have been investigated to date. Studies on the chemical composition of the essential oil and many types of extracts have been reported; depending on the area, the period, and the method of harvesting the plant, different concentrations of active substances have been obtained. The pharmacological effects of the extracts are mainly assigned to the presence of large amounts of polyphenolic compounds, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiproliferative, and cytotoxic effects, and so on. By investigating the mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics of the extracts and active compounds, new systems with biological activities for the human body and the environment can be obtained. The controlled release systems developed so far represent a future perspective for the development of new systems. These systems may contain other materials as a delivery system, or those made so far may be improved. With many substances, essential oils, and natural plant extracts available, many materials can be functionalized in order to develop controlled release systems. Materials such as silica, polysaccharides, polymers, and lipids can be used as encapsulation carriers. Functionalized controlled release systems can be enhanced with various substances so that they can be used, depending on the desired field.
As a future perspective, the phytochemical composition and pharmacological effects attributed to Melissa officinalis represent an opportunity to create new controlled release systems with the potential for targeted delivery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P., L.N.C. and L.M.; methodology, O.C.O. and A.F.; writing—preparation of the original project, G.P., L.M. and O.C.O.; writing—revision and editing, D.F. and A.F.; visualization, D.F., L.N.C. and O.C.O.; supervision, A.F.; project administration, D.F. and A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UEFISCDI through the PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019 project “Evaluarea potentialului de exploatare a materialelor poroase in tratarea disbiozelor microbiotei” no. 524PED⁄2020, as well as Cost Action CA 20126; the APC was funded by University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Available on demand.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Süntar, I. Importance of ethnopharmacological studies in drug discovery: Role of medicinal plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bonifácio, B.V.; Silva, P.B.; Ramos, M.A.; Negri, K.M.; Bauab, T.M.; Chorilli, M. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and herbal medicines: A review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, W.; Xu, J.; Fang, H.; Li, Z.; Li, M. Advances and challenges in medicinal plant breeding. Plant Sci. 2020, 298, 110573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ghiulai, R.; Avram, S.; Stoian, D.; Pavel, I.Z.; Coricovac, D.; Oprean, C.; Vlase, L.; Farcas, C.; Mioc, M.; Minda, D.; et al. Lemon Balm Extracts Prevent Breast Cancer Progression In Vitro and In Ovo on Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 6489159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Abdel-Naime, W.A.; Fahim, J.R.; Fouad, M.A.; Kamel, M.S. Antibacterial, antifungal, and GC-MS studies of Melissa officinalis. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mokhtarzadeh, S.; Demirci, B.; Goger, G.; Khawar, K.M.; Kirimer, N. Characterization of volatile components in Melissa officinalis L. under in vitro conditions. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2017, 29, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moradkhani, H.; Sargsyan, E.; Bibak, H.; Naseri, B.; Sadat-Hosseini, M.; Fayazi-Barjin, A.; Meftahizade, H. Melissa officinalis L., a valuable medicine plant: A review. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 2753–2759. [Google Scholar]
  8. Miraj, S.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M.; Kiani, S. Melissa officinalis L: A Review Study with an Antioxidant Prospective. J. Evid.-Based Integr. Med. 2017, 22, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zarei, A.; Ashtiyani, S.C.; Taheri, S.; Rasekh, F. Comparison between effects of different doses of Melissa officinalis and atorvastatin on the activity of liver enzymes in hypercholesterolemia rats. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2014, 4, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shakeri, A.; Sahebkar, A.; Javadi, B. Melissa officinalis L.—A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 188, 204–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bağdat, R.B.; Coşge, B. The essential oil of Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.), its components and using fields. J. Fac. Agric. OMU 2006, 21, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nouri, A.; Mirabzadeh, M.; Safari, N.; Ebadi, M.T. Evaluation of Essential Oil Composition and Rosmarinic Acid Content in Lemon Balm (Melissa officinalis L.) Cultivated in South of Iran. J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2020, 9, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R.; Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Szymczak, G. Volatile Constituents of Melissa officinalis Leaves Determined by Plant Age. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Souihi, M.; Amri, I.; Souissi, A.; Hosni, K.; Ben Brahim, N.; Annabi, M. Essential oil and fatty acid composition of Melissa officinalis L. Prog. Nutr. 2020, 22, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abdellatif, F.; Boudjella, H.; Zitouni, A.; Hassani, A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from leaves of Algerian Melissa officinalis L. EXCLI J. 2014, 13, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Seidler-Łożykowska, K.; Zawirska-Wojtasiak, R.; Wojtowicz, E.; Bocianowski, J. Essential oil content and its composition in herb of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) breeding strains. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2017, 29, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Taherpour, A.; Maroofi, H.; Rafie, Z.; Larijani, K. Chemical composition analysis of the essential oil of Melissa officinalis L. from Kurdistan, Iran by HS/SPME method and calculation of the biophysicochemical coefficients of the components. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahl, H.A.S.-A.; Sabra, A.S.; Gendy, A.S.; Astatkie, T. Essential Oil Content and Concentration of Constituents of Lemon Balm (Melissa officinalis L.) at Different Harvest Dates. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2018, 21, 1410–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kowalski, R.; Kowalska, G.; Jankowska, M.; Nawrocka, A.; Kałwa, K.; Pankiewicz, U.; Włodarczyk-Stasiak, M. Secretory structures and essential oil composition of selected industrial species of lamiaceae. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2019, 18, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kittler, J.; Krüger, H.; Lohwasser, U.; Ulrich, D.; Zeiger, B.; Schütze, W.; Böttcher, C.; Gudi, G.; Kästner, U.; Marthe, F. Evaluation of 28 balm and lemon balm (Melissa officinalis) accessions for content and composition of essential oil and content of rosmarinic acid. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2018, 65, 745–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Basta, A.; Tzakou, O.; Couladis, M. Composition of the leaves essential oil of Melissa officinalis s. l. from Greece. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barakat, S.A.; Hudaib, M.; Burns, D.T. Composition of Volatile Oil and Methanolic Extract of Jordanian Melissa officinalis L. and Actions against Human Cancer Cell Lines. Orient. J. Chem. 2016, 32, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Thimmappa, R.; Geisler, K.; Louveau, T.; O’Maille, P.; Osbourn, A. Triterpene Biosynthesis in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 225–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mencherini, T.; Picerno, P.; Scesa, C.; Aquino, R. Triterpene, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Compounds from Melissa officinalis. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1889–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdel-Naime, W.; Fahim, J.; Abdelmohsen, U.; Fouad, M.; Al-Footy, K.; Abdel-Lateff, A.; Kamel, M. New antimicrobial triterpene glycosides from lemon balm (Melissa officinalis). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 125, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mencherini, T.; Picerno, P.; Russo, P.; Meloni, M.; Aquino, R. Composition of the Fresh Leaves and Stems of Melissa officinalis and Evaluation of Skin Irritation in a Reconstituted Human Epidermis Model. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1512–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ibarra, A.; Feuillere, N.; Roller, M.; Lesburgere, E.; Beracochea, D. Effects of chronic administration of Melissa officinalis L. extract on anxiety-like reactivity and on circadian and exploratory activities in mice. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barros, L.; Dueñas, M.; Dias, M.I.; Sousa, M.J.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profiles of cultivated, in vitro cultured and commercial samples of Melissa officinalis L. infusions. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fierascu, I.; Georgiev, M.I.; Ortan, A.; Fierascu, R.C.; Avramescu, S.M.; Ionescu, D.; Sutan, A.; Brinzan, A.; Ditu, L.M. Phyto-mediated metallic nano-architectures via Melissa officinalis L.: Synthesis, characterization and biological properties. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gayibova, S.; Ivanišová, E.; Árvay, J.; Hŕstková, M.; Slávik, M.; Petrová, J.; Hleba, L.; Tóth, T.; Kačániová, M.; Aripov, T. In vitro screening of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of medicinal plants growing in Slovakia. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2019, 8, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Miron, T.; Herrero, M.; Ibanez, E. Enrichment of antioxidant compounds from lemon balm (Melissa officinalis) by pressurized liquid extraction and enzyme-assisted extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1288, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Pereira, R.P.; Boligon, A.A.; Appel, A.S.; Fachinetto, R.; Ceron, C.S.; Tanus-Santos, J.E.; Athayde, M.L.; da Rocha, J.B.T. Chemical composition, antioxidant and anticholinesterase activity of Melissa officinalis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 53, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Spiridon, I.; Colceru, S.; Anghel, N.; Teaca, C.A.; Bodirlau, R.; Armatu, A. Antioxidant capacity and total phenolic contents of oregano (Origanum vulgare), lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and lemon balm (Melissa officinalis) from Romania. Nat. Prod. Res. 2011, 25, 1657–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ashori, A.; Hamzeh, Y.; Amani, F. Lemon Balm (Melissa officinalis) Stalk: Chemical Composition and Fiber Morphology. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Komes, D.; Belščak-Cvitanović, A.; Horžić, D.; Rusak, G.; Likić, S.; Berendika, M. Phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of some traditionally used medicinal plants affected by the extraction time and hydrolysis. Phytochem. Anal. 2011, 22, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Sousa, M.J.; Ferreira, I.C. Systematic comparison of nutraceuticals and antioxidant potential of cultivated, in vitro cultured and commercial Melissa officinalis samples. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1866–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moacă, E.A.; Farcaş, C.; Ghiţu, A.; Coricovac, D.; Popovici, R.; Cărăba-Meiţă, N.L.; Ardelean, F.; Antal, D.S.; Dehelean, C.; Avram, Ş. A Comparative Study of Melissa officinalis Leaves and Stems Ethanolic Extracts in terms of Antioxidant, Cytotoxic, and Antiproliferative Potential. Evid.-Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2018, 2018, 7860456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Encalada, M.A.; Hoyos, K.M.; Rehecho, S.; Berasategi, I.; De Ciriano, M.G.; Ansorena, D.; Astiasarán, I.; Navarro-Blasco, I.; Cavero, R.Y.; Calvo, M.I. Anti-proliferative Effect of Melissa officinalis on Human Colon Cancer Cell Line. Mater. Veg. 2011, 66, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Magalhães, D.B.; Castro, I.; Lopes-Rodrigues, V.; Pereira, J.M.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Xavier, C.P.R.; Vasconcelos, M.H. Melissa officinalis L. ethanolic extract inhibits the growth of a lung cancer cell line by interfering with the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 3134–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pereira, R.P.; Fachinetto, R.; Prestes, A.; Puntel, R.; Da Silva, G.N.S.; Heinzmann, B.M.; Boschetti, T.K.; Athayde, M.L.; Bürger, M.E.; Morel, A.F.; et al. Antioxidant Effects of Different Extracts from Melissa officinalis, Matricaria recutita and Cymbopogon citratus. Neurochem. Res. 2009, 34, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ehsani, A.; Alizadeh, O.; Hashemi, M.; Afshari, A.; Aminzare, M. Phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of Melissa officinalis and Dracocephalum moldavica essential oils. Vet. Res. Forum Int. Q. J. 2017, 8, 223–229. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sedighi, M.; Faghihi, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M.; Rasoulian, B.; Nazari, A. Cardioprotective effect of ethanolic leaf extract of Melissa officinalis L. against regional ischemia-induced arrhythmia and heart injury after five days of reperfusion in rats. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. IJPR 2019, 18, 1530–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hasanein, P.; Riahi, H. Antinociceptive and Antihyperglycemic Effects of Melissa officinalis Essential Oil in an Experimental Model of Diabetes. Med. Princ. Pract. 2015, 24, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ghazizadeh, J.; Hamedeyazdan, S.; Torbati, M.; Farajdokht, F.; Fakhari, A.; Mahmoudi, J.; Araj-khodaei, M.; Sadigh-Eteghad, S. Melissa officinalis L. hydro-alcoholic extract inhibits anxiety and depression through prevention of central oxidative stress and apoptosis. Exp. Physiol. 2020, 105, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bayat, M.; Tameh, A.A.; Ghahremani, M.H.; Akbari, M.; Mehr, S.E.; Khanavi, M.; Hassanzadeh, G. Neuroprotective properties of Melissa officinalis after hypoxic-ischemic injury both in vitro and in vivo. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 20, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Awad, R.; Muhammad, A.; Durst, T.; Trudeau, V.L.; Arnason, J.T. Bioassay-guided fractionation of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) using an in vitro measure of GABA transaminase activity. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cunha, F.; Tintino, S.R.; Figueredo, F.; Barros, L.; Duarte, A.E.; Gomez, M.C.V.; Coronel, C.C.; Rolón, M.; Leite, N.; Sobral-Souza, C.E.; et al. HPLC-DAD phenolic profile, cytotoxic and anti-kinetoplastidae activity of Melissa officinalis. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1664–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Rastegarian, A.; Abedi, H.; Jahromi, H.K.; Zarei, S.; Nematollahi, A.; Mansouri, E.; Sameni, H. Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Melissa officinalis in the Rat Model of Hot-Water and Formalin-Induced Pain. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2020, 13, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hajhashemi, V.; Safaei, A. Hypnotic effect of Coriandrum sativum, Ziziphus jujuba, Lavandula angustifolia and Melissa officinalis extracts in mice. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 477–484. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chung, M.J.; Cho, S.-Y.; Bhuiyan, M.J.H.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.-J. Anti-diabetic effects of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis) essential oil on glucose- and lipid-regulating enzymes in type 2 diabetic mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Shin, Y.; Lee, D.; Ahn, J.; Lee, M.; Shin, S.S.; Yoon, M. The herbal extract ALS-L1023 from Melissa officinalis reduces weight gain, elevated glucose levels and beta-cell loss in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 264, 113360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gürbüz, P.; Martinez, A.; Pérez, C.; Martínez-González, L.; Göger, F.; Ayran, İ. Potential anti-Alzheimer effects of selected Lamiaceae plants through polypharmacology on glycogen synthase kinase-3β, β-secretase, and casein kinase 1δ. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 138, 111431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aubert, P.; Guinobert, I.; Blondeau, C.; Bardot, V.; Ripoche, I.; Chalard, P.; Neunlist, M. Basal and Spasmolytic Effects of a Hydroethanolic Leaf Extract of Melissa officinalis L. on Intestinal Motility: An Ex Vivo Study. J. Med. Food 2019, 22, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Astani, A.; Reichling, J.; Schnitzler, P. Melissa officinalis Extract Inhibits Attachment of Herpes Simplex Virus in vitro. Chemotherapy 2012, 58, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Araújo, S.G.; Lima, W.G.; Pinto, M.E.A.; Morais, M.; de Sá, N.P.; Johann, S.; Rosa, C.A.; Lima, L.A.R.D.S. Pharmacological prospection in-vitro of Lamiaceae species against human pathogenic fungi associated to invasive infections. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 21, 101345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. El Ouadi, Y.; Manssouri, M.; Bouyanzer, A.; Majidi, L.; Bendaif, H.; Elmsellem, H.; Shariati, M.; Melhaoui, A.; Hammouti, B. Essential oil composition and antifungal activity of Melissa officinalis originating from north-Est Morocco, against postharvest phytopathogenic fungi in apples. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 107, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Patora, J.; Klimek, B. Flavonoids from lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L., Lamiaceae). Acta Pol. Pharm. Drug Res. 2002, 59, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  59. Astani, A.; Navid, M.H.; Schnitzler, P. Attachment and Penetration of Acyclovir-resistant Herpes Simplex Virus Are Inhibited by Melissa officinalis Extract. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1547–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nair, A.B.; Jacob, S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2016, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cheng, A.Y.Y.; Fantus, I.G. Oral antihyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2005, 172, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Sutter, J.D.; Mendes, M.; Franco, O.H. Cardioprotective drugs. In The ESC Textbook of Preventive Cardiology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; p. 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. UpToDate. Pharmacology of Medicines for Treatment of Adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/image/print?imageKey=PSYCH%2F77409 (accessed on 9 January 2022).
  64. Barks, J.D.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Shangguan, Y.; Silverstein, F.S. Phenobarbital Augments Hypothermic Neuroprotection. Pediatr. Res. 2010, 67, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. UpToDate. Dosing and Selected Characteristics of Analgesic Drugs for TREATMENT of Persistent Pain in Older Adults. Available online: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/image?imageKey=ANEST%2F95621&topicKey=PALC%2F86302&source=see_link (accessed on 9 January 2022).
  66. Drugs.com. Chloral Hydrate Dosage. Available online: https://www.drugs.com/dosage/chloral-hydrate.html (accessed on 9 January 2022).
  67. Erhorn, S. Triclofos. In xPharm: The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference; Elsevier: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2007; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  68. Oral Sedation. In Sedation, 6th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 7, pp. 95–119. [CrossRef]
  69. Southwell, I. Backhousia citriodora F. Muell. (Lemon Myrtle), an Unrivalled Source of Citral. Foods 2021, 10, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Motelica, L.; Ficai, D.; Ficai, A.; Truşcă, R.-D.; Ilie, C.-I.; Oprea, O.-C.; Andronescu, E. Innovative Antimicrobial Chitosan/ZnO/Ag NPs/Citronella Essential Oil Nanocomposite—Potential Coating for Grapes. Foods 2020, 9, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Motelica, L.; Ficai, D.; Oprea, O.-C.; Ficai, A.; Ene, V.-L.; Vasile, B.-S.; Andronescu, E.; Holban, A.-M. Antibacterial Biodegradable Films Based on Alginate with Silver Nanoparticles and Lemongrass Essential Oil–Innovative Packaging for Cheese. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zheng, Y.; Shang, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Ouyang, W. Antifungal Activities of cis-trans Citral Isomers against Trichophyton rubrum with ERG6 as a Potential Target. Molecules 2021, 26, 4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Motelica, L.; Ficai, D.; Oprea, O.; Ficai, A.; Trusca, R.-D.; Andronescu, E.; Holban, A. Biodegradable Alginate Films with ZnO Nanoparticles and Citronella Essential Oil—A Novel Antimicrobial Structure. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Luu-Dam, N.A.; Tabanca, N.; Estep, A.S.; Nguyen, D.H.; Kendra, P.E. Insecticidal and Attractant Activities of Magnolia citrata Leaf Essential Oil against Two Major Pests from Diptera: Aedes aegypti (Culicidae) and Ceratitis capitata (Tephritidae). Molecules 2021, 26, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Sikora, V.; Semerdjieva, I.B.; Kačániová, M.; Astatkie, T.; Dincheva, I. Grinding and Fractionation during Distillation Alter Hemp Essential Oil Profile and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Wang, B.; Lin, Z.; Ye, M.; Ma, R.; Zheng, M.; Xiang, H.; Xu, P. Six herbs essential oils suppressing inflammatory responses via inhibiting COX-2/TNF-α/IL-6/NF-κB activation. Microchem. J. 2020, 156, 104769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ben Hsouna, A.; Dhibi, S.; Dhifi, W.; Ben Saad, R.; Brini, F.; Hfaidh, N.; Mnif, W. Essential oil from halophyte Lobularia maritima: Protective effects against CCl4-induced hepatic oxidative damage in rats and inhibition of the production of proinflammatory gene expression by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 36758–36770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zheljazkov, V.; Cantrell, C.; Semerdjieva, I.; Radoukova, T.; Stoyanova, A.; Maneva, V.; Kačániová, M.; Astatkie, T.; Borisova, D.; Dincheva, I.; et al. Essential Oil Composition and Bioactivity of Two Juniper Species from Bulgaria and Slovakia. Molecules 2021, 26, 3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Perestrelo, R.; Silva, C.; Fernandes, M.X.; Câmara, J.S. Prediction of Terpenoid Toxicity Based on a Quantitative Structure—Activity Relationship Model. Foods 2019, 8, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Plata-Rueda, A.; Rolim, G.D.S.; Wilcken, C.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Acute Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Lemongrass Essential Oil and Their Components against the Granary Weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Insects 2020, 11, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Colombo, E.; Biocotino, M.; Frapporti, G.; Randazzo, P.; Christodoulou, M.; Piccoli, G.; Polito, L.; Seneci, P.; Passarella, D. Nanolipid-Trehalose Conjugates and Nano-Assemblies as Putative Autophagy Inducers. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Yang, Y.; Xie, T.; Tian, X.; Han, N.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Qi, J.; Gao, F.; Li, W.; Wu, Q.; et al. Betulinic Acid-Nitrogen Heterocyclic Derivatives: Design, Synthesis, and Antitumor Evaluation in Vitro. Molecules 2020, 25, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kil, H.W.; Rho, T.; Yoon, K.D. Phytochemical Study of Aerial Parts of Leea asiatica. Molecules 2019, 24, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Silva, A.M.; Alvarado, H.L.; Abrego, G.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Garduño-Ramirez, M.L.; García, M.L.; Calpena, A.C.; Souto, E.B. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Oleanolic/Ursolic Acids-Loaded in PLGA Nanoparticles in Different Cell Lines. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kim, D.; Maharjan, A.; Jin, M.; Park, T.; Amatya, R.; Yang, J.; Min, K.A.; Shin, M.C. Potential Albumin-Based Antioxidant Nanoformulations for Ocular Protection against Oxidative Stress. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Rodrigues Pereira, J.; Suassuna Bezerra, G.; Alves Furtado, A.; de Carvalho, T.G.; Costa da Silva, V.; Lins Bispo Monteiro, A.; Bernardo Guerra, G.C.; de Araújo Júnior, R.F.; Sant’Ana, A.E.G.; Fernandes-Pedrosa, M.D.F.; et al. Chitosan Film Containing Mansoa hirsute Fraction for Wound Healing. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Aguilar, L.E.; Jang, S.R.; Park, C.H.; Lee, K.M. Supramolecular Caffeic Acid and Bortezomib Nanomedicine: Prodrug Inducing Reactive Oxygen Species and Inhibiting Cancer Cell Survival. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Guzmán-Oyarzo, D.; Plaza, T.; Recio-Sánchez, G.; Abdalla, D.S.; Salazar, L.A.; Hernández-Montelongo, J. Use of nPSi-βCD Composite Microparticles for the Controlled Release of Caffeic Acid and Pinocembrin, Two Main Polyphenolic Compounds Found in a Chilean Propolis. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Sergio, L.; Boari, F.; Pieralice, M.; Linsalata, V.; Cantore, V.; Di Venere, D. Bioactive Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Some Wild Edible Greens as Affected by Different Cooking Treatments. Foods 2020, 9, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Dupas de Matos, A.; Longo, E.; Chiotti, D.; Pedri, U.; Eisenstecken, D.; Sanoll, C.; Robatscher, P.; Boselli, E. Pinot Blanc: Impact of the Winemaking Variables on the Evolution of the Phenolic, Volatile and Sensory Profiles. Foods 2020, 9, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Luo, C.; Zou, L.; Sun, H.; Peng, J.; Gao, C.; Bao, L.; Ji, R.; Jin, Y.; Sun, S. A Review of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Rosmarinic Acid on Inflammatory Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bonferoni, M.C.; Rassu, G.; Gavini, E.; Sorrenti, M.; Catenacci, L.; Giunchedi, P. Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Antioxidants as a Potential Tool for the Therapy of Neurological Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Odrobińska, J.; Skonieczna, M.; Neugebauer, D. PEG Graft Polymer Carriers of Antioxidants: In Vitro Evaluation for Transdermal Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Grimaudo, M.A.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Crosslinked Hyaluronan Electrospun Nanofibers for Ferulic Acid Ocular Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. López-Yerena, A.; Perez, M.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Escribano-Ferrer, E. Insights into the Binding of Dietary Phenolic Compounds to Human Serum Albumin and Food-Drug Interactions. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chiu, J.Z.S.; Hold, I.; Newman, T.A.C.; Horsfield, J.A.; McDowell, A. Chlorogenic Acid Supplementation Benefits Zebrafish Embryos Exposed to Auranofin. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Żyżelewicz, D.; Kulbat-Warycha, K.; Oracz, J.; Żyżelewicz, K. Polyphenols and Other Bioactive Compounds of Sideritis Plants and Their Potential Biological Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Boo, Y.C. Emerging Strategies to Protect the Skin from Ultraviolet Rays Using Plant-Derived Materials. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lee, S.A.; Park, B.R.; Moon, S.M.; Shin, S.H.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, D.K.; Kim, C.S. Cynaroside protects human periodontal ligament cells from lipopolysaccharide-induced damage and inflammation through suppression of NF-κB activation. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020, 120, 104944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ma, N.-H.; Guo, J.; Chen, S.-H.X.; Yuan, X.-R.; Zhang, T.; Ding, Y. Antioxidant and Compositional HPLC Analysis of Three Common Bamboo Leaves. Molecules 2020, 25, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Mota, A.; Duarte, N.; Serra, A.; Ferreira, A.; Bronze, M.; Custódio, L.; Gaspar, M.; Simões, S.; Rijo, P.; Ascensão, L.; et al. Further Evidence of Possible Therapeutic Uses of Sambucus nigra L. Extracts by the Assessment of the In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Its PLGA and PCL-Based Nanoformulations. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wasan, E.K.; Zhao, J.; Poteet, J.; Mohammed, M.A.; Syeda, J.; Orlowski, T.; Soulsbury, K.; Cawthray, J.; Bunyamin, A.; Zhang, C.; et al. Development of a UV-Stabilized Topical Formulation of Nifedipine for the Treatment of Raynaud Phenomenon and Chilblains. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Mikulášová, M.; Chovanová, R.; Vaverková, Š. Synergism between antibiotics and plant extracts or essential oils with efflux pump inhibitory activity in coping with multidrug-resistant staphylococci. Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 15, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ulrich-Merzenich, G.; Welslau, L.; Aziz-Kalbhenn, H.; Kelber, O.; Shcherbakova, A. Synergy quantifications to identify individual contributions of combination partners to the overall activity—The example of STW 5. Phytomedicine 2019, 60, 153013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zeraatpishe, A.; Oryan, S.; Bagheri, M.H.; Pilevarian, A.A.; Malekirad, A.A.; Baeeri, M.; Abdollahi, M. Effects of Melissa officinalis L. on oxidative status and DNA damage in subjects exposed to long-term low-dose ionizing radiation. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2011, 27, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jain, N.; Valli, K.S.; Devi, V.K. Importance of novel drug delivery systems in herbal medicines. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Kiparissides, C.; Kammona, O. Nanotechnology advances in controlled drug delivery systems. Phys. Status Solidi C—Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 2008, 5, 3828–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Balmayor, E.R.; Azevedo, H.S.; Reis, R.L. Controlled Delivery Systems: From Pharmaceuticals to Cells and Genes. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 1241–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tong, Q.; Qiu, N.; Ji, J.; Ye, L.; Zhai, G. Research Progress in Bioinspired Drug Delivery Systems. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 1269–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Heng, P.W.S. Controlled release drug delivery systems. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018, 23, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ruman, U.; Fakurazi, S.; Masarudin, M.J.; Hussein, M.Z. Nanocarrier-Based Therapeutics and Theranostics Drug Delivery Systems for Next Generation of Liver Cancer Nanodrug Modalities. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, Volume 15, 1437–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Goyal, A.; Kumar, S.; Nagpal, M.; Singh, I.; Arora, S. Potential of Novel Drug Delivery Systems for Herbal Drugs. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2011, 45, 225–235. [Google Scholar]
  114. Uddin, A.; Saraf, S. Applications of novel drug delivery system for herbal formulations. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Garnett, M. Nanomedicines: Delivering drugs using bottom up nanotechnology. Int. J. Nanosci. 2005, 4, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hallan, S.S.; Sguizzato, M.; Drechsler, M.; Mariani, P.; Montesi, L.; Cortesi, R.; Björklund, S.; Ruzgas, T.; Esposito, E. The Potential of Caffeic Acid Lipid Nanoparticulate Systems for Skin Application: In Vitro Assays to Assess Delivery and Antioxidant Effect. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Fathi, M.; Mirlohi, M.; Varshosaz, J.; Madani, G. Novel Caffeic Acid Nanocarrier: Production, Characterization, and Release Modeling. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 434632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sguizzato, M.; Mariani, P.; Ferrara, F.; Drechsler, M.; Hallan, S.S.; Huang, N.; Simelière, F.; Khunti, N.; Cortesi, R.; Marchetti, N.; et al. Nanoparticulate Gels for Cutaneous Administration of Caffeic Acid. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Da Silva, S.B.; Amorim, M.; Fonte, P.; Madureira, R.; Ferreira, D.; Pintado, M.; Sarmento, B. Natural extracts into chitosan nanocarriers for rosmarinic acid drug delivery. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Da Silva, S.B.; Ferreira, D.; Pintado, M.; Sarmento, B. Chitosan-based nanoparticles for rosmarinic acid ocular delivery—In vitro tests. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 84, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Wani, T.U.; Raza, S.N.; Khan, N.A. Rosmarinic Acid Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Wound Healing in Rats. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019, 10, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar]
  122. Chung, C.H.; Jung, W.; Keum, H.; Kim, T.W.; Jon, S. Nanoparticles Derived from the Natural Antioxidant Rosmarinic Acid Ameliorate Acute Inflammatory Bowel Disease. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 6887–6896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Bhatt, R.; Singh, D.; Prakash, A.; Mishra, N. Development, characterization and nasal delivery of rosmarinic acid-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for the effective management of Huntington’s disease. Drug Deliv. 2013, 22, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Arriagada, F.; Günther, G.; Morales, J. Nanoantioxidant–Based Silica Particles as Flavonoid Carrier for Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Nordin, N.; Yeap, S.K.; Zamberi, N.R.; ABU, N.; Mohamad, N.E.; Rahman, H.; How, C.W.; Masarudin, M.J.; Abdullah, R.; Alitheen, N.B. Characterization and toxicity of citral incorporated with nanostructured lipid carrier. PeerJ 2018, 6, e3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Nordin, N.; Yeap, S.K.; Rahman, H.S.; Zamberi, N.R.; Mohamad, N.E.; Abu, N.; Masarudin, M.J.; Abdullah, R.; Alitheen, N.B. Antitumor and Anti-Metastatic Effects of Citral-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carrier in 4T1-Induced Breast Cancer Mouse Model. Molecules 2020, 25, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ailincai, D.; Mititelu, L.T.; Marin, L. Drug delivery systems based on biocompatible imino-chitosan hydrogels for local anticancer therapy. Drug Deliv. 2018, 25, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Ailincai, D.; Mititelu-Tartau, L.; Marin, L. Citryl-imine-PEG-ylated chitosan hydrogels—Promising materials for drug delivery applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1323–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Usach, I.; Margarucci, E.; Manca, M.L.; Caddeo, C.; Aroffu, M.; Petretto, G.L.; Manconi, M.; Peris, J.-E. Comparison between Citral and Pompia Essential Oil Loaded in Phospholipid Vesicles for the Treatment of Skin and Mucosal Infections. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Di Sotto, A.; Paolicelli, P.; Nardoni, M.; Abete, L.; Garzoli, S.; Di Giacomo, S.; Mazzanti, G.; Casadei, M.A.; Petralito, S. SPC Liposomes as Possible Delivery Systems for Improving Bioavailability of the Natural Sesquiterpene β-Caryophyllene: Lamellarity and Drug-Loading as Key Features for a Rational Drug Delivery Design. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Suri, S.S.; Fenniri, H.; Singh, B. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2007, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. De Jong, W.H.; Borm, P.J. Drug delivery and nanoparticles: Applications and hazards. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008, 3, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Hasnain, M.S.; Nayak, A.K. Chitosan as responsive polymer for drug delivery applications. In Stimuli Responsive Polymeric Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 581–605. [Google Scholar]
  134. Vanti, G.; Ntallis, S.G.; Panagiotidis, C.A.; Dourdouni, V.; Patsoura, C.; Bergonzi, M.C.; Lazari, D.; Bilia, A.R. Glycerosome of Melissa officinalis L. Essential Oil for Effective Anti-HSV Type 1. Molecules 2020, 25, 3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rechia, L.M.; Morona, J.B.D.J.; Zepon, K.M.; Soldi, V.; Kanis, L.A. Mechanical properties and total hydroxycinnamic derivative release of starch/glycerol/Melissa officinalis extract films. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 46, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sani, I.K.; Pirsa, S.; Tagi, S. Preparation of chitosan/zinc oxide/Melissa officinalis essential oil nanocomposite film and evaluation of physical, mechanical and antimicrobial properties by response surface method. Polym. Test. 2019, 79, 106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sani, I.K.; Marand, S.A.; Alizadeh, M.; Amiri, S.; Asdagh, A. Thermal, Mechanical, Microstructural and Inhibitory Characteristics of Sodium Caseinate Based Bioactive Films Reinforced by ZnONPs/Encapsulated Melissa officinalis Essential Oil. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 31, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Serra, E.; Saubade, F.; Ligorio, C.; Whitehead, K.; Sloan, A.; Williams, D.W.; Hidalgo-Bastida, A.; Verran, J.; Malic, S. Methylcellulose Hydrogel with Melissa officinalis Essential Oil as a Potential Treatment for Oral Candidiasis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Najafi-Soulari, S.; Shekarchizadeh, H.; Kadivar, M. Encapsulation optimization of lemon balm antioxidants in calcium alginate hydrogels. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2016, 27, 1631–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Santamaria-Echart, A.; Fernandes, I.; Barreiro, F.; Retegi, A.; Arbelaiz, A.; Corcuera, M.A.; Eceiza, A. Development of waterborne polyurethane-ureas added with plant extracts: Study of different incorporation routes and their influence on particle size, thermal, mechanical and antibacterial properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 117, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Sani, I.K.; Alizadeh, M.; Pirsa, S.; Kia, E.M. Impact of operating parameters and wall material components on the characteristics of microencapsulated Melissa officinalis essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 2019, 34, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Grumezescu, A.M.; Andronescu, E.; Oprea, A.E.; Holban, A.M.; Socol, G.; Grumezescu, V.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Iordache, F.; Maniu, H. MAPLE fabricated magnetite@Melissa officinalis and poly lactic acid: Chitosan coated surfaces with anti-staphylococcal properties. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2015, 73, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ahmeda, A.; Zangeneh, A.; Zangeneh, M.M. Preparation, formulation, and chemical characterization of silver nanoparticles using Melissa officinalis leaf aqueous extract for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in vitro and in vivo conditions. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. De Jesus Ruíz-Baltazar, A.; Reyes-López, S.Y.; Larrañaga, D.; Estevez, M.; Pérez, R. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using a Melissa officinalis leaf extract with antibacterial properties. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 2639–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ruíz-Baltazar, A.D.J.; Reyes-López, S.Y.; Silva-Holguin, P.N.; Larrañaga, D.; Estevez, M.; Pérez, R. Novel biosynthesis of Ag-hydroxyapatite: Structural and spectroscopic characterization. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Scuteri, D.; Rombolá, L.; Tridico, L.; Mizoguchi, H.; Watanabe, C.; Sakurada, T.; Sakurada, S.; Corasaniti, M.T.; Bagetta, G.; Morrone, L.A. Neuropharmacological Properties of the Essential Oil of Bergamot for the Clinical Management of Pain-Related BPSDs. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 3764–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. De Jesús Ruíz-Baltazar, Á. Green Composite Based on Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Diatomaceous Earth: Kinetic Adsorption Models and Antibacterial Effect. J. Clust. Sci. 2018, 29, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lopalco, A.; Denora, N. Nanoformulations for Drug Delivery: Safety, Toxicity, and Efficacy. Comput. Toxicol. Methods Protoc. 2018, 1800, 347–365. [Google Scholar]
  149. Boraschi, D.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Italiani, P. In Vitro and In Vivo Models to Assess the Immune-Related Effects of Nanomaterials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Lorscheidt, S.; Lamprecht, A. Safety assessment of nanoparticles for drug delivery by means of classic in vitro assays and beyond. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 1545–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The composition of Melissa officinalis and its pharmacological effects.
Figure 1. The composition of Melissa officinalis and its pharmacological effects.
Ijms 23 03591 g001
Figure 2. Drug delivery systems for Melissa officinalis components (realized with BioRender.com, accessed on 7 March 2022).
Figure 2. Drug delivery systems for Melissa officinalis components (realized with BioRender.com, accessed on 7 March 2022).
Ijms 23 03591 g002
Table 1. Components of the essential oil extracted from the dried leaves of Melissa officinalis.
Table 1. Components of the essential oil extracted from the dried leaves of Melissa officinalis.
Component NameConcentration of the Components of the Essential Oil, %Reference
Majority components
(E)-Caryophyllene1.06–6.8[12,13,14]
Caryophyllene oxide1.3–43.55[12,13,14,15,16]
Citronellal0.4–20.3[12,13,15,16,17]
Geranial (citral A)6.22–51.21[14,15,16,17,18]
Geranyl acetate0.5–19.3[12,13,14,17]
Neral (citral B)4.28–35.02[12,13,14,15,16,17,18]
α-Cadinol5.64[14]
α-Copaene0.1–7.02[12,15,16]
β-Caryophyllene1.3–29.14[14,15,16,17]
Minority components (<5%)
(2E)-Nonen-1-al0.2[12]
(E)-Nerolidol0.2[12]
(E)-α-Bergamotene1.24[14]
(E)-β-Ionone0.9[12]
(E)-β-Ocimene0.1–0.5[12,13]
(E-E)-Geranyl linalool1.59[14]
(Z)-β-Ocimene0.1[15]
1,2-Benzenedicarboxilic acid, butyl 2-methylopropyl ester0.6[13]
1,8-Dehydro-cineol0.1[13]
14-Hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene0.2[13]
1-Octen-3-ol0.2–0.3[12,13,15]
3,5-Heptadienal,2-ethylidene-6-methyl0.4[13]
3-Octanone0.2[17]
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-ol0.2–1.7[12,13,15]
Benzene acetaldehyde0.3[12]
Camphene0.38–1.38[14,16]
Camphor0.1–0.4[13,15]
Carvacrol0.3–1[12,13]
Caryophyllenol0.5–2.23[14]
cis-2H-3a-Methyl-octahydro-Inden-2-one4.7[17]
Cis-Chrysanthenol0.7–1.7[12,13,15]
Cis-Rose oxide0.1–0.2[12,15]
Citronellol0.4–1.88[12,14]
Citronellyl acetate0.1[12]
Dihydrocitronellol acetate0.3[15]
Geraniol0.6–0.7[12,13,15]
Germacrene D0.2–2.0[12,13,14]
Humulene epoxide II0.2–1.29[13,14]
iso Aromadendren epoxide0.46[14]
Isogeranial1.4–2.0[13]
Isomenthol2.4[15]
Linalool0.3–0.5[12,15]
Linalool + trans-Sabinene hydrate0.5–0.8[13]
Menthol0.3[15]
Methyl citronellate0.5–2.78[12,13,16]
Methyl eugenol0.1[12]
Methyl geranate0.2–0.4[12,13,17]
Myrcene0.1–0.3[13,15]
n-Eicosane0.6[15]
Nerol0.2[15]
Neryl acetate0.1[12]
n-Heneicosane0.4[15]
n-Nonanal0.1–0.4[12,15]
para-Mentha-1(7),8-diene0.1[13]
p-Cymene0.1[12,13]
Phytol3.64[14]
Rosefuran epoxide0.6–0.7[13]
Sabinene0.4[13]
Thymol0.1–3.1[12,13,14]
t-Muurolol0.59[14]
trans-Limonene oxide0.6[13]
trans-para-Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol2.3[17]
Trans-Rose oxide0.1[12,15]
Valencene0.1[15]
α-Humulene0.2–2.6[12,13,15,16]
α-Calacorene0.76[14]
α-Cubebene0.42–1.23[14]
β-Cubebene0.1[15]
β-Pinene oxide1.1[13]
β-sesquiphellandrene0.97[14]
γ-Cadinene0.76–1.77[14]
γ-Terpinene0.3–0.5[12,13]
Traces of components were not taken into account (contents below 0.05%).
Table 2. Triterpenes from Melissa officinalis extracts.
Table 2. Triterpenes from Melissa officinalis extracts.
Component NameContent *,
μg/g
Part of PlantReference
Betulinic acid12.85–169.88aerial parts[4]
Oleanolic acid915.03–6151.67aerial parts[4]
Ursolic acid3577.00–11,234.97aerial parts[4]
23-Sulfate ester of niga-ichigoside F1n.a.leaves and stems[25]
3β,16β,23-Trihydroxy-13,28-epoxyurs-11-ene-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosiden.a.dried leaves and stems[24]
3,23-Disulfate ester of 2α,3β,19α,23-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oicacidn.a.dried leaves and stems[24]
3,23-Disulfate ester of 2α,3β,19α,23-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oicacid 28-O-β-D-glucopyranosiden.a.dried leaves and stems[24]
3,23-Disulfate ester of2α,3β,23,29-tetrahydroxyolean-12-en-28-oicacidn.a.dried leaves and stems[24]
3,23-disulfate ester of 3β-23,29-trihydroxyolean-12-en-28-oic acidn.a.dried leaves and stems[24]
3,23-Disulfate ester of 2α,3β-23,29-tetrahydroxyolean-12-ene-28-oicacidn.a.dried leaves and stems[24]
23-sulfate ester of 2α,3β,19 α,23-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acidn.a.fresh leaves and stems[26]
23-sulfate ester of 2α,3β,19 α,23-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid 28-O-β-
D-glucopyranoside
n.a.fresh leaves and stems[26]
Melissioside An.a.leaves and stems[25]
Melissioside Bn.a.leaves and stems[25]
Melissioside Cn.a.leaves and stems[25]
n.a. = not available; * expressed on a dry weight basis.
Table 3. Major polyphenolic compounds from Melissa officinalis extracts.
Table 3. Major polyphenolic compounds from Melissa officinalis extracts.
Group NameCompound NameContent *,
μg/g
Part of PlantReference
Phenolic acidsCaffeic acid39.38–860.72Dried leaves[4]
Caftaric acid1.85–344.34Dried leaves[4]
Chlorogenic acid0.62–75.529Dried leaves[4,29]
Ferulic acid1.03–45.489Dried leaves[4,29]
Gentisic acid10.40–60.48Dried leaves[4]
p-Coumaric acid1.06–20.72Dried leaves[4]
13.37 ± 2.84Aerialparts[30]
Rosmarinic acid3515.60–86,637.60Dried leaves[4]
6914.1 ± 779Aerial parts[30]
FlavonoidsApigenin0.66–84.53Dried leaves[4,29]
41.71 ± 20.6Aerial parts[30]
Cynaroside408.13 ± 30.0Aerial parts[30]
Daidzein51.25 ± 8.07Aerial parts[30]
Hyperoside3.30–16.240Dried leaves[4]
Isoquercetin6.82–162.40Dried leaves[4]
Kaempherol21.84Dried leaves[4]
Luteolin0.81–26.32Dried leaves[4]
Myricetin3.45–17.92Dried leaves[4]
Quercetin153.46Dried leaves[29]
Quercetrol5.72–33.60Dried leaves[4]
Rutin8.11–1462.99Dried leaves[4,29]
* expressed on a dry weight basis.
Table 4. Pharmacological effects reported from Melissa officinalis extracts.
Table 4. Pharmacological effects reported from Melissa officinalis extracts.
EffectModelDosage or ConcentrationTested SystemsResultsType of ExtractReference
Antiproliferativein vitro20, 100, 250 μg/mLBreast cancer cells MDA-MB-
231 and healthy HaCat cells
Inhibitory effect on migration and proliferation of both types of cellsethanolic extract[38]
in vitro50%Human Colon Cancer Cell Line (HCT-116)The 50 % ethanolic extract showed significant differences after 72 h of treatment, reducing cell proliferation to values close to 40%ethanolic and aqueous extracts[39]
Antitumorin vitroDifferent concentrationHuman tumor cell lines: MCF-7,
AGS and NCI-H460
Obtained revealed that the ethanolic extract presented the highest cell growth inhibitory potential in all the human tumor cell lines testedethanolic, methanolic, hydro-methanolic,
hydro-ethanolic and aqueous extracts)
[40]
Antioxidantin vitroDifferent concentrationEncephalic tissue from male Wistar ratsEffective agent in the prevention of various neurological diseases associated with oxidative stressethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts[41]
in vitro1, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/mLDPPH radical scavenging activity assay, β-carotene bleaching test and ABTS assayGood antioxidant activityessential oil[42]
Antiangiogenicin vitro, in ovo50 μg/mLTwo breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7
And MDA-MB-231
Highest cell inhibitory activity was exhibited by the 96% ethanolic extractethanolic extracts and methanolic extracts[4]
Cardioprotectivein vivo25, 50 and 100 mg/kg b.w. *
(4.23/8.46/16.91 mg/kg b.w. *)
RatsAntioxidant and cardio-protective effects against arrhythmias induced by ischemia and ischemia-reperfusionethanolic leaf extract[43]
Antinociceptive
Antihyperglycemic
in vivo0.01, 0.02 and 0.04 mg/day
(0.0063/0.0126/0.0252 mg/kg b.w. *)
Male adult Wistar ratsLong-term oral administration of essential oil (at an effective dose of 0.04 mg/day) can suppress chemical hyperalgesia in diabetic ratsessential oil[44]
Anxiolytic
Antidepressant
in vivo50, 75 and 150 mg/kg b.w./day *
(3.91/5.86/11.72 mg/kg b.w. *)
Albino BALB/c male miceHydro-alcoholic extract (75 and 150 mg/kg) significantly reversed anxiety- and depressive-like behaviorshydro-alcoholic extract[45]
Neuroprotectivein vitro5, 10, 50, 100, 500 μg/mLCortical neuronal
Culture system
Protective
effects on neurons in the brain
balm oil[46]
in vivo50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg b.w. *
(8.35/16.71/33.41/66.83 mg/kg b.w. *)
Male ratsTreatment with 100 mg/kg of oil attenuated the
increased caspase-3 like protease activity significantly
balm oil[46]
GABA-T inhibitorin vitro0–4 mg/mLRat brainPhytochemical characterization of the crude extract determined rosmarinic acid as the major compound responsible for activity (40% inhibition at 100 μg/mL) since it represented approximately 1.5% of the dry mass of the leavesmethanol extract[47]
Anti-kinetoplastidaein vitro31.25, 62.5, 125, 250 μg/mLT. cruzi, L. brasiliensi,
L. infantum
A potential source of natural product featuring anti-Leishmania and anti-Trypanosoma activityethanol extract[48]
Analgesic in vivo5, 10, 20 mg/kg b.w. *
(0.87/1.73/3.46 mg/kg b.w. *)
Male Wistar ratsIntrathecal administration could significantly improve hot-water and formalin-induced pain in male Wistar ratshydro-alcoholic extract[49]
Hypnoticin vivo200, 400 and 800 mg/kg b.w. *
(14.81/29.61/59.23 mg/kg b.w. *)
Male Swiss miceExtracts may be useful for insomnia hydro-alcoholic extracts[50]
Antidiabeticin vivo0.0125 mg/ddb/db miceAnti-hyperglycaemic agentessential oil[51]
in vivo0.4%, 0.8% (w/w)Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty ratsAn effective therapeutic strategy to treat human obesity and type 2 diabetesherbal extract [52]
Anti-Alzheimerin vitro8.8 mg/mLGSK-3Β, CK-1δ, and BACE-1Best activity for ck-1δ inhibitory activity with maximum inhibitory concentration values at half (IC50) below 250 μg/mLmethanol extract[53]
Antispasmodicex vivo1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mg/mLDifferent segments of the gastrointestinal tract of miceSite- and dose-dependent effects on the contractile activity of the gastrointestinal tracthydro-ethanolic leaf extract[54]
Antiviralin vitro1.5–150 μg/mLRC-37 cellsHigh virucidal activity against
HSV-1
aqueous extract[55]
Antifungalin vitro15.5–2000 μg/mLHuman
Pathogenic fungi
Good antifungal activityethanol extracts[56]
0.25–2 μL/mLPhytopathogenic fungi in applesessential oil[57]
Antibacterialin vitro10 and 15 mg/mLE. coli, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus and S. typhimuriumA significant antimicrobial effectessential oil[42]
* estimated human equivalent dose. b.w. = body weight.
Table 5. Main components of Melissa officinalis and their activity.
Table 5. Main components of Melissa officinalis and their activity.
SubstanceActivityReference
Geranial (citral A)Antibacterial, antifungal[69,70]
Neral (citral B)Antibacterial, antifungal[71,72]
CitronellalAntimicrobial, insecticidal[73,74]
β-CaryophylleneAnti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial[75,76]
α-CadinolAntifungal, hepatoprotective[77,78]
Geranyl acetateAntibacterial, insecticidal[79,80]
Betulinic acidAntiviral, anti-inflammatory, anticancer[81,82]
Oleanolic acidAntiviral, hepatoprotective[83,84]
Ursolic acidAntibacterial, antioxidant[85,86]
Caffeic acidAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[87,88]
Caftaric acidAntioxidant[89,90]
Rosmarinic acidAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[91,92]
Ferulic acidAntioxidant[93,94]
Chlorogenic acidAntidiabetic, antioxidant[95,96]
p-Coumaric acidAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[97,98]
CynarosideAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[99,100]
RutinAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[101,102]
Table 6. Controlled release systems with active substances which are available in Melissa officinalis.
Table 6. Controlled release systems with active substances which are available in Melissa officinalis.
Type of Delivery SystemDelivery SystemEffectReference
Type of CarrierActive Agent
Organic/Inorganic Nanoparticlespoloxamer, soybean lecithin ethosomecaffeic acidantioxidant[116]
chitosan, sodium alginate[117]
poloxamer[118]
chitosanrosmarinic acid *antioxidant[119,120]
rosmarinic acidantimicrobial[121]
PEG-containing amineanti-inflammatory[122]
glycerol monostearate, soya lecithin, hydrogenated soya phosphatidyl cholinetherapeutic[123]
mesoporous silicaantioxidant[124]
nanostructured lipidcitralanticancer[125,126]
Hydrogelschitosancitralanticancer[127]
imine-PEG-ylated chitosanlocal therapy[128]
Vesiclessoybean phospholipidscitral antimicrobial[129]
ethosomecaffeic acidantioxidant[116]
soybean phosphatidyl-choline liposomesβ-caryophylleneantiproliferative[130]
* from a natural extract.
Table 7. Controlled release systems with Melissa officinalis extracts.
Table 7. Controlled release systems with Melissa officinalis extracts.
Type of Delivery SystemDelivery SystemEffectReference
Type of CarrierType of Extract
Glycerosomesphosphatidylcholine and cholesterolessential oilanti-herpetic [134]
Filmsstarch and glycerolHydroalcoholic extractanti-herpetic[135]
chitosan and zinc oxide nanoparticlesessential oilantimicrobial[136,137]
sodium caseinate and zinc oxide nanoparticles
Hydrogelmethylcelluloseessential oilantimicrobial for candida albicans in the oral cavity[138]
calcium alginateaqueous extractantioxidant[139]
Dispersionwater-based polyurethane-ureainfusionantimicrobial[140]
Nanocapsuleisolated whey proteins and sodium caseinateessential oiln.a.[141]
nanoparticles of magnetite, essential oil, polylactic acid, chitosanessential oilanti-staphylococcal[142]
Nanoparticlesilver, gold and gold-silverethanolic extractantimicrobial[29]
silveraqueous extractantioxidant and cytotoxic for the acute myeloid leukemia[143]
silverinfusionantibacterial[144]
Nanocompositesilver-hydroxyapatiteinfusionantibacterial[145]
n.a. = not available.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petrisor, G.; Motelica, L.; Craciun, L.N.; Oprea, O.C.; Ficai, D.; Ficai, A. Melissa officinalis: Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Derived Release Systems—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073591

AMA Style

Petrisor G, Motelica L, Craciun LN, Oprea OC, Ficai D, Ficai A. Melissa officinalis: Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Derived Release Systems—A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(7):3591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petrisor, Gabriela, Ludmila Motelica, Luminita Narcisa Craciun, Ovidiu Cristian Oprea, Denisa Ficai, and Anton Ficai. 2022. "Melissa officinalis: Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Derived Release Systems—A Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 3591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop