Next Article in Journal
Computational Analysis of Molnupiravir
Next Article in Special Issue
Silk Sericin Enrichment through Electrodeposition and Carbonous Materials for the Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Insertion Sequence (IS) Element-Mediated Activating Mutations of the Cryptic Aromatic β-Glucoside Utilization (BglGFB) Operon Are Promoted by the Anti-Terminator Protein (BglG) in Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis Mechanisms, Structural Models, and Photothermal Therapy Applications of Top-Down Carbon Dots from Carbon Powder, Graphite, Graphene, and Carbon Nanotubes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quaternary Selenides EuLnCuSe3: Synthesis, Structures, Properties and In Silico Studies

by
Maxim V. Grigoriev
1,
Leonid A. Solovyov
2,
Anna V. Ruseikina
3,*,
Aleksandr S. Aleksandrovsky
4,5,
Vladimir A. Chernyshev
6,
Dmitriy A. Velikanov
5,
Alexander A. Garmonov
7,
Maxim S. Molokeev
5,8,9,
Aleksandr S. Oreshonkov
5,10,
Nikolay P. Shestakov
5,
Alexey V. Matigorov
11,
Svetlana S. Volkova
3,
Evgeniy A. Ostapchuk
1,
Alexander V. Kertman
3,
Thomas Schleid
12 and
Damir A. Safin
3,13,14,*
1
Laboratory of Theory and Optimization of Chemical and Technological Processes, University of Tyumen, 625003 Tyumen, Russia
2
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Federal Research Center KSC SB RAS, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
3
Institute of Chemistry, University of Tyumen, 625003 Tyumen, Russia
4
Department of Photonics and Laser Technology, Siberian Federal University, 660079 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
5
Kirensky Institute of Physics, Federal Research Center KSC SB RAS, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
6
Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Mira Str. 19, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
7
Institute of Physics and Technology, University of Tyumen, 625003 Tyumen, Russia
8
Research and Development Department, Kemerovo State University, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia
9
Institute of Engineering Physics and Radioelectronic, Siberian Federal University, 660079 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
10
School of Engineering and Construction, Siberian Federal University, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
11
Engineering Centre of Composite Materials Based on Wolfram Compounds and Rare-Earth Elements, University of Tyumen, 625003 Tyumen, Russia
12
Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Stuttgart, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
13
Advanced Materials for Industry and Biomedicine Laboratory, Kurgan State University, Sovetskaya Str. 63/4, 640020 Kurgan, Russia
14
Innovation Center for Chemical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Mira Str. 19, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1503; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031503
Submission received: 24 December 2021 / Revised: 20 January 2022 / Accepted: 25 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Materials Science)

Abstract

:
In this work, we report on the synthesis, in-depth crystal structure studies as well as optical and magnetic properties of newly synthesized heterometallic quaternary selenides of the Eu+2Ln+3Cu+1Se3 composition. Crystal structures of the obtained compounds were refined by the derivative difference minimization (DDM) method from the powder X-ray diffraction data. The structures are found to belong to orthorhombic space groups Pnma (structure type Ba2MnS3 for EuLaCuSe3 and structure type Eu2CuS3 for EuLnCuSe3, where Ln = Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho and Y) and Cmcm (structure type KZrCuS3 for EuLnCuSe3, where Ln = Tm, Yb and Lu). Space groups Pnma and Cmcm were delimited based on the tolerance factor t’, and vibrational spectroscopy additionally confirmed the formation of three structural types. With a decrease in the ionic radius of Ln3+ in the reported structures, the distortion of the (LnCuSe3) layers decreases, and a gradual formation of the more symmetric structure occurs in the sequence Ba2MnS3 → Eu2CuS3 → KZrCuS3. According to magnetic studies, compounds EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho and Tm) each exhibit ferrimagnetic properties with transition temperatures ranging from 4.7 to 6.3 K. A negative magnetization effect is observed for compound EuHoCuSe3 at temperatures below 4.8 K. The magnetic properties of the discussed selenides and isostructural sulfides were compared. The direct optical band gaps for EuLnCuSe3, subtracted from the corresponding diffuse reflectance spectra, were found to be 1.87–2.09 eV. Deviation between experimental and calculated band gaps is ascribed to lower d states of Eu2+ in the crystal field of EuLnCuSe3, while anomalous narrowing of the band gap of EuYbCuSe3 is explained by the low-lying charge-transfer state. Ab initio calculations of the crystal structures, elastic properties and phonon spectra of the reported compounds were performed.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the copper-containing chalcogenides are of particular interest and in the limelight of many studies, the reason being their thermal, electrical and optical properties, which make them promising materials for infrared (IR) and nonlinear optics [1,2], photocatalysis, photoelectric energy and proton conductivity [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Development of electronic technologies opened prospects for the copper containing selenides as one of the most promising absorbers in thin film photovoltaic cells and high-performance thermoelectric materials [19,20]. Copper selenides can be used as bifunctional electrocatalysts for water splitting in an alkaline medium with low overvoltages for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at the cathode [21].
Quaternary selenides, comprising copper and rare earth elements, are of particular interest due to a variety of different combinations of cations that enable the design of the structural type and band gap, as well as electrical and optical characteristics [1,2,3,8,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Recent theoretical studies well predict thermoelectric properties of the copper-derived quaternary selenides [32,34,35], which are one of the promising alternatives to traditional thermoelectric materials. Notably, copper-containing chalcogenides are more abundant in the Earth’s crust and are relatively cheap in comparison to the bismuth- and lead-derivatives [36].
Selenides of the type A+2Ln+3Cu+1Se−23 (A = Sr, Ba, Pb) crystallize in several orthorhombic structural types, namely Ba2MnS3 (space group Pnma), BaLaCuS3 (space group Pnma), Eu2CuS3 (space group Pnma), KZrCuS3 (space group Cmcm) (Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials) [1,3,25,26,27,28,30,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Additionally, the magnetic and optical properties of these compounds have also been described [1,3,8,30]. Quaternary selenides have a high energy conversion efficiency with a figure of merit higher than unity at 600 K [32]. Due to a 4f–5d transition in the Eu2+ ion, incorporation of this ion into the compound yields in a narrower band gap [9], than, e.g., 1.96 eV obtained for BaGdCuSe3 [3]. For a series of thermodynamically stable quaternary chalcogenides ALnCuSe3 (A = Sr, Ba, Pb, Eu), quantum mechanical calculations revealed a very low thermal conductivity of the lattice due to its strong anharmonicity, which enhances phonon scattering [32]. Compounds with low thermal conductivity can be used as high-performance thermoelectrics in thermal barrier coatings and thermal data-storage devices [32,44,45,46,47].
Selenides of the rhombic system EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Lu, Sc, Y) with the band gap of 0.82–1.09 eV were also predicted [32]. Quaternary selenides EuLnCuSe3 are also indirectly predicted by the existence of tertiary selenides CuLnSe2 [18,48,49]. The former compounds should form in the CuLnSe2–EuS section of the EuS–Ln2Se3–Cu2S ternary system analogously to the chalcogenides of a similar composition [38,39,40,41,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Three structural types were predicted for EuLnCuSe3, namely KZrCuSe3 (Ln = Nd–Lu, Y), BaLaCuS3 (Ln = La–Pr) and NaCuTiS3 for EuScCuSe3 [32]. This contradicts the data obtained for the synthesized Eu+2Eu+3Cu+1Se−23, for which the structural type of Eu2CuS3 with the cell parameters a = 10.773(7) Å, b = 4.134(3) Å, c = 13.466(9) Å was established [31]. This compound was synthesized from elemental europium and selenium for about 400 h [31]. The resulting sample was contaminated by EuSe and an unidentified impurity. It should also be noted that selenides EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Nd, Sm, Gd, Er) were obtained very recently [60]. However, the applied synthetic procedure was remarkably time-consuming and allowed the production of only significantly contaminated samples. Furthermore, only EuErCuSe3 was structurally characterized, and its thermal, optical and magnetic properties were studied.
Finally, a similarity in the structural types of EuLnCuSe3 and SrLnCuSe3 could be observed, since the radius of Eu2+ (1.17 Å, coordination number = 6 [61]) is close to the radius of Sr2+ (1.18 Å, coordination number = 6 [61]), which was observed for the sulfides EuLnCuS3 [10] and SrLnCuS3 [51]. For a series of selenides SrLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Lu, Y, Sc), the existence of three structural types Ba2MnS3, Eu2CuS3 and KZrCuS3 (Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials) was experimentally established [26,27,28,36,42]. Thus, we expect similar structural types for the EuLnCuSe3 selenides.
With all this in mind, in this work we directed our attention towards a series of quaternary selenides EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Tm, Lu). Particularly, we focused on the efficient synthetic approach, crystal structure determination, optical and magnetic properties as well as computational analysis of the obtained structures. All the obtained results were examined with respect to the Ln3+ radius.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of Selenides

Quaternary selenides reported in this work were obtained from the corresponding starting materials, which were carefully prepared before the synthesis by thermolysis of the corresponding co-crystallized metal nitrates. Both Eu2O3 and copper were pretreated as described in the literature [9]. Oxides of rare earth elements were annealed 1070 K to remove sorption water, hydroxides, hydrocarbonates and oxycarbonates [62,63], while Tb4O7 was annealed at 470 K to keep its chemical composition and avoid a stepwise transformation: Tb4O7 → Tb11O20 → Tb7O12 → Tb2O3 [64]. The completeness of thermolysis was proved by the elimination of absorption bands in the corresponding IR spectra due to vibrations of the nitrate and hydroxyl groups. The absence of nitrogen-containing compounds was also confirmed by the distribution spectra of elements, plotted using an energy dispersive analysis system, in which no characteristic lines of nitrogen were observed, while the presence of characteristic lines of four elements O, Ln, Eu, Cu indicated the formation of oxides. According to X-ray phase analysis, the resulting samples comprised Cu2Ln2O5, CuO, (Ln/Eu)2O3, (Eu/Ln)2CuO4. Notably, the selenidation of complex oxides decreases the synthesis time of EuLnCuSe3 in comparison with the selenidation of a mixture of commercial oxides CuO, Ln2O3, Eu2O3. Finally, compounds EuLnCuSe3 in the powdered form were prepared by the reductive selenidation of the oxide mixtures, yielding aggregated particles with linear sizes up to about 30 μm (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials). The energy dispersive X-ray spectrometric analysis data are in agreement with the calculated data (see the Section 3.2 Synthesis). According to the X-ray phase analysis, the content of the main phase in the samples ranges from 95.7% to 100% (Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials). Notably, the recently reported synthetic approach allowed the isolation of selenides with the main phase content of only 87.4–96.0% [60]. Furthermore, the described herein synthetic procedure significantly decreases the reaction time down to about 24 h at the temperature 970–1170 K.

2.2. Crystal Structures

The crystal structures of EuLnCuSe3 were best solved in the orthorhombic system from powder X-ray diffraction patterns (Figure 1, Table 1, Figure S2 and Tables S2–S5 in the Supplementary Materials). The calculated unit cell parameters obtained using the PBE0 density functional theory (DFT) functional are in good agreement with the experimental values (Figure 2, Table 1 and Table S6 in the Supplementary Materials). Notably, the PBE0 functional was recently shown to be efficient to reproduce crystal structures, phonon spectra and elastic properties of compounds with ionic and covalent bonds [65]. Furthermore, it was also shown that the use of pseudopotentials for rare-earth ions replacing the inner shells, including 4f orbitals, allows the successful description of the structure and dynamics of the lattice of compounds with a sublattice of rare-earth ions [66].
Two types of orthorhombic Pnma and one type of orthorhombic Cmcm crystal structures were revealed for EuLnCuSe3 (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Compound EuLaCuSe3 belongs to the structural type Ba2MnS3, while compounds EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm, Eu [31], Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y) are isostructural to Eu2CuS3. These crystal structures have the same type of symmetry but differ in the system of bonds and coordination of Ln3+. Finally, selenides EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm, Yb, Lu) belong to the structural type KZrCuS3. In all compounds, the Eu2+ and Ln3+ cations each occupy two crystallographically independent positions.
The distorted tetrahedra CuSe4 are linked by vertex atoms yielding polymeric chains along the b axis for the structural types Ba2MnS3 and Eu2CuS3, and along the a axis for the structural type KZrCuS3. In the structure of EuLaCuSe3, the polyhedron EuSe7 is formed from two atoms of Se1i, two atoms of Se1ii, two atoms of Se2i and one atom of Se3 (Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials) with all the Eu–Se distances being within the calculated sum of ionic radii 3.15–3.18 Å (rSe2− = 1.98 Å (coordination number = 6); rEu2+ = 1.17 Å (coordination number = 6); rEu2+ = 1.20 Å (coordination number = 7) [61]). The eighth selenide ion is located at a distance that significantly exceeds the sum of ionic radii (>4 Å). The layered structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Eu–Lu) are formed by two-dimensional layers [LnCuSe3] in the ab plane for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Eu–Y) and in the ac plane for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu), between which the Eu2+ ions are located.
In the EuLnCuSe3, as the radius rLn3+ decreases, the average Ln–Se distance gradually decreases from 3.09(7) Å down to 2.82(1) Å, while the Cu–Se distance remains intact and of 2.46(2)–2.48(3) Å (Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials). Notably, since the distorted octahedra LnSe6 are linked into layers with the CuSe4 tetrahedra, as rLn3+ decreases, the crystal-chemical compression of these layers is observed. A decrease in the coordination saturation of the lanthanide cation leads to changes in the coordination polyhedron, structural type and space group (Figure 1). Particularly, changing the coordination polyhedron from the monocapped trigonal prism LnSe7 in EuLaCuSe3 to the LnSe6 octahedron (Ln = Eu–Y) leads to the change in the structural type Ba2MnS3 to Eu2CuS3, and the monocapped trigonal prism EuSe7 in EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Eu–Y) to the trigonal prism EuSe6 in EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu) leads to the change in the structural type Eu2CuS3 to KZrCuS3. A similar change in the structural types was observed for SrLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Lu) [26,27,28,36,42] and EuLnCuS3 [10]. Thus, the change in the structural type in EuLnCuSe3 is dictated by the size of the Ln3+ cation.
In the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y; structural type Eu2CuS3), six Eu–Se distances, namely two Eu–Se1i, two Eu–Se2i and two Eu–Se3i, are shorter than 3.2 Å, while the seventh and the longest distance Eu–Se3ii gradually increases in the following sequence: 3.331 Å (EuSmCuSe3) → 3.359 Å (EuGdCuSe3) → 3.384 Å (EuTbCuSe3) → 3.412 Å (EuDyCuSe3) → 3.424 Å (EuYCuSe3) → 3.507 Å (EuHoCuSe3) (Figure 3, Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials). A similar trend was observed for isostructural compounds EuLnCuS3 [10] and SrLnCuS3 [67].
In the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm, Yb, Lu; structural type KZrCuS3), six Eu–Se distances, namely four Eu–Se1ii and two Eu–Se2ii, are also shorter than 3.2 Å, while two more separations Eu–Se1 are longer than 3.55 Å and, thus, are not included in the coordination sphere of the metal ion (Figure 1, Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials).
In compounds EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Lu), the unit cell parameters b (space group Pnma) and a (space group Cmcm) decrease. The parameters a (space group Pnma) and c (space group Cmcm) also decrease within each structural type of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm–Ho) and EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu). The unit cell parameters a and c (space group Pnma) upon the changing of the structural type from Ba2MnS3 to Eu2CuS3 abruptly increase and decrease, respectively. The unit cell volume changes from EuHoCuSe3 to EuTmCuSe3 smoothly, despite the change in symmetry. A similar process was observed for isomorphic compounds ALnMX3 (A = Sr, Eu, Ba; M = Cu, Ag; X = S, Se, Te) [25,29,68]. All these changes clearly testify to morphotropy in a series of the reported EuLnCuSe3 compounds.
Despite that EuYCuSe3 belongs to the same structural type as EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm–Ho), and the yttrium ion radius is less than that of holmium, the unit cell parameters of the yttrium-based selenide are larger than those for EuDyCuSe3 and EuHoCuSe3, which is in agreement with the data obtained for isostructural quaternary sulfides ALnCuS3 (A = Sr, Eu) [10,42,68,69]. This can be explained by the electronic structure of yttrium, which is a d-element.
In general, the EuLnCuSe3 compounds are isostructural to EuLnCuS3 [10]. When selenium is included instead of sulfur, the anionic sublattice expands, since selenium is a larger anion. A comparison of sulfide and selenide analogues EuLnCuX3 (X = S, Se, Ln = La–Lu, Y) allows the reveal of the formation of different types of crystal structures with the same rare-earth metals (Figure 4). Particularly, SrYCuS3 and SrHoCuS3 crystallize in space group Pnma, while their selenide derivatives crystallize in space group Cmcm (Figure 4) [28,42,53,69].
In the structures of SrYCuSe3 and EuYCuSe3, the Sr2+ and Eu2+ ions exhibit different coordination polyhedra. Compound SrYCuSe3 contains the SrSe6 polyhedron with the most pronounced ionic character of the included atoms, having a local symmetry of 43m (highly symmetric coordination), while EuYCuSe3 contains the EuSe7 polyhedron with a less pronounced ionic character of atoms, with the mm2 symmetry (less symmetric coordination). As the ionic radius of the lanthanide rLn3+ decreases in ALnCuSe3, the formation of a highly symmetric coordination of A2+ occurs earlier in SrLnCuSe3 than in EuLnCuSe3. Particularly, SrSe7 (Pnma) transforms into SrSe6 (Cmcm) from Dy to Ho [42], while the change in the coordination polyhedron of europium occurs later, viz. from Y to Er. A similar process was an observed trend for ALnCuS3 (A = Eu, Sr) [10,42]. In SrLnCuS3 and SrLnCuS3, for example, the change in the strontium and europium coordination polyhedra is observed from Y to Er and from Er to Tm, respectively [10,42]. This is due to the more pronounced ionic characteristics of the alkaline earth elements in comparison with the rare earth metals.
Thus, with an increase in the degree of ionicity of the A2+–X bond, as well as the A2+ radius, the number of compounds, crystallized in the Cmcm space group, increases, and the A2+ ions become six-coordinated earlier.
To separate orthorhombic space groups Cmcm and Pnma in sulfides ALnCuS3 (A = Sr, Eu, Ba) clearly, the tolerance factor t′ = [rA2+] × [rCu+] + a × [rLn3+]2 (a = −0.6, critical value of t′ = 0.28) was applied [10,70]. The experimental data on selenides ALnCuSe3 obtained here allow for checking the formula for these compounds. Considering the data on both sulfides and selenides, the adjusted value of the tolerance factor is 0.273. A slight change in the value of t′ confirms the previous assumption that the change in the space group of compounds ALnCuX3 is almost independent on the ionic radius of the chalcogen, but depends on the ionic radii of A2+, Ln3+ and Cu+ [70]. We assume that studying new compounds ALnCuX3 (X = S, Se; A is an element with an ionic radius in the range of 1.2 Å (rEu2+) < (rA2+) < 1.35 Å (rBa2+)), the value of t′ can vary in the range from 0.273 to 0.285.
Thus, our results on the crystal structures of the reported quaternary selenides are in full agreement with the previously established structural types for compounds of the type A2+Ln3+Cu+1X3 (A = Eu, Sr, Pb, Ba; X = S, Se) [8]. Furthermore, the formation of the most symmetric structure of the type KZrCuS3 with the decreasing of rLn3+ and decreasing of the distortion of two-dimensional [LnCuSe3] layers in a series of the discussed compounds is also confirmed.
In compounds EuLnCuS3, the europium ion is Eu2+ [11,68,71]. An insignificant structural difference also anticipates a similarity of charges in EuLnCuX3 (X = S, Se). The bond valence sum calculation is frequently used as an efficient tool to estimate the oxidation states of atoms.
The oxidation states of the Eu, Ln and Cu ions in EuLnCuSe3 are close to 2, 3 and 1, respectively (Table S7 in the Supplementary Materials). This is in agreement with the data for Eu2CuSe3 on the presence of both Eu2+ and Eu3+ [31]. Moreover, the Eu3+ ion occupies the same position in Eu2+Eu3+CuSe3 as Ln3+ in EuLnCuSe3.

2.3. Elastic Properties

Elastic constants of crystals EuLnCuSe3 were calculated using the PBE0 functional (Table S8 in the Supplementary Materials), while the bulk modulus, Young’s modulus, and shear modulus were calculated in the Voigt, Reuss and Hill approximations (Table S9 in the Supplementary Materials). The dependence of the Young’s modulus on the direction demonstrates anisotropy of the elastic properties (Figure 5). Calculations predict that the elastic properties of crystals of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Lu) strongly depend on the structural types Ba2MnS3, Eu2CuS3 and KZrCuS3 (Figure 5, Table S8 in the Supplementary Materials), for example, for the former two structural types C12 < C13, while C12 > C13 for the latter structural type (Table S8 in the Supplementary Materials).
The calculated values of the shear modulus and bulk modulus allows the estimation of the Vickers hardness for SrTmCuS3 according to empirical formula HV = 0.92(G/B)1.137 × G0.708, where G is the shear modulus, and B is the bulk modulus, obtained from the Hill approximation [72]. It was found that for the structures with space group Pnma, the calculated hardness decreases from La to Ho, while for the structures with space group Cmcm, the calculated hardness increases from Er to Lu (Table 2). Furthermore, using formula AU = 5(GV/GR) + BV/BR − 6 (GV and GR, BV and RR are the shear and bulk modulus, calculated in the Voigt and Reuss approximations, respectively), we also calculated the so-called “universal” anisotropy index AU to estimate anisotropy of the elastic properties of EuLnCuSe3 [73]. Deviation of the index AU from zero determines the degree of anisotropic properties of the crystal. It was found that for the crystals of EuLnCuSe3 with space group Pnma, the value of AU increases, while for the crystals with space group Cmcm, the same value decreases (Table 2).

2.4. Phonon, Raman and IR Spectra

We also applied ab initio calculations with the PBE0 functional to examine wavenumbers and types of the phonon modes. As a result, IR active modes, Raman modes and “silent” modes were revealed (Tables S10–S12 in the Supplementary Materials). Participation of each ion in a particular mode was estimated from the analysis of displacement vectors obtained from these ab initio calculations (Figure 6 and Tables S13–S15 in the Supplementary Materials).
According to the obtained results, the phonon wavenumbers at the Γ-point do not exceed 230 cm−1. In this range, not only light ions of selenium and copper but also heavy rare-earth ions are actively involved. In crystals of EuLnCuSe3 with a structural type of Ba2MnS3, the europium ions actively participate in modes with wavenumbers up to about 150 cm−1, while for the structural types of Eu2CuS3 and KZrCuS3, the europium ions participate in modes with wavenumbers up to about 110 cm−1, respectively (Figure 6). Both the Ln2+ and selenium ions are involved in almost all modes for all the reported structural types (Figure 6).
Unfortunately, contrarily to the corresponding sulfide analogues [9,11], we faced problems collecting Raman spectra for some of the reported selenides, and our numerous attempts failed. This can be explained by the narrower bandgap and sequent high absorption at the wavelengths of excitation and of the scattered Raman signal. As a result, we were able to record the Raman spectra for EuTbCuSe3 and EuTmCuSe3 (Figure 7). Both the experimental and calculated Raman spectra, obtained using the PBE0 functional, for three typical representatives of each structural types of the reported selenides, namely EuLaCuSe3 (structural type Ba2MnS3), EuTbCuSe3 (structural type Eu2CuS3) and EuTmCuSe3 (structural type KZrCuS3), exhibit bands exclusively in the region up to about 250 cm−1 (Figure 7). Notably, the experimental and calculated spectra of the latter two compounds are pairwise very similar with the most intensive bands at about 60 and 180 cm−1, each corresponding to active Ag modes. However, the spectrum of EuTbCuSe3 contains an additional clearly visible band at about 15 cm−1 also due to the Ag mode (Figure 7). Both spectra further exhibit bands from B2g and B3g modes. Notably, the experimental spectrum of EuTmCuSe3 exhibits an additional clearly defined band at about 45 cm−1 (Figure 7). We can tentatively assign the origin of this band to the Raman active mode of the Tm4Se3O4 impurity. Unfortunately, our numerous attempts to calculate the Raman spectrum of Tm4Se3O4 failed and was found to be highly time-consuming, which can be explained by the nonstoichiometric occupancy of the selenium ions.
Interestingly, the calculated spectrum of EuLaCuSe3 is characterized by a noticeably larger number of bands (Figure 7). An overwhelming majority of these bands are due to Ag modes, with the most intensive one at about 150 cm−1, accompanied with two bands at about 60 and 90 cm−1, arising from B3g and B1g modes, respectively, and one band at about 115 cm−1, corresponding to the A1g mode (Figure 7).
The structures of EuLnCuSe3 were also studied by IR spectroscopy. Notably, all the reported selenides were found to be transparent for IR radiation in the range of 250–4000 cm−1. However, a close inspection of the range of 85–250 cm−1 revealed a set of absorption bands in the IR spectra of compounds (Figure 8).
Mechanical representation in the center of the Brillouin zone for EuLnCuSe3 with the structural types Ba2MnS3 and Eu2CuS3 is described as Γvibr = 12Ag + 6Au + 6B1g + 12B1u + 12B2g + 6B2u + 6B3g + 12B3u. Mechanical representation for the structural type KZrCuS3 is the sum of 36 irreducible representations: 5Ag + 2Au + 4B1g + 7B1u + B2g + 7B2u + 5B3g + 5B3u. Notably, the g and u labeled modes are Raman and IR active, respectively, except for the “silent” Au modes. Thus, the number of IR active modes is 16 and 27 for the structural types KZrCuS3, and Eu2CuS3 and Ba2MnS3, respectively.
The experimental IR spectra of the discussed selenides are of three different profiles and in good agreement with the calculated ones (Figure 8). Particularly, the spectra of the structural types KZrCuS3 and Eu2CuS3 (except for EuYCuSe3) are very similar, and a set of bands is observed at about 80–210 cm−1. This is also supported by the positions of the calculated IR active bands for these selenides, although the total number of these bands differs significantly (Figure 8). The experimental IR spectrum of the yttrium-based selenide exhibits bands in a broader range at about 80–240 cm−1. Although the structure of this compound also belongs to the structural type Eu2CuS3 as for the Sm-, Gd-, Tb-, Dy- and Ho-based derivatives, again the different nature of yttrium (d-element) is reflected. EuLaCuSe3 is the only described herein selenide of the structural type Ba2MnS3. Its experimental IR spectrum is, in general, the result of overlapping of closely positioned bands without any large gaps between the IR active vibrations (Figure 8). It should also be noted that all the reported selenides, except for the La-based one, are contaminated by the Ln4O4Se3 [74] or Ln2SeO2 [75] impurities (see discussion above). Thus, additional bands from the Ln–Se vibrations of the oxyselenides are also expected in the same range as for the quaternary selenides. However, their impact is negligible as evidenced from very weak bands of the oxyselenides Ln–O vibrations found at about 300–600 cm−1 [76].

2.5. Band Structure and Optical Properites

The DFT/B3LYP-calculated band structure and the density of states were examined (Figure 9). The path in the Brillouin zone is plotted through the most highly symmetric points for the orthorhombic lattice. For space group Pnma (no. 62), the path is built through Γ–X–Z–U–Y–S–T–R–Γ with the coordinates of points of (0,0,0), (1/2,0,0), (0,0,1/2), (1/2,0,1/2), (0,1/2,0), (1/2,1/2,0), (0,1/2,1/2), (1/2,1/2,1/2), (0,0,0), respectively. For space group Cmcm (no. 63), the path is built through Γ–Y–T–Z–S–R–Γ, and the coordinates of points are (0,0,0), (1/2,1/2,0), (1/2,1/2,1/2), (0,0,1/2), (0,1/2,0), (0,1/2,1/2), (0,0,0), respectively. Since for the rare-earth ions pseudopotentials that replaced their core shells, including 4f, were used, the band structure does not include 4f states. According to calculations, the top of the valence band is formed mainly by the states of copper and selenium, while the bottom of the conduction band is formed by the states of the Ln ion and europium. The band gap was defined as the difference in energy between the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band, namely the HOMO–LUMO value (Table 2 and Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials). Calculations predict the direct band gap Γ–Γ for EuLnCuSe3 with space group Pnma (structural types Ba2MnS3 and Eu2CuS3) and the indirect band gap Γ–Y for EuLnCuSe3 with space group Cmcm (structural type KZrCuS3). A small jump was also revealed in the band gap value from the structural type Ba2MnS3 to the structural type Eu2CuS3 (Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials).
It is known that, for the same compound, hybrid functionals yield a higher value of the gap width than non-hybrid ones. For example, it was shown that the hybrid functional PBE0 overestimates, while the non-hybrid functional PBE underestimates the gap in some oxides [65]. The same is true for the discussed selenides EuLnCuSe3 (Table 2). Furthermore, the non-hybrid PBE functional also yielded an underestimated value of the gap width for selenides as reported earlier (Table 2 and Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials) [32].
The PBE-based calculation performed in this revealed the gap width close to the results of the PBE calculations reported earlier (Table 2), where the f-shell of the rare-earth ions was considered explicitly and was not replaced by a pseudopotential [32]. We also performed a test calculation with the PBE functional for EuLaCuSe3, where the f-electrons of europium were considered explicitly. The obtained gap of about 1 eV is in good agreement with the reported one [32] and is close to the results, which were obtained by replacing the f-shell of europium with a pseudopotential.
The experimental band gaps of EuLnCuSe3 were determined from the Kubelka-Munk functions (Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials). A recent study suggested that use of the simple Kubelka-Munk function may lead to errors in band gap values of the order of several tenths of eV [77]. Landi et al. argue that the Tauc-type modification of the Kubelka-Munk functions, though containing approximations, leads to more correct band gap values. Therefore, we tested both uncorrected (Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials) and modified Kubelka-Munk functions (Table 2 and Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials). For some samples, the Kubelka-Munk functions modified for an indirect band gap failed, and the corresponding cells in Table 2 were left empty. Most of the unmodified Kubelka-Munk spectra exhibit a shoulder at longer wavelengths preceding the onset of an evident fundamental absorption. This shoulder is associated with oxyselenide impurities (Table 1) that are known to be semiconductors with the band gap of 1.02–1.46 eV [74]. Thus, to estimate the band gap value of the discussed selenides, an additional correction was applied with respect to impurities [78]. For the Dy- and Sm-based selenides, such a correction was less than 0.01 eV, while no correction was applied for the Y-based derivative since additional data on impurities are required. For the Gd-, Ho-, Tb-, Lu- and Yb-derived compounds, a correction of several hundredths of eV was revealed for the samples containing about 1% of impurities (Table 2).
The obtained values of the band gap are close to those obtained for isostructural sulfides EuLnCuS3 (Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials). The band gap of BaLnCuS3 is much higher than that of EuLnCuX3 (X = S, Se) [70,79].
Narrowing of the band gap is well-known for the majority of ab initio calculations using the PBE functional. We applied the B3LYP and PBE0 functionals to calculate the electronic band structure, which yielded overestimated band gap values in comparison to the experimental ones, while calculations preformed earlier using the PBE functional and considering f-electrons, in general, underestimated the band gap values [32].
The most probable ion that could be responsible for this narrowing is Eu2+, which is present in all of the discussed compounds. We suggest that interband transitions between sub-bands originating from partially occupied orbitals of f-electrons of Eu2+ to, e.g., unoccupied bands originating from d-orbitals of the same ion, are not correctly described by a pseudopotential, and these sub-bands are the factor that determines experimental behavior of band gaps (Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials). More specifically, experimental values of the direct band gap in all selenides containing divalent europium and trivalent lanthanide with f-electrons vary from 1.87 eV to 1.97 eV for the Pnma space group, and from 2.02 eV to 2.1 eV for the Cmcm space group (Tm, Lu).
The B3LYP-based calculation with the europium pseudopotential predicts direct band gaps in the range 2.38–2.63 eV and 2.52–2.59 eV for Pnma and Cmcm space groups, respectively. An indirect band gap for the Cmcm space group is predicted to be narrower than the direct one in contrast to the Pnma space group. However, for consistency, we compare direct band gaps produced by stronger direct transitions for all crystals. The discrepancy between the B3LYP-based calculations and experimental values of the order of 0.6 eV is ascribed to a lower position of excited d-bands of europium in comparison with the B3LYP calculation. This explanation is valid for all the discussed compounds except for the La-, Y- and Yb-derived ones, which exhibit much narrower experimental band gaps. For the Yb containing selenide, the narrower band gap can be explained as similar to BaYbCuS3 [79]. The Yb3+ ion with the f13-electronic configuration is characterized by a low-lying charge transfer transition to the f14-configuration with enhanced stability. In selenides, this charge transfer transition is expected to lie at even lower energies than in sulfides, resulting in additional narrowing of the EuYbCuSe3 band gap with respect to calculations. To explain the narrowing of the band gap of compounds where Ln3+ completely lack f-electrons, i.e., La and Y are more challenging, one may expect that the lack of f-electrons results in certain structural changes that lead to enhancement of the crystal field acting upon europium ions and sequent narrowing of the band gap. Let us compare, e.g., a local environment of the europium ion in EuYCuSe3 and in EuHoCuSe3 with the ionic radius of Ln3+ closest to that of Y3+. The europium ion is coordinated by seven selenium ions at distances of the order of 3 Å. Specifically, one of the selenium ions is positioned at a much longer distance of about 3.4–3.5 Å for the Ho- and Y-based selenides, respectively. Thus, asymmetry of the crystal field for EuYCuSe3 is the largest one. Hypothetically, it can be the reason for the narrowing of the EuYCuSe3 band gap. However, since the increase of asymmetry is rather small, this explanation must be considered as a hypothesis.

2.6. Magnetic Properties

The external field dependent magnetic moments of the samples at room temperature exhibit a linear plot, corresponding to the Curie law for paramagnets and differ only in the slope of the line (Figure 10 and Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials).
The calculated values of μ and C for EuYCuSe3, EuLaCuSe3 and EuLuCuSe3 are the same since the cations Y3+, La3+ and Lu3+ are diamagnetic, and the final magnetic properties of these selenides are exclusively associated with the Eu2+ cation. The experimental values of the effective magnetic moments of EuYCuSe3 and EuLaCuSe3 are equal within the error and differ from the calculated ones by about 1%, while the experimental magnetic moment of EuLuCuSe3 is about 5.5% larger in comparison to the calculated one (Table 3). For the other selenides, the relative deviations of the calculated values of the magnetic moments from the calculated ones do not exceed 3%. As for the corresponding Curie constants, this value of deviation is as twice as large due to the quadratic dependence on the values of the effective magnetic moments.
Plots of both specific magnetization and reciprocal magnetic susceptibility of EuLaCuSe3 and EuLuCuSe3 at 4.2–20 K indicate that, upon cooling down to 4.2 K, the compounds remain paramagnetic with the corresponding (asymptotic) Curie temperature θp = 0.2 and 3.1 K, respectively (Figure 10 and Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials). At these temperatures, the samples are most likely to be ferromagnetic. This assumption is supported by the presence of one type of magnetic ions in the compounds (Eu2+), the coincidence of the data for the FC and ZFC measurements and the linearity of the temperature dependent reciprocal susceptibility down to the lowest temperatures.
The magnetic behavior of EuYCuSe3 is similar to that of EuLaCuSe3 and EuLuCuSe3. However, below 12 K, the FC and ZFC curves slightly diverge, although there are no noticeable points in these dependences (Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials). The paramagnetic Curie temperatures were found to be 4.2 and 3.3 K for FC and ZFC, respectively. The second value is more reliable since the dependence in this case is more linear. Probably, a transition to a ferromagnetic state occurs at this point. The thermomagnetic dependences for EuYbCuSe3 are similar with the FC and ZFC curves being less diverged, and the transition to a ferromagnetic state occurs, most likely, very close to 4 K.
Curves for EuTbCuSe3, EuDyCuSe3 (ZFC), EuHoCuSe3 and, to a lesser extent, EuTmCuSe3 with decreasing temperatures exhibit an abrupt drop in the linear dependence of the reciprocal susceptibility, characteristic of ferrimagnets (Figure 10 and Figure S5 in the Supplementary Materials). Paramagnetic Curie temperatures, calculated from linear sections of the curves, are negative except for EuTmCuSe3. This testifies to the antiparallel coordination of the magnetic sublattices. The approximation of these curves at temperatures above the points of local minima χ−1, according to the Néel theory for ferrimagnets, reveals the data, including the Néel temperatures, gathered in Table 4.
The decreasing of the χ−1 values of EuDyCuSe3 and EuTbCuSe3 in the FC mode in comparison to the ZFC mode at low temperatures corresponds to an increase in the magnetic moment of the sample cooled in the presence of an external field. Apparently, when heated above the Néel point, the effect of this initial magnetization persists up to some higher temperatures. A similar explanation can be proposed for the divergence of the FC and ZFC curves of EuYCuSe3 and EuYbCuSe3, discussed above, although the temperature did not decrease below the points of magnetic transitions. The positive value of the paramagnetic Curie point calculated for EuTmCuSe3 contradicts the conclusion about ferrimagnetic ordering, but this value is rather close to zero.
The magnetization of EuHoCuSe3 below the Néel point looks significantly different, and its value is negative at temperatures from 4.2 to 4.8 K. This recently attracted increased interest for possible practical applications [81,82]. Several mechanisms of this phenomenon are considered: negative exchange coupling among ferromagnetic sublattices, negative exchange coupling among canted antiferromagnetic sublattices, negative exchange coupling among ferromagnetic/canted antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic sublattices, imbalance of spin and orbital moments, interfacial exchange coupling between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases [81]. Similar temperature dependences of the reciprocal susceptibility were obtained for (Tm0.8Mn0.2)MnO3 [82]. It was established that the negative magnetization is determined by the first mechanism. Most likely, EuHoCuSe3 exhibits similar properties and belongs to the N-type ferrimagnets according to Néel [80].
The magnetic properties of EuYCuSe3 and EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Tb, Dy, Ho, Tm, Yb, Lu) correlate well with the properties of isostructural sulfides (Table 5) [9,10,68].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Ln2O3 (Ln = La, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Ho, Y, Tm, Yb, Lu; 99.9%) and Tb4O7 (99.9%) were purchased from the Uralredmet manufacture (Verkhnyaya Pyshma, Russia). Elementary selenium (extra-pure grade, 17-4) and CuSO4·5H2O (pure for analysis) were purchased from the Lenreactiv, CJSC (Saint Petersburg, Russia). Elementary copper (99.9%) was obtained from SZB Tsvetmet, OJSC (Saint Petersburg, Russia). Argon (99.998%) was purchased from Kislorod-servis (Yekaterinburg, Russia), concentrated nitric acid (extra-pure grade, 18-4 all-Union State Standard 11125-84) was purchased from Chemreaktivsnab, CJSC (Ufa, Russia). Activated charcoal was obtained from «Tyumenskie sistemy vodoochistki» Ltd. (Tyumen, Russia).

3.2. Synthesis

Powdered samples of EuLnCuSe3 were prepared by reductive selenidation of the oxide mixtures produced by thermolysis of the co-crystallized metal nitrates. Metallic copper fragments were mechanically cleaned, treated with alcohol and dried at room temperature. Oxides of rare earth elements were annealed in a quartz glass in a muffle furnace at 1070 K for 5 h, while Tb4O7 was annealed at 470 K to keep its chemical composition and avoid stepwise transformation.
The parent reagents were calculated based on the stoichiometric ratio of metals in EuLnCuSe3 (1:1:1). Starting materials were dissolved in 65% aqueous HNO3 (100 mL) under vigorous stirring upon heating to 330–350 K. The resulting solution was slowly evaporated, followed by the co-crystallization of nitrates. The dry residue was transferred into a quartz glass and subjected to thermolysis at 1070 K for 5 h. The baked mass was ground to a size of about 30–50 µm.
Reductive selenidation was carried out in a flow of H2 (pressure 0.004 MPa) and H2Se, obtained by the interaction of hydrogen with elemental selenium at 770 K. At the outlet of the reaction zone, an excess of H2Se was passed through 200–300 g of activated charcoal. The resulting gas was bubbled through a 0.1 M CuSO4 solution. Activated charcoal was replaced by a fresh portion once flakes of Cu2Se (KSP = 60.6 [83]) appeared. Selenidation was carried out with periodic grinding of the resulting product at 970–1040 K for 2.5–12 h and at 1170 K for 6–12 h.
The resulting products were examined by SEM-EDX, and the obtained data are collected in Table 6.

3.3. Methods

The powder X-ray diffraction data were collected at room temperature with a ДPOH 7 (Burevestnik, Saint Petersburg, Russia) powder diffractometer (Cu-Kα radiation, graphite monochromator). The step size of 2θ was 0.02°, and the counting time was 13–50 s per step. The crystal structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Tm, Yb, Lu) were refined by the derivative difference minimization (DDM) method [84] in the anisotropic approximation for all atoms. The data for isostructural sulfides Ba2MnS3 [85], Eu2CuS3 [71] and KZrCuS3 [23] were used as initial structural models. The effects of preferred orientation, anisotropic broadening of peak and sample surface roughness and displacement were taken into account during refinement. Crystal structures were visualized in the program package Diamond 3 [86]. The bond valence method was applied to estimate the oxidation states of atoms [87]. CCDC 2125819–2125828 contain the supplementary crystallographic data. These data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 23 December 2021) or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44)-1223-336-033; or e-mail: [email protected].
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on a JEOLJSM-6510 LV (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer.
The low-temperature (4.2–20 K) magnetic susceptibilities of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, 0.050 g; Tb, 0.070 g; Dy, 0.090 g; Ho, 0.075 g; Y, 0.060 g; Tm, 0.155 g; Yb, 0.085 g and Lu, 0.055 g) were studied on a SQUID magnetometer (Kirensky Institute of Physics, Krasnoyarsk, Russia) [88,89] in a 10 Oe (796 A m−1) magnetic field. The measurements of low-temperature magnetization were performed in the zero-field cooled (ZFC) and nonzero-field cooled (FC) modes. The powdered samples of EuLnCuS3 (Ln = La, 0.0897 g; Sm, 0.0522 g; Gd, 0.0637 g; Tb, 0.0637 g; Dy, 0.0464 g; Ho, 0.0738 g; Y, 0.0637 g; Tm, 0.0918 g; Yb, 0.0601 g and Lu, 0.0600 g) were tightly packed into the polyvinylchloride container of 4.2 mm in diameter and 5.6 mm height with the lid. The room-temperature magnetic properties of EuLnCuSe3 were studied on a vibrating sample magnetometer with a Puzey electromagnet [90]. The magnetic field was varied in the range −15 ÷ 15 kOe (−1.2 ÷ 1.2 MA m−1) with a step of 20–100 Oe (1.59–7.96 kA m−1). The magnetometer signal from the container and the lid was measured separately and then subtracted from the total signal.
The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) absorption spectra in the range of 85–675 cm−1 were recorded on a VERTEX 80v FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker OJSC, Germany). The samples were ground in an agate mortar and then mixed with ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (Mitsui Petrochemical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and pressed into pellets of about 0.26 mm thickness and of 13 mm diameter. A Globar was used for the light source, and it was equipped with a Bruker multilayer beamsplitter and RT-DTGS FIR as a detector. The attenuated total reflectance infrared (ATR-IR) absorption spectra in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 were recorded on a Cary 630 FTIR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an ATR attachment and a DTGS detector.
The diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded on a UV-2600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu OJSC, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an ISR-2600Plus attachment with the photomultiplier PMT of the R-928 type and InGaAs detectors. BaSO4 (99.8%) was used as a standard.
Gaseous hydrogen was obtained on a SPEKTR 16 4D hydrogen generator (Spektr Ltd., Petrozavodsk, Russia). The temperature in the electric heating furnaces used for synthesis was controlled using a Termodat-16K6 (InSAT Ltd., Moscow, Russia) temperature controller with a chromel-alumel thermocouple.
The experimental Raman spectra of EuLnCuSe3 compounds were collected in backscattering geometry, using a triple monochromator Horiba JobinYvon T64000 Raman spectrometer (Horiba Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating in subtractive mode. The spectral resolution for the recorded Stokes-side Raman spectra was better than 2.5 cm−1 (this resolution was achieved by using gratings with 1800 grooves mm−1 and 100 μm slits). The single-mode radiation at 532 nm from the Spectra-Physics Excelsior laser was used as an excitation light source, the power on the sample being 1 mW.

3.4. DFT Calculations

The density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out using the PBE0 and B3LYP hybrid functionals, which consider both local and nonlocal Hartree-Fock exchanges. The calculations were performed using the CRYSTAL17 program designed to simulate periodic structures [91]. For Eu3+, the ECP53MWB quasi-relativistic pseudopotential was used with the attached valence basis set ECP53MWB [92]. For Ln3+, the ECPnMWB quasi-relativistic pseudopotential was used with the attached valence basis set ECPnMWB-I (n = Z − 1; Z is an atomic number) [92]. Thus, the inner shells of the rare-earth ion, including 4f, were replaced by a pseudopotential. To describe the outer shells 5s25p6, involved in chemical bonding, valence basis sets were used. Such an approach makes it possible to reconstitute both the lattice structure and dynamics in the compounds that have a lanthanide ion sublattice successfully [10]. For Y3+, the ECP28MHB pseudopotential was used with the attached valence basis set ECP28MWB [92]. For copper and selen, we used full-electron basis sets, known in the CRYSTAL program site as Cu_86-4111(41D)G_doll_2000 and Se_976-311d51G_towler_1995, respectively [91]. Gaussian primitives with orbital exponent values less than 0.1 were removed from basis sets since these calculations are periodic. The exponent in the outer p-orbital of the selen basis set was set to 0.1742. The exponent in the outer diffuse s-, p- and d- orbitals of the yttrium valence basis set was set to 0.1312. The accuracy of calculation of the self-consistent field and the two-electron integrals was set at 10−9 a.u. and 10−8, respectively. Integration over the Brillouin zone was carried out according to the Monkhorst-Pack scheme with a grid of k-points equal to 8 × 8 × 8.
The sequence of the DFT calculations was as follows: the crystal structure was first optimized followed by the calculation of the phonon spectrum at the Γ point or the elastic constants.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully fabricated novel quaternary selenides of the Eu+2Ln+3Cu+1Se3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Tm, Yb and Lu) composition through reductive selenidation of the oxide mixtures, produced by thermolysis of the co-crystallized metal nitrates. The applied synthetic procedure allowed a significant decrease in the reaction time and temperature, and an increase in the yield of the final product in comparison to the recently reported procedure [60]. Crystal structures of the resulting compounds were elucidated by powder X-ray diffraction. As a result, the structures were found to belong to orthorhombic space groups Pnma (structural type Ba2MnS for EuLaCuSe3 and structural type Eu2CuS3 for EuLnCuSe3, where Ln = Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho and Y) and Cmcm (structural type KZrCuS3 for EuLnCuSe3, where Ln = Tm, Yb and Lu). These space groups were delimited based on the tolerance factor t′, while the formation of three structural types was additionally probed by vibrational spectroscopy and further supported by ab initio calculations with hybrid functionals. It was also established that the revealed structural types for a series of the obtained selenides are the same as for the previously reported sulfide analogues.
According to calculations, the elastic properties change abruptly from one structural type to another. The wavenumbers and types of fundamental vibrations were determined from ab initio calculations, and the experimental IR spectra were interpreted.
Optical properties of the reported compounds EuLnCuSe3 were studied by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The corresponding band gaps are determined by the interconfigurational transitions between sub-bands originating from the occupied f-orbitals and vacant d-orbitals of the Eu2+ ion.
Field-dependent magnetic properties of the discussed selenides were also revealed by SQUID measurements. The experimental Curie constants and effective magnetic moments at room temperature are very close to calculated ones. Phase transitions to the ferrimagnetic state were established for EuTbCuSe3, EuDyCuSe3, EuHoCuSe3 and EuTmCuSe3 with the transition temperatures varying from 4.5 to 6.2 K. For EuHoCuSe3, the effect of negative magnetization, which is characteristic of an N-type ferrimagnet according to the Néel’s classification, was found at temperatures below 4.8 K. A comparison of the magnetic properties of quaternary selenides EuLnCuSe3 with isostructural sulfides showed a high degree of similarity.
Finally, we believe that a series of the reported selenides together with the revealed properties will be of value for the fabrication of novel materials with properties of interest.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23031503/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.R. and M.V.G.; software, D.A.S.; validation, D.A.S.; formal analysis, L.A.S., M.V.G., A.A.G., A.S.O., V.A.C. and M.S.M.; investigation, N.P.S., D.A.V., A.V.M., S.S.V., M.V.G., E.A.O. and A.V.K.; resources, A.V.R.; data curation, A.V.R., A.S.A., T.S. and M.V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.G., A.S.A., A.V.R. and M.V.G.; writing—review and editing, M.S.M., A.S.A., A.V.R. and D.A.S.; visualization, M.S.M., A.A.G. and D.A.S.; project administration, A.V.R.; funding acquisition, M.V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Tyumen region within the framework of the grant agreement in the form of a grant to non-profit organizations no. 89-don dated 07.12.2020. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project no. FEUZ-2020-0054). This work was supported by state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Project Reg. No. 720000Φ.99.1.Б385AA13000). The work was conducted within the framework of the budget project #0287-2021-0013 for the Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology SB RAS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting the conclusions is included within the manuscript and is available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially performed using resources of the Research Resource Center «Natural Resource Management and Physico-Chemical Research», and the laboratory for electron and probe microscopy of the Scientific and Educational Center (SEC) for Nanotechnologies (University of Tyumen). The authors express their great gratitude to Alexander S. Krylov and Svetalana N. Krylova for measurements of Raman spectra.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gulay, L.D.; Kaczorowski, D.; Pietraszko, A. Crystal structure and magnetic properties of YbCuPbSe3. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 413, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuo, S.-M.; Chang, Y.-M.; Chung, I.; Jang, J.-I.; Her, B.-H.; Yang, S.-H.; Ketterson, J.B.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Hsu, K.-F. New metal chalcogenides Ba4CuGa5Q12 (Q = S, Se) displaying strong infrared nonlinear optical response. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 2427–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, F.Q.; Mitchell, K.; Ibers, J.A. New layered materials: Syntheses, structures, and optical and magnetic properties of CsGdZnSe3, CsZrCuSe3, CsUCuSe3, and BaGdCuSe3. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 5123–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wu, T.; Bu, X.; Feng, P. Three dimensional open framework built from Cu-S icosahedral clusters and its photocatalytic property. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15238–15239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, H.; Chen, H.; Zheng, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-K.; Yu, J.-S.; Wu, L.-M. Ba5Cu8In2S12: A quaternary semiconductor with a unique 3D copper-rich framework and ultralow thermal conductivity. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 2590–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Repins, I.L.; Stanbery, B.J.; Young, D.L.; Li, S.S.; Metzger, W.K.; Perkins, C.L.; Shafarman, W.N.; Beck, M.E.; Chen, L.; Kapur, V.K.; et al. Comparison of device performance and measured transport parameters in widely varying Cu (In, Ga)(Se, S) solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2006, 14, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, S.B.; Wei, S.H.; Zunger, A.; Katayama-Yoshida, H. Defect physics of the CuInSe2 chalcopyrite semiconductor. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 9642–9656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koscielski, L.A.; Ibers, J.A. The structural chemistry of quaternary chalcogenides of the type AMM’Q3. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2012, 638, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruseikina, A.V.; Molokeev, M.S.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Krylov, A.S.; Krylova, S.N.; Velikanov, D.A.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Maximov, N.G.; Shestakov, N.P.; et al. Synthesis, structure, and properties of EuScCuS3 and SrScCuS3. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 296, 121926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruseikina, A.V.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Velikanov, D.A.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Shestakov, N.P.; Molokeev, M.S.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Andreev, O.V.; Garmonov, A.A.; Matigorov, A.V.; et al. Regularities of the property changes in the compounds EuLnCuS3 (Ln = La-Lu). J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 874, 159968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solovyov, L.A.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Andreev, O.V.; Krylova, S.N.; Krylov, A.S.; Velikanov, D.A.; Molokeev, M.S.; Maximov, N.G.; et al. Synthesis, structure, and properties of EuErCuS3. J. Alloys Compunds 2019, 805, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sengar, B.S.; Garg, V.; Siddharth, G.; Kumar, A.; Pandey, S.K.; Dubey, M.; Atuchin, V.V.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, S. Improving the Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4-based photovoltaic conversion efficiency by back-contact modification. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2021, 68, 2748–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, Y.; Wei, K.; Xia, P.; Bai, Q. The structural and electronic properties of Cu(In1–xBx)Se2 as a new photovoltaic material. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 85431–85435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, S.; Ma, R.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhu, H. Copper yttrium selenide: A potential photovoltaic absorption material for solar cells. Mater. Des. 2017, 118, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, Y.; Sturm, C.; Kleinke, H. Chalcogenides as thermoelectric materials. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 270, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, K.; Blichfeld, A.B.; Eikeland, E.; Qiu, P.; Ren, D.; Bo, B.I.; Shi, X.; Chen, L. Extremely low thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric performance in liquid-like Cu2Se1–xSx polymorph materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2017, 5, 18148–18156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wei, T.-R.; Qin, Y.; Deng, T.; Song, Q.; Jiang, B.; Liu, R.; Qiu, P.; Shi, X.; Chen, L. Copper chalcogenide thermoelectric materials. Sci. China Mater. 2019, 62, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Benaadad, M.; Nafidi, A.; Melkoud, S.; Khan, M.S.; Soubane, D. First-Principles investigations of structural, optoelectronic and thermoelectric properties of Cu-based chalcogenides compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 15882–15897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sengar, B.S.; Garg, V.; Awasthi, V.; Aaryashree; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, C.; Gupta, M.; Mukherjee, S. Growth and characterization of dual ion beam sputtered Cu2ZnSn (S, Se)4 thin films for cost-effective photovoltaic application. Sol. Energy 2016, 139, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, Y.S.; Gershon, T.; Gunawan, O.; Todorov, T.K.; Gokmen, T.; Virgus, Y.; Guha, S. Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin-film solar cells by thermal co-evaporation with 11.6% efficiency and improved minority carrier diffusion length. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chakraborty, S.B.; Beltran-Suito, R.; Hlukhyy, V.; Schmidt, J.; Menezes, P.W.; Driess, M. Crystalline copper selenide as a reliable non-noble electro(pre)catalyst for overall water. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 3222–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Grey, I.E.; Steinfink, H. Crystal structure of Ba2MnSe3. Linear antiferromagnetism in Ba2MnX3 (X = S, Se). Inorg. Chem. 1971, 10, 691–696. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mansuetto, M.F.; Keane, P.M.; Ibers, J.A. Synthesis, structure, and conductivity of the new group IV chalcogenides KCuZrQ3 (Q = S, Se, Te). J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 101, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, C.; Hou, P.; Chai, W.; Tian, J.; Zheng, X.; Shen, Y.; Zhi, M.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Y. Hydrazine-Hydrothermal syntheses, characterizations and photoelectrochemical properties of two quaternary chalcogenidoantimonates(III) BaCuSbQ3 (Q = S, Se). J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 679, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Christuk, A.E.; Wu, P.; Ibers, J.A. New quaternary chalcogenides BaLnMQ3 (Ln = Rare Earth; M = Cu, Ag; Q = S, Se). Structures and grinding-lnduced phase transition in BaLaCuQ3. J. Solid State Chem. 1994, 110, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Strobel, S.; Schleid, T. Three structure types for strontium copper (I) lanthanide (III) selenides SrCuMSe3 (M = La, Gd, Lu). J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 418, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Strobel, S.; Schleid, T. Quaternary strontium copper (I) lanthanoid (III) selenides with cerium and praseodymium: SrCuCeSe3 and SrCuPrSe3, unequal brother and sister. Z. Naturforsch. 2004, 59b, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maier, S.; Prakash, J.; Berthebaud, D.; Perez, O.; Bobev, S.; Gascoin, F. Crystal structures of the four new quaternary copper (I)-selenides A0.5CuZrSe3 and ACuYSe3 (A = Sr, Ba). J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 242, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yang, Y.; Ibers, J.A. Synthesis and characterization of a series of quaternary chalcogenides BaLnMQ3 (Ln = rare earth, M = coinage metal, Q = Se or Te). J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 147, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, P.; Christuk, A.E.; Ibers, J.A. New quaternary chalcogenides BaLnMQ3 (Ln = Rare Earth or Sc; M = Cu, Ag; Q = S, Se). Structure and property variation vs. rare-earth element. J. Solid State Chem. 1994, 110, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gladisch, F.C.; Maier, S.; Steinberg, S. Eu2CuSe3 revisited by means of experimental and quantum-chemical techniques. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 15, 1510–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pal, K.; Xia, Y.; Shen, J.; He, J.; Luo, Y.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Wolverton, C. Accelerated discovery of a large family of quaternary chalcogenides with very low lattice thermal conductivity. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gulay, L.D.; Shemet, V.Y.; Olekseynuk, I.D. Crystal structures of the compounds YCuPbSe3, Y3CuSnSe7 and Y3Cu0.685Se6. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 385, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pal, K.; Hua, X.; Xia, Y.; Wolverton, C. Unraveling the structure-valence-property relationships in AMM′q3 chalcogenides with promising thermoelectric performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 3, 2110–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hao, S.; Ward, L.; Luo, Z.; Ozolins, V.; Dravid, V.P.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Wolverton, C. Design strategy for high-performance thermoelectric materials: The prediction of electron-doped KZrCuSe3. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 3018–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ishtiyak, M.; Jana, S.; Karthikeyan, R.; Mamindla, R.; Tripathy, B.; Malladi, S.K.; Niranjan, M.; Prakash, J. Syntheses of five new layered quaternary chalcogenides SrScCuSe3, SrScCuTe3, BaScCuSe3, BaScCuTe3, and BaScAgTe3: Crystal structures, thermoelectric properties, and electronic structures. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 4086–4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gulay, L.D.; Olekseyuk, I.D. Crystal structures of the RCuPbSe3 (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu) compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 387, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gulay, L.D.; Olekseyuk, I.D.; Wołcyrz, M.; Stpien-Damm, J.; Pietraszko, A. Investigation of the Ho2Se3–Cu2Se–PbSe and Er2Se3–Cu2Se–PbSe systems at 870 K. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 416, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gulay, L.D.; Olekseyuk, I.D. Structure types of the Pb-containing compounds of the systems R2X3–Cu2X–PbX (R-Rare earth element, X = S, Se). Visnyk Lviv. Univ. 2007, 48, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gulay, L.D.; Wołcyrz, M.; Olekseyuk, I.D. Investigation of the Tb2Se3–Cu2Se–PbSe and Dy2Se3–Cu2Se–PbSe systems at 870 K. Pol. J. Chem. 2006, 80, 805–815. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gulay, L.D.; Wołcyrz, M.; Pietraszko, A.; Olekseyuk, I.D. Investigation of the Tm2Se3–Cu2Se–PbSe and Lu2Se3–Cu2Se–PbSe systems at 870 K. Pol. J. Chem. 2006, 80, 1703–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eberle, M.A. Darstellung und Charakterisierung quaternärer Seltenerdmetall-Verbindungen in Kombination mit Kupfer und Schwefel. Ph.D. Thesis, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, Germany, 16 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lemoine, P.; Carré, D.; Guittard, M. Structure du sulfure d’europium et de cuivre Eu2CuS3. Acta Crystallog. 1986, 42, 390–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, L.-D.; Tan, G.; Hao, S.; He, J.; Pei, Y.; Chi, H.; Wang, H.; Gong, S.; Xu, H.; Dravid, V.P.; et al. Ultrahigh power factor and thermoelectric performance in holedoped single crystal SnSe. Science 2016, 351, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Biswas, K.; He, J.; Blum, I.D.; Wu, C.-I.; Hogan, T.P.; Seidman, D.N.; Dravid, V.P.; Kanatzidis, M.G. High-Performance bulk thermoelectrics with all-scale hierarchical architectures. Nature 2012, 489, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Darolia, R. Thermal barrier coatings technology: Critical review, progress update, remaining challenges and prospects. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 58, 315–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Matsunaga, T.; Yamada, N.; Kojima, R.; Shamoto, S.; Sato, M.; Tanida, H.; Uruga, T.; Kohara, S.; Takata, M.; Zalden, P.; et al. Phase-Change materials: Vibrational softening upon crystallization and its impact on thermal properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 2232–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rugut, E.; Joubert, D.; Jones, G. Lattice dynamics and thermoelectric properties of YCuSe2. Mater. Today Commun. 2019, 21, 100617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ijjaali, I.; Mitchell, K.; Ibers, J.A. Preparation and structure of the light rare-earth copper selenides LnCuSe2 (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm). J. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruseikina, A.V.; Andreev, O.V. Phase equilibria in systems DyCuS2–EuS and Cu2S–Dy2S3–EuS. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 63, 1494–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sikerina, N.V. Regularities of Phase Equilibria in SrS–Ln2S3–Cu2S Systems, Preparation and Structure of SrLnCuS3 Compounds. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia, 13 December 2005. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruseikina, A.V.; Andreev, O.V. Phase equilibria in the Cu2S–La2S3–EuS system. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 62, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Solovieva, A.V. Regularities of Phase Equilibria in AIIS–FeS, AIIS–FeS–Ln2S3, AIIS–Cu2S–Ln2S3 (AII = Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba; Ln = La–Lu) Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia, 11 May 2005. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gulay, L.D.; Shemet, V.Y.; Olekseyuk, I.D.; Stępień-Damm, J.; Pietraszko, A.; Koldun, L.V.; Filimonyuk, J.O. Investigation of the R2S3–Cu2S–PbS (R = Y, Dy, Gd, Ho and Er) systems. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 431, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Andreev, O.V.; Ruseikina, A.V.; Solov’ev, L.A. Phase diagrams of sections in the EuS–Cu2S–Nd2S3 System. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 56, 792–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aliyeva, R.A.; Bayramova, S.T.; Aliyev, O.M. Phase equilibriums in quasi-ternary system PbS–Cu2S–La2S3. Chem. Probl. 2008, 3, 503–508. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bayramova, S.T.; Aliyeva, S.I.; Ajdarova, D.S.; Aliyev, O.M. Phase equilibriums in quasi-ternary system Cu2S-PbS-Gd2S3 by sections CuGdS2–PbS and Cu2S–PbCuGdS3. Chem. Probl. 2015, 4, 424–427. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solov’ev, L.A.; Andreev, O.V. Crystal structures of α- and β-EuPrCuS3. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 58, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solov’ev, L.A. Crystal structures of α- and β-SrCeCuS3. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 61, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andreev, O.V.; Atuchin, V.V.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Denisenko, Y.G.; Zakharov, B.A.; Tyutyunnik, A.P.; Habibullayev, N.N.; Velikanov, D.A.; Ulybin, D.A.; Shpindyuk, D.D. Synthesis, structure, and properties of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Nd, Sm, Gd, Er). Crystals 2022, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kochedigov, V.A.; Zakiryanova, I.D.; Korzun, I.V. Research of thermal dissociation of interaction products of rare-earth element oxides with the components of atmospheric air. Anal. Control 2005, 9, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hussen, G.A.; Buttrey, D.J.; DeSanto, P.; Abd-Elgaber, A.A.; Roshdy, H.; Myhoud, A. Formation and characterization of samarium oxide generated from different precursors. Thermochim. Acta 2003, 402, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abu-Zied, B.M.; Mohamed, A.-R.N.; Asiri, A.M. Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Formation, Textural and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Nanocrystalline Tb4O7. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 4487–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Evarestov, R.A.; Bandura, A.V. First-Principles calculations on the four phases of BaTiO3. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kumar, S.; Gupta, H.C. First principles study of zone centre phonons in rare-earth pyrochlore titanates, RE2Ti2O7 (RE = Gd, Dy, Ho, Er, Lu; Y). Vib. Spectrosc. 2012, 62, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solovyov, L.A.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Andreev, O.V. Crystal structure variations in the series SrLnCuS3 (Ln = La, Pr, Sm, Gd, Er and Lu). Acta Cryst. 2019, 75, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wakeshima, M.; Furuuchi, F.; Hinatsu, Y. Crystal structures and magnetic properties of novel rare-earth copper sulfides, EuRCuS3 (R = Y, Gd–Lu). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2004, 16, 5503–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ruseikina, A.V.; Demchuk, Z.A. Crystal structure and properties of AHoCuS3 (A = Sr or Eu). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 62, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Azarapin, N.O.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Atuchin, V.V.; Gavrilova, T.A.; Krylov, A.S.; Molokeev, M.S.; Mukherjee, S.; Oreshonkov, A.S.; Andreev, O.V. Synthesis, structural and spectroscopic properties of orthorhombic compounds BaLnCuS3 (Ln = Pr, Sm). J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 832, 153134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Furuuchi, F.; Wakeshima, M.; Hinatsu, Y. Magnetic properties and (151) Eu Mossbauer effects of mixed valence europium copper sulfide Eu2CuS3. J. Solid State Chem. 2004, 177, 3853–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tian, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhao, Z. Microscopic theory of hardness and design of novel superhard crystals. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2012, 33, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ranganathan, S.I.; Ostoja-Starzewski, M. Universal anisotropy index. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 055504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Tuxworth, A.J.; Wang, C.-H.; Evans, J.S.O. Evans, synthesis, characterisation and properties of rare earth oxyselenides A4O4Se3 (A = Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Yb and Y). Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 3009–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Eick, H.A. The crystal structure and lattice parameters of some rare earth mono-seleno oxides. Acta Cryst. 1960, 13, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oreshonkov, A.S.; Denisenko, Y.G. Structural features of Y2O2SO4 via DFT calculations of electronic and vibrational properties. Materials 2021, 14, 3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Landi, S., Jr.; Segundo, I.R.; Freitas, E.; Vasilevskiy, M.; Carneiro, J.; Tavares, C.J. Use and misuse of the Kubelka-Munk function to obtain the band gap energy from diffuse reflectance measurements. Solid State Commun. 2022, 341, 114573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV-vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 6814–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Azarapin, N.O.; Atuchin, V.V.; Maximov, N.G.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Molokeev, M.S.; Oreshonkov, A.S.; Shestakov, N.P.; Krylov, A.S.; Burkhanova, T.M.; Mukherjee, S.; et al. Synthesis, structure, melting and optical properties of three complex orthorhombic sulfides BaDyCuS3, BaHoCuS3 and BaYbCuS3. Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 140, 111314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Neel, L. Magnetism and local molecular field. Science 1971, 174, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kumar, A.; Yusuf, S.M. The phenomenon of negative magnetization and its implications. Phys. Rep. 2015, 556, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dönni, A.; Pomjakushin, V.Y.; Zhang, L.; Yamaura, K.; Belik, A.A. Origin of negative magnetization phenomena in (Tm1–xMnx)MnO3: A neutron diffraction study. Phys. Rev. 2020, B101, 054442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Pauling, L. The Principles determining the structure of complex ionic crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1929, 51, 1010–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Solovyov, L.A. Full-Profile refinement by derivative difference minimization. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2004, 37, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Brennan, T.D.; Ibers, J.A. LaPbCuS3: Cu(I) insertion into the a-La2S3 framework. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 97, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pennington, W.T. DIAMOND—Visual Crystal Structure Information System. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 1028–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Brown, I.D.; Altermatt, D. Bond-Valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallogr. 1985, B41, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Velikanov, D.A. High-Sensitivity measurements of the magnetic properties of materials at cryogenic temperatures. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2020, 11, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Velikanov, D.A. Magnetometer with a Superconducting Quantum Interferometric Sensor, RF Pat. 2481591. 2013. Available online: http://www.freepatent.ru/patents/2481591 (accessed on 19 October 2020).
  90. Velikanov, D.A. Vibration Magnetometer. RF Pat. 2341810. 2008. Available online: http://www.freepatent.ru/patents/2341810 (accessed on 19 October 2020).
  91. Crystal. Available online: http://www.crystal.unito.it/index.php (accessed on 19 June 2021).
  92. Energy-Consistent Pseudopotentials of the Stuttgart/Cologne Group. Available online: http://www.tc.uni-koeln.de/PP/clickpse.en.html (accessed on 19 June 2018).
Figure 1. Best views of the crystal structures of EuLaCuSe3, EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm–Y) and EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu) (top row). Coordination environments around the Ln3+ (middle row) and Eu2+ (bottom row) cations in the structures of the reported selenides. For bond distances, see Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials. Color code: magenta polyhedron = EuSe7 for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Y) and EuS6 for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu), green polyhedron = CuS4, blue polyhedron = LaSe7, purple polyhedron = LnSe6 (Ln = Sm–Y) and grey polyhedron = LnSe6 (Ln = Tm–Lu).
Figure 1. Best views of the crystal structures of EuLaCuSe3, EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm–Y) and EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu) (top row). Coordination environments around the Ln3+ (middle row) and Eu2+ (bottom row) cations in the structures of the reported selenides. For bond distances, see Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials. Color code: magenta polyhedron = EuSe7 for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La–Y) and EuS6 for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tm–Lu), green polyhedron = CuS4, blue polyhedron = LaSe7, purple polyhedron = LnSe6 (Ln = Sm–Y) and grey polyhedron = LnSe6 (Ln = Tm–Lu).
Ijms 23 01503 g001
Figure 2. The calculated (open circles) and experimental (filled circles) unit cell parameters in the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Eu [31], Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er [60], Tm, Yb, Lu). Black = a and b axes for space groups Cmcm and Pnma, respectively; red = c and a axes for space groups Cmcm and Pnma, respectively; blue = b and c axes for space groups Cmcm and Pnma, respectively.
Figure 2. The calculated (open circles) and experimental (filled circles) unit cell parameters in the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Eu [31], Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er [60], Tm, Yb, Lu). Black = a and b axes for space groups Cmcm and Pnma, respectively; red = c and a axes for space groups Cmcm and Pnma, respectively; blue = b and c axes for space groups Cmcm and Pnma, respectively.
Ijms 23 01503 g002
Figure 3. The M–Se distances in the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Tm, Yb, Lu).
Figure 3. The M–Se distances in the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Tm, Yb, Lu).
Ijms 23 01503 g003aIjms 23 01503 g003b
Figure 4. Discrimination between space groups for the structures of ALnCuS3 (filled circles) and ALnCuSe3 (open circles) depending on the ionic radii of the metal ions. A = Ba (top row), Sr (middle row) and Eu (bottom row).
Figure 4. Discrimination between space groups for the structures of ALnCuS3 (filled circles) and ALnCuSe3 (open circles) depending on the ionic radii of the metal ions. A = Ba (top row), Sr (middle row) and Eu (bottom row).
Ijms 23 01503 g004
Figure 5. Dependence of the Young’s modulus (GPa) on the direction in the crystals of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Nd, Yb).
Figure 5. Dependence of the Young’s modulus (GPa) on the direction in the crystals of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Nd, Yb).
Ijms 23 01503 g005
Figure 6. The displacement of ions at phonon modes in EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Tb, Tm).
Figure 6. The displacement of ions at phonon modes in EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Tb, Tm).
Ijms 23 01503 g006
Figure 7. The calculate (black) and experimental (red) Raman spectra for the selected selenides of three different structural types. Calculations were performed at λexc = 514.5 nm and T = 300 K for EuLaCuSe3, and for λexc = 532 nm and T = 296 K for EuTbCuSe3 (Pnma) and EuTmCuSe3 (Cmcm), respectively. The wavenumber scale of the calculated spectra was multiplied by 0.9 to compensate the overestimated results obtained by the applied PBE0 functional.
Figure 7. The calculate (black) and experimental (red) Raman spectra for the selected selenides of three different structural types. Calculations were performed at λexc = 514.5 nm and T = 300 K for EuLaCuSe3, and for λexc = 532 nm and T = 296 K for EuTbCuSe3 (Pnma) and EuTmCuSe3 (Cmcm), respectively. The wavenumber scale of the calculated spectra was multiplied by 0.9 to compensate the overestimated results obtained by the applied PBE0 functional.
Ijms 23 01503 g007
Figure 8. (left) IR spectra of EuLnCuSe3. Ticks stand for the calculated wavenumbers for EuLaCuSe3 (structural type Ba2MnS3), EuSmCuSe3 and EuYCuSe3 (structural type Eu2CuS3) and EuTmCuSe3 (structural type KZrCuS3) in Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials. (right) The calculated (magenta) and experimental IR spectra of EuLaCuSe3 (black), EuTbCuSe3 (red), EuYCuSe3 (blue) and EuTmCuSe3 (green).
Figure 8. (left) IR spectra of EuLnCuSe3. Ticks stand for the calculated wavenumbers for EuLaCuSe3 (structural type Ba2MnS3), EuSmCuSe3 and EuYCuSe3 (structural type Eu2CuS3) and EuTmCuSe3 (structural type KZrCuS3) in Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials. (right) The calculated (magenta) and experimental IR spectra of EuLaCuSe3 (black), EuTbCuSe3 (red), EuYCuSe3 (blue) and EuTmCuSe3 (green).
Ijms 23 01503 g008
Figure 9. Band structures and the density of states for EuCeCuSe3 (top row), EuTbCuSe3 (middle row) and EuYbCuSe3 (bottom row).
Figure 9. Band structures and the density of states for EuCeCuSe3 (top row), EuTbCuSe3 (middle row) and EuYbCuSe3 (bottom row).
Ijms 23 01503 g009aIjms 23 01503 g009b
Figure 10. Field-dependent magnetic moments at 296 K (left), and temperature-dependent specific magnetization (middle) and reciprocal magnetic susceptibility (right) of EuTmCuSe3 (top row), EuLaCuSe3 (middle row) and EuHoCuSe3 (bottom row), respectively, at 10 Oe. The measurements of low-temperature magnetization were performed in the zero-field cooled (ZFC) and nonzero-field cooled (FC) modes. Fit line shows approximation by the Néel model of a ferrimagnet [80].
Figure 10. Field-dependent magnetic moments at 296 K (left), and temperature-dependent specific magnetization (middle) and reciprocal magnetic susceptibility (right) of EuTmCuSe3 (top row), EuLaCuSe3 (middle row) and EuHoCuSe3 (bottom row), respectively, at 10 Oe. The measurements of low-temperature magnetization were performed in the zero-field cooled (ZFC) and nonzero-field cooled (FC) modes. Fit line shows approximation by the Néel model of a ferrimagnet [80].
Ijms 23 01503 g010
Table 1. Experimental details for the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Tm, Yb, Lu).
Table 1. Experimental details for the structures of EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Tm, Yb, Lu).
EuLaCuSe3EuSmCuSe3EuGdCuSe3EuTbCuSe3EuDyCuSe3
Space groupPnmaPnmaPnmaPnmaPnma
Structural typeBa2MnS3Eu2CuS3Eu2CuS3Eu2CuS3Eu2CuS3
a (Å)8.4659(5)10.7634(5)10.6746(11)10.6027(15)10.5628(8)
b (Å)4.2140(3)4.1138(2)4.0966(4)4.0843(6)4.0768(3)
c (Å)16.6636(11)13.3860(7)13.3993(14)13.3926(19)13.3915(11)
V3)594.47(7)592.71(5)585.94(11)579.97(14)576.67(8)
Dcalc (g cm−3)6.604016.752576.907626.998717.07976
R factorsRDDM = 0.058RDDM = 0.040RDDM = 0.060RDDM = 0.042RDDM = 0.058
Rexp = 0.053Rexp = 0.036Rexp = 0.042Rexp = 0.039Rexp = 0.053
RBragg = 0.044RBragg = 0.026RBragg = 0.031RBragg = 0.028RBragg = 0.024
Impurity1% SmCuSeO1.2% Gd4Se3O41.3% Tb2SeO22.8% Dy4Se3O4
EuHoCuSe3EuYCuSe3EuTmCuSe3EuYbCuSe3EuLuCuSe3
Space groupPnmaPnmaCmcmCmcmCmcm
Structural typeEu2CuS3Eu2CuS3KZrCuS3KZrCuS3KZrCuS3
a (Å)10.5182(8)10.5659(13)4.05721(17)4.0490(2)4.0434(2)
b (Å)4.0714(3)4.0800(5)13.3784(6)13.3699(7)13.3694(6)
c (Å)13.3898(10)13.4006(16)10.4477(5)10.4124(6)10.3954(5)
V3)573.40(8)577.69(12)567.09(4)563.67(5)561.94(5)
Dcalc (g cm−3)7.148266.221257.274677.366747.41257
R factorsRDDM = 0.057RDDM = 0.061RDDM = 0.046RDDM = 0.047RDDM = 0.045
Rexp = 0.038Rexp = 0.050Rexp = 0.038Rexp = 0.040Rexp = 0.040
RBragg = 0.029RBragg = 0.041RBragg = 0.021RBragg = 0.022RBragg = 0.019
Impurity2.2% Ho2SeO22.2% Y2SeO24.9% Tm4Se3O44.1% Yb4Se3O44.3% Lu4Se3O4
Table 2. Bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Vickers hardness (HV), universal anisotropy index (AU), calculated (Calc.) and experimental (Ex.) values of the band gap (BG) for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu).
Table 2. Bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Vickers hardness (HV), universal anisotropy index (AU), calculated (Calc.) and experimental (Ex.) values of the band gap (BG) for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu).
LaCePrNdSmGdTbDyHoYErTmYbLu
Space groupPnmaCmcm
Structural typeBa2MnS3Eu2CuS3KZrCuS3
B (GPa)77.277.666.667.168.268.569.169.169.270.070.971.471.772.0
G (GPa)35.631.632.031.931.230.130.327.824.330.425.126.928.128.8
HV (GPa)4.84.94.74.64.34.04.03.42.74.02.83.13.43.5
AU0.290.310.590.671.071.621.683.046.391.926.464.693.833.45
Calc. BGB3LYP (eV) 12.632.632.382.382.422.452.482.492.51 2.522.542.562.59
Calc. BGPBE0 (eV) 12.782.792.502.512.532.562.582.592.61 2.622.652.672.69
Calc. BGPBE (eV) 11.251.251.001.011.041.061.071.081.101.041.121.131.141.15
Calc. BGPBE (eV) [32]0.940.910.950.981.040.961.111.021.041.071.061.091.13
Exp. BGindirect (eV) 11.191.010.930.930.801.24, 1.702.06
Exp. BGKubelka-Munk (eV) 11.351.04, 1.761.11, 1.820.93, 1.881.09, 1.601.14, 1.871.031.161.38
Exp. BGdirect (eV) 11.541.952.011.971.872.051.191.072.09
1 This work.
Table 3. Magnetic characteristics for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu).
Table 3. Magnetic characteristics for EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = La, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu).
LaSmGdTbDyHoYTmYbLu
Space groupPnmaCmcm
Structural typeBa2MnS3Eu2CuS3KZrCuS3
χ·106 (m3 mol−1)0.3260.3300.6280.8870.8840.8860.3250.6440.4300.373
Exp. μ296KB)7.867.8710.8612.9012.9412.957.8510.999.008.38
Exp. μ15KB)7.510.711.012.310.912.08.814.0
Calc. μB)7.9377.98211.22512.55013.27913.2487.93710.9629.1427.937
Exp. C296K (K m3 kmol−1)0.09700.09720.18530.26160.26310.26340.09690.18990.12720.1102
Exp. C15K (K m3 kmol−1)0.090.190.190.240.190.220.120.32
Calc. C (K m3 kmol−1)0.099000.10010.19800.247500.277090.275780.099000.188830.131330.09900
Arrangement 1FerroFerriFerriFerriFerroFerriFerroFerro
θp (K)0.2−1.3−0.7−0.43.31.14.53.1
1 Ferro = ferromagnetic, Ferri = ferrimagnetic.
Table 4. Calculation model parameters for ferrimagnetic EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho, Tm) 1.
Table 4. Calculation model parameters for ferrimagnetic EuLnCuSe3 (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho, Tm) 1.
TbDyHoTm
Space groupPnmaCmcm
Structural typeEu2CuS3KZrCuS3
C (K m3 kmol−1)0.190.190.240.22
1/χ0 (kmol m−3)13122.83.8
σ (K m3 kmol)7.5291.055
θ (K)5.84.76.12.1
Tc (K)6.05.56.24.5
1 Formula applied for the model: 1 χ = T C + 1 χ 0     σ T     θ ; T c = 1 2 ( θ     C χ 0 + ( θ     C χ 0 ) 2 + 4 C ( θ χ 0 + σ ) ) .
Table 5. Comparison of the magnetic characteristics for EuLnCuX3 (Ln = La, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu; X = S, Se).
Table 5. Comparison of the magnetic characteristics for EuLnCuX3 (Ln = La, Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu; X = S, Se).
LaTbDyHoYErTmYbLu
Space groupPnmaCmcm
Structural typeBa2MnS3Eu2CuS3KZrCuS3
Tc for X = S (K)2.4 [10]4.9 [68]4.6 [68]4.8 [10]4.5 [68]4.8 [11]4.8 [68]5.5 [68]5.4 [68]
Tc for X = Se (K)~16.05.56.2~34.7 [60]4.5~4.3~3
Arrangement for X = S 1FerroFerriFerriFerriFerroFerriFerriFerroFerro
Arrangement for X = Se 1FerroFerriFerriFerriFerroFerriFerriFerroFerro
1 Ferro = ferromagnetic, Ferri = ferrimagnetic.
Table 6. The calculated and found elemental analysis data for the reported selenides obtained using SEM-EDX.
Table 6. The calculated and found elemental analysis data for the reported selenides obtained using SEM-EDX.
Compound (Mass)Calculated (%)Found (%)
EuLnCuSeOEuLnCuSeO
EuLaCuSe3 (591.29)25.7023.4910.7540.0625.6523.4010.7240.23
EuSmCuSe3 (602.75)25.2124.9510.5439.3025.4424.6810.6439.190.05
EuGdCuSe3 (609.64)24.9325.7910.4238.8624.6526.3110.2938.670.08
EuTbCuSe3 (611.31)24.8626.0010.3938.7524.5526.6510.2538.450.10
EuDyCuSe3 (614.89)24.7126.4310.3438.5223.9927.6210.0538.150.19
EuHoCuSe3 (617.32)24.6226.7210.2938.3724.0527.7610.0737.960.16
EuYCuSe3 (541.29)28.0716.4211.7443.7627.4717.4311.4743.380.25
EuTmCuSe3 (621.32)24.4627.1910.2338.1223.2429.249.7237.480.32
EuYbCuSe3 (625.43)24.3027.6710.1637.8723.3129.379.7537.310.26
EuLuCuSe3 (627.35)24.2227.8910.1337.7623.1629.689.7037.180.28
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grigoriev, M.V.; Solovyov, L.A.; Ruseikina, A.V.; Aleksandrovsky, A.S.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Velikanov, D.A.; Garmonov, A.A.; Molokeev, M.S.; Oreshonkov, A.S.; Shestakov, N.P.; et al. Quaternary Selenides EuLnCuSe3: Synthesis, Structures, Properties and In Silico Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031503

AMA Style

Grigoriev MV, Solovyov LA, Ruseikina AV, Aleksandrovsky AS, Chernyshev VA, Velikanov DA, Garmonov AA, Molokeev MS, Oreshonkov AS, Shestakov NP, et al. Quaternary Selenides EuLnCuSe3: Synthesis, Structures, Properties and In Silico Studies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3):1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grigoriev, Maxim V., Leonid A. Solovyov, Anna V. Ruseikina, Aleksandr S. Aleksandrovsky, Vladimir A. Chernyshev, Dmitriy A. Velikanov, Alexander A. Garmonov, Maxim S. Molokeev, Aleksandr S. Oreshonkov, Nikolay P. Shestakov, and et al. 2022. "Quaternary Selenides EuLnCuSe3: Synthesis, Structures, Properties and In Silico Studies" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3: 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop