Next Article in Journal
Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) Protects Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Streptococcus agalatiae Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Saturated Annulated Nitrogen-Containing Polycyclic Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor in the Human Hypothalamus Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Colocalizes with the Anorexigenic Neuropeptide Nucleobindin-2/Nesfatin-1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acid-Switchable Synthesis of Trifluoromethylated Triazoles and Isoxazoles via Reaction of CF3-Ynones with NaN3: DFT Study of the Reaction Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxan Derivatives—Synthesis and Biological Activity

by
Elena Chugunova
1,*,
Victoria Matveeva
1,
Alena Tulesinova
2,
Emil Iskanderov
3,
Nurgali Akylbekov
4,*,
Alexey Dobrynin
1,
Ayrat Khamatgalimov
1,
Nurbol Appazov
4,5,
Lyazat Boltayeva
6,
Bakhytzhan Duisembekov
6,
Mukhtar Zhanakov
7,
Yulia Aleksandrova
1,8,
Tatyana Sashenkova
9,
Elena Klimanova
9,
Ugulzhan Allayarova
9,
Anastasia Balakina
9,
Denis Mishchenko
9,10,11,
Alexander Burilov
1 and
Margarita Neganova
1,8
1
Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry, FRC Kazan Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan 420088, Russia
2
The Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan 420015, Russia
3
Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia
4
Laboratory of Engineering Profile “Physical and Chemical Methods of Analysis”, Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda University, Kyzylorda 120014, Kazakhstan
5
I. Zhakhaev Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Rice Growing, Kyzylorda 120008, Kazakhstan
6
Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Plant Protection and Quarantine Named after Zhazken Zhiembayev LLP, Almaty A30M0H6, Kazakhstan
7
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
8
Institute of Physiologically Active Compounds at Federal Research Center of Problems of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
9
Federal Research Center of Problems of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry—RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
10
Faculty of Fundamental Physical-Chemical Engineering, M.V. Lomonosov—MSU, Moscow 119991, Russia
11
Biomedical Institute of the Scientific and Educational Center, Moscow Regional State University in Chernogolovka, Mytishchi 141014, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(23), 14902; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314902
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022

Abstract

:
A series of novel water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans was achieved via aromatic nucleophilic substitution reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan with various amines. The salts obtained showed good effectiveness of the pre-sowing treatment of seeds of agricultural crops at concentrations of 20–40 mmol. In some cases, the seed treatment with salts leads not only to improved seed germination, but also to the suppression of microflora growth. Additionally, their anti-cancer activityin vitrohas been researched. The compounds with morpholine fragments or a fragment of N-dimethylpropylamine, demonstrated the highest cytotoxic activity, which is in good correlation with the ability to inhibit the glycolysis process in tumor cells. Two compounds 4e and 4g were selected for further experiments using laboratory animals. It was found that the lethal dose of 50% (LD50) is 22.0 ± 1.33 mg/kg for 4e and 13.75 ± 1.73 mg/kg for 4g, i.e., compound 4e is two times less toxic than 4g, according to the mouse model in vivo. It was shown that the studied compounds exhibit antileukemia activity after a single intraperitoneal injection at doses from 1.25 to 5 mg/kg, as a result of which the average lifespan of animals with a P388 murine leukemia tumor increases from 20 to 28%. Thus, the water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans can be considered as promisingcandidates for further development, both as anti-cancer agents and as stimulants for seed germination and regulators of microflora crop growth.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nitrogen- and oxygen-containing heterocycles have attracted close attention in scientific literature due to their diverse chemistry and wide application as anti-oxidant, anti-cancer [1], antimicrobial agents [2], DNA photocleavage active agents [3], and ligands in complexes with metals [4], etc.
Over the past decades, a huge number of benzofuroxan derivatives have been studied and described, which show a wide range of biological activity [5,6,7,8]. The synthetic potential of benzofuroxans is determined by the easiness of introducing into their structure, while maintaining the furoxan ring, various pharmacophore groups responsible for the appearance of biological activity, as well as obtaining on their basis a wide range of different classes of NO-containing heterocyclic compounds [9,10]. Some benzofuroxans are patented as fungicides against phytopathogenic fungi [11,12]. There are reports of the benzofuroxan compounds’ use as vasodilators [13]. Some of the nitrobenzofuroxans exhibit antitumor [14,15], anti-tuberculosis [16,17], anti-inflammatory [18,19], and antithrombotic properties [20], or are claimed to be effective agents against human and animal pathogens [21,22,23]. Benzofuroxans present a class of heterocyclic compounds that are thiol dependent NO donor agents [24,25,26,27]. Thus, benzofuroxans are considered to be NO-releasing prodrugs whose biological activity is caused by action on sGC, which in turn initiates the formation of the cGMP messenger molecule. Compared to other NO donors, benzofuroxan has certain advantages due to the slow release of the NO molecule, resulting in a longer duration of action.
A series of new amine-containing benzofuroxan derivatives, previously obtained by our research group as a result of the substitution of the chlorine atom in the 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan molecule for fragments of various aliphatic and aromatic amines, demonstrated high activity against cancer cell lines and low cytotoxicity against normal cells [28]. Selective cytotoxicity was showed against the cervical carcinoma cell line (M-HeLa) and human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF-7), comparable to the reference drug Doxorubicin and significantly superior to Tamoxifen in terms of anticancer effect, as well as high activity against the glioblastoma cell line (T98G).
However, despite the wide range of biological activity of benzofuroxans, the possibility of their use in medicine is limited by their low solubility in water, thereby narrowing the range of their possible dosage forms. All compounds obtained earlier by us were absolutely insoluble in water, which made it difficult, despite their high biological activity, to go from tests on cells in vitro to tests on mice in vivo in the case of studying anticancer activity, or in the case of high fungicidal activity, moving to the trial. To continue our research in this work, we studied the possibility of creating new water-soluble salts based on previously practically water-insoluble benzofuroxan derivatives that are of the great interest as potential anticancer agents and growth stimulators, and as regulators of various agricultural crops.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

2.1.1. Synthesis of the Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxan

Key compounds were obtained via aromatic nucleophilic substitution reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 using the aromatic amines 2ae as nucleophiles (Scheme 1).
It should be noted that in the case of compound 3c no salt formation occurs due to the strong electron withdrawing effect of furoxan moiety in para-position.
In the case of the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d, in addition to the main reaction product 3d, a by-product 5d (Figure 1d) is formed in trace amounts (see the Section 2.1.2 for more details).
According to X-ray data (Figure 1, Tables S1 and S2, Supplementary Materials) compounds 3a, 3d, 3f and 5d crystallize in different space groups: compound 3a crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P212121, compounds 3d and 5d crystallize in the monoclinic space groups P21/c and P21/n, respectively, and compound 3f crystallizes in the triclinic space group P-1. In this case, two independent molecules are present in the independent part of the unit cell of the crystal of compound 3f. In all structures 3a, 3d,3f, and 5d, the benzofuroxan fragments are planar. The nitro-groups in compounds 3a, 3d, and 3f are in the fifth position and deviate at sufficient angles from the plane of the benzene ring of the benzofuroxan fragment: in compound 3a, the O4N5C5C4 torsion angle is 44.6(6)°; in compound 3d, the O9N8C5C4 angle is 35.64(12)°; compound 3f angle O51AN5AC5AC4A−35.13(17)° and O51BN5BC5BC4B−36.74(18)° for two independent molecules, respectively. In the crystal of compound 5d, the nitro group is in the fourth position and lies almost in the plane of the benzene ring: the torsion angle O9N8C4C3A is 5.8(8)°. The morpholine substituents in the crystals of compounds 3d and 5d, as well as the piperidine substituent in compound 3f, have an “chair” conformation. The structures of these compounds in the crystal are stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds involving the NH group of the substituent at the fourth position

2.1.2. Quantum Chemical Calculations

In order to evaluate the reaction mechanism of the 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d (Scheme 2), we carried out a theoretical study of the reaction by methods of density functional theory using the B3LYP hybrid functional [29,30] in combination with the 6-31+G* basis set [31,32].
According to the quantum chemical calculations results, the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d is exothermic (thermal effect is 22.1 and 23.5 kcal/mol, respectively, for two expected reaction pathways, see Table 1) with 5d being thermodynamically a little more stable compared to 3d. Nevertheless, the higher HOMO-LUMO gap of 3d suggests its more kinetical stability. The structures of 3d and 5d are presented in Figure 2.
Thus, quantum chemical modeling shows comparable thermodynamic stabilities of products 3d and 5d. However, the higher reaction yield of the product 3d indicates a significant difference in the reaction mechanisms. Calculations show that at the first stage pre-reaction complexes [1+2d]a and [1+2d]b are formed (ΔE ~6 kcal/mol, see Table 2), with the NH2-group of 2-morpholinoethanamine being located opposite to corresponding chlorine atom or N2O-group in benzofuroxan. Further, pre-reaction complexes form reaction products 3d and 5d through corresponding transition states and intermediates with activation energies of first transition states TS1a and TS2 are 16.6 and 28.2 kcal/mol, respectively (see Table 2 and Figure 3, zero is sum of the total energies of reactants 1 and 2d infinitely distant from each other), accompanied by the removal of hydrogen chloride.
Thus, two ways for the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d are revealed by means of quantum-chemical investigations (Scheme 3). The results obtained fully confirm the experimental data and explain the higher reaction yield of the product 3d in the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d on the basis of its lower activation barrier.

2.2. Biological Studies

2.2.1. Evaluation of Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxanas Stimulants and Regulators of Crop Growth

The protection of plants from harmful organisms is of decisive importance in the cultivation of crops. The pre-sowing seed treatment is the main preventative measure in this case. More than 70% of infectious diseases are transmitted through the seed material [33]. To improve the sowing qualities of seeds, a wide range of stimulants and growth regulators is currently recommended (Fitolavin, Akpinol, Zircon) [34,35]. They improve seed germination, enhance plant growth and development, as well as plant resistance to diseases. At the same time, the saprophytic and pathogenic microflora of the seeds is suppressed, their germination energy increases, root formation, growth and the development of plants increase, and resistance to diseases during the growing season increases. The crop yield increases up to 30% in comparison with the control [36,37,38]. However, quite commonly used crop regulators and growth promoters are toxic and detrimental to the environment, as well as having a negative impact on human health. The development of low-toxic or non-toxic active substances, and having the above properties, is currently one of the urgent tasks we face. The water-soluble salts obtained by us based on benzofuroxans were evaluated as growth stimulators for various agricultural crops. To do this, in laboratory conditions, the effectiveness of the pre-sowing treatment of seeds of agricultural crops (wheat, alfalfa, barley, rice, sorghum) was evaluated. The results of experiments to assess the effect of compounds on the sowing qualities of seeds are presented in Table 3.
The results of the analysis showed that the sowing qualities of wheat seeds in the variant with the treatment of 4a, 10 mmol and 50 mmol; 4d, 40 mmol and 4e, 20 mmol and 40 mmol, are higher than in the case of controls (Figure 4, lines 1–3 in gray, Table 3.
In the case of alfalfa seed treatment, sowing qualities in variants with 4a treatment, 10 mmol and 50 mmol; 4g, 40 mmol are higher than controls (Figure 5). Treatment with compounds 4a at doses of 10 and 50 mmol; 4d, 10 and 20 mmol and 4g, 10 mmol, has a positive effect on the suppression of fungal microflora (Figure 6, line 9, Table 3).
When processing barley seeds, it was shown that the sowing qualities of seeds treated with compounds 4a, 10 and 50 mmol; 4e, 20 mmol and 4g, 20 and 40 mmol, are higher than control (lines 11–13 in gray, Table 3). A slight suppression of the bacterial microflora was noted in the treatment with compounds 4d at doses of 10 and 40 mmol and 4e at all studied doses (Figure 7, line 15, Table 3).
Rice seed treatment in variants with compounds 4a, 10 and 50 mmol; 4d, 40 mmol; 4e, 20 and 40 mmol (lines 16–18 in gray, Table 3) showed better results than the control, and the variants with compounds 4g, 40 mmol were at the control level. Treatment with compounds 4d and 4e at low doses of 10 and 20 mmol, has a positive effect on the suppression of bacterial microflora (line 20, Table 3).
In the case of sorghum seed treatment, the results of the experiment showed that the sowing qualities of seeds treated with compounds 4d, 20 mmol and 4g, 20 and 40 mmol are higher than in the control (lines 21–23 in grey, Table 3). The variant with compound 4a, 50 mmol was at the control level.
Thus, the studied substances at concentrations of 20–40 mmol show good effectiveness of the pre-sowing treatment of seeds of agricultural crops. It should be noted that the introduction of an aromatic amine moiety improves the properties, and compound 4a shows activity already at a concentration of 10 mmol. It should also be noted that in some cases, seed treatment with water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans leads not only to improved seed germination, but also to the suppression of microflora growth.

2.2.2. Anticancer Activity

Cytotoxicity of the Test Compounds

Currently, cancer is one of the most serious problems facing humanity, requiring the development of new drugs and treatment methods. Cases of cancer therapy methods improving, leading to a sharp enhancement intreatment outcomes, are extremely rare, and in general most of the drugs used to treatcancer are toxic to the body [39]. Most of the used anticancer agents have poor water solubility, which adversely affects their efficacy and safety when administered orally, intramuscularly, and intravenously. The poor aqueous solubility of anticancer drugs results in poor efficacy or requires the use of excipients that have toxic side effects. Attempts have been made to solve the problem of poor aqueous solubility of antitumor drugs, such as the use of prodrugs, polymeric nanoparticles, lipoid microspheres, solubilizers, and nanocolloids [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. However, these attempts are limited by a number of problems such as instability, the potential toxicity of the compounds, the altered distribution of the drug in the body, and so on [47,48]. As described earlier, the main emphasis in the synthetic part was made precisely on obtaining the effective water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans. All synthesized compounds were tested in order to find promising agents with antitumor potential.
In the classical script in the search for promising compounds with a potential antitumor effect, substances that exhibit a cytotoxic effect on tumor-derived cells are primarily of interest. This is due to the fact that the main focus of chemotherapeutic agents is to suppress the already formed malignant neoplasms viability, and prevent the formation of new ones.
In this work, the cytotoxic potential of the water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan was determined by the effect of compounds on the survival of the cell tumor origin cultures (SH-SY5Y, Hep2, A549, HeLa) using the MTT test. To understand how the synthesized compounds can influence the healthy microenvironment in the body, the effect of substances on the viability of a normal Hek 293 cell culture was additionally evaluated.
As shown in Table 4, at 24 h of incubation, all test compounds showed cytotoxic properties, especially in relation to SH-SY5Y. The most pronounced effect on the majority of used cell lines of tumor origin was observed for compounds 4e and 4g. At the same time, for compound 4g, high toxicity was also observed in relation to normal cells. In turn, for 4e, the selectivity index reached a value of more than 4 when comparing the IC50 on the neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y with respect to Hek 293.
Additionally, we carried out a comparative analysis of the survival of cell cultures during incubation with water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan for two time periods—24 and 72 h. It was found that with an increase in the duration of exposure to substances with selected cell lines, the values of concentrations that cause 50% inhibition of the cell population decrease growth. This may be due to both an increase in the direct toxic effect of the synthesized compounds over time, and the presence of possible antiproliferative activity, which is expressed in the effect of substances on the cell division process, since several cell cycles occur within 72 h.
Metabolic transformation is involved in various processes of malignant neoplasms formation and progression, including uncontrolled proliferation and the resistance of tumor cells to apoptosis [49,50]. To ask whether the effect of water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan on the reduction in cell survival is due to their effect on metabolism, the ability of the compounds to modulate glycolysis, the process that provides neoplastic cells with ATP and building blocks for the synthesis of macromolecules, was measured.
Using the cell metabolism analyzer Agilent Seahorse XF96e Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA, USA), the rate of extracellular acidification of the medium (ECAR) in cells of tumor origin SH-SY5Y was evaluated as a glycolysis measure. The effect of compounds on glycolytic function parameters was analyzed by monitoring changes in ECAR in response to sequential addition of glucose to evaluate glycolysis and oligomycin (Figure 8a). Interestingly, all glycolytic parameters were significantly reduced in SH-SY5Y cells treated with 100 µM of most water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan, including basal glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve, reaching a minimum after 4g injection. Moreover, cells treated with 4e also showed a significantly more pronounced suppression of glycolytic function parameters—by 60%—when compared with control samples (Figure 8b).
Together, these data indicate that 4e and 4g treatment of the tumor-derived cells has a strong influence on the glycolytic energy pathway of the tumor cells.
Thus, the compounds containing morpholine fragments, as well as a fragment of N-dimethylpropylamine 4e and 4g demonstrated the highest activity and were selected for the further experiments using laboratory animals.

Acute Toxicity

To determine LD50, a curve of increasing toxicity was built with increasing dose, based on which the following parameters were additionally determined: MTD, LD16, LD84 and LD100. Compounds 4e and 4g were intraperitoneally administered to BDF1 mice once in the dose range of 10–35 mg/kg and 5–25 mg/kg, respectively. The results are presented in the Figure 9 and Table 5.
It was shown that the death of animals began within 5–30min after the administration of the studied compounds 4e and 4g to mice at doses of 15–30 mg/kg and 10–25 mg/kg, respectively. At the same time, excitability increased in animals, convulsions were observed, after which the death of experimental animals occurred. In surviving mice, no other external signs of intoxication were observed. We did not record pathological changes in the eyes (lacrimation, swelling, hyperemia, etc.), and the nose, ears, and teeth did not differ from those in control animals. Visible mucous membranes are normal. The skin is unchanged. The volume and consistency of fecal matter, and the color of urine is also normal. During the subsequent observation period, the general condition and behavior of the surviving animals of all experimental groups corresponded to the usual. There were no differences in these parameters between the experimental and control groups.
Data on changes in the body weight of experimental animals under the action of 4e and 4g are presented in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. It was shown that after a single administration of the test compounds, the average body weight of surviving experimental animals did not significantly change relative to the control group throughout the entire observation period.
Thus, it was found that with a single intraperitoneal injection of compound 4e in the dose range of 15–30 mg/kg and 4g in the dose range of 10–25 mg/kg, the death of animals occurs within half an hour after the administration of the test compounds. The values of LD50=22.0 ± 1.33 mg/kg for 4e and LD50 = 13.75 ± 1.73 mg/kg for 4g were determined. The results of the study of acute toxicity make it possible to attribute 4e and 4g to the class of highly toxic compounds.

Antitumor Activity In Vivo

The study of the antitumor activity of compounds 4e and 4g was carried out using transplanted experimental murine tumor leukemia P388. In the experiment, concentrations from 1.25 to 10 mg/kg were used for 4e, and from 0.625 to 5 mg/kg for 4g. The concentrations used correspond to values from 1/8 MPD to MPD for the studied compounds. The results are shown in the Figure 10.
It was shown that in the control group all the studied animals die by day 11, while the administration of the benzofuroxan derivatives 4e and 4g at doses from 1/8 MPD to MPD led to an increase in the lifespan of animals up to 16 days.
It was found that chemotherapy of P388 leukemia using a single injection of 4e at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg leads to an increase in the average lifespan of animals by 28%. Similarly, when using 4g at a dose of 5 mg/kg, a 25% increase in average lifespan was observed. It should also be noted that even using a dose of 1.25 mg/kg resulted in a ~20% increase in ILS% for both test substances.
Thus, water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans can be used as a promising basis for the development of effective antitumor agents.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

IR spectra were recorded on an IR Fourier spectrometer Tensor 37 (Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany) in the 400–3600 cm−1 range in KBr. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at 400 MHz (for 1H NMR) and 101 MHz (for 13C NMR), Brucker spectrometers AVANCEIII-500 (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at 500 MHz (for 1H NMR) and 126 MHz (for 13C MMR) and Bruker Avance 600 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at 600 MHz (for 1H NMR) and 151 MHz (for 13C NMR) (Figures S1–S23, Supplementary Materials). Chemical shifts were measured in δ (ppm) with reference to the solvent (δ = 7.27 ppm and 77.00 ppm for CDCl3, δ = 2.06 ppm and 28.94 ppm for (CD3)2CO, δ = 4.79 ppm for D2O for 1H and 13C NMR, respectively). Elemental analysis was performed on a CHNS-O Elemental Analyser EuroEA3028-HT-OM (EuroVector S.p.A., Milan, Italy). The melting points were determined on JK-MAM-4 Melting-point Apparatus with Microscope (JINGKE SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT CO, Shanghai, China).
X-ray crystallography data. Data of 3a, 3d, 3f and 5d were collected on a Bruker D8 QUEST with PHOTON II CCD diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Ettlingen, Germany), using graphite monochromatedMoKα (λ = 0.71073 Å) radiation and ω-scan rotation. Data collection images were indexed, integrated, and scaled using the APEX3 [51] data reduction package70 and corrected for absorption using SADABS [52]. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined using SHELX program [53]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. H atoms were calculated on idealized positions and refined as riding atoms. Crystal Data and Refinement Details are presented in Tables S1 and S2. The X-ray analysis was performed on the equipment of Spectral-Analytical Center of FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS.
CCDC 2220082–2220085 (3a, 3d, 3f and 5d) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (accessed on 26 October 2022) or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or [email protected]).
Quantum-chemical computations. All quantum-chemical computations were carried out with the use of Gaussian 16 suite of programs [54]. Calculations were performed with Becke’s three parameter hybrid exchange functional [29] and the gradient-corrected nonlocal correlation functional of Lee et al. [30] (B3LYP) in combination with standard 6–31+G* basis set [31,32,55]. For all compounds, geometry optimization of structures was performed without symmetry constraints. To ensure the calculated structures of reagents and products were indeed minima, vibrational analyses were performed using the same methods and were proved by all positive eigenvalues of Hessian matrix. The transition states were confirmed by the presence of one negative eigenvalue in the Hessian matrix of the second derivatives. Additionally, intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) was performed to examine connections between all the species involved in the reaction. All calculations were performed for a singlet surface and the solutions found were tested for stability against perturbations imposed on the wave function using the Stable procedure.
The completeness of the reactions and the purity of the synthesized compounds were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on Sorbfil PTSH-AF-A-UF plates (Sorbpolimer, Krasnodar, Russia), UV light was used as a developer.
The following compounds were prepared following the literature procedures indicated: 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 [56], 6-chloro-4-(3-morpholinoprophylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide 3e [28].
Synthesis of amine-containing benzofuroxans 3a-f (general method). A solution of amine (1.6 mmol) in chloroform (2 mL) was added to a solution of benzofuroxan1 (0.8 mmol) in chloroform (2 mL) at room temperature with stirring. The reaction mixture was kept for 2 h at room temperature with constant stirring (the reaction progress and the purity of the obtained products were monitored by TLC, eluent toluene:ethyl acetate, 2:1). At the end of the exposure, the reaction mixture was reprecipitated in hexane (10 mL), the resulting precipitate was filtered off, washed with water (100 mL), and dried in vacuum (0.06 mm Hg) at a temperature of 40 °C to constant weight.
6-chloro-4-(2-((dimethylamino)methyl)phenylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide (3a). Brick red powder. Yield 276 mg (95%), m.p. = 152–153 °C with decomposition. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 721 (CCl), 1313 (NO2 symm), 1563 (NO2 asymm), 1624 (furoxan ring), 3084 (C7H).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.19 (m, 2H, Ph), 7.13 (m, 1H, Ph), 7.05 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ph), 6.90 (s, 1H, Bf), 3.63 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.32 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.3, 139.4, 134.8, 130.4, 129.3, 128.7, 128.2, 125.4, 121.3, 114.0, 106.7, 102.1, 63.4, 44.9. Found: C, 49.57; H, 3.89; Cl, 9.72; N, 19.21. Anal. calcd (%) for C15H14ClN5O4: C, 49.53; H, 3.88; Cl, 9.75; N, 19.25.
6-chloro-4-(3-((dimethylamino)methyl)phenylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide (3b). Purple powder. Yield 220 mg (76%), m.p. = 118–119 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 700 (CCl), 1310 (NO2 symm), 1561 (NO2 asymm), 1625 (furoxan ring).1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 7.31 (m, 2H, Ph), 7.23 (m, 2H, Ph), 7.13 (s, 1H, Bf), 3.40 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.19 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 148.2, 141.0, 139.1, 133.3, 131.9, 129.2, 127.9, 127.4, 124.9, 123.2, 114.1, 102.5, 64.0, 45.2. Found: C, 49.55; H, 3.86; Cl, 9.78; N, 19.22. Anal. calcd (%) for C15H14ClN5O4: C, 49.53; H, 3.88; Cl, 9.75; N, 19.25.
6-chloro-4-(4-((dimethylamino)methyl)phenylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide (3c). Dark brown powder. Yield 247 mg (85%), m.p. > 300 °C with decomposition. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 722 (CCl), 1536 (NO2 asymm), 1612 (furoxan ring).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.01 (s, 1H, NH), 7.39 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), 7.35 (s, 1H, Bf), 7.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ph), 3.52 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.30 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 148.8, 144.2, 139.2, 137.3, 134.1, 132.4, 130.7, 130.4, 125.6, 106.5, 64.2, 45.8. Found: C, 49.58; H, 3.84; Cl, 9.74; N, 19.28. Anal. calcd (%) for C15H14ClN5O4: C, 49.53; H, 3.88; Cl, 9.75; N, 19.25.
6-chloro-4-(2-morpholinoethylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide (3d). Bright orange powder. Yield 266 mg (98%), m.p. = 140–141 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 679 (CCl), 1387 (NO2 symm), 1579 (NO2 asymm), 1627 (furoxan ring), 3052 (C7H). 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 8.87 (s, 1H, NH), 6.79 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.19 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.67 (s, 4H, CH2), 2.80 (s, 4H, CH2), 2.57 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, acetone-d6, δ, m.d.): 148.4, 138.2, 128.9, 127.3, 113.0, 98.8, 66.6, 55.9, 52.9, 43.1. Found: C, 41.96; H, 4.09; Cl, 10.33; N, 20.34. Anal. calcd (%) for C12H14ClN5O5: C, 41.93; H, 4.11; Cl, 10.31; N, 20.37.
6-chloro-5-nitro-4-(2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethylamino)benzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide (3f). Purple powder. Yield 205 mg (75%), m.p. = 88–89 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 687 (CCl), 1366 (NO2 symm), 1561 (NO2 asymm), 1627 (furoxan ring), 3091 (C7H). 1H NMR (600 MHz, acetone-d6, δ): 8.92 (s, 1H, NH), 6.77 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.14 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.73 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.51 (m, 4H, CH2), 1.61 (m, 4H, CH2), 1.49 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (151 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 148.5, 138.1, 129.1, 127.2, 113.1, 98.6, 56.0, 53.7, 43.5, 26.0, 24.2. Found: C, 45.72; H, 4.70; Cl, 10.34; N, 20.45. Anal. calcd (%) for C13H16ClN5O4: C, 45.69; H, 4.72; Cl, 10.37; N, 20.49.
6-chloro-4-(3-(dimethylamino)propylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide (3g). Orange powder. Yield 219 mg (87%), m.p.= 55–56 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 684 (CCl), 1348 (NO2 symm), 1536 (NO2 asymm), 1619 (furoxan ring), 3104 (C7H), 3372 (NH).1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.01 (m, 1H, NH), 6.56 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.14 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.57 (m, 6H, CH3), 2.32 (s, 2H, CH2), 1.87 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.9, 136.6, 129.6, 125.5, 113.2, 97.4, 58.7, 48.3, 45.0, 25.0. Found: C, 41.80; H, 4.44; Cl, 11.28; N, 22.11. Anal. calcd (%) for C11H14ClN5O4: C, 41.85; H, 4.47; Cl, 11.23; N, 22.18.
Synthesis of benzofuroxans salts 4a-f (general method). Hydrochloric acid (1.0 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of benzofuroxan3a-f (0.8 mmol) in ethyl alcohol (2 mL) at room temperature with stirring. The reaction mixture was kept overnight at room temperature with constant stirring. At the end of the exposure, the precipitate that formed was filtered off and dried in a vacuum (0.06 mm Hg) at a temperature of 40 °C to constant weight.
6-chloro-4-(2-((dimethylammonio)methyl)phenylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide chloride (4a). Orange powder. Yield 260 mg (82%), m.p. = 125–126 °C with decomposition. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 689 (CCl), 1348 (NO2 symm), 1555 (NO2 asymm), 1623 (furoxan ring), 2465 (NH+), 3100 (C7H).1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O) δ 7.70 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, Ph), 7.55 (m, 2H, Ph), 7.36 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ph), 7.04 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.52 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.96 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, D2O) δ 147.9, 138.4, 133.1, 132.8, 132.4, 131.8, 129.6, 128.7, 128.3, 127.2, 114.9, 102.7, 57.2, 43.3. Found: C, 44.96; H, 3.81; Cl, 17.79; N, 17.73. Anal. calcd (%) for C15H15Cl2N5O4: C, 45.02; H, 3.78; Cl, 17.72; N, 17.50.
6-chloro-4-(3-((dimethylammonio)methyl)phenylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide chloride (4b). Orange oil. Yield 310 mg (96%). IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 699 (CCl), 1354 (NO2 symm), 1563 (NO2 asymm), 1624 (furoxan ring), 2478 (NH+), 3407 (NH).1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O) δ 7.55 (m, 3H, Ph), 7.48 (s, 1H, Ph), 7.46 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.31 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.79 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, D2O) δ 143.7, 132.7, 132.0, 131.9, 131.8, 131.7, 131.3, 125.8, 125.2, 124.2, 114.0, 96.9, 60.6, 42.8. Found: C, 45.01; H, 3.85; Cl, 17.81; N, 17.56. Anal. calcd (%) for C15H15Cl2N5O4: C, 45.02; H, 3.78; Cl, 17.72; N, 17.50
6-chloro-4-(2-(morpholino-4-ium)ethylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide chloride (4d). Orange powder. Yield 230 mg (76%), m.p. = 186–187 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 688 (CCl), 1392 (NO2 symm), 1577 (NO2 asymm), 1630 (furoxan ring), 2481 (NH+), 3248 (NH).1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 6.72 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.42 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.02 (br.s, 4H, CH2), 3.59 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 4H, CH2), 3.49 (br.s, 4H, CH2). ЯMP13C (101 Hz, D2O) δ 147.9, 137.1, 129.6, 129.0, 114.6, 100.5, 64.3, 56.6, 52.9, 40.7. Found: C, 37.98; H, 3.93; Cl, 18.67; N, 18.49. Anal. calcd (%) for C12H15Cl2N5O5: C, 37.91; H, 3.98; Cl, 18.65; N, 18.42.
6-chloro-4-(3-(morpholino-4-ium)propylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide chloride (4e). Red powder. Yield 250 mg (79%), m.p.= 239–240 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1:1376 (NO2 symm), 1567 (NO2 asymm), 1613 (furoxan ring), 2361 (NH+), 3197 (NH).1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 6.88 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.12 (m, 4H, CH2), 3.85 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.53 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.28 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.24 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, D2O) δ 147.9, 138.4, 129.8, 126.3, 114.7, 99.9, 63.9, 54.5, 51.9, 43.3, 24.3. Found: C, 39.68; H, 4.32; Cl, 17.95; N, 17.82. Anal. calcd (%) for C13H17Cl2N5O5: C, 39.61; H, 4.35; Cl, 17.99; N, 17.77.
6-chloro-5-nitro-4-(2-(piperidinium-1-yl)ethylamino)benzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide chloride (4f). Red powder. Yield 230 mg (78%), m.p. = 106–107 °C. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1:697 (CCl), 1373 (NO2 symm), 1561 (NO2 asymm), 1613 (furoxan ring), 2530 (NH+), 3099 (C7H), 3429 (NH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 6.92 (s, 1H, Bf), 4.39 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.60 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.48 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.03 (t, J = 12.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.94 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.76 (m, 4H, CH2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, D2O) δ 147.7, 137.1, 129.3, 128.7, 114.5, 100.5, 55.64, 53.8, 40.3, 22.6, 20.9. Found: C, 41.17; H, 4.57; Cl, 18.82; N, 18.51. Anal. calcd (%) for C13H17Cl2N5O4: C, 41.28; H, 4.53; Cl, 18.75; N, 18.52.
6-chloro-4-(3-(dimethylammonio)propylamino)-5-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide chloride (4g). Orange powder. Yield 200 mg (73%), m.p. = 196–197 °C with decomposition. IR spectrum, ν, cm−1: 687 (CCl), 1370 (NO2 symm), 1566 (NO2 asymm), 1621 (furoxan ring), 2481 (NH+), 3100 (C7H),3342 (NH).1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 6.57 (m, 1H, Bf), 4.13 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.39 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.03 (s, 6H, CH3), 2.30 (m, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, D2O) δ 147.9, 138.1, 129.8, 127.5, 114.3, 99.4, 55.5, 44.0, 43.5, 25.7. Found: C, 37.62; H, 4.33; Cl, 20.25; N, 19.93. Anal. calcd (%) for C11H15Cl2N5O4: C, 37.51; H, 4.29; Cl, 20.13; N, 19.89.

3.2. Biological Studies

3.2.1. Evaluation of Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxanas Stimulants and Regulators of Crop Growth

During phytopathological analyses of agricultural crops, the species composition of fungal and bacterial microflora was established. Laboratory studies were carried out on two nutrient media potato-agar (ingredients: potatoes—200 g; agar-agar—20 g; distilled water—1000 mL.) and potato-dextrose agar (ingredients: potatoes—200 g;dextrose—20 g; agar-agar—20 g; distilled water—1000 mL), according to the guidelines [57,58,59].
When evaluating the effectiveness of treatment of wheat, alfalfa, barley, rice, and sorghum seeds as fungicidal and bactericidal agents with preparation compounds at concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 mmol, their effect on the suppression of seed infection was evaluated. At the same time, it was noted that these drugs do not suppress fungal and bacterial infection, but stimulate the growth of seedlings in comparison with the control.
In laboratory conditions, the effectiveness of the preparation compounds were evaluated at a concentration of 10, 20, and 40 mmol on seeds of wheat, alfalfa, barley, rice, and sorghum. The sowing qualities were evaluated (germination energy for 3–4 days, laboratory germination for 7–8 days) according to GOST 12038-84 [60]. Sowing qualities of seeds were determined in wet chambers. According to the sample, 50 seeds were taken in 4-fold repetition.

3.2.2. Cell Lines and Their Cultivation

Human cell cultures of tumor origin—SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma), HeLa (cervical tumor), Hep-2 (larynx carcinoma), A549 (adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells)—and normal cell line Hek 293 (human embryonic kidneys), provided by the Laboratory of Tumor Cell Genetics of the Scientific Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, as well as the Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, were grown in a nutrient medium DMEM (PanEco, Moscow, Russia) and MEM (PanEco, Moscow, Russia), containing fetal bovine serum (10% by volume) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Paisley, UK), Glutamax (2 mM) (Gibco, Scotland, UK), and penicillin-streptomycin (1% by volume) (PanEco, Moscow, Russia). The cultivation was carried out at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 atmosphere (5%).

3.2.3. Determination of Cell Viability

Cell viability was determined by MTT test [61]. Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate in the amount of 1 × 104 cells/200µLof complete nutrient medium and cultured at 37 °C in CO2 (5%). After 24 h of incubation, various concentrations of test compounds in the range from 0.1 to 100 μM, were added to the cell cultures, and then the cells were cultured under the same conditions for 24 and 72 h. For each concentration, the experiment was carried out in triplicate.
All compounds were dissolved in DMSO, then diluted with the medium to the required concentration. The final content of DMSO in the well did not exceed 1% and did not have a toxic effect on the cells. The DMSO was also added to the control wells in a volume of 1%. After the incubation time, MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well and plates were additionally incubated for 2 h (until the characteristic color appeared).
Using a plate analyzer (Cytation3, BioTech Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA), the optical density was determined at 530 nm. The concentration value causing 50% inhibition of cell population growth (IC50) was determined from dose-dependent curves.

3.2.4. Determination of Cell Viability

The ability of compounds to suppress anaerobic glycolysis was studied using the Agilent Seahorse XF96e Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA, USA) by the level of hydrogen proton production in the studied samples on cell lines of neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y using a glycolysis stress test [62]. The rate of extracellular acidification of the medium was measured in real time, which made it possible to assess the intensity of glycolysis in cells by fixing the three main parameters of the glycolytic function: basal glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve.
SH-SY5Y cells in the exponential growth phase were seeded in a 96-well Seahorse cell culture microplate. The planting density of the cell culture was 2 × 104/well. After that, the analyzer was calibrated and, according to the protocol, the sensor cartridge with injection ports was refilled with test reagents to assess the main parameters of glycolysis by modulating cellular metabolism.
The test compounds were added from port A at a concentration of 100 μM. To determine the effect of test compounds on basal glycolysis of neoplastic cells, 10 mM glucose was added from port B. The maximum glycolytic capacity was assessed by injecting oligomycin at a concentration of 1 μM from port C. The difference between maximum glycolytic capacity and basal rate provides information about the glycolytic reserve of cells. As an inhibitor of this process, 25 mM 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose was introduced into port D.

3.2.5. Acute Toxicity

All experiments on animals were carried out on the basis of the USU Nursery and Vivarium FRC PCPMC RAS and in accordance with the rules established by the Commission on Bioethics of the FRC PCPMC RAS (protocol No. 5/22 dated May 23, 2022). Studies of acute toxicity were carried out on male hybrid mice BDF1 [DBA2 × C57Bl6] weighing from 20 to 24 g. In the experiment, clinically healthy animals were used, which were kept in the same conditions with a 12-h light and free access to water and food. Each experimental group included six animals. To determine acute toxicity, compounds 4e and 4g were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl solution and administered intraperitoneally once in the dose range of 5–35 mg/kg. Control animals received 0.9% NaCl solution. Animals were monitored continuously for 4 h on the first day after administration of the test compounds. Then, the death of animals and external signs of intoxication were assessed once a day for 14 days. Calculation of toxic doses was performed using probit analysis.

3.2.6. Antitumor Activity In Vivo

Studies of antitumor activity were carried out on hybrid male mice BDF1 [DBA2×C57Bl6] weighing from 22 to 24 g. In the experiment, clinically healthy animals were used, which were kept in the same conditions with a 12-h light and free access to water and food. Each experimental group included six animals. Transplantation of mouse leukemia P388 was performed intraperitoneally with a concentration of 106 cells in 200μLof 0.9% NaCl solution per animal. Compounds 4e and 4g were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl solution and administered intraperitoneally once in the dose range 1.25–10 mg/kg and 0.625–5 mg/kg, respectively. The compounds were administered the next day after tumor cell transplantation. Control animals received 0.9% NaCl solution. The effectiveness of therapy was assessed by the increase in the average life span (ILS, %) of the animals.

4. Conclusions

A series of novel water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan derivatives containing aromatic/heterocyclic/aliphatic amines fragments was synthesized through nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan. Thus, most samples showed good effectiveness of the pre-sowing treatment of seeds for agricultural crops at concentrations of 20–40 mmol. The introduction of an aromatic amine moiety improves the properties so compound 4a shows activity with less concentration of 10 mmol. An additional advantage of treatment with benzofuroxan derivatives is that in some cases it leads not only to improved seed germination, but also to the suppression of microflora growth.
When studying the anti-cancer activity of the synthesized compounds, it was shown that all substances exhibit a cytotoxic effect in relation to a tumor origincells panel.Compounds containing morpholine fragments, as well as a fragment of N-dimethylpropylamine, 4e and 4g showed the highest activity. They also demonstrated the ability to effectively inhibit the glycolysis process in tumor cells. These data allowed us to choosecompounds 4e and 4g for further experiments using laboratory animals.
Compound 4e was found to exhibit significantly less acute toxicity in vivo compared to 4g. Perhaps 4g is much more soluble and therefore bioavailable, so it causes more severe intoxication in animals. In addition, test compounds 4e and 4g demonstrated in vivo antileukemic activity, as measured by an increase in the mean lifespan of animals with P388 mouse leukemia, compared to an untreated control group.
Thus, water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans can be considered as promising candidates for further development both as anti-cancer and stimulants in seed germination and regulators of microflora crop growth.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232314902/s1.

Author Contributions

E.C.—investigation (chemistry), writing—original draft preparation, supervision (chemistry); A.D.—investigation (X-ray study); A.K.—software, investigation (quantum-chemical computations); V.M., A.T., E.I., N.A. (Nurgali Akylbekov) and M.Z.—investigation (chemistry); M.N. and Y.A.—investigation (in vitro study); N.A. (Nurbol Appazov)—funding acquisition; A.B. (Alexander Burilov) —project administration; L.B. and B.D.—investigation (crop growth); T.S., E.K., U.A., A.B. (Anastasia Balakina) and D.M.—investigation (in vivo study). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The synthetic part was carried out at Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry and was supported by the Russian Science Foundation and the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Tatarstan within the framework of the scientific project No. 22-23-20015, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-23-20015/ (accessed on 26 October 2022). Quantum-chemical computations were funded by the government assignment for the FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS. Evaluation of compounds as stimulants and regulators of crop growth were funded by the financial support for research from the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BR10764960). The work on animals was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation No. AAAA-A19-119071890015-6.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of FRC PCPMC RAS (protocol No. 5/22 dated 23 May 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Assigned Spectral-Analytical Center of FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS for technical assistance in research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, T.; Singh, J.; Singh, B.; Kataria, R.; Kumar, V. Methyl-linked Pyrazoles: Synthetic and Medicinal Perspective. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 770–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Richa; Kumar, S.; Sindhu, J.; Choudhary, P.; Jaglan, S.; Zangrando, E.; Kumar, R.; Sahoo, S.C.; Kumar, V.; Mehta, S.K.; et al. Exploration of synthesis, structural aspects, DFT studies and bio-efficacy of some new DHA-benzohydrazide based copper(II) complexes. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1228, 129460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, T.; Kumar, R.; Sahoo, S.C.; Sindhu, J.; Singh, J.; Singh, B.; Mehta, S.K.; Umar, A.; Saini, T.S.; Kumar, V.; et al. Synthesis, structural and pharmacological exploration of 2-(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-acetophenone oximes and their silver complexes. Polyhedron 2021, 195, 114972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bala, I.; Singh, K.; Kataria, R.; Sindhu, M. Exploration of structural, electrostatic and photophysical behaviour of novel Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes and their utility as potent antimicrobial agents. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 36, e6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jovené, C.C.; Chugunova, E.A.; Goumont, R. The properties and the use of substituted benzofuroxans in pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry: A comprehensive review. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1089–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chugunova, E.A.A.; Gazizov, A.S.S.; Burilov, A.R.R.; Yusupova, L.M.M.; Pudovik, M.A.A.; Sinyashin, O.G.G. Benzofuroxans: Their synthesis, properties, and biological activity. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2019, 68, 887–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chugunova, E.; Mukhamatdinova, R.; Sazykina, M.; Dobrynin, A.; Sazykin, I.; Karpenko, A.; Mirina, E.; Zhuravleva, M.; Gavrilov, N.; Karchava, S.; et al. Synthesis of New ‘Hybrid’ Compounds Based on Benzofuroxans and Aminoalkylnaphthalimides. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2016, 87, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chugunova, E.A.; Akylbekov, N.I.; Mahrous, E.M.; Voloshina, A.D.; Kulik, N.V.; Zobov, V.V.; Strelnik, A.G.; Gerasimova, T.P.; Dobrynin, A.B.; Burilov, A.R. Synthesis and study of antimicrobial activity of quaternary ammonium benzofuroxan salts. Mon. Chem.-Chem. Mon. 2018, 149, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chugunova, E.; Frenna, V.; Consiglio, G.; Micheletti, G.; Boga, C.; Akylbekov, N.; Burilov, A.; Spinelli, D. On the Nucleophilic Reactivity of 4,6-Dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan with Some Aliphatic and Aromatic Amines: Selective Nucleophilic Substitution. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 13472–13480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chugunova, E.; Samsonov, V.; Gerasimova, T.; Rybalova, T.; Bagryanskaya, I. Synthesis and some properties of 2H-benzimidazole 1,3-dioxides. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 7233–7244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Qiao, C. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Benzofuroxan Derivatives as Fungicides against Phytopathogenic Fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8632–8640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiao, C.; Wang, L.; Yonghao, Y. Application of Benzofuroxan derivative to Resisting Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Patent CN 103004799A, 4 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cerecetto, H.; Porcal, W. Pharmacological properties of furoxans and benzofuroxans: Recent developments. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Farias, C.F.; Massaoka, M.H.; Girola, N.; Azevedo, R.A.; Ferreira, A.K.; Jorge, S.D.; Tavares, L.C.; Figueiredo, C.R.; Travassos, L.R. Benzofuroxan derivatives N-Br and N-I induce intrinsic apoptosis in melanoma cells by regulating AKT/BIM signaling and display anti metastatic activity in vivo. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Teixeira, S.F.; de Azevedo, R.A.; Salomon, M.A.C.; Jorge, S.D.; Levy, D.; Bydlowski, S.P.; Rodrigues, C.P.; Pizzo, C.R.; Barbuto, J.A.M.; Ferreira, A.K. Synergistic anti-tumor effects of the combination of a benzofuroxan derivate and sorafenib on NCI-H460 human large cell lung carcinoma cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2014, 68, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dos Santos Fernandes, G.F.; Pavan, A.R.; Dos Santos, J.L. Heterocyclic N-oxides-A Promising Class of Agents against Tuberculosis, Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 1325–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dos Santos Fernandes, G.F.; de Souza, P.C.; Moreno-Viguri, E.; Santivañez-Veliz, M.; Paucar, R.; Pérez-Silanes, S.; Chegaev, K.; Guglielmo, S.; Lazzarato, L.; Fruttero, R.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of N-Oxide-Containing Heterocycles with In Vivo Sterilizing Antitubercular Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 8647–8660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gabriel, G.-S.; Ribeiro, B.L.; Jesse, R.Y.; Jose, C.d.S.A. Is it possible to perform molecular hybridization between acetaminophen and nitric oxide donor molecule? Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Dev. Res. 2021, 7, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Carvalho, P.S.; Maróstica, M.; Gambero, A.; Pedrazzoli, J. Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a novel nitric oxide-releasing diclofenac derivative containing a benzofuroxan moiety. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2489–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gresele, P.; Momi, S.; Guglielmini, G. Nitric oxide-enhancing or -releasing agents as antithrombotic drugs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 166, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dutra, L.A.; De Almeida, L.; Passalacqua, T.G.; Reis, J.S.; Torres, F.A.E.E.; Martinez, I.; Peccinini, R.G.; Chin, C.M.; Chegaev, K.; Guglielmo, S.; et al. Leishmanicidal activities of novel synthetic furoxan and benzofuroxan derivatives. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4837–4847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Šarlauskas, J.; Petrikaitė, V.; Pavilonis, A.; Misevičienė, L.; Anusevičius, Ž.; Čėnas, N. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of a series of substituted benzofuroxan compounds. In Protein Targets: Discovery of Bioactive Compounds, Proceedings of the BIFI 2012—V International Conference, Zaragoza, Spain, 1–4 Febuary 2012; Franco, O.A., Bruscolini, P., Villar, J.A.C., Recio, J.F., Neila, P.F., Guerrero, R.H., Júlvez, M.M., Trullenque, M.M., Sanz, J.S., Campoy, A.V., Eds.; Institut for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Universidad de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dos Santos Petry, L.; Mayer, J.C.P.; de Giacommeti, M.; de Oliveira, D.T.; Garzon, L.R.; Engelmann, A.M.; de Matos, A.F.I.M.; Baldissera, M.D.; Dornelles, L.; de Andrade, C.M.; et al. In vitro and in vivo trypanocidal activity of a benzofuroxan derivative against Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp. Parasitol. 2021, 226–227, 108125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schiefer, I.T.; VandeVrede, L.; Fa’, M.; Arancio, O.; Thatcher, G.R.J. Furoxans (1,2,5 Oxadiazole-N-Oxides) as Novel NO Mimetic Neuroprotective and Procognitive Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3076–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ding, M.; Shao, K.; Wu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Cheng, B.; Wang, L.; Shi, J.; Kong, X. A NO/ROS/RNS cascaded-releasing nano-platform for gas/PDT/PTT/immunotherapy of tumors. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 5824–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Burov, O.N.; Kletskii, M.E.; Fedik, N.S.; Lisovin, A.V.; Kurbatov, S.V. Mechanism of Thiol-Induced Nitrogen(II) Oxide Donation by Furoxans: A Quantum-Chemical Study. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2015, 51, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Mao, J.; Huang, Y.; Xu, W.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, J. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel benzofuroxan-based pyrrolidine hydroxamates as matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors with nitric oxide releasing activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 4363–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chugunova, E.; Gazizov, A.; Sazykina, M.; Akylbekov, N.; Gildebrant, A.; Sazykin, I.; Burilov, A.; Appazov, N.; Karchava, S.; Klimova, M.; et al. Design of Novel 4-Aminobenzofuroxans and Evaluation of Their Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Becke, A.D. Density Functional Thermochemistry III The Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W.J.; Pople, J.A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. IX. An extended gaussian-type basis for molecular-orbital studies of organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Petersson, G.A.; Bennett, A.; Tensfeldt, T.G.; Al-Laham, M.A.; Shirley, W.A.; Mantzaris, J. A complete basis set model chemistry. I. The total energies of closed-shell atoms and hydrides of the first-row elements. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 2193–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ageenko, A.V.; Dzhaymurzina, A.A. Dominant Microflora of Soybean Seeds and Effectiveness of Protective-Stimulating Composition against It. News Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan Ser. Agric. Sci. 2017, 6, 198–207. [Google Scholar]
  34. Taychibekov, A.U.; Erzhanov, K.B.; Abdrakov, B.K.; Beysembaev, M.K.; Eraliev, S.S. Efficiency of Plant Growth Stimulator Kn-2 (Akpinol-Alpha) on the Crop and Sugarity of Sugar Beet. Int. J. Appl. Fundam. Res. 2018, 12, 298–302. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nizamdinova, G.K.; Sagitov, A.O. Recovery of tomato seeds from a bacterial infection. A new strategy for scientific and educational priorities in the context of the development of the agro-industrial complex. AlmatyKazNAU 2015, 2, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khashdakhilova, S.M.; Musaev, M.R.; Khalilov, M.B.; Magomedova, A.A. Effect of growth stimulants on yield and quality of grain corn grown in Piedmont sub-province of Dagestan. Rudn J. Agron. Anim. Ind. 2021, 16, 54–65. [Google Scholar]
  37. Danilov, A.V. Influence of growth stimulants on the yield and quality of grain crops. Bull. Mari State Univ. Ser. Agric. Sci. Econ. Sci. 2017, 3, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  38. Polykov, A.V.; Alekseeva, T.; Loginov, S.V.; Storozhenko, P.A. The effect of the growth regulator Lostor on the yield of garlic. Kartof. Ovoshi 2019, 12, 27–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weber, G.F. DNA Damaging Drugs. In Molecular Therapies of Cancer; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 9–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, X.; Long, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Cai, Q. Carrier-Free Microspheres of an Anti-Cancer Drug Synthesized via a Sodium Catalyst for Controlled-Release Drug Delivery. Materials 2018, 11, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sun, L.; Wan, K.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Z.; Feng, J.; Zhang, J. Functional nanoemulsion-hybrid lipid nanocarriers enhance the bioavailability and anti-cancer activity of lipophilic diferuloylmethane. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 85102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shin, H.-C.; Alani, A.W.G.; Rao, D.A.; Rockich, N.C.; Kwon, G.S. Multi-drug loaded polymeric micelles for simultaneous delivery of poorly soluble anticancer drugs. J. Control. Release 2009, 140, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Narvekar, M.; Xue, H.Y.; Eoh, J.Y.; Wong, H.L. Nanocarrier for Poorly Water-Soluble Anticancer Drugs—Barriers of Translation and Solutions. AAPS PharmSciTech 2014, 15, 822–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mazzaferro, S.; Bouchemal, K.; Ponchel, G. Oral delivery of anticancer drugs II: The prodrug strategy. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mazzaferro, S.; Bouchemal, K.; Ponchel, G. Oral delivery of anticancer drugs III: Formulation using drug delivery systems. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lvov, Y.M.; Pattekari, P.; Zhang, X.; Torchilin, V. Converting Poorly Soluble Materials into Stable Aqueous Nanocolloids. Langmuir 2011, 27, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, J.J.; Yazan, L.S.; Abdullah, C.A.C. A review on current nanomaterials and their drug conjugate for targeted breast cancer treatment. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2373–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Crist, R.M.; Grossman, J.H.; Patri, A.K.; Stern, S.T.; Dobrovolskaia, M.A.; Adiseshaiah, P.P.; Clogston, J.D.; McNeil, S.E. Common pitfalls in nanotechnology: Lessons learned from NCI’s Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory. Integr. Biol. 2013, 5, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Stine, Z.E.; Schug, Z.T.; Salvino, J.M.; Dang, C.V. Targeting cancer metabolism in the era of precision oncology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022, 21, 141–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Elia, I.; Haigis, M.C. Metabolites and the tumour microenvironment: From cellular mechanisms to systemic metabolism. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. APEX2, Version 2.1, SAINTPlus. Data Reduction and Correction Program, Version 7.31A, Bruker Advansed X-ray Solutions; BrukerAXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2006.
  52. Sheldrick, G.M. SADABS, Program for Empirical X-ray Absorption Correction; Bruker-Nonius: Madison, WI, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELX Programs. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hehre, W.J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J.A. Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yusupova, L.M.; Molodykh, Z.V.; Buzykin, B.I.; Falyakhov, I.F.; Anisimova, N.N.; Sharnin, G.P.; Bulidorov, V.V.; Sviridov, S.I.; Levinson, F.S. 4- or 6-nitro-5,7-dichlorobenzofuroxan Having Fungicidal Activity. Patent RU 2032678, 10 April 1995. [Google Scholar]
  57. Naumova, N.A. Seed Analysis for Fungal and Bacterial Infection; Agricultural Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 1960; 208p. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kiray, Z.; Clement, Z.; Soimoshi, F.; Veres, Y. Edited and with a Preface by Dr., prof. M. V. Gorlenko; Kolos: Moscow, Russia, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  59. Chumaevskaya, M.A.; Matveeva, E.V. Methodological Guidelines for Isolation and Identification of Phytopathogenic Bacteria; VASHNIL: Moscow, Russia, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  60. GOST 12038-84; Agricultural Seeds. Methods for Determination of Germination. GOST: Moscow, Russia; p. 1976.
  61. Präbst, K.; Engelhardt, H.; Ringgeler, S.; Hübner, H. Basic Colorimetric Proliferation Assays: MTT, WST, and Resazurin. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1601, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q. Using Seahorse Machine to Measure OCR and ECAR in Cancer Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1928, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Obtaining water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans in two stages.
Scheme 1. Obtaining water-soluble salts of benzofuroxans in two stages.
Ijms 23 14902 sch001
Figure 1. Molecular structures of compound 3a (a), 3d (b), 3f (c) and 5d (d).
Figure 1. Molecular structures of compound 3a (a), 3d (b), 3f (c) and 5d (d).
Ijms 23 14902 g001aIjms 23 14902 g001b
Scheme 2. Two possible ways for the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan (1) with 2-morpholinoethanamine (2d).
Scheme 2. Two possible ways for the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan (1) with 2-morpholinoethanamine (2d).
Ijms 23 14902 sch002
Figure 2. The structures of 3d (a) 5d (b).
Figure 2. The structures of 3d (a) 5d (b).
Ijms 23 14902 g002
Figure 3. Energy diagram (ΔE, kcal/mol) of the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d.
Figure 3. Energy diagram (ΔE, kcal/mol) of the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d.
Ijms 23 14902 g003
Scheme 3. Two ways for the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d.
Scheme 3. Two ways for the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d.
Ijms 23 14902 sch003
Figure 4. Sowing qualities of wheat seeds.
Figure 4. Sowing qualities of wheat seeds.
Ijms 23 14902 g004
Figure 5. Sowing qualities of alfalfa seeds.
Figure 5. Sowing qualities of alfalfa seeds.
Ijms 23 14902 g005
Figure 6. Growth of microflora on alfalfa seeds treated with compounds.
Figure 6. Growth of microflora on alfalfa seeds treated with compounds.
Ijms 23 14902 g006
Figure 7. Growth of microflora on barley seeds treated with compounds.
Figure 7. Growth of microflora on barley seeds treated with compounds.
Ijms 23 14902 g007
Figure 8. The influence of the studied compounds on (a) the glycolytic profile of tumor origin cells SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma) and (b) parameters of glycolytic function. The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) is a glycolysis indicator and shows the degree of extracellular environment acidification. The concentration of the studied compounds was 100 µM, glucose was 10 mM, oligomycin was 1 µM, and 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose was 25 mM. Data are presented as mean ± error of the mean (n = 3). ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 compared to control (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 8. The influence of the studied compounds on (a) the glycolytic profile of tumor origin cells SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma) and (b) parameters of glycolytic function. The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) is a glycolysis indicator and shows the degree of extracellular environment acidification. The concentration of the studied compounds was 100 µM, glucose was 10 mM, oligomycin was 1 µM, and 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose was 25 mM. Data are presented as mean ± error of the mean (n = 3). ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 compared to control (one-way ANOVA).
Ijms 23 14902 g008
Figure 9. Dose-response curves for single intraperitoneal administration of 4e and 4g to BDF1 hybrid mice.
Figure 9. Dose-response curves for single intraperitoneal administration of 4e and 4g to BDF1 hybrid mice.
Ijms 23 14902 g009
Figure 10. Survival curves of BDF1 mice with leukemia P388 after a single intraperitoneal injection of compounds 4e and 4g.
Figure 10. Survival curves of BDF1 mice with leukemia P388 after a single intraperitoneal injection of compounds 4e and 4g.
Ijms 23 14902 g010
Table 1. Relative energies (ΔE, kcal/mol), enthalpies (ΔH, kcal/mol), Gibbs energies (ΔG, kcal/mol) and HOMO-LUMO gaps (eV) of the products 3d and 5d with HCl compared to the initial reagents 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d (Scheme 2).
Table 1. Relative energies (ΔE, kcal/mol), enthalpies (ΔH, kcal/mol), Gibbs energies (ΔG, kcal/mol) and HOMO-LUMO gaps (eV) of the products 3d and 5d with HCl compared to the initial reagents 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d (Scheme 2).
Reaction ProductsΔEΔHΔGHOMO-LUMO
3d+HCl22.5122.0818.73-
5d+HCl23.9323.4720.49-
3d0.000.000.003.07
5d−1.42−1.39−1.763.04
Table 2. Relative energies (ΔE, kcal/mol), enthalpies (ΔH, kcal/mol), Gibbs free energies (ΔG, kcal/mol) and HOMO-LUMO gaps (eV) for reagents (1+2d), pre-reaction complexes [1+2d], transition states TS, intermediates IM and products 3d and 5d of the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d.
Table 2. Relative energies (ΔE, kcal/mol), enthalpies (ΔH, kcal/mol), Gibbs free energies (ΔG, kcal/mol) and HOMO-LUMO gaps (eV) for reagents (1+2d), pre-reaction complexes [1+2d], transition states TS, intermediates IM and products 3d and 5d of the reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-nitrobenzofuroxan 1 with 2-morpholinoethanamine 2d.
Reaction ProductsΔEΔHΔGHOMO-LUMO
1+2d0.000.000.00-
1 way
[1+2d]a−5.61−4.851.81-
TS1a10.9610.3824.323.12
IM13.242.6717.203.16
TS15.284.6419.422.48
2 way
[1+2d]b−5.86−5.162.63-
TS222.3121.7536.163.04
IM2a−23.88−23.38−13.443.37
TS2b11.8411.4224.993.05
IM2b+HCl−18.17−17.77−15.163.07
TS2a+HCl−1.40−1.272.713.19
Table 3. Effect of seed treatment with test compounds on sowing qualities.
Table 3. Effect of seed treatment with test compounds on sowing qualities.
Agricultural CropLine NumberEstimated ParametersControl4a, Concentration, mmol4d, Concentration, mmol4e, Concentration, mmol4g, Concentration, mmol
1050102040102040102040
wheat1.germination energy, %82979547.671.49833.3979842.880.980.9
2.laboratory germination, %85.796.596.547.671.498.542.897.59947.690.480.9
3.the growth rate of seedlings, %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4.growth rate of microorganismsmushrooms+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5.bacteria++ +++++++++++++
alfalfa6.germination energy, %76837843.363.37846.678.57356.643.380
7.laboratory germination, %7684.579.55073.380.546.679.5746063.380
8.the growth rate of seedlings, %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
9.growth rate of microorganismsmushrooms+++--++++++++++++++++++
10.bacteria +++++++++++++++++
barley11.germination energy, %95.2969571.466.69585.7969452.3100100
12.laboratory germination, %95.29997.571.466.698.585.7989952.3100100
13.the growth rate of seedlings, %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
14.growth rate of microorganismsmushrooms+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
15.bacteria++ ++++++++++++++
rice16.germination energy, %71.4969952.347.6993898.5993871.476.1
17.laboratory germination, %95.296.59952.395.29938999947.610095.2
18.the growth rate of seedlings, %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
19.growth rate of microorganismsmushrooms+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
20.bacteria+++ ++++++++++++++++
sorghum21.germination energy, %52.347.552.533.376.158.533.350.550.536.661.957.2
22.laboratory germination, %5749.556.54080.961.563.35652.55071.480.9
23.the growth rate of seedlings, %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
24.growth rate of microorganismsmushrooms+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
25.bacteria+++ ++++++++++++++++++++++
Table 4. Cytotoxic potential of water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan.
Table 4. Cytotoxic potential of water-soluble salts based on benzofuroxan.
Incubation–24 h
SH-SY5YHep2A549HeLaHek 293
4a43.96 ± 1.0998.53 ± 2.5495.54 ± 1.0140.17 ± 2.7338.62 ± 0.10
4b45.18 ± 2.4397.04 ± 2.0899.21 ± 3.3846.09 ± 0.5635.01 ± 1.35
4d24.28 ± 1.9191.28 ± 1.40>10040.53 ± 1.9040.84 ± 2.84
4e24.07 ± 1.2283.00 ± 1.3790.25 ± 3.43>10099.01 ± 2.09
4g20.89 ± 0.8270.28 ± 1.2882.01 ± 1.5497.81 ± 3.3121.95 ± 0.39
Incubation—72 h
SH-SY5YHep2A549HeLaHek 293
4a35.12 ± 3.8590.14 ± 3.1092.10 ± 3.5832.90 ± 0.5616.13 ± 1.86
4b32.08 ± 1.4193.06 ± 2.3090.05 ± 2.0438.12 ± 1.2127.19 ± 2.50
4d22.79 ± 1.9089.94 ± 3.1298.21 ± 0.1035.47 ± 0.1228.10 ± 0.93
4e20.21 ± 0.7270.21 ± 0.5477.14 ± 1.3693.8 ± 2.5386.49 ± 5.75
4g17.07 ± 0.0358.03 ± 2.9064.19 ± 2.1283.1 ± 4.2912.03 ± 1.12
Table 5. Acute toxicity parameters of compounds 4e and 4g after intraperitoneal administration.
Table 5. Acute toxicity parameters of compounds 4e and 4g after intraperitoneal administration.
CompoundMTDLD16LD50LD84LD100
4e1018.222.00 ± 1.3324.630
4g59.413.75 ± 1.7320.325
Table 6. The body weight changes of BDF1 hybrid mice after a single intraperitoneal injection of 4e.
Table 6. The body weight changes of BDF1 hybrid mice after a single intraperitoneal injection of 4e.
Dose, mg/kgBody Weight, g
0 Day1 Day2 Days3 Days7 Days14 Days
1020.25 ± 0.3920.39 ± 0.4720.51 ± 0.4020.88 ± 0.3121.58 ± 0.5122.12 ± 0.62
1521.48 ± 0.4721.45 ± 0.5121.56 ± 0.4921.62 ± 0.5922.02 ± 0.4722.66 ± 0.38
2021.45 ± 0.5221.44 ± 0.7121.88 ± 0.8122.02 ± 0.7422.74 ± 0.5823.01 ± 0.65
2522.27 ± 0.2921.9821.8121.8922.1522.74
3021.92 ± 0.13-----
control21.55 ± 0.2821.43 ± 0.5621.67 ± 0.7721.99 ± 0.7922.80 ± 0.4423.96 ± 0.68
Table 7. Body weight changes of BDF1 hybrid mice after a single intraperitoneal injection of 4g.
Table 7. Body weight changes of BDF1 hybrid mice after a single intraperitoneal injection of 4g.
Dose, mg/kgBody Weight, g
0 Day1 Day2 Days3 Days7 Days14 Days
521.88 ± 0.4521.59 ± 0.5521.64 ± 0.7121.72 ± 0.7922.12 ± 0.7523.19 ± 1.21
1021.99 ± 0.2121.54 ± 0.4121.60 ± 0.5221.86 ± 0.6622.84 ± 1.0623.70 ± 1.12
1521.86 ± 0.5721.36 ± 2.5121.60 ± 2.4322.11 ± 3.0322.41 ± 2.7423.15 ± 2.14
2022.37 ± 0.8021.99 ± 3.0921.77 ± 3.7921.85 ± 3.1822.81 ± 3.8923.41 ± 3.01
2521.87 ± 0.74-----
control21.55 ± 0.2821.43 ± 0.5621.67 ± 0.7721.99 ± 0.7922.80 ± 0.4423.96 ± 0.68
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chugunova, E.; Matveeva, V.; Tulesinova, A.; Iskanderov, E.; Akylbekov, N.; Dobrynin, A.; Khamatgalimov, A.; Appazov, N.; Boltayeva, L.; Duisembekov, B.; et al. Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxan Derivatives—Synthesis and Biological Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314902

AMA Style

Chugunova E, Matveeva V, Tulesinova A, Iskanderov E, Akylbekov N, Dobrynin A, Khamatgalimov A, Appazov N, Boltayeva L, Duisembekov B, et al. Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxan Derivatives—Synthesis and Biological Activity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(23):14902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chugunova, Elena, Victoria Matveeva, Alena Tulesinova, Emil Iskanderov, Nurgali Akylbekov, Alexey Dobrynin, Ayrat Khamatgalimov, Nurbol Appazov, Lyazat Boltayeva, Bakhytzhan Duisembekov, and et al. 2022. "Water-Soluble Salts Based on Benzofuroxan Derivatives—Synthesis and Biological Activity" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 23: 14902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop