Next Article in Journal
Differential Immunomodulatory Effects of Head and Neck Cancer-Derived Exosomes on B Cells in the Presence of ATP
Next Article in Special Issue
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia: The Role of Biomarkers
Previous Article in Journal
Loss of Runx1 Induces Granulosa Cell Defects and Development of Ovarian Tumors in the Mouse
Previous Article in Special Issue
ECG Markers of Acute Melatonin Treatment in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Ischemia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

SCN5A Variants as Genetic Arrhythmias Triggers for Familial Bileaflet Mitral Valve Prolapse

1
Marseille Medical Genetics, INSERM, Aix Marseille Université, U1251 Marseille, France
2
Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France
3
Department of Cardiology, La Timone Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France
4
Department of Medical Genetics, Timone Enfant Hospital, 13005 Marseille, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(22), 14447; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214447
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022

Abstract

:
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common valvular heart defect with variable outcomes. Several studies reported MVP as an underestimated cause of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD), mostly in young adult women. Herein, we report a clinical and genetic investigation of a family with bileaflet MVP and a history of syncopes and resuscitated sudden cardiac death. Using family based whole exome sequencing, we identified two missense variants in the SCN5A gene. A rare variant SCN5A:p.Ala572Asp and the well-known functional SCN5A:p.His558Arg polymorphism. Both variants are shared between the mother and her daughter with a history of resuscitated SCD and syncopes, respectively. The second daughter with prodromal MVP as well as her healthy father and sister carried only the SCN5A:p.His558Arg polymorphism. Our study is highly suggestive of the contribution of SCN5A mutations as the potential genetic cause of the electric instability leading to ventricular arrhythmias in familial MVP cases with syncope and/or SCD history.

1. Introduction

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common valvulopathy with variable outcomes. It is characterized by fibromyxomatous changes in the mitral leaflet tissue and a systolic displacement of one or both mitral valve leaflets into the left atrium [1,2]. The estimated prevalence of MVP is between 1% and 3% in the general population [3,4]. The diagnosis is based on transthoracic echocardiography as a systolic billowing of one or both leaflets exceeding 2 mm beyond the mitral annulus in a long-axis view [1,5].
The complications spectrum of MVP is ranging from arrhythmias, stroke, endocarditis, mitral regurgitation (MR) requiring surgery, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) [6,7]. Arrhythmic MVP has been associated with sudden death with an incidence of up to 2% per year [8].
Recently, the association of MVP with ventricular arrhythmias as a substrate of SCD has been documented in patients with MVP. The major arrhythmogenic risk predictors reported include a history of syncope, ventricular ectopic beats (right bundle branch morphology), ventricular repolarization abnormalities, left ventricle fibrosis in the papillary muscles, and mitral annular disjunction, as well as a possible pro-arrhythmic genetic substrate [7,8,9].
A malignant subset of MVP has been correlated with an increased risk of sudden death [10]. This subtype is characterized by a bileaflet MVP occurring in young female patients with biphasic or inverted T waves in the inferior leads, and frequent complex ventricular ectopic activity with documented ventricular bigeminy or VT and premature ventricular contraction configurations of outflow tract alternating with papillary muscle or fascicular origin [9,10].
A strong hereditary component has been described by reporting several pedigrees for MVP [11,12,13]. Disse et al. identified four pedigrees suggesting an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Genetic linkage analysis of the largest pedigree with 24 members in three generations showed a significant linkage for markers mapping to chromosome 16 (chr16p11.2-p12.1; MVP1-OMIM# 157700) [14]. Thereafter, missense mutations in the DCHS1 gene have been identified in different families and segregated with the disease in affected members (MVP2-Locus MIM# 603057) [12,15]. Toomer et al. restudied a large family reported by Nesta et al. using exome sequencing and identified missense mutation in the DZIP1 gene (MVP3-Locus MIM#608671). Thereafter, additional DZIP1 variants have been prioritized in 42 MVP probands [16,17].
A recessive X-linked pattern of inheritance has been reported as well [18]. Indeed, missense mutations in the FLNA gene have been identified in MVP familial cases [19]. Delling et al. reported a four- to five-fold risk in the offspring of parents with MVP compared to parents without MVP, which highlight the relevance of genetic testing [1,11].
Here, we report the clinical and genetic investigation of a family with bileaflet myxomatous MVP complicated by several episodes of syncopes and a resuscitated SCD.

2. Results

2.1. Clinical Findings

The index case, a 42-year-old woman, was diagnosed with a bileaflet myxomatous MVP after a resuscitated SCD at the age 27 years old while she was in a church.
An exhaustive initial assessment was performed, and MVP was the only abnormality found to explain the occurrence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia.
Her 12 leads ECG at rest showed a T wave inversion in the precordial leads V1 and V2. The corrected QT interval was normal (Figure 1). Therefore, she underwent internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Monitoring of the device revealed appropriate shocks on ventricular arrhythmia’s recidivism.
Of note, before defibrillator implantation, cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed and ruled out structural cardiac diseases such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy or hypertrophic/dilated cardiomyopathies. Cardiac MRI confirmed bileaflet MVP with myxomatous impairment (Barlow’s disease) reported at the first trans-thoracic echocardiography but without late Gadolinium enhancement. The patient also underwent coronary angiography with a methylergometrine provocation test and ventriculography. No lesions of coronary arteries, vasospasm, or takotsubo cardiomyopathy were noted. Finally, programmed ventricular stimulation with isoprenaline infusion and a provocation test with flecainide injection did not induce ventricular arrhythmia or unmasked an electrical aspect of Brugada syndrome on 12 leads surface ECG.
Her echocardiography follow-up showed a constant moderate MR, with mild myxomatous thickened leaflets, the presence of a posterior annulus disjunction, and a typical atrialization of posterior leaflet insertion and posterior systolic curling of the inferolateral wall of the left ventricular (LV) (Figure 2A). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains normal but the LV and left atrium (LA) are mildly dilated according to the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines [20,21].
Regarding the treatment, in the years preceding the cardiac arrest event, the patient consulted a cardiologist for palpitations, describing episodes of tachycardia with sudden onset and termination which have never been documented. The 12 leads ECG tracing, the trans-thoracic echocardiography, and the biology were reported as normal. A trial treatment with a calcium blocker (verapamil) was temporarily taken by the patient with the only hypothesis of paroxysmal junctional tachycardia. At discharge after cardiac arrest, the calcium blockers (diltiazem) were continued for 10 months. When the patient was appropriately treated (one electric shock) by the defibrillator for ventricular tachycardia (202 beats/min) a treatment with sotalol was initiated.
Family screening revealed one symptomatic daughter (Subject II-2) with a history of two syncopes at 11 years old while she was on a thrill ride and palpitations during an intense run. Her 12 leads ECG at rest, the ECG 24 h Holter, and the exercise stress test were normal. However, her echocardiography showed a bileaflet MVP which predominates on the anterior leaflet with mild myxomatous thickened leaflets, posterior annulus disjunction, and winding movement (Figure 2B). The MVP is complicated by a moderate MR. LVEF and LA volumes were normal. LV was mildly dilated. She received an implantable loop recorder for VA screening.
The oldest sister, 23 years old (Subject II-1), is currently asymptomatic. Her echocardiography revealed a prodromal MVP with a mild holosystolic MR, a posterior annulus disjunction, and a winding movement (Figure 2C). She had no cardiac remodeling and no systolic dysfunction.
The father (Subject I-1) had normal echocardiography.

2.2. Genetic Findings

Whole-exome sequencing analysis allowed us to prioritize two missense variants in the SCN5A gene. One heterozygous rare variant shared between the index case and her daughter (II-2) NM_000335:exon12:c.1715G>T; p.(Ala572Asp) (MAF = 0.0051 in the gnomAD database; MAF = 0.0032 in the European non-Finnish population). The variant is located in the DI–DII interdomain linker of Nav1.5 channel. The SCN5A:p.(Ala572Asp) is predicted as probably pathogenic by UMD-predictor and has a CADD-phred score = 19.44 (GRCh37-v1.6).
The second variant, NM_000335:exon12:c.1673T>C; p.(His558Arg) is found in all the family members. Thus, the father (I-1) and the oldest daughter (II-1) with prodromal MVP carried only the modulatory SCN5A:p.(His558Arg) polymorphism (Figure 3).
This common variant (MAF = 0.223) is extensively studied and well-known as a functional modifying polymorphism. Indeed, the p.(His558Arg) may act in a mutation-specific manner as a risk-allele or a protector allele in the presence of other rare and/or causal highly penetrant variants in the same gene or in separate gene [22,23,24,25].
Due to the close physical genetic distance between the Ala572 and His558, both alleles are in the “cis” phase. Thus, Ala572 and His558 are invariably linked. This “cis” configuration has been confirmed by Tester et al. [24]. Of note, in our cases, the His558Arg polymorphism was found in a homozygous state in all family members.
It is noteworthy that no other clinically relevant variants that may explain the phenotype in this family were found. More specifically, genes implicated in MVP, valvulopathies, and cardiac channelopathies were targeted and screened.
Both symptomatic family members (I-2 and II-2) carried the two variants. The father and the paucisymptomatic daughter (II-1) carried only the p.(His558Arg) polymorphism (Figure 3).
More recently, another daughter of the family has been recruited for clinical and genetic screening. Her cardiac evaluation showed no MVP (Figure 4). Sanger sequencing revealed the absence of the SCN5A:p.(Ala572Asp) variant. She carried only the common SCN5A:p.(His558Arg) polymorphism (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

We report a family with bileaflet MVP female cases and a history of resuscitated SCD and syncope episodes. Whole exome sequencing of the family allowed us to identify a rare heterozygous variant SCN5A:p.(Ala572Asp) in the index case and her symptomatic daughter and the common polymorphism p.(His558Arg) in the same gene.
The SCN5A gene encodes the α-subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav1.5), a key regulator of the inward sodium current. Mutations in the SCN5A gene cause different cardiac channelopathies with diverse phenotypes such as familial atrial fibrillation type 10 (OMIM#614022), Brugada syndrome (OMIM#601144), and long QT syndrome type 3 (OMIM#603830) [26,27,28]. SCN5A mutations have been also identified in patients with primary cardiomyopathies [26,29]. In addition to the pleiotropic nature of the SCN5A gene, intrafamilial phenotypic variability has been recently reported. Indeed, Balla et al. identified an SCN5A variant (p.Leu135Pro) in several family members with multiple cardiac diseases ranging from Brugada syndrome to arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy [30].
The association of myxomatous bilealflet MVP and the SCN5A gene has been reported twice. Missov et al. identified a mutation in the SCN5A gene in a female MVP patient with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and flail posterior leaflet leading to a severe eccentric MR [30]. The second reported patient by Mahajan et al. is a young adult woman as well (37 years old) with history of sudden cardiac arrest during a dance class. Two missense variants have been identified in this patient in SCN5A and LMNA genes [31]. Of note, our index case is 42 years old and her daughter (subject II-2) presented her first arrhythmic event at the age of 11 years old.
The SCN5A:p.(Ala572Asp) found in the present family has been studied by Tester et al. in order to assess its pathogenicity and contribution to the physiopathology of Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) [24]. Functional studies showed no gating kinetic or current density differences compared with wild-type channels when Asp572 was studied in the background of His558. However, when expressed with Arg558, significant kinetics changes were found [24]. Moreover, a threefold increase in late/persistent sodium current and slower time constants of recovery from inactivation were observed [24]. The authors have concluded that the presence of the p.His558Arg polymorphism along with the p.Ala572Asp variant produced Nav1.5 channels with moderate to altered LQT3-like gain-of-function properties [24].
Furthermore, the SCN5A:p.Ala572Asp mutation has been found in approximately 3% of European torsades de pointes–positive congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction cases compared to 0.7% of European controls [32,33]. More interestingly, the same mutation has been identified in 1.6% of female SCD cases compared with 0.27% of controls [32,34]. Thus, SCN5A:p.Ala572Asp seemed to be overrepresented in female proarrhythmic cases.
Ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias were associated with complications of MVP [1,8,35]. Indeed, about 66% of MVP patients have a higher prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias (34%) with premature ventricular contractions as the most common pattern [35,36]. In addition, early repolarization and QT dispersion have been documented in MVP cases and suggested as arrhythmogenic factors [2,37].
Hourdain et al. reported the largest cohort of resuscitated patients with SCD in whom MVP was the only detectable cause [9]. MR has been demonstrated to be an independent arrhythmogenic risk factor. Nevertheless, polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the posterior papillary muscle with typical prolonged duration were reported as frequent and represented the main ventricular arrhythmia triggers. Long-term follow-up revealed the recurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias in those patients [9].
In the present family study, WES data were analyzed with a primary focus on genes related to MVP such as DCHS1 and DZIP1 but also on genes implicated in valvular and aortic defects. The only relevant variants found are SCN5A:p.(Ala572Asp) and SCN5A:p.(His558Arg).
In light of these findings, we hypothesized that the genetic substrate of arrhythmic MVP leading to life-threatening arrhythmias could be attributed to variants in the cardiac sodium channel.
In conclusion, MVP is an underestimated cause of arrhythmic SCD, mostly in young adult women. Genetic testing may play a crucial role to help stratify patients for more personalized clinical management and to identify at-risk family members early.

4. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and to the ethical standards of the first author’s institutional review board (Registration number: 2016-A00958-53).

4.1. Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)

Peripheral blood sample was collected after obtaining written informed consent from all family members included in this study or their guardians. Genomic DNA was extracted by standard techniques.
Family based WES was performed using the NimbleGen SeqCap EZ MedExome kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche Sequencing Solutions, Madison, MI, USA). Paired-end 150 bp reads from the DNA libraries were sequenced using Illumina NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Raw fastQ files were aligned to the hg19 reference human genome (University of California Santa Cruz, UCSC) using the maximum exact matches algorithm in BWA software. Alignment quality was evaluated using Qualimap 2.2.1.
Variant calling and annotation were performed using GATK and ANNOVAR best practices, respectively. Variant annotation and exome analysis were performed with VarAFT software, version 2.17 (http://varaft.eu, accessed on 15 July 2022).

4.2. In Silico Analysis Tools

Variant Prioritization

Variant prioritization was carried out using Variant Annotation and Filtering Tool (VarAFT http://varaft.eu/, accessed on 15 July 2022). A pedigree-based analysis was performed considering autosomal dominance and recessivity as well as X-linked dominance and recessivity patterns of inheritance.
A pedigree-based analysis was performed considering both “common disease-rare variant” and “common disease-common variant” hypotheses. Our strategy was driven by the high prevalence of the MVP in the general population. Thus, we removed non-coding and synonymous variants, and no frequency filter was applied.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z. and H.J.; methodology, H.J.; validation, S.Z.; clinical investigation of the patients and family members, A.T., H.M., J.H., K.N., R.H., J.-C.D., F.C. and J.-F.A.; analysis and interpretation of data, H.J., A.T. and J.-F.A.; molecular investigation and in silico analysis, H.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M. and H.J.; writing—review and editing, H.J., A.T. and S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the “Association Française contre les Myopathies-AFM Telethon” (MoThARD-Project; #23408), and the “Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale” to S.Z. This research received no specific grant from commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee “Comité Protection des Patients-Sud” (Approval n°13.061).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the family for their collaboration. We thank the Centre de Ressources Biologiques at the Timone Enfant Hospital for the extraction and storage of patient DNA samples. H.J. received postdoctoral fellowships from the “Association Française contre les Myopathies-AFM Telethon”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Delling, F.N.; Vasan, R.S. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of mitral valve prolapse: New insights into disease progression, genetics, and molecular basis. Circulation 2014, 129, 2158–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ahmed, M.; Roshdy, A.; Sharma, R.; Fletcher, N. Sudden cardiac arrest and coexisting mitral valve prolapse: A case report and literature review. Echo Res. Pract. 2016, 3, D1–D8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kukavica, D.; Guglielmo, M.; Baggiano, A.; Muscogiuri, G.; Fusini, L.; Muratori, M.; Tamborini, G.; Mantegazza, V.; Trancuccio, A.; Arnò, C.; et al. Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Introducing an Era of Multimodality Imaging-Based Diagnosis and Risk Stratification. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parwani, P.; Avierinos, J.-F.; Levine, R.A.; Delling, F.N. Mitral Valve Prolapse: Multimodality Imaging and Genetic Insights. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 60, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Trenkwalder, T.; Krane, M. Mitral valve prolapse: Will genetics finally solve the puzzle? Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 1681–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Althunayyan, A.; Petersen, S.E.; Lloyd, G.; Bhattacharyya, S. Mitral valve prolapse. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2019, 17, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Coutsoumbas, G.V.; Di Pasquale, G. Mitral valve prolapse with ventricular arrhythmias: Does it carries a worse prognosis? Eur. Heart J. Suppl. 2021, 23, E77–E82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Basso, C.; Marra, M.P.; Rizzo, S.; De Lazzari, M.; Giorgi, B.; Cipriani, A.; Frigo, A.C.; Rigato, I.; Migliore, F.; Pilichou, K.; et al. Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation 2015, 132, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hourdain, J.; Clavel, M.A.; Deharo, J.-C.; Asirvatham, S.; Avierinos, J.F.; Habib, G.; Franceschi, F.; Probst, V.; Sadoul, N.; Martins, R.; et al. Common Phenotype in Patients With Mitral Valve Prolapse Who Experienced Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation 2018, 138, 1067–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sriram, C.S.; Syed, F.F.; Ferguson, M.E.; Johnson, J.N.; Enriquez-Sarano, M.; Cetta, F.; Cannon, B.C.; Asirvatham, S.J.; Ackerman, M.J. Malignant bileaflet mitral valve prolapse syndrome in patients with otherwise idiopathic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Delling, F.N.; Rong, J.; Larson, M.G.; Lehman, B.; Osypiuk, E.; Stantchev, P.; Slaugenhaupt, S.A.; Benjamin, E.J.; Levine, R.A.; Vasan, R.S. Familial Clustering of Mitral Valve Prolapse in the Community. Circulation 2015, 131, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Durst, R.; Sauls, K.; Peal, D.S.; deVlaming, A.; Toomer, K.; Leyne, M.; Salani, M.; Talkowski, M.E.; Brand, H.; Perrocheau, M.; et al. Mutations in DCHS1 cause mitral valve prolapse. Nature 2015, 525, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Devereux, R.B.; Brown, W.T.; Kramer-Fox, R.; Sachs, I. Inheritance of mitral valve prolapse: Effect of age and sex on gene expression. Ann. Intern. Med. 1982, 97, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Disse, S.; Abergel, E.; Berrebi, A.; Houot, A.M.; Le Heuzey, J.Y.; Diebold, B.; Guize, L.; Carpentier, A.; Corvol, P.; Jeunemaitre, X. Mapping of a first locus for autosomal dominant myxomatous mitral-valve prolapse to chromosome 16p11.2-p12.1. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 65, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Freed, L.A.; Acierno, J.S.; Dai, D.; Leyne, M.; Marshall, J.E.; Nesta, F.; Levine, R.A.; Slaugenhaupt, S.A. A locus for autosomal dominant mitral valve prolapse on chromosome 11p15.4. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 72, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nesta, F.; Leyne, M.; Yosefy, C.; Simpson, C.; Dai, D.; Marshall, J.E.; Hung, J.; Slaugenhaupt, S.A.; Levine, R.A. New locus for autosomal dominant mitral valve prolapse on chromosome 13: Clinical insights from genetic studies. Circulation 2005, 112, 2022–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Toomer, K.A.; Yu, M.; Fulmer, D.; Guo, L.; Moore, K.S.; Moore, R.; Drayton, K.D.; Glover, J.; Peterson, N.; Ramos-Ortiz, S.; et al. Primary cilia defects causing mitral valve prolapse. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaax0290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kyndt, F.; Schott, J.J.; Trochu, J.N.; Baranger, F.; Herbert, O.; Scott, V.; Fressinaud, E.; David, A.; Moisan, J.P.; Bouhour, J.B.; et al. Mapping of X-linked myxomatous valvular dystrophy to chromosome Xq28. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998, 62, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Le Tourneau, T.; Mérot, J.; Rimbert, A.; Le Scouarnec, S.; Probst, V.; Le Marec, H.; Levine, R.A.; Schott, J.-J. Genetics of syndromic and non-syndromic mitral valve prolapse. Heart 2018, 104, 978–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lang, R.M.; Badano, L.P.; Mor-Avi, V.; Afilalo, J.; Armstrong, A.; Ernande, L.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Foster, E.; Goldstein, S.A.; Kuznetsova, T.; et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 1–39.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lancellotti, P.; Moura, L.; Pierard, L.A.; Agricola, E.; Popescu, B.A.; Tribouilloy, C.; Hagendorff, A.; Monin, J.-L.; Badano, L.; Zamorano, J.L.; et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2010, 11, 307–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lizotte, E.; Junttila, M.J.; Dube, M.P.; Hong, K.; Benito, B.; DE Zutter, M.; Henkens, S.; Sarkozy, A.; Huikuri, H.V.; Towbin, J.; et al. Genetic modulation of brugada syndrome by a common polymorphism. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2009, 20, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Poelzing, S.; Forleo, C.; Samodell, M.; Dudash, L.; Sorrentino, S.; Anaclerio, M.; Troccoli, R.; Iacoviello, M.; Romito, R.; Guida, P.; et al. SCN5A polymorphism restores trafficking of a Brugada syndrome mutation on a separate gene. Circulation 2006, 114, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Tester, D.J.; Valdivia, C.; Harris-Kerr, C.; Alders, M.; Salisbury, B.A.; Wilde, A.A.M.; Makielski, J.C.; Ackerman, M.J. Epidemiologic, molecular, and functional evidence suggest A572D-SCN5A should not be considered an independent LQT3-susceptibility mutation. Heart Rhythm 2010, 7, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Gui, J.; Wang, T.; Trump, D.; Zimmer, T.; Lei, M. Mutation-specific effects of polymorphism H558R in SCN5A-related sick sinus syndrome. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2010, 21, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, W.; Yin, L.; Shen, C.; Hu, K.; Ge, J.; Sun, A. SCN5A Variants: Association with Cardiac Disorders. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qureshi, S.F.; Ali, A.; John, P.; Jadhav, A.P.; Venkateshwari, A.; Rao, H.; Jayakrishnan, M.P.; Narasimhan, C.; Shenthar, J.; Thangaraj, K.; et al. Mutational analysis of SCN5A gene in long QT syndrome. Meta Gene 2015, 6, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mazzaccara, C.; Limongelli, G.; Petretta, M.; Vastarella, R.; Pacileo, G.; Bonaduce, D.; Salvatore, F.; Frisso, G. A common polymorphism in the SCN5A gene is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 19, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Balla, C.; Mele, D.; Vitali, F.; Andreoli, C.; Tonet, E.; Sanchini, M.; Ferlini, A.; Rapezzi, C.; Gualandi, F.; Bertini, M. Novel SCN5A Variant Shows Multiple Phenotypic Expression in the Same Family. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2021, 14, e003481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Missov, E.; Cogswell, R. Sudden cardiac death, mitral valve prolapse, and long QT syndrome. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, e37–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mahajan, A.M.; Itan, Y.; Cerrone, M.; Horowitz, J.; Borneman, L.; Chinitz, L.; Jankelson, L. Sudden Cardiac Arrest in a Patient With Mitral Valve Prolapse and LMNA and SCN5A Mutations. JACC Case Rep. 2021, 3, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wilde, A.A.M.; Amin, A.S. Clinical Spectrum of SCN5A Mutations: Long QT Syndrome, Brugada Syndrome, and Cardiomyopathy. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018, 4, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Albert, C.M.; Nam, E.G.; Rimm, E.B.; Jin, H.W.; Hajjar, R.J.; Hunter, D.J.; MacRae, C.A.; Ellinor, P.T. Cardiac sodium channel gene variants and sudden cardiac death in women. Circulation 2008, 117, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Spartalis, M.; Tzatzaki, E.; Spartalis, E.; Athanasiou, A.; Moris, D.; Damaskos, C.; Garmpis, N.; Voudris, V. Mitral valve prolapse: An underestimated cause of sudden cardiac death—A current review of the literature. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017, 9, 5390–5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Noseworthy, P.A.; Asirvatham, S.J. The Knot That Binds Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation 2015, 132, 551–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Narayanan, K.; Uy-Evanado, A.; Teodorescu, C.; Reinier, K.; Nichols, G.A.; Gunson, K.; Jui, J.; Chugh, S.S. Mitral valve prolapse and sudden cardiac arrest in the community. Heart Rhythm 2016, 13, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Turker, Y.; Ozaydin, M.; Acar, G.; Ozgul, M.; Hoscan, Y.; Varol, E.; Dogan, A.; Erdogan, D.; Yucel, H. Predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2010, 26, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The 12 leads ECG at rest of the index case: a normal T wave inversion is present in the precordial leads V1 and V2 (QTc = 432 ms).
Figure 1. The 12 leads ECG at rest of the index case: a normal T wave inversion is present in the precordial leads V1 and V2 (QTc = 432 ms).
Ijms 23 14447 g001
Figure 2. Echocardiography of the index case (A), the affected daughter (II-2) (B), and the oldest daughter with a prodromal MVP (II-1) (C). LV: left ventricle; LA: left atrium; Ao: aorta; MVP: mitral valve prolapse.
Figure 2. Echocardiography of the index case (A), the affected daughter (II-2) (B), and the oldest daughter with a prodromal MVP (II-1) (C). LV: left ventricle; LA: left atrium; Ao: aorta; MVP: mitral valve prolapse.
Ijms 23 14447 g002
Figure 3. Family pedigree and integrative genomics viewer visualization showing the p.(Ala572Asp) and p.(His558Arg) in the SCN5A gene.
Figure 3. Family pedigree and integrative genomics viewer visualization showing the p.(Ala572Asp) and p.(His558Arg) in the SCN5A gene.
Ijms 23 14447 g003
Figure 4. Parasternal long axis view ruling out any mitral valve prolapse (A). Mitral valve leaflets are thin without chordae elongation. Parasternal long axis view with color Doppler ruling out any mitral regurgitation in systole (B).
Figure 4. Parasternal long axis view ruling out any mitral valve prolapse (A). Mitral valve leaflets are thin without chordae elongation. Parasternal long axis view with color Doppler ruling out any mitral regurgitation in systole (B).
Ijms 23 14447 g004
Figure 5. Sanger sequencing electropherogram showing the SCN5A:p.(His558Arg) polymorphism. The wild-type p.Ala572 residue is indicated by a green arrow.
Figure 5. Sanger sequencing electropherogram showing the SCN5A:p.(His558Arg) polymorphism. The wild-type p.Ala572 residue is indicated by a green arrow.
Ijms 23 14447 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaouadi, H.; Théron, A.; Hourdain, J.; Martel, H.; Nguyen, K.; Habachi, R.; Deharo, J.-C.; Collart, F.; Avierinos, J.-F.; Zaffran, S. SCN5A Variants as Genetic Arrhythmias Triggers for Familial Bileaflet Mitral Valve Prolapse. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214447

AMA Style

Jaouadi H, Théron A, Hourdain J, Martel H, Nguyen K, Habachi R, Deharo J-C, Collart F, Avierinos J-F, Zaffran S. SCN5A Variants as Genetic Arrhythmias Triggers for Familial Bileaflet Mitral Valve Prolapse. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(22):14447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaouadi, Hager, Alexis Théron, Jérôme Hourdain, Hélène Martel, Karine Nguyen, Raja Habachi, Jean-Claude Deharo, Frédéric Collart, Jean-François Avierinos, and Stéphane Zaffran. 2022. "SCN5A Variants as Genetic Arrhythmias Triggers for Familial Bileaflet Mitral Valve Prolapse" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 22: 14447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop