Next Article in Journal
Connexin 43: A Target for the Treatment of Inflammation in Secondary Complications of the Kidney and Eye in Diabetes
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of Seedling-Stage Soybean Responses to PEG-Simulated Drought Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Insulin Clearance in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Maize DNA Methylation in Response to Drought Stress Is Involved in Target Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Melatonin Promotes SGT1-Involved Signals to Ameliorate Drought Stress Adaption in Rice

1
College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Chinese National Center for Rice Improvement, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310029, China
3
Crop Breeding and Cultivation Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(2), 599; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020599
Submission received: 9 December 2021 / Revised: 3 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Control of Plant Drought Tolerance)

Abstract

:
Drought has become one of the environmental threats to agriculture and food security. Applications of melatonin (MT) serve as an effective way to alleviate drought stress, but the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we found that foliar spray of 100-µM MT greatly mitigated the severe drought stress-induced damages in rice seedlings, including improved survival rates, enhanced antioxidant system, and adjusted osmotic balance. However, mutation of the suppressor of the G2 allele of skp1 (OsSGT1) and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 (OsABI5) abolished the effects of MT. Furthermore, the upregulated expression of OsABI5 was detected in wild type (WT) under drought stress, irrespective of MT treatment, whereas OsABI5 was significantly downregulated in sgt1 and sgt1abi5 mutants. In contrast, no change of the OsSGT1 expression level was detected in abi5. Moreover, mutation of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 significantly suppressed the expression of genes associated with the antioxidant system. These results suggested that the functions of OsSGT1 in the MT-mediated alleviation of drought stress were associated with the ABI5-mediated signals. Collectively, we demonstrated that OsSGT1 was involved in the drought response of rice and that melatonin promoted SGT1-involved signals to ameliorate drought stress adaption.

1. Introduction

Plants being sessile are particularly susceptible to various stressful environments, including abiotic stress (i.e., drought, chilling, heavy metal, etc.) and biotic stress (i.e., insect and disease damages) [1,2]. The supply of adequate soil moisture is essential for plant growth, while water shortage greatly restrict the plant developmental process [3,4]. In recent years, with the frequent climate extremes, drought stress episodes have intensified crop production worldwide, especially in drought-prone arid and semiarid areas [5]. Therefore, drought is becoming a daunting challenge for global agriculture [6]. For example, it has been announced that China is now a drought-effect country, with a 14.7% drought-induced economic loss of the total GDP in the past decade [7]. Thus, drought has become one of the environmental threats to agriculture and food security.
Drought stress can induce the hyperaccumulation of oxidant products [8,9], i.e., reactive oxygen species (ROS), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide (O2), leading to oxidative damages to cell constitutes [10]. Plants have evolved a set of antioxidant systems to protect plants from drought damages [11], including enzymatic ones, i.e., superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6), ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC 1.11.1.11), and glutathione reductase (GR, EC 1.6.4.2), and nonenzymatic molecules, i.e., glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid (ASA). Moreover, some osmolytes, i.e., soluble sugar and proline, are also triggered to adjust leaf moisture levels through stomatal movement under drought stress [12].
Various strategies aimed to enhance the antioxidant system serve as effective ways to combat drought stress. Although many abiotic stress-associated genes have been identified in plants, the efforts to improve drought tolerance have mostly failed by using genetic engineering strategy [2], which is also probably limited by the current national legislation. Nonetheless, exogenous applications of various chemicals are also effective and commonly used ways to ameliorate adaptions to drought stress, such as nanoparticles [13], abscisic acid (ABA) [14], glutathione [15], melatonin (MT) [6,16], and free proline [17]. Until now, the alleviated effects of melatonin on drought adaption have been well-documented in many plants. Thus, melatonin has recently attracted more attention and is thought to be a potential multifunctional biomolecule for tolerant drought stress [6].
The studies conducted so far on the potential of melatonin to alleviate drought stress mainly focused on the improved photosystem capacity [9] and the enhanced antioxidants for ROS scavenging in various species [16]. For example, enhanced efficiency of photosystem II and increased photosynthesis after foliar spraying with MT have been found in several cereal crops, such as wheat [9], soybean [18,19], and maize [20]. Besides, reduced ROS accumulation via a regulated antioxidant system serves as another key indicator to explain the mitigating effects of melatonin on drought stress [16,21]. Aside from these effects, phytohormone-mediated signals were also usually thought to be responsible for the melatonin-alleviated effects on drought stress. Melatonin cross talks with other plant hormones, i.e., indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), ABA, gibberellins (GA), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA), to drive system-acquired response to various stresses [22,23,24]. Among them, ABA has been widely reported to serve as one vital signalling molecule under drouth stress conditions in many plants, whose effect is largely associated with the enhanced antioxidant system [14,25]. Interestingly, melatonin antagonistically interacts with ABA to alleviate drought stress [26,27] while promoting the synthesis of other hormones, i.e., SA, JA, even under drought stress [6,19].
Despite these findings, the mechanisms underlying the alleviating effects of melatonin on drought stress in rice remains largely unknown. Rice is one of the most important staple food crops to feed the global population, especially in Asian countries [28]. Because of its semiaquatic patterns, rice growth requires a relatively high soil moisture level [29], while water deficiency causes depressed seedling growth and reduced rice productivity [3,4]. However, due to the varying water availability in the planting environments, it is still a breeding challenge to improve the drought tolerance of rice cultivars via breeding strategies [28,30] or applications of exogenous compounds, i.e., glutathione [15], proline [17], and others. Nonetheless, there are limited reports on the melatonin-induced adaption to drought stress in rice. Interestingly, SGT1 (termed suppressor of the G2 allele of skp1) plays vital roles in plant disease resistance (R) [31,32], salt tolerance [33,34], and heat tolerance [35,36]. We found that mutation of OsSGT1, one homologous cochaperone of SGT1, caused ROS accumulation and negatively affected the photosynthetic capacity of rice seedlings under drought stress, even with melatonin treatments. Therefore, we further aim to examine how melatonin ameliorates drought adaption through an SGT1-mediated signal, which would provide crucial guidance in applying melatonin in rice production.

2. Results

2.1. Determination of Optimal Concentration of Melatonin on Drought Stress

To investigate the effects of drought stress on the survival rates of seedlings, various degrees of drought stress conditions, including 100% field capacity (FC; control), 80% FC (slight), 60% FC (mild), 40% FC (middle), and 25% FC (severe), were employed to treat seedlings of wild-type (WT). Within the investigated time, compared with the control (CK), all levels of drought stress negatively affected the survival rates of seedlings. Compared with control, the survival rates were greatly reduced by 11.99%, 46.11% and 75.51% under 80% FC, 60% FC, 40% FC conditions, respectively (Figure S1). Nonetheless, there was little difference in survival rates between control and the slight conditions of 80% FC, while the severe drought stress of 25% FC caused 74.57–90.03% decreases in survival rates, compared to CK (Figure S1).
We next select 25% FC to assess the optimal concentration of melatonin needed to improve drought tolerance. Various concentrations of melatonin, including 50-, 100-, 200-, and 1000-µM melatonin, were used in foliar spraying applications on seedlings under drought stress. Compared with the single drought-stressed ones, all the employed melatonin concentrations showed improvements in seedlings’ survival rates (Figure S2). Among them, applications of 50-µM melatonin had slight effects on the survival rates, while high concentrations of 1000-µM melatonin had minimal, even lower than with 50-µM (Figure S2). In contrast, both 100- and 200-µM melatonin significantly increased seedling survival rates, and no appreciable difference in those rates were found between them (Figure S2). Since 25% FC had the most severe effects on survival rates of seedlings, and the application of 100-µM melatonin was effective in countering the effects of drought stress on the survival rates of seedlings, the 100-µM melatonin concentration was eventually used as the optimal concentration to ameliorate severe drought stress (drought).

2.2. Effects of Melatonin on the Seedling Performance in sgt1 Mutants under Drought Stress

Drought stress usually inhibits seedling growth and disrupts photosynthesis and physiological metabolism. Melatonin has been reported to mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on seedlings [6,16]. To determine whether the OsSGT1 mutation affected the mitigating effects of melatonin on seedlings’ growth under drought stress, plant phenotypes, stomatal aperture, survival rates, plants height, fresh weight, relative water contents (RWC), chlorophyll (Chl.) contents and photosynthetic rates (Pn) were investigated in WT and sgt1 mutants. Drought stress conditions led to the inhibited seedlings growth (Figure 1a), closure of stoma (Figure 1b), and lower stomatal conductance (Figure 1c), and also significantly decreased the entire investigated index (Figure 1d–h; Figure S3), both in WT and sgt1. Significantly, compared with the control, the survival rates were decreased by 46.12% and 59.3% in WT and sgt1, respectively (Figure 1d), while RWC were reduced by 67.28% and 66.76% in WT and sgt1, respectively (Figure 1f). Moreover, the contents of chlorophylls and the photosynthetic rates under drought stress were significantly lower than control (Figure 1g,h). These results suggested that the seedling growth was greatly suppressed under drought stress.
Notably, after applications of foliar spraying with MT, the seedings’ growth in WT was significantly restored, though still weaker than CK, and stoma remained opening (Figure 1a–c,e; Figure S3). All other investigated physiological attributes of WT were also significantly increased in the presence of MT treatment, compared to untreated ones (Figure 1d,f–h). In contrast, under drought stress, no significant difference was detected in the seedling performance in sgt1 mutants, irrespective of MT feeding, suggesting that the OsSGT1 mutation greatly affected the alleviating effects of melatonin on drought-stressed seedling growth (Figure 1d,f–h).
In addition, drought stress caused the increased contents of free proline and soluble sugar (SS) in WT, indicating that drought stress led to osmotic stress, and compared with the control, the melatonin treatment significantly suppressed their contents (Figure S4). However, under drought conditions, proline and soluble sugar contents in sgt1 remained at higher levels than in CK, irrespective of the MT treatment (Figure S4). These results suggested that under drought stress, the OsSGT1 mutation led to an accumulation of proline and soluble sugar, even in the conditions of melatonin treatment, which would cause osmotic stress.

2.3. Effects of Melatonin on the Oxidative Damages in sgt1 Mutants under Drought Stress

Osmotic stress caused by drought stress disrupts the redox homeostasis, which eventually causes the accumulation of oxidant products. Melatonin has been widely reported to suppress the drought stress-induced production of ROS [10]. Thus, to detect the effects of OsSGT1 mutation on the melatonin mitigated effects under drought stress, contents of the oxidant products, including MDA, H2O2, and O2, were measured in WT and sgt1. Under nonstressed conditions, no significant difference was detected in the content of oxidant products between WT and sgt1 (Figure 2). However, under drought stress conditions, compared with the control, the contents of MDA and H2O2 and the O2 production rates were significantly increased in both WT and sgt1 (Figure 2). After the MT treatment, all the investigated index was significantly decreased under drought stress in WT, though still higher than CK (Figure 2). However, under drought stress conditions, the content of MDA and H2O2, and the O2 production rates, there was no significant change in sgt1 mutants, regardless of whether melatonin treatment was administered (Figure 2). These results indicate that melatonin can suppress the drought stress-induced production of oxidant products, which failed in the absence of OsSGT1.

2.4. Effects of Melatonin on the Antioxidant Activity under Drought Stress

Oxidative products, i.e., H2O2, could activate the antioxidant system to maintain redox homeostasis, but excess accumulation would damage the antioxidant system [37]. Melatonin is thought to promote the antioxidant system to scavenge ROS, even under severe drought stress, such as 25% FC [38]. To detect whether the mutation of OsSGT1 affected the promoted effects of melatonin on antioxidant system under drought stress, activities of the enzymatic SOD, CAT, APX, GR, and content of the nonenzymatic ASA and GSH, were further investigated. There was no significant difference in the antioxidant systems detected between WT and sgt1 mutants under unstressed conditions (Figure 3). After being transferred to conditions of drought stress, activities of SOD, CAT, APX, GR in WT were greatly decreased, compared with CK, whereas in the presence of MT treatment, their activities were restored by 68.34–81.14%, a significant improvement similar to CK levels, though still lower (Figure 3). In contrast, no significant difference was found in sgt1-1 and sgt1-2 mutants under drought stress, irrespective of the MT treatment, displaying weaker activities than CK (Figure 3).
Accordingly, similar trends were seen in the contents of ASA and GSH. Under drought stress, contents of ASA and GSH were significantly decreased in WT seedlings but greatly restored, up to 62.68% and 75.79% compared with CK, after the MT treatment (Figure 3). In contrast, although decreased contents of ASA and GSH were detected in sgt1 mutants under drought stress, the treatment of melatonin had no significant effect on them (Figure 3). These results indicated that melatonin can greatly alleviate the damages of drought stress to the antioxidant system but can be significantly affected by the mutation of OsSGT1.

2.5. Effects of Melatonin on the Synthesis of Endogenous ABA, SA and JA under Drought Stress

Melatonin has been well-documented to tolerate drought stress via the crosstalk with other phytohormones, i.e., ABA, SA, and JA [37]. To further detect the effects of OsSGT1 mutation on the crosstalk of MT with other phytohormones under drought stress, contents of ABA, JA, and SA were investigated. Under optimal conditions, no significant differences in the three investigated phytohormones were found between WT and sgt1 mutants (Figure 4). However, compared with CK, the ABA content was significantly increased under drought stress, by 4.79 folds and 3.29–3.94 folds in WT and sgt1, respectively, whereas the contents of SA and JA were significantly decreased in both WT and sgt1 mutant (Figure 4). In contrast, the MT treatment greatly restored the contents of ABA, SA, and JA, almost to the levels of CK, in WT but had no effect in sgt1-1 and sgt1-2 mutants (Figure 4). This suggests that the mutation of OsSGT1 affected MT-induced synthesis of endogenous ABA, JA, and SA under drought stress.
Expressions of ABA-, JA- and SA-associated signalling genes were also investigated, including abscisic acid insensitive 5 (OsABI5), basic helix-Loop-helix protein 6 (OsbHLH6), and myelocytomatosis oncogene transcription factor 2 (OsMYC2). Consequently, upregulated OsABI5 expression and downregulated expression of OsbHLH6 and OsMYC2 were detected in WT under drought stress. The treatment of MT led to a restored expression of all three investigated genes even under conditions of drought stress (Figure 4). Specifically, MT-induced OsABI5 expression was even higher than under-drought stress, where no significant difference in the expression of OsABI5, OsMYC2, and OsbHLH6 was detected in sgt1-1 and sgt1-2 mutants, irrespective of MT treatment (Figure 4). All these results indicated that the mutation of OsSGT1 had significant effects on the interrelationship of MT with other phytohormones under drought stress.

2.6. Effects of Dual Mutation of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 on the Melatonin-Alleviated Drought Stress

ABI5 serves as ABA-mediated signalling under various environmental stresses [37,39]. The above results showed that drought stress led to increased ABA content and upregulated expression of OsABI5. Following the treatment with melatonin, the decreased contents of ABA was not consistent with the higher expression of OsABI5, which was abolished by the mutation of OsSGT1 (Figure 4). Therefore, to clarify the relationship between OsSGT1 and OsABI5 under drought stress, we investigated the seedlings’ performance in abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants. The seedlings of abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 showed weak growth and decreased survival rates under drought stress, irrespective of melatonin treatment (Figure 5a,b). In addition, compared with CK, the ABA contents were significantly increased in abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants under drought stress, but no significant difference was detected after melatonin treatment (Figure 5c).
Moreover, under drought stress, OsSGT1 showed higher expression levels than CK and even reached the highest expression levels after MT treatment, despite showing no significant difference in WT, abi5, and sgt1-1abi5 seedlings (Figure 5d). However, in sgt1-1abi5-1 and sgt1-1abi5-2 mutants, there was no significant change in OsABI5 expression levels detected under drought stress, even after melatonin treatments (Figure 5e). These results suggested that mutations of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 affected the alleviating effects of melatonin on drought stress.
Oxidant products and antioxidant systems were further investigated in abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 to detect the relationship between OsSGT1 and OsABI5 during drought stress. Compared with CK, contents of MDA/H2O2 were increased by 2.75–2.81/1.94–1.95-folds and 2.48–2.82/1.92–1.97-folds in abi5 and sgt1-1abi5, respectively (Figure S5). Similarly, the production rates of O2 was also greatly induced in abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 under drought stress compared to CK (Figure S5). Nonetheless, no significant difference in the investigated oxidant products was detected after melatonin treatments in both of abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants (Figure S5). Activities of the antioxidant system showed antagonistic dynamic changes in the performance of oxidant products (Figure S6). Although no difference in the antioxidant system was detected between WT and the mutants of abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 under unstressed conditions, activities of SOD, CAT, APX, GR, as well as the contents of GSH and ASA, were significantly decreased in abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants under drought stress, even in the melatonin-treated ones (Figure S6). These results indicated that mutation of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 affected the alleviated effects of melatonin on drought stress via the disrupted antioxidant system.

2.7. Effects of Exogenous ABA Feeding on the Expression Levels of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 under Drought Stress

To further detect the effects of ABA on the OsSGT1-involved drought adaption, expression of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 were investigated after feeding with exogenous ABA in sgt1, abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants. Compared with CK, expression of OsABI5 was significantly induced by exogenous feeding of ABA and remained consistent expression or became even much higher expression in WT and sgt1 after drought stress (Figure 6). By contrast, in dual mutants of sgt1-1abi5-1 and sgt1-1abi5-2, the expression of OsABI5 showed no significantly different expression, irrespective of ABA feeding and drought stress treatments (Figure 6). However, there was no significant difference in the OsSGT1 expression levels found in all investigated seedlings under non-stressed conditions, no matter ABA treatment or not, though the higher expression of OsSGT1 under drought stress were found in WT, abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 as compared to CK (Figure 6). Thus, the ABA feeding greatly promoted the expression of OsABI5 but had no effects on OsSGT1, while the mutation of OsSGT1 largely affected the OsABI5 expression, indicating that melatonin promoted OsSGT1 signals to induce the expression of OsABI5 via an ABA-independent way under drought stress.

2.8. Effects of Dual Mutation of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 on the Melatonin-Induced Expression of Antioxidant Genes under Drought Stress

Expression of antioxidant responsive genes, including superoxide dismutase A1 (OsSODA1), peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase 4 (OsAPX4), glutathione reductase 2 (OsGR2), and catalase 2 (OsCAT2), were further investigated to confirm the effects of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 on the antioxidant system. Compared with CK, in WT, expressions of the four investigated genes were significantly upregulated under drought stress while becoming even higher after melatonin treatment (Figure 7). In sharp contrast to WT, drought stress greatly down-regulated the expression of OsSODA1, OsCAT2, OsAPX4 and OsGR2 in sgt1-1 and sgt1-2 mutants, irrespective of MT treatment (Figure 7). Moreover, in abi5 mutants, as wells as the dual mutants of sgt1-1abi5, there was no significant difference in the expression level of these genes, irrespective of the drought stress and melatonin treatment (Figure 7). These results indicated that the effects of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 on the antioxidant system were tightly associated with the expression of antioxidant responsive genes, i.e., OsSODA1, OsCAT2, OsAPX4 and OsGR2.

3. Discussion

3.1. Melatonin Alleviates Drought Stress to Promote Seedling Growth

Drought stress damages seedlings’ growth through the over-excessed accumulation of ROS [8,10], which can also lead to the disruption of the antioxidant system [16] and photosynthetic capacity [9]. Applications of MT can effectively alleviate the drought damages in many agricultural crops, such as wheat [9], maize [20], soybean [18,19], rapeseed [21], and cotton [40]. However, limited reports have been shown in rice. We here reported that drought stress induced the retarded growth of seedlings or even lethal phenotypes, whereas foliar spray applications of 100-µM MT greatly mitigated the severe drought stress-induced damages to rice seedlings (Figure 1, Figures S1–S4). Consistent with previous reports, the alleviated effects of melatonin on drought stress in this study were mainly focused on the following aspects, including (i) the improved capacity of the photosynthetic system (Figure 1g,h), (ii) the restored stomatal phenotype and conductance (Figure 1b,c) and water utilization (Figure 1f), (iii) the enhanced antioxidant system (Figure 3), and (iv) the adjusted osmotic substances, i.e., ABA, SS and free proline (Figure 4 and Figure 5; Figure S4). Inhibited growth of the plant was largely attributed to the essential role of water in cell turgor [2]. Melatonin can enhance the stomatal conductance to improve the availability of water to ameliorate drought adaption [41,42]. We also found that melatonin significantly increased the RWC of seedlings (Figure 1f) and maintained the stomatal conductance (Figure 1b,c), suggesting that the alleviated effects of melatonin on drought stress was associated with stoma movement.
Accumulation of osmolytes, such as SS and proline, was expected to adjust osmotic stress during drought stress [12]. Subsequently, some studies also reported that enhanced soluble sugars were detected after the treatment of melatonin [43]. Others demonstrated that accumulated osmolytes caused osmotic stress under abiotic stress, which was related to the redox homeostasis by exogenous melatonin [44,45]. The current results were aligned with the latter studies, showing decreased accumulation of SS and proline after the MT treatment under severe drought stress (Figure S4). Lei et al. [44] proposed that such MT-alleviated effects were not associated with osmotic adjustment. Besides, another possible explanation was that the disruption of ROS homeostasis under severe drought stress caused depressed functioning of cell metabolism.
The enhanced effects of melatonin on drought adaption have been well-documented via the enhanced antioxidant system in many plants [6]. The present study also found that foliar spray of melatonin to rice leaves greatly improved the activities of the antioxidant system (Figure 3) and vastly decreased the contents of oxidant products (Figure 2). Aside from enzymatic antioxidants, i.e., SOD, APX, CAT, and GR, the nonenzymatic ASA–GSH biosynthesis was also significantly increased after the melatonin treatment (Figure 3). ASA–GSH is associated with abiotic tolerance in higher plants [46], and the improved tolerance of wheat seedlings to drought stress has been reported to largely depend on the regulated ASA–GSH biosynthesis [14]. Our study validated these findings (Figure 1 and Figure 3), and we confirm that melatonin can mitigate the damages of drought stress to rice seedlings.

3.2. SGT1 Is Crucial for the Melatonin Alleviated Effects on Drought Stress

SGT1, firstly identified in yeast, is a suppressor of the G2 allele of skp1 and is highly conserved in plants and mammals [32]. It is involved in thermotolerance and has been shown to function in plant disease resistance (R) [31] and in response to various abiotic stresses, such as salt [33], heat [34,35,36], and drought [34]. BolSGT1 showed enhanced expression levels under drought treatment in Brassica oleracea [34]. We also found that the expression level of OsSGT1 was sensitive to drought stress in rice seedlings (Figure 5d and Figure 6). Although the applications of melatonin alleviated the effects of drought-induced damages to seedlings, the mutation of OsSGT1 greatly affected these melatonin-mitigated effects, leading to inhibition of the antioxidant system and accumulation of oxidant products (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3) and suggests its important roles under drought stress.
Moreover, following previous reports, our results suggest that OsSGT1 possibly serves as one module in melatonin-mediated signals and that melatonin responds to drought stress through the regulation of OsSGT1 because the OsSGT1 mutation essentially abolished the alleviating effects of melatonin, resulting in retarded growth, accumulation of ROS, etc. (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Another possible explanation was that melatonin had an effect on the expression level of OsSGT1 via affecting other phytohormones, such as ABA. However, accumulated contents of ABA did not alter the expression of OsSGT1 in abi5 and sgt1–1abi5 mutants and had no effect on OsSGT1 expression levels (Figure 5). This was also confirmed in the exogenous feeding of ABA treatments, where ABA produced no significant difference in OsSGT1 expression (Figure 6). Previous reports also demonstrated that the expression of OsSGT1 was not induced by ABA but by JA or SA [47]. As the plant signalling molecules, JA and SA have been well documented to play vital roles in response to various stresses, including drought [19]. Moreover, JA has been reported to control water loss via stomata adjustment [12], while SA also serves as a receptor to provide SGT1-involved signalling in Arabidopsis [32]. In the current study, SA, JA, and their mediated signals were significantly suppressed in sgt1 mutants, even after the melatonin treatments (Figure 4), suggesting the tight association of OsSGT1 with SA and JA. This study extends the roles of OsSGT1 and shows that SGT1 is vital to the melatonin-alleviated effects under drought stress.

3.3. The Ameliorated Effects of Melatonin on Drought Adaption Is Tightly Associated with SGT1-Involved Signals

Although it is widely recognized that melatonin mitigates drought stress in many plants [6], its molecular mechanism is still poorly understood. Nonetheless, some mechanisms have been proposed to explain the functions of melatonin under various abiotic stress. Hasan et al. [48] demonstrated that melatonin employed an enhanced antioxidant system and regulated sulfur metabolism to scavenge ROS and eventually enhance cadmium tolerance in tomato seedlings. Li et al. [49] reported that the alleviated effects of melatonin under low-temperature stress was primarily associated with ABI5-mediated signals, which further activate the antioxidant system. Recently, melatonin has been reported to antagonize with ABA to promote seed germination via Ca2+ efflux [50]. Therefore, since the antioxidant system usually acts as the scavengers of ROS under various stresses [6], melatonin-mediated tolerance to stress greatly depends on redox homeostasis.
Although significant levels of ROS leading to mild oxidative stress is beneficial to stress tolerance, excessive ROS would damage cellular components and affect plant development through the alternations of cellular redox homeostasis [51]. SGT1 is involved in the tolerance to various stress, including drought [34], but whether its function in drought stress is ROS-dependent has not yet been revealed in rice. We found that OsSGT1 was greatly induced under drought stress, even after melatonin treatment (Figure 5). Thus, we proposed that SGT1 is involved in regulating antioxidant system-associated genes (ASAGs) to realize MT-enhanced tolerance to drought stress. This was confirmed with the results from the mutation of OsSGT1. Mutation of OsSGT1 significantly repressed the antioxidant system (Figure 3) via downregulated expression of ASAGs (Figure 7). However, as a chaperone protein [32], SGT1 cannot directly bind to the promoters to regulate gene expression.
Previous reports showed that melatonin mitigated abiotic stress through ABI5-regulated expression of antioxidant genes, i.e., OsCAT2, which encodes the CAT enzyme [49]. Interestingly, in the current study, the mutation of OsSGT1 greatly depressed the expression of OsABI5, but not in versus (Figure 5 and Figure 6), suggesting that roles of OsSGT1 in drought stress may be realized through OsABI5. Moreover, dual mutation of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 also indicated elimination of signals of melatonin-alleviated tolerance to drought (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7), the disruption of the antioxidant system (Figure S6), and accumulation of oxidative products, i.e., MDA and H2O2 (Figure S5). ABI5 is one of the downstream signal components of ABA, while its mutation causes insensitive phenotypes to ABA [31,39]. We found that both abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants showed no response to the accumulated endogenous ABA (Figure 5) and exogenous feeding of ABA (Figure 6), irrespective of drought stress. More importantly, the response of the antioxidant system (Figure 3 and Figure S6) and expression of antioxidant genes (Figure 7) were prone to be fully or partially lost in either sgt1 or abi5 mutants under drought stress, even in the conditions of melatonin treatments. In contrast, after melatonin treatment, drought-induced OsABI5 and OsSGT1 showed ever higher expression levels in WT, despite the reduced ABA contents (Figure 5), indicating the adjusted functions of melatonin on OsABI5 and OsSGT1.
Crosstalk between MT and other phytohormones also demonstrated this point. Under drought stress, feeding melatonin greatly promoted the synthesis of SA and JA but suppressed the ABA synthesis (Figure 4), which is consistent with the previous reports [19,47,52]. Moreover, expression of SGT1 has been reported to be induced by JA, SA, and drought stress [19,30,47,52], while ABI5 was induced by ABA [53,54], as well as exogenous melatonin [49]. We here also found that the expression of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 were both induced by melatonin under drought stress (Figure 5 and Figure 6), which was consistent with the synthesis of SA, JA, and ABA (Figure 4). Thus, melatonin promoted the expression of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 to activate the antioxidant response; simultaneously, although melatonin inhibited the synthesis of drought-induced ABA, it still partially restored the synthesis of JA and SA, which was beneficial for the plant growth. The enhanced tolerance of ABA to drought is realized at the expense of plant development (Figure 1 and Figure 5), while the alleviated effects of melatonin could largely protect plant growth from drought damages (Figure 1, Figure 5 and Figure 7). Nevertheless, SGT1 and ABI5 are two crucial modules involved in this process since their mutation would prevent the effects of melatonin on drought stress (Figure 3, Figure 5 and Figure 7).
Collectively, a proposed model was given to explain the ameliorated effects of melatonin on seedlings growth via SGT1-involved signals under drought stress in rice (Figure 8). Accumulations of drought stress-induced osmolytes, i.e., SS, proline, and ABA, leads to osmosis stress and causes stoma closure, which activates ABA-mediated signals to regulate antioxidant response genes; inversely, osmosis stress intensifies the water deficiency and cause the excessive accumulation of ROS that eventually disrupt the redox homeostasis essential for cell metabolism. However, by comparison, melatonin alleviates the accumulation of osmolytes under drought stress and greatly promotes ABA-independent SGT1-involved signals to activate antioxidant genes, i.e., OsCAT2, which further effectively enhance the activity of the antioxidant system to scavenge ROS until reaching redox homeostasis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The abi5-1 and abi5-2 mutants were derived from Li et al. [49]. To generate sgt1 mutants, the first exon of OsSGT1 (Os01g0624500) was selected as a target (Figure S7a,b). Designing of sgRNAs and utilization of CRISPR-P program (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/cgi-bin/CRISPR/, accessed on 8 December 2021) were conducted following the previous methods [55], while the vector construction, as well as the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of pH-ossgt1 vector, were performed following our previously reported methods [49]. The dual mutants of sgt-1abi5-1 and sgt1-1abi5-2 were selected from the F6 generations through the cross of sgt1-1 with abi5-1 and abi5-2, respectively (Figure S7c). The cultivar Oryza sativa L. japonica was used as the wild-type (WT).
For the experimental treatments, sterilized seeds were evenly put on moisture filter papers of germinated boxes for three days, and the germinated seedlings were transferred to plastic pots containing ½MS liquid medium in a greenhouse room (12 h PAR, 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1 light/ 12 h dark; temperature settings: 28 °C, day/24 °C, night; relative humidity: 65–75%) for another 11 days growth. The ½MS liquid medium was replaced every two days. After that, part of the uniform seedlings was subjected to different levels of drought stress based on the various soil water levels at 100% field capacity (FC; as control), 80% FC, 60% FC, 40% FC, and 25% FC (as drought stress) for another seven days [56]. From the initiation of the drought treatments, different concentrations of melatonin, including 0-μmol/L, 50-μmol/L, 100-μmol/L, 200-μmol/L, and 1000-μmol/L of MT were employed to foliar spray above seedlings of 25% FC every two days. For ABA treatment, above germinated seedlings of 14 days old were transferred to ½MS liquid medium containing 10 μmol/L ABA [14] and grown under 100% FC (as ABA) or 25% FC (ABA + drought) conditions for another seven days. At the midday of the seventh day after drought treatments, the leaf samples were collected to assess the physiological parameters and gene expression levels.

4.2. Determination of Physiological Parameters

Relative water contents (RWC) were determined with the reported methods [57]. Survival rates were determined with the survival plant numbers to the total plant numbers within the drought stress stages. Chlorophyll (Chl.) content was determined following the previous methods [58]. Appropriately 0.3 g leaf samples were ground and resolved in 80% acetone, and absorbances of the extracts at 646 nm and 663 nm were determined to calculate the Chl. contents with a standard curve. The net photosynthetic rates (Pn) were measured at the midday of day seven after drought stress using a photosynthesis system (LI-6400XT, LI-COR, Huntington Beach, CA, USA). After leaf epidermis was stained with iodine solution [1% (w/v) iodine and 1% (w/v) potassium iodide] for 30 s, stomatal morphology was observed and photographed with stereoscope (Nikon Eclipse E100, Tokyo, Japan). Stomatal conductance was measured with LI-600 stomatograph (LI-COR, Huntington Beach, CA, USA).
Soluble sugar was analyzed with the anthrone colourimetric method [59]. Briefly, 0.3 g leaf samples were homogenized with distilled water and then boiled for 30 min to collect the extracts. Subsequently, the extracts were mixed with sulfuric acid and anthrone, and the absorbances at 620 nm were detected to determine the contents of soluble sugars.
Free proline contents were detected according to the previous methods [60,61]. The homogenates collected from 0.3 g homogenized samples in 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid were incubated at 100 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, after centrifuging at 5000× g for 10 min, the supernatants were reacted with the mixture of 2.5% ninhydrin and glacial acetic acid at 100 °C for an hour and terminated in an ice bath, following a reaction with toluene. The absorbance of the chromophore phase at 520 nm was measured to determine the proline concentration.

4.3. Measurement of Oxidant Products

The content of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was determined following the methods of Velikova et al. [62] with modifications. Briefly, 0.3 g harvested leaf tissues were ground in liquid nitrogen and then immediately mixed with pre-chilled Krebs–Ringer phosphate (145 mM NaCl, 5.7 mM sodium phosphate, 4.86 mM KCl, 0.54 mM CaCl2, 1.22 mM MgSO4, 5.5 mM glucose, pH 7.35). Subsequently, the homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 20 min at 4°C, and then the supernatants were employed to incubate with 50 µM Amplex® Red reagent (10-acetyl-3,7-dihydrophenoxazine, ThermoFisher, Shanghai, China) and 0.1 U/mL horseradish peroxidase (HRP, ThermoFisher, Shanghai, China) at 37 °C for 10 min away from light. The fluorescence was measured at 530 nm and 590 nm using a VersaFluor fluorometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and calculated based on a standard curve constructed using known concentrations of H2O2.
MDA was detected with the previous methods [63]. Briefly, 0.3 g of homogenized samples were mixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid (v/v) and was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 20 min. The supernatant was added with thiobarbituric acid under a water bath of 95 °C for 30 min and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 30 min. The supernatants were collected to measure absorbance at 450, 532, and 600 nm, respectively.
The superoxide (O2) production rates were measured using the reported methods [64]. Briefly, 0.3 g of homogenized samples were mixed with 65 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.8). After centrifuging at 10,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was transferred to mix with 10 mM hydrochloride and subsequently added with 58 mM sulfanilamide and 7 mM a-naphthylamine and incubated at 25 °C for 20 min. Finally, chloroform was added, and the absorbance at 530 nm was measured.

4.4. Activity Assays of Antioxidant System

The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) and catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) was determined with the previous methods [49,65], while activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC 1.11.1.11) and glutathione reductase (GR, EC 1.6.4.2) were measured according to the previous methods [66]. Briefly, the homogenizing power of 0.3 g samples was suspended with 50 mM pre-cold phosphate buffer (containing 0.2 mM EDTA, 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone (w/v), pH 7.8). After centrifuging at 4 °C for 10 min (12,000× g), the supernatants were collected to determine the activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GR.
Extractions of glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid (ASA) were conducted with 0.3 g leaf samples following the previous methods [21]. In brief, 0.3 g of fresh leaf tissues were ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen and then mixed with a precooled solution containing 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.33). The supernatants were collected after centrifugation (10 min at 3000× g) and used for the determination of the GSH and ASA contents by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method with commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bio. Institute, Nanjing, China).

4.5. Measurement of ABA, SA and JA Contents

Quantification of ABA, SA and JA were analyzed according to the previous methods [19,67,68] with few modifications. Briefly, 0.3 g samples were ground and incubated with pre-cold extraction solution (containing methanol/water/formic, 16:3:1, v/v/v, 1 mM butylated hydroxytoluene). After centrifuging at 10,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was filtered through a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Thereafter, filters were collected to determine the contents of ABA, JA and SA by using LC-MS analysis (Aligent 6460 triple Quad LC/MS platform, Denver, CO, USA).

4.6. Gene Expression Analysis

The total RNA was extracted with 0.3 g leaf samples with the Qiagen Spin Plant RNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative Realtime PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) [69], and the expression level was calculated relative to rice UBQ5 gene according to the previous methods [70]. Genes were identified through homology search with the reported Arabidopsis genes by using the Rice Annotation Project (RAP) Database (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/, accessed on 8 December 2021): Abscisic acid insensitive 5 (OsABI5, Os01g0859300); Suppressor of the G2 allele of skp1 (OsSGT1, Os01g0624500); Basic helix-Loop-helix protein 6 (OsbHLH6, Os10g0575000); Myelocytomatosis oncogene transcription factor 2 (OsMYC2, Os10g0575000); Superoxide dismutase A1 (OsSODA1, Os05g0323900); Peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase 4 (OsAPX4, Os08g0549100); Catalase 2 (OsCAT2, Os02g0115700); Glutathione reductase 2 (OsGR2, Os02g0813500). These genes were subjected to qRT-PCR analysis using gene-specific primers (Table S1).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Values were determined with six biological replicates and showed as means ± standard deviations. The one-way ANOVA tests were used for data comparisons from different groups, followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

We here demonstrated that melatonin promoted SGT1-mediated signals to ameliorate drought stress, probably via ABI5-mediated expression of antioxidant genes, e.g., OsCAT2, which could promote the ROS scavenging until reaching ROS homeostasis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23020599/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.L. and H.Z.; methodology, R.L., W.Z., and R.Y.; investigation, R.L., L.W., C.Z., and H.Z.; data curation, H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, R.L. and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, R.L. and H.Z.; funding acquisition, R.L. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by a grant from the Natural Foundation of Anhui Province (1908085QC103), Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202105), and the Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology (20200104).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We thank editors and reviewers for their kind-hearted comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Demidchik, V. Mechanisms of oxidative stress in plants: From classical chemistry to cell biology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 109, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, J.-K. Thriving under Stress: How plants balance growth and the stress response. Dev. Cell 2020, 55, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sharma, P.; Dubey, R.S. Drought induces oxidative stress and enhances the activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 46, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lafitte, H.; Li, Z.; Vijayakumar, C.; Gao, Y.; Shi, Y.; Xu, J.; Fu, B.; Yu, S.; Ali, A.; Domingo, J.; et al. Improvement of rice drought tolerance through backcross breeding: Evaluation of donors and selection in drought nurseries. Field Crop. Res. 2006, 97, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, T.-W.; Jehanzaib, M. Drought risk analysis, forecasting and assessment under climate change. Water 2020, 12, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tiwari, R.K.; Lal, M.K.; Kumar, R.; Chourasia, K.N.; Naga, K.C.; Kumar, D.; Das, S.K.; Zinta, G. Mechanistic insights on mel-atonin-mediated drought stress mitigation in plants. Physiol. Plant 2021, 172, 121–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leng, G.; Tang, Q.; Rayburg, S. Climate change impacts on meteorological, agricultural and hydrological droughts in China. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2015, 126, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boogar, A.R.; Salehi, H.; Jowkar, A. Exogenous nitric oxide alleviates oxidative damage in turfgrasses under drought stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 92, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cui, G.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Sun, F.; Zhang, C.; Xi, Y. Beneficial effects of melatonin in overcoming drought stress in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Landi, M.; Sharma, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Sharma, A. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soares, C.; Carvalho, M.E.A.; Azevedo, R.A.; Fidalgo, F. Plants facing oxidative challenges—A little help from the antioxidant networks. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Munemasa, S.; Hauser, F.; Park, J.; Waadt, R.; Brandt, B.; Schroeder, J.I. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of sto-matal aperture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 28, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Manzoor, N.; Shahid, M.; Abdullah, M.; Ali, L.; Wang, G.; Hashem, A.; Al-Arjani, A.-B.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; et al. Nanoparticle-based amelioration of drought stress and cadmium toxicity in rice via triggering the stress responsive genetic mechanisms and nutrient acquisition. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 209, 111829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wei, L.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Guo, P.; Guo, T.; Kang, G. Abscisic acid enhances tolerance of wheat seedlings to drought and regulates transcript levels of genes encoding ascorbate-glutathione biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sohag, A.A.M.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Polash, M.A.S.; Chowdhury, M.B.; Afrin, S.; Burritt, D.J.; Murata, Y.; Hossain, M.A.; Hossain, M.A. Exogenous glutathione-mediated drought stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) is associated with lower oxidative damage and favorable ionic homeostasis. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2020, 44, 955–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hossain, S.; Li, J.; Sikdar, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Uzizerimana, F.; Muhammad, I.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Feng, B. Exogenous melatonin modulates the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of drought tolerance in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn). Molecules 2020, 25, 2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hanif, S.; Saleem, M.F.; Sarwar, M.; Irshad, M.; Shakoor, A.; Wahid, M.A.; Khan, H.Z. Biochemically triggered heat and drought stress tolerance in rice by proline application. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zou, J.N.; Jin, X.J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Ren, C.Y.; Zhang, M.C.; Wang, M.X. Effects of melatonin on photosynthesis and soybean seed growth during grain filling under drought stress. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Imran, M.; Shazad, R.; Bilal, S.; Imran, Q.M.; Khan, M.; Kang, S.M.; Khan, A.L.; Yun, B.W.; Lee, I.J. Exogenous melatonin me-diates the regulation of endogenous nitric oxide in Glycine max L. to reduce effects of drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 188, 104511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alharby, H.F.; Fahad, S. Melatonin application enhances biochar efficiency for drought tolerance in maize varieties: Modifications in physio-biochemical machinery. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 2826–2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, M.N.; Khan, Z.; Luo, T.; Liu, J.; Rizwan, M.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; Wu, H.; Hu, L. Seed priming with gibberellic acid and melatonin in rapeseed: Consequences for improving yield and seed quality under drought and non-stress conditions. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 156, 112850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arnao, M.B.; Ruiz, J.H. Melatonin: A new plant hormone and/or a plant master regulator? Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arnao, M.B.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Is phytomelatonin a new plant hormone? Agronomy 2020, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Moustafa-Farag, M.; Mahmoud, A.; Arnao, M.; Sheteiwy, M.; Dafea, M.; Soltan, M.; Elkelish, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Ai, S. Melatonin-induced water stress tolerance in plants: Recent advances. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aimar, D.; Calafat, M.; Andrade, A.; Carassay, L.; Bouteau, F.; Abdala, G.; Molas, M. Drought effects on the early development stages of Panicum virgatum L.: Cultivar differences. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 66, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, C.; Tan, D.-X.; Liang, D.; Chang, C.; Jia, D.; Ma, F. Melatonin mediates the regulation of ABA metabolism, free-radical scavenging, and stomatal behaviour in two Malus species under drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Prakash, V.; Singh, V.P.; Tripathi, D.K.; Sharma, S.; Corpas, F.J. May crosstalk between nitric oxide (NO) and abscisic acid (ABA) signalling molecules in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Degenkolbe, T.; Do, P.T.; Zuther, E.; Repsilber, D.; Walther, D.; Hincha, D.K.; Köhl, K.I. Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 133–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Mckersie, B.D.; Lesham, Y.Y. Stress and Stress Coping in Cultivated Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 148–180. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandhu, N.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, A. Chapter 8: Recent efforts in developing high-yield, drought-tolerant rice varieties. In Ad-vancement in Crop Improvement Techniques; Tuteja, N., Tuteja, R., Passricha, N., Saifi, S.K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Sawston: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 111–128. [Google Scholar]
  31. Azevedo, C.; Betsuyaku, S.; Peart, J.; Takahashi, A.; Noël, L.; Sadanandom, A.; Casais, C.; Parker, J.; Shirasu, K. Role of SGT1 in resistance protein accumulation in plant immunity. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 2007–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, X.C.; Millet, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Bush, J.; Ausubel, F.M. Jasmonate signalling in Arabidopsis involves SGT1b–HSP70–HSP90 chaperone complexes. Nat. Plant. 2015, 1, 15049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Cazalé, A.C.; Clément, M.; Chiarenza, S.; Roncato, M.A.; Pochon, N.; Creff, A.; Marin, E.; Leonhardt, N.; Noël, L.D. Altered expression of cytosolic/nuclear HSC70-1 molecular chaperone affects development and abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2653–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shanmugam, A.; Thamilarasan, S.K.; Park, J.I.; Jung, M.Y.; Nou, I.S. Characterization and abiotic stress-responsive expression analysis of SGT1 genes in Brassica oleracea. Genome 2016, 59, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fu, D.; Ghabrial, S.; Kachroo, A. GmRAR1 and GmSGT1 are required for basal, R gene-mediated and systemic acquired re-sistance in soybean. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009, 22, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Noël, L.D.; Cagna, G.; Stuttmann, J.; Wirthmüller, L.; Betsuyaku, S.; Witte, C.P.; Bhat, R.; Pochon, N.; Colby, T.; Parker, J.E.; et al. Interaction between SGT1 and cyto-solic/nuclear HSC70 chaperones regulates Arabidopsis immune responses. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 4061–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ahmad, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Tuteja, N. Plant Signaling Under Abiotic Stress Environment. In Environmental Adaptations and Stress Tolerance of Plants in the Era of Climate Change; Ahmad, P., Prasad, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 297–323. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hosseini, M.S.; Samsampour, D.; Zahedi, S.M.; Zamanian, K.; Rahman, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Tran, L.P. Melatonin alleviates drought impact on growth and essential oil yield of lemon verbena by enhancing antioxidant responses, mineral balance, and abscisic acid content. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 1363–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Skubacz, A.; Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. The role and regulation of ABI5 (ABA-Insensitive 5) in plant development, abiotic stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Hu, W.; Cao, Y.; Loka, D.A.; Harris-Shultz, K.R.; Reiter, R.J.; Ali, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z. Exogenous melatonin improves cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen fertility under drought by regulating carbohydrate metabolism in male tissues. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Antoniou, C.; Chatzimichail, G.; Xenofontos, R.; Pavlou, J.J.; Panagiotou, E.; Christou, A.; Fotopoulos, V. Melatonin system-ically ameliorates drought stress-induced damage in Medicago sativa plants by modulating nitro-oxidative homeostasis and proline metabolism. J. Pineal Res. 2017, 62, e12401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, N.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, H.-J.; Weeda, S.; Yang, C.; Yang, Z.-C.; Ren, S.; Guo, Y.-D. Melatonin promotes water-stress tolerance, lateral root formation, and seed germination in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Pineal Res. 2012, 54, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, L.; Li, D.; Ma, Y.; Shen, H.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y. Combined application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and exogenous melatonin alleviates drought stress and improves plant growth in tobacco seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1074–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lei, K.; Sun, S.; Zhong, K.; Li, S.; Hu, H.; Sun, C.; Zheng, Q.; Tian, Z.; Dai, T.; Sun, J. Seed soaking with melatonin promotes seed germination under chromium stress via enhancing reserve mobilization and antioxidant metabolism in wheat. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 220, 112241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Handa, N.; Kohli, S.K.; Thukral, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P. Protective role of selenium against chromium stress involving metabolites and essential elements in Brassica juncea L. seedlings. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Q.; Yu, B.; Gao, Y.; Dai, A.; Bai, J.G. Cinnamic acid pretreatment mitigates chilling stress of cucumber leaves through al-tering antioxidant enzyme activity. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Guo, W.; Yang, H.; Guo, Y.; Chen, B.; Mu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, J. Improved powdery mildew resistance of transgenic tobacco overexpressing the Cucurbita moschata CmSGT1 gene. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hasan, M.K.; Ahammed, G.J.; Sun, S.; Li, M.; Yin, H.; Zhou, J. Melatonin inhibits cadmium translocation and enhances plant tolerance by regulating sulfur uptake and assimilation in Solanum lycopersicum L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 10563–10576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, R.; Jiang, M.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H. Melatonin alleviates low-temperature stress via ABI5-mediated signals during seed germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 727596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, H.; Guo, Y.; Lan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ahammed, G.J.; Chang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, C.; Zhang, X. Melatonin antagonizes ABA action to promote seed germination by regulating Ca2+ efflux and H2O2 accumulation. Plant Sci. 2021, 303, 110761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Møller, I.M.; Jensen, P.E.; Hansson, A. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 459–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Arnao, M.B.; Ruiz, J.H. Melatonin and its relationship to plant hormones. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ishibashi, Y.; Aoki, N.; Kasa, S.; Sakamoto, M.; Kai, K.; Tomokiyo, R.; Watabe, G.; Yuasa, T.; Iwaya-Inoue, M. The inter rela-tionship between abscisic acid and reactive oxygen species plays a key role in barley seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Bi, C.; Ma, Y.; Wu, Z.; Yu, Y.-T.; Liang, S.; Lu, K.; Wang, X.-F. Arabidopsis ABI5 plays a role in regulating ROS homeostasis by activating CATALASE 1 transcription in seed germination. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 94, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lei, Y.; Lu, L.; Liu, H.-Y.; Li, S.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.-L. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-System in Plants. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1494–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Nachabe, M.H. Refining the definition of field capacity in the literature. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 1998, 124, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Weatherley, P.E. Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. the field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol. 1950, 49, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fairbairn, N.J. A modified anthrone reagent. Chem. Ind. Lond. 1953, 4, 86. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Song, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, H.; Li, R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate chilling stress in rice (Oryza Sativa L.) by regulating antioxidative system and chilling response transcription factors. Molecules 2021, 26, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Pro-tective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Elstner, E.F.; Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: A simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 70, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Su, X.; Fan, X.; Shao, R.; Guo, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, Q.; Guo, L. Physiological and iTRAQ-based proteomic analyses reveal that melatonin alleviates oxidative damage in maize leaves exposed to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 142, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Xia, X.-J.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Shi, K.; Chen, Z.; Yu, J.-Q. H2O2 mediates the crosstalk of brassinosteroid and abscisic acid in tomato responses to heat and oxidative stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4371–4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qi, Q.; Rose, P.A.; Abrams, G.D.; Taylor, D.C.; Abrams, S.R.; Cutler, A.J. (+)-Abscisic acid metabolism, 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme a synthase gene expression, and very-long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in Brassica napus embryos 1. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Seskar, M.; Shulaev, V.; Raskin, I. Endogenous Methyl Salicylate in Pathogen-Inoculated Tobacco Plants1. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, R.-Q.; Jiang, M.; Liu, Y.-H.; Zheng, Y.-C.; Huang, J.-Z.; Wu, J.-M.; Shu, Q.-Y. The xantha marker trait is associated with altered tetrapyrrole biosynthesis and deregulated transcription of PhANGs in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effects of melatonin treatments on seedling performance under drought stress. (a) Plant phenotype, (b) stoma phenotype, (c) stomatal conductance, (d) survival rate, (e) fresh weight, (f) relative water contents (RWC), (g) chlorophyll (Chl) contents, and (h) photosynthetic rates (Pn) were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05). (a) Bar = 3 cM; (b) Bar = 10 μM.
Figure 1. Effects of melatonin treatments on seedling performance under drought stress. (a) Plant phenotype, (b) stoma phenotype, (c) stomatal conductance, (d) survival rate, (e) fresh weight, (f) relative water contents (RWC), (g) chlorophyll (Chl) contents, and (h) photosynthetic rates (Pn) were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05). (a) Bar = 3 cM; (b) Bar = 10 μM.
Ijms 23 00599 g001
Figure 2. Effects of melatonin treatments on oxidative damages under drought stress. Contents of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide (O2) production rates, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of melatonin treatments on oxidative damages under drought stress. Contents of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide (O2) production rates, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 00599 g002
Figure 3. Effects of melatonin treatments on the antioxidant activity under drought stress. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR), as well as the ascorbic acid (ASA) and glutathione (GSH) contents, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of melatonin treatments on the antioxidant activity under drought stress. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR), as well as the ascorbic acid (ASA) and glutathione (GSH) contents, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 00599 g003
Figure 4. Effects of melatonin treatments on the endogenous phytohormones biosynthesis under drought stress. Contents of abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA), as well as expression levels of OsABI5, OsMYC2 and OsbHLH6, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effects of melatonin treatments on the endogenous phytohormones biosynthesis under drought stress. Contents of abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA), as well as expression levels of OsABI5, OsMYC2 and OsbHLH6, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT) and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 00599 g004
Figure 5. Effects of dual mutation of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 on the melatonin-alleviated drought stress. (a) Plant phenotype, (b) survival rates, (c) ABA contents, and the expression levels of (d) OsSGT1 and (e) OsABI5, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT), sgt1, abi5, and sgt1-1abi5 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05). Bar = 3 cM.
Figure 5. Effects of dual mutation of OsSGT1 and OsABI5 on the melatonin-alleviated drought stress. (a) Plant phenotype, (b) survival rates, (c) ABA contents, and the expression levels of (d) OsSGT1 and (e) OsABI5, were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT), sgt1, abi5, and sgt1-1abi5 mutant seedlings treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05). Bar = 3 cM.
Ijms 23 00599 g005
Figure 6. Effects of exogenous ABA on the expression levels of OsABI5 and OsSGT1. Expression levels of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT), abi5, sgt1-1abi5 and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with exogenous ABA (10 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effects of exogenous ABA on the expression levels of OsABI5 and OsSGT1. Expression levels of OsABI5 and OsSGT1 were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT), abi5, sgt1-1abi5 and sgt1 mutant seedlings treated with exogenous ABA (10 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 00599 g006
Figure 7. Effects of melatonin treatments on the expression level of antioxidative genes under drought stress. Expression of superoxide dismutase A1 (OsSODA1), catalase 2 (OsCAT2), peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase 4 (OsAPX4), and glutathione reductase 2 (OsGR2) were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT), sgt1, abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effects of melatonin treatments on the expression level of antioxidative genes under drought stress. Expression of superoxide dismutase A1 (OsSODA1), catalase 2 (OsCAT2), peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase 4 (OsAPX4), and glutathione reductase 2 (OsGR2) were examined in the leaves of wild-type (WT), sgt1, abi5 and sgt1-1abi5 mutants treated with melatonin (MT; 100 μM) under drought stress. Difference in letters indicates significant differences according to Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 00599 g007
Figure 8. Models explaining the ameliorated effects of melatonin on seedling growth via SGT1-involved signals under drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.).
Figure 8. Models explaining the ameliorated effects of melatonin on seedling growth via SGT1-involved signals under drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.).
Ijms 23 00599 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, R.; Yang, R.; Zheng, W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, H. Melatonin Promotes SGT1-Involved Signals to Ameliorate Drought Stress Adaption in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020599

AMA Style

Li R, Yang R, Zheng W, Wu L, Zhang C, Zhang H. Melatonin Promotes SGT1-Involved Signals to Ameliorate Drought Stress Adaption in Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(2):599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Ruiqing, Ruifang Yang, Wenyin Zheng, Liquan Wu, Can Zhang, and Huali Zhang. 2022. "Melatonin Promotes SGT1-Involved Signals to Ameliorate Drought Stress Adaption in Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 2: 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020599

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop