Next Article in Journal
A Potential Role of Keratinocyte-Derived Bilirubin in Human Skin Yellowness and Its Amelioration by Sucrose Laurate/Dilaurate
Previous Article in Journal
Ladder-like Polymer Brushes Containing Conjugated Poly(Propylenedioxythiophene) Chains
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms23115887
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular and Genetic Interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 behind Their Yin–Yang Collaboration

by
Satoshi Kubota
*,
Kazumi Kawata
,
Takako Hattori
and
Takashi Nishida
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Dentistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8525, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 5887; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115887
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 19 May 2022 / Accepted: 19 May 2022 / Published: 24 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Cellular communication network factor (CCN) 2 and 3 are the members of the CCN family that conduct the harmonized development of a variety of tissues and organs under interaction with multiple biomolecules in the microenvironment. Despite their striking structural similarities, these two members show contrastive molecular functions as well as temporospatial emergence in living tissues. Typically, CCN2 promotes cell growth, whereas CCN3 restrains it. Where CCN2 is produced, CCN3 disappears. Nevertheless, these two proteins collaborate together to execute their mission in a yin–yang fashion. The apparent functional counteractions of CCN2 and CCN3 can be ascribed to their direct molecular interaction and interference over the cofactors that are shared by the two. Recent studies have revealed the mutual negative regulation systems between CCN2 and CCN3. Moreover, the simultaneous and bidirectional regulatory system of CCN2 and CCN3 is also being clarified. It is of particular note that these regulations were found to be closely associated with glycolysis, a fundamental procedure of energy metabolism. Here, the molecular interplay and metabolic gene regulation that enable the yin–yang collaboration of CCN2 and CCN3 typically found in cartilage development/regeneration and fibrosis are described.

1. CCN2 and CCN3 in CCN Family

Cellular communication network factors 2 and 3 (CCN2 and CCN3) are two out of three founding members of the CCN family, which comprises six members in mammals. Initially, CCN2 was designated connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), owing to its mitogenic activity in fibroblasts [1], whereas the original name of CCN3 was nephroblastoma-overexpressed (NOV), since it was found to be overexpressed in a truncated form in nephroblastomas [2]. Added with the first founding member, cysteine-rich 61 (CYR61) [3], which is now generally recognized as CCN1, the CCN family was born as the acronym of these classical members [4,5], based on their striking structural similarities. It was a fortunate that the family name was not given in memory of CTGF, an impressive name representing a molecular function, as most CCN family members, particularly CCN3, turned out to be anything but growth factors [6,7,8]. After the establishment of this family, three additional members were added, completing the present form of this family of six members. Since each additional member was discovered by several independent research groups [9,10,11], a few different names were given to a single protein, which caused significant confusion. Among these names, Wnt-induced secretory protein (WISP) 1, 2 and 3 were preferred by a significant number of researchers, probably because these names represent a simple property of these proteins, although their official names were proposed as CCN4, 5 and 6 by the International CCN Society (ICCNS).
Along with the advance in CCN family research, it has gradually been clarified that CCN family members act as integrative regulators of extracellular signaling under interaction with a number of biomolecules in the microenvironment, yielding highly context-dependent biological outcomes [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, in 2018, the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) Gene Nomenclature Committee approved the new CCN nomenclature proposed by the ICCNS Scientific Committee [18,19]. According to this smart proposal, the CCN family was redefined as the cellular communication network factor family, which best represents the functionality of the family members, instead of an acronym without a specific meaning. Therefore, using this terminology is strongly encouraged now.
As is found in the case of other family members, CCN2 and CCN3 are commonly characterized by the retention of a tetra modular structure with signal peptides for secretion ahead and a hinge domain between the second and third modules from the amino termini. One exceptional member is CCN5 of tri-modular structure, which lacks the C-terminal module (Figure 1a). By using these four (or three for CCN5) modules—namely, insulin-like growth-factor binding-protein-like (IGFBP), von Willebrand factor type C repeat (VWC), thrombospondin 1 type 1 repeat (TSP1) and C-terminal cystine knot (CT) modules—both proteins bind to growth factors, extracellular matrix components and cell surface receptors, some of which interact with both CCN2 and CCN3 [12,13,14,15,16,17]. CCN2, which is probably the best investigated CCN family member, is known to directly bind to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [20], fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 1, FGF-2 [21,22], bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 2 [23], BMP-4 [24], transforming growth factor (TGF) β [24], insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 and IGF-2 [25] as a partner of growth factors. As a matricellular protein, CCN2 has an affinity with fibronectin [26], aggrecan [27] and heparan sulfate proteoglycans such as perlecan [28]. As cell-surface receptors that accept CCN2 as a ligand, integrins with a variety of combinations of α and β subunits [29,30,31,32], FGF receptor (FGFR) 1, FGFR-2, FGFR-3 [22,33], epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [34,35], tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) [36], low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) 1 [37], LRP-6 [38], receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) and its decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin [39] are known. Association with extracellular signaling modulators that include Wnt inhibitory factor (WIF) 1 [40] and slit guidance ligand (SLIT) [41] 3 was reported as well. Moreover, direct interaction between CCN2 and CCN3 was confirmed (Figure 1, in the middle) [42], the details of which are introduced later on. To date, fewer molecular counterparts have been identified for CCN3. This is assumed to be not because CCN3 is less interactive, but because it is relatively less investigated. Currently, fibulin 1c [43], Notch 1 [44], periostin [45] as well as BMP-2 and integrins [15] that are common between the two, were found as CCN3 counterparts. Extensive studies would discover as many cofactors for CCN3 as those found for CCN2 in the future.
Despite such striking structural and behavioral similarities, these two family members appear to functionally counteract each other and negatively regulate the gene expression of the other in a yin–yang manner (Figure 1b) [46,47,48]. Namely, investigation with kidney mesangial cells indicated that CCN3 markedly downregulated CCN2 production, leading to the blockade of the accumulation of extracellular matrix caused by CCN2. Moreover, TGF-β treatment reduced CCN3 expression, while inducing CCN2 in those cells and human dermal fibroblasts. The opposing biological effects of CCN2 and CCN3 and mutual repressive regulation were also observed in chondrocytes [7]. In this review, recent findings regarding the mechanism and biological significance of the intimate interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 are introduced in a brief but comprehensive fashion.

2. Yin–Yang Actions of CCN2 and CCN3

Usually, the molecular functions of CCN2 and CCN3 appear to be opposing. This is most typically represented by the effect of these CCN family proteins on cell proliferation in vitro. As exactly suggested in the original name of CCN2, early studies revealed its mitogenic activity on vascular endothelial cells, chondrocytes, osteoblasts, periodontal ligament cells and tumor cells, as well as fibroblasts [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. In contrast, the original name of CCN3 is based on the positive relationship between the tumor development and the truncated form of this protein [2], suggesting a mitogenic activity of the mutant, which at the same time implies either a distinct, or less robust effect of the full length on cell proliferation. In accordance with this expectation, subsequent studies revealed the antiproliferative effect of CCN3 on chondrocytes, osteoblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells and tumor cells [6,7,57,58,59,60,61].
However, CCN2 and CCN3 occasionally exert comparable functionalities under particular biological context. Typically, both CCN2 and CCN3 promote cell adhesion and migration [62,63,64], which constitutes the proangiogenic property that is shared by these apparently contrastive members [65,66]. It should be noted that CCN1, the other founding member of the CCN family, also acts as a proangiogenic factor [67,68]. As stated in the next section, this common functionality is enabled by the interaction of CCN1, CCN2 and CCN3 with the same molecular counterparts, integrins [14,15,16,29,66,67]. As such, despite their prominent counter action with regard to cell proliferation, one of the most fundamental cellular events, CCN2 could not simply be a foe of CCN3 in living bodies, and vice versa.
These four-handed friendly proteins are surrounded not only by their common molecular friends, but also by a number of proper counterparts in microenvironment. By shaking hands with these colleagues, these versatile proteins execute multiple missions in tissues and organs. Indeed, CCN2 plays a critical role in the development and maintenance of the olfactory bulb in the central nervous system [69], skeletal system [70,71], neuromuscular junctions [72], pancreas [73], hair and teeth [74,75]. Interestingly, CCN3 was found to be critically involved in biological states and locations distinct from those where CCN2 is highly active. In fact, CCN3 promotes hematopoietic stem-cell renewal and recruitment [76,77,78], where no significant contribution of CCN2 has been suggested. Where CCN2 is present and/or active, CCN3 is not, which is in part enabled by the genetic interaction between CCN2 and CCN3. Therefore, CCN2 and CCN3 are constructing and maintaining life by playing their proper roles in a yin–yang fashion, under mutual molecular and genetic interactions, which is reminiscent of the roles of male and female, or darkness and lightness in the world.

3. Molecular Interaction between CCN2 and CCN3

It is generally recognized that two biomolecules with similar functions require the same cofactors at work. On the other hand, as is observed in the case of antagonists, counteractive functions of two molecules can be sometimes ascribed to competitive binding to the common counterpart. Therefore, sharing the molecular counterparts confers the indirect molecular interaction in between, which forms a basis of integrated molecular functionality of CCN2 and CCN3. In fact, CCN2 and CCN3 binds to BMPs [23,24,79,80,81], as well as the well-known adhesion receptors, integrins [14,15,16,29,30,31,32,65,66]. As already introduced in the last section, both CCN family members promote cell adhesion, migration and angiogenesis under interaction with these cell-surface molecules [62,65]. Other groups of the partners, BMPs, are widely known as morphogens, signaling molecules and bone inducing agents. Upon binding to BMPs, CCN2 and CCN3 diminish the BMP signaling in the cells [24,80]. However, the effects of CCN3 on osteogenesis are particularly controversial. Several reports indicated osteogenic potential, whereas others showed inhibitory effects [82,83,84], clearly representing the context dependence of the CCN-induced biological outcomes. The osteogenic effects observed in certain studies might be caused via CCN2- or CCN3-specific molecular partners that were present in the microenvironment under the experimental conditions employed therein. Mutual interference in the molecular actions between CCN2 and CCN3 via BMPs is also considerable if both are present.
In addition to such indirect interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 mediated by cofactors, it should be of particular note that CCN2 and CCN3 directly bind each other (Figure 1) [42]. Basically, production of CCN2 and CCN3 is regulated in a yin–yang fashion, avoiding their co-existence. Nevertheless, CCN2 and CCN3 coexist and encounter each other on specific occasions, where CCN2 and CCN3 are able to communicate directly. It should be noted that antagonizing effect of CCN2 on CCN3 by direct binding was observed in chondrocytes [42]. The direct CCN2–CCN3 interaction can be a molecular switch for forwarding the cells to the next stage during biological processes, including endochondral ossification, which is detailed in Section 5.

4. CCN2-CCN3 Genetic Interaction and Its Mechanism

Unlike the molecular functionalities, temporospatial emergence of CCN2 and CCN3 in a yin–yang fashion does not result from their molecular interactions. Where and when CCN3 is, CCN2 may not be produced, and vice versa. In order to firmly support this situation, a mutual negative regulatory system is quite effective, and is actually furnished in our cells. Several reports in the past indicated that overexpression or exogenous addition of either CCN2 or CCN3 attenuated the gene expression of the other in several types of cells [7,46]. Consistent with these findings, highly elevated expression of CCN3 was observed in murine Ccn2-null chondrocytes [7]. However, the molecular mechanisms of these regulatory systems remained totally unclear for a long time. Recently, a genetic mechanism that mediates the negative regulation of CCN3 by CCN2 was uncovered in chondrocytes. In those cells, CCN2 depletion caused severe ATP deficiency. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed that metabolic intermediates of glycolysis and the gene expression of a series of enzymes that catalyze the reactions therein were both attenuated in Ccn2-null chondrocytes. In contrast, no appreciable changes were observed in the mitochondrial membrane potential in those cells. These findings strongly indicate that CCN2 deficiency leads to impaired glycolysis. [85,86]. In relation to this metabolic impact of CCN2 deficiency, recent studies revealed that CCN3 expression was strongly enhanced at a transcriptional level by impaired glycolysis [87]. Indeed, CCN3 expression was markedly induced by biochemical inhibition of two different enzymes involved in the glycolytic pathways, as well as by glucose starvation in chondrocytic cells. Subsequent study identified regulatory factor binding to the X-box (RFX) 1 as a transcription factor that binds to the enhancer in the CCN3 proximal promoter region and mediates this metabolic gene regulation (Figure 2) [88]. Therefore, in chondrocytes, glucose metabolism is a central mediator of the repressive regulation of CCN3 by CCN2. However, in contrast with the negative regulatory machinery of CCN3 by CCN2, the mechanism of how CCN3 represses CCN2 is still poorly understood.
Regarding the metabolic regulation of CCN family members, it is also of note that CCN2 expression is repressed by glycolysis inhibitors and glucose starvation that contrarily induces CCN3 in chondrocytes [87,88]. Collectively, glycolytic activity was found to upregulate CCN2 and downregulate CCN3 simultaneously in chondrocytes. Interestingly, a previous report indicated that stimulating astrocytes with TGF-β provoked simultaneous induction of CCN2 and repression of CCN3, while tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α repressed CCN2 expression and enhanced CCN3 expression at the same time [89]. The simultaneous regulation of CCN2 and CCN3 towards opposite directions may not be explained by the mutual negative regulation among these genes and their products. However, considering the metabolic effects of these cytokines, a possible mechanistic view can be proposed based on the simultaneous regulation of CCN2 and CCN3 by glycolysis. Since TGF-β enhances glycolysis [90], CCN2 induction and CCN3 repression occur simultaneously after the stimulation. Contrarily, TNF-α triggers apoptosis that affects mitochondrial function [91], leading to impaired glycolysis. As such, CCN2 and CCN3 could be repressed and induced at the same time, respectively. Together, these findings suggest that metabolic regulation by glycolytic activity may constitute a central part of the regulatory machinery that enables the yin–yang emergence of CCN2 and CCN3. Most interestingly, the yin–yang emergence and function of these proteins are also observed in pancreatic islet that regulate systemic glucose metabolism [92]. CCN2 is produced during normal development of pancreatic islet to support cell proliferation and disappears after birth, whereas CCN3 is present in quiescent pancreatic β-cells and inhibits their proliferation. However, CCN3 is known to induce the development of obesity and diabetes [93], and this system appears deranged upon these pathological conditions. Although CCN2 is decreased along with adipocyte differentiation [94], its expression level is found to be increased in the fat tissues of the model mice of obesity and diabetes. Here, the systemic importance of the metabolic yin–yang regulation of CCN2 and CCN3 is implicated.
In addition to the metabolic regulation, it is widely recognized that CCN2 is directly regulated by TGF-β through TGF-β-associated kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) -extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) and specificity protein (SP) 1/SP3, as well as the canonical Smad pathway [48,95]. Involvement of other regulatory pathways is also suspected in the CCN3-part of the yin–yang regulation. To date, negative regulation of CCN3 by TGF-β was reported in nucleus pulposus cells, which was shown to be Smad independent [96].

5. CCN2-CCN3 Collaboration in Cartilage

The yin–yang behavior of CCN2 and CCN3 during tissue development, maintenance and regeneration is typically found in the skeletal system. Roughly speaking, CCN2 promotes these processes, whereas CCN3 acts as a regulator or repressor therein, emerging and disappearing in turn. Most bones constituting our skeleton are formed through an integrated process called endochondral ossification. In this process, the bone anlage is first formed as cartilage. Thereafter, chondrocytes grow bones as cartilage, following a series of procedures which develop the growth plate therein (Figure 3, left panel). At the earliest stage, CCN3 is expressed in this avascular prototype of the bone with its higher expression levels inside [97]. Owing to the poor nutrition supply, CCN3 expression at this stage is the highest in the central region. CCN3 exerts angiogenic activity to lead blood vessels inside, which results in ossification center formation, the beginning of endochondral ossification. The CCN3 accumulated at the ossification center stays with hypertrophic chondrocytes around [98], which may assist those cells in ceasing proliferation. In the regions furthest from the vascular invasion, CCN3 expression in immature chondrocytes is retained at high levels, keeping the cells quiescent as resting chondrocytes. From this region towards the ossification center, CCN3 expression gradually diminishes, allowing them to proliferate as proliferating chondrocytes [7]. As CCN3 decreases, CCN2 increases in turn, because of the improved glycolysis supported by the nutrition infiltrating from the blood vessels. CCN2 accelerates both proliferation and differentiation as a communication network factor to grow the cartilage, and its production reaches a peak in the highly differentiated pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes, where CCN3 is not actively produced [7]. Finally, around the site of vascular invasion, terminally differentiated hypertrophic chondrocytes disappear, forming matrix vesicles, on which osteoblasts accumulate mineralized crystals to build bone tissues [97]. In spite of their differential gene expression, CCN2 and CCN3 encounter each other during the proliferative stage [7]. It is suspected that the direct binding of CCN2 to CCN3 [42] may antagonize the antiproliferative effect of CCN3, whereas the differentiating effect of CCN2 may be also attenuated, which would promote chondrocytes from resting to proliferative stages.
After the completion of bone growth, the growth plate disappears in humans, leaving articular cartilage at both ends. Articular cartilage stays until the end of the life, supporting the locomotive activities, unless damaged or offended by osteoarthritis. In normal articular cartilage, CCN2 is barely detected [99], while CCN3 is produced by a limited population of articular chondrocytes located beneath the superficial layer of the cartilage (Figure 3, right panel) [96], which is far from the nutrition source, bone marrow or synovial fluid. CCN3 is induced therein by nutrition shortage and contributes to the retention of the quiescence and cellular stemness of chondrocytes around it [100]. However, along with aging, this restricted mode of CCN3 production in articular cartilage gradually changes. Immunohistochemical evaluation of mouse articular cartilage revealed that CCN3 was produced only by a limited number of the cells beneath the superficial layer of articular cartilage in young mice at one or two months after birth. In contrast, in aged mice at 7 months after birth, the majority of the chondrocytes in the superficial layer were found to produce CCN3. This age-related accumulation of CCN3 in articular cartilage was confirmed by biochemical analysis of corresponding animals. Furthermore, significant positive correlation was found between CCN3 expression levels and ages in human articular chondrocytes [8]. Contrarily, only a few chondrocytes were found to be producing CCN2 in aged mice through immunohistochemical analysis [8]. It is highly suspected that CCN3 induced by aging may repress the CCN2 production therein. The CCN3-dominant microenvironment of aged articular cartilage is supposed to be an adaptive response to the locomotive and nutrition conditions of senior individuals, but can be a risk factor for developing osteoarthritis. As a matter of fact, cartilage-specific overexpression of CCN2 in mice adds resistance to age-related osteoarthritis development [99].
In general, damaged articular cartilage hardly regenerates without therapeutic intervention. Nevertheless, CCN2 was found to promote the regeneration of damaged articular cartilage in rat osteoarthritis models [101,102]. Namely, exogenously applied CCN2 promotes the proliferation and differentiation of the remaining cells; furthermore, this CCN family member strongly represses the production of CCN3 through the metabolic regulatory system introduced in a previous section (Figure 4) [7,88]. As a consequence of this yin–yang regulation, articular chondrocytes are released from the quiescent stem-cell stage and are engaged in cartilage reconstruction encouraged by the molecular function of CCN2. As such, this mutual regulatory system is also useful for maintaining and recovering the integrity of the permanent cartilage in synovial joints.

6. CCN2-CCN3 Interaction in Fibrosis and Inflammation

Since the discovery of CCN2, this protein has been regarded as a key player of fibrotic disorders in a variety of tissues and organs. A typical example is scleroderma, which is an intractable skin disease characterized by progressive fibrosis in skin. From early CCN2 research, the involvement of this factor has attracted the interest of the researchers in this field [103]. CCN2 was found to be highly expressed in the region of this disease [103,104], and the CCN2 levels in blood and skin correlated to the disease severality [105,106]. Accordingly, neutralizing antibody against CCN2 efficiently ameliorated it in an animal model in vivo [107]. Similarly in gingival fibrosis induced by nicotine exposure, CCN2 mediates this local effect of nicotine [108]. Gingival overgrowth with fibrosis occurs by medications with phenytoin [109,110] and nifedipine [109,110,111], in which CCN2 is involved as well. Fibrosis is also induced by bleomycin in lung, in which collagen overproduction is conducted by CCN2 [112,113]. Indeed, an anti-CCN2 antibody was shown to be effective to slow down the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [113]. In addition to lung, the contribution of CCN2 to the development of fibrosis is known in the heart [114], liver, kidney [106,115], pancreas [116] and skeletal muscles [117]. As such, diagnostic values of blood and even urine CCN2 levels as biomarkers in these fibrotic diseases are discussed [106]. Not only typical fibrotic disorders, but also several diseases accompanied by fibrotic changes in tissues, such as atherosclerosis [118], proliferative retinopathy [119] and neuromuscular diseases, such as several types of muscular dystrophy, muscle denervation, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and spinal muscular atrophy [117] are known to be related to CCN2. Therefore, CCN2 has been regarded as a highly potential target for the development of drugs that could be used in all of these fibrotic diseases [120,121,122,123]. Considering the counteracting molecular function of CCN3 against CCN2, it was reasonable that the yin–yang emergence and function of CCN2 and CCN3 were initially noted in the context of fibrosis [46]. It was widely recognized that CCN2 is involved in renal fibrosis [124], which has been confirmed by several later studies as well [46,125]. As renal fibrosis is a terminal pathological situation of diabetes, antagonists of CCN2 were expected as therapeutic agents of this severe and common complication of diabetes in humans. Along with the advance in relevant research, investigation using mesangial cells and dermal fibroblasts revealed that TGF-β regulated CCN2 and CCN3 in a bipartite and opposite manner, representing their yin–yang regulation [46,48]. Moreover, CCN3 overexpression strongly repressed CCN2 and type I collagen production, a hallmark of fibrosis, indicating the negative regulation of CCN2 and antifibrotic action of CCN3. Gene regulation and functional counteraction were suggested to be critical in maintaining the healthy renal state, as it was found collapsed at the late stage of diabetic nephropathy. The fact that either CCN2 or CCN3 deficiency predisposes aortic aneurysm is also notable [126,127]. Comparable findings were also obtained by the experiments with a non-alcoholic steatohepatitis model [128], embryonic fibroblasts [129], astrocytes and hepatic stellate cells [130], suggesting the universal role of this yin–yang system in the maintenance of extracellular matrix metabolism throughout the body. Therefore, the dysregulation or collapse of this system may well incur fibrosis, potentially in any tissue or organ. Mechanistically, as observed in the regulation of CCN3 by CCN2, TGF-β-induced glycolysis through hexokinase (HK) 2 [131] seems to provoke CCN2 production via yes-associated protein (YAP) 1 [48,130], while silencing CCN3 via RFX1 [87,88] (Figure 5).
Regarding fibrosis, the contributions of the other CCN family members are also highly suspected. CCN1 is regulated by the profibrotic TGF-β in a manner similar to that of CCN2 [48]. Upon the repression of fibrotic response by CCN3 overexpression, CCN4 expression was shown to be even better repressed than CCN2 [82]. CCN5 was reported to act as an antifibrotic agent during the development of cardiac hypertrophy with fibrosis [132,133]. Lastly, a report once indicated the profibrotic role of CCN6 in pulmonary fibrosis [134]. However, evidence that indicates a more distinct yin–yang action between the other CCN family members than that between CCN2 and CCN3 has not been presented until now.
Fibrosis is the outcome of the prolonged and dysregulated tissue reconstruction after inflammatory responses, and thus can be regarded as a chronic disorder occurring at the final stage of inflammation. In this context, it should also be noted that CCN2 and CCN3 are occasionally regulated in a yin–yang fashion by typical mediators of inflammation other than TGF-β. As already introduced in a previous section, TNF-α represses CCN2 expression, while activating CCN3 in astrocytes [89]. This CCN3 activation is suspected to be mediated by NF-κB, since an NF-κB inhibitor repressed CCN3 expression in A549 cells [135]. However, in A549 cells, CCN3 expression was induced by TGF-β as well, suggesting that the yin–yang regulation system is not retained in these cells. Similar yin–yang regulation was observed by the stimulation with IL-1β, another representative inflammatory cytokine [136,137]. On the other hand, once produced upon inflammation, these CCN family members do not necessarily behave in this manner. Indeed, both CCN2 and CCN3 were reported to induce the same chemokine, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP) 1 [89], suggesting the complex involvement of CCN family in inflammatory responses.

7. CCN2-CCN3 Interplay in Malignancies

In addition to fibrosis, a number of studies have indicated the profound involvement of CCN2 and CCN3 in human malignancies [138]. In some cases, the yin–yang emergence of CCN2 and CCN3 is retained, whereas the CCN2/CCN3 bidirectional regulation system appears to be collapsed in the others [87,139,140,141,142]. Because of the context dependence of these proteins, both CCN family member can be promotors and suppressors of tumors, depending upon what kind of partners are present in the tumor microenvironment. As a general tendency, upregulation of CCN2 and downregulation of CCN3 are observed in colorectal cancer cases [138]. In these cancers with common origin, a negative relationship between severeness and CCN3 expression levels was shown [139], suggesting that it results from the antiproliferative function of CCN3, but the pathological role of CCN2 still remains inconclusive. On the other hand, CCN2 and CCN3 are both reported to be elevated and regarded as promoting factors of malignant phenotype in liver cancers, which implies that the yin–yang regulatory system may be disabled therein. However, when the expression levels of CCN2 and CCN3 in the same cases of hepatocellular carcinoma were compared, induction and reduction of the expression of CCN3 and CCN2, respectively, were observed, indicating the retention of the yin–yang regulatory system in these particular cases [140]. In contrast, in another study with a cohort with 122 breast cancer cases, both CCN2 and CCN3 levels were rather repressed in aggressive breast cancer tissues compared to those in the normal ones [141]. It is widely recognized most malignant tumor cells undergo metabolic reprogramming biased towards glycolysis, which is called the Warburg effect [142]. Nowadays, a number of driving factors, such as hypoxia-inducible factor 1, oncogene products, mitogenic signaling pathways, glucose and lactose transporters and glycolytic enzymes, are shown to be involved in the development of this reprogramming of energy metabolism [142]. Deficiency in AMP-activated protein kinase pathway and tumor suppressor genes may promote the establishment of the Warburg effect as well [143,144]. Since glycolysis constitutes a central machinery of the bidirectional CCN2/CCN3 regulation, dysregulated glycolysis may well destroy the delicately balanced yin–yang regulation. For example, CCN2 expression could even be enhanced by impaired glycolysis in breast cancer cells [145]. Therefore, whether this system is retained or not may represent the metabolic status of malignancies, which may reflect the property of tumor cells and even the prognosis of the patients.

8. Conclusions

During physiological tissue development and regeneration, the yin–yang collaboration of CCN2 and CCN3 plays a critical role, as clearly observed in skeletal development and maintenance processes. Unfortunately, this integrated regulatory system is exploited in the process of fibrosis development. However, as far as this bidirectional regulatory system is properly retained, we may be able to revert the fibrotic lesions to normal ones by manipulating the same system. This idea may provide a clue for development of a new therapeutic strategy to combat intractable fibrotic disorders. Until now, CCN2 has already been regarded as a major target, as well as a clinical marker, in combating fibrosis. As a matter of fact, a neutralizing antibody against human CCN2 was developed and subjected to clinical trials for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [146], muscular dystrophy [121], diabetes [147] and locally advanced pancreatic cancer cases [148]. In contrast, therapeutic utility of CCN3 as an antifibrotic or anticancer agent was proposed, but has not been forwarded to clinical trials to our knowledge. CCN3 can be a therapeutic agent as effective as an anti-CCN2 antibody, if the yin–yang regulatory system is retained. Although it may not be effective for the treatment of cancers with yin–yang regulatory system deficiency, development of CCN3-based therapeutics for fibrosis and related diseases is highly expected in the near future.

Author Contributions

S.K. proposed the concept of this review article and constructed the draft. K.K., T.H. and T.N. presented the necessary information and reviewed the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP20K09889, JP21K09815 and JP21H03105.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yoshiko Miyake for her secretarial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bradham, D.M.; Igarashi, A.; Potter, R.L.; Grotendorst, G.R. Connective tissue growth factor: A cysteine-rich mitogen secreted by human vascular endothelial cells is related to the SRC-induced immediate early gene product CEF-10. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 114, 1285–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Joliot, V.; Martinerie, C.; Dambrine, G.; Plassiart, G.; Brisac, M.; Crochet, J.; Perbal, B. Proviral rearrangements and overexpression of a new cellular gene (nov) in myeloblastosis-associated virus type 1-induced nephroblastomas. Mol. Cell Biol. 1992, 12, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Simmons, D.L.; Levy, D.B.; Yannoni, Y.; Erikson, R.L. Identification of a phorbol ester-repressible v-src-inducible gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bork, P. The modular architecture of a new family of growth regulators related to connective tissue growth factor. FEBS Lett. 1993, 327, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perbal, B. CCN proteins: Multifunctional signalling regulators. Lancet 2004, 363, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bleau, A.M.; Planque, N.; Lazar, N.; Zambelli, D.; Ori, A.; Quan, T.; Fisher, G.; Scotlandi, K.; Perbal, B. Antiproliferative activity of CCN3: Involvement of the C-terminal module and post-translational regulation. J. Cell Biochem. 2007, 101, 1475–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kawaki, H.; Kubota, S.; Suzuki, A.; Lazar, N.; Yamada, T.; Matsumura, T.; Ohgawara, T.; Maeda, T.; Perbal, B.; Lyons, K.M.; et al. Cooperative regulation of chondrocyte differentiation by CCN2 and CCN3 shown by a comprehensive analysis of the CCN family proteins in cartilage. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 1751–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuwahara, M.; Kadoya, K.; Kondo, S.; Fu, S.; Miyake, Y.; Ogo, A.; Ono, M.; Furumatsu, T.; Nakata, E.; Sasaki, T.; et al. CCN3 (NOV) Drives Degradative Changes in Aging Articular Cartilage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hashimoto, Y.; Shindo-Okada, N.; Tani, M.; Nagamachi, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Shiroishi, T.; Toma, H.; Yokota, J. Expression of the Elm1 gene, a novel gene of the CCN (connective tissue growth factor, Cyr61/Cef10, and neuroblastoma overexpressed gene) family, suppresses In vivo tumor growth and metastasis of K-1735 murine melanoma cells. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, R.; Averboukh, L.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, H.; Jo, H.; Dempsey, P.J.; Coffey, R.J.; Pardee, A.B.; Liang, P. Identification of rCop-1, a new member of the CCN protein family, as a negative regulator for cell transformation. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998, 18, 6131–6141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pennica, D.; Swanson, T.A.; Welsh, J.W.; Roy, M.A.; Lawrence, D.A.; Lee, J.; Brush, J.; Taneyhill, L.A.; Deuel, B.; Lew, M.; et al. WISP genes are members of the connective tissue growth factor family that are up-regulated in wnt-1-transformed cells and aberrantly expressed in human colon tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 14717–14722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Brigstock, D.R. The CCN family: A new stimulus package. J. Endocrinol. 2003, 178, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Leask, A.; Abraham, D.J. All in the CCN family: Essential matricellular signaling modulators emerge from the bunker. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 4803–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jun, J.I.; Lau, L.F. Taking aim at the extracellular matrix: CCN proteins as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. The CCN family acting throughout the body: Recent research developments. Biomol. Concepts 2013, 4, 477–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Perbal, B. CCN proteins: A centralized communication network. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 7, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. Cellular and molecular actions of CCN2/CTGF and its role under physiological and pathological conditions. Clin. Sci. 2015, 128, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perbal, B. The concept of the CCN protein family revisited: A centralized coordination network. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 12, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perbal, B.; Tweedie, S.; Bruford, E. The official unified nomenclature adopted by the HGNC calls for the use of the acronyms, CCN1-6, and discontinuation in the use of CYR61, CTGF, NOV and WISP 1-3 respectively. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 12, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Inoki, I.; Shiomi, T.; Hashimoto, G.; Enomoto, H.; Nakamura, H.; Makino, K.; Ikeda, E.; Takata, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Okada, Y. Connective tissue growth factor binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abd El Kader, T.; Kubota, S.; Anno, K.; Tanaka, S.; Nishida, T.; Furumatsu, T.; Aoyama, E.; Kuboki, T.; Takigawa, M. Direct interaction between CCN family protein 2 and fibroblast growth factor 1. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2014, 8, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nishida, T.; Kubota, S.; Aoyama, E.; Janune, D.; Maeda, A.; Takigawa, M. Effect of CCN2 on FGF2-induced proliferation and MMP9 and MMP13 productions by chondrocytes. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 4232–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Maeda, A.; Nishida, T.; Aoyama, E.; Kubota, S.; Lyons, K.M.; Kuboki, T.; Takigawa, M. CCN family 2/connective tissue growth factor modulates BMP signalling as a signal conductor, which action regulates the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. J. Biochem. 2009, 145, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abreu, J.G.; Ketpura, N.I.; Reversade, B.; De Robertis, E.M. Connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF) modulates cell signalling by BMP and TGF-beta. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kim, H.S.; Nagalla, S.R.; Oh, Y.; Wilson, E.; Roberts, C.T., Jr.; Rosenfeld, R.G. Identification of a family of low-affinity insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs): Characterization of connective tissue growth factor as a member of the IGFBP superfamily. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12981–12986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hoshijima, M.; Hattori, T.; Inoue, M.; Araki, D.; Hanagata, H.; Miyauchi, A.; Takigawa, M. CT domain of CCN2/CTGF directly interacts with fibronectin and enhances cell adhesion of chondrocytes through integrin alpha5beta1. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1376–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aoyama, E.; Hattori, T.; Hoshijima, M.; Araki, D.; Nishida, T.; Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. N-terminal domains of CCN family 2/connective tissue growth factor bind to aggrecan. Biochem. J. 2009, 420, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nishida, T.; Kubota, S.; Fukunaga, T.; Kondo, S.; Yosimichi, G.; Nakanishi, T.; Takano-Yamamoto, T.; Takigawa, M. CTGF/Hcs24, hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product, interacts with perlecan in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. J. Cell Physiol. 2003, 196, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Babic, A.M.; Chen, C.C.; Lau, L.F. Fisp12/mouse connective tissue growth factor mediates endothelial cell adhesion and migration through integrin alphavbeta3, promotes endothelial cell survival, and induces angiogenesis in vivo. Mol. Cell Biol. 1999, 19, 2958–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kiwanuka, E.; Andersson, L.; Caterson, E.J.; Junker, J.P.; Gerdin, B.; Eriksson, E. CCN2 promotes keratinocyte adhesion and migration via integrin alpha5beta1. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 2938–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. CCN family proteins and angiogenesis: From embryo to adulthood. Angiogenesis 2007, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kim, H.; Son, S.; Ko, Y.; Shin, I. CTGF regulates cell proliferation, migration, and glucose metabolism through activation of FAK signaling in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2021, 40, 2667–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aoyama, E.; Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. CCN2/CTGF binds to fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and modulates its signaling. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 4270–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rayego-Mateos, S.; Rodrigues-Díez, R.; Morgado-Pascual, J.L.; Rodrigues Díez, R.R.; Mas, S.; Lavoz, C.; Alique, M.; Pato, J.; Keri, G.; Ortiz, A.; et al. Connective tissue growth factor is a new ligand of epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 5, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chang, C.C.; Yang, M.H.; Lin, B.R.; Chen, S.T.; Pan, S.H.; Hsiao, M.; Lai, T.C.; Lin, S.K.; Jeng, Y.M.; Chu, C.Y.; et al. CCN2 inhibits lung cancer metastasis through promoting DAPK-dependent anoikis and inducing EGFR degradation. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Wahab, N.A.; Weston, B.S.; Mason, R.M. Connective tissue growth factor CCN2 interacts with and activates the tyrosine kinase receptor TrkA. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kawata, K.; Kubota, S.; Eguchi, T.; Aoyama, E.; Moritani, N.H.; Kondo, S.; Nishida, T.; Takigawa, M. Role of LRP1 in transport of CCN2 protein in chondrocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 2965–2972. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mercurio, S.; Latinkic, B.; Itasaki, N.; Krumlauf, R.; Smith, J.C. Connective-tissue growth factor modulates WNT signalling and interacts with the WNT receptor complex. Development 2004, 131, 2137–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aoyama, E.; Kubota, S.; Khattab, H.M.; Nishida, T.; Takigawa, M. CCN2 enhances RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation via direct binding to RANK and OPG. Bone 2015, 73, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Surmann-Schmitt, C.; Sasaki, T.; Hattori, T.; Eitzinger, N.; Schett, G.; von der Mark, K.; Stock, M. The Wnt antagonist Wif-1 interacts with CTGF and inhibits CTGF activity. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227, 2207–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pi, L.; Shenoy, A.K.; Liu, J.; Kim, S.; Nelson, N.; Xia, H.; Hauswirth, W.W.; Petersen, B.E.; Schultz, G.S.; Scott, E.W. CCN2/CTGF regulates neovessel formation via targeting structurally conserved cystine knot motifs in multiple angiogenic regulators. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 3365–7339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hoshijima, M.; Hattori, T.; Aoyama, E.; Nishida, T.; Yamashiro, T.; Takigawa, M. Roles of heterotypic CCN2/CTGF-CCN3/NOV and homotypic CCN2-CCN2 interactions in expression of the differentiated phenotype of chondrocytes. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 3584–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Perbal, B.; Martinerie, C.; Sainson, R.; Werner, M.; He, B.; Roizman, B. The C-terminal domain of the regulatory protein NOVH is sufficient to promote interaction with fibulin 1C: A clue for a role of NOVH in cell-adhesion signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 869–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sakamoto, K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Ando, R.; Miyawaki, A.; Kabasawa, Y.; Takagi, M.; Li, C.L.; Perbal, B.; Katsube, K. The nephroblastoma overexpressed gene (NOV/ccn3) protein associates with Notch1 extracellular domain and inhibits myoblast differentiation via Notch signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 29399–29405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Takayama, I.; Tanabe, H.; Nishiyama, T.; Ito, H.; Amizuka, N.; Li, M.; Katsube, K.I.; Kii, I.; Kudo, A. Periostin is required for matricellular localization of CCN3 in periodontal ligament of mice. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017, 11, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Riser, B.L.; Najmabadi, F.; Perbal, B.; Rambow, J.A.; Riser, M.L.; Sukowski, E.; Yeger, H.; Riser, S.C.; Peterson, D.R. CCN3/CCN2 regulation and the fibrosis of diabetic renal disease. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2010, 4, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Leask, A. Yin and Yang: CCN3 inhibits the pro-fibrotic effects of CCN2. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2009, 3, 161–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Peidl, A.; Perbal, B.; Leask, A. Yin/Yang expression of CCN family members: Transforming growth factor beta 1, via ALK5/FAK/MEK, induces CCN1 and CCN2, yet suppresses CCN3, expression in human dermal fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shimo, T.; Nakanishi, T.; Nishida, T.; Asano, M.; Kanyama, M.; Kuboki, T.; Tamatani, T.; Tezuka, K.; Takemura, M.; Matsumura, T.; et al. Connective tissue growth factor induces the proliferation, migration, and tube formation of vascular endothelial cells in vitro, and angiogenesis in vivo. J. Biochem. 1999, 126, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nakanishi, T.; Nishida, T.; Shimo, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Kubo, T.; Tamatani, T.; Tezuka, K.; Takigawa, M. Effects of CTGF/Hcs24, a product of a hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene, on the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes in culture. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nishida, T.; Nakanishi, T.; Asano, M.; Shimo, T.; Takigawa, M. Effects of CTGF/Hcs24, a hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product, on the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells in vitro. J. Cell Physiol. 2000, 184, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Asano, M.; Kubota, S.; Nakanishi, T.; Nishida, T.; Yamaai, T.; Yosimichi, G.; Ohyama, K.; Sugimoto, T.; Murayama, Y.; Takigawa, M. Effect of connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF) on proliferation and differentiation of mouse periodontal ligament-derived cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2005, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pandey, D.P.; Lappano, R.; Albanito, L.; Madeo, A.; Maggiolini, M.; Picard, D. Estrogenic GPR30 signalling induces proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells through CTGF. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xie, J.J.; Xu, L.Y.; Wu, J.Y.; Shen, Z.Y.; Zhao, Q.; Du, Z.P.; Lv, Z.; Gu, W.; Pan, F.; Xu, X.E.; et al. Involvement of CYR61 and CTGF in the fascin-mediated proliferation and invasiveness of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kothapalli, D.; Grotendorst, G.R. CTGF modulates cell cycle progression in cAMP-arrested NRK fibroblasts. J. Cell Physiol. 2000, 182, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Grotendorst, G.R.; Duncan, M.R. Individual domains of connective tissue growth factor regulate fibroblast proliferation and myofibroblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kawaki, H.; Kubota, S.; Suzuki, A.; Suzuki, M.; Kohsaka, K.; Hoshi, K.; Fujii, T.; Lazar, N.; Ohgawara, T.; Maeda, T.; et al. Differential roles of CCN family proteins during osteoblast differentiation: Involvement of Smad and MAPK signaling pathways. Bone 2011, 49, 975–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shimoyama, T.; Hiraoka, S.; Takemoto, M.; Koshizaka, M.; Tokuyama, H.; Tokuyama, T.; Watanabe, A.; Fujimoto, M.; Kawamura, H.; Sato, S.; et al. CCN3 inhibits neointimal hyperplasia through modulation of smooth muscle cell growth and migration. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gupta, N.; Wang, H.; McLeod, T.L.; Naus, C.C.; Kyurkchiev, S.; Advani, S.; Yu, J.; Perbal, B.; Weichselbaum, R.R. Inhibition of glioma cell growth and tumorigenic potential by CCN3 (NOV). Mol. Pathol. 2001, 54, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gellhaus, A.; Dong, X.; Propson, S.; Maass, K.; Klein-Hitpass, L.; Kibschull, M.; Traub, O.; Willecke, K.; Perbal, B.; Lye, S.J.; et al. Connexin43 interacts with NOV: A possible mechanism for negative regulation of cell growth in choriocarcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 36931–36942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fu, C.T.; Bechberger, J.F.; Ozog, M.A.; Perbal, B.; Naus, C.C. CCN3 (NOV) interacts with connexin43 in C6 glioma cells: Possible mechanism of connexin-mediated growth suppression. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 36943–36950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Crean, J.K.; Furlong, F.; Finlay, D.; Mitchell, D.; Murphy, M.; Conway, B.; Brady, H.R.; Godson, C.; Martin, F. Connective tissue growth factor [CTGF]/CCN2 stimulates mesangial cell migration through integrated dissolution of focal adhesion complexes and activation of cell polarization. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1541–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Benini, S.; Perbal, B.; Zambelli, D.; Colombo, M.P.; Manara, M.C.; Serra, M.; Parenza, M.; Martinez, V.; Picci, P.; Scotlandi, K. In Ewing’s sarcoma CCN3(NOV) inhibits proliferation while promoting migration and invasion of the same cell type. Oncogene 2005, 24, 4349–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, S.; Liu, Z.; Bi, D.; Yuan, X.; Liu, X.; Ding, S.; Lu, J.; Niu, Z. CCN3 (NOV) regulates proliferation, adhesion, migration and invasion in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2012, 3, 1099–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tzeng, H.E.; Chen, J.C.; Tsai, C.H.; Kuo, C.C.; Hsu, H.C.; Hwang, W.L.; Fong, Y.C.; Tang, C.H. CCN3 increases cell motility and MMP-13 expression in human chondrosarcoma through integrin-dependent pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2011, 226, 3181–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lin, C.G.; Chen, C.C.; Leu, S.J.; Grzeszkiewicz, T.M.; Lau, L.F. Integrin-dependent functions of the angiogenic inducer NOV (CCN3): Implication in wound healing. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 8229–8237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Leu, S.J.; Lam, S.C.; Lau, L.F. Pro-angiogenic activities of CYR61 (CCN1) mediated through integrins alphavbeta3 and alpha6beta1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 46248–46255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Leu, S.J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, N.; Chen, C.C.; Lam, S.C.; Lau, L.F. Identification of a novel integrin alpha 6 beta 1 binding site in the angiogenic inducer CCN1 (CYR61). J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 33801–33808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khodosevich, K.; Lazarini, F.; von Engelhardt, J.; Kaneko, H.; Lledo, P.M.; Monyer, H. Connective tissue growth factor regulates interneuron survival and information processing in the olfactory bulb. Neuron 2013, 79, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ivkovic, S.; Yoon, B.S.; Popoff, S.N.; Safadi, F.F.; Libuda, D.E.; Stephenson, R.C.; Daluiski, A.; Lyons, K.M. Connective tissue growth factor coordinates chondrogenesis and angiogenesis during skeletal development. Development 2003, 130, 2779–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Takigawa, M.; Nakanishi, T.; Kubota, S.; Nishida, T. Role of CTGF/HCS24/ecogenin in skeletal growth control. J. Cell Physiol. 2003, 194, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ohkawara, B.; Kobayakawa, A.; Kanbara, S.; Hattori, T.; Kubota, S.; Ito, M.; Masuda, A.; Takigawa, M.; Lyons, K.M.; Ishiguro, N.; et al. CTGF/CCN2 facilitates LRP4-mediated formation of the embryonic neuromuscular junction. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e48462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Charrier, A.; Brigstock, D.R. Regulation of pancreatic function by connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, CCN2). Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013, 24, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Liu, S.; Leask, A. CCN2 modulates hair follicle cycling in mice. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24, 3939–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pacheco, M.S.; Reis, A.H.; Aguiar, D.P.; Lyons, K.M.; Abreu, J.G. Dynamic analysis of the expression of the TGFbeta/SMAD2 pathway and CCN2/CTGF during early steps of tooth development. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008, 187, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gupta, R.; Hong, D.; Iborra, F.; Sarno, S.; Enver, T. NOV (CCN3) functions as a regulator of human hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells. Science 2007, 316, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ishihara, J.; Umemoto, T.; Yamato, M.; Shiratsuchi, Y.; Takaki, S.; Petrich, B.G.; Nakauchi, H.; Eto, K.; Kitamura, T.; Okano, T. Nov/CCN3 regulates long-term repopulating activity of murine hematopoietic stem cells via integrin alphavbeta3. Int. J. Hematol. 2014, 99, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gupta, R.; Turati, V.; Brian, D.; Thrussel, C.; Wilbourn, B.; May, G.; Enver, T. Nov/CCN3 Enhances Cord Blood Engraftment by Rapidly Recruiting Latent Human Stem Cell Activity. Cell Stem. Cell 2020, 26, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nguyen, T.Q.; Roestenberg, P.; van Nieuwenhoven, F.A.; Bovenschen, N.; Li, Z.; Xu, L.; Oliver, N.; Aten, J.; Joles, J.A.; Vial, C.; et al. CTGF inhibits BMP-7 signaling in diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 2098–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Minamizato, T.; Sakamoto, K.; Liu, T.; Kokubo, H.; Katsube, K.; Perbal, B.; Nakamura, S.; Yamaguchi, A. CCN3/NOV inhibits BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation by interacting with BMP and Notch signaling pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 2007, 354, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rydziel, S.; Stadmeyer, L.; Zanotti, S.; Durant, D.; Smerdel-Ramoya, A.; Canalis, E. Nephroblastoma overexpressed (Nov) inhibits osteoblastogenesis and causes osteopenia. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 19762–19772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Matsushita, Y.; Sakamoto, K.; Tamamura, Y.; Shibata, Y.; Minamizato, T.; Kihara, T.; Ito, M.; Katsube, K.; Hiraoka, S.; Koseki, H.; et al. CCN3 protein participates in bone regeneration as an inhibitory factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 19973–19985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Su, X.; Wei, Y.; Cao, J.; Wu, X.; Mou, D.; Luo, J.; Li, A.; Zuo, G.W.; Tang, M. CCN3 and DLL1 co-regulate osteogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic fibroblasts in a Hey1-dependent manner. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chen, P.C.; Liu, J.F.; Fong, Y.C.; Huang, Y.L.; Chao, C.C.; Tang, C.H. CCN3 Facilitates Runx2 and Osterix Expression by Inhibiting miR-608 through PI3K/Akt Signaling in Osteoblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Maeda-Uematsu, A.; Kubota, S.; Kawaki, H.; Kawata, K.; Miyake, Y.; Hattori, T.; Nishida, T.; Moritani, N.; Lyons, K.M.; Iida, S.; et al. CCN2 as a novel molecule supporting energy metabolism of chondrocytes. J. Cell Biochem. 2014, 115, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kubota, S.; Maeda-Uematsu, A.; Nishida, T.; Takigawa, M. New functional aspects of CCN2 revealed by trans-omic approaches. J. Oral. Biosci. 2015, 57, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Akashi, S.; Nishida, T.; El-Seoudi, A.; Takigawa, M.; Iida, S.; Kubota, S. Metabolic regulation of the CCN family genes by glycolysis in chondrocytes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 12, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mizukawa, T.; Nishida, T.; Akashi, S.; Kawata, K.; Kikuchi, S.; Kawaki, H.; Takigawa, M.; Kamioka, H.; Kubota, S. RFX1-mediated CCN3 induction that may support chondrocyte survival under starved conditions. J. Cell Physiol. 2021, 236, 6884–6896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kular, L.; Pakradouni, J.; Kitabgi, P.; Laurent, M.; Martinerie, C. The CCN family: A new class of inflammation modulators? Biochimie 2011, 93, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hua, W.; Ten Dijke, P.; Kostidis, S.; Giera, M.; Hornsveld, M. TGFβ-induced metabolic reprogramming during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 2103–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, X.H.; Zhao, Y.P.; Xue, M.; Ji, C.B.; Gao, C.L.; Zhu, J.G.; Qin, D.N.; Kou, C.Z.; Qin, X.H.; Tong, M.L.; et al. TNF-alpha induces mitochondrial dysfunction in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2010, 328, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Twigg, S.M. Regulation and bioactivity of the CCN family of genes and proteins in obesity and diabetes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 12, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, J.Y.; Wang, Y.D.; Qi, X.Y.; Ran, L.; Hong, T.; Yang, J.; Yan, B.; Liao, Z.Z.; Liu, J.H.; Xiao, X.H. Serum CCN3 levels are increased in type 2 diabetes mellitus and associated with obesity, insulin resistance and inflammation. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 494, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nishida, T.; Nagao, Y.; Hashitani, S.; Yamanaka, N.; Takigawa, M.; Kubota, S. Suppression of adipocyte differentiation by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound via inhibition of insulin signaling and promotion of CCN family protein 2. J. Cell Biochem. 2020, 121, 4724–4740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Córdova, G.; Rochard, A.; Riquelme-Guzmán, C.; Cofré, C.; Scherman, D.; Bigey, P.; Brandan, E. SMAD3 and SP1/SP3 transcription factors collaborate to regulate connective tissue growth factor gene expression in myoblasts in response to transforming growth factor β. J. Cell Biochem. 2015, 116, 1880–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tran, C.M.; Smith, H.E.; Symes, A.; Rittié, L.; Perbal, B.; Shapiro, I.M.; Risbud, M.V. Transforming growth factor β controls CCN3 expression in nucleus pulposus cells of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 3022–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  97. Kubota, S.; Kawaki, H.; Perbal, B.; Kawata, K.; Hattori, T.; Nishida, T. Cellular communication network factor 3 in cartilage development and maintenance. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 15, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yu, C.; Le, A.T.; Yeger, H.; Perbal, B.; Alman, B.A. NOV (CCN3) regulation in the growth plate and CCN family member expression in cartilage neoplasia. J. Pathol. 2003, 201, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Itoh, S.; Hattori, T.; Tomita, N.; Aoyama, E.; Yutani, Y.; Yamashiro, T.; Takigawa, M. CCN family member 2/connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF) has anti-aging effects that protect articular cartilage from age-related degenerative changes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Janune, D.; Abd El Kader, T.; Aoyama, E.; Nishida, T.; Tabata, Y.; Kubota, S.; Takigawa, M. Novel role of CCN3 that maintains the differentiated phenotype of articular cartilage. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2017, 35, 582–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nishida, T.; Kubota, S.; Kojima, S.; Kuboki, T.; Nakao, K.; Kushibiki, T.; Tabata, Y.; Takigawa, M. Regeneration of defects in articular cartilage in rat knee joints by CCN2 (connective tissue growth factor). J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 1308–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Abd El Kader, T.; Kubota, S.; Nishida, T.; Hattori, T.; Aoyama, E.; Janune, D.; Hara, E.S.; Ono, M.; Tabata, Y.; Kuboki, T.; et al. The regenerative effects of CCN2 independent modules on chondrocytes in vitro and osteoarthritis models in vivo. Bone 2014, 59, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Igarashi, A.; Nashiro, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Sato, S.; Ihn, H.; Grotendorst, G.R.; Takehara, K. Significant correlation between connective tissue growth factor gene expression and skin sclerosis in tissue sections from patients with systemic sclerosis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1995, 105, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Igarashi, A.; Nashiro, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Sato, S.; Ihn, H.; Fujimoto, M.; Grotendorst, G.R.; Takehara, K. Connective tissue growth factor gene expression in tissue sections from localized scleroderma, keloid, and other fibrotic skin disorders. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1996, 106, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Dziadzio, M.; Usinger, W.; Leask, A.; Abraham, D.; Black, C.M.; Denton, C.; Stratton, R. N-terminal connective tissue growth factor is a marker of the fibrotic phenotype in scleroderma. QJM 2005, 98, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Leask, A.; Parapuram, S.K.; Shi-Wen, X.; Abraham, D.J. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, CCN2) gene regulation: A potent clinical bio-marker of fibroproliferative disease? J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2009, 3, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ikawa, Y.; Ng, P.S.; Endo, K.; Kondo, M.; Chujo, S.; Ishida, W.; Shirasaki, F.; Fujimoto, M.; Takehara, K. Neutralizing monoclonal antibody to human connective tissue growth factor ameliorates transforming growth factor-beta-induced mouse fibrosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2008, 216, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Takeuchi, H.; Kubota, S.; Murakashi, E.; Zhou, Y.; Endo, K.; Ng, P.S.; Takigawa, M.; Numabe, Y. Nicotine-induced CCN2: From smoking to periodontal fibrosis. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Uzel, M.I.; Kantarci, A.; Hong, H.H.; Uygur, C.; Sheff, M.C.; Firatli, E.; Trackman, P.C. Connective tissue growth factor in drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J. Periodontol. 2001, 72, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Trackman, P.C.; Kantarci, A. Molecular and clinical aspects of drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J. Dent Res. 2015, 94, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yamazaki, K.; Igarashi-Takeuchi, H.; Numabe, Y. Hepatocyte growth factor exhibits anti-fibrotic effects in an in vitro model of nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth. J. Oral. Sci. 2022, 64, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Lasky, J.A.; Ortiz, L.A.; Tonthat, B.; Hoyle, G.W.; Corti, M.; Athas, G.; Lungarella, G.; Brody, A.; Friedman, M. Connective tissue growth factor mRNA expression is upregulated in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, L365–L371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sgalla, G.; Flore, M.; Siciliano, M.; Richeldi, L. Antibody-based therapies for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2020, 20, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Koitabashi, N.; Arai, M.; Niwano, K.; Watanabe, A.; Endoh, M.; Suguta, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Tada, H.; Toyama, T.; Adachi, H.; et al. Plasma connective tissue growth factor is a novel potential biomarker of cardiac dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2008, 10, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Chen, L.; Charrier, A.L.; Leask, A.; French, S.W.; Brigstock, D.R. Ethanol-stimulated differentiated functions of human or mouse hepatic stellate cells are mediated by connective tissue growth factor. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. di Mola, F.F.; Friess, H.; Martignoni, M.E.; Di Sebastiano, P.; Zimmermann, A.; Innocenti, P.; Graber, H.; Gold, L.I.; Korc, M.; Büchler, M.W. Connective tissue growth factor is a regulator for fibrosis in human chronic pancreatitis. Ann. Surg. 1999, 230, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Rebolledo, D.L.; Lipson, K.E.; Brandan, E. Driving fibrosis in neuromuscular diseases: Role and regulation of Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF). Matrix Biol. Plus. 2021, 11, 100059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cicha, I.; Yilmaz, A.; Klein, M.; Raithel, D.; Brigstock, D.R.; Daniel, W.G.; Goppelt-Struebe, M.; Garlichs, C.D. Connective tissue growth factor is overexpressed in complicated atherosclerotic plaques and induces mononuclear cell chemotaxis in vitro. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 2005, 25, 1008–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chintala, H.; Liu, H.; Parmar, R.; Kamalska, M.; Kim, Y.J.; Lovett, D.; Grant, M.B.; Chaqour, B. Connective tissue growth factor regulates retinal neovascularization through p53 protein-dependent transactivation of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 40570–40585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Barbe, M.F.; Hilliard, B.A.; Amin, M.; Harris, M.Y.; Hobson, L.J.; Cruz, G.E.; Popoff, S.N. Blocking CTGF/CCN2 reduces established skeletal muscle fibrosis in a rat model of overuse injury. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 6554–6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. NCT02606136. Trial of Pamrevlumab (FG-3019), in Non-Ambulatory Participants with Duchenne muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02606136 (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  122. Lipson, K.E.; Wong, C.; Teng, Y.; Spong, S. CTGF is a central mediator of tissue remodeling and fibrosis and its inhibition can reverse the process of fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2012, 5, S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Leask, A. CCN2: A novel, specific and valid target for anti-fibrotic drug intervention. Expert Opin. Targets 2013, 17, 1067–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Yokoi, H.; Mukoyama, M.; Sugawara, A.; Mori, K.; Nagae, T.; Makino, H.; Suganami, T.; Yahata, K.; Fujinaga, Y.; Tanaka, I.; et al. Role of connective tissue growth factor in fibronectin expression and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2002, 282, F933–F942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Okada, H.; Kikuta, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Inoue, T.; Kanno, Y.; Takigawa, M.; Sugaya, T.; Kopp, J.B.; Suzuki, H. Connective tissue growth factor expressed in tubular epithelium plays a pivotal role in renal fibrogenesis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, C.; van der Voort, D.; Shi, H.; Zhang, R.; Qing, Y.; Hiraoka, S.; Takemoto, M.; Yokote, K.; Moxon, J.V.; Norman, P.; et al. Matricellular protein CCN3 mitigates abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Clin. Invest 2016, 126, 1282–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Rodrigues-Díez, R.R.; Tejera-Muñoz, A.; Esteban, V.; Steffensen, L.B.; Rodrigues-Díez, R.; Orejudo, M.; Rayego-Mateos, S.; Falke, L.L.; Cannata-Ortiz, P.; Ortiz, A.; et al. CCN2 (cellular communication network factor 2) deletion alters vascular integrity and function predisposing to aneurysm formation. Hypertension 2022, 79, e42–e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ren, J.; Wang, X.; Parry, S.N.; Yee, C.; Gorrell, M.D.; McLennan, S.V.; Twigg, S.M. Targeting CCN2 protects against progressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in a preclinical model induced by high-fat feeding and type 2 diabetes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Abd El Kader, T.; Kubota, S.; Janune, D.; Nishida, T.; Hattori, T.; Aoyama, E.; Perbal, B.; Kuboki, T.; Takigawa, M. Anti-fibrotic effect of CCN3 accompanied by altered gene expression profile of the CCN family. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 7, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Borkham-Kamphorst, E.; van Roeyen, C.R.; Van de Leur, E.; Floege, J.; Weiskirchen, R. CCN3/NOV small interfering RNA enhances fibrogenic gene expression in primary hepatic stellate cells and cirrhotic fat storing cell line CFSC. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2012, 6, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yin, X.; Choudhury, M.; Kang, J.H.; Schaefbauer, K.J.; Jung, M.Y.; Andrianifahanana, M.; Hernandez, D.M.; Leof, E.B. Hexokinase 2 couples glycolysis with the profibrotic actions of TGF-β. Sci. Signal. 2019, 12, eaax4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yoon, P.O.; Lee, M.A.; Cha, H.; Jeong, M.H.; Kim, J.; Jang, S.P.; Choi, B.Y.; Jeong, D.; Yang, D.K.; Hajjar, R.J.; et al. The opposing effects of CCN2 and CCN5 on the development of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2010, 49, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jeong, D.; Lee, M.A.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.K.; Kho, C.; Oh, J.G.; Hong, G.; Lee, A.; Song, M.H.; LaRocca, T.J.; et al. Matricellular protein CCN5 reverses established cardiac fibrosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1556–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Batmunkh, R.; Nishioka, Y.; Aono, Y.; Azuma, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Kishi, J.; Makino, H.; Kishi, M.; Takezaki, A.; Sone, S. CCN6 as a profibrotic mediator that stimulates the proliferation of lung fibroblasts via the integrin beta1/focal adhesion kinase pathway. J. Med. Investig. 2011, 58, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhu, H.P.; Huang, H.Y.; Wu, D.M.; Dong, N.; Dong, L.; Chen, C.S.; Chen, C.L.; Chen, Y.G. Regulatory mechanism of NOV/CCN3 in the inflammation and apoptosis of lung epithelial alveolar cells upon lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 1872–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Nowinski, D.; Koskela, A.; Kiwanuka, E.; Boström, M.; Gerdin, B.; Ivarsson, M. Inhibition of connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 expression in human dermal fibroblasts by interleukin-1alpha and beta. J. Cell Biochem. 2010, 110, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fukunaga-Kalabis, M.; Martinez, G.; Liu, Z.J.; Kalabis, J.; Mrass, P.; Weninger, W.; Firth, S.M.; Planque, N.; Perbal, B.; Herlyn, M. CCN3 controls 3D spatial localization of melanocytes in the human skin through DDR1. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 175, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yeger, H.; Perbal, B. The CCN axis in cancer development and progression. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2021, 15, 491–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, J.; Ye, L.; Sun, P.-H.; Zheng, F.; Ruge, F.; Satherley, L.K.; Feng, Y.; Zhao, H.; Du, G.; Wang, T.; et al. Reduced NOV expression correlates with disease progression in colorectal cancer and is associated with survival, invasion and chemoresistance of cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 26231–26244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, H.; Li, W.; Huang, P.; Lin, L.; Ye, H.; Lin, D.; Koeffler, H.P.; Wang, J.; Yin, D. Expression of CCN family members correlates with the clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1481–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jiang, W.G.; Watkins, G.; Fodstad, O.; Douglas-Jones, A.; Mokbel, K.; Mansel, R.E. Differential expression of the CCN family members Cyr61, CTGF and Nov in human breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2004, 11, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vaupel, P.; Multhoff, G. Revisiting the Warburg effect: Historical dogma versus current understanding. J. Physiol. 2021, 599, 1745–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Faubert, B.; Boily, G.; Izreig, S.; Griss, T.; Samborska, B.; Dong, Z.; Dupuy, F.; Chambers, C.; Fuerth, B.J.; Viollet, B.; et al. AMPK is a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Jiang, P.; Du, W.; Wang, X.; Mancuso, A.; Gao, X.; Wu, M.; Yang, X. p53 regulates biosynthesis through direct inactivation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 30, 908–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Akashi, S.; Nishida, T.; Mizukawa, T.; Kawata, K.; Takigawa, M.; Iida, S.; Kubota, S. Regulation of cellular communication factor 2 (CCN2) in breast cancer cells via the cell-type dependent interplay between CCN2 and glycolysis. J. Oral. Biosci. 2020, 62, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. NCT03955146. Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Pamrevlumab in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03955146?term=FG-3019&draw=3&rank=17 (accessed on 11 May 2022).
  147. NCT00102297. Study of the Safety of FG-3019 in Incipient Nephropathy Due to Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00102297?term=FG-3019&draw=4&rank=10 (accessed on 11 May 2022).
  148. NCT03941093. Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Treatment with Pamrevlumab in Combination with CHEMOTHERAPY (either Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX) in Participants with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03941093?term=FG-3019&draw=5&rank=18 (accessed on 11 May 2022).
Ijms 23 05887 g001
Figure 1. (a) Structures of all of the CCN family members. I, V, T and C indicate insulin-like growth factor binding protein-like (IGFBP), von Willebrand factor type C repeat (VWC), thrombospondin I type I repeat (TSP1) and C-terminal cystine-knot (CT) modules, respectively. A series of 38 cysteine residues in these modules are strictly conserved, whereas CCN6 lacks four of them in VWC. Signal peptides for secretion on the IGFBP modules (solid triangles) and hinges between VWC and TSP are also illustrated. The hinge domain is highly variable among the members, which is particularly long in CCN1. (b) The yin–yang collaboration of CCN2 and CCN3. The gene products with apparently opposite functions negatively regulate the expression of the other, while conferring opposing biological effects.
Figure 1. (a) Structures of all of the CCN family members. I, V, T and C indicate insulin-like growth factor binding protein-like (IGFBP), von Willebrand factor type C repeat (VWC), thrombospondin I type I repeat (TSP1) and C-terminal cystine-knot (CT) modules, respectively. A series of 38 cysteine residues in these modules are strictly conserved, whereas CCN6 lacks four of them in VWC. Signal peptides for secretion on the IGFBP modules (solid triangles) and hinges between VWC and TSP are also illustrated. The hinge domain is highly variable among the members, which is particularly long in CCN1. (b) The yin–yang collaboration of CCN2 and CCN3. The gene products with apparently opposite functions negatively regulate the expression of the other, while conferring opposing biological effects.
Ijms 23 05887 g001
Ijms 23 05887 g002
Figure 2. Mechanism of the negative regulation of CCN3 by CCN2 in chondrocytes. A transcriptional factor regulatory factor binding to the X-box (RFX1) mediates this metabolic gene regulation.
Figure 2. Mechanism of the negative regulation of CCN3 by CCN2 in chondrocytes. A transcriptional factor regulatory factor binding to the X-box (RFX1) mediates this metabolic gene regulation.
Ijms 23 05887 g002
Ijms 23 05887 g003
Figure 3. Distribution of CCN2 and CCN3 in the growth plate (left) and the articular cartilage (right) in a long bone (middle). Cartilage and bone tissues are shown in light blue and red, respectively. Distinct, but partly overlapping distribution of CCN2 and CCN3 is illustrated with gradation. Zones in the growth plate and articular cartilage are indicated. The arrow at the right of the growth plate indicates the direction of chondrocytic differentiation and bone growth.
Figure 3. Distribution of CCN2 and CCN3 in the growth plate (left) and the articular cartilage (right) in a long bone (middle). Cartilage and bone tissues are shown in light blue and red, respectively. Distinct, but partly overlapping distribution of CCN2 and CCN3 is illustrated with gradation. Zones in the growth plate and articular cartilage are indicated. The arrow at the right of the growth plate indicates the direction of chondrocytic differentiation and bone growth.
Ijms 23 05887 g003
Ijms 23 05887 g004
Figure 4. Molecular action of exogenous CCN2 applied to regenerate damaged articular cartilage. Under healthy conditions, CCN3 is produced immediately beneath the superficial zone to maintain the stemness of chondrocytes (left). In the articular cartilage degenerated by osteoarthritis (right), exogenously applied CCN2 (droplet in pink) releases the articular chondrocytes in the superficial zone from stemness by inhibiting the production of CCN3 and forwards them to cartilage regeneration (black T-bars). CCN2 also stimulates chondrocyte progenitors in bone marrow towards cartilage regeneration (dotted lines in pink).
Figure 4. Molecular action of exogenous CCN2 applied to regenerate damaged articular cartilage. Under healthy conditions, CCN3 is produced immediately beneath the superficial zone to maintain the stemness of chondrocytes (left). In the articular cartilage degenerated by osteoarthritis (right), exogenously applied CCN2 (droplet in pink) releases the articular chondrocytes in the superficial zone from stemness by inhibiting the production of CCN3 and forwards them to cartilage regeneration (black T-bars). CCN2 also stimulates chondrocyte progenitors in bone marrow towards cartilage regeneration (dotted lines in pink).
Ijms 23 05887 g004
Ijms 23 05887 g005
Figure 5. Metabolic yin–yang regulation of CCN2 and CCN3 during fibrotic disorder development. TGF-β signal stimulates CCN2 both directly through specific transcription factors, including Smad3, TGF-β activated kinase 1 (TAK1), specificity protein (SP) 1/SP3 and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) -extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK), and indirectly through the activation of glycolysis by accumulating hexokinase (HK)-2, which is mediated by yes-associated protein (YAP) 1. Glycolysis activation by TGF-β through HK-2 contrarily represses RFX1 expression, resulting in the repression of antifibrotic CCN3 production. Smad-independent negative regulation of CCN3 by TGF-β observed in nucleus pulposus cells could occur through this metabolic pathway. Finally, CCN2 protein promotes fibrosis in collaboration with TGF-β.
Figure 5. Metabolic yin–yang regulation of CCN2 and CCN3 during fibrotic disorder development. TGF-β signal stimulates CCN2 both directly through specific transcription factors, including Smad3, TGF-β activated kinase 1 (TAK1), specificity protein (SP) 1/SP3 and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) -extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK), and indirectly through the activation of glycolysis by accumulating hexokinase (HK)-2, which is mediated by yes-associated protein (YAP) 1. Glycolysis activation by TGF-β through HK-2 contrarily represses RFX1 expression, resulting in the repression of antifibrotic CCN3 production. Smad-independent negative regulation of CCN3 by TGF-β observed in nucleus pulposus cells could occur through this metabolic pathway. Finally, CCN2 protein promotes fibrosis in collaboration with TGF-β.
Ijms 23 05887 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubota, S.; Kawata, K.; Hattori, T.; Nishida, T. Molecular and Genetic Interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 behind Their Yin–Yang Collaboration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115887

AMA Style

Kubota S, Kawata K, Hattori T, Nishida T. Molecular and Genetic Interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 behind Their Yin–Yang Collaboration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(11):5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubota, Satoshi, Kazumi Kawata, Takako Hattori, and Takashi Nishida. 2022. "Molecular and Genetic Interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 behind Their Yin–Yang Collaboration" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 11: 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115887

APA Style

Kubota, S., Kawata, K., Hattori, T., & Nishida, T. (2022). Molecular and Genetic Interactions between CCN2 and CCN3 behind Their Yin–Yang Collaboration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(11), 5887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop