Next Article in Journal
Coffee Polyphenol, Chlorogenic Acid, Suppresses Brain Aging and Its Effects Are Enhanced by Milk Fat Globule Membrane Components
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of IgG Fc Region N-Glycosylation in the Pathomechanism of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Function and Regulation of microRNA171 in Plant Stem Cell Homeostasis and Developmental Programing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Horizons in Plant Cell Signaling

by
Aloysius Wong
1,2,3,* and
Christoph Gehring
4,*
1
Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, 88 Daxue Road, Wenzhou 325060, China
2
Zhejiang Bioinformatics International Science and Technology Cooperation Center, Wenzhou 325060, China
3
Wenzhou Municipal Key Lab for Applied Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Informatics, Wenzhou 325060, China
4
Department of Chemistry, Biology & Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(10), 5826; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105826
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Accepted: 13 May 2022 / Published: 23 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Horizons in Plant Cell Signaling)

Editorial on the Special Issue: New Horizons in Plant Cell Signaling

Responding to environmental stimuli with appropriate molecular mechanisms is essential to all life forms and particularly so in sessile organisms such as plants. To this end, plants have evolved both rapid early mechanisms such as the activation of channels and kinases directly or indirectly through protein sensors [1,2,3,4,5,6], as well as the slower systemic adaptive responses that include changes in their transcriptomes and proteomes [7,8,9,10,11,12]. To enable these processes and concomitantly tune their responses to the environment, complex cellular-signaling mechanisms have evolved, some of which have no homologues in animals [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. This Special Issue aims to broaden the current understanding of plant cell signaling, specifically highlighting recent and exciting discoveries such as the identification of novel signaling molecules and mechanisms that participate across all stages of plant growth and development, and in cellular and biological processes triggered by abiotic and biotic stresses.
One such signaling molecule is the cyclic mononucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs), which, together with nucleotide cyclases, regulate the cellular concentrations of the second messengers, cyclic nucleotide monophosphates (cNMPs), cAMP and cGMP. While well-defined in bacteria, yeast and animals, the components of cNMP signaling pathways in plants are still poorly characterized [22,23,24,25,26]. The use of manually curated amino acid motifs based only on the catalytic centers of the corresponding enzymes in organisms across species have enabled the identification and concomitantly also the characterization of several novel adenylate cyclases (ACs) and guanylate cyclases (GCs) [27,28]. The latter is reviewed by Turek and Irving 2021 [29] within the context of moonlighting roles in modulating signal cascades. The authors discussed how the GC activities that moonlight within complex plant proteins, such as the receptor-like kinases and lipid kinases, can potentiate localized cGMP-enriched niches surrounding their primary domains and interactomes [30,31,32]. Such effects include the downregulation of kinase activity, the modulation of other components or complexes in the signaling pathway and the triggering of degradation cascades leading to signal termination [25,33]. The authors proposed that these moonlighting GCs which generate cGMP-enriched nanodomains in complex proteins form a new paradigm in homeostatic responses that enable a highly precise, spatially differentiated and stimulus-specific cellular signaling in plants [21,29,34,35].
While the generating enzymes of cyclic mononucleotides are being increasingly characterized, the degrading enzymes, the phosphodiesterases (PDEs), have remained elusive in vascular plants until recently. Previously, a novel protein harboring both AC and PDE activities known as CAPE (COMBINED AC with PDE) that may be involved in spermatogenesis and sperm motility, has been identified in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha [36,37]. Adopting a motif-based approach similar to the one mentioned above, Kwiatkowski et al., 2021 [38] reported that a monocot Brachypodium distachyon (BdPDE1) can hydrolyze cNMPs to 5′NMPs but with a preference for cAMP over cGMP. Much like the PDE activities of other systems [39], BdPDE1 activity was significantly enhanced by Ca2+-calmodulin. Mutagenesis studies also identified and revealed the importance of several key residues in the catalytic center. Based on the biochemical, mutagenesis and structural analyses, as well as cross-species sequence analyses, the authors have deduced an amino acid consensus sequence that can be applied in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Identifying functional PDEs in monocots is a significant step towards crop biotechnology, e.g., enabling the design of specific inhibitors with a view to developing improved crops. Previously, a tandem motif and structural approach has identified a functional PDE moonlighting at the C-terminal of a potassium transporter from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (AtKUP5) which also harbors a functional AC at the N-terminal [40,41]. The discovery of such dual moonlighting AC-PDE architecture in complex proteins raises the exciting possibility of providing an intricate and dynamic localized spatiotemporal fine-tuning mechanism for signal intensity [30,31,42,43]. Recent discoveries of PDEs in both monocots and dicots suggest that this PDE architecture may well be a common feature in higher plants and that this motif-based strategy can be used to identify novel PDEs in model and crop plants.
The non-cyclic form of cAMP, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), is present in all life forms and is central for energy metabolism achieved through the enzyme 5’ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). As an energy sensor, AMPK is activated by decreasing ATP or increasing AMP and ADP [44,45,46]. AMP is a direct agonist for AMPK and its activation by AMP has been observed through allosteric regulation in various organisms [47]. In this regard, Clark et al., 2020 [48] reviewed the enzymes that generate AMP through the hydrolysis of ATP in plants. They are known as apyrases (APYs). The authors provided a historical account of plant APYs with a particular focus on the progress that has been made in their biochemistry, structures, and functions, reported between 2015 and 2020. Among the recent studies described were reports on how APY expression is linked to growth through extracellular ATP (eATP) treatments and how APY exerts a protective role in plant biotic and abiotic stress responses through the induction of gene expression changes while also appearing to crosstalk with hormones such as ethylene and auxin [49,50,51,52,53]. The authors noted that the initial discovery of plant eATP receptor in Arabidopsis thaliana, AtAPY1 [54], has encouraged research on APYs and despite several contradictory reports [55,56], recent data supported the ability of AtAPY1 to bind and hydrolyze ATP [57]. Additionally, new data on APY functions in multiple plant species such as peas, Brassica, and poplar assign the important role of APYs in plant defense responses [58,59,60]. These, and other major recent advances including the availability of new crystal structures, offer insights on the NTP-binding domain [57], the ability of APYs to hydrolyze ATP in the ECM and nuclei [60], and the identification of APY-binding partners [61]. The findings are summarized in a table. The authors also reviewed the prospect of using APY-specific inhibitors and their value in future research that focuses on how APY regulates cellular activities. The state of the current field is also framed in the form of outstanding major questions that serve to guide research in the field of plant APYs.
Salicylic acid (SA), a phenolic plant hormone found in many plant species, functions as a critical signaling molecule in local and systemic disease resistance pathways [62]. Responding to a broad spectrum of pathogens and abiotic stresses, SA also crosstalks with many signaling pathways ranging from reactive oxygen species, lipids, and circadian clock to other hormones such as jasmonic acid and ethylene [63,64,65,66,67]. Plant defense signaling by SA is initiated when it binds to target proteins such as the nonexpresser of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (NPR1) which is a well-established transcriptional regulator of SA signaling [68]. Pokotylo et al., 2020 [69] proposed that SA could bind to many other proteins, some of which are enzymes involved in primary metabolism such as the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) which was previously shown to bind SA in both humans and plants [70,71,72]. The authors reported that GAPDH activity was inhibited by SA and showed in surface plasmon resonance studies that SA binds to the A1 isomer of a chloroplastic glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPA1) from Arabidopsis thaliana with a KD of 16.7 nM. The authors further revealed two putative binding pockets through molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations on the apoprotein and protein–ligand complex, but only one pocket around Asn35 could bind SA when simulated in an aqueous environment. This pocket is also the binding site of the NADP+ cofactor and the binding of SA to GAPA1 inhibited NADH in a dose–response manner. Mutagenesis simulations assigned key roles to Asn35 and Arg81 for binding of SA to GAPA1 which the authors then used as a guide for the subsequent in vitro biochemical validations. Mutations of these two residues markedly reduced the ability of GAPA1 to bind SA. Taken together, this research offers novel insights into how SA controls energy fluxes in stressed plants while also providing a new dimension to the current paradigm of SA signaling through its interaction with proteins which have not normally been associated with SA [73,74].
Another signaling molecule, Ca2+, has long been known to have a significant role in many cellular activities in both plant and animal systems signaling for cell division, cell movement, cell death, fertilization, and metabolism [75,76]. Ca2+ ions in the cytosol of a resting cell are maintained at very low levels typically about 10,000 times lower than that at the extracellular space, or in the vacuole and the lumen of intracellular stores. As such, cytosolic Ca2+ must be tightly regulated by the presence of various Ca2+ ion pumps, exchangers, and channels. Ca2+ entry can be activated by membrane hyperpolarization among other possible mechanisms, but unlike the more common depolarization activation, membrane hyperpolarization would mean that hyperpolarization-activated Ca2+ channels (HACCs) are normally kept open in the resting state of the membrane [77,78,79]. If not regulated, HACCs, which are also permeable to Ba2+ and Mg2+, would leak Ca2+ into cells. Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2020 [80] showed that Mg-ATP, but not ATP on its own, significantly reduces HACC activity especially at −200 mV or lower in Vicia faba guard cells and this effect is specifically due to Mg2+. It led the authors to conclude that Mg2+ prevents the continuous leakage of Ca2+ into the cells through the inactivation of HACCs and that the opening of these channels would require high negative voltages or displacement of Mg2+. Through structural analysis of other Mg2+-sensitive K+ channels, the authors proposed that the particular HACCs responsible for this result in the guard cell are the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGCs) which harbor a conserved Mg2+-binding motif within their pores [81,82,83]. In the guard cell, HACCs can be activated by the sesquiterpene hormone ABA and H2O2 [84,85]. Therefore, this study establishes an important role for Mg2+ in Ca2+ signaling and in plant physiological processes including ABA-dependent responses which might bridge existing gaps concerning Ca2+ homeostasis in the current literature [75].
Being immobile, plants are constantly exposed to biotic and abiotic stresses and must also respond to a changing external environment. As the boundary between the plant and the external environment, the plant epidermis is not just a barrier that protects the plant against pathogens, but it also regulates exchange of water, nutrients, and gases crucial for growth and development processes [86,87]. The mechanisms involved in transcriptional regulation of epidermal cells in processes such as shoot growth, lipid metabolism and cuticle synthesis, as well as defense responses, are largely unknown [88]. Wang et al., 2020 [89] dissected the promoter of Triticum aestivum lipid transfer protein 1 (TaLTP1) by generating multiple deletion constructs and studying their activities in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana and Brachypodium distachyon. Through histochemical GUS and quantitative fluorometric analyses, the −400TaLTP1::uidA construct was able to confer full activity at the vegetative stage. A separate construct, −343TaLTP1::uidA, caused a loss of quantitative GUS activity by about 90% in transgenic plant leaves which is associated with pavement cells but not trichomes. Another construct, −297TaLTP1::uidA, resulted in a complete loss of GUS activity in true leaves but the activity was not altered in cotyledon until the promoter region was shortened to position −247 bp. Through mutagenesis studies, the authors also identified the specific cis-elements which they named as GC(N4)GGCC at positions −380 bp to −372 bp, that are responsible for pavement-cell-specific expression. Using electrophoretic mobility shift and transgenic reporter assays, the authors found a CCaacAt motif at −303 bp that regulates trichome-specific expression while a conserved CcATC motif at −268 bp was found to be involved in regulating pavement-cell-specific expression. In summary, this study identified the specific promoter regions of TaLTP1 responsible for tissue-specific expression as well as the cis elements responsible for epidermal-cell-specific expression in shoots, thus contributing to the broader understanding of gene transcription regulation in plant epidermis of aerial tissues [90,91].
Another exciting development related to the regulation of gene expression are the microRNAs. Present in both animals and plants, these single-stranded non-coding RNAs are involved in silencing and post-transcriptional regulation of RNAs [92,93]. Han and Zhou (2022) [94] reviewed the recent progress of one such group of RNAs, the microRNA171 (miR171) in plants. The authors described that miR171 is ancient and conserved in land plants and exerts its regulatory effects by repressing the HAIRYMERISTEM (HAM) gene family [95,96,97,98]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, miR171 acts as a mobile short-range signal that initiates the epidermal layer of shoot meristems and affects the patterning of apical–basal polarity of gene expression and stem cell dynamics [99]. Besides providing a brief account of miRNA171 and its targets, the authors also discussed its function as a regulatory hub in diverse plant developmental processes, as well as their expression patterns and regulations in response to abiotic stresses such as light. The authors noted that miR171 family members are conserved and have lineage-specific functions in land plants. Thus, they proposed, among other research directions, to focus on how miR171 connects environmental factors to plant development not just in seed plants but also in in non-seed vascular plants such as the fern Ceratopteris richardii. This may well provide a better account of its evolution in land plants and could potentially make miR171 a target for crop improvement and protection [100,101,102].
Contributions in this Special Issue have revealed novel signaling molecules, signaling mechanisms, and regulations that broaden our view on how plants signal for growth and development, and their responses to environmental stresses. The body of research presented in this series will hopefully inspire hypothesis generation as well as encourage and guide experiments that will collectively advance our understanding in the rapidly evolving field of plant cell signaling.

Author Contributions

A.W. and C.G. wrote, edited, and approved the manuscript for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.W. is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100581) and the International Collaborative Research Program of Wenzhou-Kean University (ICRP202202).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, X.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Y.; Song, C.; Wang, B.; Yang, S.; Guo, Y.; Gong, Z. Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dong, Q.; Wallrad, L.; Almutairi, B.O.; Kudla, J. Ca2+ signaling in plant responses to abiotic stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, H.-J.; Seo, P.J. Ca2+talyzing Initial Responses to Environmental Stresses. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 849–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, G.; Moeder, W.; Yoshioka, K.; Shan, L. A tale of many families: Calcium channels in plant immunity. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 1551–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kleist, T.J.; Wudick, M.M. Shaping up: Recent advances in the study of plant calcium channels. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2022, 76, 102080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kollist, H.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Sengupta, S.; Nuhkat, M.; Kangasjärvi, J.; Mittler, R. Rapid Responses to Abiotic Stress: Priming the Landscape for the Signal Transduction Network. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Huang, J.; Zhao, X.; Chory, J.; Huang, J.; Zhao, X.; Chory, J. The Arabidopsis Transcriptome Responds Specifically and Dynamically to High Light Stress. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 4186–4199.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nagano, A.J.; Kawagoe, T.; Sugisaka, J.; Honjo, M.N.; Iwayama, K.; Kudoh, H. Annual transcriptome dynamics in natural environments reveals plant seasonal adaptation. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Hsu, C.-C.; Du, Y.; Zhu, P.; Zhao, C.; Fu, X.; Zhang, C.; Paez, J.S.; Macho, A.P.; Tao, W.A.; et al. Mapping proteome-wide targets of protein kinases in plant stress responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 3270–3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marondedze, C.; Thomas, L.; Gehring, C.; Lilley, K.S. Changes in the Arabidopsis RNA-binding proteome reveal novel stress response mechanisms. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seaton, D.D.; Graf, A.; Baerenfaller, K.; Stitt, M.; Millar, A.J.; Gruissem, W. Photoperiodic control of the Arabidopsis proteome reveals a translational coincidence mechanism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2018, 14, e7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Orr, M.W.; Mao, Y.; Storz, G.; Qian, S.-B. Alternative ORFs and small ORFs: Shedding light on the dark proteome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 1029–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Toyota, M.; Spencer, D.; Sawai-Toyota, S.; Jiaqi, W.; Zhang, T.; Koo, A.J.; Howe, G.A.; Gilroy, S. Glutamate triggers long-distance, calcium-based plant defense signaling. Science 2018, 361, 1112–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Trewavas, A. Mindless mastery. Nature 2002, 415, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bradford, W.; Buckholz, A.; Morton, J.; Price, C.; Jones, A.M.; Urano, D. Eukaryotic G Protein Signaling Evolved to Require G Protein–Coupled Receptors for Activation. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6, ra37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wu, T.-Y.; Goh, H.; Azodi, C.B.; Krishnamoorthi, S.; Liu, M.-J.; Urano, D. Evolutionarily conserved hierarchical gene regulatory networks for plant salt stress response. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maruta, N.; Trusov, Y.; Urano, D.; Chakravorty, D.; Assmann, S.M.; Jones, A.M.; Botella, J.R. GTP binding by Arabidopsis extra-large G protein 2 is not essential for its functions. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 1240–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wong, A.; Hu, N.; Tian, X.; Yang, Y.; Gehring, C. Nitric oxide sensing revisited. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 885–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wong, A.; Tian, X.; Yang, Y.; Gehring, C. Identification of potential nitric oxide-sensing proteins using the H-NOX motif. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wong, A.; Bi, C.; Pasqualini, S.; Gehring, C. Abscisic acid (ABA) signaling: Finding novel components off the beaten track. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Campos, M.L. Round and round it goes: A cyclic nucleotide modulates stress responses in plants. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 1942–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gehring, C.; Turek, I.S. Cyclic nucleotide monophosphates and their cyclases in plant signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Marondedze, C.; Wong, A.; Thomas, L.; Irving, H.; Gehring, C. Cyclic nucleotide monophosphates in plants and plant signaling. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017, 238, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blanco, E.; Fortunato, S.; Viggiano, L.; De Pinto, M.C. Cyclic AMP: A Polyhedral Signalling Molecule in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Świeżawska-Boniecka, B.; Duszyn, M.; Kwiatkowski, M.; Szmidt-Jaworska, A.; Jaworski, K. Cross talk between cyclic nucleotides and calcium signaling pathways in plants-achievements and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 643560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, J.; Ning, Y.; Wang, L.; Wilkins, K.A.; Davies, J.M. Damage signaling by extracellular nucleotides: A role for cyclic nucleotides in elevating cytosolic free calcium? Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 788514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, W.; Chi, W.; Shen, W.; Dou, W.; Wang, J.; Tian, X.; Gehring, C.; Wong, A. Computational Identification of Functional Centers in Complex Proteins: A Step-by-Step Guide with Examples. Front. Bioinform. 2021, 1, 652286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wong, A.; Tian, X.; Gehring, C.; Marondedze, C. Discovery of Novel Functional Centers with Rationally Designed Amino Acid Motifs. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Turek, I.; Irving, H. Moonlighting Proteins Shine New Light on Molecular Signaling Niches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Irving, H.R.; Cahill, D.M.; Gehring, C. Moonlighting Proteins and Their Role in the Control of Signaling Microenvironments, as Exemplified by cGMP and Phytosulfokine Receptor 1 (PSKR1). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Su, B.; Qian, Z.; Li, T.; Zhou, Y.; Wong, A. PlantMP: A database for moonlighting plant proteins. Database 2019, 2019, baz050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wong, A.; Donaldson, L.; Portes, M.T.; Eppinger, J.; Feijó, J.; Gehring, C. The Arabidopsis Diacylglycerol Kinase 4 is involved in nitric oxide-dependent pollen tube guidance and fertilization. Development 2020, 147, 183715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, Y.; Walker, R.K.; Zhao, Y.; Berkowitz, G.A. Linking ligand perception by PEPR pattern recognition receptors to cytosolic Ca 2+ elevation and downstream immune signaling in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19852–19857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, N.; Liu, Y.; Yang, S.; Du, H.; Wang, W.; Wu, J.; Tai, F.; Chen, F.; et al. A new adenylyl cyclase, putative disease-resistance RPP13-like protein 3, participates in abscisic acid-mediated resistance to heat stress in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rahman, H.; Wang, X.-Y.; Xu, Y.-P.; He, Y.-H.; Cai, X.-Z. Characterization of tomato protein kinases embedding guanylate cyclase catalytic center motif. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kasahara, M.; Suetsugu, N.; Urano, Y.; Yamamoto, C.; Ohmori, M.; Takada, Y.; Okuda, S.; Nishiyama, T.; Sakayama, H.; Kohchi, T.; et al. An adenylyl cyclase with a phosphodiesterase domain in basal plants with a motile sperm system. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yamamoto, C.; Takahashi, F.; Ooe, Y.; Shirahata, H.; Shibata, A.; Kasahara, M. Distribution of adenylyl cyclase/cAMP phosphodiesterase gene, CAPE, in streptophytes reproducing via motile sperm. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kwiatkowski, M.; Wong, A.; Kozakiewicz-Piekarz, A.; Gehring, C.; Jaworski, K. In Search of Monocot Phosphodiesterases: Identification of a Calmodulin Stimulated Phosphodiesterase from Brachypodium distachyon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kakkar, R.; Raju, R.V.; Sharma, R.K. Calmodulin-dependent cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE1). Cell Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 55, 1164–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kwiatkowski, M.; Wong, A.; Kozakiewicz, A.; Gehring, C.; Jaworski, K. A tandem motif-based and structural approach can identify hidden functional phosphodiesterases. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 970–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Younis, I.; Wong, A.; Lemtiri-Chlieh, F.; Schmöckel, S.; Tester, M.; Gehring, C.; Donaldson, L. The Arabidopsis thaliana K+-Uptake Permease 5 (AtKUP5) Contains a Functional Cytosolic Adenylate Cyclase Essential for K+ Transport. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Sampathkumar, A.; Kerber, S.M.-L.; Swart, C.; Hille, C.; Seerangan, K.; Graf, A.; Sweetlove, L.; Fernie, A.R. A moonlighting role for enzymes of glycolysis in the co-localization of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Allipra, S.; Anirudhan, K.; Shivanandan, S.; Raghunathan, A.; Maruthachalam, R. The kinetochore protein NNF1 has a moonlighting role in the vegetative development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2021, 109, 1064–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Herzig, S.; Shaw, R.J. AMPK: Guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Trefts, E.; Shaw, R.J. AMPK: Restoring metabolic homeostasis over space and time. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 3677–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hardie, D.G.; Ross, F.A.; Hawley, S.A. AMPK: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hardie, D.G. AMP-activated protein kinase: An energy sensor that regulates all aspects of cell function. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 1895–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Clark, G.; Brown, K.; Tripathy, M.; Roux, S. Recent Advances Clarifying the Structure and Function of Plant Apyrases (Nucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolases). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lim, M.H.; Wu, J.; Yao, J.; Gallardo, I.F.; Dugger, J.; Webb, L.J.; Huang, J.; Salmi, M.; Song, J.; Clark, G.; et al. Apyrase Suppression Raises Extracellular ATP Levels and Induces Gene Expression and Cell Wall Changes Characteristic of Stress Responses. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 2054–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, X.; Wu, J.; Clark, G.; Lundy, S.; Lim, M.; Arnold, D.; Chan, J.; Tang, W.; Muday, G.K.; Gardner, G.; et al. Role for Apyrases in Polar Auxin Transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 1985–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Clark, G.; Roux, S.J. Apyrases, extracellular ATP and the regulation of growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lang, T.; Deng, C.; Yao, J.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, Y.; Deng, S.R. A Salt-Signaling Network Involving Ethylene, Extracellular ATP, Hydrogen Peroxide, and Calcium Mediates K+/Na+ Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jewell, J.B.; Sowders, J.M.; He, R.F.; Willis, M.A.; Gang, D.R.; Tanaka, K. Extracellular ATP Shapes a Defense-Related Transcriptome Both Independently and along with Other Defense Signaling Pathways. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 1144–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Choi, J.; Tanaka, K.; Cao, Y.R.; Qi, Y.; Qiu, J.; Liang, Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Stacey, G. Identification of a Plant Receptor for Extracellular ATP. Science 2014, 343, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chiu, T.Y.; Christiansen, K.; Moreno, I.; Lao, J.M.; Loque, D.; Orellana, A.; Heazlewood, J.L.; Clark, G.; Roux, S.J. AtAPY1 and AtAPY2 Function as Golgi-Localized Nucleoside Diphosphatases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1913–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chiu, T.Y.; Lao, J.; Manalansan, B.; Loque, D.; Roux, S.J.; Heazlewood, J.L. Biochemical characterization of Arabidopsis APYRASE family reveals their roles in regulating endomembrane NDP/NMP homoeostasis. Biochem. J. 2015, 472, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Summers, E.L.; Cumming, M.H.; Oulavallickal, T.; Roberts, N.J.; Arcus, V.L. Structures and kinetics for plant nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases support a domain motion catalytic mechanism. Protein Sci. 2017, 26, 1627–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Veerappa, R.; Slocum, R.D.; Siegenthaler, A.; Wang, J.; Clark, G.; Roux, S.J. Ectopic expression of a pea apyrase enhances root system architecture and drought survival in Arabidopsis and soybean. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 337–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cao, L.W.; Liu, B.; Li, J.X.; Yu, N.N.; Zou, X.X.; Chen, L.P. Light- and temperature-regulated BjAPY2 may have a role in stem expansion of Brassica juncea. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Deng, S.R.; Sun, J.; Zhao, R.; Ding, M.Q.; Zhang, Y.N.; Sun, Y.L.; Wang, W.; Tan, Y.Q.; Liu, D.D.; Ma, X.J.; et al. Populus euphratica APYRASE2 Enhances Cold Tolerance by Modulating Vesicular Trafficking and Extracellular ATP in Arabidopsis Plants. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 530–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Li, H.; Hu, J.B.; Pang, J.; Zhao, L.T.; Yang, B.; Kang, X.L.; Wang, A.M.; Xu, T.D.; Yang, Z.B. Rho GTPase ROP1 Interactome Analysis Reveals Novel ROP1-Associated Pathways for Pollen Tube Polar Growth in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Janda, T.; Szalai, G.; Pál, M. Salicylic Acid Signalling in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Thaler, J.S.; Humphrey, P.T.; Whiteman, N.K. Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yang, J.; Duan, G.; Li, C.; Liu, L.; Han, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C. The Crosstalks Between Jasmonic Acid and Other Plant Hormone Signaling Highlight the Involvement of Jasmonic Acid as a Core Component in Plant Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Saxena, I.; Srikanth, S.; Chen, Z. Cross Talk between H2O2 and Interacting Signal Molecules under Plant Stress Response. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Zhang, Q.; Xiao, S. Lipids in salicylic acid-mediated defense in plants: Focusing on the roles of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Philippou, K.; Davis, A.M.; Davis, S.J.; Sánchez-Villarreal, A. Chemical Perturbation of Chloroplast-Related Processes Affects Circadian Rhythms of Gene Expression in Arabidopsis: Salicylic Acid Application Can Entrain the Clock. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Y.; Sun, T.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Radojičić, A.; Ding, Y.; Tian, H.; Huang, X.; Lan, J.; Chen, S.; et al. Diverse Roles of the Salicylic Acid Receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in Plant Immunity. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 4002–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pokotylo, I.; Hellal, D.; Bouceba, T.; Hernandez-Martinez, M.; Kravets, V.; Leitao, L.; Espinasse, C.; Kleiner, I.; Ruelland, E. Deciphering the Binding of Salicylic Acid to Arabidopsis thaliana Chloroplastic GAPDH-A1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pokotylo, I.; Kravets, V.; Ruelland, E. Salicylic acid binding proteins (SABPs): The hidden forefront of salicylic acid signalling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Choi, H.W.; Wang, L.; Powell, A.F.; Strickler, S.R.; Wang, D.; Dempsey, D.A.; Schroeder, F.C.; Klessig, D.F. A genome-wide screen for human salicylic acid (SA)-binding proteins reveals targets through which SA may influence development of various diseases. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Klessig, D.F.; Tian, M.; Choi, H.W. Multiple Targets of Salicylic Acid and Its Derivatives in Plants and Animals. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Nadarajah, K.; Abdul Hamid, N.W.; Abdul Rahman, N. SA-Mediated Regulation and Control of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dempsey, D.A.; Klessig, D.F. How does the multifaceted plant hormone salicylic acid combat disease in plants and are similar mechanisms utilized in humans? BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Kudla, J.; Becker, D.; Grill, E.; Hedrich, R.; Hippler, M.; Kummer, U.; Parniske, M.; Romeis, T.; Schumacher, K. Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Luan, S.; Wang, C. Calcium Signaling Mechanisms Across Kingdoms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 37, 311–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Edel, K.H.; Marchadier, E.; Brownlee, C.; Kudla, J.; Hetherington, A.M. The Evolution of Calcium-Based Signalling in Plants. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R667–R679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Thor, K. Calcium-Nutrient and Messenger. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Miedema, H.; Demidchik, V.; Véry, A.-A.; Bothwell, J.H.F.; Brownlee, C.; Davies, J.M. Two voltage-dependent calcium channels co-exist in the apical plasma membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana root hairs. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lemtiri-Chlieh, F.; Arold, S.T.; Gehring, C. Mg2+ Is a Missing Link in Plant Cell Ca2+ Signalling and Homeostasis-A Study on Vicia faba Guard Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Duszyn, M.; Świeżawska, B.; Szmidt-Jaworska, A.; Jaworski, K. Cyclic nucleotide gated channels (CNGCs) in plant signalling-Current knowledge and perspectives. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 241, 153035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pan, Y.; Chai, X.; Gao, Q.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Luan, S. Dynamic Interactions of Plant CNGC Subunits and Calmodulins Drive Oscillatory Ca2+ Channel Activities. Dev. Cell 2019, 48, 710–725.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Jarratt-Barnham, E.; Wang, L.; Ning, Y.; Davies, J.M. The Complex Story of Plant Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, P.; Song, C.P. Guard-cell signalling for hydrogen peroxide and abscisic acid. New Phytol. 2008, 178, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pei, Z.M.; Murata, Y.; Benning, G.; Thomine, S.; Klüsener, B.; Allen, G.J.; Grill, E.; Schroeder, J.I. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature 2000, 406, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Javelle, M.; Vernoud, V.; Rogowsky, P.M.; Ingram, G.C. Epidermis: The formation and functions of a fundamental plant tissue. New Phytol. 2011, 18, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zuch, D.T.; Doyle, S.M.; Majda, M.; Smith, R.S.; Robert, S.; Torii, K.U. Cell biology of the leaf epidermis: Fate specification, morphogenesis, and coordination. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhatia, S.; Kumar, H.; Mahajan, M.; Yadav, S.; Saini, P.; Yadav, S.; Sahu, S.K.; Sundaram, J.K.; Yadav, R.K. A cellular expression map of epidermal and subepidermal cell layer-enriched transcription factor genes integrated with the regulatory network in Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem. Plant Direct 2021, 5, e00306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, G.; Yu, G.; Hao, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhao, J.; Sun, S.; Wang, H. Molecular Dissection of TaLTP1 Promoter Reveals Functional Cis-Elements Regulating Epidermis-Specific Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Tian, N.; Liu, F.; Wang, P.; Yan, X.; Gao, H.; Zeng, X.; Wu, G. Overexpression of BraLTP2, a Lipid Transfer Protein of Brassica napus, Results in Increased Trichome Density and Altered Concentration of Secondary Metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Balmant, K.M.; Lawrence, S.R., 2nd; Duong, B.V.; Zhu, F.; Zhu, N.; Nicklay, J.; Chen, S. Guard cell redox proteomics reveals a role of lipid transfer protein in plant defense. J. Proteomics 2021, 242, 104247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Samad, A.F.A.; Kamaroddin, M.F.; Sajad, M. Cross-Kingdom Regulation by Plant microRNAs Provides Novel Insight into Gene Regulation. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Khraiwesh, B.; Arif, M.A.; Seumel, G.I.; Ossowski, S.; Weigel, D.; Reski, R.; Frank, W. Transcriptional control of gene expression by microRNAs. Cell 2010, 140, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Han, H.; Zhou, Y. Function and Regulation of microRNA171 in Plant Stem Cell Homeostasis and Developmental Programing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhu, X.; Leng, X.; Sun, X.; Mu, Q.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Fang, J. Discovery of Conservation and Diversification of miR171 Genes by Phylogenetic Analysis based on Global Genomes. Plant Genome 2015, 8, plantgenome2014-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Geng, Y.; Guo, L.; Han, H.; Liu, X.; Banks, J.A.; Wisecaver, J.H.; Zhou, Y. Conservation and diversification of HAIRY MERISTEM gene family in land plants. Plant J. 2021, 106, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Couzigou, J.M.; Combier, J.P. Plant microRNAs: Key regulators of root architecture and biotic interactions. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Geng, Y.; Zhou, Y. HAM Gene Family and Shoot Meristem Development. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 800332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Han, H.; Yan, A.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, B.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y. A signal cascade originated from epidermis defines apical-basal patterning of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristems. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Siré, C.; Moreno, A.B.; Garcia-Chapa, M.; López-Moya, J.J.; San Segundo, B. Diurnal oscillation in the accumulation of Arabidopsis microRNAs, miR167, miR168, miR171 and miR398. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Wu, X.; Yan, A.; McAdam, S.A.M.; Banks, J.A.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y. Timing of meristem initiation and maintenance determines the morphology of fern gametophytes. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 6990–7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Djami-Tchatchou, A.T.; Sanan-Mishra, N.; Ntushelo, K.; Dubery, I.A. Functional Roles of microRNAs in Agronomically Important Plants-Potential as Targets for Crop Improvement and Protection. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wong, A.; Gehring, C. New Horizons in Plant Cell Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105826

AMA Style

Wong A, Gehring C. New Horizons in Plant Cell Signaling. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(10):5826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wong, Aloysius, and Christoph Gehring. 2022. "New Horizons in Plant Cell Signaling" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 10: 5826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop