Next Article in Journal
The Contribution of Small Vessel Disease to Neurodegeneration: Focus on Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibitors of Chemoresistance Pathways in Combination with Ara-C to Overcome Multidrug Resistance in AML. A Mini Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epigenetic Regulation of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease

School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work as first authors.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4956; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094956
Submission received: 19 March 2021 / Revised: 27 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 7 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Neurobiology)

Abstract

:
Neuroinflammation is one of the most significant factors involved in the initiation and progression of Parkinson’s disease. PD is a neurodegenerative disorder with a motor disability linked with various complex and diversified risk factors. These factors trigger myriads of cellular and molecular processes, such as misfolding defective proteins, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neurotoxic substances that induce selective neurodegeneration of dopamine neurons. This neuronal damage activates the neuronal immune system, including glial cells and inflammatory cytokines, to trigger neuroinflammation. The transition of acute to chronic neuroinflammation enhances the susceptibility of inflammation-induced dopaminergic neuron damage, forming a vicious cycle and prompting an individual to PD development. Epigenetic mechanisms recently have been at the forefront of the regulation of neuroinflammatory factors in PD, proposing a new dawn for breaking this vicious cycle. This review examined the core epigenetic mechanisms involved in the activation and phenotypic transformation of glial cells mediated neuroinflammation in PD. We found that epigenetic mechanisms do not work independently, despite being coordinated with each other to activate neuroinflammatory pathways. In this regard, we attempted to find the synergic correlation and contribution of these epigenetic modifications with various neuroinflammatory pathways to broaden the canvas of underlying pathological mechanisms involved in PD development. Moreover, this study highlighted the dual characteristics (neuroprotective/neurotoxic) of these epigenetic marks, which may counteract PD pathogenesis and make them potential candidates for devising future PD diagnosis and treatment.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, after Alzheimer’s disease (AD), affecting the old age population [1]. It is characterized by the subclinical feature of cytoplasmic proteinaceous inclusions of Lewy bodies (LBs) in the substantia nigra (SN) of the PD brain and degeneration of dopaminergic neurons (DA). Extensive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons lowers dopamine levels in the brain, resulting in clinical manifestations such as postural instability, static tremor, bradykinesia, and ankylosis arthritis [2,3,4]. Following the dopaminergic loss, various non-dopaminergic neurons also degenerate and lead to several dopamine-resistant symptoms, including insomnia, olfactory dysfunction, autonomic dysfunction, pain, and sensory manifestations [5]. Though these symptoms are treated at primary stages with dopaminergic drugs (Levodopa), their effectiveness reduces with symptoms severity due to successive underlying neurodegeneration [2,6]. Hence, it makes PD treatment quite challenging and complicated.
For decades, the underlying pathophysiology of the PD has remained unclear. It is believed to be caused by both genetic mutations (SNCA, LRRK2, PARKIN, and DJ-1), termed as familial PD, and environmental factors (exogenous neurotoxins, age, diet, and lifestyle) in sporadic PD [7]. It is observed that these factors induce various molecular and cellular events, such as oxidative stress, α-synuclein oligomerization, mitochondrial dysfunction, higher iron concentration to trigger neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Nevertheless, the core molecular and cellular processes involved in the PD are divergent. However, all of these events participate over time in neuronal apoptosis by activating the microglia and astrocytes population in particular regions of the brain [5]. Any initial stimulus, either in the form of cellular stresses (genotoxic, osmotic, hypoxic, or oxidative stress) or environmental stresses (exogenous neurotoxins or stressful lifestyle), activates the neuronal immune responses, including microglia, astrocytes, inflammatory cytokines, etc. [8]. However, the continual activation of the neuronal immune system leads to a vicious cycle of neuroinflammation that causes chronic inflammatory environments that are likely to ensue neuronal dysfunction and ultimately the death of the endangered neuronal population. A significant number of PD studies, including animal and human models, have strongly linked neuroinflammation as environmental stressors that trigger progressive degeneration of DA neurons. Therefore, on-time delivery of anti-inflammatory therapy is required to provide neuroprotective effects in PD patients at risk of genetic and epigenetic dysfunction.
Epigenetic factors have been observed to play a dynamic role in regulating neuroinflammation in both forms of PD. These factors, including DNA/RNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), etc., are sought to bridge environmental factors and genes by altering gene expression and chromosome function without changing the DNA sequence. Moreover, these epigenetic mechanisms regulate the immune cells and inflammatory factors and are believed to be part of the underlying mechanism countering neuroinflammation-induced DA damage in PD patients. It is worth mentioning that these epigenetic mechanisms act synergistically and do not regulate the neuroinflammation in PD independently. For instance, circRNAs and lncRNA sponge with miRNAs and regulate various target genes that activate microglia and astrocytes, thus trigger neuroinflammation in PD. Similarly, methylases cooperate with ncRNAs to activate various inflammatory pathways to decide the fate of glial cells in PD. Unfortunately, detailed studies of epigenetic mechanisms and their synergic interaction with neuroinflammatory pathways in PD have not been discussed until now. Therefore, in this review, we have discussed the impact of epigenetic mechanisms in regulating neuroinflammation in PD and identified their synergic interactions with various neuroinflammatory pathways. In addition, we have also highlighted various epigenetic modifications based on their neuroprotective and neurotoxic properties to identify their potential use in future PD management (Figure 1).

2. Crosstalk of Neuroinflammation in PD Progression

Neuroinflammation acts as a double-edged sword in the nervous system. Under normal circumstances, microglia and astrocytes protect against pathogenic attack or cellular stress. However, during PD progression, inflammatory cytokines activate glial cells and change their phenotype. This process triggers inflammatory mediators, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) production, leading to massive dopaminergic neuronal apoptosis and α-synuclein aggregation, thus intensifying PD development. Although the initial damage of DA neuron does not trigger neuroinflammation, the dead remains of DA neurons usually induce chemokines release that promotes the penetration of activated microglia to clear the dead remains of nerve fragments and thus results in neuroinflammation [9]. In 2016, Gerhard et al., performed PET scans on the brains of PD patients. They observed an increased level of neuroinflammation in the pons, basal ganglia, striatum, frontal, and temporal cortex areas along with the massive apoptosis of DA neurons [10]. Thus, it proposed that the apoptotic process of DA neurons and the development of neuroinflammation occurs simultaneously. Moreover, it is observed that the midbrain region enriched with DA neurons possesses the highest number of microglia [11]. Unlike neurons in the hippocampus or cortex, midbrain DA neurons exhibited more sensitivity for cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [12,13] and were directly associated with inflammation. In conclusion, the consistent degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in PD patients’ brains are the outcomes of chronic neuroinflammatory reactions.

Molecular Insight of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease

Neuroinflammation occurs on the activation and proliferation of microglia and astrocytes. Microglia are immune cells in the brain that participate in the inflammatory response in the central nervous system (CNS). Astrocytes are the most abundant type of glial cells in the CNS that support brain structure. When inflammatory factors such as TNFα and interleukins (IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ) are recognized and received, microglia differentiate into the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype. M1 phenotypic microglia secrete TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, ROS, and nitric oxide (NO) and reduce the secretion of neurotrophic factors to aggravate the damage of nerve cells [14,15]. In contrast, when stimulated by IL-4, IL-10, and other cytokines, microglia differentiate into the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Microglia with M2 phenotype produces various anti-inflammatory compounds and has an immunosuppressive effect by antagonizing M1 microglia [15]. Microglia with M2 phenotype can also secrete IL-4, IL-13, TGF-β, and neurotrophic factors such as IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor-1), displaying a neuroprotective role [14,15]. Similar to the microglia, astrocytes A1 phenotype is also programmed to secrete neurotoxic pro-inflammatory mediators after receiving inflammatory factors. However, while receiving anti-inflammatory factors, astrocytes with A2 phenotype produces neurotrophic factors and show neuroprotective role. Thus, the abnormal or over-activation of microglia and astrocytes M1/A1 phenotype and lower M2/A2 phenotype can be a possible mechanism that induces neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in PD.
The underlying mechanism involved in chronic neuroinflammation is currently elusive and is thought to be affected by many factors. According to D Cherry’s review, the M1/M2 phenotype of microglia is mostly related to the transformation of acute neuroinflammation to a chronic state. It is observed that failure of the M1 to M2 phenotype of microglia reduces neurotropic factors (such as IGF1 or brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and leads to the production of inflammatory factors and ROS, which causes chronic neuroinflammation and results in neuronal apoptosis [16]. The M1/M2 phenotype transition of microglia is associated with cytokines and growth factors. For instance, when IL-6s are released, the JAK/STAT signaling pathway activates both STAT1 and STAT3 genes that triggers other neuroinflammation-related genes such as Jmjd3 and pro-inflammatory cytokines, thus promotes microglia-mediated neuroinflammation [17]. Contrarily, anti-inflammatory signal factors such as IL-10 and STAT3 would induce the expression of the SOCS1 gene and other anti-inflammatory genes to inhibit the pro-inflammatory response, mediated by TLR4 and IL-6 [18,19]. In addition, some regulatory drugs also change the phenotype of microglia. Such as LPS (lipopolysaccharide), TNF-α inducer stimulates the polarization of microglia into the M1 phenotype. Adding fasudil (Rho-kinase inhibitor) can reduce the activities of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and NF-κB and trigger microglia towards the M2 phenotype [20]. Moreover, the NADPH inhibitor enzyme convert LPS induced M1 microglia into M2 [21]. Moreover, epigenetic modifications may affect the M1/M2 phenotype transition of microglia. For example, miR-155 drive microglia to M1 phenotype [22].
In PD, astrocytes induce the death of dopaminergic neurons by secreting the pro-inflammatory cytokines and other toxic molecules (NO, etc.) [23]. In contrast, there are other reports that astrocytes protect neurons by inhibiting neuroinflammation [24]. The paradoxical performance of astrocytes in PD neuroinflammation is due to its different polarization phenotypes. Excessive activation of the A1 phenotype and lack of A2 phenotype are important factors in developing neuroinflammation in PD. Cytokines and growth factors regulate the A1/A2 phenotype transition of astrocytes. For instance, the release of glycoprotein (gp130) leads to the A2 phenotype by astrocytes. Moreover, gp130 activated STAT1 and STAT3 and mediated the SHP2/Ras/ERK signal cascade to limit the neuroinflammation development. [25]. However, when IL17 was released, it bound to the heterologous transmembrane receptors, which led to the recruitment of NF-kB activator 1 (Act1) and the formation of signal complexes, thereby exhibiting the A1 phenotype and promoting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [26]. Except for cytokines, PD-related genes could also regulate the phenotype of astrocytes. For example, researchers found altered gene expression in astrocytes when exposed to α- synuclein and accelerated the inflammation process. They speculated that the SNCA gene might activate astrocytes in PD through IFN-c and TNF-α and regulate inflammation progression [27,28,29]. Similarly, in mouse models of PD, mutations in Parkin cause astrocyte dysfunction and aggravate neuronal death [30]. However, DJ-1 induces the A2 phenotype of astrocytes through the STAT1 pathway and protected neurons by inhibiting brain inflammation in PD patients [28,31,32].
Although the source and structure of microglia and astrocytes are quite different, they work mutually in any stimulus (brain injury). The synergy between them in neurodegenerative diseases has become a hot point in recent years. According to Ilia D. Vainchtein’s review, both microglia and astrocytes have specific receptors for norepinephrine, purines, and bacterial metabolites in the blood, which seem to induce synchronous reactions between them. Transforming growth factors (TGF-β) released by astrocytes could let neurons release certain components which act on microglia while astrocytes and microglia interact directly with molecules as IL-1α, TNF-α, and IL-33. For example, IL-1α released by astrocytes changed the permeability of the blood–brain barrier, thereby causing the activation of microglia [33]. The activated microglia secreted Il-1α, TNF-α, and C1q both in vivo and in vitro, which induced A1 astrocytes to function [34]. In PD, the two coordinated regulation mechanisms jointly regulate the progression of neuroinflammation. Research by Kaoru Saijo et al., showed that Nurr1 (a monocyte receptor) inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory neurotoxic mediators in microglia and astrocytes and reduced the death of DA neurons. Decreased expression of Nurr1 made astrocytes more susceptible to the influence of microglia and promoted inflammation [35]. Hayate Javed et al., found that glial maturation factor (GMF) was a pro-inflammatory factor, which may be a co-receptor of microglia and astrocytes. However, inhibiting GMF reduced the activation of NLRP3 (NLR family pyrin domain containing 3) inflammasomes and regulated the cytotoxic function of microglia and astrocytes, thus prevented PD development [36]. Studies by Bortolanza et al., also showed that 7-nitroindazole (a NOS inhibitor) could reduce the iNOS expression in PD rat models to downregulate neuroinflammation by inhibiting the activation of astrocytes and microglia [37]. Thus, more research in this domain may provide valuable insight into the deep understanding of the underlying mechanism of glial cell coordination and communication that may help researchers identify the novel targets for PD therapy.

3. Epigenetics and Neuroinflammation in PD

Epigenetic modifications possess a dual function in the regulation of the nervous system. Their neurotoxic and neuroprotective properties make them ideal candidates for disease management. Ample studies have shown that neuroinflammation in PD is regulated by various epigenetic modifications such as non-coding RNA, DNA/RNA methylation, and histone acetylation. They regulate neuroinflammation by governing immune cells, including macrophages, T lymphocytes, microglia, and astrocytes. For instance, histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27) methylation enhances the inflammatory phenotype of macrophages and microglia, which is known as the M1 response. In contrast, H3K27 histone demethylase jumonji-domain Protein 3 (Jmjd3) upregulates the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype of microglia [38]. Thus, a detailed study of these epigenetic mechanisms may unravel the hidden mystery of neuroinflammation involved in PD progression.

3.1. Non-Coding RNA and Neuroinflammation

3.1.1. MicroRNAs

MicroRNAs belongs to the class of small non-coding RNA (sncRNA) with a length of 17–22 nt. They inhibit gene expression level by binding to the 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNA, resulting in mRNA degradation, adenylation, or translational inhibition [39]. Over the past few years, various miRNAs target PD-related genes that induce neuroinflammation and accelerate the neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons (Table 1). For instance, downregulation of miR-133b in the mid-brain tissues of Parkinson’s patients has resulted in the malfunctioned dopaminergic neurons and induces neuroinflammation in PD [40]. Another study reported that dysregulated Let-7 had promoted neuroinflammation through the activation of microglia and macrophages by acting as DAMP of TLR7 (Toll-like receptors 7) that further induced microglia to secrete inflammatory factors [41,42,43]. Contrarily, Let-7 also promoted the M2 phenotype in microglia by targeting the C/EBP-δ transcription factor and inhibiting neuroinflammation-induced apoptosis [44,45]. Similarly, SOCS1 and SOCS3 genes involved in regulating the inflammatory signal transduction of microglia were found downregulated by miR-155 and enhanced neuroinflammation in PD [46].
Interestingly, various microRNAs possess a therapeutic potential and provide neuroprotection against neuroinflammation by targeting PD-associated genes (Table 1). In 2018, Roser et al., reported the neuroprotective role of miR-182-5p and miR-183-5p, which downregulated GDNF (glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor) and protected DA neurons against neuronal damage in the PD model [49]. A cytoplasmic protein NLRP3 belongs to an inflammatory signaling complex, inflammasome, plays a significant role in inflammation-mediated pyrophosphorylation neurodegeneration of DA in substantia nigra par compacta (SNpc) in PD [55,56,57]. A study performed on the striatum of the PD mouse model showed that miR-7 lowers the expression of the NLRP3 gene and SNCA, which resulted in reduced neuronal damage and improved microglia function in PD [47,48]. Another study on the PD model showed that inhibition of STAT3 (transcription factor regulating monoamine oxidase A) and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway reduced neuroinflammation and behavioral changes caused by microglia [58]. miR-124-3p was observed to exert its neuroprotective role in DA neurons by downregulating STAT3 gene expression in the PD cell model induced by MPP [50]. In another study, miR-124 targeted the MEKK3 in the NF-Kb pathway and the nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer that reduced inflammatory cytokine levels in the PD mouse model [51].
Other than targeting inflammation-related genes in PD, miRNAs are also involved in regulating microglia and astrocytes. Recently, PD pathogenesis was investigated on LPS induced in vitro model for microglia activation. This study showed that upregulated miR-195 inhibited the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as inducible nitric oxide synthase, IL-6, and TNF-a and increased the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10. Moreover, miR-195 was observed to downregulate ROCK1 gene expression in the PD model, which resulted in lowered microglia activation and reduced neuroinflammation [52]. Higher expression of miR-190 in the PD model inhibited pro-inflammatory mediators such as iNOS, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β1 and enhanced the release of anti-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-10. Thus, it postulates that miR-190 negatively regulates the expression of the Nlrp3 gene to inhibit the activation and inflammatory response of microglia, which abridged neuronal damage in SNpc [53].
Another study on PD mouse models treated with LPS and IFN-γ showed differential expression of miRNAs in cortical astrocytes. For instance, miR-146a, miR-146b, and miR-155 were found upregulated, whereas miR-351, miR-455, and miR-149 were downregulated. These subsets of differential miRNAs regulated TNF-α signaling pathway genes and activated astrocyte immune response in the PD [54,59]. Further investigation by Iyer et al., in 2012, demonstrated that upregulated miR-146a displayed neuroprotection by reducing the expression of IL-6 and COX-2 and inhibited the inflammatory response mediated by astrocytes [54]. Therefore, through the previous literature, it was observed that most of the miRNAs involved in neuroinflammation are interlinked and induce subsequent molecular changes along with neuroinflammation in the PD. Thus, it is difficult to predict the exact mechanism of miRNAs involved in PD progression at this stage and requires more researcher’s attention to gain insight into the underlying PD-associated molecular mechanism. Nevertheless, neurotoxic and neuroprotective properties of these miRNAs propose their potential as candidate biomarkers for specific diagnostics and therapeutics of future PD patients.

3.1.2. CircRNA

CircRNAs are naturally occurring endogenous ncRNAs, widely distributed throughout the body. They are single-stranded RNA molecules up to 100 nucleotides in length and are covalently linked with 3′ to 5′ ends to form a loop-like structure [60]. They are highly expressed in the brain and regulate various gene expressions by acting as a sponge with miRNAs. Due to the higher percentage in the brain, they regulate various neuronal processes, where their deregulated expression footmarks several neurological disorders. During PD progression, various circRNAs sponge with miRNA to induce neuroinflammation along with other sub-molecular manifestations (Table 2).
The neuroprotective microRNA miR-7 was found downregulated due to the sponging effect of ciRS-7 and circSNCA in PD models. Downregulated miR-7 upregulated the SNCA gene expression that resulted in α-synuclein aggregation accompanied by higher oxidative levels, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and neuronal death [70]. Contrarily, the downregulation of circSNCA under pramipexole (PPX) treatment proposed its therapeutic effect, reduced PD cell apoptosis, and improved autophagy [61]. Recently, transcriptomic profiling of PD brains of a mouse model showed that mmu-circRNA-0003292 sponges with miRNA-132 to downregulate the expression of the NR4A2 gene [62]. Lower expression of NR4A2 caused impaired development and differentiation of midbrain neurons that promoted DA neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, hallmark parkinsonism [62,71]. Another investigation on the PD model showed that circSLC8A1 sponged with miR-128 and downregulated SIRT1 and BMI1 transcripts. This circSLC8A1/miR-128 sponged influences protein homeostasis and chronic neuroinflammation mitochondrial dysfunction and promotes neurodegeneration to induce PD progression [66,67,68].
Since the past few years, circRNAs have gained great attention due to their neuroprotective effects against PD pathogenesis. Recently, Zhong Feng et al., showed that circDLGAP4 exerts its neuroprotective effect through regulating the miR-134-5p/CREB pathway in human and mouse PD models [63]. Moreover, circDLGAP4 sponged with miR-134-5p to regulate the activation of CREB pathway and CREB-associated genes, such as BDNF, Bcl-2, and PGC-1α, which promoted neuron viability by reducing mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and enhanced autophagy [72,73,74]. In another study, mmu_circRNA_0001320 sponged with miRNA-124 and inhibited neuroinflammation in PD by regulating the MEKK3/NF-κB signaling pathway [62,69]. Thus, it speculates that the mmu_circRNA_0001320/miRNA-124/MEKK3 axis plays an integral part in regulating the levels of the inflammatory factors in PD neuroinflammation. Knockdown of circHIPK2 in the PD model presented therapeutic properties against neuroinflammation. It caused lower expression of MIR125-2HG and SIGMAR1 gene expression and inhibited astrocyte activation through the modulation of autophagy and reduced endoplasmic reticulum stress levels [64]. Circzip-2 has been reported to protect the dopaminergic neurons by targeting miR-60 that downregulated the zip-2 expression. This circzip-2/miR-60 axis provided resistance against oxidative stress and reduced neuroinflammation in the PD model [65]. Therefore, due to their precise involvement and stability in PD development, it is proposed that circRNAs can serve as a potential tool for PD management strategies.

3.1.3. LncRNA

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNAs) is a RNA transcript with a length greater than 200 nucleotides [75]. LncRNAs are highly expressed in the central nervous system and regulate several neurobiological processes such as neural plasticity, neurogenesis, brain development, etc., where any dysregulation results in various neurodegenerative diseases [75]. Converging evidence has reported that various lncRNAs are involved in PD progression, as summarized in Table 3. In 2017, Ni Y et al., reported differential expression of 87 lncRNAs in the substantia nigra of PD patients [76]. Whereas 13 lncRNAs were found differentially expressed in the peripheral blood leukocytes of PD patients [77], postulating that lncRNAs actively participate in PD pathogenesis.
LncRNAs display an integral role in neuroinflammation development in PD. For instance, lncRNA UCA-1 (urothelial carcinoma-associated-1) is reported to induce apoptosis and neuroinflammation in the PD model through targeting P13K/Akt signaling pathways. However, its knockdown has reduced oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, which lowered the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons [78]. Another investigation showed that LncRNA-p21 (long non-coding RNA-p21) binds with miR-625 to induce cytotoxicity and neuronal apoptosis in the PD cell model. In contrast, silencing of LncRNA-p21 has reduced cytotoxicity along with TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels, which increased the SOD activity and reversed neuronal damage and neuroinflammation [83]. lncRNA HOTAIR has been found to target the miR-126-5p and RAB3IP in a ceRNA- dependent manner and enhanced PD progression [79]. Moreover, lncRNA HOTAIR and lncRNA-MALAT1 bind with miR-205 and downregulated LRRK2 gene expression to induced oxidative stress, neuronal apoptosis, and neuroinflammation [80,86] Contrarily, downregulation of these lncRNAs nullified the α-synuclein aggregation and the apoptosis of dopaminergic neurons. Further studies showed that lower expression of lncRNA ASUchl1 (antisense to the mouse Ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase 1) in the PD model had downregulated Nurr1 gene expression, which also contributed to neuronal damage and associated neuroinflammation [82]. Though a wide range of lncRNAs is found dysregulated in PD, but still not enough to understand the exact mechanism of lncRNAs in PD development. Therefore, detailed investigations are required to figure out the exact mechanism involved in PD progression.
In addition to the neurotoxic role of lncRNAs in PD, several LncRNAs displayed therapeutic significance by protecting neurons against neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in PD models. lncRNA NEAT (nuclear-enriched assembly transcript-1) has been reported to exert a neuroprotective role by upregulating the PINK1 gene expression, which inhibited the PINK1 protein deterioration in PD models and reduced neuronal injury and neuroinflammation [85]. Recent research by Zhang et al., showed that silencing of lncRNA AL049437 had reduced TNF-α, iL-6, and ROS production in MPP+ induced PD model, which significantly reduced the neuroinflammation and oxidative stress [84]. Though a limited number of lncRNAs are reported with neuroprotective properties, it still broadens the vision for their useful application in PD therapeutics.

3.1.4. Piwi Interacting RNAs

Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs (26 to 31 nt), referred to as genomic guardians. They are involved in protecting the genome by facilitating the transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing of transposable elements through DNA methylation and RNA interference. It is recently reported that piRNAs regulate various brain functions and are involved in various neurological diseases, including PD [87,88].
An investigation on PD patients reported lowered expression of SINEs (short interspersed nuclear element) and LINEs (Long interspersed nuclear element), which caused significant alterations in PGC-1α and CREB-pathways, resulted in the mitochondrial dysfunction and associated neuroinflammation [89]. Further study on long-term memory in the Aplysia CNS showed that piRNA plays a key role in regulating the methylation of CREB2 gene promoter region [90]. Thus proposes that piRNAs might lower CREB gene expression that progresses neuroinflammation in PD patients [91]. So far, limited studies have been reported in this domain; therefore, we require extensive research to elucidate their role in the pathogenesis of PD.

3.2. Methylation Regulation and Neuroinflammation

3.2.1. DNA Methylation

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that involves the covalent transfer of a methyl group to the C-5 position of cytosine by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) to induce chromatin conformation and inhibits the transcription mechanism, which results in abnormal gene expression [92]. DNA methylation is important for normal body development. It plays a vital role in various processes such as genomic imprinting, inactivation of X-chromosome, and downregulation of repetitive element transcription and transposition, where any deregulation results in various diseases, including neurodegenerative disease. A significant number of disturbed methylation patterns have been observed in various genes that trigger neuroinflammation and PD development, summarized in Table 4. Accumulating evidence showed that lower methylation levels in SNCA mRNA of PD patients resulted in the higher translation of SNCA mRNA and α-synuclein aggregation [93,94,95]. Similarly, another investigation by Masliah et al., showed that nuclear DNMT1 levels were reduced in PD brain samples and SNCA transgenic mouse models, leading to insufficient DNA methylation in the CpG island upstream of the SNCA, SEPW1, and PRKAR2A genes [96]. Interestingly, the methylation pattern of the SNCA gene in the brain was found similar to the blood of PD patients [97]. Hence DNA methylation patterns from peripheral blood of PD patients can serve as substitute biomarkers for PD progression [98].
TET enzyme encoded by the TET gene family is reported to play a prominent role in DNA demethylation. A study performed by Li Shu et al., on 1657 PD patients and 1394 control subjects showed that the TET1 gene might influence PD risk by regulating the 5hmC levels and subsequent gene expression [104]. Likewise, the Clock gene that controls circadian rhythm presented significant variations in its expression in PD patients and animal models [99,105,106]. Investigation of the seven clock genes (PER1, PER2, CRY1, CRY2, Clock, NPAS2, and BMAL1) revealed that PD patients’ leucocytes showed reduced NPAS2 promoter methylation, whereas the rest of the clock genes’ promoters found unmethylated [99]. Isil Ezgi Eryilmaza et al., in 2017, observed that variations in the methylation patterns increased the transcription regulation of PARK2, which resulted in mitochondrial dysfunction, dopaminergic neuron apoptosis, and neuroinflammation in PD [107]. Overall, these studies indicate that DNA methylation and demethylation play a significant role in the pathological process of PD.
PGC-1α is a transcriptional co-regulator, which is found downregulated during PD pathogenesis [107]. Analysis of human PD brain samples showed increased methylation at the PGC-1α promoter region. In evidence of this study, ICV administration of palmitic acid (induces epigenetic modification in neurons, microglia, and astrocytes) to α-synuclein transgenic mice resulted in hypermethylation of the PGC-1α promoter in the substantial nigra (SN), leading to the lower expression of PGC-1α gene and mitochondrial content along with higher expression of inflammation-related genes [101]. However, increased expression of the PGC-1α gene in PD models has presented the neuroprotective effects in PD models by increasing the expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain nuclear coding subunits and hence, prevented the loss of dopaminergic neurons [108]. In another study of active multiple sclerosis MS, Philip G Nijland et al., 2014 found that overexpression of PGC-1α in astrocytes could significantly reduce pro-inflammatory IL-6 and production and secretion of chemokine (CC motif) ligand 2. This led to reduced ROS production and inhibited oxidative damage and inflammation, thereby lowering the neurodegeneration [109]. Thus, we speculate that increased methylation of PGC-1α in PD may inhibit the neuroprotective effect of astrocytes and transform them to the A2 phenotype to promote neuroinflammation development.
During PD pathogenesis, the inflammatory factors induce neuroinflammation by changing the phenotype of microglia and astrocytes. Excessive activation of microglia led to the upregulation of TNF-α, il-1, il-6, il-12, and other pro-inflammatory molecules, along with mitochondrial ROS production and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, which leads to neuronal damage [110]. Thus, TNF-α activates microglia to promote the transformation of their inflammatory phenotype, while the inflammatory response of microglia induces more production of TNF-α to form a vicious circle. Increasing evidence has proposed that higher TNF expressions malfunctioned the glutamate receptors that disturb the transportation of specific ions across nerve cells and lead to neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD and PD [111]. Various studies show that PD patients exhibited higher levels of TNF-α in their cerebrospinal fluid and TNF-α receptor 1 (TNFR 1, p55TNFR) in SNpc [112,113,114]. However, TNF-α knockdown inhibited microglia activation and reduced the neurotoxicity of MPTP in DA [114]. DNA methylation is significantly involved in regulating the expression of inflammatory factors. In 2008, Heike C. Pieper et al., reported that PD patient’s SNpc cells possess a lesser degree of DNA methylation in the TNF-α promoter than the DNA of other brain parts. Additionally, they observed that specific methylation in the CpGs dinucleotides of the TNF-α promoter activity lowered the binding of specific transcription factors (AP-2 and Sp1) that downregulated the TNF-α promoter activity which increased the sensitivity of dopaminergic neurons to TNF-α-mediated inflammation [102]. In summary, DNA methylation may regulate the phenotype of microglia and inflammatory response mediated by inhibition of TNF-α expression.
iNOS is a pro-inflammatory factor encoded by the NOS2 gene and is highly expressed in the SNpc of PD patients. NOS2 gene is mostly regulated at the transcriptional level or partly by the methylation of CpG dinucleotides [115]. Hypermethylation of the CpG site in the 5’promoter region of the NOS2 gene reduces the iNOS activity [115,116]. In contrast, hypomethylation of NOS2 may increase the iNOS activity. A study on PD patients exposed to welding fumes (mainly containing Mn) reported insufficient NOS2 methylation [103], which resulted in higher iNOS activity. In contrast, inhibiting iNOS reduced the neuronal stress and downregulated the activation of microglia caused by signal molecules (such as MMPs), thus prevented neuronal damage [117,118]. Collectively, it can be deduced that the methylation level of NOS2 affects the iNOS activity and regulates the activation of microglia and the neuroinflammation caused by it.
Interleukin 1 (IL-1) has been implicated in various neurological conditions due to its significant role in the central nervous system and neurodegeneration. Increased expression of IL-1β has been observed in the cerebrospinal fluid and striatal regions of patients with various neurological diseases, including PD, inducing neuronal death and damage [119,120,121]. Various PD studies reported that IL-1β induced neuroinflammation by disabling microglia. Hypomethylation of the IL-1β promoter region has been observed to convert microglia to the M1 phenotype, triggering neuronal damage and neuroinflammation [79,100]. Thus, methylation of IL-1β may be one of the influencing factors of PD and other diseases closely related to age.

3.2.2. RNA Methylation

RNA methylation (m6A) is the most prevalent post-transcriptional modification of RNA, which involves binding the methyl group to the N6 site of adenine (RNA base). It is widely distributed in mRNA and long coding RNA (lncRNA). Most of the m6A modifications occur in exons, and it remains in the mature mRNA after splicing and influences the translation of m6A-containing mRNA. Methyltransferases and demethylases catalyze m6A modifications. Common methyltransferases include METTL3, METTL14, RBM15/B, etc., whereas demethylases include FTO (obesity-related protein) and ALKBH5 (alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homolog 5) [122,123,124,125]. Recently it has been observed that protein families containing the YTH domain may interact with m6A demethylases and contribute to the translation, degradation, and splicing of RNA [126]. Substantial evidence suggests that m6A modifications play a crucial role in numerous mechanisms, such as splicing, transportation, location, and stability of mRNAs, impacting various biological processes, including stem-cell differentiation, somatic-cell reprogramming, biological rhythms, etc. [127]. However, the actual mechanism of m6A modifications remains elusive and requires more investigations.
In the adult brain, m6A modifications are highly expressed. Substantial evidence has shown that dysregulation of m6A modifications is associated with many neuronal processes, such as dopaminergic signaling, neurogenesis [128], learning, and memory [129,130,131], proposing the close association of m6A modifications and brain activity. Recently, a study on the mouse model showed that dysregulated m6A modifications induced by circSTAG1 affected the stability of FAAH (an indispensable membrane enzyme that can degrade fatty acid amide family) mRNA, which caused astrocyte dysfunction and depressive behaviors [132]. Transcriptome-wide profiling of m6A modifications of mice with depressive behavior demonstrated a high degree of m6A modifications in the prefrontal cortex with lowered levels of FTO (nucleic acid demethylase), which resulted in the degradation of subsets of proteins involved in neuronal plasticity and led to the impaired memory-related processes [129,130,131].
More recently, m6A modifications have gained wide attention due to the significance of epitranscriptomic regulation in PD progression. A study performed on PD mouse and cell models showed that a high level of FTO reduced the m6A modifications in dopaminergic cells, resulted in the overexpression of NMDA receptor 1 (N-methyl-D-aspartate), oxidative stress, and Ca2+ influx, leading to neuronal damage and neuroinflammation [133]. Another investigation on m6A modifications in Chinese Han people with sporadic PD showed common and rare variations in m6A regulating genes (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, FTO, ALKBH5, YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, HNRNPC, and ELAVL1). Gene-wise association analysis shows that no significant association has been found between these genes, and it is proposed that ethnic factors might restrict this association [134].
However, Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), an RNA methyltransferase, is also involved in regulating various immune and inflammation processes. For instance, in an investigation on osteoarthritis, increased levels of IL-1β have been observed to enhance the expression of METTL3 that induced the significant m6A modifications. In contrast, METTL3 knockdown has reduced IL-1β-induced inflammatory cytokine levels and activation of NF-κB signaling, thus reduced neuronal damage [135,136]. Due to very limited research on m6A modifications in PD so far, the impact of METTL3 on neuroinflammation has not been studied for PD-associated m6A modifications. Though m6A modifications are widely dysregulated in PD, still this domain is barely touched and requires more investigation to understand the underlying mechanism in PD development.

3.3. Histone Modification

Histones are the basic structural proteins of chromosomes divided into H1, H3, H2A, H2B, and H4. They are involved in post-transcriptional modifications, including acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, ADP-ribosylation, etc., where variations in histones may lead to the dysfunction of the DNA transcription machinery through abnormal condensation of chromatin [137] and lead to various disorders. Various PD studies have shown a strong association between histone modification and neuroinflammation, implicating its role in PD progression.
Accumulating studies have shown a significantly higher level of histone modifications in PD models [138]. Increased histone acetylation is attributed to the imbalance between histone deacetylase (HDAC) and histone acetyltransferase (HAT). During PD development, downregulation of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) induces an abnormal neuronal cell cycle, leading to DNA damage and neuronal apoptosis [139]. In 2016, Sugeno reported that α-synuclein directly bound to histones, which upregulated histone acetyltransferase and reduced the level of acetylated histone H3 in the PD cell model [140]. This interaction resulted in reduced sirtuin activity, abnormal α-synuclein aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, resulting in DA damage and neuroinflammation [141]. Further studies have shown that PD patients possessed increased acetylation of histone H3 in the brain samples due to increased acetylation of histone H3 lysine 14 (H3K14) and histone H3 lysine 18 (H3K18) and decreased deacetylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9). This higher level of H3 acetylation followed by the downregulation of histone deacetylase led to an over-acetylation of core histones, which inhibited the gene transcription in the primary motor cortex and accelerated the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons [142,143].
In an eleven-year follow-up of four million Norwegians, Shuchi Mittal et al., found that the β2AR agonist, salbutamol (a brain-permeable asthma drug), can effectively reduce the incidence of PD. Further studies have shown that β2AR ligand regulates the SNCA’s transcription by affecting the acetylation of histone 3 lysine 27 of SNCA promoter and enhancer [144]. Moreover, it is observed that the activation of microglia in PD is significantly related to the overexpressed histone acetylation. AGK2 is an inhibitor that targets the SIRT-2 site on HDAC and is reported to protect dopaminergic neurons and reduced microglial activation [145]. Similarly, nicotinamide (an amide converted from vitamin B3) also presented a neuroprotective effect in PD animal models [146]. Recently a study on the PD rat model showed that nicotinamide induced hyperacetylation of histones and increased the expression levels of various neurotrophic and anti-apoptotic factors in the brain, thereby presenting therapeutic effects against PD progression. However, nicotinamide overdose caused neurotoxicity and led to dopaminergic neuronal damage, suggesting an appropriate dose range is needed for effective therapeutic results [147]. Studies by Xuefei Wu et al., showed that HDAC inhibitors, including sodium butyrate (SB) and trichostatin A (TSA), upregulated the expression of GDNF and BDNF in astrocytes and inhibited the HDAC to protect DA neurons [148]. In rodent models of central nervous system inflammatory diseases, BDNF can prevent NF-κB-mediated neuroinflammation and apoptosis [149]. In addition, HDAC inhibitor TSA can also alleviate the MPP+-induced astroglial glutamate uptake disorder, which may be a new mechanism for HDAC inhibitors to promote neuroprotection [150].

3.4. Prions

Prions are lethal and pathogenic proteinaceous agents involved in various neurological disorders, including PD [151,152]. They possess epigenetic inheritance and can transmit genetic information to both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions without altering the genomic sequence [153]. Recently, the “prion transmission” of α-syn has been extensively studied in PD. It is observed that α-syn can spread throughout the body during the pathogenic process and promote microglial activation and neuroinflammation in PD. These activated microglia further promote the aggregation of α-syn and may provoke neuroinflammation, forming a vicious cycle of neurodegeneration of DA neurons in PD. Therefore, it affirms that neuroinflammation induces α-syn prion-like behavior to feed-forward neuronal damage. Moreover, it is also proposed that the gastrointestinal tract and olfactory epithelium are directly associated with neuroinflammation. Disturbed gastrointestinal tracts are the initial sites of α-syn accumulation presumed to be transmitted to the nervous system through “prion-like behavior” and tune progressive neuroinflammation [153]. Unfortunately, the underlying mechanism of α-syn accumulation in the intestinal track has not been elucidated until now, hence makes a loophole in the hidden mystery of PD origin. However, based on these studies, it can be hypothesized that dietary patterns and gut microbiota might play an active part in α-syn accumulation in the intestine and triggers PD onset through prion-like behavior. Further studies are required to unravel the exact pathogenic role of α-syn prions and their association with intestinal health and PD progression.

4. Synergistic Epigenetic Regulation and PD

As discussed above, these epigenetic modifications play an integral role in developing neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease, but the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear and requires more investigations. However, through a literature survey, we attempted to find the correlation and contribution of these epigenetic modifications with various pathways involved in the progression of neuroinflammation, as shown in Figure 2. These synergic epigenetic interactions in neuroinflammatory pathways may provide a better understanding towards the biological mechanisms involved in neuroinflammation in PD.

4.1. MAPK Pathway in Neuroinflammation

MAPK signaling pathways play a dynamic role in key cellular functions, including cell division, differentiation, metabolism and motility, stress response, survival, or cellular apoptosis [154]. Dysfunctional MAPK signaling pathways contribute a significant role in the pathogenesis of various human ailments ranging from cancer to neurodegenerative diseases. During PD progression, stressful conditions, either environmental or cellular stresses or inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1B), activate the microglial cells, which trigger the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) family, including p38MAPK and SAPK/JNK [155,156,157]. Moreover, p38 MAPK induces various inflammatory processes such as synthesis of cytokines, pro-inflammatory mediators, and iNOS and COX-2 [86,158]. In contrast, SAPK (stress-activated protein kinases)/JNK (Jun amino-terminal kinases) regulates the expression of inflammatory mediators such as COX-2 and iNOS and contributes to neuroinflammation [159].
To date, various genetic mutations and epigenetic mechanisms have been associated with the onset of PD. Accumulating studies have shown that abnormal expression of PD-associated genes is linked with neuroinflammation due to dysfunctional MAPK signaling pathways [160]. Abnormal expression of the SNCA gene is one of the underlying pathological causes of PD that leads to abnormal α-synuclein misfolding to form Lewy bodies in the SNcps of PD and impart neuronal toxicity [161,162,163]. Moreover, α-synuclein triggers p38, ERK, and JNK pathways in human microglial cells, leading to the production of IL-1β and TNF-α and subsequent promotion of neuroinflammation [164]. Similarly, α-Synuclein also regulates the expression level of IL-6 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in human astrocytes and accelerates chronic inflammation [165].
Furthermore, various epigenetic modifications also induce α-synuclein accumulation, which triggers dysfunctional MAPK signaling pathway induced neuroinflammation (Figure 3). For instance, circSNCA and cirs-7 have been observed to inhibit the neuroprotective function of miR-7, which causes upregulated expression of α-synuclein and results in consequent neuroinflammation in PD models (Figure 3A (iii)) [70]. Moreover, lower methylation of SNCA also causes higher translation of SNCA mRNA and α-synuclein aggregation [93,94,95]. Abnormal α-synuclein aggregation further prevents the translocation of DNMT1 enzyme into the nucleus to dysfunctional its activity and exacerbate hypomethylation of upstream SNCA gene (Figure 3A (i)) and other related genes in PD affected models [166]. However, further investigation shows that increased levels of α-synuclein directly bind to histones that overexpress the histone acetyltransferase and lower the acetylated histone H3 (Figure 3A (ii)) [140]. This process led to reduced sirtuin activity and increased α-synuclein aggregation along with mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, resulting in DA damage and neuroinflammation [141]. In a nutshell, we conclude that DNMT1, circSNCA, and cirs-7a work synergistically to induce α-synuclein accumulation and disrupt the normal functioning of the MAPK signaling pathway, aggravates the neuroinflammation (Figure 3A). However, exploration of the precise mechanism needs further research.
Similarly, LRRK2 is another important PD-associated gene, containing various functional domains such as leucine-rich repeats, a Ras-related GTPase domain, a MAP3K domain, and WD-40 repeats [167]. It is reported that the abnormal function of the Ras-related GTPase domain and a MAP3K domain of LRRK2 are strongly associated with the dysfunctional MAPK signaling pathway and lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and neuronal apoptosis [168,169,170]. In the past few years, various epigenetic mechanisms have been found that dysregulate the LRRK2 gene in PD studies. In MPP+-induced PD mouse model, Liu et al., revealed that LncRNA MALAT1 (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1) downregulates the miR-205-5p and activates the immune response and neuroinflammation [81]. Similarly, in the same year, lncRNA HOTAIR (HOX Transcript Antisense Intergenic RNA) was also found to target miR-205-5p and shown similar neurotoxic effects in the PD model [80]. Therefore, it is predicted that LncRNA MALAT1 and lncRNA HOTAIR interact synergistically to downregulate the miR-205-5p and influence the neuroinflammation in parkinsonism (Figure 3B).
Moreover, under normal circumstances, the Parkin gene displays neuroprotective properties by inhibiting the JNK signaling pathway [171]. However, in PD, the Parkin gene is dysregulated that causes mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production that mediated neuronal inflammation. It is presumed that Parkin dysregulation activates the JNK signaling pathway that contributes to the pathological characterization of PD. Besides hereditary mutations, overexpression of miR-34b/c is found to reduce Parkin and DJ-1 gene expression in PD models, subjugating that miR-34b/c activates JNK signaling pathway to feed-forward parkinsonism [172,173]. Similarly, DJ-1 also serves as a neuroprotective protein and protects neurons against oxidative damage by inhibiting the JNK signaling pathway by targeting the MEKK1 [174]. Interestingly, it also mediates inflammatory responses in astrocytes and α-synuclein accumulation in neurons [175]. However, DJ-1 deficiency causes p38 signaling pathway activation in astrocytes that upregulates inducible NO synthase (iNOS) to produce 10-fold more NO (nitric oxide) and aggravates the neuroinflammation [175]. An investigation of PD patients’ plasma samples shows that upregulated miR-4639-5p triggers oxidative stress-induced lesions by directly targeting the DJ-1 gene [176]. Likewise, a similar expression of miR-494 in the substantia nigra of post mortem PD patients downregulates the DJ-1 expression and leads to subsequent neuronal inflammation (Figure 3C) [177]. Conclusively, these studies affirm that epigenetic modifications play a dominant role in regulating MAPK signaling pathways for progressive neuroinflammation in PD.

4.2. PI3/Akt/mTOR Pathway in Neuroinflammation

The P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is a universally expressed intracellular signaling pathway and controls several key processes, including inflammatory responses, cellular activation, and cell death [159]. This pathway contains a trilogy of lipid kinases, namely P13K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase), Akt (As protein kinase B), and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), that works in coordination to trigger cascades of reactions, resulting in the NF-κB translocation. P13K activates Akt, which further triggers mTOR. It is speculated that activation of microglia causes the activation of the P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, which intensifies NF-κB activity and releases inflammatory molecules such as iNOS COX-2 [159,178]. Numerous studies have shown that P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is highly activated in PD models, indicating its prominent role in modulating neuronal damage and associated inflammations.
Converging evidence has shown that various epigenetic modifications directly target P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways to trigger neuroinflammation and neuronal apoptosis in PD (Figure 4). For instance, upregulated expression of lncUCA directly links with activated P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling in PD studies [78], showing that lncUCA1 plays a prominent role in neuroinflammation in PD. Similarly, miR-181b family, highly regulated and expressed in astrocytes, is known for its prominent role in PD pathogenesis. Various PD studies have shown that upregulated miR-181 induces autophagy and inflammation through P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways [179]. This observation was confirmed by other studies when overexpression of miR-181c in LPS cultured astrocytes released more inflammatory cytokines, resulting in neuronal death. Whereas its knockdown enhanced the production of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) in astrocytes and protected against dopaminergic neurons oxidative stress. Moreover, its downregulated expression also inhibited the production of inflammatory proteins, such as glutathione peroxidase 1 and 4 (Gpx1 and Gpx4), peroxidase 2 (Prdx2), and glutaraldehyde toxin (SH3BGRL3), and reduced astrocytes inflammation [180]. In another study, lincRNA-p21 was observed to sponge with miR-181 and induced microglia activation through upregulating PKC-δ inflammation processes. lincRNA-p21 is functionally associated with p53 during cell proliferation, cell programming, and apoptosis, and all of these events depend on the competitive binding of the miR-181 family with lincRNA-p21 (Figure 4). Downregulation of miR-181 has reduced the linkage of p53/lincRNA-p21/miR-181 family/PKC-δ and presented therapeutic effects by reducing microglia activation through the downregulation of iNOS, NO and ROS, and the pro-inflammatory activity of lincRNA-p21 [181]. Further, it was found that DNA methylases (DNMT) also regulate the expression of miR-181 in astrocytes. Ji et al., (2017) investigated that PPARβ/δ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors) displays a neuroprotective role by reducing the expression of DNMTs. This causes hypermethylation of CpG islands in the miR-181a gene, resulting in the silencing of miR-181a and protection of astrocytes against damage induced by ER stress [182]. Together, these findings suggest that antagonizing miR-181 by inhibitor-lincRNAp21 and DNMT may hinder the neurotoxicity of P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways and reduce the activate microglia and neuroinflammation in PD pathogenesis.
Intriguingly, CDR1-AS, as the most abundant circRNA, has been widely associated with neurological disorders. CDR1-AS contains more than 70 sites for miR-7 and sponge effectively with miR-7. It is normally involved in the storage and transportation of miR-7. A body of evidence has shown that the CDR1-AS-miR-70 axis plays a significant role in neuroinflammation through the upregulating mTOR signaling pathway and contributes to PD pathogenesis (Figure 4) [183]. Moreover, CDR1-AS also sponges with miR-671 and mediates CDR1-AS Ago2 induced degradation that works as a protective mechanism against neuronal damage. During stressful conditions, miR-671 binds with the CDR1-AS-miR-7 axis and degrades CDR1-AS. This process releases miR-7, which provides neuroprotection by downregulating the mTOR signaling pathway and lowering α-synuclein aggregation to combat neuronal apoptosis (Figure 4) [184]. Thus, CDR1-AS-miR-70/miR-671 complex can serve as an effective benchmark therapy to treat PD patients in the future.

4.3. JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

The Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway are known to regulate several key cellular processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune regulation [185]. Usually, cytokines (IFN-g) employs JAK/STAT signaling pathway as their principal mode of signaling. It consists of four cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2, triggering tyrosine phosphorylation upon cytokine receptor binding [186,187]. JAKs further operates seven latent transcription factors named STATs; STAT1-4, STAT5a, STAT5b, STAT6) through tyrosine phosphorylation [186,188,189,190]. Under stressful conditions, STATs phosphorylate and translocate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. They target specific cis-elements such as GAS or gamma activated sequence and ISRE or interferon-stimulated regulating element to regulate various genes [188]. Dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway represents the pathogenic phenotypes of various neurogenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases [191,192]. A study on the PD model showed that overexpression of α-SYN leads to the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway (Figure 5A) [193]. However, inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway lowers the microglia proliferation and macrophage infiltration and reduces the MHC class II expression [194]. Thus, the JAK/ STAT signaling pathway induces innate and adaptive immune responses in Parkinson’s disease. However, JAK inhibitor might provide viable insight towards future therapeutics for PD patients.
A large number of studies have shown that stimulation of mouse microglia with aggregated α-syn led to the expression of MHC class II and the production of NO, TNF-α, and IL-1β, which induced chronic inflammation in PD [193,195,196,197]. IFN-γ and IL-6 are the two most effective activators of the JAK/STAT pathway found elevated in PD [198,199,200]. IFN-γ regulated the activity of microglia through the JAK/STAT pathway and participated in the death of dopaminergic neurons in the PD model. Moreover, it also promotes the polarization of macrophages through JAK/STAT pathway [198]. A growing body of evidence has shown that epigenetic mechanism contributes effectively to modulating JAK/STAT pathway (Figure 5). An investigation on the PD model showed that upregulated miR-155 overexpresses SOCS1 gene expression, which triggers JAK/STAT pathway [46]. Another study performed by Wang et al., 2018 demonstrated that circPTK2 sponges with miR-29b and activate SOCS-1-JAK2/STAT3-IL-1β signal transduction which causes microglia activation and inflammatory factor secretion, leading to neuronal apoptosis [201]. In another study, downregulation of DNMT1 in nestatin-positive NPCs enhanced GFAP and S100 expression and resulted in JAK/STAT pathway, including STAT1 and STAT3 [202]. Therefore, we speculate that the DNMT1 enzyme and circPTK2-miR-29b may act on different target genes to synergistically activate the JAK/STAT pathway, which brings about the activation of microglia and other inflammasomes and promote the production of inflammatory factors (Figure 5B).
Oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) is one of the influential factors that trigger the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and induces neuronal damage to accelerate neuroinflammation [203]. Recently, a study on the PD mouse model showed that knocked out of the PINK1 gene resulted in OGD-induced ischemic damage, which leads to neuronal damage through mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress [204]. An investigation on OGD-activated microglia reported that circPTK2 sponge with miR-29b to downregulate its expression. This interaction reduces SOCS-1 gene expression and activates the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, which in turn increases the production of TNF and IL-1β, induced microglial neuronal damage (Figure 5B) [201]. However, upregulation of miR-29b protected damaging neurons against OGD by suppressing the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway [201]. Thus, silencing of circPTK2 or upregulation of miR-29b may present therapeutic potential against diseases related to OGD-induced microglial activation, especially PD.
Additionally, the NLRP3 inflammasome is found to interact with various components of the JAK/STAT pathway, implicating their role in PD pathogenesis. [205,206]. Activation of NLRP3 induced the activation of the caspase-1 enzyme and triggered the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18 [207]. Convincing studies have shown that lower expression of miR-7 is associated with the accumulation of α-syn, the loss of dopaminergic cells, and the decrease of dopamine in the striatum, hallmark PD [208]. lncSNHG1 was observed as a competitive endogenous RNA of miR-7 that regulates the expression of NLRP3 gene and causes the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome (Figure 5C). In the microglial supernatant transfer model, knockdown of lncSNHG1 or NLRP3 in BV2 cells stimulated by LPS inhibited the apoptosis of primary neurons and the increase of caspase-3 activity. Whereas, the downregulation of lncSNHG1 increased the expression of miR-7 and inhibited the activation of microglia and NLRP3 inflammasomes in the substantial nigra compact part and the loss of dopaminergic neurons of the MPTP mice [209]. These results indicate that lncSNHG1 promotes neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of PD by regulating the miR-7/NLRP3 pathway (Figure 5C).
Further studies have shown that miR-223-3p is a negative regulator of NLRP3 protein (a key protein of inflammasome) involved in regulating pathological processes in various disorders, including cancer, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, etc. Roberta Mancuso et al., in 2019, reported that the serum concentration of miR-223-3p could be a differential diagnosis and serve as a potential non-invasive biomarker for AD, PD, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [210]. Another investigation has shown that lncGAS5 was found upregulated in the LPS-treated PD mouse model. LncGAS5 sponge miR-223-3p to upregulate the expression of GAS5. GAS5 promotes microglial-induced inflammation by regulating NLRP3, which accelerated neuroinflammation in PD (Figure 5C) [211]. Taken together, these various findings suggest that JAK/STAT signaling pathways participates in neuroinflammatory responses and neuronal apoptosis, triggered by dysregulated epigenetic modifications in the development of PD.

4.4. NF-κβ Activation in Neuroinflammation Pathway

The NF-κB family is highly expressed in the brain, especially in neurons, glial cells, and Schwann cells, mostly as p50/p50 homodimers and p50/RelA heterodimers [212]. It plays a significant role in modulating inflammation and apoptosis and regulates the brain programming of systemic aging and the pathogenesis of several brain disorders [213,214]. Accumulating evidence has shown phenomenal changes and deregulation of NF-κβ in Parkinsonism. Post-mortem reports of various PD patients revealed overexpressed RelA nuclear translocation in melanized neurons in SNpc, highlighting the activation of the NF-κβ signaling pathway in PD [215]. Several other studies show that the NF-κβ pathway contributes to α-syn-deposition associated neuronal damage [216,217]. Other investigations supported these findings showing that α-synuclein internalization in microglia influences the nuclear aggregation of RelA and induces microglia activation. [218]. Recently, Wang et al., (2020) corroborated lower levels of cRel in the SNcp and striatum of the PD mouse model and blood samples of PD patients. Moreover, cRel was found to promote the overexpression of apoptotic genes to promote PD-related neuronal degradation [219], thereby supporting the idea that dysregulated NF-κβ pathway induces microglia activation.
Various epigenetic modifications play an active part in modulating the NF-κβ pathway to induce neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration (Figure 6). Activated NF-κB signaling in the rat MPTP model showed higher histone H3 acetylation in the SNCA promoter region, leading to α-syn accumulation (Figure 6A). However, inhibition of NF-κβ signaling reduced H3 acetylation of the SNCA gene and mediated therapeutic effects against motor dysfunction [220]. Hypomethylation of IL-1β also contributed to the activation of the NF-κβ pathway, triggering neuronal damage and neuroinflammation (Figure 6C) [79,100]. Consequently, miR-124 is one of the highly expressed miRNAs in the brain, involved in neurotransmission, neuroinflammation, neurogenesis, autophagy, mitochondrial function, etc. It also participates in the maintenance of the microglia resting stage. However, its downregulated expression brings about microglial activation [221]. Previous literature has shown that miR-124 contributes to PD pathogenesis by modulating cell survival, cell damage, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation through calpain 1/p25/cyclin-dependent kinases 5 (CDK5), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κβ), signal transducer, and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), BCL-2-interacting mediator of cell death (Bim) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathways [222,223,224,225]. This finding was further corroborated by other PD studies, where lower expression of miR-124 reduces the expression of anti-apoptotic gene BIM and causes the overexpression of apoptotic proteins BCL-2, resulting in neuronal apoptosis [223,224,225].
Additionally, lncMALAT1 is found to be closely related to miR-124. It regulated breast cancer progression endogenously by downregulating miR-124 and activating the CDK4/E2F1 signaling pathway [226]. Moreover, lncMALAT1 competed with miR-124 to regulate the GRB2 expression and promoted the growth and invasion of HR-HPV cells [227]. A study on the PD model revealed that lncMALAT1 promoted DA neuron apoptosis through the NF-κβ signaling pathway by sponging with miR-124 [50], thereby suggesting that the lncMALAT1-miR-124-MEKK3/NF-κβ axis may provide new insight for the treatment of the neuroinflammation caused by the activation of microglia (Figure 6B).
Interestingly, overexpression of miR-124 displayed neuroprotective effects on damaging neurons against neuroinflammation. In 2013, Sun et al., showed that upregulated miR-124 performs anti-inflammatory action by inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [228]. Further studies showed that MEKK3, as a direct target of miR-124, inhibited neuroinflammation by regulating the MEKK3/NF-κβ signaling pathway. Further, it reversed the expression of LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines and promoted the secretion of neuroprotective factors [69]. To sum up, dysregulated miR-124 plays a dual role in neuroinflammation and may serve as an effective biomolecule for devising PD management strategies.

5. Conclusion and Perspectives

Since the 19th century, when James Parkinson coined the name Parkinson’s disease, researchers have never stopped exploring its etiology and pathogenesis. A significant number of studies have proposed a strong association between inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and PD. During PD progression, neuroinflammation plays a vital role in the initiation and progression of PD. It is observed that the central nervous system’s inflammation activates glial cells and cytokine release, whose abnormal function leads to progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and striatum. This pathological activity enhances the neuroinflammatory process by forming a vicious circle and promotes advanced PD development, thus hinting at the involvement of key cellular and molecular events in PD that are barely investigated thoroughly and make PD treatment more challenging. However, the hidden mystery of these mechanisms underlying the glial cells mediated neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity in PD is an active area of investigation that may provide a new avenue for better understanding of the PD pathology and may help in the establishment of target-specific PD drugs.
Recently, epigenetics has garnered increased interest because of its significant contribution to the central nervous system’s development. Notably, various epigenetic mechanisms regulate inflammatory responses, activation of glial cells, and inflammatory cytokines. To investigate their role in the onset and progression of neuroinflammation in PD pathogenesis, we thoroughly reviewed these epigenetic mechanisms. These epigenetic mechanisms act as a dual-edge sword, presenting neurotoxic and neuroprotective characteristics. Neurotoxic epigenetic modifications work synergistically to promote chronic neuroinflammation in PD models. For instance, miR-7 and lncSNHG1, miR-223-3p, and lncGAS5 interact together to promote the pathogenesis of PD inflammation through NLRP3 activation and can be utilized in future early PD diagnosis. However, neuroprotective epigenetic modifications protect DA neurons against oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Antagonism of CDR1AS and circSNCA with miR-7 has been observed to prevent DA neuron damage and associated neuroinflammation; thus, it has been proposed for future PD therapy. Hence, dual characteristics of these epigenetic modifications make them ideal candidates for future PD management, as illustrated in Figure 7. Further, we have observed that these epigenetic modifications are interlinked and work in coordination to target neuroinflammatory pathways specifically to trigger PD progression. Methylation of miR-155, miR-124-3p, lncUCA1, and TNF-α promoter regulate neuroinflammation through the JAK/STAT pathway. Similarly, hypomethylation of miR-124 and il-1β activates the NF-ΚB pathway to regulate neuroinflammation. Henceforth, we believe that the synergy between epigenetic mechanisms and neuroinflammatory pathways in PD results in the activation of microglia and astrocytes, which leads to pyrolysis and aggravates neuronal oxidative stress, thus inducing the aggregation of α-synuclein and other proteins. However, further study in this domain may reveal new dimensions in PD research and provide novel insights for improved diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s patients.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81601114) and Excellent Young Scholars Research Fund of Beijing Institute of Technology.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to the management of Beijing Institute of Technology and Hong Ma for her assistance during manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of this study declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PDParkinson’s disease
ADAlzheimer disease
LBsLewy bodies
CNScentral nervous system
SNsubstantial nigra
SNpcsubstantia nigra par compacta
DAdopaminergic neurons
ncRNAnon-coding RNA
TNFtumor necrosis factor
ROSreactive oxygen species
NOSnitric oxide synthase
NOnitric oxide
TGFtransforming growth factor
IGF-1insulin-like growth factor-1
LPSlipopolysaccharide
TLR7toll-like receptors 7
GMFglial maturation factor
3’UTR3’untranslated region
Act1NF-kB activator 1
GMFglial maturation factor
PPXpramipexole
H3K27methylation of histone 3 lysine 27
Jmjd3jumonji-domain Protein 3
GDNFglial cell-derived neurotrophic factor
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
PPXpramipexole
miRNAmicroRNA
circRNAcircular RNA
LncRNAlong coding RNA
lncRNA UCA-1urothelial carcinoma-associated-1
LncRNA-p21long non-coding RNA-p21
lncRNA NEATnuclear-enriched assembly transcript-1
LncRNA MALAT1metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1
lncRNA HOTAIRHOX Transcript Antisense Intergenic RNA
LncRNA AS Uchl1  antisense to the mouse Ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase 1
piRNAsPiwi interacting RNAs
piRNAsPiwi interacting RNAs
SINEsshort interspersed nuclear element
LINEslong interspersed nuclear element
DNMTDNA methyltransferase
IL-1Interleukin 1
m6ARNA methylation
FTOobesity related protein
ALKBH5alkylated DNA repair protein alkB homolog 5
NMDAN-methyl-D-aspartate
METTL3Methyltransferase-like 3
HDAChistone deacetylase
HAThistone acetyltransferase
H3K14histone H3 lysine 14
H3K18histone H3 lysine 18
H3K9histone H3 lysine 9
SBsodium butyrate
TSAtrichostatin A
SAPKstress-activated protein kinases
JNKJun amino-terminal kinases
ICAM-1intercellular adhesion molecule-1
NOnitric oxide
P13Kphosphoinositide 3-kinase
AktAs protein kinase B
mTORmammalian target of rapamycin
GDNFglial cell-derived neurotrophic factor
VEGFvascular endothelial cell growth factor
PPARβ/δperoxisome proliferator-activated receptors
JAK/STATJanus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription
MCIMild cognitive impairment
CDK5calpain 1/p25/cyclin-dependent kinases 5
NF-κB Nuclear factor kappa B
STAT3 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

References

  1. Gasser, T. Molecular pathogenesis of Parkinson disease: Insights from genetic studies. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2009, 11, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beitz, J.M. Parkinson s disease a review. Front. Biosci. 2014, S6, S415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sherer, T.B.; Chowdhury, S.; Peabody, K.; Brooks, D.W. Overcoming obstacles in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2012, 27, 1606–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thomas, B.; Beal, M.F. Molecular insights into Parkinson’s disease. F1000 Med. Rep. 2011, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Braak, H.; Del Tredici, K.; Rüb, U.; De Vos, R.A.I.; Jansen Steur, E.N.H.; Braak, E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2003, 24, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakamori, M.; Junn, E.; Mochizuki, H.; Mouradian, M.M. Nucleic acid–based therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics 2019, 16, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Koros, C.; Simitsi, A.; Stefanis, L. Genetics of Parkinson’s disease: Genotype—Phenotype correlations. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2017, 132, 197–231. [Google Scholar]
  8. Han, C.; Liu, Y.; Dai, R.; Ismail, N.; Su, W.; Li, B. Ferroptosis and its potential role in human diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sriram, K.; Matheson, J.M.; Benkovic, S.A.; Miller, D.B.; Luster, M.I.; O’Callaghan, J.P. Deficiency of TNF receptors suppresses microglial activation and alters the susceptibility of brain regions to MPTP-induced neurotoxicity: Role of TNF-α 1. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 670–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Gerhard, A.; Pavese, N.; Hotton, G.; Turkheimer, F.; Es, M.; Hammers, A.; Eggert, K.; Oertel, W.; Banati, R.B.; Brooks, D.J. In vivo imaging of microglial activation with [11C] (R)-PK11195 PET in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 21, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lawson, L.J.; Perry, V.H.; Dri, P.; Gordon, S. Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 1990, 39, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Block, M.L.; Zecca, L.; Hong, J.S. Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: Uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McGuire, S.O.; Ling, Z.D.; Lipton, J.W.; Sortwell, C.E.; Collier, T.J.; Carvey, P.M. Tumor necrosis factor α is toxic to embryonic mesencephalic dopamine neurons. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 169, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kiyota, T.; Machhi, J.; Lu, Y.; Dyavarshetty, B.; Nemati, M.; Zhang, G.; Lee Mosley, R.; Gelbard, H.A.; Gendelman, H.E. URMC-099 facilitates amyloid-β clearance in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 2018, 15, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Appel, S.H.; Beers, D.R.; Henkel, J.S. T cell-microglial dialogue in Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Are we listening? Trends Immunol. 2010, 31, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Cherry, J.D.; Olschowka, J.A.; O’Banion, M.K. Neuroinflammation and M2 microglia: The good, the bad, and the inflamed. J. Neuroinflammation 2014, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Przanowski, P.; Dabrowski, M.; Ellert-Miklaszewska, A.; Kloss, M.; Mieczkowski, J.; Kaza, B.; Ronowicz, A.; Hu, F.; Piotrowski, A.; Kettenmann, H.; et al. The signal transducers Stat1 and Stat3 and their novel target Jmjd3 drive the expression of inflammatory genes in microglia. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 92, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Strle, K.; Zhou, J.H.; Broussard, S.R.; Venters, H.D.; Johnson, R.W.; Freund, G.G.; Dantzer, R.; Kelley, K.W. IL-10 promotes survival of microglia without activating Akt. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002, 122, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hutchins, A.P.; Diez, D.; Miranda-Saavedra, D. The IL-10/STAT3-mediated anti-inflammatory response: Recent developments and future challenges. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2013, 12, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Guo, M.; Meng, J.; Liu, C.; Xie, Y.; Feng, L.; Xiao, B.; Ma, C. Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil regulates microglia polarization and function. Neuroimmunomodulation 2013, 20, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Choi, S.H.; Aid, S.; Kim, H.W.; Jackson, S.H.; Bosetti, F. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase promotes alternative and anti-inflammatory microglial activation during neuroinflammation. J. Neurochem. 2012, 120, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cardoso, A.L.; Guedes, J.R.; Pereira de Almeida, L.; Pedroso de Lima, M.C. miR-155 modulates microglia-mediated immune response by down-regulating SOCS-1 and promoting cytokine and nitric oxide production. Immunology 2012, 135, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rappold, P.M.; Tieu, K. Astrocytes and Therapeutics for Parkinson’s Disease. Neurotherapeutics 2010, 7, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Neal, M.; Richardson, J.R. Epigenetic regulation of astrocyte function in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tebbutt, N.C.; Giraud, A.S.; Inglese, M.; Jenkins, B.; Waring, P.; Clay, F.J.; Malki, S.; Alderman, B.M.; Grail, D.; Hollande, F.; et al. Reciprocal regulation of gastrointestinal homeostasis by SHP2 and STAT-mediated trefoil gene activation in gp130 mutant mice. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Qian, Y.; Liu, C.; Hartupee, J.; Altuntas, C.Z.; Gulen, M.F.; Jane-Wit, D.; Xiao, J.; Lu, Y.; Giltiay, N.; Liu, J.; et al. The adaptor Act1 is required for interleukin 17—Dependent signaling associated with autoimmune and inflammatory disease. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, H.J.; Suk, J.E.; Patrick, C.; Bae, E.J.; Cho, J.H.; Rho, S.; Hwang, D.; Masliah, E.; Lee, S.J. Direct transfer of α-synuclein from neuron to astroglia causes inflammatory responses in synucleinopathies. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 9262–9272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Chang, S.C.; Lee, J. Significant roles of neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: Therapeutic targets for PD prevention. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2019, 42, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barcia, C.; Ros, C.M.; Annese, V.; Gómez, A.; Ros-Bernal, F.; Aguado-Year, C.; Martínez-Paǵn, M.E.; De Pablos, V.; Fernandez-Villalba, E.; Herrero, M.T. IFN-γ signaling, with the synergistic contribution of TNF-α, mediates cell specific microglial and astroglial activation in experimental models of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2011, 2, e142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Hashida, K.; Kitao, Y.; Sudo, H.; Awa, Y.; Maeda, S.; Mori, K.; Takahashi, R.; Iinuma, M.; Hori, O. ATF6alpha promotes astroglial activation and neuronal survival in a chronic mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, J.-h.; Choi, D.-j.; Jeong, H.-k.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.W.; Choi, S.Y.; Park, S.M.; Suh, Y.H.; Jou, I.; Joe, E.H. DJ-1 facilitates the interaction between STAT1 and its phosphatase, SHP-1, in brain microglia and astrocytes: A novel anti-inflammatory function of DJ-1. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013, 60, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mullett, S.J.; Hinkle, D.A. DJ-1 knock-down in astrocytes impairs astrocyte-mediated neuroprotection against rotenone. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 33, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Vainchtein, I.D.; Molofsky, A.V. Astrocytes and microglia: In sickness and in health. Trends Neurosci. 2020, 43, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Münch, A.E.; Chung, W.S.; Peterson, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 2017, 541, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saijo, K.; Winner, B.; Carson, C.T.; Collier, J.G.; Boyer, L.; Rosenfeld, M.G.; Gage, F.H.; Glass, C.K. A nurr1/coREST pathway in microglia and astrocytes protects dopaminergic neurons from inflammation-induced death. Cell 2009, 137, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Javed, H.; Thangavel, R.; Selvakumar, G.P.; Dubova, I.; Schwartz, N.; Ahmed, M.E.; Zaheer, S.; Kempuraj, D.; Iyer, S.; Zaheer, A.; et al. NLRP3 inflammasome and glia maturation factor coordinately regulate neuroinflammation and neuronal loss in MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 83, 106441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bortolanza, M.; Cavalcanti-Kiwiatkoski, R.; Padovan-Neto, F.E.; da-Silva, C.A.; Mitkovski, M.; Raisman-Vozari, R.; Del-Bel, E. Glial activation is associated with l-DOPA induced dyskinesia and blocked by a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 73, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, Y.; Li, T.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.J.; Le, W. Jmjd3 is essential for the epigenetic modulation of microglia phenotypes in the immune pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Baghi, M.; Rostamian Delavar, M.; Yadegari, E.; Peymani, M.; Pozo, D.; Hossein Nasr-Esfahani, M.; Ghaedi, K. Modified level of miR-376a is associated with Parkinson’s disease. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 2622–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Kim, J.; Inoue, K.; Ishii, J.; Vanti, W.B.; Voronov, S.V.; Murchison, E.; Hannon, G.; Abeliovich, A. A microRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science 2007, 317, 1220–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lehmann, S.M.; Krüger, C.; Park, B.; Derkow, K.; Rosenberger, K.; Baumgart, J.; Trimbuch, T.; Eom, G.; Hinz, M.; Kaul, D.; et al. An unconventional role for miRNA: Let-7 activates Toll-like receptor 7 and causes neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buonfiglioli, A.; Efe, I.E.; Guneykaya, D.; Ivanov, A.; Huang, Y.; Orlowski, E.; Krüger, C.; Deisz, R.A.; Markovic, D.; Flüh, C.; et al. Let-7 MicroRNAs regulate microglial function and suppress glioma growth through toll-like receptor 7. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 3460–3471.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Coleman, L.G.; Zou, J.; Crews, F.T. Microglial-derived miRNA let-7 and HMGB1 contribute to ethanol-induced neurotoxicity via TLR7. J. Neuroinflammation 2017, 14, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Banerjee, S.; Xie, N.; Cui, H.; Tan, Z.; Yang, S.; Icyuz, M.; Abraham, E.; Liu, G. MicroRNA let-7c regulates macrophage polarization. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 6542–6549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cho, K.J.; Song, J.; Oh, Y.; Lee, J.E. MicroRNA-Let-7a regulates the function of microglia in inflammation. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 68, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, J.; Jou, I.; Joe, E.-H. Suppression of miR-155 expression in IFN-γ-treated astrocytes and microglia by DJ-1: A possible mechanism for maintaining SOCS1 expression. Exp. Neurobiol. 2014, 23, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Junn, E.; Lee, K.W.; Byeong, S.J.; Chan, T.W.; Im, J.Y.; Mouradian, M.M. Repression of α-synuclein expression and toxicity by microRNA-7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13052–13057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhou, Y.; Lu, M.; Du, R.H.; Qiao, C.; Jiang, C.Y.; Zhang, K.Z.; Ding, J.H.; Hu, G. MicroRNA-7 targets Nod-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome to modulate neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Roser, A.E.; Caldi Gomes, L.; Halder, R.; Jain, G.; Maass, F.; Tönges, L.; Tatenhorst, L.; Bähr, M.; Fischer, A.; Lingor, P. MiR-182-5p and miR-183-5p act as GDNF mimics in dopaminergic midbrain neurons. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 11, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Geng, L.; Liu, W.; Chen, Y. miR-124-3p attenuates MPP+-induced neuronal injury by targeting STAT3 in SH-SY5Y cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 1757–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gan, L.; Li, Z.; Lv, Q.; Huang, W. Rabies virus glycoprotein (RVG29)-linked microRNA-124-loaded polymeric nanoparticles inhibit neuroinflammation in a Parkinson’s disease model. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 567, 118449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ren, Y.; Li, H.; Xie, W.; Wei, N.; Liu, M. MicroRNA-195 triggers neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease in a Rho-associated kinase 1-dependent manner. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 5153–5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, Q.; Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Cai, H.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Xing, Y. MicroRNA-190 alleviates neuronal damage and inhibits neuroinflammation via Nlrp3 in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mouse model. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 23379–23387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Iyer, A.; Zurolo, E.; Prabowo, A.; Fluiter, K.; Spliet, W.G.M.; van Rijen, P.C.; Gorter, J.A.; Aronica, E. MicroRNA-146a: A Key Regulator of Astrocyte-Mediated Inflammatory Response. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sarkar, S.; Malovic, E.; Harishchandra, D.S.; Ghaisas, S.; Panicker, N.; Charli, A.; Palanisamy, B.N.; Rokad, D.; Jin, H.; Anantharam, V.; et al. Mitochondrial impairment in microglia amplifies NLRP3 inflammasome proinflammatory signaling in cell culture and animal models of Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Park. Dis. 2017, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Béraud, D.; Twomey, M.; Bloom, B.; Mittereder, A.; Ton, V.; Neitzke, K.; Chasovskikh, S.; Mhyre, T.R.; Maguire-Zeiss, K.A. α-Synuclein Alters Toll-Like Receptor Expression. Front. Neurosci. 2011, 5, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Codolo, G.; Plotegher, N.; Pozzobon, T.; Brucale, M.; Tessari, I.; Bubacco, L.; de Bernard, M. Triggering of Inflammasome by Aggregated α-Synuclein, an Inflammatory Response in Synucleinopathies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yuan, Y.; Zhu, F.; Pu, Y.; Wang, D.; Huang, A.; Hu, X.; Qin, S.; Sun, X.; Su, Z.; He, C. Neuroprotective effects of nitidine against traumatic CNS injury via inhibiting microglia activation. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2015, 48, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mor, E.; Cabilly, Y.; Goldshmit, Y.; Zalts, H.; Modai, S.; Edry, L.; Elroy-Stein, O.; Shomron, N. Species-specific microRNA roles elucidated following astrocyte activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 3710–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chen, I.; Chen, C.Y.; Chuang, T.J. Biogenesis, identification, and function of exonic circular RNAs. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2015, 6, 563–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sang, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Qi, L.; Sun, W.; Wang, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H. CircSNCA downregulation by pramipexole treatment mediates cell apoptosis and autophagy in Parkinson’s disease by targeting miR-7. Aging (Albany NY). 2018, 10, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jia, E.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Ouyang, T.; Pan, M.; Bai, Y.; Ge, Q. Transcriptomic profiling of circular RNA in different brain regions of Parkinson’s disease in a mouse model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Feng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Hong, Q. Circular RNA circDLGAP4 exerts neuroprotective effects via modulating miR-134-5p/CREB pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Han, B.; Bai, Y.; Zhou, R.; Gan, G.; Chao, J.; Hu, G.; Yao, H. Circular RNA HIPK2 regulates astrocyte activation via cooperation of autophagy and ER stress by targeting MIR124–2HG. Autophagy 2017, 13, 1722–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kumar, L.; Shamsuzzama; Jadiya, P.; Haque, R.; Shukla, S.; Nazir, A. Functional Characterization of Novel Circular RNA Molecule, circzip-2 and Its Synthesizing Gene zip-2 in C. elegans Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 6914–6926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hanan, M.; Simchovitz, A.; Yayon, N.; Vaknine, S.; Cohen-Fultheim, R.; Karmon, M.; Madrer, N.; Rohrlich, T.M.; Maman, M.; Bennett, E.R.; et al. A Parkinson’s disease Circ RNA s Resource reveals a link between circ SLC 8A1 and oxidative stress. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e11942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chatoo, W.; Abdouh, M.; David, J.; Champagne, M.P.; Ferreira, J.; Rodier, F.; Bernier, G. The polycomb group gene Bmi1 regulates antioxidant defenses in neurons by repressing p53 pro-oxidant activity. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Min, S.W.; Sohn, P.D.; Cho, S.H.; Swanson, R.A.; Gan, L. Sirtuins in neurodegenerative diseases: An update on potential mechanisms. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2013, 5, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Yao, L.; Ye, Y.; Mao, H.; Lu, F.; He, X.; Lu, G.; Zhang, S. MicroRNA-124 regulates the expression of MEKK3 in the inflammatory pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 2018, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hansen, T.B.; Jensen, T.I.; Clausen, B.H.; Bramsen, J.B.; Finsen, B.; Damgaard, C.K.; Kjems, J. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature 2013, 495, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jankovic, J.; Chen, S.; Le, W.D. The role of Nurr1 in the development of dopaminergic neurons and Parkinson’s disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 77, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ye, D.; Shi, Y.; Xu, Y.; Huang, J. PACAP Attenuates Optic Nerve Crush-Induced Retinal Ganglion Cell Apoptosis Via Activation of the CREB-Bcl-2 Pathway. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 68, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhao, Z.; Pu, Y. Lixisenatide enhances mitochondrial biogenesis and function through regulating the CREB/PGC-1α pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 508, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. You, M.; Pan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Si, J.; Wang, K.; Hu, F. Royal jelly alleviates cognitive deficits and β-amyloid accumulation in APP/PS1 mouse model via activation of the cAMP/PKA/CREB/BDNF pathway and inhibition of neuronal apoptosis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019, 10, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Mercer, T.R.; Dinger, M.E.; Sunkin, S.M.; Mehler, M.F.; Mattick, J.S. Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 716–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Ni, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Cao, M.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y. Investigation of Long Non-coding RNA Expression Profiles in the Substantia Nigra of Parkinson’s Disease. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 37, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Soreq, L.; Salomonis, N.; Guffanti, A.; Bergman, H.; Israel, Z.; Soreq, H. Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing data from blood leukocytes derived from Parkinson’s disease patients prior to and following deep brain stimulation treatment. Genomics Data 2015, 3, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Cai, L.; Tu, L.; Li, T.; Yang, X.; Ren, Y.; Gu, R.; Zhang, Q.; Yao, H.; Qu, X.; Wang, Q.; et al. Downregulation of lncRNA UCA1 ameliorates the damage of dopaminergic neurons, reduces oxidative stress and inflammation in Parkinson’s disease through the inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 75, 105734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lin, Q.; Hou, S.; Dai, Y.; Jiang, N.; Lin, Y. LncRNA HOTAIR targets miR-126-5p to promote the progression of Parkinson’s disease through RAB3IP. Biol. Chem. 2019, 400, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Rong, H.; Liu, T. The long noncoding RNA HOTAIR promotes parkinson’s disease by upregulating LRRK2 expression. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 24449–24456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Liu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Pan, W.; Zhao, J.; Xu, Y. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 contributes to cell apoptosis by sponging miR-124 in Parkinson disease. Cell Biosci. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Carrieri, C.; Forrest, A.R.R.; Santoro, C.; Persichetti, F.; Carninci, P.; Zucchelli, S.; Gustincich, S. Expression analysis of the long non-coding RNA antisense to Uchl1 (AS Uchl1) during dopaminergic cells’ differentiation in vitro and in neurochemical models of Parkinson’s disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Ding, X.M.; Zhao, L.J.; Qiao, H.Y.; Wu, S.L.; Wang, X.H. Long non-coding RNA-p21 regulates MPP+-induced neuronal injury by targeting miR-625 and derepressing TRPM2 in SH-SY5Y cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 307, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Dai, Q. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA AL049437 mitigates MPP+-induced neuronal injury in SH-SY5Y cells via the microRNA-205-5p/MAPK1 axis. Neurotoxicology 2020, 78, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yan, W.; Chen, Z.Y.; Chen, J.Q.; Chen, H.M. LncRNA NEAT1 promotes autophagy in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease through stabilizing PINK1 protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 496, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Chang, N. LncRNA hotair promotes MPP+-induced neuronal injury in Parkinson’s disease by regulating the miR-874-5p/ATG10 axis. EXCLI J. 2020, 19, 1141–1153. [Google Scholar]
  87. Cavalcante, G.C.; Magalhães, L.; Ribeiro-Dos-santos, Â.; Vidal, A.F. Mitochondrial epigenetics: Non-coding RNAs as a novel layer of complexity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Mani, S.R.; Juliano, C.E. Untangling the web: The diverse functions of the PIWI/piRNA pathway. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2013, 80, 632–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Schulze, M.; Sommer, A.; Plötz, S.; Farrell, M.; Winner, B.; Grosch, J.; Winkler, J.; Riemenschneider, M.J. Sporadic Parkinson’s disease derived neuronal cells show disease-specific mRNA and small RNA signatures with abundant deregulation of piRNAs. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Rajasethupathy, P.; Antonov, I.; Sheridan, R.; Frey, S.; Sander, C.; Tuschl, T.; Kandel, E.R. A role for neuronal piRNAs in the epigenetic control of memory-related synaptic plasticity. Cell 2012, 149, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Wakisaka, K.T.; Imai, Y. The dawn of pirna research in various neuronal disorders—PubMed. Front. Biosci. 2019, 24, 1440–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Guo, J.U.; Ma, D.K.; Mo, H.; Ball, M.P.; Jang, M.H.; Bonaguidi, M.A.; Balazer, J.A.; Eaves, H.L.; Xie, B.; Ford, E.; et al. Neuronal activity modifies the DNA methylation landscape in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gründemann, J.; Schlaudraff, F.; Haeckel, O.; Liss, B. Elevated α-synuclein mRNA levels in individual UV-laser-microdissected dopaminergic substantia nigra neurons in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Jowaed, A.; Schmitt, I.; Kaut, O.; Wüllner, U. Methylation regulates alpha-synuclein expression and is decreased in Parkinson’s disease patients’ brains. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 6355–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Matsumoto, L.; Takuma, H.; Tamaoka, A.; Kurisaki, H.; Date, H.; Tsuji, S.; Iwata, A. CpG demethylation enhances alpha-synuclein expression and affects the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Masliah, E.; Dumaop, W.; Galasko, D.; Desplats, P. Distinctive patterns of DNA methylation associated with Parkinson disease: Identification of concordant epigenetic changes in brain and peripheral blood leukocytes. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Pihlstrøm, L.; Berge, V.; Rengmark, A.; Toft, M. Parkinson’s disease correlates with promoter methylation in the α-synuclein gene. Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wüllner, U.; Kaut, O.; DeBoni, L.; Piston, D.; Schmitt, I. DNA methylation in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139 (Suppl. 1), 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Hood, S.; Cassidy, P.; Cossette, M.P.; Weigl, Y.; Verwey, M.; Robinson, B.; Stewart, J.; Amir, S. Endogenous dopamine regulates the rhythm of expression of the clock protein PER2 in the rat dorsal striatum via daily activation of D2 dopamine receptors. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 14046–14058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Henry, C.J.; Huang, Y.; Wynne, A.M.; Godbout, J.P. Peripheral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge promotes microglial hyperactivity in aged mice that is associated with exaggerated induction of both pro-inflammatory IL-1β and anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokines. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2009, 23, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Su, X.; Chu, Y.; Kordower, J.H.; Li, B.; Cao, H.; Huang, L.; Nishida, M.; Song, L.; Wang, D.; Federoff, H.J. PGC-1α promoter methylation in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Pieper, H.C.; Evert, B.O.; Kaut, O.; Riederer, P.F.; Waha, A.; Wüllner, U. Different methylation of the TNF-alpha promoter in cortex and substantia nigra: Implications for selective neuronal vulnerability. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 32, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Searles Nielsen, S.; Checkoway, H.; Criswell, S.R.; Farin, F.M.; Stapleton, P.L.; Sheppard, L.; Racette, B.A. Inducible nitric oxide synthase gene methylation and parkinsonism in manganese-exposed welders. Park. Relat. Disord. 2015, 21, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Shu, L.; Qin, L.; Min, S.; Pan, H.; Zhong, J.; Guo, J.; Sun, Q.; Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Tang, B.; et al. Genetic analysis of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 84, e13–e242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cai, Y.; Liu, S.; Sothern, R.B.; Xu, S.; Chan, P. Expression of clock genes Per1 and Bmal1 in total leukocytes in health and Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010, 17, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ding, H.; Liu, S.; Yuan, Y.; Lin, Q.; Chan, P.; Cai, Y. Decreased expression of Bmal2 in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 499, 186–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Eryilmaz, I.E.; Cecener, G.; Erer, S.; Egeli, U.; Tunca, B.; Zarifoglu, M.; Elibol, B.; Bora Tokcaer, A.; Saka, E.; Demirkiran, M.; et al. Epigenetic approach to early-onset Parkinson’s disease: Low methylation status of SNCA and PARK2 promoter regions. Neurol. Res. 2017, 39, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Martin, E.; Betuing, S.; Pagès, C.; Cambon, K.; Auregan, G.; Deglon, N.; Roze, E.; Caboche, J. Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1-induced neuroprotection in Huntington’s disease: Role on chromatin remodeling at the PGC-1-alpha promoter. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 2422–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Nijland, P.G.; Witte, M.E.; van het Hof, B.; van der Pol, S.; Bauer, J.; Lassmann, H.; van der Valk, P.; de Vries, H.E.; van Horssen, J. Astroglial PGC-1alpha increases mitochondrial antioxidant capacity and suppresses inflammation: Implications for multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2014, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Ye, J.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, M.; Li, J.; Liu, N. The role of autophagy in pro-inflammatory responses of microglia activation via mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in vitro. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Babcock, A.A.; Wirenfeldt, M.; Holm, T.; Nielsen, H.H.; Dissing-Olesen, L.; Toft-Hansen, H.; Millward, J.M.; Landmann, R.; Rivest, S.; Finsen, B.; et al. Toll-like receptor 2 signaling in response to brain injury: An innate bridge to neuroinflammation. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 12826–12837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Boka, G.; Anglade, P.; Wallach, D.; Javoy-Agid, F.; Agid, Y.; Hirsch, E.C. Immunocytochemical analysis of tumor necrosis factor and its receptors in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 1994, 172, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mogi, M.; Harada, M.; Riederer, P.; Narabayashi, H.; Fujita, K.; Nagatsu, T. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) increases both in the brain and in the cerebrospinal fluid from parkinsonian patients. Neurosci. Lett. 1994, 165, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nagatsu, T.; Mogi, M.; Ichinose, H.; Togari, A. Changes in cytokines and neurotrophins in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 2000, 277–290. [Google Scholar]
  115. Chan, G.C.; Fish, J.E.; Mawji, I.A.; Leung, D.D.; Rachlis, A.C.; Marsden, P.A. Epigenetic Basis for the Transcriptional Hyporesponsiveness of the Human Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene in Vascular Endothelial Cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 3846–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Yu, Z.; Kone, B.C. Hypermethylation of the inducible nitric-oxide synthase gene promoter inhibits its transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 46954–46961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Broom, L.; Marinova-Mutafchieva, L.; Sadeghian, M.; Davis, J.B.; Medhurst, A.D.; Dexter, D.T. Neuroprotection by the selective iNOS inhibitor GW274150 in a model of Parkinson disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gao, H.M.; Jiang, J.; Wilson, B.; Zhang, W.; Hong, J.S.; Liu, B. Microglial activation-mediated delayed and progressive degeneration of rat nigral dopaminergic neurons: Relevance to Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2002, 81, 1285–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Rothwell, N.; Allan, S.; Toulmond, S. The role of interleukin 1 in acute neurodegeneration and stroke: Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 2648–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Mogi, M.; Harada, M.; Kondo, T.; Riederer, P.; Inagaki, H.; Minami, M.; Nagatsu, T. Interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-α are elevated in the brain from parkinsonian patients. Neurosci. Lett. 1994, 180, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Blum-Degena, D.; Müller, T.; Kuhn, W.; Gerlach, M.; Przuntek, H.; Riederer, P. Interleukin-1β and interleukin-6 are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s and de novo Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 202, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Finkel, D.; Groner, Y. Methylations of adenosine residues (m6A) in pre-mRNA are important for formation of late simian virus 40 mRNAs. Virology 1983, 131, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Schwartz, S.; Mumbach, M.R.; Jovanovic, M.; Wang, T.; Maciag, K.; Bushkin, G.G.; Mertins, P.; Ter-Ovanesyan, D.; Habib, N.; Cacchiarelli, D.; et al. Perturbation of m6A writers reveals two distinct classes of mRNA methylation at internal and 5’ sites. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Zheng, G.; Dahl, J.A.; Niu, Y.; Fedorcsak, P.; Huang, C.M.; Li, C.J.; Vågbø, C.B.; Shi, Y.; Wang, W.L.; Song, S.H.; et al. ALKBH5 Is a Mammalian RNA Demethylase that Impacts RNA Metabolism and Mouse Fertility. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Jia, G.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; Yang, Y.; Yi, C.; Lindahl, T.; Pan, T.; Yang, Y.G.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Li, F.; Zhao, D.; Wu, J.; Shi, Y. Structure of the YTH domain of human YTHDF2 in complex with an m6A mononucleotide reveals an aromatic cage for m6A recognition. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1490–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ingolia, N.T.; Lareau, L.F.; Weissman, J.S. Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 2011, 147, 789–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Yoon, K.J.; Ringeling, F.R.; Vissers, C.; Jacob, F.; Pokrass, M.; Jimenez-Cyrus, D.; Su, Y.; Kim, N.-S.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, L.; et al. Temporal Control of Mammalian Cortical Neurogenesis by m6A Methylation. Cell 2017, 171, 877–889.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Li, H.; Ren, Y.; Mao, K.; Hua, F.; Yang, Y.; Wei, N.; Yue, C.; Li, D.; Zhang, H. FTO is involved in Alzheimer’s disease by targeting TSC1-mTOR-Tau signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Meyer, K.D.; Saletore, Y.; Zumbo, P.; Elemento, O.; Mason, C.E.; Jaffrey, S.R. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149, 1635–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Widagdo, J.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Kempen, M.J.; Tan, M.C.; Ratnu, V.S.; Wei, W.; Leighton, L.; Spadaro, P.A.; Edson, J.; Anggono, V.; et al. Experience-dependent accumulation of N6-methyladenosine in the prefrontal cortex is associated with memory processes in mice. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 6771–6777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Huang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Han, B.; Ju, M.; Chen, B.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine Modification of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Messenger RNA in Circular RNA STAG1–Regulated Astrocyte Dysfunction and Depressive-like Behaviors. Biol. Psychiatry 2020, 88, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Chen, X.; Yu, C.; Guo, M.; Zheng, X.; Ali, S.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Qie, S.; et al. Down-Regulation of m6A mRNA Methylation Is Involved in Dopaminergic Neuronal Death. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 2355–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Qin, L.; Min, S.; Shu, L.; Pan, H.; Zhong, J.; Guo, J.; Sun, Q.; Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Tang, B.; et al. Genetic analysis of N6-methyladenosine modification genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 93, e9–e143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Liu, Q.; Li, M.; Jiang, L.; Jiang, R.; Fu, B. METTL3 promotes experimental osteoarthritis development by regulating inflammatory response and apoptosis in chondrocyte. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wang, J.; Yan, S.; Lu, H.; Wang, S.; Xu, D. METTL3 Attenuates LPS-Induced Inflammatory Response in Macrophages via NF- κ B Signaling Pathway. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Gräff, J.; Kim, D.; Dobbin, M.M.; Li-Huei, T. Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression in Physiological and Pathological Brain Processes. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 603–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Park, G.; Tan, J.; Garcia, G.; Kang, Y.; Salvesen, G.; Zhang, Z. Regulation of histone acetylation by autophagy in Parkinson disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 3531–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Kim, D.; Frank, C.L.; Dobbin, M.M.; Tsunemoto, R.K.; Tu, W.; Peng, P.L.; Guan, J.S.; Lee, B.H.; Moy, L.Y.; Giusti, P.; et al. Deregulation of HDAC1 by p25/Cdk5 in Neurotoxicity. Neuron 2008, 60, 803–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Sugeno, N.; Jäckel, S.; Voigt, A.; Wassouf, Z.; Schulze-Hentrich, J.; Kahle, P.J. α-Synuclein enhances histone H3 lysine-9 dimethylation and H3K9me2-dependent transcriptional responses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Toker, L.; Tran, G.T.; Sundaresan, J.; Tysnes, O.B.; Alves, G.; Haugarvoll, K.; Nido, G.S.; Dölle, C.; Tzoulis, C. Genome-wide dysregulation of histone acetylation in the Parkinson’s disease brain. BioRxiv 2019, 785550. [Google Scholar]
  142. Gebremedhin, K.G.; Rademacher, D.J. Histone H3 acetylation in the postmortem Parkinson’s disease primary motor cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 627, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Song, C.; Kanthasamy, A.; Anantharam, V.; Sun, F.; Kanthasamy, A.G. Environmental neurotoxic pesticide increases histone acetylation to promote apoptosis in dopaminergic neuronal cells: Relevance to epigenetic mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 77, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mittal, S.; Bjørnevik, K.; Im, D.S.; Flierl, A.; Dong, X.; Locascio, J.J.; Abo, K.M.; Long, E.; Jin, M.; Xu, B.; et al. β2-Adrenoreceptor is a regulator of the α-synuclein gene driving risk of Parkinson’s disease. Science 2017, 357, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Harrison, I.F.; Smith, A.D.; Dexter, D.T. Pathological histone acetylation in Parkinson’s disease: Neuroprotection and inhibition of microglial activation through SIRT 2 inhibition. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 666, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Anderson, D.W.; Bradbury, K.A.; Schneider, J.S. Broad neuroprotective profile of nicotinamide in different mouse models of MPTP-induced parkinsonism. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Harrison, I.F.; Powell, N.M.; Dexter, D.T. The histone deacetylase inhibitor nicotinamide exacerbates neurodegeneration in the lactacystin rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2019, 148, 136–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wu, X.; Chen, P.S.; Dallas, S.; Wilson, B.; Block, M.L.; Wang, C.C.; Kinyamu, H.; Lu, N.; Gao, X.; Leng, Y.; et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors up-regulate astrocyte GDNF and BDNF gene transcription and protect dopaminergic neurons. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008, 11, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Xu, D.; Lian, D.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Sun, J.; He, D.; Li, L. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces inflammation and hippocampal apoptosis in experimental Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. J. Neuroinflammation 2017, 14, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Wu, J.Y.; Niu, F.N.; Huang, R.; Xu, Y. Enhancement of glutamate uptake in 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-treated astrocytes by trichostatin A. Neuroreport 2008, 19, 1209–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Acquatella Tran Van Ba, I.; Imberdis, T.; Perrier, V. From prion diseases to prion-like propagation mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Ma, J.; Gao, J.; Wang, J.; Xie, A. Prion-like mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Lema Tomé, C.M.; Tyson, T.; Rey, N.L.; Grathwohl, S.; Britschgi, M.; Brundin, P. Inflammation and α-synuclein’s prion-like behavior in Parkinson’s disease--is there a link? Mol. Neurobiol. 2013, 47, 561–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Plotnikov, A.; Zehorai, E.; Procaccia, S.; Seger, R. The MAPK cascades: Signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2011, 1813, 1619–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Park, S.E.; Sapkota, K.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.J. Kaempferol acts through mitogen-activated protein kinases and protein kinase B/AKT to elicit protection in a model of neuroinflammation in BV2 microglial cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 1008–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Kyriakis, J.M.; Avruch, J. Mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 807–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Cowan, K.J.; Storey, K.B. Mitogen-activated protein kinases: New signaling pathways functioning in cellular responses to environmental stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 206, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Shock, L.S.; Thakkar, P.V.; Peterson, E.J.; Moran, R.G.; Taylor, S.M. DNA methyltransferase 1, cytosine methylation, and cytosine hydroxymethylation in mammalian mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3630–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Guha, M.; Mackman, N. LPS induction of gene expression in human monocytes. Cell. Signal. 2001, 13, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Cargnello, M.; Roux, P.P. Activation and Function of the MAPKs and Their Substrates, the MAPK-Activated Protein Kinases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 50–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Saha, A.R.; Ninkina, N.N.; Hanger, D.P.; Anderton, B.H.; Davies, A.M.; Buchman, V.L. Induction of neuronal death by α-synuclein. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000, 12, 3073–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hirsch, E.C.; Hunot, S. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: A target for neuroprotection? Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 382–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Levy, O.A.; Malagelada, C.; Greene, L.A. Cell death pathways in Parkinson’s disease: Proximal triggers, distal effectors, and final steps. Apoptosis 2009, 14, 478–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Klegeris, A.; Pelech, S.; Giasson, B.I.; Maguire, J.; Zhang, H.; McGeer, E.G.; McGeer, P.L. α-Synuclein activates stress signaling protein kinases in THP-1 cells and microglia. Neurobiol. Aging 2008, 29, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Klegeris, A.; Giasson, B.I.; Zhang, H.; Maguire, J.; Pelech, S.; McGeer, P.L. Alpha-synuclein and its disease-causing mutants induce ICAM-1 and IL-6 in human astrocytes and astrocytoma cells. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2000–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Desplats, P.; Spencer, B.; Coffee, E.; Patel, P.; Michael, S.; Patrick, C.; Adame, A.; Rockenstein, E.; Masliah, E. α-synuclein sequesters Dnmt1 from the nucleus: A novel mechanism for epigenetic alterations in Lewy body diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 9031–9037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Guo, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, S.G. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2: Relevance to Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 38, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. West, A.B.; Moore, D.J.; Biskup, S.; Bugayenko, A.; Smith, W.W.; Ross, C.A.; Dawson, V.L.; Dawson, T.M. Parkinson’s disease-associated mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 augment kinase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16842–16847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. White, L.R.; Toft, M.; Kvam, S.N.; Farrer, M.J.; Aasly, J.O. MAPK-pathway activity, Lrrk2 G2019S, and Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 1288–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zimprich, A.; Biskup, S.; Leitner, P.; Lichtner, P.; Farrer, M.; Lincoln, S.; Kachergus, J.; Hulihan, M.; Uitti, R.J.; Calne, D.B.; et al. Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron 2004, 44, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Cha, G.H.; Kim, S.; Park, J.; Lee, E.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.B.; Kim, J.M.; Chung, J.; Cho, K.S. Parkin negatively regulates JNK pathway in the dopaminergic neurons of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10345–10350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Narendra, D.; Tanaka, A.; Suen, D.F.; Youle, R.J. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. McBride, H.M. Parkin mitochondria in the autophagosome. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183, 757–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Mo, J.S.; Kim, M.Y.; Ann, E.J.; Hong, J.A.; Park, H.S. DJ-1 modulates UV-induced oxidative stress signaling through the suppression of MEKK1 and cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 1030–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Waak, J.; Weber, S.S.; Waldenmaier, A.; Görner, K.; Alunni-Fabbroni, M.; Schell, H.; Vogt-Weisenhorn, D.; Pham, T.T.; Reumers, V.; Baekelandt, V.; et al. Regulation of astrocyte inflammatory responses by the Parkinson’s disease-associated gene DJ-1. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 2478–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Chen, Y.; Gao, C.; Sun, Q.; Pan, H.; Huang, P.; Ding, J.; Chen, S. MicroRNA-4639 is a regulator of DJ-1 expression and a potential early diagnostic marker for Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Xiong, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Li, H.; Chen, W.; Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Wu, L.; Li, W.; Ding, J.; et al. MicroRNA-494 reduces DJ-1 expression and exacerbates neurodegeneration. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Wang, L.; Kou, M.C.; Weng, C.Y.; Hu, L.W.; Wang, Y.J.; Wu, M.J. Arsenic modulates heme oxygenase-1, interleukin-6, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in endothelial cells: Roles of ROS, NF -kB, and MAPK pathways. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 879–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Li, W.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.; Bi, X.; Pan, X.; Ma, A.; Li, W. MiR-181b regulates autophagy in a model of Parkinson’s disease by targeting the PTEN/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 675, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hutchison, E.R.; Kawamoto, E.M.; Taub, D.D.; Lal, A.; Abdelmohsen, K.; Zhang, Y.; Wood, W.H.; Lehrmann, E.; Camandola, S.; Becker, K.G.; et al. Evidence for miR-181 involvement in neuroinflammatory responses of astrocytes. Glia 2013, 61, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ye, Y.; He, X.; Lu, F.; Mao, H.; Zhu, Z.; Yao, L.; Luo, W.; Sun, X.; Wang, B.; Qian, C.; et al. A lincRNA-p21/miR-181 family feedback loop regulates microglial activation during systemic LPS- and MPTP- induced neuroinflammation. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Ji, J.; Zeng, X.N.; Cao, L.L.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, D.D.; Sun, X.L. PPARβ/δ activation protects against corticosterone-induced ER stress in astrocytes by inhibiting the CpG hypermethylation of microRNA-181a. Neuropharmacology 2017, 113, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. D’Ambra, E.; Capauto, D.; Morlando, M. Exploring the regulatory role of circular RNAs in neurodegenerative disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Memczak, S.; Jens, M.; Elefsinioti, A.; Torti, F.; Krueger, J.; Rybak, A.; Maier, L.; Mackowiak, S.D.; Gregersen, L.H.; Munschauer, M.; et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature 2013, 495, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Bolli, R.; Dawn, B.; Xuan, Y.T. Role of the JAK-STAT pathway in protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2003, 13, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Lütticken, C.; Wegenka, U.M.; Yuan, J.; Buschmann, J.; Schindler, C.; Ziemiecki, A.; Harpur, A.G.; Wilks, A.F.; Yasukawa, K.; Taga, T.; et al. Association of transcription factor APRF and protein kinase Jak1 with the interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130. Science 1994, 263, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Stahl, N.; Boulton, T.G.; Farruggella, T.; Ip, N.Y.; Davis, S.; Witthuhn, B.A.; Quelle, F.W.; Silvennoinen, O.; Barbieri, G.; Pellegrini, S.; et al. Association and activation of Jak-Tyk kinases by CNTF-LIF-OSM-IL-6 β receptor components. Science 1994, 263, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Shuai, K.; Ziemiecki, A.; Wilks, A.F.; Harpur, A.G.; Sadowski, H.B.; Gilman, M.Z.; Darnell, J.E. Polypeptide signalling to the nucleus through tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak and Stat proteins. Nature 1993, 366, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Sadowski, H.B.; Shuai, K.; Darnell, J.E.; Gilman, M.Z. A common nuclear signal transduction pathway activated by growth factor and cytokine receptors. Science 1993, 261, 1739–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhong, Z.; Wen, Z.; Darnell, J.E. Stat3: A STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science 1994, 264, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Benveniste, E.N.; Liu, Y.; McFarland, B.C.; Qin, H. Involvement of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling pathway in multiple sclerosis and the animal model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2014, 34, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. O’Shea, J.J.; Plenge, R. JAK and STAT Signaling Molecules in Immunoregulation and Immune-Mediated Disease. Immunity 2012, 36, 542–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Qin, H.; Buckley, J.A.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Fox, T.H.; Meares, G.P.; Yu, H.; Yan, Z.; Harms, A.S.; Li, Y.; et al. Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway protects against α-synuclein-induced neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5144–5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Yan, Z.; Gibson, S.A.; Buckley, J.A.; Qin, H.; Benveniste, E.N. Role of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in regulation of innate immunity in neuroinflammatory diseases. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 189, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Lee, E.-J.; Woo, M.-S.; Moon, P.-G.; Baek, M.-C.; Choi, I.-Y.; Kim, W.-K.; Junn, E.; Kim, H.-S. α-Synuclein Activates Microglia by Inducing the Expressions of Matrix Metalloproteinases and the Subsequent Activation of Protease-Activated Receptor-1. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Couch, Y.; Alvarez-Erviti, L.; Sibson, N.R.; Wood, M.J.A.; Anthony, D.C. The acute inflammatory response to intranigral α-synuclein differs significantly from intranigral lipopolysaccharide and is exacerbated by peripheral inflammation. J. Neuroinflammation 2011, 8, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Reish, H.E.A.; Standaert, D.G. Role of α-synuclein in inducing innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson disease. J. Parkinsons. Dis. 2015, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  198. Mount, M.P.; Lira, A.; Grimes, D.; Smith, P.D.; Faucher, S.; Slack, R.; Anisman, H.; Hayley, S.; Park, D.S. Involvement of interferon-γ in microglial-mediated loss of dopaminergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 3328–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Chen, H.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Schwarzschild, M.A.; Ascherio, A. Peripheral inflammatory biomarkers and risk of Parkinson’s disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2008, 167, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Sherer, T.B. Biomarkers for parkinson’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 79ps14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Gao, J.; Liao, Q. Circular RNA circPTK2 regulates oxygen-glucose deprivation-activated microglia-induced hippocampal neuronal apoptosis via miR-29b-SOCS-1-JAK2/STAT3-IL-1β signaling. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fan, G.; Martinowich, K.; Chin, M.H.; He, F.; Fouse, S.D.; Hutnick, L.; Hattori, D.; Ge, W.; Shen, Y.; Wu, H.; et al. DNA methylation controls the timing of astrogliogenesis through regulation of JAK-STAT signaling. Development 2005, 132, 3345–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Kim, S.; Lee, M.; Choi, Y.K. The role of a neurovascular signaling pathway involving hypoxia-inducible factor and notch in the function of the central nervous system. Biomol. Ther. 2020, 28, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Imbriani, P.; D’Angelo, V.; Platania, P.; Di Lazzaro, G.; Scalise, S.; Salimei, C.; El Atiallah, I.; Colona, V.L.; Mercuri, N.B.; Bonsi, P.; et al. Ischemic injury precipitates neuronal vulnerability in Parkinson’s disease: Insights from PINK1 mouse model study and clinical retrospective data. Park. Relat. Disord. 2020, 74, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Mao, Z.; Liu, C.; Ji, S.; Yang, Q.; Ye, H.; Han, H.; Xue, Z. The NLRP3 Inflammasome is Involved in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease in Rats. Neurochem. Res. 2017, 42, 1104–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Wen, L.; Zhang, Q.S.; Heng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Yuan, Y.H.; Chen, N.H. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the thymus of MPTP-induced Parkinsonian mouse model. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 288, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Broz, P.; Dixit, V.M. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Titze-de-Almeida, R.; Titze-de-Almeida, S.S. miR-7 Replacement Therapy in Parkinson’s Disease. Curr. Gene Ther. 2018, 18, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Cao, B.; Wang, T.; Qu, Q.; Kang, T.; Yang, Q. Long Noncoding RNA SNHG1 Promotes Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease via Regulating miR-7/NLRP3 Pathway. Neuroscience 2018, 388, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Mancuso, R.; Agostini, S.; Hernis, A.; Zanzottera, M.; Bianchi, A.; Clerici, M. Circulatory miR-223-3p Discriminates Between Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s Patients. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Xu, W.; Zhang, L.; Geng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N. Long noncoding RNA GAS5 promotes microglial inflammatory response in Parkinson’s disease by regulating NLRP3 pathway through sponging miR-223-3p. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 85, 106614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Meffert, M.K.; Baltimore, D. Physiological functions for brain NF-κB. Trends Neurosci. 2005, 28, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Sarnico, I.; Lanzillotta, A.; Benarese, M.; Alghisi, M.; Baiguera, C.; Battistin, L.; Spano, P.F.; Pizzi, M. Chapter 24 NF-KappaB Dimers in the Regulation of Neuronal Survival. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2009, 85, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  214. Mincheva-Tasheva, S.; Soler, R.M. NF-κB signaling pathways: Role in nervous system physiology and pathology. Neuroscientist 2013, 19, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Hunot, S.; Brugg, B.; Ricard, D.; Michel, P.P.; Muriel, M.P.; Ruberg, M.; Faucheux, B.A.; Agid, Y.; Hirsch, E.C. Nuclear translocation of NF-κb is increased in dopaminergic neurons of patients with Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7531–7536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Cao, S.; Theodore, S.; Standaert, D.G. Fcy receptors are required for NF-kB signaling, microglial activation and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in an AAV-synuclein mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2010, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Cao, S.; Standaert, D.G.; Harms, A.S. The gamma chain subunit of Fc receptors is required for alpha-synuclein-induced pro-inflammatory signaling in microglia. J. Neuroinflammation 2012, 9, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Ghosh, A.; Roy, A.; Liu, X.; Kordower, J.H.; Mufson, E.J.; Hartley, D.M.; Ghosh, S.; Mosley, R.L.; Gendelman, H.E.; Pahan, K. Selective inhibition of NF-κB activation prevents dopaminergic neuronal loss in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 18754–18759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Wang, Z.; Dong, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Tong, J.; et al. Pro-survival and anti-inflammatory roles of NF-κB c-Rel in the Parkinson’s disease models. Redox Biol. 2020, 30, 101427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Liu, J.; Gao, J.; Tu, S.; Xu, S.; Liu, Y.; Shang, W.; Gu, C.; Huang, Y.; Han, M. Neuroprotective effects of Jitai tablet, a traditional Chinese medicine, on the MPTP-induced acute model of Parkinson’s disease: Involvement of the dopamine system. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  221. Ponomarev, E.D.; Veremeyko, T.; Barteneva, N.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Weiner, H.L. MicroRNA-124 promotes microglia quiescence and suppresses EAE by deactivating macrophages via the C/EBP-α-PU.1 pathway. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Angelopoulou, E.; Paudel, Y.N.; Piperi, C. miR-124 and Parkinson’s disease: A biomarker with therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 150, 104515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Mishima, T.; Mizuguchi, Y.; Kawahigashi, Y.; Takizawa, T.; Takizawa, T. RT-PCR-based analysis of microRNA (miR-1 and -124) expression in mouse CNS. Brain Res. 2007, 1131, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Saraiva, C.; Paiva, J.; Santos, T.; Ferreira, L.; Bernardino, L. MicroRNA-124 loaded nanoparticles enhance brain repair in Parkinson’s disease. J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Wang, H.; Ye, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Mo, L.; Lin, C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Gong, X.; He, X.; Lu, G.; et al. MiR-124 regulates apoptosis and autophagy process in MPTP model of Parkinson’s disease by targeting to bim. Brain Pathol. 2016, 26, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Feng, T.; Shao, F.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xu, D.; Qian, K.; Xie, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, N.; Wang, Y.; et al. miR-124 downregulation leads to breast cancer progression via LncRNA-MALAT1 regulation and CDK4/E2F1 signal activation. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 16205–16216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Liu, S.; Song, L.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, L. MALAT1-miR-124-RBG2 axis is involved in growth and invasion of HR-HPV-positive cervical cancer cells. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Sun, Y.; Li, Q.; Gui, H.; Xu, D.P.; Yang, Y.L.; Su, D.F.; Liu, X. MicroRNA-124 mediates the cholinergic anti-inflammatory action through inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1270–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Impact of epigenetic mechanisms regulating neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. The neuroinflammation cycle is activated on DA neuron damage, which triggers epigenetic modifications and disturbs the normal function of inflammatory responses. Epigenetic regulators are divided into two categories: neurotoxic and neuroprotective. Neurotoxic epigenetic regulators enhance inflammatory factors and ROS production, transform glial cells to an inflammatory phenotype, and promote dopaminergic neuron death. In contrast, neuroprotective epigenetic regulators display therapeutic characteristics and inhibit neuroinflammation by alleviating DA neuronal damage in Parkinson’s disease.
Figure 1. Impact of epigenetic mechanisms regulating neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. The neuroinflammation cycle is activated on DA neuron damage, which triggers epigenetic modifications and disturbs the normal function of inflammatory responses. Epigenetic regulators are divided into two categories: neurotoxic and neuroprotective. Neurotoxic epigenetic regulators enhance inflammatory factors and ROS production, transform glial cells to an inflammatory phenotype, and promote dopaminergic neuron death. In contrast, neuroprotective epigenetic regulators display therapeutic characteristics and inhibit neuroinflammation by alleviating DA neuronal damage in Parkinson’s disease.
Ijms 22 04956 g001
Figure 2. An overview of synergic epigenetic interactions with neuroinflammatory pathways in PD development. Various epigenetic mechanisms synergistically interact with each other and with inflammatory pathways (MAPK signaling pathway, P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, JAK/STAT signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathway) to feedforward neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. These neuroinflammatory pathways activate microglia and astrocytes and release inflammatory cytokines. Overactivation of microglia and astrocytes triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which further damages normal dopamine neurons, leading to neuronal apoptosis and α-synuclein aggregation. Altogether, these synergic interactions form a vicious cycle that further exaggerates neuroinflammation to hallmark parkinsonism.
Figure 2. An overview of synergic epigenetic interactions with neuroinflammatory pathways in PD development. Various epigenetic mechanisms synergistically interact with each other and with inflammatory pathways (MAPK signaling pathway, P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, JAK/STAT signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathway) to feedforward neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. These neuroinflammatory pathways activate microglia and astrocytes and release inflammatory cytokines. Overactivation of microglia and astrocytes triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which further damages normal dopamine neurons, leading to neuronal apoptosis and α-synuclein aggregation. Altogether, these synergic interactions form a vicious cycle that further exaggerates neuroinflammation to hallmark parkinsonism.
Ijms 22 04956 g002
Figure 3. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with MAPK signaling pathway in PD development. (A) MAPK signaling pathway is activated due to abnormal accumulation of α-synuclein, which activates glial cells and inflammatory cytokines. (i) Hypomethylation of the intron 1 of SNCA locus dysregulates SNCA gene transcription, leading to abnormal α-synuclein aggregation in the cytoplasm. This allows abnormal α-synuclein to enter the nucleus following oxidative stress and sequester DNMT1 into the cytoplasm, enhancing the hypomethylation of SNCA gene and causing dysregulated transcription. (ii) Meanwhile, HDAC inhibitors cause hyperacetylation of α-synuclein linked histones H2, H3, H4, and p300 promoter region of SNCA to induce α-synuclein aggregation. (iii) Synergic interaction of DNMT1, circSNCA, and cirs-7a suppresses miR-7 expression, which upregulated SNCA gene expression to trigger α-synuclein accumulation. (B) Similarly, LncHOTAIR1 and lncMALAT1 interact with miR-205 to overexpress LRRK2 and activates MAPK signaling pathway. (C) miR-34b/c interacts with PARK2 and DJ-1 to inhibit their neuroprotective role and activates glia cells. miR-494 and miR-4639 downregulate DJ-1 activity and upregulate nitric oxide ten folds to promote neuroinflammation. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also contributes to MAPK signaling pathway activation. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with MAPK signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Figure 3. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with MAPK signaling pathway in PD development. (A) MAPK signaling pathway is activated due to abnormal accumulation of α-synuclein, which activates glial cells and inflammatory cytokines. (i) Hypomethylation of the intron 1 of SNCA locus dysregulates SNCA gene transcription, leading to abnormal α-synuclein aggregation in the cytoplasm. This allows abnormal α-synuclein to enter the nucleus following oxidative stress and sequester DNMT1 into the cytoplasm, enhancing the hypomethylation of SNCA gene and causing dysregulated transcription. (ii) Meanwhile, HDAC inhibitors cause hyperacetylation of α-synuclein linked histones H2, H3, H4, and p300 promoter region of SNCA to induce α-synuclein aggregation. (iii) Synergic interaction of DNMT1, circSNCA, and cirs-7a suppresses miR-7 expression, which upregulated SNCA gene expression to trigger α-synuclein accumulation. (B) Similarly, LncHOTAIR1 and lncMALAT1 interact with miR-205 to overexpress LRRK2 and activates MAPK signaling pathway. (C) miR-34b/c interacts with PARK2 and DJ-1 to inhibit their neuroprotective role and activates glia cells. miR-494 and miR-4639 downregulate DJ-1 activity and upregulate nitric oxide ten folds to promote neuroinflammation. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also contributes to MAPK signaling pathway activation. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with MAPK signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Ijms 22 04956 g003
Figure 4. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in PD development. P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is activated due to overexpression of lncRNA UCA 1 and miR-181b, which leads to ROS production and other inflammatory responses. Similarly, CDR1-AS sponge with miR-7 and increases mTOR signaling. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also regulated the inflammatory phenotype of microglia and enhanced P13K/Akt/mTOR pathway signaling. Activated P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway enhances NF-κβ activity that further releases pro-inflammatory cytokines along with iNOS and COX-2. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Figure 4. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in PD development. P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is activated due to overexpression of lncRNA UCA 1 and miR-181b, which leads to ROS production and other inflammatory responses. Similarly, CDR1-AS sponge with miR-7 and increases mTOR signaling. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also regulated the inflammatory phenotype of microglia and enhanced P13K/Akt/mTOR pathway signaling. Activated P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway enhances NF-κβ activity that further releases pro-inflammatory cytokines along with iNOS and COX-2. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with P13K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Ijms 22 04956 g004
Figure 5. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with JAK/STAT signaling pathway in PD development. JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation involves multiple epigenetic events. (A) Hyperacetylation of Histone H2, H3, and H4 results in the overexpression of the SNCA gene, which leads to α-synuclein aggregation and JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation. (B) Higher expression of miR-155 and circPTK2 sponging with miR-29b inhibit SOCS1 expression that accelerates neuronal apoptosis through SOCS-1-JAK2/STAT3-IL-1β signaling. (C) Similarly, synergic interaction of lncSNHG1 sponging with miR-7 and lncGAS5 sponging with miR-223-3p activates NLRP3 inflammasome, which transforms glial cells to the inflammatory phenotype and the aggregation of α-synuclein. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also contributes to JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with JAK/STAT signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Figure 5. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with JAK/STAT signaling pathway in PD development. JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation involves multiple epigenetic events. (A) Hyperacetylation of Histone H2, H3, and H4 results in the overexpression of the SNCA gene, which leads to α-synuclein aggregation and JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation. (B) Higher expression of miR-155 and circPTK2 sponging with miR-29b inhibit SOCS1 expression that accelerates neuronal apoptosis through SOCS-1-JAK2/STAT3-IL-1β signaling. (C) Similarly, synergic interaction of lncSNHG1 sponging with miR-7 and lncGAS5 sponging with miR-223-3p activates NLRP3 inflammasome, which transforms glial cells to the inflammatory phenotype and the aggregation of α-synuclein. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also contributes to JAK/STAT signaling pathway activation. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with JAK/STAT signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Ijms 22 04956 g005
Figure 6. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with NF-κB signaling pathway in PD development. The NF-κB signaling pathway is activated on the higher level of α-synuclein deposits. (A) Increased histone H3 acetylation overexpresses the SNCA gene and increases the release of inflammatory cytokines. (B) Similarly, coordination of lncMALAT1 sponging with miR-124 and MEKK3 also enhances NF-κB signaling pathway activation. (C) Hypomethylation of IL-β displayed similar neuroinflammatory effects. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also contributes to NF-κB signaling pathway activation. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with NF-κB signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Figure 6. The landscape of synergic epigenetic interactions with NF-κB signaling pathway in PD development. The NF-κB signaling pathway is activated on the higher level of α-synuclein deposits. (A) Increased histone H3 acetylation overexpresses the SNCA gene and increases the release of inflammatory cytokines. (B) Similarly, coordination of lncMALAT1 sponging with miR-124 and MEKK3 also enhances NF-κB signaling pathway activation. (C) Hypomethylation of IL-β displayed similar neuroinflammatory effects. Moreover, lower expression of PGC-1α also contributes to NF-κB signaling pathway activation. Altogether, these epigenetic mechanisms interact with each other and with NF-κB signaling pathways to induce neuroinflammation in PD development. Note: ↓ shows downregulated expression, and ↑ shows an upregulated expression.
Ijms 22 04956 g006
Figure 7. Proposed applications of neurotoxic and neuroprotective epigenetic modification in Parkinson’s disease management. Neurotoxic epigenetic modifications can be utilized for PD diagnosis. In contrast, neuroprotective epigenetic modifications can be utilized for PD therapeutics.
Figure 7. Proposed applications of neurotoxic and neuroprotective epigenetic modification in Parkinson’s disease management. Neurotoxic epigenetic modifications can be utilized for PD diagnosis. In contrast, neuroprotective epigenetic modifications can be utilized for PD therapeutics.
Ijms 22 04956 g007
Table 1. MicroRNAs involved in the neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. ↑ shows up-regulated, ↓ shows down-regulated.
Table 1. MicroRNAs involved in the neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. ↑ shows up-regulated, ↓ shows down-regulated.
microRNAs ModelTargetmiRNA ExpressionFunctionReferences
miRNA with Neuroprotective Effect
miR-7PD patients, MPTP mice model, MPP+-SH-SY5Y cell modelSNCADownregulate α-synuclein and acted as a neuroprotective agent against oxidative stress, mitochondrial impairment, and neuroinflammation [47]
miR-7MPTP mouse modelNLRP3Downregulate NLRP3 expression and reduced neuronal damage, and improved microglia function[48]
miR-182-5p
miR-183-5p
Primary neuronal cell model of midbrainGDNFMimic glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and protected the survival of DA neurons[49]
miR-124-3pMPP+-SH-SY5Y cell modelSTAT3Downregulate the production of caspase-3, inflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-1β, and reactive oxygen species[50]
miR-124LPS-BV-2 cell models, MPTP mice model, MPP+-SH-SY5Y cell modelMEKK3Downregulate the activation of microglia, the production of pro-inflammatory factors, and cell apoptosis[51]
miR-195LPS-BV-2 cell modelROCK1Downregulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (iNOS, IL-6, and TNF-α) while upregulating the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10)[52]
miR-190LPS-BV-2 cell model, MPTP mice modelNlrp3Downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines and microglia activation[53]
miR-146aHuman glial cell lines IL-6 and COX-2Inhibit inflammatory response mediated by glial cells and provide neuroprotection. [54]
miRNA with Neurotoxic Effect
miR-155Microglia and astrocytes cultured from DJ-1-knockout mouse brainSOCS-1Upregulate the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in microglia and astrocytes[46]
miR-133bPitx3 mutant Aphakia mice, 6OHDA-treated micePitx3Downregulate Pitx3 and induced DA neuronal damage and trigger neuroinflammation[40]
Let-7Animal, human biopsies, cell lines, and primary cell culturesTLRsLet-7 act as a signal activator of TLR7 in microglia and induced an inflammatory response in PD[41,42,43]
Table 2. CircRNAs involved in the neuroinflammation in PD. ↑ shows up-regulated, ↓ shows down-regulated.
Table 2. CircRNAs involved in the neuroinflammation in PD. ↑ shows up-regulated, ↓ shows down-regulated.
Circular RNA miRNA SpongeExpressionTargetStudy Model FunctionReferences
circSNCAmiR-7SNCAMPTP-mouse model MPP+-SH-SY5YUpregulate miR-7 that downregulate SNCA and reduce cell apoptosis, and improves autophagy[61]
mmu-circRNA-0003292miRNA-132 NR4A2MPTP- mouse modelDownregulate NR4A2 to impair DA neurons and promote neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation[62]
circDLGAP4miR-134-5pCREBMPP+-SH-SY5Y cells, MPTP mouse modelsRegulate the activation of the CREB signal to affect the expression of BDNF, Bcl-2, and PGC-1α in cells, and exert neuroprotective effects.[63]
circHIPK2miR124-2HGSIGMAR1Sigmar1KO mice, human astrocytoma cell line A172Regulates astrocyte activation, autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum stress[64]
circzip-2miR-60Zip-2Transgenic C. elegans model of PDTarget miR-60 to protect DA neurons[65]
circSLC8A1miR-128Ago2Substantia nigra of PD patients and healthy donorsPromote oxidative stress[66,67,68]
mmu_circRNA_0001320miRNA-124MEKK3/NF-κB signaling pathwayLPS-treated BV2 cells and MPTP-mouse model Sponge with miR-124 to induce neuroinflammation through MEKK3/NF-κβ signaling pathway [62,69]
Table 3. Long non-coding RNAs involved in neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. ↑ shows up-regulated, ↓ shows down-regulated.
Table 3. Long non-coding RNAs involved in neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. ↑ shows up-regulated, ↓ shows down-regulated.
LncRNAs Study Model LncRNA
Expression
TargetFunctionReferences
LncRNA UCA16-OHDA rat modelPI3K/AKTUpregulated oxidative stress and inflammation through PI3K/Akt signaling pathway[78]
LncRNA HOTAIRMPP+-SH-SY5Y cells, MPTP-mouse modelsmiR-126-5pRegulate miR-126-5p and RAB3IP to promote the progression of PD.[79]
LncRNA-HOTAIRMPP+-SH-SY5Y cell model, MPTP-mice modelmiR-205-5p-LRRK2Upregulated LRRK2 expression by miR-205 inhibition and induce neuronal apoptosis and neuroinflammation[80]
LncRNA-MALAT1MPP+-SH-SY5Y cell model, MPTP-mice modelmiR-205-5p-LRRK2Upregulated LRRK2 expression by miR-205 inhibition and induce neuronal apoptosis and neuroinflammation[81]
LncRNA-AS Uch1iMN9D cells, MPTP-mice model Nurr1Downregulated ASUch1 expression is regulated by downregulated Nurr1 activity, results in dopaminergic dysfunction [82]
Lnc-p21MPP+-SH-SY5Y cellsmiR-625Target miR-625 to regulate TRPM2 expression that increase the levels of ROS, TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, and trigger cell apoptosis[83]
LncRNA AL049437MPP+-SH-SY5Y cells, MPTP-mouse modelmiR-205-5pRegulated the miR-205-5p/MAPK1 axis to increase the levels of inflammatory factors and ROS [84]
LncRNA NEAT1MPP+-SH-SY5Y cells, MPTP-mouse modelPINK1Inhibited the degradation of PINK1 to increase autophagy and displayed a neuroprotective role in PD[85]
Table 4. DNA methylation involved in the neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. ↑ shows up-regulated and ↓ shows down-regulated.
Table 4. DNA methylation involved in the neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. ↑ shows up-regulated and ↓ shows down-regulated.
DNA Methylation ModelTargetExpressionFunctionReferences
SNCA promoterPD patients, healthy controlsSNCAInduces α-syn aggregation and induces DA neuronal damage and activates glial cells to trigger neuroinflammation [93,94,95]
NPAS2 promoterPD patients, healthy controlsNPAS2Disturb the circadian rhythm of PD patients[99]
IL-1β promoterMouse modelIL-1βTransform microglia to the M1 phenotype, that triggered neuronal damage and neuroinflammation [79,100]
PGC-1α promoterHuman brains of PD patients and healthy controls, DM SYN mice PGC-1αIncrease inflammatory gene expression and ROS production[101]
TNF-α promoterPD patients, healthy controlsTNF-αRegulates the inflammatory phenotype of microglia[102]
NOS2 promoterPD patients, healthy controlsNOS2Reduce NO production to avoid activation of microglia[103]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rasheed, M.; Liang, J.; Wang, C.; Deng, Y.; Chen, Z. Epigenetic Regulation of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094956

AMA Style

Rasheed M, Liang J, Wang C, Deng Y, Chen Z. Epigenetic Regulation of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(9):4956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rasheed, Madiha, Junhan Liang, Chaolei Wang, Yulin Deng, and Zixuan Chen. 2021. "Epigenetic Regulation of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 9: 4956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop