Next Article in Journal
Methyl-Donors Can Induce Apoptosis and Attenuate Both the Akt and the Erk1/2 Mediated Proliferation Pathways in Breast and Lung Cancer Cell Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Biological Activity of New Brassinosteroid Analogs of Type 24-Nor-5β-Cholane and 23-Benzoate Function in the Side Chain
Previous Article in Journal
Celastrol Prevents Oxidative Stress Effects on FSHR, PAPP, and CYP19A1 Gene Expression in Cultured Human Granulosa-Lutein Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Naturally Occurring Ecdysteroids in Triticum aestivum L. and Evaluation of Fenarimol as a Potential Inhibitor of Their Biosynthesis in Plants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms22073599
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

BODIPY Conjugate of Epibrassinolide as a Novel Biologically Active Probe for In Vivo Imaging

by
Anastasiia Starodubtseva
1,2,3,
Tetiana Kalachova
1,*,
Oksana Iakovenko
1,4,
Vera Stoudková
1,
Vladimir Zhabinskii
5,
Vladimir Khripach
5,
Eric Ruelland
6,
Jan Martinec
1,
Lenka Burketová
1 and
Volodymyr Kravets
4
1
Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 263, 165 02 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, Paris-Est University, UPEC, 94010 Créteil, France
4
V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 02094 Kyiv, Ukraine
5
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Kuprevich Str., 5/2, 220141 Minsk, Belarus
6
UMR 7025 CNRS, GEC Génie Enzymatique et Cellulaire, Centre de Recherches, Rue Personne de Roberval, CS 60319, Alliance Sorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, 60203 Compiègne CEDEX, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(7), 3599; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073599
Submission received: 1 March 2021 / Revised: 25 March 2021 / Accepted: 26 March 2021 / Published: 30 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Steroids)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are plant hormones of steroid nature, regulating various developmental and adaptive processes. The perception, transport, and signaling of BRs are actively studied nowadays via a wide range of biochemical and genetic tools. However, most of the knowledge about BRs intracellular localization and turnover relies on the visualization of the receptors or cellular compartments using dyes or fluorescent protein fusions. We have previously synthesized a conjugate of epibrassinolide with green fluorescent dye BODIPY (eBL-BODIPY). Here we present a detailed assessment of the compound bioactivity and its suitability as probe for in vivo visualization of BRs. We show that eBL-BODIPY rapidly penetrates epidermal cells of Arabidopsis thaliana roots and after long exposure causes physiological and transcriptomic responses similar to the natural hormone.

1. Introduction

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are plant hormones of steroid nature. The most abundant are brassinolide and castasterone, produced in various plant organs and acting mostly in the neighboring cells and tissues [1,2]. Synthesis, transport, and signaling pathways of BRs are being actively studied, but gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms of BRs action on a cellular level. The physiological effects of brassinosteroids rely on specific recognition of the compound by a complex including leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like protein kinases (LRR-RLKs) BRI1 [3] and BRI1-associated receptor kinase 1 (BAK1) [4], which in turn initiates an intracellular phosphorylation relay cascade [5,6,7]. BRI1 subsequently phosphorylates its inhibitor BKI1 (BRI1 KINASE INHIBITOR1) and induces its dissociation from the plasma membrane (PM) [4,8,9], thus enabling heterodimerization, reciprocal phosphorylation, and full activation of BRI1 and BAK1 kinases [10,11]. BRI1 phosphorylates BSK1 (BR-SIGNALING KINASE1), CDG1 (CONSTITUTIVE DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH1), and some of their homologs, leading to the activation of BSU1 (BRI1 suppressor1) and BSU1-Like1-3 (BSL1-3) [12,13,14]. BSU1/BSLs then inactivate BIN2 (Brassinosteroid-Insensitive2) [15]. As a result, BIN2 substrates BZR1 (BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT1) and BES1 (BRI1-EMS SUPPRESSOR1) [16] get dephosphorylated and transported to the nucleus [17] where they target promoters containing BR-response element CGTGC/TG and/or E-box (CANNTG) motif to regulate the expression of thousands of BRs-responsive genes that are crucial for plant growth and development [18,19]. As a result, special groups of genes are being induced or repressed, modifying cell metabolism, and whole plant physiology. The effect of BRs on transcriptome is not restricted to a few specific genetic targets but affects genes associated with other hormone signaling pathways, especially salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and auxins [20].
The majority of the data about BR transduction have been obtained using molecular and genetics approaches targeting receptor proteins and/or signaling components. To untangle the complexity of BRs action in planta, the visualization approach can be of great use. For several plant hormones, conjugates with fluorescent dyes have been used with promising results. For example, biological activity has been reported for the conjugates of auxin [21,22], ABA [23,24,25], cytokinins [26] and jasmonic acid [27]. For brassinosteroids, a number of fluorescent conjugates have been synthesized [25,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. These conjugates have been mostly used in vitro, in the context of BRs quantitation, by HPLC [34] or in immunosorbent assays [34,37,38].
However, the biological properties of such conjugates in vivo often differ from the original BRs. Recently Irani et al. developed a conjugate of castasterone with far-red-fluorescent Alexa Fluor 647 dye, AFCS, that has been successfully applied for studies of BRI1 receptor endocytosis [39]. AFCS has been proven bioactive based on root growth assay and effect on transcription of BRs biosynthetic genes. Still, the compound was active in micromolar concentrations, while natural BRs activity lies in the nanomolar range. Lower activity of AFCS can be due to the bulky fluorophore group that affects penetration through the cell wall and/or influences binding to the receptor. A common disadvantage of almost all the described brassinosteroid conjugates is that one or more functional groups determining their biological activity are used to bind with a fluorophore [28,29,34]. Attempts to overcome this drawback led to the development of a number of new conjugates [35,40]. Lately, Hurski and colleagues have reported the synthesis of a compound that seems to have high potential as a fully functional fluorescent conjugate of 24-epibrassinolide (eBL) with green-fluorescent dye BODIPY (eBL-BODIPY) [40]. In this compound, BODIPY dye is fused in a way that functional groups of eBL remain intact, while the fluorescent properties of the molecule are similar to that of BODIPY. In addition to preserving all functional groups, this conjugate uses BODIPY as a dye. It is believed that such dyes have a number of advantages over other fluorophores [41], including a high fluorescence quantum yield, a relatively long excited state lifetime, and a small dependence of the fluorescence properties on pH and polarity [42]. Here, we present the first assessment of the biological activity of eBL-BODIPY in planta and propose it as a probe suitable for localization studies by fluorescent microscopy.

2. Results

2.1. eBL-BODIPY Affects Root Growth Similarly to eBL

As a model, we chose seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 (wild type; WT), one of the most used and well-characterized plant systems. First, we compared the effect of eBL and eBL-BODIPY on root growth elongation (Figure 1). To ensure that the observed effect is connected with the specific molecule recognition by BRI1-BAK1 receptor complex, as a negative control we used a T-DNA knock-out bak1-4 mutant [43]. Four-day-old seedlings were transferred to Petri dishes containing various concentrations of brassinosteroids (0.01, 0.1, and 1 μM). Three days later primary root, meristem, and cortical cell length were then measured. As expected, eBL caused dose-dependent root shortening in WT plants, but not in the bak1-4 mutant. Similarly, the presence of low concentrations of eBL-BODIPY caused root shortening in WT plants (Figure 1B). Notably, while roots of plants grown on eBL exhibited typical waving phenotype, this was not the case for eBL-BODIPY. We also observed shortening of the meristematic zone and cortical cells upon eBL in WT plants, but not bak1-4 (Supplemental Figure S1). For this trait, eBL-BODIPY was found to be less efficient, however still significantly active at 0.1 μM and 1 μM concentrations.

2.2. eBL-BODIPY Associates with Plant Cell Wall and Penetrates the Cytoplasm

As the probe is to be used in vivo, we investigated eBL-BODIPY behavior in association with plant roots. First, we confirmed the dye stability in the cultivation media and upon illumination for up to 3 days. The spectrum and intensity of the fluorescence in roots did not differ whether the roots were transferred on freshly prepared agar plates or the plates after 3 days in the cultivation room (data not shown). This suggests that the dye is suitable for long-term application and physiological studies.
Next, we investigated kinetics and specificity of eBL-BODIPY intake on epidermal cells of apical root meristem. Five-day-old A. thaliana WT seedlings were incubated in a drop of 1 μM or 10 μM eBL-BODIPY, washed four times, counterstained with propidium iodide, and examined for intracellular BODIPY-associated fluorescence at distinct time points. Already after 5 min of eBL-BODIPY treatment, we observed accumulation of the fluorescent compound on the cell walls. As the exposure time increased, the signal appeared inside the cytoplasm. At 30 min, we observed a strong cytoplasmic fluorescence (Figure 2A, left panel). To test whether such internalization was caused by a specific interaction with brassinosteroid receptors, we performed a competition assay: seedlings were pre-incubated with eBL for 60 min prior to treatment with fluorescent conjugate. The pre-treatment inhibited signal internalization (Figure 2A,B), which can be explained by occupation of the receptor complex by eBL that prevented binding of eBL-BODIPY.
In the cell biology studies, fluorescent dyes for the imaging purposes are often applied on roots directly as drops, but in long-term physiological studies (i.e., root growth assays) the studied compounds are to reach cells from the media. We next examined eBL-BODIPY penetration into the roots placed in contact with dye-containing agar. In this setup, BODIPY fluorescence was detected in association with cell walls in the differentiation zone already after 15 min (Figure 3A,C,E). At this time point, the dye was aggregating around the root hair. Sixty min after the transfer, the fluorescence was also observed inside the cytoplasm of the epidermal cells (Figure 3B,D,F). Notably, only trichoblast cells accumulated the dye, suggesting that eBL-BODIPY penetration is rather happening via active trafficking than simple diffusion. Increasing the exposure time to 24 h and concentration to 1 μM resulted in higher fluorescence. However, the signal did not penetrate beyond the epidermal cell layer neither in the differentiation zone, nor in the meristem (Supplemental Figure S2, Figure 4).
In the epidermal cells of the meristem and differentiated trichoblasts, we observed vesicle-like aggregates in the cytoplasm (Figure 4F, Supplemental movie 1). No fluorescence was detected in vacuolar space or in the nuclei. All meristematic cells similarly incorporated the dye. However, no signal was detected inside the differentiated atrichoblasts even upon 24 h of exposure (Figure 4A–C). We have examined a range of eBL-BODIPY concentrations and recommend 0.01–0.1 μM and 30–60 min exposure time as optimal for imaging purposes.
After long-term dye application (3 days), the eBL-BODIPY localization in the meristematic zone remained smooth and cytoplasmic. In the differentiation zone, trichoblast cells showed strong cytoplasmic fluorescence and some BODIPY-positive vesicular bodies were observed in atrichoblasts. The high concentration of dye (1 μM) caused moderate toxic effects, as shown with dead cell nuclei counterstaining with propidium iodide (Supplemental Figures S2 and S3). We observed BODIPY-associated fluorescence all along the root and found it to be more intense in the differentiation zone than in the meristem or elongation zone. No fluorescence was detected in upper tissues that were not directly exposed to eBL-BODIPY.

2.3. eBL-BODIPY Partly Mimics Transcriptomic Response to eBL

To dissect the physiological response to eBL-BODIPY, we compared the effect of eBL and eBL-BODIPY on the transcriptome of Arabidopsis seedlings. Based on imaging and root growth assay results, we selected 0.1 μM and 1 μM concentrations and 24 h incubation time for analysis. Full seedlings were harvested for RNA extraction. Based on the published data of transcriptome changes upon BRs application [44], we selected genes responsive to BRs and involved BR biosynthesis (DWF4) and in the signaling cross-talk with other phytohormones: SA (PR1, PR2, PR5, ICS1, WRKY38, WRKY70), auxins (GH3.3, SAUR1A, SHY2, AUX1), ABA (CIPK20, LEA4-1, ABI1), and JA (PDF1.2, LOX2). Transcription of DWF4 showed ca 30% decreased by 1 μM of eBL-BODIPY, comparable to a 40% decrease upon the action of eBL. However, 0.1 μM of eBL-BODIPY did not show significant impact on DWF4 (Supplemental Figure S4). As for the genes, involved in the hormonal crosstalk, only the group of SA-related genes responded consistently to both compounds. However, the effect of eBL-BODIPY was less pronounced. For example, 0.1 μM of eBL caused ca 300-fold increase of PR1 transcription, while 0.1 μM eBL-BODIPY only to a 30-fold increase) (Figure 5). However, 1 μM of eBL caused ca 5-fold increase of ICS1, WRKY38 and WRKY70 transcript accumulation, while application of eBL-BODIPY resulted in more than 10-fold induction (data not shown). That might signify moderate cytotoxicity of the compound, as WRKY70 is associated with cell death in stress responses [45], often coupled with SA synthesis via ICS1 [46]. As for auxin-associated genes, SAUR1A and GH3.3 were upregulated by both compounds in both studied concentrations, while accumulation of SHY2 and AUX1 was not changed in our system. Among studied ABA-associated genes, only CIPK20 showed a significant increase in response to both eBL and its conjugate, 5-fold and 8-fold respectively. Transcription of JA-responsive genes was not significantly affected (data not shown).

3. Discussion

In this work, we assessed the biological activity and in vivo fluorescent properties of the previously synthesized eBL-BODIPY [40]. We showed that eBL-BODIPY rapidly penetrated cell walls (intracellular signal was detected 15–60 min after exposure to the molecule). This falls into a time-frame reported for another fluorescent conjugate, AFCS, which is recommended to be applied as a solution drop ca 40 min before root imaging [47]. eBL-BODIPY was effective at 0.1–10 µM concentrations, which is relatively high compared to the usual range of concentrations for physiological studies; however, up to 20 µM of AFCS (castasterone conjugate) have been suggested for short-term treatments for imaging purposes [47].
Remarkably, eBL-BODIPY actively penetrated only trichoblast cells, while no associated signal was detected in atrichoblasts (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The difference was drastic in differentiated cells, while non-differentiated meristematic cells responded similarly. The exact nature of this effect is yet to be discovered. However, it is in line with the studies pointing our special functions of BRs in different epidermal cell types. Hacham et al. have shown that both hair and non-hair cells have comparable BRI1 receptor densities on the plasma membrane and induce a similar increase in the transcript levels of ACS5 and ACS9 in response to eBL [48]. On the other hand, the role of BRs in establishing the cell fate in root epidermal cells has been suggested. For example, elevated levels of BRs and ethylene result in enhanced deposition of crystalline cellulose specifically in atrichoblasts, thus restricting cell expansion and overall root length [49]. BRs signaling has an important role in suppressing differentiation into trichoblasts and promoting non-hairy cell fate [50]. Finally, several studies of BRs receptor turnover specifically mention imaging to be performed on the trichoblast cell lines [50,51]. Observed preference in penetration only into the trichoblast cells may be the reason of lower biological activity of the compound comparing to the unlabeled eBL.
Next, we have confirmed that the effects of eBL-BODIPY on the physiology of arabidopsis roots mimic those of natural eBL. The pretreatment of seedlings by eBL impaired further eBL-BODIPY penetration inside the cells that might be a result of the limited receptor availability. Application of eBL-BODIPY impaired root elongation in a BAK1-dependent manner, confirming the specificity of the effect (Figure 1). This was observed both for the meristem length (impact on cell division) and cortical cell length (affected cell elongation). However, eBL-BODIPY did not cause “root waving”, an increase of the gravitropic curvature of the primary root, a phenotype connected with PIN2 relocalization and brassinosteroid-auxin signaling cross-talk [52], (Figure 1B). Waving phenotype is connected with BRs regulating polar auxin transport [53]. Indeed, the functioning of BRs in adjusting plant physiology is realized via a network of cross-talks with other phytohormones [54]. For example, BRs and auxins have been shown to act synergistically in the regulation of PIN2 turnover [55], in the maintenance of root apical meristem [56], and in the radial pattern formation of vascular bundles [57]. BRs promote the initiation of lateral root primordia in an auxin transport-dependent manner [58] by regulating the expression of PIN genes [59]. Moreover, auxins participate in the control of BRI, BRL2 and BRL3 expression, and may therefore influence brassinosteroid signaling capacity [60]. Genes responding both to BRs and auxin often contain regulatory element ARFAT [60]. In our study, both eBL and eBL-BODIPY induced transcription of SAUR1A and GH3.3 (Figure 5), that is consistent with the data from full transcriptome profiling after short-term application of auxin IAA and BRs [59].
Especially strong is a connection of BRs with stress-related hormones, such as JA, ABA and SA (reviewed in [20]). The crosstalk has been implied at various levels, based on mutual regulation of hormone levels, sharing signaling components and downstream gene targets. For instance, BRs activate the production of secondary signaling messengers such as phosphatidic acid and Ca2+ and modulate the activity of antioxidant enzymes in tobacco [61]. In A. thaliana and rice, BRs increased the content of JA both under normal conditions and stress [62,63]; exogenous methyl jasmonate inhibited the expression of BRs biosynthesis genes and reduced the content of endogenous BRs in rice shoots [64]; BRs enhanced the JA-induced anthocyanin accumulation in leaves of Arabidopsis seedlings [65]. In our system, no significant changes were found in the transcription of PDF1.2 and LOX2 in response to any of the compounds. BRs co-operate with ABA in the regulation of developmental processes [66]. Indeed, BZR1 was found to directly bind to the promoter of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSTIVE 5 (ABI5), an important transcription factor in ABA signaling [67]. Among the studied ABA marker genes, we found the induction of CIPK20 by both eBL and eBL-BODIPY, while transcription of LEA4-1, ABI1 was not affected. BRs treatment increased thermotolerance in wild-type A. thaliana seedlings, but not in npr1-1 or abi1 mutants that are impaired in SA or ABA signaling [68]. At the same time, 7 h of eBL application enhanced transcription of PR1, PDF1.2 and WRKY70 [68]. In our setup, eBL increased transcription of a batch of SA signaling genes (PR1, PR2, PR5, WRKY70, WRKY38), and a biosynthetic gene ICS1. eBL-BODIPY caused a similar effect on PR1, PR5, WRKY70 and ICS1, although the induction levels were lower (Figure 5).
To summarize, strong similarities in physiological and transcriptomic responses to eBL and eBL-BODIPY support our claim of analogous biological activity of the compounds. We thus propose eBL-BODIPY as a valid active probe to be used in the research of brassinosteroid perception and intracellular turnover.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Compounds

Synthesis and fluorescent properties of the 24-epibrassinolide conjugate (eBL-BODIPY) were previously described [40]. The 24-epibrassinolide (eBL) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and eBL-BODIPY were dissolved in DMSO; 1 mM stock solutions were stored at –20 ℃ in the dark.

4.2. Plant Material

Experiments were performed on A. thaliana Col-0 as wild type (WT) and mutant lines bak1-4 (SALK_116202). Seeds were surface sterilized by 1.6% sodium hypochlorite (30% of SAVO®, Unilever) solution with 0.02% (v/v) TWEEN20 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Seeds were stratified for 2 days at 4℃ in the dark. Seeds were germinated for 3 days in Petri dishes containing a half-strength Murashige–Skoog (½ MS) basal salt medium (Duchefa, Haarlem, Netherlands), pH = 5.7, supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose and 0.8% (w/v) plant agar (Duchefa, Haarlem, Netherlands) at 22 ℃ under long-day light (16 h light/8 h dark) conditions in a vertical position. Four days after germination, seedlings were transferred to Petri dishes containing the same medium supplemented or not with eBL/eBL-BODIPY and cultivated for 3 more days in a vertical position. Brassinosteroid solutions were prepared aseptically and added into warm media after autoclaving.

4.3. Root Growth Analysis

For the evaluation of primary root length, Petri dishes were scanned (Epson Perfection V700 Photo, Suwa, Japan). For the measurement of meristem and cortical cell length, roots were observed under an ApoTome Zeiss microscope with 10x objective in bright field settings. Images were analyzed by FiJi software [69]. At least 12 seedlings were measured for each variant.
Localization of eBL-BODIPY was assessed by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 880) with a 40×/63× C-Apochromat objective (NA = 1.2 W), excitation/emission wavelength was 495/505 nm. To visualize membrane fluorescence we used plants expressing PtdIns(4)P reporter, 2×mCherryFAPP1-PH. Cell walls were counterstained with 10 μg/mL propidium iodide [70].

4.4. Transcript Accumulation Measurement

For gene transcript quantification, five-day-old seedlings were aseptically transferred to Petri dishes containing a half-strength Murashige–Skoog medium containing 0.1/1 μM of eBL or eBL-BODIPY and incubated for 24 h at the same conditions as used for germination. Seedlings were pooled (cca 150 mg of fresh weight), flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. RNA was extracted as in [71]. Briefly, the tissue was homogenized in plastic Eppendorf tubes with 1 g of 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA). Total RNA was isolated using Spectrum Plant Total RNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and treated with a DNA-free kit (Ambion, Austi, TX, USA). Subsequently, 1 μg of RNA was converted into cDNA with M-MLV RNase H–Point Mutant reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) and an anchored oligo dT21 primer (Metabion, Planegg, Germany). Transcript levels were quantified by qPCR using a LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master kit and LightCycler 480 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The PCR conditions were 95 °C for 10min followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Melting curve analysis was then conducted. Transcript level values were normalized to TIP41 and analyzed using the “delta–delta Ct” method. A list of the analyzed genes and primers is available in Supplementary Table S1.

4.5. Data Processing and Analysis

All experiments were performed in at least three independent biological repetitions. Statistical analysis and graph preparation was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software.

5. Conclusions

We present a detailed assessment of biological activity of eBL-BODIPY, a conjugate of brassinolide with the green fluorescent dye BODIPY. We show that eBL-BODIPY rapidly penetrates plant cell walls, and is perceived similarly as eBL. Based on competition assay with natural eBL, transcriptomic response and root phenotype, we conclude that the probe mimics effects of eBL and is suitable for short- and long-terms applications. We believe this compound has a high potential to be used in cell biology studies, especially to further dissect brassinosteroid-signaling pathways.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22073599/s1. Figure S1: impact of eBL and eBL-BODIPY on meristem and cortical cell length. Figure S2: representative images of meristem of 7-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants after 3 days of cultivation on media containing various concentrations of eBL-BODIPY. Figure S3: representative images of differentiation zone of 7-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants after 3 days of cultivation on media containing various concentrations of eBL-BODIPY. Figure S4; impact of eBL and eBL-BODIPY on transcription of brassinosteroid biosynthetic gene DWF4. Table S1: primers used in this study. Video S1: intracellular localization of vesicles with eBL-BODIPY-associated fluorescence in differentiated trichoblast cells, Z-stack of 46 slices, scale bar 10 µm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.K. and V.K. (Volodymyr Kravets); methodology, T.K., J.M., and L.B.; formal analysis, A.S., and O.I.; resources, L.B., V.Z., V.K. (Vladimir Khripach), and V.K. (Volodymyr Kravets); data curation, A.S., T.K., O.I., and V.S.; compound biosynthesis, V.Z. and V.K. (Vladimir Khripach); writing—original draft preparation, T.K., A.S., and O.I.; writing—review and editing, T.K., A.S., L.B., J.M., E.R., and V.K. (Volodymyr Kravets); Supervision, E.R., L.B., J.M., and V.K. (Volodymyr Kravets); project administration, T.K. and V.K. (Volodymyr Kravets); funding acquisition, L.B. and V.K. (Volodymyr Kravets). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by grants of NAS Ukraine (N 13-03-20), The Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research (BRFFR X20УKA-023), European Regional Development Fund, Project “Centre for Experimental Plant Biology” (grant no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000738); microscopy was performed at the Imaging Facility of IEB CAS, supported by project of Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports “National Infrastructure for Biological and Medical Imaging (Czech-BioImaging—LM2018129). OI benefited from the Visegrad EaP scholarship for independent postgraduate research (N 52010701).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Processed data is contained within the article and supplementary material. Raw data is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate excellent the technical support from Romana Pospichalová and suggestions for the imaging protocol from Kateřina Malinská.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Clouse, S.D.; Sasse, J.M. Brassinosteroids: Essential regulators of plant growth and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yang, C.-J.; Zhang, C.; Lu, Y.-N.; Jin, J.-Q.; Wang, X.-L. The mechanisms of brassinosteroids’ action: From signal transduction to plant development. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nam, K.H.; Li, J. BRI1/BAK1, a receptor kinase pair mediating brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Li, J.; Wen, J.; Lease, K.A.; Doke, J.T.; Tax, F.E.; Walker, J.C. BAK1, an arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. The Molecular Circuitry of Brassinosteroid Signaling-Belkhadir-2015-New Phytologist-Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/nph.13269 (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  6. Russinova, E.; Borst, J.-W.; Kwaaitaal, M.; Caño-Delgado, A.; Yin, Y.; Chory, J.; de Vries, S.C. Heterodimerization and endocytosis of arabidopsis brassinosteroid receptors BRI1 and AtSERK3 (BAK1). Plant Cell 2004, 16, 3216–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Li, J.; Nam, K.H. Regulation of brassinosteroid signaling by a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase. Science 2002, 295, 1299–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ma, X.; Xu, G.; He, P.; Shan, L. SERKing coreceptors for receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 1017–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Kota, U.; He, K.; Blackburn, K.; Li, J.; Goshe, M.B.; Huber, S.C.; Clouse, S.D. Sequential transphosphorylation of the BRI1/BAK1 receptor kinase complex impacts early events in brassinosteroid signaling. Dev. Cell 2008, 15, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, X.; Chory, J. Brassinosteroids regulate dissociation of BKI1, a negative regulator of BRI1 signaling, from the plasma membrane. Science 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Meisenhelder, J.; Hunter, T.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. Autoregulation and homodimerization are involved in the activation of the plant steroid receptor BRI1. Dev. Cell 2005, 8, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lin, W.; Lu, D.; Gao, X.; Jiang, S.; Ma, X.; Wang, Z.; Mengiste, T.; He, P.; Shan, L. Inverse modulation of plant immune and brassinosteroid signaling pathways by the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase BIK1. Proc. Nat. Aada. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 12114–12119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, T.-W.; Guan, S.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.-Y. The CDG1 kinase mediates brassinosteroid signal transduction from BRI1 receptor kinase to BSU1 phosphatase and GSK3-like kinase BIN2. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Tang, W.; Kim, T.-W.; Oses-Prieto, J.A.; Sun, Y.; Deng, Z.; Zhu, S.; Wang, R.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.-Y. BSKs mediate signal transduction from the receptor kinase BRI1 in arabidopsis. Science 2008, 321, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, T.-W.; Guan, S.; Sun, Y.; Deng, Z.; Tang, W.; Shang, J.-X.; Sun, Y.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.-Y. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from cell-surface receptor kinases to nuclear transcription factors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1254–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yin, Y.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Mora-Garcia, S.; Li, J.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. BES1 accumulates in the nucleus in response to brassinosteroids to regulate gene expression and promote stem elongation. Cell 2002, 109, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tang, W.; Yuan, M.; Wang, R.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Oses-Prieto, J.A.; Kim, T.-W.; Zhou, H.-W.; Deng, Z.; Gampala, S.S.; et al. PP2A activates brassinosteroid-responsive gene expression and plant growth by dephosphorylating BZR1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. He, J.-X.; Gendron, J.M.; Sun, Y.; Gampala, S.S.L.; Gendron, N.; Sun, C.Q.; Wang, Z.-Y. BZR1 is a transcriptional repressor with dual roles in brassinosteroid homeostasis and growth responses. Science 2005, 307, 1634–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yin, Y.; Vafeados, D.; Tao, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. A new class of transcription factors mediates brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression in arabidopsis. Cell 2005, 120, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Aerts, N.; Mendes, M.P.; Wees, S.C.M.V. Multiple levels of crosstalk in hormone networks regulating plant defense. Plant J. 2021, 105, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sokołowska, K.; Kizińska, J.; Szewczuk, Z.; Banasiak, A. Auxin conjugated to fluorescent dyes—A tool for the analysis of auxin transport pathways. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Auxin Transport Sites are Visualized in Planta Using Fluorescent Auxin Analogs|PNAS. Available online: https://www.pnas.org/content/111/31/11557.abstract (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  23. Benson, C.L.; Kepka, M.; Wunschel, C.; Rajagopalan, N.; Nelson, K.M.; Christmann, A.; Abrams, S.R.; Grill, E.; Loewen, M.C. Abscisic acid analogs as chemical probes for dissection of abscisic acid responses in arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 2015, 113, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fluorescence-Labeled Abscisic Acid Possessing Abscisic Acid-Like Activity in Barley Aleurone Protoplasts: Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry: Volume 61, No. 7. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1271/bbb.61.1198 (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  25. Lace, B.; Prandi, C. Shaping small bioactive molecules to untangle their biological function: A focus on fluorescent plant hormones. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1099–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Synthesis and Cytokinin Activity of Fluorescent 7-Phenylethynylimidazo[4,5-b]Pyridine and Its Riboside. J. Agric. Food Chem. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf0000225 (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  27. Liu, S.; Wang, W.-H.; Dang, Y.-L.; Fu, Y.; Sang, R. Rational design and efficient synthesis of a fluorescent-labeled jasmonate. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 4235–4239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gamoh, K.; Takatsuto, S. A boronic acid derivative as a highly sensitive fluorescence derivatization reagent for brassinosteroids in liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 1989, 222, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gamoh, K.; Omote, K.; Okamoto, N.; Takatsuto, S. High-Performance liquid chromatography of brassinosteroids in plants with derivatization using 9-phenanthreneboronic acid. J. Chromatogr. A 1989, 469, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Winter, J.; Schneider, B.; Meyenburg, S.; Strack, D.; Adam, G. Monitoring brassinosteroid biosynthetic enzymes by fluorescent tagging and HPLC analysis of their substrates and products. Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borisevich, N.A.; Raichenok, T.F.; Khripach, V.A.; Zhabinskii, V.N.; Ivanova, G.V. Solution electronic spectra of brassinosteroid and a synthesized conjugate of a steroid and a fluorescent label. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2008, 75, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Borisevich, N.A.; Bagnich, S.A.; Raichenok, T.F.; Knyukshto, V.N.; Baranovskii, A.V.; Zhabinskii, V.N. Luminescence of biologically active 24-epicastasterone and a model compound. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2008, 75, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raichenok, T.F.; Litvinovskaya, R.P.; Zhabinskii, V.N.; Raiman, M.E.; Kurtikova, A.L.; Minin, P.S. Synthesis and spectral and luminescence properties of new conjugates of brassinosteroids for immunofluorescence analysis. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2012, 48, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lv, T.; Zhao, X.-E.; Zhu, S.; Ji, Z.; Chen, G.; Sun, Z.; Song, C.; You, J.; Suo, Y. Development of an efficient HPLC fluorescence detection method for brassinolide by ultrasonic-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with derivatization. Chromatographia 2014, 77, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Malachowska-Ugarte, M.; Sperduto, C.; Ermolovich, Y.V.; Sauchuk, A.L.; Jurášek, M.; Litvinovskaya, R.P.; Straltsova, D.; Smolich, I.; Zhabinskii, V.N.; Drašar, P.; et al. Brassinosteroid-BODIPY conjugates: Design, synthesis, and properties. Steroids 2015, 102, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Synthetic Protocol for AFCS: A Biologically Active Fluorescent Castasterone Analog Conjugated to an Alexa Fluor 647 Dye.-Abstract-Europe PMC. Available online: https://europepmc.org/article/med/28124242 (accessed on 23 February 2021).
  37. Litvinovskaya, R.P.; Savchuk, A.L.; Kuprienko, O.S.; Sviridov, O.V.; Khripach, V.A. Competitive lanthanide immunofluorescent assay of endogenous brassinosteroids in plants. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khripach, V.; Zhabinskii, V.; Antonchick, A.; Litvinovskaya, R.; Drach, S.; Sviridov, O.; Pryadko, A.; Novik, T.; Matveentsev, V.; Schneider, B. A new type of modified brassinosteroids for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Irani, N.; Rubbo, S.; Mylle, E.; Begin, J.; Schneider-Pizoń, J.; Hniliková, J.; Sisa, M.; Buyst, D.; Vilarrasa-Blasi, J.; Szatmári, A.-M.; et al. Fluorescent castasterone reveals bri1 signaling from the plasma membrane. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hurski, A.L.; Kukel, A.G.; Liubina, A.I.; Baradzenka, A.G.; Straltsova, D.; Demidchik, V.; Drašar, P.; Zhabinskii, V.N.; Khripach, V.A. Regio- and stereoselective C–H functionalization of brassinosteroids. Steroids 2019, 146, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. The chemistry of fluorescent bodipy dyes: Versatility unsurpassed. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1184–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Paës, G. Fluorescent probes for exploring plant cell wall deconstruction: A review. Molecules 2014, 19, 9380–9402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. He, K.; Gou, X.; Yuan, T.; Lin, H.; Asami, T.; Yoshida, S.; Russell, S.D.; Li, J. BAK1 and BKK1 regulate brassinosteroid-dependent growth and brassinosteroid-independent cell-death pathways. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 1109–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Divi, U.K.; Rahman, T.; Krishna, P. Gene expression and functional analyses in brassinosteroid-mediated stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Besseau, S.; Li, J.; Palva, E.T. WRKY54 and WRKY70 co-operate as negative regulators of leaf senescence in arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2667–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, J.; Zhong, R.; Palva, E.T. WRKY70 and its homolog WRKY54 negatively modulate the cell wall-associated defenses to necrotrophic pathogens in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183731. [Google Scholar]
  47. Irani, N.G.; Di Rubbo, S.; Russinova, E. In vivo imaging of brassinosteroid endocytosis in arabidopsis. In Plant Endosomes: Methods and Protocols; Otegui, M.S., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 107–117. ISBN 978-1-4939-1420-3. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hacham, Y.; Holland, N.; Butterfield, C.; Ubeda-Tomas, S.; Bennett, M.J.; Chory, J.; Savaldi-Goldstein, S. Brassinosteroid perception in the epidermis controls root meristem size. Development 2011, 138, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Fridman, Y.; Elkouby, L.; Holland, N.; Vragović, K.; Elbaum, R.; Savaldi-Goldstein, S. Root growth is modulated by differential hormonal sensitivity in neighboring cells. Genes Dev. 2014, 28, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cheng, Y.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Y.; Ito, S.; Asami, T.; Wang, X. Brassinosteroids control root epidermal cell fate via direct regulation of a MYB-BHLH-WD40 complex by GSK3-like kinases. Elife 2014, 3, e02525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kuppusamy, K.T.; Chen, A.Y.; Nemhauser, J.L. Steroids are required for epidermal cell fate establishment in arabidopsis roots. Proc. Nat. Aada. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 8073–8076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lanza, M.; Garcia-Ponce, B.; Castrillo, G.; Catarecha, P.; Sauer, M.; Rodriguez-Serrano, M.; Páez-García, A.; Sánchez-Bermejo, E.; Tc, M.; Leo del Puerto, Y.; et al. Role of actin cytoskeleton in brassinosteroid signaling and in its integration with the auxin response in plants. Dev. Cell 2012, 22, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Li, L.; Xu, J.; Xu, Z.-H.; Xue, H.-W. Brassinosteroids stimulate plant tropisms through modulation of polar auxin transport in brassica and arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2738–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Planas-Riverola, A.; Gupta, A.; Betegón-Putze, I.; Bosch, N.; Ibañes, M.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress. Development 2019, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Retzer, K.; Akhmanova, M.; Konstantinova, N.; Malínská, K.; Leitner, J.; Petrášek, J.; Luschnig, C. Brassinosteroid signaling delimits root gravitropism via sorting of the arabidopsis PIN2 auxin transporter. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Durbak, A.; Yao, H.; McSteen, P. Hormone signaling in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ibañes, M.; Fàbregas, N.; Chory, J.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. Brassinosteroid signaling and auxin transport are required to establish the periodic pattern of arabidopsis shoot vascular bundles. Proc. Nat. Aada. Sci. USA 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Brassinosteroids Interact with Auxin to Promote Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Available online: http://www.plantphysiol.org/content/134/4/1624 (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  59. Goda, H.; Sawa, S.; Asami, T.; Fujioka, S.; Shimada, Y.; Yoshida, S. Comprehensive comparison of auxin-regulated and brassinosteroid-regulated genes in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1555–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Nemhauser, J.L.; Mockler, T.C.; Chory, J. Interdependency of brassinosteroid and auxin signaling in arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, e258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kretynin, S.V.; Kolesnikov, Y.S.; Derevyanchuk, M.V.; Kalachova, T.A.; Blume, Y.B.; Khripach, V.A.; Kravets, V.S. Brassinosteroids application induces phosphatidic acid production and modify antioxidant enzymes activity in tobacco in calcium-dependent manner. Steroids 2019, 108444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schaller, F.; Biesgen, C.; Müssig, C.; Altmann, T.; Weiler, E.W. 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 3 (opr3) is the isoenzyme involved in jasmonate biosynthesis. Planta 2000, 210, 979–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kitanaga, Y.; Jian, C.; Hasegawa, M.; Yazaki, J.; Kishimoto, N.; Kikuchi, S.; Nakamura, H.; Ichikawa, H.; Asami, T.; Yoshida, S.; et al. Sequential regulation of gibberellin, brassinosteroid, and jasmonic acid biosynthesis occurs in rice coleoptiles to control the transcript levels of anti-microbial thionin genes. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 2410–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Gan, L.; Wu, H.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Yang, N.; Xia, K.; Zhou, X.; Oh, K.; Matsuoka, M.; et al. Methyl jasmonate inhibits lamina joint inclination by repressing brassinosteroid biosynthesis and signaling in rice. Plant Sci. 2015, 241, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Peng, Z.; Han, C.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, K.; Huang, H.; Ren, C. Brassinosteroid enhances jasmonate-induced anthocyanin accumulation in arabidopsis seedlings. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, S.; Wei, Y.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X. Mechanisms of brassinosteroids interacting with multiple hormones. Plant Signal Behav. 2009, 4, 1117–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. The Antagonistic Regulation of Abscisic Acid-Inhibited Root Growth by Brassinosteroids is Partially Mediated via Direct Suppression of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 Expression by BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT 1-Yang-2016-Plant, Cell &Environment-Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pce.12763 (accessed on 17 February 2021).
  68. Divi, U.K.; Rahman, T.; Krishna, P. Brassinosteroid-mediated stress tolerance in arabidopsis shows interactions with abscisic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid pathways. Bmc. Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Lin, F.; Krishnamoorthy, P.; Schubert, V.; Hause, G.; Heilmann, M.; Heilmann, I. A dual role for cell plate-associated PI4Kβ in endocytosis and phragmoplast dynamics during plant somatic cytokinesis. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e100303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Leontovyčová, H.; Kalachova, T.; Trdá, L.; Pospíchalová, R.; Lamparová, L.; Dobrev, P.I.; Malínská, K.; Burketová, L.; Valentová, O.; Janda, M. Actin depolymerization is able to increase plant resistance against pathogens via activation of salicylic acid signalling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 03599 g001 550
Figure 1. Epibrassinolide with green fluorescent dye BODIPY (eBL-BODIPY) affects root growth similarly to eBL. (A) Chemical structures of eBL and eBL-BODIPY; (B) representative images of 7-day-old wild type (WT) seedlings after 3 days of cultivation on solid ½ Murashige-Skoog medium containing various concentrations (μM) of compounds; scale bars 10 mm; black mark indicates root tip position at the moment of transfer; (C) primary root length, n ≥ 18; p < 0.05, * indicates significant differences between groups, one-way ANOVA.
Figure 1. Epibrassinolide with green fluorescent dye BODIPY (eBL-BODIPY) affects root growth similarly to eBL. (A) Chemical structures of eBL and eBL-BODIPY; (B) representative images of 7-day-old wild type (WT) seedlings after 3 days of cultivation on solid ½ Murashige-Skoog medium containing various concentrations (μM) of compounds; scale bars 10 mm; black mark indicates root tip position at the moment of transfer; (C) primary root length, n ≥ 18; p < 0.05, * indicates significant differences between groups, one-way ANOVA.
Ijms 22 03599 g001
Ijms 22 03599 g002 550
Figure 2. eBL-BODIPY internalizes into root epidermal cells. (A) Representative images of root epidermal cells after 30 min exposure to 10 μM of eBL-BODIPY (left panel: non-pretreated seedlings, right panel: seedlings pretreated for 60 min with 1 μM eBL), scale bars 5 μm; (B) quantification of the intracellular fluorescence in root epidermal cells exposed to 1 μM eBL-BODIPY for different time, n ≥ 20; * indicates significant differences between treatments within one sampling point, p < 0.05, t-test.
Figure 2. eBL-BODIPY internalizes into root epidermal cells. (A) Representative images of root epidermal cells after 30 min exposure to 10 μM of eBL-BODIPY (left panel: non-pretreated seedlings, right panel: seedlings pretreated for 60 min with 1 μM eBL), scale bars 5 μm; (B) quantification of the intracellular fluorescence in root epidermal cells exposed to 1 μM eBL-BODIPY for different time, n ≥ 20; * indicates significant differences between treatments within one sampling point, p < 0.05, t-test.
Ijms 22 03599 g002
Ijms 22 03599 g003 550
Figure 3. eBL-BODIPY rapidly aggregates with the cell wall and penetrates the epidermal cells. Five-day-old seedlings were placed on solid MS medium containing 0.1 μM eBL-BODIPY and observed after 15 min (A,C,E) and 60 min (B,D,F): orthogonal cuts of XZ (A,B) and XY (C,D) planes, maximum intensity Z-projections (E,F); membrane fluorescence (magenta) and BODIPY fluorescence (green). Yellow arrows indicate the root side directly exposed to eBL-BODIPY. Blue arrows point to trichoblast cell lines. Scale bars 20 μm.
Figure 3. eBL-BODIPY rapidly aggregates with the cell wall and penetrates the epidermal cells. Five-day-old seedlings were placed on solid MS medium containing 0.1 μM eBL-BODIPY and observed after 15 min (A,C,E) and 60 min (B,D,F): orthogonal cuts of XZ (A,B) and XY (C,D) planes, maximum intensity Z-projections (E,F); membrane fluorescence (magenta) and BODIPY fluorescence (green). Yellow arrows indicate the root side directly exposed to eBL-BODIPY. Blue arrows point to trichoblast cell lines. Scale bars 20 μm.
Ijms 22 03599 g003
Ijms 22 03599 g004 550
Figure 4. Representative images of differentiation zone (A,B,C) and meristem (D,E,F) of 5-day- old Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants after 24 h of incubation on media containing 1 μM eBL-BODIPY. Orthogonal cuts of XZ (A,D), YZ (B,E) and XY (C,F) planes; Z-stack of 149 slices, scale bar 20 μm. Blue arrows indicate trichoblast cell lines; white asterisks indicate vacuolar space.
Figure 4. Representative images of differentiation zone (A,B,C) and meristem (D,E,F) of 5-day- old Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants after 24 h of incubation on media containing 1 μM eBL-BODIPY. Orthogonal cuts of XZ (A,D), YZ (B,E) and XY (C,F) planes; Z-stack of 149 slices, scale bar 20 μm. Blue arrows indicate trichoblast cell lines; white asterisks indicate vacuolar space.
Ijms 22 03599 g004
Ijms 22 03599 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of eBL and eBL-BODIPY on the transcription of selected genes, associated with salicylic acid (SA), auxin, and abscisic acid (ABA) responses. Five-day-old seedlings were exposed to 0.1 μM of eBL or eBL-BODIPY for 24 h prior to RNA extraction. The p-value indicated for variants significantly different from control, t-test, n = 3–4, p < 0.06.
Figure 5. Effect of eBL and eBL-BODIPY on the transcription of selected genes, associated with salicylic acid (SA), auxin, and abscisic acid (ABA) responses. Five-day-old seedlings were exposed to 0.1 μM of eBL or eBL-BODIPY for 24 h prior to RNA extraction. The p-value indicated for variants significantly different from control, t-test, n = 3–4, p < 0.06.
Ijms 22 03599 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Starodubtseva, A.; Kalachova, T.; Iakovenko, O.; Stoudková, V.; Zhabinskii, V.; Khripach, V.; Ruelland, E.; Martinec, J.; Burketová, L.; Kravets, V. BODIPY Conjugate of Epibrassinolide as a Novel Biologically Active Probe for In Vivo Imaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073599

AMA Style

Starodubtseva A, Kalachova T, Iakovenko O, Stoudková V, Zhabinskii V, Khripach V, Ruelland E, Martinec J, Burketová L, Kravets V. BODIPY Conjugate of Epibrassinolide as a Novel Biologically Active Probe for In Vivo Imaging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(7):3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Starodubtseva, Anastasiia, Tetiana Kalachova, Oksana Iakovenko, Vera Stoudková, Vladimir Zhabinskii, Vladimir Khripach, Eric Ruelland, Jan Martinec, Lenka Burketová, and Volodymyr Kravets. 2021. "BODIPY Conjugate of Epibrassinolide as a Novel Biologically Active Probe for In Vivo Imaging" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 7: 3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073599

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop