Next Article in Journal
A Lumenal Loop Associated with Catalytic Asymmetry in Plant Vacuolar H+-Translocating Pyrophosphatase
Next Article in Special Issue
A Cysteine-Rich Protein, SpDIR1L, Implicated in S-RNase-Independent Pollen Rejection in the Tomato (Solanum Section Lycopersicon) Clade
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Challenge and Therapeutic Approaches in Human Sepsis Based on the Appearance of Endotoxemia and Beta-d-Glucanemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification and Analysis of Genes Involved in Double Fertilization in Rice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Challenges and Perspectives in the Study of Self-Incompatibility in Orchids

1
College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
3
State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(23), 12901; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312901
Submission received: 18 October 2021 / Revised: 25 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 29 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollen-Pistil Interaction)

Abstract

:
Self-incompatibility affects not only the formation of seeds, but also the evolution of species diversity. A robust understanding of the molecular mechanisms of self-incompatibility is essential for breeding efforts, as well as conservation biology research. In recent years, phenotypic and multiple omics studies have revealed that self-incompatibility in Orchidaceae is mainly concentrated in the subfamily Epidendroideae, and the self-incompatibility phenotypes are diverse, even in the same genus, and hormones (auxin and ethylene), and new male and female determinants might be involved in SI response. This work provides a good foundation for future studies of the evolution and molecular mechanisms of self-incompatibility. We review recent research progress on self-incompatibility in orchids at the morphological, physiological, and molecular levels, provide a general overview of self-incompatibility in orchids, and propose future research directions.

1. Introduction

Self-incompatibility (SI) refers to the inability of hermaphroditic angiosperms to self-pollinate, which promotes outcrossing or hybridization [1]. Self-pollination can reduce the genetic diversity of populations and increase the extinction rate of species, which is why self-pollination is often considered an ‘evolutionary dead-end’; consequently, some species have evolved mechanisms to avoid self-pollination and promote outcrossing (i.e., SI), [2,3]. SI plays a key role in maintaining high levels of genetic variation and improving the adaptability of species. The evolution of SI has been shaped by frequency-dependent selection and balancing selection [4,5].
Generally, SI is divided into two categories based on genetic characteristics: gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) and sporophytic self-incompatibility (SSI). SI is controlled by a single or multiple S-loci with a variety of S-haplotypes. The specific interactions between both male and female specificity determinants (S-determinants), which are tightly linked at the SI loci, induce SI responses. The key determinants and molecular mechanisms of SI in dicotyledons are well studied. Most studies have focused on Brassicaceae (SRK-based SSI systems), Solanaceae, Rosaceae, Plantaginaceae (S-RNase-based GSI systems), and Papaveraceae (S-glycoprotein-based GSI systems) [3,6,7,8,9,10]. Review has provided useful information on SI in dicotyledons [3]. By contrast, the molecular mechanisms of SI in monocotyledons remain largely unknown [3,11].
SI has been reported in more than 100 families and 39% of angiosperm species [12], there are approximately 11 families and 75 genera in monocotyledons [13]. SI has been documented over 750 species of Orchidaceae, the largest monocotyledons family [14,15], indicating that more species should be clarified. Recent studies have identified several structural mechanisms, phytohormones, and candidate genes involved in SI responses in orchids. In this review, we focus on recent research progress on orchid SI at the morphological, physiological, and molecular levels. We also discuss the diverse molecular mechanisms of SI and future research directions.

2. Morphological Types of SI in Orchidaceae

Many traits are used to measure the SI of orchids. Pollen tube growth, fruit set, and seed abortion rate are often used as the main indicators of SI, especially the growth of the pollen tube, as it is one of the most direct and important indicators of SI [16,17]. Although SI has been reported in various orchid groups, it is most common in a few groups, such as Dendrobiinae (i.e., Dendrobium) [18], Pleurothallidinae [19], Oncidiinae [14,20], Malaxidinae [21,22,23], Laeliinae [14,24], Aeridinae [25], Angraecinae [25], and Neottieae (i.e., Epipactis) [14], which all belong to the subfamily Epidendroideae (Figure 1). Here, we mainly review the pollen tube growth in orchid SI species.

2.1. Subtribe Dendrobiinae

Studies of the SI of the subtribe have focused on Dendrobium. Dendrobium is the second largest genus in Orchidaceae (second only to Bulophyllum) [26], with approximately 1450 species. It is a perennial epiphytic herb that is mainly distributed in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions of Oceania and Asia [27].
By conducting more than 1700 pollination experiments on 61 species of Dendrobium [18], Johansen found that 44/61 (72%) of the species had wilted and yellowed ovaries and showed self-sterility after self-pollination. Among the remaining 17 fruit-producing species, the fruit ripening time and seed quality varied considerably. Analysis of the development of the self-pollenated tubes of D. fameri (SI) suggested that it was consistent with the GSI phenotype given that the pollen tubes enter the style (Table 1). This study indicated that some species of Dendrobium showed the GSI phenotype. Niu et al. [28] studied 26 representative species of Dendrobium and analyzed the pollen tube growth of 13 species (Table 1). Four kinds of pollen tube growth phenotypes were observed in self-incompatible species: (1) pollinia did not germinate; (2) the pollen tube stopped growing at the top of the style; (3) the pollen tube stopped growing at a specific position in the stylar channel, mostly at the upper third of the stylar channel; and (4) the pollen tube stopped growing in the upper third of the ovary. For example, the pollen tube of D. densiflorum stopped growing just before or after the style entrance one day after self-pollination (Table 1). The self-pollinated pollen tube of D. chrysanthum stopped growing at the upper third of the style three days after self-pollination (Table 1). The pollen tube of D. lindleyi stopped growing at the point before or just after the ovary entrance (Table 1) [28]. The growth of the pollen tube in more than half of the self-incompatible species stops in the style, and these species are distributed in different branches of Dendrobium phylogenetic tree [28,29], which is the main SI phenotype and consistent with the GSI phenotype. The diverse pollen germination and pollen tube growth phenotypes suggest that there might be more than one molecular mechanism of SI in Dendrobium species.
All these results show significant differences to those of molecular mechanisms known in other angiosperm families. There is a surprisingly high SI phenotype diversity in orchids, even in one genus, while there is only one SI phenotype described in other angiosperm families with their molecular mechanisms known, respectively. Furthermore, the emergence times of the SI phenotypes after self-pollination varies from species to species, mostly at three to five days, but even at two to three weeks, which much longer than that (mostly from tens of minutes to hours [35,36]) in other angiosperm families with their molecular mechanisms known. Therefore, investigation of more other orchids SI species is needed, which may reveal more SI phenotypes.

2.2. Subtribe Pleurothallidinae

SI analysis of Restrepia, belonging to clade B [19] of the Pleurothallidinae, revealed that 45% of the species are self-incompatible, and seed abortion is lower for cross-pollinated plants (both intraspecific and interspecific cross-pollination) than for self-pollinated plants. Pollen tubes fill the entire ovary after three weeks of cross-pollination, but the number of self-pollinated pollen tubes decreases significantly and stops growing in the upper third of the ovary, as is the case in the R. brachypus (Table 1) [16]. The genus Acianthera belongs to clade C [19] of the Pleurothallidinae. After self-pollination, the pollen tube growth of A. fabiobarrosii stops in the style (Table 1). Aside from the style, the ovary was found to be the second reaction site of SI, and it might be an extension of the SI reaction in the style [33].
In addition to pollen tubes, some Pleurothallidinae individuals can produce fruits with no seeds after self-pollination [19,34]. Seed abortion of A. johannensis after self-pollination may be caused by SI or by inbreeding depression [37]. What’s more, in Anathallis sclerophylla, A. heterophylla, and A. rubens, nearly all pollen grains do not germinate after self-pollination (Table 1), which is a typical SSI phenotype [32], but reciprocal crosses are needed for further verification.
The characteristics of the second SI reaction site and fruits with no seeds are found in this orchid group, further surprising us. What’s more, there seems to be more SI species with self-pollenated tube growth stopping at the base of column (Table 1), compared with Dendrobium species, which might suggest branch specificity. Therefore, a wider survey of the growth of pollen tube needs to be conducted, and the detailed changes in the shape of the pollen tube may also be examined, which may help answer questions on the phylogeny of SI in these groups.

2.3. Subtribe Oncidiinae

Oncidiinae has 65 genera and more than 1600 species [38,39]. Approximately 69.4% of Oncidiinae species are self-incompatible, 22.2% are self-compatible, and 8.3% have both self-incompatible and self-compatible populations [20]. The identification of SI in Oncidiinae is determined by fruit set and seed production after self-pollination [40]. In Oncidiinae, the growth of pollen tubes after self-pollination has only been reported in Notylia nemorosa (Table 1). The pollen tubes either did not germinate or stopped growing at the stigmatic surface, and the flowers withered approximately four days after pollination [31].
The high SI rate in this subtribe requires pollen tube observation experiments in more species, suggesting that different SI phenotypes exist in this group and that there might be another branch-specific trait.

2.4. Subtribe Aeridinae

The SI species reported in this subtribe is Phalaenopsis pulcherrima. Zhang’s research [41] on the breeding system of P. pulcherrima has shown that there is no significant difference in fruit set between self-pollination and cross-pollination, but the number of seeds with embryos in self-pollinated plants is significantly lower compared with cross-pollinated plants. From one to four days, the extent of pollen germination is lower and the length of the pollen tube is shorter after self-pollination. On the fifth day, there are fewer pollen tubes entering the ovule after self-pollination compared with cross-pollination [41]. These findings indicate that the SI of P. pulcherrima is late-acting SI before zygote formation. In this case, pollen can germinate, and pollen tubes can grow and enter ovules; however, the large number of self-pollinated fertilized eggs cannot develop into seeds [1,42].
Based on the above listed results, the SI phenotypes in orchids species contain each developmental stage from the beginning of hydration to the formation of the zygote after self-pollination, which is not reported in other angiosperm families. However, there are still a lot of pollination experiments to be done. For orchids groups with high SI rate, pollen tube observation experiments should be carried out in more species so that more SI phenotypes may be found, further verifying whether branch specificity exists among orchids groups. For species whose pollen tube growth stops at the stigma, reciprocal cross tests need to be performed in order to distinguish between GSI and SSI. In addition, in the past, many studies have evaluated the self-incompatibility of orchids based on fruit setting rate rather than pollen tube growth, and there has been no systematic mating system study on all orchids, so the proportion of self-incompatibility in orchids has been underestimated. A wider survey of mating systems based on pollen tube growth is needed, which will help to answer questions on the phylogeny of SI among orchids groups.

3. Physiology of SI in Orchidaceae

The pollen of the Orchidaceae contains large amounts of auxins [43]. Application of auxin to the stigma can result in post-pollination phenomena [44]. The use of auxin to treat self-incompatible orchids species can trigger flower abscission, but this can lead to parthenocarpy in self-compatible or partly self-compatible plants [18,45,46]. The detection results of the pollen substances of Phalaenopsis after pollination suggest that auxin, as the primary pollen signal [47], is transferred to the style and gradually infiltrates various organs, inducing ethylene production [48] and eventually leading to apoptosis in the perianth. The concentrations of auxin and ethylene were monitored during the development of pollen tube after self- and cross-pollination in D.chrysanthum, respectively [28]. The concentration of auxin was significantly higher within three days after self-pollination compared with cross-pollination. The concentration of ethylene (ACC) increased significantly at three days after self-pollination and decreased significantly at three days after cross-pollination. SI might fine-tune the auxin concentration, which promotes the production of ethylene [28], suggesting that auxin and ethylene might be involved in SI response.
However, further experiments are needed. Investigations into external hormone and hormone inhibitor treatment would be helpful to explore the effect of hormones on pollen tube development with self-pollination. Whether auxin and ethylene are involved in the SI response in other SI phenotypic species also needs to be verified. What is more, whether other hormones and ions, such as calcium involved in the SI response in Papaveraceae [3], are also involved in the orchids’ SI response, needs further verification.

4. Molecular Mechanisms of SI in Orchidaceae

Studies show that there are diverse SI phenotypes in orchids, even within the same genus, suggesting the high diversity and complex nature of the molecular mechanisms of SI that may exist in orchids. Since S-RNase-based GSI systems is observed in a wide range of flowering species [3], including Rosaceae, Solanaceae, and Plantaginaceae, and their SI phenotypes are similar to those of some orchids species, it is speculated that a similar molecular mechanism exists among them. Recently, based on orchids genome and transcriptome data, molecular identification of the S-RNase homolog in orchids was carried out, and revealed that no homologous gene was found in orchids [28,49]. The results suggest that SI is not mediated by S-RNase in orchids species, indicating new and undiscovered male and female determinants involving in orchids SI response. Furthermore, the WGCNA analysis based on transcriptome and hormone (auxin and ethylene) concentration data in D. chrysanthum revealed that there are some genes whose expression patterns are closely related to SI responses, such as genes encoding E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, RING finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing protein, NAC domain-containing protein, key enzymes in auxin and ethylene biosynthesis pathways, Ca2+-transporting ATPase, and the rapid alkalinization factors (RALF) [28]. Meanwhile, genes with pollen- and style-specific expression associated with SI were also screened out [28]. Then, based on functional annotation and interaction relationships between pollen- and style-specific expression genes, several SI closely related genes were considered to be candidate genes, including genes encoding ethylene biosynthesis enzyme, RALF genes and CrRLK1L genes [28], which is beneficial for the male and female determinants identification (Figure 1). So far, we are still a long way from understanding the molecular mechanisms of SI in orchids. However, it is feasible to identify what these genes do in orchids.

5. Challenges and Perspectives

Several morphological, physiological, and molecular features of SI in orchids have been studied. There are several pollen tube growth phenotypes in orchids, including the failure of pollinia to germinate, the cessation of pollen tube growth in the style, and the cessation of pollen tube growth in the ovary. Even within the same genus, such as in Dendrobium, there is more than one SI phenotypes, which is rarely reported in other angiosperm families in which SI molecular mechanisms are known. Furthermore, as one of the most diverse groups of angiosperms, SI is most common in the subfamily Epidendroideae of Orchidaceae, including Dendrobium, Oncidiinae, and Pleurothaldinae, which are groups containing large numbers of species, suggesting SI might be one of the main factors for promoting orchid species diversity. Physiological studies have suggested that auxin-induced ethylene production leads to premature flower abscission, which might be involved in the SI response. The molecular mechanisms of SI in orchids are complex and diverse and might differ from molecular mechanisms known in other angiosperm families. All these research levels are shown in Figure 1. The remarkable features prove that orchids are ideal materials for studying the molecular mechanisms and evolution of SI.
The study of SI in Orchidaceae is in an incipient stage. Several types of studies are needed to reveal the molecular mechanisms and the evolutionary process of SI in Orchidaceae. First, artificial pollination studies need to be conducted to facilitate the identification of phenotypes and haplotypes of SI in more orchids, especially by observing self- and cross-pollen tube germination and growth. Such work would enhance our understanding of the SI phenotype of orchids, and aid research examining the molecular mechanisms of SI. Second, SI-related loci and SI candidate genes need to be identified through genomic data analyses, such as genome and transcriptome sequencing, coupled with functional verification experiments; such work would not only enhance our understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms of SI in orchids but also aid hybrid breeding through the identification of advantagous haplotypes with high quality, especially for orchids with high market value, such as Dendrobium and Phalaenopsis. Third, transformation of corn poppy SI genes into Arabidopsis thaliana [50,51] has been shown to confer SI, and modification of SI genes in potato can make self-incompatible plants become self-compatible plants [52] suggesting that self-incompatible or self-compatible plants could be obtained through transformation or modification of the SI genes of specific orchids. With these techniques, new germplasm could be created by constructing artificial populations, such as F2, BC1, and RILs, which could aid the breeding of new varieties by selecting desired individuals.
In addition, the pollination strategy of Orchidaceae plants is widely known, and SI is common in large groups of orchids, such as, Dendrobium, and Pleurothallidinae. Therefore, the relationships among SI type, species number, flower morphology, and pollination strategy in the Orchidaceae phylogeny require clarification, as all of these characteristics contribute to the formation and maintenance of orchid species diversity. Most wild orchids are listed as endangered species, and all wild orchid species are included in the CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) appendix, which accounts for more than 90% of the plants protected by the Convention [53]. Studies on the relationship between SI and the formation and maintenance of population diversity will also provide new insights into the conservation biology of orchids.

Author Contributions

S.N. and Y.L. (Yibo Luo) conceived and designed the study. S.N. and X.Z. wrote the manuscript. X.Z., Y.J. and Y.L. (Yang Liu). arranged the figures and tables. D.C. provides good advice. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (nos. 2019YFD1000700 and 2019YFD1000704), the Special Research Foundation of Hebei Agricultural University (YJ201848), Basic Scientific Research Funds of Provincial Universities in Hebei Province (KY2021055), and Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (C2019204295).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yun-Xia Niu (School of Vocational Education, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China) for arranging the figures and tables. I am especially grateful to [Cun-Zhi Tian], my mother, for her encouragement, and patience.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Nettancourt, D. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dressler, R.L. Phylogeny and Classification of the Orchid Family; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fujii, S.; Kubo, K.; Takayama, S. Non-self- and self-recognition models in plant self-incompatibility. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, Q.; Han, T.-S.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.-F.; Zou, Y.-P.; Li, Z.-W.; Xu, Y.-C.; Guo, Y.-L. Long-term balancing selection contributes to adaptation in Arabidopsis and its relatives. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Guo, Y.-L.; Zhao, X.; Lanz, C.; Weigel, D. Evolution of the S-Locus Region in Arabidopsis Relatives. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Suzuki, G. Recent progress in plant reproduction research: The story of the male gametophyte through to successful fertilization. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1857–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Schopfer, C.R.; Nasrallah, M.E.; Nasrallah, J.B. The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science 1999, 286, 1697–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Takayama, S.; Shiba, H.; Iwano, M.; Shimosato, H.; Che, F.S.; Kai, N.; Watanabe, M.; Suzuki, G.; Hinata, K.; Isogai, A. The pollen determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica campestris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1920–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Akagi, T.; Henry, I.M.; Morimoto, T.; Tao, R. Insights into the Prunus-specific S-RNase-based self-incompatibility system from a genome-wide analysis of the evolutionary radiation of S locus-related F-box genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1281–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wheeler, M.J.; de Graaf, B.H.; Hadjiosif, N.; Perry, R.M.; Poulter, N.S.; Osman, K.; Vatovec, S.; Harper, A.; Franklin, F.C.; Franklin-Tong, V.E. Identification of the pollen self-incompatibility determinant in Papaver rhoeas. Nature 2009, 459, 992–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, B.; Thorogood, D.; Armstead, I.; Barth, S. How far are we from unravelling self-incompatibility in grasses? New Phytol. 2008, 178, 740–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Igic, B.; Lande, R.; Kohn, J.R. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 169, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Brewbaker, J.L.; Gorrez, D.D. Genetics of self-incompatibility in the monocot genera, Ananas (pineapple) and Gasteria. Am. J. Bot. 1967, 54, 611. [Google Scholar]
  14. East, E.M. The distribution of self sterility in the flowering plants. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1940, 82, 449–518. [Google Scholar]
  15. Franklin-Tong, V.E. Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants—Evolution, Diversity, and Mechanisms; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Millner, H.J.; McCrea, A.R.; Baldwin, T.C. An investigation of self-incompatibility within the genus Restrepia. Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Freudenstein, J.V. Fundamentals of orchid biology. Nord. J. Bot. 1994, 14, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johansen, B. Incompatibility in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1990, 103, 165–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Borba, E.L.; Barbosa, A.R.; Melo, M.; Gontijo, S.L.; Oliveira, H. Mating systems in the Pleurothallidinae (Orchidaceae): Evolutionary and systematic implications. Lankesteriana Int. J. Orchid. 2011, 11, 207–221. [Google Scholar]
  20. Castro, J.B.; Singer, R.B. A literature review of the pollination strategies and breeding systems in Oncidiinae orchids. Acta Bot. Bras. 2019, 33, 618–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oh, G.S.; Chung, M.Y.; Chung, S.G.; Chung, M.G. Contrasting breeding systems: Liparis Kumokiri and L. Makinoana (Orchidaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2001, 38, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  22. Whigham, D.F.; O’Neill, J.P. Dynamics of flowering and fruit production in two eastern North American terrestrial orchids, Tipularia discolor and Liparis lilifolia. In Population Ecology of Terrestrial Orchids; Wells, T.C.E., Willems, J.H., Eds.; SPB Academic Publishers: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  23. Aragón, S.; Ackerman, J.D. Density effects on the reproductive success and herbivory of Malaxis massonii. Lindleyana 2001, 16, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ackerman, J.D. Limitations to Sexual Reproduction in Encyclia krugii (Orchidaceae). Syst. Bot. 1989, 14, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Agnew, J.D. Self-Compatibility/Incompatibility in Some Orchids of the Subfamily Vandoideae. Plant Breed. 1986, 97, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Z.-J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, K. Studies on floral and pollination biology in endangered Dendrobium orchid. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2009, 231, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, P.J.; Chase, M.W.; Rasmussen, F.N. Genera Orchidacearum Volume 6: Epidendroideae; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Niu, S.C. Morphology and Molecular Mechanism of Dendrobium Self-Incompatibility. Ph.D. Thesis, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  29. Niu, S.C.; Huang, J.; Xu, Q.; Li, P.X.; Yang, H.J.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, G.Q.; Chen, L.J.; Niu, Y.X.; Luo, Y.B.; et al. Morphological type identification of self-incompatibility in Dendrobium and its phylogenetic evolution pattern. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Huang, J. Study on Cross-Compatibility of The Genus Dendrobium. Master’s Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Singer, R.B.; Koehler, S. Notes on the Pollination Biology of Notylia nemorosa (Orchidaceae): Do pollinators necessarily promote cross pollination? J. Plant Res. 2003, 116, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gontijo, S.L.; Barbosa, A.R.; de Melo, M.C. Occurrence of different sites of self-incompatibility reaction infour Anathallis (Orchidaceae, Pleurothallidinae) species. Plant Spec. Biol. 2010, 25, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Duarte, M.O.; Oliveira, D.; Borba, E.L. Two self-incompatibility sites occur simultaneously in the same Acianthera species (Orchidaceae, Pleurothallidinae). Plants 2020, 9, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Borba, E.L.; Semir, J.; Shepherd, G.J. Self-incompatibility inbreeding depression and crossing potential in five Brazilian Pleurothallis (Orchidaceae) Species. Ann. Bot. 2001, 88, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dickinson, H. Dry stigmas, water and self-incompatibility in Brassica. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1995, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Elleman, C.J.; Franklin-Tong, V.; Dickinson, H.G. Pollination in species with dry stigmas—The nature of the early stigmatic response and the pathway taken by pollen tubes. New Phytol. 1992, 121, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Duarte, M.O. Sementes Abortadas ou Óvulos não Fecundados? Investigação da Possível Ocorrência de Dois Sítios de Autoincompatibilidade em Acianthera (Orchidaceae). Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chase, M.W.; Cameron, K.M.; Freudenstein, J.V.; Pridgeon, A.M.; Schuiteman, A. An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 177, 151–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Neubig, K.M.; Whitten, W.M.; Williams, N.H.; Blanco, M.A.; Endara, L.; Burleigh, J.G.; Silvera, K.; Cushman, J.C.; Chase, M.W. Generic recircumscriptions of Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae: Cymbidieae) based on maximum likelihood analysis of combined DNA datasets. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 168, 117–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tremblay, R.L.; Ackerman, J.D.; Zimmerman, J.K.; Calvo, R.N. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: A spasmodic journey to diversification. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 84, 1–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Z. Conservation Biology of Three Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae) Species in Hainan Island. Ph.D. Thesis, Hainan University, Haikou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chai, L.; Ge, X.; Biswas, M.K.; Qiang, X.; Deng, X. Self-sterility in the Mutant ‘zigui Shatian’ Pummelo (Citrus grandis Osbeck) Is Due to Abnormal Post-zygotic Embryo Development and Not Self-incompatibility. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 104, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Müller, R. Zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Indolylessigsaure mittels Papirchromatographie und Papirelektrophorese. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 1953, 30, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  44. Arditti, J.; Flick, B.H. Post-pollination Phenomena in Orchid Flowers. Vi. Excised Floral Segments of Cymbidium. Am. J. Bot. 1976, 63, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Heslop-Harrison, J. The physiology of reproduction in Dactylorchis. I. Auxin and the control of meiosis, ovule formation and ovary growth. Rotaniska Not. 1957, 110, 28–48. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gregory, L.E.; Gaskins, M.H.; Colberg, C. Parthenocarpic Pod Development By Vanilla planifolia Andrews Induced with Growth-regulating Chemicals. Econ. Bot. 1967, 21, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.S.; O’Neill, S.D. Ovary and gametophyte development are coordinately regulated by auxin and ethylene following pollination. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 403–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Burg, S.P.; Dijkman, M.J. Ethylene and Auxin Participation in Pollen Induced Fading of Vanda Orchid Blossoms. Plant Physiol. 1967, 42, 1648–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Niu, S.C.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Li, P.X.; Zhang, G.Q.; Xu, Q.; Chen, L.J.; Wang, J.Y.; Luo, Y.B.; Liu, Z.J. Lack of S-RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility in orchids suggests that this system evolved after the monocot-eudicot split. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lin, Z.; Eaves, D.J.; Sanchez-Moran, E.; Franklin, F.C.; Franklin-Tong, V.E. The Papaver rhoeas S determinants confer self-incompatibility to Arabidopsis thaliana in planta. Science 2015, 350, 684–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Graaf, B.H.; Rudd, J.J.; Wheeler, M.J.; Perry, R.M.; Bell, E.M.; Osman, K.; Franklin, F.C.; Franklin-Tong, V.E. Self-incompatibility in Papaver Targets Soluble Inorganic Pyrophosphatases in Pollen. Nature 2006, 444, 490–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ye, M.; Peng, Z.; Tang, D.; Yang, Z.; Li, D.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, S. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Luo, Y.B.; Jia, J.S.; Wang, C.L. A general review of the conservation status of Chinese orchids. Biodivers. Sci. 2003, 11, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Diverse SI pollen tube morphologies exist in orchids in the subfamily Epidendroideae.
Figure 1. Diverse SI pollen tube morphologies exist in orchids in the subfamily Epidendroideae.
Ijms 22 12901 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the pollen tubes in orchids SI species.
Table 1. Characteristics of the pollen tubes in orchids SI species.
SpeciesSite Where Pollen Tubes Stop GrowingTime When Pollen Tubes Stop GrowingReference(s)
D. longicornu in Shenzhen Stigma (absence or low pollen germination) [28]
D. cucullatum[30]
Notylia nemorosa[31]
Anathallis rubens1[19,32]
A. sclerophylla[19,32]
A. heterophylla[19,32]
Masdevallia infracta2[19]
Octomeria crassifolia3[19]
Octomeria grandiflora[19]
Octomeria praestans[19]
Stelis aff. Hypnicola4[19]
Stelis aff.peliochyla[19]
Stelis sp.[19]
Specklinia pristeoglossa5[19]
Specklinia sp.[19]
D. densiflorumBeginning of the stylar channel (distal part of the column)1 d[28]
D. thyrsiflorum1 d[28]
D. farmeri4 d[18]
D. moniliforme3 d[28]
D. catenatum2–3 d[28]
D. longicornu in Yunnan4 d[28]
D. chrysanthum3 d[28]
Acianthera saurocephala6-[19]
D. unicumStylar channel4–5 d[28]
D. devonianum4–5 d[28]
D. denneanum4–5 d[28]
A. johannensisStylar channel (base of the column)7 d[33]
Acianthera adamantinensis-[19]
A. fabiobarrosii-[19]
Acianthera hamosa-[19]
Acianthera limae-[19]
Acianthera modestissima-[19]
Acianthera ochreata-[19]
Acianthera prolifera-[19]
Acianthera teres-[19]
Anathallis microphyta15 d[32]
Pleurothallis teres4-[34]
D. lindleyiBefore or after ovary entrance2 d[28]
D. hancockii3–5 d[28]
D. jenkinsii3–5 d[28]
Restrepia brachypus7Top third of ovary21 d[16]
Pleurothallis johannensisIn the ovary-[34]
The main clades of Pleurothallidinae according to Borba et al. (2011) [19]: 1 Anathallis belongs to clade D; 2 Masdevallia belongs to clade H; 3 Octomeria belongs to clade A; 4 Stelis and Pleurothallis belong to clade F; 5 Specklinia belongs to clade E; 6 Acianthera belongs to clade C; 7 Restrepia belongs to clade B. -: no data.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Jia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, D.; Luo, Y.; Niu, S. Challenges and Perspectives in the Study of Self-Incompatibility in Orchids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312901

AMA Style

Zhang X, Jia Y, Liu Y, Chen D, Luo Y, Niu S. Challenges and Perspectives in the Study of Self-Incompatibility in Orchids. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(23):12901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312901

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaojing, Yin Jia, Yang Liu, Duanfen Chen, Yibo Luo, and Shance Niu. 2021. "Challenges and Perspectives in the Study of Self-Incompatibility in Orchids" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 23: 12901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312901

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop