Next Article in Journal
Heterozygous Ldlr-Deficient Hamster as a Model to Evaluate the Efficacy of PCSK9 Antibody in Hyperlipidemia and Atherosclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Demonstration of an Aqp4/Tgf-Beta 1 Pathway in Murine Astrocytes Holds Implications for Both Neuromyelitis Optica and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Endomorphin-2- and Neurotensin- Based Chimeric Peptide Attenuates Airway Inflammation in Mouse Model of Nonallergic Asthma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cord–Age–Gender Connections Shape the Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis Progressive Forms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 23
10.3390/ijms20235934
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TGFB1-Mediated Gliosis in Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cords Is Favored by the Regionalized Expression of HOXA5 and the Age-Dependent Decline in Androgen Receptor Ligands

by
Serge Nataf
1,2,3,*,
Marine Guillen
3 and
Laurent Pays
1,2,3
1
Bank of Tissues and Cells, Lyon University Hospital (Hospices Civils de Lyon), 69003 Lyon, France
2
CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM 1060, INRA 1397, INSA Lyon, 69600 Oullins, France
3
University Claude Bernard Lyon-1, F-69000 Lyon, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(23), 5934; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235934
Submission received: 11 October 2019 / Revised: 18 November 2019 / Accepted: 22 November 2019 / Published: 26 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Cord-Age-Gender Connection in Multiple Sclerosis Pathophysiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with a progressive form of the disease, spinal cord (SC) functions slowly deteriorate beyond age 40. We previously showed that in the SC of these patients, large areas of incomplete demyelination extend distance away from plaque borders and are characterized by a unique progliotic TGFB1 (Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1) genomic signature. Here, we attempted to determine whether region- and age-specific physiological parameters could promote the progression of SC periplaques in MS patients beyond age 40. An analysis of transcriptomics databases showed that, under physiological conditions, a set of 10 homeobox (HOX) genes are highly significantly overexpressed in the human SC as compared to distinct brain regions. Among these HOX genes, a survey of the human proteome showed that only HOXA5 encodes a protein which interacts with a member of the TGF-beta signaling pathway, namely SMAD1 (SMAD family member 1). Moreover, HOXA5 was previously found to promote the TGF-beta pathway. Interestingly, SMAD1 is also a protein partner of the androgen receptor (AR) and an unsupervised analysis of gene ontology terms indicates that the AR pathway antagonizes the TGF-beta/SMAD pathway. Retrieval of promoter analysis data further confirmed that AR negatively regulates the transcription of several members of the TGF-beta/SMAD pathway. On this basis, we propose that in progressive MS patients, the physiological SC overexpression of HOXA5 combined with the age-dependent decline in AR ligands may favor the slow progression of TGFB1-mediated gliosis. Potential therapeutic implications are discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have demonstrated that spinal cord (SC) tissue alterations correlate with clinical disability in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), be it secondary progressive MS (SPMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS) [1,2,3]. Importantly, in PPMS or SPMS, scores of clinical disability tend to inexorably progress starting from the fourth decade of life [4,5], and this occurs despite an overall decrease in the number of active inflammatory lesions in the brain [6,7]. In this context, we recently reported on the in-depth analysis of SC molecular neuropathology in SPMS or PPMS patients. We found that areas of incomplete demyelination extend distance away from plaque borders [8] and are characterized by a TGF-beta 1 (transforming growth factor beta 1) progliotic signature [9]. Based on the identification of astrocyte vs. oligodendrocyte gene co-expression networks, we further proposed that TGF-beta 1, while preventing acute inflammation, could (i) promote gliosis, (ii) prevent the antigliotic effects mediated by androgen receptor ligands, and (iii) alter the translation of myelin genes [9]. However, the question as to whether such a process could be, to some extent, SC-specific, was not assessed.
Interestingly, to our best knowledge, only one article has reported on an extensive and systematic neuropathological analysis of plaque activity on both the brains and SCs derived from a large cohort of MS patients [10]. While the main conclusion of this work related with the role of smoldering plaques (i.e., slowly expanding lesions) in MS progression, an important finding was unraveled but somehow neglected and not discussed. Indeed, when assessing the impact of localization on the percentage of active vs. inactive plaques, the authors found that irrespective of age and disease duration, significant differences were observed when comparing the SC to the brain: “Lesions in the SC were more likely to be inactive (p < 0.001, p = 0.002) compared to supratentorial and infratentorial lesions. In addition “Lesions in the SC were less likely to be smoldering (p = 0.02) compared to supratentorial lesions” [10]. Finally, “no/few smoldering plaques were found in the SC or optic nerve” while “smoldering and inactive plaques were both equally distributed between the supratentorial and the infratentorial white matter” [10]. Importantly, the authors also reported that active plaques did not display any region-specific distribution even when specifically assessing early active or late active plaques [10]. It is worth noting that, although based on the analysis of fewer samples, a previous work similarly concluded a dissociation between brain and SC neuropathological features in SPMS or PPMS patients. Such a dissociation was reported with regard to both the percentage of inactive plaques (89% of inactive plaques in the SC as compared to 54% in the brain) and the percentage of slowly expanding plaques (5% of slowly expanding plaques in the SC as compared to 18% in the brain) [11]. It appears thus that downstream of the triggering autoimmune mechanisms leading to the formation of active plaques, an SC-specific process might be responsible for dampening of plaque-associated inflammation. If so, myelin repair, a process known to be coupled with plaque-associated inflammatory events, would also differ between the brain and SC. In this functional scheme, the identification of a TGFB1 genomic signature in MS spinal cords makes sense since TGFB1 was demonstrated to dampen acute central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory lesions [12,13] to exert potent progliotic effects (notably via the astrocytic synthesis of extracellular matrix molecules) [14,15,16] and to both inhibit the terminal differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors and prevent microglia-mediated remyelination [17].
In the present paper, we mined transcriptomics and proteomics databases to identify physiological parameters that would be responsible for a region-specific and age-dependent susceptibility of human SC to TGFB1-mediated gliosis. Our results may explain the particular outcome of SC active plaques and in progressive MS patients, the age-dependent deterioration of SC functions.

2. Results

2.1. The Human Spinal Cord Genomic Signature Retrieved from the ARCHS4 Database Is Specifically Enriched in Homeobox Genes

In order to identify genes whose expression is SC-specific as compared to other CNS regions, we first explored the ARCHS4 library of tissue-specific genomic signatures which may be accessed via the Enrichr platform [18]. The ARCHS4 library, obtained by the combined analysis of 84,863 publicly available human RNA-seq data, gathers genomic signatures for 108 human tissues or cell types, irrespective of the presence or absence of a pathological state [19]. From the ARCHS4 library, we retrieved brain and spinal cord genomic signatures and extracted two sets of genes specific to each of these signatures. These two lists of genes were then submitted to enrichment analyses via the TargetMine platform [20]. Interestingly, the most significant enrichment was obtained using the InterPro domain enrichment tool [21]. Indeed, we found that the 869 genes which are specific to the SC signature (as compared to the brain signature) were highly significantly enriched in homeobox genes (Figure 1). Conversely, enrichment analysis using the InterPro domain enrichment tool also showed that the set of genes specific to the brain signature (as compared to the SC signature) was enriched in terms that are not related with homeobox genes (Figure 1).

2.2. In the Normal Adult Human Central Nervous System, a Set of Homeobox Genes Are Uniquely Overexpressed in the Spinal Cord as Compared to Other CNS Regions

Since the ARCHS4 library was built from the analysis of human tissues, irrespective of their pathological or normal state, we then sought to determine whether homeobox genes are indeed physiologically overexpressed in the human SC as compared to other CNS regions. To this aim, we explored the GTEx database [22,23,24] which corresponds to the currently largest repository of RNA-seq data obtained from normal human tissues. We focused our analysis on the set of homeobox genes belonging to the ARCHS4 SC-specific signatures. Starting from this list of 29 candidate homeobox genes, we retrieved the corresponding median TPM (transcripts per kilobase million) values calculated in the GTEx database from the RNA-seq analysis of spinal cord samples (n = 159), cerebellum (n = 241), hippocampus (n = 197), or brain cortex (n = 255) samples. We then filtered the results in order to retain only homeobox genes exhibiting SC mRNA levels above the threshold of 5 TPM. This approach allowed us identifying 10 homeobox genes which, under physiological conditions, are substantially expressed in the human SC but are not or only very poorly expressed in the cerebellum, hippocampus, and brain cortex (Table 1).
It should be noted that while the brain cortex cannot be considered as a myelin-rich area, the cerebellum is abundantly myelinated and the hippocampus comprises large areas of myelinated tracts. It is thus highly unlikely that such differences may reflect differences regarding the cell composition of the SC as compared to other CNS areas. However, to address this issue, we sought to check if the HOX genes reported as poorly expressed in the brain according to the GTEx database had also been reported to be poorly expressed in cultured oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, or neurons derived from the normal human brain. To this aim, we queried the “Brain RNA-seq” database which compiles RNA-seq data obtained from primary cultures of CNS-resident cells (oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, neurons, endothelial cells) derived from adult normal human brains [25]. We found that in all analyzed cell types, the 10 homeobox genes identified as being overexpressed in the SC according to the GTEx databank exhibited mRNA levels equal to or slightly above the 0.1 FPKM threshold of detection which was set to in the “Brain RNA-seq” databank (data supplement 1). Besides the issue of cell composition, another potential drawback resides in the fact that CNS-derived samples analyzed in the GTEx database were not submitted to a careful neuropathological examination. Moreover, some of these samples were obtained from patients who died from traumatic brain injury [26]. To confirm our findings, we thus performed a complementary investigation on the previously published BNE (Brain Net Europe) transcriptomics dataset [27] from which analyzed control human CNS samples were demonstrated to be disease-free as assessed by neuropathological examination. While all the regions of interest that we explored in the GTEx database are not available in the BNE dataset, we could nevertheless assess the differential expression of homeobox genes in SC vs. brain cortex samples (Table 2). Results show that despite the relatively low number of analyzed samples in the BNE dataset (10 in each group), the retrieved expression profiles confirm the results obtained by querying the GTEx database (Table 2).
Finally, our findings are also supported by a survey of the literature regarding the spinal cord-specific expression of homeobox genes in mice. Thus, in transgenic mice expressing β-galactosidase under the Hoxb8 promoter, lacZ activity was shown to be restricted to the spinal cord [28]. Accordingly, Hoxb8-Cre (i.e., Hoxb8-Cre recombinase) mice were used for brain-sparing conditional gene deletion [29]. Similarly, according to the GENSAT database of engineered mouse strains [30,31], transgenic mice expressing EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) under the Hoxa5 promoter exhibit spinal cord-restricted EGFP expression. Of note, for both Hoxb8 and Hoxa5, the expression pattern of reporter genes was indicative of a widespread promoter activity in both neuronal and glial cells. Finally, Hoxb7 was demonstrated to be overexpressed by a factor >10 in SC-derived endothelial cells (cultured or freshly extracted) as compared to brain-derived endothelial cells [32].

2.3. The Spinal Cord-Overexpressed HOXA5 Homeobox Protein Interacts with the Gliosis-Associated Transcription Factors SOX2 (SRY-box 2) and SMAD1.

Homeobox genes encode transcription factors (TFs) which, as such, function via interacting with a wide range of proteins including TFs, co-TFs, and chromatin modifiers [33,34,35]. Indeed, complex networks of transcription factors were shown to regulate gene expression patterns in a tissue-specific manner [36]. We thus sought to identify the set of TFs establishing first shell interactions with SC-overexpressed homeobox TFs. To this aim, we queried the human proteome database “BioGrid” [37] to retrieve the most recently updated list of protein partners of spinal cord-overexpressed homeobox proteins. We obtained a list of 85 interactors (data supplement 2, sheet “HOX partners”) that we then crossed with the list of currently known human TFs [38] (data supplement 2, sheet “List Human TFs”). By this means, we retrieved 14 TFs that interact with SC-overexpressed homeobox proteins (Table 3).
Interestingly, two of these TF partners, SOX2 and SMAD1, belong to the astrocytosis-related co-expression module that we previously demonstrated in MS spinal cords (data supplement 2, sheets “MS SC gliosis-associated module” and “MS SC gliosis-associated TFs”) [9]. Both SOX2 and SMAD1 were previously shown to physically interact with HOXA5 but none of the other SC-overexpressed homeobox proteins. Considering that only 12 TFs (out of 1211 human TFs) belong to the gliosis-associated gene module identified in MS SCs, the presence of SMAD1 and SOX2 in the short list of currently known HOXA5 TF partners corresponds to an enrichment factor of 31.74 with an associated p-value of 0.002 (Fisher’s exact test). Of note, several works demonstrated the progliotic effects of SOX2 and SMAD1 [39,40,41]. Furthermore, SMAD1 belongs to the BMP (bone morphogenetic protein) and to the TGFB1 signaling pathways [42,43,44,45], both of which have been involved in astrocytosis [46,47]. Moreover, according to the BioGrid database, SOX2 and SMAD1 themselves interact with 3 TFs encoded by genes of the gliosis-associated co-expression module we identified in MS SCs: the androgen receptor (AR), GLIS3 (GLIS family zinc finger 3), and NFIB (nuclear factor I B). These findings indicate that the protein–protein interactions linking HOXA5 to SOX2 and SMAD1 are likely to be functionally relevant in the context of MS-associated spinal cord gliosis. Finally, we retrieved from the JASPAR library of predicted TF targets, the computationally inferred list of genes which harbor HOXA5 binding motifs in their promoter regions. We found that such a list of predicted targets includes SMAD1, SMAD3, TGFB1, and TGFBR2.

2.4. Data Mining Analysis Indicates that the Progliotic Pathway Associated with SC-Overexpressed HOX Proteins Is Negatively Regulated by the Androgen Receptor

That AR belongs to the gliosis-associated gene module identified in MS SCs was previously proposed to reflect a failed negative feedback process. Indeed, AR exerts antigliotic effects [48,49,50,51] and was shown to potentially antagonize the TGFB1 pathway via the hijacking of SMAD3 [52] and the transcriptional silencing of TGFB1 [53,54]. However, a global view on the potential antagonism between the AR and TGF-beta/SMAD pathway is still lacking. We thus sought to determine whether an unsupervised analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms would support the existence of such an antagonism. To achieve this goal, we queried the “QuickGO” server run by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory’s European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) [55,56], which allows exploring the 44,990 GO terms annotating the proteins referenced in UniProt Knowledgebase [57] across species. In particular, when querying any given GO term on the “QuickGO” server, the “Co-occurring terms” tablet provides the whole list of GO terms exhibiting similarities (i.e., shared annotated proteins) with the queried GO term. Here, we successively queried the GO terms “Positive regulation of SMAD protein signal transduction” (GO:0060391), “Negative regulation of SMAD protein signal transduction” (GO:0060392), “Negative regulation of androgen receptor signaling pathway” (GO:0060766), and “Positive regulation of androgen receptor activity” (GO:2000825). Similarities between SMAD-related GO terms and androgen receptor-related GO terms were then searched. Strikingly, only functionally antagonistic overlaps were observed, notably between the “Positive regulation of SMAD protein signal transduction” GO term and the “Negative regulation of androgen receptor signaling pathway” GO term (Table 4).
These results, obtained via an unsupervised system biology approach, further point to a functional antagonism between the SMAD signaling pathway and the AR pathway. On this basis, we then performed a manual curation of the literature and listed the promoter analysis studies which previously documented the silencing effects of AR on the transcription of SOX2 and/or gene members of the TGF-beta pathway (data supplement 3). We were then able to build a comprehensive network gathering previously demonstrated protein–protein interactions and/or transcriptional regulatory links between AR, HOXA5, and members of the TGFB1/SMAD pathway (Figure 2).

3. Discussion

3.1. The Spinal Cord-Overexpressed HOXA5 Gene May Amplify the TGFB1 Progliotic Pathway

We previously proposed that, while efficiently dampening neuroinflammation, chronic overexpression of TGFB1 may promote periplaque gliosis and trigger alterations of myelin synthesis in MS spinal cords [9]. However, we did not attempt to determine whether aging and/or spinal cord-specific cues could shape such a process. We found here that under normal conditions, a unique set of homeobox genes are overexpressed in the human SC as compared to the brain. Among these, HOXA5 forms heterodimers with 2 TFs which were previously found to be involved in MS SC gliosis, namely SOX2 and SMAD1. Although, at this stage, one may only speculate on the functional impact of HOXA5 on TGFB1-mediated astrocytosis, at least two published sets of experimental data indicate that HOXA5 promotes the TGFB1 pathway: (i) in murine adipocytes, Hoxa5/Smad1 interaction induces the phosphorylation of Smad1 [60] and (ii) in human carcinoma cells, the transactivating activity of HOXA5 is crucially involved in the process of TGFB1-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition [61]. Finally, a re-analysis of a recent work performed in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) shows that widespread CNS inflammation induces a region-specific increased expression of Hoxa5 in SC astrocytes [62]. The region-specificity of astrocyte function is a research focus of major interest that is, however, relatively poorly documented to date, especially with regard to spinal cord specificities [63,64,65,66]. Our results urge investigation of the impact of SC-overexpressed HOX proteins, notably HOXA5, on the functions of SC astrocytes under inflammatory conditions.

3.2. Androgens, via Transcriptional Silencing and SMAD-Interfering Mechanisms, May Antagonize the Progliotic Effects of TGFB1

Testosterone, the most potent androgen receptor ligand, was previously shown to promote myelin repair [67,68], exert immunosuppressive effects [69,70,71,72], and to prevent gliosis [48,49,50,51]. In male patients, accumulating data indicate a role for testosterone deficit in MS progression [73,74]. Moreover, the physiological levels of testosterone achieved in men are proposed to explain the 3:1 sex ratio observed to the disadvantage of females in RRMS incidence [73,74]. In male patients beyond age 40, such a protective effect may be progressively lost due to the premises of andropause. However, a loss of AR-mediated protection is also likely to occur in female patients since a gender-independent aging-associated decline in circulating androgen precursors is observed beyond age 40. Such androgen precursors, detectable in the blood of both males and females, are essentially synthesized by the adrenal gland and comprise dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHAS), and androstenedione [75,76,77], all of which can be metabolized in AR ligands by CNS cells including astrocytes [78]. The 1:1 sex ratio in PPMS may be thus explained by intra-CNS androgens levels which, beyond age 40, are equally insufficient in males and females with regard to the AR-mediated anti-inflammatory, anti-gliotic, and myelin repair-promoting functions. Similarly, that spinal cord-located RIS (radiologically isolated syndrome) in a male patient is associated with a higher risk of developing PPMS, and may indeed reflect a premature failure of the neuroprotective AR pathway, as we recently proposed.

3.3. An Imbalance between the Androgen Receptor Pathway and the HOXA5-Promoted TGFB1 Pathway May Explain the Impact of Age and Gender on MS Spinal Cord Gliosis

As revealed earlier, the SC-overexpressed HOXA5 protein may favor the TGFB1-mediated anti-inflammatory pathway in MS spinal cords, which explains the favorable outcome of SC MS plaques regarding their inflammatory activity. Moreover, until the aging-related decline in AR ligands, a proper balance between the AR-mediated antigliotic pathway and the TGFB1-mediated progliotic pathway may limit gliosis in MS SCs. However, we propose that due especially to the SC overexpression of HOXA5, the physiological decline of AR ligands beyond age 40 exposes MS spinal cords to the long term deleterious effects of TGFB1. Indeed, as supported by the molecular histology of SC periplaques [8,9], TGFB1 may fuel a process of extensive astrocytosis that possibly stems from pre-existing sites of plaque-associated gliosis (Figure 3).
Such a progliotic TGFB1 anti-inflammatory pathway may be triggered by persisting low-grade inflammation or, alternatively, may self-perpetuate. We previously provided data from gene co-expression analyses indicating that TGFB1, along with a limited set of cytokine, may alter myelin homeostasis in MS spinal cords [9]. In support of this observation, TGF-beta was recently demonstrated to not only render aging microglia inhibitory to myelin repair but to significantly block the differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells into mature myelinating oligodendrocytes [17]. Finally, it is worth noting that increased levels of TGFB1 were previously reported in the cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients as compared to controls [79]. The data mining results exposed in the present paper point to a molecular crosstalk between the AR and the TGFB1 pathways. At the protein level, previously published biochemical analyses showed that AR interaction with the TGFB1 signaling molecule SMAD3 was responsible for an antagonism between the AR and the TGFB1 pathways [52,80,81,82]. Also at the transcriptional level, several papers demonstrated the AR-mediated silencing of key genes of the TGFB1 pathway (data supplement 3), including SMAD3 [83]. Since SMAD3 is involved in the progliotic effects of TGFB1 [84,85], one may hypothesize that the hijacking of SMAD3 by AR may support the antigliotic effects exerted by androgens in different in vivo experimental settings [48,49,50,51,67,86]. Finally, since TGFB1 and AR signaling pathways may antagonize each other, any imbalance to the detriment of the AR pathway may also result in a lowered ability of AR ligands in promoting myelin repair and dampening inflammation.

3.4. Therapeutic Implications

There are two categories of arguments indicating that clinically relevant therapeutic implications may be drawn from the notion of TGFB1/AR imbalance in MS progressive forms.
Point 1: Blocking the TGFB1 pathway or stimulating the AR pathway efficiently delays and/or dampens EAE. Regarding TGFB1, in-depth mechanistic investigations were performed in at least 2 major articles showing that blocking the TGFB1 pathway is therapeutically effective in the context of EAE [87,88]. In particular, Luo et al. [88] demonstrated (i) an early and sustained upregulation of TGFB1 expression by microglia and astrocytes in EAE mice, (ii) a parallel intra-CNS induction of the TGF-beta signaling pathway and (iii) substantial clinical and histological benefits afforded by the systemic administration of a TGF-beta receptor 1 (TGFBR1) inhibitor. In another key paper, Lanz et al. [87] showed that in EAE mice (i) endogenously generated angiotensin II sustains inflammation via the glial upregulation of TGFB1 and (ii) the systemic administration of a pharmacological inhibitor of angiotensin II type 1 receptor dampens clinical signs and blunts intra-CNS T-cell infiltration via a downregulation of the TGFB1 pathway. Conversely, in transgenic mice overexpressing TGF-beta 1 under the control of an astrocyte-specific promoter, EAE develops earlier and is more severe than in wild-type littermates [89]. With regard to the AR pathway, the systemic administration of testosterone was shown to exert anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in male EAE mice [90,91] and in female EAE mice [92]. Interestingly, in a rat model of chronic EAE, therapeutic effects of testosterone were accompanied by a marked decrease of spinal cord astrocytosis [51]. Of note, a similar protective activity in the EAE model was reported with the androgen precursors DHEA [93] and androstenedione [94].
Point 2: Molecules that either block the TGFB1 pathway or stimulate the AR pathway have market authorization and are well tolerated. TGFB1 is recognized to play a major pathophysiological role in systemic sclerosis, a chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorder affecting the connective tissue [95]. In patients suffering from systemic sclerosis, the anti-TGFB monoclonal antibody fresolimumab, which targets the 3 TGFB isoforms (TGFB1, TGFB2, and TGFB3), was shown to be well tolerated and clinically efficient in a phase II clinical trial [96]. Fresolimumab is considered as a promising therapy of systemic sclerosis, either as a standalone treatment or in combination with classical immune-targeting compounds such as rituximab or mycophenolate mofetil [97]. Interestingly, fresolimumab is likely to cross a partially compromised blood–brain barrier as shown in patients suffering from glioblastoma [98]. Also of note, a large array of pharmacological inhibitors of the TGF-beta pathway have been developed and are being tested in phase I or phase II trials for the treatment of solid tumors [99]. Finally, inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system are off-the-shelf compounds that were previously shown to efficiently antagonize the TGFB1 pathway [100,101,102,103,104]. One of these compounds, the angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonist Losartan, was shown to efficiently prevent the pathogenic intra-CNS overproduction of TGF-beta 1 involved in post-stroke epilepsy [105] and in Alzheimer’s disease [106]. However, on the basis of our results, inhibiting the TGF-beta 1 pathway may become effective only if the AR pathway is concomitantly restored. In this regard, phase I/II trials in RRMS male patients showed promising neuroprotective and immunomodulatory effects of testosterone as well as a good tolerance [107,108,109]. On the other hand, testosterone treatment is likely to expose patients to potentially harmful adverse effects in the long term. An alternative possibility would be the use of the androgen precursor DHEA which, using a large cohorts of subjects, has been proven to be safe in long-term treatments, irrespective of gender [110,111,112]. Again, one should keep in mind that the antigliotic activity of AR ligands may be antagonized by TGFB1. Hence, if not associated with a therapeutic strategy aimed at dampening the impact of chronic TGFB1 overproduction, the use of AR ligands may fail to block gliosis and low-grade inflammation. Supporting this view, EAE in middle-age male mice is characterized by a chronic rather than acute clinical course and an overall unresponsiveness to testosterone therapy [113].

4. Materials and Method

All bioinformatics and data mining analyses were performed at least 3 times between January 2018 and November 2019.

4.1. Workflow of the Study

The general workflow of the present study is shown in Figure 4.

4.2. Mining of Transcriptomics Databases Obtained from the Analysis of Human CNS Tissue Samples

The ARCHS4 database gathers and combines 84,863 sets of publicly available human RNA-seq data for which gene expression values were z-score normalized across samples [19]. From these data, genomic signatures were obtained for 108 human tissues or cell types, irrespective of the presence or absence of a pathological state. The ARCHS4 library of genomic signatures was retrieved from the Enrichr platform [18] and SC vs. brain signatures were crossed in order to identify a list of genes which, as compared to the brain, are specific to the SC signature. In parallel, we explored the GTEx mRNA expression database [22,23,24], which corresponds to the currently largest repository of RNA-seq data obtained from normal human tissues. From the GTEx databank, we retrieved the median TPM (transcripts per kilobase million) values obtained from the analysis of spinal cord samples (n = 159), cerebellum samples (n = 241), hippocampus (n = 197), or brain cortex (n = 255). Finally, as a confirmatory investigation, we also performed a survey of the Brain Net Europe (BNE) dataset [27], gathering transcriptomics data obtained from the analysis of pathological vs. control human CNS samples which had been carefully selected on the basis of neuropathological examination [27]. In this study, the authors concurrently performed expression profiling of 118 samples from 6 distinct CNS regions derived from control patients affected by non-CNS disorders or by patients affected by one of the following CNS diseases: multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. From this study, of which the results are deposited in the publicly available databank “GEO DataSets” (GSE26927), we retrieved the RNA expression data obtained from 10 normal human SC samples (including 3 replicates) and 10 normal brain cortical (BC) samples (subpial grey matter from the frontal gyri). We then performed differential expression analysis of SC vs. BC mRNA profiles using the unequal variance and bilateral Student’s t test (i.e., a Welch test) adjusted for multiple test corrections using the Bonferroni procedure. Concurrently the same analysis was conducted using “GEO2R”, a NCBI interactive online tool specifically designed to compare RNA expression data archived in GEO datasets [24].

4.3. Mining of the Proteomics Database BioGrid

BioGrid is a public database that archives protein interaction data obtained by high- or low-throughput experimental approaches. Interactors of specific HOX proteins were individually retrieved on BioGrid. Filters applied in our search allowed excluding protein–protein interactions that had been reported in non-human species as well interactions that were not published. Results were filtered for transcription factors (TFs) by crossing the retrieved list of interactors with the list of currently known human TFs [38].

4.4. Enrichment Analyses

Enrichment analysis tools and corresponding tasks performed in this study are described below.
The enrichment web platform TargetMine [20]: TargetMine is a monthly updated web platform that allows performing enrichment analysis of 9 large libraries of gene/protein lists. We used the InterPro domain enrichment tool which exploits the InterPro protein families database [21]. The TargetMine bioinformatics platform provides p-values computed from the Fisher’s exact test and adjusted for multiple test corrections using notably the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure.
The gene ontology and GO annotations “QuickGO” website of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory’s European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) [55,56]. The “QuickGO” web server, run by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory’s European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) [55,56], allows exploration of the 44,990 GO terms used to annotate the proteins referenced in the UniProt Knowledgebase [57] across species. When querying any given GO term on the “QuickGO” server, the “Co-occurring terms” tablet provides the whole list of GO terms exhibiting similarities (i.e., shared annotated proteins) with the queried GO term. We used this webtool to search for similarities between SMAD-related GO terms and androgen receptor-related GO terms.
The Harmonizome website [59]: Harmonizome is a regularly updated website which compiles a large collection of processed biological datasets obtained by multiple experimental and/or computational approaches. From any queried biological object (gene symbol, protein name, biological process, etc.) sets of associated biological objects may be retrieved, allowing for the generation of integrated knowledge on the queried object. Here, we used the JASPAR library [58] to retrieve the predicted targets of HOXA5.

5. Conclusions

The present study, based on the mining of transcriptomics and proteomics data, addresses a yet poorly explored connection between age, gender, and spinal cord in MS progressive forms [114]. We conclude that the aging-related decline in AR ligands might be responsible for a process of TGFB1-mediated gliosis that preferentially targets MS spinal cords. Such a spinal cord bias is, at least in part, determined by the constitutive overexpression of homeobox genes (notably HOXA5) in the human spinal cord as compared to the human brain. We propose that MS patients suffering from a progressive form of the disease might benefit from a treatment strategy aimed at both dampening the TGFB1 progliotic pathway and promoting the AR antigliotic pathway.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/23/5934/s1. Data Supplement 1: RNA-seq data were retrieved from the “brain RNA-seq” web portal (http://www.brainrnaseq.org/). Data are expressed in Fragments Per Kilobase Million, Data Supplement 2: List of human protein partners of SC-overexpressed Homeobox proteins, Data Supplement 3: List of publications demonstrating the AR-mediated transcriptional repression of human genes previously demonstrated to promote astrocytosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.; Data curation, S.N., M.G. and L.P.; Methodology, S.N.; Visualization, S.N.; Writing—original draft, S.N.; Writing—review & editing, L.P.

Funding

No specific resources were obtained by the authors to complete this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kearney, H.; Miller, D.H.; Ciccarelli, O. Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis—diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2015, 11, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cawley, N.; Tur, C.; Prados, F.; Plantone, D.; Kearney, H.; Abdel-Aziz, K.; Ourselin, S.; Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A.G.; Miller, D.H.; Thompson, A.J.; et al. Spinal cord atrophy as a primary outcome measure in phase II trials of progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2018, 24, 932–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Valsasina, P.; Aboulwafa, M.; Preziosa, P.; Messina, R.; Falini, A.; Comi, G.; Filippi, M.; Rocca, M.A. Cervical Cord T1-weighted Hypointense Lesions at MR Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: Relationship to Cord Atrophy and Disability. Radiology 2018, 288, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Confavreux, C.; Vukusic, S. Age at disability milestones in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2006, 129, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Confavreux, C.; Vukusic, S. Natural history of multiple sclerosis: A unifying concept. Brain 2006, 129, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lassmann, H. Pathogenic Mechanisms Associated with Different Clinical Courses of Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 9, 3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kutzelnigg, A.; Lucchinetti, C.F.; Stadelmann, C.; Brück, W.; Rauschka, H.; Bergmann, M.; Schmidbauer, M.; Parisi, J.E.; Lassmann, H. Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2005, 128, 2705–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lieury, A.; Chanal, M.; Androdias, G.; Reynolds, R.; Cavagna, S.; Giraudon, P.; Confavreux, C.; Nataf, S. Tissue remodeling in periplaque regions of multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Glia 2014, 62, 1645–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nataf, S.; Barritault, M.; Pays, L. A Unique TGFB1-Driven Genomic Program Links Astrocytosis, Low-Grade Inflammation and Partial Demyelination in Spinal Cord Periplaques from Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frischer, J.M.; Weigand, S.D.; Guo, Y.; Kale, N.; Parisi, J.E.; Pirko, I.; Mandrekar, J.; Bramow, S.; Metz, I.; Brück, W.; et al. Clinical and pathological insights into the dynamic nature of the white matter multiple sclerosis plaque. Ann. Neurol. 2015, 78, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bramow, S.; Frischer, J.M.; Lassmann, H.; Koch-Henriksen, N.; Lucchinetti, C.F.; Sørensen, P.S.; Laursen, H. Demyelination versus remyelination in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2010, 133, 2983–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Taylor, R.A.; Chang, C.-F.; Goods, B.A.; Hammond, M.D.; Grory, B.M.; Ai, Y.; Steinschneider, A.F.; Renfroe, S.C.; Askenase, M.H.; McCullough, L.D.; et al. TGF-β1 modulates microglial phenotype and promotes recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 127, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Z.; Chen, H.-Q.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, Y.-H.; Peng, Y.-P. Transforming growth factor-β1 acts via TβR-I on microglia to protect against MPP+-induced dopaminergic neuronal loss. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2016, 51, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Smith, G.M.; Hale, J.H. Macrophage/Microglia regulation of astrocytic tenascin: Synergistic action of transforming growth factor-beta and basic fibroblast growth factor. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17, 9624–9633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baghdassarian, D.; Toru-Delbauffe, D.; Gavaret, J.M.; Pierre, M. Effects of transforming growth factor-beta 1 on the extracellular matrix and cytoskeleton of cultured astrocytes. Glia 1993, 7, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Smith, G.M.; Strunz, C. Growth factor and cytokine regulation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans by astrocytes. Glia 2005, 52, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baror, R.; Neumann, B.; Segel, M.; Chalut, K.J.; Fancy, S.P.J.; Schafer, D.P.; Franklin, R.J.M. Transforming growth factor-beta renders ageing microglia inhibitory to oligodendrocyte generation by CNS progenitors. Glia 2019, 67, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuleshov, M.V.; Jones, M.R.; Rouillard, A.D.; Fernandez, N.F.; Duan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Koplev, S.; Jenkins, S.L.; Jagodnik, K.M.; Lachmann, A.; et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W90–W97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lachmann, A.; Torre, D.; Keenan, A.B.; Jagodnik, K.M.; Lee, H.J.; Wang, L.; Silverstein, M.C.; Ma’ayan, A. Massive mining of publicly available RNA-seq data from human and mouse. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.-A.; Tripathi, L.P.; Fujiwara, T.; Kameyama, T.; Itoh, M.N.; Mizuguchi, K. The TargetMine Data Warehouse: Enhancement and Updates. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mitchell, A.; Chang, H.-Y.; Daugherty, L.; Fraser, M.; Hunter, S.; Lopez, R.; McAnulla, C.; McMenamin, C.; Nuka, G.; Pesseat, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families database: The classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D213–D221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. The GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 2015, 348, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. eGTEx Project. Enhancing GTEx by bridging the gaps between genotype, gene expression, and disease. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 1664–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. The GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Sloan, S.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Caneda, C.; Plaza, C.A.; Blumenthal, P.D.; Vogel, H.; Steinberg, G.K.; Edwards, M.S.B.; Li, G.; et al. Purification and Characterization of Progenitor and Mature Human Astrocytes Reveals Transcriptional and Functional Differences with Mouse. Neuron 2016, 89, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Searle, B.C.; Gittelman, R.M.; Manor, O.; Akey, J.M. Detecting Sources of Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Large-Scale RNA-Seq Data Sets. Genetics 2016, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Durrenberger, P.F.; Fernando, F.S.; Kashefi, S.N.; Bonnert, T.P.; Seilhean, D.; Nait-Oumesmar, B.; Schmitt, A.; Gebicke-Haerter, P.J.; Falkai, P.; Grünblatt, E.; et al. Common mechanisms in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation: A BrainNet Europe gene expression microarray study. J. Neural Transm. 2015, 122, 1055–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Witschi, R.; Johansson, T.; Morscher, G.; Scheurer, L.; Deschamps, J.; Zeilhofer, H.U. Hoxb8-Cre mice: A tool for brain-sparing conditional gene deletion. Genesis 2010, 48, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sugiyama, K.; Tanaka, K. Spinal cord-specific deletion of the glutamate transporter GLT1 causes motor neuron death in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 497, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schmidt, E.F.; Kus, L.; Gong, S.; Heintz, N. BAC transgenic mice and the GENSAT database of engineered mouse strains. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2013, 2013, 73692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gerfen, C.R.; Paletzki, R.; Heintz, N. GENSAT BAC cre-recombinase driver lines to study the functional organization of cerebral cortical and basal ganglia circuits. Neuron 2013, 80, 1368–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Molino, Y.; Jabès, F.; Bonnet, A.; Gaudin, N.; Bernard, A.; Benech, P.; Khrestchatisky, M. Gene expression comparison reveals distinct basal expression of HOX members and differential TNF-induced response between brain- and spinal cord-derived microvascular endothelial cells. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Rhee, D.Y.; Cho, D.-Y.; Zhai, B.; Slattery, M.; Ma, L.; Mintseris, J.; Wong, C.Y.; White, K.P.; Celniker, S.E.; Przytycka, T.M.; et al. Transcription factor networks in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 2031–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. D’Alessio, J.A.; Wright, K.J.; Tjian, R. Shifting players and paradigms in cell-specific transcription. Mol. Cell 2009, 36, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Grove, C.A.; Walhout, A.J.M. Transcription factor functionality and transcription regulatory networks. Mol. Biosyst. 2008, 4, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sonawane, A.R.; Platig, J.; Fagny, M.; Chen, C.-Y.; Paulson, J.N.; Lopes-Ramos, C.M.; DeMeo, D.L.; Quackenbush, J.; Glass, K.; Kuijjer, M.L. Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 1077–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Oughtred, R.; Stark, C.; Breitkreutz, B.-J.; Rust, J.; Boucher, L.; Chang, C.; Kolas, N.; O’Donnell, L.; Leung, G.; McAdam, R.; et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D529–D541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lambert, S.A.; Jolma, A.; Campitelli, L.F.; Das, P.K.; Yin, Y.; Albu, M.; Chen, X.; Taipale, J.; Hughes, T.R.; Weirauch, M.T. The Human Transcription Factors. Cell 2018, 172, 650–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shijo, T.; Warita, H.; Suzuki, N.; Ikeda, K.; Mitsuzawa, S.; Akiyama, T.; Ono, H.; Nishiyama, A.; Izumi, R.; Kitajima, Y.; et al. Antagonizing bone morphogenetic protein 4 attenuates disease progression in a rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 307, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuller, M.L.; DeChant, A.K.; Rothstein, B.; Caprariello, A.; Wang, R.; Hall, A.K.; Miller, R.H. Bone morphogenetic proteins promote gliosis in demyelinating spinal cord lesions. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 62, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, C.; Zhong, X.; Smith, D.K.; Tai, W.; Yang, J.; Zou, Y.; Wang, L.-L.; Sun, J.; Qin, S.; Zhang, C.-L. Astrocyte-Specific Deletion of Sox2 Promotes Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury. Cereb. Cortex 2019, 29, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Luo, K. Signaling Cross Talk between TGF-β/Smad and Other Signaling Pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a022137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Miyazawa, K.; Miyazono, K. Regulation of TGF-β Family Signaling by Inhibitory Smads. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a022095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Nurgazieva, D.; Mickley, A.; Moganti, K.; Ming, W.; Ovsyi, I.; Popova, A.; Sachindra; Awad, K.; Wang, N.; Bieback, K.; et al. TGF-β1, but Not Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Activates Smad1/5 Pathway in Primary Human Macrophages and Induces Expression of Proatherogenic Genes. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ramachandran, A.; Vizán, P.; Das, D.; Chakravarty, P.; Vogt, J.; Rogers, K.W.; Müller, P.; Hinck, A.P.; Sapkota, G.P.; Hill, C.S. TGF-β uses a novel mode of receptor activation to phosphorylate SMAD1/5 and induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Elife 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dummula, K.; Vinukonda, G.; Chu, P.; Xing, Y.; Hu, F.; Mailk, S.; Csiszar, A.; Chua, C.; Mouton, P.; Kayton, R.J.; et al. Bone Morphogenetic Protein Inhibition Promotes Neurological Recovery after Intraventricular Hemorrhage. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 12068–12082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luo, J.; Lin, A.H.; Masliah, E.; Wyss-Coray, T. Bioluminescence imaging of Smad signaling in living mice shows correlation with excitotoxic neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18326–18331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Arevalo, M.A.; Santos-Galindo, M.; Acaz-Fonseca, E.; Azcoitia, I.; Garcia-Segura, L.M. Gonadal hormones and the control of reactive gliosis. Horm. Behav. 2013, 63, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Barreto, G.; Veiga, S.; Azcoitia, I.; Garcia-Segura, L.M.; Garcia-Ovejero, D. Testosterone decreases reactive astroglia and reactive microglia after brain injury in male rats: Role of its metabolites, oestradiol and dihydrotestosterone. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 25, 3039–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Garcia-Estrada, J.; Del Rio, J.A.; Luquin, S.; Soriano, E.; Garcia-Segura, L.M. Gonadal hormones down-regulate reactive gliosis and astrocyte proliferation after a penetrating brain injury. Brain Res. 1993, 628, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Giatti, S.; Rigolio, R.; Romano, S.; Mitro, N.; Viviani, B.; Cavaletti, G.; Caruso, D.; Garcia-Segura, L.M.; Melcangi, R.C. Dihydrotestosterone as a Protective Agent in Chronic Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. Neuroendocrinology 2015, 101, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chipuk, J.E.; Cornelius, S.C.; Pultz, N.J.; Jorgensen, J.S.; Bonham, M.J.; Kim, S.-J.; Danielpour, D. The Androgen Receptor Represses Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling through Interaction with Smad3. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Qi, W.; Gao, S.; Wang, Z. Transcriptional regulation of the TGF-beta1 promoter by androgen receptor. Biochem. J. 2008, 416, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Qi, W.; Gao, S.; Chu, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Z. Negative androgen-response elements mediate androgen-dependent transcriptional inhibition of TGF-β1 and CDK2 promoters in the prostate gland. J. Androl. 2012, 33, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huntley, R.P.; Binns, D.; Dimmer, E.; Barrell, D.; O’Donovan, C.; Apweiler, R. QuickGO: A user tutorial for the web-based Gene Ontology browser. Database 2009, 2009, bap010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Binns, D.; Dimmer, E.; Huntley, R.; Barrell, D.; O’Donovan, C.; Apweiler, R. QuickGO: A web-based tool for Gene Ontology searching. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 3045–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. The UniProt Consortium UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 2699. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mathelier, A.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, A.W.; Parcy, F.; Worsley-Hunt, R.; Arenillas, D.J.; Buchman, S.; Chen, C.; Chou, A.; Ienasescu, H.; et al. JASPAR 2014: An extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D142–D147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rouillard, A.D.; Gundersen, G.W.; Fernandez, N.F.; Wang, Z.; Monteiro, C.D.; McDermott, M.G.; Ma’ayan, A. The harmonizome: A collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. Database 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cao, W.; Huang, H.; Xia, T.; Liu, C.; Muhammad, S.; Sun, C. Homeobox a5 Promotes White Adipose Tissue Browning Through Inhibition of the Tenascin C/Toll-Like Receptor 4/Nuclear Factor Kappa B Inflammatory Signaling in Mice. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cieply, B.; Farris, J.; Denvir, J.; Ford, H.L.; Frisch, S.M. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor suppression are controlled by a reciprocal feedback loop between ZEB1 and Grainyhead-like-2. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 6299–6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Itoh, N.; Itoh, Y.; Tassoni, A.; Ren, E.; Kaito, M.; Ohno, A.; Ao, Y.; Farkhondeh, V.; Johnsonbaugh, H.; Burda, J.; et al. Cell-specific and region-specific transcriptomics in the multiple sclerosis model: Focus on astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E302–E309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Clarke, L.E.; Liddelow, S.A.; Chakraborty, C.; Münch, A.E.; Heiman, M.; Barres, B.A. Normal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1896–E1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Emsley, J.G.; Macklis, J.D. Astroglial heterogeneity closely reflects the neuronal-defined anatomy of the adult murine CNS. Neuron Glia Biol. 2006, 2, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Buosi, A.S.; Matias, I.; Araujo, A.P.B.; Batista, C.; Gomes, F.C.A. Heterogeneity in Synaptogenic Profile of Astrocytes from Different Brain Regions. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schitine, C.; Nogaroli, L.; Costa, M.R.; Hedin-Pereira, C. Astrocyte heterogeneity in the brain: From development to disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Hussain, R.; Ghoumari, A.M.; Bielecki, B.; Steibel, J.; Boehm, N.; Liere, P.; Macklin, W.B.; Kumar, N.; Habert, R.; Mhaouty-Kodja, S.; et al. The neural androgen receptor: A therapeutic target for myelin repair in chronic demyelination. Brain 2013, 136, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bielecki, B.; Mattern, C.; Ghoumari, A.M.; Javaid, S.; Smietanka, K.; Abi Ghanem, C.; Mhaouty-Kodja, S.; Ghandour, M.S.; Baulieu, E.-E.; Franklin, R.J.M.; et al. Unexpected central role of the androgen receptor in the spontaneous regeneration of myelin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14829–14834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gubbels Bupp, M.R.; Jorgensen, T.N. Androgen-Induced Immunosuppression. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Giefing-Kröll, C.; Berger, P.; Lepperdinger, G.; Grubeck-Loebenstein, B. How sex and age affect immune responses, susceptibility to infections, and response to vaccination. Aging Cell 2015, 14, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Atallah, A.; Mhaouty-Kodja, S.; Grange-Messent, V. Chronic depletion of gonadal testosterone leads to blood–brain barrier dysfunction and inflammation in male mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 3161–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Laffont, S.; Blanquart, E.; Savignac, M.; Cénac, C.; Laverny, G.; Metzger, D.; Girard, J.-P.; Belz, G.T.; Pelletier, L.; Seillet, C.; et al. Androgen signaling negatively controls group 2 innate lymphoid cells. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 1581–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chitnis, T. The role of testosterone in MS risk and course. Mult. Scler. J. 2018, 24, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Bove, R.; Musallam, A.; Healy, B.; Raghavan, K.; Glanz, B.; Bakshi, R.; Weiner, H.; De Jager, P.; Miller, K.; Chitnis, T. Low testosterone is associated with disability in men with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2014, 20, 1584–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Baulieu, E.-E.; Thomas, G.; Legrain, S.; Lahlou, N.; Roger, M.; Debuire, B.; Faucounau, V.; Girard, L.; Hervy, M.-P.; Latour, F.; et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA sulfate, and aging: Contribution of the DHEAge Study to a sociobiomedical issue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 4279–4284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Parker, L.; Gral, T.; Perrigo, V.; Skowsky, R. Decreased adrenal androgen sensitivity to ACTH during aging. Metabolism 1981, 30, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Samaras, N.; Samaras, D.; Frangos, E.; Forster, A.; Philippe, J. A review of age-related dehydroepiandrosterone decline and its association with well-known geriatric syndromes: Is treatment beneficial? Rejuvenation Res. 2013, 16, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Diotel, N.; Charlier, T.D.; Lefebvre d’Hellencourt, C.; Couret, D.; Trudeau, V.L.; Nicolau, J.C.; Meilhac, O.; Kah, O.; Pellegrini, E. Steroid Transport, Local Synthesis, and Signaling within the Brain: Roles in Neurogenesis, Neuroprotection, and Sexual Behaviors. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Rollnik, J.D.; Sindern, E.; Schweppe, C.; Malin, J.P. Biologically active TGF-β1 is increased in cerebrospinal fluid while it is reduced in serum in multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2009, 96, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Itman, C.; Wong, C.; Hunyadi, B.; Ernst, M.; Jans, D.A.; Loveland, K.L. Smad3 dosage determines androgen responsiveness and sets the pace of postnatal testis development. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 2076–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kang, H.-Y.; Huang, K.-E.; Chang, S.Y.; Ma, W.-L.; Lin, W.-J.; Chang, C. Differential Modulation of Androgen Receptor-mediated Transactivation by Smad3 and Tumor Suppressor Smad4. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 43749–43756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Hayes, S.A.; Zarnegar, M.; Sharma, M.; Yang, F.; Peehl, D.M.; ten Dijke, P.; Sun, Z. SMAD3 represses androgen receptor-mediated transcription. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2112–2118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Song, K.; Wang, H.; Krebs, T.L.; Wang, B.; Kelley, T.J.; Danielpour, D. DHT selectively reverses Smad3-mediated/TGF-beta-induced responses through transcriptional down-regulation of Smad3 in prostate epithelial cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 2019–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Yu, Z.; Yu, P.; Chen, H.; Geller, H.M. Targeted inhibition of KCa3.1 attenuates TGF-β-induced reactive astrogliosis through the Smad2/3 signaling pathway. J. Neurochem. 2014, 130, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Tatomir, A.; Tegla, C.A.; Martin, A.; Boodhoo, D.; Nguyen, V.; Sugarman, A.J.; Mekala, A.; Anselmo, F.; Talpos-Caia, A.; Cudrici, C.; et al. RGC-32 regulates reactive astrocytosis and extracellular matrix deposition in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunol. Res. 2018, 66, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Coers, S.; Tanzer, L.; Jones, K.J. Testosterone treatment attenuates the effects of facial nerve transection on glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in the hamster facial motor nucleus. Metab. Brain Dis. 2002, 17, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lanz, T.V.; Ding, Z.; Ho, P.P.; Luo, J.; Agrawal, A.N.; Srinagesh, H.; Axtell, R.; Zhang, H.; Platten, M.; Wyss-Coray, T.; et al. Angiotensin II sustains brain inflammation in mice via TGF-β. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 2782–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Luo, J.; Ho, P.P.; Buckwalter, M.S.; Hsu, T.; Lee, L.Y.; Zhang, H.; Kim, D.-K.; Kim, S.-J.; Gambhir, S.S.; Steinman, L.; et al. Glia-dependent TGF-β signaling, acting independently of the TH17 pathway, is critical for initiation of murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 3306–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Wyss-Coray, T.; Borrow, P.; Brooker, M.J.; Mucke, L. Astroglial overproduction of TGF-β1 enhances inflammatory central nervous system disease in transgenic mice. J. Neuroimmunol. 1997, 77, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ziehn, M.O.; Avedisian, A.A.; Dervin, S.M.; Umeda, E.A.; O’Dell, T.J.; Voskuhl, R.R. Therapeutic testosterone administration preserves excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampus during autoimmune demyelinating disease. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 12312–12324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Palaszynski, K.M.; Loo, K.K.; Ashouri, J.F.; Liu, H.; Voskuhl, R.R. Androgens are protective in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: Implications for multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2004, 146, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Dalal, M.; Kim, S.; Voskuhl, R.R. Testosterone therapy ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and induces a T helper 2 bias in the autoantigen-specific T lymphocyte response. J. Immunol. 1997, 159, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Du, C.; Khalil, M.W.; Sriram, S. Administration of dehydroepiandrosterone suppresses experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in SJL/J mice. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 7094–7101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Offner, H.; Zamora, A.; Drought, H.; Matejuk, A.; Auci, D.L.; Morgan, E.E.; Vandenbark, A.A.; Reading, C.L. A synthetic androstene derivative and a natural androstene metabolite inhibit relapsing–remitting EAE. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002, 130, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lafyatis, R. Transforming growth factor β--at the centre of systemic sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 706–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Rice, L.M.; Padilla, C.M.; McLaughlin, S.R.; Mathes, A.; Ziemek, J.; Goummih, S.; Nakerakanti, S.; York, M.; Farina, G.; Whitfield, M.L.; et al. Fresolimumab treatment decreases biomarkers and improves clinical symptoms in systemic sclerosis patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 2795–2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Taroni, J.N.; Martyanov, V.; Mahoney, J.M.; Whitfield, M.L. A Functional Genomic Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials in Systemic Sclerosis: Toward Precision Medicine and Combination Therapy. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Den Hollander, M.W.; Bensch, F.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Oude Munnink, T.H.; Enting, R.H.; den Dunnen, W.F.A.; Heesters, M.A.A.M.; Kruyt, F.A.E.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; Cees de Groot, J.; et al. TGF-β Antibody Uptake in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Imaged with 89Zr-Fresolimumab PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 1310–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. De Gramont, A.; Faivre, S.; Raymond, E. Novel TGF-β inhibitors ready for prime time in onco-immunology. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1257453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Peters, H.; Border, W.A.; Noble, N.A. Angiotensin II blockade and low-protein diet produce additive therapeutic effects in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2000, 57, 1493–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Chauhan, V.P.; Martin, J.D.; Liu, H.; Lacorre, D.A.; Jain, S.R.; Kozin, S.V.; Stylianopoulos, T.; Mousa, A.S.; Han, X.; Adstamongkonkul, P.; et al. Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Shin, G.T.; Kim, S.J.; Ma, K.A.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, D. ACE inhibitors attenuate expression of renal transforming growth factor-beta1 in humans. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2000, 36, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Song, J.H.; Lee, S.W.; Suh, J.H.; Kim, E.S.; Hong, S.B.; Kim, K.A.; Kim, M.-J. The effects of dual blockade of the renin- angiotensin system on urinary protein and transforming growth factor-b excretion in 2 groups of patients with IgA and diabetic nephropathy. Clin. Nephrol. 2003, 60, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pokharel, S.; van Geel, P.P.; Sharma, U.C.; Cleutjens, J.P.M.; Bohnemeier, H.; Tian, X.-L.; Schunkert, H.; Crijns, H.J.G.M.; Paul, M.; Pinto, Y.M. Increased Myocardial Collagen Content in Transgenic Rats Overexpressing Cardiac Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Is Related to Enhanced Breakdown of N -Acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro and Increased Phosphorylation of Smad2/3. Circulation 2004, 110, 3129–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Bar-Klein, G.; Cacheaux, L.P.; Kamintsky, L.; Prager, O.; Weissberg, I.; Schoknecht, K.; Cheng, P.; Kim, S.Y.; Wood, L.; Heinemann, U.; et al. Losartan prevents acquired epilepsy via TGF-β signaling suppression. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 75, 864–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Papadopoulos, P.; Tong, X.-K.; Imboden, H.; Hamel, E. Losartan improves cerebrovascular function in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease with combined overproduction of amyloid-β and transforming growth factor-β1. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 1959–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kurth, F.; Luders, E.; Sicotte, N.L.; Gaser, C.; Giesser, B.S.; Swerdloff, R.S.; Montag, M.J.; Voskuhl, R.R.; Mackenzie-Graham, A. Neuroprotective effects of testosterone treatment in men with multiple sclerosis. NeuroImage Clin. 2014, 4, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Gold, S.M.; Chalifoux, S.; Giesser, B.S.; Voskuhl, R.R. Immune modulation and increased neurotrophic factor production in multiple sclerosis patients treated with testosterone. J. Neuroinflamm. 2008, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Sicotte, N.L.; Giesser, B.S.; Tandon, V.; Klutch, R.; Steiner, B.; Drain, A.E.; Shattuck, D.W.; Hull, L.; Wang, H.-J.; Elashoff, R.M.; et al. Testosterone treatment in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Arch. Neurol. 2007, 64, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kritz-Silverstein, D.; von Mühlen, D.; Laughlin, G.A.; Bettencourt, R. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation on cognitive function and quality of life: The DHEA and Well-Ness (DAWN) Trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2008, 56, 1292–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Corona, G.; Rastrelli, G.; Giagulli, V.A.; Sila, A.; Sforza, A.; Forti, G.; Mannucci, E.; Maggi, M. Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation in elderly men: A meta-analysis study of placebo-controlled trials. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 3615–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Scheffers, C.S.; Armstrong, S.; Cantineau, A.E.; Farquhar, C.; Jordan, V. Dehydroepiandrosterone for women in the peri- or postmenopausal phase. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 1, CD011066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Matejuk, A.; Hopke, C.; Vandenbark, A.A.; Hurn, P.D.; Offner, H. Middle-age male mice have increased severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and are unresponsive to testosterone therapy. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 2387–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Nataf, S. Cord-Age-Gender Connections Shape the Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis Progressive Forms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 20 05934 g001 550
Figure 1. Enrichment analyses of spinal cord vs. brain genomic signatures. The genomic signatures of human brain and spinal cord were retrieved from the “ARCHS4 Tissue” [19] library gathering and combining 84,863 publicly available human RNA-seq data for which gene expression values were z-score normalized across samples. Brain and spinal cord genomic signatures were compared and crossed in order to identify spinal cord- vs. brain-specific signatures. The retrieved lists of genes were then submitted to an enrichment analysis using the TargetMine [20] webtool “InterPro domain” which exploits the InterPro protein families database [21]. The TargetMine bioinformatics platform provides p-values computed from the Fisher’s exact test and adjusted for multiple test corrections using the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure. For each list, only the 5 most statistically significant enrichments are shown.
Figure 1. Enrichment analyses of spinal cord vs. brain genomic signatures. The genomic signatures of human brain and spinal cord were retrieved from the “ARCHS4 Tissue” [19] library gathering and combining 84,863 publicly available human RNA-seq data for which gene expression values were z-score normalized across samples. Brain and spinal cord genomic signatures were compared and crossed in order to identify spinal cord- vs. brain-specific signatures. The retrieved lists of genes were then submitted to an enrichment analysis using the TargetMine [20] webtool “InterPro domain” which exploits the InterPro protein families database [21]. The TargetMine bioinformatics platform provides p-values computed from the Fisher’s exact test and adjusted for multiple test corrections using the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure. For each list, only the 5 most statistically significant enrichments are shown.
Ijms 20 05934 g001
Ijms 20 05934 g002 550
Figure 2. Network of physical and functional interactions linking spinal cord-overexpressed HOX proteins, members of the TGFB1 pathway, and the androgen receptor. A survey of the human proteome was performed via the BioGrid database [41] to retrieve protein–protein interactions (in grey lines) between HOXA5 (homeobox A5), SOX2 (SRY-box 2) and members of the TGFB1 pathway, i.e., SMAD1 (SMAD family member 1), SMAD2 (SMAD family member 2), SMAD3 (SMAD family member 3), SMAD4 (SMAD family member 4), TGFBR1 (transforming growth factor beta receptor 1), TGFBR2 (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2), and TGFB1 (transforming growth factor beta 1). In parallel, a survey of previously published promoter analysis data allowed retrieving and visualizing (in blue dashed lines) the robustly documented silencing effects exerted by the androgen receptor on the transcription of SOX2, SMAD3, TGFBR2, and TGFB1. Finally, the JASPAR database [58] accessed via the Harmonizome website [59] was explored in order to retrieve predicted transcriptional targets of HOXA5 (red dashed lines).
Figure 2. Network of physical and functional interactions linking spinal cord-overexpressed HOX proteins, members of the TGFB1 pathway, and the androgen receptor. A survey of the human proteome was performed via the BioGrid database [41] to retrieve protein–protein interactions (in grey lines) between HOXA5 (homeobox A5), SOX2 (SRY-box 2) and members of the TGFB1 pathway, i.e., SMAD1 (SMAD family member 1), SMAD2 (SMAD family member 2), SMAD3 (SMAD family member 3), SMAD4 (SMAD family member 4), TGFBR1 (transforming growth factor beta receptor 1), TGFBR2 (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2), and TGFB1 (transforming growth factor beta 1). In parallel, a survey of previously published promoter analysis data allowed retrieving and visualizing (in blue dashed lines) the robustly documented silencing effects exerted by the androgen receptor on the transcription of SOX2, SMAD3, TGFBR2, and TGFB1. Finally, the JASPAR database [58] accessed via the Harmonizome website [59] was explored in order to retrieve predicted transcriptional targets of HOXA5 (red dashed lines).
Ijms 20 05934 g002
Ijms 20 05934 g003 550
Figure 3. A proposed pathophysiological scheme of the fate of spinal cord lesions. In adult patients before age 40, MS spinal cord lesions resolve and repair more efficiently than brain lesions. This is due to a more potent TGFB1 anti-inflammatory pathway which is favored by physiological spinal cord overexpression of the SMAD1-interacting protein HOXA5. At this stage, the androgen receptor (AR) anti-inflammatory pathway superimposes to the TGFB1 pathway, promotes myelin repair, and balances the progliotic effects exerted by TGFB1. However, in adult patients beyond age 40, the physiological decline in AR ligands provokes an imbalance between the AR and the TGFB1 pathways. Neuroinflammation mediated by blood-derived immune cells is maintained at relatively low levels but AR-mediated myelin repair becomes inefficient. The imbalanced TGFB1 pathway fuels extensive gliosis and leads to profound alterations of myelin homeostasis which eventually translate into a process of myelinodegeneration [9].
Figure 3. A proposed pathophysiological scheme of the fate of spinal cord lesions. In adult patients before age 40, MS spinal cord lesions resolve and repair more efficiently than brain lesions. This is due to a more potent TGFB1 anti-inflammatory pathway which is favored by physiological spinal cord overexpression of the SMAD1-interacting protein HOXA5. At this stage, the androgen receptor (AR) anti-inflammatory pathway superimposes to the TGFB1 pathway, promotes myelin repair, and balances the progliotic effects exerted by TGFB1. However, in adult patients beyond age 40, the physiological decline in AR ligands provokes an imbalance between the AR and the TGFB1 pathways. Neuroinflammation mediated by blood-derived immune cells is maintained at relatively low levels but AR-mediated myelin repair becomes inefficient. The imbalanced TGFB1 pathway fuels extensive gliosis and leads to profound alterations of myelin homeostasis which eventually translate into a process of myelinodegeneration [9].
Ijms 20 05934 g003
Ijms 20 05934 g004 550
Figure 4. Workflow of the study. Rectangles in yellow or red frame the main results obtained following each of the analytical steps briefly described in green ellipse shapes. Terms in italics correspond to the name of the bioinformatics tools used for each analytical step. BNE: Brain Net Europe; GTEx: genome-tissue expression; SC: spinal cord; TFs: transcription factors.
Figure 4. Workflow of the study. Rectangles in yellow or red frame the main results obtained following each of the analytical steps briefly described in green ellipse shapes. Terms in italics correspond to the name of the bioinformatics tools used for each analytical step. BNE: Brain Net Europe; GTEx: genome-tissue expression; SC: spinal cord; TFs: transcription factors.
Ijms 20 05934 g004
Table
Table 1. Region-specific homeobox mRNA median TPM (transcripts per kilobase million) values retrieved from the GTEx databank [20,21,22].
Table 1. Region-specific homeobox mRNA median TPM (transcripts per kilobase million) values retrieved from the GTEx databank [20,21,22].
Spinal Cord
(n =159)		Cerebellum
(n = 241)		Hippocampus
(n = 197)		Brain Cortex
(n = 255)
HOXA28.14000
HOXA429.140.0300.01
HOXA523.010.080.010.02
HOXB220.310.540.190.10
HOXB36.160.170.050.04
HOXB58.52000
HOXB65.37000
HOXB715.8200.050.02
HOXB817.91000
HOXD85.41000.01
Table
Table 2. Comparisons of spinal cord vs. brain cortex mRNA levels of homeobox genes retrieved from the BNE dataset [23].
Table 2. Comparisons of spinal cord vs. brain cortex mRNA levels of homeobox genes retrieved from the BNE dataset [23].
Gene SymbolSC/BC Ratio Adjusted p-Value
HOXA215.494.57 × 10−7
HOXA458.622.62 × 10−6
HOXA5234.909.03 × 10−6
HOXB241.461.14 × 10−7
HOXB32.580.01
HOXB552.410.002
HOXB61.740.06
HOXB7102.292.47 × 10−6
HOXB8407.520.009
HOXD813.420.001
Table
Table 3. List of transcription factors which physically interact with spinal cord-overexpressed HOX proteins.
Table 3. List of transcription factors which physically interact with spinal cord-overexpressed HOX proteins.
SC-Overexpressed HOX GenesGene Symbols (Bold) and Names of TFs Interacting with SC-Overexpressed HOX Proteins
HOXA5DDIT3 (DNA damage inducible transcript 3)
HOXA5FOXA2 (forkhead box A2)
HOXA5FOXO1 (forkhead box O1)
HOXA5SMAD1 (SMAD family member 1)
HOXA5SOX2 (SRY-box 2)
HOXA5TWIST1 (twist family bHLH transcription factor 21)
HOXA5ZNF707 (zinc finger protein 707)
HOXB5HOXC4 (homeobox C4)
HOXB5HRAS (HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase)
HOXB5NKX2-1 (NK2 homeobox 1)
HOXB6ALX4 (ALX Homeobox 4)
HOXB6TCF21 (transcription Factor 21)
HOXB7, HOXB8PBX1 (PBX homeobox 1)
HOXB8PBX3 (PBX homeobox 3)
Table
Table 4. Antagonistic overlap between SMAD-related GO terms and androgen receptor-related GO terms.
Table 4. Antagonistic overlap between SMAD-related GO terms and androgen receptor-related GO terms.
Queried GO TermRelevant Overlapping GO TermRank of Similarity
Positive regulation of SMAD protein signal transduction (GO:0060391)Negative regulation of androgen receptor signaling pathway (GO:0060766)23rd from 743 overlapping GO terms
Negative regulation of SMAD protein signal transduction (GO:0060392)No overlap with androgen receptor-related GO-termNot applicable
Negative regulation of androgen receptor signaling pathway (GO:0060766)Positive regulation of SMAD protein signal transduction (GO:0060391)4th from 562 overlapping GO terms
Positive regulation of androgen receptor activity (GO:2000825)No overlap with SMAD-related GO-termNot applicable

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nataf, S.; Guillen, M.; Pays, L. TGFB1-Mediated Gliosis in Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cords Is Favored by the Regionalized Expression of HOXA5 and the Age-Dependent Decline in Androgen Receptor Ligands. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235934

AMA Style

Nataf S, Guillen M, Pays L. TGFB1-Mediated Gliosis in Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cords Is Favored by the Regionalized Expression of HOXA5 and the Age-Dependent Decline in Androgen Receptor Ligands. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(23):5934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235934

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nataf, Serge, Marine Guillen, and Laurent Pays. 2019. "TGFB1-Mediated Gliosis in Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cords Is Favored by the Regionalized Expression of HOXA5 and the Age-Dependent Decline in Androgen Receptor Ligands" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 23: 5934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235934

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop