Next Article in Journal
Dark Antibacterial Activity of Rose Bengal
Next Article in Special Issue
Heart Failure Differentially Modulates Natural (Sinoatrial Node) and Ectopic (Pulmonary Veins) Pacemakers: Mechanism and Therapeutic Implication for Atrial Fibrillation
Previous Article in Journal
The AtHSP17.4C1 Gene Expression Is Mediated by Diverse Signals that Link Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors with ROS and Can Be a Useful Molecular Marker for Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Renin Activity in Heart Failure with Reduced Systolic Function—New Insights
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms20133198
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Heart Failure: Assessment, Findings, Significance, and Potential Therapeutic Targets

by
Manal M. Alem
Department of Pharmacology, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, PO Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(13), 3198; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133198
Submission received: 19 April 2019 / Revised: 13 June 2019 / Accepted: 25 June 2019 / Published: 29 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heart Failure: From Molecular Basis to Therapy)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a complex syndrome that results from structural and functional disturbances that affect the ability of the heart to supply oxygen to tissues. It largely affects and reduces the patient’s quality of life, socio-economic status, and imposes great costs on health care systems worldwide. Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a newly discovered phenomenon that contributes greatly to the pathophysiology of numerous cardiovascular conditions and commonly co-exists with chronic heart failure. However, the literature lacks clarity as to which heart failure patients might be affected, its significance in CHF patients, and its reversibility with pharmacological and non-pharmacological means. This review will emphasize all these points and summarize them for future researchers interested in vascular pathophysiology in this particular patient population. It will help to direct future studies for better characterization of these two phenomena for the potential discovery of therapeutic targets that might reduce future morbidity and mortality in this “at risk” population.

1. Introduction

The endothelium is a single layer of squamous epithelial cells called endothelial cells, which line the inside of all blood vessels. In a healthy state, the endothelium is a dynamic tissue whose constituent cells synthesize and secrete substances affecting its own function and that of adjacent structures. It is essentially involved in the regulation of blood flow, blood coagulation, vascular permeability, and structure. Endothelial dysfunction is a pathological condition characterized by loss of balance in all major endothelial mechanisms. It has been implicated in the pathophysiology of different cardiovascular diseases, including chronic heart failure [1]. Its existence in CHF patients imposes increased morbidity and mortality, and if established, it might persist even after cardiac transplantation [2]. Despite that, it is still debatable whether it underlies all types of chronic heart failure (CHF): Ischemic vs. non-ischemic, systolic vs. diastolic, and mild vs. severe [3]. Therefore, endothelial dysfunction in CHF needs well-structured research for a better understanding of how it develops, in which patients’ groups, its significance, and its reversibility by pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. This review will summarize the literature for future investigators pursuing that field of research. It used scholarly platforms and several libraries, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, to extract data on endothelial function/dysfunction in chronic heart failure.

2. Assessment of Endothelial Function

The principle of endothelial function assessment involves measuring the vasodilatory response to endothelium-dependent agonists, such as acetylcholine (Ach), carbachol, methacholine, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), and others, as all induce endothelial cells (ECs) to generate nitric oxide (NO), and then comparing this response to that of agonists that are endothelium-independent, such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). These vasoactive substances can be infused locally into forearm blood vessels via a technique called venous occlusion plethysmography (VOP).
VOP is a technique that was first described over 100 years ago and is still considered as a “gold-standard” investigation for the assessment of vascular physiology in vivo in different populations. It is commonly applied to the forearm vascular bed although it can also be applied to lower limbs. The aforementioned vasoactive substances can be infused intra-arterially into the brachial artery under local anesthesia to measure forearm blood flow (FBF) in mL/min/100 mL [4]. Changes in forearm blood flow result in changes in arm circumference and a change in the strain gauge length that is placed around the forearm. The other non-infused arm will provide the control blood flow. Alternatively, blood flow can be measured by Doppler flow measurements in the test arm that can be related to the control arm as a percentage.
Due to the invasive nature of VOP, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was introduced as a non-invasive technique to measure flow-mediated changes in arterial diameters in relatively superficial arteries, such as brachial, radial, or femoral arteries [5]. In principle, endothelium-dependent FMD can be assessed by an ultrasound system equipped with two-dimensional (2D) imaging, color, and spectral Doppler. A baseline image of the brachial artery is obtained, followed by arterial occlusion by blood pressure cuff inflation to supra-systolic pressure to occlude arterial inflow, which causes ischemia. Subsequent cuff deflation induces a high-flow state (reactive hyperemia) in the brachial artery, with shear stress causing vasodilatation that can be measured [6]. The change in brachial artery diameter can be quantified as a percentage change from the baseline diameter.

3. Findings

The first description of endothelial dysfunction was in 18 patients with essential hypertension who were compared with 18 control subjects in 1990 [7]. Such a phenomenon was confirmed later with other studies and attributed to systemic oxidative stress and vascular inflammation [8]. As another important risk factor for heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus was also associated with endothelial dysfunction. Such pathology was attributed to systemic oxidative stress due to hyperglycemia, fatty acid excess, and insulin resistance [9,10]. ED at the coronary microvascular level in diabetic patients could precipitate coronary microvascular dysfunction and ischemic heart disease in the absence of coronary artery disease [11].
The description of endothelial dysfunction in the heart failure population started to appear in the literature and was mainly performed on a small scale. A study that included 24 patients with CHF with left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction (New York Heart Association NYHA class II–III) demonstrated that endothelium-dependent vasodilatation was impaired in patients when compared with 22 control subjects. Such a finding was demonstrated invasively via the VOP technique with methacholine infusion into the brachial artery with FBF of 5.32 ± 0.31 in CHF patients vs. 9.52 ± 0.60 mL/min/100 mL in control subjects; p = 0.0003. FBF in response to nitroprusside infusion (endothelium-independent vasodilatation) was not significantly different between the two groups [12].
Endothelial dysfunction was assessed in nine patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction (NYHA class III) and in nine control subjects invasively via the VOP technique with acetylcholine and NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) as NO synthase inhibitor infusion in the brachial artery. FBF in response to acetylcholine was blunted in CHF patients (endothelium-dependent vasodilatation). In addition, there was an exaggerated decrease in blood flow induced by L-NMMA infusion (nitric oxide derived from L-arginine is preserved/enhanced) in CHF patients when compared with control subjects [13].
Conduit artery distensibility is determined, at least, in part, by endothelial function. Such a method was used to assess endothelial function in nine patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction (NYHA class I–III) and in nine control subjects. There was a reduction in the pulse wave velocity in the right common iliac artery in response to acetylcholine local infusion in control subjects but not in CHF patients. The same study assessed the brachial artery diameter and distensibility change in response to reactive hyperemia in the hand. Such a technique has shown increased parameters in control subjects (8.8% and 18.4%, respectively) but not CHF patients (0.3% and −4.5%) for similar blood flow and similar GTN induced effects [14].
A fourth study demonstrated the existence of endothelial dysfunction in 14 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction (NYHA class III) who were compared with 10 control subjects. Flow-dependent endothelium-mediated vasodilatation (FDD) assessed the radial artery diameter change in response to wrist occlusion. FDD was impaired in patients with CHF in comparison with control subjects (p < 0.01). Such a phenomenon was interestingly associated with increased endothelium-bound xanthine oxidase activity and reduced endothelium-bound extracellular superoxide dismutase activity [15].
Later studies started to include patients having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as the target population. Table 1 lists four studies, where the first study assessed endothelial function by brachial artery-FMD (BA-FMD) in comparison with patients with systemic hypertension. The second and third studies assessed BA-FMD, along with an assessment of the microvascular endothelial dysfunction in comparison with hypertensive and healthy controls, respectively. The fourth assessed BA-FMD along with an intima-media thickness measurement as an index of an abnormal vascular structure. Collectively, these studies show the existence of endothelial dysfunction in HFpEF patients in conduit arteries and the microvascular circulation.
The suggested pathophysiological mechanism of ED in CHF is related to a state of increased oxidative stress in this patient population via multiple mechanisms, reduced NO synthesis [20] with possible involvement of genetic polymorphism for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) [21], oxidative inactivation of NO [22], increased levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous eNOS inhibitor [23], increased plasma oxidized low- density lipoprotein concentrations [24], increased 8,12-isoprostane F (2α) concentration [25], increased endothelium-bound xanthine oxidase (XO) activity, and reduced endothelium-bound extracellular superoxide dismutase activity [15]. The latest research revealed the role of microRNAs (miRs) in endothelial (dys) function [26], and demonstrated that circulating miR-126 released from ECs is downregulated in CHF [27]. Such a property might have implications in endothelial dysfunction in this patient population.

4. Significance

4.1. Predictive Value of ED in Population-Based Studies

Endothelial dysfunction assessed by brachial artery FMD was a predictor of 5 years incident cardiovascular events in a case-cohort sample of 3026 subjects with traditional cardiovascular risk factors that participated in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. FMD findings improved the classification of those subjects as low, intermediate, and high CVD risk compared with the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) [28]. Similar findings were reported in two other smaller cohort studies. The first included 921 subjects with traditional cardiovascular risk factors who participated in the Prospective Study of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study, where endothelial dysfunction was assessed invasively by the VOP and independently associated with 5-year risk of a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke [29]. The second cohort study included 435 subjects with traditional cardiovascular risk factors but no apparent heart disease, where FMD of the brachial artery independently predicted long-term adverse cardiovascular events after a follow-up period of 32 months, in addition to other risk factors’ assessment [30].
Two other studies were less supportive of the predictive value of endothelial dysfunction when compared with another measure of vascular structure, such as the intima-media thickness. The first included 444 patients described as being at risk of cardiovascular events because of underlying coronary artery disease (CAD), renal dysfunction, or the presence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors, who were followed for 24 months. This study has shown that patients with the most severe endothelial dysfunction assessed by brachial artery FMD had greater subsequent cardiac morbidity and mortality compared with those with normal or mild endothelial dysfunction. However, mortality in such a population was independently predicted by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and left ventricular mass rather than FMD [31]. The latter study included 398 patients for whom coronary angiography was performed due to chest pain, along with brachial artery FMD and brachial artery IMT. After a follow-up period of 39 months, only the presence of CAD and brachial artery IMT significantly predicted future cardiovascular events [32].

4.2. Predictive Value of ED in the CHF Population

Table 2 summarizes seven studies that assessed endothelial function in CHF patients. All of these studies were performed on patients with heart failure with systolic dysfunction (i.e., heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HFrEF). They included patients of all severity classes, with ischemic and non-ischemic etiologies. Endothelial dysfunction was assessed at a medium-sized conduit, and small arteries were found to be an independent predictor of mortality and hospitalization due to worsening of HF during a follow-up period that varied between 1 and 5 years.
Two other studies assessed the significance of endothelial function in CHF after they had undergone major interventions. The first included 185 CHF patients (of ischemic and non-ischemic etiology), 25 months after they received heart transplantation (EF of 75 ± 10%; SD). Epicardial endothelial function, assessed in response to intracoronary acetylcholine administered during coronary angiography, was found to be an independent predictor of 5-year cardiovascular-related events and death after heart transplantation [40]. The second study included 34 patients with CHF with systolic dysfunction (of ischemic and non-ischemic etiology) who were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of advanced HF. Their baseline peripheral endothelial function (RH-PAT) independently predicted hospitalization due to HF progression during a follow-up period of 11 months [41].

5. Potential Therapeutic Targets for ED in the CHF Population

5.1. Role of Exercise Training on ED in HFrEF

In the general population, physical activity is an essential health strategy that needs to be encouraged. Based on the results of a large cohort study that included more than 20,000 middle- aged men and women, regular physical activity (bicycling to work) was related to a lower risk of incident obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and impaired glucose tolerance in comparison with passive travel during 10 years of follow-up [42]. For patients with HF, the European Society of Cardiology ESC 2016 class IA level recommendations encourage regular aerobic exercise to improve functional capacity and symptoms. This recommendation is regardless of the LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Regular aerobic exercises are also encouraged in stable patients with HFrEF to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization [43]. Since endothelial dysfunction plays an important role in the physical incapacity of HF patients, studies have shown that factors, such as reduced NO bioavailability, increased oxidative stress, increased pro-inflammatory cytokines, reduced number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells, and reduced functional capacity of circulating angiogenic cells, all underlie endothelial dysfunction in this patient population. Hence, exercise training has shown its genuine ability to combat these contributing factors, at least, partially and to improve endothelial function accordingly [44]. For that reason, numerous studies in the literature have shown the advantage of exercise training on endothelial function in heart failure patients (HFrEF as it is the most abundant patient group studied so far). Such a benefit was quantified with a recent meta-analysis that included a total of 529 individuals (NYHA class I–III) who participated in aerobic, resistance, and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for an intervention duration that ranged between 4 weeks and 6 months. Such an analysis has shown that overall exercise training improved FMD with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.08 (95%CI 0.70–1.46, p < 0.001) [45]. A later smaller study that included 35 patients with more advanced CHF (NYHA class III–IV) was published; it showed a trend of a similar benefit in FMD with low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation for 8 weeks when compared with skin only stimulation (SHAM) [46]. Suggested mechanisms of exercise training benefits were increased NO bioavailability by shear stress [47], upregulation of eNOS expression and phosphorylation [48], increased antioxidant enzymes [49], and lately, mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) that are involved in the endogenous repair of endothelial dysfunction [50,51].
Adrenergic System, Physical Exercise, and ED in HFrEF Patients
The sympathetic nervous system’s (SNS) over activity in heart failure is a well-established mechanism that has a transitional contribution to the pathophysiology, is supportive of cardiac function initially, and is a burden on it ultimately [52]. Research has revealed molecular alterations occurring in SNS in different models, myocardial cells, peripheral lymphocytes, and endothelial cells. Interpretation of these changes should take into consideration genetic polymorphism in human adrenergic receptors (ARs) and NOS enzymes, which adds to the complexity of the pathophysiological interactions of these phenomena in heart failure.
In the myocardium, the most abundant AR are βAR subtypes. Their density changes from a predominant β1AR (77%): β2AR (23%) in a non-failing heart to 60%: 38% with improper signaling mechanisms in a failing heart [53,54]. βAR desensitization has also been reported in the myocardium of heart failure patients [55,56], a property that has also been associated with receptor phosphorylation by adrenergic receptor kinase-2 [57]. Peripheral blood lymphocytes served as another model to study changes in βAR in heart failure patients. This is because they exist in high numbers in Tsuppressor/cytotoxic cells, B cells, natural killer cells, and monocytes [58]. These numbers have been found to correlate with βAR density in human myocardial cells [59]. In heart failure patients, the density of βAR on peripheral lymphocytes and isoproterenol-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity were reduced [60].
The benefits of physical exercise in heart failure were studied on myocardial cells and peripheral lymphocytes. In animal models, physical exercise increased myocardial βAR density and reduced G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 over-expression, with the resultant improvement of cardiac inotropic activity in response to adrenergic stimulation [61]. In patients with heart failure, physical exercise has increased the density of βAR in peripheral lymphocytes [60]. The third studied model are endothelial cells (ECs), where all AR subtypes exist (with β2AR sub-type predominance) and directly or via NOS stimulation induce NO-dependent vasodilatation [62,63]. α2AR are also expressed and involved in the activation of NOS and NO-dependent vasodilatation [64].
The benefits of physical exercise in heart failure were studied on myocardial cells and peripheral lymphocytes. In animal models, physical exercise increased myocardial βAR density and reduced G-protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 over-expression, with the resultant improvement of cardiac inotropic activity in response to adrenergic stimulation [61]. In patients with heart failure, physical exercise has increased the density of βAR in peripheral lymphocytes [60]. The third studied model are endothelial cells (ECs), where all AR subtypes exist (with β2AR sub-type predominance) and directly or via NOS stimulation induce NO-dependent vasodilatation [62,63]. α2AR are also expressed and involved in the activation of NOS and NO-dependent vasodilatation [64].
Considering the current findings, we could anticipate that physical exercise in heart failure might modify the molecular changes to the adrenergic system at the EC level and improve endothelial function, as it does enhance autonomic receptor-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in animal models [65]. Such a benefit might be in addition to its ability to recruit EPCs from the bone marrow to repair endothelial function. Therefore, future studies should establish which exercise regimens should be emphasized and to which heart failure patients. In addition, more research is needed to establish the effect of physical exercise on prognosis if continued or terminated.

5.2. Role of Exercise Training on ED in HFpEF

There is a paucity of data in the literature on HFpEF patients. A study included 30 patients with HFpEF (NYHA class II–III) who were randomized to functional electrical stimulation (FES) (25 Hz; 15 patients) vs. a placebo “much lower intensity of stimulation” (5 Hz; 15 patients) for 6 weeks. The FES group had a significant improvement in BA-FMD, 6-min walking distance, and quality of life with the HF questionnaire compared with the placebo group [66]. However, another study, which included 63 patients with HFpEF (NYHA class II–III) who were randomized to endurance training (32 patients to walking, arm, and leg ergometry, and 31 to attention control) for 16 weeks, did not show any improvement in endothelial function assessed by the same technique [67].

5.3. Role of Pharmacological Agents on ED in HFrEF

Pharmacological agents explored in the literature include those considered standards of care in the HF population and other newly investigated agents. Standard heart failure therapies include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACI) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), spironolactone, and the commonly co-administered statins. ACE inhibitors’ beneficial effect on endothelial function was described in the literature, mostly in the hypertensive population, with a meta-analysis that demonstrated that they significantly improved BA-FMD when compared with placebo, no treatment, and other antihypertensive agents, like calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers [68]. Further experimentation of their potential additive benefit if combined with ARBs in the hypertensive population was carried out in two studies with inconsistent results [69,70]. Spironolactone’s short-term administration has shown beneficial effects on endothelial function assessed by brachial artery VOP, which was associated with increased vasoconstriction with L-NMMA infusion in 10 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic etiology (NYHA class II–III) [71]. In another small study that included 20 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic etiology (NYHA class III–IV), it showed a beneficial effect on BA-FMD as compared with baseline readings [72]. Co-administered lipid-lowering therapy in HF patients is commonly achieved with statins, which might have an additional benefit on endothelial function in such a population. A 12-week administration of rosuvastatin in high doses (40 mg/d) improved endothelial function assessed by radial artery-FMD in 42 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic and non-ischemic etiology (NYHA class II–III) as compared with the placebo [73]. A smaller dose of Rosuvastatin (10 mg/d) administered over 1 month to 21 patients with similar criteria also resulted in a significant improvement in BA-FMD and released EPCs as compared with baseline figures [74]. In a third study, atorvastatin in two doses (10 and 40 mg/d) administered over 4 weeks in 26 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic etiology (NYHA class II–III) resulted in a significant improvement in BA-FMD and the number of bone-marrow release of EPCs in a dose-dependent manner [75]. These positive findings were similar to those documented with atorvastatin 20 mg daily dose administered over 8 weeks in 38 CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic and non-ischemic etiology (NYHA class II–IV) [76].
In the current literature, new pharmacological agents have started to appear to improve endothelial function in different patient populations. Among them, allopurinol as a XO inhibitor showed some benefit to endothelial function that is most noticeable in CHF patients. This is because circulating XO can bind to the endothelial surface where reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced to contribute to endothelial dysfunction [77], and because uric acid per se has been found to correlate negatively with FMD readings [78]. In a recent meta-analysis that included a total of 197 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic and non-ischemic etiology (NYHA class II–III), allopurinol 300 mg dose administered for a period of 1 week to 3 months improved endothelial function with a standardized mean difference of 0.776 (95%CI; 0.429–1.122, p < 0.001) [79].
Levosimendan is a calcium-sensitizing agent used for the management of HFrEF. It has been shown to possess vasodilatory properties via inhibition of phosphodiesterase III, desensitization of contractile proteins to calcium, and by the opening of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. In addition, it induces eNOS-dependent NO production in coronary endothelial cells in animal models [80]. It has also been shown to improve endothelial function assessed via FMD in 26 patients with CHF with LV systolic dysfunction with ischemic and non-ischemic etiology (NYHA class II–III). Such a benefit was associated with the inhibition of vascular inflammation [81].
After the beneficial effects of ivabradine on clinical outcomes in CHF patients with LV systolic dysfunction [82] (SHIFT trial), and its benefit on ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), its effect on endothelial function and VAC was assessed in 30 CHF patients with LV systolic dysfunction due to hypertensive heart disease predominantly (NYHA class II). Ivabradine was administered with a dose of 10 mg/d for 4 months, and it showed an improvement in endothelial function at the microvascular level [83].

5.4. Role of Pharmacological Agents on ED in HFpEF

Since the optimal therapy of patients with HFpEF is still under investigation, the current literature lacks adequate studies on pharmacological therapies for ED in this patient population. A small study included 48 patients with HFpEF and assessed the effect of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, administered over 24 weeks, with no significant benefits on the reactive hyperemic change in digital blood flow [84]. With the first large animal model of hypertensive heart disease with a loss of LV capacitance similar to patients with HFpEF, identification of the titin isoform shift and NOS uncoupling in the presence of preserved ejection fraction will help with gaining a better understanding of the pathophysiology and represents future therapeutic targets for pharmacological intervention in this patient population [85].

6. Conclusions

Chronic heart failure is a complex syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. New staging systems have emerged to address the involvement of not only the heart but also lungs, kidneys, liver, and central nervous system [86]. Endothelial dysfunction is an important concomitant characteristic that plays an integral role in the pathological process and the multi-system involvement. It is systemic in nature and involves arteries and veins. Peripheral endothelial dysfunction assessed via VOP or FMD was found to be a significant and independent predictor of mortality, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization due to worsening HF. This finding seems to be irrespective of severity or etiology of CHF. Additionally, one of the important intervention strategies in the literature to combat this phenomenon is physical exercise. Physical exercise has shown recognized benefits on endothelial function, oxidative stress, skeletal muscles, hemodynamics, and the adrenergic system in patients with HFrEF (Figure 1). In HFrEF patients, the recommended exercise regimen and to which patients is still to be clarified. As exercise training in this population has started to show diversity in the designed regimens, a spectrum that ended in stretching exercises to CHF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators has documented success [87]. However, and according to the current literature, less clear benefits of physical exercise are shown in HFpEF [88] Another important consideration for future research is to focus on endothelial repair mechanisms in CHF patients by EPCs mobilized from the bone marrow to facilitate a better understanding of their epigenetic mechanisms that play a role in the repair process, such as DNA methylation, post-translational histone modification, and the expression patterns of some microRNAs (miRNAs) [51]. As far as pharmacological agents are concerned, the strongest evidence available is supportive of allopurinol as a XO inhibitor. Such a drug possesses antioxidant properties and has shown promising benefits on endothelial function in patients with HFrEF. Therefore, allopurinol is worthy of further testing in well-designed clinical trials to explore the value of including it as an add-on therapy to improve clinical outcomes in this “at risk” population.

Author Contributions

An individual authored this manuscript fully.

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to all the associated personnel in any reference that contributed to this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Endemann, D.H.; Schiffrin, E.L. Endothelial dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004, 15, 1983–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Patel, A.R.; Kuvin, J.T.; Pandian, N.G.; Smith, J.J.; Udelson, J.E.; Mendelsohn, M.E.; Konstam, M.A.; Karas, R.H. Heart failure etiology affects peripheral vascular endothelial function after cardiac transplantation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kovacic, S.; Plazonic, Z.; Batinac, T.; Miletic, D.; Ruzic, A. Endothelial dysfunction as assessed with magnetic resonance imaging—A major determinant in chronic heart failure. Med. Hypotheses 2016, 90, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wilkinson, I.B.; Webb, D.J. Venous occlusion plethysmography in cardiovascular research: Methodology and clinical applications. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001, 52, 631–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Raitakari, O.T.; Celermajer, D.S. Flow-mediated dilatation. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 50, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Corretti, M.C.; Anderson, T.J.; Benjamin, E.J.; Celermajer, D.; Charbonneau, F.; Creager, M.A.; Deanfield, J.; Drexler, H.; Gerhard-Herman, M.; Herrington, D.; et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: A report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Panza, J.A.; Quyyumi, A.A.; Brush, J.E., Jr.; Epstein, S.E. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dharmashankar, K.; Widlansky, M.E. Vascular endothelial function and hypertension: Insights and directions. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2010, 12, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Avogaro, A.; Albiero, M.; Menegazzo, L.; de Kreutzenberg, S.; Fadini, G.P. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: the role of reparatory mechanisms. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, S285–S290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Severino, P.; D’Amato, A.; Netti, L.; Pucci, M.; De, M.M.; Palmirotta, R.; Volterrani, M.; Mancone, M.; Fedele, F. Diabetes Mellitus and Ischemic Heart Disease: The Role of Ion Channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Severino, P.; D’Amato, A.; Netti, L.; Pucci, M.; Infusino, F.; Maestrini, V.; Mancone, M.; Fedele, F. Myocardial Ischemia and Diabetes Mellitus: Role of Oxidative Stress in the Connection between Cardiac Metabolism and Coronary Blood Flow. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 2019, 9489826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kubo, S.H.; Rector, T.S.; Bank, A.J.; Williams, R.E.; Heifetz, S.M. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1991, 84, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Drexler, H.; Hayoz, D.; Munzel, T.; Hornig, B.; Just, H.; Brunner, H.R.; Zelis, R. Endothelial function in chronic congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 1992, 69, 1596–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramsey, M.W.; Goodfellow, J.; Jones, C.J.; Luddington, L.A.; Lewis, M.J.; Henderson, A.H. Endothelial control of arterial distensibility is impaired in chronic heart failure. Circulation 1995, 92, 3212–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Landmesser, U.; Spiekermann, S.; Dikalov, S.; Tatge, H.; Wilke, R.; Kohler, C.; Harrison, D.G.; Hornig, B.; Drexler, H. Vascular oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure: role of xanthine-oxidase and extracellular superoxide dismutase. Circulation 2002, 106, 3073–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Farrero, M.; Blanco, I.; Batlle, M.; Santiago, E.; Cardona, M.; Vidal, B.; Castel, M.A.; Sitges, M.; Barbera, J.A.; Perez-Villa, F. Pulmonary hypertension is related to peripheral endothelial dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ. Heart Fail. 2014, 7, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Marechaux, S.; Samson, R.; van Belle, E.; Breyne, J.; de Monte, J.; Dedrie, C.; Chebai, N.; Menet, A.; Banfi, C.; Bouabdallaoui, N.; et al. Vascular and Microvascular Endothelial Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J. Card Fail. 2016, 22, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lee, J.F.; Barrett-O’Keefe, Z.; Garten, R.S.; Nelson, A.D.; Ryan, J.J.; Nativi, J.N.; Richardson, R.S.; Wray, D.W. Evidence of microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Heart 2016, 102, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kishimoto, S.; Kajikawa, M.; Maruhashi, T.; Iwamoto, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Iwamoto, A.; Oda, N.; Matsui, S.; Hidaka, T.; Kihara, Y.; et al. Endothelial dysfunction and abnormal vascular structure are simultaneously present in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 231, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Katz, S.D.; Khan, T.; Zeballos, G.A.; Mathew, L.; Potharlanka, P.; Knecht, M.; Whelan, J. Decreased activity of the L-arginine-nitric oxide metabolic pathway in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1999, 99, 2113–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fedele, F.; Mancone, M.; Chilian, W.M.; Severino, P.; Canali, E.; Logan, S.; De Marchis, M.L.; Volterrani, M.; Palmirotta, R.; Guadagni, F. Role of genetic polymorphisms of ion channels in the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction and ischemic heart disease. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2013, 108, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lopez, F.A.; Casado, S. Heart failure, redox alterations, and endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension 2001, 38, 1400–1405. [Google Scholar]
  23. Usui, M.; Matsuoka, H.; Miyazaki, H.; Ueda, S.; Okuda, S.; Imaizumi, T. Increased endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in patients with congestive heart failure. Life Sci. 1998, 62, 2425–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsutsui, T.; Tsutamoto, T.; Wada, A.; Maeda, K.; Mabuchi, N.; Hayashi, M.; Ohnishi, M.; Kinoshita, M. Plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein as a prognostic predictor in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Polidori, M.C.; Pratico, D.; Savino, K.; Rokach, J.; Stahl, W.; Mecocci, P. Increased F2 isoprostane plasma levels in patients with congestive heart failure are correlated with antioxidant status and disease severity. J. Card Fail. 2004, 10, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Santulli, G. MicroRNAs and Endothelial (Dys) Function. J. Cell Physiol. 2016, 231, 1638–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wronska, A.; Kurkowska-Jastrzebska, I.; Santulli, G. Application of microRNAs in diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Acta Physiol. 2015, 213, 60–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yeboah, J.; Folsom, A.R.; Burke, G.L.; Johnson, C.; Polak, J.F.; Post, W.; Lima, J.A.; Crouse, J.R.; Herrington, D.M. Predictive value of brachial flow-mediated dilation for incident cardiovascular events in a population-based study: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation 2009, 120, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lind, L.; Berglund, L.; Larsson, A.; Sundstrom, J. Endothelial function in resistance and conduit arteries and 5-year risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011, 123, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shechter, M.; Issachar, A.; Marai, I.; Koren-Morag, N.; Freinark, D.; Shahar, Y.; Shechter, A.; Feinberg, M.S. Long-term association of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation and cardiovascular events in middle-aged subjects with no apparent heart disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009, 134, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fathi, R.; Haluska, B.; Isbel, N.; Short, L.; Marwick, T.H. The relative importance of vascular structure and function in predicting cardiovascular events. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 43, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Frick, M.; Suessenbacher, A.; Alber, H.F.; Dichtl, W.; Ulmer, H.; Pachinger, O.; Weidinger, F. Prognostic value of brachial artery endothelial function and wall thickness. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 1006–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Meyer, B.; Mortl, D.; Strecker, K.; Hulsmann, M.; Kulemann, V.; Neunteufl, T.; Pacher, R.; Berger, R. Flow-mediated vasodilation predicts outcome in patients with chronic heart failure: Comparison with B-type natriuretic peptide. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Heitzer, T.; Baldus, S.; von Kodolitsch, Y.; Rudolph, V.; Meinertz, T. Systemic endothelial dysfunction as an early predictor of adverse outcome in heart failure. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 1174–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fischer, D.; Rossa, S.; Landmesser, U.; Spiekermann, S.; Engberding, N.; Hornig, B.; Drexler, H. Endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic heart failure is independently associated with increased incidence of hospitalization, cardiac transplantation, or death. Eur. Heart J. 2005, 26, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Katz, S.D.; Hryniewicz, K.; Hriljac, I.; Balidemaj, K.; Dimayuga, C.; Hudaihed, A.; Yasskiy, A. Vascular endothelial dysfunction and mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 2005, 111, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shechter, M.; Matetzky, S.; Arad, M.; Feinberg, M.S.; Freimark, D. Vascular endothelial function predicts mortality risk in patients with advanced ischaemic chronic heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2009, 11, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. De Berrazueta, J.R.; Guerra-Ruiz, A.; Garcia-Unzueta, M.T.; Toca, G.M.; Laso, R.S.; de Adana, M.S.; Martin, M.A.; Cobo, M.; Llorca, J. Endothelial dysfunction, measured by reactive hyperaemia using strain-gauge plethysmography, is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2010, 12, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Fujisue, K.; Sugiyama, S.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Akiyama, E.; Sugamura, K.; Matsubara, J.; Kurokawa, H.; Maeda, H.; Hirata, Y.; Kusaka, H.; et al. Prognostic Significance of Peripheral Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Circ. J. 2015, 79, 2623–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kubrich, M.; Petrakopoulou, P.; Kofler, S.; Nickel, T.; Kaczmarek, I.; Meiser, B.M.; Reichart, B.; von Scheidt, W.; Weis, M. Impact of coronary endothelial dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2008, 85, 1580–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yufu, K.; Shinohara, T.; Ebata, Y.; Ayabe, R.; Fukui, A.; Okada, N.; Nakagawa, M.; Takahashi, N. Endothelial Function Predicts New Hospitalization due to Heart Failure Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2015, 38, 1260–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Grontved, A.; Koivula, R.W.; Johansson, I.; Wennberg, P.; Ostergaard, L.; Hallmans, G.; Renstrom, F.; Franks, P.W. Bicycling to Work and Primordial Prevention of Cardiovascular Risk: A Cohort Study Among Swedish Men and Women. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5, e004413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ponikowski, P.; Voors, A.A.; Anker, S.D.; Bueno, H.; Cleland, J.G.F.; Coats, A.J.S.; Falk, V.; Gonzalez-Juanatey, J.R.; Harjola, V.P.; Jankowska, E.A.; et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2129–2200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Conraads, V.M.; Van Craenenbroeck, E.M.; De Maeyer, C.; Van Berendoncks, A.M.; Beckers, P.J.; Vrints, C.J. Unraveling new mechanisms of exercise intolerance in chronic heart failure: role of exercise training. Heart Fail. Rev. 2013, 18, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pearson, M.J.; Smart, N.A. Effect of exercise training on endothelial function in heart failure patients: A systematic review meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 231, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ennis, S.; McGregor, G.; Shave, R.; McDonnell, B.; Thompson, A.; Banerjee, P.; Jones, H. Low frequency electrical muscle stimulation and endothelial function in advanced heart failure patients. ESC Heart Fail. 2018, 5, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Green, D.J.; Maiorana, A.; O’Driscoll, G.; Taylor, R. Effect of exercise training on endothelium-derived nitric oxide function in humans. J. Physiol 2004, 561, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hambrecht, R.; Adams, V.; Erbs, S.; Linke, A.; Krankel, N.; Shu, Y.; Baither, Y.; Gielen, S.; Thiele, H.; Gummert, J.F.; et al. Regular physical activity improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease by increasing phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2003, 107, 3152–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Linke, A.; Adams, V.; Schulze, P.C.; Erbs, S.; Gielen, S.; Fiehn, E.; Mobius-Winkler, S.; Schubert, A.; Schuler, G.; Hambrecht, R. Antioxidative effects of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: Increase in radical scavenger enzyme activity in skeletal muscle. Circulation 2005, 111, 1763–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Volaklis, K.A.; Tokmakidis, S.P.; Halle, M. Acute and chronic effects of exercise on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in healthy and diseased patients. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2013, 102, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Recchioni, R.; Marcheselli, F.; Antonicelli, R.; Lazzarini, R.; Mensa, E.; Testa, R.; Procopio, A.D.; Olivieri, F. Physical activity and progenitor cell-mediated endothelial repair in chronic heart failure: Is there a role for epigenetics? Mech. Ageing Dev. 2016, 159, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lymperopoulos, A.; Rengo, G.; Koch, W.J. Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure: Pathophysiology and therapy. Circ. Res. 2013, 113, 739–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bristow, M.R.; Ginsburg, R.; Minobe, W.; Cubicciotti, R.S.; Sageman, W.S.; Lurie, K.; Billingham, M.E.; Harrison, D.C.; Stinson, E.B. Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and beta-adrenergic-receptor density in failing human hearts. N. Engl. J. Med. 1982, 307, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bristow, M.R.; Ginsburg, R.; Umans, V.; Fowler, M.; Minobe, W.; Rasmussen, R.; Zera, P.; Menlove, R.; Shah, P.; Jamieson, S. Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic-receptor subpopulations in nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium: Coupling of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective beta 1-receptor down-regulation in heart failure. Circ. Res. 1986, 59, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ungerer, M.; Parruti, G.; Bohm, M.; Puzicha, M.; DeBlasi, A.; Erdmann, E.; Lohse, M.J. Expression of beta-arrestins and beta-adrenergic receptor kinases in the failing human heart. Circ. Res. 1994, 74, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Choi, D.J.; Rockman, H.A. Beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 31, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rengo, G.; Perrone-Filardi, P.; Femminella, G.D.; Liccardo, D.; Zincarelli, C.; De Lucia, C.; Pagano, G.; Marsico, F.; Lymperopoulos, A.; Leosco, D. Targeting the beta-adrenergic receptor system through G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2: a new paradigm for therapy and prognostic evaluation in heart failure: from bench to bedside. Circ. Heart Fail. 2012, 5, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Maisel, A.S.; Harris, T.; Rearden, C.A.; Michel, M.C. Beta-adrenergic receptors in lymphocyte subsets after exercise. Alterations in normal individuals and patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1990, 82, 2003–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brodde, O.E.; Kretsch, R.; Ikezono, K.; Zerkowski, H.R.; Reidemeister, J.C. Human beta-adrenoceptors: relation of myocardial and lymphocyte beta-adrenoceptor density. Science 1986, 231, 1584–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mancini, D.M.; Frey, M.J.; Fischberg, D.; Molinoff, P.B.; Wilson, J.R. Characterization of lymphocyte beta-adrenergic receptors at rest and during exercise in ambulatory patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989, 63, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Leosco, D.; Rengo, G.; Iaccarino, G.; Golino, L.; Marchese, M.; Fortunato, F.; Zincarelli, C.; Sanzari, E.; Ciccarelli, M.; Galasso, G.; et al. Exercise promotes angiogenesis and improves beta-adrenergic receptor signalling in the post-ischaemic failing rat heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 78, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guimaraes, S.; Moura, D. Vascular adrenoceptors: An update. Pharmacol. Rev. 2001, 53, 319–356. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Iaccarino, G.; Cipolletta, E.; Fiorillo, A.; Annecchiarico, M.; Ciccarelli, M.; Cimini, V.; Koch, W.J.; Trimarco, B. Beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene delivery to the endothelium corrects impaired adrenergic vasorelaxation in hypertension. Circulation 2002, 106, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lembo, G.; Iaccarino, G.; Vecchione, C.; Barbato, E.; Morisco, C.; Monti, F.; Parrella, L.; Trimarco, B. Insulin enhances endothelial alpha2-adrenergic vasorelaxation by a pertussis toxin mechanism. Hypertension 1997, 30, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cheng, L.; Yang, C.; Hsu, L.; Lin, M.T.; Jen, C.J.; Chen, H. Acute exercise enhances receptor-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilation by receptor upregulation. J. Biomed. Sci. 1999, 6, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Karavidas, A.; Driva, M.; Parissis, J.T.; Farmakis, D.; Mantzaraki, V.; Varounis, C.; Paraskevaidis, I.; Ikonomidis, I.; Pirgakis, V.; Anastasiou-Nana, M.; et al. Functional electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles improves endothelial function and clinical and emotional status in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Am. Heart J. 2013, 166, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kitzman, D.W.; Brubaker, P.H.; Herrington, D.M.; Morgan, T.M.; Stewart, K.P.; Hundley, W.G.; Abdelhamed, A.; Haykowsky, M.J. Effect of endurance exercise training on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shahin, Y.; Khan, J.A.; Samuel, N.; Chetter, I. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors effect on endothelial dysfunction: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Atherosclerosis 2011, 216, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Koh, K.K.; Quon, M.J.; Lee, Y.; Han, S.H.; Ahn, J.Y.; Chung, W.J.; Kim, J.A.; Shin, E.K. Additive beneficial cardiovascular and metabolic effects of combination therapy with ramipril and candesartan in hypertensive patients. Eur. Heart J. 2007, 28, 1440–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Souza-Barbosa, L.A.; Ferreira-Melo, S.L.E.; Ubaid-Girioli, S.; Nogueira, E.A.; Yugar-Toledo, J.C.; Moreno, H., Jr. Endothelial Vascular Function in Hypertensive Patients After Renin-Angiotensin System Blockad. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2006, 8, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Farquharson, C.A.; Struthers, A.D. Spironolactone increases nitric oxide bioactivity, improves endothelial vasodilator dysfunction, and suppresses vascular angiotensin I/angiotensin II conversion in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 2000, 101, 594–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Abiose, A.K.; Mansoor, G.A.; Barry, M.; Soucier, R.; Nair, C.K.; Hager, D. Effect of spironolactone on endothelial function in patients with congestive heart failure on conventional medical therapy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004, 93, 1564–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Erbs, S.; Beck, E.B.; Linke, A.; Adams, V.; Gielen, S.; Krankel, N.; Mobius-Winkler, S.; Hollriegel, R.; Thiele, H.; Hambrecht, R.; et al. High-dose rosuvastatin in chronic heart failure promotes vasculogenesis, corrects endothelial function, and improves cardiac remodeling—Results from a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011, 146, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tousoulis, D.; Andreou, I.; Tsiatas, M.; Miliou, A.; Tentolouris, C.; Siasos, G.; Papageorgiou, N.; Papadimitriou, C.A.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Stefanadis, C. Effects of rosuvastatin and allopurinol on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with congestive heart failure: the impact of inflammatory process and oxidative stress. Atherosclerosis 2011, 214, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Oikonomou, E.; Siasos, G.; Zaromitidou, M.; Hatzis, G.; Mourouzis, K.; Chrysohoou, C.; Zisimos, K.; Mazaris, S.; Tourikis, P.; Athanasiou, D.; et al. Atorvastatin treatment improves endothelial function through endothelial progenitor cells mobilization in ischemic heart failure patients. Atherosclerosis 2015, 238, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Castro, P.F.; Miranda, R.; Verdejo, H.E.; Greig, D.; Gabrielli, L.A.; Alcaino, H.; Chiong, M.; Bustos, C.; Garcia, L.; Mellado, R.; et al. Pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin in heart failure: role in oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial function, and exercise capacity. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2008, 27, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Houston, M.; Estevez, A.; Chumley, P.; Aslan, M.; Marklund, S.; Parks, D.A.; Freeman, B.A. Binding of xanthine oxidase to vascular endothelium. Kinetic characterization and oxidative impairment of nitric oxide-dependent signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 4985–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kato, M.; Hisatome, I.; Tomikura, Y.; Kotani, K.; Kinugawa, T.; Ogino, K.; Ishida, K.; Igawa, O.; Shigemasa, C.; Somers, V.K. Status of endothelial dependent vasodilation in patients with hyperuricemia. Am. J. Cardiol. 2005, 96, 1576–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alem, M.M. Allopurinol and endothelial function: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2018, 36, e12432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Grossini, E.; Molinari, C.; Caimmi, P.P.; Uberti, F.; Vacca, G. Levosimendan induces NO production through p38 MAPK, ERK and Akt in porcine coronary endothelial cells: role for mitochondrial K(ATP) channel. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 156, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Parissis, J.T.; Karavidas, A.; Bistola, V.; Arapi, S.; Paraskevaidis, I.A.; Farmakis, D.; Korres, D.; Filippatos, G.; Matsakas, E.; Kremastinos, D.T. Effects of levosimendan on flow-mediated vasodilation and soluble adhesion molecules in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Atherosclerosis 2008, 197, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Swedberg, K.; Komajda, M.; Bohm, M.; Borer, J.S.; Ford, I.; Dubost-Brama, A.; Lerebours, G.; Tavazzi, L. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): A randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2010, 376, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bonadei, I.; Sciatti, E.; Vizzardi, E.; Fabbricatore, D.; Pagnoni, M.; Rossi, L.; Carubelli, V.; Lombardi, C.M.; Metra, M. Effects of ivabradine on endothelial function, aortic properties and ventricular-arterial coupling in chronic systolic heart failure patients. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2018, 36, e12323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Borlaug, B.A.; Lewis, G.D.; McNulty, S.E.; Semigran, M.J.; LeWinter, M.; Chen, H.; Lin, G.; Deswal, A.; Margulies, K.B.; Redfield, M.M. Effects of sildenafil on ventricular and vascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ. Heart Fail. 2015, 8, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Schwarzl, M.; Hamdani, N.; Seiler, S.; Alogna, A.; Manninger, M.; Reilly, S.; Zirngast, B.; Kirsch, A.; Steendijk, P.; Verderber, J.; et al. A porcine model of hypertensive cardiomyopathy: implications for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2015, 309, H1407–H1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Fedele, F.; Severino, P.; Calcagno, S.; Mancone, M. Heart failure: TNM-like classification. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 1959–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kato, M.; Masuda, T.; Ogano, M.; Hotta, K.; Takagi, H.; Tanaka, S.; Kamada, Y.; Akiyama, A.; Kamekawa, D.; Shimizu, R.; et al. Stretching Exercises Improve Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction Through Attenuation of Oxidative Stress in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2017, 37, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tanaka, S.; Sanuki, Y.; Ozumi, K.; Harada, T.; Tasaki, H. Heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction following cardiac rehabilitation: impact of endothelial function. Heart Vessels 2018, 33, 886–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Leosco, D.; Parisi, V.; Femminella, G.D.; Formisano, R.; Petraglia, L.; Allocca, E.; Bonaduce, D. Effects of exercise training on cardiovascular adrenergic system. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Fraga, R.; Franco, F.G.; Roveda, F.; de Matos, L.N.; Braga, A.M.; Rondon, M.U.; Rotta, D.R.; Brum, P.C.; Barretto, A.C.; Middlekauff, H.R.; et al. Exercise training reduces sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure patients treated with carvedilol. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2007, 9, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Roveda, F.; Middlekauff, H.R.; Rondon, M.U.; Reis, S.F.; Souza, M.; Nastari, L.; Barretto, A.C.; Krieger, E.M.; Negrao, C.E. The effects of exercise training on sympathetic neural activation in advanced heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003, 42, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Coats, A.J.; Adamopoulos, S.; Radaelli, A.; McCance, A.; Meyer, T.E.; Bernardi, L.; Solda, P.L.; Davey, P.; Ormerod, O.; Forfar, C. Controlled trial of physical training in chronic heart failure. Exercise performance, hemodynamics, ventilation, and autonomic function. Circulation 1992, 85, 2119–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Conti, V.; Russomanno, G.; Corbi, G.; Izzo, V.; Vecchione, C.; Filippelli, A. Adrenoreceptors and nitric oxide in the cardiovascular system. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Laurent, M.; Daline, T.; Malika, B.; Fawzi, O.; Philippe, V.; Benoit, D.; Catherine, M.; Jacques, R. Training-induced increase in nitric oxide metabolites in chronic heart failure and coronary artery disease: An extra benefit of water-based exercises? Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2009, 16, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Van Craenenbroeck, E.M.; Hoymans, V.Y.; Beckers, P.J.; Possemiers, N.M.; Wuyts, K.; Paelinck, B.P.; Vrints, C.J.; Conraads, V.M. Exercise training improves function of circulating angiogenic cells in patients with chronic heart failure. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2010, 105, 665–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Erbs, S.; Hollriegel, R.; Linke, A.; Beck, E.B.; Adams, V.; Gielen, S.; Mobius-Winkler, S.; Sandri, M.; Krankel, N.; Hambrecht, R.; et al. Exercise training in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (NYHA IIIb) promotes restoration of peripheral vasomotor function, induction of endogenous regeneration, and improvement of left ventricular function. Circ. Heart Fail. 2010, 3, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sarto, P.; Balducci, E.; Balconi, G.; Fiordaliso, F.; Merlo, L.; Tuzzato, G.; Pappagallo, G.L.; Frigato, N.; Zanocco, A.; Forestieri, C.; et al. Effects of exercise training on endothelial progenitor cells in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Card. Fail. 2007, 13, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mezzani, A.; Grassi, B.; Jones, A.M.; Giordano, A.; Corra, U.; Porcelli, S.; Della, B.S.; Taddeo, A.; Giannuzzi, P. Speeding of pulmonary VO2 on-kinetics by light-to-moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training in chronic heart failure: clinical and pathophysiological correlates. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 167, 2189–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Adams, V.; Doring, C.; Schuler, G. Impact of physical exercise on alterations in the skeletal muscle in patients with chronic heart failure. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Adamopoulos, S.; Coats, A.J.; Brunotte, F.; Arnolda, L.; Meyer, T.; Thompson, C.H.; Dunn, J.F.; Stratton, J.; Kemp, G.J.; Radda, G.K. Physical training improves skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1993, 21, 1101–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Hambrecht, R.; Niebauer, J.; Fiehn, E.; Kalberer, B.; Offner, B.; Hauer, K.; Riede, U.; Schlierf, G.; Kubler, W.; Schuler, G. Physical training in patients with stable chronic heart failure: Effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and ultrastructural abnormalities of leg muscles. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995, 25, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Gielen, S.; Adams, V.; Mobius-Winkler, S.; Linke, A.; Erbs, S.; Yu, J.; Kempf, W.; Schubert, A.; Schuler, G.; Hambrecht, R. Anti-inflammatory effects of exercise training in the skeletal muscle of patients with chronic heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003, 42, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sullivan, M.J.; Higginbotham, M.B.; Cobb, F.R. Exercise training in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Circulation 1988, 78, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Adamopoulos, S.; Ponikowski, P.; Cerquetani, E.; Piepoli, M.; Rosano, G.; Sleight, P.; Coats, A.J. Circadian pattern of heart rate variability in chronic heart failure patients. Effects of physical training. Eur. Heart J. 1995, 16, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hambrecht, R.; Gielen, S.; Linke, A.; Fiehn, E.; Yu, J.; Walther, C.; Schoene, N.; Schuler, G. Effects of exercise training on left ventricular function and peripheral resistance in patients with chronic heart failure: A randomized trial. JAMA 2000, 283, 3095–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Coats, A.J.; Adamopoulos, S.; Meyer, T.E.; Conway, J.; Sleight, P. Effects of physical training in chronic heart failure. Lancet 1990, 335, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Belardinelli, R.; Georgiou, D.; Cianci, G.; Purcaro, A. 10-year exercise training in chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 1521–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Flynn, K.E.; Pina, I.L.; Whellan, D.J.; Lin, L.; Blumenthal, J.A.; Ellis, S.J.; Fine, L.J.; Howlett, J.G.; Keteyian, S.J.; Kitzman, D.W.; et al. Effects of exercise training on health status in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009, 301, 1451–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Adamopoulos, S.; Parissis, J.; Karatzas, D.; Kroupis, C.; Georgiadis, M.; Karavolias, G.; Paraskevaidis, J.; Koniavitou, K.; Coats, A.J.; Kremastinos, D.T. Physical training modulates proinflammatory cytokines and the soluble Fas/soluble Fas ligand system in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Leosco, D.; Iaccarino, G.; Cipolletta, E.; De Santis, D.; Pisani, E.; Trimarco, V.; Ferrara, N.; Abete, P.; Sorriento, D.; Rengo, F.; et al. Exercise restores beta-adrenergic vasorelaxation in aged rat carotid arteries. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 285, H369–H374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Leosco, D.; Rengo, G.; Iaccarino, G.; Filippelli, A.; Lymperopoulos, A.; Zincarelli, C.; Fortunato, F.; Golino, L.; Marchese, M.; Esposito, G.; et al. Exercise training and beta-blocker treatment ameliorate age-dependent impairment of beta-adrenergic receptor signaling and enhance cardiac responsiveness to adrenergic stimulation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2007, 293, H1596–H1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Calvert, J.W.; Condit, M.E.; Aragon, J.P.; Nicholson, C.K.; Moody, B.F.; Hood, R.L.; Sindler, A.L.; Gundewar, S.; Seals, D.R.; Barouch, L.A.; et al. Exercise protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via stimulation of beta(3)-adrenergic receptors and increased nitric oxide signaling: role of nitrite and nitrosothiols. Circ. Res. 2011, 108, 1448–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rengo, G.; Leosco, D.; Zincarelli, C.; Marchese, M.; Corbi, G.; Liccardo, D.; Filippelli, A.; Ferrara, N.; Lisanti, M.P.; Koch, W.J.; et al. Adrenal GRK2 lowering is an underlying mechanism for the beneficial sympathetic effects of exercise training in heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2010, 298, H2032–H2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. DiCarlo, S.E.; Blair, R.W.; Bishop, V.S.; Stone, H.L. Role of beta 2-adrenergic receptors on coronary resistance during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1988, 64, 2287–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 03198 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanisms of beneficial effects of physical exercise in HFrEF patients and animal models [89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114]. AR; adrenergic receptors, CA; catecholamines, ROS; reactive oxygen species, NO; nitric oxide, EF; endothelial function, VOP; venous occlusion plethysmography, FMD; flow-mediated dilatation, EPCs; endothelial progenitor cells, VEGF; vascular endothelial growth factor, CAC; circulating angiogenic cells; WKY rats; Wistar–Kyoto rats, HF; heart failure, GRK2; G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of beneficial effects of physical exercise in HFrEF patients and animal models [89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114]. AR; adrenergic receptors, CA; catecholamines, ROS; reactive oxygen species, NO; nitric oxide, EF; endothelial function, VOP; venous occlusion plethysmography, FMD; flow-mediated dilatation, EPCs; endothelial progenitor cells, VEGF; vascular endothelial growth factor, CAC; circulating angiogenic cells; WKY rats; Wistar–Kyoto rats, HF; heart failure, GRK2; G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2.
Ijms 20 03198 g001
Table
Table 1. Studies that assessed endothelial dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Table 1. Studies that assessed endothelial dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Study Sample Size and Population MethodologyFindings
Farrero et al. 2014 [16]28 HFpEFBrachial artery FMDPatients 1.95 (−0.81–4.92)% (median, IQR)
Controls 5.02 (3.90–10.12)%
p = 0.002
42 Hypertensive control subjects
Maréchaux et al. 2016 [17]45 HFpEFBrachial artery FMDPatients 3.6 (0.4–7.4)% (median, IQR)
Controls 7.2 (3.2–17.2)%
p = 0.001
45 Hypertensive control subjectsLaser Doppler Flowmetry to assess forearm cutaneous peak blood flowPatients 135 (104–206) PU
Controls 177 (139–216) PU
p = 0.03
Lee et al. 2016 [18]24 HFpEFBrachial artery FMDPatients 3.06 ± 0.68% (mean ± SEM)
Controls 5.06 ± 0.53%
p = 0.03, with no difference when corrected to shear rate
24 healthy controlsMicrovascular function via reactive hyperemia (RH) Patients 454 ± 35 mL/min (mean AUC ± SEM)
Controls 659 ± 63 mL/min
p = 0.03
Kishimoto et al. 2017 [19]41 HFpEFBrachial artery FMDPatients 2.9 ± 2.1% (mean ± SD)
Controls 4.6 ± 2.7%
p = 0.0002
165 control subjects with cardiovascular risk factorsBrachial artery IMTPatients 0.35 ± 0.06 mm
Controls 0.31 ± 0.07 mm
p = 0.0002
PU; Perfusion unit, IMT; intima-media thickness.
Table
Table 2. Predictive value of endothelial dysfunction in HFrEF patients.
Table 2. Predictive value of endothelial dysfunction in HFrEF patients.
Study Sample Size and Population MethodologyFollow-upOutcome Findings
Meyer et al. 2005 [33]75 CHF with systolic dysfunction NYHA class I–IV
Ischemic and non-ischemic etiology 		BA-FMD
Response to reactive hyperemia		3 yearsConversion to United Network of Organ Sharing UNOS status 1 (chronic inotropic support or implantation of ventricular assist device) or death27 UNOS-1/death
48 survivors
2 control groups (19 healthy and young subjects, and 14 age- and gender- matched control subjects)Multivariate stepwise analysis showed that FMD (Chi-square = 11.5, p = 0.0007), log BNP (Chi-square = 8.7, p = 0.003), and mean BP (Chi-square = 3.9, p = 0.047) were independent predictors of the combined endpoint
Heitzer et al. 2005 [34]287 CHF with mild systolic dysfunction NYHA class I
Ischemic and non-ischemic etiology 		VOP
Response to Ach and SNP		4.8 yearsDeath, heart transplant, readmission due to worsening HF79 patients had events
208 patients without
Cox-proportional hazards model showed that age (HR = 1.07, 95%CI; 1.03–1.11, p = 0.001), renal function (HR = 0.97, 95%CI; 0.94–1.02, p = 0.001), and blunted Ach-induced vasodilatation (HR = 0.96, 95%CI; 0.94–0.98, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of the outcome
Fischer et al. 2005 [35]67 CHF (30 had systolic dysfunction) NYHA class II–III
Ischemic and non-ischemic etiology 		FDD Radial artery3.8 yearsCardiac death, hospitalization due to worsening HF, or heart transplant24 patients had events
43 patients without
Cox-regression analysis showed that FDD (HR = 0.665 ± SE 0.182, p < 0.01), DM (HR = 0.055 ± 0.946, p < 0.01), and EF (HR = 0.054 ± 0.894, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of the outcome
Katz et al. 2005 [36]259 CHF with systolic dysfunction NYHA class II–III
Ischemic and non-ischemic etiology 		BA-FMD
Response to reactive hyperemia in 149 patients		2.3 yearsDeath, and urgent transplantation17 patients had events
132 patients without
Exhaled NO production during submaximal exercise (pulmonary circulation) in 110 patients1 year19 patients had events
91 patients without
Cox- multivariate proportional- hazards model showed that FMD (HR for 1% decrease in FMD = 1.20; 95%CI; 1.03–1.45; p = 0.027), and exhaled NO (HR for 1-ppb/min decrease = 1.31, 95%CI; 1.01–1.69, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of the outcome
Shechter et al. 2009 [37]82 CHF with systolic dysfunction NYHA class IV (advanced)
Ischemic etiology		BA-FMD
Response to reactive hyperemia		1.2 yearsDeath, hospitalization for CHF exacerbation, or MI30 patients had events
52 patients without
Cox-proportional hazard model showed that FMD (HR for 1% decrease = 1.20; 95%CI; 1.01–1.69; p < 0.03) was an independent predictor of mortality
de Berrazueta et al. 2010 [38]242 CHF with systolic dysfunction NYHA class I–IV
Ischemic and non-ischemic etiology 		VOP
Response to reactive hyperemia		5 yearsTotal events (death, heart attack, angina, stroke, NYHA class IV, or hospitalization for worsening HF)737 total events
62 patients died
180 patients survived
Cox-regression hazard model showed that FBF post-hyperemia (HR = 0.665 ± SE 0.182, p = 0.01) was an independent predictor of total events
Fujisue et al. 2015 [39]362 HFrEF NYHA class I–III
Ischemic and non-ischemic etiology		RH-PAT Reactive Hyperemia-Peripheral Arterial Tonometry (peripheral microvascular EF; distal finger)3 yearsHF-related events (composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization)82 patients had events
280 patients without
Cox-regression hazard model showed that Ln-RH-PAT (per 0.1, HR = 0.84, 95%CI; 0.75–0.95, p = 0.005); Serum sodium (per meq/L, HR = 0.92, 95%CI; 0.87–0.98, p = 0.004); and Ln-BNP (per 1.0, HR = 1.38, 95%CI; 1.12–1.70, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of HF-related events
BA-FMD; brachial artery flow- mediated dilatation, BNP; B-type natriuretic peptide, BP; blood pressure, VOP; venous occlusion plethysmography of brachial artery, HF; heart failure, Ach; Acetylcholine, SNP; sodium nitroprusside, HR; Hazard Ratio, FDD; flow-dependent, endothelium-mediated vasodilatation, DM; diabetes mellitus, EF; ejection fraction, ppb; parts per billion, MI; myocardial infarction, NYHA; New York Heart Association, FBF; forearm blood flow, EF; endothelial function.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alem, M.M. Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Heart Failure: Assessment, Findings, Significance, and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133198

AMA Style

Alem MM. Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Heart Failure: Assessment, Findings, Significance, and Potential Therapeutic Targets. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(13):3198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133198

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alem, Manal M. 2019. "Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Heart Failure: Assessment, Findings, Significance, and Potential Therapeutic Targets" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 13: 3198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133198

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop