Next Article in Journal
Development of EST Intron-Targeting SNP Markers for Panax ginseng and Their Application to Cultivar Authentication
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptional Profiling and miRNA-Target Network Analysis Identify Potential Biomarkers for Efficacy Evaluation of Fuzheng-Huayu Formula-Treated Hepatitis B Caused Liver Cirrhosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms17060888
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization of the Complete Genome of Three Basal-BR Isolates of Turnip mosaic virus Infecting Raphanus sativus in China

by
Fuxiang Zhu
†,
Ying Sun
†,
Yan Wang
,
Hongyu Pan
,
Fengting Wang
,
Xianghui Zhang
,
Yanhua Zhang
and
Jinliang Liu
*
College of Plant Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(6), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060888
Submission received: 25 March 2016 / Revised: 16 May 2016 / Accepted: 27 May 2016 / Published: 4 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) infects crops of plant species in the family Brassicaceae worldwide. TuMV isolates were clustered to five lineages corresponding to basal-B, basal-BR, Asian-BR, world-B and OMs. Here, we determined the complete genome sequences of three TuMV basal-BR isolates infecting radish from Shandong and Jilin Provinces in China. Their genomes were all composed of 9833 nucleotides, excluding the 3′-terminal poly(A) tail. They contained two open reading frames (ORFs), with the large one encoding a polyprotein of 3164 amino acids and the small overlapping ORF encoding a PIPO protein of 61 amino acids, which contained the typically conserved motifs found in members of the genus Potyvirus. In pairwise comparison with 30 other TuMV genome sequences, these three isolates shared their highest identities with isolates from Eurasian countries (Germany, Italy, Turkey and China). Recombination analysis showed that the three isolates in this study had no “clear” recombination. The analyses of conserved amino acids changed between groups showed that the codons in the TuMV out group (OGp) and OMs group were the same at three codon sites (852, 1006, 1548), and the other TuMV groups (basal-B, basal-BR, Asian-BR, world-B) were different. This pattern suggests that the codon in the OMs progenitor did not change but that in the other TuMV groups the progenitor sequence did change at divergence. Genetic diversity analyses indicate that the PIPO gene was under the highest selection pressure and the selection pressure on P3N-PIPO and P3 was almost the same. It suggests that most of the selection pressure on P3 was probably imposed through P3N-PIPO.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) is a member of the genus Potyvirus and possesses an exceptionally broad host range in terms of plant genera and families compared to any other potyvirus; it is known to infect at least 318 species of 156 genera belonging to 43 families of plants representing many arable, vegetable and ornamental crops, especially in the family Brassicaceae [1,2]. TuMV was ranked second only to Cucumber mosaic virus as the most important virus infecting field-grown vegetables in a survey of virus diseases in 28 countries and regions [3].
TuMV forms flexuous filamentous particles 700–750 nm in length, each of which contains a single copy of the genome, which is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA molecule of about 10,000 nt. The virion RNA is infectious and serves as both the genome and viral messenger RNA. The genomic RNA is translated into one large polyprotein which is subsequently processed by the action of three viral-encoded proteinases (Pl, HC-Pro and NIa-Pro) into functional products [4]. Furthermore, P3N-PIPO is expressed by a +2 ribosomal frameshift within the P3 ORF and probably acts as a movement protein [5,6].
TuMV is a highly variable virus. The world population of TuMV has probably been more thoroughly sampled and sequenced than that of any other potyviruses [7]. Studies of the genetic and molecular variability of viruses help to provide understanding of some important features of their biology, like changes in virulence, host adaptation, geographical ranges, their new emergence and so on [2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The present worldwide population of TuMV is evolving and diverging rapidly. TuMV is spread by polyphagous aphids as well as in seed and infected plant materials. On average, the nucleotide evolutionary rate of TuMV is around 10−3 substitutions per site per year [7]. In previous studies of the molecular evolution of TuMV, the virus was found to have four phylogenetic lineages (basal-B, basal-BR, Asian-BR, world-B) [12]. Recently, Nguyen et al. reported that TuMV diverged from a closely related TuMV-like virus (TuMV-OMs) from wild orchids in Europe about 1000 years ago. It was viewed as a significant host switch between monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant lineages [7]. It was supposed that non-unique combinations of transient viral genomic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) allowed the host switch to occur [9]. The five host-infecting types are mostly congruent with the phylogenetic groupings [7,11,14]. Isolates from host type OM infect some Brassicaceae plants but not Brassica spp. plants. Isolates from host type [(B)] infect Brassica plants latently and occasionally but not Raphanus plants. Isolates from host type [B] infect most Brassica species systemically (systemic mosaic symptoms) but do not infect Raphanus plants. Isolates from host type [B(R)] infect most Brassica systemically (systemic mosaic symptoms) and occasionally infect Raphanus plants latently. Isolates from host type [BR] infect both Brassica and Raphanus plants systemically (systemic mosaic symptoms). The paraphyletic basal-B cluster of [(B)] pathotype isolates is the most variable. The world-B cluster is the more variable and widespread cluster. The basal-BR and the Asian-BR clusters of the [BR] pathotype isolates are less variable [12,15]. Most European isolates do not infect Raphanus, whereas Asian isolates infect both Brassica and Raphanus.
Potyviruses have spread throughout much of the subtropical and temperate zones of the world. Phylogeographic analysis of the potyviruses indicates that the genus originated in western Eurasia and/or North Africa, and their recent adaptive radiation has involved many emergences [9,16]. Like other potyviruses, TuMV originated in Europe and spread to other parts of the world, and that the basal-BR population, in a state of sudden expansion, has recently evolved in East Asia [8,12,13,17]. Studies of the genetic structure of plant virus populations have shown that the evolution of virus populations is shaped by founder effects, selection and recombination [14]. As in other potyviruses, recombination is a frequent event in the evolution of TuMV. TuMV isolates from China and Japan are part of the same population but are a discrete lineage. TuMV populations in Vietnam are clustered in the world-B group with clear local founder effects compared to that of Chinese and Japanese isolates and there have been no basal-BR isolates [11]. The basal-BR isolates were first reported in 2000 in Japan, when they were at an epidemic situation nationwide [2].
Previous studies showed that TuMV isolates in China belonged to the world-B and Asian-BR groups [2,12,13,18,19]. However, we first detected the existence of basal-BR isolates in China in the years 2004–2005 [17]. We then reported the full genomic sequences of the first two basal-BR isolates and analyzed their recombination pattern and genetic diversity [8]. In the study reported here, the complete genome sequences of three TuMV isolates collected from radish from Shandong and Jilin Provinces in China were determined. We analyzed their phylogenetic relationships, recombination pattern and genetic diversity, together with 30 other previously reported representative TuMV isolates collected from different hosts around the world. The results showed that the three isolates were clustered to the basal-BR group and had no “clear” recombination. Genetic diversity analyses indicate that the selection pressure on PIPO was the highest and that of P3N-PIPO and p3 was almost the same.

2. Results

2.1. Genome Structure and Characterization of Putative Polyproteins

The complete genome sequences of the CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 isolates were all 9833 nt (excluding the 3′ poly(A) tail) and were allocated the accession numbers of KR153038, KR153039 and KR153040. The base composition of the three isolate’s genomic RNA were not significantly different, with the following nucleotide percentages: adenine 31.75%–31.76%, cytosine 21.56%–21.64%, guanine 24.14%–24.16% and uracil 22.46%–21.54%. The genome contained one large ORF that coded for a polyprotein of 3164 residues and was flanked by 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTR) of 129 and 209 nt, respectively. The 5′-UTR contained the conserved sequences ACAACAU (positions 20–26) and UCAAGCA (positions 67–73), corresponding to potyboxes “a” and “b”, respectively, which probably plays an important role in transcription initiation [20,21]. The first inframe translation start codon AUG (130–132) of the three isolates genomic RNA was situated in the appropriate context of AGCAAUGGC (CCLB and LWLB isolates) and AGAAAUGGC (WFLB14 isolate), which were similar to the corresponding sequence AACAAUGGC in plants [22]. The −3 and +4 nucleotides were both purines that might be required for initiation of translation [23].
As predicted by Adams et al. [24], nine putative protease cleavage sites were identified in the CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 polyprotein at amino acid positions 362, 820, 1175, 1227, 1871, 1924, 2116, 2359 and 2876 that give rise to ten mature proteins: P1, HC-Pro, P3, 6K1, CI, 6K2, VPg, NIa-Pro, NIb and CP. The cleavage sites for P1 and HC-Pro were Y/S and G/G, respectively, and those for NIa-Pro were Q/A, Q/T, Q/N, E/A, E/S, Q/T and Q/A (Figure 1, Table 1).
Comparing amino acid sequences of CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 with other potyviruses, conserved motifs in each of these proteins were identified. In HC-Pro, the 414KITC417 and 672PTK674 were important motifs involved in aphid transmission [25]; the motif 543FRNK546 has been shown to be involved in symptom formation [26] and suppression of RNA silencing [27]; the motifs 654CCCVT658, 679IGN681 and 706C-X72-H779 have been implicated in virus cell-to-cell movement [28], genome amplification [29] and proteinase activity [30], respectively. The NTP-binding motif 1313GAVGSGKS1320 in the CI protein was involved in helicase activity [31]. Additionally, the 1480LVYV1483, 1531VATNIIENGVTL1542 and 1575GERIQRLGRVGR1586 motifs might also be characteristic of helicase proteins [32]. The conserved tyrosine residue (Y) in the context 1986MYGF1989 has been shown to be essential for linking VPg to genomic RNA [33]. In NIa-Pro, 2162H-(X)34-D-(X)69-C-(X)15-H2283 was a conserved motif associated with proteinase activity [34]. In NIb, the conserved motif 2611FDSS2614 was located 266 aa upstream of the putative NIb/CP cleavage site [35], and 2710GDD2712 was necessary for RNA polymerase activity and NTP binding [35]. Like the CPs of most potyviruses, these three TuMV isolates also carried the 2882DAG2884 motif interacting with the PTK of HC-Pro as an important factor related to aphid transmission, and the 3054R-(X)43-D3098 motif associated with virus movement [36]. In addition, The three consensus motifs, 3013MVWCIENGTSP3023, 3096AFDF3099 and 3116QMKAAA3121, were also found in the CPs of the CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 isolates [35].
The recently described ORF coding the putative protein PIPO [6] was identified within the P3 ORF expressed by a +2 ribosomal frameshift, starting from a G1A4 motif at position 3076 (Figure 1). This motif was distinct from the highly conserved motif G1–2A6–7 that is known for other potyviruses [6] and ended with a UAA termination codon at position 3258–3261.

2.2. Percentage Identity

Pairwise comparisons of the CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 genome sequences with those of 30 other TuMV isolates available in sequence databases show that the most closely related isolate is DEU4 (AB701701), which was the BR pathotype from Germany, sharing 95.0%, 94.7% and 94.8% nucleotide identity, respectively (Table 2). The nucleotide and amino acid identities of each gene in these three isolates compared with those of others is shown in Table 2, and the isolates shared the highest identities with genes from Cal1 (AB093601), DEU4 (AB701701), PV0104 (AB093603), ITA8 (AB701725) and USA6 (AB701741).

2.3. Phylogenetic Relationships

To estimate the phylogenetic relationships among the TuMV isolates and the outgroups, the complete genome sequences of 33 TuMV isolates, including the three isolates determined in this work, were subjected to phylogenetic analyses, with two Japanese yam mosaic virus (JYMV) isolates (AB016500 and AB027007) sharing the highest identities with TuMV as the outgroup (Table 3, Figure 2). The maximum likelihood (ML) tree showed that these TuMV isolates were clustered to five lineages corresponding to basal-B, basal-BR, Asian-BR, world-B and OMs, which was consistent with previous reports [7,9]. The CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 were clustered to the basal-BR group. The phylogenetic trees estimated for the individual P1 and CP genes of the 33 isolates were very similar with the results above (data not shown).
In a recent report, it was showed that the “emergence” of TuMV was probably a “gene-for-quasi-gene” event based on in vivo and in silico studies [9]. According to this, conserved amino acids changed between the group were also found in 35 sequences, including two JYMV isolates (outgroup) using the clustal W program (Figure 2). At codon positions 852 and 1006, their OGp and OMs amino acids were the same (852V, 1006I), and the other TuMV groups (basal-B, basal-BR, Asian-BR, world-B) were different (852K /852Q/852L, 1006K/1006R). This asymmetric phylogenetic pattern was called the XXY pattern, which suggests that, at the divergence, the amino acids in the OM progenitor did not change, but in the TuMV other groups the progenitor did. In both sites, the encoded amino acids changed from hydrophobic to polar amino acids. Codon 852 encodes an amino acid at the N-terminal end of the P3 protein and Codon 1006 is translated to an amino acid in the C-terminal third of the P3 protein and near the 5′ terminal third of the PIPO ORF. Amino acid 1548 in the middle of the CI protein sequence was unique to all isolates of OGp and OMs (1548V), while the alternate (1548A) was conserved in the other TuMV groups. The results in this work were consistent with that of Gibbs et al. [9]. At three codon sites (852, 1006, 1548), CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 were all 852L1006K1548A, which were conserved in isolates of the basal-BR group (Figure 2).

2.4. Recombination Analysis

The polyprotein-encoding gene sequences of 33 isolates from the public DNA sequence databases were screened for possible recombination events in isolates CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 and assessed for evidence of recombination using an RDP version 4 software package, PHYLPRO version 1 and SISCAN version 2. Only three out of 33 genomes (9.1%) showed evidence of recombination. The CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 isolates in this study had no “clear” recombination. Three recombinant isolates (CHN1, ND10J and 59J) were all intralineage recombinants of Asian-BR and world-B isolates, most with CH6 of Asian-BR as the major parent and 2J or KWB778J of world-B as the minor parent. Most recombination sites were located in P1, CI, 6K2 and CP, which were hotspots of recombination in TuMV [8,13,37] (Table 4).

2.5. Genetic Distance and Selection Pressure

Genetic distances of the 33 isolates within and between groups were calculated by the K2P methods in MEGA version 6 [38] (Table 5). It showed that the genetic distance within the basal-B group was the largest (0.185 ± 0.004), two times that of the basal-BR group, in which CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 were clustered. Genetic distances within the group were significantly smaller than those between groups, indicating that the groupings are correct.
Each gene was checked to determine the direction of mutation of 16 TuMV isolates in Chinese and Japanese populations in their dN/dS substitution rates using the codeml program and PBL method (Table 6). It was found that the values of the dN/dS ratio were always <1 and differed considerably in different genomic regions, indicating that there was selection against most amino acid changes, namely, “negative selection” or “purifying selection”, in most of these regions. The largest dN/dS ratio was for the PIPO gene. However, the dN/dS ratio of P3N-PIPO and P3 were almost the same, each only one quarter that of the PIPO gene. This indicates that most of the selection pressure in P3 was imposed by P3N-PIPO. In addition, the dN/dS ratios for the P1 gene was also larger than that of all other genes except PIPO. This result was helpful in understanding that P1 and P3 are the most variable genes in the TuMV genome [10]. The dN/dS ratios for the Chinese and Japanese populations and for the different phylogenetic lineages were not significantly different for any of the genes analyzed by the two methods.

3. Discussion

Here, we reported the complete genome sequences of three Chinese TuMV isolates infecting Raphanus sativus that were grouped to basal-BR lineage according to their molecular characteristics. Basal-BR is a recent “emerged” branch of the population in East Asia, which was in a state of sudden expansion [8,11,12,13,17]. In China, since the first report of the basal-BR lineage isolates [17], the population of basal-BR isolates increased rapidly and showed characteristics of the founder effect [8]. In this study, CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 genome sequences shared their highest identities with isolates from Eurasian countries (Germany, Italy, Turkey and China) and were clustered in the basal-BR group (Table 2, Figure 2) which was consistent with the (delete possible) interpretations that TuMV originated in western Eurasia and spread to other parts of the world [12].
Recently, a sister lineage of TuMV-like potyviruses (TuMV-OM) was identified from European orchids (Orchis militaris, Orchis morio and Orchis simia), from which TuMV diverged about 1000 years ago [7]. A virus emergence involving a major host switch would probably result in significant genomic changes, especially in the emergent lineage [9]. In this work, conserved amino acids changed between groups were found in 35 sequences, including two JYMV isolates (OGp) (Figure 2). The OGp and OMs groups codons were the same at three codon sites (852, 1006, 1548), and their TuMV other groups (basal-B, basal-BR, Asian-BR, world-B) were different. This pattern suggests that the codon in the OMs progenitor did not change but that in the TuMV other groups the progenitor did change at the divergence. Gibbs described this “emergence” of TuMV as probably a “gene-for-quasi-gene” event [9]. Codon 852 and 1006 are translated to amino acids in the P3 protein, and the amino acid 1548 is in the middle of the CI protein sequence. In previous studies, the P3 and CI genes of TuMV, together with the small 6K2 and VPg genes, were identified to be involved in host determination [9,39,40,41].
The degree of selection pressure in genes can be estimated by calculating the dN/dS ratios, which provide evidence of strong selection against amino acid change as a driving force for TuMV evolution [13,15,42,43]. In previous results, it was shown that Chinese TuMV isolates were under negative or purifying selection according to the whole ORF and other genes [8,9,17]. In this work, we also checked gene-by-gene to see whether there were significant differences between the Chinese and Japanese populations in their dN/dS substitutions (Table 6). Surprisingly, the selection pressure on PIPO was the highest, not P1, which was reported to be the highest in previous studies [8,13,15]. This may be interpreted that PIPO was recently described as a new ORF encoded within the genome of the Potyviridae family [6], and the selection pressure on PIPO was not examined in that search. Additionally, we also found that the selection pressure on P3N-PIPO and P3 was almost the same, but only one quarter that of PIPO. The PIPO ORF is embedded within the P3 cistron and is translated in the +2 reading frame relative to the potyviral long ORF as the P3N-PIPO fusion protein. So it suggests that most of the selection pressure on P3 was imposed by P3N-PIPO and seems not to account for the presence of alternative stop codons in PIPO ORF [44]. This is hypothesized to be associated with the function of P3N-PIPO in cell-to-cell movement and overcoming host resistance [5,42,45,46]. In addition, the selection pressure on the P1 gene was (delete also) larger than that of all other genes except PIPO. The higher selection pressure on P1, P3 and P3N-PIPO might provide an evolutionary force to host dependence and adaptation [5,9,13,15].
TuMV isolates of basal-BR are prevalent and expanding rapidly in China since the first report of their existence in 2005. More full genome sequences of TuMV isolates of basal-BR in China were identified, which made it possible to further understand the genetic diversity of TuMV comprehensively. Our results provided useful information about the evolution and genetic conservation of TuMV. It will also be important in the future to study the pathogenic mechanism of TuMV and the resistance of cruciferous crops to TuMV isolates.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Virus Samples, RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Three samples with typical symptoms of viral diseases were collected from radish from Shandong and Jilin Provinces, which we named WFLB14, LWLB and CCLB. All the isolates were sap-inoculated to Chenopodium amaranticolor and serially cloned through single lesions at least three times. They were propagated in Brassica rapa plants.
The viral RNAs were extracted from purified virions with an Invitrogen Trizol Kit following the instructions of the manufacturer. The RNAs were reverse-transcribed with UTR-R, a primer that was complementary to poly (A) (Figure 1, Table 7). Most parts of the genomes were amplified by PCR (Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with forward primers and reverse primers, which will be provided upon request, and designed according to the conserved region and newly determined genomic sequences (Figure 1, Table 7). The 5′-proximal part was obtained using GSP and NGSP primers (Figure 1, Table 7) with the 5′-Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (5’-RACE) method, as described in an earlier study [47].
The amplification products were ligated to the vector pMD18-T (TaKaRa Biotechnology Dalian Co., Ltd., Dalian, China), which was confirmed by PCR and restriction enzyme digestion before sequencing by an ABI PRISMTM 377 DNA Sequencer. Nucleotide sequences from each isolate were determined using at least four overlapping independent RT-PCR products for each region to cover the complete genome. At least six clones for the fragments obtained from the 5′-RACE were sequenced. The determined sequences were assembled with DNAMAN (Lynnon Biosoft, Vandreuil, QC, Canada) and DNASTAR Lasergene (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA).

4.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

To estimate the phylogenetic relationships among the TuMV isolates and the outgroups, we aligned the 33 complete genome sequences (Table 3) using the clustal W program [48] and constructed the Phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood method in the MEGA version 6 [38]. Statistical significance of tree branching was tested by performing 1000 bootstrap replications. Two Japanese yam mosaic virus (JYMV) isolates (JYMV-j1 and JYMV-mild) [49,50] with known complete genomic sequences were used as the outgroup (OGp), because BLAST searches had shown them to be most closely and consistently related to those of TuMV. In order to identify sequence changes between groups, codons of interest were examined in an alignment of 33 sequences using the clustal W program [9,48].

4.3. Recombination Analyses

According to the Phylogenetic trees constructed using different genes of TuMV, we initially confirmed the probable instances of recombination by analyses of different isolates clustered into the lineages. All sequences were aligned using the clustal X program [48] and determined using a combination of methods in the RDP version 4 software package [51], namely RDP [51], GENECONV [52], BOOTSCAN [53], CHIMEARA [54] and MAXCHI [55]. All isolates that had been identified as likely recombinants by the programs in RDP version 4, supported by three different methods with an associated p-value of <1.0 × 10−6, were re-checked using the original PHYLPRO version 1 [56] and SISCAN version 2 [57].

4.4. Genetic Distance and Selection Pressure

Genetic distances of all the isolates within and between groups were calculated by Kimura2-parameter (K2P)methods in MEGA version 6 [38]. Non-synonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) differences that correlated with phylogenetic relationships were estimated using the codeml program of PAML version 4 [58] and the Pamilo-Bianchi-Li (PBL) method assembled in MEGA version 6 [38]. The dN/dS ratios, representing selection pressure in evolution for each protein-encoding region of TuMV sub-populations of different collection regions, were calculated using the Pamilo-Bianchi-Li method in MEGA version 6 [38].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 31201485, 31271991, 31471730). We are grateful to Xiangdong Li and Yanping Tian at Shandong Agricultural University for technical assistance. We thank Deborah Mathews at University of California, Riverside for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Fuxiang Zhu: responsible for article writing, participated in the parts of the manuscript and experiment. Ying Sun: participated in the parts of the manuscript and experiment; Yan Wang: participated in the parts of the experiment and sequence analysis. Hongyu Pan: participated in the experiment design ideas; Fengting Wang: participated in the parts of the manuscript. Xianghui Zhang: participated in virus samples collection and biology experiment. Yanhua Zhang: participated in the experiment design ideas; Jinliang Liu: corresponding author, responsible for the experiment design ideas and funding to make the experiments going smoothly.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Walsh, J.A.; Jenner, C.E. Turnip mosaic virus and the quest for durable resistance. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tomimura, K.; Gibbs, A.J.; Jenner, C.E.; Walsh, J.A.; Ohshima, K. The phylogeny of Turnip mosaic virus; comparisons of 38 genomic sequences reveal a Eurasian origin and a recent ”emergence” in East Asia. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 2099–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tomlinson, J. Epidemiology and control of virus diseases of vegetables. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1987, 110, 661–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. King, A.M.; Adams, M.J.; Lefkowitz, E.J. Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vijayapalani, P.; Maeshima, M.; Nagasaki-Takekuchi, N.; Miller, W.A. Interaction of the trans-frame potyvirus protein P3N-PIPO with host protein PCaP1 facilitates Potyvirus movement. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chung, B.Y.W.; Miller, W.A.; Atkins, J.F.; Firth, A.E. An overlapping essentiapgene in the Potyviridae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5897–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nguyen, H.D.; Tomitaka, Y.; Ho, S.Y.; Duchêne, S.; Vetten, H.-J.; Lesemann, D.; Walsh, J.A.; Gibbs, A.J.; Ohshima, K. Turnip mosaic potyvirus probably first spread to Eurasian Brassica crops from wild orchids about 1000 years ago. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, H.Y.; Liu, J.L.; Gao, R.; Chen, J.; Shao, Y.H.; Li, X.D. Complete genomic sequence analyses of Turnip mosaic virus basal-BR isolates from China. Virus Genes 2009, 38, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gibbs, A.J.; Nguyen, H.D.; Ohshima, K. The ”emergence” of Turnip mosaic virus was probably a ”gene-for-quasi-gene” event. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 10, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ohshima, K.; Akaishi, S.; Kajiyama, H.; Koga, R.; Gibbs, A.J. Evolutionary trajectory of Turnip mosaic virus populations adapting to a new host. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91, 788–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nguyen, H.D.; Tran, H.T.N.; Ohshima, K. Genetic variation of the Turnip mosaic virus population of Vietnam: A case study of founder, regional and local influences. Virus Res. 2013, 171, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ohshima, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Hirota, R.; Hamamoto, T.; Tomimura, K.; Tan, Z.; Sano, T.; Azuhata, F.; Walsh, J.A.; Fletcher, J. Molecular evolution of Turnip mosaic virus: Evidence of host adaptation, genetic recombination and geographical spread. J. Gen. Virol. 2002, 83, 1511–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tomitaka, Y.; Ohshima, K. A phylogeographical study of the Turnip mosaic virus population in East Asia reveals an ”emergent” lineage in Japan. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15, 4437–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yasaka, R.; Ohba, K.; Schwinghamer, M.W.; Fletcher, J.; Ochoa-Corona, F.M.; Thomas, J.E.; Ho, S.Y.; Gibbs, A.J.; Ohshima, K. Phylodynamic evidence of the migration of Turnip mosaic potyvirus from Europe to Australia and New Zealand. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96, 701–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tomimura, K.; Špak, J.; Katis, N.; Jenner, C.E.; Walsh, J.A.; Gibbs, A.J.; Ohshima, K. Comparisons of the genetic structure of populations of Turnip mosaic virus in West and East Eurasia. Virology 2004, 330, 408–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gibbs, A.; Ohshima, K. Potyviruses and the Digital Revolution. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tian, Y.P.; Zhu, X.P.; Liu, J.L.; Yu, X.Q.; Du, J.; Kreuze, J.; Li, X.D. Molecular characterization of the 3′-terminal region of Turnip mosaic virus isolates from Eastern China. J. Phytopathol. 2007, 155, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Song, Y.Z.; Li, L.L.; Zhu, C.X.; Wen, F.J.; Wen, F.K. Cloning and sequence analysis of coat protein genes of Turnip mosaic virus isolates obtained from Shandong. Scientia Agric. Sin. 2005, 38, 504–510. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shi, M.L. Cloning and sequence analysis of HC-Pro genes of Turnip mosaic virus Eurasian isolates. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2007, 37, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  20. Turpen, T. Molecular cloning of a Potato virus Y genome: Nucleotide sequence homology in non-coding regions of Potyviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1989, 70, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yukawa, Y.; Sugita, M.; Choisne, N.; Small, I.; Sugiura, M. The TATA motif, the CAA motif and the poly(T) transcription termination motif are all important for transcription re-initiation on plant tRNA genes. Plant J. 2000, 22, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lütcke, H.; Chow, K.; Mickel, F.; Moss, K.; Kern, H.; Scheele, G. Selection of AUG initiation codons differs in plants and animals. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Mlotshwa, S.; Verver, J.; Sithole-Niang, I.; Van Kampen, T.; Van Kammen, A.; Wellink, J. The genomic sequence of cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus and its similarities with other potyviruses. Arch. Virol. 2002, 147, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Adams, M.J.; Antoniw, J.F.; Beaudoin, F. Overview and analysis of the polyprotein cleavage sites in the family Potyviridae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Atreya, C.D.; Pirone, T.P. Mutational analysis of the helper component-proteinase gene of a potyvirus: Effects of amino acid substitutions, deletions, and gene replacement on virulence and aphid transmissibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 11919–11923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gal-On, A. A point mutation in the FRNK motif of the potyvirus helper component-protease gene alters symptom expression in cucurbits and elicits protection against the severe homologous virus. Phytopathology 2000, 90, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gal-On, A. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus: Insect transmission and pathogenicity—The tails of two proteins. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 8, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Maia, I.G.; Bernardi, F. Nucleic acid-binding properties of a bacterially expressed Potato virus Y helper component-proteinase. J. Gen. Virol. 1996, 77, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Plisson, C.; Drucker, M.; Blanc, S.; German-Retana, S.; Le Gall, O.; Thomas, D.; Bron, P. Structural characterization of HC-Pro, a plant virus multifunctional protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 23753–23761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Guo, D.; Merits, A.; Saarma, M. Self-association and mapping of interaction domains of helper component-proteinase of potato A potyvirus. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 1127–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kadaré, G.; Haenni, A.-L. Virus-encoded RNA helicases. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 2583. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Liang, W.; Song, L.; Tian, G.; Li, H.; Fan, Z. The genomic sequence of Wisteria vein mosaic virus and its similarities with other potyviruses. Arch. Virol. 2006, 151, 2311–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Murphy, J.F.; Klein, P.G.; Hunt, A.G.; Shaw, J.G. Replacement of the tyrosine residue that links a potyviral VPg to the viral RNA is lethal. Virology 1996, 220, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dougherty, W.G.; Parks, T.D.; Cary, S.M.; Bazan, J.F.; Fletterick, R.J. Characterization of the catalytic residues of the tobacco etch virus 49-kDa proteinase. Virology 1989, 172, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dujovny, G.; Sasaya, T.; Koganesawa, H.; Usugi, T.; Shohara, K.; Lenardon, S. Molecular characterization of a new potyvirus infecting sunflower. Arch. Virol. 2000, 145, 2249–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Atreya, C.; Raccah, B.; Pirone, T. A point mutation in the coat protein abolishes aphid transmissibility of a potyvirus. Virology 1990, 178, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ohshima, K.; Tomitaka, Y.; Wood, J.T.; Minematsu, Y.; Kajiyama, H.; Tomimura, K.; Gibbs, A.J. Patterns of recombination in Turnip mosaic virus genomic sequences indicate hotspots of recombination. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 298–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jenner, C.E.; Wang, X.; Tomimura, K.; Ohshima, K.; Ponz, F.; Walsh, J.A. The dual role of the potyvirus P3 protein of Turnip mosaic virus as a symptom and avirulence determinant in Brassicas. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Suehiro, N.; Natsuaki, T.; Watanabe, T.; Okuda, S. An important determinant of the ability of Turnip mosaic virus to infect Brassica spp. and/or Raphanus sativus is in its P3 protein. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 2087–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tan, Z.; Gibbs, A.J.; Tomitaka, Y.; Sánchez, F.; Ponz, F.; Ohshima, K. Mutations in Turnip mosaic virus genomes that have adapted to Raphanus sativus. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wei, T.; Zhang, C.; Hong, J.; Xiong, R.; Kasschau, K.D.; Zhou, X.; Carrington, J.C.; Wang, A. Formation of complexes at plasmodesmata for potyvirus intercellular movement is mediated by the viral protein P3N-PIPO. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tian, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, X.-D.; Guo, Z.; Valkonen, J. Genetic diversity of Potato virus Y infecting tobacco crops in China. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hillung, J.; Elena, S.F.; Cuevas, J.M. Intra-specific variability and biological relevance of P3N-PIPO protein length in potyviruses. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 249–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Geng, C.; Cong, Q.Q.; Li, X.D.; Mou, A.L.; Gao, R.; Liu, J.L.; Tian, Y.P. DEVELOPMENTALLY REGULATED PLASMA MEMBRANE PROTEIN of Nicotiana benthamiana contributes to potyvirus movement and transports to plasmodesmata via the early secretory pathway and the actomyosin system. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 394–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Choi, S.H.; Hagiwara-Komoda, Y.; Nakahara, K.S.; Atsumi, G.; Shimada, R.; Hisa, Y.; Naito, S.; Uyeda, I. Quantitative and qualitative involvement of P3N-PIPO in overcoming recessive resistance against Clover yellow vein virus in pea carrying the cyv1 Gene. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 7326–7337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Frohman, M.A. 5′-End cDNA amplification using classic RACE. CSH Protoc. 2005, 2006, 210–212. [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fuji, S.; Nakamae, H. Complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of a Japanese yam mosaic virus, a new potyvirus in Japan. Arch. Virol. 1999, 144, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Fuji, S.; Nakamae, H. Complete nucleotide sequence of the geonomic RNA of a mild strain of Japanese yam mosaic potyvirus. Rch. Virol. 2000, 145, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martin, D.P.; Lemey, P.; Lott, M.; Moulton, V.; Posada, D.; Lefeuvre, P. RDP3: A flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2462–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sawyer, S. GENECONV: A Computer Package for the Statistical Detection of Gene Conversion; Washington University: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  53. Salminen, M.O.; CARR, J.K.; BURKE, D.S.; McCutchan, F.E. Identification of breakpoints in intergenotypic recombinants of HIV type 1 by bootscanning. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 1995, 11, 1423–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Posada, D.; Crandall, K.A. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13757–13762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Smith, J.M. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J. Mol. Evol. 1992, 34, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Weiller, G.F. Phylogenetic profiles: A graphical method for detecting genetic recombinations in homologous sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gibbs, M.J.; Armstrong, J.S.; Gibbs, A.J. Sister-Scanning: A Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1586–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 00888 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of TuMV (Turnip mosaic virus) full genome cloning strategies. 5′-UTR = 5′-untranslated region; P1 = protein 1; HC-Pro = helper component proteinase; P3 = protein 3; PIPO = Pretty Interesting Potyviridae ORF; 6K1 = peptide 1; CI =cylindrical inclusion protein; 6K2 = peptide 2; VPg = viral genome-linked protein; NIa-Pro= nuclear inclusion a (proteinase); NIb = nuclear inclusion b (viral replicase); CP = coat protein; 3′-UTR = 3′-untranslated region.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of TuMV (Turnip mosaic virus) full genome cloning strategies. 5′-UTR = 5′-untranslated region; P1 = protein 1; HC-Pro = helper component proteinase; P3 = protein 3; PIPO = Pretty Interesting Potyviridae ORF; 6K1 = peptide 1; CI =cylindrical inclusion protein; 6K2 = peptide 2; VPg = viral genome-linked protein; NIa-Pro= nuclear inclusion a (proteinase); NIb = nuclear inclusion b (viral replicase); CP = coat protein; 3′-UTR = 3′-untranslated region.
Ijms 17 00888 g001
Ijms 17 00888 g002 1024
Figure 2. A maximum likelihood tree showing the relationships inferred from the complete genome sequences of 33 viruses of the TuMV group, together with those of isolates of JYMV as an outgroup (OGp). The branches are horizontal and show, for each genome, the codons at sites 852, 1006 and 1548, numbered as in the alignment used. Bootstrap values (%) more than 60 are listed; nodes with <50% bootstrap support have been collapsed. Isolates are indicated in the tree by isolate name/geographical origin/origin of host/pathotype. “-“ indicates the corresponding information is not available.
Figure 2. A maximum likelihood tree showing the relationships inferred from the complete genome sequences of 33 viruses of the TuMV group, together with those of isolates of JYMV as an outgroup (OGp). The branches are horizontal and show, for each genome, the codons at sites 852, 1006 and 1548, numbered as in the alignment used. Bootstrap values (%) more than 60 are listed; nodes with <50% bootstrap support have been collapsed. Isolates are indicated in the tree by isolate name/geographical origin/origin of host/pathotype. “-“ indicates the corresponding information is not available.
Ijms 17 00888 g002
Table
Table 1. Genome structure and nine putative protease cleavage sites in polyproteins of CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14.
Table 1. Genome structure and nine putative protease cleavage sites in polyproteins of CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14.
Region (Gene)Start–End SiteSize in nt/aaCleavage Site (C-Terminus)
5′-UTR1–129129/–
P1130–12151086/362Y/S
HC-Pro1216–25891374/458G/G
P32590–36541065/355Q/A
6K13655–3810156/52Q/T
CI3811–57421932/644Q/N
6K25743–5901159/53E/A
VPg5902–6477576/192E/S
NIa-Pro6478–7206729/243Q/T
NIb7207–87571551/517Q/A
CP8758–9621864/288-
3′-UTR9625–9833209/--
Table
Table 2. Highest identities of individual CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 genes with other TuMV isolates at nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) levels.
Table 2. Highest identities of individual CCLB, LWLB and WFLB14 genes with other TuMV isolates at nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) levels.
Region (Gene)CCLB LWLB WFLB14
Isolate Nament (%)aa (%)Isolate Nament (%)aa (%)Isolate Nament (%)aa (%)
P1Cal195.394.2Cal194.793.4Cal195.594.5
HC-ProDEU497.099.8DEU496.999.8DEU496.799.8
PIPOPV0104/DEU499.598.4PV0104/DEU499.598.4PV0104/DEU499.598.4
P3PV0104/DEU497.198.6PV0104/DEU496.998.6PV0104/DEU496.898.6
6K1PV0104/DEU499.4100.0PV0104/DEU498.1100.0PV0104/DEU499.4100.0
CIDEU498.799.8DEU498.699.8DEU498.399.8
6K2PV0104/DEU498.1100.0PV0104/DEU496.996.2Cal198.1100
NIa-VPgCal195.599.0Cal195.799.0Cal195.899.5
NIa-ProITA891.598.8ITA890.598.8ITA890.998.8
NIbUSA693.698.8USA693.398.6USA693.598.8
CPPV0104/DEU496.699.0PV0104/DEU496.599.0PV0104/DEU496.698.6
PolyproteinDEU494.998.1DEU494.697.9DEU494.798.0
Genome SequenceDEU495.0-DEU494.7-DEU494.8-
Table
Table 3. TuMV isolates analyzed in this study a.
Table 3. TuMV isolates analyzed in this study a.
Accession NumberIsolatesOriginal HostLocationPathotype bYear of Collection
AB0936222JBrassica pekinensisJapanBR1994
AB09362059JRaphanus sativusJapanBR1996
AB252097AD855JRaphanus sativusJapanBR2002
AB252099AKD161JRaphanus sativusJapanBR1998
AB252102AT181JEustoma russellianumJapanBR<1998
HQ446217BJ-C4cruciferous plantsChinaUnknown1985–1987
AB093601Cal1Calendula officinalisItalyBR1979
AB252103CH6Raphanus sativusChinaBR1999
AB252104CHK16Raphanus sativusChinaBR2000
AB252105CHL13Raphanus sativusChinaBR1999
AB093626CHN1Brassica sp.ChinaBR<1980
AB093614CP845JCalendula officinalisJapanBR1997
AB701701DEU4Lactuca sativaGermanyBR1986
AB093623DMJRaphanus sativusJapanBR1996
AB701705Eru1DEruca sativaItalyB1991
AB252109FKD001JRaphanus sativusJapanBR2000
AB701696GK1Matthiola incanaGreeceB<1989
AB252118H1JRaphanus sativusJapanBR1996
AB093627HRDRaphanus sativusChinaBR1998
AB093602IS1Allium ampeloprasumIsraelB1993
AB701721ITA2Cheiranthus cheiriItalyBR1992
AB701725ITA8Abutilon sp.ItalyBR1993
KM094174JPN 1Raphanus sativusJapanUnknown2014
AB093605KEN1Brassica oleraceaKenyaB1994
AB252124KWB778JBrassica oleraceaJapanB2004
AB252125KWB779JBrassica rapaJapanBR2004
AB252130ND10JRaphanus sativusJapanBR1998
AB701727NLD2Brassica oleraceaNetherlandsB<1995
AB701690OMOrchis militarisGermanyDI c1981
AB701691OMAOrchis militarisGermanyDI1981
AB701692ORMOrchis morioGermany(B)1983
AB701693OSOrchis simiaGermanyDI1981
AB093603PV0104Lactuca sativaGermanyBR1993
AY134473RC4Zantedeschia sp.ChinaBR2000
AB093615TD88JRaphanus sativusJapanBR1998
AB105134Tu-3Brassica oleraceaJapanBUnknown
AB362513TUR9Raphanus sativusTurkeyB(R)<2007
AF169561UK1Brassica napusUKB1975
AB701741USA6Raphanus sativusUSABR2002
EU734434WFLB06Raphanus sativusChinaBR2006
AF530055YC5Zantedeschia sp.ChinaBR2000
KF246570ZH1Phalaenopsis sp.ChinaUnknown2012
KR153038CCLBRaphanus sativusChinaUnknown2014
KR153039LWLBRaphanus sativusChinaUnknown2014
KR153040WFLB14Raphanus sativusChinaUnknown2014
a All the data were from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/); b Pathotype [B] isolates, infect most Brassica species systemically but do not infect Raphanus plants. Pathotype [(B)] isolates, infect Brassica plants latently and occasionally but not Raphanus plants. Pathotype [BR] isolates , infect both Brassica and Raphanus plants systemically. Pathotype [B(R)] isolates, infect most Brassica systemically and occasionally infect Raphanus plants latently; c DI, Difficult to infect brassica plants.
Table
Table 4. Recombination sites and possible parent-like isolates.
Table 4. Recombination sites and possible parent-like isolates.
IsolateRecombination Region“Parential-Like” IsolateType of “Recombinant”Recombination Detection
MajorMinorMethods *p-Value
CHN1nt 8872-9776 (5′-UTR-P1)CH62JAsian-BR × world-BRGCS1.334 × 10−8
ND10Jnt 143-723 (5′-UTR-P1)CH6KWB778JAsian-BR × world-BRGMCS31.410 × 10−14
nt 4598-5983 (VPg-CP)59JDMJAsian-BR × world-BRGBMCS31.608 × 10−25
nt 9133-9759 (VPg-CP)CH62JAsian-BR × world-BRGCS1.334 × 10−8
59Jnt 142-742 (HC-Pro-P3)CH6KWB778JAsian-BR × world-BRGMCS31.410 × 10−14
nt 9174-9759 (HC-Pro-P3)CH62JAsian-BR × world-BRGCS1.334 × 10−8
* The programs supporting recombination events. RGBMCS3 represent RDP, GENECONV, BootScan, MaxChi, Chimaera, SiScan and 3Seq, respectively. The program that had the greatest p-value is underlined.
Table
Table 5. The genetic distance of within and between populations and sub-populations.
Table 5. The genetic distance of within and between populations and sub-populations.
GroupOMsworld-BAsian-BRbasal-BRbasal-B
OMs0.003 ± 0.000
world-B0.278 ± 0.0050.042 ± 0.001
Asian-BR0.286 ± 0.0050.175 ± 0.0030.037 ± 0.001
basal-BR0.281 ± 0.0040.182 ± 0.0030.158 ± 0.0040.092 ± 0.002
basal-B0.283 ± 0.0050.219 ± 0.0040.222 ± 0.0040.217 ± 0.0030.185 ± 0.004
Table
Table 6. Nucleotide diversity of each coding gene of TuMV isolates collected from China and Japan.
Table 6. Nucleotide diversity of each coding gene of TuMV isolates collected from China and Japan.
Gene NameChinaJapan
dNdSdN/dSdNdSdN/dS
P10.097 (±0.009)0.519 (±0.039)0.1870.060 (±0.007)0.322 (±0.029)0.186
HC-Pro0.016 (±0.003)0.854 (±0.083)0.0190.015 (±0.003)0.716 (±0.094)0.021
P30.065 (±0.008)0.705 (±0.057)0.0920.064 (±0.007)0.519 (±0.055)0.123
P3N-PIPO0.055 (±0.009)0.594 (±0.067)0.0930.051 (±0.009)0.481 (±0.066)0.106
PIPO0.047 (±0.013)0.105 (±0.038)0.4480.050 (±0.016)0.133 (±0.045)0.375
6K10.015 (±0.008)0.769 (±0.151)0.0200.017 (±0.009)0.801 (±0.211)0.021
CI0.012 (±0.002)0.567 (±0.032)0.0210.011 (±0.002)0.413 (±0.034)0.027
6K20.048 (±0.015)0.546 (±0.104)0.0880.030 (±0.011)0.280 (±0.086)0.107
VPg0.042 (±0.008)0.614 (±0.069)0.0680.039 (±0.008)0.631 (±0.085)0.062
NIa-Pro0.013 (±0.003)0.618 (±0.058)0.0210.008 (±0.003)0.471 (±0.064)0.017
NIb0.013 (±0.003)0.451 (±0.032)0.0290.013 (±0.002)0.400 (±0.036)0.033
CP0.017 (±0.004)0.240 (±0.027)0.0710.012 (±0.003)0.175 (±0.024)0.069
Numbers in parenthesis represent standard deviation.
Table
Table 7. Primers used for amplifying the complete genomic sequences of TuMV.
Table 7. Primers used for amplifying the complete genomic sequences of TuMV.
PrimerSequence (5′→3′)
P1-FAAAAATATAAAAACTCAACACAACATACACAAAACGA
HC-RCTGTCGAAGCCTTTCCARAAGT
HC-FACTTYTGGAAAGGCTTCGACAG
P3-RCGCTGTATCTGCCGCCTAAATCG
P3-FCGATTTAGGCGGCAGATACAGCG
CI-RTCCYTCAAGCACTGATATGTTCTC
CI-FGAGAACATATCAGTGCTTGARGGA
NIb-RTCTTCYTTCATCTCRGGTGTGAACTC
NIb-FGAGTTCACACCYGAGATGAARGAAGA
UTR-RTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGTCCCTTGCATCCTATCAAATG
5′-RACE-QTCCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACGAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
5′-RACE-QOCCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACG
5′-RACE-QIGAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGC
GSPAGCTGCGGCTTCCCTGAGGCTA
NGSPTCCCAAATTGTACCATTCCGGTG
R = A, G; Y = C, T.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, F.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Pan, H.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J. Molecular Characterization of the Complete Genome of Three Basal-BR Isolates of Turnip mosaic virus Infecting Raphanus sativus in China. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060888

AMA Style

Zhu F, Sun Y, Wang Y, Pan H, Wang F, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Liu J. Molecular Characterization of the Complete Genome of Three Basal-BR Isolates of Turnip mosaic virus Infecting Raphanus sativus in China. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(6):888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060888

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Fuxiang, Ying Sun, Yan Wang, Hongyu Pan, Fengting Wang, Xianghui Zhang, Yanhua Zhang, and Jinliang Liu. 2016. "Molecular Characterization of the Complete Genome of Three Basal-BR Isolates of Turnip mosaic virus Infecting Raphanus sativus in China" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 6: 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060888

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop