Next Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Two Potential Probiotic Lactobacilli Strains and Evaluation of Their Performance as Starter Adjuncts in Yogurt Production
Previous Article in Journal
A Brief Review of Computer-Assisted Approaches to Rational Design of Peptide Vaccines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms17050669
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside as a Glycine N-Methyltransferase Enhancer by High-Throughput Screening of Natural Products Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma

by
Rajni Kant
1,2,†,
Chia-Hung Yen
2,3,4,5,†,
Chung-Kuang Lu
6,7,
Ying-Chi Lin
8,9,
Jih-Heng Li
8,9 and
Yi-Ming Arthur Chen
2,10,11,*
1
Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
2
Center for Infectious Disease and Cancer Research (CICAR), Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
3
Graduate Institute of Natural Products, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
4
Lipid Science and Aging Research Center (CHY), Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
5
Research Center for natural products and Drug Development (CHY), Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
6
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
7
Department of Life Sciences and Institute of Genome Sciences, College of Life Science, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
8
School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
9
Ph.D. Program in Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
10
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
11
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research and Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(5), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050669
Submission received: 1 April 2016 / Revised: 25 April 2016 / Accepted: 25 April 2016 / Published: 4 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) expression is vastly downregulated in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). High rates of GNMT knockout mice developed HCC, while overexpression of GNMT prevented aflatoxin-induced carcinogenicity and inhibited liver cancer cell proliferation. Therefore, in this study, we aimed for the identification of a GNMT inducer for HCC therapy. We established a GNMT promoter-driven luciferase reporter assay as a drug screening platform. Screening of 324 pure compounds and 480 crude extracts from Chinese medicinal herbs resulted in the identification of Paeonia lactiflora Pall (PL) extract and the active component 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (PGG) as a GNMT inducer. Purified PL extract and PGG induced GNMT mRNA and protein expression in Huh7 human hepatoma cells and in xenograft tumors. PGG and PL extract had potent anti-HCC effects both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, PGG treatment induced apoptosis in Huh7 cells. Moreover, PGG treatment sensitized Huh7 cells to sorafenib treatment. Therefore, these results indicated that identifying a GNMT enhancer using the GNMT promoter-based assay might be a useful approach to find drugs for HCC. These data also suggested that PGG has therapeutic potential for the treatment of HCC.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies and deadliest cancers [1,2]. To date, only sorafenib has been approved for the treatment of HCC [3,4]. However, it has side effects, and patients quickly develop resistance to it [5,6]. Therefore, there is an unmet need for more effective drugs for HCC [7].
Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) possesses a tumor suppressive effect against HCC [8,9]. GNMT has protective effects against exposure to various carcinogens, including aflatoxins and polyaromatic hydrocarbons [10,11]. It is downregulated in the tumorous tissues of >80% HCC patients, as well as in the livers of cirrhotic patients who were at risk of developing HCC [12,13]. Furthermore, GNMT is downregulated in the liver tissues of nonalcoholic fatty liver (NFLD) patients and dietary rodent models of NFLD [14]. In addition, high rates of both genders of Gnmt knockout mice developed HCC spontaneously [8,15]. However, transgenic mice with human GNMT overexpression in their livers resisted aflatoxin B1-induced liver tumorigenesis [10]. Moreover, recent studies have shown that overexpression of GNMT inhibits cancer cell proliferation [16,17]. Therefore, we hypothesized that enhancement of GNMT expression would have a beneficial therapeutic effect on HCC.
Natural products have been regarded as an unlimited resource for drug discovery [18]. It has been estimated that up to 1990, nearly 80% of drugs were either natural products or their analogs [19]. Among natural products, traditional Chinese medicine has a unique position, since it represents a wide diversity of plants that has been used by human beings for a long period of time [20]. Here, we developed a GNMT promoter reporter assay and used it to screen a Chinese medicinal drug library. PGG was identified as a GNMT inducer from the extract of Paeonia lactiflora Pall (PL). We further characterized the inhibitory function of PGG on HCC both in vitro and in vivo.

2. Results

2.1. Establishment of Drug Screening Platform and Identification of Paeonia lactiflora Pall Extract as a Glycine N-Methyltransferase (GNMT) Inducer

To identify the GNMT inducer, we established a GNMT promoter-driven firefly luciferase reporter stable cell line, the Huh7 GNMT promoter-luciferase (H7GPL) cell. Basal luciferase activity measured in H7GPL cells confirmed the presence of the reporter fragment (Figure 1a). We tested 26 drugs that can reverse the gene signatures of HCC [21] and found that 23% (6/26) of the tested drugs enhance GNMT promoter activity (Supplementary Table S1). Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) was shown to be a potent GNMT inducer (Supplementary Table S1). We further evaluated the qualification of H7GPL cells as a drug screening platform with SAHA. H7GPL cells responded to SAHA dose-dependently and showed a small inter-well variation in a 96-well format (Figure 1b). Statistical parameters associated with the quality of the platform, such as signal-to-background (S/B) ratio (22.5), signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio (278) and Z’ factor (0.79), indicated that our platform met the acceptance criteria for high-throughput screening.
The library consisting of 324 pure compounds and 480 crude extracts from Chinese medicinal herbs was used for screening. The screening flowchart is described in the supplementary data (Supplementary Figure S1). We identified the extract of Paeonia lactiflora Pall (PL) as the highest inducer of GNMT promoter activity (Figure 1c–e).

2.2. The Anti-Hepatocellular Carcinomas (HCC) Effect of Paeonia lactiflora (PL) Extract-Derived Bioactive Fraction

Bioassay-guided fractionation was used to identify the active fractions and the effective compound in PL extract. Fraction F3-6 was the most potent fraction (Figure 2a) and induced GNMT promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2b). Moreover, F3-6 upregulated endogenous GNMT expression at mRNA and protein levels in Huh7 cells (Figure 2c). F3-6 inhibited the proliferation of Huh7 cells dose dependently (Figure 2d). Importantly, results from the xenograft assay showed that F3-6 delayed and reduced the incidence of tumor formation in mice (Figure 2e). The control group mice began to develop tumors at 20 days after they were inoculated with Huh7 cells, and 80% (8/10) of mice developed tumors within eight weeks. In contrast, it took 30 days for the first mice in the 25 mpk (mg per kg of body weight) F3-6-treated group to develop tumors, and the incidence reduced to 33% (3/9). Furthermore, no tumor was observed in mice treated with F3-6 at a dosage of 300 mpk during the experiment period (Figure 2e). Moreover, compared to the vehicle control group, the average size of the tumors in the F3-6 (25 mpk)-treated group decreased remarkably with an elevated mRNA level of GNMT (Figure 2f,g).

2.3. 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (PGG), the Active Component in F3-6, Inhibits Liver Cancer Cells’ Growth both in Vitro and in Vivo

The F3-6 fraction was further purified by HPLC and 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (PGG, purity >98%) was identified as the active component in fraction F3-6 (Figure 3a and Supplementary Figure S2). PGG is a hydrolysable tannin composed of glucose and gallic acid. As shown in Figure 3b, PGG either purified from F3-6 or purchased from Sigma induced GNMT promoter activity, while neither glucose nor gallic acid showed similar effects as PGG. Furthermore, PGG induced GNMT mRNA, as well as protein expression in Huh7 cells (Figure 3c). Next, we analyzed the effect of PGG on cell proliferation in different liver cancer cell lines, including Huh7, Hep 3B, SK-HEP-1, Mahlavu and Hep G2. Results showed that PGG inhibited the proliferation of all tested liver cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3d). Furthermore, PGG reduced the colony formation of Huh7 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3e,f). Finally, a significant suppression of xenograft tumor growth was observed in the PGG-treated mice compared to vehicle control (Figure 3g). Finally, qPCR and immunoblot analysis of tumor samples revealed that GNMT was induced in the PGG-treated group (Figure 3h).

2.4. PGG Treatment Induces Apoptosis in Huh7 Cells

Next, we explored the mechanism by which PGG inhibits liver cancer cell proliferation. Treatment of Huh7 cells with PGG for 24 h resulted in significant increases in the sub-G1 population (Figure 4a,b), as well as Annexin-V-positive cells (Figure 4c,d), indicating that PGG could induce apoptosis. Consistent with these findings, a five-fold increase in caspase 3/7 activity was observed in Huh7 cells after 12 h of PGG treatment (Figure 4e). Immunoblot further confirmed that PGG treatment increased the level of cleaved caspase 3 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4f). Taken together, PGG caused apoptosis in Huh7 cells.

2.5. PGG Sensitizes Huh7 Cells to Sorafenib Treatment

To date, sorafenib is considered the drug of choice for HCC, but its effectiveness is limited, and its side effects are still a major concern [6]. Moreover, ongoing studies are seeking to increase the efficacy of sorafenib by combining it with other drugs or therapeutic interventions. Therefore, we investigated whether PGG treatment can sensitize hepatoma cells to sorafenib treatment. As shown in Figure 5, co-exposure with PGG significantly enhanced the effect of sorafenib on the viability of Huh7 cells.

3. Discussion

GNMT has a tumor suppressive role in HCC [9]. It is highly abundant in normal hepatocytes, but is barely detectable in HCC [22]. It has been shown that restoration of GNMT in HCC cell lines results in repression of cell proliferation and tumor growth [16]. In this study, we developed a GNMT-oriented drug screening platform to identify potential drug candidates for HCC. We tested 26 drugs previously reported to reverse the gene expression signature of HCC [21]. Six compounds (23%) were identified as capable of increasing GNMT promoter activity. Most of them have never been reported as enhancers of GNMT. We reasoned that our GNMT-based approach could be useful in discovering potential drugs for HCC. Subsequently, we used such an assay to screen a traditional Chinese medicine drug library and identified PGG from the extracts of Paeonia lactiflora Pall having an anti-HCC effect in vitro and in vivo.
The Paeonia lactiflora Pall root, a famous traditional Chinese medicine, has been used for the treatment of hepatic diseases for years [23]. Here, we showed that PGG purified from Paeonia lactiflora Pall sensitizes Huh7 cells to sorafenib treatment. Sorafenib is the only oral-administrated drug approved for advanced HCC, while concerns, including the efficacy, adverse effects and drug resistance, have been raised [5,6]. The combination of herbal medicines or natural products with conventional anti-cancer agents has been shown to produce beneficial effects [24]. Thus, it is worthy to further evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib in combination with PL extract or PGG for HCC treatment in more models or clinically.
PGG is a natural product that exhibits multiple pharmacological activities, including anti-cancer effects on different types of cancers [25]. Oh et al. [26] showed that PGG induces G0/G1 phase arrest and inhibits NF-κB in SK-HEP-1 cells. Yin et al. [27] demonstrated that PGG induces senescence-like S-phase arrest in hepatoma and breast cancer cells. Dong et al. [28] reported that PGG induces autophagy-mediated senescence-like arrest in liver, breast and lung cancer cells. In the present study, PGG was found to be a GNMT gene expression inducer for the first time. The mechanism of GNMT promoter induction by PGG needs further study.
Several reports on the safety of PGG have been published [25]. We tested the safety of PGG supplementation in C57BL/6 mice for 28 days. PGG was well tolerated; no significant weight loss and organ damage were observed in tested mice (Supplementary Figure S3). Moreover, the Ames test showed that PGG was not mutagenic both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). Furthermore, its anti-mutagenic activity was reported previously. All of these results supported the safety of PGG in clinical use as a single treatment or adjuvant therapy.
GNMT is highly downregulated in HCC, and the downregulation mechanism is still not clear [9]. Huidobro et al. [29] have reported that DNA methylation contributes to the gene repression of GNMT in HCC. However, in their report, the demethylating agent (AdC) did not show notable induction in GNMT mRNA expression in HCC cells (<1.5-fold induction). Histone deacetylation is known as one of the mechanisms for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer [30]. Our results showed that histone deacetylase inhibitors SAHA, as well as trichostatin A (TSA) remarkably induced GNMT promoter activity [31]. Moreover, we found a three-fold induction in GNMT mRNA expression in TSA-treated Huh7 cells (Supplementary Figure S4). For the first time, our data related histone deacetylation to inactivation of GNMT in HCC. Moreover, identifying PGG’s enhancement mechanism might help us to understand the pathways involved in GNMT downregulations. The possible mechanism underlying GNMT induction by PGG is under investigation.
In summary, we established and evaluated a GNMT promoter-driven drug screening assay as a valuable platform for high throughput screening of compounds for the treatment of HCC. Importantly, we revealed a novel bioactivity of PGG, which has been reported to possess anti-HCC properties, as a GNMT enhancer. Results suggested that GNMT induction by PGG treatment may play an important role in the anti-HCC activities of PGG. Thus, studies of PGG and its effect on GNMT expression in HCC will require further investigation. Furthermore, our result is the first, to our knowledge, to report that the combination of PGG with sorafenib inhibited Huh7 cell growth to a greater extent than either component alone. These data indicate a potential application of a novel combination in the future treatment of HCC. Moreover, this study, for the first time, linked histone deacetylation to GNMT promoter activity and provided important insight for understanding the mechanism of GNMT downregulation in HCC.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

Human liver cancer cell lines Huh7, Hep G2, Hep 3B, SK-HEP-1, Mahlavu and embryonic kidney cell line HEK-293T all were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), nonessential amino acids (0.1 mM/L) and l-glutamine (2 mM/L) in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Stable cells established by lentiviral-system H7GPL were grown in DMEM supplemented with 1 μg/mL puromycin.

4.2. Plasmids and Transfections

Plasmids for lentivirus production (pCMV-ΔR8.91, pMD.G and pLKO.1) were obtained from the National RNAi Core Facility (Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan). The −1812/+14 GNMT promoter-luciferase plasmid was constructed in our previous study [32]. For transfection, cells were plated to 70%–90% confluence, and plasmid DNAs were transfected by using TurboFect Reagent (Fermentas, Hanover, MD, USA). All transfections were performed according to the manufacturer recommendation.

4.3. Development of GNMT Expression-Oriented Drug Screening Platform

The plasmid-pLKO.1 was purchased from RNAi Core (Academia Sinica). The U6 promoter fragment located within the ClaI and EcoRI site of pLKO.1 was replaced by a ClaI-BamHI-EcoRI (CBE) linker. The CBE linker was generated by annealing two oligonucleotides: 5′-CGATATCGGATCCGTCGACG-3′ and 5′-AATTCGTCGACGGATCCGATAT-3′. The resultant double-stranded DNA fragment contained a 5′ overhang end of ClaI followed by an EcoRV site, a BamHI site, a SalI site and a 5′ overhang end of EcoRI. The CBE linker was ligated to ClaI and EcoRI digested pLKO.1 vector to generate pLV-CBE plasmid. A ~4 kilobase (kb) fragment containing a synthetic poly(A) signal element (from the pGL3 promoter vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA)), the GNMT promoter, the firefly luciferase reporter gene and Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40) late poly(A) signal elements were generated by digesting −1812/+14 GNMT promoter-luciferase plasmid with SspI and SalI. The resulting fragment was ligated into EcoRV and SalI digested pLV-CBE plasmid. The resultant plasmid was designated as pLV-GNMTpLuc and was used for lentivirus production. In brief, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with a packaging plasmid-pCMV-ΔR8.91, a VSV-G envelope-expressing plasmid-pMD.G and pLV-GNMTpLuc using TurboFect™ Reagent (Fermentas). Supernatant containing lentiviruses was harvested according to the protocol published on the website (http://rnai.genmed.sinica.edu.tw/). Huh7 cells were infected with this virus and selected with puromycin-containing medium. One resultant colony was picked, amplified and denominated as H7GPL (Huh7 GNMT promoter-luciferase). The cell lysate of H7GPL was used for luciferase activity measurement using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega). To determine the quality of the platform for drug screening, the promoter activities were used to calculate the statistical parameters, such as the signal-to-background (S/B) ratio, the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio and the value of the Z’ factor according to the equations published by Zhang et al. [33]. H7GPL cells were used to screen the traditional Chinese medicinal drug library from the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine as detailed in the supplementary methods.

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

RNA was prepared by using Tri Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Super Script II Reverse Transcriptase Kit (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR was performed on an ABI StepOne Plus System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the LightCycler® First Start DNA Master SYBR Green I reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The mRNA level was normalized using the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) mRNA level as the standard. The following primers were used: GNMT forward, 5′-ACTGGATGACTCTGGACAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-ACTGAGGATGTGGTCGT-3′; TBP forward, 5′-TGCACAGGAGCCAAGAGTGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CACATCACAGCTCCCCACCA-3′.

4.5. Immunoblotting

Cells or xenograft tumors were harvested with RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM Phenylmethanesulfonyl Fluoride (PMSF), 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 50 μg/mL Tosyllysine Chloromethyl Ketone (TLCK), 50 μg/mL Tosyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), 1 μg/mL aprotinin, 1 mM sodium fluoride (NaF), 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate (NaPPi) and 10 mM sodium orthovanadate (Na3VO4). Protein lysates were quantified and separated on SDS–PAGE gel, and immunoblotting was carried out as described previously [16]. The following antibodies were used: anti-GNMT (14-1, YMAC Bio Tech, Taiwan), anti-caspase-3 (9H19L2, Thermo Scientific) and anti-β-actin (AC-15, Sigma-Aldrich).

4.6. Cell Viability and Colony Formation Assay

AlamarBlue® assay (AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA) was used to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of the tested drugs according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. For the colony assay, Huh7 cells were seeded (1 × 104 cells/well) in 6-well plates. After an overnight incubation, cells were treated with drugs at the specified concentrations for 7 days. Numbers of surviving colonies were analyzed through the crystal violet staining method [34]. Colonies were quantified by OpenCFU colony counting software (http://opencfu.sourceforge).

4.7. Flow Cytometry

Cells were harvested and fixed with cold 75% ethanol overnight and stained with propidium iodide (10 μg/mL) and RNase A (1 mg/mL) at 37 °C for 30 min. The cells were then analyzed by an Accuri C6 Flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Cells were stained for Annexin V according to the manufacturer’s protocol (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed by an Accuri C6 Flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

4.8. Caspase 3/7 Activity Assay

Huh7 cells were plated in 96-well plate and treated with solvent or PGG for 12 h. To measure caspase-3 and caspase-7 activation, the Apo-ONE® Homogeneous Caspase-3/7 assay was performed according to the Promega Technical Bulletin-Apo-ONE® Homogeneous Caspase-3/7 assay.

4.9. In Vivo Tumor Models

All animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kaohsiung Medical University (city, country) and performed in accordance with relevant guidelines. For the tumor incidence assay, 5–6-week-old female nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD-SCID) mice were subcutaneously injected with Huh7 cells (1 × 106) in the right flank. Five days after transplantation, mice were randomly divided into 3 groups and were treated with F3-6 (25 mg/kg (mpk) by i.p injection and 300 mpk by oral administration) and vehicle three times per week for 53 days. To test the antitumor effect of PGG in vivo, Huh7 cells (2 × 106) were implanted subcutaneously into Balb/c nude mice as described above. Upon detection of palpable tumor, mice were randomly grouped and treated with PGG and drug vehicle orally every day for 10 days. Tumor growth was monitored (every day or three times per week) by using Vernier caliper measurement of the length (L) and width (W) of the tumor. Tumor volume (TV) was calculated by using the formula volume = (L × W2)/2. F3-6 was dissolved in PBS, PGG was dissolved in PBS or 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using MS excel and GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Cumulative tumor incidence curves were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. p-values were calculated using the unpaired two-sided Student’s t-test to compare groups, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/5/669/s1.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine for providing the drug library, Marcelo Chen for revising the English writing and the staff from the Center of Infectious Disease and Cancer Research (CICAR) of Kaohsiung Medical University for technical assistance. This work was supported by the National Research Program for Biopharmaceuticals grant (MOST 104-2325-B-037-002), the Program to Upgrade the R&D Capabilities of Private Universities grant (MOST104-2632-B-037-001) and grant (MOST104-2320-B-037-031-MY3) from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan. This study was supported partially by the National Health Research Institutes grant (NHRI-104A1-PDCO-0315162), Kaohsiung Medical University “Aim for the Top Universities Grant, Grant Nos. KMU-TP104E11, KMU-TP104E14, KMU-TP104E37, KMU-TP104D07 and KMU-TP104H05”, “Aim for the Top Journals Grant”, Grant No. KMU-DT105004, and Ministry of Health and Welfare grant (MOHW104-TDL-B-212-124-003), Taiwan.

Author Contributions

These studies were conceived of and designed by Rajni Kant, Chia-Hung Yen and Yi-Ming Arthur Chen. Whole experiments were performed by Rajni Kant with help from Chia-Hung Yen. Chung-Kuang Lu contributed to the isolation and purification part, and the Ames test was performed by Ying-Chi Lin and Jih-Heng Li. Data analysis, interpretation and paper writing were done by Rajni Kant and Chia-Hung Yen.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

GNMTglycine N-methyltransferase
HCChepatocellular carcinomas
PLPaeonia lactiflora Pall
PGG1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside
NFLDnonalcoholic fatty liver
qPCRquantitative real-time PCR
SAHAsuberoylanilide hydroxamic acid
TSAtrichostatin A
S/Bsignal-to-background
S/Nsignal-to-noise
mpkmg per kg of body weight

References

  1. Forner, A.; Llovet, J.M.; Bruix, J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2012, 379, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ferlay, J.; Shin, H.R.; Bray, F.; Forman, D.; Mathers, C.; Parkin, D.M. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: Globocan 2008. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2893–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Llovet, J.M.; Ricci, S.; Mazzaferro, V.; Hilgard, P.; Gane, E.; Blanc, J.F.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Santoro, A.; Raoul, J.L.; Forner, A.; et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cervello, M.; McCubrey, J.A.; Cusimano, A.; Lampiasi, N.; Azzolina, A.; Montalto, G. Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Novel agents on the horizon. Oncotarget 2012, 3, 236–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Berasain, C. Hepatocellular carcinoma and sorafenib: Too many resistance mechanisms? Gut 2013, 62, 1674–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kalyan, A.; Nimeiri, H.; Kulik, L. Systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: Current and promising. Clin. Liver Dis. 2015, 19, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Scudellari, M. Drug development: Try and try again. Nature 2014, 516, S4–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liao, Y.J.; Liu, S.P.; Lee, C.M.; Yen, C.H.; Chuang, P.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Tsai, T.F.; Huang, S.F.; Lee, Y.H.; Chen, Y.M. Characterization of a glycine N-methyltransferase gene knockout mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma: Implications of the gender disparity in liver cancer susceptibility. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yen, C.H.; Lin, Y.T.; Chen, H.L.; Chen, S.Y.; Chen, Y.M. The multi-functional roles of GNMT in toxicology and cancer. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 266, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yen, C.H.; Hung, J.H.; Ueng, Y.F.; Liu, S.P.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, H.H.; Chou, T.Y.; Tsai, T.F.; Darbha, R.; Hsieh, L.L.; et al. Glycine N-methyltransferase affects the metabolism of aflatoxin B1 and blocks its carcinogenic effect. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 235, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, S.Y.; Lin, J.R.; Darbha, R.; Lin, P.; Liu, T.Y.; Chen, Y.M. Glycine N-methyltransferase tumor susceptibility gene in the benzo(a)pyrene-detoxification pathway. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 3617–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, Y.M.; Shiu, J.Y.; Tzeng, S.J.; Shih, L.S.; Chen, Y.J.; Lui, W.Y.; Chen, P.H. Characterization of glycine-N-methyltransferase-gene expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 75, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Avila, M.A.; Berasain, C.; Torres, L.; Martin-Duce, A.; Corrales, F.J.; Yang, H.; Prieto, J.; Lu, S.C.; Caballeria, J.; Rodes, J.; et al. Reduced mRNA abundance of the main enzymes involved in methionine metabolism in human liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2000, 33, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liao, Y.J.; Chen, T.L.; Lee, T.S.; Wang, H.A.; Wang, C.K.; Liao, L.Y.; Liu, R.S.; Huang, S.F.; Chen, Y.M. Glycine N-methyltransferase deficiency affects Niemann-Pick type C2 protein stability and regulates hepatic cholesterol homeostasis. Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Martinez-Chantar, M.L.; Vazquez-Chantada, M.; Ariz, U.; Martinez, N.; Varela, M.; Luka, Z.; Capdevila, A.; Rodriguez, J.; Aransay, A.M.; Matthiesen, R.; et al. Loss of the glycine N-methyltransferase gene leads to steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yen, C.H.; Lu, Y.C.; Li, C.H.; Lee, C.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Cheng, M.Y.; Huang, S.F.; Chen, K.F.; Cheng, A.L.; Liao, L.Y.; et al. Functional characterization of glycine N-methyltransferase and its interactive protein DEPDC6/DEPTOR in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. DebRoy, S.; Kramarenko, I.I.; Ghose, S.; Oleinik, N.V.; Krupenko, S.A.; Krupenko, N.I. A novel tumor suppressor function of glycine N-methyltransferase is independent of its catalytic activity but requires nuclear localization. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kingston, D.G. Modern natural products drug discovery and its relevance to biodiversity conservation. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 496–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Graziose, R.; Lila, M.A.; Raskin, I. Merging traditional chinese medicine with modern drug discovery technologies to find novel drugs and functional foods. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2010, 7, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chen, M.H.; Yang, W.L.; Lin, K.T.; Liu, C.H.; Liu, Y.W.; Huang, K.W.; Chang, P.M.; Lai, J.M.; Hsu, C.N.; Chao, K.M.; et al. Gene expression-based chemical genomics identifies potential therapeutic drugs in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Luka, Z.; Mudd, S.H.; Wagner, C. Glycine N-methyltransferase and regulation of S-adenosylmethionine levels. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 22507–22511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, Y.; Ma, X.; Wang, J.; Wen, R.; Jia, L.; Zhu, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, R.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; et al. Large dose means significant effect—Dose and effect relationship of Chi-Dan-Tui-Huang decoction on α-naphthylisothiocyanate-induced cholestatic hepatitis in rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, L.; Leung, P.S. Use of herbal medicines and natural products: An alternative approach to overcoming the apoptotic resistance of pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 53, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Kim, S.H.; Hagerman, A.E.; Lu, J. Anti-cancer, anti-diabetic and other pharmacologic and biological activities of penta-galloyl-glucose. Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 2066–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Oh, G.S.; Pae, H.O.; Oh, H.; Hong, S.G.; Kim, I.K.; Chai, K.Y.; Yun, Y.G.; Kwon, T.O.; Chung, H.T. In vitro anti-proliferative effect of 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose on human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, SK-HEP-1 cells. Cancer Lett. 2001, 174, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, S.; Dong, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, J.; Hu, H. Penta-1,2,3,4,6-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose induces senescence-like terminal S-phase arrest in human hepatoma and breast cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2011, 50, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dong, Y.; Yin, S.; Jiang, C.; Luo, X.; Guo, X.; Zhao, C.; Fan, L.; Meng, Y.; Lu, J.; Song, X.; et al. Involvement of autophagy induction in penta-1,2,3,4,6-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose-induced senescence-like growth arrest in human cancer cells. Autophagy 2014, 10, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Huidobro, C.; Torano, E.G.; Fernandez, A.F.; Urdinguio, R.G.; Rodriguez, R.M.; Ferrero, C.; Martinez-Camblor, P.; Boix, L.; Bruix, J.; Garcia-Rodriguez, J.L.; et al. A DNA methylation signature associated with the epigenetic repression of glycine N-methyltransferase in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 91, 939–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ropero, S.; Esteller, M. The role of histone deacetylases (HDACS) in human cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2007, 1, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Giannini, G.; Cabri, W.; Fattorusso, C.; Rodriquez, M. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer: Overview and perspectives. Future Med. Chem. 2012, 4, 1439–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, C.M.; Shih, Y.P.; Wu, C.H.; Chen, Y.M. Characterization of the 5′ regulatory region of the human glycine N-methyltransferase gene. Gene 2009, 443, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, J.H.; Chung, T.D.; Oldenburg, K.R. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 1999, 4, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, G.G.; Li, W.H.; He, W.G.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, G.X.; Chen, W.; Yang, H.F.; Liu, Q.L.; Huang, Y.N.; Zhang, L.; et al. MiR-184 post-transcriptionally regulates SOX7 expression and promotes cell proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Malo, N.; Hanley, J.A.; Cerquozzi, S.; Pelletier, J.; Nadon, R. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nishizawa, M.; Yamagishi, T.; Nonaka, G.; Nishioka, I.; Nagasawa, T.; Oura, H. Tannins and related compounds. XII. Isolation and characterization of galloylglucoses from paeoniae radix and their effects on urea-nitrogen concentration in rat serum. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31, 2593–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kiss, A.K.; Derwinska, M.; Dawidowska, A.; Naruszewicz, M. Novel biological properties of oenothera paradoxa defatted seed extracts: Effects on metallopeptidase activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7845–7852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Maron, D.M.; Ames, B.N. Revised methods for the salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res./Environ. Mutagen. Relat. Subj. 1983, 113, 173–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Test No. 471: Bacterial reverse mutation test. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4: Health Effects; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2014.
Ijms 17 00669 g001 1024
Figure 1. Establishment of a drug screening platform for high-throughput screening. (a) Huh7 GNMT promoter-luciferase (H7GPL) stable clone and parental human hepatoma Huh7 cells were harvested for luciferase activity measurement. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (b) Well-to-well reproducibility (n = 10) and dose response of Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) promoter activity in H7GPL cells treated with Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Relative luciferase activity was calculated by normalizing luciferase activity to cell viability and presented as the fold to control after 24 h of drug treatment; (c) Primary screening plot shows the distribution of the Z score; the dashed line shows the cut off value (Z score > 1.5), and dots above this line represent hits; (d) XY-scatter plot of relative promoter activity illustrating the compounds that increased GNMT promoter reporter expression in the secondary screen. The cell viability was used to normalize the reporter activity and plotted as the fold to control. The “relative promoter activity Plate 1” and “Relative promoter activity Plate 2” represent the fold change for the two independent replicates of the screen. Dashed lines show the cut off value (fold change > 1.5), and dots above this line in both replicates were considered as hits; (e) H7GPL cells were treated with indicated concentrations of PL extract. After 24 h, the relative luciferase activity was determined as described above. The graph shows the means ± SD (n = 3). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 1. Establishment of a drug screening platform for high-throughput screening. (a) Huh7 GNMT promoter-luciferase (H7GPL) stable clone and parental human hepatoma Huh7 cells were harvested for luciferase activity measurement. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (b) Well-to-well reproducibility (n = 10) and dose response of Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) promoter activity in H7GPL cells treated with Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Relative luciferase activity was calculated by normalizing luciferase activity to cell viability and presented as the fold to control after 24 h of drug treatment; (c) Primary screening plot shows the distribution of the Z score; the dashed line shows the cut off value (Z score > 1.5), and dots above this line represent hits; (d) XY-scatter plot of relative promoter activity illustrating the compounds that increased GNMT promoter reporter expression in the secondary screen. The cell viability was used to normalize the reporter activity and plotted as the fold to control. The “relative promoter activity Plate 1” and “Relative promoter activity Plate 2” represent the fold change for the two independent replicates of the screen. Dashed lines show the cut off value (fold change > 1.5), and dots above this line in both replicates were considered as hits; (e) H7GPL cells were treated with indicated concentrations of PL extract. After 24 h, the relative luciferase activity was determined as described above. The graph shows the means ± SD (n = 3). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).
Ijms 17 00669 g001
Ijms 17 00669 g002 1024
Figure 2. Partially-purified fraction Fraction F3-6 enhances GNMT gene expression and inhibits Huh7 cell growth. (a) Effect of PL extracts (0.1 mg/mL) and (b) indicated concentrations of F3-6 on GNMT promoter expression in H7GPL cells after 24 h of treatment. Relative luciferase activity was calculated and presented as mentioned in the Materials and Methods. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (c) Effect of F3-6 (0.1 mg/mL) on GNMT mRNA (left panel) and protein expression (right panel) in Huh7 cells after 24 h of treatment. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (d) The cell viability of Huh7 cells was analyzed after F3-6 treatment for 72 h, and cell viability was determined by the alamarBlue® viability assay. The percentages of viable cells compared to the solvent control are plotted. Results are means ± SD (n = 3); (e) The overall tumor incidence curve of Huh7-implanted mice treated with F3-6 and vehicle control. The number of mice having a tumor at any given time point shown below; (f) Average tumor volume of each group at sacrifice. Columns, mean tumor volume for each group; bars, SE; (g) GNMT mRNA expression in tumors. The graph shows the means ± SE (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 2. Partially-purified fraction Fraction F3-6 enhances GNMT gene expression and inhibits Huh7 cell growth. (a) Effect of PL extracts (0.1 mg/mL) and (b) indicated concentrations of F3-6 on GNMT promoter expression in H7GPL cells after 24 h of treatment. Relative luciferase activity was calculated and presented as mentioned in the Materials and Methods. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (c) Effect of F3-6 (0.1 mg/mL) on GNMT mRNA (left panel) and protein expression (right panel) in Huh7 cells after 24 h of treatment. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (d) The cell viability of Huh7 cells was analyzed after F3-6 treatment for 72 h, and cell viability was determined by the alamarBlue® viability assay. The percentages of viable cells compared to the solvent control are plotted. Results are means ± SD (n = 3); (e) The overall tumor incidence curve of Huh7-implanted mice treated with F3-6 and vehicle control. The number of mice having a tumor at any given time point shown below; (f) Average tumor volume of each group at sacrifice. Columns, mean tumor volume for each group; bars, SE; (g) GNMT mRNA expression in tumors. The graph shows the means ± SE (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Ijms 17 00669 g002
Ijms 17 00669 g003 1024
Figure 3. Effect of PGG treatment on liver cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. (a) Chemical structure of PGG; (b) Effect of indicated compounds (0.1 mg/mL) on GNMT promoter expression in H7GPL cells after 24 h of treatment. Data are presented as the fold to solvent control. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (c) Endogenous GNMT mRNA (left panel) and protein level (right panel) in PGG (0.1 mg/mL)-treated Huh7 cells. The graph shows the means ± SD (n = 3); (d) Dose response viability curve of indicated liver cancer cell lines treated with PGG for 72 h. The percentages of viable cells compared to the solvent control are plotted. IC50 values of PGG in each cell line are shown. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (e) Long-term effect of PGG on Huh7 growth was determined by the colony formation assay (representative image); (f) The graph shows the quantification of colony numbers in (e). Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (g) Growth curves of Huh7 xenograft tumors in mice treated with PGG and vehicle control. Error bars represent the SE (n = 5); (h) GNMT mRNA (upper panel) and protein expression in tumor samples (lower panel) SE (n = 3). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 3. Effect of PGG treatment on liver cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. (a) Chemical structure of PGG; (b) Effect of indicated compounds (0.1 mg/mL) on GNMT promoter expression in H7GPL cells after 24 h of treatment. Data are presented as the fold to solvent control. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (c) Endogenous GNMT mRNA (left panel) and protein level (right panel) in PGG (0.1 mg/mL)-treated Huh7 cells. The graph shows the means ± SD (n = 3); (d) Dose response viability curve of indicated liver cancer cell lines treated with PGG for 72 h. The percentages of viable cells compared to the solvent control are plotted. IC50 values of PGG in each cell line are shown. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (e) Long-term effect of PGG on Huh7 growth was determined by the colony formation assay (representative image); (f) The graph shows the quantification of colony numbers in (e). Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (g) Growth curves of Huh7 xenograft tumors in mice treated with PGG and vehicle control. Error bars represent the SE (n = 5); (h) GNMT mRNA (upper panel) and protein expression in tumor samples (lower panel) SE (n = 3). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
Ijms 17 00669 g003
Ijms 17 00669 g004 1024
Figure 4. PGG treatment induces apoptosis in Huh7 cells. (a) Huh7 cells were harvested for PI staining and flow cytometry analysis after 24 h of PGG (0.1 mg/mL) treatment; (b) The quantification of the sub-G1 population in (a). Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (c) Huh7 cells were harvested for Annexin V staining and flow cytometry analysis after 12 h of PGG treatment (0.1 mg/mL); (d) The quantification of fluorescence intensity in (c). Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (e) Huh7 cells were harvested for caspase 3/7 assay after 12 h of PGG (0.1 mg/mL) treatment. Caspase 3/7 activity were expressed as the fold to solvent control. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (f) Immunoblot analysis showing induction of cleaved caspase 3 after 12 h of treatment with indicated concentrations of PGG. β-actin expression was used as the loading control. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 4. PGG treatment induces apoptosis in Huh7 cells. (a) Huh7 cells were harvested for PI staining and flow cytometry analysis after 24 h of PGG (0.1 mg/mL) treatment; (b) The quantification of the sub-G1 population in (a). Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (c) Huh7 cells were harvested for Annexin V staining and flow cytometry analysis after 12 h of PGG treatment (0.1 mg/mL); (d) The quantification of fluorescence intensity in (c). Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (e) Huh7 cells were harvested for caspase 3/7 assay after 12 h of PGG (0.1 mg/mL) treatment. Caspase 3/7 activity were expressed as the fold to solvent control. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3); (f) Immunoblot analysis showing induction of cleaved caspase 3 after 12 h of treatment with indicated concentrations of PGG. β-actin expression was used as the loading control. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).
Ijms 17 00669 g004
Ijms 17 00669 g005 1024
Figure 5. PGG sensitizes Huh7 cells to sorafenib treatment. Huh7 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of PGG (blue), sorafenib (green) or combinations (red) for 72 h. Cell viability was measured using the alamarBlue® assay. The percentages of viable cells compared to the solvent control are plotted. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 5. PGG sensitizes Huh7 cells to sorafenib treatment. Huh7 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of PGG (blue), sorafenib (green) or combinations (red) for 72 h. Cell viability was measured using the alamarBlue® assay. The percentages of viable cells compared to the solvent control are plotted. Results are the means ± SD (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Ijms 17 00669 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kant, R.; Yen, C.-H.; Lu, C.-K.; Lin, Y.-C.; Li, J.-H.; Chen, Y.-M.A. Identification of 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside as a Glycine N-Methyltransferase Enhancer by High-Throughput Screening of Natural Products Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050669

AMA Style

Kant R, Yen C-H, Lu C-K, Lin Y-C, Li J-H, Chen Y-MA. Identification of 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside as a Glycine N-Methyltransferase Enhancer by High-Throughput Screening of Natural Products Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(5):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kant, Rajni, Chia-Hung Yen, Chung-Kuang Lu, Ying-Chi Lin, Jih-Heng Li, and Yi-Ming Arthur Chen. 2016. "Identification of 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranoside as a Glycine N-Methyltransferase Enhancer by High-Throughput Screening of Natural Products Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 5: 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop