Next Article in Journal
Effect of Experimental Parameters on Cavitation Dose in Ultrasonic Baths via Modified Aluminum Foil Test
Previous Article in Journal
Water-Soluble Inclusion Complexation of Naphthyl-Containing Thiosemicarbazides and Thioureas with β-Cyclodextrin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on β-Cyclodextrin-Functionalized Molten Salt Nitrogen-Doped Biochar and Its Adsorption Performance and Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Contrasting Sonodegradation and Anodic Oxidation of Sulfonamides in Water: Degradation routes, Matrix Effects, and Theoretical Study

by
Efraím A. Serna-Galvis
1,2,* and
Ricardo A. Torres-Palma
2,*
1
Grupo de Investigación en Remediación Ambiental y Biocatálisis (GIRAB), Instituto de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia
2
Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 No. 100-00, Santiago de Cali 760032, Colombia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(8), 1292; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31081292
Submission received: 27 February 2026 / Revised: 5 April 2026 / Accepted: 10 April 2026 / Published: 15 April 2026

Abstract

Mid-high-frequency ultrasound (375 kHz) and anodic oxidation at low current intensity (<50 mA, NaCl as the supporting electrolyte) were employed to treat sulfonamide antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole—SMX and sulfacetamide—SAM). The sonodegradation involved HO, while electrogenerated HClO was mainly responsible for the antibiotics’ elimination in the electrochemical process. A comparison of the processes evidenced that the degradation of SMX by ultrasound was faster due to its higher hydrophobicity. In contrast, in the electrochemical system, the SAM degradation was more efficient, which was associated with a higher reactivity of its acetamide moiety toward HClO. Interestingly, SMX was selectively sonodegraded in synthetic hospital wastewater and seawater, whereas the matrix components strongly accelerated the electrochemical degradation but affected the process performance in the hospital wastewater. On the other hand, theoretical analyses of atomic charge indicated that the central S-N bond, the N and aromatic ring in the aniline moiety, the C=C bond, and methyl groups in the isoxazole groups on SMX are the most susceptible moieties to the attacks by HO and HClO. Furthermore, for the typical byproducts, calculations of the probability of being active against bacteria were slightly lower than that of the parent pharmaceutical, even being much lower for the byproducts from the electrochemical treatment.
Keywords: antibiotics degradation; ACC; electrochemistry; sonochemistry; photochemistry; sulfonamides; water treatment antibiotics degradation; ACC; electrochemistry; sonochemistry; photochemistry; sulfonamides; water treatment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serna-Galvis, E.A.; Torres-Palma, R.A. Contrasting Sonodegradation and Anodic Oxidation of Sulfonamides in Water: Degradation routes, Matrix Effects, and Theoretical Study. Molecules 2026, 31, 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31081292

AMA Style

Serna-Galvis EA, Torres-Palma RA. Contrasting Sonodegradation and Anodic Oxidation of Sulfonamides in Water: Degradation routes, Matrix Effects, and Theoretical Study. Molecules. 2026; 31(8):1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31081292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serna-Galvis, Efraím A., and Ricardo A. Torres-Palma. 2026. "Contrasting Sonodegradation and Anodic Oxidation of Sulfonamides in Water: Degradation routes, Matrix Effects, and Theoretical Study" Molecules 31, no. 8: 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31081292

APA Style

Serna-Galvis, E. A., & Torres-Palma, R. A. (2026). Contrasting Sonodegradation and Anodic Oxidation of Sulfonamides in Water: Degradation routes, Matrix Effects, and Theoretical Study. Molecules, 31(8), 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31081292

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop