2.1. Electronic Structure of NpO3+
The ground state of the neutral and the first five cationic neptunium species are Np (
6L
11/2; 5
f46
d17
s2), Np
+ (
7L
5; 5
f46
d17
s1), Np
2+ (
6H
5/2; 5
f5), Np
3+ (
5I
4; 5
f4), Np
4+ (
4I
9/2; 5
f3), and Np
5+ (
3H
4; 5
f2). Going sequentially from Np to Np
5+, our LC-SO-MRCI+Q-DKH3-calculated ionization energies compared to the experimental values in parentheses are 6.0 (6.266), 11.7 (11.5), 19.6 (19.7), 33.7 (33.8), and 49.2 (48.0) eV [
15]. For the last two ionization energies, SC-SO-MRCI-DKH3 calculations were feasible, and the ionization energies changed by less than 0.1 eV (49.1 vs. 49.2 and 33.6 vs. 33.7 eV). The very good agreement between theory and experiment validates the methodology used presently. The calculated ionization energy for oxygen is 13.4 eV, which is also in very good agreement with the experimental value of 13.6 eV [
15].
Next, the potential energy curves (PECs), bonding schemes, electronic structure information, spin–orbit splitting, and spectroscopic constants for the lowest energy electronic states of the bare NpO
3+ unit are discussed. Based on the ionization energies of neptunium and oxygen, and the electron affinity of oxygen, the lowest energy fragments are Np
2+(
6H) and O
+(
4S;
2p3). This channel generates triplet, quintet, septet, and nonet states,
3,5,7,9[Σ
−, Π, Δ, Φ, Γ, Η], all of which should have dissociative PECs due to the strong Coulombic repulsion. The next channel, Np
3+(
5I) + O(
3P), produces triplets, quintets, and septets, which are expected to have moderately bound PECs. Two more channels of interest are Np
4+(
4I) + O
−(
2P) and Np
5+(
3H) + O
2−(
1S) since they are anticipated to form the equilibrium structures. A quantitative plot of the expected PECs for all four spin multiplicities is shown in
Figure 1. Low-lying singlet states are omitted in this plot but they can be present stemming from the excited states of these channels.
The constructed PECs at the LC-MRCI-DKH3 level shown in
Figure 2 agree well with those of
Figure 1. Thirty-four low-lying electronic states have been considered, i.e.,
1Σ
+,
1Π,
1Γ,
1Η,
1Ι,
1Κ,
3Σ
− (×2),
3Π,
3Δ,
3Φ,
3Γ,
3Η,
3Ι,
5Σ
−,
5Π,
5Δ,
5Φ,
5Γ,
5Η,
5Ι,
7Σ
−,
7Π,
7Δ,
7Φ,
7Γ,
7Η,
7Ι,
9Σ
−,
9Π,
9Δ,
9Φ,
9Γ, and
9Η. The left figure includes distances from 1.0 to 15.0 Å, while the right figure offers a clearer view of the PECs at the equilibrium region. Individual plots for each spin multiplicity are given in
Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI).
The PECs for the nonet spin multiplicity are indeed all repulsive following a 2/r asymptote. The same observation was found for the other spin states at the CASSCF level for long distances (6–7 to 15 Å), but in the region of 5–6 Å we coped with insurmountable technical issues due to the crossing of these repulsive PECs with the PECs coming from the next adiabatic channel, Np3+(5I; 5f4) and O (3P; 2p4). Since none of the Np3+ + O fragments can generate nonet states, the multi-reference character of nonet wavefunctions in the 5–6 Å is significantly suppressed easing the convergence issues. Therefore, for singlets, triplets, quintets, and septets, we used the wavefunction at 4 Å to construct the PECs. This strategy allowed us to get smooth PECs for distances between 1 and 9 Å. However, it should not be ignored that all these PECs are technically inaccurate in the 5–15 Å region, since they should suffer from an avoided crossing with the repulsive PECs of the Np2+(6H; 5f5) + O+(4S; 2p3) channel at ~5 Å.
Focusing on Np
3+(
5I;
5f4) + O (
3P;
2p4), we built the PECs of all produced states,
3,5,7[Σ
+, Σ
−(×2), Π(×3), Δ(×3), Φ(×3), Γ(×3), Η(×3), I(×2), K], at the CASSCF level of theory; see
Figure S2 of SI. The PECs of all three spin multiplicities are all attractive, making potential energy wells with a minimum at around 2.7 Å. One third of these PECs are quasi-degenerate, making a beam of deeper potential wells with ~27 kcal/mol binding energy, while the other two-thirds of them create a second beam of PECs with ~10 kcal/mol binding energy. Looking at the CI vectors at the equilibrium distance of 2.7 Å, it is apparent that the most stable group of PECs corresponds to the 2
px12
py12
pz2 configuration of O(
3P), with z being the axis connecting the two atoms, while the other group pertains to 2
px22
py12
pz1 or 2
px12
py22
pz1. This justifies the relative ratio of states in the two groups. The lower energy group consists of the Σ
−, Π, Δ, Φ, Γ, Η, Ι states, which can be formed from Np
3+ (
5I; M
L = 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4, ±5, ±6) and O (
3P; M
L = 0; 2
px12
py12
pz2).
The PECs of the septet states are smooth along the whole range of distances, but the CASSCF PECs of the quintet states exhibit some inflection points at distances around 2 Å, and the PECs of triplets form a barrier at ~2.2 Å leading to new potential energy local minima at ~1.7 Å. At the MRCI, the observed inflection points become local minima (see for example the PEC of
5I in
Figure 2), and the CASSCF local minima at 1.7 Å become global minima at the MRCI (compare
Figure S3 of SI and
Figure 2). The CI vectors of the quintet spin states at 2 Å reveal an ionic character where oxygen adopts a
2p5 configuration, indicating that the observed inflection points are due to the involvement of the Np
4+(
5I; 5
f3) + O
−(
2P;
2p5) fragments, which can generate both quintets and triplets. Similarly, the minimum at 1.7 Å of the triplet states stems from Np
5+(
3H; 5
f2) + O
2−(
1S;
2p6), which can only produce triplet states. The latter channel generates the
3[Σ
−, Π, Δ, Φ, Γ, Η] states, with
3H,
3Σ
−, and
3Π creating the lowest energy states of NpO
3+.
The next lowest energy minima correspond to the PECs of singlet spin states,
1Σ
+,
1Π,
1Γ,
1Η, and
1I (see
Figure 2). The PECs stem from the next asymptotic channel corresponding to the first triplet state of Np
3+(
3K) and O(
3P). To our knowledge, there is no experimental report on an excited state of Np
3+; the calculated Np
3+(
3K) state has a 5
f4 character. The PECs of the singlet states are nearly parallel to the triplet states with the same features, such as local minima at 2.7 Å, avoided crossings at ~2 Å, and lower energy minima at ~1.7 Å. Based on the CI vectors, the latter minima also originate from Np
5+ + O
2−.
The main configurations of the CI vector of the lowest triplet and singlet spin states at 1.7 Å are listed in
Table 1, and the corresponding molecular orbitals are shown in
Figure 3. The σ and π
x,y orbitals pertain to the bonding Np–O orbitals. The compositions of these are σ ≈ 0.81 [2
pz(O)] − 0.51 [4
fz3(Np)] and π
x,y ≈ 0.81 [2
px,y(O)] + 0.35 [4
fxz2,
yz2(Np)]. The σ* and π
x,y* are the corresponding anti-bonding orbitals, σ* ≈ 0.50 [2
pz(O)] + 0.81 [4
fz3(Np)] and π
x,y* ≈ 0.81 [2
px,y(O)] − 0.73 [4
fxz2,
yz2(Np)]. The bonding orbitals are polarized more towards the oxygen terminus, while the antibonding ones are polarized towards neptunium. The remaining four orbitals, δ
± and φ
±, are non-bonding atomic orbitals of neptunium since they have minimal overlap with the valence orbitals of oxygen. This pattern resembles that of transition metal oxide dications [
16], with the difference that φ
± are present only for
f-block metals.
In all nine states listed in
Table 1, the σ and π orbitals are doubly occupied (natural orbital population is larger than 1.92) and the corresponding σ* and π* are vacant (natural orbital population is smaller than 0.08). This observation signifies that the oxygen terminus for all these states has a strong O
2− character (σ and π are heavily localized on oxygen). The remaining two electrons populate the δ
± and φ
± orbitals, and the specific combinations determine the overall symmetry and angular momentum of the wavefunctions. For example, the wavefunctions of the
1,3H and
1,3Π states are composed of the various δ
+1φ
+1/δ
−1φ
−1 configurations (B
1 symmetry component), whereas the
1Γ,
1I,
1Σ
+, and
3Σ
− include δ
+1δ
−1/φ
+1φ
−1 electron configurations (see
Table 1).
To further understand the bonding scheme of the potential wells at 2.7 Å, we plotted the orbital contours in
Figure S3 of SI. At this distance, there is minimal overlap between the atomic orbitals of neptunium and oxygen. The σ and π orbitals are clearly localized on oxygen and are practically identical to its 2
p orbitals. The remaining orbitals are all localized on neptunium and have mainly 5
f character. The wavefunctions for all spin multiplicities are very multi-reference and the CI vectors include exclusively σ
2π
2 or σ
1π
3 (S = 1) configurations for oxygen corresponding to O (
3P; 2
p4). As a result, the natural populations for σ and π or
2p are 4/3 = 1.333, and for the other orbitals (σ*, π*, δ, φ or 5f) are 4/7 = 0.571. These observations point to Np
3+–O electrostatically attracted structures.
For distances of ~1.9 Å, the quintet states reveal some shallow minima or inflection points with CI vectors composed mainly of σ2π3 or σ1π4 (S = 1/2) configurations pertaining to Np4+O− species. Triplet states can also be generated from Np4+(4I; 5f3) + O−(2P), but the corresponding minima are shadowed by the crossings with the Np5+(3H; 5f2) + O2−(2P) PECs. There are no quintet states generated by the latter channel, rendering the Np4+O− minima particularly clear for quintets. There are no septet states from either Np4+O− or Np5+O2− and thus only Np3+O minima are observed for septets. Overall, the constructed PECs for NpO3+ reveal the existence of four different electronic structure patterns depending on the spin multiplicity and Np–O distance. For distances longer than 5.0 Å the dissociative Np2+O+ dominates for all spin states (S = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4); for distances of ~2.7 Å there are Np3+O minima for S = 0, 1, 2, 3, for distances of ~1.9 Å there are shallow Np4+O− minima for S = 2, and for distances of ~1.7 Å the S = 0 and 1 states are dominant.
Focusing on the Np
5+O
2− minima, SO calculations are performed for Np–O distances between 1.6 and 1.85 Å. The PECs are shown in
Figure S4 of SI, while equilibrium distances, harmonic vibrational frequencies, excitation energies, and analysis of the wavefunction in terms of the parent
2S+1Λ states are listed in
Table 2. The lowest energy state can be fairly written as a 1
3H
4 state as it has Ω = 4 and it is composed of 1
3Η by 97%. The next two states at 0.383 and 0.633 eV have Ω = 0
+ and 1 and cannot be assigned to a specific
2S+1Λ state. But the next two states at 0.878 and 1.298 eV can be clearly represented as 1
3H
5 and 1
3Π
0−. Eleven more states are listed in
Table 2 with excitation energies ranging from 1.391 to 3.035 eV, and only five of them remain rather pure
2S+1Λ states: 1
3H
6, 1
3Π
2, 1
1Γ
4, 1
1Ι
6, and 1
1Η
5. The equilibrium bond lengths r
e of all these states are bracketed between 1.709 and 1.743 Å, and the frequencies ω
e cover the range of 810–878 cm
−1. The similar r
e and ω
e values mirror the same bonding character in all states (Np
5+O
2− with minor influence from the non-bonding
f-electrons of neptunium) and indicate nearly parallel PECs with large Franck–Condon factors. To see the effect of correlating the subvalence 6s and 6p electrons, we performed calculations without correlating them for the ground state
3H. The bond lengths increased by 0.009 Å.
2.2. Ligand Effects on the Stabilization of NpO3+
Figure 2 indicates that the equilibrium Np
5+O
2− structure is metastable lying higher than the lowest energy fragments Np
2+ + O
+. To understand the role of the ligands in stabilizing the experimentally observed N(CH
2CH
2NR)
3NpO, R = Si
iPr, we performed calculations on the model (NH
3)
x(NH
2−)
yNp
5+O
2− and (NH
3)
x(NH
2−)
yNp
2+ species with x = 0–1 and y = 0–3. For all species different spin multiplicities (see
Table S1 of SI) were considered. The geometry of the model systems was made starting with N(CH
2CH
2NR)
3NpO, keeping only the nitrogen and oxygen atoms, and saturating the N atoms with hydrogen atoms. Here we focus on the lowest energy spin state, which is found to be S = 1 for all oxides, and S = 5/2 for the ligated Np
2+ species except for x = 0/y = 3, which favors the S = 3/2 state.
The energy difference at B3LYP/RSC(Np)/cc-pVTZ(N,H)/aug-cc-pVTZ(O) between (NH
3)
x(NH
2−)
yNp
5+O
2− and (NH
3)
x(NH
2−)
yNp
2+ + O
+ is plotted in
Figure 4. For NpO
3+ (x = 0/y = 0) the equilibrium structure is unstable which agrees with the PECs of
Figure 2. The addition of the axial NH
3 stabilizes the equilibrium but remains unstable. However, the addition of one equatorial NH
2− makes it stable by 128.1 kcal/mol; this trend continues with additional equatorial NH
2− ligands. The second NH
2− stabilizes it further by 169.1 kcal/mol and a third one by 135.9 kcal/mol more. As a result, the latter species is overall stabilized by an energy of 433.9 kcal/mol. The addition of the ammonia ligand stabilizes (NH
2−)
y = 1–3Np
5+O
2− by no more than 36.1 kcal/mol (y = 1). The stabilization energy due to ammonia decreases as y increases and is only 10.4 kcal/mol for y = 3 (see
Figure 4). In conclusion, the NH
3 ligand has a minimal effect on the overall stability of the complex but serves as an anchor for the polydentate ligand and the NH
2− units, which are responsible for stabilizing the Np
5+O
2− unit. Similar observations have been made for Fe
4+O
2− vs. Fe
3+O
− units, where ammonia ligands were shown to stabilize Fe
4+O
2− [
17]. These examples show how ligand design can be wisely selected to stabilize unbound structures with high-oxidation state metal centers. For reasons of completeness, the binding energy of (NH
3)(NH
2−)
3Np
5+O
2− with respect to the lowest energy fragments, (NH
3)
x(NH
2−)
yNp
3+(S = 2) + O(
3P), is calculated to be 127.8 kcal/mol, which is indicative of a strong metal–oxygen bond [
18,
19].
Finally, the electronic structure of the fully coordinated complex is examined. The six partially occupied natural orbitals (DFT/B3LYP level) of the fully coordinated complex are shown in
Figure 5. These orbitals can be divided into three groups:
and
,
δ+,NpO and
δ−,NpO, and
and
. The first group pertains to the bonding and anti-bonding orbitals of the NpO σ-bond, which are populated by 1.985 and 0.015 electrons. The second group includes the non-bonding δ-orbitals like those observed for pure NpO
3+, and they are singly occupied. The third group combines the
fφ-orbitals of pure NpO
3+ with the p
π of the three −CH
2NH− groups forming in-phase and out-of-phase combinations representing donation and back-donation schemes [
20]. Their natural occupations are also 1.975 (in-phase) and 0.025 (out-of-phase) electrons. A population of
points to a “pure” Np
5+O
2− unit, specifically the 1
3Σ
− state of NpO
3+ (see
Table 1), and three −CH
2NH
− units donating electrons to the vacant
orbital. The overall bonding scheme suggests minor (−CH
2NH)
32−,●Np
4+O
2− character, which would be important if the population of
were larger.
Next, higher-level multi-reference state-averaged (including six triplet states) CASSCF and MRCI calculations for its lowest energy electronic states were carried out to further shed light on the electronic structure of N(CH
2CH
2NH)
3NpO. Several attempts to include the
,
,
, and π
NpO orbitals in the CASSCF active space failed since these orbitals remained as closed-shell orbitals confirming the strong (−CH
2NH
−)
3Np
5+O
2− nature of the complex. Our final CASSCF active space is composed of two electrons in seven orbitals corresponding to the δ
±, φ
±, π
x,y*, and σ* orbitals of
Figure 3 (
φ+ ~). In the subsequent MRCI calculations 22 electrons are correlated pertaining to the two aforementioned electrons and all seven lone pairs of nitrogen atoms.
According to the MRCI results, the lowest energy states are triplet states, well separated from singlet or quintet states. The CI vectors (CI coefficients in parentheses) indicate that the ground state is of mixed character [δ
−1φ
+1 (0.70), δ
+1δ
−1 (0.41), δ
+1φ
−1 (−0.44)] followed by another two multi-reference states, [δ
+1φ
+1 (0.79), δ
−1φ
−1 (0.54)] and [δ
+1δ
−1 (0.75), δ
−1φ
+1 (−0.41)], at 0.002 and 0.047 eV (MRCI+Q) excitation energies. All these electron configurations are present in the first three states of NpO
3+ (1
3H, 1
3Σ
−, 1
3Π), while the DFT/B3LYP natural orbital populations fail to mirror the multi-reference character of these states. Our results are somewhat different from the CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations reported by Dutkiewicz et al. [
5], who found a ground state with a configuration described as φ
+1φ
−1 in the present notation (see Figure S29 of their SI). Their DFT electron configuration (~δ
+1δ
−1; Figure S30 of their SI) agrees with the present DFT results. Finally spin–orbit calculations were conducted combining the MRCI spin–orbit Hamiltonian elements with MRCI+Q energies. The spin–orbit operator further mixed these three states splitting them into eighteen states lying in an energy range of 1.66 eV (see
Table S2 of SI).
2.3. Assessment of Neptunium Oxide as Catalyst for Methane Activation
Recently, our group identified the (NH
3)
4Rh
4+O
2− trigonal bipyramidal as a potential catalyst for selectively converting methane into methanol [
3,
4]. The main feature of this catalyst is that it promotes the [2+2] mechanism instead of the radical mechanism and that further oxidation of the produced methanol is prevented kinetically. The observed trend was attributed to the low-spin high-oxidation state Rh
4+ center. The present N(CH
2CH
2NH)
3NpO molecular complex presents similar geometric and electronic structure (trigonal bipyramidal and high-oxidation state of the metal). Therefore, its ability to activate methane was assessed for the two mechanisms ([2+2] and radical) and for the different spin states. The DFT calculations (see
Section 3) used for this purpose should be considered as qualitative since the multi-reference character even for the ground state (see
Section 2.2) and spin–orbit effects should be considered for more accurate calculations.
The structures of the radical mechanism (S = 1) for the initial encounter complex of the reactants (ECR), the intermediate complex (IC), the transition state (TS1) connecting them, the encounter complex of the products (ECP) and the transition state (TS2), which connects the IC and ECP, are shown in
Figure 6. The pathway from the IC to TS2 involves the rotation of the OH group. The Np–O-H angle of 180° changes to about 110° allowing the CH
3 group to approach oxygen. We were not able to optimize all the corresponding structures for the [2+2] mechanism. The Cartesian coordinates for the ECR, TS1, and IC are given in
Tables S3 and S4 of the SI (for all spin multiplicities, S = 0, 1, 2, 3) along with all structures of the radical path. However, all our attempts to optimize the TS2 structure for [2+2] led to the TS2 structure of the radical mechanism.
The complete energy diagrams along the reaction coordinate at B3LYP, MN15, MN15 combined with solvent (water or toluene) effects are given in the
SI (Figures S5–S8). MN15 seems to stabilize the IC, ECP, products of the low spin states (S = 0,1) and the TS1 (S = 1) structure of [2+2] over the radical pathway. The solvent effects using a polar (water) or non-polar (toluene) primarily favor the release of methanol, reducing the binding energy of methanol to the metal center.
The gas-phase MN15-calculated H3C–H activation barriers (ECR→TS1) are relatively large (>35 kcal/mol) for the lowest energy spin states (S = 0, 1) and both reaction paths ([2+2] or radical). The next higher spin state (S = 2) bears small H3C–H activation and H3C–OH (IC→TS2) recombination barriers of 16.3 and 22.8 kcal/mol (radical mechanism), respectively, and its potential energy surface crosses with those of S = 0 and S = 1. The first S = 3 also has small activation barriers but lies higher in energy and is well separated from the others. Among the S = 0, 1, 2 states, the quintet is the only state where the ECP is lower in energy than the ECR.
According to the singly occupied orbitals of the ECR and IC for S = 2 (see
Figure S9 of SI), the distinct reactivity of S = 2 can be attributed to the radical character on the amidic terminals (-NH) of the polydentate ligand (see
Figure S6 of the SI). The -NH
● radical accepts readily an electron from methane to return to -NH
−, while the terminal oxygen accepts a proton from methane (see
Figure S9 of the SI).
This proton-coupled electron transfer process is like the one observed in transition metal oxides [
2,
11], but the new feature in the present complex is that this electron transfer is mediated by ligand species.
The NpO and Np–N bond lengths are indicative of the electronic structure of N(CH
2CH
2NH)
3NpO for S = 0, 1, 2, 3. The Np–O bond distances for S = 0–3 are 1.82, 1.82, 1.86, and 2.27 Å, and the Np–N
ax distances of the quaternary axial nitrogen are 2.67, 2.68, 2.76, and 2.76 Å. The other Np–N
eq (equatorial nitrogen atoms) distances range within 2.21–2.23 Å for both S = 0 and S = 1. The S = 2 state has one long Np–N bond (2.41 Å) and two shorter bonds of 2.27 Å. The S = 3 state has two long and one short Np–N bonds of 2.41–2.42 Å and 2.27 Å, respectively. The corresponding values for the N(CH
2CH
2NSiH
3)
3NpO (S = 1) complex taken from ref. [
5] are 1.89 (Np–O), 2.67 (Np–N
ax), and 2.25 (Np–N
eq) Å. The latter Np–N
ax and Np–N
eq values are in very good agreement with the present ones, but the Np–O bond is more elongated than the present one, by 0.07 Å, probably due to the presence of the silicon groups.
The potential energy profiles for S = 1 and S = 2 plotted in
Figure 7 cross at the geometry of the IC due to the very similar electronic structure, where two neptunium electrons couple with the single remote electron of methyl, N(CH
2CH
2NH)
3NpOH (S = 3/2) × CH
3 (S = 1/2). Overall, the lowest energy ECR (S = 1) is 17 kcal/mol lower in energy than the lowest energy ECP (S = 2) preventing the use of N(CH
2CH
2NH)
3NpO as a catalyst for methane activation. This highly endothermic process can be attributed to the strong NpO triple (σ
2π
4) bond (D
e = 127.8 kcal/mol; see
Section 2.2), which is reluctant to provide the oxygen atom to oxidize methane. Therefore, a suggested strategy for utilizing
f-block metals in methane activation would be the use of proper ligands that host an unpaired electron to stabilize a high-spin state and render it a ground state.