Next Article in Journal
Water-Scavenging Suspended Mediator in Electrolytes for Silicon-Based Lithium-Ion Batteries with High-Nickel Cathode
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of PCNA Inhibitor AOH1996 Analogs in Cancer Cell Cultures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trimetallic Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-Derived CoNiO2/NiCo2O4/NiFe2O4 Hierarchical Architecture: Unveiling Multi-Component Synergism for Ultrahigh-Capacity and Highly Stable Lithium Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MOF-Derived Carbon-Anchored Cu2Se/MnSe Heterointerfacial Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lithium Storage via Synergistic Interface Effects

1
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Atomic and Subatomic Structure and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter, School of Physics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Engineering and Quantum Materials, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
4
Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
5
School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(5), 860; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050860
Submission received: 30 January 2026 / Revised: 25 February 2026 / Accepted: 3 March 2026 / Published: 5 March 2026

Abstract

To address the inherent limitations of Cu2Se as a lithium-ion battery (LIB) anode, a Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite was rationally designed and synthesized via selenization of a CuMn bimetallic metal–organic framework (MOF) precursor. This synthesis strategy integrates carbon composite engineering and heterogeneous structure construction, achieving in situ formation of Cu2Se/MnSe heterogeneous nanoparticles anchored on amorphous carbon nanosheets. Structural characterizations confirm the successful construction of well-defined Cu2Se/MnSe interfaces and uniform dispersion of selenide components, with Mn introduction inducing regulated electron transfer between Cu2Se and MnSe. Electrochemical evaluations demonstrate that the Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite exhibits a significantly enhanced lithium storage performance compared to single-component Cu2Se@C, including higher specific capacity and superior rate capability. Mechanistic studies reveal that the synergistic effects of the carbon matrix (enhancing electrical conductivity and mitigating volume expansion) and the Cu2Se/MnSe heterogeneous interface (lowering charge transfer resistance, accelerating Li+ diffusion, and boosting pseudocapacitive contribution) are responsible for the performance enhancement. Moreover, Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LiFePO4 full cells deliver a stable average operating voltage and reliable cycling stability, validating the composite’s practical application potential.

1. Introduction

As a core component of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the anode material directly determines the battery’s overall electrochemical performance. Among various candidate anode materials, transition metal selenides (TMSes) have attracted considerable attention due to their higher theoretical specific capacities, better electrical conductivity, and more favorable redox kinetics compared to traditional graphite [1,2,3]. Copper selenide (Cu2Se) stands out as a promising candidate owing to its abundant reserves, low cost, and moderate volume expansion during lithiation/delithiation processes [4,5]. However, Pure Cu2Se has inherent drawbacks of structural pulverization during cycling and sluggish ion/electron transfer kinetics, and single modification strategies fail to address these issues comprehensively [6,7,8].
Carbon hybridization alone can enhance conductivity and alleviate volume expansion but cannot modulate the intrinsic electronic structure of Cu2Se [9]. Heterogeneous interface construction solely optimizes charge distribution yet lacks a robust carbon scaffold to avoid interfacial collapse [10,11]. Thus, the synergistic combination of the two strategies is a rational design, which realizes dual optimization of structural stability and electrochemical kinetics for Cu2Se-based anodes, with the carbon matrix acting as a stable conductive support for heterointerfaces and the heterointerfaces boosting ion/charge transfer efficiency [12,13]. Manganese selenide (MnSe) is rationally selected as the secondary selenide component for its multiple synergistic characteristics with Cu2Se: it has a favorable lattice matching degree for the formation of stable Cu2Se/MnSe heterointerfaces, complementary redox behavior and high theoretical capacity to increase lithium storage active sites and total specific capacity, and the unique atomic properties of Mn that induce effective charge transfer between Cu2Se and MnSe, thus modulating the electronic structure and lowering the charge transfer resistance of the composite [14,15,16].
In this work, we rationally designed and synthesized a Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite anode by integrating carbon composite and heterogeneous structure construction strategies. The composite was fabricated via selenization of a CuMn bimetallic metal–organic framework (MOF) precursor, enabling in situ formation of Cu2Se/MnSe heterogeneous nanoparticles anchored on amorphous carbon nanosheets. Structural and compositional characterizations confirmed the successful construction of well-defined Cu2Se-MnSe heterogeneous interfaces and uniform dispersion of selenide components on the carbon matrix, accompanied by regulated electron transfer between Cu2Se and MnSe induced by Mn introduction. Electrochemical evaluations demonstrated that the Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite outperformed single-component Cu2Se@C in specific capacity, rate capability, and cycling stability. Mechanistic analyses revealed that the enhanced performance originated from the synergistic effects of the carbon matrix (reinforcing conductivity and structural integrity) and the heterogeneous interface (lowering charge transfer resistance, accelerating Li+ diffusion, and boosting pseudocapacitive contribution). Moreover, the assembly of Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LiFePO4 full cells validated the composite’s practical application potential, delivering stable operating voltage and long-cycle reliability.

2. Results and Discussion

The phase composition of the selenized products derived from Cu-MOF and CuMn-MOF was characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization. As illustrated in the XRD pattern (Figure 1a), selenization of Cu-MOF yielded single-phase Cu2Se (PDF No. 29-0575), whereas selenized CuMn-MOF produced a Cu2Se/MnSe binary composite (PDF No. 29-0575 and PDF No. 75-0889). As illustrated in Figure S1 and Figure 1b, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images reveal that the composite is constructed by the assembly of nanosheets, with ultra-small nanoparticles uniformly anchored on the surface of the nanosheets. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) characterization (Figure 1c) further confirms the homogeneous dispersion of these nanoparticles onto the amorphous carbon nanosheet, forming a well-integrated hybrid structure. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images (Figure 1d,e) demonstrate the presence of distinct heterogeneous interfaces between Cu2Se and MnSe. These well-defined heterogeneous interfaces play a pivotal role in enhancing the lithium storage performance of the composite: firstly, they can modulate the electronic structure and optimize the charge distribution at the interface, thereby reducing the energy barrier for lithium ion diffusion and accelerating charge transfer kinetics [17,18]; secondly, the synergistic interaction between Cu2Se and MnSe across the interface alleviates the volume expansion during repeated lithiation/delithiation cycles, improving the structural stability of the composite [19]; additionally, the interface provides abundant active sites for lithium ion adsorption and redox reactions, which contributes to the enhancement of lithium storage capacity [20]. Furthermore, selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns exhibit characteristic diffraction rings corresponding to the crystal planes of Cu2Se and MnSe (Figure 1f), which further confirms the successful fabrication of the heterogeneous structure in the Cu2Se/MnSe@NC composite.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed to investigate the elemental composition and chemical states of the Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites. As presented in the survey XPS spectrum (Figure 2a), both composites contain Cu, Se, C, and O elements, which confirms the successful retention of the main components during the synthesis process. Notably, an additional characteristic peak corresponding to Mn is detected in the Mn 2p spectrum of Cu2Se/MnSe@C (Figure 2b), verifying the successful introduction of Mn into the bimetallic selenide composite without the presence of unexpected impurities [21]. As exhibited in Figure 2c,d, the Cu 2p and Se 3d spectra of Cu2Se/MnSe@C show distinct negative shifts with quantifiable values compared to those of Cu2Se@C after the introduction of Mn: the Cu 2p3/2 peak presents a negative shift of ~0.1 eV, and the Se 3d3/2 peak exhibits a negative shift of ~0.4 eV. This characteristic binding energy shift directly indicates that both Cu and Se atoms gain electrons [22,23], which is attributed to the redistribution of interfacial electron cloud density induced by the formation of Cu2Se/MnSe heterogeneous interfaces; the electronegativity difference between Mn and Cu/Se triggers the transfer of partial electron density from Mn to the Cu2Se phase across the heterointerface [24], thus increasing the electron occupancy of Cu and Se atomic orbitals. In addition, the reduced intensity of Cu 2p satellite peaks in Cu2Se/MnSe@C relative to Cu2Se@C is attributed to the modulation of Cu valence state by interfacial electronic interaction: Mn introduction induces directional charge transfer between Cu2Se and MnSe, where Cu atoms gain electrons and partial Cu2+ is reduced to lower-valence Cu+ species [25], which directly leads to the weakened satellite peak intensity. This interface-induced Cu valence modulation optimizes the surface electronic structure of the composite by reducing the energy barrier for charge transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface and increasing the active sites for Li+ adsorption, effectively facilitating charge transfer kinetics and thus enhancing lithium storage performance. The C 1s spectra of both Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C were deconvoluted into three characteristic peaks (Figure 2e), corresponding to the C-C, C-O, and C=O bonds, respectively [26]. The O 1s spectra (Figure 2f) of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C are deconvoluted into three labeled components: Olatt (lattice oxygen), Oads (adsorbed oxygen), and Ow (water). Olatt corresponds to metal-oxygen (M-O) bonds on Cu2Se/MnSe nanoparticle surfaces, Oads to surface-adsorbed oxygen and oxygen-containing functional groups in the carbon matrix, and Ow to physically adsorbed water molecules [27,28]. Overall, the XPS analysis not only verifies the desired elemental composition of the composites but also reveals the quantitative characteristics and mechanism of the electronic interaction induced by Mn introduction: Mn triggers directional charge transfer and electron cloud redistribution at the Cu2Se/MnSe heterointerface, modulates the valence state of Cu species and the electron density of Se atoms, and optimizes the surface electronic structure of the composite. These interfacial electronic regulation effects are conducive to reducing the charge transfer resistance, accelerating Li+ diffusion kinetics, and increasing the active sites for lithium storage, thus comprehensively enhancing the electrochemical performance of the composite in lithium storage applications.
As exhibited in the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves (Figure 3a,b and Figure S2), Cu2Se@C shows two pairs of redox peaks (R1/R2 for reduction, O1/O2 for oxidation), corresponding to the stepwise conversion of Cu2Se to Cu and Li2Se via a CuSe intermediate [29]. In contrast, Cu2Se/MnSe@C presents an additional redox pair (R3/O3) derived from MnSe’s characteristic conversion reaction [30], contributing extra lithium storage capacity. Moreover, the CV curves of Cu2Se/MnSe@C from the second to the fourth cycle are nearly overlapping, demonstrating superior electrochemical reversibility compared to Cu2Se@C, which benefits from the synergistic stabilization of the heterogeneous interface and carbon matrix. The rate capability test (Figure 3c) further confirms that Cu2Se/MnSe@C outperforms Cu2Se@C. Even at high current densities, Cu2Se/MnSe@C maintains a significantly higher specific capacity (Figure 3d). The morphological and microstructural features of Cu2Se/MnSe@C revealed by SEM and TEM are the key structural bases for its enhanced electrochemical performance. The carbon nanosheet-assembled framework provides a continuous conductive network for fast electron transport and a flexible buffer to mitigate volume expansion during cycling; the uniformly anchored ultra-small Cu2Se/MnSe nanoparticles enlarge the electrode–electrolyte contact area and increase lithium storage active sites with shortened ion diffusion distance; the well-defined heterointerfaces on carbon nanosheets accelerate interfacial charge transfer and maintain structural integrity upon cycling. These structural merits synergistically optimize the composite’s electrochemical kinetics and structural stability, thus leading to its higher specific capacity and superior rate capability than Cu2Se@C. XPS analysis indicates that the surface atomic percentages (at%) are C: 73.88%, Se: 3.78%, O: 19.48%, Cu: 2.86% for Cu2Se@C, and C: 72.73%, Se: 4.61%, O: 19.87%, Mn: 2.30%, Cu: 0.50% for Cu2Se/MnSe@C. After conversion, the mass percentages (wt%) of carbon in Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C materials are 53% and 51%, respectively. The trade-off between carbon content and initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) is critical for carbon-based anodes, as high-surface-area carbon easily causes excessive electrolyte decomposition and thick SEI film formation, leading to irreversible Li+ loss and reduced ICE. The carbon contents of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C are 53% and 51% respectively, at a moderate level. The tight anchoring of selenide nanoparticles on amorphous carbon nanosheets reduces the exposed active surface of the carbon matrix, which not only maintains the carbon’s roles in improving electrical conductivity and alleviating volume expansion during lithiation/delithiation, but also inhibits excessive SEI formation effectively. This design realizes a favorable balance between carbon content and ICE, and the better ICE performance of Cu2Se/MnSe@C with lower carbon content further confirms the rationality of carbon content regulation in this work. Additionally, Cu2Se/MnSe@C exhibits a capacity increase during long-term cycling at 1 A g−1 (Figure 3e), which may be associated with its structural advantages. Repeated lithiation/delithiation is likely to promote electrolyte infiltration into the carbon matrix, thus gradually activating the latent inner active sites of Cu2Se/MnSe nanoparticles and increasing the effective sites for lithium storage [31]. Moreover, the flexible carbon matrix alleviates the volume change of selenide nanoparticles; the tiny pores generated in cycling may serve as extra Li+ diffusion channels, and the contact between active nanoparticles may be tightened upon cycling, which could optimize the electronic conduction network and improve ion/electron transport efficiency [32]. The combined effect of these factors may lead to the capacity increase, indirectly verifying the good structural stability of Cu2Se/MnSe@C during long-term cycling.
CV tests were conducted on Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites to probe the lithium storage mechanism and pseudocapacitive contribution (Figure S3 and Figure 4a). As depicted in Figure 4b, the log(i) vs. log(v) plots were employed to calculate the slope (b-value), a key parameter reflecting the charge storage behavior—where a b-value of ~0.5 indicates diffusion-controlled intercalation/deintercalation, and a value of ~1.0 corresponds to surface-dominated pseudocapacitive behavior [33,34]. The Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite exhibits a higher b-value (0.58) compared to Cu2Se@C (0.42), suggesting that the introduction of MnSe modulates the lithium storage mechanism by enhancing the pseudocapacitive contribution. This higher b-value implies faster charge transfer kinetics and Li+ diffusion efficiency, as pseudocapacitive reactions are less dependent on ion diffusion within the bulk material and instead occur rapidly at the electrode–electrolyte interface [35,36]. Furthermore, the pseudocapacitive contribution ratios of the two composites were quantitatively analyzed. The k1 (capacitive) and k2 (diffusion-controlled) values were calculated using the classic equation i = k1v + k2v1/2: peak currents at characteristic potentials were extracted from CV curves (0.2–1.6 mV s−1), a linear fit of i/v1/2 vs. v1/2 was performed at each potential, yielding the slope (k1) and intercept (k2). At all tested scan rates, Cu2Se/MnSe@C demonstrates a higher pseudocapacitive proportion than Cu2Se@C (Figure 4c, Figures S4 and S5). The elevated pseudocapacitive contribution not only explains the superior rate capability of Cu2Se/MnSe@C but also contributes to its enhanced cycling stability. Pseudocapacitive reactions mitigate the structural strain caused by repeated ion insertion/extraction, as they involve minimal volume change compared to diffusion-controlled processes [37]. Additionally, the increased pseudocapacitive behavior is closely associated with the heterogeneous interface between Cu2Se and MnSe, which creates abundant active sites for surface redox reactions and optimizes the electronic structure to facilitate rapid charge transfer [38]. Collectively, these results confirm that the integration of MnSe into Cu2Se@C promotes a transition toward pseudocapacitive-dominated lithium storage, endowing the composite with improved electrochemical kinetics and overall performance.
To quantitatively analyze electrochemical kinetics and interfacial behaviors, an equivalent circuit model was used to fit the Nyquist plots (Figure 4d). Herein, Rs denotes solution and contact resistance, Rct is interfacial charge transfer resistance, CPE compensates for non-ideal double-layer capacitance, and Wo characterizes Li+ diffusion within the electrode [39,40]. Fitting results show that Cu2Se/MnSe@C has smaller Rs (12 Ω vs. 83 Ω) and Rct (581 Ω vs. 1120 Ω) compared to Cu2Se@C, indicating the heterogeneous structure and carbon matrix synergistically optimize interface contact and reduce charge transfer barriers. This reduction in Rs and Rct originates from two key structural advantages: first, the amorphous carbon matrix forms a continuous conductive network that minimizes the contact resistance between active particles and the current collector, accounting for the lower Rs [41]; second, the electronic interaction at the Cu2Se/MnSe heterointerface redistributes the electron cloud density, reduces the energy barrier for charge transfer across the electrode–electrolyte interface, and thus drastically lowers Rct [42]. Furthermore, the linear portion of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) plots reflects the Li+ diffusion process within the electrode materials. The Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite shows a much lower slope of the linear segment (Figure 4e), suggesting a faster Li+ diffusion rate in the bimetallic selenide composite [43]. This accelerated Li+ diffusion can be attributed to the synergistic effects of the heterogeneous structure and the carbon matrix: in addition to the short-range diffusion pathways provided by the well-defined Cu2Se/MnSe interfaces, the heterointerface-induced lattice distortion at the interfacial boundaries in the selenide phases creates abundant interstitial channels for Li+ migration, while the porous carbon framework acts as a fast ion transport medium that shortens the diffusion distance of Li+ from the electrolyte to the active material surface. The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) tests (Figure 4f–i) further corroborated the superior ion diffusion kinetics of Cu2Se/MnSe@C. The GITT-derived Li+ diffusion coefficients during both lithiation and delithiation processes are higher for Cu2Se/MnSe@C than for Cu2Se@C. Specifically, the D(Li+) values of Cu2Se/MnSe@C remain stable across different charge–discharge states, indicating consistent and rapid Li+ transport throughout the cycling process. This stability in D(Li+) is attributed to the structural robustness of the composite: the carbon matrix buffers the volume expansion of selenides during cycling, while the strong interaction at the Cu2Se/MnSe heterointerface prevents the disintegration of active phases, thus maintaining the integrity of Li+ diffusion pathways over repeated cycles. In contrast, Cu2Se@C exhibits lower and more fluctuating D(Li+) values, reflecting limited ion diffusion efficiency caused by severe volume expansion and the lack of interfacial diffusion channels. Collectively, the EIS and GITT results demonstrate that the Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite possesses enhanced charge transfer kinetics and accelerated Li+ diffusion compared to Cu2Se@C. These favorable electrochemical kinetics are closely associated with the unique heterogeneous structure and the synergistic interaction between Cu2Se, MnSe, and the carbon matrix: the electronic modulation at the heterointerface optimizes charge transfer, the interfacial boundaries create fast Li+ diffusion channels, and the carbon matrix ensures structural stability and continuous ion/electron transport—all contributing to the composite’s excellent rate capability and cycling stability observed in previous electrochemical tests.
To further explore the practical application potential of the Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite as an anode material, coin-type full cells were assembled and characterized. As schematically illustrated in Figure 5a, the full cell configuration employs Cu2Se/MnSe@C as the anode and lithium iron phosphate (LFP, Figure S6) as the cathode. The rate capability of the Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LFP full cell was evaluated at various current densities, as presented in Figure 5b. In addition, the Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LFP full cell exhibits an average operating voltage of ~2.7 V (Figure 5c), which is compatible with commercial LIB requirements. A visual demonstration of the full cell powering light-emitting diodes (LEDs, Figure 5d) further verifies its practical electrochemical output capability. The Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LFP full cell demonstrates favorable cycling stability (Figure 5e), maintaining a stable specific capacity over long-term charge–discharge cycles. Collectively, the Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LFP full cell demonstrates prominent rate capability, a stable operating voltage, and superior long-cycle stability, coupled with successful LED lighting performance.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Synthesis of CuMn-MOF Precursor

The CuMn-MOF precursor was synthesized via a hydrothermal method. Typically, 0.75 mmol Cu(NO3)2·3H2O and 0.75 mmol Mn(NO3)2·4H2O were dissolved in 20 mL ethanol. Subsequently, 1.0 g polyvinylpyrrolidone was added to the solution, which was then stirred continuously for 30 min to form a homogeneous mixture denoted as Solution A. Meanwhile, 0.2 mmol terephthalic acid was dissolved in 20 mL N,N-dimethylformamide with vigorous stirring to prepare Solution B. Solution B was slowly added dropwise into Solution A over a period of 30 min under constant stirring to ensure uniform mixing. The resulting mixture was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave, sealed tightly, and subjected to hydrothermal reaction at 120 °C for 24 h. After the reaction system was naturally cooled to room temperature, the solid product was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm (revolutions per minute), washed thoroughly with ethanol three times to remove residual impurities, and then vacuum-dried at 60 °C for 12 h to obtain the CuMn-MOF precursor. For the control sample (Cu-MOF), it was synthesized under identical experimental conditions except that 1.5 mmol Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was used as the sole metal source instead of the CuMn bimetallic nitrate mixture.

3.2. Synthesis of Cu2Se/MnSe@C Composite

The Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite was prepared by gas-phase selenization of the CuMn-MOF precursor. A quartz boat containing 100 mg selenium powder was placed upstream in a tube furnace, and 200 mg of the CuMn-MOF precursor was placed in a separate crucible downstream. Under a continuous argon flow rate of 50 sccm (standard cubic centimeters per minute) to maintain an inert atmosphere, the system was heated at a rate of 5 °C min−1 to 650 °C and held at this temperature for 2 h to ensure full selenization. After the reaction, the product was furnace-cooled to room temperature under argon protection and collected as the Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite. The pure Cu-MOF precursor was selenized under the same conditions to obtain the Cu2Se@C sample.

3.3. Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Shimadzu XRD-6100 (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), Cu Kα, λ = 1.5418 Å, 40 kV) characterized crystallographic structures over 2θ = 10–80° (5° min−1). Morphology and microstructure were observed via SEM (Zeiss Gemini 500 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany), 20 kV) and TEM (FEI Tecnai G2 F30 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA), 200 kV). Surface chemical states and elemental valence were analyzed by XPS (Thermo Fisher K-Alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Al Kα, 1486.6 eV), with the powder samples fixed on the sample stage using conductive adhesive and all XPS spectra calibrated for energy accuracy against the standard binding energy of C 1s = 284.8 eV.

3.4. Electrochemical Measurements

Working electrodes were fabricated by mixing the active material, acetylene black (conductive agent), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, binder) in a mass ratio of 7:2:1. The mixture was dispersed in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone to form a homogeneous slurry, which was uniformly cast on Cu foil. The coated Cu foil was vacuum-dried at 60 °C for 12 h, and the thickness of the active material layer was controlled at 100 microns. After drying, the Cu foil was punched into 12 mm-diameter discs, and the electrode was compacted to ensure sufficient contact between the active material, conductive agent, and current collector. CR2025 coin cells were assembled in an argon-filled glovebox (H2O/O2 < 0.01 ppm), using lithium foil as counter/reference electrode, Celgard 2500 as separator, and 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC/EMC (1:1:1 v/v) as electrolyte. Galvanostatic charge–discharge tests were conducted on a NEWARE BST-60 system within 0.01–3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+). EIS measurements were performed on a CHI760E workstation in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz with an AC amplitude of 5 mV at the open circuit potential. GITT tests were conducted on a NEWARE BST-60 system at a current density of 50 mA g−1, with a pulse duration of 0.5 h and a relaxation time of 4 h, within the voltage window of 0.01–3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+).

4. Conclusions

In summary, a Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite anode material with integrated carbon hybridization and heterogeneous interface engineering was successfully fabricated via MOF-derived selenization. The key innovation lies in the rational combination of Cu2Se and MnSe to form well-defined heterogeneous interfaces, coupled with in situ growth on carbon nanosheets, which synergistically addresses the intrinsic drawbacks of pure Cu2Se. Structural and compositional analyses confirm that Mn introduction modulates the electronic interaction between Cu2Se and MnSe, while the carbon matrix ensures structural integrity and rapid electron transport. Electrochemical and mechanistic studies validate that the heterogeneous interfaces not only reduce charge transfer resistance and accelerate Li+ diffusion but also enhance pseudocapacitive contribution, thereby promoting overall electrochemical kinetics. As a result, the Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite outperforms Cu2Se@C in specific capacity and rate capability. Furthermore, the successful assembly of full cells with LiFePO4 cathodes demonstrates the composite’s practical applicability.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31050860/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite, displaying the hierarchical nanosheet-assembled microstructure and uniform anchoring of Cu2Se/MnSe nanoparticles on the carbon nanosheet surface; Figure S2: Initial four-cycle CV curves of (a) Cu2Se@C and (b) Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites, reflecting the evolution of redox reactions and electrochemical reversibility during initial lithiation/delithiation processes; Figure S3. CV curves of Cu2Se@C composite at scan rates ranging from 0.2 to 1.6 mV s−1, illustrating the scan rate-dependent electrochemical response and charge storage behavior; Figure S4. Quantitative pseudocapacitive contribution analysis of Cu2Se@C composite at various scan rates (0.2–1.6 mV s−1), showing the proportion of capacitive current (shadowed area) in the total lithium storage capacity; Figure S5. Quantitative pseudocapacitive contribution analysis of Cu2Se/MnSe@C composite at various scan rates (0.2–1.6 mV s−1), showing the proportion of capacitive current (shadowed area) in the total lithium storage capacity; Figure S6. Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of LiFePO4 cathode material, showing the basic lithium storage performance for full cell assembly.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; methodology, Y.Z.; validation, J.L.; formal analysis, L.H., J.Z. and H.L.; investigation, H.S.; resources, G.S. and Q.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.H. and J.Z.; supervision, L.H., Y.W. and C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Innovation & Entrepreneurship Training Initiative (202410363061), the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students in Anhui Province (S202510363281), and the Anhui Polytechnic University’s Undergraduate Research Grant (2023DZ23).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Mao, J.; Zhao, X.; Jin, J. MCr2Se4 (M = Cu, Ni, Fe)/C composites derived from metal-organic frameworks as novel anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 710, 163973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Z.; Chao, D.; Luo, N.; Tian, Y.; Ma, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, B.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, X. Rational design of hierarchical Zn-Fe bimetallic selenide with N-doped carbon nanorod toward high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2026, 663, 238814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Lü, W. Dynamic coupling mechanism in NbSe2/MoSe2 heterojunctions for enhanced temperature adaptability of lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2026, 14, 7071–7082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, X.; Cao, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, K.; Peng, H.; Xiong, J.; Su, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhong, M. Interface engineering of Cu2−xSe/Bi2Se3 heterostructure in situ encapsulated into porous carbon for superior lithium/sodium ion storage. J. Power Sources 2025, 652, 237702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, S.-T.; Wen, W.-X.; Chen, P.-P.; Dong, S.-C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.-Z.; Zhao, D.-L. Enabling Stable and Rapid Lithium/Sodium Storage by Anchoring Bimetallic Selenides with a Heterogeneous Interface on Reduced Graphene Oxide. Small 2025, 21, e07592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, B.; Xue, J.-Y.; Li, F.-L.; Geng, H.; Lang, J.-P. Interfacial Kinetics Regulation of MoS2/Cu2Se Nanosheets toward Superior High-Rate and Ultralong-Lifespan Sodium-Ion Half/Full Batteries. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 5304–5310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bugday, N.; Huang, J.; Deng, W.; Zou, G.; Hou, H.; Ji, X.; Yaşar, S. Architectures of zeolitic imidazolate framework derived Cu2Se/ZnSe@NPC and Cu1.95Se@NPC nanoparticles as anode materials for sodium-ion and lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2025, 632, 236352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wen, W.-X.; Zheng, C.-L.; He, X.-C.; Sun, W.; Cui, M.-X.; Hou, Y.-L.; Zhao, D.-L. Boosting lithium/sodium ion storage performance of the bimetallic selenide anodes via morphology engineering and interface regulation. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2025, 996, 119337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, D.; Jiang, C.; Feng, Z.; Xiong, D.; He, M. Porous-carbon supported and Fluorine-doped Lamellar SnO2-ZnO Composite as Anode for High-rate and Long-cycle Lithium-ion Batteries. Ceram. Int. 2026; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, G.; Zhou, J.; Gui, R.; Xu, M.; Mao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Shao, B.; Song, M. Interface–Defect Coupling Modulation in CuCo2O4/CuO Heterostructures for Enhanced Lithium Storage Performance. Langmuir 2026, 42, 3264–3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, S.; Liu, B.; Zhang, H.; Guo, Q.; Xia, Q.; Zhai, T.; Xia, H. Boosting Energy Storage via Confining Soluble Redox Species onto Solid–Liquid Interface. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kalsoom, U.; Khan, S.; Kashif, M.; Yaseen, H.S.; Hussain, S.A.; Azizi, S.; Maaza, M. MXene-based hybrid composites for lithium-ion batteries: Advances in synthesis strategies and electrochemical performance. Ionics 2025, 31, 10053–10073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Priyadharshini, A.; Vinodhini, S.P.; Xavier, J.R. A comprehensive review of graphene-based nanocomposites for high-performance energy storage: Advances in design, electrochemical mechanisms, and future prospects. Ionics, 2026; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, P.; Guo, D.; Tong, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Zhang, M.; Su, Z. Concerted carbon confinement and conductivity enhancement in a MnSe/carbon nanotube/porous carbon anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2026, 152, 120792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Fang, S.; Guo, M.; Fang, Z.; Qi, L.; Guo, L.; Qin, Y.; Bao, H. Heterostructure MnO/MnSe nanoparticles encapsulated in a nitrogen-doped carbon shell for high-performance lithium/sodium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2024, 82, 110584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Yu, Q.; Shi, L.; Wei, X. Novel MOF-derived bimetallic selenide heterojunction CoSe2/MnSe@NC enhancing lithium-ion anode storage performance. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2025, 997, 119482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, H.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Yu, G.; Zhu, M.; Liu, Y. Interfacial Storage for Next-Generation Batteries: Mechanisms, Advances, and Challenges. Carbon Neutralization 2025, 4, e70031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, H.; Zhao, H.; Feng, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W. Coherent heterogeneous interface engineering for advanced lithium-ion batteries anodes. J. Energy Storage 2026, 141, 119278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zeng, J.; Xia, S.; Xie, P.; Xie, X.; Peng, H.; Zhu, L.; Shakir, I.; Ma, G.; Xu, Y. Sulfur vacancy and heterointerface synergistically regulated VS4@Bi2S3 for high-capacity and long-life magnesium-ion batteries. Nano Res. 2026; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Shen, A.; Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Feng, Y.; Li, Q. MoS2/MoN hierarchical heterostructure induces built-in electric field achieving high-rate and long-life lithium-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2026, 708, 139871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, K.; Guo, G.; Tan, X.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, H. Achieving high-energy and long-cycling aqueous zinc-metal batteries by highly reversible insertion mechanisms in Ti-substituted Na0.44MnO2 cathode. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 139059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.; Lei, Y.; Wang, X.; Lv, E.; Li, J.; Zhang, N.; Wang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Shang, H.; Zhang, B. Synergistic Long-Range Interaction of Co-Cu Dual-Atom Sites on Hollow CeO2 Nanostructures for Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026, 36, e11730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, L.; Zhong, P.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Balogun, M.S.; Tong, Y. Improved hydrogen generation integrated with methanol electrooxidation by manganese selenide/cobalt selenide heterostructure electrocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 669, 160553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, S.; Jia, S.; Xi, N.; Wang, Q.; Lin, Y.; Yang, C.; Yin, W.; Qiu, T. Bimetallic Ru-Ni supported on hierarchical nitrogen doped carbon for efficient catalytic hydrotreatment of fast pyrolysis liquids. Biomass Bioenergy 2026, 205, 108544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meda, L.; Ranghino, G.; Moretti, G.; Cerofolini, G.F. XPS detection of some redox phenomena in Cu-zeolites. Surf. Interface Anal. 2002, 33, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, Y.; Pan, S.; Yi, X.; Chi, S.; Yin, X.; Geng, C.; Yin, Q.; Zhan, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Jin, F.-M.; et al. Fluorinating All Interfaces Enables Super-Stable Solid-State Lithium Batteries by in Situ Conversion of Detrimental Surface Li2CO3. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2308493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, R.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, N.; Liu, W.; Gao, B.; Li, Q. Utilizing the oxygen-atom trapping effect of Co3O4 with oxygen vacancies to promote chlorite activation for water decontamination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2319427121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, X.; Ju, S.; Xie, K.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, M. Understanding and Quantifying the Contribution of Oxygen Species in Hydrogen Sensing by Pd/In2O3 Nanosheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, 65, e18988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, H.; Jiang, J.; Wang, F.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J. Facile Synthesis of Rod-like Cu2−xSe and Insight into its Improved Lithium-Storage Property. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 2235–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tian, J.; Yao, Y.; Yang, L.; Zha, L.; Xu, G.; Huang, S.; Wei, T.; Cao, J.; Wei, X. Fabrication of MnSe/SnSe@C heterostructures for high-performance Li/Na storage. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 5848–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boaretto, N.; Rana, M.; Marcilla, R.; Vilatela, J.J. Revealing the Mechanism of Electrochemical Lithiation of Carbon Nanotube Fibers. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 8695–8705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, N.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; He, W.; Cui, J.; Sun, J. Constructing Biomass-Based Ultrahigh-Rate Performance SnOy@C/SiOx Anode for LIBs via Disproportionation Effect. Small 2023, 19, 2204867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chung, Y.; Lee, J.-Y.; Shin, J.; Park, B.-N. A leap in LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 cathode technology: Additive-free alternating current electrophoretic deposition for maximized pseudocapacitive contribution and rate capability. J. Energy Storage 2026, 141, 119408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khan, M.Y.; Husain, A.; Alqarni, S.A.; Zeeshan, M.; Alarifi, A.; Li, X.; Shahid, M. Enhanced pseudocapacitive performance of a Pb-based MOF/FCNT composite for high-stability supercapacitor applications: A step ahead towards energy storage. Dalton Trans. 2026, 55, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, S.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Gao, F.; Lu, Q. Harnessing 4f–3d synergy in Ce–Fe heterostructure: A PBA-derived oxygen reservoir for stable high-capacity lithium storage. Chem. Commun. 2026, 62, 2691–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wei, L.; Geng, S.; Liu, H.; Deng, L.; Mao, Y.; Ning, Y.; Wang, B.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lou, S. Crystallographic Engineering Enables Fast Low-Temperature Ion Transport of TiNb2O7 for Cold-Region Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2026, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Luo, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Choi, J.; Park, G.H.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Lee, H. Pseudo-capacitive and kinetic enhancement of metal oxides and pillared graphite composite for stabilizing battery anodes. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Kang, H.; Dai, M.; Tian, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, X. Synergistic Modulation and Compositional Orchestration of Triphasic Hybrid Phosphides with Multi-Atom Active Sites Toward High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Small 2026, 22, e11411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schalenbach, M.; Raijmakers, L.; Tempel, H.; Eichel, R.-A. How Microstructures, Oxide Layers, and Charge Transfer Reactions Influence Double Layer Capacitances. Part 2: Equivalent Circuit Models. Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2025, 5, e202400010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oh, M.J.; Park, J.H.; Roh, K.C. Elucidating the Synergistic Role of in Situ SiOX Shell and rGO Network in Stabilizing Si Anodes via Distribution of Relaxation Times Analysis. Small Struct. 2026, 7, e202500689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, H.; Zhou, H. Enhancing the performances of Li-ion batteries by carbon-coating: Present and future. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1201–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; Ren, J.; Wang, J.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, Y. Interface Engineering and Multidimensional Heterojunction Design: Sodium Storage Mechanism and Performance Optimization of Sodium-Ion Battery Anode Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, e13954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, X.; Yang, H.; Lin, X.; Tong, Y. Construction of cobalt vacancies in cobalt telluride to induce fast ionic/electronic diffusion kinetics for lithium-ion half/full batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 127, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phase composition and microstructural features of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites: (a) XRD patterns confirming the formation of single-phase Cu2Se and bimetallic Cu2Se/MnSe composite with matched standard diffraction data; (b) SEM image, (c) TEM image, (d,e) HRTEM images and (f) SAED pattern of Cu2Se/MnSe@C, revealing the nanosheet-assembled architecture, homogeneous dispersion of ultra-small selenide nanoparticles, and well-defined Cu2Se/MnSe heterogeneous interfaces with distinct lattice fringes.
Figure 1. Phase composition and microstructural features of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites: (a) XRD patterns confirming the formation of single-phase Cu2Se and bimetallic Cu2Se/MnSe composite with matched standard diffraction data; (b) SEM image, (c) TEM image, (d,e) HRTEM images and (f) SAED pattern of Cu2Se/MnSe@C, revealing the nanosheet-assembled architecture, homogeneous dispersion of ultra-small selenide nanoparticles, and well-defined Cu2Se/MnSe heterogeneous interfaces with distinct lattice fringes.
Molecules 31 00860 g001
Figure 2. Elemental composition and chemical state evolution of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites probed by XPS: (a) Survey spectra verifying the presence of core elements; (b) Mn 2p spectrum of Cu2Se/MnSe@C confirming successful Mn incorporation without impurity phases; (c) Cu 2p, (d) Se 3d, (e) C 1s and (f) O 1s core-level spectra, illustrating interfacial electron transfer-induced binding energy shifts after Mn introduction.
Figure 2. Elemental composition and chemical state evolution of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites probed by XPS: (a) Survey spectra verifying the presence of core elements; (b) Mn 2p spectrum of Cu2Se/MnSe@C confirming successful Mn incorporation without impurity phases; (c) Cu 2p, (d) Se 3d, (e) C 1s and (f) O 1s core-level spectra, illustrating interfacial electron transfer-induced binding energy shifts after Mn introduction.
Molecules 31 00860 g002
Figure 3. Electrochemical lithium storage performance of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites: (a) CV curves of Cu2Se@C showing intrinsic redox behavior; (b) CV curves of Cu2Se/MnSe@C with extra redox peaks from MnSe and enhanced reversibility; (c) Rate capability comparison demonstrating the superior high-current performance of Cu2Se/MnSe@C; (d) Galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles of Cu2Se/MnSe@C at different current densities; (e) Long-cycle stability of Cu2Se/MnSe@C at 1 A g−1 with capacity activation phenomenon.
Figure 3. Electrochemical lithium storage performance of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites: (a) CV curves of Cu2Se@C showing intrinsic redox behavior; (b) CV curves of Cu2Se/MnSe@C with extra redox peaks from MnSe and enhanced reversibility; (c) Rate capability comparison demonstrating the superior high-current performance of Cu2Se/MnSe@C; (d) Galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles of Cu2Se/MnSe@C at different current densities; (e) Long-cycle stability of Cu2Se/MnSe@C at 1 A g−1 with capacity activation phenomenon.
Molecules 31 00860 g003
Figure 4. Lithium storage mechanism and electrochemical kinetics of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites: (a) CV curves of Cu2Se/MnSe@C at varied scan rates; (b) log(i) vs. log(v) plots for b-value calculation to distinguish charge storage mechanisms; (c) Quantitative pseudocapacitive contribution ratios at different scan rates; (d) Nyquist plots fitted with equivalent circuit model; (e) Z′ vs. ω−1/2 plots for analyzing Li+ diffusion behavior; (fi) GITT curves and corresponding Li+ diffusion coefficients during lithiation/delithiation processes.
Figure 4. Lithium storage mechanism and electrochemical kinetics of Cu2Se@C and Cu2Se/MnSe@C composites: (a) CV curves of Cu2Se/MnSe@C at varied scan rates; (b) log(i) vs. log(v) plots for b-value calculation to distinguish charge storage mechanisms; (c) Quantitative pseudocapacitive contribution ratios at different scan rates; (d) Nyquist plots fitted with equivalent circuit model; (e) Z′ vs. ω−1/2 plots for analyzing Li+ diffusion behavior; (fi) GITT curves and corresponding Li+ diffusion coefficients during lithiation/delithiation processes.
Molecules 31 00860 g004
Figure 5. Practical application feasibility of Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LiFePO4 full cells: (a) Schematic illustration of the full cell configuration; (b) Rate capability at different current densities; (c) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves exhibiting a stable average operating voltage of ~2.7 V; (d) Visual demonstration of powering LEDs to verify actual electrochemical output; (e) Long-cycle stability confirming reliable performance for practical lithium-ion battery applications.
Figure 5. Practical application feasibility of Cu2Se/MnSe@C||LiFePO4 full cells: (a) Schematic illustration of the full cell configuration; (b) Rate capability at different current densities; (c) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves exhibiting a stable average operating voltage of ~2.7 V; (d) Visual demonstration of powering LEDs to verify actual electrochemical output; (e) Long-cycle stability confirming reliable performance for practical lithium-ion battery applications.
Molecules 31 00860 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, L.; Zhu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, H.; Lin, H.; Li, S.; Su, G.; Li, Q.; Wu, Y.; et al. MOF-Derived Carbon-Anchored Cu2Se/MnSe Heterointerfacial Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lithium Storage via Synergistic Interface Effects. Molecules 2026, 31, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050860

AMA Style

Hu L, Zhu J, Zheng Y, Li J, Shi H, Lin H, Li S, Su G, Li Q, Wu Y, et al. MOF-Derived Carbon-Anchored Cu2Se/MnSe Heterointerfacial Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lithium Storage via Synergistic Interface Effects. Molecules. 2026; 31(5):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050860

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Lei, Jie Zhu, Yuchen Zheng, Junwei Li, Haowu Shi, Haoran Lin, Shixuan Li, Guanyu Su, Qiangyu Li, Yongbo Wu, and et al. 2026. "MOF-Derived Carbon-Anchored Cu2Se/MnSe Heterointerfacial Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lithium Storage via Synergistic Interface Effects" Molecules 31, no. 5: 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050860

APA Style

Hu, L., Zhu, J., Zheng, Y., Li, J., Shi, H., Lin, H., Li, S., Su, G., Li, Q., Wu, Y., & Yang, C. (2026). MOF-Derived Carbon-Anchored Cu2Se/MnSe Heterointerfacial Nanoparticles for Enhanced Lithium Storage via Synergistic Interface Effects. Molecules, 31(5), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050860

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop