Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds Isolated from Salix cinereaL. with Emphasis on the Pharmaceutical Relevance of Flavan-3-ols
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of a Confirmatory LC-MS/MS Method Using QuEChERS for Determination of Nitrofuran Metabolites in Eggs According to EU Regulation 2021/808
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Potent Quinone Reductase Encoded by ywqN (Qnr1) Protects Bacillus subtilis from Oxygen Radical Genotoxicity

by
Beatriz R. González
1,†,
Norma Ramírez
1,†,
Karen Abundiz-Yáñez
1,
Víctor M. Ayala-García
2,
Luz I. Valenzuela-García
3,
Eduardo A. Robleto
4 and
Mario Pedraza-Reyes
1,*
1
Department of Biology, Division of Natural and Exact Sciences, University of Guanajuato, Guanajuato C.P. 36060, Mexico
2
Faculty of Chemical Sciences, Juarez University of Durango State, Av. Veterinaria S/N. Circuito Universitario. Col. Valle del Sur, Durango C.P. 34120, Mexico
3
Department of Sustainable Engineering, Advanced Materials Research Center (CIMAV), Arroyo Seco, Durango C.P. 34147, Mexico
4
School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Molecules 2026, 31(4), 701; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040701
Submission received: 27 December 2025 / Revised: 6 February 2026 / Accepted: 13 February 2026 / Published: 17 February 2026

Abstract

ywqN encodes a protein with an unassigned function that shares partial 3D homology with B. subtilis YhdA, Pseudomonas putida ChrR, and Escherichia coli YieF, which are NADP(H)/FMN-dependent oxidoreductases that catalyze the reduction of diverse chemical pollutants, including Cr(VI). Here, we report that a recombinant His6-YwqN protein displays marginal chromate reductase activity but is capable of reducing synthetic azo dyes. Remarkably, His6-YwqN exhibits a potent quinone reductase activity, catalyzing the reduction of menadione (MD) and 1,4-naphthoquinone (NQ). The individual and combined roles of YwqN and YhdA in protecting B. subtilis from ROS-promoting agents were further tested. Sensitization to the oxidizing agent H2O2 required the simultaneous loss of both YwqN and YhdA. In contrast, strains deficient in ywqN, either alone or in combination with yhdA, exhibited similar but higher susceptibilities to the superoxide-generating agent MD compared with the WT strain. These results indicate that YwqN and YhdA contribute to protection against the deleterious effects of ROS in B. subtilis. Further results revealed that while YwqN, but not YhdA, prevented MD-induced mutagenesis, both proteins synergistically prevented RifR mutations induced by H2O2. Furthermore, overexpression of YwqN suppressed the hypermutagenesis phenotype of a B. subtilis strain deficient in the prevention/repair oxidized guanine (GO) system, which is prone to accumulate 8-oxoGs. In summary, YwqN counteracts the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects promoted by ROS in B. subtilis and represents a potential tool for the remediation of soils and effluents contaminated with carcinogenic azo dyes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases catalyze the reduction or oxidation of distinct substrates coupled to the oxidation/reduction of a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide cofactor (either NAD+ or NADP+) [1]. Some NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases contain flavin mononucleotide (FMN) or, more frequently, flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as a redox-active prosthetic group. NAD(P)H–flavoproteins are widespread in microorganisms, where they catalyze a diversity of reactions that play pivotal roles in central metabolic pathways [1,2]. Bacterial NAD(P)H/FMN oxidoreductases are of particular interest in bioremediation processes due to their ability to reductively cleave dyes containing an azo bond [1,3]. Large amounts of these synthetic dyes are used worldwide and released into the environment by textile industries, thus representing major sources of pollution [3,4]. Azo dyes are water-soluble and difficult to detect, and their degradation products, usually aromatic amines, are of human health concern due to their carcinogenic potential [4].
The three-dimensional structures of several bacterial azoreductases have been solved, and all display a common structural topology known as the flavodoxin-like fold [5,6]. This fold is composed of a central five-stranded parallel β-sheet flanked by five α-helices and is shared by some eukaryotic NAD(P)H oxidoreductases that possess quinone reductase activity [5,6]. In addition to azo compounds, azoreductases can reduce a broad range of substrates, including quinones, nitrofurans, and chromate [5,6,7]; therefore, NAD(P)H–quinone oxidoreductases and azoreductases can be considered part of a common enzyme family [3,6]. Notably, although proteins belonging to this family are highly divergent in their amino acid sequences, they share a conserved overall fold and similar enzymatic activities [6].
In addition to DNA repair proteins, peroxidases, and superoxide dismutases, FMN-dependent oxidoreductases constitute alternative cellular defenses against oxidative stress. Accordingly, in Pseudomonas putida, a biological role has been attributed to the FMN-Red protein ChrR, which confers resistance to H2O2 [8]. Similarly, the diaphorase NQO1 has been shown to protect mammals from the toxicity of ROS-generating carcinogenic compounds such as benzo-pyrene quinone, naphthoquinone, and benzoquinone [9]. Furthermore, the FMN-dependent oxidoreductase YhdA was shown to reduce hexavalent chromium and quinones, and to protect B. subtilis from the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects promoted by these ROS-generating agents [7].
YwqN from B. subtilis shares structural homology with the FMN/NADPH-dependent oxidoreductases YhdA, ChrR and YieF, which reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) while avoiding the generation of partially reduced species that promote oxidative stress [7,8,10,11,12]. The biochemical and physiological functions of YwqN, which have remained elusive to date, were here investigated. Our results reveal that a purified recombinant YwqN protein displays marginal chromate reductase activity but exhibits strong NADPH/FMN-dependent azoreductase and quinone reductase activities. Genetic analyses of B. subtilis strains deficient in YwqN and/or YhdA further demonstrate that both proteins play important roles in protecting B. subtilis from the deleterious and mutagenic effects of the oxygen radical generators H2O2 and MD. Remarkably, overexpression of YwqN counteracted the hypermutagenesis exhibited by a B. subtilis strain lacking the prevention/repair oxidized guanine (GO) system, thereby preventing the accumulation of the ROS-induced lesion 8-oxoG. Overall, these findings assign for the first time a functional role to YwqN in protecting B. subtilis from ROS-promoted DNA damage, and based on its biochemical properties, suggest its potential application in the remediation of soils and effluents polluted with carcinogenic azo dyes.

2. Results

2.1. YwqN Possesses Structural Homology with NADP(H)/FMN-Dependent Oxidoreductases

The biochemical and physiological roles of B. subtilis YwqN (BsuYwqN) have remained elusive to date [13]. Previous crystallographic studies reported that BsuYwqN adopts a similar fold to that reported for the tryptophan repressor protein [14]. As shown in this report, multiple-sequence analysis revealed that BsuYwqN shares 42% amino acid similarity with B. subtilis YhdA (BsuYhdA) and 34% similarity with E. coli YieF (EcoYieF), respectively (Figure 1). Previous biochemical evidence demonstrated that these oxidoreductases catalyze the FMN/NADPH-dependent reduction of hexavalent chromium and quinones, respectively [7,10]. Consistent with this, the primary structure of BsuYwqN contains the NAD(P)H-dh2-binding motif, LFVTPEYNXXXXXXLKNAIDXXS, characteristic of oxidoreductases from divergent origins [1,5,14] (Figure 1). Within this region, BsuYwqN contains the amino acid residues Pro77, Tyr79, Gly85, Leu87, Lys88, and Asp92, all of which are conserved in EcoYieF and BsuYhdA (Figure 1), supporting the dependence of these proteins on NAD(P)H as an electron donor.
A second motif required for FMN-binding was identified between the β1 sheet and α-helix 1 of BsuYwqN (Figure 1). This motif includes the invariant amino acids Gly8 and Arg11, the non-polar residues Gly13 and Gly14, as well as the polar amino acid Thr16 (Figure 1). These residues are likely involved in hydrogen bonding with the hydroxyl groups of the ribitol moiety of FMN, as described for YhdA [7] (Figure 2A). Notably, among the positively charged residues Arg and Lys involved in phosphate binding in YhdA and YieF, only Arg11 is conserved in YwqN; the corresponding lysine residue is replaced by Ser12, whose uncharged hydroxymethyl side chain may alter interactions with the FMN phosphate group (Figure 1) [15].
Further similarities and differences between BsuYwqN, BsuYhdA, and EcoYieF were established by 3D structural alignments (Figure 2A–C). All three proteins exhibited the typical folding of bacterial flavodoxin-like enzymes, consisting of a sandwich-like configuration with five α-helices and five parallel β-sheets. However, while EcoYieF and BsuYwqN shared a high level of structural similarity (Figure 2A), BsuYwqN exhibited notable differences, including a shorter N-terminal α-helix and a disordered C-terminal region, which correspond to longer α-helices in BsuYhdA and EcoYieF, respectively (Figure 2B,C).
Despite these structural differences, molecular docking analyses indicated that BsuYwqN, as well as EcoYieF and BsuYhdA, bind FMN within a conserved region that includes the GXXRXGXXT motif (Figure 1 and Figure 2A) [1,5,14]. Notably, the best-scored docking pose for FMN in BsuYwqN (i.e., −156.5) was comparable to the energies obtained from redocking of EcoYieF and BsuYhdA; namely, −166.5 and −167.3, respectively.
A detailed analysis of FMN–protein interactions, supported by the docking results, revealed that in EcoYieF and BsuYhdA, an arginine residue (R15 and R11, respectively) forms a stabilizing salt bridge with the FMN phosphate group. Additionally, a conserved glutamate residue (E82 and E73, respectively) establishes hydrogen bonds with the FMN isoalloxazine ring (Figure 2D,E). BsuYhdA and BsuYwqN also conserve a valine residue (V104 and V120, respectively), Thr16, and a glycine residue (G106 and G155, respectively), all of which participate in hydrogen bonding interactions (Figure 2E,F). In BsuYwqN, the glutamate residue is replaced by an aspartate, which retains the negative charge and can similarly interact with the FMN ring (Figure 2F). In addition, all three proteins contain a tyrosine residue (Y83 in EcoYieF; Y74 in BsuYhdA; and Y79 in BsuYwqN) that engages in multiple hydrophobic interactions with FMN (Figure 2D–F). Overall, FMN binding in these enzymes involves a combination of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions; however, the absence of a predicted arginine-mediated salt bridge in BsuYwqN may indicate a reduced FMN-binding affinity relative to the other proteins (Figure 2F).
Taken together, these findings indicate that YwqN shares key structural features with known chromate and quinone reductases and that its structural properties may allow it to catalyze FMN/NADPH-dependent reduction of environmental pollutants such as azo dyes, hexavalent chromium and quinones.

2.2. Elucidation of the Biochemical Function of BsuYwqN

As indicated above, the biochemical function of BsuYwqN has remained elusive; therefore, we sought to express its encoding gene to generate a recombinant protein in E. coli. To this end, the ORF of ywqN lacking the first and last codons was PCR-amplified and cloned into the expression vector pQE30 to generate a His6-tagged BsuYwqN protein, as described in the Materials and Methods. Based on its amino acid composition, a molecular mass of 20.47 kDa was predicted for BsuYwqN [15]. In agreement with this prediction, purification of His6-YwqN by metal affinity chromatography yielded a ~20 kDa protein with a high level of purity, as revealed by SDS-PAGE (Table S1 and Figure 3 inset).
We next investigated the ability of purified His6-BsuYwqN to catalyze the reduction of distinct substrates, beginning with the azo compound methyl red (MR). These assays were initially performed in the absence of FMN, but in the presence of an excess of NADPH. Under these conditions, the protein was unable to reduce the azo dye MR. As noted above, analysis of the structural properties of YwqN revealed the absence of key amino acid residues involved in FMN binding (Figure 1 and Figure 2F); therefore, we inquired whether BsuHis6-YwqN contained an associated flavin cofactor. Ultraviolet–visible absorbance spectroscopy revealed the absence of a characteristic peak centered at approximately 450 nm, which would be indicative of a bound oxidized flavin in BsuHis6-YwqN (Figure 3) [16]. This result suggested that FMN was either dissociated from the recombinant purified protein or was not efficiently incorporated during its production in E. coli. We, therefore, supplemented FMN to the buffers employed during the purification of BsuHis6-YwqN, as described in the Materials and Methods. This procedure yielded a purified protein displaying a UV–visible spectrum with two distinct peaks at 375 and 455 nm, consistent with the presence of a flavin cofactor [16] (Figure 3). Furthermore, this FMN-reconstituted form of BsuHis6-YwqN was able to oxidize the cofactors NADH and NADPH, with similar kinetics, as determined by monitoring absorbance at 340 nm (Figure S1). As expected, no oxidation of these cofactors was detected in the control reaction lacking the FMN-reconstituted enzyme (Figure S1).
Having determined the cofactor requirements of BsuHis6-YwqN, we next tested its capacity to reduce three distinct azo dyes, namely, MR, methyl orange (MO) and disperse orange (DO). The results revealed that BsuYwqN catalyzed the decolorization of all three compounds, exhibiting, over time, a higher efficiency toward MO than toward the other two azo dyes (Figure S1 and Table 1). We further explored the enzymatic properties of BsuYwqN by experimentally determining its catalytic efficiency during the reduction of the three azo dyes, as described in the Materials and Methods. The enzyme exhibited similar catalytic efficiency values of 577, 667, and 630 M−1 s−1 during reduction of MR, MO, and DO, respectively (Table 1). Altogether, these results support the notion that BsuYwqN possesses structural and functional properties of azoreductases, thereby revealing its potential for bioremediation applications.
We next determined the catalytic efficiencies of BsuYwqN during reduction of the quinones MD and NQ. The enzyme was able to reduce both compounds with essentially similar catalytic efficiencies, namely, 12,500 M−1 s−1 for MD and 12,600 M−1 s−1 for NQ, respectively (Table 1). Notably, BsuYwqN reduced both quinones with catalytic efficiencies ~20-fold higher than those determined for the azo compounds (Table 1). Taken together, these results indicate that YwqN possesses structural and functional properties for the efficient reduction of both quinone compounds and azo dyes but displays better properties for catalyzing quinone reduction.
We finally investigated whether BsuYwqN exhibited chromate reductase activity. To this end, the FMN-reconstituted enzyme was incubated with increasing concentrations of hexavalent chromium in a range of 20–120 ppm for 30 min. Under these conditions, the enzyme displayed specific activities corresponding to approximately 10% and 0.1% of those calculated for the reduction of azo dyes and quinone compounds, respectively (Table S2). These results support the conclusion that BsuYwqN is considerably more efficient at reducing azo dyes and quinones than hexavalent chromium.

2.3. Determination of the Physiological Role of BsuYwqN

As demonstrated above, BsuYwqN possesses quinone reductase activity; therefore, we explored a possible role for this protein in conferring protection to B. subtilis against the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects promoted by oxygen radicals. To this end, we first challenged a B. subtilis strain deficient in ywqN with increasing doses of the ROS generators H2O2 and MD. Compared with the WT strain, the single loss of YwqN did not sensitize B. subtilis cells to the noxious effects of H2O2 (Figure 4A). To investigate whether this result could be explained by a suppressive effect mediated by the oxidoreductase YhdA [5,7], we disrupted the gene encoding this protein in both the WT strain and in a YwqN-deficient background. Notably, in comparison with the WT strain, loss of YhdA alone did not significantly affect the H2O2 susceptibility of B. subtilis; however, simultaneous loss of both YwqN and YhdA generated B. subtilis cells that were approximately 2.7-fold more sensitive to the noxious effects of this oxidizing agent than the WT strain (Figure 4A). Meanwhile, sensitivity to MD increased approximately 1.4- and 1.6-fold in strains deficient in ywqN or yhdA, respectively, relative to the WT strain, and this effect did not significantly increase in the double mutant lacking both ywqN and yhdA (Figure 4B). Altogether, these results suggest that while YwqN and YhdA complement each other’s functions to counteract the noxious effects of hydrogen peroxide, they seem to work in a common pathway to prevent MD-promoted cytotoxicity (Figure 4A,B).
Next, spontaneous RifR mutation frequencies, as well as those promoted by H2O2 or MD, were determined in a B. subtilis strain deficient in ywqN. The results revealed that, relative to the wild-type parental strain, loss of YwqN caused a mild but significant increase in both the spontaneous and H2O2-induced RifR mutation frequencies (Figure 5). Of note, while a pDG148 construct, carrying an IPTG-inducible Phs-ywqN cassette, restored the mutation frequencies of the ywqN mutant to those exhibited by the WT strain, such an effect was not observed with the empty vector control (Figure S3).
A previous report revealed that the oxidoreductase YhdA from B. subtilis (BsuYhdA) counteracts the mutagenic effects derived from the accumulation of ROS-induced genetic lesions [7]. Consistent with this, we found that loss of YhdA had a higher impact on both the spontaneous and H2O2-promoted mutagenesis than loss of ywqN alone (Figure 5). Notably, simultaneous loss of YwqN and YhdA caused a significant increase in spontaneous and H2O2-promoted RifR mutation frequencies relative to the WT strain and to strains carrying single deficiencies in yhdA or ywqN (Figure 5).
We further explored the mutagenic phenotypes associated with both oxidoreductases by challenging strains carrying single or double deficiencies in ywqN and/or yhdA, after being challenged with the superoxide radical generator, MD [17]. The results showed that relative to the WT strain, the loss of YwqN, but not of YhdA, increased the menadione-induced mutation frequency by approximately three-fold, and such an effect was not further enhanced in the strain deficient in both ywqN and yhdA (Figure 6). Of note, IPTG-induced expression of ywqN from the pDG148-Phs-ywqN plasmid, but not from the empty vector, restored MD-induced mutation frequencies to wild-type levels, thereby confirming the role of YwqN in protecting B. subtilis from MD-induced mutagenesis (Figure S3).
As shown in this study, YwqN confers protection to B. subtilis from the noxious effects of MD and H2O2. The ROS generated by these compounds can target DNA, producing strand breaks and oxidized bases, including the highly mutagenic lesion 8-oxoG [7]. Antioxidant enzymes such as KatA and SodA, as well as the prevention/repair GO system, counteract these effects [7]. Thus, to better understand the mechanism by which YwqN confers protection to B. subtilis against ROS-induced mutagenesis, an extrachromosomal plasmid designed to overexpress ywqN from an IPTG-inducible promoter was introduced into B. subtilis strains deficient in either the prevention/repair GO system or the major vegetative catalases KatA and KatB (Figure S4). Our results revealed a significant decrease in both spontaneous and H2O2-induced mutagenesis in the ΔGO strain carrying the plasmid that overexpresses ywqN (pDG148-ywqN) but not in the GO-deficient strain harboring the empty pDG148 vector (Figure 7A). Notably, overexpression of ywqN also reduced spontaneous H2O2- and MD-induced mutagenesis significantly in the strain deficient in KatA and KatB; however, this protective effect was not observed in the strains carrying the empty vector pDG148 (Figure 7B,C). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that the quinone reductase activity of YwqN enables B. subtilis to counteract the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects promoted by hydroxyl and superoxide radicals.

3. Discussion

ywqN from B. subtilis encodes a protein whose function has remained undetermined [13]. In this study, we first employed an in silico approach to demonstrate that YwqN shares structural features with bacterial NAD(P)H/FMN-dependent oxidoreductases that catalyze the reduction of hexavalent chromium, industrial dyes, and quinone compounds. We then determined the substrate preference, kinetic parameters, and biochemical properties of a recombinant His6-YwqN protein, which allowed us to assign YwqN a primary function as a quinone reductase. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that YwqN plays an important role in counteracting the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects promoted by superoxide and hydroxyl radicals in B. subtilis.
A previous crystallographic study suggested that YwqN adopts a similar fold to that of the tryptophan repressor [14]. Here, we determined that YwqN exhibits secondary and tertiary structural similarities with oxidoreductases that utilize NAD(P)H and FMN to catalyze the reduction of a broad range of substrates.
Primary sequence analysis of YwqN revealed the presence of independent domains predicted to bind the cofactors NAD(P)H and FMN. Within the NAD(P)H-binding region, YwqN contains only six of the thirteen amino acids reported to be absolutely conserved among diverse bacterial oxidoreductases [1,5,14]. A recent study that classified NAD(P)H-binding motifs of oxidoreductases of diverse origins based on their amino acid sequences defined six distinct 1d motifs to discriminate between NAD- and NADP-binding proteins [18]. Here, we found that NADH and NADPH can be efficiently reduced by BsuYwqN (Figure S1). Therefore, the YwqN residues Pro72, Tyr74, Gly80, Leu82, Lys83, and Asp87, which are located in the NAD(P)H motif and are conserved in EcoYieF and BsuYhdA (Figure 1), can be proposed as components of an additional, functional NAD(P)H-binding motif in bacterial oxidoreductases.
Analysis of the primary and tertiary structures of BsuYwqN revealed a divergence between its predicted FMN-binding motif and those of the oxidoreductases EcoYieF and BsuYhdA (Figure 1 and Figure 2). We hypothesized that such structural differences could negatively impact the affinity of BsuYwqN for the FMN cofactor. In support of this hypothesis, recombinant His6-YwqN purified by metal affinity chromatography lacked the characteristic absorbance peaks of flavin-containing proteins. Furthermore, under conditions of NADPH saturation, the FMN-deficient enzyme was unable to catalyze the reduction of the azo dye MR. It must be pointed out that flavin-dependent oxidoreductases exhibiting a low FMN affinity, as found here for YwqN, have been previously reported in E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Deinococcus radiodurans [19,20,21]. Previous studies reported the reconstitution of apo forms of bacterial flavodoxins with FMN concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 mM [19,20,22]. Here, we found that supplementation with 20 mM FMN was enough to reconstitute BsuYwqN activity, as demonstrated by its ability to efficiently catalyze the reduction of NADH, NADPH, three azo dyes, and the quinones MD and NQ (Figure S1). Furthermore, using MR as a substrate, His6-YwqN exhibited maximal dye reduction at pH 7.5 and at temperatures between 30 and 40 °C (Figure S5).
Our results aimed at determining the range of substrates that can be processed by BsuYwqN revealed its capacity to catalyze the reduction of distinct azo dyes and quinone compounds. However, in contrast with ChrR from P. putida, EcoYieF and BsuYhdA, BsuYwqN was found to be inefficient at reducing hexavalent chromium [7,10,11,12]. We speculate that the low affinity of BsuYwqN for FMN and/or the structural differences it displays relative to EcoYieF and BsuYhdA (Figure 1 and Figure 2) negatively impact the recognition and reduction of hexavalent chromium [23,24].
Although BsuYwqN exhibited stronger activity toward quinones than toward azo dyes, determination of initial reaction rates revealed that reduction of these compounds did not follow classical Michaelis–Menten kinetics. Therefore, we determined reduction rates at low substrate concentrations, where the reaction velocity was proportional to the substrate concentration (Figure S2) and employed a simplified form of the Michaelis–Menten equation [25,26] to calculate the catalytic efficiencies of YwqN over the aforementioned substrates. Of note, BsuYwqN reduced the dyes MR, MO and DO with similar efficiencies; however, the enzyme was ~ 20-fold more efficient at reducing MD and NQ than the azo dyes (Table 1). Overall, in terms of cofactor requirements, catalytic behavior and ability to reduce quinones and azo dyes, BsuYwqN parallels bacterial flavodoxins such as WbrA from E. coli and Archaeoglobus fulgidus, AzoA from Enterococcus faecalis, BsuYhdA, AcpD from E. coli, AzoR from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and Azo1 from Staphylococcus aureus [27,28,29,30,31,32].
In natural environments, B. subtilis can be exposed to soil pollutants such as hexavalent chromium and quinones; these compounds can promote the intracellular generation of ROS by acting as substrates of oxidoreductases [33,34]. Reduced semiquinone anions stimulate the production of superoxide and indirectly hydroxyl radicals [35], which can impact DNA, leading to mutagenesis and cell death [36].
Here, in agreement with our biochemical evidence revealing that ywqN encodes a potent FMN/NAD(P)H quinone reductase, we found that its encoded product confers protection to B. subtilis from the mutagenic effects of menadione and H2O2. Our genetic analyses of B. subtilis strains deficient in YwqN and/or YhdA indicated that YwqN plays a more important role in counteracting the mutagenic effects of menadione, whereas YhdA contributes better to preventing hydrogen peroxide-promoted mutagenesis. Notably, the combined loss of YwqN and YhdA generated a more pronounced mutagenic phenotype, indicating a synergistic role in protecting B. subtilis against hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage. Therefore, BsuYhdA not only shares the ability to reduce hexavalent chromium with PpuChrR but also confers protection against the noxious effects of H2O2 [8]. Meanwhile, YwqN seems to be more involved in protecting B. subtilis from electrophilic stress by catalyzing the two-electron reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol, thereby preventing the formation of mutagenic superoxide radicals. Similar protective roles have been reported for the mammalian flavoprotein reductases NQO1 and NQO2, as well as for the bacterial oxidoreductases AZR from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, MdaB from Helicobacter pylori and BsuYhdA [7,9,37,38,39,40]. Consistent with this model, overexpression of ywqN suppressed the mutagenic phenotypes of B. subtilis strains deficient in the GO prevention/repair system or in the major catalases KatA and KatB. These results further support a role for YwqN in counteracting the mutagenic effects of ROS and 8-OxoG and reinforce the notion that YwqN catalyzes a two-electron transfer reduction reaction that avoids the generation of electrophilic stress.
While our results strongly suggest that YwqN plays an antimutagenic role in actively growing B. subtilis cells, future studies will explore its contribution to stationary phase-associated mutagenesis, a process in which oxidative stress has been shown to promote genetic diversity in nutritionally stressed bacteria [36].
Finally, in addition to its physiological role in protecting B. subtilis from ROS-induced DNA damage, the broad substrate range of YwqN highlights its potential applicability in bioremediation of soils and effluents contaminated with carcinogenic azo dyes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains, Culture Conditions, and Reagents

All B. subtilis and E. coli strains and the plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 2. The growth medium used routinely was lysogeny broth (LB; Lennox formulation, Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA). When required, ampicillin (Amp; 100 μg mL−1), kanamycin (Kan; 10 μg mL−1 for B. subtilis and 50 μg mL−1 for E. coli), tetracycline (Tet; 10 μg·mL−1), spectinomycin (Sp; 100 μg·mL−1), chloramphenicol (Cm; 5 μg·mL−1), kanamycin (Kan; 25 μg·mL−1), erythromycin (Ery; 5 μg·mL−1), or rifampin (Rif; 10 μg·mL−1) was added to the medium. Liquid cultures were incubated with vigorous aeration (shaking at 250 rpm) at 37 °C. Cultures on solid media were grown at 37 °C. The optical density (OD) of liquid cultures was monitored with a Pharmacia Ultrospec 2000 spectrophotometer (Peapack, NJ, USA) set at 600 nm.
The azo dyes and quinones used in this study were methyl red (MR), methyl orange (MO), disperse orange (DO), menadione (MD), and 1,4-naphtoquinone (NQ). All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The wavelengths of maximum absorption of the azo compounds used were 430 nm for MR, 465 nm for MO, 445 for DO, and 340 nm for NQ, MD, NADH and NADPH.

4.2. Genetic and Molecular Biology Techniques

Preparations of competent E. coli or B. subtilis cells and their transformation with DNA were performed as previously described [42,43]. Chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis was purified according to a previously described protocol [44]. Small-scale preparation of plasmid DNA from E. coli cells, enzymatic manipulations, and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed by standard techniques [43]. Medium-scale preparation and purification of plasmid DNA were accomplished by using commercial ion-exchange columns according to the instructions of the supplier (Sigma-Aldrich).

4.3. Generation of a Construct to Overexpress ywqN in B. subtilis

A construct to overexpress ywqN in WT and distinct repair/prevention- and antioxidant-deficient B. subtilis strains was constructed as follows. A 721 bp fragment encompassing the open reading frame (ORF) of ywqN and extending 24 bp upstream of ORF and 154 bp downstream of the stop codon was amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA from strain B. subtilis 168 and the synthetic oligonucleotide primers 5′-GCGTCGACCGTAAACAAAGGAGCAGATGC-3′ (forward, containing a SalI site, underlined) and 5′-GCGCATGCTGCTTGACTTGCAGCGTGGTT-3′ (reverse, containing a SphI site, underlined). DNA amplification was carried out using high-fidelity Vent DNA polymerase according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The PCR product was digested with SalI and SphI and ligated into the SalI/SphI-digested expression vector pDG148. The resulting construct (pPERM1877) was first amplified in E. coli XL-10 Gold and then introduced by transformation into competent cells of B. subtilis ΔkatB::Cmr ΔkatA::Eryr (PERM1275) and B. subtilis ΔytkD:Cmr ΔmutM:Tetr ΔmutY:Spr (ΔGO; PERM1699) to generate the ywqN-overexpressing strains B. subtilis PERM1867 and PERM1876, respectively (Table 2). Additionally, a B. subtilis ΔkatB::Cmr ΔkatA::Eryr (PERM 1275) strain carrying the empty vector pDG148 was generated and designated PERM1868 (Table 2). A B. subtilis ΔGO strain, carrying the empty vector pDG148 (PERM1709), was also employed in this study (Table 2). Experiments employing these strains were amended with 1 mM IPTG.

4.4. Generation of a B. subtilis Strain Deficient in ywqN and yhdA

To generate a B. subtilis strain deficient in ywqN and yhdA, chromosomal DNA isolated from B. subtilis PERM1817 (ΔywqN::Ery) was used to transform competent cells of B. subtilis PERM1818 (yhdA::Kan) to generate B. subtilis strain PERM1905 (ΔywqN::Eryr ΔyhdA::Kanr) (Table 2).

4.5. Design of an E. coli Strain to Overproduce a YwqN Protein Containing an N-Terminal His6-Tag

The ORF of ywqN lacking the first and stop codon was amplified by PCR, using chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis 168 and the oligonucleotide primer set 5′- GCGGATCCAAAATTGCGGTTATTAACG-3′ (containing a BamHI site, underlined) and 5′- GCGTCGACTATCGCATCGCTTCTTTTC-3′ (containing a SalI site, underlined). The PCR fragment (540 bp) was first cloned into pJET1.2/blunt vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and replicated in E. coli DH5α. This plasmid was digested with BamHI/SalI, and the 519-bp ywqN fragment was cloned into the BamHI/SalI site of pQE30 (Qiagen; Germantown, MD, USA). The resulting construct was introduced by transformation into competent cells of E. coli XL-10 Gold to generate the strain E. coli PERM1892 (Table 2).

4.6. Purification of His6-YwqN

E. coli strain PERM1892 was grown at 37 °C in 100 mL of LB medium to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5. At this point, the culture was supplemented with IPTG to a final concentration of 1.0 mM, and the expression of ywqN was induced for 4 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with 10 mL of 100 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5 (buffer A). Cells were resuspended and incubated in 10 mL of buffer A containing 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenyl-methyl-sulfonyl-fluoride (PMSF), 1 mM DTT, 20 μM FMN and lysozyme (2 mg mL−1) for 30 min at 4 °C and then disrupted by sonication. The cell lysate was subjected to centrifugation (27,200× g) to eliminate undisrupted cells and cell debris, and the supernatant was applied to 5 mL of a nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA)–agarose (Qiagen; Valencia, CA, USA) column equilibrated with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)–250 mM NaCl (buffer B). The column was washed with 150 mL of buffer A containing 10% glycerol and 20 μM FMN (buffer C) containing 25 mM imidazole, and then the protein bound to the resin was eluted with 6 mL of buffer C containing 300 mM imidazole. Aliquots (15 μL) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, as previously described [45].

4.7. Homology and Structural Analyses

The amino acid sequences of B. subtilis YwqN and YhdA were obtained from the SubtiWiki database [13]. The E. coli YieF amino acid sequence was downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the T-coffee WEB server [46]. Secondary structure information was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) for BsuYwqN (PDB 1rli), BsuYhdA (PDB 1nni) and EcoYieF (PDB 3svl). Secondary structure alignment and visualization were carried out using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Schrödinger LLC, v.3.1.6.1).
While reported 3D structures of BsuYhdA and EcoYieF were co-crystallized with FMN, the available structure of BsuYwqN lacks a bound FMN molecule. Therefore, we employed molecular docking analyses to predict the FMN binding mode in BsuYwqN. To this end, firstly, FMN was redocked into BsuYhdA and BsuYieF using Molegro Virtual Docker [47] to identify the optimal search algorithm and scoring function. The best-performing parameters were MolDock Optimizer (algorithm) and MolDock Score [GRID] (scoring function). These parameters were then used to predict the FMN binding mode in BsuYwqN. All dockings and redocking procedures were run with 10,000 maximum iterations and an initial population of 50 poses, using a docking region of 10 Å and a grid size of 0.2 Å. For FMN redocking, poses were evaluated based on their RMSD relative to the binding mode observed in crystallized complexes BsuYhdA (PDB 1nni) and EcoYieF (PDB 3svl). For FMN docking in BsuYwqN, the FMN structure from PDB 1nni was used as a ligand, and RMSD values were calculated relative to this reference. The top-scoring pose was selected as the representative model in Figure 2.
Protein–ligand interaction analyses with FMN were performed using the Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler (PLIP) server from the University of Dresden [48]. All structural images of docking and protein–ligand interactions were generated using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (Schrödinger LLC, v.3.1.6.1).

4.8. Enzyme Assays

YwqN activity was measured by spectrophotometry in a JENWAY Genova Plus equipment (Cole Parmer; Vernon Hill, IL, USA) set at room temperature. Oxidation of nicotinamide cofactors was assayed in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM of NADH or NADPH and 0.5 μM of YwqN in 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5 and monitored for 10 min at 340 nm. To determine oxidation of MD and NQ, both compounds to a final concentration of 50 mM were mixed with 0.5 μM of His6 –YwqN and 300 mM of NADPH at pH 7.5 at room temperature and recorded at 340 nm for 10 min. Azoreductase activity was determined by dissolving the corresponding azo dye at a final concentration of 60 μM in 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5. An amount of 0.5 μM YwqN was added to the reaction mixture, and the reaction started by the addition of 1 mM NADPH was followed for 40 min. Initial rates for azo dyes were determined by monitoring the absorbance decrease at a suitable wavelength (MR: 430 nm, MO: 465 nm, and DO: 445 nm). To determine quinone reductase activity, assays were performed in a reaction mixture consisting of 300 μM NADPH and 0.5 μM of enzyme in 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5. The reaction was started by the addition of different concentrations of 2-methyl-1,4-naphtoquinone (menadione; MD) or 1,4-naphthoquinone (NQ). The quinone reductase activity was followed by NADPH consumption at 340 nm [22,47]. The degradation rate of the dyes was obtained as the concentration (μM) of each degraded dye/min. The kinetic analysis of YwqN activity was performed by plotting the degradation rate as a function of the concentration of each dye. Determination of initial reaction rates revealed that reduction of the compounds analyzed did not fit a Michaelis–Menten behavior, i.e., a hyperbolic curve showing an increase in the enzyme reaction rate as a function of the substrate concentration, which reaches a maximum velocity upon saturation of the enzyme with the substrate [25,26]. Therefore, reduction kinetics curves at low concentrations of the substrates, where the velocity was proportional to the substrate concentration (Figure S2), were employed together with the simplified Michaelis–Menten equation (kcat/KM = vo/([Et].[S]) to calculate the catalytic efficiencies of YwqN’s azoreductase and quinone reductase [25,26].

4.9. Determination of Optimal pH and Temperature for His6-YwqN-Dependent Methyl Red Reduction

To determine the optimum pH, 0.5 μM of His6-YwqN was incubated at 30 °C with 1 mM NADPH and 100 μM methyl red in either 50 mM MES (pH 6.5) or 50 mM Tris/HCl (pHs 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5 and 9.5). The optimum temperature was determined in reactions set at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 °C containing 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 μM of His6-YwqN, 1 mM NADPH and 100 μM methyl red. The reactions were incubated for 30 min, and the fraction of methyl red remaining was determined as described above. These experiments were repeated two times, and values were plotted as averages of duplicate determinations.

4.10. Determination of B. subtilis Cells’ Sensitivity to Oxidizing Agents

The susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and menadione was determined from dose–response curves of B. subtilis strains exposed or not to increasing amounts of the oxidizing agents. To this end, the wild-type and mutant strains B. subtilis ΔywqN (PERM1817), ΔyhdA (PERM1818), and ΔywqN ΔyhdA (PERM1905) (Table 2) were cultured at 37 °C in LB medium to an OD600 of 0.7. At this point, cell samples of the strains of interest were treated with different concentrations of either H2O2 (0–80 mM) or menadione (0–120 μM) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with shaking. Bacterial viability was estimated by counting the colony-forming units (CFUs) on LB–agar plates. To this end, samples of the bacterial suspensions were collected and serially diluted in 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (137 mM NaCl; 2.7 mM KCl; 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.8 mM KH2PO4), and aliquots were plated on LB–agar plates. Colonies were counted after overnight incubation at 37 °C. Data were reported as 90% lethal dose (LD90) values, namely, the concentration of H2O2 or menadione that killed 90% of the bacterial population.

4.11. Determination of Spontaneous and H2O2- or MD-Induced Mutation Frequencies

The frequencies of B. subtilis RifR mutants in the presence or absence of hydrogen peroxide or menadione were determined as follows. B. subtilis strains WT, ΔywqN, ΔyhdA, ΔywqNyhdA, and ΔkatA ΔkatB or ΔGO bearing the pDG148-empty vector (PERM1868 or PERM1709; Table 2) or the pDG148-ywqN construct (PERM1867 or PERM1876; Table 2) were propagated in A3 (Antibiotic 3 medium; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) to an OD600 of 1.0; then, each culture was split into two subcultures. One of the subcultures of each strain was left untreated, and the other was amended with an LD25 of H2O2 or menadione, respectively. The untreated and treated cultures were shaken at 37 °C for 16 h. Mutation frequencies were determined from three independent cultures and plating aliquots of each culture, amended with menadione or H2O2 or unamended, onto six LB plates containing 10 mg mL−1 rifampin (Rif) and 1 mM IPTG. The same procedure was repeated using LB plates lacking rifampin. The total number of colonies and RifR colonies was counted after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C to determine mutation frequencies.

4.12. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses to compare the results of mutation frequencies were performed using R software (Version R-4.5.2). A Shapiro–Wilk normality test was performed for all data, as well as a homoscedasticity of variances test. Variables that met the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity of the data were analyzed using a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test for multiple comparisons. For data that did not meet normality assumptions, a Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon U-test was applied to assess differences between groups. The statistical significance used in all tests was p = 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31040701/s1: Figure S1: (A) NAD(P)H-FMN reductase activity, (B) Azoreductase activity, (C) Quinone Reductase activity of YwqN; Figure S2: Kinetic analysis of YwqN for Azo dyes and quinone compounds; Figure S3: Complementation of spontaneous or H2O2-induced (A) and MD-induced (B) mutation frequencies following expression of ywqN from an IPTG-inducible expression vector; Figure S4: SDS-PAGE analysis of YwqN expression in B. subtilis WT (A) and strains deficient for the GO system (B) or KatA/KatB (C); Figure S5: Optimal temperature (A) and pH (B) for His6-YwqN-promoted methyl red reduction; Table S1: Total and specific activities during purification of His6-YwqN; Table S2: Specific activities of BsYwqN over distinct substrates.

Author Contributions

Analyses and interpretation of data, M.P.-R., E.A.R., N.R., K.A.-Y., L.I.V.-G. and V.M.A.-G.; methodology, N.R., B.R.G. and K.A.-Y.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P.-R., N.R., K.A.-Y. and B.R.G.; writing—review and editing, M.P.-R., E.A.R., K.A.-Y. and L.I.V.-G.; funding acquisition, M.P.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Secretary of Science, Humanities, Technology and Innovation (SECIHTI; grants A-1S-27116 and CBF2023-2024-708) and the University of Guanajuato (CIIC-029-2024). B.R.G. and K.A.-Y. were supported by a doctoral scholarship from SECIHTI.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the technical support of Rocío C. Barajas, Hilda C. Leyva, and Estefania Ramírez.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vidal, L.S.; Kelly, C.L.; Mordaka, P.M.; Heap, J.T. Review of NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases: Properties, engineering and application. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Proteins Proteom. 2018, 1866, 327–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Medina, M. Structural and mechanistic aspects of flavoproteins: Photosynthetic electron transfer from photosystem I to NADP+. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 3942–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Suzuki, H. Remarkable diversification of bacterial azoreductases: Primary sequences, structures, substrates, physiological roles, and biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 3965–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, H. Toxicological significance of azo dye metabolism by human intestinal microbiota. Front. Biosci. 2012, E4, 568–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deller, S.; Macheroux, P.; Sollner, S. Flavin-dependent quinone reductases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ryan, A.; Kaplan, E.; Nebel, J.-C.; Polycarpou, E.; Crescente, V.; Lowe, E.; Preston, G.M.; Sim, E. Identification of NAD(P)H Quinone Oxidoreductase Activity in Azoreductases from P. aeruginosa: Azoreductases and NAD(P)H Quinone Oxidoreductases Belong to the Same FMN-Dependent Superfamily of Enzymes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Valenzuela-García, L.I.; Zapata, B.L.; Ramírez-Ramírez, N.; Huchin-Mian, J.P.; Robleto, E.A.; Ayala-García, V.M.; Pedraza-Reyes, M. Novel Biochemical Properties and Physiological Role of the Flavin Mononucleotide Oxidoreductase YhdA from Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01688-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gonzalez, C.F.; Ackerley, D.F.; Lynch, S.V.; Matin, A. ChrR, a Soluble Quinone Reductase of Pseudomonas putida That Defends against H2O2. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 22590–22595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Talalay, P. NAD(P)H:quinone acceptor oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), a multifunctional antioxidant enzyme and exceptionally versatile cytoprotector. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 501, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ackerley, D.F.; Gonzalez, C.F.; Park, C.H.; Blake, R.; Keyhan, M.; Matin, A. Chromate-Reducing Properties of Soluble Flavoproteins from Pseudomonas putida and Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ackerley, D.F.; Barak, Y.; Lynch, S.V.; Curtin, J.; Matin, A. Effect of Chromate Stress on Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3371–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eswaramoorthy, S.; Poulain, S.; Hienerwadel, R.; Bremond, N.; Sylvester, M.D.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Berthomieu, C.; Van Der Lelie, D.; Matin, A. Crystal Structure of ChrR—A Quinone Reductase with the Capacity to Reduce Chromate. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Michna, R.H.; Zhu, B.; Mäder, U.; Stülke, J. Subti Wiki 2.0—An integrated database for the model organism Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D654–D662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Burley, S.K.; Bhatt, R.; Bhikadiya, C.; Bi, C.; Biester, A.; Biswas, P.; Bittrich, S.; Blaumann, S.; Brown, R.; Chao, H.; et al. Updated resources for exploring experimentally-determined PDB structures and Computed Structure Models at the RCSB Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D564–D574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gasteiger, E. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grandori, R.; Khalifah, P.; Boice, J.A.; Fairman, R.; Giovanielli, K.; Carey, J. Biochemical Characterization of WrbA, Founding Member of a New Family of Multimeric Flavodoxin-like Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 20960–20966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Monks, T.J.; Hanzlik, R.P.; Cohen, G.M.; Ross, D.; Graham, D.G. Quinone chemistry and toxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1992, 112, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hua, Y.H.; Wu, C.Y.; Sargsyan, K.; Lim, C. Sequence-motif Detection of NAD(P)-binding Proteins: Discovery of a Unique Antibacterial Drug Target. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Crescente, V.; Holland, S.M.; Kashyap, S.; Polycarpou, E.; Sim, E.; Ryan, A. Identification of novel members of the bacterial azoreductase family in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gorman, J.; Shapiro, L. Crystal structures of the tryptophan repressor binding protein WrbA and complexes with flavin mononucleotide. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 3004–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Natalello, A.; Doglia, S.M.; Carey, J.; Grandori, R. Role of Flavin Mononucleotide in the Thermostability and Oligomerization of Escherichia coli Stress-Defense Protein WrbA. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mancini, S.; Solioz, M. Determination of Quinone Reductase Activity. Bio-Protocol 2015, 5, e1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lostao, A.; El Harrous, M.; Daoudi, F.; Romero, A.; Parody-Morreale, A.; Sancho, J. Dissecting the Energetics of the Apoflavodoxin-FMN Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 9518–9526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Maldonado, S.; Lostao, A.; Irún, M.P.; Férnandez-Recio, J.; Genzor, C.G.; González, E.B.; Rubio, J.A.; Luquita, A.; Daoudi, F.; Sancho, J. Apoflavodoxin: Structure, stability, and FMN binding. Biochemistry 1998, 80, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Berg, J.M.; Tymoczko, J.L.; Stryer, L.; Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 5th ed.; W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Park, C. Visual Interpretation of the Meaning of kcat/KM in Enzyme Kinetics. J. Chem. Educ. 2022, 99, 2556–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bin, Y.; Jiti, Z.; Jing, W.; Cuihong, D.; Hongman, H.; Zhiyong, S.; Yongming, B. Expression and characteristics of the gene encoding azoreductase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides AS1.1737. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 236, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Chen, H.; Wang, R.-F.; Cerniglia, C.E. Molecular cloning, overexpression, purification, and characterization of an aerobic FMN-dependent azoreductase from Enterococcus faecalis. Protein Expr. Purif. 2004, 34, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, H.; Hopper, S.L.; Cerniglia, C.E. Biochemical and molecular characterization of an azoreductase from Staphylococcus aureus, a tetrameric NADPH-dependent flavoprotein. Microbiology 2005, 151, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deller, S.; Sollner, S.; Trenker-El-Toukhy, R.; Jelesarov, I.; Gübitz, G.M.; Macheroux, P. Characterization of a Thermostable NADPH:FMN Oxidoreductase from the Mesophilic Bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 7083–7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.-J.; Chen, H.; Shaw, N.; Hopper, S.L.; Chen, L.; Chen, S.; Cerniglia, C.E.; Wang, B.-C. Crystal structure of an aerobic FMN-dependent azoreductase (AzoA) from Enterococcus faecalis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 463, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakanishi, M.; Yatome, C.; Ishida, N.; Kitade, Y. Putative ACP Phosphodiesterase Gene (acpD) Encodes an Azoreductase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 46394–46399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bai, Y.; Sun, T.; Angenent, L.T.; Haderlein, S.B.; Kappler, A. Electron Hopping Enables Rapid Electron Transfer between Quinone-/Hydroquinone-Containing Organic Molecules in Microbial Iron(III) Mineral Reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 10646–10653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Myers, J.M.; Antholine, W.E.; Myers, C.R. Hexavalent chromium causes the oxidation of thioredoxin in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicology 2008, 246, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. O’Brien, P.J. Molecular mechanisms of quinone cytotoxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1991, 80, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pedraza-Reyes, M.; Abundiz-Yañez, K.; Rangel-Mendoza, A.; Martínez, L.E.; Barajas-Ornelas, R.C.; Cuéllar-Cruz, M.; Leyva-Sánchez, H.C.; Ayala-García, V.M.; Valenzuela-García, L.I.; Robleto, E.A. Bacillus subtilis stress-associated mutagenesis and developmental DNA repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2024, 88, e00158-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cassagnes, L.-E.; Perio, P.; Ferry, G.; Moulharat, N.; Antoine, M.; Gayon, R.; Boutin, J.A.; Nepveu, F.; Reybier, K. In cellulo monitoring of quinone reductase activity and reactive oxygen species production during the redox cycling of 1,2 and 1,4 quinones. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 89, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, G.; Zhou, J.; Jin, R.; Zhou, M.; Wang, J.; Lu, H.; Qu, Y. Enhancing survival of Escherichia coli by expression of azoreductase AZR possessing quinone reductase activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, G.; Alamuri, P.; Maier, R.J. The diverse antioxidant systems of Helicobacter pylori. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, G.; Maier, R.J. An NADPH Quinone Reductase of Helicobacter pylori Plays an Important Role in Oxidative Stress Resistance and Host Colonization. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Santos-Escobar, F.; Gutiérrez-Corona, J.F.; Pedraza-Reyes, M. Role of Bacillus subtilis Error Prevention Oxidized Guanine System in Counteracting Hexavalent Chromium-Promoted Oxidative DNA Damage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5493–5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boylan, R.J.; Mendelson, N.H.; Brooks, D.; Young, F.E. Regulation of the Bacterial Cell Wall: Analysis of a Mutant of Bacillus subtilis Defective in Biosynthesis of Teichoic Acid. J. Bacteriol. 1972, 110, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd. ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  44. Harwood, C.R.; Cutting, S.M. Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  45. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Di Tommaso, P.; Moretti, S.; Xenarios, I.; Orobitg, M.; Montanyola, A.; Chang, J.-M.; Taly, J.-F.; Notredame, C. T-Coffee: A web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W13–W17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bitencourt-Ferreira, G.; De Azevedo, W.F. Molegro Virtual Docker for Docking. In Docking Screens for Drug Discovery; De Azevedo, W.F., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY USA, 2019; pp. 149–167. [Google Scholar]
  48. Adasme, M.F.; Linnemann, K.L.; Bolz, S.N.; Kaiser, F.; Salentin, S.; Haupt, V.J.; Schroeder, M. PLIP 2021, expanding the scope of the protein–ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W530–W534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sequence homology comparison of bacterial quinone reductases. Amino acid sequence alignment comparing YwqN from B. subtilis with the well-characterized quinone reductases YhdA from B. subtilis and YieF from E. coli. The dashed blue box indicates the FMN cofactor-binding site, and the dashed red box encloses the conserved motifs that characterize the NAD(P)H-dh2 family, including quinone reductases. Conserved residues are highlighted in bold; dark boxed residues indicate identical residues, and gray boxed residues indicate similar residues. Secondary structure information for BsuYwqN is depicted above the sequences, showing a typical flavodoxin-like topology.
Figure 1. Sequence homology comparison of bacterial quinone reductases. Amino acid sequence alignment comparing YwqN from B. subtilis with the well-characterized quinone reductases YhdA from B. subtilis and YieF from E. coli. The dashed blue box indicates the FMN cofactor-binding site, and the dashed red box encloses the conserved motifs that characterize the NAD(P)H-dh2 family, including quinone reductases. Conserved residues are highlighted in bold; dark boxed residues indicate identical residues, and gray boxed residues indicate similar residues. Secondary structure information for BsuYwqN is depicted above the sequences, showing a typical flavodoxin-like topology.
Molecules 31 00701 g001
Figure 2. Structural homology comparison of quinone reductases. Structural alignments of (A) EcoYieF (blue, PDB 3SVL) and BsuYhdA (pink, PDB 1NNI); (B) BsuYhdA (pink) and BsuYwqN (green, PDB 1RLI); and (C) EcoYieF (blue) and BsuYwqN (green). Panels (DF) show the tertiary structures of EcoYieF (D), BsuYhdA (E), and BsuYwqN (F) with bound FMN (yellow, stick representation with elemental coloring). Boxes below each structure display the residues involved in FMN binding and their interactions with FMN: salt bridges (yellow dashed lines), hydrogen bonds (solid blue lines), hydrophobic interactions (gray dashed lines), and π-stacking interactions (green dashed lines).
Figure 2. Structural homology comparison of quinone reductases. Structural alignments of (A) EcoYieF (blue, PDB 3SVL) and BsuYhdA (pink, PDB 1NNI); (B) BsuYhdA (pink) and BsuYwqN (green, PDB 1RLI); and (C) EcoYieF (blue) and BsuYwqN (green). Panels (DF) show the tertiary structures of EcoYieF (D), BsuYhdA (E), and BsuYwqN (F) with bound FMN (yellow, stick representation with elemental coloring). Boxes below each structure display the residues involved in FMN binding and their interactions with FMN: salt bridges (yellow dashed lines), hydrogen bonds (solid blue lines), hydrophobic interactions (gray dashed lines), and π-stacking interactions (green dashed lines).
Molecules 31 00701 g002
Figure 3. UV–vis absorbance spectrum of His6-YwqN. Solid and dashed lines represent the spectra of His6-YwqN in the presence and absence of FMN, respectively. The inset shows SDS-PAGE analysis of YwqN expression and purification. Lane M, molecular weight markers; lane 2, flowthrough; lanes 3–4, non-bound protein fractions eluted with 25 mM imidazole; lanes 5 to 9, protein fractions eluted from the Ni-NTA column with 300 mM imidazole. Proteins were visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. All purification procedures were performed as described in the Materials and Methods. Aliquots of 15 μL of each purification step were loaded onto the polyacrylamide gel.
Figure 3. UV–vis absorbance spectrum of His6-YwqN. Solid and dashed lines represent the spectra of His6-YwqN in the presence and absence of FMN, respectively. The inset shows SDS-PAGE analysis of YwqN expression and purification. Lane M, molecular weight markers; lane 2, flowthrough; lanes 3–4, non-bound protein fractions eluted with 25 mM imidazole; lanes 5 to 9, protein fractions eluted from the Ni-NTA column with 300 mM imidazole. Proteins were visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. All purification procedures were performed as described in the Materials and Methods. Aliquots of 15 μL of each purification step were loaded onto the polyacrylamide gel.
Molecules 31 00701 g003
Figure 4. Resistance to H2O2 (A) or menadione (MD) (B) of B. subtilis 168 and derivatives. Exponentially growing cells (OD600nm = 0.7) of B. subtilis strains wild type (WT; white bars), ΔywqN (dark gray bars), ΔyhdA (light gray bars) or ΔywqNyhdA (black bars) were treated with increasing doses of H2O2 (A) or MD (B) for 1 h, and cell survival was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. The LD90 in (A) and (B) was calculated for each strain from the dose–response curves. Data are expressed as the averages ± SD of at least two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between strains, as determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s test; p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Resistance to H2O2 (A) or menadione (MD) (B) of B. subtilis 168 and derivatives. Exponentially growing cells (OD600nm = 0.7) of B. subtilis strains wild type (WT; white bars), ΔywqN (dark gray bars), ΔyhdA (light gray bars) or ΔywqNyhdA (black bars) were treated with increasing doses of H2O2 (A) or MD (B) for 1 h, and cell survival was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. The LD90 in (A) and (B) was calculated for each strain from the dose–response curves. Data are expressed as the averages ± SD of at least two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between strains, as determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s test; p < 0.05.
Molecules 31 00701 g004
Figure 5. Spontaneous and H2O2-induced mutation frequencies of yhdA and/or ywqN-deficient B. subtilis strains. Cells of strains ΔywqN, ΔyhdA and ΔywqN ΔyhdA were propagated in A3 medium in the absence or presence of H2O2, and frequencies of mutation to RifR were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Each bar represents the mean of data collected from three independent experiments done in sextuplicate, and the error bars represent standard errors of the means (SEMs). Mutation frequencies of all strains, untreated and treated, were compared with a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD test, with a level of significance of 95% (p < 0.05). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 5. Spontaneous and H2O2-induced mutation frequencies of yhdA and/or ywqN-deficient B. subtilis strains. Cells of strains ΔywqN, ΔyhdA and ΔywqN ΔyhdA were propagated in A3 medium in the absence or presence of H2O2, and frequencies of mutation to RifR were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Each bar represents the mean of data collected from three independent experiments done in sextuplicate, and the error bars represent standard errors of the means (SEMs). Mutation frequencies of all strains, untreated and treated, were compared with a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD test, with a level of significance of 95% (p < 0.05). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Molecules 31 00701 g005
Figure 6. Spontaneous and menadione-induced mutation frequencies of yhdA and/or ywqN-deficient strains. Cells of strains ΔywqN, ΔyhdA, and ΔywqN ΔyhdA were propagated in A3 medium in the absence or presence of menadione, and frequencies of mutation to RifR were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Each bar represents the mean of data collected from three independent experiments done in sextuplicate, and the error bars represent standard errors of the means (SEMs). Mutation frequencies of all strains, untreated and treated, were compared with a Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon U-test, with a level of significance of 95% (p < 0.05). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 6. Spontaneous and menadione-induced mutation frequencies of yhdA and/or ywqN-deficient strains. Cells of strains ΔywqN, ΔyhdA, and ΔywqN ΔyhdA were propagated in A3 medium in the absence or presence of menadione, and frequencies of mutation to RifR were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Each bar represents the mean of data collected from three independent experiments done in sextuplicate, and the error bars represent standard errors of the means (SEMs). Mutation frequencies of all strains, untreated and treated, were compared with a Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon U-test, with a level of significance of 95% (p < 0.05). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Molecules 31 00701 g006
Figure 7. (AC). Spontaneous and H2O2- or MD-induced mutation frequencies of B. subtilis strain ΔGO (A) and ΔkatAkatB (B,C), as affected by overexpression of ywqN. Cells of strains ΔGO (A) and ΔkatAkatB (B,C) bearing a pDG148 empty vector or a pDG148-ywqN construct were propagated in A3 medium in the absence or presence of H2O2 (A,B) or MD (C), and frequencies of mutation to RifR were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Each bar represents the mean of data collected from three independent experiments done in sextuplicate, and the error bars represent standard errors of the means (SEMs). Mutation frequencies of all strains, untreated and treated, were compared with a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD test, with a level of significance of 95% (p < 0.05). The asterisk indicates statistically significant differences.
Figure 7. (AC). Spontaneous and H2O2- or MD-induced mutation frequencies of B. subtilis strain ΔGO (A) and ΔkatAkatB (B,C), as affected by overexpression of ywqN. Cells of strains ΔGO (A) and ΔkatAkatB (B,C) bearing a pDG148 empty vector or a pDG148-ywqN construct were propagated in A3 medium in the absence or presence of H2O2 (A,B) or MD (C), and frequencies of mutation to RifR were determined as described in the Materials and Methods. Each bar represents the mean of data collected from three independent experiments done in sextuplicate, and the error bars represent standard errors of the means (SEMs). Mutation frequencies of all strains, untreated and treated, were compared with a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD test, with a level of significance of 95% (p < 0.05). The asterisk indicates statistically significant differences.
Molecules 31 00701 g007
Table 1. Catalytic efficiencies of BsuYwqN.
Table 1. Catalytic efficiencies of BsuYwqN.
Substratekcat/KM (M−1 s−1)
Methyl red5.77 × 102
Methyl orange6.67 × 102
Disperse orange6.30 × 102
Menadione1.25 × 104
Naphtoquinone1.26 × 104
Table 2. Strains and plasmids employed in this study.
Table 2. Strains and plasmids employed in this study.
Plasmid or StrainGenotype and/or Description aSource or Reference b
Plasmid
pDG148Shuttle IPTG-inducible Pspac vector; Ampr Kanr[7]
pQE30Expression vector containing T5 promoter that enables 6xHis-tagged protein; AmprQiagen (Germantown, MD, USA)
pPERM1877pDG148 with a 721 bp fragment encompassing the ORF and extending 24 bp upstream of ORF and 154 bp downstream of the stop codon of ywqN and cloned between the SalI/SphI restriction sites; KanrThis study
pPERM1892pQE30 containing a 540 bp fragment from the ywqN ORF lacking the start and stop codons and cloned between the BamHI/SalI restriction sites; AmprThis study
Strain
E. coli
DH5αF 80dlacZ M15 (lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1hsdR17(rk, mk+) phoAsupE44-thi-1 gyrA96 relA1New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA)
XL10 GoldTetr Δ(mcrA)183 Δ(mcrCB-hsdSMR-mrr)173 endA1 supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA96 relA1 lac Hte [F’ proAB lacIqZΔM15 Tn10 Tetr Kanr Amy Cmr]Stratagene (La Jolla, CA, USA)
PERM1877E. coli DH5α containing plasmid pPERM1877; Ampr KanrpPERM1877 → E. coli-DH5α;
This study
PERM1892E. coli XL10-Gold containing plasmid pPERM1892; Ampr KanrpPERM1892 → E. coli-XL10 Gold; this study
B. subtilis
PERM110B. subtilis IA751 egIS Δ102, bgIT/bgIS ΔEV npr apr hisc BGSC (Ohio State University)
PERM1275B. subtilis 168 ΔkatB::Cmr ΔkatA::Eryr[41]
PERM1585B. subtilis IA751 containing expression vector pDG148; KanrThis study
PERM1699B. subtilis IA751 ΔytkD:Cm, ΔmutM:Tet, ΔmutY:Sp; Cmr Spr TcrThis study
PERM1709B. subtilis IA751 ΔytkD:Cm, ΔmutM:Tet, ΔmutY:Spc containing expression vector pDG148; Cmr Spr Tetr Kanr[7]
PERM1817B. subtilis 168 ΔywqN::EryrBGSC (Ohio State University)
PERM1818B. subtilis 168 ΔyhdA::Kanr[7]
PERM1867B. subtilis 168 ΔkatB::Cmr ΔkatA::Eryr containing plasmid pPERM1877; KanrpPERM1877 → PERM1867; this study
PERM1868B. subtilis 168 ΔkatB::Cmr ΔkatA::Eryr containing expression vector pDG148 KanrpDG148 → PERM1868; this study
PERM1876B. subtilis IA751 ΔytkD:Cm, ΔmutM:Tet, ΔmutY:Spc containing plasmid pPERM1877; Cmr Spcr Tetr KanrpPERM1877 → PERM1876; this study
PERM1879B. subtilis IA751 containing plasmid pPERM1877; KanrpPERM1877 → PERM1879; this study
PERM1905B. subtilis 168 ΔywqN::EryrΔyhdA::KanrThis study
a Amp, ampicillin; Cm, chloramphenicol; Ery, erythromycin; Kan, kanamycin; Spc, spectinomycin; Tet, tetracycline. b DNA of the plasmid to the left of the arrow was used to transform the strain to the right of the arrow. c BGSC, Bacillus Genetic Stock Center.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González, B.R.; Ramírez, N.; Abundiz-Yáñez, K.; Ayala-García, V.M.; Valenzuela-García, L.I.; Robleto, E.A.; Pedraza-Reyes, M. A Potent Quinone Reductase Encoded by ywqN (Qnr1) Protects Bacillus subtilis from Oxygen Radical Genotoxicity. Molecules 2026, 31, 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040701

AMA Style

González BR, Ramírez N, Abundiz-Yáñez K, Ayala-García VM, Valenzuela-García LI, Robleto EA, Pedraza-Reyes M. A Potent Quinone Reductase Encoded by ywqN (Qnr1) Protects Bacillus subtilis from Oxygen Radical Genotoxicity. Molecules. 2026; 31(4):701. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040701

Chicago/Turabian Style

González, Beatriz R., Norma Ramírez, Karen Abundiz-Yáñez, Víctor M. Ayala-García, Luz I. Valenzuela-García, Eduardo A. Robleto, and Mario Pedraza-Reyes. 2026. "A Potent Quinone Reductase Encoded by ywqN (Qnr1) Protects Bacillus subtilis from Oxygen Radical Genotoxicity" Molecules 31, no. 4: 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040701

APA Style

González, B. R., Ramírez, N., Abundiz-Yáñez, K., Ayala-García, V. M., Valenzuela-García, L. I., Robleto, E. A., & Pedraza-Reyes, M. (2026). A Potent Quinone Reductase Encoded by ywqN (Qnr1) Protects Bacillus subtilis from Oxygen Radical Genotoxicity. Molecules, 31(4), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31040701

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop