Next Article in Journal
Molecular Simulation Study of Water–Rock Interfaces During Supercritical CO2 Sequestration
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Abu Hajleh et al. Synergistic Effects of AgNPs and Biochar: A Potential Combination for Combating Lung Cancer and Pathogenic Bacteria. Molecules 2023, 28, 4757
Previous Article in Special Issue
TD-NMR-Based Determination of the Entrapped Water Yield of Water-in-Oil-in-Water Double Emulsions: Influence of Xanthan Gum Addition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Inline NMR Detection of Li+ in Aqueous Solutions Using a Cryogen-Free Magnet at 4.7 T

1
Institute of Mechanical Process Engineering and Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
2
Institute for Technical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
3
Chair of Water Chemistry and Water Technology, Engler-Bunte-Institut, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(2), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020267
Submission received: 17 December 2025 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 9 January 2026 / Published: 13 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NMR and MRI in Materials Analysis: Opportunities and Challenges)

Abstract

Lithium is of major importance for many areas of technology, especially batteries, and is therefore relevant to both the industrial and private sectors. High-performance, ideally inline-compatible analytics are important for economical and environmentally friendly lithium extraction. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance is an established analytical method that has already been used in numerous inline applications. For this study on 7Li NMR in flow, a cryogen-free magnet with a variable magnetic field was used, whereby a field strength of 4.7 T was set for the measurements for compatibility reasons. The influences of flow velocity, repetition time, and lithium concentration were investigated in spin echo measurements. This allows for defining limitations and potential fields of application for the measurement setup. In addition, the possibilities of internal pre-polarization were investigated. The results show that the method and setup are well suited for inline flow measurements on 7Li and have great potential for expanding the range of applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lithium has become an incredibly important raw material for numerous technologies, particularly for the production of high-performance batteries for electric mobility and mobile electronic devices [1]. The limited resources that can currently be economically exploited via mining make the development of new technologies and the exploitation of further mining areas attractive from both economic and ecological perspectives. Suitable process-compatible analysis methods are essential for powerful, efficient, and sustainable technical processes for lithium extraction. Inline methods offer advantages over offline methods in that chemical or physical measurements are available almost instantly while being non-destructive and contactless, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and agile technical process [2]. This increases lithium output and reduces energy consumption on the one hand. On the other hand, since the salt solutions are corrosive, this approach of minimum sample preparation and treatment in a closed loop leads to minimum destruction of the measurement equipment.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a widely used and well-established analytical tool with applications both in research, such as chemical structure elucidation, and in the industrial sector, for example, in quality control [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Industrial NMR applications require monitoring tools that are robust against external influences in a process plant, generate a small magnetic stray field, and are easy to operate with low maintenance needs. Classic high-field NMR instruments with their superconducting magnets cooled with liquid helium and nitrogen are often unsuitable for this purpose. Furthermore, mobile applications are hardly feasible. Instead, low-field NMR with permanent magnets is well suited for this purpose and has already been used extensively for inline applications [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. A low-field NMR sensor for 7Li inline measurements on lithium-containing brines has also been developed and applied [16]. However, when measuring nuclei other than 1H and samples with small concentrations of the target product, a stronger magnetic field B0 should be used to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. The gyromagnetic ratio γ of 7Li is a factor of 2.573 smaller than that of 1H, the spin quantum number is 3/2, and the natural abundance is with 92.4% slightly lower than of 1H so that a stronger B0 with inherently larger sensitivity is desirable for the development of process-compatible applications of 7Li NMR [17,18,19].
In this study, 7Li NMR on flowing aqueous lithium chloride (LiCl) solutions was performed with a superconducting, cryogen-free magnet at a B0 of 4.7 T as a basis for the development of an inline-capable measurement method for monitoring the lithium concentration in process streams during lithium extraction. In addition to the influence of lithium concentration, the influences of flow velocity, repetition time, and polarization length were also investigated. A compact, industrial-grade Bruker minispec NF instrument was used as electronic unit in order to realize a potentially mobile and space-saving setup.

2. Results and Discussion

The maximum signal intensities Imax of the Hahn echo envelopes are plotted as a function of the mean velocity to show the dependencies on the respective parameters. A value of 100% corresponds to the maximum signal intensity that can be correctly processed by the receiver. For the solution with cLiCl = 27.1 g/L and lpol = 30 cm, Imax decreases with increasing vmean (Figure 1, red data points). However, for sufficiently small vmean, Imax increases compared to the static case of vmean = 0 cm/s. This can be explained by the inflow effect, which is well known in flow NMR [20,21]: The flow causes fresh, polarized, but unexcited spins to flow into the sensitive area after previous excitation and echo detection during the repetition time. In the next experiment, their magnetization can be excited, thereby reducing integral saturation effects. This results in a larger integral signal intensity if the repetition time RD is smaller than five times the longitudinal relaxation time T1. For larger vmean, the residence time in the static magnetic field B0 along the polarization length of 0.3 m is not sufficient for an almost complete polarization due to the long T1 of 7Li of around 8 s [16]. This results in smaller Imax values. Please note that RD = 15 s in Figure 1 already results in partial saturation in non-flowing liquids and, thus, smaller Imax. For static measurements, RD would have to be significantly larger.
The measurements show that the selected experimental setup with the cryogen-free magnet can be used for measurements on 7Li, even in flow. The impact of the flow velocity can clearly be derived from the signal intensity as a consequence of the inflow effect, even at the small pre-polarization length. The investigation of the influence of the internal pre-polarization length on the measurement results additionally provides a basis for further potential applications of the magnet. The large bore allows the tube to be wound up in the magnet, increasing lpol here to 120 cm.
The signal intensities are larger for the longer pre-polarization length lpol = 1.2 m (Figure 1, black data points), which is explained by the larger residence time and the more pronounced longitudinal magnetization build-up. However, the influence of the inflow effect can still be observed. A further increase in the internal lpol will result in a larger signal intensity, making the magnet well suited for experiments with the need for pre-polarization, which is especially the case for moieties with long T1 and low NMR sensitivity.
In addition to vmean, the repetition time RD was varied (Figure 2). For vmean = 0 cm/s, Imax increases with increasing RD. This is due to saturation effects as a result of the large T1 of 7Li in the used sample. For vmean > 0 cm/s, the influence of lpol is clearly noticeable. Larger lpol leads to larger Imax. Furthermore, a plateau in Imax occurs as a function of RD for vmean > 0 cm/s, which is explained by the inflow effect and the smaller influence of saturation effects. At small RD and medium vmean, an increase in Imax due to the inflow effect can be seen when compared to vmean = 0 cm/s. For larger velocities, the shorter residence time in B0 and smaller pre-polarization lead to reduced Imax. In addition, the outflow effect needs to be considered. The benefit of the described setup becomes obvious in the left part of the graph: Imax is considerably larger at moderate velocities, even at the largest velocity of 10.7 cm/s, and Imax is in the range of thermal polarization for the larger pre-polarization length. This observation allows for reducing the repetition time considerably to reasonable values: for example, RD around 1 s instead of 8 s for lpol = 1.2 m and vmean = 6.4 cm/s, which results in eight times faster experiments or a significant gain in the signal-to-noise ratio. The observations are consistent with expectations, making the experimental setup and the selected parameter ranges suitable for these applications.
The three-dimensional (vmean, RD, and lpol) parameter space was examined using full factorial design so that all inter-dependencies could be identified. The experiments with cLiCl = 27.1 g/L show a sufficiently large signal intensity for the investigation of the respective influences for all parameter combinations (Figure 3).
Spin echoes could also be detected for the aqueous solution of the smaller concentration cLiCl = 15.6 g/L. The measurement settings have been adjusted accordingly. Imax at vmean > 4.2 cm/s is barely distinguishable from the noise level, so these data points are not shown (Figure 4).
Also, at smaller concentrations, the positive influence of the longer lpol on Imax is clear. The experiments with smaller cLiCl reveal the limitations of the current measurement setup in terms of Li+ concentration and flow velocity range.

3. Materials and Methods

The superconducting magnet used for the investigations consists of a NbTi magnet coil and generates a maximum B0 of 5 T in a warm vertical bore of 180 mm diameter (Figure 5). The magnet is operated at 4 K and cooled without cryogen using a cryocooler. The cool-down process takes approximately 80 h, whereby only a power supply is required. In the cold state, the maximum field is reached within 42 min. The axial B0 homogeneity in the relevant area is <1%, and neither cryogenic nor room temperature shim systems are included. Chemical resolution is not the focus of the measurement method as only Li+ ions were observed. For compatibility reasons with results on a conventional helium-cooled NMR magnet, a B0 of 4.7 T was selected, which corresponds to a 7Li Larmor frequency of 77.81 MHz. The electronic unit of a Bruker minispec NF series (Bruker BioSpin GmbH & Co. KG, Ettlingen, Germany) was used for control, pulse generation, and data acquisition, whereby the preamplifier was modified in order to extend the frequency range. A Bruker MICWB40 7Li 25 mm LTR micro imaging probe (Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) was used for the experiments.
The Hahn echo pulse sequence was selected for the measurements [22]. In this pulse sequence, a 90° excitation pulse is followed by a 180° refocusing pulse after the half echo time τe and then by the detection of a spin echo after a further delay of τe/2. In contrast to single-pulse acquisition, the Hahn echo pulse sequence refocuses the dephasing due to static magnetic field inhomogeneities, making it more suitable for measurements with the magnet used. Since the transverse NMR relaxation properties of the sample were not of interest for the fundamental investigations of this work, measurements were only performed at one echo time so that no echo train was acquired. This enables fast, quantitative measurements of lithium concentration, which is necessary for potential inline applications in quality control and process management.
For the flow-through measurements and to show the principle on the lab scale, a fluidic circuit was built through the magnet. It comprised a reservoir tank, a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow 323 S, Watson-Marlow Ltd., Falmouth, UK), and a pressure compensation tank to reduce flow pulsation before the fluid enters the magnet (Figure 6). A tube of polyurethane with an inner diameter of 7 mm was passed through the probe. The flow direction was selected from bottom to top, and the sample was recirculated for longer total experiment times. The probe was positioned in the magnet from the top and held in a reproducible position with a cover plate and precision spacers. A straight, i.e., shortest, possible arrangement of the tube results in a pre-polarization length lpol of 30 cm from the lower edge of the magnet to the sensitive area of the probe. To realize a longer pre-polarization length, the tube was wound in a spiral and positioned in the magnet, resulting in lpol = 120 cm.
To prove the sensitivity of the measurements on 7Li, two aqueous LiCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solutions with concentrations of cLiCl = 27.1 g/L and 15.6 g/L were prepared. The solutions were mixed by adding crystalline LiCl to deionized water and shaking the vessel for several minutes. Measurements were made on both solutions in flow at different mean flow velocities vmean and repetition times (relaxation delay RD). The NMR measurement parameters were determined individually for both concentrations (Table 1).

4. Conclusions

The suitability of a cryogen-free magnet at 4.7 T for 7Li NMR on flowing samples, for example, in a lithium extraction plant, were investigated. The Hahn echo pulse sequence was used to measure signal intensities and thus make quantitative determinations about lithium concentration. By varying the mean flow velocity and the repetition time, information was obtained about the usability in a process plant and about the influences of the inflow effect on the NMR measurements in the desired area of application. The experiments with two different LiCl concentrations revealed corresponding limitations with regard to the LiCl concentration. The method can therefore be applied in the product streams of a production plant with sufficiently large lithium concentrations. In addition to the suitability of the cryogen-free magnet for 7Li NMR measurements, it was also shown that the magnet can be used for internal pre-polarization and that positive effects on the measurement results can be generated. Based on the investigations shown here, measurements could be made on lithium-containing solutions from a real production plant that offers, in addition, considerable paramagnetic relaxation enhancement in the natural composition for the reduction of Li measurement time. This effect could also be used to investigate the influence of other components, particularly those of these paramagnetic constituents. NMR relaxation measurements can also be considered for this purpose in order to gain in-depth insight, also in form of multiple echo sequences. Furthermore, measurements on other NMR-active nuclei and a comprehensive characterization of the pre-polarization properties are conceivable at the larger magnetic fields in comparison to permanent magnets. A further improvement in the measurement process can be achieved by further increasing the polarization length in the magnet. In addition, the sample volume can be increased to further improve the signal-to-noise ratio, which, together with multi-echo sequences, will result in the real inline NMR determination of Li ion content along the enrichment process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S., J.H. and G.G.; methodology, E.S. and G.G.; validation, E.S., F.H. and G.G.; formal analysis, E.S. and G.G.; investigation, E.S. and G.G.; resources, H.N. and G.G.; data curation, E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S., J.H. and G.G.; writing—review and editing, E.S., J.H., F.H., H.N. and G.G.; visualization, E.S., J.H. and G.G.; supervision, G.G.; project administration, J.H. and G.G.; funding acquisition, H.N. and G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)—Project-ID 454252029—SFB/CRC 1527.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Philipp Heger and Paul Jelden (ITEP) for technical assistance and the Bruker minispec development group for the design and production of a dedicated preamplifier. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is thanked for the substantial financial contribution in the form of NMR instrumentation within the instrumental facility Pro2NMR and within the CRC 1527 Hyperion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
LiClLithium chloride
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance

References

  1. Steiger, K.; Hilgers, C.; Kolb, J. Lithiumbedarf Für Die Batteriezellen-Produktion in Deutschland und Europa im Jahr 2030; KIT: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowler, A.L.; Bakalis, S.; Watson, N.J. A review of in-line and on-line measurement techniques to monitor industrial mixing processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2020, 153, 463–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wüthrich, K. NMR studies of structure and function of biological macromolecules. Biosci. Rep. 2003, 23, 119–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chinn, S.C.; Cook-Tendulkar, A.; Maxwell, R.; Wheeler, H.; Wilson, M.; Xie, Z.H. Qualification of Automated Low-Field NMR Relaxometry for Quality Control of Polymers in a Production Setting. Polym. Test. 2007, 26, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mitchell, J.; Gladden, L.F.; Chandrasekera, T.C.; Fordham, E.J. Low-field permanent magnets for industrial process and quality control. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2014, 76, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fan, K.; Zhang, M. Recent developments in the food quality detected by non-invasive nuclear magnetic resonance technology. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2202–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kern, S.; Wander, L.; Meyer, K.; Guhl, S.; Mukkula, A.R.G.; Holtkamp, M.; Salge, M.; Fleischer, C.; Weber, N.; King, R.; et al. Flexible automation with compact NMR spectroscopy for continuous production of pharmaceuticals. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 3037–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kern, S.; Meyer, K.; Guhl, S.; Grasser, P.; Paul, A.; King, R.; Maiwald, M. Online low-field NMR spectroscopy for process control of an industrial lithiation reaction-automated data analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 3349–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Schmid, E.; Rondeau, S.; Rudszuck, T.; Nirschl, H.; Guthausen, G. Inline NMR via a Dedicated V-Shaped Sensor. Sensors 2023, 23, 2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Schmid, E.; Pertzel, T.O.; Nirschl, H.; Guthausen, G. Characterization of Flow with a V-Shaped NMR Sensor. Sensors 2024, 24, 6163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Herold, H.; Hardy, E.H.; Ranft, M.; Wassmer, K.H.; Nestle, N. Online Rheo-TD NMR for analysing batch polymerisation processes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 178, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Corver, J.; Guthausen, G.; Kamlowski, A. In-line non-contact check weighing (NCCW) with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) presents new opportunities and challenges in process control. Pharm. Eng. 2005, 25, 18–30. [Google Scholar]
  13. Colnago, L.A.; Andrade, F.D.; Souza, A.A.; Azeredo, R.B.V.; Lima, A.A.; Cerioni, L.M.; Osan, T.M.; Pusiol, D.J. Why is Inline NMR Rarely Used as Industrial Sensor? Challenges and Opportunities. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2014, 37, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Foley, D.A.; Bez, E.; Codina, A.; Colson, K.L.; Fey, M.; Krull, R.; Piroli, D.; Zell, M.T.; Marquez, B.L. NMR flow tube for online NMR reaction monitoring. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 12008–12013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Keifer, P.A. Flow techniques in NMR spectroscopy. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 2007, 62, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schmid, E.; Lerner, R.; Rudszuck, T.; Nirschl, H.; Guthausen, G. Inline Monitoring of Lithium Brines with Low-Field NMR. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fukushima, E.; Roeder, S.B.W. Experimental Pulse NMR, A Nuts and Bolts Approach; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.: London, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  18. Abragam, A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  19. Blümich, B. Essential NMR; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pope, J.M. Quantitative NMR Imaging of Flow. Concept. Magn. Res. 1993, 5, 281–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, J.-H.; Liu, H.-L. Inflow effects on functional MRI. NeuroImage 2012, 62, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hahn, E.L. Spin Echoes. Phys. Rev. 1950, 80, 580–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Imax as a function of vmean for a LiCl solution with cLiCl = 27.1 g/L and RD = 15 s, with lpol = 0.3 m () and lpol = 1.2 m (■). The longer pre-polarization length leads to a larger signal intensity, whereby the dependence of Imax on vmean is roughly the same for both lpol. B-Splines are guides for the eye. Imax for vmean = 0 cm/s is displayed as .
Figure 1. Imax as a function of vmean for a LiCl solution with cLiCl = 27.1 g/L and RD = 15 s, with lpol = 0.3 m () and lpol = 1.2 m (■). The longer pre-polarization length leads to a larger signal intensity, whereby the dependence of Imax on vmean is roughly the same for both lpol. B-Splines are guides for the eye. Imax for vmean = 0 cm/s is displayed as .
Molecules 31 00267 g001
Figure 2. Imax for cLiCl = 27.1 g/L as a function of RD for () vmean = 0 cm/s; () lpol = 1.2 m, vmean = 6.4 cm/s; () lpol = 0.3 m, vmean = 6.4 cm/s; () lpol = 1.2 m, vmean = 10.7 cm/s; and () lpol = 0.3 m, vmean = 10.7 cm/s. Lines are guide for the eyes. Imax increases with increasing RD. A longer pre-polarization length results in a larger Imax. For smaller RD, Imax for v = 0 cm/s is between the values of Imax for v > 0 cm/s, and for larger RD, Imax for v = 0 cm/s is the largest.
Figure 2. Imax for cLiCl = 27.1 g/L as a function of RD for () vmean = 0 cm/s; () lpol = 1.2 m, vmean = 6.4 cm/s; () lpol = 0.3 m, vmean = 6.4 cm/s; () lpol = 1.2 m, vmean = 10.7 cm/s; and () lpol = 0.3 m, vmean = 10.7 cm/s. Lines are guide for the eyes. Imax increases with increasing RD. A longer pre-polarization length results in a larger Imax. For smaller RD, Imax for v = 0 cm/s is between the values of Imax for v > 0 cm/s, and for larger RD, Imax for v = 0 cm/s is the largest.
Molecules 31 00267 g002
Figure 3. Imax for cLiCl = 27.1 g/L as a function of vmean and RD for a LiCl solution with lpol = 0.3 m (gray scale) and lpol = 1.2 m (yellow-red scale).
Figure 3. Imax for cLiCl = 27.1 g/L as a function of vmean and RD for a LiCl solution with lpol = 0.3 m (gray scale) and lpol = 1.2 m (yellow-red scale).
Molecules 31 00267 g003
Figure 4. Imax for cLiCl = 15.6 g/L as a function of vmean and RD for a LiCl solution with lpol = 0.3 m (gray scale) and lpol = 1.2 m (yellow-red scale).
Figure 4. Imax for cLiCl = 15.6 g/L as a function of vmean and RD for a LiCl solution with lpol = 0.3 m (gray scale) and lpol = 1.2 m (yellow-red scale).
Molecules 31 00267 g004
Figure 5. Picture of the magnet on a stand in the front and the NMR control units in the back.
Figure 5. Picture of the magnet on a stand in the front and the NMR control units in the back.
Molecules 31 00267 g005
Figure 6. Scheme of the experimental flow setup with the reservoir (1), the peristaltic pump (2), the pressure compensation tank (3), the magnet (4), and the probe (5). The sample is recirculated back to the reservoir.
Figure 6. Scheme of the experimental flow setup with the reservoir (1), the peristaltic pump (2), the pressure compensation tank (3), the magnet (4), and the probe (5). The sample is recirculated back to the reservoir.
Molecules 31 00267 g006
Table 1. Measurement and experiment parameters of the flow measurements with the two aqueous LiCl solutions.
Table 1. Measurement and experiment parameters of the flow measurements with the two aqueous LiCl solutions.
ParametercLiCl = 27.1 g/LcLiCl = 15.6 g/L
Echo time τe (ms)1.01.0
Repetition time RD (s)0.1 … 150.1 … 15
Number of averages (−)816
Receiver gain (dB)8488
vmean (cm/s)0 … 12.90 … 4.2
lpol (cm)30; 12030; 120
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmid, E.; Hänisch, J.; Hornung, F.; Nirschl, H.; Guthausen, G. Inline NMR Detection of Li+ in Aqueous Solutions Using a Cryogen-Free Magnet at 4.7 T. Molecules 2026, 31, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020267

AMA Style

Schmid E, Hänisch J, Hornung F, Nirschl H, Guthausen G. Inline NMR Detection of Li+ in Aqueous Solutions Using a Cryogen-Free Magnet at 4.7 T. Molecules. 2026; 31(2):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schmid, Eric, Jens Hänisch, Frank Hornung, Hermann Nirschl, and Gisela Guthausen. 2026. "Inline NMR Detection of Li+ in Aqueous Solutions Using a Cryogen-Free Magnet at 4.7 T" Molecules 31, no. 2: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020267

APA Style

Schmid, E., Hänisch, J., Hornung, F., Nirschl, H., & Guthausen, G. (2026). Inline NMR Detection of Li+ in Aqueous Solutions Using a Cryogen-Free Magnet at 4.7 T. Molecules, 31(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020267

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop