Thermally Stable and Energy Efficient Newly Synthesized Bipolar Emitters for Yellow and Green OLED Devices

Abstract

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) have emerged as a leading high-resolution display and lighting technology, as well as for photo-therapeutic applications, due to their light weight, flexibility, and excellent color rendering. However, achieving long-term thermal stability and high energy efficiency remains a principal issue for their widespread adoption. Strong thermal robustness in OLED emitter materials is a critical parameter for achieving long device lifetimes, stable film morphology, reliable high-temperature processing, and sustained interface integrity in high-performance hosts. Bipolar emitters RB14 (N-(9-ethylcarbazole-3-yl)-4-(diphenylamino)phenyl-9H-carbazole-9-yl-1,8-naphthalimide), RB18 (N-phenyl-4-(diphenylamino)phenyl-9H-carbazole-9-yl-1,8-naphthalimide), and RB22 (N-phenyl-3-(2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)-9H-carbazole-9-yl-1,8-naphthalimide) were newly synthesized. RB18 is a yellow bipolar OLED emitter that has a glass transition temperature (T_g) of 162 °C and thermal durability (T_d) of 431 °C, which is the highest reported value for naphthalimide-based bipolar emitter derivatives for yellow OLEDs. Meanwhile, RB14 and RB22 are green OLED emitters that have glass transition temperatures (T_g) of 133 °C and 167 °C, and thermal durabilities (T_d) of 336 °C and 400 °C, respectively. We have fabricated OLED devices using these bipolar emitters dispersed in CBP host matrix, and we have found that the maximum EQEs (%) for RB14, RB18, and RB22 emitter-based devices are 7.93%, 3.40%, and 4.02%, respectively. For confirmation of thermal stability, we also used UV-visible spectroscopy measurements at variable temperatures on annealed spin-coated glass films of these emitter materials and found that RB22 is the most thermally stable emitter among these materials.

1. Introduction

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) have emerged as a revolutionary technology in the fields of display and solid-state lighting [1], as well as in photo-therapeutic, catalysis, energy storage, and health-conscious lighting applications [2,3,4], owing to their transparency, flexibility [5], light weight [6], high contrast ratios, wide viewing angles [7], excellent color rendering [8], fast response time, low power [9], and potential for energy-efficient operation [10]. Low-cost fabrication processes, compatible with both vacuum- and solution-based techniques, also support their scalability for large-area production [11,12,13]. Performance lies in the emitting layer because it is the heart of the OLED, which directly influences not only the color purity and brightness, but also the power efficiency and operational lifetime of the device. In practical applications, OLEDs are often exposed to elevated temperatures either due to external environmental conditions or internal joule heating during high-brightness operation [14]. One of the critical factors determining the long-term functionality of OLEDs is the thermal stability of these emitter materials. Thermally unstable emitter materials can undergo morphological changes such as phase separation, crystallization, or molecular aggregation, all of which can lead to device degradation or complete failure [15].

Increasing the glass transition temperature (T_g) of organic materials could reduce heat-induced morphological changes, hence strengthening the stability of device performance. The glass transition temperature (T_g) and thermal decomposition temperature (T_d) of organic materials are key indicators of their robustness under thermal stress [16]. Thermal stability is particularly important in high-performance OLEDs that operate at high luminance, such as in large-area display applications [17]. To meet these demands, recent studies have focused on molecular design strategies that improve morphological and thermal robustness. In particular, bipolar emitter structures containing both electron-donating and electron-accepting groups can facilitate balanced charge transport, minimize charge accumulation, and enhance operational stability and efficiency. Several carbazole-, bicarbazole-, and naphthalimide-based bipolar derivatives have previously been reported as electroactive materials for optoelectronic applications [18,19,20,21].

From an energy efficiency standpoint, emitter materials play a pivotal role in determining the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of OLEDs. Efficient exciton harvesting mechanisms, such as those enabled by phosphorescent materials and thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF), are instrumental in achieving high internal quantum efficiencies (IQEs), theoretically up to 100% [22,23]. TADF emitters, in particular, exploit reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) to convert non-radiative triplet states into radiative singlet states, significantly enhancing efficiency without relying on heavy metal complexes [24]. However, the operational stability of TADF emitters under thermal stress remains a challenge, as the RISC process itself is thermally activated and may lead to increased exciton–polaron interactions and degradation over time [25].

In this paper, we report newly synthesized bipolar emitter materials: RB14 (N-(9-ethylcarbazole-3-yl)-4-(diphenylamino)phenyl-9H-carbazole-9-yl-1,8-naphthalimide), RB18 (N-phenyl-4-(diphenylamino)phenyl-9H-carbazole-9-yl-1,8-naphthalimide), and RB22 (N-phenyl-3-(2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)-9H-carbazole-9-yl-1,8-naphthalimide). RB18 is a yellow bipolar OLED emitter that has a glass transition temperature (T_g) of 162 °C and thermal durability (T_d) of 431 °C, which are the highest reported values for yellow OLED emitters. In contrast, RB14 and RB22 are green OLED emitters with glass transition temperatures (T_g) of 133 °C and 167 °C, and thermal durability (T_d) of 336 °C and 400 °C, respectively. The thermal behavior of these synthesized materials was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The thermogravimetric analysis confirmed that the newly synthesized derivatives are highly thermally stable compounds with temperatures of 5% weight loss in the range from 331 °C to 400 °C. We have fabricated OLED devices using these bipolar emitters with a CBP host matrix, and we found that the maximum EQEs (%) for RB14, RB18, and RB22 are 7.93%, 3.40%, and 4.02%, respectively. For the thermal stability validation of these materials, we also analyzed UV-visible spectra at variable temperatures of the films of the spin-coated emitters and found that the RB22 absorbance peak variation is negligible, which confirmed the highest thermal stability of RB22 among these emitting materials.

2. Results and Discussion

Intermediate materials were synthesized through a synthetic route as illustrated in Figure 1. Initially, 3-iodo-9H-carbazole (2) was prepared according to the procedure described by Tucker [26]. Then, carbazole intermediates (3 and 4) were prepared via Suzuki cross-coupling of the 3-iodo-9H-carbazole (2) with an excess of 4-(diphenylamino) phenylboronic acid or 2-methoxy-3-pyridinylboronic acid, respectively, utilizing a palladium catalyst under basic conditions [27]. Other starting derivatives (6 and 7) were synthesized by reaction of commercially available 4-bromo-1,8-napthalic anhydride with, respectively, aniline or 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole.

The objective compound N-(9-ethylcarbazole-3-yl)-4-[3-(diphenylamino)phenylcarbazol-9-yl]-1,8-naphthalimide (RB14) was synthesized through an Ullmann coupling reaction between N-(9-ethylcarbazole-3-yl)-4-bromo-1,8-naphthalimide (7) and 3-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-9H-carbazole (3) in dimethylformamide. The other two target derivatives, N-phenyl-4-[3-(diphenylamino)phenylcarbazol-9-yl]-1,8-naphthalimide (RB18) and N-phenyl-4-[3-(2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)carbazol-9-yl]-1,8-naphthalimide (RB22), were also obtained by the Ullmann coupling reaction for the next step between N-phenyl-4-bromo-1,8-naphthalimide (6) and, respectively, 3-[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-9H-carbazole (3) or 3-(2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)-9H-carbazole (4). All the detailed synthetic information is provided in the Figure 2 and Supporting Information section of this article.

Mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy were employed to identify the newly synthesized derivatives. The experimental data supported the proposed structures. All the target compounds demonstrated excellent solubility in common organic solvents, such as chloroform, DMF, and tetrahydrofuran (THF) at room temperature.

2.1. Photo-Physical Properties

The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of compounds RB14, RB18, and RB22 are shown in Figure 3a, illustrating peak emission wavelengths of 525 nm, 520 nm, and 555 nm for RB14, RB18, and RB22, respectively, in THF solvent, while the peak emission wavelengths of films on glass shown in Figure 3b were 600 nm, 600 nm and, 535 nm for RB14, RB18, and RB22, respectively. RB14 has a maximum emission peak at 525 nm in the THF solvent, while at 600 nm over the glass film. RB18 has a maximum peak emission at 520 nm in the THF solvent, while at 600 nm over the glass film. RB22 has a maximum emission at 555 nm in the THF solvent, while at 535 nm in the thin film. The maximum peak shift from solution to glass film is higher in RB14 and RB18, from lower to higher wavelength range, while the maximum peak shift from solution to glass film is lower in RB22, from higher to lower wavelength range. A red shift indicates that an increase in conjugation length of molecules reduces the electronic band gap. RB14 and RB18 exhibit a higher formation of J-aggregates [28]. In RB22, the formation of an H-aggregate causes a blue shift [29]. H-aggregated films show that H-type packing restricts exciton delocalization and suppresses non-radiative decay, whereas J-aggregates promote delocalized exciton states that are more vulnerable to quenching and dark-state formation [30]. Blue shift absorption is also responsible for the increase in band gap energy; therefore, RB22 has the highest band gap energy among these materials, as shown in Figure 4f.

Under ambient conditions, the ultraviolet-visible absorbance (UV-vis abs) spectra of the compounds RB14, RB18, and RB22 were examined using THF solvent. Figure 4a–c shows the absorbance spectra of the respective prepared 10 mg/mL solutions measured using a quartz cuvette. A Tauc plot was constructed (Figure 4d–f) using the absorption wavelength and intensity data. The Tauc plot was calculated by employing the following Equation (1) [31]:

(αhν)² = A(hν − E_g)

(1)

where hν is the photon energy (1240/wavelength), α is the absorption coefficient, A is a constant, and E_g is the optical bandgap.

It could be observed from the results that the optical band gaps (E_g) of RB14, RB18, and RB22 are 2.46 eV, 2.48 eV, and 2.61 eV, respectively.

2.2. Electrochemical Properties

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were conducted to estimate the electrochemical characteristics of compounds RB14, RB18, and RB22. The results of these measurements are presented in Figure 5. These results were utilized to calculate highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy.

Calculation of the HOMO level was performed using Equation (2), and calculation of the LUMO level was performed using Equation (3).

$${\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{O}}=-4.8-\left[\left({\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{x}}-{\mathrm{E}}_{1/2\left(\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{e}\right)}\right)\right]$$

(2)

$${\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{U}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{O}}={\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{O}}+{\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{g}}$$

(3)

where E_ox is the oxidation onset potential of a material, E_{1/2 (Ferrocene)} is the half-wave potential of ferrocene, E_g is the bandgap, E_HOMO is the HOMO energy, and E_LUMO is the LUMO energy [32].

The bandgap (E_g) was calculated using a Tauc plot, and the values obtained were utilized to determine the LUMO energy. For RB14, RB18, and RB22, the measured HOMO energy levels were determined to be −5.16, −5.05, and −4.76 eV, respectively. Similarly, the LUMO levels were calculated to be −2.68, −2.59, and −2.15 eV for RB14, RB18, and RB22, respectively. These results indicate that the LUMO level of the derivative RB14 closely matches with LUMO energy of ETL and of the host material. This band matching is beneficial for electron transport, which may be the reason for the highest EQE of 7.93% at 10 wt% doping with CBP host among all these materials.

2.3. Thermal Properties

The thermal behavior of the synthesized materials RB14, RB18, and RB22 was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), shown in Figure 6, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), as shown in Figure 7. The results revealed that the compounds demonstrate high thermal stability. The temperatures of 5% weight loss (T_d) for derivatives RB14, RB18, and RB22 were 336 °C, 431 °C, and 400 °C, respectively, as confirmed by TGA with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

The derivatives RB14, RB18, and RB22 were obtained after synthesis as fully amorphous materials with glass transition temperatures (T_g) of 133 °C, 162 °C, and 167 °C, respectively, as indicated during the DSC experiment. No crystallization or melting transitions were detected during the first or second heating and cooling cycles. The very high T_g values of all target compounds indicate their potential advantage for application in OLEDs. The DSC thermograms of the target compounds RB14, RB18, and RB22 during the second heating cycle are presented in Figure 7.

2.4. Structure and Characterization of Electroluminescent OLED Devices

Preliminary tests of the RB emitting materials in the fabrication and characterization of the OLEDs using host matrix CBP demonstrated that the emitters RB14, RB18, and RB22 are promising components of the multilayer devices. The fabricated devices had the structures: ITO (125 nm)/PEDOT: PSS (35 nm)/CBP host: x wt% of RB emitters (x = 5.0, 10, 15, and 20%) (20 nm)/TPBi (40 nm)/LiF (1 nm)/Al (200 nm). The detailed device fabrication process is described in the Experimental part. Figure 8 represents the energy level diagrams of the yellow and green light-emitting OLEDs using the hosts CBP doped with RB14, RB18, and RB22 emitters. It was observed that these emitting materials could be suitable for fabricating thermally stable OLEDs.

The electroluminescent (EL) properties of the devices using the emitter RB14 at dopant concentrations of 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, and 20.0 wt% with a CBP host were investigated. Figure 9 shows electroluminescence spectra, current density–voltage, luminance–voltage, current efficacy–luminance, power efficacy–luminance, and external quantum efficiency–luminance characteristics of the OLEDs containing the emitter RB14 with the CBP host. Some characteristics of these devices are also summarized in

Table 1. Characteristics of OLEDs using emitter RB14 with different dopant concentrations and CBP host.

Host	Dopant Emitters		Driving Voltage (V)	Power Efficacy (PE) (lm/W)	Current Efficacy (CE) (cd/A)	EQE (%)	CIE (x, y)	Maximum Luminance (cd/m2)
	Materials (RB)	Conc. (wt. %)
				@ Max [PE, CE and EQE (%)]/100 cd/m2/1000 cd/m2			at 100 and 1000 cd/m2
		0	7.90	0.40/ 0.40	1.14/ 1.10	2.46/ 0.90	(0.25, 0.27)/-	878
CBP	RB14	5	5.80	2.93/ 1.50/ 0.90	5.89/ 3.60/ 2.90	4.18/ 1.30/ 1.10	(0.46, 0.50)/ (0.44, 0.50)	3722
		10	4.60	2.40/ 1.70/ 0.90	5.09/ 3.20/ 2.50	7.93/ 1.30/ 1.30	(0.49, 0.50)/ (0.47, 0.50)	3799
		15	4	2.90/ 2.90/ 1.10	7.39/ 4.70/ 2.60	4.42/ 1.80/ 1.10	(0.50, 0.49)/ (0.48, 0.50)	3746
		20	3.60	2.17/ 1.70/ 0.70	2.77/ 2.50/ 1.60	1.60/ 1.10/ 1.10	(0.51, 0.48)/ (0.49, 0.49)	3999

. The observed EL spectra (Figure 9a) showed emission peaks for different doping concentrations in the RB14 emitter and CBP host-based devices. The fabricated devices emitted a yellowish-green light, with CIE coordinates ranging from (0.46, 0.50) to (0.51, 0.48) and broad spectra from 450 to 750 nm with a maximum peak at 578 nm.

The RB14-based OLEDs demonstrated driving voltages of 3.6–5.8 V, maximal current efficacies of 2.77–7.39 cd/A, maximal power efficacies of 2.17–2.93 lm/W, maximal external quantum efficiencies of 1.6–7.93% and maximal luminance in the range of 3722–3999 cd/m². At higher brightness, such as 1000 cd/m², which can be used for illumination applications, it was observed that the 10 wt% emitter-based device slightly outperformed the other OLEDs by displaying a maximum power efficacy of 2.4 lm/W, maximum current efficacy of 5.09 and maximal external quantum efficiency of 7.93% with a rather low driving voltage of 4.6 eV, as well as high luminance of about 3800 cd/m². The maximum external quantum efficiency is higher than that of other RB materials because the energy level of RB14 closely matches the LUMO of the host material and the ETL material.

The electroluminescent (EL) properties of the devices using the emitter RB18 at dopant concentrations of 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, and 20.0 wt% with the CBP host were also investigated. Figure 10 shows electroluminescence spectra, current density–voltage, luminance–voltage, current efficacy–luminance, power efficacy–luminance, and external quantum efficiency–luminance characteristics of the OLEDs with the emitter RB18 dispersed in the CBP host. Some characteristics of these devices are also summarized in

Table 2. Characteristics of OLEDs using emitter RB18 with different dopant concentrations and CBP host.

Host	Dopant Emitters		Driving Voltage (V)	Power Efficacy (PE) (lm/W)	Current Efficacy (CE) (cd/A)	EQE (%)	CIE (x, y)	Maximum Luminance (cd/m2)
	Materials (RB)	Conc. (wt. %)
				@ Max [PE, CE and EQE (%)]/100 cd/m2/1000 cd/m2			at 100 and 1000 cd/m2
		0	7.90	0.40/ 0.40	1.14/ 1.10	2.46/ 0.90	(0.25, 0.27)/-	878
CBP	RB18	5	5.70	1.29/ 1.20/ 0.70	3.39/ 3.20/ 2.20	1.65/ 1.20/ 0.80	(0.47, 0.49)/ (0.43, 0.48)	2244
		10	4.90	2.60/ 1.70/ 0.70	4.24/ 3.50/ 2	2.33/ 1.40/ 0.70	(0.49, 0.49)/ (0.46, 0.49)	2338
		15	4.30	2.91/ 1.70/ 0.40	4.17/ 3.20/ 1.30	3.40/ 1.30/ 0.60	(0.50, 0.48)/ (0.48, 0.48)	2931
		20	3.60	1.38/ 1.20/ 0.50	1.81/ 1.80/ 1.20	1.22/ 0.70/ 0.50	(0.51, 0.48)/ (0.49, 0.49)	1950

. The observed EL spectra (Figure 10a) showed emission peaks for different doping concentrations in the RB18 emitter and CBP host-based devices. The fabricated devices emitted the yellow light, with CIE coordinates from (0.47, 0.49) to (0.49, 0.49) and broad spectra from 450 to 750 nm with a maximum peak at 582 nm and color temperature range from 2671 K to 2989 K, which is a warm yellow color similar to sunset, and can be used in photo-therapeutic and comfort lighting applications.

The RB18-based OLEDs demonstrated driving voltages of 3.6–5.7 V, maximal current efficacies of 1.81–4.24 cd/A, maximal power efficacies of 1.29–2.91 lm/W, maximal external quantum efficiencies of 1.22–3.40% and maximal luminance in the range of 1950–2931 cd/m². At higher brightness, such as 1000 cd/m², which can be used for illumination applications, it was observed that the 15 wt% emitter-based device slightly outperformed the other OLEDs by displaying a maximum power efficacy of 2.91 lm/W, maximum current efficacy of 4.17 and maximal external quantum efficiency of 3.40% with a rather low driving voltage of 4.30 eV, as well as luminance of 2931 cd/m².

The electroluminescent (EL) properties of the devices using the emitter RB22 at dopant concentrations of 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, and 20.0 wt% with a CBP host were also investigated. Figure 11 shows electroluminescence spectra, current density–voltage, luminance–voltage, current efficacy–luminance, power efficacy–luminance, and external quantum efficiency–luminance characteristics of the OLEDs with the emitter RB22 dispersed in the CBP host. Some characteristics of these devices are also summarized in

Table 3. Characteristics of OLEDs using emitter RB22 with different dopant concentrations and CBP host.

Host	Dopant Emitters		Driving Voltage (V)	Power Efficacy (PE) (lm/W)	Current Efficacy (CE) (cd/A)	EQE (%)	CIE (x, y)	Maximum Luminance (cd/m2)
	Materials (RB)	Conc. (wt.%)
				@ Max [PE, CE and EQE (%)]/100 cd/m2/1000 cd/m2			at 100 and 1000 cd/m2
		0	7.90	0.40/ 0.40	1.14/ 1.10	2.46/ 0.90	(0.25, 0.27)/-	878
CBP	RB22	5	8.10	1.31/ 1.30/ 1.10	3.90/ 3.80/ 3.50	4.02/ 2.30/ 1.80	(0.22, 0.40)/ (0.21, 0.39)	3986
		10	6.30	2.30/ 1.70/ 0.90	4.66/ 3.90/ 2.80	1.84/ 1.40/ 1	(0.26, 0.50)/ (0.25, 0.48)	4165
		15	5.10	2.98/ 2.20/ 1.30	5.20/ 4.30/ 3.40	2.05/ 1.40/ 1.20	(0.29, 0.54)/ (0.27, 0.51)	4100
		20	4.50	2.13/ 2/ 1.10	3.40/ 3.40/ 2.60	1.40/ 1.20/ 0.90	(0.30, 0.55)/ (0.29, 0.53)	4375

. The observed EL spectra (Figure 11a) showed emission peaks of devices for different doping concentrations of the RB22 emitter in CBP. The fabricated devices emitted the green light with CIE coordinates from (0.22, 0.40) to (0.30, 0.55) and with broad spectra from 430 to 650 nm and a maximum peak at 495 nm.

The RB22-based OLEDs demonstrated driving voltages of 4.5–8.1 V, maximal current efficacies of 3.40–5.20 cd/A, maximal power efficacies of 1.31–2.98 lm/W, maximal external quantum efficiencies of 1.40–4.02% and maximal luminance in the range of 3986–4375 cd/m². At higher brightness, such as 1000 cd/m², which can be used for illumination applications, it could be stated that the 5 wt% emitter-based device slightly outperformed the other OLEDs by displaying a maximum power efficacy of 1.31 lm/W, maximum current efficacy of 3.90, and maximal external quantum efficiency of 4.02% with a rather high driving voltage of 8.10 eV, as well as luminance of 3986 cd/m².

2.5. CIE-Chromaticity Diagram and Color Temperature

CIE-chromaticity diagrams and color temperatures are shown in Figure 12 for these devices using RB emitters with 5 to 20% doping in the CBP host matrix. Due to their color temperature range of 2600–3641 K, RB14 and RB18 indicated their suitability for warm lighting applications.

3. Experimental Part

3.1. Synthesis

Detailed synthesis process of the objective materials N-(9-ethylcarbazole-3-yl)-4-[3-(diphenylamino)phenylcarbazol-9-yl]-1,8-naphthalimide (RB14), N-phenyl-4-[3-(diphenylamino)phenylcarbazol-9-yl]-1,8-naphthalimide (RB18), and N-phenyl-4-[3-(2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)carbazol-9-yl]-1,8-naphthalimide (RB22) are described in experimental Section S1.1 of the Supporting Information.

3.2. Instrumentation

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a TGAQ50 apparatus (Verder Scientific Haan, Haan, Germany). The TGA and DSC curves were recorded in a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out using a Bruker Reflex II thermos-system (Bruker, Berlin, Germany). The OLED devices were formed on pre-patterned ITO glass substrates, which were first cleaned with a soap solution for 10 min and then rinsed for 5 min with distilled water. Then the substrates were ultrasonically cleaned for 30 min in acetone at 50 °C and afterward for a further 30 min in isopropyl alcohol at 60 °C. After the cleaning, the substrates were treated for 15–20 min with UV to remove the solvents, and then they were transferred to a nitrogen-filled glove box. Deposition of a multilayer OLED structure was carried out in the glove box under an inert atmosphere. Hole-injecting layer of PEDOT: PSS was spin-coated at 4000 rpm for 20 s, and then the substrates were heated at 130 °C for 10 min and then cooled. An emissive layer was then spin-coated from a solution of CBP host with the dopant RB materials on the cooled substrates at 2500 rpm for 20 s. The substrates were then transferred to a thermal evaporation chamber for deposition of TPBi electron transporting and LiF injecting layer, as well as Al cathode at a high vacuum of 10⁶ torr. The device area was 0.09 cm².

Characterization of the OLED devices was carried out in a completely dark room under ambient conditions. The current density–voltage–luminance characteristics were recorded using a CS-100A luminescence spectrophotometer (Becker & Hickl, Berlin, Germany), while power efficacy–luminance–current characteristics were recorded using a PR-655 spectrophotometer (NLIR, Farum, Denmark). The Keithley 2400 voltmeter (Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, OH, USA) was used to measure the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the devices was calculated using the method described in the literature [33].

4. Conclusions

Three new bipolar emitting materials, RB14, RB18, and RB22, were synthesized and exhibited excellent thermal and electroluminescent properties. RB18 was characterized as a bipolar OLED emitter having CIE coordinates of (0.47, 0.49) to (0.49, 0.49) and broad spectra from 450 to 750 nm with a maximum peak at 582 nm and with a color temperature range from 2671 K to 2989 K, which is a warm yellow color. This sunset-like color can be used in photo-therapeutic and comfort lighting applications. This material demonstrated thermal durability (T_d) up to 431 °C and a high glass transition temperature (T_g) of 162 °C, which is the highest T_g reported for naphthalimide-based bipolar emitter derivatives for a yellow OLEDs to date, making it suitable for photo-therapeutic and comfort lighting applications. RB14 and RB22 are yellowish-green and green bipolar emitters and also exhibited high T_g and T_d values, confirming their morphological and operational stability. In RB22, a blue shift due to H-aggregate formation causes an increase in thermal stability, which is validated through TGA, DSC, and variable-temperature UV–visible spectroscopy. RB22 is the most thermally stable material in the group. OLED devices fabricated with a CBP host achieved maximum EQEs of 7.93% with RB14, 3.40% with RB18, and 4.02% with RB22, outperforming previously reported naphthalimide-based bipolar emitters. Although these emitters possess excellent intrinsic stability, further optimization of device architecture, charge-transporting layers, and fabrication processes could further improve performance. These results indicate strong potential for the development of next-generation high-efficiency, thermally robust OLEDs.