2.1. Phytotoxicity of [TEA][AA] Salts
Phytotoxicity assessment was carried out with cress seeds (
Lepidium sativum L.) as an example species of terrestrial plants.
Lepidium sativum L. is an excellent bioindicator due to its rapid growth and high sensitivity [
27]. The test is analogous to the standard ISO 18763:2016 [
28]. The effect of the type and concentration of [TEA][AA] salts were assessed in two bioassays. In the first, the degree of cress seeds germination, and in the second—the root growth in pregerminated cress seed, at 24 h after the beginning of incubation in the presence of salt solution—were measured. Inhibition of seed germination (%I
SG) and root growth (%I
RG) relative to a control sample were determined. The %I
SG and %I
RG values are listed in the
Supplementary Materials in Tables S1 and S2, respectively. In addition, photos of Petri dishes showing the effect of [TEA][AA] salt concentration on the degree of cress seed germination (
Figures S1–S3) and root growth
(Figures S4–S6) are included in the Supplementary Materials.
The effect of [TEA][AA] salts concentration in the range from 0.01% to 5.0% on the decrease of the cress seeds germination in comparison to the control containing only water in the substrate was assessed. The dependence of seed germination inhibition (%I
SG) on the concentration of the compound is presented in
Figure 1,
Figure 2,
Figure 3 and
Figure 4. Data are grouped into four categories based on the type of amino acid—polar (
Figure 1), nonpolar (
Figure 2), basic (
Figure 3), and acidic (
Figure 4) in the salt. Data for starting triethanolamine, TEA, are added to each graph.
In the group of polar amino acids (
Figure 1), seed germination was inhibited to the lowest extent for the salts with anions of serine [TEA][Ser] and threonine [TEA][Thr], containing a hydroxyl group in the side chain, and was comparable to that for TEA. A little increase in %I
SG, up to about 20%, was observed with an increase in salts concentration to 3.0%. Further increase in concentration above 3.0% caused a stronger inhibition of germination, and finally for the highest concentration of 5.0%, the %I
SG was over 70%, both for [TEA][Ser] and [TEA][Thr]. In contrast, for [TEA][Asn] and [TEA][Gln], containing an amide group in the side chain, an increase in germination inhibition was observed with increasing concentration, and at a concentration of 3.0%, the %I
SG was 2 to 2.5 times higher than for the [TEA][Ser] and [TEA][Thr] salts. Moreover, when [TEA][Gln] was used at a concentration of 5.0%, the germination was completely inhibited.
In the group of nonpolar amino acid salts (
Figure 2), the seed germination was inhibited at the least degree for [TEA][Met] and [TEA][Phe], practically in the entire concentration range, except for the highest concentration of 5.0% for [TEA][Phe]. For [TEA][Met] and [TEA][Phe] used at a concentration of 3.0%, the %I
SG was lower than 15%, which is also lower compared to the least phytotoxic salts of polar amino acids—[TEA][Ser] and [TEA][Thr]. The highest germination inhibition among nonpolar amino acid salts was observed for [TEA][Trp], as well as [TEA][Gly] and [TEA][Leu]—for a concentration of 3.0%, the seed germination inhibition was 53.7%, 63.8%, and 58.5%, respectively. For the highest concentration of 5.0% of these salts, the germination was inhibited by 90% to 100%.
In the group of basic amino acid salts (
Figure 3), the seed germination inhibition for each amino acid is similar and comparable with TEA. Lysine salt can be considered the least toxic at concentrations up to 2.0%, as it inhibits seed germination by 11.5%. For concentrations higher than 2.0%, arginine and lysine salts showed the highest phytotoxicity. Germination inhibition at 3.0% concentration was 32.7% and 38.5% for [TEA][Arg] and [TEA][Lys], respectively, and above 76% for both salts used at 5.0% concentration.
The group of salts based on acidic amino acids (
Figure 4) ensured the lowest level of germination inhibition. The lowest germination inhibition was found for monocationic salts of aspartic acid, [TEA][Asp], and glutamic acid, [TEA][Glu]—at a concentration of 3%, the %I
SG was 3.5% and 14.3%, respectively, and at a concentration of 5.0%–28.8% and 33.9%, respectively. The bicationic salts [TEA]
2[Asp] and [TEA]
2[Glu] inhibited seed germination to a greater degree than monocationic and similarly to the starting TEA (%I
SG = 55.9%) and salts of polar amino acids Ser and Thr.
The inhibition increased with the increase in [TEA][AA] salts concentration. Moreover, the seed coat became darker and darker with the higher concentration of salts (
Figures S1–S3 in Supplementary Materials). The darker color may be the result of the triethanolammonium cation connection to the surface of the seed coat or to the secreted exudate lepidimoid (sodium 2-OL-rhamnopyranosyl-4-deoxy-alpha-L-threo-hex-4-ene-pyranoside duronate) in the germinated cress seeds.
The second phytotoxicity test concerned the effect of [TEA][AA] salts and their concentration in the range of 0.01–5.00% on the inhibition level of root growth (%I
RG), as shown in
Figure 5,
Figure 6,
Figure 7 and
Figure 8, respectively, for polar (
Figure 5), non-polar (
Figure 6), basic (
Figure 7), and acidic (
Figure 8) amino acids comprising the salt.
Dependence of root growth inhibition level on salt concentration has a similar shape for each salt (
Figure 5,
Figure 6,
Figure 7 and
Figure 8). An increase in concentration up to about 1.0% causes a significant, even 80%, inhibition level of root growth, and further increases in concentration cause only slight changes in inhibition level; practically the curves reach a plateau for concentrations higher than 1.0%. The shape of this curve is different than for the effect of salt concentration on the inhibition level of germination (
Figure 1,
Figure 2,
Figure 3 and
Figure 4), where the increase in concentration, usually up to 3.0%, caused a slight inhibition of germination, and concentrations higher than 3.0% resulted in a sharper increase in inhibition. Probably, the process of seed germination is dependent to a lesser extent on the substrate composition because during germination the materials accumulated in the seeds are used.
In the root growth inhibition bioassay, a twisting of roots was observed for concentrations of [TEA][AA] salts above 0.5%. Root twisting can be the effect of a change in osmotic pressure in the presence of [TEA][AA] salts. The probable effect of [TEA][AA] salts on the root growth is related to the inhibition of mitotic divisions, the inhibition of the activity of hydrolytic enzymes, and the slowdown of cell elongation growth (
Figures S4–S6 in Supplementary Materials).
In the group of polar amino acids (
Figure 5), the root growth was inhibited to the lowest level by salt of serine [TEA][Ser], which contains a hydroxyl group in the side chain. Practically, up to a concentration of 0.1% [TEA][Ser], no inhibition compared to the control was noted. A small increase in %I
RG to 14.6% was observed with an increase in [TEA][Ser] concentration to 0.3%. Comparable inhibition of root growth (%I
RG = 12.9%) was obtained for the same concentration of TEA. However, the salts of other polar amino acids [TEA][Asn], [TEA][Thr], and [TEA][Gln], used in a concentration of 0.3%, inhibited statistically significant root growth at the level of 34.9%, 37.8%, and 50.5%, respectively (
Table S5).
In the group of nonpolar amino acid salts (
Figure 6), the least inhibition of root growth, lower than for the starting TEA, was observed for the [TEA][Met] salt, practically in the entire concentration range. For [TEA][Met] used in a concentration of 0.1%, the %I
RG was less than 2%. The highest inhibition of root growth in the group of nonpolar amino acid salts was observed for [TEA][Trp] and [TEA][Phe] salts as well as [TEA][Val] and [TEA][Gly] (
Table S7). Even at the lowest applied concentration of 0.01%, the inhibition of root growth was 38.1%, 23.6%, 11.6%, and 8.7%, respectively. These four salts applied at the highest concentration of 5.0% inhibited the root length growth by 90–96%.
In the group of basic amino acid salts (
Figure 7 &
Table S6), [TEA][His] could be considered as less phytotoxic in comparison to [TEA][Lys] and [TEA][Arg] salts. For example, at a concentration of 0.3%, the inhibition of root growth by [TEA][His] was 28.6% and was 2-fold lower than for [TEA][Lys] and [TEA][Arg] salts.
TEA salts of acidic amino acids (
Figure 8) were characterized by the least inhibition of the cress root growth. Monocationic salts of the aspartic acid [TEA][Asp] as well as glutamic acid [TEA][Glu] used at the concentration of 0.3% inhibited the root growth by only 9.1% and 5.8%, respectively. In the case of bicationic salts of these two amino acids, the inhibition of root growth was significantly higher (
Table S4) and comparable to TEA. The inhibition increased with the increase in the concentration of [TEA][AA], but even for the highest concentration of 5.0%, the lowest root growth inhibition was for [TEA][Asp] (%I
RG = 68.3%).
The salts [TEA][Asp], [TEA][Glu], and [TEA][Ser] can be considered as the least phytotoxic at the concentration up to and including 0.5%. Root growth inhibition using these salts at a concentration of 0.5% was 12.9%, 21%, and 25.3%, respectively. Moreover, these three salts are less toxic than TEA, for which %I
RG was 49.7%, at a concentration of 0.5%. The most toxic effect on root growth causes [TEA][Trp], which, applied at the lowest concentration of 0.01%, inhibited root growth by 38.1%. An equally high level of toxicity was characterized by [TEA][Phe] with %I
RG on the level of 23.6% at the same concentration of 0.01% (
Tables S4 and S5).
Considering the phytotoxicity of [TEA][Ser] and [TEA][Thr], the higher toxicity of [TEA][Thr] can be the effect of the longer alkyl chain and different position of the hydroxyl group in the side chain of threonine. A similar tendency was observed comparing [TEA][Asn] and [TEA][Gln], where in the case of the latter salt, the longer alkyl chain resulted in greater inhibition. Comparing three salts, [TEA][His], [TEA][Lys], and [TEA][Arg], the highest inhibition was found for [TEA][Arg], both in the seed germination test and the root growth test. In the case of triethanolammonium salts of acidic amino acids, dicationic salts [TEA]2[Asp] and [TEA]2[Glu] showed a higher inhibition of seed germination and root growth than the monocationic salts [TEA][Asp] and [TEA][Glu]. This can be attributed to the higher proportion of TEA in the dicationic salts.
Based on two bioassays—cress seed germination and root growth—it can be concluded that the combination of TEA with the amino acids Asp, Met, and Ser provided the lowest phytotoxicity.
Considering the series of [TEA][AA] according to the no observed effects concentration (NOEC) for cress seed germination (
Table 1) and cress root growth (
Table 2), [TEA][Asp] salt was characterized by the lowest phytotoxicity. On this basis, it can be concluded that aspartic acid significantly eliminates the phytotoxic properties of the cation. The other salts can be ranked according to increasing NOEC value for both tests and decreasing toxicity as follows: [TEA][Met], [TEA][Ala], and [TEA][Ser].
In our studies of the [TEA][AA] salts effect on the cress seed germination and root growth, we used higher salt concentrations than in studies presented by other authors in the same bioassays. For example, compared to concentrations between 0.0003 and 0.03 mg L
−1 applied by Kondratenko et al. [
12], the concentrations of [TEA][AA] salts in the range from 100 mg L
−1 to 50,000 mg L
−1 used by us were about a million times higher. Kondratenko et al. studies [
12] revealed that TEA salts of benzoic, salicylic, cinnamic, oxalic, succinic, malonic, malic, and citric acid in all tested concentrations were characterized by the lack of a statistically significant effect on the cress growth. However, for TEA salicylate used at the highest concentration of 0.03 mg L
−1 and TEA citrate at a concentration of 0.0003 mg L
−1 a significant inhibition effect on root and shoot length was determined by authors. Moreover, it was found that TEA salts of cinnamic, benzoic, and malonic acids had a positive stimulating effect on the seed germination and root growth of cress. The most visible stimulation of cress seed germination and root growth was shown by TEA salt of cinnamic acid at concentrations of 0.003 and 0.03 mg L
−1. It can be expected that [TEA][AA] salts used by us in such low concentrations as by Kondratenko could also show a stimulating effect on cress, due to comprising the amino acids, which play important roles in plant growth and stress control and are effective biostimulants for plants. Our achievement is to demonstrate that even at concentrations as high as 0.01% to 2% (corresponding to 100–20,000 mg L
−1), there are [TEA][AA] salts that do not cause a negative effect on the germination and growth of cress roots.
Our results can also be compared to the studies conducted by Studzińska and Buszewski [
17] that concerned the effect of imidazolium ionic liquids ([EMIM][Cl], [BMIM][Cl], and [HMIM][Cl]) in the concentration range of 0.01–1000 mg L
−1, on the cress seed germination. The authors reported that concentrations from 0.01 to 0.1 mg L
−1 of all ILs did not affect root growth and were considered safe. However, at the highest concentration of 1000 mg L
−1 for [BMIM][Cl] and [HMIM][Cl], the decrease in germination was 100%, and for [EMIM][Cl], it was 85%. In relation to these studies [
17], [TEA][AA] salts tested by us showed no germination inhibition at the same concentration of 1000 mg L
−1 (0.1%) and even at higher concentrations, in the range between 3000 and 20,000 mg L
−1 (0.3–2.0%) (
Table 1). Our results confirm no phytotoxic effect of TEA amino acid salts compared to imidazolium ionic liquids [
17].
2.2. Mammalian Cell Cytotoxicity of [TEA][AA] Salts
To evaluate cytotoxic or growth-inhibitory effects of [TEA][AA] salts, an in vitro assay was performed using mouse L929 fibroblasts. Screening experiments were performed at two different exposure times (24 h and 48 h) over a concentration range of <0.001% to 5%. The obtained results regarding the cytotoxic effect of amino acid ionic liquids on the mouse fibroblast cell line (L929) are presented in
Supplementary Materials (Table S3). The cytotoxicity test was performed using the National Cancer Institute 60 panel [
29] for 24 and 48 h. A four-parameter dose-response model (logistic or Weibull) was used to calculate 50% effective doses (ED
50). The doubling time of L929 is typically around 20–22 h, so viability values below 50% indicate cytotoxicity.
After 24 h of culture, all tested compounds were cytotoxic at concentrations > 1%; however, the most negative effect on the viability of L929 cells was observed after exposure to [TEA][Met], whose ED
50 was 0.29% ± 0.02 (
Figure 9). The second compound causing acute cell cytotoxicity was TEA, for which the ED
50 was 0.33% ± 0.02. Interestingly, [TEA][Phe] with an aromatic side chain was characterized by the lowest degree of cytotoxicity (ED
50 = 0.72% ± 0.07) compared to TEA. The use of an amino acid as an anion in the design of an ionic liquid reduces the cytotoxic effect of TEA. [TEA][AA] salts with the acidic anion [TEA][Asp] were less toxic than the basic [TEA][Lys]. Similar ED
50 values were observed for [TEA][Leu], [TEA][Pro], [TEA][Ser], [TEA][Thr], and [TEA][Ala].
The ED50 values for [TEA][AA] salts are ranked by decreasing cytotoxicity after 24 h:
[TEA][Met] > TEA > [TEA][Lys] > [TEA][Leu] > [TEA][Ser] > [TEA][Pro] > [TEA][Thr] ≈ [TEA][Ala] > [TEA][Asp] > [TEA][Phe].
While an increase in cytotoxicity of [TEA][AA] salts on L929 fibroblasts was observed after 48 h of exposure (
Figure 10), the ED
50 values (with few exceptions) are similar to those after 24 h (
Figure 9), which indicates that the majority of the toxic effect was acute. TEA (0.22% ± 0.01) was characterized by the highest cytotoxicity in ED
50. Only in the case of [TEA][Met] and [TEA][Pro], the ED
50 cytotoxic effect slightly decreased, while in [TEA][Leu] it remained at the same level. A strong toxic effect after 48 h exposure to [TEA][AA] salts, which were ranked in descending toxicity order:
TEA > [TEA][Met] > [TEA][Lys] > [TEA][Thr] > [TEA][Ala] > [TEA][Asp] > [TEA][Leu] > [TEA][Phe] > [TEA][Pro].
In the cell suspension, we also observed fluctuations in the pH of the medium, indicated by a pink (alkaline pH) or yellow (acidic pH) color change induced by the addition of TEA, [TEA][Lys], or [TEA][Asp], which has a negative effect on animal cells that are sensitive to pH changes. Therefore, such high cytotoxicity towards animal cells results not only from the properties of the above compounds but also from the effect of their pH. In the tests of the remaining compounds, there was no change in the color of the culture medium; the pH did not change. However, the combination of TEA with an amino acid anion reduced the cytotoxic effect compared to pure TEA. The change in cell viability depends on the concentration of ILs used as well as its structure. An equally frequently used cation is the choline cation, which belongs to the quaternary ammonium compounds known as cationic surfactants [
30,
31], which may justify the effect on reducing cell viability. However, choline ILs show less cytotoxicity compared to the more common imidazolium ILs. It is worth paying attention to the possibility of exerting a toxic effect on cells not only by the cation but also depending on the type of anion used in ILs. An increase in cytotoxicity was observed with the extension of the side chain in the amino acid itself [
32,
33]. Therefore, our team attempted to assess the toxicity of [TEA][AA] salts based on examples described in the literature. In the case of choline ILs with Gly and Ala anion, they induced a slight decrease in 3T3 cell viability (mouse embryonic fibroblasts) with increasing concentration over 48 h. Cell viability was over 90% at a concentration of about 0.5%, and the IC
50 was about 55 mM (1%) for both ILs [
34]. Almeida et al. found that for [Cho][Glu] and [Cho][Phe], the IC
50 was 0.43% (
v/
v) and 0.42% (
v/
v), respectively [
35]. With regard to their research, after 48 h of exposure of L929 cells in the case of [TEA][Ala], [TEA][Asp], [TEA][Leu], [TEA][Phe], and [TEA][Pro], ED
50 values were obtained in the range of 0.42–0.64%, which coincides with the literature data and confirms the low toxicity of those [TEA][AA] salts. Only in the case of [TEA][Met], [TEA][Lys], and [TEA][Thr] were the ED
50 values lower (0.31–0.38%), but still higher than the TEA reference substance. In addition, [Cho][Gly] and [Cho][Ala], when used in small amounts, increased the solubility of ibuprofen, and more importantly, did not increase cytotoxicity, so they can act as excipients [
34]. Amino acid ionic liquids are less toxic than commonly used imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids [
36]. The cytotoxicity of other ILs against murine L929 fibroblasts was also investigated. Agostinho et al. [
37] determined the cytotoxicity profile for ionic liquids based on carboxylic anions and ammonium cations after 24 h exposure. Almost all ILs tested had an IC
50 higher than 100 mM for L929 fibroblast cells. In addition, scientists emphasized that ILs containing dicarboxylate anion, the growth of the alkyl chain does not increase toxicity as is usually the case in monocarboxylate ILs. Silva et al. [
38] studied the cytotoxic effect of a large set of dicationic ionic liquids on L929 mouse fibroblasts after 24 h and showed that the dicationic ionic liquids [N
12OH2OH2C
6][AcPhe
2] and [N
12OH2OH2C
6][CH
3CH
2CH
2CO
2]
2 are toxic. In this kind of IL, the anion was responsible for the toxicity. Moreover, it has been observed that dicationic ILs are much less toxic than monocationic ones. [N
12OH2OH2C
4][CH
3CO
2]
2 and [N
12OH2OH2C2OC
2][CH
3CO
2]
2 were the least toxic, and an increase in cytotoxicity was correlated to the increase in the length of the alkyl chain between the cations in ILs. In our studies, we came to a different conclusion, namely, depending on the amino acid anion used, a different degree of cytotoxicity is exerted. The triethanolammonium cation in combination with Met turned out to be the most toxic, and in combination with Phe, the least toxic after 24 h of exposure.
Egorova et al. [
39] analyzed the influence of a series of ionic liquids based on imidazolium cations with amino acids and inorganic anions on the viability of two types of cell lines: NIH/3T3—mouse fibroblasts and CaCo-2—adenocarcinoma of the intestine and rectum. The ILs analyzed were less toxic to NIH/3T3 fibroblasts, except for [BMIM][BF
4] and [HMIM][Cl], which showed similar toxicity to CaCo-2 and NIH/3T3. It was observed that with the increase in the length of the alkyl side chain in the cation ([EMIM][Cl], [BMIM][Cl], and [HMIM][Cl]), the toxic effect of ILs on cell lines increases. The influence of anion on the degree of toxicity was also observed, which was the lowest after the application of [BMIM][Ala] (IC
50 = 19.35 mM), [BMIM][Cl] (IC
50 = 18.85 mM), and [BMIM][(L)-Lac] (IC
50 = 19.16 mM) against CaCo-2, while against NIH/3T3 they were [BMIM][Ala] (IC
50 = 30.23 mM) and [BMIM][(L)-Lac] (IC
50 = 33.65 mM). The highest degree of toxicity was determined for CaCo-2 in [BMIM][BF
4] (IC
50 = 11.19 mM) and [BMIM][PF
6] (IC
50 = 11.50 mM) and for NIH/3T3 in [BMIM][BF
4] (IC
50 = 11.30 mM). While Gly and Val anions were less toxic than BF
4, PF
6, and HSO
4, they were more toxic than L-lactate anion. Also, the amino acid cations ([Gly-OMe][BF
4], [Ala-OMe][BF
4], and [Val-OMe][BF
4]) showed comparable or higher toxicity compared to the other ILs [HMIM][Cl] and [BMIM][BF
4]. In conclusion, the presence of an amino acid may not always result in lower IL toxicity, especially when an amino acid cation combined with a toxic anion, e.g., BF
4−, may increase toxicity.
2.3. Antimicrobial Activity of [TEA][AA] Salts
The antimicrobial activities of a series of [TEA][AA] salts were tested using gram-positive
S. aureus, gram-negative
E. coli, and the yeast
C. albicans as model microorganisms. The calculated average minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were listed and summarized in
Table 3.
Bacteria, with their short generation times, serve as ideal starting points for investigations into the structure-activity relationships of ionic liquids (ILs). In this study, the following [TEA][AA] salts demonstrated inhibitory effects against S. aureus: [TEA][Lys], [TEA][Arg], TEA, [TEA][Ala], [TEA][Pro], [TEA][Ser], [TEA][Asp], and [TEA][Glu]. The strongest inhibitory properties against S. aureus were observed in [TEA][AA] salts with basic amino acid anions, specifically [TEA][Lys] and [TEA][Arg]. Their MIC values, 1.88% and 3.75%, respectively, were lower than that of the reference compound TEA (6.25%). The compounds [TEA][Ala], [TEA][Pro], and [TEA][Ser] were characterized by similar antimicrobial activity to pure TEA. On the other hand, [TEA][AA] salts with acidic amino acids in the structure showed the weakest inhibitory effect ([TEA][Asp] and [TEA][Glu] = 15%). Only [TEA][Arg] was able to determine an MBC = 3.75%.
IL effectively combating E. coli turned out to be basic [TEA][Lys], which at a concentration of 0.94% inhibited the growth of this bacteria. Other liquids with similar antibacterial properties to TEA (MIC = 3.12%) were alkaline [TEA][Arg] and non-polar [TEA][Ala], whose MIC was 3.75%. The remaining [TEA][AA] salts: [TEA][Thr], [TEA][Pro], [TEA][Ser], and acidic [TEA][Asp] and [TEA][Glu] were characterized by lower bacterial growth inhibiting capacity than TEA. Lower bactericidal properties of the tested liquids were observed compared to the reference compound, which was TEA (MBC = 3.13%). Liquids with anions of basic amino acids, namely [TEA][Lys] and [TEA][Arg] (MBC = 3.75%), had the strongest bactericidal effect, similar to TEA. On the other hand, [TEA][AA] salts based on acidic amino acids ([TEA][Asp] and [TEA][Glu]) showed the lowest bactericidal properties, MBC equal to 15%.
The trend of increasing antimicrobial activity for C. albicans, corresponding to the polarity of the side chain of amino acid anions, was as follows:
[TEA][Glu] ≈ [TEA][Asp] < [TEA][Pro] < TEA < [TEA][Met] < [TEA][Thr] » [TEA][Ser] < [TEA][His] < [TEA][Ala] < [TEA][Arg] » [TEA][Lys].
[TEA][Lys] and [TEA][Arg] (MIC = 0.94%) had the strongest inhibitory effect on yeast growth, and [TEA][Glu] and [TEA][Asp] (MIC = 15%) the weakest compared to pure TEA. It was also observed that [TEA][Asp] showed a stronger bactericidal effect (MBC = 15%) than TEA (MBC = 25%). An interesting observation is that more of the tested [TEA][AA] salts produced an inhibitory effect against C. albicans than against S. aureus and E. coli. In addition, [TEA][AA] salts have a greater bactericidal efficacy against E. coli than S. aureus. Hence, it may be concluded that [TEA][AA] salts are more likely to have antifungal than antibacterial properties.
The results obtained by us, as well as the research conducted by Wu et al. [
31], who studied series of ionic liquids based on imidazolium and choline cations with different amino acids and anions, confirm that ionic liquids with the Asp anion are characterized by the lowest toxicity towards the tested microorganisms. This was due to having one hydrophilic carboxyl group in the IL, which is not easy to pass through the membrane of microorganisms [
31]. The toxic effects of ionic liquids (ILs) on microorganisms can vary significantly due to the distinct structures of their cell walls. In Gram-positive bacteria, the cell wall is characterized by a thick layer of peptidoglycan, which can account for up to 90% of its composition. This thick peptidoglycan layer is rich in polysaccharides and provides considerable rigidity and structural support (R0) [
40]. Additionally, the cell wall contains teichoic acids, which are hydrophobic and can interact with ILs. This hydrophobic nature of the cell wall influences how ILs penetrate and affect these bacteria [
41]. In contrast, gram-negative bacteria have a more complex cell wall structure. Their cell wall consists of a thinner peptidoglycan layer situated between an inner cytoplasmic membrane and an outer membrane. The outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria is composed of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which form a protective barrier against various compounds, including ILs [
42]. This outer membrane has hydrophobic properties and can limit the penetration of ILs, thereby affecting the bacterial response to these substances [
43]. Yeasts, which are eukaryotic microorganisms, have a cell wall that differs from both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The cell walls of these microbes are primarily composed of glucans (e.g., β-glucans) and mannans, which provide structural integrity and protection. The structure of the yeast cell wall also includes chitin, a polymer of N-acetylglucosamine, which contributes to its rigidity [
44,
45]. The different chemical and physical properties of yeast cell walls can influence how ILs interact with and affect these organisms. However, our study showed equal or lower MIC values when applying the same [TEA][AA] salts to gram-negative than gram-positive bacteria compared to studies by Wu et al. where they reported a higher level of tolerance of gram-negative than gram-positive bacteria. Yeasts were the most sensitive microorganisms to the toxic effects of the [TEA][AA] salts we studied, which is also consistent with the results obtained in the studies of Wu et al. [
31]. The effect of the ionic liquid on bacterial cells is primarily associated with the disintegration of the cell wall. The action of ILs on bacteria is generally less specific but faster compared to standard antibiotics, which exert their effects by interfering with cell wall synthesis, inhibiting enzymes or nucleic acid synthesis, disrupting the bacterial membrane structure, or inhibiting metabolic pathways [
46].
Our study found that gram-negative bacteria were more sensitive to the toxic effects of [TEA][AA] salts than gram-positive bacteria, aligning with Hou et al. [
33]. This contradicts the general trend of gram-negative bacteria being more resistant to biocides. The toxicity of these salts varied depending on their functional groups. Those with hydroxyl groups exhibited toxicity similar to pure TEA, while salts containing carboxyl groups ([TEA][Asp] and [TEA][Glu]) were the least toxic [
33,
47]. In contrast, salts with basic amino acid anions showed high toxicity, a pattern also observed by Hou et al. The greater toxicity of [TEA][AA] salts compared to choline chloride can be attributed to TEA’s three 2-hydroxyethyl chains, in contrast to choline chloride’s single 2-hydroxyethyl chain. Earlier we reported the antibacterial activity of ILs based on choline amino acids ([Ch][Ser], [Ch][Val], [Ch][Pro], [Ch][His], [Ch][Ala]) against the gram-positive bacterium
L. monocytogenes and the gram-negative bacteria
A. hydrophila and
K. pneumoniae; all ILs showed relatively similar EC
50 toxicity to microorganisms except for the least performing [Ch][Ser] [
24].
Another future of ILs, such as increasing lipophilicity by elongating the alkyl chains in the cation as well as in the anion, leads to an enhancement of the toxic effect on microorganisms. However, this has not been confirmed in our research [
33,
41]. However, the use of an appropriate cation may decrease the toxic effect. The use of the [OHBMIM] cation turned out to be less toxic than the [Cho] and [OMIM] cations with Ser and Pro anions against gram-negative bacteria
Aliivibrio fischeri. In the case of [Cho][Ala], it was detected to be less toxic than [OHBMIM][Ala] and the most toxic to
A. fischeri [
48].
The salt of amino acid in combination with benzalkonium as a cation showed a variance in antimicrobial effect for
S. aureus,
S. epidermidis,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
E. coli, and
Raoultella ornithinolytica. The highest inhibitory effect was observed for [BA][Tyr], [BA][Pro], and [BA][Ile] (MIC = 0.5 mg L
−1) against
S. aureus. However, these compounds had the weakest inhibitory and bactericidal activity against
S. epidermidis. [BA][Met] and [BA][Tyr] (MIC = 0.5 mg L
−1) action against
P. aeruginosa were similar to benzalkonium chloride.
E. coli was the most resistant strain to the tested compounds, except for [BA][Leu], which acted similarly to benzalkonium chloride (MIC = 15 mg L
−1) [
49].
The influence of ILs with amino acid anions of proline and histidine and based on bis-ammonium or bis-phosphonium cations with an alkyl linker or a linker containing two ester bonds on gram-positive bacteria:
S. aureus,
S. epidermidis,
Enterococcus faecalis,
Bacillus subtilis,
Micrococcus luteus,
Clostridium perfringens,
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, gram-negative bacteria:
E. coli,
P. aeruginosa,
Serratia marcescens,
Proteus vulgaris,
Moraxella catarrhalis,
Salmonella enteritidis, and fungi:
C. albicans,
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa,
Botrytis cinerea,
Fusarium graminearum was determined [
50]. Most of the tested compounds (19 out of 24) showed no activity or slight inhibition of some of the tested microorganisms. ILs with quaternary phosphorus atoms were more effective in inhibiting microbial growth than those with quaternary nitrogen atoms. Salts containing in their structure an alkyl chain with 12 carbon atoms were characterized by the highest antimicrobial activity. The presence of ester bonds resulted in a decrease in antimicrobial properties, and ILs with two ester bonds in the quaternary ammonium cation were among the weakest compounds. Among the tested compounds, the strongest bacterial growth inhibitory effect was observed for C
12-bis-ammonium prolinate, C
12-1,ω-bis(carboxymethyltributylammonium) prolinate, C
8-bis-phosphonium prolinate, C
12-bis-phosphonium prolinate, and C
12-bis-phosphonium histidinate, which was at a level similar to the comparative compounds: [DDA][Cl] and [BA][Cl]. The MIC ranged from <0.5 to 125 μg mL
−1 for gram-positive bacteria, from <0.5 to > 1000 μg mL
−1 for gram-negative bacteria, and from 8 to 1000 μg mL
−1 for the tested fungi. In the conducted research, we observed that the choice of anion type has a strong influence on the antifungal properties. The [TEA][His] showed stronger inhibition than [TEA][Pro] against
C. albicans. However, in research led by Kaczmarek et al. [
50], the degree of inhibition against
C. albicans was the same when the C
12-bis-phosphonium cation was used with His and Pro anions.
The next developed IL, based on TEA with Ala, Pro, and Ser anions, exhibited the same level of toxicity against
S. aureus compared to Ghanem et al. [
25]. In contrast, [TEA][Ala] was more potent than [TEA][Pro] and [TEA][Ser] against
E. coli, as was [C
2mpyrr][Ala] in comparison to [C
2mpyrr][Ser] and [C
2mpyrr][Pro]. Ghanem et al. [
51] also reported the antimicrobial activity (
Aeromonas hydrophila,
E. coli,
Listeria monocytogenes, and
S. aureus) of ILs based on the 1-ethyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium cation [C
2mpyrr] with amino acid anions: Gly, Ala, Ser, and Pro. The EC
50 toxicity grade was as follows: [C
2mpyrr][Ser] < [C
2mpyrr][Pro] < [C
2mpyrr][Ala] < [C
2mpyrr][Gly]. These associations were referenced to earlier work by Ghanem et al. [
25], in which ILs with the cation 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium [OMIM] and 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium [C
2OHMIM] with the above anions were studied. ILs with serinate anion showed the lowest toxicity compared to other compounds. [OMIM][AA] showed higher toxicity than [C
2OHMIM][AA] and [C
2mpyrr][AA] [
51]. The last of the created based on the aromatic nonpolar amino acid IL, [TEA][Phe], does not cause any antimicrobial properties in our studies. Sivapragasam et al. [
52] in studies indicated the high toxicity of ILs to the effective tetrabutylphosphonium [P
4444] and tetrabutylammonium [N
4444] cations with the Phe anion compared to those with the anion acetate [Ac] and taurinate [Tau] against
S. aureus and
E. coli. These findings highlight the crucial role of IL salt composition in determining antimicrobial activity, confirming the significance of interactions between IL components in shaping their potential antimicrobial effects.