Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Sustainable Ethanolamine-Based Protic Ionic Liquids with Varied Carboxylic Acid Chains as Corrosion Inhibitors for Carbon Steel in Saline Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Rational Design of Hierarchical Beta Zeolites via Post-Synthesis Treatments and Their Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
CO2 Capture: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Scalable Materials and Sustainable Solutions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CO2 Reforming of Biomass Gasification Tar over Ni-Fe-Based Catalysts in a DBD Plasma Reactor

1
State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(5), 1032; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051032
Submission received: 17 January 2025 / Revised: 15 February 2025 / Accepted: 21 February 2025 / Published: 24 February 2025

Abstract

:
The removal of tar and CO2 represents a critical challenge in the production of biomass gasification syngas, necessitating the development of advanced catalytic systems. In this study, plasma-enhanced catalytic CO2 reforming was employed to remove biomass tar, with toluene selected as a model compound for biomass tar. Supported Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts, with varying Ni/Fe molar ratios (3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3), were synthesized for the CO2 reforming of toluene in dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) non-thermal plasma reactors. The experiments were conducted at 250 °C and ambient pressure. The effects of various Ni/Fe molar ratios, discharge powers, and CO2 concentrations on DBD plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene to synthesis gas were analyzed. The results indicate that CO and H2 are the primary gaseous products of toluene decomposition, with the selectivity for these gaseous products increasing with the discharge power. Increasing discharge power leads to a higher selectivity for CO and H2 production. A CO2/C7H8 ratio of 1.5 was found to effectively enhance the catalytic performance of the system, leading to the highest toluene conversion and syngas selectivity. The selectivity of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts for H2 and CO follows the following order: Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni2-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe2/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3. Notably, the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst exhibits a high CO2 adsorption capacity due to its strong basicity, demonstrating significant potential for both tar conversion and carbon resistance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The growing importance of biomass as a renewable energy source is driven by its potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and mitigate climate change. As a carbon-neutral resource, biomass plays a crucial role in the transition to sustainable energy systems by providing a reliable and renewable alternative for power generation, heating, and biofuel production [1]. Gasification is a critical process to utilize biomass, and during the biomass gasification process, tar formation is a significant issue due to the incomplete decomposition of organic matter, resulting in a complex mixture of hydrocarbons that condense into a liquid phase. These tars cause operational challenges, such as clogging and fouling of gasification equipment, leading to reduced efficiency and increased maintenance costs. Furthermore, tar buildup can poison catalysts in downstream processes like syngas cleaning and biofuel production, ultimately hindering the overall performance and commercial viability of biomass conversion technologies.
Biomass tar is a complex mixture of organic compounds, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phenols, aldehydes, and other oxygenated species [2,3]. The chemical composition of biomass tar varies depending on the feedstock and process conditions, but its high molecular weight and stability make it resistant to decomposition, causing operational issues like equipment fouling and catalyst deactivation [4]. Model compounds of biomass tar are used to investigate the reforming process because they provide a simplified, controlled environment that allows researchers to isolate and study specific tar components and their interactions during reforming. This approach helps identify optimal reaction conditions and catalyst performance before applying the findings to the complex, heterogeneous nature of actual biomass tar [5]. Regular tar model compounds that have been used include toluene, benzene, and naphthalene [6,7]. To eliminate and convert tar in fuel gas, various tar removal technologies have been developed, including mechanical separation, thermal cracking, and catalytic steam reforming. Mechanical separation is effective for removing low-concentration and simple tar compounds but suffers from low energy efficiency and is less suitable for complex tar mixtures. Thermal cracking, while effective at breaking down tar, requires substantial energy to maintain high-temperature conditions, resulting in high energy consumption and associated operational costs [8]. Moreover, the need for specialized equipment to handle the high-temperature process increases maintenance costs. Catalytic steam reforming is often considered a promising method due to its high conversion efficiency, but it is dependent on fossil fuels for energy, which leads to high energy consumption and could contribute to increased carbon emissions. In contrast, catalytic CO2 reforming offers a more sustainable alternative. It can utilize CO2 which can be sourced from renewable or waste streams, and works at lower temperatures than thermal cracking, reducing energy requirements. Additionally, it has the potential to enhance syngas yields, thus improving the overall efficiency of biomass gasification processes while also reducing harmful emissions. This makes catalytic CO2 reforming an attractive option for cleaner, more efficient tar removal and syngas production in biomass gasification [9,10]. CO2 reforming, on the other hand, offers a promising solution by utilizing CO2 as a reactive agent to break down tar molecules into lighter hydrocarbons, hydrogen, and carbon monoxide. This method is advantageous compared to traditional methods because it reduces CO2 emissions by utilizing it as a feedstock, and improves syngas production efficiency while minimizing secondary tar formation [11].
In the meantime, with the rapid development of renewable energies, renewable energy-powered electrification technologies coupled with CO2 reforming of biomass tar are promising alternatives to achieve efficient biomass utilization and CO2 valorization towards a circular economy. Plasma catalysis is an innovative technology that combines non-thermal plasma (NTP) with heterogeneous catalysis to enhance chemical reactions [12,13]. Non-thermal plasma generates highly reactive species such as electrons, ions, and radicals, which can activate and break down stable tar molecules at relatively low temperatures [14]. When coupled with a catalyst, plasma catalysis significantly improves the efficiency of the reforming process by facilitating the conversion of these reactive species into smaller hydrocarbons, hydrogen, and syngas. The synergy between plasma and catalysis allows for a lower energy input compared to traditional thermal reforming methods, as the plasma species effectively “activate” the tar molecules, while the catalyst promotes and directs these reactions [15]. This combined approach not only increases the reaction rate and selectivity but also helps maintain catalyst stability by preventing carbon deposition and surface deactivation.
Among the various types of metal-supported catalysts, Ni-based catalysts are ideal for CO2 reforming of toluene due to their high catalytic activity, so they have garnered significant attention in tar reforming processes [16]. However, deactivation due to coke deposition and metal sintering has limited the practical application of single-metal nickel-based catalysts in tar reforming [17,18]. To address these challenges, researchers have focused on modifying Ni-based catalysts to enhance their anti-deactivation properties. One effective approach is the introduction of a second active metal (Fe, Cu, Co, etc.) [19,20]. Studies have demonstrated that iron oxide formed by Fe after calcination can increase the lattice oxygen content of the catalyst, thereby improving its carbon resistance. In bimetallic Ni-Fe catalysts, the migration of iron oxide can effectively provide redox capacity and remove carbon deposits [21,22]. These catalysts are cost-effective and offer robust performance in high-temperature reactions, making them particularly suitable for biomass tar reforming, where efficient breakdown of complex hydrocarbons is essential. The synergy between plasma and Ni or Fe catalysts enhances tar reforming by allowing plasma-generated reactive species to interact with the catalyst surface, increasing the overall reaction rate, improving selectivity, and preventing catalyst deactivation through carbon deposition. Zou et al. prepared Fe-Ni/palygorskite catalysts for tar reforming, and found that its catalytic performance was better than that of single metal catalysts [23]. The uniform distribution of alloy on mesoporous Ni-Fe/SBA-15 results in a 90% tar conversion rate in catalytic steam reforming of tar (CSTR) [24]. Previous studies mainly focused on Ni-Fe catalyst for tar steam reforming, and its role in CO2 reforming was rarely reported. Considering the potential of tar CO2 reforming to inhibit tar formation and reduce CO2 content in syngas during biomass gasification, the carbon deposition resistance of bimetallic Ni-Fe catalysts and their Ni/Fe molar ratio in the tar reforming process under CO2 atmosphere needs to be further explored.
In this work, toluene was selected as a tar model compound and was reformed over Nix-Fey/Al2O3 (x, y represent the molar ratio between Ni and Fe) catalysts coupled with dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma reactor. While toluene is not fully representative of all tar components in biomass, it is considered one of the key species present in the gasification products, making it a relevant model compound for this study. The effects of various Ni/Fe molar ratios (3-1, 2-1, 1-1 1-2, 1-3), discharge powers, and CO2 concentrations on DBD plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene to synthesis gas were analyzed.

2. Results

2.1. Crystalline Compositions and Texture Properties

The crystalline compositions of as-prepared Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD), with the resulting patterns presented in Figure 1. Distinct diffraction peaks at 37.5°, 39.3°, and 66.6° are observed in several catalyst samples, corresponding to the characteristic peaks of the γ-Al2O3 support (PDF#50-0741). For the Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3 catalyst, sharp peaks associated with the Fe2O3 phase (PDF#33-0664) are present. As the Ni content increases, the characteristic peaks of metallic Ni exhibited a slight shift towards lower 2θ values, while no features corresponding to Fe2O3 were observed. This observation is likely due to the formation of NiAl2O4 species [25] and the high dispersion of the Fe phase. Notably, FeAl2O4 was not detected in the catalysts, indicating that the interaction between nickel (Ni) and Al2O3 is stronger than that between iron (Fe) and Al2O3 [26]. Among the various Ni/Fe ratio catalysts, the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst exhibits a slightly enhanced full width at half maximum of the diffraction lines, indicative of a higher degree of crystallinity or slightly larger Al2O3 crystallite size [27].
The pore structure of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts significantly influences the catalytic tar reforming performance. The porosity of the as-prepared catalyst was characterized using nitrogen adsorption measurements. As illustrated in Figure 2a, all five Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts exhibit type IV isotherms with H3 hysteresis loops, according to the IUPAC classification, irrespective of the Ni/Fe ratio [27]. This suggests that varying the Fe content does not significantly alter the mesoporous structure of the catalysts. The formation of mesoporous structures is typically governed by the synthesis conditions of the support material, such as the calcination temperature. In this case, Ni and Fe metal nanoparticles are primarily loaded onto the surface of the support or within the pores as active components, rather than directly contributing to the construction of the mesoporous framework. As a result, altering the Fe content mainly impacts the catalytic activity without disrupting the integrity of the original mesoporous structure. The specific surface area, total pore volume, and average pore size of the catalysts are summarized in Table 1. Among them, the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst exhibits the largest specific surface area and pore volume, attributed to the high dispersion of active metal nanoparticles on the support surface [28], which preserves the pore structure. The pore size distribution curve (Figure 2b) shows a narrow pore size distribution range (2–5 nm), further confirming the mesoporous structure of all catalysts [29]. The mesoporous structure provides ideal sites for accommodating macromolecular tar during the reforming reaction and offers numerous available channels to facilitate the diffusion and transport of tar and CO2 [30]. The transport path of reactants is not confined solely to the pores; however, the presence of pores enhances the likelihood of reactants interacting with the active sites, thereby improving the selectivity of the reaction.

2.2. Nix-Fey/Al2O3 Morphologies

The surface morphology and metal dispersion of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts were further analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figure 3a–c, the average particle sizes of the Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3, Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3, and Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalysts were 15.4 nm, 11.2 nm, and 4.3 nm, respectively. Notably, the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalysts exhibit the best metal dispersion, indicating that the appropriate iron doping can significantly promote the dispersion and reduce the nanoparticle sizes. Previous studies have highlighted that catalysts containing small-sized nickel nanoparticles exhibit superior tar conversion activity and improved resistance to carbon deposition [30]. In order to further analyze the crystal structure of Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3, we use fast Fourier transform and fast inverse Fourier transform on the selected region of the HRTEM image to obtain the information of its lattice fringe space. The HR-TEM images in Figure 3d show clear lattice streaks of metal nanoparticles. The interplanar spacings of 0.208 nm and 0.242 nm correspond to the NiO (200) and NiAl2O4 (311) crystal planes, respectively. Additionally, Al2O3 (400) crystal planes were also identified, which supports the XRD results. The findings indicate that the strategic addition of Fe helps to prevent the sintering of active metal particles and further reduces the average particle size. Furthermore, high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image and the corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) elemental mapping of the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst (Figure 3e) reveal the uniform distribution of Ni and Fe across the Al2O3 support. These results provide crucial insights into the catalyst’s structural characteristics and its potential for efficient catalytic performance.

2.3. Redox Properties and Basicity

Hydrogen programmed reduction (H2-TPR) was conducted to investigate the reducibility of metal oxides on the Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalyst surface (Figure 4a). All samples exhibited three distinct H2 consumption peaks within the 200–900 °C temperature range. Specifically, the peaks around 269~286 °C are attributed to the reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 on the catalyst surface, as well as the surface reduction of nickel monoxide, which is likely influenced by its weak interaction with the Al2O3 support. The peaks around 370~403 °C are associated with the reduction of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 within the catalyst lattice [31,32]. For the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst, a minor peak at 269 °C, a principal peak at 403 °C, and a broad peak centered around 750 °C was noted. The peak observed at 750 °C is associated with the reduction of NiAl2O4 to metallic Ni [33,34]. These observations are in strong agreement with the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, confirming the presence of the corresponding phases. Among all the catalysts evaluated, Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 exhibits the highest reduction temperature at 403 °C. This phenomenon can be attributed to the particularly strong metal–support interaction, which facilitates a high degree of metal dispersion on the Al2O3 support surface. The enhanced reducibility of the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst, as demonstrated by the H2-TPR results, is expected to generate a greater number of active sites, thus enhancing its catalytic activity.
In the case of CO2 reforming, CO2 acts as an acid, while the catalysts serve as bases [35]. Consequently, the basicity of catalysts significantly influences the reaction in tar CO2 reforming. The surface alkaline sites were characterized using CO2 temperature programmed desorption (CO2-TPD). The CO2 desorption peaks are associated with the interaction between acidic CO2 and basic sites on the catalyst surface. As illustrated in Figure 4b, desorption peaks observed in the range of 50–200 °C correspond to weakly alkaline sites, which are primarily provided by surface hydroxyl groups [1]. Stronger peaks occurring between 200 and 500 °C are associated with moderately basic sites, representing the acid–base Lewis pairs. The Lewis basic sites facilitate the adsorption and activation of CO2 by providing electron pairs to the carbon atom in CO2. In catalytic reactions, Lewis bases can stabilize cationic intermediates or activate electrophilic species. For instance, they can enhance the cleavage of C-H bonds in tar, leading to the formation of activated carbon species and hydrogen (H2), which serve as feedstock for subsequent reactions involving CO2 [36]. The high temperature peak above 500 °C is related to strongly basic sites facilitated by low coordination surface O2− [37]. The notable distinction among the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts with varying Ni/Fe ratios lies in the desorption peak associated with medium-strong basic sites. The total number of basic sites on the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts increased in the following order: Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni2-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe2/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3. In general, a higher alkalinity on the catalyst surface facilitates the cleavage of C-C bonds, enhances the activation of adsorbed CO2, promotes the oxidation of carbon deposits at active sites, and helps reduce carbon accumulation on the catalyst surface [38]. Therefore, the Ni3Fe1/Al2O3 catalysts are expected to exhibit superior catalytic performance in toluene CO2 reforming.

2.4. Surface Chemical Properties

The electronic states and chemical composition of the elements on the surface of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 5a presents the survey spectra of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts, revealing that the chemical composition of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts primarily consists of Ni, Fe, Al, and O. This observation is consistent with the results obtained from EDX analysis. In Figure 5b, the Fe 2p spectra can be deconvoluted into six peaks. The peaks at approximately 710.3 eV and 723.9 eV are attributed to Fe2+, while those at approximately 712.5 eV and 727.1 eV are attributed to Fe3+ [39,40]. The remaining two peaks are identified as satellite peaks [41]. As the Ni content increases, the binding energy of Fe 2p in Nix-Fey/Al2O3 shifts to a lower value. This observation confirms the presence of a strong electronic interaction between Ni and Fe, resulting in the presence of different Ni contents affecting the chemical environment of metal Fe. Figure 5c illustrates the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ni 2p3/2, which consists of peaks corresponding to Ni2+ (855.5 eV) and NiAl2O4 (856.9 eV), attributed to air exposure, along with satellite peaks at 862.0 eV [33,42]. In the Ni 2p3/2 spectra of the catalysts, the relative abundance of Ni2+ species increases significantly with higher Fe content, resulting in a more pronounced presence compared to Ni3+. This trend is accompanied by a reduction in binding energy, indicating a stronger interaction between Ni and Fe with increasing Fe content.
In Figure 5d, the O 1s spectrum is deconvoluted into three distinct oxygen species of the metal oxide: lattice oxygen (530.4 eV), defect oxygen vacancy in hypoxic coordination (531.4 eV), and surface adsorbed hydroxyl oxygen (532.3 eV) [43,44,45]. The surface chemical states of the catalyst are further compared, and the surface element composition is listed in Table 2. It is noteworthy that on Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst, a small amount of iron doping disrupts the orderly arrangement of nickel atoms, leading to defects within the crystal structure [36]. These defects predominantly manifest as oxygen vacancies, which account for the highest proportion of oxygen vacancies (35.4% relative peak area). The presence of oxygen vacancies induces lattice distortion, enhances the mobility of lattice oxygen, and enables it to participate in the toluene reforming reaction as active surface oxygen [46]. Furthermore, the percentage of Ni2+(NiAl2O4) increases significantly with decreasing Fe content, suggesting that the addition of an appropriate amount of Fe can drive more Ni into the Al2O3 lattice to form NiAl2O4, thereby enhancing the interaction between the metal and support. These findings demonstrate that an optimal amount of Fe can effectively regulate the electronic structure of the Ni-based catalysts, providing more abundant and stable active sites for toluene cracking reaction.
Based on the characterization results, the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst demonstrates superior catalytic properties, largely due to its large specific surface area and small particle size, which provide more active sites for the reaction and significantly improve its activity. The combination of H2-TPR, CO2-TPD, and XPS findings reveals that the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst exhibits remarkable redox capabilities, enhanced basicity, and an abundance of vacancy defects. These factors collectively contribute to its high catalytic performance, making it a promising catalyst for achieving high toluene conversion in reforming reactions. This assessment underscores the role of the catalyst’s structural and electronic properties, specifically its strong metal–support interaction, which supports a greater number of active sites, as well as its ability to facilitate CO2 activation and carbon deposition reduction.

2.5. Plasma-Catalytic Acativity Evaluation

The plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene over Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts with various Ni-Fe ratios was evaluated in a DBD plasma reactor.

2.5.1. Effect of Discharge Power on CO2 Reforming of Toluene

In this study, the effect of varying discharge power on toluene CO2 reforming catalyzed by Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts in a DBD reactor was investigated, with the reaction temperature maintained at 250 °C and a fixed C7H8 concentration. The results show that different Ni/Fe ratios significantly impact both the conversion efficiency of toluene and the energy efficiency of the process. The catalytic performance followed the following order: Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni2-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe2/Al2O3 > Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3, with Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 exhibiting the best performance. This superior performance can be attributed to its small particle size (nanometer scale), large specific surface area, and strong alkalinity, all of which contribute to enhanced catalytic activity. When the discharge power is increased from 30 W to 80 W, the toluene conversion and CO2 conversion over Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst rise by 6% and 145%, respectively. The selectivity of major gas products, including H2 and CO, exhibited a similar tendency to the toluene conversion (Figure 6c,d). This phenomenon aligns with the findings reported by Xu et al. [47] regarding the use of DBD plasma for toluene reforming. In the plasma environment, the generation of high-energy electrons facilitates the cleavage of chemical bonds within tar molecules, leading to the formation of reactive species that promote the decomposition and reforming of toluene [48]. As discharge power increases, the electric field intensity in the discharge region also increases, leading to a greater abundance of high-energy electrons [49]. This intensifies micro-discharge phenomena and creates additional reaction pathways, facilitating the transformation of toluene into desired products. Thus, under suitable temperature and discharge power conditions, the conversion of toluene and the generation of gas products can be significantly enhanced.
Additionally, the conversion rate of toluene was found to be significantly higher than that of CO2. This phenomenon can be attributed to the plasma-catalytic system, wherein high-energy electrons excite gas molecules or break their chemical bonds, resulting in the formation of new reactive species. Toluene’s molecular structure, with C-H bonds in the methyl group and aromatic ring having lower bond energies (3.7 eV and 4.3 eV, respectively) [50] than the dissociation energy of CO2 (5.5 eV), makes it more susceptible to activation and bond cleavage under plasma discharge, promoting its transformation into other products.

2.5.2. Effect of CO2/C7H8 Ratio on CO2 Reforming of Toluene

The reaction between CO2 and the carbon deposit on the catalyst surface at high temperatures plays a crucial role in maintaining the catalyst’s activity and stability. To evaluate the impact of CO2 concentration on toluene conversion, experiments were conducted with a fixed plasma discharge power of 60 W, while varying the molar ratio of CO2 to C7H8 from 0.5 to 2.5. The results show that in the CO2/C7H8 range of 0.5–1.5, increasing CO2 concentration led to higher selectivity for CO and H2, as illustrated in Figure 7d. This behavior can be explained by the fact that, with fixed discharge power, total gas flow rate, and reaction temperature, the number of electrons and active species in the plasma remain constant. As the CO2/C7H8 molar ratio increases, each toluene molecule shares more electrons and active species, resulting in a higher conversion of toluene. At a CO2/C7H8 molar ratio of 1.5, the maximum conversions of toluene and CO2 over the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst were achieved, reaching 98% and 32%, respectively. However, when the CO2/C7H8 ratio was further increased to 2.5, the conversion of toluene decreased to 95%, and the selectivity for CO and H2 dropped from 56% to 47% and from 27% to 25%, respectively. This indicates that excess CO2 input negatively affects the overall performance of the plasma-catalytic system, which is consistent with findings from other studies [51].
The decline in syngas selectivity at high CO2 concentration is possibly the result of a combination of the following factors. High CO2 concentration can promote the reverse water–gas shift (RWGS) reaction (R6) [52], which consumes H2 and accelerates the depletion of hydrogen in the system. As a strong oxidizing agent, CO2 may promote the complete oxidation of toluene (C7H8) to CO2 and H2O, rather than partial oxidation to synthesis gas. This process significantly reduces the yield of CO and H2. On the catalyst surface, at elevated concentrations of CO2, carbon dioxide may compete with toluene for adsorption, leading to the formation of stable carbonates (such as single-tooth and double-tooth carbonates), particularly at alkaline sites. These compounds obstruct the active sites and hinder the adsorption and activation of C7H8, thereby significantly reducing both conversion rates and selectivity. As an electronegative gas, CO2 will trap a large number of high-energy electrons at high concentrations and form negative ions. This reduces the number of available electrons for the conversion of tar, thereby affecting the formation and stability of active species within the plasma-catalytic system. Excess CO2 can quench active free radicals (such as H*, CHx*) by collision, inhibit the dehydrogenation and recombination steps of toluene, and indirectly reduce the synthesis gas generation rate.
Therefore, while moderate CO2 concentration enhances the conversion efficiency, excess CO2 interferes with the efficiency of the plasma-catalytic process. The main reason for the decrease in syngas selectivity at high CO2 concentration may be the combination of the enhancement of side reactions (RWGS and complete oxidation) and the covering/poisoning of the active site on the catalyst surface, and the imbalance of plasma energy distribution may exacerbate this phenomenon. A high CO2/C7H8 ratio is not essential for the catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene in a plasma-catalytic system.
The participation of active species generated by plasma discharge in surface reactions via Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L-H) or Eley–Rideal (E-R) mechanisms is considered to be a key factor in plasma–catalyst synergism [8]. Table 3 listed the possible major reactions in the plasma-catalytic toluene reforming. In the plasma environment, high-energy electrons induce the transformation of stable CO2 molecules into highly reactive intermediates, such as free radicals, ions, and excited molecules, through excitation, ionization, and de-excitation (R1). These intermediates are crucial for cracking and converting tar molecules. Direct electron collisions primarily dissociate CO2 into active species (R2) [53]. Several typical plasma-activated substances have been reported in the literature, including hydrogen radicals (·H), oxygen radicals (·O) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) [54], as well as metastable gas molecules such as excited argon atoms (Ar*) [55]. Additionally, excited argon atoms (Ar*) collide with CO2, promoting its dissociation (R2), while also facilitating toluene activation through energy transfer. This process generates highly reactive intermediate products (R3–R4), which can be further decomposed through collisions with electrons or other excited species [56]. This energy transfer mechanism not only increases the reactivity of toluene molecules but also improves the overall energy utilization efficiency of the reaction system, enabling the reaction to proceed at lower temperatures. The free radicals formed from toluene decomposition (e.g., C6H5·, CH3·) react with oxygen species, CO, or atomic oxygen (O·) derived from CO2 decomposition to form oxygen-containing organic compounds such as phenols (C6H5OH) (R7–R8), aldehydes, ketones, or carboxylic acids. Additionally, atomic oxygen (O·) may oxidize toluene or its decomposition products, leading to the formation of smaller molecular products such as CO and H2O (R5).

2.5.3. Long-Term Stability Evaluation

A long-term stability test was employed to evaluate the stability of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts and was conducted following the same procedure, and at a discharge power of 60 W and a CO2/C7H8 ratio of 1.5 over 7 h. As presented in Figure 8, the results indicate that all four indicators, including toluene conversion, CO2 conversion, and syngas selectivity remained stable over 7 h over Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts. Among them, Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 performed relatively more stably than others, its toluene conversion, CO2 conversion, and syngas selectivity remaining consistent with minimal variation. Moreover, a slight drop was identified over other Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts along with time change. The long-term stability tests suggested that the as-prepared Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts demonstrate stable characteristics toward the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene.

3. Materials and Methods

Nix-Fey/Al2O3 (x, y represent the molar ratio between Ni and Fe) catalysts with various Ni-Fe ratios were synthesized via the wet impregnation method. Typically, 2 g of Al2O3 was pre-calcined at 500 °C in air for 3 h. Specific amounts of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O were dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water to form precursor solutions, with a total molar mass of 0.4 mol. The precursor solutions were then mixed with 2 g of Al2O3 powder, using molar ratios of Ni to Fe of 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3, respectively. The precursor concentrations for each catalyst are summarized in Table 4. The mixed solution was stirred in a magnetic stirrer at 50 °C for 4 h, followed by oven drying at 110 °C overnight. The dried samples were calcined in a muffle furnace at 500 °C for 3 h with a ramping rate of 10 °C/min, then sieved to 40–60 mesh. The final catalyst samples were reduced under dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma conditions for 1 h in a 10 vol% H2/Ar mixture (total gas flow: 100 mL·min−1, discharge power: 50 W). The resulting catalysts were labeled as Nix-Fey/Al2O3, with a total metal loading of 5 wt% and varying Ni/Fe ratios.
Elemental composition was determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Agilent 7800, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Prior to measurement, the catalysts were digested in an aqua regia solution overnight, then diluted with deionized water to the appropriate concentration for analysis. The surface area and pore structure of the catalysts were characterized using nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms obtained with a Quantachrome Autosord-1. Prior to analysis, each sample was degassed at 200 °C for 2 h under high vacuum conditions. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted using a Rigaku Miniflex 600 diffractometer, employing Cu Kα radiation over a 2θ range of 10° to 90°. The surface chemical states of the catalysts were examined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha instrument, using an Al Kα X-ray source. Binding energy calibration was performed relative to the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV, and data analysis was conducted using Thermo Scientific Advantage software (Version 5.9) and XPSPEAK41 for peak deconvolution. The basicity of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts was evaluated by CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD) using a JW-HX100 instrument, Beijing JWGB Instrument, Beijing, China. In a typical experiment, 100 mg of catalyst was degassed in pure He at 150 °C for 1 h, then cooled to 50 °C. The sample was exposed to a 10 vol% CO2/He mixture (50 mL·min−1) for 1 h for CO2 adsorption. After purging with pure He to remove weakly adsorbed CO2, the temperature was increased from 50 °C to 800 °C at a rate of 5 °C·min−1, and the CO2 desorption signal was recorded. The reduction behavior of the catalysts was investigated using hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) on a JW-HX100 instrument. A 50 mg sample was pretreated in pure He (30 mL·min−1) at 200 °C for 1.5 h, followed by cooling to 50 °C. A 10 vol% H2/Ar mixture (30 mL·min−1) was then introduced, and the reduction profiles were recorded as the temperature was increased from 50 °C to 650 °C at a rate of 5 °C·min−1 [57].
The plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene was conducted in a coaxial DBD plasma reactor, as shown in Figure 9. The reactor was constructed using a quartz tube with an inner diameter of 13 mm and outer diameter of 20 mm. A mesh stainless steel wire served as the ground electrode and was wound around the outside of the quartz tube, while a high-voltage electrode was positioned inside the tube, creating a discharge gap of 3.5 mm. CO2 and argon were introduced into the reactor using mass flow controllers (MFCs), while toluene was injected via a high-precision syringe pump into a feed line, which was preheated to 200 °C. The reactor was maintained at 250 °C, with thermal insulation provided by a tubular furnace to minimize heat loss. A sinusoidal high-voltage power supply (Suman, Nanjing, China, CTP-2000KP) was used to generate plasma inside the reactor, with a frequency of approximately 9.7 kHz. The discharge power was determined by integrating the Q-U Lissajous diagram, and the input current and voltage were monitored using an oscilloscope (Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA, TBS1102C). The voltage was measured through a passive voltage probe (Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA, TPP0201) after capacitor voltage division (1:1000). All electrical signals were recorded for analysis. The gas phase composition was analyzed using an online gas chromatograph (Micro GC Fusion, Inficon, Zurich, Switzerland).
In each experiment, 100 mg of catalyst was placed in the discharge gap. The feed gases, including CO2 and toluene, were introduced into the plasma reactor in a specified ratio. The reforming reaction was carried out under the synergistic influence of the catalyst and plasma, with energy supplied by the alternating current power supply. The discharge power was calculated using the following equation:
Discharge   power   ( P ) = f   ×   C F   ×   A ( W )
where f represents alternating discharge frequency, A(W) is integration area in Lissajous diagram, and C(F) is the external capacitance (0.47 μF).
The conversion of toluene and CO2 and the selectivity of CO and H2 are defined as follows:
x ( C 7 H 8 ) = [ T ] i n [ T ] o u t [ T ] i n × 100 %
x C O 2 = [ C O 2 ] i n [ C O 2 ] o u t C O 2 i n × 100 %
S ( C O ) = [ C O ] o u t 7 × ( [ T ] i n T o u t ) + ( [ C O 2 ] i n C O 2 o u t ) × 100 %
S ( H 2 ) = [ H 2 ] o u t 4 × ( [ T ] i n T o u t ) × 100 %
where [T]in is mole of toluene input; [T]out is mole of toluene output, mol; [CO2]in is mole of CO2 input, mol; [CO2]out, [CO]out, [H2]out are mole of CO2, CO, H2 in the produced gas, respectively. S(CO) and S(H2) are selectivity of CO and H2, respectively.

4. Conclusions

This study investigates the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene, a model compound for tar, using Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts with varying Ni/Fe ratios in a DBD (dielectric barrier discharge) plasma system. The effects of key reaction parameters—such as discharge power and the molar ratio of CO2 to C7H8—on toluene and CO2 conversion, as well as the selectivity of gas products (CO and H2), were systematically examined. The results indicate that increasing discharge power leads to a higher selectivity for CO and H2 production, which is a direct consequence of enhanced electron energy in the plasma environment. Additionally, by adding an optimal amount of CO2 (CO2/C7H8 = 1.5), the catalytic performance of the system is further improved, leading to enhanced toluene conversion and increased selectivity for synthesis gas. Among the catalysts studied, the Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 catalyst exhibited superior catalytic activity, attributed to its unique physical and chemical properties. Specifically, the strong lattice distortion on the surface of Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3 promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies and increases its basicity, facilitating CO2 adsorption and activation. The study concludes that adjusting the Fe content in the Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalysts can significantly improve their performance in plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming reactions. This research demonstrates the promising potential of plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming for biomass gasification tar removal using Ni-Fe-based catalysts. Regarding real-world applications, while the experimental results are promising, the scalability of this process requires further exploration. The integration of this method into large-scale biomass gasification systems would require addressing issues such as energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and long-term catalyst stability. Plasma-assisted CO2 reforming offers a more energy-efficient alternative to conventional tar removal techniques, such as thermal cracking and catalytic steam reforming, especially at lower operating temperatures. However, the energy consumption of the plasma system and the need for optimization to reduce plasma energy losses remain key challenges. Future work should focus on optimizing plasma reactor designs, reducing energy consumption, and improving the overall system efficiency to make this technology viable for large-scale industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C.; methodology, B.G. and G.C.; validation, B.G., G.C., and Y.F. (Yutong Feng); formal analysis, B.G., G.C., Y.F. (Yutong Feng) and Y.J.; investigation, B.G. and G.C.; resources, J.Z. and Y.F. (Yitian Fang); data curation, B.G., G.C. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.G.; writing—review and editing, G.C.; visualization, B.G. and G.C.; supervision, G.C., J.Z. and Y.F. (Yitian Fang); project administration, J.Z.; funding acquisition, G.C. and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by Fund Program for the Scientific Activities of Selected Returned Overseas Professionals in Shanxi Province (Grant No. 20230065), Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 202203021222405), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22409204).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, T.; Liu, H.; Shi, P.; Chen, D.; Song, L.; He, H.; Frost, R.L. CO2 Reforming of Toluene as Model Compound of Biomass Tar on Ni/Palygorskite. Fuel 2013, 107, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guan, G.; Kaewpanha, M.; Hao, X.; Abudula, A. Catalytic Steam Reforming of Biomass Tar: Prospects and Challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, C.; Suzuki, K. Tar Property, Analysis, Reforming Mechanism and Model for Biomass Gasification—An Overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tian, Y.; Ma, X.; Chen, X. Effect of Air Introduction on Filamentous Coke during CO2 Reforming of Tar with Core-Shell Catalysts. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 168, 105765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, G.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, W.-M.; Chen, C.-H.; Baltrusaitis, J. DBD Plasma-Assisted Ethanol Steam Reforming for Green H2 Production: Process Optimization through Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 48, 553–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, S.; Mei, D.; Wang, L.; Tu, X. Steam Reforming of Toluene as Biomass Tar Model Compound in a Gliding Arc Discharge Reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chun, Y.N.; Kim, S.C.; Yoshikawa, K. Decomposition of Benzene as a Surrogate Tar in a Gliding Arc Plasma. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2013, 32, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, B.; Xie, J.; Wang, N.; Huang, Y.; Liu, H.; Yin, X.; Wu, C.; Tu, X. Plasma-Enabled Catalytic Steam Reforming of Toluene as a Biomass Tar Surrogate: Understanding the Synergistic Effect of Plasma Catalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 464, 142696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kawi, S.; Ashok, J.; Dewangan, N.; Pati, S.; Junmei, C. Recent Advances in Catalyst Technology for Biomass Tar Model Reforming: Thermal, Plasma and Membrane Reactors. Waste Biomass Valorization 2022, 13, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Das, S.; Kawi, S. Reforming of Tar from Biomass Gasification in a Hybrid Catalysis-Plasma System: A Review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 250, 250–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, L.; Song, Z.; Zhao, X.; Ma, C.; Kong, X.; Wang, F. Microwave-Induced Cracking and CO2 Reforming of Toluene on Biomass Derived Char. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cao, G.; Handler, R.M.; Luyben, W.L.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, C.; Baltrusaitis, J. CO2 Conversion to Syngas via Electrification of Endothermal Reactors: Process Design and Environmental Impact Analysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 265, 115763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, B.; Cao, G.; Hu, D.; Guo, L.; Ba, Z.; Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Fang, Y. Insight into the Effect of Support Properties on DBD Plasma-Catalytic NH3 Synthesis over Ru-Co Bimetallic Catalysts. Fuel 2025, 382, 133802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Liao, Z.; Mathieu, S.; Bin, F.; Tu, X. Prediction and Evaluation of Plasma Arc Reforming of Naphthalene Using a Hybrid Machine Learning Model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 123965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sheng, Z.; Watanabe, Y.; Kim, H.-H.; Yao, S.; Nozaki, T. Plasma-Enabled Mode-Selective Activation of CH4 for Dry Reforming: First Touch on the Kinetic Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, J.; Feng, Y.; Li, C.; Yuan, Z.; Shang, R.; Yuan, S. Highly Efficiency H2 Production for Real Coal Tar Steam Reforming over Ni-ca/H-Al Catalyst: Effects of Oxygen Vacancy, CaO Doping and Synthesis Methods. Appl. Energy 2024, 367, 123354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azancot, L.; González-Castaño, M.; Bobadilla, L.F.; Centeno, M.A.; Odriozola, J.A. Reforming of Biomass-Derived Producer Gas Using Toluene as Model Tar: Deactivation and Regeneration Studies in Ni and K-Ni Catalysts. Environ. Res. 2024, 247, 118210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, J.; Abbasi, Z.; Ullah, I.; Zeng, F. Dry Reforming of Toluene for Syngas Production over Ni-Based Perovskite-Type Oxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2025, 361, 124555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Xu, R.; Ananthanarasimhan, J.; Zheng, J.; Wan, J.; Wang, K.; Lan, B.; Yan, J.; Li, X. Destruction of Biomass Tar Model Compound in a Rotating Gliding Arc Plasma Catalytic System: Contribution of Typical Transition Metals in Ni-Based Bimetallic Catalyst. Fuel 2022, 323, 124385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, Y.; Dou, L.; Zhang, S.; Zong, L.; Pan, J.; Hu, X.; Sun, H.; Ostrikov, K.; Shao, T. Coupling Bimetallic Ni-Fe Catalysts and Nanosecond Pulsed Plasma for Synergistic Low-Temperature CO2 Methanation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, S.; Guo, F.; Du, S.; Tian, B.; Dong, Y.; Jia, X.; Qian, L. Synthesis of Sargassum Char-Supported Ni-Fe Nanoparticles and Its Application in Tar Cracking during Biomass Pyrolysis. Fuel 2020, 275, 117923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dhillon, G.S.; Cao, G.; Yi, N. The Role of Fe in Ni-Fe/TiO2 Catalysts for the Dry Reforming of Methane. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zou, X.; Chen, T.; Zhang, P.; Chen, D.; He, J.; Dang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Chen, Y.; Toloueinia, P.; Zhu, C.; et al. High Catalytic Performance of Fe-Ni/Palygorskite in the Steam Reforming of Toluene for Hydrogen Production. Appl. Energy 2018, 226, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kathiraser, Y.; Ashok, J.; Kawi, S. Synthesis and Evaluation of Highly Dispersed SBA-15 Supported Ni–Fe Bimetallic Catalysts for Steam Reforming of Biomass Derived Tar Reaction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 4327–4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kwon, Y.; Eichler, J.E.; Mullins, C.B. NiAl2O4 as a Beneficial Precursor for Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts for the Dry Reforming of Methane. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 63, 102112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Q.; Cai, N.; Peng, B.; Wu, C.; Hong, R.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, H. Investigating the Influences of Metal-Support Interaction in NiFe Catalysts on the Quality of Carbon Nanomaterials from Waste Polypropylene. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 236, 107428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huynh, H.L.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, G.; Shen, Y.; Tucho, W.M.; Ding, Y.; Yu, Z. Promoting Effect of Fe on Supported Ni Catalysts in CO2 Methanation by in Situ DRIFTS and DFT Study. J. Catal. 2020, 392, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Z.; Chen, G.-H.; Gong, X.-C.; Yao, J.-J.; Guo, J.-K.; Chen, L.; Peng, C.; Huang, X.-Y.; Hu, Q.; Xiong, J.; et al. Ni Supported on Al2O3-La2O3 Derived from Layered Double Hydroxides for Efficient Thermal Catalytic Decomposition of Ammonia to Hydrogen. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2025, 304, 121000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tian, Y.; Ma, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C. Effect of Ni-Co Bimetallic Core-Shell Catalyst for Coke Resistance in CO2 Reforming of Biomass Tar. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 164, 105539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, Y.; Ma, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, J. The Study of Coke Resistance of Ni/ZrO2 by Core-Shell Structure Coupling with Cobalt Doping Modification in CO2 Reforming of Tar. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2022, 643, 118797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, S.-H.; Ryu, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Seo, S.-J.; Yoo, Y.-D.; Sai Prasad, P.S.; Lim, H.-J.; Byun, C.-D. Co-Methanation of CO and CO2 on the NiX-Fe1−X/Al2O3 Catalysts; Effect of Fe Contents. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 2282–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Voskoboinikov, T.V.; Chen, H.-Y.; Sachtler, W.M.H. On the Nature of Active Sites in Fe/ZSM-5 Catalysts for NOx Abatement. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1998, 19, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, T.; Peng, Q.; Shi, W.; Xu, J.; Fan, Y. An Anionic Surfactant-Assisted Equilibrium Adsorption Method to Prepare Highly Dispersed Fe-Promoted Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts for Highly Selective Mercaptan Removal. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 230, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hossain, M.Z.; Chowdhury, M.B.I.; Charpentier, P.A. Effect of Surface Acidity of Al2O3 Supported Metal Catalysts on Catalytic Activity and Carbon Deposition during SCWG of Glucose. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 124, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aziz, M.A.A.; Jalil, A.A.; Wongsakulphasatch, S.; Vo, D.-V.N. Understanding the Role of Surface Basic Sites of Catalysts in CO2 Activation in Dry Reforming of Methane: A Short Review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, L.; Dai, J.; Das, S.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Xi, S.; Zhang, Z.; Tu, X. Plasma-Catalytic CO2 Reforming of Toluene over Hydrotalcite-Derived NiFe/(Mg, Al)Ox Catalysts. JACS Au 2023, 3, 785–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wierzbicki, D.; Moreno, M.V.; Ognier, S.; Motak, M.; Grzybek, T.; Da Costa, P.; Gálvez, M.E. Ni-Fe Layered Double Hydroxide Derived Catalysts for Non-Plasma and DBD Plasma-Assisted CO2 Methanation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 10423–10432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, B.; Wang, H.; Liu, H.; You, C. Aluminum-yttrium Oxides Supported Iron for Effective Catalytic Reforming of Toluene: Promotion Roles of Yttrium. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 235, 107344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, G.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Shan, S.; Yuan, C.; Weng, T.-C. Enhance the Proportion of Fe3+ in NiFe-Layered Double Hydroxides by Utilizing Citric Acid to Improve the Efficiency and Durability of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ChemSusChem 2024, 18, e202401582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mo, L.; Chen, G.; Wang, H. Degradation of Orange G Using PMS Triggered by NH2-MIL-101(Fe): An Amino-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework. Molecules 2024, 29, 1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cao, Z.; Zhou, T.; Ma, X.; Shen, Y.; Deng, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y. Hydrogen Production from Urea Sewage on NiFe-Based Porous Electrocatalysts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 11007–11015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Song, Z.; Wang, Q.; Guo, C.; Li, S.; Yan, W.; Jiao, W.; Qiu, L.; Yan, X.; Li, R. Improved Effect of Fe on the Stable NiFe/Al2O3 Catalyst in Low-Temperature Dry Reforming of Methane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 17250–17258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yuan, H.; Li, J.; Yang, W.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; He, L.; Xu, L.; Liao, X.; Zhu, R.; Mai, L. Oxygen Vacancy-Determined Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction in NiCo2O4/Hollow Carbon Spheres. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 16410–16417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiao, H.; Sang, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, Y. Depolymerization of Lignin into Cycloalkanes over a Hydrotalcite-Derived NiFe Alloy Catalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 3379–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, G.; Deskins, N.A.; Yi, N. Carbon Monoxide Oxidation over Copper and Nitrogen Modified Titanium Dioxide⋆. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 285, 119748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, H.; Meng, J.; Tang, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Bu, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; Xie, H.; Piao, G. Overcoming Carbon Deposition in Non-Thermal Plasma Catalyzed Biomass Tar Reforming: Innovative Strategies Employed by GPPC Systems. Fuel 2025, 381, 133649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, B.; Xie, J.; Liu, H.; Yang, W.; Yin, X.; Wu, C. Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study of Tar Partial Oxidative Reforming by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Using Toluene as a Model Compound. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 479, 147533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, B.; Xie, J.; Zhan, H.; Yin, X.; Wu, C.; Liu, H. Removal of Toluene as a Biomass Tar Surrogate in a Catalytic Nonthermal Plasma Process. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 10709–10719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mei, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Alliati, M.; Yang, H.; Tu, X. Plasma Reforming of Biomass Gasification Tars Using Mixed Naphthalene and Toluene as Model Compounds. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 195, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yao, X.; Zhang, J.; Liang, X.; Long, C. Plasma-Catalytic Removal of Toluene over the Supported Manganese Oxides in DBD Reactor: Effect of the Structure of Zeolites Support. Chemosphere 2018, 208, 922–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liu, S.; Mei, D.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Tu, X. Plasma Reforming of Toluene as a Model Tar Compound from Biomass Gasification: Effect of CO2 and Steam. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 2019, 1, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cheng, Y.; Thow, Z.; Wang, C.-H. Biomass Gasification with CO2 in a Fluidized Bed. Powder Technol. 2016, 296, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, K.; Zhang, G.; Liu, X.; Phan, A.N.; Luo, K. A Study on CO2 Decomposition to CO and O2 by the Combination of Catalysis and Dielectric-Barrier Discharges at Low Temperatures and Ambient Pressure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 3204–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, S.; Yu, X.; Dang, X.; Guo, H.; Liu, P.; Qin, C. Using Non-Thermal Plasma for Decomposition of Toluene Adsorbed on γ-Al2O3 and ZSM-5: Configuration and Optimization of a Double Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 122027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xiao, K.; Li, X.; Santoso, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, K.; Wu, J.; Zhang, D. Synergistic Effect of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma and Mn Catalyst on CO2 Reforming of Toluene. Fuel 2021, 285, 119057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saleem, F.; Zhang, K.; Harvey, A. Role of CO2 in the Conversion of Toluene as a Tar Surrogate in a Nonthermal Plasma Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 5164–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, Y.; Ye, T.-N.; Li, J.; Li, Z.; Guan, H.; Sasase, M.; Niwa, Y.; Abe, H.; Li, Q.; Pan, F.; et al. Approach to Chemically Durable Nickel and Cobalt Lanthanum-Nitride-Based Catalysts for Ammonia Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202211759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Molecules 30 01032 g001
Figure 2. (a) Adsorption–desorption isotherm and (b) distribution of the pore diameter of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Figure 2. (a) Adsorption–desorption isotherm and (b) distribution of the pore diameter of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Molecules 30 01032 g002
Figure 3. TEM images and particle size distribution of (a) Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3, (b) Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3 and (c) Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3, (d,e) HR-TEM images of Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3, and HAADF and EDX elemental mapping of Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3.
Figure 3. TEM images and particle size distribution of (a) Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3, (b) Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3 and (c) Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3, (d,e) HR-TEM images of Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3, and HAADF and EDX elemental mapping of Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3.
Molecules 30 01032 g003
Figure 4. H2-TPR (a) and CO2-TPD (b) of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3.
Figure 4. H2-TPR (a) and CO2-TPD (b) of the Nix-Fey/Al2O3.
Molecules 30 01032 g004
Figure 5. XPS spectra of Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalysts. (a) The survey spectra; (b) Fe 2p XPS spectra; (c) Ni 2p3/2 XPS spectra; (d) O 1 s XPS spectra (OA represents surface adsorbed hydroxyl oxygen, OV represents defect oxygen vacancy, OL represents lattice oxygen).
Figure 5. XPS spectra of Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalysts. (a) The survey spectra; (b) Fe 2p XPS spectra; (c) Ni 2p3/2 XPS spectra; (d) O 1 s XPS spectra (OA represents surface adsorbed hydroxyl oxygen, OV represents defect oxygen vacancy, OL represents lattice oxygen).
Molecules 30 01032 g005
Figure 6. Effect of discharge power on the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming performance of toluene over different Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts: (a) toluene conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) CO selectivity, and (d) H2 selectivity.
Figure 6. Effect of discharge power on the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming performance of toluene over different Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts: (a) toluene conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) CO selectivity, and (d) H2 selectivity.
Molecules 30 01032 g006
Figure 7. Effect of CO2/C7H8 ratio on the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming performance of toluene over different Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts: (a) toluene conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) CO selectivity, and (d) H2 selectivity.
Figure 7. Effect of CO2/C7H8 ratio on the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming performance of toluene over different Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts: (a) toluene conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) CO selectivity, and (d) H2 selectivity.
Molecules 30 01032 g007
Figure 8. (a) Toluene conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) CO selectivity, and (d) H2 selectivity as a function of time on stream over Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Figure 8. (a) Toluene conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) CO selectivity, and (d) H2 selectivity as a function of time on stream over Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Molecules 30 01032 g008
Figure 9. The experimental setup schematic diagram of plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming system.
Figure 9. The experimental setup schematic diagram of plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming system.
Molecules 30 01032 g009
Table 1. Specific surface area, pore volume, pore size and metal loading of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
Table 1. Specific surface area, pore volume, pore size and metal loading of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts.
SamplesSBET a (m2·g−1)Total Pore Volume a (cm3·g−1)Average Pore Size a (nm)
Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3160.1 ± 0.20.24 ± 0.034.8 ± 0.2
Ni2-Fe1/Al2O3149.1 ± 0.10.22 ± 0.044.8 ± 0.3
Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3152.9 ± 0.20.24 ± 0.024.9 ± 0.1
Ni1-Fe2/Al2O3148.8 ± 0.30.24 ± 0.035.1 ± 0.4
Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3147.5 ± 0.10.25 ± 0.055.4 ± 0.2
a The surface area is determined by the BET equation. In addition, total pore volume and average pore size were obtained from BJH desorption data.
Table 2. Surface element compositions of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts determined by XPS spectra.
Table 2. Surface element compositions of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts determined by XPS spectra.
CatalystsSurface Nickel SpeciesSurface Iron SpeciesSurface Oxygen Species
Ni2+Ni2+(NiAl2O4)Fe2+Fe3+OLOVOA
Area
(%)
Area
(%)
Area
(%)
Area
(%)
Area
(%)
Area
(%)
Area
(%)
Ni3-Fe1/Al2O350.449.659.940.137.835.426.8
Ni2-Fe1/Al2O360.239.849.850.249.134.616.3
Ni1-Fe1/Al2O358.042.048.251.841.633.325.1
Ni1-Fe2/Al2O373.426.655.644.451.828.719.5
Ni1-Fe3/Al2O372.227.844.255.846.227.026.8
Table 3. Possible major reactions in the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene.
Table 3. Possible major reactions in the plasma-catalytic CO2 reforming of toluene.
Chemical ReactionSerial Number
Ar + e → Ar* + e(R1)
CO2 + e/Ar* → CO + O· + e/Ar*(R2)
C6H5CH3 + e/Ar* → C6H5· + CH3· + e/Ar*(R3)
C6H5CH3 + e/Ar* → C6H5CH2· + H· + e/Ar*(R4)
C6H5CH3 + O· → CO + H2 + LHC(R5)
CO2 + H2 → CO + H2O(R6)
C6H5· + O· → C6H5(R7)
C6H5O· + H· → C6H5OH(R8)
Table 4. Precursor solution concentrations used in the preparation of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts with various Ni/Fe ratios.
Table 4. Precursor solution concentrations used in the preparation of Nix-Fey/Al2O3 catalysts with various Ni/Fe ratios.
SamplesPrecursor Concentration (mol/L)
Ni3-Fe1/Al2O3Ni2-Fe1/Al2O3Ni1-Fe1/Al2O3Ni1-Fe2/Al2O3Ni1-Fe3/Al2O3
Ni(NO3)2·6H2O0.2870.2560.1940.1300.098
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O0.0960.1280.1940.2610.295
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, B.; Cao, G.; Feng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Fang, Y. CO2 Reforming of Biomass Gasification Tar over Ni-Fe-Based Catalysts in a DBD Plasma Reactor. Molecules 2025, 30, 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051032

AMA Style

Gao B, Cao G, Feng Y, Jiao Y, Li C, Zhao J, Fang Y. CO2 Reforming of Biomass Gasification Tar over Ni-Fe-Based Catalysts in a DBD Plasma Reactor. Molecules. 2025; 30(5):1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Bianbian, Guoqiang Cao, Yutong Feng, Yuting Jiao, Chunyu Li, Jiantao Zhao, and Yitian Fang. 2025. "CO2 Reforming of Biomass Gasification Tar over Ni-Fe-Based Catalysts in a DBD Plasma Reactor" Molecules 30, no. 5: 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051032

APA Style

Gao, B., Cao, G., Feng, Y., Jiao, Y., Li, C., Zhao, J., & Fang, Y. (2025). CO2 Reforming of Biomass Gasification Tar over Ni-Fe-Based Catalysts in a DBD Plasma Reactor. Molecules, 30(5), 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051032

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop