Next Article in Journal
The Role of Probiotics and Their Postbiotic Metabolites in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Iron(II) and Manganese(II) Coordination Chemistry Ligated by Coplanar Tridentate Nitrogen-Donor Ligand, 2,6-bis(5-isopropyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)pyridine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Engineering a Radiohybrid PSMA Ligand with an Albumin-Binding Moiety and Pharmacokinetic Modulation via an Albumin-Binding Competitor for Radiotheranostics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Evaluation of (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-Tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic Acid (DOTMA) as a Chelator for Zirconium-89

1
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA
3
MATFab Facility, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA 52242, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(20), 4129; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30204129
Submission received: 5 August 2025 / Revised: 7 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 19 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Radiochemistry, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Recently, macrocycles such as 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) have been observed to form zirconium-89 (89Zr: t½ = 78.4 h, β+: 22.8%, Eβ+max = 901 keV; EC: 77%, Eγ = 909 keV)-complexes with excellent in vivo stability. In this report, we describe (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTMA) as an 89Zr chelator. Using [89Zr]ZrCl4, [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was prepared in 99% radiochemical yield and a molar activity of 1055 ± 6 MBq/µmol. In vitro studies revealed a LogP value of −2.97± 0.02 and a radiometal complex that was inert when challenged with 1000-fold excess EDTA or high concentrations of biologically relevant metal ions. Finally, biodistribution studies revealed that the radiometal complex demonstrated in vivo behavior that was like [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and superior to [89Zr]Zr-DFO. Despite these promising observations, the elevated temperature required to form the [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex and the lack of derivatives available for bioconjugation will require additional ligand engineering to improve its utility for future nuclear medicine applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Zirconium-89 (89Zr: t1/2 = 78.4 h; β+; 23%, 909 keV) chelator development remains an active area of research, with numerous ligands being reported in the literature by a vibrant and creative research community [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. While many coordinating units such as hydroxamate, hydroxyisopthalamide, terepthalamide, and hydroxypyridinone have been evaluated as part of acyclic and cyclic ligands, the most widely used chelation strategy remains focused on the use of [89Zr]Zr-oxalate and desferrioxamine (DFO) or its analogues. However, potential challenges exist with this strategy and include 89Zr transchelation in vivo. For example, Ulaner et al. used [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab and clinical PET/CT to identify HER2+, distant metastases in women diagnosed with HER2, and primary disease [21]. While using [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab and clinical PET/CT demonstrated success, a false-positive lesion detection rate of 30%, with half of those observed in osseous metastases, was considered a limitation of this imaging strategy [21]. The authors suggested that this large false-positive rate may result from the 89Zr4+ ion being released from the DFO-trastuzumab conjugate and non-specifically localizing in bone at sites of metastasis. These findings demonstrate the importance of improving the stability of 89Zr complexes used in radiopharmaceutical applications. Furthermore, while these hydroxamate derivatives have been used in Zr-89 immuno-PET applications, the ligands have not been shown to stably chelate a variety of therapeutic radionuclides such as 177Lu, 212Pb, or 225Ac, which are currently being evaluated in PRRT- or radioimmunotherapy-based clinical trials [22]. Currently, this represents manufacturing and regulatory challenges for research groups seeking to translate their novel theranostic approaches since two separate bioconjugates would be required for imaging and radiotherapy.
Over the last decade, several research groups have sought to overcome these perceived limitations by reexamining the potential utility of azamacrocyles for this purpose. Historically, azamacrocycles have been extensively studied in molecular imaging and radiotherapy research given their ability to stably chelate a variety of radioactive and non-radioactive metals that could be utilized in radiotherapy, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [23,24]. Several groups have actively championed azamacrocycles as alternative 89Zr chelators after Holland et al. described the preparation of [89Zr]Zr-oxalate and [89Zr]ZrCl4 with excellent molar activity; these studies resulted in new guidelines for the long-term storage of 89Zr-based radiopharmaceuticals and methods for utilizing the reactivity of [89Zr]ZrCl4 in the radiochemical synthesis of 89Zr-labelled antibodies without loss of antigen reactivity [25,26,27]. Additionally, using [89Zr]ZrCl4 as a zirconium-89 source, Pandya et al. was able to synthesize and evaluate [89Zr]Zr-DOTA, [89Zr]Zr-DOTP, and [89Zr]Zr-DOTAM and their non-radioactive analogs (Figure 1). Using single crystal x-ray diffraction analysis, the molecular structure of Zr-DOTA was elucidated [10]. This study definitively demonstrated that all four macrocycle nitrogen atoms and all four acetate pendant arms participate in Zr4+ ion coordination to form an octa-coordinate complex. Furthermore, it provided a structure-based rationale to explain the extraordinary and unexpected stability of the resulting [89Zr]Zr-DOTA complex, which was superior to [89Zr]Zr-DFO in vitro and in vivo. In a subsequent publication, Pandya et al. described the synthesis and characterization of [89Zr]Zr-PCTA, [89Zr]Zr-TETA, [89Zr]Zr-TRITA, and [89Zr]Zr-NOTA (Figure 1) and their analogous non-radioactive complexes to determine how changes in the macrocycle’s structure affect the chemical and physical properties of the respective radiometal complex [11].
The solid-state structures of Zr-TRITA, Zr-PCTA, and Zr-NOTA were described, and these structural data reinforced what was observed with the Zr-DOTA crystal structure. Additionally, the preparation of [89Zr]Zr-TRITA, [89Zr]Zr-NOTA, and [89Zr]Zr-PCTA was achieved. Despite the poor in vitro and in vivo behavior of [89Zr]Zr-TRITA, [89Zr]Zr-NOTA and [89Zr]Zr-PCTA demonstrated robust in vitro stability and in vivo behavior, which in many aspects was superior to that of [89Zr]Zr-DFO. Furthermore, several groups have begun to demonstrate how 89Zr-azamacrocyle chemistry can be applied to clinical questions through several first-in-human studies. For example, Prive et al. compared [89Zr]Zr-DOTA-PSMA-617 and [89Zr]Zr-DOTA-PSMA-I&T with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-PSMA-I&T, respectively, in a mouse model of PSMA+/- prostate cancer [28]. The 89Zr radiopharmaceuticals performed well with the amount of radioactivity in the blood and tumors of animals receiving either the 89Zr or 177Lu agents, as they are similar. More interestingly, [89Zr]Zr-DOTA-PSMA-617 was evaluated in a first-in-human study in a 64-year-old subject with suspected biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Clinical PET imaging revealed excellent image contrast that improved over time due to the rapid excretion of the radiopharmaceutical from non-target tissues and the relatively long half-life that is intrinsic to 89Zr. Adverse events were not observed, suggesting that the use of this radiochemistry strategy was well-tolerated. More importantly, due to the excellent image contrast, a small focal lesion in the prostate bed, which was suspected of local recurrence, was observed at the 48 h imaging time point. A further study conducted by Rosar et al. compared the utility of [89Zr]Zr-PSMA-617 PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging in seven subjects with suspected biochemical recurrent prostate cancer [29]. In 75% of subjects, [89Zr]Zr-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging revealed at least one prostate cancer lesion that was not detected by the 68Ga-based radiopharmaceutical. Although these reports evaluated small patient cohorts, they independently validated the 89Zr-tetraazamacrocycle radiochemistry paradigm and gratifyingly demonstrated the important role it may play in improving clinical care.
In this report, we extend our investigations in 89Zr-tetraazamacrocycle chemistry by describing the use of (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTMA) (Figure 1) as an 89Zr chelator. We chose to investigate this additional tetraazamacrocycle to understand the influence of the methyl groups on radiochemistry and stability and to determine how closely those observations paralleled what is reported with metal–DOTMA complexes already described in the literature. Furthermore, we rationalized that if the radiochemistry and in vivo behavior of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was like that of [89Zr]Zr-DOTA, then the four methyl groups located on the pendant arms could be modified in subsequent studies to generate a bifunctional chelator version of DOTMA that would be valuable to the nuclear medicine community as 89Zr-polyazamacrocyle research expands over time.

2. Results and Discussion

Over the last few decades, research involving the use of 89Zr has accelerated, with excellent scientific contributions from a global research community [3,7,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In addition to optimized production and purification protocols that yield this radiometal in excellent purity and high molar activity, significant effort has been expended to develop novel ligands to ensure the stable chelation of 89Zr [1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,27,31,37,38]. The stable chelation of 89Zr is required to inspire confidence in the 89Zr-radiopharmaceutical PET/CT imaging results if clinical translation is to be realized. 89Zr complex instability has already been identified in numerous preclinical studies and postulated as the source of a large false-positive scan rate in at least one Phase 0 clinical trial [25,26,39,40,41,42,43]. Since the reality of FDA-approved 89Zr-mAbs is on the horizon, with at least one Phase 3 trial (NCT 03849118) successfully meeting its clinical endpoints [44], solving the problem of 89Zr-chelate instability remains an active area of research. If resolved, it will improve clinical imaging and positively impact patient care on a broad scale. Additionally, the recent first-in-human studies using 89Zr-tetraazamacrocycle complexes as part of a broader PET imaging strategy has demonstrated that this approach is safe, yields acceptable dosimetry, and may have a larger role to play when used to determine personalized dosimetry in advance of targeted, systemic radiotherapy [28,45,46].
For nearly a decade, we have evaluated cyclen- and cyclam-based macrocycles as 89Zr chelators with the overall goal of developing ultra-stable radiometal chelates that could be used in the immuno-PET or theranostic paradigms [10,11]. In these studies, we observed that the macrocycles DOTA, NOTA, and PCTA formed 89Zr complexes with excellent in vitro and in vivo stability. In this report, we extend those studies by evaluating the ligand (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTMA) as a chelator for zirconium-89. Given its extensive use in preclinical MRI contrast agent development and its structural similarity to DOTA, we theorized the resulting [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex would exhibit similar behavior to that of [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and yield another ultra-stable radiometal complex that can be utilized in 89Zr-based imaging applications [47,48]. Most importantly, the four additional methyl groups that are located on the pendant arms of the macrocycle offer an accessible derivatization point, which may be used to convert this ligand into a bifunctional chelator.

2.1. Structural Characterization of Zr-DOTMA

As with our previous studies and to assist in our understanding of the chemical reactivity of this ligand with 89Zr, we attempted to characterize the Zr-DOTMA complex. Unfortunately, the synthesis of Zr-DOTMA was problematic. Any reaction conditions attempted either revealed the presence of starting materials suggesting either that no reaction occurred or that a reaction occurred that produced a white powder, which was insoluble in every conventional solvent tested. This insolubility prevented any rigorous characterization using standard analytical techniques such as solution NMR, mass spectrometry, or single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Thus, to provide some characterization data, we completed solid-state NMR of Zr-DOTMA and compared its spectrum with that of the DOTMA ligand (Figures S1 and S2). Briefly, the C-13 spectrum of the DOTMA ligand is composed of four groups of resonances consistent with CH3, CH2, CH, and COO. The spectra are assigned as COO near 182 ppm, CH at 58 ppm, CH2 centered near 48 ppm, and four methyl resonances near 9.5 ppm. The CH3 is attached to a chiral carbon atom at a stereogenic center. In contrast to the ligand spectra, the Zr-DOTMA spectrum is comprised of a major crystalline phase, apparently with Z’ = 1 having resonances consistent with CH3, CH2, CH, and COO at 11, 47, 66, and 179 ppm, respectively. It also has minor resonances near 52, 62, and 174 ppm. The resonances near 174 are composed of at least three unique carbons but, based on linewidth, appear to be crystalline in nature. The methyl groups are magnetically inequivalent. Importantly, no un-complexed DOTMA ligand was observed in the Zr-DOTMA C-13 spectrum, which would be consistent with the formation of the Zr-DOTMA complex.
The N-15 spectrum of the DOTMA ligand is composed of three resonances with similar chemical shifts likely suggesting disorder in the conformation, but they could also suggest multiple phases. In contrast, the N-15 spectrum of the Zr-DOTMA represents a single resonance, which is shifted by about 30 ppm. The single resonance is consistent with a single environment for the nitrogen. The nitrogen spectrum is consistent with a high-symmetry environment, and similar to the C-13 spectra, no un-complexed DOTMA ligand was observed in the Zr-DOTMA sample, which further supports the formation of the Zr-DOTMA complex.
To further aid our structural understanding of Zr-DOTMA, we performed DFT calculations using the Zr-DOTA crystal structure and NMR data as guides. Based upon those calculations, a model of the proposed Zr-DOTMA structure in comparison with that of Zr-DOTA is presented in Figure 2 (Table S1). The DFT-optimized structure of Zr-DOTMA is in good agreement with the experimentally elucidated crystal structure of Zr-DOTA [10], with bond and angle differences of ca. 0.038 Å and ca. 1.38°, respectively. These small differences can be attributed to differences between the crystal environment and the simulated aqueous environment (e.g., crystal packing). This supports the choice of method to characterize the structure of both Zr-DOTA and similar complexes for which a crystal structure is not available, such as Zr-DOTMA. In this case, the Zr environment is very similar to Zr-DOTA, with bond and angle differences of only ca. 0.003 Å and ca. 0.09°, respectively. These results, when considered with the NMR and elemental analysis data, provide circumstantial evidence to support the formation of the Zr-DOTMA complex.
Based upon the previously solved Zr-DOTA crystal structure and the work of Aime (Vida infra), a possible explanation can be rationalized to explain the difficulty in forming this complex [49]. In their publication, which investigated Gd-DOTMA complexes as MRI contrast agents, the research team observed that the methyl groups of the DOTMA pendant arms were positioned anti to the metal ion. This ligand configuration was believed to be responsible for negatively influencing the formation kinetics of any resulting Ln3+-DOTMA complex. Thus, we speculate that this same ligand conformation is responsible for the forcing conditions needed to form [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA and would be consistent with our previous observations regarding the formation of [89Zr]Zr-TETA [11]. Disappointingly, being unable to characterize Zr-DOTMA using solution NMR, mass spectrometry, or single crystal diffraction analysis remains a limitation of this work.

2.2. Radiochemistry

Following our previously published studies, we first attempted to radiolabel DOTMA using [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 [25,50]. However, radiochemical yields were poor (Figure S3 and Table S2); we were only able to obtain a radiochemical yield of 36 ± 5%, which was consistent with results obtained when we attempted the preparation of [89Zr]Zr-DOTA under similar conditions [10]. Thus, we used [89Zr]ZrCl4 (Scheme 1 and Figure S4) as a radioactive precursor and a variety of reaction buffers (Table S3 and Figure S5) and reaction temperatures (Table S4 and Figure S6) to prepare [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA.
The optimized radiochemical synthesis conditions are presented in Table S5. Like [89Zr]Zr-DOTA, an elevated reaction temperature was required to generate [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA. The radiochemical yield and purity of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex were confirmed by radio-TLC (Figure S7) and radio-HPLC (Figure 3). HPLC analysis revealed a peak with a retention time of 8.37 min in the radio-chromatogram (Figure 3). This retention time was distinct from the peak associated with the DOTMA ligand that was observed in the UV–vis chromatogram and suggested formation of the radiometal complex. The molar activity (Am) for [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was found to be 1055 ± 6 MBq/µmol and was comparable with other Am values associated with 89Zr-complexes previously reported in the literature [10,11]. When we consider the 89Zr-azamacrocycles evaluated to date, the ease of radiochemical synthesis can be qualitatively ordered as [89Zr]Zr-PCTA > [89Zr]Zr-NOTA > [89Zr]Zr-DOTA >> [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA [10,11].

2.3. Lipophilicity (LogP) and In Vitro Stability Studies

Lipophilicity (LogP) represents a fundamental physiochemical property that influences the in vivo performance of a radiopharmaceutical [51]. While LogD7.2 may also be used, we chose LogP to be consistent with our previously reported results. Based upon the water/octanol partition method, [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA demonstrates hydrophilic character and suggests that renal excretion would be a preferred route of elimination after in vivo injection [10,11]. Interestingly, [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA demonstrated a LogP value (−2.97 ± 0.02; Table S6) that was more negative than the LogP value of [89Zr]Zr-DFO (−2.83 ± 0.03) but more positive than the LogP of [89Zr]Zr-PCTA (−3.09 ± 0.03), which probably reflects a combination of the pyridyl ring and the radiometal complex’s expected 1+ charge. However, its LogP was more positive than the value reported for [89Zr]Zr-DOTA (−3.80 ± 0.04), and this may be attributed to the influence of the four extra methyl groups on the pendant arms of the DOTMA macrocycle [10].
The in vitro stability of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was evaluated by challenging it with excess EDTA, high concentrations of biologically relevant metal ions, or human serum proteins over a seven-day time course [10,11]. These experiments revealed that [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was stable to a 1000-fold excess EDTA challenge (at pH 5 or pH 7; Table 1).
Additionally, no demetallation of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was observed when challenged with high concentrations of Fe3+, Co2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Mg2+, Ga3+, or Gd 3+ ions. (Table 2). Finally, incubation in human serum (Figure 4, Figures S8 and S9, and Table 3) revealed that any 89Zr, which was added to the serum as [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA, was not associated with the serum proteins, suggesting that the former radiometal complex was like [89Zr]Zr-DOTA in its ability to resist transchelation by serum proteins.

2.4. Biodistribution Studies in Non-Tumor-Bearing, Normal Mice

We then evaluated the in vivo behavior of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA in acute biodistribution studies involving normal mice. Results are shown in Table S7 and Figure 5. At 2 h post-injection (p.i.), animals injected with [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA demonstrated a slightly elevated level of blood-associated radioactivity, which decreased over the time course of the experiment. The only structural differences between [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA and [89Zr]Zr-DOTA are the four extra methyl groups, which are believed to contribute to the increased lipophilicity of the former radiometal complex. It is believed that this more positive LogP value increases the interaction between [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA and serum proteins once in the systemic circulation, causing this retention in the blood pool. This is not uncommon, as lipophilicity has been observed to influence a molecule’s interaction with human serum proteins [52,53]. In all other aspects, [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA demonstrated a comparable biodistribution profile to [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and was observed to be superior to [89Zr]Zr-DFO [10,11]. For example, at 72 h p.i., animals injected with [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA had 9-fold less radioactivity associated with liver tissue when compared to animals receiving [89Zr]Zr-DFO ([89Zr]Zr-DOTMA vs. [89Zr]Zr-DFO (liver (72 h p.i., %ID/g ± SD); p-value: 0.007 ± 0.001 vs. 0.066 ± 0.009; p < 0.0001). Similarly, radioactivity associated with kidney tissues was significantly reduced. Animals receiving [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA retained 69-fold less radioactivity in the kidney than did animals receiving [89Zr]Zr-DFO ([89Zr]Zr-DOTMA vs. [89Zr]Zr-DFO (kidney (72 h p.i., %ID/g ± SD); p-value: 0.010 ± 0.002 vs. 0.69 ± 0.09; p < 0.0001). Finally, radioactivity in the bone tissue of animals receiving [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was 3-fold less than in animals injected with [89Zr]Zr-DFO ([89Zr]Zr-DOTMA vs. [89Zr]Zr-DFO (bone (72 h p.i., %ID/g ± SD); p-value: 0.023 ± 0.003 vs. 0.079 ± 0.006; p < 0.0001). Despite the excellent biodistribution profile, we did not perform metabolism studies since they were beyond the scope of this initial investigation. Thus, the nature of the radioactive species within the tissues remains unknown. Furthermore, we acknowledge that the observed stability of the radiometal–chelate complex may differ when incorporated into a bioconjugate. Considering that BFC derivatives of DOTMA are not commercially available, these differences are difficult to assess currently.

2.5. Limitations of the Current Research and Future Research Directions

This manuscript augments what is known about the 89Zr radiochemistry of azamacrocycles by studying the in vitro and in vivo stability of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA. While it is beyond the scope of this text to provide a side-by-side comparison with every 89Zr chelator reported in the literature, the following points are proffered to put our results in context with the wider literature. Foremost, elevated temperatures were required to form [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA; this characteristic will never supplant the facile radiochemistry exhibited by numerous chelators containing hydroxamate coordinating units including DFO and DFO*. Once formed, however, [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA exhibits behavior that is consistent with other 89Zr radiometal complexes that have been reported to demonstrate excellent radiochemical stability. Within the context of azamacrocycles, [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA exhibits behavior that is consistent with the behavior of the 89Zr complexes formed with DOTA, PCTA, and NOTA. When compared specifically to DOTA, the radiochemistry to form both complexes was similar, and both radiometal chelates were of comparable inertness when challenged with exogenous ligands, metal ions, or serum proteins. The only observable differences were in the excretion profiles of individual tissues, but on aggregate, the data do not suggest one radiometal complex is superior to the other [10]. However, DOTMA does differ from DOTA in that, at present, bifunctional chelators of it are not commercially available. While DOTMA BFC derivatives have been prepared for use in MRI contrast agent development, their use has not been evaluated in nuclear medicine applications. Given these challenges, our current efforts are refocused on creating a BFC derivative of DOTMA, which could be used with a variety popular bioconjugation strategies and would be more valuable to the research community [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Equipment

Zirconium-89 (89Zr: (t1/2 = 78.4 h, β+:22.8%, Eβ+max = 901 keV; EC: 77%, Eγ = 909 keV) was purchased from Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis, MO, USA) as [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 in 0.1 M oxalic acid. Unless otherwise noted, all other chemicals were purchased from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), and solutions were prepared using ultrapure water (resistivity = 18 MΩ cm−1). The macrocyclic ligand (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTMA, M.Wt. = 460.5 g/mol) was purchased from CheMatech, Inc. (Dijon, France). Radiochemistry reaction progress and purity were analyzed using an analytical HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), which runs Empower v.3.9.0 software and is configured with a Model 1525 binary pump, Model 2707 autosampler, Model 2998 photodiode array detector, Model 1500 column heater, fraction collector, HYPERCARB C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 100 mm, ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and a Model 105-s radioactivity detector (Carrol Ramsey, Berkeley, CA, USA). The DOTMA ligand and subsequent radiolabeled products were monitored at 201 nm, using a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% TFA/H2O (solvent A) and 0.1% TFA/acetonitrile (solvent B) and a gradient consisting of 0% B to 70% B in 20 min at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. In addition, radio-TLC was conducted on a Bioscan AR 2000 radio-TLC scanner equipped with a 10% methane/argon gas supply and a PC interface running Winscan v.3 analysis software (Eckert & Ziegler, Berlin, Germany). Varian ITLC-SA strips (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Merck C-18 TLC plates (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were employed using 50 mM EDTA (pH 5) or 1:1.0 MeOH:10% NH4Cl solution as eluents, respectively. Both [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 and [89Zr]ZrCl4 were used as standard controls. Radioactive samples were counted using either a CRC-25R radioisotope calibrator (Capintec, Inc., Florham Park, NJ, USA) or a PerkinElmer 2480 Wizard gamma counter (Revvity, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with an energy window of 500−1500 keV. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy was performed using a Bruker AVANCEIII 500 MHZ NMR spectrometer running Topspin 3.0 software (Bruker Biospin, Billerica, MA, USA). Elemental analysis was performed using an Exeter Analytical Combustion CE440 Elemental Analysis analyzer (Exeter Analytical, Inc., North Chelmsford, MA, USA).

3.2. Solid-State NMR Data Acquisition Parameters

NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with a double resonance 4 mm MASprobe (Bruker Biospin, Billerica, MA, USA) operating at a proton frequency of 500.13 MHz. All the measurements were carried out with the sample oriented at the magic angle in 4 mm zirconia rotors and under controlled temperature. The temperature was maintained at 298 K via a stream of air. MAS spectra were recorded using shaped cross-polarization pulses (ramped from 50 to 100% on the H-1 channel) at a MAS frequency of 10 kHz. The same filled rotor was used for both C-13 and N-15 measurements.
For carbon (C-13) observation, the following parameters were used: Proton 90° pulse of 4.6 μs, contact time of 2 ms, a spectral width of 300 ppm, and a relaxation delay of 5 times the proton t1 (ranging from 6 to 10 s). Typically, 4096 scans of 3 K data points were coadded before zero filling to 8 K and processing with an exponential weight of 25 Hz. Composite pulse decoupling using the TPPM scheme was applied on the proton channel. The carbon (C-13) spectra were refenced to TMS using external 3-Methylglutaric acid [63].
For nitrogen (N-15) observation, the following parameters were used: Proton 90° pulse of 4.25 μs, contact time of 3 ms, a spectral width of 200 ppm or 600 ppm, and a relaxation of 21 s. Typically, 1024 to 8192 scans of 4 K data points were coadded before zero filling to 8 K and processing with an exponential weight of 14 Hz. Composite pulse decoupling using the Spinal64 scheme was applied on the proton channel. The nitrogen (N-15) spectra were refenced to NH3 = 0 ppm using external NH4NO3 [64].

3.3. Synthesis of Zirconium (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-Tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic Acid (Zr-DOTMA)

ZrAcAc (702 mg, 1.44 mmol) was added to a solution of DOTMA (529 mg, 1.31 mmol) in 40 mL of methanol. The resulting solution was refluxed for 3 h. As the reaction proceeded, a white precipitate formed. It was filtered, washed with MeOH (2 × 10 mL), and dried in an oven (604 mg, 94% yield). 13C-NMR (500 MHz, solid state): δ 11 (m, CH3), 47 (m, CH2), 66 (m, CH), 179 (s, COO) 14N-NMR (500 MHz, solid state): δ 40 (s, N). Elemental analysis (calculated): C, 43.86%; H, 5.89%; N, 10.23%. Elemental analysis (observed, n = 4): C, 43.71 ± 0.19%; H, 6.05 ± 0.04%; N, 9.27 ± 0.16%.

3.4. Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculations and Modelling of the Zr-DOTMA Structure

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Amsterdam Density Functional package with the PBE exchange-correlation functional in conjunction with an all-electron triple-ζ Slater-type basis set with two additional polarization functions. The relativistic corrections were taken into account using the scalar relativistic zero-order regular approximation (ZORA). Dispersion effects were included using the D3 Grimme correction. Geometry optimizations were performed using the COSMO solvation model with water parameters. The nature of all stationary points and transition states were verified by the calculation of analytical vibrational frequencies. The optimized structure was visualized using Mol* 3D Viewer, which is free and available on the RCSB Protein Data Bank website: https://www.rcsb.org/ (accessed on 15 October 2025).

3.5. Radiochemical Synthesis of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA with [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 [10]

The complexation of 89Zr with DOTMA was achieved by reacting 10–50 µg (0.022–0.109 µmol, 1–5 µL, 10 mg/mL in water) of DOTMA with an aliquot of [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 (0.49–0.55 mCi, 18.2–20.5 MBq) diluted in 100 µL of water and pH adjusted to 6.9–7.2 using 1.0 M Na2CO3 or 0.5 M HEPES (pH 7.0–7.2). Reactions were incubated at 99 °C for 2 h in a thermomixer (700 rpm). The formation of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex was monitored by radio-TLC, using Varian ITLC-SA strips and 50 mM EDTA (pH 5) as the mobile phase.

3.6. Preparation of [89Zr]Zr-Chloride

[89Zr]ZrCl4 was produced using a procedure modified from the literature [26,27]. Briefly, a [89Zr]Zr-oxalate solution in 0.1 M oxalic acid was loaded onto an activated Waters Sep-pak Light Accell plus QMA strong anion exchange cartridge (300 Å pore size, 37–55 μm particle size, 230 μeq/g ion exchange capacity) that was prewashed with 6 mL MeCN, 10 mL 0.9% saline, and 10 mL water. The cartridge was then washed with water (>50 mL) to remove oxalic acid and the radioactivity eluted with 100% recovery of 89Zr by chloride ion exchange with 400–500 μL of 1.0 M HCl (aq.).

3.7. Radiochemical Synthesis of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA with [89Zr]ZrCl4 [10]

Complexation of 89Zr with DOTMA was achieved by reacting 15–20 μg (0.033–0.043 µmol,15–20 μL, 1.0 mg/mL in water) of the ligand with an aliquot of [89Zr]ZrCl4 (1.1–1.6 mCi, 40.7–59.2 MBq) diluted in 200 μL of 0.5 M HEPES (pH 7.2), followed by 60 min of incubation at 95 °C in a thermomixer (600 rpm). The formation of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex was monitored by radio-TLC, using a mobile phase consisting of 1:1 MeOH:10% NH4Cl on C-18 plates and 50 mM EDTA (pH 5) on Varian ITLC-SA strips. In the C-18 system, un-chelated 89Zr remained at the origin (Rf = 0), while the [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex eluted near the solvent front (Rf = 0.75–0.80). In the ITLC-SA system, free 89Zr formed a complex with EDTA and eluted with the solvent front (Rf ≈ 1), while the [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex elutes from origin (Rf = 0.10–0.15). The identity of the radioactive complex [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA was further confirmed by comparing its radio-HPLC elution profile to the UV-HPLC spectrum of the un-complexed ligand.

3.8. Determination of Partition Coefficient (LogP) [10]

The partition coefficient (LogP) was determined by adding 5 μL of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (~5 μCi; 0.19 MBq) to a mixture of 500 μL of octanol and 500 μL of water (pH 5.5). The resulting solutions (n = 5) were vigorously vortexed for 5 min at room temperature, then centrifuged for 5 min to ensure complete separation of layers. From each of the five sets, a 50 μL aliquot was removed from each phase into new tubes and counted separately in a gamma counter. Each organic phase was washed with water to remove any radioactivity remaining in the organic phase before gamma counting. The partition coefficient was calculated as a ratio of counts in the octanol fraction to counts in the water fraction. The LogP values were reported as an average of five measurements.

3.9. In Vitro EDTA Challenge Study [10]

The in vitro EDTA challenge study was performed by adding 20 μL of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex (121–130 μCi, 4.5–4.8 MBq) to 500 μL of EDTA (10 mM, 50 mM, and 100 mM: pH 5 or pH 7) with a 1:100, 1:500, and 1:1000 ratio of radiometal complex/EDTA. The solutions (n = 3) were incubated at 37 °C for 7 days in a thermomixer. Samples were analyzed at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days post administration to EDTA using radio-TLC, Varian ITLC-SA strips, 50 mM EDTA (pH 5) as the mobile phase, and gamma counting. All studies were performed in triplicate.

3.10. In Vitro Metal Competition Study [10]

To separate solutions of metal cations (iron(III) chloride, cobalt(II) chloride, zinc(II) chloride, copper(II) chloride, magnesium(II) chloride, gallium(III) nitrate, and gadolinium(III) chloride) (1.0 mM, 200 μL), [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex (0.1 mM, 20 μL, 110−119 μCi, 4.1–4.4 MBq) in PBS (pH 7.4) was added. The resulting solutions (n = 3) were incubated at 37 °C for 7 days in a thermomixer. Dissociation of 89Zr from [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex was monitored by radio-TLC at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days using radio-TLC, Varian ITLC-SA strips, 50 mM EDTA (pH 5) as the mobile phase, and gamma counting. All studies were performed in triplicate.

3.11. In Vitro Serum Stability Study [10]

The in vitro serum stability was determined by adding 20 μL of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (113–124 μCi, 4.2–4.6 MBq) to 500 μL of human serum. The solutions (n = 3) were incubated at 37 °C for 7 days and were analyzed daily for 1 week by radio-TLC using Varian ITLC-SA strips, 0.1 M EDTA (pH 5) as the mobile phase, and gamma counting. Samples were also analyzed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days via size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as an eluent with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Fractions (0.5 mL per tube) were collected, and the activity in each fraction was measured in a gamma counter. The percent intact radiopharmaceutical was determined by subtracting the total integrated area under the product peak from the total integrated area generated for all peaks in the chromatogram and multiplying by a factor of 100%.

3.12. Animal Care and Use

All animal studies were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals of the National Institutes of Health and approved by the University of Iowa’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol # 302265-001). Furthermore, all animal experiments comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and were conducted in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and associated guidelines, EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments, or the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All staff underwent animal handling training through the University of Iowa’s Office of Animal Research prior to the start of any experiments.
The studies described herein were designed to study the biodistribution and excretion patterns of a radiometal chelate in normal animals. These were not therapy or survival studies, and the injected mass or amount of radioactivity was considered below the limit of pharmacological action as defined by the University of Iowa’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol # 302265-001). Thus, euthanasia was based upon predetermined study time points and not humane endpoints. However, in order to verify the absolute necessity of animal research for this project, to prevent repeating work that had been done by others and to confirm the lack of alternative procedures, we performed multiple PubMed scientific literature searches using numerous relevant key words, alone and/or in combination, related to the subject matter. The results of these searches confirmed that the experiments proposed are novel and in no way duplicate any previous work. Additionally, these searches verified that we used the proper methodology in our animal studies in order to screen for promising agents and minimize the number of animals used. The search also uncovered the fact that the proposed animal studies are irreplaceable and must be performed in order to assess the potential utility of these radiopharmaceuticals.
Female NIH Swiss mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Inotiv, Lafayette, IN, USA. All animals were acclimated to a 12 h light/dark cycle and received food and water ad libitum for 5 days before any manipulations were performed. All animals were checked by veterinary staff daily to ensure well-being and proper environment and to monitor for signs of distress. Clinical signs of distress in laboratory rodents include decreased activity, pilo-erection, un-groomed appearance, excessive licking and scratching, self-mutilation, abnormal stance, hunched appearance, rapid or shallow respiration, grunting, dilated pupils, aggressiveness towards handler, high-pitched vocalizations, change in feeding activity, and attempts to separate from group. In the event of clinical distress, animals were euthanized after consulting the on-call veterinarian. To minimize suffering during the tail vain injection, animals were kept under deep isoflurane anesthesia. At the end point of the study, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and were euthanized by cervical dislocation, which is consistent with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines on Euthanasia. Animals were monitored every 30 min during the experiment, but during the experiment, none of the animals died or were found ill before experimental end point.

3.13. Biodistribution Studies

Biodistribution studies were conducted using a modified literature procedure [10,11]. Briefly, female NIH Swiss mice (6–8 weeks old, n = 6/cohort; 30 animals total) were injected with [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (0.55 MBq (15 μCi)/mouse) via the tail vein and sacrificed at 2, 4, 24, 48, and 72 h p.i. Organs and tissues of interest were excised, weighed, and counted on a gamma counter. The percent injected dose per gram (%ID/g) was calculated by comparison to a weighed, counted standard for each group. At the completion of this study, 30 animals were euthanized; zero animals were found dead in their cages.

3.14. Statistical Analysis [10]

For statistical analysis, all plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Student’s t-tests (two-tailed, unpaired) were performed. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Within the text, Student’s t-test data are presented as mean ± SD or mean (95% confidence intervals) and p-value.

4. Conclusions

This report describes the preparation and characterization of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA in vitro and in vivo. The [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA complex was prepared in high radiochemical yield and molar activity. In vitro, this radiometal complex displayed excellent resistance to EDTA, metal ion, and human serum challenge. Biodistribution studies in normal mice revealed a clearance profile that was superior to [89Zr]Zr-DFO and comparable to [89Zr]Zr-DOTA. Despite these encouraging data, which augment what is known about 89Zr-tetraazamacrocycle chemistry, the inability to adequately characterize the analogous non-radioactive complex and the lack of bifunctional chelator derivatives of DOTMA currently limit its utility as an 89Zr chelator at this time.

5. Patents

WO2017161356A1 and WO2019/147912A1.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30204129/s1. Solid State 13C-NMR of DOTMA and Zr-DOTMA (Figure S1). Solid State 15N-NMR of DOTMA and Zr-DOTMA (Figure S2). Selected geometrical parameters of Zr-DOTA and Zr-DOTMA in gas phase and in solution (Table S1). Radiochemistry protocol using [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 for [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (Table S2, Figure S3). Preparation of [89Zr]ZrCl4 from [89Zr]Zr(ox)4 (Figure S4). Summary of optimized reaction buffers using [89Zr]ZrCl4 for [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (Table S3, Figure S5). Summary of optimized reaction temperatures using [89Zr]ZrCl4 for [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (Table S4, Figure S6). Quality control of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA by radio-TLC (Figure S7). Summary of optimized radiochemistry conditions to prepare [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA with [89Zr]ZrCl4 (Table S5). Determination of partition coefficients (LogP) (Table S6). In vitro serum stability study by Radio-ITLC (Figures S8 and S9). Complete biodistribution studies of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (Table S7).

Author Contributions

D.N.P. and T.J.W. equally contributed to study conception, study design, the completion of all experiments; P.M. performed DFT calculations and experimental modelling of the ZR-DOTMA complex; M.A.S. and G.B.C. provided structural characterization of the Zr-DOTMA complex; D.N.P. and T.J.W. contributed equally to the preparation and review of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge support from Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Wake Forest Innovations, the North Carolina Biotechnology Center, and the University of Iowa. Wadas gratefully acknowledges the NCI (R21-CA219899 and R21-CA227709) and the DoD (W81XWH-19-1-0046) for research support. The production of 89Zr at Washington University School of Medicine was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Science, Nuclear Physics Isotope Program (DESC0008657). The University of Iowa Central NMR facility equipment was supported by NIH grant, S10-RR025500, NSF grant, CHE-0840371, and University of Iowa funds. The MATFab Facility and the CE440 Elemental Analyzer are supported, in part, by the Office of Vice President of Research, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, and the College of Engineering.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the University of Iowa’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol # 302265-001; approved 16 April 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge use of the University of Iowa Small Animal Imaging Core Facility, which is supported by the Department of Radiology at the University of Iowa. We acknowledge the University of Iowa Materials Analysis, Testing, and Fabrication Facility for use of the Exeter Analytical Combustion Elemental Analysis analyzer.

Conflicts of Interest

T.J.W. and D.N.P. have filed patents WO2017161356A1 and WO2019/147912A1 relating to this work. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

DFO: Deferoxamine; PCTA: 3,6,9,15-Tetraazabicyclo [9.3.1]pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene-3,6,9-triacetic acid; NOTA: 2,2′,2″-(1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid; TRITA: 2,2′,2″,2‴-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclo tridecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid; TETA: 2,2′,2″,2‴-(1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid; EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; Zr(AcAc)4: Zirconium(IV) acetylacetonate; Zr(ox)4: Zirconium(IV) oxalate; TFA: Trifluoroacetic acid; MeOH: Methanol; NH4Cl: Ammonium chloride; NH4OAc: Ammonium acetate; NaOAc: Sodium acetate; TMAA: Tetramethylammonium acetate; MES: 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; HEPES: 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl) piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid; TRIS: Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane; NMR: Nuclear magnetic resonance; HMBC: Heteroatom multiple-bond correlation; HMQC: Heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence; UV-HPLC: Ultra-violet high-performance liquid chromatography; RT: Retention time; Rf: Retention factor; ESI-HR-MS: Electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry; HS: Human serum; ITLC: Instant thin-layer chromatography; kBq: Kilobecquerel; MBq: Megabecquerel; %ID/g: Percent injected dose per gram; P.I.: Post-injection; ROI: Region of interest; CPM: Counts per minute; TLC: Thin-layer chromatography; PET: Positron emission tomography; CT: Computed tomography;89Zr: Zirconium-89.

References

  1. Allott, L.; Da Pieve, C.; Meyers, J.; Spinks, T.; Ciobota, D.M.; Kramer-Marek, G.; Smith, G. Evaluation of DFO-HOPO as an octadentate chelator for zirconium-89. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 8529–8532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alnahwi, A.H.; Ait-Mohand, S.; Dumulon-Perreault, V.; Dory, Y.L.; Guerin, B. Promising Performance of 4HMS, a New Zirconium-89 Octadendate Chelator. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10731–10739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhatt, N.B.; Pandya, D.N.; Wadas, T.J. Recent Advances in Zirconium-89 Chelator Development. Molecules 2018, 23, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhatt, N.B.; Pandya, D.N.; Xu, J.; Tatum, D.; Magda, D.; Wadas, T.J. Evaluation of macrocyclic hydroxyisophthalamide ligands as chelators for zirconium-89. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brandt, M.; Cowell, J.; Aulsebrook, M.L.; Gasser, G.; Mindt, T.L. Radiolabelling of the octadentate chelators DFO* and oxoDFO* with zirconium-89 and gallium-68. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 25, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deri, M.A.; Ponnala, S.; Zeglis, B.M.; Pohl, G.; Dannenberg, J.J.; Lewis, J.S.; Francesconi, L.C. Alternative chelator for (8)(9)Zr radiopharmaceuticals: Radiolabeling and evaluation of 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO). J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 4849–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deri, M.A.; Zeglis, B.M.; Francesconi, L.C.; Lewis, J.S. PET imaging with (8)(9)Zr: From radiochemistry to the clinic. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2013, 40, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, C.S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Ren, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Bandara, N.; Rogachev, A.Y.; Rogers, B.E.; et al. Novel Chelating Agents for Zirconium-89-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging: Synthesis, DFT Calculation, Radiolabeling, and In Vitro and In Vivo Complex Stability. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 37229–37236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Khozeimeh Sarbisheh, E.; Summers, K.L.; Salih, A.K.; Cotelesage, J.J.H.; Zimmerling, A.; Pickering, I.J.; George, G.N.; Price, E.W. Radiochemical, Computational, and Spectroscopic Evaluation of High-Denticity Desferrioxamine Derivatives DFO2 and DFO2p toward an Ideal Zirconium-89 Chelate Platform. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 2637–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pandya, D.N.; Bhatt, N.; Yuan, H.; Day, C.S.; Ehrmann, B.M.; Wright, M.; Bierbach, U.; Wadas, T.J. Zirconium tetraazamacrocycle complexes display extraordinary stability and provide a new strategy for zirconium-89-based radiopharmaceutical development. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 2309–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pandya, D.N.; Henry, K.E.; Day, C.S.; Graves, S.A.; Nagle, V.L.; Dilling, T.R.; Sinha, A.; Ehrmann, B.M.; Bhatt, N.B.; Menda, Y.; et al. Polyazamacrocycle Ligands Facilitate (89)Zr Radiochemistry and Yield (89)Zr Complexes with Remarkable Stability. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 17473–17487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pandya, D.N.; Pailloux, S.; Tatum, D.; Magda, D.; Wadas, T.J. Di-macrocyclic terephthalamide ligands as chelators for the PET radionuclide zirconium-89. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2301–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Price, E.W.; Zeglis, B.M.; Lewis, J.S.; Adam, M.J.; Orvig, C. H6phospa-trastuzumab: Bifunctional methylenephosphonate-based chelator with 89Zr, 111In and 177Lu. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Salih, A.K.; Raheem, S.J.; Garcia, M.D.; Ahiahonu, W.K.; Price, E.W. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of DFO-Em: A Modular Chelator with Octadentate Chelation for Optimal Zirconium-89 Radiochemistry. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 20964–20976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sarbisheh, E.K.; Salih, A.K.; Raheem, S.J.; Lewis, J.S.; Price, E.W. A High-Denticity Chelator Based on Desferrioxamine for Enhanced Coordination of Zirconium-89. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 11715–11727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhai, C.; He, S.; Ye, Y.; Rangger, C.; Kaeopookum, P.; Summer, D.; Haas, H.; Kremser, L.; Lindner, H.; Foster, J.; et al. Rational Design, Synthesis and Preliminary Evaluation of Novel Fusarinine C-Based Chelators for Radiolabeling with Zirconium-89. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guarrochena, X.; Kronberger, J.; Tieber, M.; Ciesielski, P.; Mindt, T.L.; Feiner, I.V.J. Straightforward Synthesis of DFO*—An Octadentate Chelator for Zirconium-89. ChemMedChem 2024, 19, e202300495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Imura, R.; Ida, H.; Sasaki, I.; Ishioka, N.S.; Watanabe, S. Re-Evaluations of Zr-DFO Complex Coordination Chemistry for the Estimation of Radiochemical Yields and Chelator-to-Antibody Ratios of (89)Zr Immune-PET Tracers. Molecules 2021, 26, 4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Salih, A.K.; Dominguez Garcia, M.; Raheem, S.J.; Ahiahonu, W.K.; Price, E.W. DFO-Km: A Modular Chelator as a New Chemical Tool for the Construction of Zirconium-89-Based Radiopharmaceuticals. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 20806–20819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Ren, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, M.; Sagastume, E.; Chong, H.S. Synthesis and evaluation of Diaza-Crown Ether-Backboned chelator containing hydroxamate groups for Zr-89 chelation chemistry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 72, 128847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ulaner, G.A.; Hyman, D.M.; Lyashchenko, S.K.; Lewis, J.S.; Carrasquillo, J.A. 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT for Detection of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastases in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2017, 42, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sgouros, G.; Bodei, L.; McDevitt, M.R.; Nedrow, J.R. Radiopharmaceutical therapy in cancer: Clinical advances and challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 589–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wadas, T.J.; Wong, E.H.; Weisman, G.R.; Anderson, C.J. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2858–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wahsner, J.; Gale, E.M.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, A.; Caravan, P. Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 957–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bhatt, N.B.; Pandya, D.N.; Rideout-Danner, S.; Gage, H.D.; Marini, F.C.; Wadas, T.J. A comprehensively revised strategy that improves the specific activity and long-term stability of clinically relevant (89)Zr-immuno-PET agents. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 13214–13221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pandya, D.N.; Bhatt, N.B.; Almaguel, F.; Rideout-Danner, S.; Gage, H.D.; Solingapuram Sai, K.K.; Wadas, T.J. (89)Zr-Chloride Can Be Used for Immuno-PET Radiochemistry Without Loss of Antigen Reactivity In Vivo. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holland, J.P.; Sheh, Y.; Lewis, J.S. Standardized methods for the production of high specific-activity zirconium-89. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009, 36, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prive, B.M.; Derks, Y.H.W.; Rosar, F.; Franssen, G.M.; Peters, S.M.B.; Khreish, F.; Bartholoma, M.; Maus, S.; Gotthardt, M.; Laverman, P.; et al. (89)Zr-labeled PSMA ligands for pharmacokinetic PET imaging and dosimetry of PSMA-617 and PSMA-I&T: A preclinical evaluation and first in man. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 2064–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rosar, F.; Burgard, C.; Linxweiler, J.; Wagner, M.; Ezziddin, S. Histologically Confirmed Testicular Metastasis Revealed by [(89)Zr]Zr-PSMA-617 PET/CT in a Patient with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional PSMA PET/CT Imaging. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dilworth, J.R.; Pascu, S.I. The chemistry of PET imaging with zirconium-89. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2554–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feiner, I.V.J.; Brandt, M.; Cowell, J.; Demuth, T.; Vugts, D.; Gasser, G.; Mindt, T.L. The Race for Hydroxamate-Based Zirconium-89 Chelators. Cancers 2021, 13, 4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ikotun, O.F.; Lapi, S.E. The rise of metal radionuclides in medical imaging: Copper-64, zirconium-89 and yttrium-86. Future Med. Chem. 2011, 3, 599–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jauw, Y.W.; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C.W.; Hoekstra, O.S.; Hendrikse, N.H.; Vugts, D.J.; Zijlstra, J.M.; Huisman, M.C.; van Dongen, G.A. Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography with Zirconium-89-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology: What Can We Learn from Initial Clinical Trials? Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. La, M.T.; Tran, V.H.; Kim, H.K. Progress of Coordination and Utilization of Zirconium-89 for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Studies. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 53, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. van de Watering, F.C.; Rijpkema, M.; Perk, L.; Brinkmann, U.; Oyen, W.J.; Boerman, O.C. Zirconium-89 labeled antibodies: A new tool for molecular imaging in cancer patients. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 203601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Hong, H.; Cai, W. PET tracers based on Zirconium-89. Curr. Radiopharm. 2011, 4, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Adumeau, P.; Davydova, M.; Zeglis, B.M. Thiol-Reactive Bifunctional Chelators for the Creation of Site-Selectively Modified Radioimmunoconjugates with Improved Stability. Bioconjug. Chem. 2018, 29, 1364–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zeglis, B.M.; Lewis, J.S. The bioconjugation and radiosynthesis of 89Zr-DFO-labeled antibodies. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, 96, 52521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ulaner, G.A.; Carrasquillo, J.A.; Riedl, C.C.; Yeh, R.; Hatzoglou, V.; Ross, D.S.; Jhaveri, K.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Hyman, D.M.; Zeglis, B.M.; et al. Identification of HER2-Positive Metastases in Patients with HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer by Using HER2-targeted (89)Zr-Pertuzumab PET/CT. Radiology 2020, 296, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pandya, D.N.; Sinha, A.; Yuan, H.; Mutkus, L.; Stumpf, K.; Marini, F.C.; Wadas, T.J. Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein Alpha Expression in a Preclinical Mouse Model of Glioma Using Positron Emission Tomography. Molecules 2020, 25, 3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Perk, L.R.; Vosjan, M.J.; Visser, G.W.; Budde, M.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G.E.; van Dongen, G.A. p-Isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine: A new bifunctional chelate for facile radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for immuno-PET imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2010, 37, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vosjan, M.J.; Perk, L.R.; Visser, G.W.; Budde, M.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G.E.; van Dongen, G.A. Conjugation and radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using the bifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 739–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Holland, J.P.; Divilov, V.; Bander, N.H.; Smith-Jones, P.M.; Larson, S.M.; Lewis, J.S. 89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Clinicaltrials.gov. 89Zr-TLX250 for PET/CT Imaging of ccRCC—ZIRCON Study (89ZR-TLX250). Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06750419?term=telix&page=1&viewType=Table&rank=4 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  45. Rosar, F.; Bartholoma, M.; Maus, S.; Prive, B.M.; Khreish, F.; Franssen, G.M.; Derks, Y.H.W.; Nagarajah, J.; Ezziddin, S. 89Zr-PSMA-617 PET/CT May Reveal Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Unidentified by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2022, 47, 435–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rosar, F.; Schaefer-Schuler, A.; Bartholoma, M.; Maus, S.; Petto, S.; Burgard, C.; Prive, B.M.; Franssen, G.M.; Derks, Y.H.W.; Nagarajah, J.; et al. [(89)Zr]Zr-PSMA-617 PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: First clinical experience from a pilot study including biodistribution and dose estimates. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 4736–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Clough, T.J.; Jiang, L.; Wong, K.L.; Long, N.J. Ligand design strategies to increase stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Suchy, M.; Li, A.X.; Milne, M.; Bartha, R.; Hudson, R.H.E. DOTMA-based amides (DOTMAMs) as a platform for the development of PARACEST MRI contrast agents. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 62647–62655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aime, S.; Botta, M.; Garda, Z.; Kucera, B.E.; Tircso, G.; Young, V.G.; Woods, M. Properties, solution state behavior, and crystal structures of chelates of DOTMA. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 7955–7965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cohen, R.; Vugts, D.J.; Stigter-van Walsum, M.; Visser, G.W.; van Dongen, G.A. Inert coupling of IRDye800CW and zirconium-89 to monoclonal antibodies for single- or dual-mode fluorescence and PET imaging. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1010–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Waterhouse, R.N. Determination of lipophilicity and its use as a predictor of blood-brain barrier penetration of molecular imaging agents. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2003, 5, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Deschamps-Labat, L.; Pehourcq, F.; Jagou, M.; Bannwarth, B. Relationship between lipophilicity and binding to human serum albumin of arylpropionic acid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1997, 16, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kuga, N.; Shikano, N.; Takamura, N.; Nishii, R.; Yamasaki, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Nagamachi, S.; Tamura, S.; Kawai, K. Competitive displacement of serum protein binding of radiopharmaceuticals with amino acid infusion investigated with N-isopropyl-p-123I-iodoamphetamine. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1378–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rossin, R.; van Duijnhoven, S.M.; Lappchen, T.; van den Bosch, S.M.; Robillard, M.S. Trans-cyclooctene tag with improved properties for tumor pretargeting with the diels-alder reaction. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11, 3090–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. van Onzen, A.; Versteegen, R.M.; Hoeben, F.J.M.; Filot, I.A.W.; Rossin, R.; Zhu, T.; Wu, J.; Hudson, P.J.; Janssen, H.M.; Ten Hoeve, W.; et al. Bioorthogonal Tetrazine Carbamate Cleavage by Highly Reactive trans-Cyclooctene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 10955–10963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Versteegen, R.M.; Rossin, R.; ten Hoeve, W.; Janssen, H.M.; Robillard, M.S. Click to release: Instantaneous doxorubicin elimination upon tetrazine ligation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52, 14112–14116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Versteegen, R.M.; Ten Hoeve, W.; Rossin, R.; de Geus, M.A.R.; Janssen, H.M.; Robillard, M.S. Click-to-Release from trans-Cyclooctenes: Mechanistic Insights and Expansion of Scope from Established Carbamate to Remarkable Ether Cleavage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 10494–10499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zeglis, B.M.; Davis, C.B.; Abdel-Atti, D.; Carlin, S.D.; Chen, A.; Aggeler, R.; Agnew, B.J.; Lewis, J.S. Chemoenzymatic strategy for the synthesis of site-specifically labeled immunoconjugates for multimodal PET and optical imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2014, 25, 2123–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zeglis, B.M.; Davis, C.B.; Aggeler, R.; Kang, H.C.; Chen, A.; Agnew, B.J.; Lewis, J.S. Enzyme-mediated methodology for the site-specific radiolabeling of antibodies based on catalyst-free click chemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zeglis, B.M.; Emmetiere, F.; Pillarsetty, N.; Weissleder, R.; Lewis, J.S.; Reiner, T. Building Blocks for the Construction of Bioorthogonally Reactive Peptides via Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis. ChemistryOpen 2014, 3, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Adumeau, P.; Vivier, D.; Sharma, S.K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T.; Chen, A.; Agnew, B.J.; Zeglis, B.M. Site-Specifically Labeled Antibody-Drug Conjugate for Simultaneous Therapy and ImmunoPET. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. van Duijnhoven, S.M.; Rossin, R.; van den Bosch, S.M.; Wheatcroft, M.P.; Hudson, P.J.; Robillard, M.S. Diabody Pretargeting with Click Chemistry In Vivo. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 1422–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Barich, D.H.; Gorman, E.M.; Zell, M.T.; Munson, E.J. 3-Methylglutaric acid as a C solid-state NMR standard. Solid. State Nucl. Mag. 2006, 30, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bertani, P.; Raya, J.; Bechinger, B. N chemical shift referencing in solid state NMR. Solid. State Nucl. Mag. 2014, 61–62, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of polyazamacrocycles and their 89Zr-complexes. Since single crystal x-ray crystallography was not performed on Zr-DOTMA, the atomic connectivity of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA is a proposed structure based upon solid-state NMR analysis and DFT calculations.
Figure 1. Structures of polyazamacrocycles and their 89Zr-complexes. Since single crystal x-ray crystallography was not performed on Zr-DOTMA, the atomic connectivity of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA is a proposed structure based upon solid-state NMR analysis and DFT calculations.
Molecules 30 04129 g001
Figure 2. DFT-optimized structures of Zr-DOTMA and Zr-DOTA. Asterix (*) denotes the position of the additional methyl groups of the Zr-DOTMA structure. Calculations and modelling support an octa-coordinate coordination environment, which is very similar to the coordination environment of Zr-DOTA. Bond lengths and angles vary by 0.003 Å and 0.09°, respectively. Legend: gray, carbon; white, hydrogen; blue, nitrogen; red, oxygen; teal, zirconium.
Figure 2. DFT-optimized structures of Zr-DOTMA and Zr-DOTA. Asterix (*) denotes the position of the additional methyl groups of the Zr-DOTMA structure. Calculations and modelling support an octa-coordinate coordination environment, which is very similar to the coordination environment of Zr-DOTA. Bond lengths and angles vary by 0.003 Å and 0.09°, respectively. Legend: gray, carbon; white, hydrogen; blue, nitrogen; red, oxygen; teal, zirconium.
Molecules 30 04129 g002
Scheme 1. Radiochemical synthesis of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA using [89Zr]ZrCl4.
Scheme 1. Radiochemical synthesis of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA using [89Zr]ZrCl4.
Molecules 30 04129 sch001
Figure 3. Quality control of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA by radio-HPLC. UV-HPLC chromatogram (201 nm) of un-complexed ligand DOTMA (top) compared with radio-HPLC chromatogram of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (bottom). HPLC analysis revealed a peak with a retention time of 8.37 min in the radio-chromatogram. This retention time was distinct from the peak associated with the DOTMA ligand that was observed in the UV–vis chromatogram and suggested formation of the radiometal complex.
Figure 3. Quality control of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA by radio-HPLC. UV-HPLC chromatogram (201 nm) of un-complexed ligand DOTMA (top) compared with radio-HPLC chromatogram of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (bottom). HPLC analysis revealed a peak with a retention time of 8.37 min in the radio-chromatogram. This retention time was distinct from the peak associated with the DOTMA ligand that was observed in the UV–vis chromatogram and suggested formation of the radiometal complex.
Molecules 30 04129 g003
Figure 4. In vitro serum stability by HPLC. UV-SE-HPLC (220 nm, black) and radio-SE-HPLC chromatogram (red) of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (top) and [89Zr]ZrCl4 (bottom) in serum after 7 days. Black lines are the UV absorbance due to the human serum components, and red lines are the radiotracer associated with 89Zr complexes. The radiometal complex elutes at approximately 39 min. This retention time is distinct from the retention times associated with serum proteins or [89Zr]ZrCl4 and suggests that the radiometal complex is inert to transchelation by serum proteins.
Figure 4. In vitro serum stability by HPLC. UV-SE-HPLC (220 nm, black) and radio-SE-HPLC chromatogram (red) of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (top) and [89Zr]ZrCl4 (bottom) in serum after 7 days. Black lines are the UV absorbance due to the human serum components, and red lines are the radiotracer associated with 89Zr complexes. The radiometal complex elutes at approximately 39 min. This retention time is distinct from the retention times associated with serum proteins or [89Zr]ZrCl4 and suggests that the radiometal complex is inert to transchelation by serum proteins.
Molecules 30 04129 g004
Figure 5. Biodistribution comparison of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA with [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and [89Zr]Zr-DFO in select tissues. While retention in the blood pool was slightly higher than that of [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and [89Zr]Zr-DFO, the excretion profile of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA from the liver, kidney, and bone were better than the excretion profiles of [89Zr]Zr-DFO and similar to [89Zr]Zr-DOTA. These data suggest that [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA may be ultra-stable in vivo and, like [89Zr]Zr-DOTA, may be useful in the radiolabeling of peptides and antibodies with zirconium-89. The complete biodistribution of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA is depicted in Table S7 of the Supplementary Materials. [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and [89Zr]Zr-DFO data are reproduced from ref. [10].
Figure 5. Biodistribution comparison of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA with [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and [89Zr]Zr-DFO in select tissues. While retention in the blood pool was slightly higher than that of [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and [89Zr]Zr-DFO, the excretion profile of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA from the liver, kidney, and bone were better than the excretion profiles of [89Zr]Zr-DFO and similar to [89Zr]Zr-DOTA. These data suggest that [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA may be ultra-stable in vivo and, like [89Zr]Zr-DOTA, may be useful in the radiolabeling of peptides and antibodies with zirconium-89. The complete biodistribution of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA is depicted in Table S7 of the Supplementary Materials. [89Zr]Zr-DOTA and [89Zr]Zr-DFO data are reproduced from ref. [10].
Molecules 30 04129 g005
Table 1. Chronological stability study of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA in EDTA (pH 5 and pH 7) maintained at 37 °C for 7 days and analyzed by radio-ITLC (n = 3 at each pH and time point).
Table 1. Chronological stability study of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA in EDTA (pH 5 and pH 7) maintained at 37 °C for 7 days and analyzed by radio-ITLC (n = 3 at each pH and time point).
ComplexEDTApH% Intact of [89Zr]Zr-Complex (n = 3)
0 h1 d3 d5 d7 d
[89Zr]Zr-DOTMA100-fold7.0≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
5.0≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
500-fold7.0≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
5.0≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
1000-fold7.0≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
5.0≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
Table 2. Chronological stability study of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA during metal ion competition study (PBS, pH 7.4) maintained at 37 °C for 7 days and analyzed by radio-ITLC (n = 3 for each metal and time point).
Table 2. Chronological stability study of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA during metal ion competition study (PBS, pH 7.4) maintained at 37 °C for 7 days and analyzed by radio-ITLC (n = 3 for each metal and time point).
Time PointComplex% Intact of [89Zr]Zr-Complex (n = 3)
Fe3+Zn2+Co2+Cu2+Mg2+Gd3+Ga3+
0 h[89Zr]Zr-DOTMA ≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
1 d≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
3 d≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
5 d≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
7 d≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99≥99.99
Table 3. Chronological in vitro serum stability study of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA in human serum maintained at 37 °C for 7 days as determined by size exclusion chromatography and radio-ITLC (n = 3 at each time point).
Table 3. Chronological in vitro serum stability study of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA in human serum maintained at 37 °C for 7 days as determined by size exclusion chromatography and radio-ITLC (n = 3 at each time point).
Time Point% Intact of [89Zr]Zr-DOTMA (n = 3)
Radio-SE-HPLCRadio-ITLC
0 h≥99.99≥99.99
1 d≥99.99≥99.99
3 d≥99.99≥99.99
5 d≥99.99≥99.99
7 d99.9 ± 0.1≥99.99
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pandya, D.N.; Miro, P.; Sinnwell, M.A.; Crull, G.B.; Wadas, T.J. The Evaluation of (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-Tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic Acid (DOTMA) as a Chelator for Zirconium-89. Molecules 2025, 30, 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30204129

AMA Style

Pandya DN, Miro P, Sinnwell MA, Crull GB, Wadas TJ. The Evaluation of (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-Tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic Acid (DOTMA) as a Chelator for Zirconium-89. Molecules. 2025; 30(20):4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30204129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pandya, Darpan N., Pere Miro, Michael A. Sinnwell, George B. Crull, and Thaddeus J. Wadas. 2025. "The Evaluation of (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-Tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic Acid (DOTMA) as a Chelator for Zirconium-89" Molecules 30, no. 20: 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30204129

APA Style

Pandya, D. N., Miro, P., Sinnwell, M. A., Crull, G. B., & Wadas, T. J. (2025). The Evaluation of (1R,4R,7R,10R)-α,α′,α″,α‴-Tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic Acid (DOTMA) as a Chelator for Zirconium-89. Molecules, 30(20), 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30204129

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop