Next Article in Journal
Storage and Ripening Monitoring of Pecorino Cheese Through 2D 1H-NMR Relaxation and ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (ASCA): A Comparison with DSC and ATR-FTIR Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
Tricyclic Isatin Derivatives as Anti-Inflammatory Compounds with High Kinase Binding Affinity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intraspecific Variability of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Occurring in Poland in Respect of Developmental and Chemical Traits

1
Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Environmental Protection and Dendrology, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(14), 2915; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30142915
Submission received: 14 June 2025 / Revised: 3 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the intraspecific variability among 11 wild-growing populations of wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) originating from Central Europe and preserved in the Polish Genebank Collection. The populations were introduced into ex situ conditions, and assessed in terms of selected developmental and chemical traits (essential oil, phenolic acids, polyphenols, and tannins content). Developmental observations and harvest of raw materials were carried out in the second year of plant vegetation, at the beginning of flowering. The populations exhibited significant differences. The greatest variability was observed in the number of shoots per plant (38–51) and dry mass of herb per plant (0.83–1.60 kg). Essential oil (EO) content ranged from 0.75 to 1.69 g/100 g dry weight (DW). A total of 41 compounds were identified in the EOs, with oxygenated monoterpenes (such as sabinyl acetate, cis-chrysanthenol, chrysantenyl acetate, 1,8-cineole, α- and β-thujone) as dominants, showing considerable variation among populations. Based on the EO profiles, several chemotypes were distinguished, mainly (1) a pure sabinyl acetate chemotype; (2) mixed chemotypes with sabinyl acetate accompanied by β-myrcene, cis-chrysanthenol, chrysanthenyl acetate, or 1,8-cineole; and (3) a thujone chemotype. The total content of phenolic acids (expressed as caffeic acid equivalent), tannins, and polyphenols (as pyrogallol equivalent) varied significantly, too (0.37–0.50; 0.10–0.26; 0.58–0.79%, respectively). The results confirm a high level of intraspecific variability in both developmental and chemical traits of A. absinthium populations originating from Poland. This diversity may be valuable for future breeding programs and for the selection of populations with desired phytochemical profiles for medicinal, food, and agricultural applications. It is worth noting that the floristic diversity among populations indicates the habitat heterogeneity, ranging from natural or semi-natural (populations 1, 6) to more anthropogenically influenced ones (populations 2, 4, 5, 7–11).

1. Introduction

Plants belonging to the genus Artemisia (Asteraceae family) are widely distributed throughout the temperate zone of Europe and Asia. These perennials were also introduced to other parts of the world, especially North America and Australia. Several Artemisia species have been recognized as important medicinal plants, such as A. annua, A. dracunculus, A. vulgaris, and A. absinthium [1,2]. Among these, Artemisia absinthium, commonly known as wormwood, is the most widely investigated. Its aerial parts (herb; Absinthi herba), described in a European Pharmacopoeia (EP) monograph, are traditionally used to stimulate appetite and improve digestion [3,4]. The herb is particularly rich in EO, the content of which, according to EP requirements, should not be lower than 2 mL per kg [3]. The EO, chemically quite variable, is composed mainly of the following: α-thujone, β-thujone, β-pinene, sabinene, cis-epoxyocimene, sabinyl acetate, chrysanthenol, chrysanthenyl acetate, nerolidol, and chamazulene [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The raw material also contains significant amounts of non-volatile sesquiterpene derivatives, specifically sesquiterpene lactones of the guaianolide type (absinthin, anabsinthin, artabsinthin, matricin) and the pelenolide type (arabsin, artabin). Among these, absinthin, present at a level of 0.20–0.28%, is responsible for the herb’s characteristic bitter taste [4,10]. Other important constituents are phenolics, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, and coumarins. The most abundant phenolic acids are caffeoylquinic, dicaffeoylquinic, vanillic, coumaric, syringic, and chlorogenic acids. Flavonoids are mainly represented by artemetin, homorientin, quercetin, isorhamnetin, and their derivatives, while tannins are mainly represented by epigallocatechin gallate. Among coumarins, isofraxidine and scopolin have been identified here [1,4,25,26,27].
Wormwood exhibits digestive, choleretic, antispasmodic, carminative, hepatoprotective, and gastroprotective activity. The herb, considered as aromatica amara, is traditionally used to prepare tea infusions and alcoholic tinctures, applied mainly in the case of gastrointestinal disorders (flatulence, cramps) as a bitter aromatic medicine for temporary loss of appetite and to stimulate bile secretion in liver diseases [1,4,28]. Furthermore, wormwood herb exhibits antimicrobial, antioxidant, antipyretic, analgesic, anti-atherosclerotic, and anti-inflammatory activity [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. It also demonstrates antiparasitic, especially anthelmintic, activity, resulting from the presence of α- and β-thujone [41,42]. However, due to the neurotoxic properties of these compounds, wormwood herb should be used only for a short period and in doses not exceeding the recommended limits. Toxicological studies of thujone are summarized, i.a., in the Public Statement on the use of herbal medicinal products containing thujone (EMA/HMPC/732886/2012) [43,44,45].
Given its broad spectrum of biological activity, the use of Absinthi herba is also recommended in veterinary practice, both internally, as a feed additive to prevent and treat gastrointestinal disorders, and externally against skin parasites such as lice and scabies [35,38,40,41,42]. Due to its strong antimicrobial activity, it is considered as a natural fungicide, effective mainly against Fusarium, Alternaria, and Botrytis strains [46,47]. Moreover, extracts from this plant have been shown to have insecticidal and repellent activity against Sitophilus granarius and Rhyzopertha dominica [48]. Due to its versatile applications, the plant has recently become the object of interest of various industries, especially the phytopharmaceutical, food, and agricultural sectors [1,2,28,29].
In Poland, wormwood herb is collected both from cultivation and, more commonly, from wild-growing plants [49,50]. The species grows naturally in various habitats, in a wide range of ecological conditions, mainly in grasslands, meadows, and ruderal and segetal communities. From a phytosociological perspective, wormwood is a characteristic species of the Onopordetalia acanthii order within the Artemisietea vulgaris class [51,52]. As mentioned earlier, the species is highly polymorphic. Raw materials collected from wild-growing plants are chemically heterogeneous, especially in terms of EO composition what may reduce its commercial quality. On the other hand, wild-growing populations can be a valuable source of genotypes useful for future breeding programs, particularly when searching for non-thujone forms [53].
The aim of the present work was to determine intraspecific variability of Artemisia absinthium growing wild in Poland in terms of developmental traits as well as the content and composition of biologically active compounds (essential oil, phenolic acids, polyphenols, and tannins) in the herb.

2. Results and Discussion

The phytosociological analysis indicates the heterogeneous character of wormwood plant communities (Table 1). Based on the species composition, two main types of communities may be distinguished here: ruderal/synanthropic communities, as well as sandy grasslands. In the frame of the first group, the presence of species such as Oenothera biennis, Echium vulgare, Melilotus officinalis, Verbascum thapsus, and Artemisia absinthium allow us to classify populations 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 as comprising the Oenopordetalia acanthi order within the Artemisietea vulgaris class. This type of plant community, characteristic for a wormwood occurrence, usually develops on sites disturbed by human activity [51,52]. In turn, populations 1 and 6 represent more natural or semi-natural dry habitats (sandy grasslands), with typical species such as Thymus serpyllum, Helichrysum arenarium, and Sedum acre. Populations 3 and 11 show species typical for meadow and ruderal communities, including nitrophilous plants such as Urtica dioica (Table 1).
The investigated populations varied in terms of developmental traits (Table 2). In general, the greatest variation was observed in the number of shoots per plant and internode length, whereas plant height and inflorescence length showed more uniformity across populations. The average plant height was at a level of 173.7 cm, with the highest plants observed in population 11 (196.0 ± 10.6 cm), which differed visibly from population 8 (165.2 ± 4.6 cm). Regarding the number of shoots per plant, a wide range (from 38 to 51) was noticed, followed by a high coefficient of variation (35.02%), indicating considerable variability within populations. Internode length varied from 21 mm in population 8 to 33 mm in population 1. Inflorescence length was relatively uniform across populations, with no significant differences observed. Here, the mean inflorescence length was 91.2 cm, with the longest recorded in populations 4 (112.7 ± 19.2 cm) and 11 (108.8 ± 13.6 cm) (Table 2). Such variability in morphological and developmental traits is typical for wild-growing plants, where phenotypic variation reflects their adaptation to the environment [49]. Moreover, features such as height, shoot number, and inflorescence length can be important from a practical viewpoint, since they affect the yield of herb and its mechanical harvest.
Both the mass of dry herb and grated herb exhibited relatively high variability within populations; however, these results were not statistically important (Table 3). The average dry herb mass per plant was at a level of 1.15 kg, with individual population values ranging from 0.83 kg (population 3) to 1.60 kg (population 6). Mass of grated herb, being a commercial raw material, was also variable: population 6 was characterized by the highest mass of grated herb (0.51 kg), and populations 1 and 2 by the lowest (0.26 kg) (Table 3).
Among examined wormwood populations, the content of EO varied from 0.94 to 1.69 g/100 g. Populations 7, 10, and 11 showed the highest content of this substance (1.47; 1.41; 1.69 g/100 g, respectively), visibly exceeding that in populations 1, 2, and 3 (0.94; 0.75 g/100 g) (Table 4). It is worth noting that according to EP requirements, EO content in wormwood herb should be not lower than 0.2 g/100 g [3]. Lachenmeier et al. (2006) claim that the amount of this substance ranges from 0.2% to 1.5% [45]. According to Juteau et al. (2003), the main factors influencing its accumulation are geographical origin of the population, stage of plant development, and the type of raw material. The authors noticed that the content of EO in wormwood herb decreases from the full blooming (0.68%) to the post-flowering stage (0.56%) of plant vegetation. Moreover, the upper part of flowering shoots contains 2–3 more EOs in comparison to lower parts [8].
In the present work, 41 compounds were detected in the EOs, comprising 81.02% to 97.18% of the whole fraction, depending on the population (Table 5). Identified compounds were classified as monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, both in the form of hydrocarbons and oxygenated derivatives, as well as other group such as esters, alcohols, and aldehydes, present in minor concentrations. The oxygenated monoterpenes were a fundamental part, accounting for 41.10% (population 4) to 90.34% (population 8) of the total EOs. The main oxygenated monoterpenes included 1,8-cineole, sabinyl acetate, cis-chrysanthenol, and chrysantenyl acetate as well as α- and β-thujone. Their content exhibited remarkable variations depending on the population. The content of 1,8-cineole ranged from 0.47 to 40.64%, and was predominant in both populations 3 (40.64%) and 5 (28.93%). Sabinyl acetate was found as highly abundant in populations 11 (76.02%), 7 (56.80%), 8 (41.91%), 6 (39.02%), 10 (30.77%), and 1 (17.37%), being nearly absent in the others. Cis-chrysanthenol was present in significant amount in populations 1 (32.09%) and 2 (49.48%) while its derivative chrysanthenol acetate was present only in population 8 (19.83%). Regarding the two isomers of thujone, α-thujone and β-thujone, both were present in remarkable amounts only in population 9 (19.31% and 19.26%, respectively). Monoterpene hydrocarbons varied among populations, ranging from 1.26% in population 8 to 44.04% in population 4. Major compounds in this group included β-myrcene, with the highest concentrations recorded in populations 4 (25.76%) and 5 (16.33%). Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated sesquiterpenes were present in smaller quantities, usually below 4%, with slight variability between populations. Among the more significant compounds in this group were caryophyllene, α-humulene, and β-copaene (Table 5).
Taking into account such a variable composition of the EOs, several chemotypes may be distinguished within the examined wormwood populations. Here, populations 11 and 7 may be qualified as a pure sabinyl acetate chemotype. Populations 1, 6, 8, and 10 constitute mixed chemotypes where sabinyl acetate is accompanied by β-myrcene, cis-chrysanthenol, chrysanthenyl acetete, and 1,8-cineole. Population 9 alone represents a mixed chemotype dominated by thujones followed by cis-chrysanthenol. Finally, populations 2, 3, 4, and 5 represent mixed chemotypes with β-myrcene, 1,8-cineole, cis-chrysanthenol, and cis-epoxyocymene as dominants (Figure 1).
The obtained results are in good agreement with the literature data and confirm the highly variable character of wormwood. The chemical diversity of wormwood essential oil is well established, with numerous studies confirming that both genetic and environmental factors, as well as plant developmental stage and organ specificity, contribute to its pronounced polymorphism [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
Globally, α-thujone and β-thujone are often regarded as the most frequent dominant compounds in wormwood EO, yet this is only one aspect of a highly diverse species. In Central Europe, at least four main chemotypes have been identified: α- and β-thujone, sabinene and β-myrcene, cis-epoxyocimene, and sabinyl acetate [11,12,26]. Regional differences are worth noting; for example, in Lithuania, thujones and trans-sabinyl acetate predominate, whereas in Poland, sabinyl acetate, chrysanthenyl acetate, and sabinene chemotypes are most common, with β-thujone-dominant types occurring only rarely [11,26]. In France, EO profiles can be dominated by cis-chrysanthenol or cis-epoxyocimene, while in the Spanish Pyrenees, cis-epoxyocimene (up to 49.7%) or its combination with cis-chrysanthenyl acetate (up to 36.7%) is typical. Italian and Spanish populations may also contain significant levels of 1,8-cineole (18.0%), carvone (18.5%), thymol (10.8%), and carvacrol (9.7%) [13,14]. Recent comprehensive analyses confirm that the chemotype spectrum in A. absinthium is even broader. For instance, Raal et al. (2024) examined commercial EO samples from 14 European countries, identifying 41 compounds and revealing that while monoterpenes and their derivatives dominate, the quantitative composition varies widely. Pure chemotypes such as E-sabinyl acetate and E-epoxyocymene were observed, as well as numerous mixed chemotypes, with major constituents differing even within a single country. This variability is not strictly associated with geographic or altitudinal gradients, indicating a complex interplay of factors shaping EO profiles [15].
Outside Europe, Egyptian wormwood is characterized by high α-phellandrene and terpinen-4-ol content, and Iranian populations may be rich in β-pinene [16,17]. A particularly instructive example of environmental impact comes from Tunisia, where Riahi et al. (2015) investigated A. absinthium from four bioclimatic zones ranging from humid to arid. They found high qualitative and quantitative variation in EO composition depending on locality. For example, plants from the Inferior Arid region (Gafsa) had chamazulene, α-thujone, and camphor as main constituents, while those from the humid zone (Ghar Dimaou) were characterized by high camphor, Z-sabinene hydrate, and 1-terpinen-4-ol. The antioxidant activity of the essential oils also increased significantly from humid to arid zones, correlating with higher thujone and chamazulene content in arid environments. These results highlight that both environmental and genetic factors shape the chemotype and biological activity of wormwood EO, and that adaptation to local stressors (such as drought) may drive the synthesis of specific bioactive compounds [18].
Environmental conditions and developmental stages significantly influence EO composition as well. Malaspina et al. (2025) demonstrated that both geographical location and phenological stage (vegetative versus flowering) can shift the dominant chemical classes in the essential oil. For example, in Northern Italy, oxygenated monoterpenes prevailed, while in Southern Italy, oxygenated sesquiterpenes or monoterpene hydrocarbons dominated depending on the developmental stage. The main EO constituents also changed: myroxide and 3,6-dihydrochamazulene were abundant in Cogne, whereas camphor, davanone, β-myrcene, and β-phellandrene were prominent in Ogliastro [19].
Organ- and stage-specific differences are also significant. Nguyen et al. (2018) showed that EO content is generally higher in flowers than in leaves, and the proportions of key compounds such as thujones and sabinyl acetate change during plant development. In thujone chemotypes, α- and β-thujone are most abundant at early stages and decrease after flowering, while in trans-sabinyl acetate chemotypes, this ester declines over time with a concomitant increase in thujones post flowering. These changes are primarily quantitative, but qualitative differences between organs and stages were also observed [20].
Investigated populations were differentiated by the content of phenolic compounds, including polyphenols, tannins, and phenolic acids (Table 4). Average polyphenols content reached 0.66 g/100 g (CV = 11.77%), with populations 5 and 6 characterized by their highest level (0.79 g/100 g), and populations 2, 9, and 11 characterized by the lowest (around 0.58–0.60 g/100 g). The content of polyphenols in wormwood was investigated earlier by other authors [25,26,28]. In our work, phenolic acids content was at a level of 0.42 g/100 g with moderate variability (CV = 13.04%), with populations 1 and 9 distinguished by the highest amount of these compounds (0.50 g/100 g). Tannin content was more variable (CV = 28.04%), ranging from 0.10 g/100 g in population 2 to 0.26 g/100 g in population 5 (Table 4).
In general, such chemical variability within the content of biologically active compounds is often driven by genetic differences and environmental influences, which affect their biosynthesis and accumulation in plant tissues. From a physiological perspective, both EOs and phenolics play crucial roles in plant stress responses [54,55,56]. These compounds contribute to antioxidative protection by scavenging reactive oxygen species generated under abiotic stresses like drought, UV radiation, and temperature extremes, as well as biotic stresses such as pathogen attack. Tannins and EO, in particular, may inhibit microbial (including bacteria and fungi) growth, enhancing plant survival in wild habitats [54,55,56,57,58,59]. The reported coefficients of variation indicate that both tannin and EO content in the examined populations is particularly variable (CV = 28.04 and 23.89%, respectively), suggesting that these classes of compounds are responsive to environmental factors. In turn, polyphenols and phenolic acids showed moderate but statistically significant variation (CV = 11.77% and 13.04%, respectively).
The observed variability provides opportunities for selecting wormwood populations with desirable traits for cultivation and commercial use, both medicinal and non-medicinal. The medicinal properties of the abovementioned phenolic compounds present in wormwood herb are well-documented. They are considered mainly as strong antioxidants, exhibiting also antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and astringent activities [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Therefore, populations 5 and 6 with an elevated content of polyphenols and tannins appeared to be valuable from a medicinal viewpoint. Given the EO content, all populations meet or even exceed European Pharmacopoeia standards [3]. Due to the biological activity of sabinyl acetate, both pure and mixed chemotypes with this as the dominant compound may contribute to medicinal, e.g., antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory, applications [60,61]. However, the use of the thujone-rich chemotype (population 9), due to its neurotoxic activity, would be limited for direct human consumption. Nevertheless, thujone’s strong repellent activity against pests and bactericidal effects on phytopathogens make it valuable biopesticide in organic crop protection [62,63,64].
To sum up, our results indicate that population 6 stands out as the most promising candidate for practical applications. This population achieved the highest average dry herb mass per plant (1.60 kg) and the highest mass of grated herb (0.51 kg). The essential oil content in this population, reaching 1.21 g/100 g, exceeds the minimum requirements set by the European Pharmacopoeia. From a quality perspective, population 6 represents a mixed sabinyl acetate chemotype, characterized by a high proportion of sabinyl acetate (39.02%) and a favorable profile of oxygenated monoterpenes, while maintaining a low content of thujones. Additionally, population 6 is distinguished by a high content of polyphenols (0.79 g/100 g) and an elevated tannin level (0.22 g/100 g), both of which are associated with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, enhancing the therapeutic and functional value of the raw material. All these makes population 6 particularly attractive for cultivation and further breeding.

3. Materials and Methods

The objects of the study were 11 wormwood populations originating from northern-east and central Poland, introduced to ex situ conditions (Table 6, Figure 2). At each natural site the basic floristic observations were carried out [51,52].

3.1. Field Experiment

In 2023, at each identified natural site, the seedlings of wormwood (young plants in the vegetative stage) were collected in order to establish a field experiment. The research was conducted in an experimental field of Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, WULS-SGGW, on alluvial soil. On a single plot, 15 seedlings were planted out, with a spacing of 50 × 80 cm. The developmental observations and harvest of raw material was carried out in the second year of plant vegetation (2024), at the beginning of blooming (July). The collected herb was dried at 35 °C and grated herb was subjected to chemical analysis. Soil characteristics and climatic parameters of the 2024 vegetation season were recorded (Table 7 and Table 8). During the vegetation season, irrigation was applied when required to maintain optimal soil moisture.
The voucher specimens of the populations’ seeds collected in natural habitats are kept in the National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources (Polish GeneBank), while representative plants are kept in the living collection of medicinal and aromatic plants of the Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants.

3.2. Developmental Characteristics

Directly before the harvest of raw materials, the following measurements of plants were performed: plant height (cm), number of shoots per plant, length of the internode (mm), and length of inflorescence (cm). Dry mass of herb and mass of grated herb (kg/plant) were determined, as well. At each population, the observations were conducted on 15 plants.

3.3. Chemical Analysis

3.3.1. Essential Oil Content

A total of 30 g of air-dried raw material was obtained by 2 h hydro-distillation using the Clevenger-type apparatus (Chemland, Warsaw, Poland). The content of EO was expressed as g/100 g of dry weight (DW). Essential oils were collected and stored in amber vials, at 4 °C.

3.3.2. Analysis of Essential Oils by GC/MS

The qualitative GC-MS analysis was carried out using Shimadzu GC2050 (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with autosampler AOC30i (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and polar column SH-PolarWax-MS (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) (30 m; 0.25 mm; 0.25 µm). The operating conditions were as follows: oven temperature 2 min. isothermal at 60 °C, then rising at 4 °C per min to 210 °C and held isothermal for 5 min. Injector temperature: 210 °C. The carrier gas (He) flow was 1.1 mL·min−1. The split ratio was 1:20. Diluted samples (5/1000 v/v, in n-hexane) of 1 μL were injected at 210 °C by auto sampler. Ion source temperature −220 °C, ionization voltage 70 eV. Mass spectra were scanned in the range 40–500 amu. Essential oil compounds identification was based on comparison of mass spectra from the Mass Spectral Database, i.e., NIST20R and FNSSC, and on comparison of retention indices (RI) relative to retention times of a series of n-hydrocarbons (C7–C30) with those reported in literature [65].

3.3.3. Total Content of Phenolic Acids

The analyses were carried out according to Polish Pharmacopeia 6th ed. [66]. Measurement of phenolic acids content was carried out by Arnov’s method. A total of 1 g of air-dried, powdered raw material was extracted twice with portions of 25 mL of distilled water (a total of 50 mL), with shaking at room temperature for 30 min each time (a total of 1 h). Cumulated extract was completed to 50 mL with distilled water. A total of 1 mL of extract was mixed with 5 mL of distilled water, 1 mL 0.5 M HCl, 1 mL of Arnov reagent (10 g of sodium molybdate and 10 g of sodium nitrite dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water), and 1 mL 1 M NaOH and subsequently diluted to 10 mL with distilled water. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm for both basic (with extract) and comparison (without extract) solutions. The total phenolic acid content was expressed as caffeic acid equivalent (g/100 g DW).

3.3.4. Total Content of Tannins and Polyphenols

The analysis was carried out according to Polish Pharmacopoeia 6th ed. [66]. Total tannin content was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method. A total of 1 g of air-dried, powdered raw material was extracted with 150 mL of distilled water for 30 min. The mixture was cooled, transferred to a 250 mL volumetric flask, and made up to volume with water. After sedimentation, the extract was filtered, discarding the first 50 mL. For the determination of total polyphenols, 5 mL of filtrate was diluted to 25 mL with water. A total of 2 mL of this solution was mixed with 1 mL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, 10 mL water, and completed to 25 mL with sodium carbonate solution (290 g/L). Absorbance (A1) was measured at 760 nm after 30 min. For non-tannin polyphenols, 10 mL of filtrate was shaken with 0.1 g hide powder for 1 h, filtered, and 5 mL was diluted to 25 mL with water. A total of 2 mL of this solution was treated as above and absorbance (A2) was measured. For the standard, 50 mg pyrogallol was dissolved in 100 mL water, 5 mL was diluted to 100 mL, and 2 mL was treated as above and absorbance (A3) measured. After recalculation, the results were expressed as pyrogallol equivalents (g/100 g DW).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to a statistical analysis using the Statistica 12 software (Krakow, Poland). All observations and analysis were performed min. in triplicate. The mean values were compared using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and expressed as mean with standard deviation (±SD). The differences between individual means were signed as different letters and considered to be significant at p < 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify the main components of the essential oil and to differentiate amongst population groups according to their chemical similarity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30142915/s1, Figure S1. Natural site of population 1; Figure S2. Natural site of population 2; Figure S3. Natural site of population 3; Figure S4. Natural site of population 5; Figure S5. Natural site of population 7; Figure S6. Natural site of population 11; Figure S7. Young plants of wormwood in the vegetative stage (seedling); Figure S8. Seedlings preparation; Figure S9. Well-rooted seedlings; Figure S10. Plantation establishment; Figure S11. Plants in the first year of the vegetation; Figure S12. Plants in the second year of the vegetation; Figure S13. EO chromatogram of population 4; Figure S14. EO chromatogram of population 9; Figure S15. EO chromatogram of population 10; Table S1. One-way Analysis of Variance parameters (DF—the degrees of freedom; SS—the sum of squares; MS—the mean sum of squares; F—the F-statistic; P—the p-value).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. and K.B.; methodology, Z.W. and O.K.; software, S.S.; validation, O.K.; formal analysis, O.K. and A.Ż.; investigation, O.K., Z.W., A.Ż. and K.B.; resources, O.K. and K.B.; data curation, O.K. and E.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, O.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.W. and K.B.; visualization, O.K. and S.S.; supervision, K.B.; project administration, K.B.; funding acquisition, K.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The studies was supported by the Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development within IHAR-SGGW research agreement; Task 1.2.: “Characterization and ex situ conservation of genetic resources of medicinal and spice plants (including aromatic plants)”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bora, K.S.; Sharma, A. The Genus Artemisia: A Comprehensive Review. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bordean, M.-E.; Martis, G.S.; Pop, A.; Ungur, R.; Borda, I.M.; Buican, B.-C.; Muste, S. Artemisia Species: Traditional Uses and Importance in Pharmacology. Hop Med. Plants 2022, 30, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Health Care (EDQM). European Pharmacopoeia, 9th ed.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wichtl, M. Herbal Drugs and Phytopharmaceuticals: A Handbook of Practice on a Scientific Basis, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Stuttgart, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lis, A. Najcenniejsze Olejki Eteryczne Część II; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej: Łódź, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Llorens-Molina, J.A.; Vacas, S.; Castell, V.; Németh-Zámboriné, É. Variability of Essential Oil Composition of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Affected by Plant Organ. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2016, 29, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Msaada, K.; Salem, M.; Bachrouch, O.; Bousselmi, S.; Tammar, S.; Alfaify, A.; Al Sane, K.; Ammar, W.B.; Azeiz, S.; Brahim, A.H.; et al. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Essential Oils and Phenolics. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 804658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Juteau, F.; Jerkovic, I.; Masotti, V.; Milos, M.; Mastelic, J.; Bessière, J.M.; Viano, J. Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil of Artemisia absinthium from Croatia and France. Planta Med. 2003, 69, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohammadi, A.; Ahmadzadeh Sani, T.; Ameri, A.A.; Imani, M.; Golmakani, E.; Kamali, H. Seasonal Variation in the Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Total Phenolic Content of Artemisia absinthium Essential Oils. Pharmacogn. Res. 2015, 7, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kiss, A.; Filipek, A.; Parzonko, A. Lek Pochodzenia Naturalnego; PWN, PZWL Wydawnictwo Lekarskie: Warszawa, Poland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. Judzentiene, A.; Tomi, F.; Casanova, J. Analysis of Essential Oils of Artemisia absinthium L. from Lithuania by CC, GC(RI), GC-MS and 13C NMR. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Orav, A. Composition of the Essential Oil of Artemisia absinthium L. of Different Geographical Origin. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carnat, A.P.; Madesclaire, M.; Chavignon, O.; Lamaison, J.L. cis-Chrysanthenol, a Main Component in Essential Oil of Artemisia absinthium L. Growing in Auvergne (Massif Central), France. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arino, A.; Arberas, I.; Renobales, G.; Arriaga, S.; Dominguez, J.B. Essential Oil of Artemisia absinthium L. from the Spanish Pyrenees. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1999, 11, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Raal, A.; Ilina, T.; Kovalyova, A.; Orav, A.; Karileet, M.; Džaniašvili, M.; Koliadzhyn, T.; Grytsyk, A.; Koshovyi, O. Variation in the composition of the essential oil of commercial Artemisia absinthium L. herb samples from different countries. ScienceRise Pharm. Sci. 2024, 2, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aboutabl, E.A.; El Azzouny, A.M.; El Dahmy, S.I. Constituents of the Essential Oil of Artemisia absinthium Grown in Egypt. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 1998, 1, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sefidkon, F.; Jalili, A.; Rabie, M.; Hanzehee, B.; Asri, Y. Chemical composition of the essential oil of five Artemisia species from Iran. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2003, 6, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Riahi, E.; Ghazghazi, H.; Ayari, B.; Aouadhi, C.; Klay, I.; Chograni, H.; Cherif, A.; Zoghlami, N. Effect of environmental conditions on chemical polymorphism and biological activities among Artemisia absinthium L. essential oil provenances grown in Tunisia. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 66, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malaspina, P.; Polito, F.; Mainetti, A.; Khedhri, S.; De Feo, V.; Cornara, L. Exploring chemical variability in the essential oil of Artemisia absinthium L. in relation to different phenological stages and geographical location. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 19, e00743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nguyen, H.T.; Radácsi, P.; Gosztola, B.; Rajhárt, P.; Zámboriné Németh, É. Accumulation and composition of essential oil due to plant development and organs in wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 123, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bordean, M.E.; Muste, S.; Marțiș, G.; Chiș, M.S.; Beldean, B.V.; Mureșan, I.E.; Mateescu, M.A.; Buican, B.C.; Pop, A.I.; Mureșan, V. Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.): Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil. Hop Med. Plants 2020, 28, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Julio, L.F.; Burillo, J.; Giménez, C.; Cabrera, R.; Díaz, C.E.; Sanz, J.; González-Coloma, A. Chemical and biocidal characterization of two cultivated Artemisia absinthium populations with different domestication levels. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, H.T.; Radácsi, P.; Rajhárt, P.; Zámboriné Németh, É. Variability of thujone content in essential oil due to plant development and organs from Artemisia absinthium L. and Salvia officinalis L. J. Appl. Bot Food Qual. 2019, 92, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, H.T.; Inotai, K.; Radácsi, P.; Tavaszi-Sárosi, S.; Ladányi, M.; Zámboriné-Németh, É. Morphological, phytochemical and molecular characterization of intraspecific variability of wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.). J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2017, 90, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, R.; Verma, P.K.; Singh, G. Total phenolic, flavonoids and tannin contents in different extracts of Artemisia absinthium. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 1, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geszprych, A.; Przybył, J.; Kuczerenko, A.; Węglarz, Z. Diversity of wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) growing wild in Poland in respect of the content and composition of essential oil and phenolic compounds. Acta Hortic. 2011, 925, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moacă, E.A.; Pavel, I.Z.; Danciu, C.; Crăiniceanu, Z.; Minda, D.; Ardelean, F.; Antal, D.S.; Ghiulai, R.; Cioca, A.; Derban, M.; et al. Romanian Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.): Physicochemical and Nutraceutical Screening. Molecules 2019, 24, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Szopa, A.; Pajor, J.; Klin, P.; Rzepiela, A.; Elansary, H.O.; Al-Mana, F.; Mattar, M.A.; Ekiert, H. Artemisia absinthium L.—Importance in the History of Medicine, the Latest Advances in Phytochemistry and Therapeutical, Cosmetological and Culinary Uses. Plants 2020, 9, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahamad, J.; Mir, S.R.; Amin, S. A pharmacognostic review on Artemisia absinthium. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2019, 10, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boudjelal, A.; Smeriglio, A.; Ginestra, G.; Denaro, M.; Trombetta, D. Phytochemical Profile, Safety Assessment and Wound Healing Activity of Artemisia absinthium L. Plants 2020, 9, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koyuncu, I. Evaluation of anticancer, antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of Artemisia absinthium L. Extract. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aati, H.Y.; Attia, H.A.; Alanazi, A.S.; AL Tamran, L.K.; Wanner, J.K. Phytochemical Characterization Utilizing HS-SPME/GC-MS: Exploration of the Antioxidant and Enzyme Inhibition Properties of Essential Oil from Saudi Artemisia absinthium L. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Benmimoune, S.; Tigrine, C.; Mouas, Y.; Kameli, A. Chemical profiling and assessment of biological activities of wild Artemisia absinthium L. essential oil from Algeria. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2023, 26, 1410–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Malla, A.T.; Paul, Z.A.; Dar, M.A.; Masoodi, M.H. An Update on the Pharmacological Activity and Phytochemistry of Artemisia Absinthium L. Curr. Tradit. Med. 2023, 9, e241023222620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Beigh, Y.A.; Ganai, A.M. Potential of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium Linn.) herb for use as additive in livestock feeding: A review. J. Pharm. Innov. 2017, 6, 176–187. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hadi, A.; Hossein, N.; Shirin, P.; Najmeh, N.; Abolfazl, M. Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic Activities of Artemisia absinthium and Chemical Composition of its Essential Oil. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 24, 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  37. Batiha, G.E.-S.; Olatunde, A.; El-Mleeh, A.; Hetta, H.F.; Al-Rejaie, S.; Alghamdi, S.; Zahoor, M.; Beshbishy, A.M.; Murata, T.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A.; et al. Bioactive Compounds, Pharmacological Actions, and Pharmacokinetics of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium). Antibiotics 2020, 9, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Khori, V.; Nayebpour, M. Effect of Artemisia absinthium on electrophysiological properties of isolated heart of rats. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2007, 10, 303–312. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hurrell, J.A.; Puentes, J.P.; Arenas, P.M. Medicinal plants with cholesterol-lowering effect marketed in the Buenos Aires-La Plata conurbation, Argentina: An Urban Ethnobotany study. Ethnobiol. Conserv. 2015, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kostadinović, L.; Lević, J.; Popović, S.T.; Čabarkapa, I.; Puvača, N.; Djuragic, O.; Kormanjoš, S. Dietary inclusion of Artemisia absinthium for management of growth performance, antioxidative status and quality of chicken meat. Eur. Poult. Sci. 2015, 79, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mravčáková, D.; Komáromyová, M.; Babják, M.; Urda Dolinská, M.; Königová, A.; Petrič, D.; Čobanová, K.; Ślusarczyk, S.; Cieslak, A.; Várady, M.; et al. Anthelmintic Activity of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) and Mallow (Malva sylvestris L.) against Haemonchus contortus in Sheep. Animals 2020, 10, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Etewa, S.E.; Abaza, S.M. Herbal Medicine and Parasitic Diseases. Parasitol. United J. 2011, 4, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  43. EMA/HMPC/732886; Public Statement on the Use of Herbal Medicinal Products Containing Thujone. European Medicines Agency (EMA): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012.
  44. EMA/HMPC/751484; Assessment Report on Artemisia absinthium L. European Medicines Agency (EMA): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
  45. Lachenmeier, D.W.; Walch, S.G.; Padosch, S.A.; Kröner, L.U. Absinthe—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mihajilov-Krstev, T.; Jovanović, B.; Jović, J.; Ilić, B.; Miladinović, D.; Matejić, J.; Rajković, J.; Đorđević, L.; Cvetković, V.; Zlatković, B. Antimicrobial, Antioxidative, and Insect Repellent Effects of Artemisia absinthium Essential Oil. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 1698–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Radulović, M.; Gavrilović, M.; Rajčević, N.; Janakiev, T.; Dimkić, I.; Janaćković, P. The essential oil composition of different parts of Artemisia absinthium and its antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria. Biol. Nyssana 2022, 13, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dhen, N.; Majdoub, O.S.; Souguir, S. Chemical Composition and Fumigant Toxicity of Artemisia absinthium Essential Oil Against Rhyzopertha dominica and Spodoptera littoralis. Tunis. J. Plant Prot. 2014, 9, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bączek, K.; Kosakowska, O.; Pióro-Jabrucka, E.; Przybył, J.; Szymona, J.; Węglarz, Z. Dziko Rosnące Rośliny Lecznicze Źródłem Surowców Ekologicznych; Wydawnictwo SGGW: Warszawa, Poland, 2020; ISBN 978-83-7583-972-2. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bączek, K.; Kosakowska, O.; Pióro-Jabrucka, E.; Węglarz, Z. Rośliny lecznicze i aromatyczne—charakterystyka i potencjał uprawy. In Dzikie Gatunki Pokrewne Roślinom Uprawnym Występujące w Polsce. Lista, Zasoby, Zagrożenia; Dostatny, D.F., Dajdok, Z., Eds.; Wydawnictwo Kontekst: Radzików-Poznań, Poland, 2020; pp. 89–93. ISBN 978-83-66476-12-7. [Google Scholar]
  51. Matuszkiewicz, W. Przewodnik do Oznaczania Zbiorowisk Roślinnych Polski, 3rd ed.; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wysocki, C.; Sikorski, P. Fitosocjologia Stosowana w Ochronie i Kształtowaniu Krajobrazu, 2nd ed.; Wydawnictwo SGGW: Warszawa, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sznitowska, M.; Jambor, J. Technologia Produktów Roślinnych. Leki, Suplementy Diety i Kosmetyki; Medpharm Polska: Warszawa, Poland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; José, G.; Pedro, L.G.; Scheffer, J.J.C. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: Volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Frag. J. 2008, 23, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Goleniowski, M.; Bonfill, M.; Cusidó, R.; Palazón, J. Phenolic acids. In Natural Products; Ramawat, K.G., Merillon, J.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 135–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Iqbal, N.; Poór, P. Plant Protection by Tannins Depends on Defence-Related Phytohormones. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, 44, 22–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baser, K.H.C.; Buchbauer, G. Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology and Applications; Chemical Rubber Company Press: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rohloff, J. Essential oil drugs—Terpene composition of aromatic herbs. In Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops; Quality Handling and Evaluation; Dris, R., Jain, S.M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 3, pp. 73–128. [Google Scholar]
  59. Weng, J.K.; Chapple, C. The origin and evolution of lignin biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2010, 187, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sharma, S.; Gupta, J.; Prabhakar, P.K.; Gupta, P.; Solanki, P.; Rajput, A. Phytochemical Repurposing of Natural Molecule: Sabinene for Identification of Novel Therapeutic Benefits Using In Silico and In Vitro Approaches. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2019, 17, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Judžentienė, A.; Pečiulytė, D.; Nedveckytė, I. In Situ Antimicrobial Properties of Sabinene Hydrate, a Secondary Plant Metabolite. Molecules 2024, 29, 4252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nollet, L.; Rathore, H.S. Green Pesticides Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Raveau, R.; Fontaine, J.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. Essential oils as potential alternative biocontrol products against plant pathogens and weeds: A Review. Foods 2020, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chang, Y.; Harmon, P.F.; Treadwell, D.D.; Carrillo, D.; Sarkhosh, A.; Brecht, J.K. Biocontrol potential of essential oils in organic horticulture systems: From farm to fork. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 805138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Babushok, V.I.; Linstrom, P.J.; Zenkevich, I.G. Retention indices for frequently reported compounds of plant essential oils. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2011, 40, 043101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Polish Pharmacopoeia, 6th ed.; Office of Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products, Polish Pharmaceutical Society: Warsaw, Poland, 2002.
Figure 1. PCA analysis: (A) principal components analysis (PCA) performed on the major EO component for the analysed populations; (B) grouping of phytochemical compounds obtained from essential oils according to their first and second components.
Figure 1. PCA analysis: (A) principal components analysis (PCA) performed on the major EO component for the analysed populations; (B) grouping of phytochemical compounds obtained from essential oils according to their first and second components.
Molecules 30 02915 g001
Figure 2. The map of Poland with the examined natural sites of wormwood (origin of population 1–11).
Figure 2. The map of Poland with the examined natural sites of wormwood (origin of population 1–11).
Molecules 30 02915 g002
Table 1. Other plant species present on the investigated natural sites.
Table 1. Other plant species present on the investigated natural sites.
Population No.Plant Species
1Achillea millefolium L., Vicia cracca L., Plantago lanceolata L., Prunus spinosa L., Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench, Echium vulgare L., Malus sylvestris Mill., Oenothera biennis L., Pinus sylvestris L., Thymus serpyllum L., Galium mollugo L., Artemisia absinthium L.
2Conyza canadensis (L.), Artemisia campestris L., Daucus carota L., Cichorium intybus L., Artemisia vulgaris L., Senecio jacobaea L., Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke, Achillea millefolium L., Tripleurospermum inodora (L.) Sch.Bip., Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., Eryngium campestre L., Cirsium sp., Artemisia absinthium L.
3Potentilla anserina L., Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., Plantago major L., Urtica dioica L., Galium verum L., Artemisia absinthium L.
4Plantago major L., Polygonum aviculare L., Trifolium pratense L., Daucus carota L., Artemisia campestris L., Medicago lupulina L., Artemisia absinthium L.
5Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., Echium vulgare L., Achillea millefolium L., Trifolium pratense L., Plantago major L., Polygonum aviculare L., Sambucus nigra L., Equisetum arvense L., Crepis biennis L., Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pall., Artemisia absinthium L.
6Hypericum perforatum L., Echium vulgare L., Plantago major L., Polygonum aviculare L., Urtica dioica L., Thymus serpyllum L., Betula pendula Roth., Euphorbia cyparissias L., Sedum acre L., Senecio sylvaticus L.
7Pinus sylvestris L., Chelidonium majus L., Daucus carota L., Prunus spinosa L., Tanacetum vulgare L., Cichorium intybus L., Symphytum officinale L., Artemisia absinthium L.
8Cichorium intybus L., Echium vulgare L., Achillea millefolium L., Tussilago farfara L., Equisetum arvense L., Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pall., Prunus spinosa L., Betula pendula Roth, Artemisia absinthium L.
9Artemisia vulgaris L., Plantago major L., Achillea millefolium L., Rumex acetosella L., Chelidonium majus L., Tanacetum vulgare L., Malva neglecta Wallr., Polygonum aviculare L., Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., Trifolium pratense L., Galium mollugo L., Galium verum L. Artemisia absinthium L.
10Potentilla anserina L., Plantago major L., Achillea millefolium L., Chelidonium majus L., Echium vulgare L., Tanacetum vulgare L., Malva neglecta Wallr., Polygonum aviculare L., Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., Oenothera biennis L., Artemisia absinthium L.
11Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., Achillea millefolium L., Equisetum arvense L., Plantago lanceolata L., Potentilla anserina L., Galium verum L., Artemisia absinthium L.
Table 2. Developmental traits of investigated populations.
Table 2. Developmental traits of investigated populations.
PopulationPlant Height (cm)Number of Shoots per PlantLength of Internodes (mm)Length of Inflorescences (cm)
1165.8 ± 15.6 ab38 ± 1033 ± 4 b92.1 ± 3.2
2177.4 ± 12.0 ab51 ± 1227 ± 1 ab90.5 ± 11.1
3165.6 ± 10.9 ab46 ± 1227 ± 4 ab82.3 ± 2.1
4160.2 ± 15.3 a43 ± 2025 ± 1 ab112.7 ± 19.2
5176.4 ± 15.1 ab39 ± 628 ± 0 ab103.2 ± 12.5
6172.8 ± 9.3 ab42 ± 1123 ± 2 ab74.2 ± 10.5
7186.6 ± 16.7 ab41 ± 1824 ± 4 ab81.4 ± 7.6
8165.2 ± 4.6 a44 ± 1521 ± 2 a79.3 ± 12.7
9166.6 ± 9.5 ab44 ± 1424 ± 3 ab88.5 ± 12.3
10177.6 ± 15.9 ab48 ± 1526 ± 1 ab90.4 ± 12.3
11196.0 ± 10.6 b39 ± 1824 ± 2 ab108.8 ± 13.6
mean173.743.52691.2
CV9.4235.0216.2518.13
α = 0.05; a, b—homologues groups.
Table 3. Mass of herb (kg/plant).
Table 3. Mass of herb (kg/plant).
PopulationDry HerbDry Grated Herb
10.87 ± 0.190.26 ± 0.07
21.30 ± 0.320.26 ± 0.08
30.83 ± 0.300.28 ± 0.06
41.20 ± 0.270.41 ± 0.12
51.50 ± 0.180.42 ± 0.15
61.60 ± 0.290.51 ± 0.15
70.98 ± 0.280.29 ± 0.11
80.92 ± 0.360.48 ± 0.14
91.12 ± 0.590.33 ± 0.12
101.25 ± 0.110.37 ± 0.11
111.13 ± 0.330.34 ± 0.09
mean1.150.36
CV34.1724.00
α = 0.05.
Table 4. The total content of biologically active compounds (g/100 g).
Table 4. The total content of biologically active compounds (g/100 g).
PopulationEssential OilPhenolic Compounds
PolyphenolsTanninsPhenolic Acids
10.94 ± 0.04 ab0.72 ± 0.03 bc0.24 ± 0.06 cd0.50 ± 0.05 c
20.94 ± 0.20 ab0.59 ± 0.04 a0.10 ± 0.01 a0.39 ± 0.05 ab
30.75 ± 0.03 a0.66 ± 0.06 ab0.20 ± 0.01 bcd0.39 ± 0.04 ab
40.99 ± 0.02 abc0.66 ± 0.03 ab0.14 ± 0.03 ab0.45 ± 0.03 abc
51.11 ± 0.06 bc0.79 ± 0.03 c0.26 ± 0.03 d0.43 ± 0.05 abc
61.21 ± 0.06 cd0.79 ± 0.01 c0.22 ± 0.02 bcd0.46 ± 0.01 abc
71.47 ± 0.06 de0.63 ± 0.01 ab0.21 ± 0.02 bcd0.37 ± 0.02 a
81.23 ± 0.05 cd0.67 ± 0.05 ab0.23 ± 0.04 bcd0.39 ± 0.02 ab
91.09 ± 0.04 bc0.60 ± 0.01 a0.14 ± 0.01 ab0.48 ± 0.04 bc
101.41 ± 0.06 d0.61 ± 0.01 ab0.21 ± 0.01 bcd0.40 ± 0.03 abc
111.69 ± 0.07 e0.58 ± 0.01 a0.16 ± 0.01 abc0.39 ± 0.03 ab
mean1.180.660.190.42
CV23.8911.7728.0413.04
α = 0.05, a–e—homologues groups.
Table 5. The chemical composition of EOs (%).
Table 5. The chemical composition of EOs (%).
Compound Populations
RI1234567891011
1β-myrcene116012.393.334.1925.7616.3310.1912.020.773.534.001.59
2d-limonene12040.070.150.320.240.15nd0.070.100.140.120.12
31,8-cineole12147.1219.7140.6418.5828.9314.870.4713.0616.186.772.18
4γ-terpinene12380.130.261.450.48nd0.290.190.220.100.330.16
5cis-epoxyocymene12960.530.280.2117.561.190.37nd0.171.220.120.10
6hex-(3Z)-enol13720.10nd0.10nd0.20nd0.13nd0.100.110.08
7nonanal13910.130.19nd0.14ndndnd0.100.11nd0.06
8α-thujone14250.160.110.091.01nd0.190.950.2319.310.160.14
91-octen-3-ol14460.271.240.640.370.190.420.420.220.180.230.06
10β-thujone14480.090.230.121.130.650.740.061.1219.260.120.13
11sabinene hydrate14510.140.101.930.160.330.330.200.15nd0.190.21
12sabinyl acetate146417.370.91nd0.800.7139.0256.8041.910.3130.7776.02
13linalool15422.412.284.024.013.582.911.212.582.536.900.48
14chrysanthenyl acetate15606.160.14ndnd0.16ndnd19.830.154.370.13
15β-copaene15801.63ndndnd0.510.570.391.25ndnd0.16
16linalyl acetate15810.24nd0.11nd0.15ndndndndndnd
17caryophyllene15941.823.303.153.211.901.372.280.69nd1.221.80
18terpinen-4-ol15971.531.013.454.764.550.840.541.081.211.900.51
19α-humulene16580.220.31nd0.420.160.120.22nd0.150.130.15
20δ-terpineol16620.170.28nd0.330.350.16nd0.430.19ndnd
21isoborneol16700.110.19ndndndndndnd0.140.47nd
22lavandulol16752.600.67nd0.990.14nd0.490.170.27nd0.11
23lavandulyl isobutyrate16770.901.191.661.911.611.270.491.141.032.160.50
24lavandulyl isovalerate16800.810.42nd0.47ndnd0.08ndndndnd
25neral16880.08nd0.180.220.12ndnd0.09ndndnd
26α-terpineol16941.152.866.103.164.412.260.172.152.551.140.59
27trans-sabinol17171.250.250.210.20nd6.218.793.070.152.962.87
28geranial17250.07ndnd0.580.14ndndndndnd0.64
29neryl isobutyrate17610.520.601.320.550.880.760.270.530.530.680.25
30cis-chrysanthenol176632.0949.486.20nd26.166.510.20nd21.1615.890.58
31nerol17700.650.351.140.690.920.450.250.460.71nd0.34
32geranyl acetate17800.100.150.130.190.430.25nd0.260.150.220.06
33geranyl isobutanoate17900.201.360.20ndnd1.451.251.140.142.221.01
34tridecanol18180.190.43ndnd0.400.14ndnd0.210.09nd
35ionone18380.390.150.450.23ndnd0.31ndnd0.17nd
36hexanoic acid18430.120.38ndnd0.20ndnd0.260.710.33nd
37geraniol18450.120.090.320.150.150.220.070.170.150.130.17
38neryl isovalerate18700.600.501.331.031.071.120.350.770.771.130.47
39geranyl isovalerate19040.330.45ndndnd0.160.27nd0.140.180.19
40jasmone <(E)->19550.190.210.230.180.31nd0.07ndnd0.13nd
4114-hydroxycaryophyllene23500.720.731.131.870.200.530.940.33nd0.410.29
Monoterpene hydrocarbons 13.124.026.1744.0417.6710.8512.281.264.994.571.97
Oxygenated monoterpenes 76.9283.5469.2741.1075.6079.7272.9890.3487.0378.4987.58
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 3.913.613.263.632.722.062.891.940.151.352.11
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes 0.720.731.131.870.200.530.940.33nd0.410.29
Other 1.202.391.190.740.990.560.860.581.310.930.20
Total 95.8794.2981.0291.3897.1893.7289.9594.4593.4885.7592.15
nd—not detected.
Table 6. Geographical location of natural sites of wormwood populations.
Table 6. Geographical location of natural sites of wormwood populations.
Population NoAccesion NoCoordinatesVoivodeshipAltitude
1407,47953°43′ N21°47′ Ekujawsko-pomorskie71
2407,48053°48′ N21°39′ Epomorskie202
3407,48153°39′ N22°23′ Ekujawsko-pomorskie69
4407,48253°36′ N21°35′ Epodlaskie183
5407,48353°23′ N22°15′ Epodlaskie135
6407,48553°07′ N23°15′ Epodlaskie99
7407,48452°18′ N21°15′ Emazowieckie105
8407,58753°12′ N22°26′ Ewarmińsko-mazurskie104
9407,58653°03′ N17°26′ Ewarmińsko-mazurskie108
10407,58853°51′ N17°20′ Ewarmińsko-mazurskie95
11407,58953°06′ N17°30′ Ewarmińsko-mazurskie159
Table 7. Soil parameters (pH, the content of main nutrients (mg·L−1), and salinity (g KCl·L−1).
Table 7. Soil parameters (pH, the content of main nutrients (mg·L−1), and salinity (g KCl·L−1).
pHNO3NH4+PKCaMgClSalinity
5.83618195073995<200.55
Table 8. Climatic parameters in the vegetation season of 2024.
Table 8. Climatic parameters in the vegetation season of 2024.
MonthsTemperature (°C)Rainfall (mm)Sun HoursSun Days
April1139.7916185
May17
June20
July2231.6522788
August23
September20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kosakowska, O.; Węglarz, Z.; Żuchowska, A.; Styczyńska, S.; Zaraś, E.; Bączek, K. Intraspecific Variability of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Occurring in Poland in Respect of Developmental and Chemical Traits. Molecules 2025, 30, 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30142915

AMA Style

Kosakowska O, Węglarz Z, Żuchowska A, Styczyńska S, Zaraś E, Bączek K. Intraspecific Variability of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Occurring in Poland in Respect of Developmental and Chemical Traits. Molecules. 2025; 30(14):2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30142915

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kosakowska, Olga, Zenon Węglarz, Agnieszka Żuchowska, Sylwia Styczyńska, Ewa Zaraś, and Katarzyna Bączek. 2025. "Intraspecific Variability of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Occurring in Poland in Respect of Developmental and Chemical Traits" Molecules 30, no. 14: 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30142915

APA Style

Kosakowska, O., Węglarz, Z., Żuchowska, A., Styczyńska, S., Zaraś, E., & Bączek, K. (2025). Intraspecific Variability of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) Occurring in Poland in Respect of Developmental and Chemical Traits. Molecules, 30(14), 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30142915

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop