Next Article in Journal
New Dual Inhibitors of Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 and 2 Based on Deoxycholic Acid: Design, Synthesis, Cytotoxicity, and Molecular Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
What Are We Eating? Surveying the Presence of Toxic Molecules in the Food Supply Chain Using Chromatographic Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Theoretical Investigation of Iridium Complex with Aggregation-Induced Emission Properties

Institute of Chemistry, University of Silesia in Katowice, Szkolna 9, 40-006 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(3), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030580
Submission received: 5 December 2023 / Revised: 11 January 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 24 January 2024

Abstract

:
The mechanism of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) for the bis(1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazole)(2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline)iridium(III) complex, denoted as Ir(dfppz)2(oz), was investigated with use DFT and the TD-DFT level of theory. The mechanism of radiationless deactivation of the triplet state was elucidated. Such a mechanism requires an additional, photophysical triplet channel of the internal conversion (IC) type, which is activated as a result of intramolecular motion deforming the structure of the oz ligand and distorting the iridium coordination sphere. Formally, the rotational movement of the oxazoline relative to the C–C bond in the oz ligand is the main active coordinate that leads to the opening of the triplet channel. The rotation of the oxazoline group and the elongation of the Ir-Nox bond cause a transition between the luminescent, low-lying triplet state with a d / π π * characteristic ( T 1 ( eq ) ), and the radiationless d d triplet state ( T 1 ( Ir ) ). This transition is made possible by the low energy barrier, which, based on calculations, was estimated at approximately 8.5 kcal/mol. Dimerization, or generally aggregation of the complex molecules, blocks the intramolecular movement in the ligand and is responsible for a strong increase in the energy barrier for the T 1 ( eq ) T 1 ( Ir ) conversion of triplet states. Thus, the aggregation phenomenon blocks the nonradiative deactivation channel of the excited states and, consequently, contributes to directing the photophysical process toward phosphorescence. The mechanism involved in locking the nonradiative triplet path can be called restricted access to singlet–triplet crossing (RASTC).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aggregation-induced emission (AIE) is a phenomenon that involves the increased luminescence of a chemical compound in the aggregates or in the solid state compared to in a solution where it shows no or weak emission [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Tang et al. first described this phenomenon for siloles [10,11]. Since then, many compounds have been found with such properties. Other terms for this phenomenon have also been used, such as aggregation-induced enhanced emission or aggregation-induced enhanced phosphorescence (AIEE and AIEP, respectively). The molecules with AIE properties are generally named AIE luminogens (AIEgens). In compounds with AIE properties, other phenomena, such as mechanochromism or vapochromism [2,12,13,14,15], often occur. These allow for very wide practical applications of this type of system. Examples of possible applications of AIEgen materials include anticounterfeiting fluorescent hydrogels and inks, the luminescent detection of explosives, medical bioimaging, data recording, encryption, and OLED materials [16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Several possible mechanisms have been proposed that lead to the occurrence of AIE. Blocking channels for nonradiative deactivation of excited states in aggregates or the solid state may be one of the causes of AIE. Restricting the possibility of rotation or other intramolecular motions, for which the terms restriction of intramolecular rotations (RIR) or restriction of intramolecular motions (RIM) [23,24,25,26] are used, is one of the possible mechanisms of AIE. Based on experimental findings and theoretical calculations, other mechanisms of the AIE phenomenon, such as restriction of access to conical intersection (RACI), restriction of vibronic coupling (RVC), restriction of access to the dark state (RADS), and suppression of photochemical reaction (SPRC) [15,23,24,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], have also been proposed. All of them can be traced to the geometric changes caused by the rigidification of the molecular system in the aggregated or solid state; hence, they can be regarded as the consequences of RIM.
In addition to organic AIEgens, metal complexes are also subject to intense interest in terms of AIE properties [13,14,35,36,37,38]. Organic AIEgens are fluorescent materials, while their organometallic counterparts exhibit phosphorescence during light emission. Compounds characterized by phosphorescence have unique properties due to the involvement of triplet excited states. Phosphorescent materials (PMCs) have great advantages, such as long emission times and large Stokes shifts, and could be used in a wide range of practical applications; therefore, there is great interest in organometallic AIEgens [39,40,41,42,43].
In this work, we investigated the iridium(III) complex, bis(1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazole)(2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline)iridium(III) (denoted further as 1), which we refer to hereafter as Ir(dfppz)2(oz), (Figure 1). Complex 1 shows AIE in acetonitrile solutions, in which it is soluble. The phosphorescence intensity is low, but, after adding water, the intensity increases due to the formation of aggregates [44,45]. According to theoretical and experimental studies, the increased luminescence of organometallic AIEgens in aggregates and solids is associated with substituents in the ligands, whose rotation is inhibited under these conditions [43,46,47,48]. In complex 1, the ligands do not have any rotatable side groups, Therefore the question about the underlying mechanism is particularly interesting. To explain the source of AIE in this compound, we performed theoretical calculations for the monomer and for the dimer of 1, the latter being a model of the state in which the complex forms aggregates. Our goal was to determine what types of molecular motions contribute to the AIE effect.

2. Results

2.1. Geometry

The optimized geometry of complex 1 is presented in Figure 2, and the calculated structural parameters are gathered in Table 1. As can be seen in Table 1, there is a very good agreement between the calculated and experimental geometry parameters.

2.2. Electronic Spectrum of 1

The TD-DFT method was used to describe the electronic excited states of the studied complex. Figure 3a presents the obtained results in the form of the spectral distribution of electronic excitations. Additionally, for comparison, a reproduction of the spectral line of the experimental absorption spectrum is included. Because the calculated transitions are at shorter wavelengths than the experimental ones, the calculated wavelengths were shifted 20 nm toward the longer wavelengths to fit them to the experimental data and to better illustrate the relationship between the calculated and experimental spectra. It should be noted that the differences between the experimental bands and those assigned to them from the theoretical calculations are within 20 nm or less, which is very good agreement. In Figure 3b,c, the MOs of the three lowest energy electronic transitions and an energy diagram of the lowest singlet and triplet states are presented, respectively.
Several lowest excited singlet states are collected in Table 2. All calculated singlet and triplet states are provided in Tables S1 and S2. The three lowest energy calculated transitions presented as vertical bars in Figure 3a can be assigned to the experimental band with a maximum at about 370 nm [44]. The lowest energy one at 348 nm has a d / π o z π o z * character. The nature of the lowest triplet state is the same as that of the lowest singlet (Table S2). This triplet determines the photophysical properties of complex 1. The next two transitions are of the d / π o z π d f p p z * type. The subsequent several calculated transitions between 313 and 283 nm, which can be attributed to the experimental bands at 325 and 290 nm, are of similar nature. At higher energies, the transitions of the π d f p p z π d f p p z * type appear, which are responsible for bands with higher intensity. The calculated transition at 252 nm can be assigned to the experimental band at 260 nm (Table S1). This is a typical situation, where π π * transitions are very intense.
In Table 2 and Figure 3c, the calculated wavelength of phosphorescence is shown. It amounts to 540 nm, compared to the experimental 500 nm [44]. The phosphorescence comes from the LUMO to HOMO transition with the same character as the lowest electronic transition in the absorption spectrum.

2.3. Properties of Monomer Complex 1

In the monomeric form of complex 1, there are no rotatable substituents in the ligands. The phosphorescence quenching mechanism for the monomer should therefore be different than is usually proposed for this mechanism. We took into account a possibility in which changes in geometry directly in the coordination sphere of the metal affect the photophysics of complex 1, which determines its AIE properties. We decided to check the effect of geometry changes inside the oz ligand, namely, rotation around the bond between phenolate and the oxazoline motifs. Formally, such a rotation corresponds to a change in the selected dihedral angle in the structure of the ligand (Figure 2, angle α (C1-C2-C3-Nox)). Since the oz ligand is bound to the iridium ion, there are two possibilities: rotation of the oxazoline or the phenolate moiety. In these cases, the ligand–metal bond is broken with the nitrogen or oxygen atom, respectively.
Compounds of iridium and other metals of the second and third transition row exhibit phosphorescence from the triplet state due to the rapid singlet–triplet transition. Taking this into account, we determined the potential energy curve of the lowest triplet state as a function of the dihedral angle for the rotation of the oxazoline and phenolate units.

2.3.1. Rotation of the Oxazoline Moiety

Figure 4a presents the potential energy curves as a function of the rotation angle α for the lowest triplet state, T1 (blue line), and the lowest singlet state S0 calculated at the T1 geometry (red line). In the case considered here, the rotation relative to the the oxazoline-phenolate bond (Figure 4b, α rotation angle) corresponds to a change in the position of the oxazoline motif, and, at the same time, it is associated with a change in the Ir-Nox distance. As the value of the rotation angle increases, this distance is increased until the Ir-Nox bond is broken. The dependence of the Ir-Nox bond distance on the rotation angle is depicted in Figure S2.
According to the shape of the PEC presented in Figure 4a, due to rotation, the energy of the T1 state increases up to angle of approximately 50° and then remains practically unchanged. The same changes in the value of the rotation angle cause a rapid change in the energy of the singlet state, S0. The energy of S0 calculated at T1 geometry increases rapidly at about 40° and intersects with T1. The crossing point on T1 curve is placed at 8.4 kcal above the T1 minimum. The S0–T1 intersection depicted in Figure 4a describes a nonradiative deactivation pathway for the triplet state of complex 1. The plot of the spin density on the iridium ion (Figure 4c) indicates that in the range of up to 40°, T1 is characterized by d y z / π o z π o z * ; above 40°, its characteristics change to the d d type. The characteristic of the triplet wave function can be discerned from the spin density contour: below 40°, the unpaired spin density is located mainly on the oz ligand and in part on iridium; above 50°, the unpaired electron density is found on the iridium ion. Figure 4d, shows that above the rotation angle of 40°, the Ir-Nox bond undergoes rupture. In Figure S2, it can be seen that the Ir-Nox bond is practically unchanged up to about 40°. As a result of further increase in the rotation angle, this distance grows rapidly, confirming the breakage of the Ir-Nox bond.

2.3.2. Rotation of the Phenolate Moiety

In Figure 5a, the PEC for the triplet state and singlet state in the triplet geometry as a function of the rotation angle of the phenolate group is presented. The spin density contours for the triplet state are shown in Figure 5c. They indicate that between rotation angles 30° and 40°, the triplet wave function changes its characteristic from d / π o z π o z * to the state where one electron resides on a d orbital of iridium and the second one resides on the oz ligand ( d / p h e n ), as a consequence of phenolate oxygen–iridium homolytic bond breaking. The transition between these two triplet states involves an energy barrier of 16 kcal/mol. The energy of the singlet state is everywhere lower than that of the triplet state, and the curves do not intersect. The presented calculations show that the rotation of the phenolate group does not lead to the nonradiative deactivation of the triplet state in complex 1.

2.4. Dimer of Ir(dfppz)2(oz)

The geometry of the three dimers of complex 1 were optimized, and their equilibrium structures are shown in Figure 6. A structural model was adopted in which the oz ligand from one molecule interacted through intermolecular forces with the dfpp ligand from the other, owing to which one oz ligand has the properties of a free molecule, and the one in which rotation takes place is under the influence of intermolecular forces. In this way, both oz ligands are in different situations, which allows the isolation of the influence of intermolecular forces on one oz ligand to not affect the other oz ligand.
Further calculations, the results of which are presented later in the text, were performed only for dimer I, which has the lowest energy; however, it can be noted that the energies for the optimized geometries of dimers are very close. The calculated interaction energy between the two molecules in the dimer was found to be 11.3 kcal/mol.
To determine the effect of intermolecular interactions on the energy of the dimer upon rotation within the oz ligand, which is in contact with the second molecule, we determined the energy of the triplet electronic state as a function of the rotation angle. The rotation of phenolate was not considered for the dimeric form, since it was shown as being inactive in deactivation process for the monomer. In Figure 7a, the potential energy curves for optimized geometries of the triplet state, T1, are presented as a function of the rotation of the oxazoline moiety in ligand oz of the A unit in dimer I. The energy of the singlet state calculated for the geometry of the triplet state (S0/T1) is also shown. The energy of the triplet rises with the rotation angle and reaches the maximum at an angle α of 100°. The maximum corresponds to the intersection of two triplet states. The respective energy barrier at the maximum equals 22.0 kcal/mol. The type of these two states can be deduced from the spin densities shown in Figure 7c,e. In the range of angles below 100°, thetriplet state is located on molecule B of the dimer and has a d / π π * character (Figure 7c,e). The spin density is located on the B molecule: partly on the iridium ion and mostly on the oz ligand. Its value on IrB is about 0.26. For the rotation angle starting from 100°, the triplet state is located on the A molecule of the dimer, mainly on the Ir ion. The spin density on IrA is about 1.2, which allows this electronic state to be classified as d d type.
The singlet state energy calculated at the triplet geometry slowly rises up to a rotation angle of about 90°, then rises abruptly at about a 100° rotation angle, approaching the energy of the triplet function. Above 100°, the energies of both wave functions, singlet and triplet, are virtually the same. The singlet wave function approaches the triplet at that rotation angle, and the intersection between singlet and triplet requires the same energy as the maximum on the triplet energy curve, i.e., 22.0 kcal/mol. This barrier is much higher than in the monomer (8.4 kcal/mol), which is the cause of the radiationless deactivation path being blocked in the dimeric form. This situation is caused by the intermolecular interactions between two molecules in the dimer. As a consequence, the rotation of the oxazoline group is hindered. In Figure S2, the dependence of Ir-Nox in the monomer and dimer is depicted. This distance in the dimer is virtually constant for rotation angles up to about 100°, where it increases very quickly. This corresponds to the breaking of the iridium–nitrogen bond and the transition to the d d state. For the monomer, this process occurs much earlier, at about 40°.

3. Discussion

The AIEgen complex 1 studied in this work contains an oz ligand (2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline), which consists of two fragments—the oxazoline and phenolate moietes, linked by a C–C bond. To investigate the mechanism of AIE in this complex, we examined the rotation of the oxazoline and phenolate fragments around the bond connecting them. We also carried out a calculation for the dimeric form of the complex to clarify the effect of the intermolecular interactions on the luminescent properties of 1.

3.1. Monomer Complex 1

Rotation of the oxazoline fragment in the triplet state leads to the intersection of the d / π π * state with the d d state at a rotation angle (Figure 2) of about 40°. The bond with oxazoline is then broken, and the nitrogen atom moves away from the Ir cation. The iridium atom basically becomes five-coordinated; hence, it adopts a triplet configuration, effectively the d d state. At the same time, the energy of the singlet ground state increases rapidly. The intersection of the singlet and the triplet provides an effective channel for the radiationless deactivation of the triplet to the ground state. On the other hand, the rotation of the phenolate part is associated with almost twice-higher barrier in the triplet zone. After breaking the Ir-Ophen bond, one electron is in the d orbital of the Ir ion, while the other is in the phenolate. The triplet and singlet states do not intersect—the singlet state is of much lower energy in this case. In general, it can be considered that nonradiative deactivation of the triplet state is rather impossible as a result of the rotation of the phenolate fragment.
The characteristics of the three triplet states relevant to the photophysical properties of 1 are depicted in Figure 8. It can be noticed that the spin populations on individual fragments of the molecule are smaller then one (Figure 4c and Figure 5c); hence, it is an idealized image of the spin density distribution in excited triplet states.

3.2. Dimer of Complex 1

To determine the effect of aggregation on the emission properties of complex 1, we carried out calculations for the dimeric structure, where the oz ligand interacts with the dfppz ligand in two monomers. According to the results presented in Figure 7, the T1 energy has a maximum at an α of about 100°, which corresponds to the crossing of two wave functions of different character: d / π o z B π o z B * and d A d A . This transition is caused by the following: at large rotation angles, the d d state in the monomer A becomes lower in energy as the Ir-nitrogen bond breaks. At the same time, the energy of the singlet calculated for triplet geometry (S0/T1) increases and becomes practically equal with the triplet energy at the triplet maximum. The high barrier of this process of 22.0 kcal/mol effectively prevents the deactivation of the triplet state, leading to phosphorescence. The change in the triplet state nature is reflected in the spin densities on the iridium ions shown in Figure 7c,e, which is localized on the B monomer at rotation angles smaller than 100°, and on iridium in monomer A otherwise.

3.3. Mechanism of AIE in Complex 1

Figure 9 shows a schematic diagram of the AIE mechanism in complex 1, derived from the calculation results. After absorbing light of wavelength in the range of about 370 nm (calculated value 348 nm), the S1 state with a d / π o z π o z * characteristic can be populated directly or from a higher excited state via sequential IC processes. As a result of the ISC process, the S1 state undergoes conversion to a T1 triplet state with a similar d / π o z π o z * characteristic. After geometry relaxation, the T1(eq) triplet is in the emissive state, from which the phosphorescence process can take place. However, the experiment data show that complex 1 in solution exhibits virtually no emission; therefore, a radiation-free deactivation path must be available. In the presented mechanism, the deactivation path is associated with the interaction between two triplet states T 1 ( eq ) ( d / π o z π o z * ) T 1 ( Ir ) ( d d ) , as shown in the top panel in Figure 9. Such a process requires a deformation of the equilibrium geometry of the complex in the ligand region and/or within the coordination sphere. As previously noted, in the Ir complex, none of the ligands have substituents capable of free rotation; hence, we investigated the geometry deformation related to the intramolecular rotation of groups in the oz ligand around the C-C bond between the oxazoline (ox) and phenolate (phen) fragments. During rotation in the excited T1(eq) triplet state of d / π o z π o z * type, at initial small values of the rotation angle, both fragments of the oz ligand most probably perform rotations up to 30–40° (Figure 4 and Figure 5). At larger rotation angles, it is energetically more favorable to twist the oxazoline fragment and, in effect, to detach nitrogen from the central atom, which leads to a change in the triplet state characteristic to the T1(Ir) ( d d ) type. The determined energy barrier for the transition between T1(eq) and T1(Ir) states is less than 8.5 kcal/mol. The T1(Ir) triplet state is energetically near degenerate, with the S 0 * singlet state in a twisted oz ligand geometry. Taking into account that the triplet and singlet are close in energy, the T1(eq) S 0 * intersystem crossing should be effective, which means that the triplet state is quenched nonradiatively, and the system relaxes to the energy minimum of the S0 ground state and the equilibrium geometry of the complex (right-hand side of the panel in Figure 9). The second factor that causes the effectiveness of ISC is the fact that for large dihedral angles α , the potential energy curves of both states are almost parallel. This local surface topology suggests that around the PES intersection region, the difference in energy gradients of the interacting electronic states is small. This property, according to Landau–Zener theory [49], efficiently increases the probability of intersystem crossing.
To summarize, intramolecular rotation in the oxazoline ligand (oz) opens an additional triplet channel, competitive with phosphorescence, which leads to the nonradiative deactivation of the excited states. The photophysical mechanism of this channel is completely consistent with the experimental data, in which, in the absence of a possible rotation-blocking factor, a significant reduction in the intensity of phosphorescent radiation or its complete disappearance is observed. The most obvious factor blocking the rotation in the oz ligand is the intermolecular interactions that occur as a result of the formation of molecular aggregates. As can be seen from the calculations, already in the case of a dimer, the energy barrier for the transition between triplet states increases almost three times (calculated value of 22 kcal/mol, Figure 7). In such a situation, as shown in the bottom panel in Figure 9, the conversion between the T1(eq) and T1(Ir) states is blocked, and the emission-free triplet channel becomes inactive and noncompetitive with phosphorescence. Therefore, the mechanical blocking of rotation means that the deactivation of excited states can only occur as a result of photon emission. It is also worth noting that the results of the calculations indicate the possibility of luminescence batochromism. The calculated wavelength for phosphorescence for the monomer is 540 nm; for the dimer, it is 560 nm. The above-described mechanism of the AIE properties of 1 can be called restricted access to singlet–triplet crossing (RASTC).

4. Conclusions

For the complex under study, and low-energy deformation of the oz ligand structure and the Ir coordination sphere in the lowest triplet state cause the disappearance of phosphorescence, associated with the occurrence of a competitive, nonradiative triplet channel connecting the emission state with the electronic ground state. The partial or complete blocking of intramolecular movements due to aggregation of molecules blocks access to the nonradiative path and contributes to directing the photophysical process toward phosphorescence, giving rise to the AIE effect.
We have shown that the energy barrier that lead to the deactivation of the excited state and thus to the quenching of phosphorescence is approximately 2.5 times higher in the dimer than in the monomer of the iridium complex under study. The experimental magnitude of these barriers is unknown, so the calculated values cannot be verified. However, it seems that the model used explains the lack of luminescence in the monomer and its appearance in dimers and, further, in oligomers, where this phenomenon is enhanced.

5. Calculation Methods

The calculations were performed with the use of the Gaussian16 program [50]. The DFT method was used with the PBE0 functional [51].
The PBE0 functional is often used in calculations for transition metal complexes, including iridium complexes, and has been shown to accurately reproduce the electronic spectra and geometry of such compounds [52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. The def2-TZVP, (8s7p6d1f)/[6s4p3d1f], basis set with the appropriate ECP was used for iridium, while for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, the TZVP basis, (11s6p1d)/[5s3p1d] and (5s1p)/[3s1p], for hydrogen was used [59,60].
The SMD solvent model [61] was used with acetonitrile as the solvent. The GD3 dispersion corrections [62] were applied in the calculations. In order to determie the influence of the rotation within the oz ligand on the photophysical properties of complex 1, the energy was determined as a function of the rotation angle C1-C2-C3-Nox ( α , Figure 2), for the rotation of the oxazoline and phenolate fragments. The rotation angle was frozen with 10° increment, while other geometric parameters were optimized. The optimization for the dimeric forms of complex 1 was performed without any structural constraints. For the optimized structures of complex 1 and the dimer, all vibration frequencies were real.
The electronic spectra were calculated with the TD-DFT method. The energy of the lowest T1 state was calculated via independent optimization of the triplet spin wave function.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29030580/s1, Table S1. The twenty lowest vertical triplet electronic transitions for Ir(dfppz)2(oz) complex based on the TD-DFT/PBE0/def2-TZVP calculations with GD3 dispersion correction and SMD/acetonitrile solvent model, Table S2. The fifteen lowest vertical triplet electronic transitions for Ir(dfppz)2(oz) complex based on the TD-DFT/PBE0/def2-TZVP calculations with GD3 dispersion correction and SMD/acetonitrile solvent model, Figure S1. Molecular orbital diagram for complex 1, Figure S2. Distance Ir-Nox as a function of the oxazoline moiety rotation angle, Figure S3. Comparison of the conformation of complex 1 in the dimer and monomer for the geometry at the rotation angle at which the Ir-Nox is broken, Figure S4. Superposition of optimized Ir(dfppz)2(oz) complex geometries for monomer and dimer. Presented geometries are form Figure S3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.; methodology, M.J. and P.L.; validation, M.J. and P.L.; investigation, M.J.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.; writing—review and editing, P.L.; visualization, M.J. and P.L.; supervision, M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The results of the calculations are accessible from the repository at https://repod.icm.edu.pl/dataverse/us.

Acknowledgments

All calculations were carried out at the Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing, http://www.wcss.wroc.pl, under grant No.18.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIEAggregation Induced Emission
PECPotentia Energy Curve
RASTCRestricted Acess to Singlet-Triplet Crossing
ISCIntersystem Crossing
ICInternal Conversion

References

  1. Behera, S.K.; Park, S.Y.; Gierschner, J. Dual Emission: Classes, Mechanisms, and Conditions. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22624–22638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Girish, Y.; Prashantha, K.; Byrappa, K. Recent advances in aggregation-induced emission of mechanochromic luminescent organic materials. Emergent Mater. 2021, 4, 673–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gong, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, G.; Feng, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, F. Unveiling the Aggregation-Induced Emission (AIE) Mechanism and the Effect of Substituents on Luminescence Properties for Salicylaldehyde Azine Derivatives with Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 18429–18438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guan, J.; Shen, C.; Peng, J.; Zheng, J. What leads to aggregation-induced emission? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 4218–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rodrigues, A.C.B.; Seixas de Melo, J.S. Aggregation-Induced Emission: From Small Molecules to Polymers—Historical Background, Mechanisms and Photophysics. Top. Curr. Chem. 2021, 379, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stojanović, L.; Crespo-Otero, R. Aggregation-Induced Emission in the Tetraphenylthiophene Crystal: The Role of Triplet States. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 17752–17761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suman, G.; Pandey, M.; Chakravarthy, A.S.J. Review on new horizons of aggregation induced emission: From design to development. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 1541–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suzuki, S.; Sasaki, S.; Sairi, A.S.; Iwai, R.; Tang, B.Z.; Konishi, G. Principles of Aggregation-Induced Emission: Design of Deactivation Pathways for Advanced AIEgens and Applications. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 9856–9867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Würthner, F. Aggregation-Induced Emission (AIE): A Historical Perspective. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 14192–14196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, B.; Nie, H.; Hu, R.; Qin, A.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, B.Z. Red fluorescent siloles with aggregation-enhanced emission characteristics. Sci. China Chem. 2016, 59, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, B.; Nie, H.; Lu, P.; Zhou, J.; Qin, A.; Qiu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, B.Z. Conjugation versus rotation: Good conjugation weakens the aggregation-induced emission effect of siloles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4500–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Martínez-Junquera, M.; Lara, R.; Lalinde, E.; Moreno, M.T. Isomerism, aggregation-induced emission and mechanochromism of isocyanide cycloplatinated(ii) complexes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 7221–7233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, X.; Chi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, J. Recent advances in mechanochromic luminescent metal complexes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 3376–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alam, P.; Climent, C.; Alemany, P.; Laskar, I.R. “Aggregation-induced emission” of transition metal compounds: Design, mechanistic insights, and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2019, 41, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Q.; Yang, G.; Jia, M.; Song, X.; Zhao, J. Exploring and elaborating the excited state mechanism of a novel AIE material 2-(5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-2-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole. Struct. Chem. 2018, 29, 1767–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Quan, C.; Nie, H.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, B.Z. N-type organic luminescent materials based on siloles with aggregation-enhanced emission. In Proceedings of the Organic Light Emitting Materials and Devices XIX, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–13 August 2015; Volume 9566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.; Nie, H.; Chen, B.; Lin, G.; Luo, W.; Hu, R.; Huang, F.; Qin, A.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, B.Z. 2,5-Dicarbazole-functioned siloles with aggregation-enhanced emission for application in organic light-emitting diodes. J. Photonics Energy 2015, 5, 053598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mei, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.Z.; Zhao, H.; Yuan, W.; Deng, C.; Chen, S.; Sung, H.H.Y.; Lu, P.; Qin, A.; et al. Siloles symmetrically substituted on their 2,5-positions with electron-accepting and donating moieties: Facile synthesis, aggregation-enhanced emission, solvatochromism, and device application. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, X.F.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.C.; Hou, M.; Feng, G.L.; Ji, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, G.W. Design and assembly of AIE-active fluorescent organic nanoparticles for anti-counterfeiting fluorescent hydrogels and inks. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 11547–11550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chi, W.; Wang, C.; Liu, X. State-crossing from a Locally Excited to an Electron Transfer State(SLEET) Model Rationalizing the Aggregation-induced Emission Mechanism of (Bi)piperidylanthracenes. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2021, 37, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dai, W.; Bianconi, T.; Ferraguzzi, E.; Wu, X.; Lei, Y.; Shi, J.; Tong, B.; Carlotti, B.; Cai, Z.; Dong, Y. Excited-State Modulation of Aggregation-Induced Emission Molecules for High-Efficiency Triplet Exciton Generation. ACS Mater. Lett. 2021, 3, 1767–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, S.; Sun, H.; Ma, Y.; Ye, S.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Mou, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, W. Rational design of metallophosphors with tunable aggregation-induced phosphorescent emission and their promising applications in time-resolved luminescence assay and targeted luminescence imaging of cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 22167–22173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, S.; Ding, J.; Bi, A.; Yu, K.; Zeng, W. Insights into Optical Probes Based on Aggregation-Induced Emission: From Restriction of Intramolecular Motions to Dark State. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Mechanistic connotations of restriction of intramolecular motions (RIM). Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8, nwaa260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Restriction of Intramolecular Motion(RIM): Investigating AIE Mechanism from Experimental and Theoretical Studies. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2021, 37, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, P.; Li, P.; Zhao, Y.; Han, K. Restriction of Flip-flop Motion as a Mechanism for Aggregation-Induced Emission. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 6929–6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Q.; Blancafort, L. A conical intersection model to explain aggregation induced emission in diphenyl dibenzofulvene. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5966–5968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Peng, X.L.; Ruiz-Barragan, S.; Li, Z.S.; Li, Q.S.; Blancafort, L. Restricted access to a conical intersection to explain aggregation induced emission in dimethyl tetraphenylsilole. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 2802–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, S.; Qin, M.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, K.; Lin, L.; Wang, C.K.; Fan, J. Theoretical studies on the excited-state properties of thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules with aggregation induced emission. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 9377–9390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tu, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Peng, Q.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Restriction of Access to the Dark State: A New Mechanistic Model for Heteroatom-Containing AIE Systems. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14911–14914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, H.; Gong, Q.; Wang, G.; Dang, J.; Liu, F. Deciphering the Mechanism of Aggregation-Induced Emission of a Quinazolinone Derivative Displaying Excited-State Intramolecular Proton-Transfer Properties: A QM, QM/MM, and MD Study. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 5440–5447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, F. Exploring the Mechanism of Fluorescence Quenching and Aggregation-Induced Emission of a Phenylethylene Derivative by QM (CASSCF and TDDFT) and ONIOM (QM:MM) Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 21850–21857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yamamoto, N. Free Energy Profile Analysis for the Aggregation-Induced Emission of Diphenyldibenzofulvene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 4939–4945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, K.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, J.; Wang, C.K.; Lin, L. Theoretical Study of the Mechanism of Aggregation-Caused Quenching in Near-Infrared Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Molecules: Hydrogen-Bond Effect. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alam, P.; Climent, C.; Kaur, G.; Casanova, D.; Roy Choudhury, A.; Gupta, A.; Alemany, P.; Laskar, I.R. Exploring the Origin of Aggregation Induced Emission Activity and Crystallization Induced Emission in Organometallic Iridium(III) Cationic Complexes: Influence of Counterions. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 5738–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, K.; Wu, H.; Shi, M.; Li, F.; Yi, T.; Huang, C. Reply to comment on ’aggregation-induced phosphorescent emission (AIPE) of iridium(III) complexes’: Origin of the enhanced phosphorescence. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1243–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Inoue, R.; Naota, T.; Ehara, M. Origin of the Aggregation-Induced Phosphorescence of Platinum(II) Complexes: The Role of Metal–Metal Interactions on Emission Decay in the Crystalline State. Chem.—Asian J. 2021, 16, 3129–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, Q.; Li, L.; Li, F.; Yu, M.; Liu, Z.; Yi, T.; Huang, C. Aggregation-induced phosphorescent emission (AIPE) of iridium(III) complexes. Chem. Commun. 2008, 685–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, H.B.; Zhang, J.; Liang, X.J. Transition metal complex-based smart AIEgens explored for cancer diagnosis and theranostics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 473, 214822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prasad, P.; Gupta, A.; Sasmal, P.K. Aggregation-induced emission active metal complexes: A promising strategy to tackle bacterial infections. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ramdass, A.; Sathish, V.; Thanasekaran, P. AIE or AIE(P)E-active transition metal complexes for highly sensitive detection of nitroaromatic explosives. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Deng, J.; Zou, D.; Yang, J. Two Ru(II) compounds with aggregation induced emission as promising photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 212, 111233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. You, Y.; Huh, H.S.; Kim, K.S.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, D.; Park, S.Y. Comment on ’aggregation-induced phosphorescent emission (AIPE) of iridium(III) complexes’: Origin of the enhanced phosphorescence. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3998–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Che, W.; Li, G.; Liu, X.; Shao, K.; Zhu, D.; Su, Z.; Bryce, M.R. Selective sensing of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) in aqueous media with “aggregation-induced emission enhancement” (AIEE)-active iridium(III) complexes. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 1730–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chao, K.; Shao, K.; Peng, T.; Zhu, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Su, Z.; Bryce, M.R. New oxazoline- and thiazoline-containing heteroleptic iridium(iii) complexes for highly-efficient phosphorescent organic light-emitting devices (PhOLEDs): Colour tuning by varying the electroluminescence bandwidth. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 6800–6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alam, P.; Kaur, G.; Chakraborty, S.; Roy Choudhury, A.; Laskar, I.R. Aggregation induced phosphorescence active rollover iridium(iii) complex as a multi-stimuli-responsive luminescence material. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 6581–6592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sheet, S.K.; Sen, B.; Aguan, K.; Khatua, S. A cationic organoiridium(iii) complex-based AIEgen for selective light-up detection of rRNA and nucleolar staining. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 11477–11490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vignesh, A.; Zhang, Q.; Khan, A.A.; Li, Z.; Salohiddinov, S.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, W.H. Exploring an aggregation induced emission behaviour of neutral iridium complexes consisting of salicylaldimine ligand with dibenzosuberane core. J. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 949, 121954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wittig, C. The Landau-Zener formula. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8428–8430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian˜16 Revision C.01, 2016; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  51. Adamo, C.; Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Azar, Y.T.; Payami, M. Theoretical description of efficiency enhancement in DSSCs sensitized by newly synthesized heteroleptic Ru complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 29574–29585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Le Bahers, T.; Brémond, E.; Ciofini, I.; Adamo, C. The nature of vertical excited states of dyes containing metals for DSSC applications: Insights from TD-DFT and density based indexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 14435–14444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Boukabene, M.; Brahim, H.; Hadji, D.; Guendouzi, A. Theoretical study of geometric, optical, nonlinear optical, UV–Vis spectra and phosphorescence properties of iridium(III) complexes based on 5-nitro-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridyl. Theor. Chem. Accounts 2020, 139, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brahim, H.; Haddad, B.; Brahim, S.; Guendouzi, A. DFT/TDDFT computational study of the structural, electronic and optical properties of rhodium (III) and iridium (III) complexes based on tris-picolinate bidentate ligands. J. Mol. Model. 2017, 23, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Guillemoles, J.F.; Barone, V.; Joubert, L.; Adamo, C. A theoretical investigation of the ground and excited states of selected Ru and Os polypyridyl molecular dyes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 11354–11360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gu, X.; Fei, T.; Zhang, H.; Xu, H.; Yang, B.; Ma, Y.; Liu, X. Theoretical studies of blue-emitting iridium complexes with different ancillary ligands. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 8387–8393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Petit, L.; Maldivi, P.; Adamo, C. Predictions of optical excitations in transition-metal complexes with time dependent-Density Functional Theory: Influence of basis sets. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schäfer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structure of bis(1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazole)(2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline)iridium(III) complex, denoted as Ir(dfppz)2(oz) (1), where oz is 2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline group. (b) Rotation of the oxazoline group. (c) Rotation of the phenolate group.
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structure of bis(1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1H-pyrazole)(2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline)iridium(III) complex, denoted as Ir(dfppz)2(oz) (1), where oz is 2-(20-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline group. (b) Rotation of the oxazoline group. (c) Rotation of the phenolate group.
Molecules 29 00580 g001
Figure 2. Optimized structure of complex 1.
Figure 2. Optimized structure of complex 1.
Molecules 29 00580 g002
Figure 3. (a) Blue solid line—experimental absorption spectrum from [44], bars—calculated electronic transitions. Calculated transitions are shifted by 20 nm toward longer wavelengths. (b) Orbital excitations for the three lowest energy electronic transitions. (c) Energy of the lowest singlet and triplet states of the complex 1. Experimental (green) and calculated (blue) wavelengths of the absorption and phosphorescence emission are shown. ISC and IC stand for intersystem crossing and internal conversion, respectively.
Figure 3. (a) Blue solid line—experimental absorption spectrum from [44], bars—calculated electronic transitions. Calculated transitions are shifted by 20 nm toward longer wavelengths. (b) Orbital excitations for the three lowest energy electronic transitions. (c) Energy of the lowest singlet and triplet states of the complex 1. Experimental (green) and calculated (blue) wavelengths of the absorption and phosphorescence emission are shown. ISC and IC stand for intersystem crossing and internal conversion, respectively.
Molecules 29 00580 g003
Figure 4. (a) Energy as a function of rotation angle around the oxazoline–phenolate bond, where the oxazoline moiety is being rotated. T1 (blue line)—energy of optimized-geometry lowest triplet state, S0/T1(red line)—energy of the lowest singlet state at the geometry of triplet T1. (b) Complex 1, with rotation angle α marked. (c) Spin population value in the T1 state of 1 on the Ir ion as a function of angle α . The spin density contours of complex 1 are drawn at α equal 10° and 50°. (d) Geometry of 1 at rotation angle of 50° showing broken Ir-Nox bond.
Figure 4. (a) Energy as a function of rotation angle around the oxazoline–phenolate bond, where the oxazoline moiety is being rotated. T1 (blue line)—energy of optimized-geometry lowest triplet state, S0/T1(red line)—energy of the lowest singlet state at the geometry of triplet T1. (b) Complex 1, with rotation angle α marked. (c) Spin population value in the T1 state of 1 on the Ir ion as a function of angle α . The spin density contours of complex 1 are drawn at α equal 10° and 50°. (d) Geometry of 1 at rotation angle of 50° showing broken Ir-Nox bond.
Molecules 29 00580 g004
Figure 5. (a) Energy of the optimized triplet and singlet state in triplet geometry as a function of the rotation angle of the phenolate moiety. (b) Complex 1 with rotation angle 0°. (c) Spin density on the iridium ion as a function of the rotation angle. (d) Complex 1 with phenolate rotated 40°, where the Ir–O bond is broken and the transition between d / π π * to d / p h e n takes place.
Figure 5. (a) Energy of the optimized triplet and singlet state in triplet geometry as a function of the rotation angle of the phenolate moiety. (b) Complex 1 with rotation angle 0°. (c) Spin density on the iridium ion as a function of the rotation angle. (d) Complex 1 with phenolate rotated 40°, where the Ir–O bond is broken and the transition between d / π π * to d / p h e n takes place.
Molecules 29 00580 g005
Figure 6. Optimized geometry of complex 1 dimeric structures.
Figure 6. Optimized geometry of complex 1 dimeric structures.
Molecules 29 00580 g006
Figure 7. (a) Energy curves as function of oxozaline in unit A rotation angle: T1; the lowest energy singlet state calculated for the geometry of the triplet state (S0/T1. (b) Dimer geometry at the energy minimum. (c) Spin population on iridium ions as function of the rotation angle. (d) Dimer geometry at rotation angle of 100°, showing dissociated oxazoline moiety. (e) Spin density contours at rotation angles of 100° and 40°.
Figure 7. (a) Energy curves as function of oxozaline in unit A rotation angle: T1; the lowest energy singlet state calculated for the geometry of the triplet state (S0/T1. (b) Dimer geometry at the energy minimum. (c) Spin population on iridium ions as function of the rotation angle. (d) Dimer geometry at rotation angle of 100°, showing dissociated oxazoline moiety. (e) Spin density contours at rotation angles of 100° and 40°.
Molecules 29 00580 g007
Figure 8. The three triplet state’s characteristics for complex 1, from the left: equilibrium geometry, d / π o z π o z * state with two unpaired electrons mainly on the oxazoline fragment; d d state at large rotation angle of oxazoline, with two electrons predominantly on iridium; triplet state at large rotation angle of the phenolate fragment, with one electron on iridium and the second one on phenolate.
Figure 8. The three triplet state’s characteristics for complex 1, from the left: equilibrium geometry, d / π o z π o z * state with two unpaired electrons mainly on the oxazoline fragment; d d state at large rotation angle of oxazoline, with two electrons predominantly on iridium; triplet state at large rotation angle of the phenolate fragment, with one electron on iridium and the second one on phenolate.
Molecules 29 00580 g008
Figure 9. Mechanism of AIE in complex 1.
Figure 9. Mechanism of AIE in complex 1.
Molecules 29 00580 g009
Table 1. Selected geometry parameters of 1. Bond lengths in Å, angles in degrees.
Table 1. Selected geometry parameters of 1. Bond lengths in Å, angles in degrees.
ParameterCalc.Expt. 1
Ir-Ophen2.1222.131
Ir-Nox2.1122.122
Ir-N12.0262.006
Ir-N22.0161.987
Ir-C42.0122.011
Ir-C51.9981.996
C1-C2-C3-Nox−6.9−11.9
1 Ref. [44].
Table 2. TD-DFT lowest energy calculated electronic transitions of 1. f and ω are the oscillator strength and weight of the given configuration, respectively.
Table 2. TD-DFT lowest energy calculated electronic transitions of 1. f and ω are the oscillator strength and weight of the given configuration, respectively.
E (eV) λ (nm)fCharacteristic ω Characteristic ω λ ex (nm) 1
Absorption
3.55348.30.059 H ( d y z / π o z ) L ( π o z * ) 0.980 370
3.75330.10.032 H ( d y z / π o z ) L + 1 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.892
3.80326.20.015 H ( d y z / π o z ) L + 2 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.919
3.95313.20.017 H 1 ( d x y / π d f p p z ) L ( π o z * ) 0.590 H 1 ( d x y / π d f p p z ) L + 1 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.262
4.00309.90.026 H 1 ( d x y / π d f p p z ) L + 1 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.583 H 1 ( d x y / π d f p p z ) L ( π o z * ) 0.336325
4.06304.90.010 H 1 ( d x y / π d f p p z ) L + 2 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.828
4.32286.50.107 H 2 ( d x z ) L ( π o z * ) 0.621 H 2 ( d x z ) L + 1 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.297
4.37283.20.052 H 2 ( d x z ) L + 1 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.366 H 2 ( d x z ) L + 2 ( π d f p p z * ) 0.328290
H 2 ( d x z ) L ( π o z * ) 0.264
Phosphorescence
2.30540 L ( π o z * ) H ( d y z / π o z ) 500
1 Ref. [44].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lodowski, P.; Jaworska, M. Theoretical Investigation of Iridium Complex with Aggregation-Induced Emission Properties. Molecules 2024, 29, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030580

AMA Style

Lodowski P, Jaworska M. Theoretical Investigation of Iridium Complex with Aggregation-Induced Emission Properties. Molecules. 2024; 29(3):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lodowski, Piotr, and Maria Jaworska. 2024. "Theoretical Investigation of Iridium Complex with Aggregation-Induced Emission Properties" Molecules 29, no. 3: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030580

APA Style

Lodowski, P., & Jaworska, M. (2024). Theoretical Investigation of Iridium Complex with Aggregation-Induced Emission Properties. Molecules, 29(3), 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29030580

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop