Next Article in Journal
The Effects of External Interfaces on Hydrophobic Interactions I: Smooth Surface
Previous Article in Journal
Cs-Doped WO3 with Enhanced Conduction Band for Efficient Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction Driven by Long-Wavelength Visible Light
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of Ferric-Oxide-Doped Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Electrocatalysts by Magnetic-Field-Assisted Chemical Corrosion toward Boosted Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Hubei Key Laboratory of Plasma Chemistry and Advanced Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Engineering Process of Ministry of Education, Wuhan Institute of Technology, No. 206 Guanggu 1st Road, Wuhan 430205, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(13), 3127; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133127
Submission received: 7 June 2024 / Revised: 22 June 2024 / Accepted: 27 June 2024 / Published: 1 July 2024

Abstract

:
Transition-metal-based oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts have attracted widespread attention due to their inexpensive prices, unique layered structures, and rich active sites. Currently, designing low-cost, sustainable, and simple synthesis methods is essential for the application of transition-metal-based catalysts. Here, magnetic field (MF)-assisted chemical corrosion, as a novel technology, is adopted to construct superior OER electrocatalysts. The produced Ni(Fe)(OH)2-Fe2O3 electrode exhibits an overpotential of 272 mV at a current density of 100 mA cm−2, presenting a 64 mV reduction compared to the electrode without an MF. The experimental results indicate that an MF can induce the directional growth of Fe2O3 rods and reduce their accumulation. In addition, an external MF is beneficial for the lattice dislocation of the obtained catalysts, which can increase the surface free energy, thus reducing the activation energy and accelerating the electrochemical reaction kinetics. This work effectively combines a magnetic field with chemical corrosion and electrochemical energy, which offers a novel strategy for the large-scale development of environmentally friendly and superior electrocatalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Serious energy crises and environmental problems have hindered the sustainable development of the economy; thus, developing renewable and clean energy sources is vital to solve the above problems [1,2]. Hydrogen energy is widely used as a clean and renewable energy source [3]. Recently, environmentally friendly and sustainable methods of green hydrogen production, such as water splitting, have been developed [4]. However, as a four-electron transfer reaction, the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) (4OH → 2H2O + O2 + 4e) is a key reaction during water splitting and generates a high overpotential. Therefore, developing highly efficient catalysts is essential to improve the slow kinetics of the OER [5,6,7]. Noble metals (such as Ru and Ir) demonstrate efficient OER activity; nevertheless, their low abundance, high cost, and instability limit their application [8]. NiFe compounds present the merits of low costs, adjustable components, and a controllable morphology; they are considered to be the most promising non-precious-metal-based OER electrocatalysts [9]. For instance, a two-stage electrodeposition technique was introduced to deposit individual Ru atoms on NiFe LDH. The obtained Ru0.3/NiFe showed an overpotential of 243 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and exhibited superior stability performance [10]. In addition, amorphous NiFe oxides synthesized by nanoreactors showed an overpotential of 228 mV at 10 mA cm−2 [11]. The superior OER performance of composite materials can be ascribed to the existence of strong interfacial interactions, which are beneficial for the transport of oxygen ions [12,13]. In addition, the strong electronic contact within the composite material can enhance the active sites, thus presenting high catalytic activity [14,15].
Recently, various synthesis methods, including high-temperature calcination, hydrothermal/solvothermal methods, and electrodeposition, have been widely adopted to construct OER catalysts. However, these preparation methods have the disadvantages of requiring harsh conditions, complex processes, and high energy consumption [16,17]. In general, the chemical corrosion of metals can spontaneously take place in the natural environment, which causes great damage during industrial production [18,19]. Typically, corrosion is a spontaneous redox reaction that occurs in different microscopic regions of a metal surface; this corrosion process can lead to the generation of metal oxide or hydroxide products [20]. Interestingly, these corrosion layers can be utilized as efficient OER catalysts; therefore, chemical corrosion, with its merits of a low cost, effective regulation, and large-scale production, can be adopted to synthesize superior OER electrocatalysts.
In addition, a magnetic field (MF) plays a critical role in synthesizing new materials and optimizing material properties. Generally, the high-intensity energy of MFs can change the microstructure of the material, such as the lattice arrangement, grain size, and orientation [21,22,23]. By adjusting the MF strength, the magnetic moment orientation and magnetic domain structure of the material can be regulated, thereby affecting the phase transition behavior of the material [24,25,26]. For example, a two-phase nickel–cobalt hydroxide nanosheet with a clear phase boundary was constructed by an MF-focused plasma jet [27]. Furthermore, there is a Lorentz force between the MF and the moving ions, which induces the ions to grow in a certain direction and form unique nanomaterials [28]. For instance, the MF-confined picosecond laser ablation of MOF was adopted to synthesize uniform ultra-small Co catalysts [29]. More importantly, an MF has the ability to greatly improve the substance transfer efficiency, thus affecting the formation of chemical corrosion products [30]. Therefore, MF-assisted chemical corrosion can serve as an important technology to construct advanced electrocatalysts.
In this work, the MF-assisted chemical corrosion strategy is introduced to construct efficient OER catalysts. The produced Ni(Fe)(OH)2-Fe2O3 electrode exhibits an overpotential of 285 mV at a current of 100 mA cm−2, marking a 45 mV reduction compared to the MF-free electrode. The experimental results indicate that an MF can induce the directional growth of Fe2O3 rods and reduce their accumulation. In addition, an external MF is beneficial for the lattice dislocation of the obtained catalysts, which can increase the surface free energy, thus reducing the activation energy and accelerating the electrochemical reaction kinetics. This work effectively combines a magnetic field with chemical corrosion and electrochemical energy, which offers a novel strategy for the large-scale development of environmentally friendly and excellent electrocatalysts.

2. Results and Discussion

When an external MF is applied to the system of NF immersed in an FeCl3 solution, chloride ions are hydrolyzed to produce HCl, which accelerates the corrosion of NF (Cl + H2O → HCl + OH) [31]. In addition, OH- from hydrolysis can react with the dissolved Ni2+ and Fe3+ in the solution to form NiFe layered double hydroxides (LDH) [32]. The high Fe3+ concentration can induce the resulted Fe(OH)3 to dehydrate to Fe2O3 (Fe(OH)3 → Fe2O3 + H2O) [33]. Under the presence of the MF, the magnetic induction line is perpendicular to the surface of the NF; therefore, the Fe2O3 nanorods can distribute on the surface of the NiFe LDH layer (Figure 1a). SEM and TEM images indicate that the corrosion layer presents some nanorods on the nanosheets (Figure 1b,c). After analyzing the images in high-resolution (HR)TEM, the lattice spacing of 0.33 nm is assigned to the (002) plane of the Fe2O3 nanorods, while the lattice spacing of 0.346 nm is assigned to the (111) plane of α-Ni(OH)2 (Figure 1d,e). Element mapping diagrams indicate that the Ni, Fe, and O elements are evenly dispersed on the corrosion product (Figure 1f). For the chemical corrosion environment without the external MF, there are denser Fe2O3 nanorods on α-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets (Figure S1), indicating that the MF can induce the directional growth of the Fe2O3 nanorods and reduce their accumulation. However, with the assistance of the MF, the lattice spacings of both Fe2O3 and α-Ni(OH)2 become larger, and there exists obvious lattice disorder (Figure 1e). This is ascribed to the directional moving ions in the solution, induced by the external MF. Furthermore, incorporating an MF may lead to a prolonged nucleation induction period, a widened substable zone, and an increased nucleation barrier. Under the joint influence of the nucleation kinetics and growth kinetics, an MF can have a significant effect on crystal growth and effectively control the crystal morphology [34,35]. Obviously, the atomic ratios of Fe to O in the electrodes constructed with an MF are significantly reduced, which further proves that the corroded electrodes constructed with an MF have lower Fe2O3 yields (Table S1). These results imply that the MF can modify the free energy of the synthesized substances and influence the nucleation selectivity accompanied by the nucleation rate of Fe2O3, effectively controlling the amount of Fe2O3 and avoiding its excessive stacking [36,37].
The samples have three characteristic peaks at 145, 300, and 400 cm−1 in the Raman spectrum, which correspond to Ni-O, Fe-O, and Fe-OH, respectively (Figure 2a) [38]. The peaks at 24° and 27° in the XRD correspond to Fe2O3 (JCPDS 47-1409) and α-Ni(OH)2 (JCPDS 22-0444) (Figure 2b). The peaks at 45° and 52° correspond to the substrate Ni (JCPDS 04-0850). Under the external MF, both the Fe2O3 peak and the α-Ni(OH)2 peak shift negatively, indicating that the crystal spacing increases. Moreover, the intensity of the diffraction peaks increases and they become sharper, which is ascribed to the enhanced crystallinity of the catalyst and the more regular internal atomic arrangement induced by the MF [36]. The coexistence of Ni, Fe, and O in the products is further verified by XPS (Figure 2c). The peaks at 529, 530, and 531 eV in the O 1s spectra correspond to M(Fe/Ni)-O, M-OH, and H2O, respectively (Figure 2d) [39]. The Ni 2p spectra present the characteristic peaks of Ni(II) (Figure 2e). The peaks at 855 and 861 eV are assigned to Ni 2p3/2, while the peaks at 873 and 879 eV are assigned to Ni 2p1/2 [40]. After adding the MF, these peaks shift negatively. The two characteristic peaks shown in the Fe 2p spectrum correspond to Fe(III) (Figure 2f). The peak at 711 eV is assigned to Fe 2p3/2, while the peak at 723 eV is assigned to Fe 2p1/2 [41]. With the addition of the MF, the Fe 2p1/2 peak is significantly shifted and has higher binding energy. The above results suggest that the introduction of the MF stretches the Fe-O bond in the structure, inducing the electrons to transfer from Ni to Fe through the O bridge across the Ni/Fe ions [42,43,44]. These results are consistent with the morphology characterization of the different corrosion electrodes.
The electrochemical measurements of different corrosion electrodes are conducted in 1.0 M KOH solution. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is used for activation, and the oxidation peaks located at 1.2–1.5 V are assigned to the transformation of Ni2+ to Ni3+ (Figure 3a). The OER activity of the corrosion electrode is further evaluated by the LSV curve. The corrosion electrode constructed without an MF has an overpotential of 336 mV at 100 mA cm−2, while the corrosion electrode prepared with an MF shows a lower overpotential of 272 mV (Figure 3b). It can be seen that the corrosion electrode constructed with an MF has a Tafel slope of 48 mV dec−1, which is significantly lower compared to the MF-free electrode (56 mV dec−1) (Figure 3c) [45]. Comparing the electrochemical impedance spectra, the catalysts prepared with the external MF have lower charge transfer resistance (Figure 3d). In addition, the double-layer capacitances of the corroded electrodes increase, demonstrating that the OER catalysts constructed with the MF have a larger electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) (Figure 3e). The catalysts prepared with the MF still show better performance when normalized to the ECSA, implying that the Ni(Fe)(OH)2-Fe2O3 presents higher intrinsic OER activity (Figure S2). Furthermore, at a current density of 100 mA cm−2, the MF-assisted constructed electrode can remain stable for 16 h (Figure 3f). These results illustrate that the Ni(Fe)(OH)2-Fe2O3 constructed with an MF during the chemical corrosion process has outstanding OER performance and stability.
In order to illustrate the effects of various reaction environments and MF conditions on the performance of catalytic electrodes, different preparation conditions, including corrosion times (0.08 h, 0.25 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, and 2 h), FeCl3 solution concentrations (5.4 mmol, 27 mmol, 54 mmol, 81 mmol, and 108 mmol), and MF intensities (0 mT, 60 mT, 90 mT, 120 mT, 150 mT, and 180 mT), are considered. Under the external MF, the OER performance of the prepared electrodes is gradually improved with the increasing corrosion time from 0.08 to 0.25 h; then, the OER activity decreases from 0.25 h to 2 h, and the optimum OER performance is reached at 0.25 h (Figure 4a). The increased corrosion time induces more products, which can provide more exposed active sites (Figure 1b and Figure S3a). However, the continuously increasing corrosion time leads to the stacking coverage of the products, resulting in their gradual agglomeration into a dense lamellar structure (Figure S3b–d). Thus, the abundant active sites on the original NF surface are covered, reducing the OER activity of the catalyst [46]. Regarding the Fe3+ concentration in the corrosive environment, the OER performance gradually increases and then decreases, obtaining the optimum OER performance at 81 mmol (Figure 4b). This is mainly because more Fe3+ can form more Ni(Fe)(OH)2-Fe2O3 (Figure 1b and Figure S4a–c) [47,48,49,50]. Additionally, the generated heterojunction structures between Fe2O3 and Ni(Fe)(OH)2 can optimize the electronic structure of Ni in the electrode and further promote the OER performance [42]. Nevertheless, the higher Fe3+ can induce the formation of a disorganized lamellar structure, leading to fewer exposed active sites (Figure S4d) [46]. Concerning the external MF strength, the OER performance gradually increases with the increase in the MF strength from 0 mT to 90 mT, and the OER performance decreases when the MF strength increases to 180 mT (Figure 4c). The external MF can cause Fe2O3 to grow directionally and prevent stacking, thus increasing the exposed active sites of the electrode [51]. Moreover, the MF can promote the flow of ions in the solution, reduce the concentration of Fe3+ ions on the surface of the NF during chemical corrosion, and decrease the agglomeration of Fe2O3 (Figure 1b, Figures S1a and S5) [52]. However, when the external MF strength continues to increase, the ion movement in the solution is greatly promoted, which reduces the Fe3+ concentration and inhibits the Fe2O3 production on the NF surface. In addition, the overpotentials of different electrodes, at 100 mA cm−2, demonstrate more clearly the effect of corrosion conditions on the OER performance of the electrodes (Figure 4d).
To further assess the structural evolution of different samples during the OER process, in situ Raman spectroscopy from the open circuit voltage to 1.5 V vs. RHE is conducted (Figure 5a,b). When the actual potential exceeds 1.4 V vs. RHE, a pair of distinct Raman peaks appear at 476 and 556 cm−1. These peaks are ascribed to the bending and tensile vibrations of Ni(III)-O, suggesting that the Ni(Fe)(OH)2 transforms into Ni(Fe)OOH. In addition, at 1.4 V vs. RHE, the peak intensity of the electrode prepared with MF assistance is significantly higher than that prepared without an MF (Figure 5c). The applied MF can significantly accelerate the chemical corrosion process, which helps to control the generation and arrangement of the Fe2O3 [53]. These reactive substances can optimize the desorption of O intermediates in the OER process, which promotes the conversion of Ni(II) → Ni(III) [54]. As a result, the vibration of the chemical bonds inside the material becomes more intense, presenting a higher peak intensity in the Raman spectrum [55,56,57]. The magnetic properties of different catalytic electrodes are studied using a vibrating sample magnetometer. The electrode produced under the MF yields a higher saturation magnetization value (38 emu·g−1) (Figure 5d). The MF can induce directional alignment in the material [58]. For ferromagnetic materials, the spin magnetic moment makes an important contribution to the magnetic property, enabling the production of more free electrons [59,60]. Thus, the electrode has room-temperature ferromagnetism and there are more free electrons in the electrode. The external MF can promote the spin polarization of the electrons located in the outermost orbital and optimize the arrangement of the electrons, thus improving the OER performance [61,62,63].

3. Experimental Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Ni foam (NF, 99.99%, Kunshan Long Sheng Bao Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., Kunshan, China) was used as the substrate. Other reagents and chemicals were of analytical reagent (AR) grade. Solutions were prepared with deionized water.

3.2. Corrosion Electrode Preparation

NF (1.0 cm × 5.0 cm) with a thickness of 1.5 mm was selected as the base material. The NF was placed in a mixture of anhydrous ethanol and acetone (volume ratio 1:1) for 30 min under ultrasonic treatment. Then, the pre-treated electrodes were immersed in an FeCl3 solution. Different corrosion times (0.08 h, 0.25 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h), Fe3+ concentrations (5.4 mmol, 27 mmol, 54 mmol, 81 mmol, 108 mmol), and magnetic field intensities (0 mT, 60 mT, 90 mT, 120 mT, 150 mT, 180 mT) were considered.

3.3. Physical Property Characterization

The morphology of various electrodes was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI NOVA NANO450, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI-Talos F200X, Waltham, MA, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD, Empyrean, Almelo, The Netherlands) was performed with Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1.5416 Å) and a scanning range of 10° to 90° at 10° min−1. Raman spectra (Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution, Paris, France) were collected at the wavelength of 532 cm−1. The base pressure of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos AXIS SUPRA, Kyoto, Japan) analyzed in the experimental chamber was below 10−9 bar, the spectra were measured with Al Ka (1486.6 eV) radiation, the overall energy resolution was 0.45 eV, and the binding energies were calibrated relative to the C 1s peak at 284.6 eV.

3.4. Electrochemical Performance Characterization

Electrochemical tests were carried out at the Chenhua Electrochemistry Workstation (CHI600E) with a three-electrode system. A synthetic corrosion electrode was used as the working electrode, a carbon rod was used as the opposite electrode, and a Hg/HgO electrode was used as the reference electrode. All tests were performed with 50 mL of KOH (1 mol L−1) as the electrolyte at ~25 °C and were repeated at least three times to ensure the reliability of the experimental results. Equation (1) was used to convert the potential data obtained from the electrochemical test into a relatively reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale, and the oxygen evolution overpotential η = ERHE − 1.23.
E R H E = E H g / H g O + 0.0591 × P H + 0.097
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured at 1.54 V vs. RHE. The frequency range was 105 kHz–0.01 Hz. The linear scan voltammetry (LSV) curves were measured at a scan rate of 5.0 mV s−1, starting from 1.0 V to 1.7 V vs. RHE. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed in the potential range of 1.07 to 1.18 V vs. RHE at different scan rates of 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mV s−1, and 20 cycles were recorded. The OER stability of the electrode was tested at a constant current density of 100 mA cm−2.

4. Conclusions

In summary, an MF is introduced to further promote the chemical corrosion of NF, and the prepared electrocatalysts exhibit superior OER activity. The experimental results show that the Ni(Fe)(OH)2-Fe2O3 electrocatalyst exhibits an overpotential of 272 mV at a current density of 100 mA cm−2, marking a 64 mV reduction compared to the MF-free electrocatalyst (336 mV). These results indicate that MFs can induce the directional growth of Fe2O3 rods and reduce their accumulation, thus exposing more active sites. In addition, an external MF can induce the lattice dislocation of the heterojunction structure, which can increase the surface free energy, thus reducing the activation energy and accelerating the electrochemical reaction kinetics. This work demonstrates that an applied magnetic field can improve the composition and structure of catalysts during chemical corrosion, effectively combining the magnetic field with chemical corrosion and electrochemical energy, offering a novel strategy for the large-scale development of environmentally friendly and superior electrocatalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29133127/s1, Figure S1: (a) SEM micrograph; (b) TEM micrograph; (c,d) HRTEM micrograph; (e) corresponding element mapping diagrams of the electrocatalysts obtained without MF; Figure S2: LSV curves of different samples after electrochemically active surface area normalization; Figure S3: SEM micrographs of electrodes prepared at different corrosion times of (a) 0.08 h; (b) 0.5 h; (c) 1 h; (d) 2 h; Figure S4: SEM micrographs of electrodes prepared at different solution concentrations of (a) 5.4 mmol; (b) 27 mmol; (c) 54 mmol; (d) 108 mmol; Figure S5: SEM micrographs of electrodes prepared at different magnetic field strengths of (a) 60 mT; (b) 120 mT; (c) 150 mT; (d) 180 mT; Table S1: The Content of Ni, Fe, and O elements corresponding to the element distribution of unactivated samples obtained by chemical corrosion under different magnetic field intensities.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, M.X.; methodology, L.L.; investigation, H.H.; formal analysis, Y.C.; resources, X.Y.; validation, K.Y. and B.C.; software, X.Z.; project administration and supervision, X.J.; writing—review and editing, C.Y. and H.Y.; conceptualization, H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by the Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Hubei Province (S202310490027). We also thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22102125) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2023AFB620) for the financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The most important data are included in this article, while others are included in the Supporting Information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Niether, C.; Faure, S.; Bordet, A.; Deseure, J.; Chatenet, M.; Carrey, J.; Chaudret, B.; Rouet, A. Improved water electrolysis using magnetic heating of FeC–Ni core–shell nanoparticles. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garcés-Pineda, F.A.; Blasco-Ahicart, M.; Nieto-Castro, D.; López, N.; Galán-Mascarós, J.R. Direct magnetic enhancement of electrocatalytic water oxidation in alkaline media. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guan, D.; Wang, B.; Zhang, J.; Shi, R.; Jiao, K.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Xie, B.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, J.; et al. Hydrogen society: From present to future. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 4926–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thorarinsdottir, A.E.; Veroneau, S.S.; Nocera, D.G. Self-healing oxygen evolution catalysts. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, J.; Xie, F.; Wang, D.; Ma, C.; Wu, M.; Gong, K. Effect of magnetic field on stress corrosion cracking induced by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 303, 124521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yao, J.; Huang, W.; Fang, W.; Kuang, M.; Jia, N.; Ren, H.; Liu, D.; Lv, C.; Liu, C.; Xu, J. Promoting electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction and oxygen evolution reaction by fields: Effects of electric field, magnetic field, strain, and light. Small Methods 2020, 4, 2000494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abdelghafar, F.; Xu, X.; Jiang, S.P.; Shao, Z. Perovskite for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution at elevated temperatures. ChemSusChem 2024, e202301534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shi, Q.; Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Robust noble metal-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3181–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, H.; Guan, D.; Gu, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, C.; Shao, Z.; Guo, Y. Tuning synergy between nickel and iron in ruddlesden-popper perovskites through controllable crystal dimensionalities towards enhanced oxygen-evolving activity and stability. Carbon Energy 2024, 6, e465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Q.; Zhou, W.; Shao, J.; Jiang, X.; Feng, C.; Yang, H.; He, C. Amorphous NiFe oxide-based nanoreactors for efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, H.; Xin, G.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Si, C.; Chen, J.; Lu, L.; Peng, Y.; Li, X. Single-atoms Ru/NiFe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst: Efficient for oxidation of selective oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2023, 339, 123157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, X.; Pan, Y.; Ge, L.; Chen, Y.; Mao, X.; Guan, D.; Li, M.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, Z.; Peterson, V.K.; et al. High-performance perovskite composite electrocatalysts enabled by controllable interface engineering. Small 2021, 17, 2101573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, L.; Wang, R.; Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Liu, H.; Xing, B.; Wang, K. Three-dimensional heterostructured MnNiCoP/FeOOH cross-linked nano-flake supported by Ni foam as a bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 656, 159711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, M.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, R.; Zhu, L.; Yang, S.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; Wang, K. Polymetallic Prussian blue analogues with hierarchical structure for high efficiency oxygen evolution reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 54, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, H.; Xu, X.; Kim, H.; Shao, Z.; Jung, W. Advanced electrocatalysts with unusual active sites for electrochemical water splitting. InfoMat 2024, 6, e12494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, D.; Zhu, J.; Mu, X.; Cheng, R.; Li, W.; Liu, S.; Pu, Z.; Lin, C.; Mu, S. Nitrogen-doped carbon coupled FeNi3 intermetallic compound as advanced bifunctional electrocatalyst for OER, ORR and Zn-air batteries. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2020, 268, 118729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qazi, U.Y.; Yuan, C.-Z.; Ullah, N.; Jiang, Y.-F.; Imran, M.; Zeb, A.; Zhao, S.-J.; Javaid, R.; Xu, A.-W. One-step growth of iron–nickel bimetallic nanoparticles on FeNi alloy foils: Highly efficient advanced electrodes for the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 28627–28634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, B.; Wang, J.; Wu, B.; Guo, X.W.; Wang, Y.J.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.C.; Du, K.; Oguzie, E.E.; Ma, X.L. Unmasking chloride attack on the passive film of metals. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ramus Moreira, A.; Panossian, Z.; Camargo, P.L.; Ferreia Moreira, M.; da Silva, I.C.; Ribeiro de Carvalho, J.E. Zn/55Al coating microstructure and corrosion mechanism. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48, 564–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Le Bozec, N.; Compère, C.; L’Her, M.; Laouenan, A.; Costa, D.; Marcus, P. Influence of stainless steel surface treatment on the oxygen reduction reaction in seawater. Corros. Sci. 2001, 43, 765–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woodward, J.R. Radical pairs in solution. Prog. React. Kinet. Mech. 2002, 27, 165–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, L.; Zhang, R.; Chen, Q.J.N. Synthesis and assembly of nanomaterials under magnetic fields. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 14064–14105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. De Rango, P.; Lees, M.; Lejay, P.; Sulpice, A.; Tournier, R.; Ingold, M.; Germi, P.; Pernet, M. Texturing of magnetic materials at high temperature by solidification in a magnetic field. Nature 1991, 349, 770–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guillon, O.; Elsässer, C.; Gutfleisch, O.; Janek, J.; Korte-Kerzel, S.; Raabe, D.; Volkert, C.A. Manipulation of matter by electric and magnetic fields: Toward novel synthesis and processing routes of inorganic materials. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zuo, X.; Qu, L.; Zhao, C.; An, B.; Wang, E.; Niu, R.; Xin, Y.; Lu, J.; Han, K. Nucleation and growth of γ-Fe precipitate in Cu-2% Fe alloy aged under high magnetic field. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 662, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dai, P.; Yan, T.; Hu, L.; Pang, Z.; Bao, Z.; Wu, M.; Li, G.; Fang, J.; Peng, Z. Phase engineering of cobalt hydroxides using magnetic fields for enhanced supercapacitor performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 19203–19209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, G.; Chen, D.; Huang, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, W.; Li, T.; Huang, B.; Shao, T.; Li, J.; Ostrikov, K.K. Focused plasma and pure water-enabled, electrode-emerged nanointerfaced NiCo hydroxide–oxide for robust overall water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 45566–45577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liang, C.; Zou, P.; Nairan, A.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, K.; Hu, S.; Kang, F.; Fan, H.J.; Yang, C. Exceptional performance of hierarchical Ni–Fe oxyhydroxide@NiFe alloy nanowire array electrocatalysts for large current density water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, J.; Wang, R.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.; An, L.; Jin, S.; Deng, B.; Wu, W.; Cheng, G.J. Magnetically aligned ultrafine cobalt embedded 3D porous carbon metamaterial by one-step ultrafast laser direct writing. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2102477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiu, N.; Yan, J.; Zuo, X. A novel strategy for hierarchical structure in multicomponent nano-precipitated steels by high magnetic field aging. Scr. Mater. 2021, 191, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peugeot, A.; Creissen, C.E.; Schreiber, M.W.; Fontecave, M. From nickel foam to highly active NiFe-based oxygen evolution catalysts. ChemElectroChem 2022, 9, e202200148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mahmood, A.; Yu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Qiu, L.; Liu, B. Controllable structure reconstruction of nickel–iron compounds toward highly efficient oxygen evolution. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 10751–10759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hu, S.; Li, Y.; Kim, D.; Liu, M.; Lee, L.Y.S.; Wong, K.Y. Surface modulated Fe doping of β-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets for highly promoted oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. EcoMat 2022, 4, e12256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, M.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, H.; Zheng, X.; Shen, J.; Zhao, R.; Zhou, W.; et al. Greatly enhanced methanol oxidation reaction of CoPt truncated octahedral nanoparticles by external magnetic fields. Energy Environ. Mater. 2023, 6, e12403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, Y.H.; Hou, B.H.; Liu, C.H.; Ji, X.T.; Huang, Y.H.; Sui, J.C.; Liu, D.; Wang, N.; Hao, H.X. Mechanistic study on the effect of magnetic field on the crystallization of organic small molecules. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 15741–15751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ding, W.; Hu, L.; Dai, J.; Tang, X.; Wei, R.; Sheng, Z.; Liang, C.; Shao, D.; Song, W.; Liu, Q.; et al. Highly ambient-stable 1T-MoS2 and 1T-WS2 by hydrothermal synthesis under high magnetic fields. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1694–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jiang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; You, F.; Yao, J.; Yang, H.; Xia, B.Y. Magnetic field-assisted construction and enhancement of electrocatalysts. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202201551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhao, J.-W.; Shi, Z.-X.; Li, C.-F.; Gu, L.-F.; Li, G.-R. Boosting the electrocatalytic performance of NiFe layered double hydroxides for the oxygen evolution reaction by exposing the highly active edge plane (012). Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiang, W.J.; Niu, S.; Tang, T.; Zhang, Q.H.; Liu, X.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.Y.; Li, J.H.; Gu, L.; Wan, L.J. Crystallinity-modulated electrocatalytic activity of a nickel(II) borate thin layer on Ni3B for efficient water oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6572–6577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, T.; Nam, G.; Jin, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, P.; Kim, M.G.; Liang, J.; Wen, X.; Jang, H.; Han, J. NiFe (oxy) hydroxides derived from NiFe disulfides as an efficient oxygen evolution catalyst for rechargeable Zn–air batteries: The effect of surface S residues. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, H.; Dong, C.L.; Wang, H.M.; Qi, R.J.; Gong, L.Q.; Lu, Y.R.; He, C.H.; Chen, S.H.; You, B.; Liu, H.F.; et al. Constructing nickel–iron oxyhydroxides integrated with iron oxides by microorganism corrosion for oxygen evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2202812119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guan, J.L.; Li, C.F.; Zhao, J.W.; Yang, Y.Z.; Zhou, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.R. FeOOH-enhanced bifunctionality in Ni3N nanotube arrays for water splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2020, 269, 118600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jiang, M.; Gao, S.; Shi, W.; Guo, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; You, J.; Zeng, J.; Zeng, H.; Hou, X.; et al. Magnetic-field-dominated spin-driven lattice deformation of 2D FeO/Cu2O composites for CO2 photocatalytic C–C coupling. Chem Catal. 2023, 3, 100808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fu, Q.; Han, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, P.; Yao, T.; Zhong, J.; Zhong, W.; Liu, S.; Gao, T.; Zhang, Z.; et al. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: Design, modulation, and challenges in electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 1907818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Zou, Y.; Wang, S. Water-plasma-enabled exfoliation of ultrathin layered double hydroxide nanosheets with multivacancies for water oxidation. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Burke, M.S.; Kast, M.G.; Trotochaud, L.; Smith, A.M.; Boettcher, S.W. Cobalt–iron (oxy) hydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts: The role of structure and composition on activity, stability, and mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3638–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gong, L.; Koh, J.; Yeo, B.S. Mechanistic study of the synergy between iron and transition metals for the catalysis of the oxygen evolution reaction. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3790–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Burke, M.S.; Enman, L.J.; Batchellor, A.S.; Zou, S.; Boettcher, S.W. Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis on transition metal oxides and (oxy) hydroxides: Activity trends and design principles. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 7549–7558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xie, X.; Du, L.; Yan, L.; Park, S.; Qiu, Y.; Sokolowski, J.; Wang, W.; Shao, Y. Oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline environment: Material challenges and solutions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shuai, M.; Klittnick, A.; Shen, Y.; Smith, G.P.; Tuchband, M.R.; Zhu, C.; Petschek, R.G.; Mertelj, A.; Lisjak, D.; Čopič, M.; et al. Spontaneous liquid crystal and ferromagnetic ordering of colloidal magnetic nanoplates. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, H.; Wang, K.; Zuo, Y.; Wei, M.; Pei, P.; Zhang, P.; Chen, Z.; Shang, N. Magnetoelectric Coupling for metal–air batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, M.; Guo, L.; Ajmal, M.; Pan, L.; Shi, C.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Z.-F.; Zou, J.-J. Coupling ferromagnetic ordering electron transfer channels and surface reconstructed active species for spintronic electrocatalysis of water oxidation. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 85, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liao, H.; Luo, T.; Tan, P.; Chen, K.; Lu, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.; Pan, J. Unveiling role of sulfate ion in nickel-iron (oxy)hydroxide with enhanced oxygen-evolving performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhai, P.; Xia, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Gao, J.; Zhang, B.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Fan, Z. Engineering single-atomic ruthenium catalytic sites on defective nickel-iron layered double hydroxide for overall water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, G.; Wu, C.; Hu, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, R.; Li, Y.; Xiong, J. Identification of key reversible intermediates in self-reconstructed nickel-based hybrid electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 131, 17619–17625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, S.; Chen, F.; Zhu, L.; Yang, Z.; Lin, Y.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Y. Insight into the catalytic activity of amorphous multimetallic catalysts under a magnetic field toward the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 10227–10236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kodaimati, M.S.; Gao, R.; Root, S.E.; Whitesides, G.M. Magnetic fields enhance mass transport during electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Chem Catal. 2022, 2, 797–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, Z.; Lin, L.; He, J.; Ding, D.; Wang, T.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, M.; et al. Regulating the spin state of FeIII enhances the magnetic effect of the molecular catalysis mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8204–8213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ren, X.; Wu, T.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Xian, G.; Liu, X.; Shen, C.; Gracia, J.; Gao, H.-J.; Yang, H. Spin-polarized oxygen evolution reaction under magnetic field. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yan, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, S.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Direct magnetic reinforcement of electrocatalytic ORR/OER with electromagnetic induction of magnetic catalysts. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Xu, H.; Qi, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Hu, L.; Feng, M.; Lü, W. Magnetic field-enhanced oxygen evolution reaction via the tuneability of spin polarization in a half-metal catalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 32320–32328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Saini, K.; Nair, A.N.; Yadav, A.; Enriquez, L.G.; Pollock, C.J.; House, S.D.; Yang, S.; Guo, X.; Sreenivasan, S.T. Nickel-based single-molecule catalysts with synergistic geometric transition and magnetic field-assisted spin selection outperform RuO2 for oxygen evolution. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2302170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Preparation process diagram; (b) SEM micrograph; (c) TEM micrograph; (d,e) HRTEM micrograph (yellow color: the lattice spacing, red circle: the lattice distortion region); (f) corresponding element mapping diagrams of electrocatalysts obtained under magnetic-field-assisted chemical etching.
Figure 1. (a) Preparation process diagram; (b) SEM micrograph; (c) TEM micrograph; (d,e) HRTEM micrograph (yellow color: the lattice spacing, red circle: the lattice distortion region); (f) corresponding element mapping diagrams of electrocatalysts obtained under magnetic-field-assisted chemical etching.
Molecules 29 03127 g001
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra; (b) XRD pattern; (c) XPS profile; (d) O 1s (yellow: M-O, purple: M-OH, green: H2O); (e) Ni 2p (purple: Ni 2p3/2, green: Ni 2p1/2); (f) Fe 2p (green: Fe 2p3/2, purple: Fe 2p1/2) of electrocatalysts obtained under different magnetic field strengths.
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra; (b) XRD pattern; (c) XPS profile; (d) O 1s (yellow: M-O, purple: M-OH, green: H2O); (e) Ni 2p (purple: Ni 2p3/2, green: Ni 2p1/2); (f) Fe 2p (green: Fe 2p3/2, purple: Fe 2p1/2) of electrocatalysts obtained under different magnetic field strengths.
Molecules 29 03127 g002
Figure 3. (a) CV curves; (b) LSV curves; (c) corresponding Tafel slope; (d) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; (e) corresponding capacitance current scan rate curves; (f) chronopotentiogram at 100 mA cm−2 of electrocatalysts obtained under different magnetic field strengths.
Figure 3. (a) CV curves; (b) LSV curves; (c) corresponding Tafel slope; (d) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; (e) corresponding capacitance current scan rate curves; (f) chronopotentiogram at 100 mA cm−2 of electrocatalysts obtained under different magnetic field strengths.
Molecules 29 03127 g003
Figure 4. LSV curves of (a) electrodes prepared at different corrosion times; (b) electrodes prepared at different Fe3+ concentrations; (c) electrodes prepared under different magnetic field strengths; (d) overpotential at 100 mA cm−2 corresponding to electrodes obtained under different chemical corrosion conditions.
Figure 4. LSV curves of (a) electrodes prepared at different corrosion times; (b) electrodes prepared at different Fe3+ concentrations; (c) electrodes prepared under different magnetic field strengths; (d) overpotential at 100 mA cm−2 corresponding to electrodes obtained under different chemical corrosion conditions.
Molecules 29 03127 g004
Figure 5. (a,b) In situ Raman spectra from open circuit voltage to 1.5 V vs. RHE; (c) in situ Raman spectra at 1.4 V vs. RHE; (d) magnetic hysteresis loops of electrocatalysts obtained under different magnetic field strengths.
Figure 5. (a,b) In situ Raman spectra from open circuit voltage to 1.5 V vs. RHE; (c) in situ Raman spectra at 1.4 V vs. RHE; (d) magnetic hysteresis loops of electrocatalysts obtained under different magnetic field strengths.
Molecules 29 03127 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, M.; Lei, L.; Hu, H.; Chen, Y.; Yang, X.; Yu, K.; Cao, B.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, X.; Yao, C.; et al. Construction of Ferric-Oxide-Doped Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Electrocatalysts by Magnetic-Field-Assisted Chemical Corrosion toward Boosted Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Molecules 2024, 29, 3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133127

AMA Style

Xu M, Lei L, Hu H, Chen Y, Yang X, Yu K, Cao B, Zhang X, Jiang X, Yao C, et al. Construction of Ferric-Oxide-Doped Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Electrocatalysts by Magnetic-Field-Assisted Chemical Corrosion toward Boosted Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Molecules. 2024; 29(13):3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Mengdie, Ling Lei, Huilin Hu, Yana Chen, Xuchao Yang, Kaige Yu, Bingying Cao, Xianzheng Zhang, Xueliang Jiang, Chu Yao, and et al. 2024. "Construction of Ferric-Oxide-Doped Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Electrocatalysts by Magnetic-Field-Assisted Chemical Corrosion toward Boosted Oxygen Evolution Reaction" Molecules 29, no. 13: 3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133127

APA Style

Xu, M., Lei, L., Hu, H., Chen, Y., Yang, X., Yu, K., Cao, B., Zhang, X., Jiang, X., Yao, C., & Yang, H. (2024). Construction of Ferric-Oxide-Doped Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Electrocatalysts by Magnetic-Field-Assisted Chemical Corrosion toward Boosted Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Molecules, 29(13), 3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133127

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop