Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study on the Volatile Organic Compounds and Characteristic Flavor Fingerprints of Five Varieties of Walnut Oil in Northwest China Using Using Headspace Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
CoO–Co Heterojunction Covered with Carbon Enables Highly Efficient Integration of Hydrogen Evolution and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
Importance of Inactivation Methodology in Enzymatic Processing of Raw Potato Starch: NaOCl as Efficient α-Amylase Inactivation Agent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rational Fabrication of Defect-Rich and Hierarchically Porous Fe-N-C Nanosheets as Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts for Zinc-Air Battery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Improving the Reaction Kinetics by Annealing MoS2/PVP Nanoflowers for Sodium-Ion Storage

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
School of Mechanical Engineering, Henan Institute of Technology, Xinxiang 453000, China
3
Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Engineering of Shaanxi Province, College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(7), 2948; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072948
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Revised: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 23 March 2023 / Published: 25 March 2023

Abstract

:
Under the ever-growing demand for electrochemical energy storage devices, developing anode materials with low cost and high performance is crucial. This study established a multiscale design of MoS2/carbon composites with a hollow nanoflower structure (MoS2/C NFs) for use in sodium-ion batteries as anode materials. The NF structure consists of several MoS2 nanosheets embedded with carbon layers, considerably increasing the interlayer distance. Compared with pristine MoS2 crystals, the carbon matrix and hollow-hierarchical structure of MoS2/C exhibit higher electronic conductivity and optimized thermodynamic/kinetic potential for the migration of sodium ions. Hence, the synthesized MoS2/C NFs exhibited an excellent capacity of 1300 mA h g−1 after 50 cycles at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 and 630 mA h g−1 at 2 A g−1 and high-capacity retention at large charge/discharge current density (80% after 600 cycles 2 A g−1). The suggested approach can be adopted to optimize layered materials by embedding layered carbon matrixes. Such optimized materials can be used as electrodes in sodium-ion batteries, among other electrochemical applications.

1. Introduction

Developing efficient and cost-effective materials is necessary to improve manufacturing processes for affordable electrochemical power storage devices. Such materials can be further used to improve the performance of power storage devices widely used in compact electronics, electrical motor vehicles, and other applications [1,2,3]. The most promising power storage devices developed recently are sodium-ion batteries (SIBs); SIBs have been successfully commercialized and are used extensively [4]. In a typical SIB, electrical energy is stored as chemical energy derived from the reversible intercalation and deintercalation of sodium into and out of anode materials (e.g., graphite) [5,6,7]. The use of recently developed effective anode materials has increased the energy concentration of SIBs [8,9,10].
Owing to its good chemical stability, electronic properties, and high theoretical capacity, two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has received comprehensive focus as a potential substance for use in sodium-ion storage [11,12,13,14]. However, the applicability of MoS2 is limited by its weak intrinsic conductivity and considerable volume effect during the process of discharge/charge, similar to graphite [15]. The spacing between adjacent MoS2 layers (0.63 nm) is approximately twice as large as that in graphite (0.34 nm). Thus, the intercalation of sodium into MoS2 is considerably facile and does not require any significant volume expansion, indicating its potential for use in SIBs [16]. Hence, it can be considered an excellent electrode material for SIBs. Nevertheless, the performance of bulk MoS2 as an anode material in SIBs is unsatisfactory because of quick capacity fading owing to its weak electrical/ionic conductivity and structural destruction during sodiation/desodiation [11,15,17].
Several studies have proposed strategies to improve the electrochemical performance of MoS2, for example, modifying the structure of pristine MoS2, improving structural stability and ion diffusion kinetics by developing a three-dimensional porous structure, enhancing surface defects or interlayer spacing for lowering ion diffusion resistance, and phase engineering to enhance electrical conductivity [18,19]. Furthermore, various modification approaches have been adopted for improving the electrical conductivity of MoS2 by fabricating composites such as hybrid graphene/MoS2 [20] and polyaniline/MoS2 electrode materials [21]. These strategies have been effective in enhancing the process of charge/discharge. Studies have demonstrated the excellent electrochemical performance of hybrid nanocomposites [22,23]. For example, Deng et al. investigated the applicability of a graphene/MoS2 mesoporous foam as the anode material in SIBs; the resultant device had a high discharge capacity of 488 mA h g−1 at a current density of 100 mA g−1 after 100 cycles and a power of 200 mA h g−1 at 1000 mA g−1 after 1000 cycles [19]. Zheng et al. developed an integrated carbon paper/SiO2 template with a mesoporous three-dimensional foam structure that achieved stable performance (at 2000 mA g−1) over 1000 cycles with a capacity of 225 mA h g−1 [18]. Based on the relationship between structure and function, recent research has demonstrated that a hollow hierarchical structure can help achieve improved electrochemical performance.
Motivated by the aforementioned research, this study established an easy-to-use solvothermal technique for the fabrication of hollow MoS2/carbon nanoflowers (NFs) utilizing polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as a carbon precursor and disodium molybdate and thiourea (CH4N2S) as sources of Mo and S, respectively. By annealing the MoS2/PVP NFs in an Ar atmosphere at 600 °C, hollow hierarchical MoS2/C NFs with good reversible capability (1300 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1), strong cycling stability (516 mA h g−1 after 600 cycles at 2 A g−1), and potent capability (630 mA h g−1 at 2 A g−1) were generated. In the resulting hollow hierarchical MoS2/C NFs, the hollow architecture facilitated a large electrode–electrolyte interfacial area. For rapid sodium-ion diffusion and the expansion of volume during the process of charge/discharge, the hierarchical structures provided sufficiently large voids. Moreover, the conductivity and structural stability of the electrode material were increased by carbon layer doping.

2. Results and Discussion

Scheme 1 illustrates the method adopted to fabricate the hollow hierarchical MoS2/C NFs. PVP and thiourea were first dispersed in an organic solvent containing dimethylformamide (DMF) and hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O) to obtain a homogeneous solution through ultrasonication. During the chemical reaction at 200 °C, the disodium molybdate and thiourea were employed as sources of Mo and S, respectively. Next, nanosheets consisting of several layers of MoS2 nanosheets and PVP were assembled into hollow hierarchical NFs during the hydrothermal process. As reported in the literature, the van der Waals interface between the ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets primarily enables the development of hollow hierarchical structures. Subsequently, the hollow MoS2/PVP-precursor NFs were annealed in an Ar atmosphere for 2 h at 500 °C, resulting in a carbon layer in or on the MoS2 layer and, thus, excellent electrochemical performance.
The images of the hollow MoS2/C NFs and MoS2 obtained through transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Figure 1a) and standard scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Figure 1b) are depicted in Figure 1. The MoS2 layer exhibited a uniform hollow framework. The interlayer distance was estimated to be 0.63 nm (see Figure 1c); this value was consistent with the X-ray diffraction (XRD) results along the (002) plane of the MoS2 layer (Figure 2a) [24]. High-angle annular dark field and TEM-STEM images indicated that the MoS2/C NFs retained their hollow NF structure despite being doped with carbon. The TEM images in Figure 1d,e indicated that the MoS2 NFs had a large interlayer spacing (0.85 nm) and a large number of active sites, which could serve as sites for sodium-ion sodiation/desodiation. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Figure 1f and Figure S1) analysis revealed that the carbon layers on the hollow MoS2 NFs were uniformly doped. Furthermore, the XRD patterns indicated the presence of thin carbon layers outside the hollow MoS2/C NFs, with no visible C (002) peaks except for the diffraction peaks corresponding to MoS2 after carbon layer doping (see Figure 2a). In the Raman spectra of the hollow MoS2/C NFs, an additional characteristic G peak (1582 cm−1) indicated the presence of graphite in addition to the A1g (408 cm−1) and E12g (383 cm−1) forms of MoS2 (see Figure 2b) [25]. The D band (1370 cm−1) in the Raman spectra indicated defects in the carbon layers, consistent with the TEM results (Figure 1e). In addition, a large interlayer spacing was revealed by local Raman amplification (Figure 2c) [26]. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed that the hollow MoS2/C NFs had a carbon content of 44 wt% (Figure 2d), which increased the specific surface area. The hollow NF structures and the ultrasmall dimensions of the nanosheets endow both of them with a relatively large surface area of 22.7 m2 g−1 and 43.1 m2 g−1, respectively (Figure 2e), as revealed by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. Moreover, the BET surface area curve for the hollow MoS2/C NFs was a Type IV isotherm (Figure 2e) with a clear H3 hysteresis loop, demonstrating the presence of adequate mesopores with diameters of approximately 6.9 nm inside the complex material (Figure 2f).
The chemical composition and surface electronic states of the hollow MoS2/C NFs were determined by employing X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 3a depicts the Mo 3d, S 2p, O 1s, and C 1s spectra of the structures. The peaks at 284.3 and 286.5 eV in the C 1s spectra (Figure 3b) can be attributed to C–O and C–C/C=C bonds [27]. In the high-resolution Mo 3d spectra (Figure 3c), the peaks at 226.3, 228.8, 232.1, and 235.2 eV correspond to S 2s, Mo 3d5/2, Mo 3d3/2, and Mo6+, respectively. The peak at 235.2 eV can be attributed to Mo6+ 3d3/2, which is generated by the surface oxidation of Mo4+ in an air atmosphere [28]. The two peaks at 161.7 and 162.8 eV in the S 2p spectra can be attributed to S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2, respectively (Figure 3d) [29].
In a voltage range of 0.05–3.0 V vs. Na/Na+, the electrochemical storage capability of the hollow composite MoS2/C anode was measured and subjected to a comparison with that of a pure MoS2 anode. First, cyclic voltammograms (CV) were recorded for the initial three cycles of the hollow MoS2/C NFs at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 (Figure 4a). A reduction peak was found at 0.42 V during the first discharge cycle, associated with the intercalation of the sodium ion into MoS2 and the generation of a solid–electrolyte interface (SEI) film. A prominent oxidation peak was observed within the range of 1.5–2.0 V, corresponding to the deintercalation of NaxMoS2 to MoS2 and sodium metal produced during the first charge cycle [30]. The oxidation and reduction peaks were roughly constant from the third cycle onwards, indicating the excellent reversibility and cycling stability of the hollow MoS2/C NF electrode throughout the sodiation/desodiation processes. The electrochemical performance of hollow MoS2/C NFs was further examined by analyzing the rate performance and cycling stability. As illustrated in Figure 4b,c, the hollow MoS2/C NFs exhibited the highest rate capacities of 1321, 1171, 1036, 819, and 632 mA h g−1 at current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 A g−1, respectively. Furthermore, the discharge capacity recovered to 1300 mA h g−1 when the current density reduced from 2.0 to 0.1 A g−1. These results indicated the outstanding reaction kinetics of the hollow MoS2/C NFs, attributable to the rapid electron transport and sodium-ion diffusion induced by the carbon and MoS2 layer, thereby resulting in the high utilization of MoS2 NFs and a high specific capacity. Additionally, long-term cycling performance at high current density was achieved. As depicted in Figure 4d, the hollow MoS2/C NFs retained a high reversible capacity of 438 mA h g−1 even after 600 cycles at 2.0 A g−1, with a slow decay rate of 0.034% per cycle. Without the carbon layer structure, the MoS2 NFs exhibited the lowest specific capacity and rate stability.
At an electrolyte/electrode interface, EIS technology is an efficient technique to determine the kinetics of charge transfer [31,32,33]. In the Nyquist plots shown in Figure 4e, a single depressed semicircle in the high-frequency region indicated the charge transfer resistance (Rct), and the sodium-ions diffusion ability, also known as the Warburg impedance (Zw), was indicated by the inclined line in the low-frequency region [34,35,36]. The inset of Figure 4f displays the equivalent circuit that corresponds to the Nyquist impedance plots, along with definitions for each parameter. In accordance with the equivalent circuit model, the hollow MoS2/C NFs exhibited a lower Rct value (60 Ω) than that of MoS2 (93 Ω), indicating that the hollow MoS2/C NFs can remarkably enhance interfacial charge separation and transfer between adjacent layers when sodium-ions are repeatedly inserted/extracted. The present study also investigated the sodium-ion storage kinetics of hollow MoS2/C NFs through CV measurements, as illustrated in Figure 5a. data on the scan rates between 0.1 and 2.0 mV s−1 were employed to obtain CV curves. As illustrated in Figure 5b, the b values calculated using the linear relationship between log (current) and log (scan rate) during anodic and cathodic scans were 0.99 and 0.99, respectively, indicating that the process was capacitance-controlled [37]. As shown in Figure 5c and Figure S4, the contribution of capacitive charge was 79% at a scan rate of 2.0 mV s−1. Therefore, compared with MoS2 (Figure S3), hollow MoS2/C NFs exhibited larger capacitive components at all scan rates, thus indicating greater efficient sodium-ion adsorption and quicker reaction kinetics [38].
The electrode was recycled after 600 cycles at 2.0 A g−1 to determine the factors contributing to the high performance of hollow MoS2/C NFs. TEM and XPS were used to analyze the morphology and nanostructure of the regenerated hollow MoS2/C NFs. The results indicated that the morphology and structure of the NFs remained unchanged in the presence of long-term cycling, indicating the electrode’s high durability owing to the carbon layers. Although the macroporous nanostructure of the hollow MoS2/C NFs partially collapsed, the porosity of the structure was still evident in the TEM images displayed in Figures S5 and S6. The HRTEM image of MoS2 shown in Figure S6b indicated the presence of the layered structure even after cyclic use. However, the interlayer spacing of the hollow MoS2/C NFs exhibited a substantial increase (up to 1.03 nm in contrast with a layer spacing of 0.83 nm in the new electrode), likely because of long-term use in sodiation/desodiation, which helps minimize mass transfer resistance and favors long-term cyclic stability. As indicated by the XPS results shown in Figure S7, the hollow MoS2/C NF electrodes retained their good electrical structure even after prolonged cyclic use.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

From Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), PVP, DMF, hydrazine hydrate, sodium molybdate dehydrate (Na2MoO4), and thiourea were procured. None of the chemicals used were further purified since they were all analytical-grade chemicals.

3.2. Synthesis of Hollow MoS2/Carbon NFs

A solution comprising 35 mL of DMF and 0.1 mL of hydrazine hydrate was used to thoroughly dissolve 0.01 g PVP and 0.06 g thiourea in a typical synthesis. Then, the addition of 0.02 g of sodium molybdate dehydrate was carried out. Following 30 min of stirring, the solution was heated under static circumstances in a Teflon-lined autoclave for 24 h at 200 °C. The recovery of a solid product was achieved through centrifugation in water and ethanol thrice, and the product was vacuum-dried overnight at 60 °C. Precursor samples were prepared by pyrolyzing the solid in an Ar atmosphere in a tube furnace at a heating rate of 2 °C min−1 up to 250 °C, dwelling for 2 h, reheating at a rate of 5 °C min−1 up to 500 °C, and dwelling again for 2 h.

3.3. Synthesis of MoS2 NFs

To facilitate the comparison, the aforementioned process was also applied to prepare the MoS2 sample, but PVP was not added.

3.4. Materials Characterization

An FEI Quanta 200F was employed for conducting SEM. High-resolution transmission microscopy (HRTEM) was performed using an FEI TECNAI G2 F30. PE Diamond TG/DTA was employed for high-resolution TGA. KANGTA Quadrasorb evo was used for BET. XRD was performed using a Rigaku D/Max 2500/PC. LabRAM HR 800 Raman spectrometer was employed for Raman spectroscopy. KRATOS Axis Ultra DLD was employed for XPS.

3.5. Electrochemical Measurements

CR2032 coin cells were employed for electrochemical experiments. The working electrodes of the cells comprised an active material, carbon black, and a polymer binder (polyvinylidene fluoride) mixed at a weight ratio of 7:2:1. The electrodes were constructed by coating this mixture onto Cu foil and drying it under vacuum for 24 h at 60 °C. The electroactive materials had a mass loading of 0.6–0.8 mg cm−2. As counter electrodes and reference electrodes, metallic Na pieces were utilized. As a separator, a glass fiber membrane (Whatman/F) was employed. The electrolyte was constituted by a 1 M solution of NaClO4 in a 1:1 vol% mixture of ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate with 5 wt% fluoroethylene carbonate. A NEWARE battery testing system was employed for galvanostatic discharge/charge measurements within a voltage range of 0.05–3.0 V (vs. Na/Na+). The electrolyte and separator were identical to those used in the half cell, and the voltage range was between 0.05 and 3.0 V. An electrochemical workstation (CHI 760E) was employed for CV and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests. By applying a 5 mV amplitude signal within the frequency range 50–100 kHz, electrodes’ EIS spectra were obtained.

4. Conclusions

We designed and synthesized a unique hollow MoS2/C NFs with large interlayer spacing for SIB applications. The large interlayer spacing and the carbon layer in the as-prepared composite material provide ion adsorption sites and diffusion channels for the transportation of ions. Furthermore, the conductivity of MoS2 was improved because of favorable interactions between the carbon and the MoS2 layers in the prepared material. Therefore, the designed MoS2/carbon NF composites can exhibit outstanding long-term cycling performance with a capacity of 438 mA h g−1 after 600 cycles at 2.0 A g−1. The current study offers novel perspectives into the structural design of 2D materials as energy storage materials by highlighting the importance of enhancing the sodium storage performance of MoS2 electrodes by increasing interlayer spacing and incorporating carbon layers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28072948/s1, Figure S1: EDS analysis of MoS2/C; Figure S2: XPS survey scan of MoS2. High-resolution (b) Mo 3d and (c) S 2p spectra of MoS2, respectively; Figure S3: (a) CV curves at various scan rates of MoS2. (b–f) Capacitive-controlled and diffusion-controlled contributions at different scan rates of MoS2; Figure S4: (a–d) Capacitive-controlled and diffusion-controlled contributions at different scan rates of MoS2/C; Figure S5: Morphology and nanostructure characterizations of MoS2 electrode after 600 long-term cycles under the current density of 2.0 A g−1; Figure S6: Morphology and nanostructure characterizations of MoS2/C electrode after 600 long-term cycles under the current density of 2.0 A g−1; Figure S7: (a) XPS full spectra and high-resolution (b) C 1s, (c) Mo 3d, and (d) M S 2p spectra of MoS2/C after long-term cycles; Table S1: Comparison of the rate and cycle performance between MoS2/C NFs with the recently reported MoS2-based anode materials. Ref [18,23,25,30,39,40] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Y.L. performed the materials preparation, characterization and studied the performance; L.Z. and J.C. supervised the project and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22162026 and 11372284).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xia, H.C.; Qu, G.; Yin, H.B.; Zhang, J.A. Atomically dispersed metal active centers as a chemically tunable platform for energy storage devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 15358–15372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hou, S.; Ji, X.; Gaskell, K.; Wang, P.F.; Wang, L.; Xu, J.; Sun, R.; Borodin, O.; Wang, C. Solvation sheath reorganization enables divalent metal batteries with fast interfacial charge transfer kinetics. Science 2021, 374, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Islam, M.S.; Fisher, C.A. Lithium and sodium battery cathode materials: Computational insights into voltage, diffusion and nanostructural properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Xia, H.; Yuan, P.; Zan, L.; Qu, G.; Tu, Y.; Zhu, K.; Wei, Y.; Wei, Z.; Zheng, F.; Zhang, M.; et al. Probing the active sites of 2D nanosheets with Fe-N-C carbon shell encapsulated FexC/Fe species for boosting sodium-ion storage performances. Nano Res. 2021, 15, 7154–7162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.L.; Li, T.C.; Huang, S.; Zhang, J.; Pam, M.E.; Yang, H.Y. Controllable Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) for Energy-Storage Applications. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 1379–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, J.; Choi, M.S.; Shin, K.H.; Kota, M.; Kang, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, H.S. Rational Design of Carbon Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Sodium Storage and Capture. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1803444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kim, S.-W.; Seo, D.-H.; Ma, X.; Ceder, G.; Kang, K. Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, C.; Owusu, K.A.; Xu, X.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, G.; Yang, W.; Mai, L. 1D Carbon-Based Nanocomposites for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Small 2019, 15, e1902348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, H.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Q.; Han, Y.; Wu, X.; Ji, P.; Zhou, M.; Diao, G.; Chen, M. Confined growth of 2D MoS2 nanosheets in N-doped pearl necklace-like structured carbon nanofibers with boosted lithium and sodium storage performance. Chem. Commun. 2019, 56, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yun, Q.; Li, L.; Hu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H. Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide-Based Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1903826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xia, H.; Zan, L.; Wei, Y.; Guo, K.; Yan, W.; Deng, D.; Zhang, J.-N. Catalytic effect of carbon-based electrode materials in energy storage devices. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Soares, D.M.; Mukherjee, S.; Singh, G. TMDs beyond MoS2 for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Chem.-Eur. J. 2020, 26, 6320–6341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fang, Y.; Luan, D.; Lou, X.W.D. Recent Advances on Mixed Metal Sulfides for Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2002976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, H.X.; Tran, D.; Qian, J.; Ding, F.Y.; Losic, D. MoS2/Graphene Composites as Promising Materials for Energy Storage and Conversion Applications. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, C.; Liu, P.; Niu, B.; Liu, Y.; Xin, W.; Chen, W.; Kong, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wen, L. Metallic Two-Dimensional MoS2 Composites as High-Performance Osmotic Energy Conversion Membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1932–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lian, G.; Li, Y.; Jing, L.; Zhao, M.; Cui, D.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Wong, C.P. Electron-Injection and Atomic-Interface Engineering toward Stabilized Defected 1T-Rich MoS2 as High Rate Anode for Sodium Storage. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 12425–12436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, F.; Wei, Z.; Xia, H.; Tu, Y.; Meng, X.; Zhu, K.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; et al. 3D MoS2 foam integrated with carbon paper as binder-free anode for high performance sodium-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 65, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, J.; Zeng, C.; Ma, C.; von Bulow, J.F.; Zhang, L.; Deng, D.H.; Tian, Z.Q.; Bao, X.H. Graphene layer reinforcing mesoporous molybdenum disulfide foam as high-performance anode for sodium-ion battery. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 8, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, C.L.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yao, H.; Pang, H. MoS2/graphene composites: Fabrication and electrochemical energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 33, 470–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiao, Y.; Lee, S.H.; Sun, Y.K. The Application of Metal Sulfides in Sodium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, C.Z.; Han, F.; Wang, F.; Liu, Q.D.; Zhou, D.W.; Zhang, F.Q.; Xu, S.H.; Fan, C.L.; Li, X.K.; Liu, J.S. Improving compactness and reaction kinetics of MoS2@C anodes by introducing Fe9S10 core for superior volumetric sodium/potassium storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xia, H.; Yuan, P.; Zan, L.; Qu, G.; Dong, H.; Wei, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wei, Z.; Yan, W.; Hu, J.S.; et al. Evolution of Stabilized 1T-MoS2 by Atomic-Interface Engineering of 2H-MoS2/Fe-Nx towards Enhanced Sodium Ion Storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202218282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pan, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, F.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Ou, X.; Xiong, X.; Yang, C.; Liu, M. Construction of MoS2/C Hierarchical Tubular Heterostructures for High-Performance Sodium Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 12578–12586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Liu, X.; Kim, J.K.; Luo, Y. Inter-overlapped MoS2/C composites with large-interlayer-spacing for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020, 5, 1127–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Z.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Vinayan, B.P.; Zhao-Karger, Z.; Diemant, T.; Wang, K.; Behm, R.J.; Kubel, C.; Klingeler, R.; Fichtner, M. Hetero-layered MoS2/C composites enabling ultrafast and durable Na storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 21, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, B.A.; Lu, H.H.; Zhou, J.W.; Ye, C.; Shi, C.S.; Zhao, N.Q.; Qiao, S.Z. Porous MoS2/Carbon Spheres Anchored on 3D Interconnected Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Networks forUltrafast Na Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, Q.; Fang, Q.; Chu, W.S.; Wan, Y.Y.; Li, X.L.; Xu, W.Y.; Habib, M.; Tao, S.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, D.B.; et al. Electron-Doped 1T-MoS2 via Interface Engineering for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 4738–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, F.; Xiao, Y.; Han, P.; Liu, Y.; Qin, G. Fabricating ferromagnetic MoS2-based composite exposed to simulated sunlight for sodium storage. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 21081–21092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fang, Y.; Luan, D.; Chen, Y.; Gao, S.; Lou, X.W. Rationally Designed Three-Layered Cu2S@Carbon@MoS2 Hierarchical Nanoboxes for Efficient Sodium Storage. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7178–7183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ng, B.; Duan, X.; Liu, F.; Agar, E.; White, R.E.; Mustain, W.E.; Jin, X. Investigation of Transport and Kinetic Nonideality in Solid Li-Ion Electrodes through Deconvolution of Electrochemical Impedance Spectra. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 020523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, H.; Li, K.; Zhang, J. Interfacial engineering of Ag nanodots/MoSe2 nanoflakes/Cu(OH)2 hybrid-electrode for lithium-ion battery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 557, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhao, R.; Di, H.; Hui, X.; Zhao, D.; Wang, R.; Wang, C.; Yin, L. Self-assembled Ti3C2 MXene and N-rich porous carbon hybrids as superior anodes for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Manikandan, B.; Ramar, V.; Yap, C.; Balaya, P. Investigation of physico-chemical processes in lithium-ion batteries by deconvolution of electrochemical impedance spectra. J. Power Source 2017, 361, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chao, D.; Liang, P.; Chen, Z.; Bai, L.; Shen, H.; Liu, X.; Xia, X.; Zhao, Y.; Savilov, S.V.; Lin, J.; et al. Pseudocapacitive Na-Ion Storage Boosts High Rate and Areal Capacity of Self-Branched 2D Layered Metal Chalcogenide Nanoarrays. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10211–10219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xia, H.; Zan, L.; Qu, G.; Tu, Y.; Dong, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, K.; Yu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Deng, D.; et al. Evolution of a solid electrolyte interphase enabled by FeNX/C catalysts for sodium-ion storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Augustyn, V.; Come, J.; Lowe, M.A.; Kim, J.W.; Taberna, P.L.; Tolbert, S.H.; Abruna, H.D.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, X.; Zhao, R.; Ai, W.; Chen, B.; Du, H.; Wu, L.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Yu, T. Controllable Design of MoS2 Nanosheets Anchored on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene: Toward Fast Sodium Storage by Tunable Pseudocapacitance. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1800658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gui, D.; Wei, Z.; Chen, J.; Yan, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, C. Boosting the sodium storage of the 1T/2H MoS 2@ SnO 2 heterostructure via a fast surface redox reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, W.; Xia, Y.; Yang, D.; Dong, A. Exfoliation of large-flake, few-layer MoS 2 nanosheets mediated by carbon nanotubes. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 4400–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the fabrication of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers from diatomite as SIB anodes.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the fabrication of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers from diatomite as SIB anodes.
Molecules 28 02948 sch001
Figure 1. Morphological structure characterizations. (a) SEM, (b) TEM, (c) HRTEM images of MoS2. (d) TEM, (e) HRTEM, and (f) mapping images of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers.
Figure 1. Morphological structure characterizations. (a) SEM, (b) TEM, (c) HRTEM images of MoS2. (d) TEM, (e) HRTEM, and (f) mapping images of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers.
Molecules 28 02948 g001
Figure 2. Structural characterization. (a) XRD patterns of MoS2/C and MoS2. (b,c) Raman patterns of MoS2/C and MoS2. (d) TG patterns of MoS2/C and MoS2. (e) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (f) pore-size distribution curves of the MoS2/C and MoS2, respectively.
Figure 2. Structural characterization. (a) XRD patterns of MoS2/C and MoS2. (b,c) Raman patterns of MoS2/C and MoS2. (d) TG patterns of MoS2/C and MoS2. (e) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (f) pore-size distribution curves of the MoS2/C and MoS2, respectively.
Molecules 28 02948 g002
Figure 3. Structural characterization. (a) XPS survey scan of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers. High-resolution (b) C 1s, (c) Mo 3d and (d) S 2p spectra of MoS2/C, respectively.
Figure 3. Structural characterization. (a) XPS survey scan of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers. High-resolution (b) C 1s, (c) Mo 3d and (d) S 2p spectra of MoS2/C, respectively.
Molecules 28 02948 g003
Figure 4. Sodium-ion storage performance. (a) CV curves of MoS2/C at scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (b) Rate performances at various current densities. (c) The GCD curves of MoS2/C at various current densities. (d) Long-term cycling stability at 2.0 A g−1. (e) EIS curves of MoS2/C and MoS2. (f) Equivalent circuit model corresponding to the Nyquist plots of the MoS2/C.
Figure 4. Sodium-ion storage performance. (a) CV curves of MoS2/C at scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (b) Rate performances at various current densities. (c) The GCD curves of MoS2/C at various current densities. (d) Long-term cycling stability at 2.0 A g−1. (e) EIS curves of MoS2/C and MoS2. (f) Equivalent circuit model corresponding to the Nyquist plots of the MoS2/C.
Molecules 28 02948 g004
Figure 5. Electrochemical kinetic behaviors. (a) CV curves of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers at various current densities. (b) Log(i)-log(v) plots at different cathodic/anodic peaks. (c) Normalized contribution ratios of capacitive capacities of MoS2/C at a scan rate of 2.0 mV s−1. (d) Normalized contribution ratios of capacitive capacities MoS2/C and MoS2 at different scan rates.
Figure 5. Electrochemical kinetic behaviors. (a) CV curves of hollow MoS2/C nanoflowers at various current densities. (b) Log(i)-log(v) plots at different cathodic/anodic peaks. (c) Normalized contribution ratios of capacitive capacities of MoS2/C at a scan rate of 2.0 mV s−1. (d) Normalized contribution ratios of capacitive capacities MoS2/C and MoS2 at different scan rates.
Molecules 28 02948 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Zan, L.; Chen, J. Improving the Reaction Kinetics by Annealing MoS2/PVP Nanoflowers for Sodium-Ion Storage. Molecules 2023, 28, 2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072948

AMA Style

Li Y, Zan L, Chen J. Improving the Reaction Kinetics by Annealing MoS2/PVP Nanoflowers for Sodium-Ion Storage. Molecules. 2023; 28(7):2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072948

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuan, Lingxing Zan, and Jingbo Chen. 2023. "Improving the Reaction Kinetics by Annealing MoS2/PVP Nanoflowers for Sodium-Ion Storage" Molecules 28, no. 7: 2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072948

APA Style

Li, Y., Zan, L., & Chen, J. (2023). Improving the Reaction Kinetics by Annealing MoS2/PVP Nanoflowers for Sodium-Ion Storage. Molecules, 28(7), 2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072948

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop