Next Article in Journal
Solid-State 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of Soluble and Insoluble β-Glucans Extracted from Candida lusitaniae
Previous Article in Journal
Achieving Luminescence of Sr3Ga1.98In0.02Ge4O14:0.03Cr3+ via [In3+] Substitution [Ga3+] and Its Application to NIR pc-LED in Non-Destructive Testing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules28248067
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phloretin Inhibits Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Serratia marcescens

by
Yueheng Qi
1,2,†,
Pengcheng Ji
3,†,
Kunyuan Yin
3,
Yi Zheng
3,
Jiangxiu Niu
2,
Aiqun Jia
1,
Jinwei Zhou
3,* and
Jingguo Li
1,*
1
Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 477150, China
2
Luoyang Key Laboratory of Organic Functional Molecules, College of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China
3
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2023, 28(24), 8067; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248067
Submission received: 24 October 2023 / Revised: 28 November 2023 / Accepted: 3 December 2023 / Published: 13 December 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study investigated the antivirulence capacity and mechanism of apple-skin-derived phloretin against Serratia marcescens NJ01, a vegetable spoilage bacterium. At 0.5 to 2 mg/mL doses, phloretin considerably inhibited the secretion of acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), indicating that phloretin disrupted quorum sensing (QS) in S. marcescens NJ01. The dysfunction of QS resulted in reduced biofilms and the decreased production of protease, prodigiosin, extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs), and swimming and swarming motilities. Dysfunctional QS also weakened the activity of antioxidant enzymes and improved oxidative injury. The improved oxidative injury changed the composition of the membrane, improved membrane permeability, and eventually increased the susceptibility of biofilm cells to amikacin, netilmicin, and imipenem. The disrupted QS and enhanced oxidative stress also caused disorders of amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, and nucleic acid metabolism, and ultimately attenuated the ability of S. marcescens NJ01 to induce spoilage. Our results indicated that phloretin can act as a potent drug to defend against spoilage by S. marcescens.

1. Introduction

Food spoilage caused by foodborne pathogens has attracted global attention due to its resulting economic loss and foodborne illness [1]. Serratia marcescens is a Gram-negative bacterium that is widely found in soil, air, vegetables, meat, and dairy products [2,3]. S. marcescens is responsible for the vegetable yellow vine disease that induces leaf yellowing, withering, and even death [4]. Chemical drugs are adopted as the main measures for preventing and treating vegetable disease [5]. However, the extensive application of chemical drugs has led to serious drug resistance [5], and drug residues in food products also pose a threat to the environment and human health [6]. Therefore, new approaches to defend against infections induced by S. marcescens without extensive fungicidal use are urgently needed.
The formation of biofilms is among the most important reasons why S. marcescens attains drug resistance [7]. Biofilms are bacterial communities, in which cells are surrounded by a dense matrix consisting of proteins, lipids, EPS, and nucleic acids that can prevent drugs from entering cells [8]. Studies have demonstrated that biofilm formation of S. marcescens is controlled by quorum sensing (QS), a contact medium utilized by bacteria to regulate their colony action [9]. Acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) are the main signaling molecules secreted by S. marcescens [3]. S. marcescens secretes C4-C8 AHLs to mediate biofilm development, infection, drug resistance, and the secretion of virulence factors [3]. Therefore, disrupting the QS of S. marcescens is a compelling technique to diminish the drug resistance and virulence of S. marcescens.
The high toxicity of chemically synthesized drugs limits their widespread application in the food industry [10]. Natural compounds derived from medicinal and edible plants have received great attention due to their high inhibitory activity against QS and low toxicity [11]. For instance, hordenine derived from sprouting barley showed potent anti-QS activity against the spoilage bacterium S. marcescens [3]. Petroselinic acid isolated from many plant seed oils could significantly inhibit the biofilms and QS of S. marcescens [12]. Phytol in Piper betle considerably reduced the virulence and pathogenicity of S. marcescens by interrupting the QS system of S. marcescens [13]. Phloretin, a phenolic compound, is abundant in the peel and root bark of juicy fruits, such as apples and pears. Previous studies have shown that phloretin could inhibit the virulence and biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes and Pectobacterium brasiliense by affecting their QS systems [14,15]. However, whether phloretin can decrease the virulence of S. marcescens has yet to be documented. Here, the QS and biofilm inhibitory potential of phloretin against S. marcescens NJ01 was evaluated, and the synergistic mechanism by which phloretin improves the susceptibility of biofilms to antibiotics was clarified.

2. Results

2.1. Growth Curve

As presented in Figure 1, phloretin at a concentration of 4 mg/mL has a side effect on the cell growth of S. marcescens NJ01. When the concentration of phloretin is lower than 2 mg/mL, it had no antimicrobial effect on S. marcescens NJ01 (Figure 1).

2.2. AHL Production

The AHLs of C4-HSL and C6-HSL were detected based on the peak time and their MS and MS2 ions (Figure 2A,B). A relative quantification analysis indicated that the secretion of C4-HSL and C6-HSL was significantly reduced after treatment with phloretin (Figure 2A,C,D). Exposure to 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL phloretin diminished C4-HSL levels by approximately 30%, 40%, and 60%, respectively (Figure 2C). After 1 and 2 mg/mL phloretin was applied, the production of C6-HSL decreased to 75% and 46%, respectively (Figure 2D). Therefore, the QS of NJ01 was gravely disrupted by phloretin exposure.

2.3. Biofilm Formation

As presented in Figure 3, the biofilm biomass was decreased by approximately 20% and 28% after exposure to 1 and 2 mg/mL phloretin, respectively. The antibiotics amikacin, netilmicin, and imipenem used individually exhibited no inhibitory effect on biofilm formation. However, when exposed to these antibiotics alongside phloretin, the inhibitory effect was remarkably improved. Exposure to 16 µg/mL amikacin and 8 µg/mL netilmicin alongside 2 mg/mL phloretin reduced biofilm formation by approximately 50% (Figure 3A). After exposure to 256 µg/mL imipenem and 2 mg/mL phloretin, the inhibitory impact was enhanced to 63% (Figure 3B).
The SEM images presented that the untreated biofilms exhibited a thick and three-dimensional structure adhered with extracellular polymers (Figure 4A). However, after exposure to 1 and 2 mg/mL phloretin, the cells were separated and the attached extracellular polymers were significantly decreased (Figure 4B,C). Treatment with 16 µg/mL amikacin individually showed no obvious inhibition of biofilm formation in S. marcescens NJ01 (Figure 4D). However, after exposure to amikacin in combination with phloretin, a significant improvement in the reduction of biofilms was observed (Figure 4E,F). The remaining cells were well separated and the integrity of some bacterial cells was seriously disrupted (Figure 4).

2.4. Inhibition of Virulence Factors

Phloretin exposure at 1 and 2 mg/mL inhibited protease activity by 43% and 53%, respectively (Figure 5A). The inhibitory effect of phloretin on prodigiosin production is presented in Figure 5B. The results indicated that phloretin administration at 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL resulted in a reduction of prodigiosin by more than 73% (Figure 5B). The EPS quantification indicated that the EPS production was significantly inhibited after exposure to phloretin (Figure 5C). Phloretin exposure at 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL decreased EPS production by approximately 30%, 39%, and 44%, respectively. Furthermore, the swimming and swarming motilities were also considerably repressed with phloretin administration (Figure 5D,E).

2.5. Metabolic Analysis

The typical 500 MHz 1H NMR spectra of S. marcescens NJ01 extracts obtained from the DMSO- and phloretin-treated groups are shown in Figure 6. Assignments of metabolites were based on chemical shifts and by querying publicly accessible metabolomics databases such as the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, http://www.kegg.jp, accessed on 23 October 2023) and the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB, http://www.hmdb.ca, accessed on 23 October 2023). A total of 23 metabolites were assigned. The assigned compounds mainly corresponded to amino acids, organic acids, nucleotides, amines, and metabolites involved in the energy supply. The detailed compounds and their identification, chemical shifts, and fold changes are shown in Table 1. The OSC-PLS-DA plot showed that the DMSO- and phloretin-treated groups exhibited notable discrimination (Figure 7A), indicating that significant metabolic changes occurred in these two groups. The vital variables in the S-plot exhibited various colors and shapes, and contributions of those metabolites to the grouping were related to their distance to the center: variables that were further from the center gained more significant contributions to the group separation (Figure 7B). On the basis of correlation coefficients, the loading plots (Figure 7C,D) were coded with a cool color and warm color tone; from blue to red, the relativity gradually enhanced. The metabolites isoleucine, leucine, lactate, alanine, ethanolamine, glycine, maltose, and uracil were notably increased, while 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate, 2-aminoadipate, glutamate, succinate, betaine, fumarate, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and NAD+ were notably decreased after exposure to phloretin (Figure 7C,D).

2.6. Oxidative Damage and Membrane Permeability

The levels of ROS and H2O2 were notably improved after exposure to 2 mg/mL of phloretin (Figure 8A). The results implied that the bacterial cells of NJ01 underwent serious oxidative stress after phloretin exposure. Furthermore, the permeability of the cell membrane was also investigated. The results indicated that membrane permeability was notably improved after phloretin administration (Figure 8B). This improvement was intensified as incubation continued.

2.7. RT-qPCR Analysis

The expressions of the genes htpX, fimC, bsmA, pigM, pigC, ebp, katG, and gpx, which are responsible for protease, fimbriae, adherence, prodigiosin synthesis, extracellular polysaccharides, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, respectively, were downregulated by 5.6-, 3.7-, 1.6-, 4.8-, 5.4-, 2.3-, 2.0-, and 2.3-fold, respectively, after exposure to phloretin (Figure 8C). These genes were correlated well with virulence factor secretion, biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, and oxidative injury. This implied that the virulence of NJ01 may be attenuated by phloretin exposure.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Growth

S. marcescens NJ01, one spoilage bacterium obtained from rotten tomatoes, was incubated in Luria Bertani (LB) medium at 28 °C [3]. The phenolic compound phloretin was isolated from apple skin and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of phloretin against NJ01 was measured through a two-fold dilution procedure [16]. To determine the growth profile, overnight cultures of NJ01 (OD600 = 0.5) were 0.1% inoculated into LB broth with varying concentrations of phloretin (0.5–4 mg/mL). DMSO were used as the negative control. Bacterial growth was determined using a microplate reader at 600 nm (Synergy H1, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

3.2. Inhibition of AHL Production

Overnight cultures of NJ01 (OD600 = 0.5) were 0.1% (v/v) inoculated into LB broth with varying concentrations of phloretin (0.5–2 mg/mL). After 24 h cultivation, the mixtures were centrifuged and extracted with acidified ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v). The organic solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residues were redissolved in methanol, and high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrum (HPLC-MS) was employed for AHL analysis. The AHLs were detected according to the MS2 fragment ions of standard C4-HSL and C6-HSL and their retention time. The AHL production was normalized to the DMSO-treated samples as described previously [17].

3.3. Biofilm Development

Overnight cultures of NJ01 (OD600 = 0.5) were 0.1% (v/v) inoculated into trypticase Soytone broth (TSB) with different concentrations of phloretin combined with or without 16 µg/mL amikacin, 8 µg/mL netilmicin, and 64, 128, and 256 µg/mL imipenem, respectively. The cultures were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h without shaking and then washed using phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to remove planktonic cells. The formed biofilms were stained with crystal violet, dissolved in ethanol, and then determined by reading the optical density (OD) value at 570 nm [18].

3.4. Microscopic Analysis

Overnight cultures of NJ01 (OD600 = 0.5) were 0.1% (v/v) inoculated into TSB medium with different concentrations of phloretin and 16 µg/mL amikacin in 24-well chambered cover slides. The cultures were cultivated at 28 °C for 24 h without shaking. The mature cells were washed with distilled water, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and then dehydrated using graded ethanol. Subsequently, biofilms were freeze-dried, coated with gold, and analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM6360, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) [7,19,20].

3.5. Virulence Factors

Bacterial seed solution of NJ01 (0.1%, v/v) was inoculated into LB broth with varying concentrations of phloretin (0.5–2 mg/mL). The 24 h cultures were centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was mixed with 0.3% azocasein (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) in a volume ratio of 5:3, and 1.2 mL of 1 g/dL trichloroacetic acid was supplemented to precipitate the undigested substrate for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was added to 1.2 mL of 1 mol/L NaOH to stop the reaction. The protease activity was evaluated by recording the OD440 value [21].
For prodigiosin secretion, 1 mL of the cultures were centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min and the obtained cells for pellets were extracted with 1 mL acidified ethanol (4%, 1 M HCl). Prodigiosin was determined by measuring OD534 [21].
For the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) assay, the formed biofilms on the coverslips were washed with PBS and then added with NaCl–phenol–hydrazine sulfate mixture [21]. The mixture was incubated without light for 60 min, and EPS production was assessed by recording OD490 [21].
Swimming and swarming assays were performed by inoculating 1 μL S. marcescens NJ01 cultures into the swimming (1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, 0.3% agar, pH 7.2) and swarming medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% NaCl, 0.5% glucose, 0.3% agar, pH 7.2) as described previously. Bacterial cells were incubated at 28 °C for 24 h, and the movement status was recorded [21,22].

3.6. Metabolomics Analysis

Bacterial seed solution of NJ01 (0.1%, v/v) was inoculated into LB broth with 2 mg/mL phloretin. After 24 h of incubation, bacterial cells were gathered through 10 min of centrifugation at 10,000 rpm. Bacterial cells were washed with PBS and then extracted with methanol/water/chloroform mixture in a volume ratio of 10:9:20. The mixture was centrifuged at 4 °C at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and the upper layer was collected for lyophilization. The dried samples were redissolved in D2O phosphate buffer and then transferred to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tubes for NMR analysis [23,24].

3.7. Analysis of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and H2O2

ROS were evaluated by adding 6-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate to NJ01 cells. After incubation for 30 min, the mixture was centrifuged and bacterial cells were collected. The obtained cells were resuspended in PBS and analyzed at 485 nm for excitation and 525 nm for emission [25]. To measure H2O2, the obtained cells were resuspended in PBS. H2O2 was released from the cells and equilibrated in the solutions. The mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was used for H2O2 analysis using the horseradish peroxidase–scopoletin method as described by Gonzalez-Flecha and Demple (1997) [26].

3.8. Membrane Permeability

The cultures of NJ01 were centrifuged and bacterial cells were obtained. Bacterial cells were washed with 5% glucose until their electric conductivities were near to that of the 5% glucose, and then the strains became isotonic strains. The 5% glucose was supplemented with 2 mg/mL of phloretin and their electric conductivities were determined as L1. The isotonic strain solution was supplemented with 2 mg/mL of phloretin and incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. After incubation, the electric conductivities were determined as L2. The conductivity of bacteria in 5% glucose treated in boiling water for 5 min was determined as L0. The cell membrane permeability was determined as described by Diao et al. (2014) using the formula [27]:
the relative electric permeability (%) = 100 × (L2 − L1)/L0.

3.9. Gene Expression

S. marcescens NJ01was grown in LB medium with or without 2 mg/m phloretin at 28 °C at 180 rpm for 24 h. After incubation, cells were washed with sterile PBS and collected after 10 min centrifugation at 4 °C. Total RNA was extracted using an RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). Genomic DNA was removed using the gDNA wiper mix, and first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the HiScript II qRT Supermix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacture’s recommendations. The expression of genes was analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The gene rplT was used as the reference gene and the primers used are presented in Supplementary Table S1. The fold-changes of these genes were normalized as described previously [28].

3.10. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in duplicate. The groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance using the statistical software SPSS version 18.0. p values of ≤0.05 indicated significant differences between groups.

4. Discussion

Phloretin is a phenolic compound that is abundant in the skin and root bark of many kinds of juicy fruits such as apples, pears, and loquat [29]. Previous studies have shown that phloretin could inhibit the biofilm formation and virulence of Streptococcus mutans and Escherichia coli [30,31]. However, whether phloretin can inhibit the biofilm formation and pathogenicity of S. marcescens has not been documented. Here, the antivirulence potential of pholretin in combination with traditional antibiotics against S. marcescens NJ01 was evaluated, and the underlying mechanism was elucidated.
The formation of biofilms is among the most important factors leading to resistance in S. marcescens [32]. QS has been proven to play a crucial role in the mediation of biofilm formation [9]. Therefore, disrupting the QS of S. marcescens is a compelling method for controlling the drug resistance of this spoilage bacterium. S. marcescens can secrete a series of AHLs with chain lengths ranging from C4 to C8. Once AHLs accumulate to a certain level, they bind to their native receptors, thereby regulating the synthesis of biofilms and virulence factors [33]. In the present study, C4-HSL and C6-HSL were detected as the main AHLs secreted by S. marcescens NJ01. After exposure to pholoretin, the secretion of C4-HSL and C6-HSL was significantly reduced. The results indicated that pholoretin has a powerful suppressive effect against the QS. As biofilm formation was QS-mediated, the suppressed QS of S. marcescens would inevitably result in the reduced biomass of biofilms. The quantitative analysis indicated that the biofilms of S. marcescens were considerably diminished after exposure to phloretin. This result was consistent with Ramanathan et al., who reported that the disruption of QS inhibits the biofilm formation of S. marcescens [12]. Furthermore, RT-qPCR analysis indicated that the expression of bsmA, which is involved in biofilm development, was considerably repressed. The repressed expression of bsmA was consistent with the inhibited biofilm formation.
Notably, the phloretin-treated samples showed flat and scattered biofilms. The thick matrix wrapped on the surface of the biofilms was significantly reduced. Thus, the structure of the biofilms was disrupted. QS-mediated EPSs are crucial components of biofilms and play a critical role in blocking the access of antibiotics to cells [8]; therefore, we determined the impact of phloretin on EPS production. Our results indicated that EPS production was notably reduced after phloretin was administered. The reduced EPS production was correlated well with the RT-qPCR analysis results, in which the expression of ebp, a gene involved in EPS synthesis, was found to be downregulated [34].
Metabolomics research indicated that the level of ethanolamine was considerably increased after exposure to phloretin. Ethanolamine is a crucial ingredient of the cell membrane and takes the lead in sustaining membrane permeability [35]. The increased ethanolamine suggested that the membrane permeability might be changed. To validate our hypothesis, the permeability of membranes treated with phloretin was investigated. Our results indicated that phloretin considerably improved the permeability of the membrane. The altered biofilm structure and improved membrane permeability helped antibiotics enter the biofilm cells, eventually increasing the susceptibility of biofilm cells to mikacin, netilmicin, and imipenem. The improved efficiency of phloretin and antibiotics was similar to our previous study, which showed the notably enhanced susceptibility of S. marcescens toward ciprofloxacin [3].
Phloretin treatment also resulted in the significantly suppressed production of virulence factors including protease, prodigiosin, and swimming and swarming motilities. Protease secreted by S. marcescens is the main factor causing the spoilage and deterioration of dairy products [36,37]. Siddiqui et al. reported that htpX is involved in the synthesis of protease [38]. Here, the expression of htpX was considerably repressed after exposure to phloretin, which was consistent with the reduced protease activity. Prodigiosin is among the most typical virulence factors produced by S. marcescens and plays a vital role in host infection [39]. The synthesis of prodigiosin is controlled by pig gene clusters (pigA-O) [40]. Here, the expression of pigC and pigM was considerably downregulated after phloretin exposure. The repressed expression of pigC and pigM correlated well with the decreased prodigiosin level. Furthermore, the motilities of S. marcescens were considerably repressed after exposure to phloretin. Swimming and swarming motilities are essential for the attachment and development of S. marcescens biofilms [3]. The inhibition of motilities would result in reduced biofilm formation and pathogenicity. This speculation was validated by the results observed, in which biofilm formation was inhibited.
Glutamate is an important component of glutathione and plays an essential role in countering oxidative injury [41]. Betaine is essential for defending against oxidative stress and maintaining the integrity and normal function of the cell membrane [24]. Here, the levels of glutamate and betaine were considerably decreased after treatment with phloretin. Oxidative stress might be intensified, as glutamate and betaine levels were reduced. To defend against the intensified oxidative stress induced by phloretin and repair the damaged membrane, glutamate and betaine were excessively consumed. To confirm the oxidative injury caused by phloretin, the production of ROS and H2O2 was investigated. The data indicated that the production of ROS and H2O2 was considerably increased after phloretin treatment. A previous study showed that QS would improve the activity of antioxidant enzymes [42]. Here, the repressed expression of katG and gpx, which are involved in the synthesis of catalase and glutathione peroxidase, respectively, further confirmed that the QS of S. marcescens NJ01 was dysfunctional. Isoleucine and leucine are branched-chain amino acids and take the lead in the synthesis of functional proteins [43]. The notable reduction in isoleucine and leucine indicated that amino acid metabolism was disrupted due to oxidative stress and resulted in the attenuated virulence of S. marcescens, consistent with the reduced virulence factors.
Succinate and fumarate are important intermediate metabolites of the TCA cycle. The decrease in succinate and fumarate indicated that energy metabolism was notably disrupted. The disruption of the TCA cycle, as the most important energy source for micro-organisms, will inevitably lead to a shortage of the energy supply and the weakened pathogenicity of S. marcescens [24]. NAD+ is an important metabolite involved in nucleic acid metabolism. It also takes the lead in antioxidation and improving the survival rate of cells in stressful situations [44]. The reduced NAD+ indicated that the nucleic acid metabolism was disrupted, and also functioned as a cell self-repairing mechanism to resist oxidative injury.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated the antivirulence capacity of phloretin against S. marcescens NJ01 and uncovered the underlying mechanism. Phloretin significantly inhibited the secretion of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, thus disrupting the QS system of this bacterium. Dysfunctional QS resulted in the suppressed formation of biofilms and production of virulence factors, as well as intensified oxidative injury. The improved injury altered components of the cell membrane, improved membrane permeability, and eventually enhanced the susceptibility of biofilm cells to antibiotics. Oxidative stress also resulted in disorders of amino acid metabolism, energy supply, and nucleic acid metabolism, eventually attenuating the pathogenicity of S. marcescens. Therefore, phloretin is expected to become an effective method for controlling vegetable spoilage induced by S. marcescens.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28248067/s1, Table S1: PCR primers for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Y.Q.: investigation, writing. P.J.: investigation. K.Y.: investigation. Y.Z.: methodology. J.N.: methodology. A.J.: conceptualization, formal analysis—review and editing. J.Z.: investigation, formal analysis, writing and editing. J.L.: formal analysis, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000091), the Jiangsu Youth Talent Promotion Project (TJ-2021-066), the Major Natural Science Research Project in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province (22KJA550002), the Henan Province Science and Technology Attack Plan Foundation (222102310356), the Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education of Henan Province (22B350004 and 23A350002), the Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province of China (232102311164), and the innovative training program for college students in Henan Province of China (202310482004).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the work described in this manuscript.

References

  1. Gonzalez-Flecha, B.; Demple, B. Homeostatic Regulation of Intracellular Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration in Aerobically Growing Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 382–388. Available online: https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC178707&blobtype=pdf (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef]
  2. Hassett, D.J.; Ma, J.F.; Elkins, J.G.; McDermott, T.R.; Ochsner, U.A.; West, S.E.; Huang, C.T.; Fredericks, J.; Burnett, S.; Stewart, P.S.; et al. Quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa controls expression of catalase and superoxide dismutase genes and mediates biofilm susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 34, 1082–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, J.W.; Ruan, L.Y.; Chen, H.J.; Luo, H.Z.; Jiang, H.; Wang, J.S.; Jia, A.Q. Inhibition of Quorum Sensing and Virulence in Serratia marcescens by Hordenine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bruton, B.D.; Mitchell, F.; Fletcher, J.; Pair, S.D.; Wayadande, A.; Melcher, U.; Brady, J.; Bextine, B.; Popham, T.W. Serratia marcescens, a Phloem-Colonizing, Squash Bug -Transmitted Bacterium: Causal Agent of Cucurbit Yellow Vine Disease. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 937–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zarei, M.; Aminzadeh, S.; Zolgharnein, H.; Safahieh, A.; Daliri, M.; Noghabi, K.A.; Ghoroghi, A.; Motallebi, A. Characterization of a chitinase with antifungal activity from a native Serratia marcescens B4A. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 1017–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Syed, J.H.; Alamdar, A.; Mohammad, A.; Ahad, K.; Shabir, Z.; Ahmed, H.; Ali, S.M.; Sani, S.G.; Bokhari, H.; Gallagher, K.D.; et al. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Pakistan: A review of the occurrence and associated human health risks. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 13367–13393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xue, B.L.; Geng, X.W.; Cui, H.H.; Chen, H.Y.; Wu, Z.K.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, M.T.; Tan, C.L.; et al. Size engineering of 2D MOF nanosheets for enhanced photodynamic antimicrobial therapy. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 108140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, J.; Bi, S.; Chen, H.; Chen, T.; Yang, R.; Li, M.; Fu, Y.; Jia, A.Q. Anti-Biofilm and Antivirulence Activities of Metabolites from Plectosphaerella cucumerina against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rice, S.A.; Koh, K.S.; Queck, S.Y.; Labbate, M.; Lam, K.W.; Kjelleberg, S. Biofilm Formation and Sloughing in Serratia marcescens are Controlled by Quorum Sensing and Nutrient Cues. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3477–3485. Available online: https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC1111991&blobtype=pdf (accessed on 24 October 2023). [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, A.; Shukla, R.; Singh, P.; Dubey, N.K. Chemical composition, antifungal and antiaflatoxigenic activities of Ocimum sanctum L. essential oil and its safety assessment as plant based antimicrobial. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salini, R.; Pandian, S.K. Interference of quorum sensing in urinary pathogen Serratia marcescens by Anethum graveolens. Pathog. Dis. 2015, 73, ftv038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ramanathan, S.; Ravindran, D.; Arunachalam, K.; Arumugam, V.R. Inhibition of quorum sensing-dependent biofilm and virulence genes expression in environmental pathogen Serratia marcescens by petroselinic acid. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 501–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Srinivasan, R.; Devi, K.R.; Kannappan, A.; Pandian, S.K.; Ravi, A.V. Piper betle and its bioactive metabolite phytol mitigates quorum sensing mediated virulence factors and biofilm of nosocomial pathogen Serratia marcescens in vitro. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 193, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pun, M.; Khazanov, N.; Galsurker, O.; Weitman, M.; Kerem, Z.; Senderowitz, H.; Yedidia, I. Phloretin, an Apple Phytoalexin, Affects the Virulence and Fitness of Pectobacterium brasiliense by Interfering With Quorum-Sensing. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 671807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wei, L.N.; Shi, C.Z.; Luo, C.X.; Hu, C.Y.; Meng, Y.H. Phloretin inhibits biofilm formation by affecting quorum sensing under different temperature. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 131, 109668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, S.; Zhao, C.; Yin, Y.; Chen, F.; Chen, H.; Wang, H. A Practical Approach for Predicting Antimicrobial Phenotype Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Through Machine Learning Analysis of Genome Data. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 841289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Truchado, P.; Gimenez-Bastida, J.A.; Larrosa, M.; Castro-Ibanez, I.; Espin, J.C.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A.; Garcia-Conesa, M.T.; Allende, A. Inhibition of quorum sensing (QS) in Yersinia enterocolitica by an orange extract rich in glycosylated flavanones. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8885–8894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bakkiyaraj, D.; Sivasankar, C.; Pandian, S.K. Inhibition of quorum sensing regulated biofilm formation in Serratia marcescens causing nosocomial infections. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 3089–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, B.H.; Chu, D.D.; Cui, H.H.; Li, Z.R.; Zhou, Z.; Tan, C.L.; Li, J.G. Activating MoO3 nanobelts via aqueous intercalation as a near-infrared type I photosensitizer for photodynamic periodontitis treatment. SmartMat 2023, e1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Z.; Wang, T.; Hu, T.T.; Cheng, C.H.; Yu, S.L.; Li, H.; Liu, S.Y.; Ma, L.F.; Zhao, M.T.; Liang, R.Z.; et al. Facile synthesis of 2D Al-TCPP MOF nanosheets for efficient sonodynamic cancer therapy. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023, 7, 1684–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, H.Z.; Zhou, J.W.; Sun, B.; Jiang, H.; Tang, S.; Jia, A.Q. Inhibitory effect of norharmane on Serratia marcescens NJ01 quorum sensing-mediated virulence factors and biofilm formation. Biofouling 2021, 37, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Koorehdavoudi, H.; Bogdan, P.; Wei, G.; Marculescu, R.; Zhuang, J.; Carlsen, R.W.; Sitti, M. Multi-fractal characterization of bacterial swimming dynamics: A case study on real and simulated Serratia marcescens. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 473, 20170154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, H.; Guo, S.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wang, S.; Liao, Y.X.; Shen, J.L.; Hou, J.T. A stable NIR fluorescent probe for imaging lipid droplets in cells and tumors. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2024, 398, 134740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, T.; Sheng, J.; Fu, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Jia, A.Q. 1H NMR-Based Global Metabolic Studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa upon Exposure of the Quorum Sensing Inhibitor Resveratrol. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Min, L.; He, S.; Chen, Q.; Peng, F.; Peng, H.; Xie, M. Comparative proteomic analysis of cellular response of human airway epithelial cells (A549) to benzo(a)pyrene. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2011, 21, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dusane, D.H.; Pawar, V.S.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Venugopalan, V.P.; Kumar, A.R.; Zinjarde, S.S. Anti-biofilm potential of a glycolipid surfactant produced by a tropical marine strain of Serratia marcescens. Biofouling 2011, 27, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Diao, W.R.; Zhang, L.L.; Feng, S.S.; Xu, J.G. Chemical composition, antibacterial activity, and mechanism of action of the essential oil from Amomum kravanh. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Velasco, C.; Rodriguez-Martinez, J.M.; Briales, A.; Diaz de Alba, P.; Calvo, J.; Pascual, A. Smaqnr, a new chromosome-encoded quinolone resistance determinant in Serratia marcescens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tuli, H.S.; Rath, P.; Chauhan, A.; Ramniwas, S.; Vashishth, K.; Varol, M.; Jaswal, V.S.; Haque, S.; Sak, K. Phloretin, as a Potent Anticancer Compound: From Chemistry to Cellular Interactions. Molecules 2022, 27, 8819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, J.H.; Regmi, S.C.; Kim, J.A.; Cho, M.H.; Yun, H.; Lee, C.S.; Lee, J. Apple flavonoid phloretin inhibits Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilm formation and ameliorates colon inflammation in rats. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 4819–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rudin, L.; Bornstein, M.M.; Shyp, V. Inhibition of biofilm formation and virulence factors of cariogenic oral pathogen Streptococcus mutans by natural flavonoid phloretin. J. Oral Microbiol. 2023, 15, 2230711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yin, L.; Zhang, P.P.; Wang, W.; Tang, S.; Deng, S.M.; Jia, A.Q. 3-Phenylpropan-1-Amine Enhanced Susceptibility of Serratia marcescens to Ofloxacin by Occluding Quorum Sensing. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0182922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Horng, Y.T.; Deng, S.C.; Daykin, M.; Soo, P.C.; Wei, J.R.; Luh, K.T.; Ho, S.W.; Swift, S.; Lai, H.C.; Williams, P. The LuxR family protein SpnR functions as a negative regulator of N-acylhomoserine lactone-dependent quorum sensing in Serratia marcescens. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 45, 1655–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Okonkwo, C.C.; Ujor, V.; Cornish, K.; Ezeji, T.C. Inactivation of the Levansucrase Gene in Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365 Diminishes Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis during 2,3-Butanediol Fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00196-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schmidley, J.W. Free radicals in central nervous system ischemia. Stroke 1990, 21, 1086–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Machado, S.G.; Heyndrickx, M.; De Block, J.; Devreese, B.; Vandenberghe, I.; Vanetti, M.C.; Van Coillie, E. Identification and characterization of a heat-resistant protease from Serratia liquefaciens isolated from Brazilian cold raw milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 222, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Salgado, C.A.; Bagliniere, F.; Vanetti, M.C.D. Spoilage potential of a heat-stable lipase produced by Serratia liquefaciens isolated from cold raw milk. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 126, 109289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Siddiqui, A.A.; Jalah, R.; Sharma, Y.D. Expression and purification of HtpX-like small heat shock integral membrane protease of an unknown organism related to Methylobacillus flagellatus. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2007, 70, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, G.Y.; Nizet, V. Color me bad: Microbial pigments as virulence factors. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiang, T.; Zhou, W.; Xu, C.; Xu, J.; Liu, R.; Wang, N.; Xu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, M.; Mo, X.; et al. Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Competitive Growth Advantage of Non-pigmented Serratia marcescens Mutants. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 793202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, J.W.; Jia, A.Q.; Jiang, H.; Li, P.L.; Chen, H.; Tan, X.J.; Liu, E.Q. 1-(4-Amino-2-hydroxyphenyl)ethanone from Phomopsis liquidambari showed quorum sensing inhibitory activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gram, L.; Ravn, L.; Rasch, M.; Bruhn, J.B.; Christensen, A.B.; Givskov, M. Food spoilage-interactions between food spoilage bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 78, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pomini, A.M.; Paccola-Meirelles, L.D.; Marsaioli, A.J. Acyl-homoserine lactones produced by Pantoea sp. isolated from the “maize white spot” foliar disease. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rongvaux, A.; Galli, M.; Denanglaire, S.; Van Gool, F.; Dreze, P.L.; Szpirer, C.; Bureau, F.; Andris, F.; Leo, O. Nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase/pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor/visfatin is required for lymphocyte development and cellular resistance to genotoxic stress. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 4685–4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 08067 g001
Figure 1. Growth profile of S. marcescens NJ01 treated with 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL of phloretin for 24 h.
Figure 1. Growth profile of S. marcescens NJ01 treated with 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL of phloretin for 24 h.
Molecules 28 08067 g001
Molecules 28 08067 g002
Figure 2. Effect of phloretin on AHL secretion. (A) HPLC chromatograms of C4-HSL and C6-HSL exposure to (b) DMSO, (c) 0.5, (d) 1, and (e) 2 mg/mL of phloretin. (a) Standard chemicals of C4-HSL and C6-HSL. (B) MS and MS2 spectra of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively: (a) and (c) represented full MS spectra of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively; (b) and (d) represented MS2 spectra of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively. (C) and (D) represented quantitative analysis of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively. *, p < 0.05 versus DMSO control. **, p < 0.01 versus DMSO control. ***, p < 0.001 versus DMSO control.
Figure 2. Effect of phloretin on AHL secretion. (A) HPLC chromatograms of C4-HSL and C6-HSL exposure to (b) DMSO, (c) 0.5, (d) 1, and (e) 2 mg/mL of phloretin. (a) Standard chemicals of C4-HSL and C6-HSL. (B) MS and MS2 spectra of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively: (a) and (c) represented full MS spectra of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively; (b) and (d) represented MS2 spectra of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively. (C) and (D) represented quantitative analysis of C4-HSL and C6-HSL, respectively. *, p < 0.05 versus DMSO control. **, p < 0.01 versus DMSO control. ***, p < 0.001 versus DMSO control.
Molecules 28 08067 g002
Molecules 28 08067 g003
Figure 3. The synergistic effect of phloretin (Phl) and amikacin (Ami) (A), netilmicin (Net) (A), and imipenem (B) on biofilm formation of S. marcescens NJ01. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01; (***) p < 0.001 versus the DMSO control.
Figure 3. The synergistic effect of phloretin (Phl) and amikacin (Ami) (A), netilmicin (Net) (A), and imipenem (B) on biofilm formation of S. marcescens NJ01. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01; (***) p < 0.001 versus the DMSO control.
Molecules 28 08067 g003
Molecules 28 08067 g004
Figure 4. SEM (8μm) analysis of biofilms exposure to (A) DMSO, (B) 1 mg/mL of phloretin, (C) 2 mg/mL of phloretin, (D) 16 µg/mL of amikacin, (E) 1 mg/mL of phloretin + 16 µg/mL of amikacin, and (F) 2 mg/mL of phloretin + 16 µg/mL of amikacin, respectively.
Figure 4. SEM (8μm) analysis of biofilms exposure to (A) DMSO, (B) 1 mg/mL of phloretin, (C) 2 mg/mL of phloretin, (D) 16 µg/mL of amikacin, (E) 1 mg/mL of phloretin + 16 µg/mL of amikacin, and (F) 2 mg/mL of phloretin + 16 µg/mL of amikacin, respectively.
Molecules 28 08067 g004
Molecules 28 08067 g005
Figure 5. Impact of phloretin on virulence factors of (A) protease activity, (B) prodigiosin production, (C) EPS production, and (D) swimming and (E) swarming motility. (a), (b), (c), and (d) represented treatment with DMSO, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL of phloretin, respectively. (***) p < 0.001 versus the DMSO control.
Figure 5. Impact of phloretin on virulence factors of (A) protease activity, (B) prodigiosin production, (C) EPS production, and (D) swimming and (E) swarming motility. (a), (b), (c), and (d) represented treatment with DMSO, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL of phloretin, respectively. (***) p < 0.001 versus the DMSO control.
Molecules 28 08067 g005
Molecules 28 08067 g006
Figure 6. 1H NMR spectra of S. marcescens NJ01 extracts from phloretin-treated (red line) and control groups (black line). Labeled metabolites: 1, glycocholate; 2, isoleucine; 3, leucine; 4, valine; 5, 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate; 6, lactate; 7, alanine; 8, acetate; 9, 2-aminoadipate; 10, glutamate; 11, succinate; 12, 2-oxoglutarate; 13, ethanolamine; 14, betaine; 15, glycine; 16, maltose; 17, uracil; 18, fumarate; 19, tyrosine; 20, phenylalanine; 21, hypoxanthine; 22, NAD+; 23, nicotinate.
Figure 6. 1H NMR spectra of S. marcescens NJ01 extracts from phloretin-treated (red line) and control groups (black line). Labeled metabolites: 1, glycocholate; 2, isoleucine; 3, leucine; 4, valine; 5, 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate; 6, lactate; 7, alanine; 8, acetate; 9, 2-aminoadipate; 10, glutamate; 11, succinate; 12, 2-oxoglutarate; 13, ethanolamine; 14, betaine; 15, glycine; 16, maltose; 17, uracil; 18, fumarate; 19, tyrosine; 20, phenylalanine; 21, hypoxanthine; 22, NAD+; 23, nicotinate.
Molecules 28 08067 g006
Molecules 28 08067 g007
Figure 7. OSC−PLS−DA of metabolomics profiles from phloretin-treated and control groups. (A) Score plot. Component 1 and component 2 explained 90% of total variance in the extracts of S. marcescens NJ01; (B) S-plot points represent different variables (metabolites); (C,D) Color-coded loading plot after removal of water signals and affected regions. Color bars in red and blue represent metabolites that significantly or indistinctively contributed to the separation of groups, respectively. Peaks in positive and negative status indicate decreased and increased metabolites relative to the score plot in the phloretin-treated group.Labeled metabolites: 1, glycocholate; 2, isoleucine; 3, leucine; 4, valine; 5, 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate; 6, lactate; 7, alanine; 8, acetate; 9, 2-aminoadipate; 10, glutamate; 11, succinate; 12, 2-oxoglutarate; 13, ethanolamine; 14, betaine; 15, glycine; 16, maltose; 17, uracil; 18, fumarate; 19, tyrosine; 20, phenylalanine; 21, hypoxanthine; 22, NAD+; 23, nicotinate.
Figure 7. OSC−PLS−DA of metabolomics profiles from phloretin-treated and control groups. (A) Score plot. Component 1 and component 2 explained 90% of total variance in the extracts of S. marcescens NJ01; (B) S-plot points represent different variables (metabolites); (C,D) Color-coded loading plot after removal of water signals and affected regions. Color bars in red and blue represent metabolites that significantly or indistinctively contributed to the separation of groups, respectively. Peaks in positive and negative status indicate decreased and increased metabolites relative to the score plot in the phloretin-treated group.Labeled metabolites: 1, glycocholate; 2, isoleucine; 3, leucine; 4, valine; 5, 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate; 6, lactate; 7, alanine; 8, acetate; 9, 2-aminoadipate; 10, glutamate; 11, succinate; 12, 2-oxoglutarate; 13, ethanolamine; 14, betaine; 15, glycine; 16, maltose; 17, uracil; 18, fumarate; 19, tyrosine; 20, phenylalanine; 21, hypoxanthine; 22, NAD+; 23, nicotinate.
Molecules 28 08067 g007
Molecules 28 08067 g008
Figure 8. Oxidative stress (A), membrane permeability (B), and gene expressions (C) induced by phloretin. (***) p < 0.001 versus the DMSO control.
Figure 8. Oxidative stress (A), membrane permeability (B), and gene expressions (C) induced by phloretin. (***) p < 0.001 versus the DMSO control.
Molecules 28 08067 g008
Table 1. Metabolite assignment in S. marcescens NJ01.
Table 1. Metabolite assignment in S. marcescens NJ01.
No.CompoundAssignmentsChemical Shift (ppm) aFold bp c
1GlycocholateCH30.93 (t)0.1
2Isoleucined-CH3, g-CH3, a-CH0.94 (t), 1.01 (d), 3.67 (d)0.73*
3Leucined-CH3, d-CH3, a-CH0.96 (t), 0.97 (d), 3.72 (d)0.56***
4Valineg-CH3, g-CH3, a-CH0.99 (d), 1.05 (d), 3.59 (d)0.07
53-Methyl-2-oxovalerateCH31.1 (d)−0.67
6LactateCH31.33 (d)1.13***
7AlanineCH3, CH1.49 (d), 3.78 (q)0.92***
8AcetateCH31.92 (s)−0.07
92-AminoadipateCH22.07 (m)−1.05*
10Glutamateb-CH2, g-CH2, a-CH2.06 (m), 2.35 (dt), 3.76 (q)−1.21***
11SuccinateCH22.41 (s)−0.43*
122-OxoglutarateCH3.0 (t)−0.96
13EthanolamineCH23.13 (t), 3.81 (t)0.74*
14BetaineCH23.23 (s)−3.82**
15GlycineCH23.56 (s)0.7***
16MaltoseCH3.63 (dd)0.97***
17UracilCH5.81 (d), 7.54 (d)0.71***
18FumarateCH6.52 (s)−2.19***
19Tyrosine2-CH, 6-CH6.91 (d)−0.52**
20Phenylalanineph-H7.3–7.46 (m)−0.3**
21Hypoxanthine2-H, 8-H8.2 (s), 8.22 (s)0.03
22NAD+7-CH, 39-CH8.13 (s), 8.83 (s), 8.84 (d)−0.86*
23NicotinateCH8.89 (dd)0.38
a Multiplicity: (s) singlet, (d) doublet, (t) triplet, (q) quartets, (m) multiplets. b Color-coded according to the log2(fold): red and blue represent the increased and decreased metabolites, respectively, in Ses-treated group. c p values were calculated based on a parametric Student t test or a nonparametric Mann–Whitney test and were corrected by the BH (Benjamini–Hochberg) methods; values with asterisk symbols denoted extent of significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, Y.; Ji, P.; Yin, K.; Zheng, Y.; Niu, J.; Jia, A.; Zhou, J.; Li, J. Phloretin Inhibits Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Serratia marcescens. Molecules 2023, 28, 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248067

AMA Style

Qi Y, Ji P, Yin K, Zheng Y, Niu J, Jia A, Zhou J, Li J. Phloretin Inhibits Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Serratia marcescens. Molecules. 2023; 28(24):8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Yueheng, Pengcheng Ji, Kunyuan Yin, Yi Zheng, Jiangxiu Niu, Aiqun Jia, Jinwei Zhou, and Jingguo Li. 2023. "Phloretin Inhibits Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Serratia marcescens" Molecules 28, no. 24: 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248067

APA Style

Qi, Y., Ji, P., Yin, K., Zheng, Y., Niu, J., Jia, A., Zhou, J., & Li, J. (2023). Phloretin Inhibits Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Serratia marcescens. Molecules, 28(24), 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop