Next Article in Journal
Autothermal Reforming of Volatile Organic Compounds to Hydrogen-Rich Gas
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Antidiabetic Activity of Squalene via In Silico and In Vivo Assay
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Aspects and Therapeutic Implications of Herbal Compounds Targeting Different Types of Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Mechanistic Pathways Targeted by Natural Compounds in the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 2
10.3390/molecules28020751
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy

by
Wenwei Wan
1,†,
Qikai Qin
1,†,
Linshan Xie
1,
Hanqing Zhang
2,
Fan Wu
3,
Raymond C. Stevens
2,3,* and
Yan Liu
2,*
1
iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
2
iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
3
Structure Therapeutics, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Molecules 2023, 28(2), 751; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020751
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antidiabetic Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a critical therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The GLP-1R cellular signaling mechanism relevant to insulin secretion and blood glucose regulation has been extensively studied. Numerous drugs targeting GLP-1R have entered clinical treatment. However, novel functional molecules with reduced side effects and enhanced therapeutic efficacy are still in high demand. In this review, we summarize the basis of GLP-1R cellular signaling, and how it is involved in the treatment of T2DM. We review the functional molecules of incretin therapy in various stages of clinical trials. We also outline the current strategies and emerging techniques that are furthering the development of novel therapeutic drugs for T2DM and other metabolic diseases.

1. Introduction

Diabetes is considered the fastest-growing global health problem, affecting about 10% of adults around the world [1,2]. The diabetic population will reach 783 million globally in 2045 according to an estimate from the International Diabetes Federation [2]. All types of diabetes share the common clinical manifestation of hyperglycemia and several characteristic symptoms, including thirst, polyuria, constant hunger, fatigue, weight loss, and blurred vision [2]. As the disease progresses, complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy may occur, and the risk of cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease will increase, which significantly affects the quality of life.
T2DM accounts for more than 90% of diabetes cases [1,2], although this percentage might be higher since approximately one-third of people living with T2DM are undiagnosed [2]. Adopting a healthy lifestyle and taking metformin are the cornerstone for T2DM management. A combination of sulfonylureas, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, and insulin injections can be added when the single antidiabetic medication is insufficient. However, these drugs can cause side effects such as hypoglycemia, weight gain, and cardiovascular risk [3].
Pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and resultant insulin deficiency are the key features of T2DM [4], however, most medications do not target β-cell and become less effective as diabetes progress [5]. Fortunately, a couple of gut-derived natural peptides termed incretins that can stimulate insulin secretion [6] have inspired novel T2DM treatments. Incretins were first discovered upon observing that oral glucose administration leads to greater insulinotropic effects than intravenous administration [7]. Since then, researchers began to investigate gut-derived insulin secretagogues; and incretin-based therapies currently have become the preferred first injection therapy for T2DM treatment, due to their strong glycemic control effect and remarkable safety profile [8]. Incretins include glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Although both GLP-1 and GIP could promote insulin secretion in a healthy state, the therapeutic potential of GIP alone is controversial [9,10]. In contrast, the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is thought to be one of the most important potential drug targets for glucose-dependent T2DM treatment, lowering hypoglycemia risk compared to insulin and sulfonylureas [11].
GLP-1, as the endogenous agonist of GLP-1R [12,13,14], is a promising natural antidiabetic product due to its anorexigenic, insulinotropic, and weight-reducing effects [15]. However, in vivo GLP-1 can be cleaved by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) immediately after secretion at the second amino acid (alanine) from its N-terminal [16]. This will lead to an instant degradation of GLP-1 and a short circulation time in the human body. Although GLP-1 has many potential advantages, its short circulation time of about 2 min [17] limits its application in treatment since such frequent administration is incompatible with patient compliance and thereby reducing drug effectiveness.
DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogs with prolonged circulation time have already been applied in incretin therapy and have performed well. However, GLP-1R agonists are favored because they have superior body weight control [18] and cardiovascular outcomes [19]. In this review, we discuss the current GLP-1R signaling and ligand development strategies, trends in incretin therapy, and perspectives on T2DM treatment.

2. GLP-1R Signaling

2.1. The Structural Basis of GLP-1R

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are widely distributed in various tissues and play key roles in a diversity of physiological activities. As the largest receptor family, GPCRs are important drug targets for a broad range of indications [20]. GPCRs share a conserved seven-transmembrane helix bundle (Figure 1) with three extracellular loops (ECLs) and three intracellular loops (ICLs). The ECLs form an extracellular surface that interacts with orthosteric ligands. While the ICLs, to large extent, determine downstream receptor signaling. GLP-1R, together with four other glucagon receptors (GCGR, GLP-2R, GIPR, and GHRHR), belongs to the secretin (class B1) GPCR family, whose endogenous ligands are peptide hormones [21,22]. Class B1 GPCRs have a large and structurally conserved extracellular domain (ECD) of 120–160 residues at the N-terminal, forming a three-layered α-β-β-α fold that is stabilized by three interlayer disulfide bonds [23].
The endogenous ligands of GLP-1R are GLP-1 (7-36) and GLP-1 (7-37), products from the post-translational processing of proglucagon [24]. Proglucagon also produces several other peptide hormones for receptors in the glucagon receptor family, such as glucagon, oxyntomodulin (OXM), and GLP-2. On binding with endogenous peptides, the glucagon receptor family shares a similar recognition mode, which is described as a “two-domain” binding mode. The C-terminal α helix of peptide ligand initiates peptide recognition by binding to the ECD, then the peptide N-terminal can activate the receptor and trigger its downstream signaling cascade by binding to the transmembrane domain (TMD) ligand-binding pocket [25]. Recently released cryo-EM structures of GLP-1R in complex with a peptide ligand revealed that peptides form a single helix in binding post, which is a unique feature shared in class B1 GPCRs [26,27,28].

2.2. Signaling Pathways of GLP-1R

Researchers have been pursuing functional studies of GLP-1R for many years to illuminate the mechanism of GLP-1R signaling. GLP-1R downstream signaling pathways network can be activated through coupling with the intracellular transducers [29]. The diverse protein-binding forms will lead to complex downstream pathways.
Molecules 28 00751 g001 550
Figure 1. Signaling pathways of GLP-1R in pancreatic β-cell [15,30]. Three downstream signaling pathways initiated from Gαs (blue), Gαq (pink), and β-arrestin (green) are shown in the left half of the β-cell. The GLP-1R internalization process and insulin secretion after GLP-1R activation are also shown. Colored circles show mono-agonists targeting GLP-1R (red), GIPR (green), and GCGR (blue), and multi-agonists targeting GLP-1R/GIPR (red/green), GLP-1R/GCGR (red/blue), and GLP-1R/GIPR/GCGR (red/green/blue). The top left inset shows the structure of GLP-1R with a seven-transmembrane helix bundle and a large ECD. Abbreviations: VDCC, voltage-dependent calcium channel; TRPM, the transient receptor potential melastatin; GCGR, glucagon receptor; GIPR, gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor.
Figure 1. Signaling pathways of GLP-1R in pancreatic β-cell [15,30]. Three downstream signaling pathways initiated from Gαs (blue), Gαq (pink), and β-arrestin (green) are shown in the left half of the β-cell. The GLP-1R internalization process and insulin secretion after GLP-1R activation are also shown. Colored circles show mono-agonists targeting GLP-1R (red), GIPR (green), and GCGR (blue), and multi-agonists targeting GLP-1R/GIPR (red/green), GLP-1R/GCGR (red/blue), and GLP-1R/GIPR/GCGR (red/green/blue). The top left inset shows the structure of GLP-1R with a seven-transmembrane helix bundle and a large ECD. Abbreviations: VDCC, voltage-dependent calcium channel; TRPM, the transient receptor potential melastatin; GCGR, glucagon receptor; GIPR, gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor.
Molecules 28 00751 g001
Currently, it is believed that GLP-1R predominantly signals through the Gαs/cAMP pathway; however, there is evidence that GLP-1R couples with Gαq and other G proteins. After activation, GLP-1R undergoes phosphorylation at the C-terminal, which further recruits β-arrestin, leading to internalization and desensitization of the receptor (Figure 1). The Gαs/cAMP pathway directly leads to the glucose-induced secretion of insulin granules [31,32]. After activation by full agonists such as GLP-1, GLP-1R couples with Gαs, activates adenylate cyclase (AC), and causes the accumulation of cAMP [33]. With increasing cAMP levels, protein kinase A (PKA) [31] and the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP-2 (Epac-2) [34] are also activated. PKA and Epac-2 trigger the closure of KATP and KV channels, which depolarizes the cell membrane, opens voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCC), and causes Ca2+ influx [35,36]. In addition to the classical function of cAMP, the cAMP/CREB pathway could also induce the expression of insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS2) and promote β-cell survival, demonstrating the protective effects of GLP-1 analogs on β-cells [37].
In addition to the Gαs/cAMP pathway, GLP-1R is also able to couple with other G protein subtypes including Gαi, Gαq, Gαo, and Gα11 [38,39]. Recent research has demonstrated the importance of the Gαq pathway in the pancreatic β-cell. First, the Gαq pathway initiates from the coupling of phospholipase-C (PLC), transforming phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to inositol triphosphate 3 (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), and accompanies the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and intracellular Ca2+ influx production via IP3 receptor [39]. PKC also triggers the closure of the KATP channel and activation of TRPM4/5 [40]. Gαs and Gαq regulate the cAMP and Ca2+ levels, respectively; however, variational mechanisms exist in the complex network of G protein signaling pathways. A switch of Gαs and Gαq pathways has been found under certain conditions, including persistent depolarization of cell membrane [30], and reduction in GLP-1 concentration to picomolar [41]. The switch of G protein pathways clarifies a possible mechanism for basal insulin secretion under drug treatment and provides important direction for incretin therapy in T2DM.
Two types of β-arrestin, β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2, mediate the GLP-1R downstream signaling in β-cells, and also elicit the receptor internalization process. β-arrestin-1 mediates the phosphorylation of CREB and ERK1/2 [42], further phosphorylating Bad (Bcl-xL/Bcl-2-associated death promoter homolog) and inhibiting cell apoptosis [43]. β-arrestin-2 functions as an indispensable insulin regulator. Knocking out β-arrestin-2 in the mice model and leading to impaired insulin secretion [44]. With the treatment of sulfonylureas, direct interaction between β-arrestin-1 and Epac-2 can upregulate the Ca2+ concentration [45].
GLP-1R is a fast-internalized and recycling receptor [46]. After activation, GLP-1R-ligand complexes enter the endosome [32]. A portion of that is eventually transported to lysosomes for degradation, while the other portion returns to the cell membrane [46]. Different agonists may show different effects on GLP-1R internalization and recycling. For example, GLP-1 is apt to receptor recycling, while exendin-4 may favor slower recycling and lysosome targeting [47]. The latest study suggested that internalized endosomal GPCR-Gαs complexes are the origin of induced ERK activity [48], but the detailed mechanism remains implicit.
Due to advantageous physiological effects and rapid response in GLP-1R signaling pathways, functional molecules targeting GLP-1R are attracting increasing attention in drug discovery. Optimization of the current molecules and discovery of novel compounds are highly demanded.

3. Functional Molecules Targeting GLP-1R

3.1. Peptide-Based Mono-Agonists

The short circulation time of endogenous GLP-1R agonists, such as GLP-1, limits its potential for T2DM treatment. Fortunately, exendin-4, a 39-amino acid peptide from Gila monster (Heloderma suspectum) venom, showed similar characteristics to the mammalian incretin hormone [49,50]. It naturally has better resistance to DPP-4 cleavage due to its different amino acid sequence (Figure 2A), and thus has a much longer circulation time than GLP-1. Eventually, exendin-4 was developed as the first marketed twice-daily GLP-1R peptide agonist, exenatide [51]. Although exenatide represents a huge step forward, antidiabetic drugs with even longer circulation times for better patient compliance are still in demand.
Peptide optimization strategies for GLP-1R peptide agonists include sequence alteration, chemical modification, and fusion. The most obvious approaches to resist degradation are sequence alteration (Figure 2A) and amino acids substitution with α-amino iso-butyric acid (Aib) at the cleavage site [54,55,56] (Figure 2B). As for chemical modification, C-terminal amidation, PEGylation, fatty acid acylation, and amino acid substitution are the main methods to improve peptide stability in vivo (Figure 2B). C-terminal amidation can not only limit proteolytic degradation, thus extending the circulation time of the peptide, but also improve the binding affinity with the receptor [57]. PEGylation attaches polyethylene glycol (PEG) units to the peptide [58], while fatty acid acylation allows the covalent attachment of a fatty acid chain on the peptide [59] (Figure 2B). PEGylation and fatty acid acylation can increase the molecular mass of peptides, improving resistance to renal filtration and enzymatic degradation due to steric hindrance [53,60]. Beyond that, fatty-acid acylated peptides can spontaneously oligomerize at the subcutaneous injection site and delay absorption due to their amphiphilicity, resulting in a sustained-release effect [61,62,63]. The fatty acid chain can also protect the peptide monomer by reversibly binding to albumin [53]. These strategies are usually undertaken in conjunction with each other to generate a better protective effect.
In addition to chemical modifications, we can also fuse the peptide to a long-circulating and low immunogenic protein, such as an antibody fragment (Fc region), antibody, and albumin (Figure 2C). This strategy can prolong the peptide half-life in two ways. First, like PEGylation and fatty acid acylation, the increased molecular mass can improve resistance to enzymatic degradation and renal filtration. Second, the fusion protein can go through the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) recycling pathway [64].
Table
Table 1. Peptide-based mono-agonists targeting GLP-1R.
Table 1. Peptide-based mono-agonists targeting GLP-1R.
NameTrade NameAdministrationIndicationsStatus 1Ref.
ExenatideByettaSC, bidT2DM2005[51,65,66]
BydureonSC, qwT2DM2012[67]
LiraglutideVictoza
Saxenda		SC, qdT2DM
Obesity		2010
2014		[68,69]
[70]
DulaglutideTrulicitySC, qwT2DM2014[71]
AlbiglutideTanzeumSC, qwT2DM2014 (withdrawal 2018)[72,73]
LixisenatideAdlyxinSC, qdT2DM2016[74]
BeinaglutideYishengtaiSC, tidT2DM2016[75]
SemaglutideOzempic
Rybelsus
Wegovy		SC, qw
PO 2, qd
SC, qw		T2DM
T2DM
Obesity		2017
2019
2021		[76]
[77]
[78]
PEG-LoxenatideFulaimeiSC, qwT2DM2019[79]
PEGylated Exenatide (PB-119)/SC, qwT2DMPhase 3[80]
Efpeglenatide (SAR439977)/SC, qwT2DMPhase 3[81,82]
Vurolenatide/SC, bimSBSPhase 2/
JY09/SC, qwT2DMPhase 2/
1 Year of approval, or the final phase reached. So far, all approved GLP-1R agonists are derived from peptides such as GLP-1 or exendin-4. 2 Rybelsus is the only approved oral peptide-based drug. Abbreviations: SC, Subcutaneous injection; bid, twice daily; qw, once weekly; qd, once daily; PO, oral administration; bim, twice monthly; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; SBS, short bowel syndrome. Data were manually collected from clinicaltrials.gov and Drugs@FDA database on 15 December 2022.

3.2. Peptide-Based Multi-Agnosits

Rather than single agonists targeting only GLP-1R, dual or triple agonists targeting additional receptors (GIPR, GCGR, and GLP-2R) involved in the incretin axis and/or other pathways (Table 2) are expected to have stronger glucoregulatory, weight-reducing, and even cardiovascular protective effects [4]. Although the mechanism by which multi-agonists have superior effects is unknown, many clinical results have shown their therapeutic potential.
Thus far, GIPR/GLP-1R is the most attractive target combination. Instead of playing a redundant role, GIP may protect β-cells from dysfunction and destruction independently of GLP-1 [83]. Although the therapeutic potential of GIPR agonists is debatable, clinical trials of dual GIPR/GLP-1R agonists have produced promising results. The combination of these two GPCR pathways is assumed to increase glucose-dependent insulin secretion, decrease energy consumption, improve white adipose tissue function, and increase insulin sensitivity [84]. Tirzepatide, the first dual agonist for the treatment of T2DM and obesity targeting GIPR and GLP-1R, was approved by the U.S. FDA in 2022. Compared with existing drugs such as semaglutide, once-weekly tirzepatide showed better results in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) [85] and body weight reduction [86] with a similar safety profile.
GCGR/GLP-1R dual agonists have also received much attention. OXM can naturally activate both GCGR and GLP-1R with lower potency than their primary ligands [87]. Although glucagon and GLP-1 have distinct effects on glucose levels, their effects on food intake may be additive [88], leading to more significant body-weight reduction. Several OXM derivatives are under clinical trials, for example, cotadutide, a once-daily GCGR/GLP-1R dual agonist, has shown promising impacts on glycemic control, body weight, and liver fat reduction [89].
Table
Table 2. Dual/triple-agonists targeting GLP-1R and other GPCRs.
Table 2. Dual/triple-agonists targeting GLP-1R and other GPCRs.
NameTrade NameAdministrationIndicationsStatus 1Ref.
GLP-1R/GIPR
TirzepatideMounjaro
/		SC, qwT2DM
Obesity		2022
2022 FTD 2		[90,91]
[86]
CT-868/SC, qdT2DMPhase 1/
NNC0090-2746 (RG7697)/SC, qdT2DMPhase 2[92]
GLP-1R/GLP-2R
Dapiglutide (ZP7570)/SC, qwSBSPhase 1/
GLP-1R/GCGR
SAR425899/SC, qdT2DMPhase 2 (discontinued)[93]
Pemvidutide (ALT-801)/SC, qwObesity
NASH		Phase 1
Phase 1		/
/
Pegapamodutide (LY2944876)/SC, qwT2DMPhase 2 (discontinued)/
Cotadutide (MEDI0382)/SC, qdT2DM
NASH
CKD
Obesity		Phase 2
Phase 2
Phase 2
Phase 1		[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
Efinopegdutide (MK-6024)/SC, qwNASHPhase 2/
Mazdutide (IBI-362)/SC, qwT2DM
Obesity		Phase 2
Phase 1		/
[98]
BI456906/SC, qwT2DM
Obesity		Phase 2
Phase 2		/
/
MK-8521/SC, qdT2DMPhase 2/
PB-718/SC, qwNASHPhase 1/
NN9277 (NNC 9204 1177)/SC, qwObesityPhase 1 (discontinued)/
MOD6031/SC, qwObesityPhase 1/
GLP-1R/GCGR/GIPR
HM-15211/SC, qwNAFLDPhase 1/
LY-3437943/SC, qwT2DMPhase 1[99]
1 Year of approval, the final phase reached. 2 The U.S. FDA granted fast track designation (FTD) to Tirzepatide in October 2022. Among these drug candidates, only tirzepatide has been approved. Abbreviations: SC, subcutaneous injection; bid, twice daily; qw, once weekly; qd, once daily; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; SBS, short bowel syndrome; CKD, chronic kidney disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Data were manually collected from clinicaltrials.gov and Drugs@FDA database on 15 December 2022.
Clinical trial failures may occur in some cases of dual or triple agonists, caused by their side effects. In order to develop safer therapeutic drugs, it is essential to study the mechanism of these dual and triple agonists [88] from structural, functional, and pharmacologic aspects.

3.3. Small Molecule Agonists and Positive Allosteric Modulators (PAM)

So far, all marketed GLP-1R agonists are peptide-based and were developed from natural products such as GLP-1 and exendin-4 (Table 1). Although their half-lives can be prolonged by the strategies discussed above, problems or limits such as cost, side effects, and subcutaneous injection remain [100]. In the expectation of improving these deficiencies, many groups and major pharmaceutical companies have long been pursuing the development of non-peptide drugs. Due to a poor understanding of the ligand binding mode and activation mechanism prior to the first GLP-1R structure being solved in 2017 [101], high-throughput screening was adapted in many studies to identify promising candidates, followed by massive structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies to improve the chemical and pharmacokinetic properties of compounds.
Table
Table 3. Small molecule agonists and PAM targeting GLP-1R.
Table 3. Small molecule agonists and PAM targeting GLP-1R.
NameFrequencyIndicationsStatus 1Ref.
Danuglipron (PF-06882961)bidT2DM
obesity		Phase 2
Phase 2		[102]
TTP-273qd/bidT2DMPhase 2/
LY3502970 (OWL833)qdT2DM
obesity		Phase 2
Phase 1		[103]
PF-07081532qdT2DMPhase 1[104]
RGT-075qdT2DMPhase 1[105]
TT-OAD2//Preclinical (discontinued)[106]
1 Year of approval, or the final phase reached. All these small molecules are designed for oral administration. Abbreviations: bid, twice daily; qd, once daily; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data were manually collected from clinicaltrials.gov on 15 December 2022.
Currently, none of the small molecule GLP-1R agonists have been approved. However, several candidates are under clinical trial (Table 3). There are fewer small molecule agonists and PAMs targeting GLP-1R than peptide-based drug candidates, and most of them are still in the early stage of development. One of the first small-molecule agonists, Boc5, is a substituted cyclobutane identified by HT screening [107]. However, it has not been launched into clinical study. PF-06882961, based on diazabenzimidazoles, is a full agonist in cAMP elevation, but a partial agonist in other signaling pathways [108,109]. TTP-273, which has completed phase 2 trials, is an azoanthracene derivative reported in several patents [110,111]. Another compound in the same series as TTP-273, TT-OAD2, is a partial agonist with slow kinetics in promoting cAMP [106]. LY3502970 is a pyrazolopyridine derivative and is a biased agonist that abolished β-arrestin signaling [103,112]. The chemical structures of PF-07081532 and RGT-075 have not yet been disclosed.
Several GLP-1R structures in complex with different small molecules have been released later, and revealed dramatic diversity in the binding mode of each compound (Figure 3A). TT-OAD2 forms a U-shape conformation in the GLP-1R helical bundle near the ECD where it interacts with residues within the transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) to TM3 and ECLs [106]. LY3502970 sits in a similar position as TT-OAD2, while both its arms insert into slits between helixes, clamping around TM2. PF06882961 stays in the orthosteric binding pocket in the TMD, almost overlapping with the binding sites of the N-terminal of GLP-1 [28]. Additionally, both PF06882961 and LY3502970 have vital π–π interactions with W33 in the ECD, which abolished their effects on GLP-1R in rodents [103]. Finally, a Boc5 binding structure is published recently, which shows that Boc5 adapts a claw shape in its binding pocket, with three fingers stuck into the slits between TM1-TM3 and TM7 [113].
Many allosteric modulators have also been reported in the past few years. As one of the first reported small molecules, compound 2 was extensively studied over the years and was characterized as an ago-PAM [114,115], a type of molecule that possesses functions of both agonist and PAM. Another set of ago-PAMs based on pyrimidines represented by BETP was identified by screening a small library generated through a pharmacophore model [116]. Recently, a new ago-PAM, LSN3318839, was reported to restore the activity of GLP-1 (9-39) [117]. However, none of these allosteric modulators has entered clinical study.
To mimic peptide interaction and to obtain sufficient affinity when occupying the peptide pocket, most small molecules end up having a relatively large molecular weight, which could affect the physical properties and pharmacokinetics of compounds. Though most PAMs or ago-PAMs have lower molecular weight, none of them has entered clinical trial. As revealed by the structures, TT-OAD2, LY3502970, and PF-06882961 have quite different binding pockets: only three residues interact with all three compounds, 13 residues interact with two out of three, and 22 residues interact with only one of them (Figure 3B). Different binding modes of each compound may contribute to differences in efficacy and biased agonism. As peptide-based drug development has entered the era of dual agonists, a clearer understanding of the activation and biased signaling mechanism of GLP-1R is needed to aid the design of ideal compounds.

4. Incretin Therapeutic Studies

4.1. GLP-1R Agonists Based T2DM Therapy in Clinical Trials

In the early stage of diabetes, metformin monotherapy is widely applied as the first-line drug and is generally sufficient for glycemic control in T2DM [118]. With the progression of the disease, metformin alone cannot maintain blood glucose at the desired level, and combination therapies become necessary. The selection of combined medication, including sulfonylureas, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), GLP-1 agonists, and sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) [2,119], is based on clinical characteristics and patients’ preferences.
Among these drugs, thiazolidinediones and sulfonylureas are commonly used and cost-effective. However, they can cause congestive heart failure and hypoglycemia, respectively, thus limiting their further application. GLP-1R agonists and SGLT2i both have fewer side effects and are recommended for patients with comorbidities. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of a GLP-1R agonist and metformin could effectively reduce blood glucose levels [120]. Insulin injection is inevitable for glycemic control after the dysfunction of non-insulin treatment.
Among the non-insulin medication, incretin therapy is an advanced treatment for T2DM patients. The therapeutic potential of incretin in T2DM has been explored for more than one hundred years. In 1906, Moore et al. used extracts from the duodenal mucous membrane to treat T2DM [121]. Half a century later, Nauck et al. discovered an impaired incretin response in T2DM patients, leading to a decrease in incretin-stimulated insulin release [122]. A further study identified that the reduction in GLP-1 accounted for the diabetic state [6]. A 6-week pilot study investigated the long-term effect of GLP-1 in T2DM by continuous administration of this peptide hormone. Patients had lower fasting glucose (4.3 mmol/L) and HbA1c (−1.3%) under the administration of GLP-1 [123]. However, due to the short circulation time of native GLP-1, it is infeasible to continuously administrate native GLP-1 for long-term blood glucose management [124]. Some GLP-1 analogs were developed to overcome this problem.
Exenatide, the first approved GLP-1 analog, has significant effects on HbA1c level reduction [125], weight loss, and glycemic control [125], but no cardioprotective effect [67]. As the plasma drug concentration could be maintained for 12 h, the method of administration was by subcutaneous injection twice a day. Liraglutide was another novel GLP-1 analog that was approved by the FDA in 2010. A series of phase 3 trials (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes, LEAD) was launched to compare the efficacy and safety between liraglutide and other oral antidiabetic drugs [69,126,127]. In the LEAD-3 study, a significant reduction in HbA1c level was found with a dosage of 1.8 mg liraglutide compared with glimepiride monotherapy [126]. Moreover, compared with exenatide, liraglutide carries a lower risk of cardiovascular death [120]. Throughout the LEAD trials, patients showed high tolerance to the drug, with the most frequently reported side effects being GI events such as nausea and vomiting. Liraglutide was found to maintain a maximum plasma drug concentration for about 12–14 h, so the period of administration became once daily. Most recently, the GLP-1 analogs have continuously improved, representing great advances in treating T2DM, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. Semaglutide Unabated Sustainability in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN) trials showed the positive effects of subcutaneous semaglutide on glycemic control [128]. Weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide, compared with daily 3 mg liraglutide, shows a superior effect on weight loss [129]. Oral semaglutide administered once per week showed favorable efficacy and safety in the treatment of T2DM patients and the large, randomized control clinical trial is ongoing [130].
In addition to GLP-1R agonists, the discovery of multi-agonists is also ongoing in recent years. The first approved dual agonist, tirzepatide, is a potent agonist for both GLP-1R and GIPR. At dosages of 5, 10, and 15 mg, tirzepatide showed non-inferior treatment in glycemic control and superior behavior in weight loss than 1 mg semaglutide [85], further demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy of multi-agonists. Many other multi-agonists have emerged and are in the process of early-stage clinical trials (Table 2).

4.2. Adverse Effects of Current Available GLP-1R Agonists

Although GLP-1R agonists possess multiple beneficial effects and are a promising next-generation therapy for T2DM, their application still has many contraindications. Due to initial concerns about potential risks in preclinical studies [8], they are not recommended for T2DM patients with diseases such as severe gastrointestinal disease, medullary carcinoma of the thyroid [131], multiple endocrine neoplasm syndrome type 2, and history of pancreatitis [126]. Specifically, the following adverse effect profiles of GLP-1R agonists should be taken into consideration when formulating a clinical treatment plan. Firstly, among all the adverse effects of GLP-1R agonist treatment, nausea and related gastrointestinal responses, such as vomiting and diarrhea, are the most common [132,133]. These unwanted gastrointestinal responses reduce patient compliance and are important reasons for discontinuing T2DM treatment [134,135]. Secondly, the roles of GLP-1R agonists in promoting the proliferation of β-cells and reducing their apoptosis could increase the risk of pancreatic cancer [136,137]. Further, several concerns remain about the correlation of GLP1R agonist treatment with many other adverse events, including eye disorders such as retinopathy [138,139,140], and gallbladder- or biliary-related events [141]. In the case of Efpeglenatide, retinal safety, severe gastrointestinal events, and kidney function have attracted sustained attention [82]. Although not all the above adverse effects related to GLP-1R agonists treatment have been supported by recent evidence [142,143], further research and rigorous clinical trials examining the incidence of these events are still needed.

4.3. Strategies for Optimizing GLP-1R Agonists

Despite the numerous anti-hyperglycemic agents that are already available on the market for T2DM treatment, there are still a surprising number of drug candidates in clinical trials, of which no less than 40% are with novel therapeutic molecules or targets [144,145]. With this rapid development of clinical therapeutic solutions for treating diabetes, a burst of potential first-in-class drugs is expected that would further reduce adverse effects while maintaining or even enhancing the efficacy of current drugs. Such advances would provide more choices for diabetes management and would be beneficial to personalize medicine with better patient compliance.
Many strategies have been conducted to further optimize GLP-1R agonists. For example, in the quest for longer-lasting peptides, a series of GLP-1R G-protein biased agonists have been developed via backbone modifications with normal or enhanced G-protein signaling, but significantly reduced β-arrestin response, leading to the improved duration of action of the peptides [133]. Compared with “nonbiased” agonists, these biased GLP-1 agonists would lead to reduced receptor desensitization, prolonged availability of GLP-1R at the cell surface, enhanced insulinotropic and glucose-lowering properties, and greater therapeutic value. Among all these agents, replacing the first eight amino acids of exendin-4 (HGEGTFTS) with novel sequence ELVDNAVGG, the modified agent named P5, was a potent and selective biased GLP-1 agonist that was investigated, which was found to have a higher acute anti-hyperglycemia efficacy than exendin-4 [135]. A recent study reported that PX17, an updated agent based on P5, shows greater blood glucose modulation and body weight reduction compared with semaglutide [146]. Exendin-phe1, with minimal substitutions within the N-terminus of exendin-4, was found to promote glycemic benefits without decreasing tolerability [147]. Structure and functional studies, aided by molecular dynamics simulation, illustrate that the peptide agonist conformation plasticity, especially the dynamic interaction of the receptor with the N-terminal activation domain of the peptide, may be an essential determinant for agonist efficacy [148]. Thus, biased GLP-1R agonists generated via backbone modification provide a powerful strategy for improving therapeutic efficacy and have led to novel treatments for T2DM.
Recent studies have reported strategies, which altered the brain penetration property of GLP-1R agonists, to mitigate nausea or other unwanted gastrointestinal responses, the most prominent adverse effects of GLP-1R agonist treatment [134,149]. The adverse and glucose-lowing effects probably possess at least partially different signaling response profiles. Thus, researchers could rationally design for separating these two signaling pathways to tune down the unwanted adverse effects via directed modifications. Nausea, or other unwanted gastrointestinal responses, may be triggered by the effects of GLP1R agonists targeting the receptors expressed in the central nervous system (CNS). Blood glucose regulation effects mainly depend on the targeting of the pancreas or other peripheral systems. One possible strategy would be to downregulate the effects of GLP1R agonists on the CNS. Since all the agents gain access to the brain by penetrating the blood–brain barrier, this protection mechanism could be utilized as a key step to filter out unwanted agents. Studies utilizing the corrination method, conjugating GLP1R agonists with vitamin B12 or related compounds containing corrin ring, affect pharmacokinetics and modify the solubility of GLP1R agonists and prevent them from penetrating into the CNS. Specifically, covalent conjugation of extendin-4 to vitamin B12, which possesses a corrin ring structure, forms B12-exendin-4 with reduced brain penetrance, leading to glucose lowering while significantly abolishing the unwanted emetic events [134]. Conjugation of extendin-4 with Dicyanocoinamide, the B12 precursor, could also exhibit similar glucoregulatory capability and nausea reduction effect [149]. These approaches have effectively reduced emetic effects, while retaining efficient glycemic control.

5. Conclusion and Perspective

In summary, the importance of incretin in blood glucose modulation has been fully recognized [119]. Incretin therapy is the focus of significant drug development and has become one of the most promising therapies for T2DM. GLP-1R agonists, as the most prominent glucose-lowering agents in incretin therapy, possess unique advantages in T2DM treatment, with low hypoglycemic risk, clear cardioprotective effects, superior body weight loss, and other associated clinical benefits [8].
Currently, all marketed GLP-1R agonists are derived from natural peptides, including GLP-1, OXM, and exendin-4. Several strategies, such as chemical modification, antibody or albumin fusion, multi-agonist design, etc., have been applied to improve the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of GLP-1R agonists. However, the demand for novel agents with better therapeutic efficacy and attenuated adverse effects remains strong.
The complexity of downstream GLP-1R signaling pathways determines both the antidiabetic and potential adverse effects of GLP-1R agonists. A comprehensive understanding of GLP-1R structure and its functional pathways is critical for novel drug/therapy development for T2DM treatment. The increasing availability of high-quality GLP-1R structures in different states can help us decipher the factors that alter cell signaling, receptor trafficking, and biased agonism. This insight is essential for the rational design of drugs that can selectively activate certain signaling pathways. Notably, combinational computational approaches may accelerate this process. Furthermore, novel screening technology, such as affinity selective mass spectrometry (ASMS), could promote the discovery of lead compounds from natural products that act as reservoirs of novel therapeutic agents [29,150,151].
As a chronic complex metabolic disease, T2DM requires long-term management. However, the inconvenience of injection administration as well as the difficulties of managing multiple drugs for treating complications can lead to poor adherence. Novel oral GLP-1R agonists can overcome this problem, to a certain extent, and we are glad to see many small-molecule oral drug candidates under clinical trials. With transcellular permeation enhancers, peptide-based GLP-1R agonists may also be taken orally [152]. Moreover, polypill (fixed-low-dose combination drug) can also help by simplifying medication [153,154,155,156] and, if oral antidiabetic drugs were included in the polypill formulation, diabetic patients would further benefit [157,158].
It is critical to implement incretin therapy before severe pancreatic β-cell mass destruction or dysfunction. Unfortunately, in recent decades, the population of adolescents and young adults with T2DM is increasing [159], which highlights the urgency of early diagnosis. Although conventional diabetes diagnostic indicators such as fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c are simple and practicable, they do not provide the specificity to distinguish pathways related to pancreatic β-cell mass destruction or dysfunction [160,161]. Noninvasive imaging tools (such as PET and MRI) and novel biomarkers can provide abundant pathological characteristics about β-cells [162,163,164,165,166] or related diagnostic information [140,167,168,169,170,171,172,173], which may help improve monitoring disease progress and severity, support the development of diabetes management strategies, evaluate and even guide drug development [174,175]. Artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to play an increasingly important role in diabetes diagnosis (such as medical image analysis and subtype classification), clinical decision support, management, risk identification, prevention [133,134,135,136], and prognosis [176]. These applications in incretin therapy could bring better treatment efficacy.
The significance of incretin therapy based on GLP-1R and its future potential has been clearly shown. While successful advances have been made in solving structures, developing/optimizing drugs, and decoding downstream signaling pathways of GLP-1R, integration of the progress on novel GLP-1R agonists development, early diagnosis, treatment, management, prevention, and personalized medicine will ultimately lead to the resolution of T2DM globally.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C.S. and Y.L.; investigation, W.W., Q.Q., L.X. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.W., Q.Q., L.X. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, W.W., Q.Q., L.X., F.W., R.C.S. and Y.L.; visualization, H.Z., W.W., Q.Q. and L.X.; supervision, R.C.S. and Y.L.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, R.C.S. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai Municipal Government, and Shanghai Frontiers Science Center for Biomacromolecules and Precision Medicine at ShanghaiTech University. Y.L. was supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 21ZR1442500).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Huixia Wang (postdoctoral fellow at ShanghaiTech University) and Kaini Hang (ShanghaiTech University alumna) for helpful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

R.C.S. is founder and executive of Structure Therapeutics, a company developing a GLP-1R small molecule medicine. Other authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Garber, A.J.; Handelsman, Y.; Grunberger, G.; Einhorn, D.; Abrahamson, M.J.; Barzilay, J.I.; Blonde, L.; Bush, M.A.; DeFronzo, R.A.; Garber, J.R.; et al. Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm—2020 Executive Summary. Endocr. Pract. 2020, 26, 107–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Perreault, L.; Skyler, J.S.; Rosenstock, J. Novel therapies with precision mechanisms for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Turner, R.C.; Cull, C.A.; Frighi, V.; Holman, R.R.; UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Glycemic Control With Diet, Sulfonylurea, Metformin, or Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusProgressive Requirement for Multiple Therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA 1999, 281, 2005–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nauck, M.A.; Meier, J.J. The incretin effect in healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes: Physiology, pathophysiology, and response to therapeutic interventions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016, 4, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elrick, H.; Stimmler, L.; Hlad, C.J.J.; ARAI, Y. Plasma Insulin Response to Oral and Intravenous Glucose Administration1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1964, 24, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Davies, M.J.; Aroda, V.R.; Collins, B.S.; Gabbay, R.A.; Green, J.; Maruthur, N.M.; Rosas, S.E.; Del Prato, S.; Mathieu, C.; Mingrone, G.; et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022, 45, 2753–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Christensen, M.; Vedtofte, L.; Holst, J.J.; Vilsbøll, T.; Knop, F.K. Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide: A Bifunctional Glucose-Dependent Regulator of Glucagon and Insulin Secretion in Humans. Diabetes 2011, 60, 3103–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. El, K.; Gray, S.M.; Capozzi, M.E.; Knuth, E.R.; Jin, E.; Svendsen, B.; Clifford, A.; Brown, J.L.; Encisco, S.E.; Chazotte, B.M.; et al. GIP mediates the incretin effect and glucose tolerance by dual actions on α cells and β cells. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabf1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lind, M.; Jendle, J.; Torffvit, O.; Lager, I. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue combined with insulin reduces HbA1c and weight with low risk of hypoglycemia and high treatment satisfaction. Prim. Care Diabetes 2012, 6, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baggio, L.L.; Drucker, D.J. Biology of Incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 2131–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mojsov, S.; Weir, G.C.; Habener, J.F. Insulinotropin: Glucagon-like peptide I (7-37) co-encoded in the glucagon gene is a potent stimulator of insulin release in the perfused rat pancreas. J. Clin. Investig. 1987, 79, 616–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kreymann, B.; Ghatei, M.A.; Williams, G.; Bloom, S.R. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 7-36: A Physiological Incretin In Man. Lancet 1987, 330, 1300–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Müller, T.D.; Finan, B.; Bloom, S.R.; D’Alessio, D.; Drucker, D.J.; Flatt, P.R.; Fritsche, A.; Gribble, F.; Grill, H.J.; Habener, J.F.; et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol. Metab. 2019, 30, 72–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Drucker, D.J.; Nauck, M.A. The incretin system: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2006, 368, 1696–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vilsbøll, T.; Agersø, H.; Krarup, T.; Holst, J.J. Similar Elimination Rates of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Healthy Subjects. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dicembrini, I.; Pala, L.; Rotella, C.M. From Theory to Clinical Practice in the Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and DPP-4 Inhibitors Therapy. Exp. Diabetes Res. 2011, 2011, 898913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Longato, E.; Di Camillo, B.; Sparacino, G.; Tramontan, L.; Avogaro, A.; Fadini, G.P. Better cardiovascular outcomes of type 2 diabetic patients treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists versus DPP-4 inhibitors in clinical practice. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wootten, D.; Christopoulos, A.; Marti-Solano, M.; Babu, M.M.; Sexton, P.M. Mechanisms of signalling and biased agonism in G protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 638–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, F.; Song, G.; de Graaf, C.; Stevens, R.C. Structure and Function of Peptide-Binding G Protein-Coupled Receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 2726–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, F.; Yang, L.; Hang, K.; Laursen, M.; Wu, L.; Han, G.W.; Ren, Q.; Roed, N.K.; Lin, G.; Hanson, M.A.; et al. Full-length human GLP-1 receptor structure without orthosteric ligands. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. de Graaf, C.; Song, G.; Cao, C.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, M.-W.; Wu, B.; Stevens, R.C. Extending the Structural View of Class B GPCRs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 946–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ørskov, C.; Wettergren, A.; Holst, J.J. Biological Effects and Metabolic Rates of Glucagonlike Peptide-1 7–36 Amide and Glucagonlike Peptide-1 7–37 in Healthy Subjects Are Indistinguishable. Diabetes 1993, 42, 658–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parthier, C.; Reedtz-Runge, S.; Rudolph, R.; Stubbs, M.T. Passing the baton in class B GPCRs: Peptide hormone activation via helix induction? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2009, 34, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Qiao, A.N.; Han, S.; Li, X.M.; Li, Z.X.; Zhao, P.S.; Dai, A.T.; Chang, R.; Tai, L.H.; Tan, Q.X.; Chu, X.J.; et al. Structural basis of G(s) and G(i) recognition by the human glucagon receptor. Science 2020, 367, 1346–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, F.H.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, Q.T.; Hang, K.N.; Zou, X.Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, F.; Rao, Q.D.; Dai, A.T.; Yin, W.C.; et al. Structural insights into hormone recognition by the human glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor. Elife 2021, 10, e68719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Belousoff, M.J.; Zhao, P.; Kooistra, A.J.; Truong, T.T.; Ang, S.Y.; Underwood, C.R.; Egebjerg, T.; Senel, P.; Stewart, G.D.; et al. Differential GLP-1R Binding and Activation by Peptide and Non-peptide Agonists. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 485–500.e487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, D.; Zhou, Q.; Labroska, V.; Qin, S.; Darbalaei, S.; Wu, Y.; Yuliantie, E.; Xie, L.; Tao, H.; Cheng, J.; et al. G protein-coupled receptors: Structure- and function-based drug discovery. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2021, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oduori, O.S.; Murao, N.; Shimomura, K.; Takahashi, H.; Zhang, Q.; Dou, H.; Sakai, S.; Minami, K.; Chanclon, B.; Guida, C.; et al. Gs/Gq signaling switch in beta cells defines incretin effectiveness in diabetes. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 6639–6655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marzook, A.; Tomas, A.; Jones, B. The Interplay of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Trafficking and Signalling in Pancreatic Beta Cells. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 678055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuna, R.S.; Girada, S.B.; Asalla, S.; Vallentyne, J.; Maddika, S.; Patterson, J.T.; Smiley, D.L.; DiMarchi, R.D.; Mitra, P. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-mediated endosomal cAMP generation promotes glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 305, E161–E170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, Y.S.; Jun, H.S. Anti-diabetic actions of glucagon-like peptide-1 on pancreatic beta-cells. Metabolism 2014, 63, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kang, G.; Chepurny, O.G.; Holz, G.G. cAMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor II (Epac2) mediates Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in INS-1 pancreatic β-cells. J. Physiol. 2001, 536, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kang, G.; Leech, C.A.; Chepurny, O.G.; Coetzee, W.A.; Holz, G.G. Role of the cAMP sensor Epac as a determinant of KATP channel ATP sensitivity in human pancreatic beta-cells and rat INS-1 cells. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 1307–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rorsman, P.; Braun, M. Regulation of insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2013, 75, 155–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jhala, U.S.; Canettieri, G.; Screaton, R.A.; Kulkarni, R.N.; Krajewski, S.; Reed, J.; Walker, J.; Lin, X.; White, M.; Montminy, M. cAMP promotes pancreatic beta-cell survival via CREB-mediated induction of IRS2. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bavec, A.; Hallbrink, M.; Langel, U.; Zorko, M. Different role of intracellular loops of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor in G-protein coupling. Regul. Pept. 2003, 111, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Montrose-Rafizadeh, C.; Avdonin, P.; Garant, M.J.; Rodgers, B.D.; Kole, S.; Yang, H.; Levine, M.A.; Schwindinger, W.; Bernier, M. Pancreatic glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor couples to multiple G proteins and activates mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 1132–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shigeto, M.; Ramracheya, R.; Tarasov, A.I.; Cha, C.Y.; Chibalina, M.V.; Hastoy, B.; Philippaert, K.; Reinbothe, T.; Rorsman, N.; Salehi, A.; et al. GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion by PKC-dependent TRPM4 and TRPM5 activation. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 4714–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Shigeto, M.; Cha, C.Y.; Rorsman, P.; Kaku, K. A role of PLC/PKC-dependent pathway in GLP-1-stimulated insulin secretion. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holman, R.R.; Paul, S.K.; Bethel, M.A.; Matthews, D.R.; Neil, H.A. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1577–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quoyer, J.; Longuet, C.; Broca, C.; Linck, N.; Costes, S.; Varin, E.; Bockaert, J.; Bertrand, G.; Dalle, S. GLP-1 mediates antiapoptotic effect by phosphorylating Bad through a beta-arrestin 1-mediated ERK1/2 activation in pancreatic beta-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 1989–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zhu, L.; Almaca, J.; Dadi, P.K.; Hong, H.; Sakamoto, W.; Rossi, M.; Lee, R.J.; Vierra, N.C.; Lu, H.; Cui, Y.; et al. beta-arrestin-2 is an essential regulator of pancreatic beta-cell function under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Barella, L.F.; Rossi, M.; Zhu, L.; Cui, Y.; Mei, F.C.; Cheng, X.; Chen, W.; Gurevich, V.V.; Wess, J. beta-Cell-intrinsic beta-arrestin 1 signaling enhances sulfonylurea-induced insulin secretion. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 3732–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Roed, S.N.; Wismann, P.; Underwood, C.R.; Kulahin, N.; Iversen, H.; Cappelen, K.A.; Schäffer, L.; Lehtonen, J.; Hecksher-Soerensen, J.; Secher, A.; et al. Real-time trafficking and signaling of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2014, 382, 938–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fang, Z.; Chen, S.; Manchanda, Y.; Bitsi, S.; Pickford, P.; David, A.; Shchepinova, M.M.; Correa, I.R.J.; Hodson, D.J.; Broichhagen, J.; et al. Ligand-Specific Factors Influencing GLP-1 Receptor Post-Endocytic Trafficking and Degradation in Pancreatic Beta Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kwon, Y.; Mehta, S.; Clark, M.; Walters, G.; Zhong, Y.; Lee, H.N.; Sunahara, R.K.; Zhang, J. Non-canonical β-adrenergic activation of ERK at endosomes. Nature 2022, 611, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yap, M.K.K.; Misuan, N. Exendin-4 from Heloderma suspectum venom: From discovery to its latest application as type II diabetes combatant. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019, 124, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Eng, J.; Kleinman, W.A.; Singh, L.; Singh, G.; Raufman, J.P. Isolation and characterization of exendin-4, an exendin-3 analogue, from Heloderma suspectum venom. Further evidence for an exendin receptor on dispersed acini from guinea pig pancreas. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 7402–7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. DeFronzo, R.A.; Ratner, R.E.; Han, J.; Kim, D.D.; Fineman, M.S.; Baron, A.D. Effects of Exenatide (Exendin-4) on Glycemic Control and Weight Over 30 Weeks in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Liu, C.; Zou, Y.; Qian, H. GLP-1R agonists for the treatment of obesity: A patent review (2015–present). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2020, 30, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yu, M.; Benjamin, M.M.; Srinivasan, S.; Morin, E.E.; Shishatskaya, E.I.; Schwendeman, S.P.; Schwendeman, A. Battle of GLP-1 delivery technologies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 130, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lau, J.; Bloch, P.; Schäffer, L.; Pettersson, I.; Spetzler, J.; Kofoed, J.; Madsen, K.; Knudsen, L.B.; McGuire, J.; Steensgaard, D.B.; et al. Discovery of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogue Semaglutide. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7370–7380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Johnson, L.M.; Barrick, S.; Hager, M.V.; McFedries, A.; Homan, E.A.; Rabaglia, M.E.; Keller, M.P.; Attie, A.D.; Saghatelian, A.; Bisello, A.; et al. A Potent α/β-Peptide Analogue of GLP-1 with Prolonged Action in Vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 12848–12851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Chavda, V.P.; Ajabiya, J.; Teli, D.; Bojarska, J.; Apostolopoulos, V. Tirzepatide, a New Era of Dual-Targeted Treatment for Diabetes and Obesity: A Mini-Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kumar, D.; Eipper, B.A.; Mains, R.E. Amidation. In Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  58. Harris, J.M.; Chess, R.B. Effect of pegylation on pharmaceuticals. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kontermann, R.E. Strategies for extended serum half-life of protein therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shu, J.Y.; Panganiban, B.; Xu, T. Peptide-Polymer Conjugates: From Fundamental Science to Application. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2013, 64, 631–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Erak, M.; Bellmann-Sickert, K.; Els-Heindl, S.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Peptide chemistry toolbox—Transforming natural peptides into peptide therapeutics. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 2759–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Frederiksen, T.M.; Sønderby, P.; Ryberg, L.A.; Harris, P.; Bukrinski, J.T.; Scharff-Poulsen, A.M.; Elf-Lind, M.N.; Peters, G.H. Oligomerization of a Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Analog: Bridging Experiment and Simulations. Biophys. J. 2015, 109, 1202–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, Y.; Lomakin, A.; Kanai, S.; Alex, R.; Benedek, G.B. Transformation of Oligomers of Lipidated Peptide Induced by Change in pH. Mol. Pharm. 2015, 12, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Suzuki, T.; Ishii-Watabe, A.; Tada, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Kanayasu-Toyoda, T.; Kawanishi, T.; Yamaguchi, T. Importance of Neonatal FcR in Regulating the Serum Half-Life of Therapeutic Proteins Containing the Fc Domain of Human IgG1: A Comparative Study of the Affinity of Monoclonal Antibodies and Fc-Fusion Proteins to Human Neonatal FcR. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1968–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Buse, J.B.; Henry, R.R.; Han, J.; Kim, D.D.; Fineman, M.S.; Baron, A.D.; Exenatide-113 Clinical Study Group. Effects of Exenatide (Exendin-4) on Glycemic Control Over 30 Weeks in Sulfonylurea-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 2628–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kendall, D.M.; Riddle, M.C.; Rosenstock, J.; Zhuang, D.; Kim, D.D.; Fineman, M.S.; Baron, A.D. Effects of Exenatide (Exendin-4) on Glycemic Control Over 30 Weeks in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin and a Sulfonylurea. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Holman, R.R.; Bethel, M.A.; Mentz, R.J.; Thompson, V.P.; Lokhnygina, Y.; Buse, J.B.; Chan, J.C.; Choi, J.; Gustavson, S.M.; Iqbal, N.; et al. Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1228–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nauck, M.; Frid, A.; Hermansen, K.; Shah, N.S.; Tankova, T.; Mitha, I.H.; Zdravkovic, M.; During, M.; Matthews, D.R.; Group, L.-S. Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: The LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Marre, M.; Shaw, J.; Brandle, M.; Bebakar, W.M.; Kamaruddin, N.A.; Strand, J.; Zdravkovic, M.; Le Thi, T.D.; Colagiuri, S. Liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, added to a sulphonylurea over 26 weeks produces greater improvements in glycaemic and weight control compared with adding rosiglitazone or placebo in subjects with Type 2 diabetes (LEAD-1 SU). Diabet Med. 2009, 26, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Astrup, A.; Rössner, S.; Van Gaal, L.; Rissanen, A.; Niskanen, L.; Al Hakim, M.; Madsen, J.; Rasmussen, M.F.; Lean, M.E.J. Effects of liraglutide in the treatment of obesity: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2009, 374, 1606–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gerstein, H.C.; Colhoun, H.M.; Dagenais, G.R.; Diaz, R.; Lakshmanan, M.; Pais, P.; Probstfield, J.; Riesmeyer, J.S.; Riddle, M.C.; Rydén, L.; et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019, 394, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hernandez, A.F.; Green, J.B.; Janmohamed, S.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Granger, C.B.; Jones, N.P.; Leiter, L.A.; Rosenberg, A.E.; Sigmon, K.N.; Somerville, M.C.; et al. Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018, 392, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Górriz, J.L.; Soler, M.J.; Navarro-González, J.F.; García-Carro, C.; Puchades, M.J.; D’Marco, L.; Martínez Castelao, A.; Fernández-Fernández, B.; Ortiz, A.; Górriz-Zambrano, C.; et al. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Call of Attention to Nephrologists. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pfeffer, M.A.; Claggett, B.; Diaz, R.; Dickstein, K.; Gerstein, H.C.; Køber, L.V.; Lawson, F.C.; Ping, L.; Wei, X.; Lewis, E.F.; et al. Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2247–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, Y.L.; Zhou, C.; Li, X.F.; Yang, M.N.; Tao, L.; Zheng, X.Y.; Jia, Y.S. Beinaglutide showed significant weight-loss benefit and effective glycaemic control for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting: A 3-month, multicentre, observational, retrospective, open-label study. Obes. Sci. Pract. 2019, 5, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Marso, S.P.; Bain, S.C.; Consoli, A.; Eliaschewitz, F.G.; Jódar, E.; Leiter, L.A.; Lingvay, I.; Rosenstock, J.; Seufert, J.; Warren, M.L.; et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1834–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Husain, M.; Birkenfeld, A.L.; Donsmark, M.; Dungan, K.; Eliaschewitz, F.G.; Franco, D.R.; Jeppesen, O.K.; Lingvay, I.; Mosenzon, O.; Pedersen, S.D.; et al. Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wilding, J.P.H.; Batterham, R.L.; Calanna, S.; Davies, M.; Van Gaal, L.F.; Lingvay, I.; McGowan, B.M.; Rosenstock, J.; Tran, M.T.D.; Wadden, T.A.; et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 989–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Liu, L.; Ruan, Z.; Ung, C.O.L.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Han, S.; Jia, R.; Qiao, J.; Hu, H.; Guo, L. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Polyethylene Glycol Loxenatide for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China. Diabetes Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ji, L.; Du, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhou, X.; Mo, Z.; Ma, J.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Lin, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Efficacy and safety of PEGylated exenatide injection (PB-119) in treatment-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A Phase II randomised, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study. Diabetologia 2021, 64, 1066–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rosenstock, J.; Sorli, C.H.; Trautmann, M.E.; Morales, C.; Wendisch, U.; Dailey, G.; Hompesch, M.; Choi, I.Y.; Kang, J.; Stewart, J.; et al. Once-Weekly Efpeglenatide Dose-Range Effects on Glycemic Control and Body Weight in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin or Drug Naive, Referenced to Liraglutide. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 1733–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gerstein, H.C.; Sattar, N.; Rosenstock, J.; Ramasundarahettige, C.; Pratley, R.; Lopes, R.D.; Lam, C.S.P.; Khurmi, N.S.; Heenan, L.; Del Prato, S.; et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Efpeglenatide in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 896–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Campbell, J.E.; Ussher, J.R.; Mulvihill, E.E.; Kolic, J.; Baggio, L.L.; Cao, X.; Liu, Y.; Lamont, B.J.; Morii, T.; Streutker, C.J.; et al. TCF1 links GIPR signaling to the control of beta cell function and survival. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Samms, R.J.; Coghlan, M.P.; Sloop, K.W. How May GIP Enhance the Therapeutic Efficacy of GLP-1? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 31, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Frías, J.P.; Davies, M.J.; Rosenstock, J.; Pérez Manghi, F.C.; Fernández Landó, L.; Bergman, B.K.; Liu, B.; Cui, X.; Brown, K. Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jastreboff, A.M.; Aronne, L.J.; Ahmad, N.N.; Wharton, S.; Connery, L.; Alves, B.; Kiyosue, A.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Bunck, M.C.; et al. Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Andersen, D.B.; Holst, J.J. Peptides in the regulation of glucagon secretion. Peptides 2022, 148, 170683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Holst, J.J.; Albrechtsen, N.J.W.; Gabe, M.B.N.; Rosenkilde, M.M. Oxyntomodulin: Actions and role in diabetes. Peptides 2018, 100, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ali, M.M.; Hafez, A.; Abdelgalil, M.S.; Hasan, M.T.; El-Ghannam, M.M.; Ghogar, O.M.; Elrashedy, A.A.; Abd-ElGawad, M. Impact of Cotadutide drug on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022, 22, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rosenstock, J.; Wysham, C.; Frías, J.P.; Kaneko, S.; Lee, C.J.; Fernández Landó, L.; Mao, H.; Cui, X.; Karanikas, C.A.; Thieu, V.T. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021, 398, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dahl, D.; Onishi, Y.; Norwood, P.; Huh, R.; Bray, R.; Patel, H.; Rodríguez, Á. Effect of Subcutaneous Tirzepatide vs Placebo Added to Titrated Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SURPASS-5 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022, 327, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Frias, J.P.; Bastyr, E.J.; Vignati, L.; Tschöp, M.H.; Schmitt, C.; Owen, K.; Christensen, R.H.; DiMarchi, R.D. The Sustained Effects of a Dual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, NNC0090-2746, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2017, 26, 343–352.e342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Schiavon, M.; Visentin, R.; Göbel, B.; Riz, M.; Cobelli, C.; Klabunde, T.; Dalla Man, C. Improved postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes by the dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucagon receptor agonist SAR425899 in comparison with liraglutide. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2021, 23, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Parker, V.E.R.; Robertson, D.; Wang, T.; Hornigold, D.C.; Petrone, M.; Cooper, A.T.; Posch, M.G.; Heise, T.; Plum-Moerschel, L.; Schlichthaar, H.; et al. Efficacy, Safety, and Mechanistic Insights of Cotadutide, a Dual Receptor Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Glucagon Agonist. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, 803–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nahra, R.; Wang, T.; Gadde, K.M.; Oscarsson, J.; Stumvoll, M.; Jermutus, L.; Hirshberg, B.; Ambery, P. Effects of Cotadutide on Metabolic and Hepatic Parameters in Adults With Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A 54-Week Randomized Phase 2b Study. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 1433–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Parker, V.E.R.; Hoang, T.; Schlichthaar, H.; Gibb, F.W.; Wenzel, B.; Posch, M.G.; Rose, L.; Chang, Y.T.; Petrone, M.; Hansen, L.; et al. Efficacy and safety of cotadutide, a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, in a randomized phase 2a study of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2022, 24, 1360–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ambery, P.; Parker, V.E.; Stumvoll, M.; Posch, M.G.; Heise, T.; Plum-Moerschel, L.; Tsai, L.-F.; Robertson, D.; Jain, M.; Petrone, M.; et al. MEDI0382, a GLP-1 and glucagon receptor dual agonist, in obese or overweight patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomised, controlled, double-blind, ascending dose and phase 2a study. Lancet 2018, 391, 2607–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jiang, H.; Pang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, T.; Liu, M.; Deng, H.; Li, L.; Feng, L.; Song, B.; Han-Zhang, H.; et al. A phase 1b randomised controlled trial of a glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor dual agonist IBI362 (LY3305677) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Urva, S.; Coskun, T.; Loh, M.T.; Du, Y.; Thomas, M.K.; Gurbuz, S.; Haupt, A.; Benson, C.T.; Hernandez-Illas, M.; D’Alessio, D.A.; et al. LY3437943, a novel triple GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptor agonist in people with type 2 diabetes: A phase 1b, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multiple-ascending dose trial. Lancet 2022, 400, 1869–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Malik, F.; Li, Z. Non-peptide agonists and positive allosteric modulators of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors: Alternative approaches for treatment of Type 2 diabetes. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 179, 511–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Song, G.; Yang, D.; Wang, Y.; de Graaf, C.; Zhou, Q.; Jiang, S.; Liu, K.; Cai, X.; Dai, A.; Lin, G.; et al. Human GLP-1 receptor transmembrane domain structure in complex with allosteric modulators. Nature 2017, 546, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Saxena, A.R.; Gorman, D.N.; Esquejo, R.M.; Bergman, A.; Chidsey, K.; Buckeridge, C.; Griffith, D.A.; Kim, A.M. Danuglipron (PF-06882961) in type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kawai, T.; Sun, B.; Yoshino, H.; Feng, D.; Suzuki, Y.; Fukazawa, M.; Nagao, S.; Wainscott, D.B.; Showalter, A.D.; Droz, B.A.; et al. Structural basis for GLP-1 receptor activation by LY3502970, an orally active nonpeptide agonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 29959–29967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Buckeridge, C.; Tsamandouras, N.; Carvajal-Gonzalez, S.; Brown, L.S.; Chidsey, K.L.; Saxena, A.R. Once-daily oral small molecule GLP-1R agonist PF-07081532 robustly reduces glucose and body weight within 4-6 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetic adults with obesity. Diabetologia 2022, 65, S60. [Google Scholar]
  105. Pirner, M.A.; Lin, J.; Liu, F.; Yao, L.; Zettler, M.E.; Valacer, D.J. 94-LB: A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Escalating Dose Study of RGT-075 Novel Small-Molecule Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2022, 71, 94-LB. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhao, P.; Liang, Y.L.; Belousoff, M.J.; Deganutti, G.; Fletcher, M.M.; Willard, F.S.; Bell, M.G.; Christe, M.E.; Sloop, K.W.; Inoue, A.; et al. Activation of the GLP-1 receptor by a non-peptidic agonist. Nature 2020, 577, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chen, D.S.; Liao, J.Y.; Li, N.; Zhou, C.H.; Liu, Q.; Wang, G.X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, S.; Lin, L.L.; Chen, K.X.; et al. A nonpeptidic agonist of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptors with efficacy in diabetic db/db mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Aspnes, G.E.; Bagley, S.W.; Curto, J.M.; Dowling, M.S.; Edmonds, D.J.; Flanagan, M.E.; Futatsugi, K.; Griffith, D.A.; Huard, K.; Ingle, G.; et al. Glp-1 Receptor Agonists and Uses Thereof. WO2018109607, 21 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  109. Griffith, D.A.; Edmonds, D.J.; Fortin, J.P.; Kalgutkar, A.S.; Kuzmiski, J.B.; Loria, P.M.; Saxena, A.R.; Bagley, S.W.; Buckeridge, C.; Curto, J.M.; et al. A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 8208–8226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mjalli, A.M.M.; Polisetti, D.R.; Yokum, T.S.; Kalpathy, S.; Guzel, M.; Behme, C.; Davis, S.T. Oxadiazoanthracene Compounds for the Treatment of Diabetes. WO2009111700, 11 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
  111. Mjalli, A.M.M.; Behme, C.; Christen, D.P.; Polisetti, D.R.; Quada, J.S.K.; Bondlela, M.; Guzel, M.; Yarragunta, R.R.; Gohimukkula, D.R.; Andrews, R.C.; et al. Substituted Azoanthracene Derivatives, Pharmaceutical Compositions, and Methods of Use Thereof. WO2010114824, 7 October 2010. [Google Scholar]
  112. Yoshino, H.; Tsuchiya, S.; Matsuo, A.; Sato, T.; Nishimoto, M.; Oguri, K.; Ogawa, H.; Nishimura, Y.; Furuta, Y.; Kashiwagi, H.; et al. Pyrazolopyridine Derivative having glp-1 Receptor Agonist Effect. WO2018056453, 29 March 2018. [Google Scholar]
  113. Cong, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.N.; Zhang, Z.C.; Liang, A.; Liu, Q.; Wu, X.; Dai, A.; Xia, T.; et al. Structural basis of peptidomimetic agonism revealed by small- molecule GLP-1R agonists Boc5 and WB4-24. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2200155119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Knudsen, L.B.; Kiel, D.; Teng, M.; Behrens, C.; Bhumralkar, D.; Kodra, J.T.; Holst, J.J.; Jeppesen, C.B.; Johnson, M.D.; de Jong, J.C.; et al. Small-molecule agonists for the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Teng, M.; Truesdale, L.K.; Bhumralkar, D.; Kiel, D.; Johnson, M.D.; Thomas, C.; Joergensen, A.S.; Madsen, P.; Olesen, P.H.; Knudsen, L.B.; et al. Non-Peptide glp-1 Agonists. WO0042026, 14 January 2000. [Google Scholar]
  116. Sloop, K.W.; Willard, F.S.; Brenner, M.B.; Ficorilli, J.; Valasek, K.; Showalter, A.D.; Farb, T.B.; Cao, J.X.C.; Cox, A.L.; Michael, M.D.; et al. Novel Small Molecule Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Stimulates Insulin Secretion in Rodents and From Human Islets. Diabetes 2010, 59, 3099–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Willard, F.S.; Wainscott, D.B.; Showalter, A.D.; Stutsman, C.; Ma, W.; Cardona, G.R.; Zink, R.W.; Corkins, C.M.; Chen, Q.; Yumibe, N.; et al. Discovery of an Orally Efficacious Positive Allosteric Modulator of the Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 3439–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Vijan, S.; Sussman, J.B.; Yudkin, J.S.; Hayward, R.A. Effect of patients’ risks and preferences on health gains with plasma glucose level lowering in type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA Intern. Med. 2014, 174, 1227–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. ElSayed, N.A.; Aleppo, G.; Aroda, V.R.; Bannuru, R.R.; Brown, F.M.; Bruemmer, D.; Collins, B.S.; Hilliard, M.E.; Isaacs, D.; Johnson, E.L.; et al. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care 2022, 46, S140–S157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Tsapas, A.; Avgerinos, I.; Karagiannis, T.; Malandris, K.; Manolopoulos, A.; Andreadis, P.; Liakos, A.; Matthews, D.R.; Bekiari, E. Comparative Effectiveness of Glucose-Lowering Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Moore, B. On the treatment of Diabetus mellitus by acid extract of Duodenal Mucous Membrane. Biochem. J. 1906, 1, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Nauck, M.A.; Homberger, E.; Siegel, E.G.; Allen, R.C.; Eaton, R.P.; Ebert, R.; Creutzfeldt, W. Incretin effects of increasing glucose loads in man calculated from venous insulin and C-peptide responses. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1986, 63, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zander, M.; Madsbad, S.; Madsen, J.L.; Holst, J.J. Effect of 6-week course of glucagon-like peptide 1 on glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes: A parallel-group study. Lancet 2002, 359, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Andersen, A.; Lund, A.; Knop, F.K.; Vilsboll, T. Glucagon-like peptide 1 in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Fineman, M.S.; Bicsak, T.A.; Shen, L.Z.; Taylor, K.; Gaines, E.; Varns, A.; Kim, D.; Baron, A.D. Effect on glycemic control of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) additive to existing metformin and/or sulfonylurea treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 2370–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Garber, A.; Henry, R.; Ratner, R.; Garcia-Hernandez, P.A.; Rodriguez-Pattzi, H.; Olvera-Alvarez, I.; Hale, P.M.; Zdravkovic, M.; Bode, B.; Group, L.-S. Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 Mono): A randomised, 52-week, phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 2009, 373, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zinman, B.; Gerich, J.; Buse, J.B.; Lewin, A.; Schwartz, S.; Raskin, P.; Hale, P.M.; Zdravkovic, M.; Blonde, L.; Investigators, L.-S. Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD). Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Ahmann, A.J.; Capehorn, M.; Charpentier, G.; Dotta, F.; Henkel, E.; Lingvay, I.; Holst, A.G.; Annett, M.P.; Aroda, V.R. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care 2018, 41, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Rubino, D.M.; Greenway, F.L.; Khalid, U.; O’Neil, P.M.; Rosenstock, J.; Sørrig, R.; Wadden, T.A.; Wizert, A.; Garvey, W.T. Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022, 327, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Andersen, A.; Knop, F.K.; Vilsboll, T. A Pharmacological and Clinical Overview of Oral Semaglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Drugs 2021, 81, 1003–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nauck, M.A.; Quast, D.R.; Wefers, J.; Meier, J.J. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes—state-of-the-art. Mol. Metab. 2021, 46, 101102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Bettge, K.; Kahle, M.; Abd El Aziz, M.S.; Meier, J.J.; Nauck, M.A. Occurrence of nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea reported as adverse events in clinical trials studying glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A systematic analysis of published clinical trials. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017, 19, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. El Eid, L.; Reynolds, C.A.; Tomas, A.; Ben, J. Biased agonism and polymorphic variation at the GLP-1 receptor: Implications for the development of personalised therapeutics. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 184, 106411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Borner, T.; Shaulson, E.D.; Tinsley, I.C.; Stein, L.M.; Horn, C.C.; Hayes, M.R.; Doyle, R.P.; De Jonghe, B.C. A second-generation glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist mitigates vomiting and anorexia while retaining glucoregulatory potency in lean diabetic and emetic mammalian models. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020, 22, 1729–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, H.; Sturchler, E.; Zhu, J.; Nieto, A.; Cistrone, P.A.; Xie, J.; He, L.; Yea, K.; Jones, T.; Turn, R.; et al. Autocrine selection of a GLP-1R G-protein biased agonist with potent antidiabetic effects. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Butler, P.C.; Elashoff, M.; Elashoff, R.; Gale, E.A. A critical analysis of the clinical use of incretin-based therapies: Are the GLP-1 therapies safe? Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 2118–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Jones, B. The therapeutic potential of GLP-1 receptor biased agonism. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 179, 492–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Vilsboll, T.; Bain, S.C.; Leiter, L.A.; Lingvay, I.; Matthews, D.; Simo, R.; Helmark, I.C.; Wijayasinghe, N.; Larsen, M. Semaglutide, reduction in glycated haemoglobin and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bethel, M.A.; Diaz, R.; Castellana, N.; Bhattacharya, I.; Gerstein, H.C.; Lakshmanan, M.C. HbA1c Change and Diabetic Retinopathy During GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Cardiovascular Outcome Trials: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Goh, J.K.H.; Cheung, C.Y.; Sim, S.S.; Tan, P.C.; Tan, G.S.W.; Wong, T.Y. Retinal Imaging Techniques for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, 10, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. He, L.; Wang, J.; Ping, F.; Yang, N.; Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, H. Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use With Risk of Gallbladder and Biliary Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern. Med. 2022, 182, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Egan, A.G.; Blind, E.; Dunder, K.; de Graeff, P.A.; Hummer, B.T.; Bourcier, T.; Rosebraugh, C. Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs--FDA and EMA assessment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Sattar, N.; Lee, M.M.Y.; Kristensen, S.L.; Branch, K.R.H.; Del Prato, S.; Khurmi, N.S.; Lam, C.S.P.; Lopes, R.D.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Pratley, R.E.; et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Dahlén, A.D.; Dashi, G.; Maslov, I.; Attwood, M.M.; Jonsson, J.; Trukhan, V.; Schiöth, H.B. Trends in Antidiabetic Drug Discovery: FDA Approved Drugs, New Drugs in Clinical Trials and Global Sales. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 807548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Trapp, S.; Stanford, S.C. New developments in the prospects for GLP-1 therapy. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 179, 489–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Wang, M.; Yao, P.; Gao, M.; Jin, J.; Yu, Y. Novel fatty chain-modified GLP-1R G-protein biased agonist exerts prolonged anti-diabetic effects through targeting receptor binding sites. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 8044–8053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Jones, B.; Buenaventura, T.; Kanda, N.; Chabosseau, P.; Owen, B.M.; Scott, R.; Goldin, R.; Angkathunyakul, N.; Correa, I.R.J.; Bosco, D.; et al. Targeting GLP-1 receptor trafficking to improve agonist efficacy. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Cary, B.P.; Deganutti, G.; Zhao, P.; Truong, T.T.; Piper, S.J.; Liu, X.; Belousoff, M.J.; Danev, R.; Sexton, P.M.; Wootten, D.; et al. Structural and functional diversity among agonist-bound states of the GLP-1 receptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2022, 18, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Borner, T.; Workinger, J.L.; Tinsley, I.C.; Fortin, S.M.; Stein, L.M.; Chepurny, O.G.; Holz, G.G.; Wierzba, A.J.; Gryko, D.; Nexø, E.; et al. Corrination of a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist for Glycemic Control without Emesis. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Luo, K.; Huang, W.; Qiao, L.; Zhang, X.; Yan, D.; Ning, Z.; Ma, C.; Dang, H.; Wang, D.; Guo, H.; et al. Dendrocalamus latiflorus and its component rutin exhibit glucose-lowering activities by inhibiting hepatic glucose production via AKT activation. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 2239–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Lu, Y.; Qin, S.; Zhang, B.; Dai, A.; Cai, X.; Ma, M.; Gao, Z.G.; Yang, D.; Stevens, R.C.; Jacobson, K.A.; et al. Accelerating the Throughput of Affinity Mass Spectrometry-Based Ligand Screening toward a G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 8162–8169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Aroda, V.R.; Blonde, L.; Pratley, R.E. A new era for oral peptides: SNAC and the development of oral semaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2022, 23, 979–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Baumgartner, A.; Drame, K.; Geutjens, S.; Airaksinen, M. Does the Polypill Improve Patient Adherence Compared to Its Individual Formulations? A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Castellano, J.M.; Sanz, G.; Peñalvo, J.L.; Bansilal, S.; Fernández-Ortiz, A.; Alvarez, L.; Guzmán, L.; Linares, J.C.; García, F.; D’Aniello, F.; et al. A Polypill Strategy to Improve Adherence: Results From the FOCUS Project. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 2071–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Yusuf, S.; Joseph, P.; Dans, A.; Gao, P.; Teo, K.; Xavier, D.; López-Jaramillo, P.; Yusoff, K.; Santoso, A.; Gamra, H.; et al. Polypill with or without Aspirin in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 384, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Castellano, J.M.; Pocock, S.J.; Bhatt, D.L.; Quesada, A.J.; Owen, R.; Fernandez-Ortiz, A.; Sanchez, P.L.; Marin Ortuño, F.; Vazquez Rodriguez, J.M.; Domingo-Fernández, A.; et al. Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 967–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Janssen, V.E.; Visseren, F.L.; de Boer, A.; Grobbee, D.E.; Westerink, J.; van der Graaf, Y.; Lafeber, M. Combined use of polypill components in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020, 25, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Infante-Garcia, C.; Ramos-Rodriguez, J.J.; Hierro-Bujalance, C.; Ortegon, E.; Pickett, E.; Jackson, R.; Hernandez-Pacho, F.; Spires-Jones, T.; Garcia-Alloza, M. Antidiabetic Polypill Improves Central Pathology and Cognitive Impairment in a Mixed Model of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 6130–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Xie, J.; Wang, M.; Long, Z.; Ning, H.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.; Liao, Y.; Liu, G.; Wang, F.; Pan, A. Global burden of type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults, 1990-2019: Systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ 2022, 379, e072385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Schwartz, S.S.; Epstein, S.; Corkey, B.E.; Grant, S.F.A.; Gavin, J.R.; Aguilar, R.B. The Time Is Right for a New Classification System for Diabetes: Rationale and Implications of the β-Cell–Centric Classification Schema. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. ElSayed, N.A.; Aleppo, G.; Aroda, V.R.; Bannuru, R.R.; Brown, F.M.; Bruemmer, D.; Collins, B.S.; Hilliard, M.E.; Isaacs, D.; Johnson, E.L.; et al. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care 2022, 46, S19–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hernandez, R.; Graves, S.A.; Gregg, T.; VanDeusen, H.R.; Fenske, R.J.; Wienkes, H.N.; England, C.G.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Jeffery, J.J.; Barnhart, T.E.; et al. Radiomanganese PET Detects Changes in Functional β-Cell Mass in Mouse Models of Diabetes. Diabetes 2017, 66, 2163–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Li, L.; Zhao, R.; Hong, H.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zha, Z.; Zhu, J.; Qiao, J.; Zhu, L.; et al. 68Ga-labelled-exendin-4: New GLP1R targeting agents for imaging pancreatic β-cell and insulinoma. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2021, 102, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Bini, J.; Naganawa, M.; Nabulsi, N.; Huang, Y.; Ropchan, J.; Lim, K.; Najafzadeh, S.; Herold, K.C.; Cline, G.W.; Carson, R.E. Evaluation of PET Brain Radioligands for Imaging Pancreatic β-Cell Mass: Potential Utility of 11C-(+)-PHNO. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 1249–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Burtea, C.; Laurent, S.; Crombez, D.; Delcambre, S.; Sermeus, C.; Millard, I.; Rorive, S.; Flamez, D.; Beckers, M.-C.; Salmon, I.; et al. Development of a peptide-functionalized imaging nanoprobe for the targeting of (FXYD2)γa as a highly specific biomarker of pancreatic beta cells. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2015, 10, 398–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Demine, S.; Schulte, M.L.; Territo, P.R.; Eizirik, D.L. Beta Cell Imaging—From Pre-Clinical Validation to First in Man Testing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sakai, N.S.; Taylor, S.A.; Chouhan, M.D. Obesity, metabolic disease and the pancreas—Quantitative imaging of pancreatic fat. Br. J. Radiol. 2018, 91, 20180267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Seyer, P.; Vallois, D.; Poitry-Yamate, C.; Schütz, F.; Metref, S.; Tarussio, D.; Maechler, P.; Staels, B.; Lanz, B.; Grueter, R.; et al. Hepatic glucose sensing is required to preserve β cell glucose competence. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 1662–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Low, K.T.; Peh, W.C. Magnetic resonance imaging of diabetic foot complications. Singap. Med. J. 2015, 56, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Gooding, K.M.; Lienczewski, C.; Papale, M.; Koivuviita, N.; Maziarz, M.; Dutius Andersson, A.-M.; Sharma, K.; Pontrelli, P.; Garcia Hernandez, A.; Bailey, J.; et al. Prognostic imaging biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease (iBEAt): Study protocol. BMC Nephrol. 2020, 21, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Huang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Tang, T.; Yang, M.; Chen, C.; Tao, J.; Liang, S. Abnormalities of Brain White Matter in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 693890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Diamanti, K.; Visvanathar, R.; Pereira, M.J.; Cavalli, M.; Pan, G.; Kumar, C.; Skrtic, S.; Risérus, U.; Eriksson, J.W.; Kullberg, J.; et al. Integration of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI with non-targeted metabolomics can provide new insights on tissue-specific insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zhang, M.; Qin, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liu, W.; Meng, H.; Xu, M.; Huang, X.; Lin, X.; Lin, M.; Herman, P.; et al. Aerobic glycolysis imaging of epileptic foci during the inter-ictal period. eBioMedicine 2022, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Eriksson, O.; Långström, B.; Antoni, G. News ways of understanding the complex biology of diabetes using PET. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2021, 92, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chen, W.J.Y.; Diamant, M.; de Boer, K.; Harms, H.J.; Robbers, L.F.H.J.; van Rossum, A.C.; Kramer, M.H.H.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Knaapen, P. Effects of exenatide on cardiac function, perfusion, and energetics in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiomyopathy: A randomized controlled trial against insulin glargine. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2017, 16, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Zou, X.; Huang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Ren, Q.; Han, X.; Zhou, X.; Ji, L. The efficacy of canagliflozin in diabetes subgroups stratified by data-driven clustering or a supervised machine learning method: A post hoc analysis of canagliflozin clinical trial data. Diabetologia 2022, 65, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 00751 g002 550
Figure 2. Development strategies for GLP-1R ligands [16,52,53]. (A) Amino acid sequences of GLP-1 (7-36) amide, exendin-4, and oxyntomodulin. Different residues from GLP-1 are in bold type. DPP-4 deactivates the GLP-1 (7-36) amide by cleaving it after the second amino acid (alanine) from the N-terminal and leads to the short circulation time of GLP-1 (7-36) in human body. (B) Several chemical modifications and their combinations can be applied in GLP-1R peptide agonist development, including C-terminal amidation, acylation, PEGylation, and substitution. (C) GLP-1R peptide ligands can fuse to Fc region of antibody, antibody, and albumin. (D) Three typical small-molecule agonists for GLP-1R: LY-3502970 and PF-06882961 are under clinical trials, while TT-OAD2 has failed.
Figure 2. Development strategies for GLP-1R ligands [16,52,53]. (A) Amino acid sequences of GLP-1 (7-36) amide, exendin-4, and oxyntomodulin. Different residues from GLP-1 are in bold type. DPP-4 deactivates the GLP-1 (7-36) amide by cleaving it after the second amino acid (alanine) from the N-terminal and leads to the short circulation time of GLP-1 (7-36) in human body. (B) Several chemical modifications and their combinations can be applied in GLP-1R peptide agonist development, including C-terminal amidation, acylation, PEGylation, and substitution. (C) GLP-1R peptide ligands can fuse to Fc region of antibody, antibody, and albumin. (D) Three typical small-molecule agonists for GLP-1R: LY-3502970 and PF-06882961 are under clinical trials, while TT-OAD2 has failed.
Molecules 28 00751 g002
Molecules 28 00751 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of peptide and small molecule binding pockets. (A) Structures of GLP1R in complex with GLP1 (PDB: 6X18), tirzepatide (PDB: 7RGP), danuglipron (PDB: 6X1A), LY3502970 (PDB: 7E14), and TT-OAD2 (PDB: 6ORV) are shown in the separated ECD and TMD. GLP-1R is shown as a gray surface model. Residues within 4 Å of the corresponding ligand are colored in blue. (B) Specific residues that interact with corresponding ligands in a fingerprint array. Ligands in (A) and their interaction fingerprints in (B) appear as follows: GLP-1 (orange), tirzepatide (yellow), danuglipron (green), LY3502970 (red), TT-OAD2 (magenta). N/A, not applicable. ECD was not resolved in TT-OAD2 binding structure.
Figure 3. Comparison of peptide and small molecule binding pockets. (A) Structures of GLP1R in complex with GLP1 (PDB: 6X18), tirzepatide (PDB: 7RGP), danuglipron (PDB: 6X1A), LY3502970 (PDB: 7E14), and TT-OAD2 (PDB: 6ORV) are shown in the separated ECD and TMD. GLP-1R is shown as a gray surface model. Residues within 4 Å of the corresponding ligand are colored in blue. (B) Specific residues that interact with corresponding ligands in a fingerprint array. Ligands in (A) and their interaction fingerprints in (B) appear as follows: GLP-1 (orange), tirzepatide (yellow), danuglipron (green), LY3502970 (red), TT-OAD2 (magenta). N/A, not applicable. ECD was not resolved in TT-OAD2 binding structure.
Molecules 28 00751 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wan, W.; Qin, Q.; Xie, L.; Zhang, H.; Wu, F.; Stevens, R.C.; Liu, Y. GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy. Molecules 2023, 28, 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020751

AMA Style

Wan W, Qin Q, Xie L, Zhang H, Wu F, Stevens RC, Liu Y. GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy. Molecules. 2023; 28(2):751. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020751

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wan, Wenwei, Qikai Qin, Linshan Xie, Hanqing Zhang, Fan Wu, Raymond C. Stevens, and Yan Liu. 2023. "GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy" Molecules 28, no. 2: 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020751

APA Style

Wan, W., Qin, Q., Xie, L., Zhang, H., Wu, F., Stevens, R. C., & Liu, Y. (2023). GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy. Molecules, 28(2), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020751

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop