Next Article in Journal
The Influence of pH Value on the Microstructure and Properties of Strontium Phosphate Chemical Conversion Coatings on Titanium
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Masitinib Derivatives with Enhanced Mpro Ligand Efficiency and Reduced Cytotoxicity
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Preparation of Golgi Apparatus-Targeted Polymer Dots Encapsulated with Carbon Nanodots of Bright Near-Infrared Fluorescence for Long-Term Bioimaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Development of Lysosome-Targeted Organic Fluorescent Probes for Reactive Oxygen Species

1
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
2
School of Computer Science, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
3
School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(18), 6650; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186650
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 13 September 2023 / Accepted: 14 September 2023 / Published: 15 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluorescent Probes for Imaging and Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are extremely important for various biological functions. Lysosome plays key roles in cellular metabolism and has been known as the stomach of cells. The abnormalities and malfunctioning of lysosomal function are associated with many diseases. Accordingly, the quantitative monitoring and real-time imaging of ROS in lysosomes are of great interest. In recent years, with the advancement of fluorescence imaging, fluorescent ROS probes have received considerable interest in the biomedical field. Thus far, considerable efforts have been undertaken to create synthetic fluorescent probes for sensing ROS in lysosomes; however, specific review articles on this topic are still lacking. This review provides a general introduction to fluorescence imaging technology, the sensing mechanisms of fluorescent probes, lysosomes, and design strategies for lysosome-targetable fluorescent ROS probes. In addition, the latest advancements in organic small-molecule fluorescent probes for ROS detection within lysosomes are discussed. Finally, the main challenges and future perspectives for developing effective lysosome-targetable fluorescent ROS probes for biomedical applications are presented.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Fluorescence Imaging and Fluorescent Probes

Intravital imaging technology is a crucial approach for modern biology and the medical sciences, and allows us to gain a better insight into the physiological activities of living organisms at the molecular level [1,2,3]. Among various imaging techniques, fluorescence imaging shows significant potential in biomedical science due to its unique advantages such as noninvasiveness, high spatial resolution and sensitivity, fast response time, technical simplicity, and the lack of ionizing radiation exposure [2,4,5,6,7]. In recent decades, significant advancements in fluorescence imaging technology have expanded the possibilities for biological imaging. Ratiometric fluorescence imaging offers distinct advantages in contrast to fluorescence-intensity-based imaging, primarily due to its built-in self-calibration and robust anti-interference capabilities [8]. In addition, high-speed, high-resolution, and field-of-view (FOV) fluorescence imaging offers additional advantages, enabling biologists to utilize a diverse range of models for investigating biological systems [9,10].
Since the key component of the fluorescence imaging technique is the fluorescent probe, advanced smart fluorescent probes are urgently required for it to fully be applied in clinical practice. A fluorescent probe is defined as a material that can interact with a target and transfer the recognition event into an optical signal output. A fluorescent probe typically involves a recognition site, a fluorophore, and a sensing mechanism [11,12,13]. Typically, there are three types of fluorescent probes, including type 1: the binding-site-signaling subunit approach on the basis of molecular recognition and host–guest chemistry; type 2: a displacement approach relying on a coordination complex; and type 3: chemodosimeters (reaction-based fluorescent probes) (Figure 1) [4,14,15]. Thus far, many fluorescent chemical sensors have been developed for biosensing and bioimaging. In this regard, various photophysical strategies have been established to design fluorescent probes, including photo-induced electron transfer (PET) [16,17,18], chelation-induced fluorescence enhancement (CHFE), Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) [11,19], intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) [20,21,22], excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) [23,24,25,26], monomer–excimer systems [11,19], and aggregation-induced enhancement (AIE) [27,28,29].
Up to now, most fluorescent ROS probes have belonged to type 3, chemodosimeters, which are designed and developed on the basis of various conventional fluorophore skeletons such as coumarin, naphthalimide, flavonoid, BODIPY, rhodamine, pentamethine cyanine, hemicyanine, and heptamethine cyanine (Figure 2a) [4,11,30,31,32,33]. Generally, the consideration of a “turn-on” or ratiometric fluorescent probe is more desirable compared to “turn-off” fluorescent types due to its excellent sensitivity [34,35,36]. In addition, near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent probes are of great interest because they can improve the penetration depth of imaging and the signal-to-noise ratio in fluorescence imaging [2]. This review highlights the design approaches of small-molecule fluorescent probes and their bio-applications for biosensing and bioimaging of ROS in lysosomes. We believe that this review may encourage more and more researchers to develop smart chemical probes for practical applications.

1.2. Lysosomes and Lysosome-Targeted Fluorescent Probes

Lysosomes are small membrane-enclosed cytoplasmic organelles with sizes of 0.1–0.5 µm in diameter, and lysosomes are described as the stomach of cells. Lysosomes are responsible for degrading intracellular biomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, triggered by various lysosomal enzymes. Lysosomes have acidic environments with a pH range of 4.0 to 6.0 [37,38]. Although lysosomes play an important role in physiological activities, lysosome dysfunction might induce numerous diseases. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of the lysosomal working principle becomes highly imperative for modern biomedical research [37]. At the cell organelle level, lysosomal ROS play a crucial role in upholding the redox balance of lysosomal functions. However, abnormal concentrations of ROS in lysosomes may induce a loss of lysosomal function. Therefore, it is highly demanded to develop effective fluorescent probes for lysosomal ROS [34,39,40,41]. Lysosomes display unique physicochemical and structural characteristics. In particular, their acidic vesicular structures facilitate the accumulation of weakly basic molecules. Some lysosomal trackers with weakly basic properties have been developed and commercialized. Normally, morpholine and other amine groups are extensively utilized as specific lysosome-targeting units [41]. Notably, the acidic tumor microenvironment may enable the selective delivery of lysosome-targetable probes to tumors based on pH, with the assistance of morpholine or other amine groups possessing lone pairs of electrons. This review provides the design approaches of small-molecule fluorescent probes and their applications for monitoring ROS in lysosomes.

2. Lysosome-Targeted Fluorescent Probes for ROS

ROS are chemically active compounds that are naturally produced within living organisms as by-products of oxygen metabolism. ROS encompass various types and play crucial roles in many physiological processes [4,42,43]. However, abnormal ROS generation is closely linked to the pathological processes of various diseases [41]. Consequently, there is a high demand for developing smart fluorescent probes for ROS. This section will introduce the application of small-molecule fluorescent probes for the specific detection of ROS, particularly in lysosomes.

2.1. Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)

H2O2 is one of the most significant ROS, and plays a crucial role in redox signaling and oxidative stress in lysosomes. Nevertheless, uncontrolled levels of H2O2 may cause many diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases and cancer [44,45,46,47]. Thus, the sensing and imaging of physiological H2O2 in lysosomes have attracted considerable attention. In this section, organic fluorescent probes based on small molecules for lysosomal H2O2 are discussed. Lysosome-targeted fluorescent H2O2 probes usually consist of a boronate ester as the specific sensing unit, a morpholine/amine group as the lysosomal targeting moiety, and a fluorophore. Recently, Lin et al. introduced a two-photon probe, 1, to detect H2O2 in lysosomes (Figure 3a) [6]. Probe 1 featured an “acceptor-п-acceptor” electronic structure, initially exhibiting weak fluorescence. Upon exposure to H2O2, the boronate ester group in 1 underwent oxidation, transforming into an electron-rich hydroxyl group. The transformation triggered a significant increase in fluorescence around 550 nm due to ICT from the hydroxyl group donor to the naphthalimide acceptor. Probe 1 remained unaltered in the presence of other analytes, showcasing its exceptional selectivity for H2O2. Probe 1 was successfully employed to visualize lysosomal H2O2 in cells and tissues using two-photon fluorescence imaging.
Based on the phthalazinone scaffold, Xu et al. developed a lysosome-targetable two-photon probe, 2, for H2O2. Probe 2 was specifically designed to investigate the dynamic progression of hypoxia–reoxygenation injury (Figure 3b) [48]. Probe 2 demonstrated rapid responsiveness, high sensitivity, and excellent selectivity towards H2O2. By incorporating the morpholine group, 2 was effectively utilized to monitor H2O2 within lysosomes. The investigation revealed that reoxygenation potentially led to the accumulation of H2O2 in lysosomes among post-hypoxia cells.
Employing a similar oxidative cleavage of the boronate ester strategy, Zhao et al. developed pH-activatable probes 36 for sensing H2O2 in lysosomes (Figure 4) [49]. In their work, an aryl boronate group, a morpholine moiety, and a benzorhodol fluorophore were used as the H2O2-sensing moiety, the lysosome-locating moiety, and the pH-responsive unit, respectively. The aryl boronate moiety was introduced into the different positions of the benzorhodol fluorophore to evaluate the response of the probes to H2O2. Among them, 4 exhibited an excellent ability to selectively monitor H2O2 under lysosomal pH (4.5–5.0) compared to 5 and 6. Cell imaging studies further demonstrated that 4 was able to image endogenous H2O2 in the lysosomes of living cells.
Kumar et al. constructed a fluorescent probe, 7, for monitoring H2O2, using a naphthalimide as the fluorophore, a catechol as the reactive site, and a morpholine moiety as the lysosome-targeting group (Figure 5a) [50]. In the presence of H2O2, the probe converted its catechol moiety into an o-quinone form, activating emission by blocking PeT from the catechol to the naphthalimide core. Probe 7 was sensitive and selective towards H2O2, and served as a promising fluorescence imaging agent for tracking H2O2 levels in lysosomes, brain tissues, and living nematodes.
Ge et al. reported an NIR lysosome-targetable probe, 8, using phenoxazinium and methyl(phenyl)sulfane as the fluorophore and the sensing unit, respectively, for H2O2 detection (Figure 5b) [51]. With the addition of H2O2, oxidation took place at a sulfur atom to produce the corresponding sulfoxide, which led to an increase in fluorescence intensity around 676 nm by the suppression of the PET process. Probe 8 showed good selectivity, excellent sensitivity, and rapid response time. Cell imaging studies indicated that 8 had a potential for detecting and visualizing lysosomal H2O2 in cells.
Yoon et al. synthesized a boronate-based H2O2 probe, 9, using a naphthalimide as the fluorophore and a morpholine moiety as the targeting group (Figure 6a) [52]. Probe 9 exhibited remarkable specificity for H2O2, both in the solution and the living cells. The cellular imaging indicated its potential for monitoring endogenous and exogenous H2O2 levels effectively. Furthermore, time-dependent fluorescence bioimaging provided additional verification of the probe’s efficacy as a reliable marker for detecting H2O2.
Peng et al. introduced a ratiometric fluorescent probe, 10, for H2O2, utilizing a naphthalimide as the fluorophore, a benzyl boronic acid as the reactive moiety for H2O2, and a pyridine group as the lysosomal targeting unit (Figure 6b) [53]. Without H2O2, it emitted bright blue light. With H2O2, it emitted vivid yellow light. Notably, probe 11 exhibited excellent sensing performance for H2O2: (1) it displayed a target-responsive ratiometric fluorescence; (2) it featured a significant Stokes shift with distinct 425 nm and 550 nm channels; and (3) it responded rapidly (<1 min) and selectively to H2O2 over other substances. Probe 11 successfully detected and imaged H2O2 in biological systems.
Ma et al. developed a H2O2-specific probe, 11, using a benzothiazole framework as the fluorophore, a boric acid ester as the reactive site, and a morpholine group as the lysosome-targeted unit (Figure 6c) [54]. In the absence of H2O2, the probe showed weak fluorescence. However, the fluorescence intensity significantly increased in the presence of H2O2. Probe 11 displayed a good linear correlation with a low LOD of 0.46 μM, indicating excellent sensitivity. Probe 11 was non-toxic and effectively imaged H2O2 in the lysosomes of A549 cells.

2.2. Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl)

Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is also known as a crucial ROS in living systems, and is mainly generated through the reaction of chloride (Cl¯) and H2O2 in the presence of myeloperoxidase (MPO) [4,34,55,56]. HOCl plays a pivotal role within the context of the immune system. However, excessive HOCl production is implicated in numerous pathological processes, leading to various diseases, even cancer [39,41,56]. Accordingly, the consideration of probes for lysosomal HOCl has garnered great interest. In 2017, Ye et al. introduced a two-photon fluorescent probe, 12, based on the ICT mechanism for detecting HOCl. Probe 12 was prepared via a direct attachment of the methyl thioether group to the naphthalimide structure at its four-position (Figure 7a) [57]. Upon the addition of ClO¯ into solutions of 12, the absorption peak at 405 nm diminished as the color of the solutions changed from yellow to colorless, and the emission band around 505 nm was gradually quenched. The observation was ascribed to the conversion of methyl thioether into sulfoxide through oxidative processes. Probe 12 exhibited a low LOD of 0.674 µM and a rapid response time in a broad working pH range (pH 4.0 to pH 10.0). In addition, 12 was able to monitor the redox cycles between ClO¯ and GSH because the resulting oxidized product could be reconverted to 12 by GSH. Finally, probe 12 was used to image HOCl in lysosomes by using one- and two-photon fluorescence imaging.
Zeng et al. developed a water-soluble probe, 13, for determining HOCl using a hydrazone as the responsive unit and a morpholine as the lysosome-targeting moiety (Figure 7b) [58]. In the absence of HOCl in water, 13 was weakly fluorescent (ΦPL = 0.04). The emission of 13 rapidly grew in intensity (ΦPL = 0.77) when ClO¯ was added. The titration outcomes revealed a highly linear association between fluorescence intensities and ClO¯ concentrations (0.5−2.5 μM) and the low LOD (~60 nM). The “off-on” sensing mechanism was achieved through the promotion of hydrazone oxidation by ClO¯ and led to the ring-opening of the spirolactame. Probe 13 was successfully employed for imaging of HOCl in lysosomes.
Yuan et al. designed two europium-complex-based probes for HOCl, in which a triphenylphosphonium (14) and a morpholine (15) were used as the mitochondrial targeting moiety and the lysosomal targeting moiety, respectively (Figure 7c) [59]. Upon the addition of incremental amounts of HOCl, the carbonyl group of Eu3+ complexes readily transformed into a carboxylic acid. Consequently, the luminescence intensity of probes gradually quenched due to the decomposition of complexes. They displayed remarkable sensitivity (<15 nM) in a wide pH range and a rapid response (<5 s). Both complexes were applied to visualize HOCl in mitochondrial and lysosomal cells and animals using time-gated luminescence microscopy.
Considering the distinct chlorination-induced cyclization properties of rhodamine acid, Zhang et al. reported a pH-mediated probe, 16, for the recognition of HOCl (Figure 8a) [60]. Upon the introduction of HOCl into the acidic solution of 16, HOCl was easily decomposed into chlorinium ions (Cl+). The resulting Cl+ induced the ring-closure process of the rhodamine derivative to form a chlorinated spirolactone structure. As a result, a significant decrease in fluorescence at 587 nm was observed. Probe 16 was reported to be highly sensitive (at the picomolar level) and selective over other bioactive molecules. Probe 16 was applied for imaging of HOCl in the lysosomes of live RAW264.7 macrophage cells.
A ratiometric fluorescent probe, 17, for visualizing HOCl, relying on the FRET mechanism and the rhodamine ring-opening processes, was developed by Lin et al. (Figure 8b) [61]. The probe was composed of a naphthalene as the donor, a rhodamine fluorophore as the acceptor, and a morpholine as the lysosome-targeting unit. As shown in Figure 8b, the rhodamine ring-opening processes were induced upon the addition of HOCl to the 17 solutions, resulting in the ratiometric fluorescence response. Probe 17 was used for ratiometric imaging of lysosomal HOCl.
An NIR ratiometric fluorescent probe for HOCl was developed by Fan et al., utilizing a BODIPY dye conjugated with Fisher aldehyde (Figure 9a) [62]. During the addition of NaClO into the 18 solutions, the absorption band centered at 650 nm gradually decreased while a new absorption band at 501 nm emerged, resulting in a color shift from blue to vibrant pink. Meanwhile, fluorescent intensity at 713 nm (λex = 635 nm) decreased and fluorescent intensity at 511 nm (λex = 488 nm) increased with the gradual addition of NaClO. The fluorescence intensity ratio (I511 nm/I713 nm) correlated well with the NaOCl concentrations and had a 300-fold enhancement in the presence of HOCl. Probe 18 exhibited high sensitivity to HOCl and was utilized to visualize HOCl in lysosomes with low cytotoxicity.
Taking advantage of the ratiometric fluorescent probe, Zhao et al. synthesized a coumarin–rhodamine platform, 19, for HOCl detection based on the FRET mechanism and rhodamine ring-opening characteristics. Coumarin and rhodamine moieties were linked by monothio-bishydrazide (Figure 9b) [63]. Without HOCl, the rhodamine moiety existed in a ring-closed form, and 19 displayed only the fluorescence of the coumarin moiety at 480 nm under 410 nm excitation. However, upon the addition of HOCl, a decrease in the emission intensity of coumarin and an increase in rhodamine emission were observed. The observation was described as a proficient FRET mechanism, initiated by the HOCl-induced ring-opening process of the rhodamine platform, facilitating energy transfer from the coumarin donor to the rhodamine acceptor. Probe 19 was suitable for sensing lysosomal HOCl.
Zeng et al. prepared naphthalimide-based “off–on” fluorescent probes (20 and 21) for sensing HOCl (Figure 10a) [64]. The intact probes were reported to be essentially non-fluorescent because of the PET process from the phenothiazine (electron donor) to the naphthalimide fluorophore (electron acceptor). Upon the addition of HOCl, the phenothiazine unit was oxidized to form sulfoxide, which inhibited the PET process. As a result, the fluorescence intensity significantly increased over 160-fold and 34-fold for 20 and 21, respectively. Both probes showed high selectivity and selectivity with fast response time (within 10 s) towards HOCl. They were applied to monitor HOCl in lysosomes. In particular, 21 was capable of accurately exploring the functions of lysosomal HOCl in cells.
Considering both photocaging technology and traditional lysosomal HOCl-responsive systems, Lin et al. developed the first photo-controllable fluorescent probe for HOCl, using a 2-nitrobenzyl group as the photon-sensitive moiety, a morpholine as the targeting unit, and a fluorescein as the fluorophore (Figure 10b) [65]. Probe 22 itself exhibited weak fluorescence (ΦFL = 0.03) and was intact towards HOCl in dark conditions. However, in the presence of HOCl and UV light irradiation, an approximate 102-fold enhancement of fluorescence intensity (ΦFL = 0.57) was observed under neutral and acidic conditions, indicating the formation of fluorescein dye. Probe 22 was highly sensitive (62 nM) and selective for HOCl. Probe 22 was suitable for the visualization of HOCl in lysosomes after UV-light photolysis.
Cao et al. reported a rhodamine-based HOCl fluorescent probe, 23 (Figure 11a) [66]. In the presence of HOCl, 23 rapidly reacted with HOCl, leading to an enhancement of fluorescence at 582 nm. In addition, a clear change in the solution color from colorless to pink was observed with the naked eye. The phenomena were attributed to the structural conversion of the rhodamine moiety from the spirocyclic form to the ring-opened form by HOCl. The LOD of 23 was 2.6 nM. Probe 23 could detect endogenous HOCl in lysosomes with low cytotoxicity.
Cao et al. developed a FRET-based system as a ratiometric fluorescent sensor for HOCl using an imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine and a rhodamine (Figure 11b) [67]. When HOCl was introduced, the absorption peak at 360 nm for imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine remained nearly unchanged but a new absorption peak at 565 nm emerged, resulting in a shift in color from colorless to light red. The emission peak of the imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine decreased significantly, while a rhodamine-specific emission peak at 588 nm grew with HOCl addition. Probe 24 exhibited a rapid response to HOCl, excellent selectivity, and a low LOD of 27 nM. The fluorescence imaging demonstrated that 24 enabled visualizations of endogenous HOCl in lysosomes.
Chen et al. developed a PET-based two-photon fluorescent probe, 25, for lysosomal HOCl detection using a naphthalimide as the fluorophore, a phenyl-thiourea as the HOCl recognition unit, and a morpholine as the lysosome-targetable group (Figure 12a) [68]. Probe 25 exhibited weak emission (ΦPL < 0.01) in the absence of HOCl. However, upon the addition of HOCl, the fluorescence significantly increased. The enhanced fluorescence intensity was primarily attributed to the oxidation of thiourea to urea triggered by HOCl. The LOD of 25 was estimated to be 5.7 nM. Probe 25 was capable of imaging HOCl using one- and two-photon microscopy.
Similarly, Cao et al. also described a fluorescent probe, 26, based on the rhodamine fluorophore for HOCl (Figure 12b) [69]. When probe 26 reacted with HOCl, it resulted in the emergence of an absorption band at 568 nm, accompanied by a noticeable change in the solution’s color from colorless to pink. This phenomenon allowed for visual, colorimetric detection of HOCl with the naked eye. Furthermore, an increase in fluorescence intensity at 592 nm was observed following the addition of HOCl. The observation was attributed to the structural transformation from the spirocyclic form to the ring-opened configuration of the rhodamine derivative. Probe 26 demonstrated excellent selectivity and sensitivity to HOCl (LOD = 2.8 nM) in aqueous conditions. Probe 26 was successfully applied to image endogenous HOCl in RAW264.7 cells.
In their ongoing research in this field, Shen et al. utilized the rhodamine-imidazo[1,5-a] pyridine platform to develop a through-bond energy transfer (TBET)-based ratiometric fluorescent probe, 27, for the selective detection of lysosomal HOCl (Figure 12c) [70]. In the absence of HOCl, the rhodamine moiety remained in its non-fluorescent ring-closed form, and probe 27 exhibited only the typical absorption and fluorescence of the imidazo[1,5-a] pyridine moiety. However, upon interaction with HOCl, an absorption band in the range of 500−600 nm and a fluorescence peak corresponding to the ring-opened rhodamine emerged. The spectral change was attributed to the formation of the oxadiazole compound, facilitated by efficient TBET between the imidazo[1,5-a] pyridine donor and the rhodamine acceptor. Probe 27 was utilized to image HOCl in lysosomes.
Zhang et al. proposed an AIE-based ratiometric fluorescent nanoprobe, 28, primarily composed of an AIE fluorogen and a rhodamine B unit for imaging HOCl in living cells (Figure 13a) [71]. The nanoprobe exhibited excellent water solubility, high photostability, and good biocompatibility. In the presence of ClO under acidic conditions, the rhodamine B moiety was converted into a chlorinated spirolactone structure. The transformation led to a significant decrease in the fluorescence intensity of the rhodamine B unit and minimal change in the fluorescence intensity of the AIE dye, resulting in a shift in emission color from orange to blue. Moreover, nanoprobe 28 was applied to monitor HOCl within lysosomes.
A rhodamine-based spiro-ring platform, 29, was utilized by Gong et al. for HOCl detection by connecting a thiolactone rhodamine unit with a morpholine lysosome-specific moiety (Figure 13b) [72]. When exposed to HOCl, notable photophysical changes were observed, including a gradual increase in fluorescence emission (λem = 632 nm) and absorption (λex = 591 nm). The observation was attributed to the rapid chlorination reaction between HOCl and the sulfur atom, resulting in the spiro-ring-opening process. Probe 29 was utilized to image lysosomal HOCl in cells and tissues using two-photon microscopy.
Wang et al. developed phenothiazine-based ratiometric fluorescent probes (30 and 31) for sensing HOCl by converting AIE into ICT emission in solution (Figure 13c) [73]. In an aqueous medium, intramolecular motion was suppressed, leading to highly red ICT emission by the probes. Upon the addition of HOCl, the emission peak at 620 nm was reduced, while the emission intensity at 470 nm increased. Consequently, the fluorescence intensity ratios (I470/I620) increased about 600-fold. The observed phenomenon was attributed to the selective cleavage of the imine linkage between the phenothiazine and the diaminomaleonitrile (DAMN) in the probes by HOCl, resulting in the removal of the DAMN moiety and the eventual formation of aldehyde or carboxylic acid products. Imaging results demonstrated that 31 was more effective in monitoring endogenous HOCl than a non-targeting probe. Probe 31 was successfully utilized to monitor HOCl generation in zebrafish.
Qian et al. introduced a lysosome-targeting fluorescent probe, 32, by incorporating an aldoxime unit into the BODIPY fluorophore platform for specific ClO¯ detection (Figure 14a) [74]. Upon exposure to ClO¯, the probe exhibited a substantial 29-fold increase in fluorescence intensity at 530 nm, which was ascribed to the conversion of aldoximes into aldehydes through oxidation. Probe 33 displayed an LOD of 16.5 nM and a rapid response to ClO¯ within 60 s. Notably, 32 was effectively employed to image ClO¯ levels in MCF-7 cells.
Hou et al. devised a novel phenothiazine derivative, 33, serving as a lysosome-targeted fluorescent probe for detecting ClO¯ (Figure 14b) [75]. Probe 33 combined a lysosome-targeting group (the morpholine), a fluorophore moiety (the phenothiazine-benzo[d]thiazole), and a recognition site (the sulfur atom within phenothiazine). In the recognition process, the sulfur atom in phenothiazine could be readily oxidized by ClO¯ to form a sulfoxide, leading to a substantial blue shift in the emission. The effectiveness of 33 in ClO¯ detection was demonstrated both in cells and in zebrafish.

2.3. Hypobromous Acid (HOBr)

HOBr is formed through the catalysis of MPO, combining hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with bromide ions (Br¯). Excessive generation of HOBr can lead to a redox imbalance and the loss of lysosomal function, resulting in tissue damage and diseases [76]. In 2018, Zhang et al. developed a two-photon fluorescent probe, 34, for HOBr (Figure 15) [77]. When exposed to HOBr, both the amino and methylthio groups underwent a cyclization reaction, forming a nitrogen–sulfur double bond. Consequently, the fluorescence intensity at 540 nm gradually decreased upon the addition of HOBr. The “on-off” fluorescence phenomenon was elucidated based on the PET mechanism. The LOD of 34 was determined to be 33.5 nM, indicating good sensitivity. Probe 34 demonstrated its capability to detect HOBr within lysosomes in HeLa cells and visualize endogenous HOBr in living mice using two-photon fluorescence microscopy.

3. Conclusions and Outlook

Numerous organic lysosome-targetable probes based on small molecules have been developed for ROS detection, which are summarized in this work. Despite the progress made to date in developing organic small-molecule fluorescent probes for sensing ROS in lysosomes, several issues should be overcome. Firstly, morpholine and other amine-based lysosome-targeting probes can potentially lead to toxicity due to their alkalinizing effect on lysosomal pH. For instance, the alkalinization of lysosomal pH can disrupt the proper functioning of lysosomes, impairing enzyme activity and hindering cellular waste degradation [78,79]. To mitigate the potential toxicities associated with these probes, researchers should meticulously optimize their experimental conditions, including probe concentrations and exposure times. Additionally, proper validation of lysosomal targeting and probe specificity are essential. Secondly, current probes suffer from poor water solubility, poor aqueous stability, and aggregation-induced quenching effects in aqueous media, which limit their performance in biological systems. By considering water-soluble and non-aggregating fluorophore skeletons or employing nanodelivery systems, these drawbacks can be addressed to enhance in vivo imaging.
In addition, fluorescent probes based on coumarin, naphthalimide, flavonoid, BODIPY, and rhodamine skeletons usually exhibit short excitation (<550 nm)/emission (<600 nm) wavelengths, limiting their applications in in vivo imaging due to restricted penetration depth, the signal-to-noise ratio in fluorescence imaging, and the risk of phototoxicity. To address these issues, the extension of fluorophore-skeleton-based probes for NIR absorption and emission and the consideration of two-photon fluorescent probes from these skeletons are crucial. Currently, most of the NIR fluorescent probes used for in vivo imaging are cyanine derivatives. An exemplary case is indocyanine green (ICG), which has received clinical approval from the FDA for in vivo imaging applications. Thus, the development of organic lysosome-targetable ROS probes based on cyanine platforms should be considered. However, the enhancement of the performance of cyanine-based probes is still required due to the high susceptibility of cyanine skeletons to oxidants and photobleaching. Nanotechnology can be used to address these limitations of cyanine-based probes. The recent discovery of the hemicyanine platform with superior performance may provide an excellent alternative platform for the construction of lysosome-targetable ROS probes.
Most importantly, the focus should be on developing lysosomal fluorescent ROS probes with clinical potential and ensuring their entry into clinical trials for successful translation. We anticipate that, through the combined efforts of chemists, physicists, biologists, and medical scientists, these challenges will be addressed soon, and organic small-molecule fluorescent probes will serve as powerful molecular tools for gaining a better understanding of the physiological functions of ROS in lysosomes.

Author Contributions

V.-N.N. contributed to the conceptualization; methodology; investigation; writing—original draft preparation; writing—review and editing; and project supervision. H.L. contributed to the review and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, S.; Ren, W.X.; Hou, J.T.; Won, M.; An, J.; Chen, X.Y.; Shu, J.; Kim, J.S. Fluorescence imaging of pathophysiological microenvironments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8887–8902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, C.Y.; Chen, G.C.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wu, F.; Wang, Q.B. Advanced Fluorescence Imaging Technology in the Near-Infrared-II Window for Biomedical Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 14789–14804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, Y.F.; Gao, F.C.; Wang, Y.D.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Z.W.; Jiang, Y.Y. Fluorescent Organic Small Molecule Probes for Bioimaging and Detection Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 8421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nguyen, V.N.; Ha, J.; Cho, M.; Li, H.D.; Swamy, K.M.K.; Yoon, J. Recent developments of BODIPY-based colorimetric and fluorescent probes for the detection of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and cancer diagnosis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 439, 213936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, W.; Schierle, G.S.K.; Lei, B.F.; Liu, Y.L.; Kaminski, C.F. Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Super-Resolution Imaging. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 12495–12543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ren, M.; Deng, B.; Wang, J.Y.; Kong, X.; Liu, Z.R.; Zhou, K.; He, L.; Lin, W. A fast responsive two-photon fluorescent probe for imaging H2O2 in lysosomes with a large turn-on fluorescence signal. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qi, S.J.; Kim, S.; Nguyen, V.N.; Kim, Y.; Niu, G.L.; Kim, G.M.; Kim, S.J.; Park, S.; Yoon, J. Highly Efficient Aggregation-Induced Red-Emissive Organic Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Materials with Prolonged Fluorescence Lifetime for Time-Resolved Luminescence Bioimaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 51293–51301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, L.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, N.; Wang, K.N.; Tian, M.; Pan, Q.; Lin, W. Ratiometric Fluorescence Imaging for the Distribution of Nucleic Acid Content in Living Cells and Human Tissue Sections. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 1612–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hickey, S.M.; Ung, B.; Bader, C.; Brooks, R.; Lazniewska, J.; Johnson, I.R.D.; Sorvina, A.; Logan, J.; Martini, C.; Moore, C.R.; et al. Fluorescence Microscopy-An Outline of Hardware, Biological Handling, and Fluorophore Considerations. Cells 2021, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lelek, M.; Gyparaki, M.T.; Beliu, G.; Schueder, F.; Griffie, J.; Manley, S.; Jungmann, R.; Sauer, M.; Lakadamyali, M.; Zimmer, C. Single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2021, 1, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, D.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Akkaya, E.U.; Yoon, J.; James, T.D. Fluorescent chemosensors: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7105–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, Y. Recent Advances in Excimer-Based Fluorescence Probes for Biological Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, R.; Zhu, T.; Xu, J.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Kuang, Y.W.; Sun, M.N.; Chen, Y.Q.; He, W.; Wang, Z.X.; Jiang, T.W.; et al. Organic Fluorescent Probes for Monitoring Micro-Environments in Living Cells and Tissues. Molecules 2023, 28, 3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, C.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Hirao, T.; Sessler, J.L. Supramolecular Fluorescent Sensors: An Historical Overview and Update. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 427, 213560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, S.K.; Lee, D.H.; Hong, J.I.; Yoon, J. Chemosensors for pyrophosphate. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Munan, S.; Ali, M.; Yadav, R.; Mapa, K.; Samanta, A. PET- and ICT-Based Ratiometric Probe: An Unusual Phenomenon of Morpholine-Conjugated Fluorophore for Mitochondrial pH Mapping during Mitophagy. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 11633–11642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jing, X.Y.; Yu, F.Q.; Lin, W.Y. A PET-based lysosome-targeted turn-on fluorescent probe for the detection of H2S and its bioimaging application in living cells and zebrafish. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 16796–16800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Du, C.C.; Fu, S.B.; Wang, X.H.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Zhen, W.; Li, M.J.; Li, X.Q.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.Y.; et al. Diketopyrrolopyrrole-based fluorescence probes for the imaging of lysosomal Zn2+ and identification of prostate cancer in human tissue. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 5699–5704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Yin, J.; Yoon, J. Recent Advances in Development of Chiral Fluorescent and Colorimetric Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4918–4959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.Y.; Cui, X.L.; Xiao, M.M.; Miao, J.Y.; Zhao, B.X.; Lin, Z.M. An FRET-ICT-based ratiometric fluorescent and colorimetric probe for pH monitoring in lysosomes and water. Dyes Pigm. 2021, 193, 109481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abeywickrama, C.S. Large Stokes shift benzothiazolium cyanine dyes with improved intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) for cell imaging applications. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 9855–9869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, T.; Huo, F.J.; Zhang, W.J.; Chao, J.B.; Yin, C.X. Ultra-pH-sensitive sensor for visualization of lysosomal autophagy, drug-induced pH alteration and malignant tumors microenvironment. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 345, 130393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Roy, B.; Mengji, R.; Roy, S.; Pal, B.; Jana, A.; Singh, N.D.P. NIR-Responsive Lysosomotropic Phototrigger: An “AIE plus ESIPT” Active Naphthalene-Based Single-Component Photoresponsive Nanocarrier with Two-Photon Uncaging and Real-Time Monitoring Ability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 4862–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abeywickrama, C.S.; Bertman, K.A.; Mcdonald, L.J.; Alexander, N.; Dahal, D.; Baumann, H.J.; Salmon, C.R.; Wesdemiotis, C.; Konopka, M.; Tessier, C.A.; et al. Synthesis of highly selective lysosomal markers by coupling 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole (HBT) with benzothiazolium cyanine (Cy): The impact of substituents on selectivity and optical properties. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 7502–7514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singh, A.K.; Nair, A.V.; Shah, S.S.; Ray, S.; Singh, N.D.P. ESIPT-, AIE-, and AIE plus ESIPT-Based Light-Activated Drug Delivery Systems and Bioactive Donors for Targeted Disease Treatment. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 3732–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huo, F.J.; Wu, Q.; Yin, C.X.; Zhang, W.J.; Zhang, Y.B. A high efficient and lysosome targeted “off-on” probe for sulfite based on nucleophilic addition and ESIPT. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 214, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, X.; Yan, N.; Niu, G.; Sung, S.H.P.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Wang, W.X.; Sung, H.H.; et al. In vivo monitoring of tissue regeneration using a ratiometric lysosomal AIE probe. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 3152–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hong, Y.X.; Wang, H.; Xue, M.J.; Zhang, P.S.; Liu, W.Q.; Chen, S.; Zeng, R.J.; Cui, J.X.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J. Rational design of ratiometric and lysosome-targetable AIE dots for imaging endogenous HClO in live cells. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, W.J.; Chen, R.; Yang, J.R.; Wei, Y.F.; Guo, Y.H.; Wang, Z.Z.; Yan, J.W.; Niu, L. Novel Meso-Benzothiazole-Substituted BODIPY-Based AIE Fluorescent Rotor for Imaging Lysosomal Viscosity and Monitoring Autophagy. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 14707–14715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, K.; Lv, T.; Qin, T.; Huang, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, B. A flavonoid-based fluorescent probe enables the accurate quantification of human serum albumin by minimizing the interference from blood lipids. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 13983–13986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bertman, K.A.; Abeywickrama, C.S.; Baumann, H.J.; Alexander, N.; McDonald, L.; Shriver, L.P.; Konopka, M.; Pang, Y. A fluorescent flavonoid for lysosome detection in live cells under “wash free” conditions. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 5050–5058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, H.; Kim, H.; Xu, F.; Han, J.; Yao, Q.; Wang, J.; Pu, K.; Peng, X.; Yoon, J. Activity-based NIR fluorescent probes based on the versatile hemicyanine scaffold: Design strategy, biomedical applications, and outlook. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1795–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Luo, P.; Wang, M.; Liu, W.; Liu, L.; Xu, P. Activity-Based Fluorescent Probes Based on Hemicyanine for Biomedical Sensing. Molecules 2022, 27, 7750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, D.; Chen, L.; Xu, Q.; Chen, X.; Yoon, J. Design Principles, Sensing Mechanisms, and Applications of Highly Specific Fluorescent Probes for HOCl/OCl. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2158–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nguyen, V.N.; Heo, S.; Kim, S.; Swamy, K.M.K.; Ha, J.; Park, S.; Yoon, J. A thiocoumarin-based turn-on fluorescent probe for hypochlorite detection and its application to live-cell imaging. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 317, 128213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cho, M.; Nguyen, V.N.; Yoon, J. Simultaneous Detection of Hypochlorite and Singlet Oxygen by a Thiocoumarin-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe. ACS Meas. Sci. Au. 2022, 2, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, H.X.; Ren, D.J. Lysosomal Physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2015, 77, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nguyen, V.N.; Baek, G.; Qi, S.; Heo, S.; Yim, Y.; Yoon, J. A lysosome-localized thionaphthalimide as a potential heavy-atom-free photosensitizer for selective photodynamic therapy. Dyes Pigm. 2020, 177, 108265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choi, N.E.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, E.C.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J. Recent Advances in Organelle-Targeted Fluorescent Probes. Molecules 2021, 26, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hou, J.T.; Yu, K.K.; Sunwoo, K.; Kim, W.Y.; Koo, S.; Wang, J.Y.; Ren, W.X.; Wang, S.; Yu, X.Q.; Kim, J.S. Fluorescent Imaging of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Associated with Pathophysiological Processes. Chem 2020, 6, 832–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, P.; Pan, W.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Fluorescent probes for organelle-targeted bioactive species imaging. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 6035–6071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, L.L.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Sun, X.L.; Bull, S.D.; He, X.P.; James, T.D. Reaction-Based Fluorescent Probes for the Detection and Imaging of Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Species. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2582–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Geng, Y.J.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, J.Y.; Zhu, M.G.; Liu, J.; James, T.D. Recent progress in the development of fluorescent probes for imaging pathological oxidative stress. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 3873–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Guo, H.C.; Aleyasin, H.; Dickinson, B.C.; Haskew-Layton, R.E.; Ratan, R.R. Recent advances in hydrogen peroxide imaging for biological applications. Cell Biosci. 2014, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ye, S.; Hu, J.J.; Zhao, Q.A.; Yang, D. Fluorescent probes for in vitro and in vivo quantification of hydrogen peroxide. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 11989–11997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zuo, Y.Y.; Jiao, Y.; Ma, C.M.; Duan, C.Y. A Novel Fluorescent Probe for Hydrogen Peroxide and Its Application in Bio-Imaging. Molecules 2021, 26, 3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, S.R.; Xiao, Y.S.; Chen, C.; Jia, L.X. Recent Progress in Organic Small-Molecule Fluorescent Probe Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide. Acs Omega 2022, 7, 15267–15274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Yang, L.; Yuan, L.; Liang, L.; Xu, P. Revelation of the dynamic progression of hypoxia-reoxygenation injury by visualization of the lysosomal hydrogen peroxide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 486, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, J.; Zhou, S.Q.; Ren, J.; Wu, C.L.; Zhao, Y.B. A lysosome-locating and acidic pH-activatable fluorescent probe for visualizing endogenous H2O2 in lysosomes. Analyst 2017, 142, 4522–4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Reja, S.I.; Gupta, M.; Gupta, N.; Bhalla, V.; Ohri, P.; Kaur, G.; Kumar, M. A lysosome targetable fluorescent probe for endogenous imaging of hydrogen peroxide in living cells. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3701–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, Y.; Zhu, W.J.; Wei, X.R.; Xu, Y.J.; Sun, R.; Ge, J.F. Near-infrared and lysosome-targetable fluorescent probe based on phenoxazinium for hydrogen peroxide detection. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 3754–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, D.; Kim, G.; Nam, S.J.; Yin, J.; Yoon, J. Visualization of Endogenous and Exogenous Hydrogen Peroxide Using A Lysosome-Targetable Fluorescent Probe. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhou, R.R.; Peng, Q.Y.; Wan, D.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Luo, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, S.H.; Xie, L.; et al. Construction of a lysosome-targetable ratiometric fluorescent probe for H2O2 tracing and imaging in living cells and an inflamed model. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 24032–24037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhu, N.N.; Xu, J.H.; Ma, Q.J.; Mao, G.J.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.K.; Liu, S.Z. A new lysosome-targeted fluorescent probe for hydrogen peroxide based on a benzothiazole derivative. Methods 2023, 215, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, C.X.; Xiao, S.Y.; Gong, X.L.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.W.; Peng, Y. A Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for Recognition of Hypochlorite Anions Based on Dicyanoisophorone Skeleton. Molecules 2023, 28, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hou, J.T.; Kwon, N.; Wang, S.; Wang, B.Y.; He, X.J.; Yoon, J.; Shen, J.L. Sulfur-based fluorescent probes for HOCl: Mechanisms, design, and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 450, 214232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, B.B.; Yang, X.P.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Ren, X.L.; Xian, M.; Ye, Y.; Zhao, Y.F. Lysosomal-Targeted Two-Photon Fluorescent Probe to Sense Hypochlorous Acid in Live Cells. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 10384–10390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiao, X.J.; Liu, C.; Wang, Q.; Huang, K.; He, S.; Zhao, L.C.; Zeng, X.S. Fluorescence probe for hypochlorous acid in water and its applications for highly lysosome-targetable live cell imaging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 969, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ma, H.; Song, B.; Wang, Y.X.; Liu, C.L.; Wang, X.; Yuan, J.L. Development of organelle-targetable europium complex probes for time-gated luminescence imaging of hypochlorous acid in live cells and animals. Dyes Pigm. 2017, 140, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Y.W.; Wu, L.; Liu, C.Y.; Guo, B.P.; Zhu, B.C.; Wang, Z.K.; Duan, Q.X.; Ma, Z.M.; Zhang, X.L. A highly specific and ultrasensitive fluorescent probe for basal lysosomal HOCl detection based on chlorination induced by chlorinium ions (Cl+). J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 3377–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ren, M.G.; Nie, J.; Deng, B.B.; Zhou, K.; Wang, J.Y.; Lin, W.Y. A fluorescent probe for ratiometric imaging of exogenous and intracellular formed hypochlorous acid in lysosomes. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 5259–5262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Fan, J.L.; Cheng, G.H.; Ghazali, S.; Du, J.J.; Peng, X.J. Fluorescence completely separated ratiometric probe for HClO in lysosomes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yuan, Q.; Zhao, Z.M.; Zhang, Y.R.; Su, L.; Miao, J.Y.; Zhao, B.X. A lysosome-targeted ratiometric fluorescent probe for detection of hypochlorous acid in living cells. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 247, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, C.; Jiao, X.J.; He, S.; Zhao, L.C.; Zeng, X.S. A highly selective and sensitive fluorescent probe for hypochlorous acid and its lysosome-targetable biological applications. Talanta 2017, 174, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ren, M.G.; Li, Z.H.; Nie, J.; Wang, L.; Lin, W.Y. A photocaged fluorescent probe for imaging hypochlorous acid in lysosomes. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 9238–9241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Huang, X.Q.; Wang, Z.Y.; Lv, Y.J.; Shen, S.L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.R.; Wang, J.M.; Ge, Y.Q.; Cao, X.Q. A fluorescent probe for the detection of HOCl in lysosomes. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 11480–11484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shen, S.L.; Huang, X.Q.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Hou, C.; Ge, Y.Q.; Cao, X.Q. Ratiometric fluorescent probe for the detection of HOCl in lysosomes based on FRET strategy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 263, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, P.S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, X.Y.; Zeng, R.J.; Xiao, L.H.; Tao, H.W.; Long, Y.F.; Yi, P.G.; Chen, J. Two-photon fluorescent probe for lysosome-targetable hypochlorous acid detection within living cells. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 2223–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shen, S.L.; Huang, X.Q.; Jiang, H.L.; Lin, X.H.; Cao, X.Q. A rhodamine B-based probe for the detection of HOCl in lysosomes. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1046, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shen, S.L.; Huang, X.Q.; Lin, X.H.; Cao, X.Q. A ratiometric fluorescent probe for lysosomal hypochlorous acid based on through-bond energy transfer strategy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1052, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xue, M.J.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Ren, J.Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, H.P.; Zeng, R.J.; Long, Y.F.; Zhang, P.S. Ratiometric fluorescent sensing of endogenous hypochlorous acid in lysosomes using AIE-based polymeric nanoprobe. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 282, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gong, Y.J.; Zhang, M.L.; Wang, B.X.; Lv, Q.; Wang, Y.; Dong, W.P. A smart approach toward rhodamine spiro-ring derivatives sensing platform for lysosome-targetable imaging applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shi, R.G.; Chen, H.; Qi, Y.P.; Huang, W.; Yin, G.; Wang, R.Y. From aggregation-induced to solution emission: A new strategy for designing ratiometric fluorescent probes and its application for in vivo HClO detection. Analyst 2019, 144, 1696–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Huang, C.M.; Qian, Y. A fast-responsed lysosomal-targeted fluorescent probe based on BODIPY with low limit detection for hypochlorous acid and its application of intracellular hypochlorous acid bioimaging. Opt. Mater. 2019, 92, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hou, P.; Chen, S.; Liang, G.L.; Li, H.M.; Zhang, H.G. A lysosome-targeted ratiometric fluorescent probe with a large blue shift for monitoring hypochlorous acid in living cells and zebrafish. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 229, 117866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, B.; Li, P.; Yu, F.; Chen, J.; Qu, Z.; Han, K. A near-infrared reversible and ratiometric fluorescent probe based on Se-BODIPY for the redox cycle mediated by hypobromous acid and hydrogen sulfide in living cells. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5790–5792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ma, C.; Ma, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhou, L.; Fang, R.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H. Lysosome-targeted two-photon fluorescent probe for detection of hypobromous acid in vitro and in vivo. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 212, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, Y.Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, D.H.; Liu, Y.H.; Ran, X.Y.; Xiang, F.F.; Zhang, L.N.; Chen, Y.J.; Yu, X.Q.; Li, K. Migration from Lysosome to Nucleus: Monitoring Lysosomal Alkalization-Related Biological Processes with an Aminofluorene-Based Probe. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 7294–7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, T.; Hong, X.Q.; Zhi, H.T.; Hu, J.H.; Chen, W.H. Synthesis and mechanism of biological action of morpholinyl-bearing arylsquaramides as small-molecule lysosomal pH modulators. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 22748–22759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Three main sensing mechanisms of fluorescent chemical sensors. (a) Binding site-signaling subunit approach (reversible recognition); (b) Displacement approach; (c) Chemodosimeter (reaction-based fluorescent probe).
Figure 1. Three main sensing mechanisms of fluorescent chemical sensors. (a) Binding site-signaling subunit approach (reversible recognition); (b) Displacement approach; (c) Chemodosimeter (reaction-based fluorescent probe).
Molecules 28 06650 g001
Figure 2. (a) Conventional fluorophore platforms and (b) general structures of lysosome-targeted fluorescent chemical probes. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 2. (a) Conventional fluorophore platforms and (b) general structures of lysosome-targeted fluorescent chemical probes. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g002
Figure 3. The fluorescence mechanism of 1 (a) and 2 (b) in response to H2O2. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 3. The fluorescence mechanism of 1 (a) and 2 (b) in response to H2O2. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g003
Figure 4. (a) Chemical structures of 36. (b) The sensing mechanism for H2O2 of 4. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 4. (a) Chemical structures of 36. (b) The sensing mechanism for H2O2 of 4. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g004
Figure 5. The proposed mechanism for the fluorescence response of 7 (a) and 8 (b) to H2O2. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Figure 5. The proposed mechanism for the fluorescence response of 7 (a) and 8 (b) to H2O2. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Molecules 28 06650 g005
Figure 6. Sensing mechanism of fluorescent probes 911 (ac) for monitoring H2O2. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 6. Sensing mechanism of fluorescent probes 911 (ac) for monitoring H2O2. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g006
Figure 7. The chemical structures and proposed mechanism for the fluorescence response of 1215 (ac) towards HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 7. The chemical structures and proposed mechanism for the fluorescence response of 1215 (ac) towards HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g007
Figure 8. The proposed sensing mechanism for the fluorescence response of 16 (a) and 17 (b) to HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Figure 8. The proposed sensing mechanism for the fluorescence response of 16 (a) and 17 (b) to HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Molecules 28 06650 g008
Figure 9. The fluorescence mechanism of 18 (a) and 19 (b) in response to HOCl. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Figure 9. The fluorescence mechanism of 18 (a) and 19 (b) in response to HOCl. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Molecules 28 06650 g009
Figure 10. The fluorescence mechanism of 2022 (a,b) in response to HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Figure 10. The fluorescence mechanism of 2022 (a,b) in response to HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Molecules 28 06650 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structures and the proposed detection mechanism of 23 (a) and 24 (b) toward HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 11. Chemical structures and the proposed detection mechanism of 23 (a) and 24 (b) toward HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g011
Figure 12. The proposed sensing mechanism of 2527 (ac) toward HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Figure 12. The proposed sensing mechanism of 2527 (ac) toward HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Molecules 28 06650 g012
Figure 13. The fluorescence response of 2831 (ac) to HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent prob.
Figure 13. The fluorescence response of 2831 (ac) to HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent prob.
Molecules 28 06650 g013
Figure 14. The detection mechanism of 32 (a) and 33 (b) towards HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Figure 14. The detection mechanism of 32 (a) and 33 (b) towards HOCl. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe.
Molecules 28 06650 g014
Figure 15. Schematic illustration for the fluorescence response of 34 to HOBr. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Figure 15. Schematic illustration for the fluorescence response of 34 to HOBr. The different background colors in the Figure indicate the different parts of the structure of the fluorescent probe. “X” represent for “prohibition”.
Molecules 28 06650 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, V.-N.; Li, H. Recent Development of Lysosome-Targeted Organic Fluorescent Probes for Reactive Oxygen Species. Molecules 2023, 28, 6650. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186650

AMA Style

Nguyen V-N, Li H. Recent Development of Lysosome-Targeted Organic Fluorescent Probes for Reactive Oxygen Species. Molecules. 2023; 28(18):6650. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186650

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Van-Nghia, and Haidong Li. 2023. "Recent Development of Lysosome-Targeted Organic Fluorescent Probes for Reactive Oxygen Species" Molecules 28, no. 18: 6650. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186650

APA Style

Nguyen, V. -N., & Li, H. (2023). Recent Development of Lysosome-Targeted Organic Fluorescent Probes for Reactive Oxygen Species. Molecules, 28(18), 6650. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28186650

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop