Advances in Biodegradable Polymers and Biomaterials for Medical Applications—A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. A Review of Biomaterials
2.1. Metallic Biomaterials
2.2. Ceramic Biomaterials
Bio-Ceramic Biomaterials
- Resorbable or biodegradable (non-inert),
- Surface-reactive or bioactive (semi-inert),
- Non-absorbable (inert).
2.3. Polymer Biomaterials
2.3.1. Biomaterials of Natural Origin
2.3.2. Synthetic Polymers
2.4. Discussion
- It is similar in structure and composition to natural bones and teeth, and it improves the biocompatibility of bio-composites;
- By introducing HAp particles into a polymer matrix, it is possible to improve the degradation rate of composites due to the bioactivity of HAp.
3. Materials and Methods
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Donate, M.R.; Monzón, M.E. Alemán-Domínguez. Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. e-Polymers 2020, 20, 571–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roseti, L.; Parisi, V.; Petretta, M.; Cavallo, C.; Desando, G.; Bartolotti, I.; Grigolo, B. Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 1246–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pupilli, F.; Ruffini, A.; Dapporto, M.; Tavoni, M.; Tampieri, A.; Sprio, S. Design Strategies and Biomimetic Approaches for Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Regeneration. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubiński, W. Materiałoznastwo. Tom 2. Materiały do Określonych Zastosowań w Różnych Dziedzinach Techniki; Wydawnictwo AGH: Kraków, Poland, 2011; pp. 107–132. [Google Scholar]
- Vishwakarma, A.; Bhise, N.S.; Evangelista, M.B.; Rouwkema, J.; Dokmeci, M.R.; Ghaemmaghami, A.M.; Vrana, N.E.; Khademhosseini, A. Engineering Immunomodulatory Biomaterials To Tune the Inflammatory Response. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lock, A.; Cornish, J.; Musson, D.S. The Role of In Vitro Immune Response Assessment for Biomaterials. J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salthouse, D.; Novakovic, K.; Hilkens, C.M.; Ferreira, A.M. Interplay between biomaterials and the immune system: Challenges and opportunities in regenerative medicine. Acta Biomater. 2023, 155, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lendlein, A.; Pierce, B.F.; Ambrosio, L.; Grijpma, D. Advanced functional polymers for medicine: Multifunctional biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guarino, V.; Taddei, P.; Foggia, M.D.; Fagnano, C.; Ciapetti, G.; Ambrosio, L. The influence of hydroxyapatite particles on in vitro degradation behavior of polyepsilon-caprolactone-based composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15, 3655–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bat, E.; van Kooten, T.G.; Feijen, J.; Grijpma, D.W. Resorbable elastomeric networks prepared by photocrosslinking of high-molecular-weight poly(trimethylene carbonate) with photoinitiators and poly(trimethylene carbonate) macromers as crosslinking aids. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 1939–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, D.; Entrialgo-Castaño, M.; Kratz, K.; Lendlein, A. Knowledge-Based Approach towards Hydrolytic Degradation of Polymer-Based Biomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3237–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wischke, C.; Neffe, A.T.; Steuer, S.; Lendlein, A. Evaluation of a degradable shape-memory polymer network as matrix for controlled drug release. J. Control. Release 2009, 138, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kratz, K.; Voigt, U.; Lendlein, A. Temperature-Memory Effect of Copolyesterurethanes and their Application Potential in Minimally Invasive Medical Technologies. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 3057–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.M.; Rodriguez, A.; Chang, D.T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burugapalli, K.; Pandit, A. Characterization of Tissue Response and in Vivo Degradation of Cholecyst-Derived Extracellular Matrix. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 3439–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gorbet, M.B.; Sefton, M.V. Endotoxin: The uninvited guest. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 6811–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vallet-Regí, M. Evolution of Biomaterials. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 864016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallet-Regí, M. Bioceramics: From bone substitutes to nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pure Appl. Chem. 2019, 91, 687–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallet-Regí, M.; Lozano, D.; González, B.; Izquierdo-Barba, I. Biomaterials against Bone Infection. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 2000310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markets and Markets, Indie. Available online: www.marketsandmarkets.com (accessed on 1 May 2022).
- Behera, A. Biomaterials, Advanced Materials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 439–467. [Google Scholar]
- Marin, E.; Boschetto, F.; Pezzotti, G. Biomaterials and biocompatibility: An historical overview. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2020, 108, 1617–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baino, F. Towards an ideal biomaterial for vitreous replacement: Historical overview and future trends. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanker, J.S.; Giammara, B.L. Biomaterials and Biomedical Devices. Science 1988, 242, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, F.-M.; Liu, X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 86–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.; Kim, Y.; Fendereski, M.; Hwang, N.S.; Hwang, Y. Recent Advancements in Decellularized Matrix-Based Biomaterials for Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1077, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kroczek, K.; Turek, P.; Mazur, D.; Szczygielski, J.; Filip, D.; Brodowski, R.; Balawender, K.; Przeszłowski, Ł.; Lewandowski, B.; Orkisz, S.; et al. Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, C.G.; Martins, P.N. Nanotechnology Applications in Transplantation Medicine. Transplantation 2020, 104, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hollister, S.J. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dutta, R.C.; Dutta, A.K. Cell-interactive 3D-scaffold; advances and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edalat, F.; Sheu, I.; Manoucheri, S.; Khademhosseini, A. Material strategies for creating artificial cell-instructive niches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mogoşanu, G.D.; Grumezescu, A.M. Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 463, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekinci, F. Properties of Metallic Biomaterials and Proton Therapy Applications; Advances in Health Sciences: Ankara, Turkey, 2022; pp. 171–198. [Google Scholar]
- Teixidor, F.; Núñez, R.; Viñas, C. Towards the Application of Purely Inorganic Icosahedral Boron Clusters in Emerging Nanomedicine. Molecules 2023, 28, 4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, E.T.J.; Ng, J.W.; Lee, P.-C. Classification and Medical Applications of Biomaterials–A Mini Review. BIO Integr. 2023, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anil, S.; Chalisserry, E.P.; Nam, S.Y.; Venkatesan, J. 24-Biomaterials for craniofacial tissue engineering and regenerative dentistry. In Advanced Dental Biomaterials; Khurshid, Z., Najeeb, S., Zafar, M.S., Sefat, F., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 643–674. ISBN 978-0-08-102476-8. [Google Scholar]
- Stoppel, W.L.; Ghezzi, C.E.; McNamara, S.L.; Iii, L.D.B.; Kaplan, D.L. Clinical applications of naturally derived biopolymer-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 43, 657–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Renth, A.N.; Detamore, M.S. Leveraging “Raw Materials” as Building Blocks and Bioactive Signals in Regenerative Medicine. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2012, 18, 341–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, W.-J.; Oh, J.-W.; Kwak, K.; Lee, B.Y.; Meyer, J.; Wang, E.; Hexemer, A.; Lee, S.-W. Biomimetic self-templating supramolecular structures. Nature 2011, 478, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Biswal, T. Biopolymers for tissue engineering applications: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 41, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, D.; Nunalee, M.L.; Lim, D.W.; Simnick, A.J.; Chilkoti, A. Peptide-based biopolymers in biomedicine and biotechnology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2008, 62, 125–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, F.-Z.; Li, Y.; Ge, J. Self-assembly of mineralized collagen composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2007, 57, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mano, J.F.; Silva, G.A.; Azevedo, H.S.; Malafaya, P.B.; Sousa, R.A.; Silva, S.S.; Boesel, L.F.; Oliveira, J.M.; Santos, T.C.; Marques, A.P.; et al. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Present status and some moving trends. J. R. Soc. Interface 2007, 4, 999–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, C.M.; O’Brien, F.J.; Little, D.G.; Schindeler, A. Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad. Eur. Cells Mater. 2013, 26, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malafaya, P.B.; Silva, G.A.; Reis, R.L. Natural–origin polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell delivery in tissue engineering applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 207–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.-S.; Park, I.-K.; Hoshiba, T.; Jiang, H.-L.; Choi, Y.-J.; Akaike, T.; Cho, C.-S. Design of artificial extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 238–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, D.Y.; Shinde, U.P.; Yeon, B.; Jeong, B. Recent progress of in situ formed gels for biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 672–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.-A.; Yeom, J.; Hwang, B.W.; Hoffman, A.S.; Hahn, S.K. In situ-forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1973–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnes, C.P.; Pemble, C.W., IV; Brand, D.D.; Simpson, D.G.; Bowlin, G.L. Cross-Linking Electrospun Type II Collagen Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Carbodiimide in Ethanol. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 1593–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Smith, L.A.; Hu, J.; Ma, P.X. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2252–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ravindran, S.; Song, Y.; George, A.; Gao, Q.; Kotecha, M.; Magin, R.L.; Karol, S.; Bedran-Russo, A.; Oliveira, J.T.; Santos, T.C.; et al. Development of Three-Dimensional Biomimetic Scaffold to Study Epithelial–Mesenchymal Interactions. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atala, A.; Kasper, F.K.; Mikos, A.G. Engineering Complex Tissues. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 160rv12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abascal, N.C.; Regan, L. The past, present and future of protein-based materials. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wendt, H.; Hillmer, A.; Reimers, K.; Kuhbier, J.W.; Schäfer-Nolte, F.; Allmeling, C.; Kasper, C.; Vogt, P.M. Artificial Skin—Culturing of Different Skin Cell Lines for Generating an Artificial Skin Substitute on Cross-Weaved Spider Silk Fibres. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egorov, A.R.; Khubiev, O.; Rubanik, V.V., Jr.; Lobanov, N.N.; Savilov, S.V.; Kirichuk, A.A.; Kritchenkov, I.S.; Tskhovrebov, A.G.; Kritchenkov, A.S. The first selenium containing chitin and chitosan derivatives: Combined synthetic, catalytic and biological studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 2175–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodane, V.; Vilivalam, V.D. Pharmaceutical applications of chitosan. Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today 1998, 1, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Yan, C. Antimicrobial Properties of Chitosan and Chitosan Derivatives in the Treatment of Enteric Infections. Molecules 2021, 26, 7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, A.; Patel, R.; Padhan, B.; Palimkar, S.; Galgali, P.; Adhikari, A.; Varga, I.; Patel, M. Chitosan Based Biodegradable Composite for Antibacterial Food Packaging Application. Polymers 2023, 15, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asadpoor, M.; Peeters, C.; Henricks, P.A.J.; Varasteh, S.; Pieters, R.J.; Folkerts, G.; Braber, S. Anti-Pathogenic Functions of Non-Digestible Oligosaccharides In Vitro. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AlShahrani, S.S.; AlAbbas, M.A.S.; Garcia, I.M.; AlGhannam, M.I.; AlRuwaili, M.A.; Collares, F.M.; Ibrahim, M.S. The Antibacterial Effects of Resin-Based Dental Sealants: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Materials 2021, 14, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fakhri, E.; Eslami, H.; Maroufi, P.; Pakdel, F.; Taghizadeh, S.; Ganbarov, K.; Yousefi, M.; Tanomand, A.; Yousefi, B.; Mahmoudi, S.; et al. Chitosan biomaterials application in dentistry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 956–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, A.; Wang, B.; Ni, Y. Chitosan-Nanocellulose Composites for Regenerative Medicine Applications. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 27, 4584–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Hack, M.E.A.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Shafi, M.E.; Zabermawi, N.M.; Arif, M.; Batiha, G.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; El-Hakim, Y.M.A.; Al-Sagheer, A.A. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of chitosan and its derivatives and their applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2726–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barton, A.J.; Niemczyk, K.; Czaja, Ł.; Korach, B.; Sacher-Majewska, B. Kompozyty, biokompozyty i nanokompozyty polimerowe. Otrzymywanie, skład, właściwości i kierunki zastosowań. Chemik 2014, 68, 280–287. [Google Scholar]
- Lutolf, M.P.; Hubbell, J.A. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okamoto, M.; John, B. Synthetic biopolymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1487–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Ma, P.X. The nanofibrous architecture of poly(l-lactic acid)-based functional copolymers. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atala, A.; Bauer, S.B.; Soker, S.; Yoo, J.J.; Retik, A.B. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 2006, 367, 1241–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raya-Rivera, A.; Esquiliano, D.R.; Yoo, J.J.; Lopez-Bayghen, E.; Soker, S.; Atala, A. Faculty Opinions recommendation of Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: An observational study. Lancet 2011, 377, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, H.-K.; Madihally, S.V.; Palmer, B.; Frimberger, D.; Fung, K.-M.; Kropp, B.P. Biomatrices for bladder reconstruction. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 82–83, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ribeiro-Filho, L.A.; Sievert, K.D. Acellular matrix in urethral reconstruction. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2015, 82-83, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Z.; Tan, B.H. Towards the development of polycaprolactone based amphiphilic block copolymers: Molecular design, self-assembly and biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 45, 620–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boffito, M.; Sirianni, P.; Di Rienzo, A.M.; Chiono, V. Thermosensitive block copolymer hydrogels based on poly(ε-caprolactone) and polyethylene glycol for biomedical applications: State of the art and future perspectives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 103, 1276–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Peter, S.J.; Lyman, M.D.; Lai, H.-L.; Leite, S.M.; Tamada, J.A.; Uyama, S.; Vacanti, J.P.; Langer, R.; Mikos, A.G. In vitro and in vivo degradation of porous poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 1837–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vacanti, N.M.; Cheng, H.; Hill, P.S.; Guerreiro, J.D.; Dang, T.T.; Ma, M.; Watson, S.; Hwang, N.S.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G. Localized Delivery of Dexamethasone from Electrospun Fibers Reduces the Foreign Body Response. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 3031–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J. Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 4639–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Xie, J.; Yuan, X.; Xia, Y. Coating electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) fibers with gelatin and calcium phosphate and their use as biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Langmuir 2008, 24, 14145–14150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coburn, J.M.; Gibson, M.; Monagle, S.; Patterson, Z.; Elisseeff, J.H. Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilagerepair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10012–10017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, F.; van Griensven, M. Polymer functionalization as a powerful tool to improve scaffold performances. Tissue Eng. Part A 2014, 20, 2043–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gadomska-Gajadhur, P.A.; Ruśkowski, P.; Wrzecionek, M.; Kwidzyński, M. Biodegradowalne poliestry stosowane w medycynie. Wyr. Med. 2021, 27–30, 2543–8069. [Google Scholar]
- Egbo, M.K. A fundamental review on composite materials and some of their applications in biomedical engineering. J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 2020, 33, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J.; Cheng, Y.; Sun, M. Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Properties and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rec. 2020, 20, 1474–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allioux, F.-M.; Ghasemian, M.B.; Xie, W.; O’Mullane, A.P.; Daeneke, T.; Dickey, M.D.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Applications of liquid metals in nanotechnology. Nanoscale Horiz. 2021, 7, 141–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mou, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, X.; Fan, K.; Liu, H. Nanozymes for Regenerative Medicine. Small Methods 2022, 6, e2200997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Shahruzzaman, M.; Islam, S.; Khan, M.N.; Haque, P. Preparation and properties of biodegradable polymer/nano-hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffold for spongy bone regeneration. J. Polym. Eng. 2018, 39, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shekhawat, D.; Singh, A.; Banerjee, M.; Singh, T.; Patnaik, A. Bioceramic composites for orthopaedic applications: A comprehensive review of mechanical, biological, and microstructural properties. Ceram. Int. 2020, 47, 3013–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartolewska, M. Nanocząstki w biokompozytach polimer—Ceramika do regeneracji tkanki kostnej. Szkło I Ceram. 2021, 72, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
- Rahmati, M.; Pennisi, C.P.; Budd, E.; Mobasheri, A.; Mozafari, M. Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Current Trends. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1119, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alizadeh-Osgouei, M.; Li, Y.; Wen, C. A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater. 2018, 4, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, Y.; Kollampally, S.C.R.; Jorgensen, M.; Zhang, X. Alginate microfibers as therapeutic delivery scaffolds and tissue mimics. Exp. Biol. Med. 2022, 247, 2103–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Świeczko-Żurek, B. Biomateriały; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej: Gdańsk, Poland, 2009; pp. 7–36. [Google Scholar]
- Binyamin, G.; Shafi, B.M.; Mery, C.M. Biomaterials: A primer for surgeons. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2006, 15, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Z.; Poot, A.A.; Grijpma, D.W. Advanced polymer-based composites and structures for biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 149, 110388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, É.R.; Nie, L.; Podstawczyk, D.; Allahbakhsh, A.; Ratnayake, J.; Brasil, D.L.; Shavandi, A. Advances in Growth Factor Delivery for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorashadizade, F.; Abazari, S.; Rajabi, M.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.; Ismail, A.F.; Sharif, S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Berto, F. Overview of magnesium-ceramic composites: Mechanical, corrosion and biological properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 6034–6066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidal, C.; Alves, P.; Alves, M.M.; Carmezim, M.J.; Fernandes, M.H.; Grenho, L.; In´acio, P.L.; Ferreira, F.B.; Santos, T.G.; Santos, C. Fabrication of a biodegradable and cytocompatible magnesium/nanohydroxyapatite/fluorapatite composite by upward friction stir processing for biomedical applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2022, 129, 105137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunil, B.R.; Kumar, T.S.; Chakkingal, U.; Nandakumar, V.; Doble, M. Friction stir processing of magnesium–nanohydroxyapatite composites with controlled in vitro degradation behavior. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 39, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzuki, S.S.; Lee, T.; Miyajima, K.; Kato, A.; Sugawara-Narutaki, M.; Sakurai, F.; Nagat, F. Evaluation of Drug-Loading Ability of Poly(Lactic Acid)/Hydroxyapatite Core–Shell Particles. Materials 2021, 14, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.; Miyajima, T.; Sugawara-Narutaki, A.; Kato, K.; Nagata, F. Development of paclitaxel-loaded poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite core-shell nanoparticles as a stimuli-responsive drug delivery system. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2021, 8, 202030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hassan, M.; Sulaiman, M.; Yuvaraju, P.D.; Galiwango, E.; Rehman, I.U.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H.; Khaleel, A.; Mohsin, S. Biomimetic PLGA/Strontium-Zinc Nano Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mo, X.; Zhang, D.; Liu, K.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Wang, W. Nano-Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds Loaded with Bioactive Factors and Drugs for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shuai, C.; Yang, W.; Feng, P.; Peng, S.; Pan, H. Accelerated degradation of HAP/PLLA bone scaffold by PGA blending facilitates bioactivity and osteoconductivity. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 6, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Motloung, M.P.; Mofokeng, T.G.; Ray, S.S. Viscoelastic, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Melt-Processed Poly (ε-Caprolactone)(PCL)/Hydroxyapatite (HAP) Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korbut, A.; Włodarczyk, M.; Rudnicka, K.; Szwed, A.; Płociński, P.; Biernat, M.; Tymowicz-Grzyb, P.; Michalska, M.; Karska, N.; Rodziewicz-Motowidło, S.; et al. Three Component Composite Scaffolds Based on PCL, Hydroxyapatite, and L-Lysine Obtained in TIPS-SL: Bioactive Material for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skirbutis, G.; Dzingutė, A.; Masiliūnaitė, V.; Šulcaitė, G.; Zilinskas, J. A review of PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija 2017, 19, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- Verma, S.; Sharma, N.; Kango, S.; Sharma, S. Developments of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) as a biomedical material: A focused review. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 147, 110295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.; Kang, J.; Sun, C.; Yang, C.; Wang, L.; Li, D. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 118, 104475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, T.; Das, A.; Biswas, B.; Sarkar, S.; Mukherjee, N.; Sinha, A.; Datta, S. Hydroxyapatite dispersed sulphonated PEEK composite membrane: Synthesis, structural and mechanical characterization. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process. Mech. Eng. 2022, 236, 1869–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Wan, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Z.; Yao, F.; Luo, H. Simultaneous engineering of nanofillers and patterned surface macropores of graphene/hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone ternary composites for potential bone implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 123, 111967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
PICO component | Abstract component inherent to all research designs |
Problem | Research object: biodegradable polymers and biomaterials |
Intervention | Application of a theory or method; biocompatibility, appropriate mechanical properties, ease of sterilization, high porosity, ensure an improvement of living |
Comparison | Alternative theories or methods (or, in their absence, the null hypothesis); specimens did not receive surface conditioning before bonding |
Outcome | Knowledge generation: medical, dental or esthetical application. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oleksy, M.; Dynarowicz, K.; Aebisher, D. Advances in Biodegradable Polymers and Biomaterials for Medical Applications—A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 6213. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176213
Oleksy M, Dynarowicz K, Aebisher D. Advances in Biodegradable Polymers and Biomaterials for Medical Applications—A Review. Molecules. 2023; 28(17):6213. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176213
Chicago/Turabian StyleOleksy, Małgorzata, Klaudia Dynarowicz, and David Aebisher. 2023. "Advances in Biodegradable Polymers and Biomaterials for Medical Applications—A Review" Molecules 28, no. 17: 6213. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176213