Next Article in Journal
Catechins and Selenium Species—How They React with Each Other
Next Article in Special Issue
Developing an Electrochemically Reversible Switch for Modulating the Optical Signal of Gold Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Methoxy-Exfoliated Montmorillonite Nanosheets as Potential Carriers of 5-Fluorouracil Drug with Enhanced Loading, Release, and Cytotoxicity Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melamine-Assisted Thermal Activation Method for Vacancy-Rich ZnO: Calcination Effects on Microstructure and Photocatalytic Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Oxide Materials for Thermoelectric Conversion

1
Institute of Quantum and Sustainable Technology (IQST), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Foshan (Southern China) Institute for New Materials, Foshan 528200, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(15), 5894; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155894
Submission received: 15 July 2023 / Revised: 1 August 2023 / Accepted: 4 August 2023 / Published: 5 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysis, Electronics, Energy and Health at Nanoscale Domain)

Abstract

:
Thermoelectric technology has emerged as a prominent area of research in the past few decades for harnessing waste heat and improving the efficiency of next-generation renewable energy technologies. There has been rapid progress in the development of high-performance thermoelectric materials, as measured by the dimensionless figure of merit (ZT = S2 · σ · κ−1). Several heavy-metal-based thermoelectric materials with commercial-level performance (ZT = 1) have so far been proposed. However, the extensive application of these materials still faces challenges due to their low thermal/chemical stability, high toxicity, and limited abundance in the Earth’s crust. In contrast, oxide-based thermoelectric materials, such as ZnO, SrTiO3, layered cobalt oxides, etc., have attracted growing interest as they can overcome the limitations of their heavy-metal-based counterparts. In this review, we summarize the recent research progress and introduce improvement strategies in oxide-based thermoelectric materials. This will provide an overview of their development history and design schemes, ultimately aiding in enhancing the overall performance of oxide-based thermoelectric materials.

1. Introduction

Following the progression of human civilization and industrialization, vast amounts of fossil fuels have been consumed for energy purposes [1]. However, due to the low efficiency of utilizing fossil fuels, only around 30% of the primary energy can be effectively harnessed, while more than 60% is wasted as heat [2]. Therefore, the exploration of new and efficient technologies for recycling waste heat is crucial to align with the sustainable world envisioned by the United Nations in 2015 [3].
Thermoelectrics has emerged as a promising technique for the reutilization of waste heat [4,5]. By leveraging the Seebeck effect, thermoelectric materials can directly convert a temperature gradient into electricity (Figure 1a) [6]. The performance of a thermoelectric material is commonly quantified by a dimensionless figure of merit known as ZT, which is defined as:
Z T   = S 2 σ T κ
where S, σ, κ, and T denote the Seebeck coefficient (or thermopower), electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and absolute temperature, respectively. The overall conversion efficiency (η) of a thermoelectric generator can be determined by ZT using the following relationship [1]:
η = Δ T T h   ·   1 + Z T   1 1 + Z T + T c T h
where Th, Tc, and ΔT are the temperature at the hot and cold sides, and the temperature gradient along the thermoelectric generator, respectively. In accordance with the second law of thermodynamics, the maximum efficiency of the thermoelectric generators is constrained by the Carnot efficiency (ΔT/Th). As illustrated in Figure 1b, the conversion efficiency of the thermoelectric generators, with varying average ZT values (ZTavg), is plotted against Th while assuming a fixed Tc at room temperature (300 K). To maximize η, it is imperative to utilize thermoelectric materials with high ZT values. Typically, ZT~1 is considered the minimum threshold for the practical application of a thermoelectric material.
Thus far, a range of thermoelectric materials exhibiting high ZT values has been discovered, including filled skutterudites alloy [8], semi-Heusler intermetallic compounds [9], Bi2Te3 [10], Mg3Sb2 [11], GeTe [12], AgPbmSbTe2+m [13], Cu2Se [14], Cu2S [15], SnSe [16,17,18,19,20], etc, primarily belonging to the chalcogenide family. However, despite advancements, the conversion efficiency of thermoelectric materials still falls short of meeting practical application requirements when compared to traditional energy conversion techniques [7]. Additionally, these materials face limitations in high-temperature usage (i.e., >700 °C) due to their low thermal and chemical stabilities. Furthermore, their low natural element abundance and high toxicity introduce uncertainties and challenges in their practical implementation.
To address these challenges, considerable attention has been directed toward oxide-based thermoelectrics as a potential solution. Oxide-based thermoelectric materials offer higher thermal and chemical robustness, making them more suitable for high-temperature applications. Moreover, as depicted in Figure 1b, the advantage of operating at high temperatures can offset some of the limitations associated with lower ZT values.
Extensive research on oxide-based thermoelectrics initially centered around investigating simple conducting oxides, such as CdO [21], NiO [22], ZnO [23], In2O3 [24], rutile-TiO2 [25], SnO2 [26], Cu2O [27], and Fe3O4 [28]. This was followed by a subsequent surge of interest in cuprous oxide-based superconducting materials, such as La2CuO4 [29], La-Ba-Cu-O [30], YBa2Cu3O7−δ [31], and Tl-Ca-Ba-Cu-O [32]. Recent studies have uncovered the potential of compounds, including CaMnO3 [33], Zn1−xAlxO [34], AxCoO2 (Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33) [35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and SrTiO3 [42,43,44,45,46]. This review provides an overview of the advancements in oxide-based thermoelectrics, with a particular focus on the development of several representative compounds and the recent effective methods employed by researchers to enhance their properties. Notably, the review delves into the progress made in ZnO, SrTiO3, and layered cobaltates (AxCoO2, Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33).

2. ZnO

ZnO is one of the most investigated oxides for photovoltaic, sensing, piezoelectric, and thermoelectric applications, with n-type semiconducting behaviors [34,47,48,49,50]. As shown in Figure 2a, ZnO crystals possess a wurtzite structure, where the Zn atom is surrounded by four oxygens, resulting in a hexagonal closely packed sublattice. In the solid state, ZnO acts as an insulator with a wide bandgap of about 3.2–3.5 eV. The conduction band minimum (CBM) is mainly derived from the 4s orbital in the Zn2+ ion, which shows a high carrier mobility. Pristine ZnO displays an increasing electrical conductivity with temperature due to the thermally excited electrons. Under ideal stoichiometric conditions, ZnO materials demonstrate a thermoelectric power factor ranging from 0.8 to 1 mW m−1 K−2. However, due to the low electrical conductivity and high thermal conductivity (49 W m−1 K−1 at 300 K and 10 W m−1 K−1 at 1000 K [51]), the ZT value and overall efficiency of pristine ZnO are still limited in practical applications.
In order to enhance the electrical characteristics of zinc oxide (ZnO), the introduction of donor dopants such as Al3+ and Ga3+ has been widely employed. A small number of dopants can tune the conduction behavior of ZnO from semiconducting to metallic. In 1996, Ohtaki and Tswbota reported on the high-temperature thermoelectric properties of Al-doped ZnO, exhibiting a thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT) of approximately 0.3 at 1273 K, along with a thermoelectric power factor ranging from 1 to 1.5 mW m−1 K−2, which is comparable to traditional chalcogenide-based counterparts [34,50]. In 2011, Jood et al. prepared ZnO nanocomposites incorporating Al, further enhancing the ZT value to 0.44 at 1000 K [53]. In addition to Al, a diverse range of dopants, including Ga, Ni, Co, Fe, In, Ti, Mn, and Sb, have been utilized to improve either the overall or specific ZnO performance characteristics [54,55,56]. Furthermore, apart from their influence on electrical properties, elemental doping has proven effective in reducing the thermal conductivity in the ZnO system. As shown in Figure 3, Ohtaki et al. found that using a third element, Ga, co-doped with Al, could dramatically reduce the thermal conductivity, while having a relatively small effect on electrical conductivity [57]. With an obvious reduction in thermal conductivity and enhancement in power factor, the ZT value of the double-doped oxide in the composition of Zn0.96Al0.02Ga0.02O is 0.47 at 1000 K and 0.65 at 1247 K.
In 2021, utilizing the thermal conductivity reduction effect of the coating grain structure, Somnath Acharya et al. prepared ZnS-coated Al-doped compact ZnO nanostructures using the low-temperature co-precipitation method and spark plasma sintering (SPS), in which the Al doping increased the carrier concentration as well as optimizing the electron transport characteristics (Figure 4). The decrease in thermal conductivity can be attributed to the enhanced coherent phonon-scattering in Zn1−xAlxO. The power factor of the resulting 2% ZnS-coated Zn0.98Al0.02O nanostructures exhibited a noteworthy enhancement of 161% compared to pure ZnO, reaching a value of 0.75 mW m⁻1 K⁻2. Furthermore, a peak figure of merit (ZT) value of 0.2 was attained, which represents a remarkable 272% increase compared to pure ZnO [58].
More recently, as shown in Figure 5, Soumya Biswas et al. prepared ZnO nanocomposites using a simple solution-based method with both Al doping and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) encapsulation techniques. The influence of Al doping on the nanocomposites resulted in an increased electrical conductivity and decreased thermal conductivity, albeit accompanied by low Seebeck coefficient values. Furthermore, the incorporation of RGO inclusions into the nanocomposites yielded dual benefits. Firstly, it enhanced the overall electrical conductivity, contributing to improved charge transport properties. Secondly, through the phenomenon of energy filtration, the presence of RGO enhanced the Seebeck coefficient, promoting more favorable thermoelectric properties. Consequently, the synthesized material exhibited a notable figure of merit (ZT) value of approximately 0.52 at an elevated temperature of 1100 K [59].
In addition to the bulk state, recent progress has also been achieved in two-dimensional thin film-based ZnO materials. Zhou et al. prepared Ga-doped ZnO epitaxial thin films using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technology. During the preparation process, growth rate, crystallinity, surface roughness, and even the Fermi level could be changed by controlling deposition temperature. The improved Ga doping efficiency resulted in an increased Hall mobility and higher carrier concentration, consequently, leading to a notable enhancement in electrical conductivity. Finally, GZO films deposited at 673 K showed the best quality and crystallinity, with a power factor of 256 mW m−1 K−2 [60]. In 2016, Shimizu et al. proposed that the thermoelectric performance of ZnO could be enhanced by a two-dimensional electron gas in the ion gel-gated field-effect transistor (Figure 6a) [61]. The accumulation of an ~1 nm 2D electron gas at the surface of ZnO can significantly enhance the Seebeck coefficient (Figure 6b), which brings about an obviously increased power factor compared to the bulk counterparts [62,63,64,65].

3. SrTiO3

SrTiO3 is considered a promising n-type oxide thermoelectric material with a high Seebeck coefficient due to the large effective mass of the Ti 3D orbital [43]. Meanwhile, its high melting point also makes it a thermoelectric candidate at high temperatures. As shown in Figure 7, SrTiO3 has a simple cubic-perovskite crystal structure (lattice parameter, a = 3.905 Å). SrTiO3 behaves as an insulator, characterized by a very low carrier concentration, poor electron transport, and high thermal conductivity. Therefore, to enhance the thermoelectric performance of SrTiO3, two crucial aspects necessitate attention: optimizing the carrier concentration and reducing thermal conductivity. SrTiO3 possesses a high relative dielectric constant (εr~220 at room temperature), and the impurity orbitals start to overlap at a rather low donor doping level (~0.5 mol%), resulting in a metallic electron transport property in SrTiO3 [43]. In this case, it is easy to introduce dopants (i.e., La3+ and Nb5+) into the SrTiO3 matrix and modulate the thermoelectric properties.
In addition to the common donor dopant La3+ and Nb5+, other elements are also utilized to tailor the carrier concentration, lattice constant, defect level, and lattice distortion. In the A-site doping, common elements included La, Y, Na, Ce, Mn, Bi, Nd, Pr, Sm, Gd, Dy, etc. [5,66]. At the B-site, common doping elements included Nb, Ta, Se, V, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, In, Sb, Mg, etc. Ru, Al, etc. [67]. In 2001, Okuda first found that the power factor of Sr1−xLaxTiO3 was 28–36 mW cm−1k−2, which is comparable to traditional alloy-type thermoelectric material Bi2Te3 at room temperature, although its ZT was still < 1 due to its excessive thermal conductivity (Figure 8). Despite this limitation, the notable power factor exhibited by Sr1−xLaxTiO3 proved its potential for application in thermoelectric systems [42].
Co-doping on both the Sr site and Ti site is a widely employed strategy in the field. In 2017, Wang et al. successfully overcame the challenges associated with nanoscale co-doping of Nb and La by integrating the hydrothermal method with efficient sintering techniques. Using this approach, they achieved precise control over the co-doping process, resulting in the precipitation of nano-inclusions during the sintering phase and the formation of a complex microstructure. Consequently, the Seebeck coefficient was significantly enhanced, while the thermal conductivity was effectively reduced. Finally, a record-high ZT of >0.6 was generated at 1000–1100 K in the 10 mol% La and 10 mol% Nb-doped SrTiO3 bulk materials [46]. More recently, Acharya et al. proposed thermoelectric composites of Nb-doped SrTiO3 using natural graphite, which possessed surged electrical conductivity, while restraining thermal conductivity (Figure 9). The ZT value can reach 1.42 at ~1050 K and keep within >1.2 of a broad temperature range (850–1050 K) [68].
In addition to common doping, low-dimensional is another effective strategy to improve thermoelectric performance. In thin film cases, phonon scatterings at the interface and surface areas will be much more obvious than in the bulk state. In 2021, Zhang et al. prepared La- and Nb-doped SrTiO3 full-range solid solution epitaxial films by the PLD method and investigated their thermoelectric phase diagrams at room temperature (Figure 10) [69,70]. Both SrTiO3–LaTiO3 and SrTiO3–SrNbO3 solid solutions displayed a similar power factor (=S2 · σ) changing pattern, which peaked at the carrier concentration (n) of around 1021 cm−3, while different thermal conductivity variation tendencies, especially at the substitution level, were above 50 mol%. The authors attributed this to the different lattice distortions in the two solid solution systems. Modulation of the thermal conductivity through doping achieved a much larger ZT value of ~0.11 at room temperature compared to previous reports [71].
In 1993, Dresselhaus et al. published their findings that the two-dimensional electron system (2DES) can enhance thermopower without sacrificing electrical conductivity, which significantly boosted the ZT value [72]. As shown in Figure 11a, the absolute value of thermopower is proportional to the energy differential in the density of the state:
| S |   D O S ( E ) E E = E F
As the thickness of the 2DES decreases below the de Broglie Wavelength, the conduction band (CB) will split, which results in an enhancement of thermopower. In 2007, Ohta et al. fabricated the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3|SrTiO3 superlattice structure and confirmed the 2DES enhancement effect in thermopower by decreasing the thickness of the quantum wells (Figure 11b) [73]. A ZT value of ~2.4 was achieved in the 2DES (Figure 11c).
In order to achieve a stronger enhancement effect, Dresselhaus et al. proposed the concept of using materials with longer de Broglie wavelengths in quantum well constructions [74]. Based on this concept, Zhang et al. utilized the tunable de Broglie wavelength in the SrTiO3–SrNbO3 full-range solid solution when constructing superlattices [69]. With a longer de Broglie wavelength, the superlattice structures achieved superior overall thermoelectric performances over the bulk counterparts [75]. As shown in Figure 12a, the 2DES exerts a much higher enhancement factor (S2DES/SBulk) in the thermopower, where the 2DES with a longer de Broglie wavelength reached 10, which is ~2 times larger than the 2DESs, which has a shorter de Broglie wavelength. Meanwhile, a longer de Broglie wavelength better maintains the better electron-transport property. As a result, the highest power factor in the superlattices reached ~5 mW m−1 K−2, thereby reaching 200% of the bulk counterparts (Figure 12b).
More recently, the strategy of high-entropy alloying has been applied to increase the thermoelectric performance of SrTiO3-based materials, where multiple metal ions are introduced to the A-site or B-site of the SrTiO3 lattice to induce more anharmonicity and multiphonon scattering, while the lattice thermal conductivity can be significantly suppressed. Banerjee et al. mixed five transition metal elements at the B-site in the SrTiO3, synthesizing Sr(Ti0.2Fe0.2Mo0.2Nb0.2Cr0.2)O3 high-entropy perovskite ceramics. The thermal conductivity can be reduced to 0.7 W m−1 K−1 at 1100 K [76]. Zheng et al. fabricated the A-site high-entropy SrTiO3-based thermoelectric ceramics [77]. Ca, Sr, Ba, Pb, and La were introduced to induce a large lattice distortion and a huge mass fluctuation effect, which resulted in a minimum thermal conductivity of 1.17 W m−1 K−1 at 923 K. Using newer concepts combined with traditional oxide-based materials, a chance remains to further increase their thermoelectric performance.

4. Layered Cobalt Oxides (AxCoO2 (Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33))

Layered cobalt oxides (AxCoO2) exert a sandwich structure composed of CoO2 and A-site cations by stacking layer by layer (Figure 13). The conduction path is dependent on the CoO2 layer, which displays a large Seebeck coefficient due to the low-spin state of Co3+ [78]. It has been theoretically and experimentally proven that the spin entropy flow generated from the electronic conduction between Co3+ and Co4+ majorly contributes to the enhancement of the thermoelectric potential of AxCoO2-based oxide materials [78,79,80,81]. At high temperatures, the Seebeck coefficient (S) can be calculated based on the Koshibae equation:
S   ( T )   = k B e   ln g ( C o 4 + ) g ( C o 3 + )   n C o 4 + n C o 3 +
where kB is the Boltzmann constant, e is the electronic unit charge, g is the different possible ways in which electrons can be arranged in the orbitals of Co3+ and Co4+ ions, and n is the concentration of a given Co species. Additionally, g is the product of the spin degeneracy (gs) and orbital (go) degeneracy: g = gsgo, whereby gs = 2ζ + 1, where ζ is the ions’ total spin number and go is the number of valid permutations for distributing the electrons across its orbitals. Using electronic conduction through hopping in NaxCoO2, a spin entropy flow occurs in the opposite direction [82]. Therefore, the contribution of the spin entropy to the thermoelectric potential in the cobalt oxide group is related to the concentration of the Co4+ and Co3+ ions, as well as the degree of the spin degeneracy of Co ions. Since a decrease in the Co4+ concentration will lead to an increase in spin entropy; thus, the manipulation of the Co4+ ion concentration through excessive metal doping has emerged as an effective approach to modulating the spin entropy contribution. Using the ion exchange process, the A-site cations can be tuned from Na2+ to Ca2+, Sr2+, and Ba2+ and accompanied by a topotactic phase transition.
In 1997, Terasaki et al. discovered that Na0.5CoO2 crystal was a good candidate for thermoelectric application [35]. Compared to the traditional alloy-type materials Bi2Te3, it was found that their power factors are in the same order of magnitude. Meanwhile, the conductivity of NaxCoO2 is nearly four times that of Bi2Te3 [35,83]. In terms of thermal conductivity, the interface between layers affects heat transfer and contributes to the reduction in lattice thermal conductivity. Therefore, the large Seebeck coefficient and high electrical conductivity also indicate that the layered Na0.5CoO2 crystal is a kind of oxide-based thermoelectric material with research significance and prospect. The discovery has also drawn the attention of researchers to various metallic layered cobalt oxide-based thermoelectric materials.
However, constrained by the high thermal conductivity, the overall thermoelectric performance, ZT value, of Na0.5CoO2 is still far from the commercial level. In 2020, Cho et al. proposed that thermal conductivity can be suppressed significantly by substituting A-site ions in AxCoO2 from light ions to heavy ions [84]. Using heavier A-site ions will create a mismatch in phonon vibration modes between CoO2 and the A-site cation layers, which will reduce the phonon mean free path and phonon group velocity, and therefore, the thermal conductivity (Figure 14a). They fabricated AxCoO2 (Ax = Li1, Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, La0.3) epitaxial films using the PLD method followed by the reactive solid phase epitaxy (R-SPE) method and ion exchange process. The thermal conductivity tendency was good after following the hypothesis along the in-plane direction, suggesting that the thermoelectric performance of AxCoO2-based materials can be enhanced through an elaborate modification of the A-site ions.
Following this strategy, Takashima et al. checked the thermoelectric properties of AxCoO2 (Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33) epitaxial films along the in-plane direction [40]. As shown in Figure 15, the power factor stays almost unchanged as the A-site ion mass increases, while the thermal conductivity is effectively suppressed, which suggests that the A-site ion exchange will not affect the electrical conduction path along the CoO2 layer and only reduce their thermal transport properties. It also needs to be emphasized that AxCoO2 shows an A-site ion arrangement evolution with temperature. For example, Ca0.33CoO2 exerts a phase transition from a 3 a × 3 a hexagonal superstructure to a 2 a × 3 a orthorhombic superstructure as the temperature increases above 400 °C [85]. However, in the Ba0.33CoO2 lattice, a mixture of orthorhombic and hexagonal superstructures can be maintained within a wide temperature range. This lattice disorder contributes significantly to phonon scattering and thermal conductivity reduction. A peak ZT value of ~ 0.11 was realized in the Ba0.33CoO2 epitaxial film at room temperature, which is a record high among the reported “reliable” ZT values in conducting oxides.
As indicated in the report by Takashima et al., Ba0.33CoO2 is a promising thermoelectric material with superior performance to other counterparts. Later, Zhang et al. tested the high-temperature thermoelectric properties of AxCoO2 (Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33) epitaxial films to confirm the application of Ba0.33CoO2 at elevated temperature environments [41]. They found a relatively high thermal stability of Ba0.33CoO2 up to 650 °C in air compared to other counterparts, by checking the room temperature resistivity after heat treatment in air at elevated temperatures (Figure 16a). High thermal stability makes it possible to measure thermoelectric properties of Ba0.33CoO2 up to 600 °C, with a ZT value of 0.55 at 600 °C (Figure 16b), comparable to those of PbTe and p-type SiGe (Figure 16c), which indicates Ba1/3CoO2 as a good candidate for high-temperature thermoelectric applications.

5. Summary and Perspective

The recent advancements in oxide-based thermoelectric materials, with a focus on ZnO, SrTiO3, and layered cobalt oxides, are reviewed, as they have garnered increasing attention due to their advantages over the chalcogenide family. The combination of high thermal/chemical stabilities and abundant elements on Earth makes thermoelectric oxides a highly promising candidate for numerous applications in waste heat recycling at elevated temperatures. Until now, these materials have witnessed revolutionary breakthroughs in performance enhancement through conventional doping and nanostructuring techniques. Additionally, the concept of low-dimensionalization has emerged as a new approach to further improve efficiency, especially in the context of device miniaturization and flexibility. With the implementation of novel strategies aimed at enhancing the performance of thermoelectric oxides, such as augmenting the power factor through low-dimensionalization and reducing thermal conductivity via high-entropy alloying, oxide-based thermoelectric materials are poised to undergo significant advancements in the foreseeable future.

Funding

Y.Z. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52202242), the Ministry of Science and Technology of PRC (Grant No. G2022014136L), the National Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 22KJB430002), and the Start-Up Fund of Jiangsu University (Grant No. 5501310015). Q.Y. is supported by the support from Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2022A1515111067) and the Start-Up Fund of Jiangsu University (Grant No. 5501310025). L.Z. is supported by the Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20210744) and the Start-Up Fund of Jiangsu University (Grant No. 4111310027).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Snyder, G.J.; Toberer, E.S. Complex thermoelectric materials. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Fang, L.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, S. Exceptional thermoelectric properties of flexible organic−inorganic hybrids with monodispersed and periodic nanophase. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Griggs, D.; Stafford-Smith, M.; Gaffney, O.; Rockström, J.; Öhman, M.C.; Shyamsundar, P.; Steffen, W.; Glaser, G.; Kanie, N.; Noble, I. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 2013, 495, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rowe, D.M. CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldsmid, H.J. Introduction to Thermoelectricity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Seebeck, T. Abh. K. Akad. Wiss 1823, 265, 1822. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vining, C.B. An inconvenient truth about thermoelectrics. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rull-Bravo, M.; Moure, A.; Fernández, J.F.; Martín-González, M. Skutterudites as thermoelectric materials: Revisited. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 41653–41667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Quinn, R.J.; Bos, J.-W.G. Advances in half-Heusler alloys for thermoelectric power generation. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 6246–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Scheele, M.; Oeschler, N.; Veremchuk, I.; Peters, S.-O.; Littig, A.; Kornowski, A.; Klinke, C.; Weller, H. Thermoelectric Properties of Lead Chalcogenide Core-Shell Nanostructures. Acs Nano 2011, 5, 8541–8551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhang, J.; Song, L.; Pedersen, S.H.; Yin, H.; Hung, L.T.; Iversen, B.B. Discovery of high-performance low-cost n-type Mg3Sb2-based thermoelectric materials with multi-valley conduction bands. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Liu, W.D.; Wang, D.Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z.; Chen, Z.G. High-Performance GeTe-Based Thermoelectrics: From Materials to Devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsu, K.F.; Loo, S.; Guo, F.; Chen, W.; Dyck, J.S.; Uher, C.; Hogan, T.; Polychroniadis, E.K.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Cubic AgPbmSbTe2+m: Bulk Thermoelectric Materials with High Figure of Merit. Science 2004, 303, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, H.; Shi, X.; Xu, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Li, Q.; Uher, C.; Day, T.; Snyder, G.J. Copper ion liquid-like thermoelectrics. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, Y.; Day, T.; Zhang, T.; Liu, H.; Shi, X.; Chen, L.; Snyder, G.J. High Thermoelectric Performance in Non-Toxic Earth-Abundant Copper Sulfide. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3974–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhao, L.-D.; Lo, S.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Tan, G.; Uher, C.; Wolverton, C.; Dravid, V.P.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Ultralow thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric figure of merit in SnSe crystals. Nature 2014, 508, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, L.-D.; Tan, G.; Hao, S.; He, J.; Pei, Y.; Chi, H.; Wang, H.; Gong, S.; Xu, H.; Dravid, V.P.; et al. Ultrahigh power factor and thermoelectric performance in hole-doped single-crystal SnSe. Science 2016, 351, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chang, C.; Wu, M.; He, D.; Pei, Y.; Wu, C.-F.; Wu, X.; Yu, H.; Zhu, F.; Wang, K.; Chen, Y.; et al. 3D charge and 2D phonon transports leading to high out-of-plane ZT in n-type SnSe crystals. Science 2018, 360, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhou, C.; Lee, Y.K.; Yu, Y.; Byun, S.; Luo, Z.-Z.; Lee, H.; Ge, B.; Lee, Y.-L.; Chen, X.; Lee, J.Y.; et al. Polycrystalline SnSe with a thermoelectric figure of merit greater than the single crystal. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1378–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, L.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Qin, B.; Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Jin, Y.; Chang, C.; Zhao, L.-D. High thermoelectric performance realized through manipulating layered phonon-electron decoupling. Science 2022, 375, 1385–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hogarth, C.A.; Andrews, J.P. XXV. Variation with oxygen pressure of the thermoelectric power of cadmium oxide. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1949, 40, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Parravano, G. Thermoelectric behavior of nickel oxide. J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hutson, A. Electronic properties of ZnO. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1959, 8, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arvin, M. Electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power of indium oxide. Phys. Chem. Solids 1962, 23, 1681–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thurber, W.; Mante, A. Thermal Conductivity and Thermoelectric Power of Rutile (TiO2). Phys. Rev. 1965, 139, A1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marley, J.; Dockerty, R. Electrical properties of stannic oxide single crystals. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Young, A.; Schwartz, C. Electrical conductivity and thermoelectric power of Cu2O. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1969, 30, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Griffiths, B.; Elwell, D.; Parker, R. The thermoelectric power of the system NiFe2O4-Fe3O4. Philos. Mag. 1970, 22, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bednorz, J.G.; Müller, K.A. Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system. Z. Für Phys. B Condens. Matter 1986, 64, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cooper, J.; Alavi, B.; Zhou, L.; Beyermann, W.; Grüner, G. Thermoelectric power of some high-Tc oxides. Phys. Rev. B 1987, 35, 8794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, J.; McEwan, C.; Wenger, L.; Logothetis, E. Determination of charge carriers in superconducting La-Ba-Cu-O by thermoelectric measurements. Phys. Rev. B 1987, 35, 7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mitra, N.; Trefny, J.; Yarar, B.; Pine, G.; Sheng, Z.; Hermann, A. Thermoelectric power of the Tl-Ca-Ba-Cu-O superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ohtaki, M.; Koga, H.; Tokunaga, T.; Eguchi, K.; Arai, H. Electrical transport properties and high-temperature thermoelectric performance of (Ca0.9M0.1)MnO3 (M = Y, La, Ce, Sm, In, Sn, Sb, Pb, Bi). J. Solid State Chem. 1995, 120, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ohtaki, M.; Tsubota, T.; Eguchi, K.; Arai, H. High-temperature thermoelectric properties of (Zn1−xAlx)O. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 1816–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Terasaki, I.; Sasago, Y.; Uchinokura, K. Large thermoelectric power in NaCo2O4 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, R12685–R12687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Masset, A.; Michel, C.; Maignan, A.; Hervieu, M.; Toulemonde, O.; Studer, F.; Raveau, B.; Hejtmanek, J. Misfit-layered cobaltite with an anisotropic giant magnetoresistance: Ca3Co4O9. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Funahashi, R.; Matsubara, I.; Ikuta, H.; Takeuchi, T.; Mizutani, U.; Sodeoka, S. An oxide single crystal with high thermoelectric performance in air. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 39, L1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ishikawa, R.; Ono, Y.; Miyazaki, Y.; Kajitani, T. Low-Temperature Synthesis and Electric Properties of New Layered Cobaltite, SrxCoO2. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 41, L337–L339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kanno, T.; Yotsuhashi, S.; Adachi, H. Anisotropic thermoelectric properties in layered cobaltite AxCoO2 (A = Sr and Ca) thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 739–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takashima, Y.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Wei, J.; Feng, B.; Ikuhara, Y.; Cho, H.J.; Ohta, H. Layered cobalt oxide epitaxial films exhibiting thermoelectric ZT = 0.11 at room temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, L.; Tsuruta, A.; Mikami, M.; Cho, H.J.; Ohta, H. Ba1/3CoO2: A Thermoelectric Oxide Showing a Reliable ZT of ~0.55 at 600 °C in Air. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 33355–33360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Okuda, T.; Nakanishi, K.; Miyasaka, S.; Tokura, Y. Large thermoelectric response of metallic perovskites: Sr1−xLaxTiO3 (0 < ~x < ~0.1). Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 113104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ohta, S.; Nomura, T.; Ohta, H.; Koumoto, K. High-temperature carrier transport and thermoelectric properties of heavily La-or Nb-doped SrTiO3 single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 034106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ohta, S.; Nomura, T.; Ohta, H.; Hirano, M.; Hosono, H.; Koumoto, K. Large thermoelectric performance of heavily Nb-doped SrTiO3 epitaxial film at high temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 092108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lu, Z.L.; Zhang, H.R.; Lei, W.; Sinclair, D.C.; Reaney, I.M. High-Figure-of-Merit Thermoelectric La-Doped A-Site-Deficient SrTiO3 Ceramics. Chem Mater 2016, 28, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Wang, J.; Zhang, B.-Y.; Kang, H.-J.; Li, Y.; Yaer, X.; Li, J.-F.; Tan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Fan, G.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; et al. Record high thermoelectric performance in bulk SrTiO3 via nano-scale modulation doping. Nano Energy 2017, 35, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jang, J.S.; Kim, J.; Ghorpade, U.; Shin, H.H.; Gang, M.G.; Park, S.D.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, D.S.; Kim, J.H. Comparison study of ZnO-based quaternary TCO materials for photovoltaic application. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 793, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, Y.; Yu, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, L.; Li, Y. Review of ZnO-based nanomaterials in gas sensors. Solid State Ion. 2021, 360, 115544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Le, A.T.; Ahmadipour, M.; Pung, S.-Y. A review on ZnO-based piezoelectric nanogenerators: Synthesis, characterization techniques, performance enhancement and applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 844, 156172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tsubota, T.; Ohtaki, M.; Eguchi, K.; Arai, H. Thermoelectric properties of Al-doped ZnO as a promising oxide material for high-temperature thermoelectric conversion. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, X.; Lee, J.; Varshney, V.; Wohlwend, J.L.; Roy, A.K.; Luo, T. Thermal Conductivity of Wurtzite Zinc-Oxide from First-Principles Lattice Dynamics—A Comparative Study with Gallium Nitride. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wu, M.; Sun, D.; Tan, C.; Tian, X.; Huang, Y. Al-Doped ZnO Monolayer as a Promising Transparent Electrode Material: A First-Principles Study. Materials 2017, 10, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jood, P.; Mehta, R.J.; Zhang, Y.; Peleckis, G.; Wang, X.; Siegel, R.W.; Borca-Tasciuc, T.; Dou, S.X.; Ramanath, G. Al-Doped Zinc Oxide Nanocomposites with Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4337–4342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Park, K.; Seong, J.K.; Nahm, S. Improvement of thermoelectric properties with the addition of Sb to ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 455, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Colder, H.; Guilmeau, E.; Harnois, C.; Marinel, S.; Retoux, R.; Savary, E. Preparation of Ni-doped ZnO ceramics for thermoelectric applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 31, 2957–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liang, X. Thermoelectric Transport Properties of Fe-Enriched ZnO with High-Temperature Nanostructure Refinement. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7927–7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ohtaki, M.; Araki, K.; Yamamoto, K. High Thermoelectric Performance of Dually Doped ZnO Ceramics. J. Electron. Mater. 2009, 38, 1234–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Acharya, S.; Yu, B.-K.; Hwang, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, W. High Thermoelectric Performance of ZnO by Coherent Phonon Scattering and Optimized Charge Transport. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2105008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Biswas, S.; Singh, S.; Singh, S.; Chattopadhyay, S.; De Silva, K.K.H.; Yoshimura, M.; Mitra, J.; Kamble, V.B. Selective Enhancement in Phonon Scattering Leads to a High Thermoelectric Figure-of-Merit in Graphene Oxide-Encapsulated ZnO Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 23771–23786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, Z.-F.; Ren, G.-K.; Tan, X.; Liu, R.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Nan, C.-W. Enhancing the thermoelectric performance of ZnO epitaxial films by Ga doping and thermal tuning. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 24128–24135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shimizu, S.; Bahramy, M.S.; Iizuka, T.; Ono, S.; Miwa, K.; Tokura, Y.; Iwasa, Y. Enhanced thermopower in ZnO two-dimensional electron gas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6438–6443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hutson, A.R. Piezoelectric Scattering and Phonon Drag in ZnO and CdS. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 2287–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bérardan, D.; Byl, C.; Dragoe, N. Influence of the Preparation Conditions on the Thermoelectric Properties of Al-Doped ZnO. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 2352–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Le, T.N.H.; Hou, F.; Vo, T.T.X.; Pham, Q.N.; Berardan, D.; Dragoe, N. Preparation and study of thermoelectric properties of fine grains GdxZn1−xO. Phys. Status Solidi A 2013, 210, 2693–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Tang, W. Extracting the effective mass of electrons in transparent conductive oxide thin films using Seebeck coefficient. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 212103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Okhay, O.; Zlotnik, S.; Xie, W.; Orlinski, K.; Hortiguela Gallo, M.J.; Otero-Irurueta, G.; Fernandes, A.J.S.; Pawlak, D.A.; Weidenkaff, A.; Tkach, A. Thermoelectric performance of Nb-doped SrTiO3 enhanced by reduced graphene oxide and Sr deficiency cooperation. Carbon 2019, 143, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shi, X.-L.; Wu, H.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, W.; Lu, S.; Shao, Z.; Dargusch, M.; Chen, Z.-G. SrTiO3-based thermoelectrics: Progress and challenges. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Acharya, M.; Jana, S.S.; Ranjan, M.; Maiti, T. High performance (ZT > 1) n-type oxide thermoelectric composites from earth abundant materials. Nano Energy 2021, 84, 105905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Y.; Feng, B.; Hayashi, H.; Tohei, T.; Tanaka, I.; Ikuhara, Y.; Ohta, H. Thermoelectric phase diagram of the SrTiO3–SrNbO3 solid solution system. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 185102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, Y.; Sugo, K.; Cho, H.J.; Ohta, H. Thermoelectric phase diagram of the SrTiO3-LaTiO3 solid-solution system through a metal to Mott insulator transition. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 075104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Y.; Cho, H.J.; Sugo, K.; Mikami, M.; Woo, S.; Jung, M.C.; Zhuang, Y.H.; Feng, B.; Sheu, Y.M.; Shin, W.; et al. Low thermal conductivity of SrTiO3−LaTiO3 and SrTiO3−SrNbO3 thermoelectric oxide solid solutions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 4075–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hicks, L.D.; Dresselhaus, M.S. Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 12727–12731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ohta, H.; Kim, S.; Mune, Y.; Mizoguchi, T.; Nomura, K.; Ohta, S.; Nomura, T.; Nakanishi, Y.; Ikuhara, Y.; Hirano, M.; et al. Giant thermoelectric Seebeck coefficient of a two-dimensional electron gas in SrTiO3. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hung, N.T.; Hasdeo, E.H.; Nugraha, A.R.T.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Saito, R. Quantum effects in the thermoelectric power factor of low-dimensional semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 036602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Feng, B.; Hayashi, H.; Chang, C.-P.; Sheu, Y.-M.; Tanaka, I.; Ikuhara, Y.; Ohta, H. Double thermoelectric power factor of a 2D electron system. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Banerjee, R.; Chatterjee, S.; Ranjan, M.; Bhattacharya, T.; Mukherjee, S.; Jana, S.S.; Dwivedi, A.; Maiti, T. High-Entropy Perovskites: An Emergent Class of Oxide Thermoelectrics with Ultralow Thermal Conductivity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17022–17032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zheng, Y.; Zou, M.; Zhang, W.; Yi, D.; Lan, J.; Nan, C.-W.; Lin, Y.-H. Electrical and thermal transport behaviours of high-entropy perovskite thermoelectric oxides. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Koshibae, W.; Tsutsui, K.; Maekawa, S. Thermopower in cobalt oxides. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 6869–6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tang, G.D.; Xu, F.; Zhang, D.W.; Wang, Z.H. Improving the spin entropy by suppressing Co4+ concentration in thermoelectric Ca3Co4O9+δ. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 1341–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Koshibae, W.; Maekawa, S. Effects of spin and orbital degeneracy on the thermopower of strongly correlated systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 236603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Y.; Rogado, N.S.; Cava, R.J.; Ong, N.P. Spin entropy as the likely source of enhanced thermopower in NaxCo2O4. Nature 2003, 423, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Roca, A.G.; Mele, P.; Kijima-Aoki, H.; Fantechi, E.; Vejpravova, J.K.; Kalbac, M.; Kaneko, S.; Endo, T. Surfaces and Interfaces of Metal Oxide Thin Films, Multilayers, Nanoparticles and Nano-composites: In Memory of Prof. Dr. Hanns-Ulrich Habermeier; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sales, B.C.; Jin, R.; Affholter, K.A.; Khalifah, P.; Veith, G.M.; Mandrus, D. Magnetic, thermodynamic, and transport characterization of Na0.75CoO2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 174419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cho, H.J.; Takashima, Y.; Nezu, Y.; Onozato, T.; Ohta, H. Anisotropic Heat Conduction in Ion-Substituted Layered Cobalt Oxides. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 1901816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Huang, R.; Mizoguchi, T.; Sugiura, K.; Ohta, H.; Koumoto, K.; Hirayama, T.; Ikuhara, Y. Direct observations of Ca ordering in Ca0.33CoO2 thin films with different superstructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 181907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of thermoelectric generators. (a) Thermoelectric power generation process based on the Seebeck effect, which was discovered by Thomas Johann Seebeck (1770–1831). Using a temperature gradient applied along the thermoelectric P-N junction, charge carriers inside the materials are driven from the hot side to the cold side, resulting in a current flow (I) through the circuit. (b) Power generation efficiency (η), as a function of the temperature of heat source (Th), in the thermoelectric generators with different average ZT values (ZTavg). The efficiency values for several heat engines currently being used are plotted for comparison. Reproduced with permission [7].
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of thermoelectric generators. (a) Thermoelectric power generation process based on the Seebeck effect, which was discovered by Thomas Johann Seebeck (1770–1831). Using a temperature gradient applied along the thermoelectric P-N junction, charge carriers inside the materials are driven from the hot side to the cold side, resulting in a current flow (I) through the circuit. (b) Power generation efficiency (η), as a function of the temperature of heat source (Th), in the thermoelectric generators with different average ZT values (ZTavg). The efficiency values for several heat engines currently being used are plotted for comparison. Reproduced with permission [7].
Molecules 28 05894 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustrations of (a) crystal structure and (b) electronic band structure of ZnO bulk materials. The pure ZnO exerts a wurtzite structure with a direct band gap of 3.3–3.5 eV [52].
Figure 2. Schematic illustrations of (a) crystal structure and (b) electronic band structure of ZnO bulk materials. The pure ZnO exerts a wurtzite structure with a direct band gap of 3.3–3.5 eV [52].
Molecules 28 05894 g002
Figure 3. Thermoelectric properties of Al–Ga-co-doped ZnO. (a) Power factor. (b) Thermal conductivity. (c) ZT values. Reproduced with permission [57].
Figure 3. Thermoelectric properties of Al–Ga-co-doped ZnO. (a) Power factor. (b) Thermal conductivity. (c) ZT values. Reproduced with permission [57].
Molecules 28 05894 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustrating the synthesizing steps of ZnO-coated Zn1−xAlxO samples demonstrating the high ZT values compared to previously reported Al-doped ZnO. Reproduced with permission [58].
Figure 4. Schematic illustrating the synthesizing steps of ZnO-coated Zn1−xAlxO samples demonstrating the high ZT values compared to previously reported Al-doped ZnO. Reproduced with permission [58].
Molecules 28 05894 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of (a) formation of the RGO-encapsulated Al-doped ZnO composites (RGO–AZO). (b) Scattering and transport mechanisms in a densified ZnO–RGO composite across grain boundaries. (c) Scattering of phonons and electrons in bulk samples. Reproduced with permission [59].
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of (a) formation of the RGO-encapsulated Al-doped ZnO composites (RGO–AZO). (b) Scattering and transport mechanisms in a densified ZnO–RGO composite across grain boundaries. (c) Scattering of phonons and electrons in bulk samples. Reproduced with permission [59].
Molecules 28 05894 g005
Figure 6. Two-dimensional electron gas accumulated at the surface of ZnO boosts the thermoelectric performance. (a) Schematic structure of ZnO-based ion-gated transistor. (b) Carrier concentration (n) dependence on Seebeck coefficient (S) at 200 K. The values of |S| in the ion-gated ZnO were larger than in bulk ZnO [62,63,64,65]. (c) Carrier concentration dependence of thermoelectric power factor (S2σ). The ion-gated ZnO showed larger values than the bulk ZnO, as expected from the enhanced S. Reproduced with permission [61].
Figure 6. Two-dimensional electron gas accumulated at the surface of ZnO boosts the thermoelectric performance. (a) Schematic structure of ZnO-based ion-gated transistor. (b) Carrier concentration (n) dependence on Seebeck coefficient (S) at 200 K. The values of |S| in the ion-gated ZnO were larger than in bulk ZnO [62,63,64,65]. (c) Carrier concentration dependence of thermoelectric power factor (S2σ). The ion-gated ZnO showed larger values than the bulk ZnO, as expected from the enhanced S. Reproduced with permission [61].
Molecules 28 05894 g006
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the SrTiO3 lattice structure and doping mechanism.
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the SrTiO3 lattice structure and doping mechanism.
Molecules 28 05894 g007
Figure 8. Carrier concentration (n) dependence of power factor (PF) thermal conductivity (κ), and ZT value at room temperature in Sr1−xLaxTiO3. Solid lines are guides to the eye and the dashed line represents the electronic thermal conductivity (κel), estimated by the Wiedemann–Franz law. Reproduced with permission [42].
Figure 8. Carrier concentration (n) dependence of power factor (PF) thermal conductivity (κ), and ZT value at room temperature in Sr1−xLaxTiO3. Solid lines are guides to the eye and the dashed line represents the electronic thermal conductivity (κel), estimated by the Wiedemann–Franz law. Reproduced with permission [42].
Molecules 28 05894 g008
Figure 9. Schematic representation of processing bulk SrTi0.85Nb0.15O3 matrix (STN) oxide composites with graphite inclusions (a) and temperature-dependent ZT values for sintered STN + x wt% graphite composites (0 ≤ x ≤ 3) (b). Reproduced with permission [68].
Figure 9. Schematic representation of processing bulk SrTi0.85Nb0.15O3 matrix (STN) oxide composites with graphite inclusions (a) and temperature-dependent ZT values for sintered STN + x wt% graphite composites (0 ≤ x ≤ 3) (b). Reproduced with permission [68].
Molecules 28 05894 g009
Figure 10. Power factor (PF), thermal conductivity (κ), and ZT values for SrTiO3–LaTiO3. (a) and SrTiO3–SrNbO3 (b) solid solutions. La3+ and Nb3+ substitutions result in a similar power factor behavior and a rather different tendency in thermal conductivity due to the different lattice distortions. The ZT value of SrTiO3-based epitaxial films reached 0.11 at room temperature. The solid line is a guide for eyes. The dotted lines are the values of bulk single crystals. Reproduced with permission [43,71].
Figure 10. Power factor (PF), thermal conductivity (κ), and ZT values for SrTiO3–LaTiO3. (a) and SrTiO3–SrNbO3 (b) solid solutions. La3+ and Nb3+ substitutions result in a similar power factor behavior and a rather different tendency in thermal conductivity due to the different lattice distortions. The ZT value of SrTiO3-based epitaxial films reached 0.11 at room temperature. The solid line is a guide for eyes. The dotted lines are the values of bulk single crystals. Reproduced with permission [43,71].
Molecules 28 05894 g010
Figure 11. Enhancing thermopower through the two-dimensional electron system (2DES). (a) Schematic illustration of the 2DES enhanced thermopower mechanism while holding a good transport property. (b) Room temperature thermopower versus quantum well thickness in the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3|SrTiO3 superlattice. An obvious boost in thermopower can be observed when the thickness of the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3 quantum well is smaller than 1.56 nm (four-unit cells of SrTiO3). (c) Carrier concentration-dependent ZT values at room temperature. The ZT value of the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3 quantum well reaches ~2.4. Reproduced with permission [73].
Figure 11. Enhancing thermopower through the two-dimensional electron system (2DES). (a) Schematic illustration of the 2DES enhanced thermopower mechanism while holding a good transport property. (b) Room temperature thermopower versus quantum well thickness in the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3|SrTiO3 superlattice. An obvious boost in thermopower can be observed when the thickness of the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3 quantum well is smaller than 1.56 nm (four-unit cells of SrTiO3). (c) Carrier concentration-dependent ZT values at room temperature. The ZT value of the SrTi0.8Nb0.2O3 quantum well reaches ~2.4. Reproduced with permission [73].
Molecules 28 05894 g011
Figure 12. Longer de Broglie wavelength creates a larger enhancement in thermoelectric performance. (a) Enhancement factors in thermopower (S2DES/SBulk) for three sets of [N uc SrTi1−xNbxO3|11 uc SrTiO3]10 2DESs. For x = 0.2 and 0.3 2DESs, the highest S2DES/SBulk values are obtained at N = 1, which are 4 and 5, respectively, while that of x = 0.8 can reach 10. (b) Double enhancement of power factor (PF) is seen when x = 0.6 (5.1 mW m−1 K−2 at n~8 × 1020 cm−3). Reproduced with permission [75].
Figure 12. Longer de Broglie wavelength creates a larger enhancement in thermoelectric performance. (a) Enhancement factors in thermopower (S2DES/SBulk) for three sets of [N uc SrTi1−xNbxO3|11 uc SrTiO3]10 2DESs. For x = 0.2 and 0.3 2DESs, the highest S2DES/SBulk values are obtained at N = 1, which are 4 and 5, respectively, while that of x = 0.8 can reach 10. (b) Double enhancement of power factor (PF) is seen when x = 0.6 (5.1 mW m−1 K−2 at n~8 × 1020 cm−3). Reproduced with permission [75].
Molecules 28 05894 g012
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of the layered cobaltite crystal structure (AxCoO2 (Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33)).
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of the layered cobaltite crystal structure (AxCoO2 (Ax = Na0.75, Ca0.33, Sr0.33, Ba0.33)).
Molecules 28 05894 g013
Figure 14. Reduction in thermal conductivity through heavy ion substitution at the AxCoO2 A-site. (a) Schematic phonon propagation of AxCoO2. Heavy ions (sumo wrestler) display a stronger thermal conductivity suppression effect than light ions (baby). (b) Anisotropic thermal conductivities of AxCoO2. As the mass of A-site ions increases, the in-plane thermal conductivity (κ||) and cross-plane thermal conductivity (κ) decrease in tendency. Reproduced with permission [84].
Figure 14. Reduction in thermal conductivity through heavy ion substitution at the AxCoO2 A-site. (a) Schematic phonon propagation of AxCoO2. Heavy ions (sumo wrestler) display a stronger thermal conductivity suppression effect than light ions (baby). (b) Anisotropic thermal conductivities of AxCoO2. As the mass of A-site ions increases, the in-plane thermal conductivity (κ||) and cross-plane thermal conductivity (κ) decrease in tendency. Reproduced with permission [84].
Molecules 28 05894 g014
Figure 15. Thermoelectric properties of AxCoO2 epitaxial films at room temperature. (a) Power factor, (b) thermal conductivity, and (c) ZT values. The thermal conductivity decreases with A-site ion mass, while the power factor stays constant. The ZT value of Ba0.33CoO2 epitaxial film is ~0.11. Reproduced with permission [40].
Figure 15. Thermoelectric properties of AxCoO2 epitaxial films at room temperature. (a) Power factor, (b) thermal conductivity, and (c) ZT values. The thermal conductivity decreases with A-site ion mass, while the power factor stays constant. The ZT value of Ba0.33CoO2 epitaxial film is ~0.11. Reproduced with permission [40].
Molecules 28 05894 g015
Figure 16. Thermal stability and thermoelectric properties of AxCoO2 (Ax = Na3/4, Ca1/3, Sr1/3, and Ba1/3) epitaxial films. (a) Resistivity was measured at room temperature after annealing at high temperatures for 0.5 h in air. (b) Temperature-dependent ZT values compared among the four AxCoO2 (A = Na3/4, Ca1/3, Sr1/3, and Ba1/3) films and (c) against commercially available p-type thermoelectric materials. Reproduced with permission [41].
Figure 16. Thermal stability and thermoelectric properties of AxCoO2 (Ax = Na3/4, Ca1/3, Sr1/3, and Ba1/3) epitaxial films. (a) Resistivity was measured at room temperature after annealing at high temperatures for 0.5 h in air. (b) Temperature-dependent ZT values compared among the four AxCoO2 (A = Na3/4, Ca1/3, Sr1/3, and Ba1/3) films and (c) against commercially available p-type thermoelectric materials. Reproduced with permission [41].
Molecules 28 05894 g016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Zhi, J.; Li, W.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y. Oxide Materials for Thermoelectric Conversion. Molecules 2023, 28, 5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155894

AMA Style

Liu Y, Zhi J, Li W, Yang Q, Zhang L, Zhang Y. Oxide Materials for Thermoelectric Conversion. Molecules. 2023; 28(15):5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155894

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yucen, Jun Zhi, Wannuo Li, Qian Yang, Long Zhang, and Yuqiao Zhang. 2023. "Oxide Materials for Thermoelectric Conversion" Molecules 28, no. 15: 5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155894

APA Style

Liu, Y., Zhi, J., Li, W., Yang, Q., Zhang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Oxide Materials for Thermoelectric Conversion. Molecules, 28(15), 5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155894

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop