Next Article in Journal
Nanocomposites Based on Spin-Crossover Nanoparticles and Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods: A Nonlinear Optical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Multilayer, Broadband Infrared Reflectors Based on the Photoinduced Preparation of Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancement of Inhibitory Activity by Combining Allosteric Inhibitors Putatively Binding to Different Allosteric Sites on Cathepsin K
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Columnar Liquid Crystals of Copper(I) Complexes with Ionic Conductivity and Solid State Emission

Department of Inorganic and Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Catalysis, University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Bld., Sector 5, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
National Institute of Materials Physics, Atomistilor 405A, 077125 Magurele, Romania
Department of Physics, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Spl. Independentei, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov Str., 050094 Bucharest, Romania
Asociația Independent Research, 58 Timișului, Sector 1, 012416 Bucharest, Romania
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bucharest, 91-95 Spl. Independentei, 050095 Bucharest, Romania
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(10), 4196;
Original submission received: 27 April 2023 / Revised: 16 May 2023 / Accepted: 17 May 2023 / Published: 19 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Liquid Crystals II)


Two neutral copper(I) halide complexes ([Cu(BTU)2X], X = Cl, Br) were prepared by the reduction of the corresponding copper(II) halides (chloride or bromide) with a benzoylthiourea (BTU, N-(3,4-diheptyloxybenzoyl)-N′-(4-heptadecafluorooctylphenyl)thiourea) ligand in ethanol. The two copper(I) complexes show a very interesting combination of 2D supramolecular structures, liquid crystalline, emission, and 1D ionic conduction properties. Their chemical structure was ascribed based on ESI–MS, elemental analysis, IR, and NMR spectroscopies (1H and 13C), while the mesomorphic behavior was analyzed through a combination of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarizing optical microscopy (POM), and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). These new copper(I) complexes have mesomorphic properties and exhibit a hexagonal columnar mesophase over a large temperature range, more than 100 K, as evidenced by DSC studies and POM observations. The thermogravimetric analysis (TG) indicated a very good thermal stability of these samples up to the isotropization temperatures and over the whole temperature range of the liquid crystalline phase existence. Both complexes displayed a solid-state emission with quantum yields up to 8% at ambient temperature. The electrical properties of the new metallomesogens were investigated by variable temperature dielectric spectroscopy over the entire temperature range of the liquid crystalline phase. It was found that the liquid crystal phases favoured anhydrous proton conduction provided by the hydrogen-bonding networks formed by the NH…X moieties (X = halide or oxygen) of the benzoylthiourea ligand in the copper(I) complexes. A proton conductivity of 2.97 × 10−7 S·cm−1 was achieved at 430 K for the chloro-complex and 1.37 × 10−6 S·cm−1 at 440K for the related bromo-complex.

1. Introduction

Over the last few years, we have seen an increase in the development and manufacture of materials for emission applications (OLEDs, luminescence-based sensors, etc.). In this respect, the search for new emitting materials have led to low-cost copper(I) complexes, which can show exceptional luminescent properties, including thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) and high emission efficiencies of nearly 100%, by using both singlet and triplet excitons, despite small spin-orbit coupling [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Copper represents a cheaper alternative to that offered by platinum or iridium (commonly used in practical lighting applications) due to its higher natural abundance (27 ppm) as well as lower production costs. Most of the luminescent copper(I) complexes developed so far are based on heteroleptic tetracoordinate cationic copper(I) with phosphine ligands and diimine nitrogen-containing ligands [9,10]. Moreover, most of the reports on copper(I) complexes with sulfur donor ligands are limited to their structural aspects and their biological properties, while studies regarding their photochemical properties are scarce [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Unlike the cationic analogues, the photophysical properties of mononuclear neutral copper(I) compounds have not been well investigated. Current research indicates that the development of neutral copper(I) complexes is crucial for achieving high phosphorescent radiative rates from these materials and thus for the realization of highly-efficient emission-based devices [19,20,21]. On the other hand, luminescent liquid crystalline compounds (LC) provide anisotropic long-range order and thus polarized emission that should improve the performance parameters of electro-optical devices. Although the copper(I) ion can give complexes with low coordination numbers (2–4) suitable for the stabilization of LC phases, metallomesogens (liquid crystals based on metal complexes) composed of copper(I) complexes are quite rare, unlike other d10 metals. The LCs based on copper(I) complexes reported so far are limited to several classes of ligands related to alkylthiolates [22], isocyanides [23,24,25,26,27], biquinoline [28], phenantrolines, azamacrocycles, or Schiff bases derived from 2-iminopyridines [29,30], giving either mono- or dinuclear two- or tetra-coordinate complexes [31]. The cyclic trinuclear copper(I) complexes with pyrazolate type ligands show interesting emission properties and highest absolute quantum yields (42%) [32,33]. Several other structural types, including the ionic columnar metallomesogens formed by three-coordinate copper(I) complexes with bis(1-pyrazolyl)ethyl ether ligands reported by Lin et al [34]., the first example of a three-coordinate copper(I) metallomesogen, have been proposed.
In this work, we report a new class of neutral copper(I) halide complexes (chloride or bromide) with benzoylthiourea (BTU) ligands that combine, in a successfully appealing manner, the 2D supramolecular structures and the liquid crystalline, emission, and 1D ionic conduction properties [35]. This is the first example of anhydrous proton conduction evidenced for a discotic liquid crystal based on a copper(I) metallomesogen provided by the hydrogen-bonding networks formed by NH…X moieties (X = halide or oxygen) of the acylthiourea ligand. Nitrogen-based heterocycles are regarded as some of the best candidates for anhydrous proton conduction due to the formation of inter- and intramolecular hydrogen-bonding. Liquid crystals, both pure organic or Pd(II) and Pt(II) metallomesogens, based on related motifs (benzimidazole [36,37], triazole [38], or pyrazole [39]) have been investigated recently. Importantly, the complex nanosegregated organization of columnar liquid crystals can provide 1D nanochannels for ionic transport, in particular proton conduction with a wide range of attractive applications in proton exchange membranes (PEM) [40] or other electro-optical and energy-related devices [41,42,43].

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Synthesis and Structural Characterization

The synthetic pathway used to prepare the benzoylthiourea ligand 1 (BTU) and its two copper halide complexes, Cu2a and Cu2b, is depicted in Scheme 1.
The novel benzoylthiourea ligand has, at one side, two heptyloxy chains and, at the other side, a perfluorooctyl group; it was prepared by treating the 3,4-diheptyloxybenzoic acid with thionyl chloride in freshly distilled dichloromethane to give the corresponding acyl chloride. Without any further purification, the acid chloride was treated with potassium thiocyanate in dry acetone to provide the isothiocyanate intermediate that was reacted with 4-perflourooctyloxyaniline to yield the benzoylthiourea compound as a white crystalline solid. The synthetic protocol is based on the methods already described in the literature [44,45,46]. The reaction between metal salts and these versatile N-acylthiourea derivatives provides a variety of metal complexes, including both homoleptic and heteroleptic complexes. These ligands can act as a bidentate ligand in the monoanionic form through the O and S atoms or as a monodentate ligand via the thione S atom in the neutral form [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59].
It is well documented that the complex redox reaction of N-acylthiourea derivatives and copper(II) salts produce mono-, di-, or polynuclear species with halide or S-thioureato-bridges in which the copper(II) ion is reduced to copper(I). The geometry around the copper(I) could be either plan-trigonal for three-coordinate species or tetrahedral for tetra-coordinate species, proving the versatility of these organic compounds and the coordination flexibility of the copper(I) ion [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. For example, there is a growing number of reported three-coordinate copper(I) complexes with acylthiourea ligands in which the planar trigonal geometry with a typical butterfly-like structure is stabilized by hydrogen bonding involving the halide ligand, the carbonyl, and the NH groups [67,68,69,70,71]. The same stereochemistry was seen for organosulfur-copper(I) complexes with S-coordinated thiosemicarbazone [72] or thione [73]. These three-coordinate copper(I) complexes have two molecules of acylthiourea ligands, coordinated through the thiocarbonyl sulfur atom and one halide ion, yielding an approximately overall planar shape which, in principle, could easily lead to columnar stacking in the liquid crystal phases [74]. However, dimerization with a sulfur-bridged thiourea ligand can occur, yielding dinuclear tetracoordinated copper(I) complexes [60]. In our case, the results of the elemental analysis gave the CuL2X stoichiometry (L = N-benzoylthiourea ligand). We sought additional support for the nuclearity of the copper(I) complexes from mass spectrometry. Indeed, the electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) patterns of the two complexes are similar and show the highest m/z values at 1867.59 for Cu2a and 1867.54 for Cu2b, assigned to [Cu+2L]+ (calc. 1867.41) and at 901.39 for [L−H]+ (calc. 901.23) (Figure S10, Supplementary Materials).
The molecular structure of the two copper(I) complexes were further confirmed based on the elemental analysis results, IR, UV–VIS, and NMR spectroscopy data. The coordination through the C=O groups is ruled out as the position and intensity of the corresponding stretching frequency located at 1678 cm−1 in the IR spectrum of free ligand 1 are essentially unchanged, found at 1674 cm−1, in the IR spectra of the copper(I) complexes Cu2a and Cu2b (Figure 1a). The coordination of the copper(I) ion to the sulfur atom of the C=S group is confirmed by the absence in the IR spectra of complexes [71] of the medium intense band assigned to vC=S + νC-N, located at 1330 cm−1 in the IR spectrum of uncoordinated ligand 1, and by the shift to higher wavenumbers, from 1145 cm−1 for 1 to 1152cm−1 for Cu2a and Cu2b of the νC-N frequency. In addition, the apparently decrease in νC=O frequencies for the ligand and the two copper(I) complexes, compared with the ordinary carbonyl absorption (1700 cm−1), could be indicative of the possible formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonding with the N–H groups [75].
The 1H and 13C-NMR spectra of copper(I) complexes, recorded in CDCl3 solvent, support the coordination of the benzoylthiourea ligand to the copper(I) ion. The signals assigned to the two NH singlets are significantly downfield shifted as a consequence of the coordination of the ligand to the copper(I) metal center. A more pronounced shift was observed for the signal assigned to the NH group located between the carbonyl and thiocarbonyl groups of the BTU ligand that is supposed to be involved in the hydrogen bonding with the halide ions (Figure 1b).

2.2. Characterization of Liquid Crystalline Properties

2.2.1. DSC and POM Studies

The mesomorphic behaviours of the ligand and the two copper(I) complexes were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarizing optical microscopy (POM), while the mesophase type was assigned based on powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies. The thermal stability of the new compounds was investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TG). The resulting thermal parameters are presented in Table 1.
In the first heating run, the DSC thermogram of the ligand shows only one thermal event corresponding to the melting process, from a crystalline phase straight to the isotropic state. However, during the cooling run, the two exothermic peaks indicate two different transitions: at a higher temperature, the isotropic to liquid crystal phase transition, followed by a second one, at 365 K, corresponding to the crystallization process (Figure 2). These two transitions are reproducible at further heating–cooling cycles. The POM observations suggested that the monotropic liquid crystalline phase of the ligand could easily be assigned to an SmA phase based on the characteristic fan shape texture accompanied by the homeotropic regions (Figure 2). The related N-acyl thiourea compounds functionalized with terminal alkoxy groups on both sides display interesting liquid crystals properties, where the position and length of the alkyl chains have a significant impact on the mesophase type (either nematic or smectic A and C phases) and the corresponding thermal range. The previous studies on related partially fluorinated N-acyl thiourea compounds indicated a similar mesomorphic behavior, with an increased stability of lamellar phases and higher transition temperatures, a typical feature of liquid crystals possessing semi- or perfluoro-alkylated chains [76,77], explained by the incompatibility between the aliphatic and perfluoro-alkylated chains, as well as the rigidity of the latter [28,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
The thermal behaviors of the two copper(I) complexes are very different in the first heating run. The DSC thermogram of the chloro-complex Cu2a shows a glass transition at 318 K followed by a clearing transition at 430 K during the first heating run (Figure 3a). On the contrary, the bromo-complex Cu2b is a crystalline solid that, during the first heating run, displays one phase transition between two different crystalline states at 363 K, and the melting to liquid crystal phase at 412 K, followed by the isotropization process at 441 K (Figure 3b). The clearing temperatures are related to the size of the halide ion and, obviously, the clearing temperature of the bromo-complex is slightly higher than the one of the chloro-complex, as expected. The DSC thermograms of both copper(I) complexes show that, on cooling the isotropic liquid, a strong phase transition to the liquid crystal phase occurs, as indicated by the birefringent texture observed by POM. Further cooling did not indicate any crystallization transformations and only a glass transition could be detected at 318 K for Cu2a and 313 K for Cu2b (temperature recorded at half inflexion point). The following heating–cooling cycles displayed the same two-phase transitions, one corresponding to the isotropic to Colh phase and the glass transition in the same interval found in the first cooling run, meaning that the two copper(I) complexes remain in glassy states at an ambient temperature.
The POM observations support this behavior as the texture developed from the isotropic state remains virtually the same after cooling to room temperature when the compounds solidify as a glass (Figure 4).

2.2.2. Thermal Decomposition

The thermal stability of the BTU ligand and the new copper(I) complexes was checked by thermogravimetric analysis. The samples were heated in a nitrogen flow with a heating rate of 10 K.min−1 in the 298–823 K temperature range. The TG curves are shown in Figure 5.
There is no weight loss recorded in the 300–400 K thermal range of the TG curves, confirming that the copper(I) complexes do not have crystallization water or other solvent molecules. The comparison of the amount of the solid residue, estimated from the TG curves shown in Figure 5 (found to be 7.59% for the chloro-complex Cu2a and 9.77% for the bromo-complex Cu2b), with the calculated value for Cu2S (4.17% for Cu2a and 4.08% for Cu2b) or for CuX (5.20% for Cu2a and 7.36% for Cu2b), and metallic copper (3.34% for Cu2a and 3.26% for Cu2b) denotes that the decomposition of these compounds at 825 K is almost completed and the residue is predominantly formed by CuX. The decomposition at high temperatures (above 1100 K) in the nitrogen atmosphere of the copper(I) complexes with sulfur containing ligands can lead to residues consisting of Cu2S, CuX, Cu, or a mixture of these products, as shown by XRD investigations [86,87]. Both copper(I) complexes showed an improved thermal stability in comparison with the uncoordinated ligand 1, with higher decomposition temperatures, 458 K for Cu2a and 460 K for Cu2b, respectively (Figure 5), that can be accounted to the intramolecular hydrogen bonding involving Cu-X…H-N interactions [88]. The relatively high decomposition temperatures recorded for the two copper(I) complexes have made accessible the variable-temperature XRD measurements that can be used to confirm the nature of the mesophase.

2.2.3. X-ray Diffraction Investigation

In order to avoid the partial decomposition of the copper(I) complexes during the XRD measurements, the samples were cast on a glass slide as dichloromethane solutions and heated with 10K.min−1 to the temperature of the mesophase existence, but below isotropization temperatures. The XRD diffractograms of Cu2a and Cu2b recorded at 388K are presented in Figure 6. Clear typical patterns that are characteristic of a hexagonal packing were measured for both complexes. On cooling the samples from the isotropic phase down to the mesomorphic domain, the diffractograms of Cu2a and Cu2b displayed a strong diffraction peak from the (100) reflection, followed by a series of four weaker sharp peaks with a d-spacing ratio of d/ 3 , d/ 4 , d/ 7 , and d/ 9 , attributed to (110), (200), (210), and (300) reflections, respectively, as depicted in Figure 6 and Figure S13 (Supplementary Materials). The XRD data are indicated in Table 2. In addition to these reflections, another broad and asymmetric peak was observed in the wide-angle region (20–25 degree) in the XRD patterns of the two copper(I) complexes; this could be assigned to the combined lateral interactions of the alkyl chains and π–π stacking interactions. As a consequence of the coordination of the N-acylthiourea ligand to the metal center, the fluorophobic effect was reduced, thus preventing the segregation of the fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon chains. The XRD diffractograms of the two copper(I) complexes did not have any broad signal around 5.5 Å that could be assigned to the lateral interactions of the fluorocarbon chains [89,90].
From the two-dimensional hexagonal parameters (d100) calculated as 24.94 Å for Cu2a and 25.52 Å for Cu2b, the distance between the neighbouring columns were evaluated as 28.80 Å for Cu2a and 29.48 Å for Cu2b. These two hexagonal lattice parameters are very similar for the two copper(I) complexes, providing the conclusion of an identical packing model in the mesophase. In order to propose a self-assembled packing model, the number of molecules (N) within a volume fraction of thickness h of a column can be calculated with the following relation: hS = NVmol, where S is the columnar cross-section, h is the stacking periodicity along the columns of the hexagonal lattice, and Vmol is the molecular volume. The Vmol can be estimated with the formula Vmol = M/ρ·0.6022, where M is the molecular weight and ρ is the density and can be approximated as 1g·cm−3. These relationships give N values of 0.82 and 0.84 for Cu2a and Cu2b, respectively, when h = 3.6 Å (the typical distance for π–π interactions), but 1.02 and 1.04, respectively, when h = 4.5 Å. The stacking distance of 4.5 Å points to the formation of a similar molecular arrangement for the two copper(I) complexes where one molecule is found in the slice of the columns.

2.3. UV–VIS and Emission Properties

The photophysical properties of copper(I) complexes have been investigated both in solution and in a solid state at an ambient temperature and the results are summarized in Table 3 [91,92].
The absorption spectra of copper(I) complexes in dichloromethane (Figure 7a) display one highly intense absorption band at ~315 nm with a shoulder at ~290 nm (ε = 34,400–54,900 M−1 cm−1) that was assigned to the π–π* ligand-centred (LC) transition of the coordinated BTU ligand, based on a similarity with the absorption spectrum of the uncoordinated ligand. This absorption band is slightly red-shifted compared with their position in the electronic spectrum of the free ligand as a consequence of the rigidity of the molecule, resulting from the coordination of the N-acylthiourea compound to the metal center. No additional distinct absorption bands have been detected in the electronic spectra of these two complexes but the long tail of the absorption at ~350 nm could be attributed to the characteristic metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) and intraligand charge transfer (ILCT) transitions specific to the copper(I) complexes [93,94].
The ligand and the two copper complexes were almost non-emissive in dichloromethane solution. In addition, the emission of the ligand was not detected in a solid state. The solid-state emission spectra recorded at room temperature for the copper(I) complexes Cu2a and Cu2b are shown in Figure 7b. The emission spectra in a solid state of the two copper(I) complexes are similar and show one maxima at λmax around 545 nm with a shoulder around 580 nm when the samples are irradiated with λexc = 365 nm; the color impression analysis for the green–yellow luminescence indicated that x = 0.42 and y = 0.58 (Figure 8b). The green–yellow emission was also visually detected by the optical microscope when the samples were irradiated in the 320–360 nm region (Figure 8a). The photoluminescence at 545 nm and the corresponding excitation peaks above 300 nm (located at 350 and 450 nm) were due to the electronic transitions of the copper(I) complexes’ excited state 3MLCT (low energy LE emission) [95]. By heating the two complexes, the photoluminescence intensity was dramatically reduced upon heating from the crystalline state to the mesophase due to the inherent aggregation–caused quenching (ACQ) effect often seen in common luminescent metallomesogens [96]. The highest quantum yield was measured for Cu2b and its value of 8% is comparable to other copper(I) complexes with related acyl-thiourea ligands [16].

2.4. Dielectric Spectroscopy

2.4.1. Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity temperature dependencies, σ = σ T , for the two copper(I) complexes, Cu2a and Cu2b, recorded for a fixed frequency, f = 10 Hz, are presented in Figure 9.
While the values of the electrical conductivity recorded for the bromo-complex Cu2b are slightly higher in comparison with the values recorded for the chloro-complex Cu2a, over almost the entire temperature range, the electrical conductivity temperature variation of the two complexes has some similarities. Firstly, it is important to remark on the very large variation of conductivity with temperature, from 10−12−1 to 10−6−1, which is seven orders of magnitude (Table 4).
Then, the growth rate has a “tortuous” variation, up to the temperature 428 K. The electrical conductivity of Cu2a presents a jump (a sudden variation) when the temperature rises from 428 K to 432 K, which is the temperature range corresponding to the isotropization process. Furthermore, both conductivities show a stagnation on the ranges 432–443 K and 425 K–443 K, respectively, and higher rates at temperatures above T = 443 K, in the isotropic state, were observed (Figure 9). Because of the different conductivity variation rates with temperature, we conclude the presence of several thermally activated conduction mechanisms.
The variation of conductivity with the temperature should be correlated with the conductivity spectra of the two copper complexes presented in Figure 10, which were recorded at different temperatures. As can be seen in Figure 10, the plateau region, where the conductivity is approximately constant as the frequency increases, extends to higher frequencies in the case of higher temperature values. The plateau region can be attributed to the DC conductivity due to the movement of charge carriers by diffusion, and the ascending part to the AC conductivity or/and some dielectric relaxation processes. As a consequence, in the two temperature ranges, the electrical behaviour of the studied complexes has different features: (a) the interval of relatively low temperatures, T = 313–358 K, where the electrical properties are predominantly determined by the dielectric relaxation processes; (b) the interval of relatively high temperatures, 358–453 K, where the electrical properties are predominantly influenced by the electrical conduction.
The important question arises: what type of conduction characterizes these samples? To answer this question, we noticed that the presence of free charge carriers has an effect on the permittivity spectra in the low frequency region. Experimentally, it is known that, for a purely ohmic (electronic) conduction, the dielectric losses have a linear increase with the decrease in frequency, but no contribution to the permittivity value appears. At the same time, the real part of conductivity is constant [97]. On the other hand, in the case of ionic conductivity, it is known that the dielectric losses, but also the dielectric constant, increase with the decrease in frequency. In the sense of increasing the frequency from low to high values, the conductivity first presents a flat region followed by an ascending branch where the conductivity increases proportionally to the frequency at a certain power σ ω s , 0 < s < 1 .
In the present study, the electrical conductivity spectra, represented in a double logarithmic scale, contains a part with an almost constant value, in the region of low and medium frequencies, continued with a proportional increase with log (ω), at higher frequencies; the slope of the line has a sub-unit value (Figure 10). The flat region of the conductivity extends to the higher frequencies as the temperature increases. In the limit f 0 ( ω 0 ), the DC value of electrical conductivity is obtained, σ D C [97,98]. To analyze these spectra, Joncher proposes the following equation regarding the real part of electrical conductivity, σ ω = Re σ * ω = σ D C + σ A C ω , where the alternative current component of the conductivity, σ A C ω A ω s , complies with a power law in relation to frequency [98], called the ‘universal dielectric response’. It should be noted that a wide variety of homogeneous or heterogeneous samples with a disordered structure, in solid, liquid, or composite states, show the same kind of dependence of electrical conductivity depending on frequency. Electrical relaxation measurements are commonly used to characterize the dynamics of ionic transport in ionically conducting materials.
The experimental data were fitted with a simple, three-parameter expression for the “universal dielectric response”, as follows [99,100]:
σ ω = σ D C 1 + ω / ω p N
where the exponent N has a subunitary value, 0 N < 1 . Typically, for the ionic conduction, N has values in the range 0.6 < N < 0.9. The characteristic frequency (studied in terms of angular valocity), ω p , is the frequency from which the alternative current conduction begins to activate, σ A C = σ D C or σ ω p = 2 σ D C . Equation (1) allows the establishment of a correlation between the relaxation (dispersion) of macroscopic electrical conduction and the microscopic movement of ions in materials with ion conduction. DC electrical conductivity, σ D C , and the characteristic frequency, ωp, are related by the Barton–Nakajima–Namikawa (BNN) equation [101], σ D C = ε 0 ε r , ω p , where ε r , = lim ω ε r ω is the relative permittivity in the ω limit. All parameters are temperature dependent: σ D C T , ω p T , N T . The temperature dependence of the exponent N provides information about the mechanism involved in the AC electrical conductivity. In most situations, DC electrical conduction complies with the Arrhenius law, but there are also exceptions when temperature dependence complies with the empirical law of Vogel–Fulcher–Tamman.
The frequency (pulsation), ω p T , depends on the temperature in a similar way, as does the DC conductivity, σ D C , which supports the BNB equation [101].
The variation of the exponent, N, with temperature depends on the materials. Thus, for some types of samples, N decreases with temperature [102], while for others, N increases with temperature [102,103], or it can display a non-monotonous variation, presenting a maximum [104]. By performing the fitting of the experimental conductivity spectra with Equation (3), the calculated values of the N parameter were found to be between 0.610 and 0.915 for Cu2a, and between 0.536 and 0.862 for Cu2b, reinforcing the assignment of the ionic conduction [99]. Additionally, for both complexes, N shows a tendency to increase with temperature.
For the two copper(I) complexes, the charge carriers are highly mobile ions (e.g., protons, or other small ions). Based on these arguments and considering that the copper(I) complexes have no other possible diffusible ions, the measured electrical conductivity can be assigned to proton conductivity. The hydrogen-bonding networks formed in the copper(I) complexes provide continuous pathways for 1D proton conduction based on the proton transfer in the N-H…X moieties (X = halide or oxygen) of the acylthiourea ligand. It is easily observed that the liquid crystal phases favored anhydrous proton conduction in these copper(I) complexes and a proton conductivity of 2.97 × 10−7−1 was achieved at 430K for Cu2a and 1.37 × 10−6 for Cu2b−1 at 440K (Table 4). For example, similar maximum values of the proton conductivity, in the 10−5–10−9−1 range, were reported for palladium(II) complexes with pyridyl or isoquinoline-functionalized pyrazolate ligands in the temperature range of the existence of columnar mesophase [39].

2.4.2. Dielectric Properties

The ionic conduction mechanism assigned, based on the variation of electrical conductivity as a function of temperature and frequency, is also supported by the dielectric properties of the two copper(I) complexes. The temperature variation curves of the dielectric constant are presented in Figure 11a and the variation of dielectric loss as a function of temperature, for both copper(I) compounds, at a constant frequency of f = 10 Hz, are presented in Figure 11b.
A similar trend in the variation rate was observed in the case of the dielectric constant and dielectric loss (Figure 11), as found for the electrical conductivity (Figure 9) in the high temperatures domain, over 420 K, where a slight stagnation followed by a faster growth was measured. However, it is worth mentioning here that both the dielectric constant and the dielectric losses have high and very high values up to 5 10 04 and 1 10 06 , respectively, which supports the conclusion of the existence of an important electrical conductivity, characteristic of these copper(I) complexes.
In order to highlight the specific mechanisms of electrical conductivity and those of dielectric relaxation, the Cole–Cole representation was chosen: dielectric losses as a function of dielectric constant, ε = ε ε , in a double logarithmic scale, log ε = f log ε .
The overviews of the dielectric losses versus the dielectric constant for the two copper complexes at different temperatures, presented in Figure S11 (Supplementary Materials), show the whole range of values for the two components of the dielectric permittivity. In order to be able to get further insights, the ranges of values were narrowed, and these enlarged regions are depicted in Figure 12.
At 313 K (solid black squares), an incomplete semicircle is observed, indicating a single dielectric relaxation process, which was assigned to the “alpha” relaxation process. This semicircle shows a pronounced deformation due to the use of the logarithmic scale. At 368 K (solid green squares), two incomplete semicircles were evidenced. The small one corresponds to the dielectric “alpha” relaxation process while the big one corresponds to a dielectric relaxation at a lower frequency, assigned to the “beta” relaxation process. The latter semicircle is extended by an ascending line. Importantly, the rising branch, on the right side of the figure, can be ascribed to the electrical conductivity [97,98]. Finally, at 448.15 K (solid red squares), the “alpha” relaxation process is no longer visible as the “beta” relaxation process predominates. Similar to the results recorded at 368 K, the ascending branch is naturally attributed to electrical conductivity. An important increase, by a few orders of magnitude, of the dielectric constant and of the dielectric losses at low frequencies was evidenced. For temperatures higher than 348 K, the “intensity” of the dielectric relaxation process is artificially amplified by the logarithmic scale used. On a linear scale, these processes would not have been observed. Therefore, the electrical conductivity is the main mechanism that manifests itself at medium and high temperatures. Moreover, the movement of the charge carriers under the effect of the sinusoidal electric field also has a great effect on the values of losses and on the values of the dielectric constant (as can be seen on the rising part of the curve on the right side, Figure 12).

3. Conclusions

New three-coordinate copper(I) complexes with a combination of emission properties in a solid state, 1D ionic conduction properties, and liquid crystalline properties on a long thermal range, from 313 up to 440 K, are reported. The mesophase thermal range can be controlled by the exchange of the halide ion coordinated to a metal center. The complexes lack emission in air-equilibrated solution and in the hexagonal columnar phase at elevated temperatures but show luminescence quantum yields up to 8% in a crystalline state. Considering the very high values of the dielectric constant and of the dielectric losses, up to 5 × 104 and 1 × 106, respectively, the existence of an important electrical conductivity has been attributed to the anhydrous proton conduction supported by the hexagonal columnar organization at higher temperatures of the copper(I) complexes and provided by the hydrogen-bonding networks formed by NH…X moieties (X = halide or oxygen) of the N-acylthiourea ligand. The highest value of proton conductivity, 2.97 × 10−7−1, was achieved at 430K for Cu2a and 1.37 × 10−6−1 for Cu2b S·cm−1 at 440 K.
The design of these copper(I) complexes represents a totally new approach to the feasible preparation of luminescent liquid crystals showing anhydrous proton conduction that opens the way for the development of such materials by grafting different mesogenic groups on related N-acylthiourea neutral ligands.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Characterization Methods

The chemicals employed in this study were used without further purification as received from the suppliers. The elemental analyses were performed with EuroEA 3300 instrument. The purity of the new compounds was checked by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectroscopy using a Bruker spectrometer operating at 500 MHz and CDCl3 as solvent. 1H chemical shifts were referenced to the solvent peak position, δ 7.26 ppm. Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured at room temperature from 4000 to 400 cm1 on a Bruker spectrophotometer in KBr discs and the UV–VIS spectra were recorded in dichloromethane solution on a Jasco V650 spectrophotometer. For electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) analysis, approximately 10 mg of each complex was dissolved in a mixture of dichloromethane and methanol (8:2) and directly injected into a Velos Pro ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 5 μL/min running in ESI + Full MS mode, Spray Voltage: 3 kV, Capillary Temperature: 375 °C, m/z ranges from 100 to 2000 and 1000 to 2000.
The optical textures of the benzoylthiourea ligand and its two copper(I) complexes were observed by polarizing optical light microscopy (POM) using a Nikon 50iPol microscope equipped with a Linkam THMS600 hot stage and TMS94 control processor. The samples were sandwiched between two untreated glass slides. The DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) experiments were carried out with a Diamond DSC Perkin Elmer instrument at 10°/min scanning rate after being encapsulated in aluminium pans. At least two heating/cooling cycles were performed for each sample. Thermogravimetric analyses for all samples were performed on a TA Q50 TGA instrument using alumina crucibles and nitrogen as purging gas. The samples were heated with 10 °C min−1 rate from room temperature to 550 °C.
The nature of the mesophase was analysed by X-ray diffraction technique. The powder X-ray diffraction measurements were made on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) in parallel beam setting, with a monochromatized Cu–Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), a scintillation detector, and a horizontal sample stage. The measurements were performed in symmetric (θ–θ) geometry in the 2θ range from 1.5° to 30° in steps of 0.02°, with measuring times per step in the 5–40 s range. The temperature control of the samples during measurements was achieved by adapting a home-made heating stage to the sample stage of the diffractometer.
The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded at room temperature in solid state and the samples deposited on a glass slide, with an OceanOptics QE65PRO spectrometer attached to the polarizing optical microscope and using a Nikon Intensilight excitation source or a LED light source (LLS-LED, OceanOptics, λ = 365 nm). The photoluminescence, excitation spectra, and photoluminescence decay curves were recorded at room temperature by using a FluoroMax 4P spectrophotometer; for the quantum efficiency, we have used the Quanta–Phi accessory.
The dielectric spectroscopy (DS) measurements were performed using a Broadband Dielectric Spectrometer, Novocontrol, consisting of the Alpha-A High Performance Frequency Analyzer in the LF domain 0.1–10 MHz equipped with WinDETA software. The spectra have been registered in the (313–458) K temperature domain. Temperatures were controlled within 0.2 K. Alternative voltage was set to 0.5 V.

4.2. Preparation of N-(4-Perfluorooctylphenylcarbamothioyl)-3,4-Diheptyloxybenzamide (1)

The preparation of the benzoylthiourea (BTU) ligand 1 is based on the method described earlier [45,46,74]. The 3,4-diheptyloxybenzoic acid (6 mmol) was treated with an excess of thionyl chloride (25 mmol) in freshly distilled dichloromethane (30 mL) for 3 h and heating under reflux. After this period, the excess of thionyl chloride and the solvent were removed under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator. The corresponding acid chloride was not purified further and it was used as isolated in the next step. Dry acetone (10 mL) was poured over the acid chloride followed by the dropwise addition of a solution of ammonium thiocyanate (6 mmol) in acetone (15 mL), under nitrogen. The resulting mixture was heated under reflux for a period of 30 min. Addition of the NH4SCN solution produced a cloudy white precipitate. Further, the mixture was cooled down to room temperature, after which a solution of p-perfluoroctylaniline (5.6 mmol) in acetone (15 mL) was added dropwise for a period of 30 min. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h and then it was poured in 100 mL of deionized water. The precipitate was filtered off and washed several times with water and ethanol and then recrystallized two times from a mixture of dichloromethane/ethanol to yield a white crystalline solid.
Compound 1. White crystalline solid. Yield: 78%. Anal. Calcd. For C36H39F17N2O3S (%): C, 47.89; H. 4.32; N, 3.10; Found (%): C, 48.52; H, 4.41; N, 3.44.
1H-NMR (500 MHz, ppm, CDCl3) δ 13.00 (s, 1H), 9.03 (s, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 4H), 1.92–1.80 (m, 4H), 1.54–1.44 (m, 4H), 1.43–1.26 (m, 12H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H).
13C-NMR (125 MHz, ppm, CDCl3) δ 178.39(s), 166.64(s), 154.31(s), 149.47(s), 141.09(s), 127.67(t, 3JC-F = 6.5Hz), 126.52(t, 2JC-F = 24.5Hz), 123.23(s), 122.98(s), 120.97(s), 112.52(s), 112.07(s), 69.51(s), 69.22(s), 31.79(s), 31.77(s), 29.13(s), 29.05(s), 29.01(s), 28.99(s), 25.94(s), 25.90(s), 22.60(s), 22.58(s), 14.08(s), 14.07(s).
IR (KBr, cm−1) 3266 (νNH), 2961, 2930, 2859 (νC-H), 1678 (νC=O); 1509 (νC-N), 1330 (νC=S+ νC-N), 1276 (νAr-O) 1249 (νC-N), 1145 (νC-N).

4.3. Preparation of Copper(I) Complexes (Cu2a and Cu2b)

The corresponding BTU ligand (1 mmol) was dissolved in hot ethanol (10 mL). Separately, a solution of the corresponding halide copper(II) salt (CuX2, X = Cl, or Br, 0.5 mmol) in hot ethanol (5 mL) was prepared. The two solutions were slowly mixed together over a period of 10 min. The reaction mixture was stirred and heated under reflux for 1.5 h when a green–yellow precipitate was formed in each case. The resulting precipitate was filtered off while the mixture was hot and then washed several times with ethanol and dried in vacuum. The yields were calculated based on copper salts.
Compound Cu2a. Yellow-green solid. Yield: 78%. Anal. Calcd. For C72H78F34N4O6S2CuCl (%): C, 45.41; H, 4.13; N, 2.94; Found (%): C, 44.57; H, 4.61; N, 3.14.
1H NMR (500 MHz, ppm, CDCl3) δ 13.34 (s, 1H), 11.04 (s, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.75–7.58 (m, 5H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.04 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.89–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.80–1.71 (m, 2H), 1.52–1.20 (m, 16H), 0.95–0.84 (m, J = 15.7, 7.0 Hz, 6H).
13C NMR (126 MHz, ppm, CDCl3) δ 179.23(s), 168.99(s), 154.60(s), 148.95(s), 139.94(s), 127.86(m, 2JC-F = 24.5, 3JC-F = 6.5Hz), 125.36(s), 123.88(s), 122.24(s), 113.43(s), 111.72(s), 69.49(s), 69.06(s), 31.93(s), 31.81(s), 31.79(s), 29.70(s), 29.67(s), 29.37(s), 29.18(s), 29.11(s), 29.07(s), 25.98(s), 25.94(s), 22.62(s), 22.60(s), 14.09(s), 14.07(s).
IR (KBr, cm−1) 3274 (νNH), 2960, 2932, 2859 (νC-H), 1674 (νC=O); 1512(νC-N), 1275 (νAr-O) 1244 (νC-N), 1152 (νC-N).
Compound Cu2b. Yellow-green solid. Yield: 97%. Anal. Calcd. For C72H78F34N4O6S2CuBr (%): C, 44.37; H, 4.03; N, 2.87; Found (%): C, 44.45; H, 3.48; N, 3.04.
1H NMR (500 MHz, ppm, CDCl3) δ 13.29 (s, 1H), 10.61 (s, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (m, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.55 (m, 3H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.99 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.93–1.68 (m, 4H), 1.50–1.16 (m, 16H), 0.98-0.78 (m, J = 15.2, 7.0 Hz, 6H).
13C NMR (126 MHz, ppm, CDCl3) δ 178.04(s), 168.65(s), 154.69(s), 148.99(s), 139.79(s),127.84(m, 2JC-F = 24.5, 3JC-F = 6.5Hz), 125.15(s), 123.89(s), 121.93(s), 113.26(s), 111.69(s), 69.54(s), 69.04(s), 31.80(s), 31.77(s), 29.70(s), 29.19(s), 29.11(s), 29.05(s), 29.02(s), 25.99(s), 25.92(s), 22.60(s), 22.58(s), 14.06(s), 14.04(s).
IR (KBr, cm−1) 3271 (νNH), 2960, 2931, 2860 (νC-H), 1674 (νC=O); 1506(νC-N), 1276 (νAr-O) 1244 (νC-N), 1152 (νC-N).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at:, Figure S1: IR spectrum of compound 1; Figure S2. IR spectrum of compound Cu2a; Figure S3: IR spectrum of compound Cu2b; Figure S4. 1H-NMR spectrum of ligand 1; Figure S5: 13C-NMR spectrum of ligand 1; Figure S6: 1H-NMR spectrum of complex Cu2a; Figure S7: 13C-NMR spectrum of complex Cu2a; Figure S8: 1H-NMR spectrum of complex Cu2b; Figure S9: 13C-NMR spectrum of complex Cu2b; Figure S10: Mass spectrometry identification of [Cu+2L]+ and [L-H]+ ions of Cu2a (A) and Cu2b (B) corresponding to calculated m/z; Figure S11: DC conductivity (natural logarithm) versus 1000/T and the linear fitting function for Cu2b; Figure S12: Overviews: dielectric losses versus dielectric constant for the coppper(I) complexes at different temperatures (T1 = 313.15 K, T2 = 368.15 K and T3 = 448 K): Cu2a (a) and Cu2b (b); Figure S13: Powder XRD pattern for complex Cu2a (a) and Cu2b (b) in the hexagonal columnar mesophase (Colh) at 388 K recorded on heating; Figure S14. Photoluminescence decay profiles for Cu1a (a) and Cu2b (b) represented in the log scale, showing the two exponential decays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.C.; Methodology, C.P.G., D.M.-M. and I.P.; Validation, V.C., C.P.G., D.M.-M., G.C.M., R.G.P. and I.P.; Formal analysis, M.S. and I.P.; Investigation, M.S., G.C.M. and R.G.P.; Writing—original draft, D.M.-M.; Writing—review & editing, V.C.; Supervision, V.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This work has been partially funded by the project C1.2.PFE_CDI.2021-587/contract no.41PFE/30.12.2021. C.P.G, M.S., and I.P acknowledge the financial support of the Romanian Ministry of Research Innovation and Digitisation (MCI) through the project PC3-PN23080303.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.


  1. Ravaro, L.P.; Zanoni, K.P.; de Camargo, A.S. Luminescent Copper(I) complexes as promising materials for the next generation of energy-saving OLED devices. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bergmann, L.; Hedley, G.J.; Baumann, T.; Bräse, S.; Samuel, I.D.W. Direct observation of intersystem crossing in a thermally activated delayed fluorescence copper complex in the solid state. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1500889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bergmann, L. New Emitters for OLEDs: The Coordination- and Photo-Chemistry of Mononuclear Neutral Copper(I) Complexes; Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2016; ISBN 978-3-8325-4183-5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Housecroft, C.E.; Constable, E.C. TADF: Enabling luminescent copper(i) coordination compounds for light-emitting electrochemical cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 4456–4482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Au, V.K.-M. Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Luminescent Self-Assembled Materials of Copper(I). Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 18982–18999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, X.-W.; He, L.-H.; Ju, P.; Chen, J.-L.; Liu, S.-J.; Wen, H.-R. Mechanochromic luminescent materials of bimetallic Cu(i) complexes showing thermally activated delayed fluorescence. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 16160–16167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Czerwieniec, R.; Leitl, M.J.; Homeier, H.H.; Yersin, H. Cu(I) complexes—Thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Photophysical approach and material design. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 325, 2–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; Yin, G.; Wu, M.; Du, C.; Zhang, B. Three-coordinated mononuclear Cu(I) complexes with crystallization-enhanced thermally activated delayed fluorescence characteristics. Polyhedron 2022, 218, 115761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mara, M.W.; Fransted, K.A.; Chen, L.X. Interplays of excited state structures and dynamics in copper(I) diimine complexes: Implications and perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 282–283, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Schulz, M.; Wächtler, M.; Karnahl, M.; Dietzek, B. Heteroleptic diimine–diphosphine Cu(I) complexes as an alternative towards noble-metal based photosensitizers: Design strategies, photophysical properties and perspective applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 356, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Langer, R.; Yadav, M.; Weinert, B.; Fenske, D.; Fuhr, O. Luminescence in Functionalized Copper Thiolate Clusters—Synthesis and Structural Effects. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 21, 3623–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koutsari, A.; Karasmani, F.; Kapetanaki, E.; Zainuddin, D.I.; Hatzidimitriou, A.G.; Angaridis, P.; Aslanidis, P. Luminescent thione/phosphane mixed-ligand copper(I) complexes: The effect of thione on structural properties. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 458, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Favarin, L.R.; Rosa, P.P.; Pizzuti, L.; Machulek, A.; Caires, A.R.; Bezerra, L.; Pinto, L.; Maia, G.; Gatto, C.C.; Back, D.F.; et al. Synthesis and structural characterization of new heteroleptic copper(I) complexes based on mixed phosphine/thiocarbamoyl-pyrazoline ligands. Polyhedron 2017, 121, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Borges, A.P.; Carneiro, Z.A.; Prado, F.S.; Souza, J.R.; Silva, L.H.F.E.; Oliveira, C.G.; Deflon, V.M.; de Albuquerque, S.; Leite, N.B.; Machado, A.E.; et al. Cu(I) complexes with thiosemicarbazides derived from p-toluenesulfohydrazide: Structural, luminescence and biological studies. Polyhedron 2018, 155, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aslanidis, P.; Cox, P.; Tsaliki, P. Copper(I) halide complexes with 2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphano)-1,1′-binaphthyl (rac-binap) and heterocyclic thiones. Racemic compounds in chiral and achiral crystal space groups. Polyhedron 2008, 27, 3029–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tudor, C.A.; Iliş, M.; Secu, M.; Ferbinteanu, M.; Cîrcu, V. Luminescent heteroleptic copper(I) complexes with phosphine and N-benzoyl thiourea ligands: Synthesis, structure and emission properties. Polyhedron 2022, 211, 115542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Troyano, J.; Perles, J.; Amo-Ochoa, P.; Martínez, J.I.; Gimeno, M.C.; Fernández-Moreira, V.; Zamora, F.; Delgado, S. Luminescent Thermochromism of 2D Coordination Polymers Based on Copper(I) Halides with 4-Hydroxythiophenol. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 18027–18035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Troyano, J.; Castillo, Ó.; Amo-Ochoa, P.; Martínez, J.I.; Zamora, F.; Delgado, S. Reversible transformation between Cu(I)-thiophenolate coordination polymers displaying luminescence and electrical properties. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 3232–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Y.; Lemaur, V.; Beltrán, J.I.; Cornil, J.; Huang, J.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.; Fröhlich, R.; Wang, H.; Jiang, L.; et al. Neutral Mononuclear Copper(I) Complexes: Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Photophysical Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 5845–5852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bergmann, L.; Friedrichs, J.; Mydlak, M.; Baumann, T.; Nieger, M.; Bräse, S. Outstanding luminescence from neutral copper(i) complexes with pyridyl-tetrazolate and phosphine ligands. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6501–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chan, K.; Cheng, S.; Lo, L.T.; Yiu, S.; Ko, C. Luminescent Charge-Neutral Copper(I) Phenanthroline Complexes with Isocyanoborate Ligand. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Espinet, P.; Lequerica, M.C.; Álvarez, J.M.M. Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Mesogenic Behavior of Copper(I)n-Alkylthiolates. Chem. A Eur. J. 1999, 5, 1982–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Benouazzane, M.; Coco, S.; Espinet, P.; Barberá, J. Supramolecular Organization in Copper(I) Isocyanide Complexes: Copper(I) Liquid Crystals from a Simple Molecular Structure. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 1740–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benouazzane, M.; Coco, S.; Espinet, P.; Barberá, J. Binuclear Mesogenic Copper(I) Isocyanide Complexes with an Unusual Inorganic Core Formed by Two Tetrahedra Sharing an Edge. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 5754–5759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Coco, S.; Cordovilla, C.; Donnio, B.; Espinet, P.; García-Casas, M.J.; Guillon, D. Self-Organization of Dendritic Supermolecules, Based on Isocyanide–Gold(I), –Copper(I), –Palladium(II), and –Platinum(II) Complexes, into Micellar Cubic Mesophases. Chem. A Eur. J. 2008, 14, 3544–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dembinski, R.; Espinet, P.; Lentijo, S.; Markowicz, M.W.; Martín-Alvarez, J.M.; Rheingold, A.L.; Schmidt, D.J.; Sniady, A. Fluorophobic Effect in Metallomesogens—The Synthesis and Mesomorphism of Ag, Au, Cu, Fe, Pd, and Pt Fluorous Isocyanide Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chico, R.; de Domingo, E.; Domínguez, C.; Donnio, B.; Heinrich, B.; Termine, R.; Golemme, A.; Coco, S.; Espinet, P. High One-Dimensional Charge Mobility in Semiconducting Columnar Mesophases of Isocyano-Triphenylene Metal Complexes. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7587–7595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cretu, C.; Andelescu, A.A.; Candreva, A.; Crispini, A.; Szerb, E.I.; La Deda, M. Bisubstituted-biquinoline Cu(I) complexes: Synthesis, mesomorphism and photophysical studies in solution and condensed states. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 10073–10082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Douce, L.; El-Ghayoury, A.; Ziessel, R.; Skoulios, A. Columnar mesophases from tetrahedral copper(I) cores and Schiff-base derived polycatenar ligands. Chem. Commun. 1999, 20, 2033–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El-Ghayoury, A.; Douce, L.; Skoulios, A.; Ziessel, R. Cation-Induced Macroscopic Ordering of Non-Mesomorphic Modules—A New Application for Metallohelicates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2205–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alkali, M.; Cîrcu, V. Perspectives on the Structural Design and Luminescent Behavior of Liquid Crystalline Materials Based on Copper(I) Complexes. Chemistry 2023, 5, 646–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giménez, R.; Crespo, O.; Diosdado, B.; Elduque, A. Liquid crystalline copper(i) complexes with bright room temperature phosphorescence. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 6552–6557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kishimura, A.; Yamashita, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Aida, T. Rewritable phosphorescent paper by the control of competing kinetic and thermodynamic self-assembling events. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lin, H.-D.; Lai, C.K. Ionic columnar metallomesogens formed by three-coordinated copper(I) complexes. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2001, 16, 2383–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sergeyev, S.; Pisula, W.; Geerts, Y.H. Discotic liquid crystals: A new generation of organic semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1902–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tan, S.; Wei, B.; Liang, T.; Yang, X.; Wu, Y. Anhydrous proton conduction in liquid crystals containing benzimidazole moieties. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 34038–34042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, B.; Tan, S.; Liang, T.; Cao, S.; Wu, Y. Synthesis, structural and electrochemical characterization of benzimidazole compounds exhibiting a smectic C liquid crystal phase. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1133, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Basak, D.; Christensen, S.; Surampudi, S.K.; Versek, C.; Toscano, D.T.; Tuominen, M.T.; Hayward, R.C.; Venkataraman, D. Proton conduction in discotic mesogens. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5566–5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cuerva, C.; Campo, J.A.; Cano, M.; Schmidt, R. Nanostructured discotic Pd(ii) metallomesogens as one-dimensional proton conductors. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peighambardoust, S.; Rowshanzamir, S.; Amjadi, M. Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 9349–9384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kato, T.; Yoshio, M.; Ichikawa, T.; Soberats, B.; Ohno, H.; Funahashi, M. Transport of ions and electrons in nanostructured liquid crystals. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gu, J.; Luo, J.; Yang, J.; Tan, S.; Wang, C.; Wu, Y. Anhydrous proton conduction in protic ionic liquid crystals formed by 1-alkyl-3H-imidazolium hydrogen sulfates. Ionics 2022, 28, 2293–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chai, S.; Xu, F.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Zhai, L.; Li, X.; Qian, H.-J.; Wu, L.; Li, H. Hybrid Liquid-Crystalline Electrolytes with High-Temperature-Stable Channels for Anhydrous Proton Conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 21433–21442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Iliş, M.; Bucos, M.; Dumitraşcu, F.; Cîrcu, V. Mesomorphic behaviour of N-benzoyl-N′-aryl thioureas liquid crystalline compounds. J. Mol. Struct. 2011, 987, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Iliş, M.; Micutz, M.; Pasuk, I.; Staicu, T.; Cîrcu, V. Synthesis and liquid crystalline properties of novel fluorinated N-benzoyl thiourea compounds. Effect of perfluoroalkyl chains on the thermal behavior and smectic phases stability. J. Fluor. Chem. 2017, 204, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Staicu, T.; Iliş, M.; Cîrcu, V.; Micutz, M. Influence of hydrocarbon moieties of partially fluorinated N -benzoyl thiourea compounds on their gelation properties. A detailed rheological study of complex viscoelastic behavior of decanol/N -benzoyl thiourea mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 255, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duan, X.-H.; Su, B.-Q.; Xian, L.; Sheng, L.; Tan, R. Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Fluorescent Property of Cis-bis[N,N-diethyl-N′-(p-nitrobenzoyl)thiourea-kS,O] Platinum(II) Complex. J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cîrcu, V.; Mocanu, A.S.; Roşu, C.; Manaila-Maximean, D.; Dumitraşcu, F. Thermal behaviour and electro-optical properties of a series of liquid crystals based on palladium complexes with mixed ligands Schiff bases and N-benzoyl thioureas. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 107, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mühl, P.; Gloe, K.; Dietze, F.; Hoyer, E.; Beyer, L. N-Acyl-thioharnstoffe—Effektive Extraktionsmittel für die Flüssig-Flüssig-Extraktion von Metallionen. Z. Chem. 1986, 26, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Iliş, M.; Micutz, M.; Dumitraşcu, F.; Pasuk, I.; Molard, Y.; Roisnel, T.; Cîrcu, V. Enhancement of smectic C mesophase stability by using branched alkyl chains in the auxiliary ligands of luminescent Pt(II) and Pd(II) complexes. Polyhedron 2014, 69, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Molter, A.; Kathrein, S.; Kircher, B.; Mohr, F. Anti-tumour active gold(I), palladium(II) and ruthenium(II) complexes with thio- and selenoureato ligands: A comparative study. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 5055–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yeşilkaynak, T. 2-Chloro-N-((5-chloropyridine-2-yl)carbamothioyl)benzamide and its Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) metal complexes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2016, 124, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Keskin, E.; Solmaz, U.; Gumus, I.; Arslan, H. Di- and tetra-nuclear oxorhenium(V) complexes of benzoylthiourea derivative ligands: Synthesis, structural characterization, and catalytic applications. Polyhedron 2022, 219, 115786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sternberg, M.; Rust, J.; Lehmann, C.W.; Mohr, F. Synthesis and Metal Complexes of Thiourea Ligands Containing Carbohydrate-Derived Substituents. Helv. Chim. Acta 2013, 96, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nkabyo, H.A.; Luckay, R.C.; Koch, K.R. Photo-isomerization of palladium(II) N,N-di-substituted acylthioureas: The role of free ligands and formation of mixed-ligand complexes. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 119, 108035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kuchar, J.; Rust, J.; Lehmann, C.W.; Mohr, F. Copper(I) Complexes with Anionic Acylthio- or Acylselenourea Ligands and N-Heterocyclic Carbenes or Phosphanes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 5215–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Roşu, C.; Manaila-Maximean, D.; Circu, V.; Molard, Y.; Roisnel, T. Differential negative resistance in the current–voltage characteristics of a new palladium(II) metallomesogen. Liq. Cryst. 2011, 38, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ilis, M.; Batalu, D.; Pasuk, I.; Cîrcu, V. Cyclometalated palladium(II) metallomesogens with Schiff bases and N -benzoyl thiourea derivatives as co-ligands. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 233, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nkabyo, H.A.; Barnard, I.; Koch, K.R.; Luckay, R.C. Recent advances in the coordination and supramolecular chemistry of monopodal and bipodal acylthiourea-based ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 427, 213588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, X.-Y.; Zhu, C.-B.; Li, H.-P.; Yang, Y.; Roesky, H.W. Synthesis and Characterization of Copper(I) Halide Complexes withN-(2, 6-Diisopropylphenyl)-N′-benzoylthiourea: Monomeric, Dimeric, and Cage Structures. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 1614–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, D.; Wu, S.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Roesky, H.W. Synthesis and Characterization of Copper Complexes with the N -(2,6-Diisopropylphenyl)- N′-acylthiourea Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 1406–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, G.; Che, D.-J.; Li, Z.-F.; Zhu, Y.; Zou, D.-P. Versatile coordination patterns in the reaction system of N-benzoyl-N′-(2-pyridyl)thiourea with CuCl2. Their reaction conditions, systematic isolation and crystal structures. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 1629–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Singh, D.P.; Pratap, S.; Pandey, S.K.; Butcher, R.J.; Marverti, G. N-(naphthyl)-N′-(methoxy carbonyl)thiocarbamide and its Cu(I) complex: Synthesis, spectroscopic, X-ray, DFT and in vitro cytotoxicity study. J. Coord. Chem. 2015, 68, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xian, L.; Wei, T.-B.; Zhang, Y.-M. Synthesis and crystal structure of bis(N-o-methylphenyl-N′-ethoxycarbonylthiourea) copper(I) chloride. J. Coord. Chem. 2004, 57, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Peng, L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Li, H.; Yang, Y. Synthesis and Characterization of Copper(I) Halide Complexes Prepared with Bipodal Diacylthioureas. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2020, 2521–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hou, X.; Wang, F.; Han, L.; Pan, X.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Roesky, H.W. Self-Assembly of Discrete Copper(I)-Halide Complexes with Diacylthioureas. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2018, 644, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pandey, S.K.; Pratap, S.; Pokharia, S.; Mishra, H.; Marverti, G.; Kaur, M.; Jasinski, J.P. Copper (I) complexes based on novel N, N′-disubstituted thiocarbamides: Synthesis, spectroscopic, in vitro cytotoxicity, DNA damage and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2019, 491, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pandey, S.K.; Singh, D.P.; Pratap, S.; Marverti, G.; Butcher, R. Copper(I) complexes of N-(2/4 methoxy/2-chloro-4-nitro)phenyl-N′ (methoxycarbonyl)thiocarbamides as potential anticancer agents: Synthesis, crystal structure, in vitro cytotoxicity and DNA damage studies. Polyhedron 2019, 170, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pandey, S.K.; Singh, D.P.; Marverti, G.; Butcher, R.J.; Pratap, S. Monodentate Coordination of N, N′-Disubstituted Thiocarbamide Ligands: Syntheses, Structural Analyses, In Vitro Cytotoxicity and DNA Damage Studies of Cu(I) Complexes. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 3675–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. ElHusseiny, A.F.; Eldissouky, A.; Al-Hamza, A.M.; Hassan, H.H. Structure–property relationship studies of copper(I) complexes of nanosized hypodentate ligands and evaluation of their antitumor and antimicrobial activities. J. Coord. Chem. 2015, 68, 241–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yuan, Y.F.; Wang, J.T.; Gimeno, M.; Laguna, A.; Jones, P.G. Synthesis and characterisation of copper complexes with N-ferrocenoyl-N′-aryl(alkyl)thioureas. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 324, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Krishna, P.M.; Reddy, K.H. Synthesis, single crystal structure and DNA cleavage studies on first 4N-ethyl substituted three coordinate copper(I) complex of thiosemicarbazone. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 4185–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Beheshti, A.; Nozarian, K.; Mousavifard, E.S.; Abrahams, C.T.; Mayer, P.; Gajda, R.; Woźniak, K.; Motamedi, H. Design and construction of the imidazole-2-thione-based copper(I) complexes by varying the co-anion and synthesis conditions and verifying their antimicrobial activity. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 294, 121874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Iliş, M.; Cîrcu, V. Discotic Liquid Crystals Based on Cu(I) Complexes with Benzoylthiourea Derivatives Containing a Perfluoroalkyl Chain. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Weiqun, Z.; Baolong, L.; Liming, Z.; Jiangang, D.; Yong, Z.; Lude, L.; Xujie, Y. Structural and spectral studies on N-(4-chloro)benzoyl-N′-(4-tolyl)thiourea. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 690, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hird, M. Fluorinated liquid crystals—Properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 2070–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Spengler, M.; Dong, R.Y.; Michal, C.A.; Pfletscher, M.; Giese, M. Fluorination of supramolecular liquid crystals—Tuning tool and analytical probe. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 2235–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Marzouk, S.; Khalfallah, A.; Heinrich, B.; Khiari, J.E.; Kriaa, A.; Méry, S. Synthesis and mesomorphic properties of liquid crystals containing a perfluorinated segment via different linkers. J. Fluor. Chem. 2017, 197, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jang, J.Y.; Park, Y.W. Smectic C Mesogens with Terminal Perfluoroalkyl Chains. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2015, 606, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jang, J.Y.; Park, Y.W. Synthesis and structural studies of smectic C mesogens with terminal perfluoroalkyl chains. Liq. Cryst. 2013, 40, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ciastek, S.; Szymańska, K.; Kaszyński, P.; Jasiński, M.; Pociecha, D. Smectic behaviour of methyl 4-alkoxybenzoates with a partially fluorinated alkyl chain. Liq. Cryst. 2018, 45, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bilgin-Eran, B.; Ocak, H.; Tschierske, C.; Baumeister, U. Synthesis and mesomorphism of fluoroalkylated platinum complexes. Liq. Cryst. 2012, 39, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Piccionello, A.P.; Calabrese, A.; Pibiri, I.; Giacalone, V.; Pace, A.; Buscemi, S. Synthesis of Fluorinated Bent-Core Mesogens (BCMs) Containing the 1,2,4-Oxadiazole Ring. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2016, 53, 1935–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Doi, T.; Sakurai, Y.; Tamatani, A.; Takenaka, S.; Kusabayashi, S.; Nishihata, Y.; Terauchi, H. Thermal and X-ray diffraction studies of liquid crystals incorporating a perfluoroalkyl group. J. Mater. Chem. 1991, 1, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ocak, H.; Bilgin-Eran, B.; Tschierske, C.; Baumeister, U.; Pelzl, G. Effect of fluorocarbon chains on the mesomorphic properties of chiral imines and their complexes with copper(II). J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6995–7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Aslanidis, P.; Kyritsis, S.; Lalia-Kantouri, M.; Wicher, B.; Gdaniec, M. Copper(I) halide complexes of 2-thiohydantoin and 5,5-diphenyl-2-thiohydantoin. Polyhedron 2012, 48, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Aslanidis, P.; Gaki, V.; Chrissafis, K.; Lalia-Kantouri, M. Luminescence and thermal behavior by simultaneous TG/DTG–DTA coupled with MS of neutral copper (I) complexes with heterocyclic thiones. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2011, 103, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Brammer, L.; Bruton, E.A.; Sherwood, P. Understanding the Behavior of Halogens as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors. Cryst. Growth Des. 2001, 1, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tschierske, C. Fluorinated liquid crystals: Design of soft nanostructures and increased complexity of self-assembly by perfluorinated segments. Top Curr. Chem. 2012, 318, 1–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hori, K.; Maeda, M.; Yano, M.; Kunugi, M. The effect of fluorination (2): Dependence of alkyl chain length on the crystal structures of mesogenic alkyl 4-[2-(perfluorohexyl)ethoxy]benzoate. Liq. Cryst. 2011, 38, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, S.; Tian, H.; Ren, C.; Yu, J.; Sun, M. Electronic and optical properties of heterostructures based on transition metal dichalcogenides and graphene-like zinc oxide. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, S.; Ukhtary, M.S.; Saito, R. Strain effect on circularly polarized electroluminescence in transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 033340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Takeda, H.; Monma, Y.; Sugiyama, H.; Uekusa, H.; Ishitani, O. Development of Visible-Light Driven Cu(I) Complex Photosensitizers for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Armaroli, N.; Accorsi, G.; Cardinali, F.; Listorti, A. Photochemistry and Photophysics of Coordination Compounds: Copper. Top Curr. Chem. 2007, 280, 69–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cariati, E.; Lucenti, E.; Botta, C.; Giovanella, U.; Marinotto, D.; Righetto, S. Cu(I) hybrid inorganic–organic materials with intriguing stimuli responsive and optoelectronic properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 306, 566–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Binnemans, K. Luminescence of metallomesogens in the liquid crystal state. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kremer, F.; Schonhals, A. (Eds.) Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jonscher, A.K. The ‘universal’ dielectric response. Nature 1977, 267, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dyre, J.C.; Maass, P.; Roling, B.; Sidebottom, D.L. Fundamental questions relating to ion conduction in disordered solids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2009, 72, 046501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Almond, D.; West, A. Impedance and modulus spectroscopy of “real” dispersive conductors. Solid State Ion. 1983, 11, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dyre, J.C. On the mechanism of glass ionic conductivity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1986, 88, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Debbebi, I.S.; Megdiche-Borchani, S.; Cheikhrouhou-Koubaa, W.; Cheikhrouhou, A. Study of complex impedance spectroscopic properties of La0.7−xDyxSr0.3 MnO3 perovskite oxides. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 172201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dhahri, A.; Dhahri, E.; Hlil, E.K. Electrical conductivity and dielectric behaviour of nanocrystalline La0.6Gd0.1Sr0.3Mn0.75Si0.25O3. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 9103–9111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kumar, S.; Pal, J.; Kaur, S.; Malhi, P.S.; Singh, M.; Babu, P.; Singh, A. The structural and magnetic properties, non-Debye relaxation and hopping mechanism in PbxNd1−xFeO3 (where x = 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3) solid solutions. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2019, 7, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the benzoylthiourea ligand BTU (1) and of the copper(I) complexes (Cu2a and Cu2b).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the benzoylthiourea ligand BTU (1) and of the copper(I) complexes (Cu2a and Cu2b).
Molecules 28 04196 sch001
Figure 1. IR spectra (a) and the low field region of the 1H-NMR spectra (b) of the benzoylthiourea ligand 1 and its copper(I) complexes (Cu2a and Cu2b).
Figure 1. IR spectra (a) and the low field region of the 1H-NMR spectra (b) of the benzoylthiourea ligand 1 and its copper(I) complexes (Cu2a and Cu2b).
Molecules 28 04196 g001
Figure 2. First DSC heating–cooling cycle for ligand 1 (inset: the polarized optical micrograph taken at 370 K on cooling from the isotropic liquid).
Figure 2. First DSC heating–cooling cycle for ligand 1 (inset: the polarized optical micrograph taken at 370 K on cooling from the isotropic liquid).
Molecules 28 04196 g002
Figure 3. DSC thermograms of the first and second heating–cooling cycles for complex Cu2a (a) and for complex Cu2b (b) (10 K·min−1).
Figure 3. DSC thermograms of the first and second heating–cooling cycles for complex Cu2a (a) and for complex Cu2b (b) (10 K·min−1).
Molecules 28 04196 g003
Figure 4. POM micrographs for complex Cu2a at 425K (a) and 405K (b); textures of complex Cu2b at 435K (c) and 415K (d).
Figure 4. POM micrographs for complex Cu2a at 425K (a) and 405K (b); textures of complex Cu2b at 435K (c) and 415K (d).
Molecules 28 04196 g004aMolecules 28 04196 g004b
Figure 5. The TG curves for the benzoylthiourea ligand and its copper(I) complexes.
Figure 5. The TG curves for the benzoylthiourea ligand and its copper(I) complexes.
Molecules 28 04196 g005
Figure 6. Powder XRD pattern for complex Cu2a (a) and Cu2b (b) in the hexagonal columnar mesophase (Colh) at 388 K.
Figure 6. Powder XRD pattern for complex Cu2a (a) and Cu2b (b) in the hexagonal columnar mesophase (Colh) at 388 K.
Molecules 28 04196 g006
Figure 7. The UV–VIS spectra recorded in dichloromethane solution of ligand 1 (4 × 10−5 M), and copper (I) complexes Cu2a and Cu2b (2 × 10−5 M) at ambient temperature (a); the excitation and emission spectra of copper(I) complexes Cu2a and Cu2b recorded in solid state at room temperature (b).
Figure 7. The UV–VIS spectra recorded in dichloromethane solution of ligand 1 (4 × 10−5 M), and copper (I) complexes Cu2a and Cu2b (2 × 10−5 M) at ambient temperature (a); the excitation and emission spectra of copper(I) complexes Cu2a and Cu2b recorded in solid state at room temperature (b).
Molecules 28 04196 g007
Figure 8. The optical microscopy images of Cu2b in normal light and under UV irradiation in 320–360 nm region (a) and CIE 1931 (x,y) chromaticity diagram for copper (I) complexes derived from the solid-state emission spectra (b).
Figure 8. The optical microscopy images of Cu2b in normal light and under UV irradiation in 320–360 nm region (a) and CIE 1931 (x,y) chromaticity diagram for copper (I) complexes derived from the solid-state emission spectra (b).
Molecules 28 04196 g008
Figure 9. Variation of the electrical conductivity with temperature for the copper(I) complexes Cu2a (black squares) and Cu2b (red squares), σ = σ T , f = 10 Hz.
Figure 9. Variation of the electrical conductivity with temperature for the copper(I) complexes Cu2a (black squares) and Cu2b (red squares), σ = σ T , f = 10 Hz.
Molecules 28 04196 g009
Figure 10. Conductivity spectra versus frequency for copper(I) complexes recorded at different temperatures (313, 368, and 448 K): Cu2a (open symbols) and Cu2b (solid symbols).
Figure 10. Conductivity spectra versus frequency for copper(I) complexes recorded at different temperatures (313, 368, and 448 K): Cu2a (open symbols) and Cu2b (solid symbols).
Molecules 28 04196 g010
Figure 11. Variation of dielectric constant as a function of temperature (a) and the dielectric loss versus temperature (b), ε′ = ε′ (T), f = 10 Hz.
Figure 11. Variation of dielectric constant as a function of temperature (a) and the dielectric loss versus temperature (b), ε′ = ε′ (T), f = 10 Hz.
Molecules 28 04196 g011
Figure 12. Dielectric losses versus dielectric constant for the two copper(I) complexes at fixed temperatures: T1 = 313 K, T2 = 368 K, and T3 = 448 K: Cu2a (a) and Cu2b (b).
Figure 12. Dielectric losses versus dielectric constant for the two copper(I) complexes at fixed temperatures: T1 = 313 K, T2 = 368 K, and T3 = 448 K: Cu2a (a) and Cu2b (b).
Molecules 28 04196 g012
Table 1. Thermal parameters for the BTU ligand and its copper(I) complexes.
Table 1. Thermal parameters for the BTU ligand and its copper(I) complexes.
CompoundTransitions (T/K, ∆H/kJmol−1) 1,2
1 (BTU)1st: Cr 386 (45.1) Iso 373 (2.1) SmA 365 (33.2) Cr
2nd: Cr 385 (45.0) Iso 373 (2.0) SmA 364 (32.9) Cr
Cu2a1st: g 318 Colh 430 (22.9) Iso 429 (23.0) Colh 318 g
2nd: g 318 Colh 429 (22.8) Iso 428 (23.0) Colh 318 g
Cu2b1st: Cr 363 (7.9) Cr’ 412 (18.0) Colh 441 (16.7) Iso 440 (16.9) Colh 313 g
2nd: g 313 Colh (17.1) 440 Iso 439 (17.2) Colh 313 g
1 The corresponding transition temperatures and enthalpies are given in parenthesis; Cr and Cr-crystalline phases, g—glassy state, Iso—isotropic phase, SmA—smectic A phase, Colh —hexagonal columnar phase; 2 Data recorded in the first and second heating runs.
Table 2. XRD data for copper(I) complexes.
Table 2. XRD data for copper(I) complexes.
exp.(Å)calc. (Å)parameter (Å) a
Cu2aColh38810024.9424.94a = 28.80
Cu2bColh38810025.5225.52a = 29.48
a the Colh lattice parameter a = 2<d100>/ 3 .
Table 3. Absorption data in dichloromethane solution and emission data in solid state for the BTU ligand and copper(I) complexes.
Table 3. Absorption data in dichloromethane solution and emission data in solid state for the BTU ligand and copper(I) complexes.
CompoundAbsorption, λmax/nm (ε × 10−3/M−1 cm−1)Emission
Solid λem/nm (λexc = 365nm)τ/μsΦ (%)
1290 (20.4), 313 (26.4)---
Cu2a291 (45.7), 317 (54.9)545, 580 (sh)11, 1722.5
Cu2b290 (sh, 34.4), 316 (41.4)546, 580 (sh)9, 1768.0
Table 4. Ionic conductivities and activation energies in the solid state (glassy state, 320 K) mesophase (370 and 400 K), and isotropic liquids (450 K) for complexes Cu2a and Cu2b. The calculation of the activation energy EA is presented in SI.
Table 4. Ionic conductivities and activation energies in the solid state (glassy state, 320 K) mesophase (370 and 400 K), and isotropic liquids (450 K) for complexes Cu2a and Cu2b. The calculation of the activation energy EA is presented in SI.
CompoundConductivity (σ/S·cm−1) EA (Mesophase)
GlassMesophase Isotropic
320 K370 K400 K450 K(eV)
Cu2a5.05 × 10−121.32 × 10−91.12 × 10−81.88 × 10−61.2
Cu2b2.64 × 10−121.86 × 10−94.98 × 10−83.03 × 10−61.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cîrcu, V.; Ganea, C.P.; Secu, M.; Manaila-Maximean, D.; Marinescu, G.C.; Popescu, R.G.; Pasuk, I. Columnar Liquid Crystals of Copper(I) Complexes with Ionic Conductivity and Solid State Emission. Molecules 2023, 28, 4196.

AMA Style

Cîrcu V, Ganea CP, Secu M, Manaila-Maximean D, Marinescu GC, Popescu RG, Pasuk I. Columnar Liquid Crystals of Copper(I) Complexes with Ionic Conductivity and Solid State Emission. Molecules. 2023; 28(10):4196.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cîrcu, Viorel, Constantin P. Ganea, Mihail Secu, Doina Manaila-Maximean, George Cătălin Marinescu, Roua Gabriela Popescu, and Iuliana Pasuk. 2023. "Columnar Liquid Crystals of Copper(I) Complexes with Ionic Conductivity and Solid State Emission" Molecules 28, no. 10: 4196.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop