Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Transition-Metal-Doped Nanocatalysts with Antibacterial Capabilities Using a Complementary Green Method
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Molecular Docking Studies of Alkoxy- and Imidazole-Substituted Xanthones as α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules28104181
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of the Nonpolar and Polar Extractable Components of Glanded Cottonseed for Its Valorization

by
Zhongqi He
1,*,
Sunghyun Nam
1,
Shasha Liu
2 and
Qi Zhao
3
1
USDA-ARS, Southern Regional Research Center, 1100 Allen Toussaint Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
2
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
3
Coordinated Instrument Facility, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(10), 4181; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104181
Submission received: 18 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 16 May 2023 / Published: 19 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cottonseed is the second major product of cotton (Gossypium spp.) crops after fiber. Thus, the characterization and valorization of cottonseed are important parts of cotton utilization research. In this work, the nonpolar and polar fractions of glanded (Gd) cottonseed were sequentially extracted by 100% hexane and 80% ethanol aqueous solutions and subjected to 13C and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS), respectively. The nonpolar (crude oil) extracts showed the characteristic NMR peak features of edible plant oils with the absence of ω-3 linolenic acid. Quantitative analysis revealed the percentage of polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, and saturated fatty acids as 48.7%, 16.9%, and 34.4%, respectively. Both general unsaturated fatty acid features and some specific olefinic compounds (e.g., oleic, linolenic, and gondonic acids) were found in the nonpolar fraction. In the polar extracts, FT-ICR MS detected 1673 formulas, with approximately 1/3 being potential phenolic compounds. Both the total and phenolic formulas fell mainly in the categories of lipid, peptide-like, carbohydrate, and lignin. A literature search and comparison further identifies some of these formulas as potential bioactive compounds. For example, one compound [2,5-dihydroxy-N′-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene) benzohydrazide] identified in the polar extracts is likely responsible for the anticancer function observed when used on human breast cancer cell lines. The chemical profile of the polar extracts provides a formulary for the exploration of bioactive component candidates derived from cottonseed for nutritive, health, and medical applications.

1. Introduction

Cotton (Gossypium spp.) is a global crop grown primarily for fibers used in the textile industry. Currently, the majority of the cotton crop value (85–90%) derives from cotton fiber [1,2]. Thus, the characterization and valorization of other non-fiber biomass byproducts are important parts of research on cotton production and utilization [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. With the advent of glandless (Gl) cottonseed, an especially attractive target, the enhanced utilization of cottonseed has been a trending topic in recent years, as cottonseed is the major byproduct from cotton fiber ginning [2,5,6,11,12,13]. Whereas cottonseed is a natural resource of agrochemicals (e.g., fiber, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids), its nutritional value is hindered by the presence of a toxic chemical (i.e., gossypol) in the conventional glanded (Gd) cottonseed [5,14]. The current strategies of valorization of cottonseed include (1) the development of novel Gl cottonseed varieties for food applications [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], (2) synthesis and formulation of biobased materials from traditional Gd cottonseed and its byproducts for nonfood applications [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], and (3) exploration of the bioactive components in cottonseed for nutritive, health, and medical applications [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. While these bioactive components are assumed to be peptide fragments, polyphenolics, and/or flavonoids, the specific functional groups or compounds are yet to be identified [33,38,39,40,41].
13C and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) are powerful tools in agrochemical and natural products research [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. 13C and 1H NMR spectroscopy have been used to evaluate the functional groups of valorized cottonseed products, such as edible cottonseed oil [50], cottonseed oil-converted biodiesel [51], and cottonseed meal-based biochar [52]. FT-ICR MS has been applied to profile the chemical composition of cottonseed meal-derived bio-oil [53], waste cottonseed oil-based biokerosene [54], and the polar fraction of Gl cottonseed impacted by roasting [55]. Therefore, in this work, we applied these advanced instrumental techniques to characterize the nonpolar and polar fractions of Gd cottonseed. The primary objective of this work was to increase the basic knowledge of the chemical composition of the extractable fractions of Gd cottonseed. Through the chemical profiling, our purposes were to (1) confirm and/or identify the major nutrient and functional carbon (C) components in Gd cottonseed, (2) establish the potential bioactive capability of selectively identified compounds by literature comparison, and (3) highlight bioactive component candidates for future valorization research.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. 1H NMR Spectral Features of Nonpolar Oil Fraction

The 1H NMR spectrum and relevant functional group proton assignments of the Gd sample are shown in Figure 1. These 1H NMR peaks appeared in 10 clusters ranging from 0.5 ppm to 5.5 ppm. The characteristic functional groups identified in the nonpolar extracts were the olefin peaks at 5.35 ppm, glycerol peaks at 5.25 ppm (methine) and 4.3 and 4.1 ppm (methylene), bis-allylic at 2.75 ppm, beta methylene at 2.3 ppm, allyl at 2.0 ppm, alpha methylene at 1.6 ppm, and long chain methylene at ca. 1.3 ppm. While the terminal methyl was apparent at 0.85 ppm, it is worth noting that another methyl peak at 0.95 ppm exclusively for the terminal methylene of ω-3 linolenic acid was not observed. Indeed, in the evaluation of the lipid profile of cottonseeds at different stages of development, Kurkuri et al. [56] reported that 1H NMR analysis demonstrated the presence of sterols (0.64 ppm), linolenic acid (0.95 ppm), and butyl ester of fatty acids (4.03 ppm) in the early stages. However, the 1H NMR peaks of the three compounds were not detected in the hexane extracts of late-stage cottonseed from nearly mature fruits with fibers opened up. The similarity of the 1H NMR spectral feature(s) to those of the hexane extracts of matured field cottonseeds [56] and other refine cottonseed oil samples [50,51,57] implied that the chemical composition of the 100% hexane-extracted nonpolar fractions of the Gd cottonseed was typical for a cottonseed oil sample. The quantitative comparison of the relative intensities of these peaks with edible oils further confirmed this observation, as these values of the Gd-n sample are more similar to those of cottonseed than other samples in the literature (Table 1). Furthermore, the data in Table 1 indicates that the oil fraction of cottonseed belonged to the same category as that of corn and peanut oils without ω-3 linolenic acid (i.e., peak 9), while the ω-3 lipid was present in canola, soybean, and walnut oils.
More specifically, the allylic region of Peak 6 at 2.00 ppm was present in all unsaturated fatty acids, and the two protons of the acyl group of Peak 5 at 2.30 ppm contributed one methylene group to all types of fatty acids. In other words, the relative intensities of peaks 4, 5, and 6 in the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure 1) reflect the ratios (i.e., relative distribution) of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and saturated fatty acids (SFAs) [58,59]. Thus, the integration ratio of Peak 6 over 2x that of Peak 5 represents the relative percentage of unsaturated fatty acids in the sample, so the relative distribution of SFAs was equal to 100%—the percentage of unsaturated fatty acids. Additionally, the protons in bi-unsaturated fatty acids were shifted to Peak 4 at 2.75 ppm due to their attachment to the bi-allylic carbon. Therefore, the integration ratio of Peak 4 over Peak 5 represents the relative percentage of PUFAs. Subsequently, the percentage of MUFAs was the difference between total unsaturated fatty acids and PUFAs. Table 2 lists the relative distribution of the three types of fatty acids in Gd cottonseed samples in comparison to those of other seed oils (hexane extracts) in the literature. While all four oil samples were highly unsaturated (65.6–98.0%), the comparisons indicate the fatty acid profile of Gd cottonseed was similar to that of Spondia mombin seed oil. While both walnut and bluebell oil samples showed a higher percentage of unsaturated fatty acids than Gd cottonseed, walnut was dominated by PUFAs, and bluebell was dominated by MUFAs. Similarly, Barison et al. [60] applied these 1H NMR spectral characteristics to develop a simple method for the determination of linolenic, linoleic, oleic, and saturated fatty acids. They found the ratio changes of these fatty acid compositions in oil samples of rice, sunflower, corn, canola, olive, and soybean. However, it is impossible to quantitatively compare those data with those in Table 2 not only due to the difference in the specific fatty types but also as no tabulated quantitative values were presented in [60].

2.2. 13C NMR Spectral Features of Oil Extracts

Figure 2 shows the 13C NMR spectrum of the nonpolar oil fraction of Gd cottonseed. The 13C NMR spectrum was similar to that of cottonseed oil in the literature [51]. However, the previous work [51] did not give detailed peak assignments of this cottonseed oil sample. Thus, we assigned and discussed the 13C NMR of our sample based on the general 13C NMR spectral features of plant oils (e.g., olive, coconut, and soybean oil) [45,62]. By comparison, it was notable that the chemical shift values of the 13C NMR peaks in the oil fractions of our cottonseed sample were systematically 0.20–0.4 ppm higher than those in the literature [45,58,61,62]. Both the minor differences between the oil types [62,63] and the reference CDCl3 variability [64] could have contributed to the consistent minor upshift of those 13NMR signal peaks in our Gd cottonseed sample. With appropriate minor adjustment, those peaks in the Gd cottonseed sample could be assigned to the oil components of triacyl glycerol, oleyle, linoleyl, and other acyl-chain C-functional groups (Table 3). Those data further confirmed that the nonpolar hexane fraction of Gd cottonseed was a typical plant oil sample. An additional benefit of the 13C NMR analysis of the plant oil samples was the larger dispersion of some common unsaturated (olefinic) acyl groups around 130 ppm [63]. In other words, different unsaturated acyl carbons could be distinguished by the 13NMR spectral features in this region. For example, the S. Mombin seed oil shows 7 peaks from 127.88 ppm to 130.20 ppm, which are assigned to the linoleyl and oleyl functional groups [61]. Hama et al. [58] reported 11–15 peaks in four clusters from 127.03 ppm to 131.82 ppm for the hexane extracts (oil) of walnut. These peaks indicated the presence of several unsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic, linolenic, vaccenic, and gondonic acids. Similarly, the nonpolar extracts of Gd cottonseed showed 9 peaks in two clusters from 128.07 ppm to 130.40 ppm (Figure 2 inset). The distribution patterns of these peaks were comparable to the patterns of walnut oil but without the two end peaks at 127.03 ppm and 131.82 ppm (C15 and C16 linoleyl). These results implied that several polyunsaturated fatty acids isomers, but not ω-3 𝛼-linolenic acid, were also present in the cottonseed oil sample. More research needs to be performed to confirm the observation. In particular, spiking the samples with the referenced fatty compounds would be helpful for such a purpose [65].

2.3. ESI FT-ICR Mass Spectral Analysis of Gd Cottonseed Extracts

Both the nonpolar (100% hexane) and polar (80% ethanol) extracts of Gd cottonseed were subjected to negative ion ESI FT-ICR analysis. This ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry detected 1673 formulas in the polar extracts (Figure 3). Among them, 772 formulas contained CHO elements, 775 had CHON elements, and 146 had CHOS elements. Per the O/C and H/C values defined by V-K diagrams, these formulas were further separated into seven categories. Visually, those formulas were mainly in the categories of lipid, peptide-like, carbohydrate, and lignin. The relative diversity (number-weighted %) and abundance (magnitude-weighted %) of the formulas in the seven classes are listed in Table 4. The quantitative data confirmed the visual observation of the dominant four types of biomolecules in the 80% ethanol extracts of Gd cottonseed. These quantitative data also indicated that the diversity and relative abundance of these biomolecules were not in a consistent order among the seven categories. For example, the lignin category contained the most formulas (784) and accounted for 46.9% of the total diversity. However, its abundance was only 6.6% of the total identifiable mass of the extracts. The most abundant biomolecule was lipid (65.2% of mass abundance) but with only 165 different lipid formulas (9.9% of total formulas).
Furthermore, approximately 1/3 (1067 of 1673) of the formulas were potential phenolic compounds (Table 4). Almost all of the formulas classified as lignin or tannin were phenolic molecules, as multiple phenolic rings are the structural characteristics of these two categories of biomolecules. Thus, the two types of compounds accounted for 78.8% of the diversity and 72.4% of the potential phenolic compounds in the polar extracts of Gd cottonseed. There was a moderate presence of phenolic peptides, which accounted for 64% of the total peptide formulas. Lipid and carbohydrate were mainly present in the polar extracts as non-phenolic compounds, as only 42 of the 165 lipid formulas and 38 of the 172 carbohydrate formulas were potential phenolic molecules. Together, these accounted for 7.6% of phenolic compounds. However, their abundance was significant and represented 38.6% of the total phenolic mass abundance.
Table 4 compares the relevant data from Gd versus Gl cottonseed from previously published work [55]. The distribution patterns in the seven types of formulas for both the total and phenolic compounds were similar between Gd and Gl samples, with lignin as the dominant component. Compared to the Gl sample, however, both the total and phenolic formulas in the Gd sample were more than doubled. For example, the lignin formulas increased from 195 in the Gl sample to 784 in the Gd sample, a 4-fold increase. In addition to the extraction efficiency, some precursors and metabolites of gossypol may have contributed to the observation of the phenomenal difference of the Gd sample from the Gl sample while gossypol (C30H30O8, molecular mass 518.563 D) itself was not detected in the 80% ethanol extracts of Gd sample. The observed minor differences in peptide distribution were consistent with a previous observation of storage protein distribution in the two cottonseed samples (Gd versus Gl) [66].

2.4. Selected Potential Bioactive Compounds in the Polar Extracts of Gd Cottonseed

The ultrahigh resolving power of FT-ICR-MS not only allowed the assignment of its M/Z peaks to specific formulas but also further identified them to the relevant functional compounds and isomers of some formulas by literature comparison [46,67]. Through literature search and comparison, we identified the top 15 potential bioactive compounds with a double bond equivalent (DBE) ≥ 4 in the polar extracts of Gd cottonseed (Table 5). Thirteen of the 15 compounds were also identified in the Gl cottonseed sample, which was extracted in the same procedure, although their abundances were not equivalent. Three compounds (i.e., 2, 4, and 5) were observed to have >0.1% higher abundance in the Gd sample than in the Gl sample, but the other three compounds (i.e., 1, 3, and 11) showed >0.1% higher abundances in the Gl sample than in the Gd sample. The abundances of the other nine compounds had similar levels between the two types of cottonseed with differences <0.1%. These components (formulas) could serve as future test candidates to separate bioactive compounds in Gd and Gl cottonseed.
As a stable oxidation product of linoleic acid, hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (HODE) was the top compound (in terms of abundance) in both the Gd and Gl samples, shown in Table 5. HODE isomers have demonstrated strong anti-inflammatory effects in a Murine macrophage cell model [68]. However, increased HODE levels could contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis and the risk of clinical events, such as a myocardial infarction or stroke [69]. 2,5-Dihydroxy-N′-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene)benzohydrazide was the third and second in abundance in the Gd and Gl samples, respectively, in the top 15 identifiable potential bioactive compounds (Table 5). It is a hexokinase 2 inhibitor [70]. Hexokinase 2 is required for tumor initiation and maintenance, and its ablation inhibits the neoplastic phenotype of human lung and breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [71]. During the evaluation of the effect of bioactive components from cottonseeds in human cancer cells, Cao, Sethumadhavan, and Bland [38] reported that the 80% ethanol extracts from cottonseeds decreased the mitochondrial activity of cancer cell lines derived from the breast and pancreas. While Cao, Sethumadhavan, and Bland [38] could not identify the inhibitory compound(s) via HPLC-UV-MS, it would be interesting to investigate if the 2,5-dihydroxy-N′-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene) benzohydrazide identified in this work contributed to the anticancer function of the cottonseed extracts. N-acyl amino acids were also prominently observed, and they have been highlighted for their therapeutic potential [72]. They are chemically related to the endocannabinoids and belong to the complex lipid signaling system known as the endocannabinoidome. While the three acylamide compounds were detected in the Gd samples, only one was detected in the Gl cottonseed with lower abundance. This information will aid the characterization and valorization of Gd and Gl cottonseed as functional food supplements and biomedical additives [31,38,73]. Manipulation of the sample processing could alter the abundance of some compounds. For example, roasting Gl cottonseed could increase the abundance of the hexokinase 2 inhibitor 2,5-dihydroxy-N′-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene) benzohydrazide but decrease the abundance of asperspin A (C16H21O4) [55].
Table
Table 5. Identities and relative abundance (%) of 15 selected potentially bioactive compounds with a double bond equivalent (DBE) ≥ 4 in the polar extracts of glanded (Gd) cottonseed. The relative abundances of these compounds in glandless (Gl) cottonseed samples are also listed for comparison [55].
Table 5. Identities and relative abundance (%) of 15 selected potentially bioactive compounds with a double bond equivalent (DBE) ≥ 4 in the polar extracts of glanded (Gd) cottonseed. The relative abundances of these compounds in glandless (Gl) cottonseed samples are also listed for comparison [55].
MS Peak (m/z)Theoretic
Mass		[M − H]−
Formula		DBEAbundance (%)Compound Name and Potential FunctionReference
GdGl [55]
293.2123293.2122C18H29O340.6090.787Hydroxy-octadecatrienoic acid; anti-inflammatory [74,75,76]
392.3173392.3170C24H42O3N40.4780.1623-Methoxy-1-methoxymethyl-3-phenylpropyl)dodecanamide; ceramide trafficking inhibitor analogue[77]
305.0779305.0779C14H13O6N290.3820.6252,5-Dihydroxy-N′-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene)benzohydrazide; hexokinase 2 inhibitor[70]
426.3017426.3014C27H40O3N80.291ND aN-Docosahexaenoyl valine or N-linoleoyl phenylalanine; N-acylamides[78]
378.3015378.3014C23H40O3N40.2330.070N-linoleoyl valine; N-acylamides[78]
290.0882290.0881C11H16O8N40.2040.138Pyroglutamic acid hexose; bioactive metabolite[79]
277.2173277.2173C18H29O240.1550.182Linolenic acid isomer; nutrient[74,75]
309.2073309.2071C18H29O440.1200.121Hydroperoxy-octadecatrienoic acid, anti-inflammatory[69,74]
278.0670278.0670C13H12O6N80.1170.208N-coumaroyl aspartic acid; bioactive amino derivatives[80]
499.3279499.3276C27H47O840.1040.076Cholestane octaol; Polar Steroid[81]
387.1663387.1661C18H27O950.1000.234Tuberonic acid hexoside; tuber-forming substance[82]
431.2288431.2287C21H35O940.0910.048Neorehmannioside; carotenoid glycoside[83]
402.3015402.3014C25H40O3N60.084ND aN-palmitoyl phenylalanine; N-acylamides[78]
319.0937319.0936C15H15O6N290.0840.1285-Phenyluridine; fluorescent nucleotide[84]
307.1915307.1915C18H27O450.0840.054Dihydrocapsiate; thermogenic[85]
a: Not detected.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The whole, mechanically dehulled Gd cottonseed sample was provided by Cotton, Inc. (Cary, NC, USA). The macro chemical composition of these Gd kernels has been investigated and is listed in Table 6 [14]. All other chemicals were reagent grade, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburg, PA, USA).

3.2. Sequential Extraction of Polar and Nonpolar Fractions of Gd Cottonseed

The sequential extraction of polar and nonpolar components from Gd cottonseed kernels followed the procedure reported previously [14]. Before the extraction, these kernels were ground for 3 min in a stainless-steel jar of a Waring Commercial Blender (Model WF2211214, Torrington, CT, USA). Ground Gd particles (5.00 g each) were then placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube with 15 mL of 100% hexane and shaken at room temperature (26 °C) overnight (18 h) with a rotary shaker (60 rpm). Those tubes were then centrifuged for 30 min at 5 °C and 2500× g by a Centra GP8R (International Equipment Company, Needham, MA, USA). After centrifugation, the supernatant in the tubes was collected, and the residual pellets were extracted by 100% hexane one additional time via the same procedure. After the second extraction, the residual parts were washed twice with 100% hexane (5 mL each). The washed residual pellets were then twice subject to extraction by 80% ethanol (i.e., ethanol/water 4:1, 15 mL each) with the same procedure used for the 100% hexane extraction. The supernatants of the 100% hexane extracts were placed in a venting hood to evaporate the hexane out at room temperature (26 °C). The non-evaporated leftover was designated as the extractable nonpolar oil fraction of the cottonseed kernels. The supernatants of the 80% ethanol were dried in a vacuum (up to 25” Hg) oven at 40 °C to constant weights and designated as the extractable polar components (fractions) of Gd cottonseed.

3.3. NMR Spectral Analysis

The nonpolar oil extracts were analyzed by 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy at ambient probe temperature on a Bruker DRX 500 NMR instrument (Karlsruhe, Germany). Each sample was dissolved at 10% concentration (weight/volume) in deuterochloroform and placed in a 5 mm NMR tube. Standard instrument conditions were used, including a 30-degree pulse and a 5-s pulse delay. The chemical shifts were referenced to CDCl3 at 77.23 ppm for 13C NMR and the CHCl3 residues at 7.26 ppm for the 1H NMR spectrum [64]. The 1H NMR spectrum was normalized with the peak at 1.3 ppm as the maximum, and the 13C spectrum was normalized in reference to the aliphatic region (peaks around 30 ppm as the maximum) [45,56]. The quantitative calculation of the peak integral (i.e., relative peak intensity) was performed by Bruker Topspin 2.1 NMR software.
The relative distributions of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and saturated fatty acids (SFAs) in the nonpolar fraction of Gd cottonseed were quantified per their different functional group protons identified by the 1H NMR [58,59]. Specifically, with the peaks numbered as in Figure 1, the relative percentage (%) of the three types of fatty acids was calculated via the integrals of Peaks 4, 5, and 6 as follows: PUFAs = Peak4/Peak5; MUFAs = (Peak6/2 × Peak5) − PUFAs; and SFA = 1 − (Peak6/2 × Peak5).

3.4. ESI FT-ICR MS Spectrometry

Before the analysis, the dried sample of 80% ethanol extracts was diluted 100-fold using methanol. The ultrahigh-resolution mass spectral analysis was provided by the State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (Beijing, China), using the procedure reported previously [47,55]. Briefly, the sample was continuously infused into the Apollo II ESI ion source of a Bruker 9.4 Tesla Apex-Ultra FT-ICR MS spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA), introduced by a syringe pump operating at 120 μL h−1. The lower and upper mass limit was set to m/z 150 and 2000, respectively. The spray shield voltage was set to 3.0 kV. The capillary voltage was set to 3.5 kV, and the capillary column end voltage was −320 V. Mass spectra were collected over 128 scans, with an ion accumulation rate of 0.02 s. MS peaks were detected in broadband mode at 200–800 m/z. The detection error was within 1 ppm absolute mass.
For molecular formula calculation, six elements, C, H, O, N, and S (C5-50H5-100O1-30N0-4S0-2), were taken into consideration using a self-written software routine [47]. The threshold value of the signal to noise (S/N) of the m/z molecular formula calculator was ≥6. Formulas were assigned based on a list of conservative rules that ensured that the formulas were chemically possible in nature [53]. In the vast majority of cases, the assigned formulas were within an error value of <0.5 ppm compared to the theoretic mass of the designated formulas. Double bond equivalents (DBE) values were calculated by the equation (2c + 2 + n + p − h)/2, corresponding to the molecular formula CcHhNnOoSsPp [46]. As at least one phenyl ring (DBE = 4) is present in a phenolic compound, those formulas with a DBE ≥ 4 were further considered as potential phenolic compounds in data discussion [55,67].

3.5. Van Krevelen (V-K) Diagrams of ESI FT-ICR MS Data

V-K diagrams are graphical plots of the elemental H/C versus O/C ratios of the molecular formulas, with the diagram space separated into seven discrete regions of biomolecular groups [47,86]. Both the total and potential phenolic formulas were subjected to the analysis. The seven V-K spaces (categories), with some overlap, were as follows: (1) lipid-like compounds in the O/C 0.0–0.2 and H/C 1.7–2.2 region; (2) peptide-like compounds in the O/C 0.2–0.6 and H/C 1.5–2.2 region, with N/C > 0.05; (3) carbohydrate-like compounds in the O/C 0.6–1.2 and H/C 1.5–2.2 regions; (4) lignin-like compounds in the O/C 0.1–0.6 and H/C 0.5-1.7 region; (5) tannin-like compounds in the O/C 0.6–1.2 and H/C 0.5–1.5 region; (6) unsaturated hydrocarbon in the O/C 0.0–0.1 and H/C 0.7–1.7 region; and (7) condensed aromatics in the O/C 0.0–1.0 and H/C 0.3–0.7 region. In addition, those formulas outside of the seven V-K spaces were labeled as “extra” or “other” [46,53].

4. Conclusions

This work sequentially extracted nonpolar and polar components from Gd cottonseed by 100% hexane and 80% ethanol aqueous solutions, respectively. 13C and 1H NMR spectra of the nonpolar extracts showed the characteristic peak features of edible plant oils with the absence of ω-3 linolenic acid. The relative distributions of polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, and saturated fatty acids were 48.7%, 16.9%, and 34.4%, respectively. In addition to the general classification (e.g., as olefinic) of the unsaturated fatty acids, the NMR data revealed the presence of specific types of unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., oleic, linolenic, and gondonic acids) in the nonpolar (crude oil) fraction. FT-ICR MS spectrometry detected 1673 formulas, with approximately 1/3 being potential phenolic compounds in the polar extracts. Those formulas were mainly categorized as lipid, peptide-like, carbohydrate, and lignin. The most abundant fifteen potentially bioactive compounds were identified through literature search and comparison, providing targets for the future exploration of the bioactive functions of the polar extracts. Notably, a specific chemical [2,5-dihydroxy-N′-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene) benzohydrazide] identified in the polar extracts may provide a clue to the identity of the bioactive compound(s) of cottonseed extracts that affect human cancer cell growth previously reported. The separation and recovery of such bioactive compounds from cottonseed promise to be a useful research topic in the valorization of cottonseed.

Author Contributions

Project conceptualization, Z.H.; methodology and investigation, Z.H., S.N., S.L. and Q.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.H., S.N., S.L. and Q.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Christopher Mattison, Yongbao Pan, and Jay Shockey for reviewing the manuscript. This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. He, Z.; Uchimiya, S.M.; Guo, M. (Eds.) Production and characterization of biochar from agricultural by-products: Overview and use of cotton biomass residues. In Agricultural and Environmental Applications of Biochar: Advances and Barriers; Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2016; pp. 63–86. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng, H.N.; He, Z.; Ford, C.; Wyckoff, W.; Wu, Q. A review of cottonseed protein chemistry and non-food applications. Sustain. Chem. 2020, 1, 256–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, Z.; Olk, D.C.; Tewolde, H.; Zhang, H.; Shankle, M. Carbohydrate and amino acid profiles of cotton plant biomass products. Agriculture 2020, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, Z.; Zhang, H.; Tewolde, H.; Shankle, M. Chemical characterization of cotton plant parts for multiple uses. Agric. Environ. Lett. 2017, 2, 110044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rojo-Gutiérrez, E.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.; López-Martínez, L.; Sepúlveda, D.; Baeza-Jiménez, R. Biotechnological potential of cottonseed, a by-product of cotton production. In Valorisation of Agro-Industrial residues–Volume II: Non-Biological Approaches; Zainul, A.Z., Aguilar, C.N., Kusumaningtyas, R.D., Binod, P., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 63–82. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, M.; Tomar, M.; Punia, S.; Grasso, S.; Arrutia, F.; Choudhary, J.; Singh, S.; Verma, P.; Mahapatra, A.; Patil, S. Cottonseed: A sustainable contributor to global protein requirements. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 111, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, M.; Xiao, P.; Li, H. Valorization of agricultural byproducts through conversion to biochar and bio-oil. In Byproducts from Agriculture and Fisheries: Adding Value for Food, Feed, Pharma, and Fuels; Benjamin, K.S., Alberta, N.A.A., Toldrá, F., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 501–522. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kantarelis, E.; Zabaniotou, A. Valorization of cotton stalks by fast pyrolysis and fixed bed air gasification for syngas production as precursor of second generation biofuels and sustainable agriculture. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Primaz, C.T.; Ribes-Greus, A.; Jacques, R.A. Valorization of cotton residues for production of bio-oil and engineered biochar. Energy 2021, 235, 121363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grewal, J.; Tiwari, R.; Khare, S. Secretome analysis and bioprospecting of lignocellulolytic fungal consortium for valorization of waste cottonseed cake by hydrolase production and simultaneous gossypol degradation. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2020, 11, 2533–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sihag, M.K.; Patel, A.; Kumar, V. Cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum). In Oilseeds: Health Attributes and Food Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 73–92. [Google Scholar]
  12. Riaz, T.; Iqbal, M.W.; Mahmood, S.; Yasmin, I.; Leghari, A.A.; Rehman, A.; Mushtaq, A.; Ali, K.; Azam, M.; Bilal, M. Cottonseed oil: A review of extraction techniques, physicochemical, functional, and nutritional properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 1219–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, Z.; Liu, Y. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis in applied cotton fiber and cottonseed research: A review. J. Cotton Sci. 2021, 25, 167–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, Z.; Nam, S.; Zhang, H.; Olanya, O.M. Chemical composition and thermogravimetric behaviors of glanded and glandless cottonseed kernels. Molecules 2022, 27, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Wedegaertner, T. Genetics and breeding for glandless upland cotton with improved yield potential and disease resistance: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 753426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Delgado, E.; Valverde-Quiroz, L.; Lopez, D.; Cooke, P.; Valles-Rosales, D.; Flores, N. Characterization of soluble glandless cottonseed meal proteins based on electrophoresis, functional properties, and microscopic structure. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 2820–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. He, Z.; Cheng, H.N.; He, J. Initial formulation of novel peanut butter-like products from glandless cottonseed. Foods 2023, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mattison, C.P.; He, Z.; Zhang, D.; Dupre, R.; Lloyd, S.W. Cross-serological reaction of glandless cottonseed proteins to peanut and tree nut allergic ige. Molecules 2023, 28, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reyes-Jáquez, D.; Casillas, F.; Flores, N.; Cooke, P.; Licon, E.D.; Soto, A.S.; González, I.A.; Carreón, F.O.C.; Roldán, H.M. Effect of glandless cottonseed meal content on the microstructure of extruded corn-based snacks. Adv. Food Sci. 2014, 36, 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  20. Velazquez-Martinez, V.; Quintero-Quiroz, J.; Rodriguez-Uribe, L.; Valles-Rosales, D.V.; Reyes-Jaquez, D.; Klasson, T.; Delgado, E. Effect of glandless cottonseed meal protein and maltodextrin as microencapsulating agents on spray-drying of sugarcane bagasse phenolic compounds. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, W.; Zhu, X.; Ding, L.; Xu, B.; Gao, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Dai, F.; Liu, B.; Si, Z.; Fang, L. Development of the engineered “glanded plant and glandless seed” cotton. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2022, 5, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, Z.; Nam, S.; Klasson, K.T. Oxidative stability of cottonseed butter products under accelerated storage conditions. Molecules 2023, 28, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Apaydin-Varol, E.; Uzun, B.B.; Onal, E.; Putun, A.E. Synthetic fuel production from cottonseed: Fast pyrolysis and a tga/ft-ir/ms study. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2014, 105, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. DePaolis, M.; De Respino, S.; Samineni, L.; Brighton, S.; Kumar, M. Cottonseed extract as a coagulant for water treatment. Environ. Sci. Adv. 2023, 2, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, L.; Yue, H.; Wu, Q.; Fernández-Blázquez, J.P.; Shuttleworth, P.S.; Clark, J.H.; Guo, J. Unveiling the reinforcement effects in cottonseed protein/polycaprolactone blend biocomposites. Compos. Sci.Technol. 2022, 225, 109480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, J.; Pradyawong, S.; Sun, X.S.; Wang, D.; He, Z.; Zhong, J.; Cheng, H.N. Improving adhesion performance of cottonseed protein by the synergy of phosphoric acid and water soluble calcium salts. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2021, 108, 102867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, N.; Huang, J.; Li, K. Investigation of a formaldehyde-free cottonseed flour-based adhesive for interior plywood. BioResources 2020, 15, 5546–5557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Villalpando, A.; Easson, M.; Cheng, H.; Condon, B. Use of cottonseed protein as a strength additive for nonwoven cotton. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 1725–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, Z.; Cheng, H.N. Preparation and utilization of water washed cottonseed meal as wood adhesives. In Bio-Based Wood Adhesives: Preparation, Characterization, and Testing; He, Z., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 156–178. [Google Scholar]
  30. He, Z.; Cheng, H.N.; Nam, S. Comparison of the wood bonding performance of water-and alkali-soluble cottonseed protein fractions. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2021, 35, 1500–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, H.; Sethumadhavan, K. Identification of bcl2 as a stably expressed qpcr reference gene for human colon cancer cells treated with cottonseed-derived gossypol and bioactive extracts and bacteria-derived lipopolysaccharides. Molecules 2022, 27, 7560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zia, M.; Shah, S.; Shoukat, S.; Hussain, Z.; Khan, S.; Shafqat, N. Physicochemical features, functional characteristics, and health benefits of cottonseed oil: A review. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 82, e243511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Ma, M.; Yu, Z.; Du, S.-k. Preparation and identification of antioxidant peptides from cottonseed proteins. Food Chem. 2021, 352, 129399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Song, W.; Kong, X.; Hua, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity and in vitro digestion stability of cottonseed protein hydrolysates. LWT 2020, 118, 108724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mohammadrezaei, M.; Navidshad, B.; Gheisari, A.; Toghyani, M. Cottonseed meal bioactive peptides as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in broiler chicks. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2020, 27, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, J.; Sun, H.; Nie, C.; Ge, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W. Oligopeptide derived from solid-state fermented cottonseed meal significantly affect the immunomodulatory in balb/c mice treated with cyclophosphamide. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 1791–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cao, H.; Sethumadhavan, K. Cottonseed extracts and gossypol regulate diacylglycerol acyltransferase gene expression in mouse macrophages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6022–6030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cao, H.; Sethumadhavan, K.; Bland, J.M. Isolation of cottonseed extracts that affect human cancer cell growth. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tan, C.F.; Kwan, S.H.; Lee, C.S.; Soh, Y.N.A.; Ho, Y.S.; Bi, X. Cottonseed meal protein isolate as a new source of alternative proteins: A proteomics perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Bertolo, M.R.V.; Gautério, G.V.; de Mendonça, G.M.N.; Lemes, A.C.; Egea, M.B. Bioactive phytochemicals from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seed oil processing by-products. In Bioactive Phytochemicals from Vegetable Oil and Oilseed Processing By-Products; Ramadan Hassanien, M.F., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cao, H.; Sethumadhavan, K.; Wu, X.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, L. Cottonseed extracts regulate gene expression in human colon cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Taylor, R.E.; French, A.D.; Gamble, G.R.; Himmelsbach, D.S.; Stipanovic, R.D.; Thibodeaux, D.P.; Wakelyn, P.J.; Dybowski, C. 1h and 13c solid-state nmr of gossypium barbadense (pima) cotton. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 878, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, Z.; Zhong, J.; Cheng, H.N. Conformational change of metal phytates: Solid state 1d 13c and 2d 1h-13c nmr spectroscopic investigations. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 965–970. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, F.; Meng, W.; Wang, H.; He, Z.; Guo, W.; Song, F.; Giesy, J.P. Using solid 13c nmr coupled with solution 31p nmr spectroscopy to investigate molecular species and lability of organic carbon and phosphorus from aquatic plants in tai lake, china. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 1880–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sacchi, R.; Addeo, F.; Paolillo, L. 1h and 13c nmr of virgin olive oil. An overview. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1997, 35, S133–S145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, Z.; Sleighter, R.L.; Hatcher, P.G.; Liu, S.; Wu, F.; Zou, H.; Olanya, O.M. Molecular level comparison of water extractives of maple and oak with negative and positive ion esi ft-icr mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 54, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, S.; He, Z.; Tang, Z.; Liu, L.; Hou, J.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Q.; Giesy, J.P.; Wu, F. Linking the molecular composition of autochthonous dissolved organic matter to source identification for freshwater lake ecosystems by combination of optical spectroscopy and ft-icr-ms analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Terrell, E.; Garcia-Perez, M. Novel strategy to analyze fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry data of biomass pyrolysis oil for oligomeric structure assignment. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 8466–8481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tian, Y.; Sun, J.N.; Jiang, B.; Zhan, Z.W. Characterisation of copal resin and amber by negative-ion electrospray ionisation fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 56, e4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Liu, Z.; Vermillion, K.; Jin, C.; Wang, X.; Zhao, W. Nmr study on the oxidation of vegetable oils for assessing the antioxidant function of trehalose. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 36, 102134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, D.; Ali, A. Nanocrystalline lithium ion impregnated calcium oxide as heterogeneous catalyst for transesterification of high moisture containing cotton seed oil. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 2091–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, Z.; Guo, M.; Fortier, C.; Cao, X.; Schmidt-Rohr, K. Fourier transform infrared and solid state 13c nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic characterization of defatted cottonseed meal-based biochars. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2021, 15, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, Z.; Guo, M.; Sleighter, R.L.; Zhang, H.; Fortier, C.A.; Hatcher, P.G. Characterization of defatted cottonseed meal-derived pyrolysis bio-oil by ultrahigh resolution electrospray ionization fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2018, 136, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Melo, J.A.; de Sá, M.S.; Moral, A.; Bimbela, F.; Gandía, L.M.; Wisniewski, A. Renewable hydrocarbon production from waste cottonseed oil pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading of vapors with mo-co and mo-ni catalysts supported on γ-al2o3. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. He, Z.; Liu, S.; Nam, S.; Klasson, K.T.; Cheng, H.N. Molecular level characterization of the effect of roasting on the extractable components of glandless cottonseed by fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2023, 403, 134404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kurkuri, N.J.; Annarao, S.; Miyapadavu, P.; Kamaiah, J. 1h-nmr based lipid profiling of gossypium hirsutum seed oil at different developmental stages. Cur. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ye, Y.; Khushvakov, J.; Boboev, A.; Akramova, R.; Yunusov, O.; Dalimova, D.; Turdikulova, S.; Mirzaakhmedov, S.; Engelsen, S.B.; Khakimov, B. Effect of refinement and production technology on the molecular composition of edible cottonseed oils from a large industrial scale production. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 99, 105326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hama, J.R.; Fitzsimmons-Thoss, V. Determination of unsaturated fatty acids composition in walnut (Juglans regia L.) oil using nmr spectroscopy. Food Anal. Met. 2022, 15, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thoss, V.; Murphy, P.J.; Marriott, R.; Wilson, T. Triacylglycerol composition of british bluebell (hyacinthoides non-scripta) seed oil. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 5314–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. López-Camacho, P.Y.; Martínez-Espinosa, J.C.; Basurto-Islas, G.; Torres-Zarraga, A.; Márquez-Villa, J.M.; Macías-Alonso, M.; Marrero, J.G. Spondias mombin seed oil compounds identification by raman spectroscopy and nmr. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goldson-Barnaby, A.; Clarke, J.; Warren, D.; Duffus, K. Free radical scavenging capacity, carotenoid content, and nmr characterization of blighia sapida aril oil. J. Lipids 2018, 2018, 1762342. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wollenberg, K.F. Quantitative high resolution 13c nuclear magnetic resonance of the olefinic and carbonyl carbons of edible vegetable oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1990, 67, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gottlieb, H.E.; Kotlyar, V.; Nudelman, A. Nmr chemical shifts of common laboratory solvents as trace impurities. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512–7515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Y.; Jiang, B.; Lou, Y.; Shi, Q.; Zhuang, R.; Zhan, Z.W. Molecular characterization of edible vegetable oils via free fatty acid and triacylglycerol fingerprints by electrospray ionization fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, Z.; Rodgers, R.P.; Marshall, A.G. Characterization of vegetable oils: Detailed compositional fingerprints derived from electrospray ionization fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5322–5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. He, Z.; Zhang, D.; Mattison, C.P. Quantitative comparison of the storage protein distribution in glandless and glanded cottonseeds. Agric. Environ. Lett. 2022, 7, e20076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dou, Y.; Mei, M.; Kettunen, T.; Mäkinen, M.; Jänis, J. Chemical fingerprinting of phenolic compounds in finnish berry wines using fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. El-Razek, A.; Mohamed, H.; Mohamed, T.A.; Ali, M.I.; Hamed, A.R. Anti-inflammatory activity of two new acylic c18 hydroxy unsaturated fatty acids from the gum resin of styrax benzoin in raw264. 7 macrophages. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022, 65, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vangaveti, V.; Baune, B.T.; Kennedy, R.L. Review: Hydroxyoctadecadienoic acids: Novel regulators of macrophage differentiation and atherogenesis. Therap. Adv. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2010, 1, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, C.; Yang, K.; Gao, S.; Zheng, M.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Chen, L. Structure based discovery of novel hexokinase 2 inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 96, 103609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Patra, K.C.; Wang, Q.; Bhaskar, P.T.; Miller, L.; Wang, Z.; Wheaton, W.; Chandel, N.; Laakso, M.; Muller, W.J.; Allen, E.L. Hexokinase 2 is required for tumor initiation and maintenance and its systemic deletion is therapeutic in mouse models of cancer. Cancer Cell 2013, 24, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Battista, N.; Bari, M.; Bisogno, T. N-acyl amino acids: Metabolism, molecular targets, and role in biological processes. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. He, Z.; Zhang, D.; Olanya, O.M. Antioxidant activities of the water-soluble fractions of glandless and glanded cottonseed protein. Food Chem. 2020, 325, 126907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nastić, N.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Švarc-Gajić, J.; Segura-Carretero, A. Comparative assessment of phytochemical profiles of comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) root extracts obtained by different extraction techniques. Molecules 2020, 25, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nastić, N.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Švarc-Gajić, J.; Segura-Carretero, A. New technological approaches for recovering bioactive food constituents from sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) stems. Phytochem. Anal. 2020, 31, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zaharieva, M.M.; Zheleva-Dimitrova, D.; Rusinova-Videva, S.; Ilieva, Y.; Brachkova, A.; Balabanova, V.; Gevrenova, R.; Kim, T.C.; Kaleva, M.; Georgieva, A. Antimicrobial and antioxidant potential of scenedesmus obliquus microalgae in the context of integral biorefinery concept. Molecules 2022, 27, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nakamura, Y.; Matsubara, R.; Kitagawa, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Kumagai, K.; Yasuda, S.; Hanada, K. Stereoselective synthesis and structure—Activity relationship of novel ceramide trafficking inhibitors.(1 r, 3 r)-n-(3-hydroxy-1-hydroxymethyl-3-phenylpropyl) dodecanamide and its analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3688–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gibson, C.M. Applications of Chemical Methodology in Environmental Science, Systems Biology, and Interdisciplinary Chemical Education; University of Tennessee: Knoxville, TN, USA, 2019; Available online: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/5400 (accessed on 15 May 2023).
  79. Bondia-Pons, I.; Savolainen, O.; Törrönen, R.; Martinez, J.A.; Poutanen, K.; Hanhineva, K. Metabolic profiling of goji berry extracts for discrimination of geographical origin by non-targeted liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Res. Inter. 2014, 63, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cosson, A.; Meudec, E.; Ginies, C.; Danel, A.; Lieben, P.; Descamps, N.; Cheynier, V.; Saint-Eve, A.; Souchon, I. Identification and quantification of key phytochemicals in peas–linking compounds with sensory attributes. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Popov, R.S.; Ivanchina, N.V.; Kicha, A.A.; Malyarenko, T.V.; Dmitrenok, P.S. Structural characterization of polar steroid compounds of the far eastern starfish lethasterias fusca by nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30, 743–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kumar, S.; Chandra, P.; Bajpai, V.; Singh, A.; Srivastava, M.; Mishra, D.; Kumar, B. Rapid qualitative and quantitative analysis of bioactive compounds from phyllanthus amarus using lc/ms/ms techniques. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 69, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rodríguez-Pérez, C.; Quirantes-Piné, R.; Amessis-Ouchemoukh, N.; Madani, K.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutierrez, A. A metabolite-profiling approach allows the identification of new compounds from pistacia lentiscus leaves. J. Pharmac. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 77, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liu, A.-D.; Wang, Z.-L.; Liu, L.; Cheng, L. Aqueous and visible-light-promoted c–h (hetero) arylation of uracil derivatives with diazoniums. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 16434–16447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nastić, N.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Švarc-Gajić, J.; Segura-Carretero, A. Optimization of the extraction of phytochemicals from black mulberry (Morus nigra L.) leaves. J. Ind. Engineer. Chem. 2018, 68, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ohno, T.; He, Z.; Sleighter, R.L.; Honeycutt, C.W.; Hatcher, P.G. Ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry and indicator species analysis to identify marker components of soil- and plant biomass-derived organic matter fractions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8594–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 04181 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of the nonpolar (oil) extract of Gd cottonseed. The integral peak ranges and values are presented at the bottom in red font. Functional peak proton assignments are based on [45,50,58].
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of the nonpolar (oil) extract of Gd cottonseed. The integral peak ranges and values are presented at the bottom in red font. Functional peak proton assignments are based on [45,50,58].
Molecules 28 04181 g001
Molecules 28 04181 g002 550
Figure 2. 13C NMR spectrum of the nonpolar (oil) extract of Gd cottonseed. Inset is showing the peak details around 130 ppm.
Figure 2. 13C NMR spectrum of the nonpolar (oil) extract of Gd cottonseed. Inset is showing the peak details around 130 ppm.
Molecules 28 04181 g002
Molecules 28 04181 g003 550
Figure 3. The Van Krevelen diagram of the formulas detected by ESI FT-ICT MS in 80% ethanol extracts of Gd cottonseed. Overlain boxes show where the seven major biomolecular compound classes align.
Figure 3. The Van Krevelen diagram of the formulas detected by ESI FT-ICT MS in 80% ethanol extracts of Gd cottonseed. Overlain boxes show where the seven major biomolecular compound classes align.
Molecules 28 04181 g003
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the relative intensities (%) of 1H NMR functional group protons in nonpolar (oil) extracts of Gd cottonseed kernels (Gd-n) to those of edible oils reported in the literature. Refer to Figure 1 for the functional carbon group proton assignments.
Table 1. Comparison of the relative intensities (%) of 1H NMR functional group protons in nonpolar (oil) extracts of Gd cottonseed kernels (Gd-n) to those of edible oils reported in the literature. Refer to Figure 1 for the functional carbon group proton assignments.
Chemical Shift Peak and Position in ppm
123345678910
5.35 5.254.3 4.1 2.75 2.30 2.00 1.61.30.950.87Reference
Gd-n5.810.831.581.782.585.306.956.5655.93ND a12.68This work
Cottonseed7.411.031.992.093.216.098.716.4653.99ND9.02[50]
Corn8.271.022.010.253.346.0610.276.6352.99ND9.15[50]
Canola2.360.340.640.6567.711.933.572.0317.790.282.70[50]
Peanut6.250.971.921.991.725.829.246.1357.40ND8.56[50]
Soybean8.761.032.012.063.926.069.676.1651.200.14 b[50]
Walnut9.610.973.79 c4.765.7310.395.8348.061.179.71[58]
a: Not detected. b: Peak at 0.95 ppm detected, but data reported with peak at 0.87 ppm. c: Data reported for both peaks at 4.3 and 4.1 ppm.
Table
Table 2. Relative distribution (%) of polyunsaturated (PUFAs), monounsaturated (MUFA), and saturated (SFAs) fatty acids in nonpolar (oil) extracts of Gd cottonseed kernels (Gd-n) and those of seed oils (hexane extracts) reported in the literature.
Table 2. Relative distribution (%) of polyunsaturated (PUFAs), monounsaturated (MUFA), and saturated (SFAs) fatty acids in nonpolar (oil) extracts of Gd cottonseed kernels (Gd-n) and those of seed oils (hexane extracts) reported in the literature.
PUFAsMUFAsSFAsReference
Gd-n (Cottonseed Oil)48.716.934.4This work
Spondias mombin Seed43.529.427.1[61]
Walnut Oil84.013.02.0[58]
Bluebell Oil a11.079.69.2[59]
a: Averages calculated per the five-year data in [59].
Table
Table 3. Chemical shifts and carbon functional assignments of 13C NMR peaks in nonpolar (oil) extracts of Gd cottonseed kernels (Gd-n) according to the NMR studies of edible oils reported in the literature [45,58,61,62].
Table 3. Chemical shifts and carbon functional assignments of 13C NMR peaks in nonpolar (oil) extracts of Gd cottonseed kernels (Gd-n) according to the NMR studies of edible oils reported in the literature [45,58,61,62].
Chemical Shift (ppm)CarbonAssignment
14.25, 14.34α-CH3All acyl chains
22.75, 22.90β-CH3All acyl chains
25.00, 25.07C-3All acyl chains
25.81C-11Diallylic
27.39C8-11 (oleyl), C8-14 (linoleyl)Allylic
multiple 29.24–29.96 peaks(CH2)nAll acyl chains
31,72, 32.11, 32.13C-16 R-CH2-CH2-CH3 (stearyl, oleyl, linoleyl)
34.21, 34.24, 34,38C-2All acyl chains
62.29α-CH2OGlycerol (triacylglycerol)
69.06β-CH2OGlycerol (triacylglycerol)
128.07, 128.08C-12Linolenyl
128.25, 128.26C-13Linolenyl
128.89, 129.87C-9Linolenyl, oleyl
130.16, 130.18, 130.40C-10, C-11, C-12Linolenyl, gondoyl
173.05α-C-1 GlycerolCarbonyl (triacylglycerols)
173.46, 173.51β-C-1 GlycerolCarbonyl (triacylglycerols)
Table
Table 4. Diversity (the number and % of formulas) and relative abundance (% magnitude) of the seven identified classes and one unidentified (other) class of total and potential phenolic formulas in the polar extracts of glanded (Gd) cottonseed samples. For comparison, data from glandless (Gl) cottonseed samples are also listed in the table [55].
Table 4. Diversity (the number and % of formulas) and relative abundance (% magnitude) of the seven identified classes and one unidentified (other) class of total and potential phenolic formulas in the polar extracts of glanded (Gd) cottonseed samples. For comparison, data from glandless (Gl) cottonseed samples are also listed in the table [55].
Class GdGl [55]
TotalPhenolicTotalPhenolic
LipidNumber1654211130
% Formulas9.9%4.0%15.2%9.0%
% Magnitude65.2%14.5%61.0%10.7%
PeptideNumber2321497440
% Formulas13.9%14.0%10.1%12.1%
% Magnitude1.7%8.2%1.7%6.3%
CarbohydrateNumber171389214
% Formulas10.2%3.6%12.6%4.2%
% Magnitude6.7%24.1%7.6%6.5%
LigninNumber784765195186
% Formulas46.9%72.0%26.7%56.0%
% Magnitude6.6%61.9%5.3%57.7%
TanninNumber73721818
% Formulas4.4%6.8%2.5%5.4%
% Magnitude1.1%10.5%0.7%7.8%
Unsaturated
Hydrocarbon		Number1100
% Formulas0.06%0.09%--
% Magnitude<0.01%<0.01%--
Condensed AromaticNumber0000
% Formulas----
% Magnitude----
Other aNumber247024044
% Formulas14.8%-32.9%13.3%
% Magnitude18.6%-23.8%11.0%
SummaryNumber16731067730332
a: Compounds that do not fit into any of the above categories.
Table
Table 6. Selected chemical components of Gd cottonseed kernels. Data are reported on a dry weight basis with average (A) and standard deviation (SD, n = 3). ADF, acid detergent fiber. ADL, acid detergent lignin. Adapted from [14].
Table 6. Selected chemical components of Gd cottonseed kernels. Data are reported on a dry weight basis with average (A) and standard deviation (SD, n = 3). ADF, acid detergent fiber. ADL, acid detergent lignin. Adapted from [14].
Major Component (g kg−1)
MoistureGossypolOilProteinADFADLStarch
67.9 ± 0.53.75 ± 0.02387 ± 18397 ± 8100 ± 1852.3 ± 10.112.2 ± 1.0
Macro Element and Ash (g kg−1)
PCaKMgNaSAsh
9.8 ± 0.8 2.0 ± 0.312.0 ± 0.75.4 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.04.5 ± 0.346.7 ± 0.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Z.; Nam, S.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Q. Characterization of the Nonpolar and Polar Extractable Components of Glanded Cottonseed for Its Valorization. Molecules 2023, 28, 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104181

AMA Style

He Z, Nam S, Liu S, Zhao Q. Characterization of the Nonpolar and Polar Extractable Components of Glanded Cottonseed for Its Valorization. Molecules. 2023; 28(10):4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104181

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Zhongqi, Sunghyun Nam, Shasha Liu, and Qi Zhao. 2023. "Characterization of the Nonpolar and Polar Extractable Components of Glanded Cottonseed for Its Valorization" Molecules 28, no. 10: 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104181

APA Style

He, Z., Nam, S., Liu, S., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Characterization of the Nonpolar and Polar Extractable Components of Glanded Cottonseed for Its Valorization. Molecules, 28(10), 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104181

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop