Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Precipitation pH on Protein Recovery Yield and Emulsifying Properties in the Extraction of Protein from Cold-Pressed Rapeseed Press Cake
Next Article in Special Issue
Interplay between Lignans and Gut Microbiota: Nutritional, Functional and Methodological Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
External Electric Field Effect on the Strength of σ-Hole Interactions: A Theoretical Perspective in Like⋯Like Carbon-Containing Complexes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Polyphenols: Extraction, Identification, Bioavailability, and Role for Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal and Prostate Cancers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules27092958
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigating the Stability of Six Phenolic TMZ Ester Analogues, Incubated in the Presence of Porcine Liver Esterase and Monitored by HPLC

by
Leroy A. Shervington
1,* and
Oliver Ingham
2
1
School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
2
Kindeva Drug Delivery, Bakewell Road, Loughborough LE11 5RB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(9), 2958; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092958
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 28 April 2022 / Published: 5 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Research in Plant Polyphenols and Gut Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Previous published data from our group showed the encouraging in vitro activities of six phenolic temozolomide (TMZ) ester analogues (ES8–ES12 and ES14) with up to a five-fold increase in potency compared to TMZ against glioblastoma multiform cell lines and TMZ-resistant O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT)-positive primary cells. This study investigated the stabilities of the six phenolic TMZ ester analogues in the presence of porcine liver esterase (PLE) as a hydrolytic enzyme, using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), monitored by a diode-array detector (DAD). Determining the rates of hydrolysis of the esters provided a useful insight into the feasibility of progressing them to the next phase of drug development. Fifty percent of TMZ esters consisting of para nitro, chloro, phenyl and tolyl groups (ES9, ES10, ES12 and ES14) were hydrolysed within the first 4.2 min of PLE exposure, while the TMZ esters consisting of para methoxy and nitrile groups (ES8 and ES11) demonstrated increased stability, with 50% hydrolysis achieved in 7.3 and 13.7 min, respectively. In conclusion, the survival of these phenolic TMZ esters on route to the target site of a brain tumor would be a challenge, mainly due to the undesirable rapid rate of hydrolysis. These findings therefore pose a question regarding the effectiveness of these esters in an in vivo setting.

1. Introduction

Temozolomide (TMZ) is the standard of care treatment for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, the median survival of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma is only increased by approximately 2.5 months when treated with TMZ and radiotherapy, compared with that treated with radiotherapy alone [1]. Furthermore, the current literature suggests that 60–75% of patients experience no clinical benefit from TMZ and a further 15–20% of these patients develop significant toxicity, which can make further treatment unsafe [2]. Therefore, there is an inherent need for a chemotherapeutic agent that is safer and more effective for patients with high-grade glioma [3].
A comprehensive review of the literature indicates that position 8 on the imidazole ring of TMZ holds significant promise in terms of improving the activity of the molecule [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Numerous studies have demonstrated a degree of success in investigating both ester and amide analogues of TMZ. However, to date, modifications at position 8 of the imidazole ring of TMZ have not been fully explored. The rationale behind designing analogues at position 8 is based on three concepts. Firstly, a series of ester and amide analogues of TMZ were synthesised to assess the impact of hydrogen bond-donating and hydrogen bond-accepting sites at position 8, provided by ester and amide moieties. Secondly, the inclusion of phenyl esters and amides with various aromatic substituents could provide an insight into the mesomeric and inductive effects of these analogues. Thirdly, the addition of alkyl chains to ester moieties would provide a platform to assess the effect of increasing the lipophilicity of TMZ analogues. Therefore, the initial aim of the study was to synthesise a series of novel ester and amide analogues of TMZ, with the aim of improving our understanding of the structure activity relationship at this position, thus improving the activity of the molecule [18].
Novel ester and amide analogues of TMZ were synthesised using two routes and assessed for their cytotoxic potency against the glioblastoma cell lines, i.e., U87-MG, 1321-N1 and GOS-3, and the human glial cell line, i.e., SVGp12, used as a control [18].
The antiproliferative effects of the phenolic ester and amide analogues synthesised from TMZ have been evaluated against specific glioma cell lines and patient-derived primary cultures [18]. A number of these phenolic TMZ esters analogues (ES8–ES12 and ES14) were found to have an up to five-fold increased activity against specific GBM cell lines, when compared to TMZ (Figure 1). Furthermore, the lead phenolic TMZ esters were found to induce significant antiproliferative effects against TMZ-resistant O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT)-positive primary cells. These findings were encouraging, since they indicated that these phenolic TMZ esters could potentially provide an alternative treatment for patients diagnosed with GBM [18].
In light of the in vitro activities of the phenolic TMZ esters analogues (ES8–ES12 and ES14), the stabilities of these analogues needed to be investigated in an environment resembling that of the physiological system. Due to the fact that these analogues are esters, a fundamental concern regarding their stability in an environment rich in esterase enzymes was posed.
The hydrolysis of these TMZ esters yield TMZ acid and the corresponding alcohols (Scheme 1) and can be readily monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
In mammalian systems, esterase enzymes are primarily found in the liver and gastrointestinal (GI) tract as well as in other regions of the body [19], playing a pivotal role in drug metabolism. These enzymes are responsible for the hydrolytic metabolism of numerous drug substrates, including esters, carbamates, thioesters and amides [20]. The designed ester prodrugs serve as vehicles for the active portion of the drug which offers increased lipophilicity to enhance oral absorption and cellular penetration [21]. Increased cellular uptake due to enhanced lipophilicity is thought to correlate with increased activity. Since the analogues described here were designed to act on cancerous brain tissue, it is important to ascertain the stability of these analogues when exposed to esterase enzymes and thus should provide an insight into their behavior during their potentially challenging journey towards the intentioned site of the action.
The most common carboxylesterases enzymes found in humans are human carboxylesterase 1 (hCE1) and human carboxylesterase 2 (hCE2) [20]. Mammalian carboxylesterase enzymes are found primarily in cells of the liver and GI tract but are also found in other tissues throughout the body [22]. The enzymes reside in the cytoplasm and endoplasmic reticulum, contributing to the hydrolysis of various endogenous and exogenous substrates [23]. hCE1 is mainly found in the liver, while hCE2 is found predominantly in the small intestine [24]. Although both hCE1 and hCE2 are promiscuous towards a wide range of ester substrates, the most predominate one depends on the ester substrate [20,25]. Esters containing large acyl and small alcoholic groups are the preferred substrates of hCE1, while hCE2 has a preference for esters with small acyl and bulkier alcoholic groups [22,26]. More in-depth accounts of these carboxylesterases were described by Fleming et al. [27] and Wang et al. [28].
It is worth highlighting that the use of specific individual isoenzymes may provide a less reliable representation of ester hydrolysis in vivo, and therefore, porcine liver esterase (PLE) was used since it consists of numerous isoenzymes that provide a more acceptable representation of an in vivo environment, rather than directing the study on individual hCE isoenzymes [29]. The aim of this study was to investigate the stability of selected TMZ ester analogues, i.e., ES8–ES12 and ES14, when treated with PLE. The study would provide an initial insight into their possible suitability as potential chemotherapeutic agents specifically designed for the treatment of GBM.

2. Results and Discussion

Methods Validation

The standard HPLC analytical method for the analysis of TMZ traditionally centres round an acidified buffer to aid the stability of the imidazotetrazine core [30,31,32]. The composition of the mobile phases developed for TMZ analysis usually comprises of 80–95% aqueous solvents [33]. Consequently, initial attempts at developing an HPLC method for analysing phenolic TMZ esters utilised a mixture of a sodium acetate buffer and acetonitrile in a volume ratio of 80:20 at a pH of 4.5 [34]. However, since the TMZ esters exhibited increased hydrophobicity, the elution times of these TMZ esters were found to be upwards of 40 min, which was unacceptable. The composition of the mobile phase was therefore adjusted by increasing the organic phase to 40%, thus achieving a run time of 20 min.
There were no overlapping peaks between each TMZ ester and the corresponding hydrolysed products, and therefore, monitoring the rate of hydrolysis of each ester was carried out without interference (Table 1).
Each analyte described in Table 1 was tested for repeatability at a concentration of approximately 0.02 mg/mL. A summary of the coefficient of variance (CV) of 6 injections for each analyte indicated that the method achieved suitable precision for all analytes, affording a CV of less than 1.60%. The reproducibility of the analytical method was carried out by preparing six separate solutions of each analyte at a concentration of approximately 0.02 mg/mL. Each solution was run twice, and the average peak area was recorded. The CVs obtained for the six samples analysed ranged from 0.56% to 2.64%.
In order to confirm that the method gave a response that was directly proportional to the concentration of the analyte in question, linearity determinations were carried out. In Table 2, a summary of the regression equations for each analyte is included along with the coefficient of determination (R2). All analytes assessed exhibited R2 values above 0.9988, indicating an excellent relationship between the response and the analyte concentration. The graphical representations of the relationship between the response and concentration of the TMZ ester analogues and the corresponding alcohols are shown in Figure 2; Figure 3.
In order to determine the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the analytical method, stock solutions of each analyte were serially diluted and analysed systematically. Figure 4 provides a suitable illustration on how each determination was deduced using a combination of TMZ acid and ES8 as an example. Chromatogram A is included in Figure 4 in order to provide a comparison to highlight what was expected to observe at a high concentration of both analytes TMZ (103 µM) and ES8 (66 µM), compared to concentrations near the LLOQ and the LLOD and taking into account the apparent level of baseline noise at very low concentrations. With reference to Table 1, TMZ and ES8 had retentions times of 2.3 and 9.7 min, respectively. Chromatogram B represented the LLOQs of TMZ and ES8, determined as a result of analysing a series of dilutions. The LLOQ was confirmed by carrying out a repeated analysis (n = 6) of a mixture of the two analytes at the concentrations of 320 ηM and 207 ηM, respectively, achieving a CV less than 2%. Chromatogram C represented a one-in-two dilution of the LLOQ, and chromatogram D was a further one-in-two dilution, which afforded the LLOD of TMZ acid and ES8 with the concentrations of 80 ηM and 52 ηM, respectively. Although the repeated analysis (n = 6) at this concentration provided a clear response, the CV for each of the two analytes was greater than 2% and therefore defined as the LLOD since the responses were not consistently repeatable. Chromatogram E represented a one-in-two dilution of the LLOD concentration and clearly indicated the absence of both the TMZ and ES8 analytes. The above procedure was also carried out for determining the LLOQs and the LLODs of all analytes, and the results are shown in Table 2.
The method validation provided an appropriate proof to show that it was suitable for monitoring the hydrolysis of the lead TMZ esters using PLE. The formation of TMZ acid and the corresponding alcohol, together with the simultaneous disappearance of the TMZ ester, was a convenient approach to monitoring the hydrolytic process.
The rate of hydrolysis for each of the phenolic TMZ esters, ES8–ES12 and ES14 when treated with PLE, was determined using the described HPLC analytical method, and all the hydrolytic reactions were quenched using acetonitrile. The phenolic TMZ ester recovery was calculated by expressing the observed concentration of the ester in the control reactions as a percentage of the determined ester concentration. In order to ensure the degradation of the esters was only specific to TMZ ester hydrolysis and not the hydrolysis of the imidazotetrazine core, reactions were carried out at pH 6. The analytical method also incorporated investigating the stability of the imidazotetrazine ring whilst ensuring PLE to retain a significant level of activity, and these findings were in line with earlier work [35] that found PLE to have a broad pH optima (pH: 6–8).
An illustration of a typical enzyme reaction profile is shown in Figure 5, depicting the gradual hydrolytic degradation of ES11 and the formation of the corresponding TMZ acid and 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile. A diode-array multiwavelength detector was used in monitoring both the degradation and formation of products during the process. Monitoring the reaction at a 250 nm wavelength provided information related to the degradation of ES11 and the formation of 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile, while monitoring the reaction at 325 nm provided information on the formation of TMZ acid in addition to the degradation of ES11. Once the method was refined and verified, it was used for monitoring the degradation of the remaining five esters.
A summary of the results shown in Table 3 indicated that an estimated 50% hydrolysis of all six TMZ esters occurred within the first 14 min of exposure. The finding that 50% of TMZ esters, namely the para nitro, para chloro, phenyl and tolyl groups (ES9, ES10, ES12 and ES14), were hydrolysed within the first 4.2 min of incubation was an unexpected outcome (Table 3; Figure 1). The TMZ ester analogues, namely the para methoxy and nitrile groups (ES8 and ES11), presented increased stability, with 50% of both the analogues being hydrolysed within 7.3 and 13.7 min, respectively. All the hydrolytic reactions were conducted at a PLE concentration of 7.85 µg/mL, compared with studies carried out by Höllerer et al. [36], who observed a 21% hydrolysis of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate after 48 h of exposure using a 1.3 µg/mL concentration of PLE, while Shervington et al. reported a 24–37% hydrolysis of various chlorambucil esters over a 24 h period, after exposure to PLE at a 9.1 µg/mL concentration [37].
The evidence from these two studies suggests a possible marked fragility of the ester bonds within the phenolic TMZ esters described in this study and, as a consequence, could negatively impact on the proposed therapeutic potential of these TMZ ester analogues.
On evaluating the para-substituted aromatic substituents of the TMZ esters, one would expect the relatively strong electron-withdrawing groups, namely the nitro (ES9) and the nitrile (ES11), to experience similar rates of hydrolysis (Figure 1). However, despite ES9 and ES11 consisting of a nitro and a nitrile aromatic substituent, respectively, the rather different rates of hydrolysis of these esters were surprising, that is, 50% of the analogue ES11 was hydrolysed within a little bit shorter than 14 min, 50% of the ES9 analogue was hydrolysed in a little bit over 4 min. Although there was no apparent explanation for this discrepancy when taking into account the differences in relation to the electronic effects of these two analogues, one possible explanation could be attributed to the toxic effect of the nitrile (cyano) group towards enzymes in general [38].
Furthermore, ES10, ES12 and ES14 did not fit the expected trend in terms of the electron-withdrawing and -donating effects of the substituents. In a related study involving the ester hydrolysis of ethyl benzoates, the rate of hydrolysis was found to be directly proportional to the electronic effects of the substituents on the aromatic ring [39]. Interestingly, this effect was not observed in this investigation, and therefore, electronic differences appear to have no significant part to play with regards to the bond strengths of the ester linkage of these analogues when subjected to PLE.

3. Materials and Methods

Acetonitrile (HPLC grade: ≥99.9%), water (HPLC grade: ≥99.9%), acetic acid (HPLC grade: ≥99.7%), citric acid monohydrate (HPLC grade) and dimethyl sulfoxide (reagent grade) were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Horsham, UK. Sodium phosphate dibasic (HPLC grade: ≥99.0%), sodium acetate (HPLC grade: ≥99.0%), phenol (reagent grade: >99%) and p-cresol (reagent grade: >98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK. PLE was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA. 4-Nitrophenol (reagent grade: >97%), 4-Chlorophenol (reagent grade: >98%), 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile (reagent grade: >97%) and 4-Methoxyphenol (reagent grade: >99%) were sourced from Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA. All reagents sourced from external suppliers were used without further purification. The TMZ esters were synthesised, purified and characterised following standard procedures [18]. The purity of each synthesised TMZ ester was also estimated to be at least 95%, using 1H NMR.

3.1. Instrumentation and HPLC Method

The analytical study was carried out on an HPLC system consisting of a Jasco PI-2089 plus quaternary gradient pump, a Jasco AS-1555 intelligent autosampler and a Jasco MD-1510 diode-array multiwavelength detector. These three components were linked to a Dell Optiplex 790 computer system using a Jasco LC-Net II/ADC. Chromatograms were acquired and processed using ChromNAV 1.0 Chromatography Data System. The HPLC analysis was carried out using an isocratic reversed-phase system. The TMZ esters were separated from their esterase-mediated degradation products, namely TMZ acid and the corresponding phenolic alcohol. Samples were injected using an autosampler from crimp top sample vials using a Rheodyne injector with a 100 µL loop. Separation was achieved using a Waters Symmetry Shield RP C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm), containing particles with a size of 5 micron. The detection of TMZ acid and TMZ esters (ES8–ES12 and ES14) was carried out at 325 nm. The detection of 4-Methoxyphenol and 4-Chlorophenol was carried out at 225 nm. The detection of 4-Nitrophenol, 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile, phenol and p-Cresol were detected at 325, 250, 270 and 225 nm, respectively. The mobile phase consisted of a 20 mM sodium acetate buffer and acetonitrile (60:40, v/v). The pH of the resulting mixture was adjusted to 4.5 using acetic acid. The analysis of the samples was carried out over a period of 20 min at 1 mL/min at ambient temperature.

3.2. Preparation of the Mobile Phase and Standards Used for Validation

The mobile phase was made up in 2000 mL batches (consisting of 1200 mL sodium acetate buffer (20 mM) and 800 mL acetonitrile). The sodium acetate buffer was prepared by solubilising sodium acetate (3.282 g) in 2000 mL of HPLC-grade water to achieve a final concentration of 20 mM. To ensure imidazotetrazines to remain stable, the pH of the sodium acetate/ acetonitrile mixture was adjusted to 4.5 by the addition of glacial acetic acid. Ten milligrams of each of the sample were solubilised in the mobile phase (100 mL) to afford the concentrations displayed in Table 4. The samples were diluted to appropriate working concentrations in order to carry out the method validation.

3.3. Method Validation

Repeatability, reproducibility linearity, LLOD and LLOQ were determined as part of the validation procedures, following protocols set by The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) in ICH Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures. Text and Methodology were used to validate the method [40].

3.4. Repeatability

Stock solutions were diluted with the mobile phase yielding approximately 0.02 mg/mL for each of the compounds listed in Table 4. Each of the prepared solutions was analysed 6 times, and the corresponding peak areas were recorded. The CVs for the 6 determinations were calculated.

3.5. Reproducibility

Six separate solutions at approximately 0.02 mg/mL were prepared from each of the standards shown in Table 4, as described above. Each of six solutions was analysed twice, and the mean peak area was recorded. The CV was calculated for the 6 determinations.

3.6. Linearity

The solutions of each of the standards were diluted from their respective stock solutions to afford concentrations of approximately 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08 and 0.10 mg/mL. Each sample was analysed twice, and the mean peak area was recorded. Calibration curves were obtained for each analyte (Figure 2 and Figure 3), and the coefficient of determination (R2) and regression equations were calculated to assess the relation between the peak area and the concentration.

3.7. LLOQ and LLOD

Each of the analyte stock solutions was systematically diluted, and each sample was analysed twice. This process was repeated several times, once the detector could no longer accurately quantify and detect an analyte peak. Both the LLOQ and the LLOD were determined after calculating the corresponding CV for all analytes analysed.

3.8. General Protocol for Monitoring the Stability of Lead Phenolic TMZ Analogues after Exposure to PLE

A disodium phosphate/citric acid buffer (pH: 6) was prepared by adding 63.15 mL of disodium phosphate (Na2HPO4·12H2O, 200 mM) to 36.85 mL of citric acid (100 mM). A stock solution consisting of 80 mg of each of the TMZ esters (ES8–ES12 and ES14) were prepared by dissolving in 100 mL of DMSO. Prior to preparing the esterase reactions, all reagents were incubated at 37 °C. The control reaction, in the absence of PLE, was prepared by adding 3000 µL of the buffer to the reaction vessel along with 56.25 µL of the 0.80 mg/mL stock solution. The test reaction, with enzymes, was prepared by adding 2999 µL of the buffer to the reaction vessel along with 56.25 µL of the TMZ esters. The final concentration of the TMZ esters in the reaction vessels was 14.7 µg/mL. An aliquot of PLE (1 µL), suspended in ammonium sulphate, was added to the test reaction at zero minutes. Both the control and test reactions were then incubated at 37 °C. Aliquots with a volume of 200 µL were transferred from the reaction vessels to 1 mL Eppendorf tubes at 3 min intervals for a total of 30 min. Each reaction was terminated by quenching with 200 µL of acetonitrile in an Eppendorf tube. The Eppendorf tubes were vortexed for 30 s and then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant (200 µL) was transferred to HPLC vials and diluted with the mobile phase (200 µL) before analysis.

4. Conclusions

These phenolic TMZ esters, namely ES8–ES12 and ES14, showed encouraging in vitro antiproliferative activity when evaluated against specific glioma cell lines and patient-derived cultures [18]. In this study, however, the application of HPLC was used in order to monitor the stability of these TMZ esters and the results were very informative, since it revealed that when these esters were subjected to in vitro hydrolytic conditions in the presence of PLE, they underwent rapid hydrolysis which would equate to a serious disadvantage, bearing in mind that they were specifically designed to enhance the ability of the TME moiety to target cancerous brain tissue. From this study, it is clear that the TMZ esters would have negligible opportunity of surviving the challenging in vivo conditions without excessive hydrolytic degradation. A positive outcome of this study lies in the fact that further in vivo and in vitro studies could prove to be costly and unnecessary; however, since it has been reported that PLE has a higher hydrolytic efficacy compared human carboxylases [41], this aspect of research would certainly be a logical next step in order to further validate our findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.S.; methodology, L.A.S. and O.I.; software, L.A.S. and O.I.; validation L.A.S. and O.I.; formal analysis, L.A.S. and O.I.; investigation, O.I.; resources, L.A.S. and O.I.; data curation, L.A.S. and O.I.; writing-original draft preparation, L.A.S.; writing-review and editing, L.A.S. and O.I.; visualization, L.A.S.; supervision, L.A.S.; project administration, L.A.S.; funding acquisition, L.A.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the University Ethics Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Where applicable, informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank The University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) for providing a Studentship to Oliver Ingham, supported by the School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences. We would also like to thank Pat Cookson, Tamar Garcia-Sorribes and Sameera Mahroof for their technical assistance, together with Fiaz Shah and Paige Raven for their contributions in relation to their MSc research projects. Finally, I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the contribution my Dear wife Amal Shervington has made in the area of GBM research over the past two decades.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Stupp, R.; Mason, W.P.; van den Bent, M.J.; Weller, M.; Fisher, B.; Taphoorn, M.J.; Belanger, K.; Brandes, A.A.; Marosi, C.; Bogdahn, U.; et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hegi, M.E.; Diserens, A.C.; Gorlia, T.; Hamou, M.F.; de Tribolet, N.; Weller, M.; Kros, J.M.; Hainfellner, J.A.; Mason, W.; Mariani, L.; et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chamberlain, M.C. Temozolomide: Therapeutic limitations in the treatment of adult high-grade gliomas. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2010, 10, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lunt, E.; Newton, C.G.; Smith, C.; Stevens, G.P.; Stevens, M.F.; Straw, C.G.; Walsh, R.J.; Warren, P.J.; Fizames, C.; Lavelle, F. Antitumor imidazotetrazines. 14. Synthesis and antitumor activity of 6- and 8-substituted imidazo [5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazinones and 8-substituted pyrazolo [5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazinones. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Langnel, D.A.F.; Arrowsmith, J.; Stevens, M.F.G. Antitumor imidazotetrazines. 38. New 8-substituted derivatives of the imidazo [5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazines temozolomide and mitozolomide. ARKIVOC 2000, 3, 421–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, D.; Yang, J.G.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, L.X. Synthesis and antitumor activity of 3-methyl-4-oxo-3,4-dihydroimidazo [5,1-d][1,2,3,5]tetrazine-8-carboxylates and -carboxamides. Molecules 2010, 15, 9427–9437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Suppasansatorn, P.; Wang, G.; Conway, B.R.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y. Skin delivery potency and antitumor activities of temozolomide ester prodrugs. Cancer Lett. 2006, 244, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arrowsmith, J.; Jennings, S.A.; Clark, A.S.; Stevens, M.F. Antitumor imidazotetrazines. 41. Conjugation of the antitumor agents mitozolomide and temozolomide to peptides and lexitropsins bearing DNA major and minor groove-binding structural motifs. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5458–5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, T.C.; Cho, H.Y.; Wang, W.; Nguyen, J.; Jhaveri, N.; Rosenstein-Sisson, R.; Hofman, F.M.; Schonthal, A.H. A novel temozolomide analog, NEO212, with enhanced activity against MGMT-positive melanoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2015, 358, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cho, H.Y.; Wang, W.; Jhaveri, N.; Lee, D.J.; Sharma, N.; Dubeau, L.; Schonthal, A.H.; Hofman, F.M.; Chen, T.C. NEO212, temozolomide conjugated to perillyl alcohol, is a novel drug for effective treatment of a broad range of temozolomide-resistant gliomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 2004–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Svec, R.L.; Furiassi, L.; Skibinski, C.G.; Fan, T.M.; Riggins, G.J.; Hergenrother, P.J. Tunable Stability of Imidazotetrazines Leads to a Potent Compound for Glioblastoma. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 3206–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wesolowski, J.R.; Rajdev, P.; Mukherji, S.K. Temozolomide (Temodar). AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2010, 31, 1383–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tisdale, M.J. Antitumor imidazotetrazines--XV. Role of guanine O6-alkylation in the mechanism of cytotoxicity of imidazotetrazinones. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1987, 36, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, Z.; Wei, D.; Dai, X.; Stevens, M.F.G.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, J. C8-Substituted Imidazotetrazine Analogs Overcome Temozolomide Resistance by Inducing DNA Adducts and DNA Damage. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rai, R.; Banerjee, M.; Wong, D.H.; McCullagh, E.; Gupta, A.; Tripathi, S.; Riquelme, E.; Jangir, R.; Yadav, S.; Raja, M.; et al. Temozolomide analogs with improved brain/plasma ratios—Exploring the possibility of enhancing the therapeutic index of temozolomide. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 5103–5109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wollowitz, S.; Kataisto, E. Methods for preparing pyridylethyl-substituted carbolines. World Intellectual Property Organization Patent No. PCT/US2009/035992, 11 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sweetlove, M. Phase III CONCERT Trial of Latrepirdine. Pharm. Med. 2012, 26, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shervington, L.A.; Ingham, O.; Shervington, A. A novel series of phenolic temozomide (TMZ) esters with 4 to 5-fold increased potency, compared to TMZ, against glioma cells irrespective of MGMT expression. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 17561–17570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Timoumi, R.; Buratti, F.M.; Abid-Essefi, S.; Dorne, J.L.C.M.; Testai, E. Metabolism of triflumuron in the human liver: Contribution of cytochrome P450 isoforms and esterases. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 312, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laizure, S.C.; Herring, V.; Hu, Z.; Witbrodt, K.; Parker, R.B. The role of human carboxylesterases in drug metabolism: Have we overlooked their importance? Pharmacotherapy 2013, 33, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Montella, I.R.; Schama, R.; Valle, D. The classification of esterases: An important gene family involved in insecticide resistance—A review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2012, 107, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Taketani, M.; Shii, M.; Ohura, K.; Ninomiya, S.; Imai, T. Carboxylesterase in the liver and small intestine of experimental animals and human. Life Sci. 2007, 81, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Imai, T. Human carboxylesterase isozymes: Catalytic properties and rational drug design. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2006, 21, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hatfield, M.J.; Tsurkan, L.; Garrett, M.; Shaver, T.M.; Hyatt, J.L.; Edwards, C.C.; Hicks, L.D.; Potter, P.M. Organ-specific carboxylesterase profiling identifies the small intestine and kidney as major contributors of activation of the anticancer prodrug CPT-11. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 81, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Fukami, T.; Yokoi, T. The Emerging Role of Human Esterases. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2012, 27, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vistoli, G.; Pedretti, A.; Mazzolari, A.; Testa, B. Homology modeling and metabolism prediction of human carboxylesterase-2 using docking analyses by GriDock: A parallelized tool based on AutoDock 4.0. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2010, 24, 771–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fleming, C.D.; Edwards, C.C.; Kirby, S.D.; Maxwell, D.M.; Potter, P.M.; Cerasoli, D.M.; Redinbo, M.R. Crystal structures of human carboxylesterase 1 in covalent complexes with the chemical warfare agents soman and tabun. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 5063–5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, D.; Zou, L.; Jin, Q.; Hou, J.; Ge, G.; Yang, L. Human carboxylesterases: A comprehensive review. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brüsehaber, E.; Böttcher, D.; Bornscheuer, U.T. Insights into the physiological role of pig liver esterase: Isoenzymes show differences in the demethylation of prenylated proteins. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 7878–7883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gilant, E.; Kaza, M.; Szlagowska, A.; Serafin-Byczak, K.; Rudzki, P.J. Validated HPLC Method for Determination of Temozolomide in Human Plasma. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2012, 69, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar]
  31. Khan, A.; Imam, S.S.; Aqil, M.; Sultana, Y.; Ali, A.; Khan, K. Design of experiment based validated stability indicating RP-HPLC method of temozolomide in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2016, 5, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Khosa, A.; Krishna, K.V.; Saha, R.N.; Dubey, S.K.; Reddi, S. A simplified and sensitive validated RP-HPLC method for determination of temozolomide in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2018, 41, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reyderman, L.; Statkevich, P.; Thonoor, C.M.; Patrick, J.; Batra, V.K.; Wirth, M. Disposition and pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in rat. Xenobiotica 2004, 34, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kapcak, E.; Satana-Kara, E.H. Development and Full Validation of a Stability-indicating HPLC Method for the Determination of the Anticancer Drug Temozolomide in Pharmaceutical Form. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 15, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Junge, W.; Heymann, E. Characterization of the Isoenzymes of Pig-Liver Esterase 2. Kinetic Studies. Eur. J. Biochem. 1979, 95, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Höllerer, C.; Becker, G.; Göen, T.; Eckert, E. Regioselective ester cleavage of di-(2-ethylhexyl) trimellitates by porcine liver esterase. Toxicol. In Vitro 2018, 47, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shervington, L.A.; Smith, N.; Norman, E.; Ward, T.; Phillips, R.; Shervington, A. To determine the cytotoxicity of chlorambucil and one of its nitro-derivatives, conjugated to prasterone and pregnenolone, towards eight human cancer cell-lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 2944–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tanii, H.; Hashimoto, K. Studies on the mechanism of acute toxicity of nitriles in mice. Arch. Toxicol. 1984, 55, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clayden, J. Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Clayden, J., Greeves, N., Warren, S., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  40. ICH. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology (Q2(R1)); ICH Secretariat: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xiao, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, L.; Tian, Z.; Wang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Shi, D. Breed Differences in Pig Liver Esterase (PLE) between Tongcheng (Chinese Local Breed) and Large White Pigs. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 02958 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of temozolomide (TMZ) and phenolic TMZ esters assessed for esterase-mediated stability.
Figure 1. Structures of temozolomide (TMZ) and phenolic TMZ esters assessed for esterase-mediated stability.
Molecules 27 02958 g001
Molecules 27 02958 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Esterase-mediated degradation of phenolic TMZ esters.
Scheme 1. Esterase-mediated degradation of phenolic TMZ esters.
Molecules 27 02958 sch001
Molecules 27 02958 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparative calibration curves for six TMZ ester analogues, highlighting the relationship between the concentration and the peak area (PA). Relative regression equations and R2 values are shown in Table 2.
Figure 2. Comparative calibration curves for six TMZ ester analogues, highlighting the relationship between the concentration and the peak area (PA). Relative regression equations and R2 values are shown in Table 2.
Molecules 27 02958 g002
Molecules 27 02958 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparative calibration graphs for the corresponding six alcohols, highlighting the relationship between the concentration and the PA. Relative regression equations and R2 values are shown in Table 2.
Figure 3. Comparative calibration graphs for the corresponding six alcohols, highlighting the relationship between the concentration and the PA. Relative regression equations and R2 values are shown in Table 2.
Molecules 27 02958 g003
Molecules 27 02958 g004 550
Figure 4. Shows an example of how the LLOQ and the LLOD were determined. Chromatogram (A) was included in order to provide a comparison and identify the peak responses at low concentrations. Chromatogram (B), with TMZ acid (320 nM) and ES8 (207 nM) with retentions times of 2.3 and 9.7 min, respectively, was estimated to be the LLOQ for both TMZ acid and ES8. Chromatogram (C) represented a one-in-two dilution of the LLOQ. Chromatogram (D), with TMZ acid and ES8 at the concentrations of 80 and 52 nM, respectively, was estimated to be the LLOD. Chromatogram (E) represented a one-in-two dilution of the LLOD concentration and clearly indicated the absence of both the TMZ and ES8 analytes. The analysis was carried out at a wavelength of 325 nm.
Figure 4. Shows an example of how the LLOQ and the LLOD were determined. Chromatogram (A) was included in order to provide a comparison and identify the peak responses at low concentrations. Chromatogram (B), with TMZ acid (320 nM) and ES8 (207 nM) with retentions times of 2.3 and 9.7 min, respectively, was estimated to be the LLOQ for both TMZ acid and ES8. Chromatogram (C) represented a one-in-two dilution of the LLOQ. Chromatogram (D), with TMZ acid and ES8 at the concentrations of 80 and 52 nM, respectively, was estimated to be the LLOD. Chromatogram (E) represented a one-in-two dilution of the LLOD concentration and clearly indicated the absence of both the TMZ and ES8 analytes. The analysis was carried out at a wavelength of 325 nm.
Molecules 27 02958 g004
Molecules 27 02958 g005 550
Figure 5. A series of chromatograms showing the monitored degradation of ES11 into its corresponding TMZ acid and 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile. Each series of chromatograms showed a different wavelength, allowing all analytes to be visualised. (A) Breakdown of ES11 and the formation of 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile (250 nm). (B) Breakdown of ES11 and the formation of TMZ acid (325 nm).
Figure 5. A series of chromatograms showing the monitored degradation of ES11 into its corresponding TMZ acid and 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile. Each series of chromatograms showed a different wavelength, allowing all analytes to be visualised. (A) Breakdown of ES11 and the formation of 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile (250 nm). (B) Breakdown of ES11 and the formation of TMZ acid (325 nm).
Molecules 27 02958 g005
Table
Table 1. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) data showing the retention times of the TMZ esters and their corresponding alcohols and a summary of the concentrations used and the coefficient of variance (CV) data for repeatability and reproducibility.
Table 1. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) data showing the retention times of the TMZ esters and their corresponding alcohols and a summary of the concentrations used and the coefficient of variance (CV) data for repeatability and reproducibility.
AnalyteElution Time (min)Concentration (µM)Repeatability
(n = 6)
CV		Reproducibility
(n = 6)
CV
TMZ acid2.31030.151.19
ES89.7660.590.88
4-Methoxyphenol6.01620.171.00
ES912.1630.750.93
4-Nitrophenol10.41440.780.74
ES1017.5660.230.56
4-Chlorophenol14.81550.990.69
ES118.6680.161.19
4-Hydroxybenzonitrile7.11960.540.57
ES129.5740.142.64
Phenol7.22510.142.59
ES1413.9711.291.59
p-Cresol9.81851.551.56
Table
Table 2. A summary of the regression analysis for each analyte, together with the corresponding data for the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and the lower limit of detection (LLOD) data.
Table 2. A summary of the regression analysis for each analyte, together with the corresponding data for the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and the lower limit of detection (LLOD) data.
AnalyteRegression
Equation		Coefficient of
Determination (R2)		LLOQ (ηM)
n = 6		LLOD (ηM)
n = 6
TMZ acidY = 9649x − 376670.999632080
ES8Y = 12553x − 216350.999720752
4-MethoxyphenolY = 3862x − 119390.99981010505
ES9Y = 14837x + 6760.999919899
4-NitrophenolY = 10025x + 526620.9996451113
ES10Y = 12399x − 93250.9999206103
4-ChlorophenolY = 8174x + 614620.9996969485
ES11Y = 13214x − 86980.999913367
4-HydroxybenzonitrileY = 17651x + 16120.99998321
ES12Y = 12460x + 77320.999914536
PhenolY = 1674x − 177720.9997490122
ES14Y = 11240x − 324130.9995221111
p-CresolY = 5577x − 293970.99881156577
Table
Table 3. The time taken for each of the phenolic TMZ esters to be hydrolysed to 50% of the initial concentration.
Table 3. The time taken for each of the phenolic TMZ esters to be hydrolysed to 50% of the initial concentration.
TMZ esterTime Taken to Hydrolyse 50% of the Ester (min)TMZ esterTime Taken to Hydrolyse 50% of the Ester (min)
ES87.3ES1113.7
ES94.2ES123.4
ES104.1ES143.2
Table
Table 4. Concentrations of standard stock solutions (100 µg/mL) used for the validation of the HPLC analytical method, which were obtained by separately solubilising 10 mg of each analyte in 100 mL of the mobile phase.
Table 4. Concentrations of standard stock solutions (100 µg/mL) used for the validation of the HPLC analytical method, which were obtained by separately solubilising 10 mg of each analyte in 100 mL of the mobile phase.
AnalyteConcentration (µg/mL)Concentration (µM)
TMZ acid100.1513.2
ES899.9331.8
4-Methoxyphenol100.4808.8
ES9100.3317.3
4-Nitrophenol100.3721.0
ES10100.7330.1
4-Chlorophenol99.7775.3
ES11100.1301.1
4-Hydroxybenzonitrile100.7845.3
ES12100.9372.2
Phenol101.81081.7
ES14101.0354.3
P-Cresol100.0924.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shervington, L.A.; Ingham, O. Investigating the Stability of Six Phenolic TMZ Ester Analogues, Incubated in the Presence of Porcine Liver Esterase and Monitored by HPLC. Molecules 2022, 27, 2958. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092958

AMA Style

Shervington LA, Ingham O. Investigating the Stability of Six Phenolic TMZ Ester Analogues, Incubated in the Presence of Porcine Liver Esterase and Monitored by HPLC. Molecules. 2022; 27(9):2958. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092958

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shervington, Leroy A., and Oliver Ingham. 2022. "Investigating the Stability of Six Phenolic TMZ Ester Analogues, Incubated in the Presence of Porcine Liver Esterase and Monitored by HPLC" Molecules 27, no. 9: 2958. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092958

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop