Next Article in Journal
Applicability of Ash Wastes for Reducing Trace Element Content in Zea mays L. Grown in Eco-Diesel Contaminated Soil
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanistic Insights into the Pharmacological Significance of Silymarin
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Turmeric Rhizome Extract Nano-Formula for Delivery to Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Biodiversity of the Genus Dictyota: Phytochemical and Pharmacological Natural Products Prospectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter, a Rapidly Spreading Invasive Plant: Chemistry and Bioactivity

1
Department of Science, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
2
Spinoff BioActiPlant s.r.l., Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
3
Laboratory of Heterocyclic Chemistry, Natural Products and Reactivity, Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products (LR11ES39), Faculty of Sciences of Monastir, University of Monastir, Monastir 5000, Tunisia
4
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Molecules 2022, 27(3), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030895
Submission received: 17 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Featured Reviews in Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Dittrichia graveolens L. Greuter belonging to the Asteraceae family, is an aromatic herbaceous plant native to the Mediterranean region. This plant species has been extensively studied for its biological activities, including antioxidant, antitumor, antimicrobial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, anticholinesterase, and antityrosinase, and for its peculiar metabolic profile. In particular, bioactivities are related to terpenes and flavonoids metabolites, such as borneol (40), tomentosin (189), inuviscolide (204). However, D. graveolens is also well known for causing health problems both in animals and humans. Moreover, the species is currently undergoing a dramatic northward expansion of its native range related to climate change, now including North Europe, California, and Australia. This review represents an updated overview of the 52 literature papers published in Scopus and PubMed dealing with expansion, chemistry (262 different compounds), pharmacological effects, and toxicology of D. graveolens up to October 2021. The review is intended to boost further studies to determine the molecular pathways involved in the observed activities, bioavailability, and clinical studies to explore new potential applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter, (common name Stinkwort syn. Inula graveolens L. Desf.), is a Mediterranean native plant. The genus Dittrichia belongs to the family of Asteraceae (order Asterales) and includes five species native to the Mediterranean basin [1], two of which are currently widespread in other regions [2,3,4]. Dittrichia reaches a height of 50 cm [5]; it is an annual plant and has a strong aroma with a camphor-like smell.
Coinciding with recent climate change in central Europe, the species is currently undergoing a dramatic northward expansion of its native range which now includes the UK, the Netherlands, and Poland. This range expansion may in part have been promoted by the rapid evolution of earlier flowering time in northern populations over the past few decades. Outside its native range, D. graveolens has a long history of colonizing regions with a Mediterranean climate on other continents, including Australia, South Africa, California, and now Chile. Due to their adaptation to disturbed open habitats as well as their efficient seed production and dispersal [6], species of Dittrichia are considered invasive in California [3,7], Australia [2], and recently colonized areas of Europe [8].
Dittrichia graveolens is widely used in traditional and modern medicine for its antifungal, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, insecticide, and sedative properties. It is also known to be poisonous to livestock and causes allergic contact dermatitis in humans. Dittrichia is not palatable to animals, even if its aerial parts are used in Crete as a component of an external application to treat lice in chicken [9].
This herbal plant is found primarily along roadsides and grows well in disturbed upland and wetland sites on a variety of substrates, including soils with heavy metals. In California, D. graveolens is most common on roadsides, right-of-ways, gravel mines, detention basins, riparian floodplains, and seasonal wetlands.
Besides the negative effects that this introduction might have on local biodiversity, the species could be dangerous if ingested by animals and a potential hazard for humans.
Due to the potential of this plant in drug discovery, this study wishes to review all metabolites and biological activities reported in the literature until October 2021 and point out the attention of climate change’s spreading.
The bubble map (Figure 1) created with VOSviewer software, version 1.6.17 (© 2022, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) for Windows, is intended to offer a rapid visualization of the interdisciplinary work involved in this review to boost novel projects related to D. graveolens.

2. Phytochemistry

D. graveolens is a strongly aromatic species, and its essential oil, known as “odorous Inula” or “odorous Dittrichia”, is widely used in phytotherapy or industries in the production of perfumes, soaps, and toiletries [10,11]. Moreover, numerous studies have investigated the essential oil chemical composition (Table S1) [11]. In particular, until now, thin-layer chromatography (TLC) [12], fractionation with Sephadex and silica gel columns [13,14,15,16,17], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [18], electron ionization mass spectroscopy (EIMS) [17], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [11], and associated techniques, like gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) [10,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [32], and gas chromatograph-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) [28] have been used to investigate the active molecules of D. graveolens. These methods have been applied after extracting the vegetal material, which was principally made using distillation, Soxhlet, maceration, microwave, ultrasound-assisted extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction techniques [11,25,31,33] (Figure 2).

Chemical Characterization of D. graveolens

The essential oil of D. graveolens has been extensively studied from a chemical point of view. Bicyclic monoterpenes, i.e., borneol (40) and bornyl acetate (41) have been shown to be the principal metabolites of essential oil, followed by monoterpenes, camphene (47), terpineol (95) and sesquiterpenes, caryophyllene (130), cadinol (114), and farnesol (155) [10,19,23,24,27,29,30]. The most abundant metabolites produced by this species are oxygenated monoterpenes, followed by monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated sesquiterpenes, and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons [21,29].
In 2004, Blanc et al. [19] reported using an acid-basic methodology to obtain the neutral part of the commercial oil, leading to the identification of 37 monoterpenes, 34 sesquiterpenes, and only 15 acyclic non-terpenic compounds.
It was observed that the different geographic distribution of D. graveolens and the harvesting season affected phytochemical composition [10], ascribing to the distinct climatic pattern of the samples [23]. Bornyl acetate (41) appeared to be the major compound found in D. graveolens essential oil. As an example, the essential oil of D. graveolens from a species collected in France, analyzed by GC-MS [22], was found to be constituted by 54% of bornyl acetate (41) followed by borneol (40) and camphene (47), 20% and 4.9%, respectively. The same results have been reported by Blanc and coworkers, in 2004, from the essential oil obtained from Corsica species collected at the full flowering stage [19]. Bornyl acetate (41) with a lower percentage (25.4%) was also present in the essential oil of the wild-growing Greek species collected at the full-flowering stage and investigated by Petropoulou et al., together with epi-α-cadinol (116) (30.2%) [29]. Bornyl acetate (41) (21.7%), followed by borneol (40) (18.7%), was also dominant in the essential oil of aerial parts collected from the Stara Planina mountain in Serbia [26]. On the other hand, borneol (40) was prevalent in the oil obtained from the Iranian species with a percentage of 60.7% [30], but only with 12.8% in the Greek essential oil [26,29]. Instead, it was present in an intermediate percentage (43.6%) in the essential oil of Montenegrin D. graveolens, followed by bornyl acetate (41), caryophyllene oxide (128), trans-p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol (77) and dehydro-1,8-cineol (56) (38.3%, 2.5%, 2.2%, and 1.2%, respectively) [28]. The hydrodistilled of the fresh aerial parts of D. graveolens collected in Constantine (North Easter Algerian) was shown to contain the iso bornyl acetate (42), instead of bornyl acetate (41), in a high percentage (50.8%), followed by borneol (40) (18.3%) and τ-cadinol (116) (6.2%) [20]. Interestingly, the essential oils obtained from D. graveolens collected in Morocco, Algeria, Iran, Serbia, Lebanon, Turkey, and Corsica have oxygenated monoterpenes as main compounds, and, in particular, the bornyl acetate (41) and borneol (40) [19,20,21,23,26,28]. The highest percentage of oxygenated compounds was reported in D. graveolens oil from Lebanon and Turkish origin plants [23].
Differently, the major compounds found in the hydrodistilled essential oil obtained from Iranian aerial parts was 1,8-cineole (55) followed by p-cymene (61) (54.89% and 16.2%, respectively) [10]; while selin-11-en-4-α-ol (185), 1,10-di-epi-cubenol (144), and cedr-8(15)-en-9-α-ol (134) (14.1, 10.3 and 10.3%, respectively) were the main compounds of hydrodistilled essential oil obtained from the flowering species in Monserrato (southern Sardinia) [25].
Different results were obtained when the same flowering species was subjected to supercritical CO2 extraction (SFE). In fact, the three main compounds, present in the hydrodistillate, were present in the SFE extract in a lower percentage (respectively 3.5, 5.7, and 9.7% for selin-11-en-4-α-ol (185), 1,10-di-epi-cubenol (144), and cedr-8(15)-en-9-α-ol (134)). At the same time, the main compound was found to be caryophyllene oxide (128) (14.3%), followed by cedr-8(15)-en-9-α-ol (134). Bornyl acetate (41) and borneol (40) were not even present in trace amounts [25].
A further investigation on the chemical composition of the essential oil was carried out by Sellem et al. in 2020 [30] by comparing the variation of the chemical composition related to the seasons in which the plant has been collected. In particular, the essential oil was produced starting from D. graveolens collected at Chebba salt marsh in the months of April, July, October, and January. The differences found mainly concern the odor and the quantitative of metabolites rather than the qualitative composition of the oil. The highest oil quantitative was obtained from the plants harvested in July (0.678%). In addition, this oil had a stronger odor than those obtained in the other three seasons. Authors justify these results by observing that D. graveolens in summer is in the flowering time and therefore at the best of its activity in attracting pollinating insects. Moreover, the season influences the composition of oil and the percentage of metabolites. The oil obtained in the summer showed the highest content in bornyl acetate (41), borneol (40), and thymol (99) that drastically decreased in the other seasons [30]. As previously stated, in 2004, Blanc et al. [19] reported similar results. On the other hand, β-selinene (186) and manool (179) were identified only in the oil obtained in July. In contrast, camphene (47) and 1,8-cineole (55), reached their lowest value in July. In addition, τ-cadinol (116), α-terpineol (95), carveol (52), and β-caryophyllene (129) recorded the high amount in October and then dropped dramatically. Among factors that influence the different chemical composition of the essential oil, there are the brightness, which is different in the four seasons, and the thermoregulation; in fact, the hydrophobic compounds protect the plant from drying out and therefore increase in properties, thus reaching larger quantities [30].
The hydrodistillation process used to produce the essential oil gave an aqueous residue. Its release could represent a risk of environmental pollution. For these reasons, Gharred et al. investigated the aqueous residue of dried and ground leaves and flowers hydrodistillation by HPLC analysis identifying flavonoid compounds. The authors identified quercetin (28) and catechin (19) as the flavonoids responsible for the yellow color of D. graveolens flowers. These two metabolites are present in aqueous residue in a quantity of 4 mg/g and 5.92 mg/g of extract, respectively. The high flavonoid content means that the aqueous residue can be reused for its good dyeing power in the dyeing process [11].
Previously, Lanzetta et al., in 1991 [14], identified two xanthanolides in an acetone extract of leaves, together with sesquiterpenes. Compounds were isolated on Sephadex LH-20 columns followed by fraction purification using TLC; thus, compounds were identified with EIMS and NMR methods.
In 2018, Silinsin et al. studied the composition of plant leaves’ ethanol and water extracts, identifying 10 phenolic compounds among 27 standards. The major phenolic compounds present in leaves were chlorogenic (7) and quinic (14) acids (2167 ± 106 and 845 ± 41 ppb, respectively) [32].
In 2007, the ethanol extract of D. graveolens flowers, after a TLC examination, showed to contain terpenoids, as well as coumarins, phenolics, and flavonoids; however, alkaloids were not identified [12].
Afterward, the crude CH2Cl2/MeOH extract of the air-dried epigeal parts of D. graveolens was subjected to fractionation and further separation and purification by Abou-Douh in 2008. Thanks to structure elucidation procedures, several known sesquiterpenes and two new eudesmane sesquiterpene derivatives, 3a-hydroxyilicic acid methyl ester (171) and 2a-hydroxy-4-epi-ilicic acid (173) [13], were found in addition to the ones previously identified in aerial parts by Sevil et al. in 1992 [17].

3. Biological Activities

The use of natural medicines has for centuries been the only way to treat human illnesses. Nowadays, plant-based phytochemicals are viewed as promising compounds for treating or preventing several diseases due to their safe characteristics. Genus Inula is widely used in East Asia for its several medicinal properties such as antibacterial, anticancerous, cytotoxic, hepatoprotective, and anti-inflammatory activity (Figure 3).
For this reason, researchers have focused their attention on the study of phytochemistry and the biological activity of this genus. In particular, preliminary investigations made on D. graveolens species have evidenced varied medicinal properties attributable to the followed active molecules: eugenol (9), aromadendrin, 7-O-methyl (18), quercetin (28), borneol (40), bornyl acetate (41), eucalyptol (55), p-mentha-1(7),2-dien-8-ol (β-phellandren-8-ol) (76), α-pinene (86), α-terpineol (95), carabrone (122), eudesma, 12-carboxy,3,11(13)-diene (148), ilicic acid (169), invalin (177), invalin acetate (178). This section summarized the latest available knowledge on the potential biological activity of D. graveolens (Table 1).

3.1. Antioxidant Activity

Overproduction of oxidants in the human body is responsible for oxidative stress, a pathological condition associated with several diseases such as diabetes, neurodegenerative, and cardiovascular ailments [34]. It has been reported that intake of vegetables and fruits, rich sources of bioactive molecules, could prevent or delay the development of chronic diseases due to their antioxidant properties [35].
As mentioned before, the harvesting period affected the phytochemical composition and therefore the biological activity of the plant extracts. Essential oils obtained from aerial parts of D. graveolens collected in the four seasons were evaluated by DPPH, ABTS, and β-carotene bleaching tests [30]. Essential oils from plants collected in April and July were the most active. Particularly, in summer, the essential oil showed the best radical scavenging activity vs. DPPH reporting an EC50 of 23.12 ± 0.29 µg/mL lower than the synthetic antioxidant butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) (31.2 ± 0.5 µg/mL), whereas in April, it demonstrated the strongest activity by ABTS (EC50 = 7.58 ± 0.4 µg/mL) and β-carotene bleaching assays (EC50 = 79.10 ± 0.59 µg/mL) [30].
The aqueous residue released during essential oil production was subjected to the radical-scavenging activity by DPPH and ORAC methods for an alternative application [11]. Results showed a significant radical scavenging activity vs. DPPH (IC50 = 0.022 mg/mL) comparable with that of quercetin (28) (IC50 = 0.013 mg/mL). Moreover, the extracts slowed the loss of fluorescence of fluorescein by quenching peroxyl radicals (ORAC) in a dose-dependent manner in the range 0.01 and 0.05 mg/mL, leading to AUCnet of 90 at 0.05 mg/mL.
D. graveolens was used to recover specialized compounds by different solvent and extraction procedures. Nowadays, different techniques are used for the extraction of the antioxidant compounds from plants: the traditional methods like maceration, Soxhlet extraction, and the innovative ones like microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) [36]. This latter allowed to improve the extraction yield of active compounds by reducing solvent, time, and energy. In the UAE, the mechanical effect of the ultrasound causes breaking the cell walls, so they release their content. MAE uses electromagnetic radiations that penetrate the vegetable matrix, leading to the rupture of the cells and the release of intracellular products into the solvent. The microwave effect induced an increase in the temperature and consequently a rapid completion of the reaction. Thus, extraction techniques influence the phytochemical composition and biological activity. As reported by Souri and Shakeri in 2020 [31], aerial parts of D. graveolens extracted with different percentages of methanol and water by microwave showed the highest yield of phenols and tannins. Consequently, it demonstrated the best antioxidant activity in DPPH assay, reporting an IC50 value of 7.7 mg/mL, lower than the extracts obtained by ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) (IC50 value 21.5 mg/mL) and maceration (IC50 value 32.3 mg/mL).
Methanolic extract of D. graveolens showed higher lipid peroxidation inhibition (64.28%, at 50 mg/mL), evaluated by β-carotene bleaching test [37], but it was lower than BHT used as standard, which at the same concentration reported 88.57% of antioxidant activity after 105 min at 50 °C [37]. Moreover, D. graveolens plant extract reported the best ability in chelating ferrous ions at 20 mg/mL (up to 96%). At the same concentration, the extract showed the best ability to scavenge the hydroxyl radicals generated by the Fenton reaction. The extract counteracted superoxide anion without significant difference among the doses reporting a scavenging percentage of 82.51% and 93.43% at 4 and 12 mg/L, respectively [37]. Leaf extract demonstrated better antioxidant activity than the whole plant extract, reporting interesting antioxidant effects at lower doses. As reported by Boudkhili et al. 2012 [38], D. graveolens leaf extract inhibited the oxidation of β-carotene, reporting 45% of antioxidant activity after 24 h at 2 mg/mL, a dose of about 10 times lower than that previously reported [37]. In addition, leaf water and ethanol extracts showed DPPH scavenging activity having an IC50 value of 29.1 µg/mL and 35.9 µg/mL, respectively [32].

3.2. Antitumor Activity

Many studies reported that natural products could represent new and alternative strategies for preventing and treating several human diseases characterized by excessive production of free radicals involved in several diseases, including cancer, and that it is important to have a holistic approach [39,40].
Essential oils of aerial parts of D. graveolens and the main compound, bornyl acetate (41), showed an IC50 of 66.5 and 85.6 µg/mL, respectively, lower than cis-platin (IC50 141.5 µg/mL) used as standard. Essential oils demonstrated the highest toxicity on HT-29 (IC50 24.6 µg/mL) and on A549 (IC50 28.3 µg/mL) cell lines. In all cell lines, the essential oil was more active than bornyl acetate (41) and the standard cis-platin. The disadvantage was that both essential oils and bornyl acetate (41) also affected normal cells (human amnion cells, also indicated with the acronym of FL), reporting an IC50 of 42.1 and 50.6 µg/mL, respectively. Morphologically, both caused disruption and disintegration of cells and detachment of cells from the plate surface in a dose-dependent manner [24]. Otherwise, no toxicity was observed on fibroblasts [11,41]. Bornyl acetate, as other monoterpenes, demonstrated the cytotoxic effect by promoting apoptosis generally caused by a high amount of ROS, and cytostatic effect by inducing cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase leading to the inhibition of cell invasion and migration [42]. The aqueous residue of the hydrodistillation of D. graveolens reported no cytotoxic effect on skin healthy human fibroblast CCD-45 SK at all tested doses after 72 h of treatment [11] as well as polycaprolactone (PCL) polymeric scaffold made with methanol extract of D. graveolens aerial parts on fibroblasts (rat dermal) cell line after 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment [41]. Moreover, the scaffold promoted cell proliferation compared to the control group and cells treated with a scaffold made of PCL alone, suggesting the potential biomedical application of D. graveolens in tissue engineering, for example, to replace damaged tissues, support cell growth, possible injury healing [41]. Other compounds isolated from D. graveolens demonstrated cytotoxic activity against murine lymphocytic leukemia cells (P-338), nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells (KB-3), and vinblastine resistant cells (KB-V1) [33]. Ivalin (177) is the major compound found in many Dittrichia species and, with its derivative ivalin acetate (178), demonstrated the best activity on all investigated cell lines. In particular, ivalin (177) was the most cytotoxic compound showing an ED50 value ranging from 0.14 to 1.8 µg/mL on investigated cell lines (P-338, KB-3, KB-V1 cell line) [33]. Previous studies reported the ability of ivalin in promoting apoptosis by inducing Bax protein and increasing membrane mitochondrial permeability with the consequent release of cytochrome c into the cytosol [43]. Cytotoxicity was also confirmed on breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF7) [12]. Ethanol extract of flowers reported an IC50 of 3.83 µg/mL after 72 h, probably due to the presence of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Chloroform extract demonstrated similar toxicity (6.80 ± 1.73 µg/mL), unlike the aqueous extract which reported lower MCF7 cytotoxicity with an IC50 value ten times higher [12].

3.3. Antimicrobial Activity

In recent years, antibiotic resistance is becoming an important problem all over the world, and for this reason, the search for new molecules plays a key role. Plant metabolites as polyphenols, alkaloids, and terpenoids could represent an interesting approach to afford this task since they can destroy bacterial cells or inhibit their growth [44]. Several natural compounds or plant extracts, including D. graveolens, have been widely studied to assess the antibacterial activity against different species of fungi and bacteria.
In 2016, Mitic et al. [28], reported that the D. graveolens essential oil (10 mg) was effective against two Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, showing an inhibition zone diameter respectively of 33.0 and 22.0 mm compared to 15 μg of streptomycin (23 mm) and 30 μg of chloramphenicol (26–30 mm) used as references [28]. The antibacterial activity of D. graveolens on S. aureus was also investigated by Guinoiseau et al. [45], which reported a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 5 mg/mL and a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) value of 10 mg/mL, very close to each other thus showing a bactericidal activity. In addition, the preliminary treatment with the essential oil at MIC concentration showed that after 2 h of exposure, the bactericidal end-point (99%) was obtained. They observed that the mechanism responsible for this action involved the uncommon invagination of the cell wall and the alterations in the cytoplasm density and distribution, which represent the potential sites of the antibacterial action of the substances [45]. Bamuamba et al. [46] also reported the antibacterial activity of the acetone/water (4:1) crude extract and its hexane fraction against S. aureus. In contrast, a recent study reported no activity against S. aureus, while D. graveolens extract (1.25 mg) was able to inhibit the Gram-positive B. subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis with an inhibition zone of 10 and 34 mm respectively [31]. The extraction processes influence the chemical profile, which may explain the difference in the antibacterial activity results obtained between the extracts or essential oils.
The inhibitory effect of the essential oil against different planktonic strains of E. faecalis was also reported by Benbelaid, et al. [47], obtaining a diameter inhibition zones ranging from 12 ± 1 and 13 ± 1 mm and MIC between 2.000 ± 0.000 and 4.000 ± 0.000% v/v against all tested strains [47]. However, no antibacterial activity was reported by Boudkhili et al. [38] against B. subtilis, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Salmonella spp, Staphylococcus spp.
Another study showed that the Gram-positive B. cereus was inhibited by D. graveolens crude extract CH2Cl2/MeOH (1:1) and its five fractions (Et2O/hexane 1:3; Et2O/hexane 1:1; Et2O/hexane 3:1; Et2O; Me2CO/Et2O 1:1) at the concentration of 200 μg/mL with inhibition zone values ranged between 15 and 20 mm [13].
To date, there are only a few studies reporting the antibacterial activity of the D. graveolens essential oil against Gram-negative bacteria. Usually, Gram-negative bacteria show greater resistance to essential oils than Gram-positives because of the different structure of the cell walls; thus, the mechanism of action of the essential oils or their compounds depend on their chemical properties [48,49]. In particular, the hydrophobicity of substances is important for the activity as it guarantees the disruption of bacterial structures with a consequent increase in permeability [49].
The essential oil was tested against Salmonella thypi and Enterobacter aerogenes, causing an inhibition zone diameter of 33 and 27 mm, respectively [31]. However, it did not inhibit the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli and P. aeruginosa, contrary to what Bamuamba et al. have reported [46].
Djenane et al. [21], on the other hand, have reported the antibacterial activity against the Gram-negative Campylobacter jejuni, responsible for foodborne and gastrointestinal tract infections. Specifically, the essential oil showed an inhibition zone diameter of 53.3 ± 9.0 mm compared to 21 ± 2.6 mm of the positive control gentamicin with a MIC value of 0.2 ± 0.02% v/v. Furthermore, the authors investigated the C. jejuni growth inhibition in chicken meat during storage. In particular, the essential oil (at 2-fold MIC concentration) showed a reduction of 3.08 log10 cfu/g after four days of storage and 6.94 log10 cfu/g after eight days compared to untreated samples (initial populations 5.60 log10 cfu/g increased to 8.14 log10 cfu/g at the end of the storage) thus contributing to the preservation of the chicken meats [21].
The D. graveolens aerial parts essential oil was also tested for antimycotic activity. In particular, it was effective against ten isolates of Candida albicans with a total MIC of 30.675 mg/mL. The mechanism of action involves the lipophilicity and volatile nature of essential oil compounds, which help to attach and penetrate cell membranes [10]. Abou-Douh et al. [13], also investigated the antifungal activity showing that the crude extract CH2Cl2/MeOH (1:1), and its two fractions at 200 μg/mL (Et2O/hexane 1:3 and Me2CO/Et2O 1:3), possess the same activity as the positive control tioconazole (10 mm) against the fungus Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, while other two fractions (Et2O and Me2CO/Et2O 1.5:8.5) exerted a higher effect than tioconazole (14 and 12 mm respectively vs. 10 mm of the positive control) [13].
The presence of compound classes such as alcohols, aldehydes, and phenolics is associated with antimicrobial activity [50]. In addition to these compounds, sesquiterpene acids, and lactones are also reported as antimicrobials. Topҫu et al. [33] investigated the activity of the flavonoid 7-O-methylaromadendrin (18), and the two sesquiterpenes inuviscolide (204) and carabrone (122) extracted from D. graveolens aerial parts. They reported weak antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis with MIC values of 40, 100, and 80 μg/mL respectively if compared with streptomycin (MIC 1.6 μg/mL) and penicillin G (MIC ≤ 0.02 μg/mL). Furthermore, ivalin (177), a sesquiterpene lactone was active against B. subtilis (MIC 375 μg/mL) but less than the positive controls amoxicillin (MIC 0.25 μg/mL) or gentamicin (MIC ≤ 4 μg/mL) [33]. The terpenes borneol (40) and bornyl acetate (41), the main constituents of D. graveolens essential oil, have also been reported weak antibacterial activity [28,50].
However, the chemical profile and thus the biological activities of plant extracts depend on seasonal changes. Sellem et al. [30] demonstrated that the antibacterial effect of D. graveolens essential oil produced in the autumn was greater against the tested microorganisms. In particular, the treatment with 1 mg/mL of the autumn essential oil has reported the lowest MIC value (15.6 μg/mL) against S. aureus and M. luteus, while the July oil was the most effective against the fungal pathogen C. albicans (MIC = 250 μg/mL) [30].
It is difficult to attribute the effect to a single compound; the activity is usually determined by a synergy between the components of the essential oil blend [51]. In addition, in order to improve the antimicrobial effect and to reduce antibiotic doses, essential oils could be associated with antibiotics. Miladinović et al. [26] reported that the combination of D. graveolens essential oil with chloramphenicol, showed a 10-fold reduction of the antibiotic MIC (1.0 to 2048.0 μg/mL) against different tested bacteria may be due to the borneol (40) and other constituents of the essential oil that favor the entrance of the antibiotic. Instead, the association with tetracycline decreased the MIC (0.5 to 64.0 μg/mL) from 1.7-fold to 3.3-fold. In this way, it is possible not only to enhance the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil but also to reduce the dose and the adverse side effects of antibiotics, thus representing a strategy to overcome antibiotic resistance [26].
The antibacterial activity was also investigated in the aqueous residue of the hydrodistillation process to obtain the essential oil. Gharred et al. [11] reported that the extract (10 mg/mL) was active against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, and S. epidermidis, producing an inhibition zone diameter of 18, 21, and 17 mm respectively after 18h of incubation. This represents a great alternative since the aqueous residue is a source of bioactive compounds that can be exploited for biological activities avoiding the risk of environmental pollution [11].

3.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

In addition to the activities previously reported for the aqueous residue of D. graveolens obtained by hydrodistillation, significant anti-inflammatory activity was also demonstrated [11]. In fact, in a recent in vivo study, the aqueous extract (5 and 10 mg/kg), or reference drug (dexamethasone and Aspegic®, 15 mg/kg) were intraperitoneally administrated in mice model and, 30 min after, the xylene, as phlogogenic agent, was topically applied to the right ear of mice. The Aspegic® reference showed the highest anti-inflammatory potential (91.48%) [11]. By comparison with the control, aqueous extract suppressed the ear edema in a dose-dependent manner, reaching 75.59% of inhibition (10 mg/kg), higher than dexamethasone (53.49%). The anti-inflammatory activity is linked to the presence of terpenes which could influence the activities of crucial mediators of inflammation. In fact, it is reported that borneol attenuates the activity of iNOS and COX-2 whose inhibition reduces the production of arachidonic acid, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins [52]. In addition, also the sesquiterpenes inuviscolide (204) and ilicic acid (169) have been reported for their interference in leukotrienes synthesis [53].

3.5. Anti-Cholinesterase and Anti-Tyrosinase Activity

Essential oil of D. graveolens was found to be able to inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and tyrosinase, enzymes involved in the neurodegenerative and depigmentation disorders, respectively, in humans [54].
AChE is predominant in the brain of healthy individuals regulating the acetylcholine level. This enzyme, along with butyrylcholinesterase, is a potential target to ameliorate the cholinergic lack in Alzheimer’s disease. Nowadays, the research of inhibitors of AChE from natural matrices has gained more attention. The acetylcholinesterase inhibition of D. graveolens essential oil (from France) was reported for the first time by Dohi et al. [22] with an IC50 value of 0.27 ± 0.10 mg/mL by in vitro microplate assay method. Recently, more interesting results reported an increased inhibitory capacity of essential oil from Tunisian plants collected from April (IC50 5.50 ± 0.25 µg/mL) to October (IC50 5.01 ± 0.34 µg/mL), then decreased in Winter (IC50 8.12 ± 0.54 µg/mL) [30]. The activity could be affected by chemical composition related to the harvesting season and the plant origin.
In Autumn, the content of α-terpineol (95) (2.74%, IC50 1.3 ± 0.06 mg/mL for AChE inhibition) was higher than other seasons (0.55–1.71%) and in comparison, with French cultivar (1.6%). The presence of other molecules with anti-AChE activity, as 1,8 cineol (55) (IC50 0.015 ± 0.003 mg/mL), eugenol (9) (IC50 0.48 ± 0.16 mg/mL) and α-pinene (86) (IC50 0.022 ± 0.003 mg/mL) could contribute to the biological activity [16,22,30].
Other Inula species reported anti-AChE activity; results ranged from 3.56 ± 0.16 mg GALAE/g) (I. peacockiana) to 5.13 ± 0.15 mg GALAE/g) (I. aucheriana). Some sesquiterpene lactones from I. oculus-christi and I. aucheriana (gaillardin, pulchellin C, and britannin), not identified in D. graveolens, inhibited in vitro AChE enzyme, but the mechanism was not investigated [55].
Tyrosinase plays a vital role in the enzymatic browning of food and depigmentation disorders in humans, playing a key role in the synthesis of melanin [54]. D. graveolens also showed a weak in vitro tyrosinase inhibitory activity in comparison with kojic acid as a reference standard (IC50 4.05 ± 0.25 µg/mL). Harvesting season also affected this inhibitory activity, with IC50 values ranging from 18.34 ± 0.21 µg/mL (April) to 49.25 ± 0.5 µg/mL (July) [30]. Previous studies reported that the sesquiterpenes as 1-O-acetylbritannilactone [56] and inulavosin [57] from Inula britannica L. and Inula nervosa Wall., respectively, were found to be tyrosinase inhibitors in cell-based systems. The compound 1-O-acetylbritannilactone from I. britannica inhibited cell-based tyrosinase activity in a dose-dependent manner in B16 melanoma cells, but no evidence was reported on mushroom and mouse tyrosinase activity by cell-free assay. Thus, its potential mechanism is not directly related to the catalytic activity of the enzyme [56]. Other Inula species, I. peacockiana and I. viscidula methanol extracts inhibited the activity of tyrosinase, with 120.65 ± 0.35 mg KAE/g and 122.13 ± 0.63 mg KAE/g [58].
The table below summarizes the biological activities of D. graveolens (Table 2).

4. Toxicology

Ethnobotanical studies reported the use of D. graveolens for treating cold and against bruises and burns, as external use. Further, the anti-hemorrhoidal employment of this drug and the possibility of using the leaf and twig infusion to treat diabetes and high blood pressure were documented [59,60]. The employment of this species as a traditional medicinal plant was confirmed by investigating its biological activity according to the harvested season, and it was demonstrated that the most interesting biological activity was seen for D. graveolens species collected in April and July [30].
However, besides the health benefits, irritant and/or allergic dermatitis cases are also reported from D. graveolens. Iconic for this adverse reaction is a case study of a 56-year-old man showing dermatitis with marked erythema and hyperkeratosis on the dorsum of the hands and, to a lesser extent, hyperkeratosis on the knees and elbows. The patch test performed by the North American Contact Dermatitis Research Group recognized plants from the Compositae family and, in particular, D. graveolens as triggering factors for dermatitis. The allergen was primarily identified in inuviscolide (204), a sesquiterpene lactone. Molecules from this chemical class are common in many plants belonging to the Compositae family; this can also explain the positive patch test not only for D. graveolens but also for Frullania, Laurus nobillis, and other Compositae. The patient’s skin lesions were treated with clobetasol cream, a class I topical corticoid, and vinyl gloves occlusion at bedtime [61].
Other adverse effects related to D. graveolens were observed in sheep. Specifically, after D. graveolens seed ingestion, pyogranulomatous enteritis and enterotoxemia were observed due to bristles penetration into the intestine mucosa. This enteritis may contribute to cases of undernutrition, anemia, illthrift, and deaths in flocks grazing in fields where this weed grows. Philbey and Morton have observed the presence of penetrating bristles in the jejunum [62], while Schneider and Plessis have noted reddening and thickening across the small intestine of affected sheep [63]. The location of the penetrating bristles into the small intestine can be explained by the fact that they may pass intact throughout the forestomaches and abomasum before separating from the seed for partial digestion in the small intestine. This process allows bristles to embed in the mucosa. However, it was seen that after six days from D. graveolens removal as food, clinical signs of enteritis disappeared even if bristles were still in sheep intestinal mucosa [62]. In another study, Seddon and Carne failed to induce diseases in sheep by feeding them with D. graveolens; in this case, it was not used mature seed but vegetative growth and finely ground pappus hair [64]. In general, it is possible to say that pastures containing D. graveolens should be grazed in the vegetative stage, while when it is in the seeding stage, the presence of an alternative feed is necessary.
The toxic effect of D. graveolens was also demonstrated in fishes. The aerial parts of this species are occasionally used to facilitate freshwater fish capture by fishermen. In fact, after maceration in water, the immersion of leaves in the fishing site led to definitive sedative effects of fishes’ present in the surrounding area. This ichthyotoxicity seems to be related to the presence in D. graveolens of two major sesquiterpenes 12-carboxyeudesma-3,11(13)-diene (148) and tomentosin (189) [14]. Leaves essential oil from D. graveolens was also investigated, together with other 18 essential oils, to evaluate its repellent capacity against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. It was found that although to a lesser extent than more potent essential oils, D. graveolens showed a reduction in mosquitoes’ attraction to human fingers when compared to the finger used as a unique stimulus. This repellent activity seems to be related to the presence of bornyl acetate (41) and p-mentha-1(7),2-dien-8-ol (76) in D. graveolens essential oil [65].
Finally, the allelopathic activity of D. graveolens was also investigated. Omezzine et al. demonstrated that the incorporation of D. graveolens shoots and flowers powder in the soil culture of Lactuca sativa L., Raphanus sativus L., Peganum harmala L., and Silybum marianum L. significantly decreased the shoot and root length of this target species. Equally, the application of D. graveolens shoots and flowers aqueous extract in soil reduced the seedlings’ length even if the flower extract possesses a higher inhibitory effect than the shoot extract [66]. These results agree with that obtained by Abu Irmaileh et al., who demonstrated that the ethanolic extract of D. graveolens significantly reduced root length more than shoot length or seed germination at 200 ppm [67]. This is in line with knowledge for which root growth sensitivity is the best indicator of allelochemicals phytotoxicity for its high permeability to these chemicals [66,68]. The bio-guided fractionation of D. graveolens ethanolic extract allowed the isolation of allelopathic sesquiterpene ilicic acid (169). It was, indeed, demonstrated that this compound inhibited the growth of some plants at 25 ppm. In particular, ilicic acid (169) reduced the root length of cauliflower, cress, and radish [67]. Data obtained by these studies are in line with the invasive nature of D. graveolens. In fact, recently a theory has emerged for which the invasive nature of plants should be linked to their ability to produce secondary metabolites able to inhibit the growth of other species leading to the elimination of competitive vegetation [69,70].

5. Materials and Methods

This study aims to review all the metabolites and biological activities of D. graveolens reported in the literature until October 2021. This review included articles found on two specific databases: Scopus and PubMed. Only English articles containing the selected keywords (Inula graveolens and Dittrichia graveolens) were detected, while the unavailable full texts were not requested. The initial selection provided 85 articles, of which 68 were found in Scopus and 17 on PubMed. Among the 85 articles, 52 were relevant to the research topic. All selected articles were carefully analyzed and divided by argument (chemical characterization, biological activity, toxicology), as shown in Figure 4.

6. Conclusions

D. graveolens is a Mediterranean native plant, spreading northward in Europe. It has recently attracted increasing research interest due to its chemical composition and biological activities, especially due to its terpene and phenolic content. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the chemical composition is strongly influenced by plant collection seasons, phenological stage, processing, and extraction methods. Among studied biological activities: antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and cholinesterase inhibitory activities seem to be the most promising. Although this plant species has been used for ages as traditional medicine for different purposes, several areas still need investigation like antirheumatic, anti-inflammation, and anti-infection against Leishmaniasis. In fact, more studies are needed, as preclinical or clinical studies, to define the molecular pathways involved in biological activities demonstrated by D. graveolens as well as the role of the main components for its pharmacological application. Moreover, it is necessary to determine whether there might be synergy or antagonism among these components and, at the same time, there might be other industrial applications of its extract or essential oil in the food industry, for its effectiveness as an antioxidant or antimicrobial agent.
Furthermore, the ecological role of D. graveolens seems to be worth future investigation as the invasive nature of plants should be linked to their ability to produce specialized metabolites able to inhibit the growth of other species leading to the elimination of competitive vegetation and to the spread of climate change. Moreover, characterization of plant biology and life cycle traits, including growth and phenology, is a necessary first step for assessing invasion potential and for developing targeted management strategies for invasive plants.
Despite all the studies carried out, there are still several open issues, and there is a lack of description of its bioavailability that has not been thoroughly investigated. Consequently, further studies are needed to address the ecological role and mechanism of action of Dittrichia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at online, Table S1: Bioactive metabolites identified in Dittrichia graveolens L.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M. and V.C.; software, M.P., L.L., D.R., I.F., C.S. and G.E.; resources, L.M. and V.C.; data curation, L.M., V.C., G.E., M.P., L.L., D.R., I.F., C.S., M.B.M., H.B.J.; writing—original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, V.C.; supervision, L.M. and V.C.; project administration, L.M. and V.C.; funding acquisition, L.M. and V.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by: Regione Basilicata; Project ALIMINTEGRA, GO NUTRIBAS financed on 16.1 PSR Basilicata funding ex D.G.R. n° 312/17 CUP: C31G18000210002; Italian Ministry of the Economic Development “Fondo per la Crescita Sostenibile—Sportello “Agrifood” PON I&C 2014–2020”, Project n. F/200099/01-03/X45 and Bando contributo alla ricerca, Anno 2021, Progetto “CiaAQ”_PI: Valeria Costantino.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Viviana Di Matteo, Federica Savarese, and Alessia Panariello for their kind contribution to the project “CiaAQ”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

A549Human lung carcinoma
ABTS2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid
AChEAcetylcholinesterase
BCBβ-carotene bleaching tests
BHTbutylhydroxytoluene
DPPH2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
EIMSElectron Ionization Mass Spectroscopy
GC-FIDGas chromatograph-flame ionization detection
GC-MSGas chromatography-mass spectrometer
FLHuman amnion cells
HeLaHuman cervix carcinoma
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography
HT29Human colon carcinoma
KB-3Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
KB-VlVinblastine resistant
LC-MSLiquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
MAEMicrowave-assisted extraction
MBCMinimum bactericidal concentration
MCF7Human breast adenocarcinoma
MICMinimum inhibitory concentration
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
ORACquenching peroxyl radicals
P-388Murine lymphocytic leukemia
PCLPolycaprolactone
ROSReactive oxygen species
SFESupercritical CO2 extraction
TLCThin-layer chromatography
UAEUltrasound-assisted extraction

References

  1. Brullo, S.; de Marco, G. Taxonomical revision of the genus Dittrichia (Asteraceae). Port. Acta Biol. 2000, 19, 341–354. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parsons, W.T.; Cuthbertson, E. Noxious Weeds of Australia; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton, Australia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brownsey, R.N.; Kyser, G.B.; DiTomaso, J.M. Seed and germination biology of Dittrichia graveolens (Stinkwort). Invasive Plant. Sci. Manag. 2013, 6, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lustenhouwer, N.; Wilschut, R.A.; Williams, J.L.; van der Putten, W.H.; Levine, J.M. Rapid evolution of phenology during range expansion with recent climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, e534–e544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Parson, W.T.; Cuthbertson, E. Noxiuos Weeds of Australia; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton, Australia, 1992; Volume 1, pp. 281–283. ISBN 9780909605810. [Google Scholar]
  6. Parolin, P.; Scotta, M.I.; Bresch, C. Biology of Dittrichia viscosa, a Mediterranean ruderal plant: A review. Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 83, 251–262. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownsey, R.N.; Kyser, G.B.; DiTomaso, J.M. Growth and phenology of Dittrichia graveolens, a rapidly spreading invasive plant in California. Biol. Invasions 2014, 16, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roy, D.; Alderman, D.; Anastasiu, P.; Arianoutsou, M.; Augustin, S.; Bacher, S.; Başnou, C.; Beisel, J.; Bertolino, S.; Bonesi, L.; et al. DAISIE Inventory of Alien Invasive Species in Europe; Version 1.7.; Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO): Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pieroni, A.; Giusti, M.E.; De Pasquale, C.; Lenzarini, C.; Censorii, E.; Gonzáles-Tejero, M.R.; Sánchez-Rojas, C.P.; Ramiro-Gutiérrez, J.M.; Skoula, M.; Johnson, C. Circum-Mediterranean cultural heritage and medicinal plant uses in traditional animal healthcare: A field survey in eight selected areas within the RUBIA project. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2006, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Aghel, N.; Mahmoudabadi, A.Z.; Darvishi, L. Volatile constituents and anti candida activity of the aerial parts essential oil of Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter grown in Iran. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2011, 5, 772–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gharred, N.; Baaka, N.; Bettache, N.; Hamdi, A.; Dbeibia, A.; Dhaouadi, H.; Morere, A.; Menut, C.; Dridi-Dhaouadi, S. Wastewater to Ecological dyeing process and bioactive compounds resources: Case study of Dittrichia graveolens hydrodistillation aqueous residue. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 5065–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abu-Dahab, R.; Afifi, F. Antiproliferative activity of selected medicinal plants of Jordan against a breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF7). Sci. Pharm. 2007, 75, 121–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Abou-Douh, A.M. New eudesmane derivatives and other sesquiterpenes from the epigeal parts of Dittrichia graveolens. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56, 1535–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lanzetta, R.; Lama, G.; Mauriello, G.; Parrilli, M.; Racioppi, R.; Sodano, G. Ichthyotoxic sesquiterpenes and xanthanolides from Dittrichia graveolens. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 1121–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rustaiyan, A.; Jakupovic, J.; Chau-Thi, T.; Bohlmann, F.; Sadjadi, A. Further sesquiterpene lactones from the genus Dittrichia. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 2603–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sarkar, B.; Alam, S.; Rajib, T.K.; Islam, S.S.; Araf, Y.; Ullah, M.A. Identification of the most potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants for possible treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A computational approach. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2021, 22, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sevil, O. A eudesmanolide and other constituents from Inula graveolens. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 195–197. [Google Scholar]
  18. Baldovini, N.; Tomi, F.; Casanova, J. Enantiomeric differentiation of bornyl acetate by 13C-NMR using a chiral lanthanide shift reagent. Phytochem. Anal. 2003, 14, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Blanc, M.C.; Muselli, A.; Bradesi, P.; Casanova, J. Chemical composition and variability of the essential oil of Inula graveolens from Corsica. Flavour Fragr. J. 2004, 19, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boudouda, H.B.; Kabouche, A.; Aburjai, T.; Kabouche, Z. GC-MS analysis of Inula graveolens (L.) Desf. from Algeria. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2013, 16, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Djenane, D.; Yangueela, J.; Gomez, D.; Roncales, P. Perspectives on the use of essential oils as antimicrobials against Campylobacter jejuni CECT 7572 in retail chicken meats packaged in microaerobic atmosphere. J. Food Saf. 2012, 32, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dohi, S.; Terasaki, M.; Makino, M. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity and chemical composition of commercial essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4313–4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ghosn, M.W.; Chemali, C.B.; Zaknoun, F.I.; Saliba, N.A. Chemical profle of the Dittrichia graveolens (Desf.) greuter essential oil of Lebanese origin. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 443–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karan, T.; Yildiz, I.; Aydin, A.; Erenler, R. Inhibition of various cancer cells proliferation of bornyl acetate and essential oil from Inula graveolens (Linnaeus) Desf. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2018, 12, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Marongiu, B.; Piras, A.; Pani, F.; Porcedda, S.; Ballero, M. Extraction, separation and isolation of essential oils from natural matrices by supercritical CO2. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miladinović, D.L.; Ilić, B.S.; Kocić, B.D.; Marković, M.S.; Miladinović, L.C. In vitro trials of Dittrichia graveolens essential oil combined with antibiotics. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1934578X1601100642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mirza, M.; Ahmadi, L. Composition of the essential oil of Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2000, 12, 507–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mitic, V.; Stankov Jovanovic, V.; Ilic, M.; Jovanovic, O.; Djordjevic, A.; Stojanovic, G. Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter essential oil: Chemical composition, multivariate analysis, and antimicrobial activity. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Petropoulou, A.; Tzakou, O.; Verykokidou, E. Volatile constituents of Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter from Greece. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004, 16, 400–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sellem, I.; Chakchouk-Mtibaa, A.; Zaghden, H.; Smaoui, S.; Ennouri, K.; Mellouli, L. Harvesting season dependent variation in chemical composition and biological activities of the essential oil obtained from Inula graveolens (L.) grown in Chebba (Tunisia) salt marsh. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 4835–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Souri, M.; Shakeri, A. Optimization of total phenol and tannin content and biological activity of Dittrichia graveolens (L.) GREUTER. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2020, 16, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silinsin, M.; Bursal, E. UHPLC-MS/MS phenolic profiling and in vitro antioxidant activities of Inula graveolens (L.) Desf. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 1467–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Topçu, G.; Öksüz, S.; Shieh, H.-L.; Cordell, G.A.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Bozok-Johansson, C. Cytotoxic and antibacterial sesquiterpenes from Inula graveolens. Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sinisgalli, C.; Faraone, I.; Vassallo, A.; Caddeo, C.; Bisaccia, F.; Armentano, M.F.; Milella, L.; Ostuni, A. Phytochemical profile of Capsicum annuum L. cv Senise, incorporation into liposomes, and evaluation of cellular antioxidant activity. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vinatoru, M.; Mason, T.; Calinescu, I. Ultrasonically assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave assisted extraction (MAE) of functional compounds from plant materials. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 97, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Russo, D.; Faraone, I.; Labanca, F.; Sinisgalli, C.; Bartolo, M.; Andrade, P.B.; Valentao, P.; Milella, L. Comparison of different green-extraction techniques and determination of the phytochemical profile and antioxidant activity of Echinacea angustifolia L. extracts. Phytochem. Anal. 2019, 30, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Al-Fartosy, A.J. Antioxidant properties of methanolic extract from Inula graveolens L. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2011, 35, 591–596. [Google Scholar]
  38. Boudkhili, M.; Greche, H.; Bouhdid, S.; Zerargui, F.; Aarab, L. In vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of some Moroccan’s medicinal. Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2012, 4, 637–642. [Google Scholar]
  39. Spatuzzi, R.; Giulietti, M.V.; Ricciuti, M.; Merico, F.; Fabbietti, P.; Raucci, L.; Bilancia, D.; Cormio, C.; Vespa, A. Exploring the associations between spiritual well-being, burden, and quality of life in family caregivers of cancer patients. Palliat. Support. Care 2019, 17, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, H.; Labanca, F.; Ullah, H.; Hussain, Y.; Tzvetkov, N.T.; Akkol, E.K.; Milella, L.J.P.R. Advances and challenges in cancer treatment and nutraceutical prevention: The possible role of dietary phenols in BRCA regulation. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Kaabi, W.J.; Albukhaty, S.; Al-Fartosy, A.J.; Al-Karagoly, H.K.; Al-Musawi, S.; Sulaiman, G.M.; Dewir, Y.H.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Soliman, D.A. Development of Inula graveolens (L.) plant extract electrospun/polycaprolactone nanofibers: A novel material for biomedical application. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Silva, B.I.; Nascimento, E.A.; Silva, C.J.; Silva, T.G.; Aguiar, J.S. Anticancer activity of monoterpenes: A systematic review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 5775–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, Z.; Liu, F.-y.; Lin, S.-q.; Zhang, C.-y.; Ma, J.-h.; Guo, C.; Jia, F.-j.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, W.-d.; Li, X.J.M. Ivalin Induces Mitochondria-Mediated Apoptosis Associated with the NF-κB Activation in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma SMMC-7721 Cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Khameneh, B.; Iranshahy, M.; Soheili, V.; Bazzaz, B.S.F. Review on plant antimicrobials: A mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Guinoiseau, E.; Luciani, A.; Rossi, P.; Quilichini, Y.; Ternengo, S.; Bradesi, P.; Berti, L. Cellular effects induced by Inula graveolens and Santolina corsica essential oils on Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 29, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bamuamba, K.; Gammon, D.W.; Meyers, P.; Dijoux-Franca, M.-G.; Scott, G. Anti-mycobacterial activity of five plant species used as traditional medicines in the Western Cape Province (South Africa). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 117, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Benbelaïd, F.; Khadir, A.; Abdoune, M.A.; Bendahou, M.; Muselli, A.; Costa, J. Antimicrobial activity of some essential oils against oral multidrug–resistant Enterococcus faecalis in both planktonic and biofilm state. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Trombetta, D.; Castelli, F.; Sarpietro, M.G.; Venuti, V.; Cristani, M.; Daniele, C.; Saija, A.; Mazzanti, G.; Bisignano, G. Mechanisms of antibacterial action of three monoterpenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2474–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; De Martino, L.; Coppola, R.; De Feo, V. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1451–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dorman, H.D.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Swamy, M.K.; Akhtar, M.S.; Sinniah, U.R. Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils against human pathogens and their mode of action: An updated review. Evid. -Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 3012462 . [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, T.; Song, B.; Cho, K.S.; Lee, I. Therapeutic potential of volatile terpenes and terpenoids from forests for inflammatory diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Barrero, A.F.; Herrador, M.M.; Arteaga, P.; Catalán, J.V. Dittrichia viscosa L. Greuter: Phytochemistry and biological activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3, 1934578X0800301110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Labanca, F.; Faraone, I.; Nolè, M.R.; Hornedo-Ortega, R.; Russo, D.; García-Parrilla, M.C.; Chiummiento, L.; Bonomo, M.G.; Milella, L. New Insights into the exploitation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Aglianico leaf extracts for nutraceutical purposes. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hajimehdipoor, H.; Mosaddegh, M.; Naghibi, F.; Haeri, A.; Hamzeloo-Moghadam, M.J. Natural sesquiterpen lactones as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2014, 86, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Choo, S.-J.; Ryoo, I.-J.; Kim, K.C.; Na, M.; Jang, J.-H.; Ahn, J.S.; Yoo, I.-D. Hypo-pigmenting effect of sesquiterpenes from Inula britannica in B16 melanoma cells. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2014, 37, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fujita, H.; Motokawa, T.; Katagiri, T.; Yokota, S.; Yamamoto, A.; Himeno, M.; Tanaka, Y. Inulavosin, a melanogenesis inhibitor, leads to mistargeting of tyrosinase to lysosomes and accelerates its degradation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009, 129, 1489–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ceylan, R.; Zengin, G.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Sinan, K.I.; Ak, G.; Jugreet, S.; Cakır, O.; Ouelbani, R.; Paksoy, M.Y.; Yılmaz, M.A. Enzyme inhibition and antioxidant functionality of eleven Inula species based on chemical components and chemometric insights. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2021, 95, 104225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maxia, A.; Lancioni, M.C.; Balia, A.N.; Alborghetti, R.; Pieroni, A.; Loi, M.C. Medical ethnobotany of the Tabarkins, a Northern Italian (Ligurian) minority in south-western Sardinia. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2008, 55, 911–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nortje, J.; Van Wyk, B.-E. Medicinal plants of the kamiesberg, namaqualand, South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 171, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thong, H.Y.; Yokota, M.; Kardassakis, D.; Maibach, H.I. Allergic contact dermatitis from Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter (stinkwort). Contact Dermat. 2008, 58, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Philbey, A.; Morton, A. Pyogranulomatous enteritis in sheep due to penetrating seed heads of Dittrichia graveolens. Aust. Vet. J. 2000, 78, 858–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schneider, D.; Du Plessis, J. Enteritis in sheep due to the ingestion of Inula graveolens Desf (Cape Khakiweed). J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 1980, 51, 159–161. [Google Scholar]
  64. Seddon, H.; Carne, H. Feeding tests with stinkwort (Inula graveolens). NSW Dept Agric. Sci Bull. 1927, 29, 46–47. [Google Scholar]
  65. Drapeau, J.; Fröhler, C.; Touraud, D.; Kröckel, U.; Geier, M.; Rose, A.; Kunz, W. Repellent studies with Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and human olfactory tests on 19 essential oils from Corsica, France. Flavour Fragr. J. 2009, 24, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Omezzine, F.; Ladhari, A.; Rinez, A.; Haouala, R. Allelopathic potential of Inula graveolens on crops and weeds. Allelopath. J. 2011, 28, 63–76. [Google Scholar]
  67. Abu Irmaileh, B.E.; Al-Aboudi, A.M.; Abu Zarga, M.H.; Awwadi, F.; Haddad, S.F. Selective phytotoxic activity of 2,3,11β,13-tetrahydroaromaticin and ilicic acid isolated from Inula graveolens. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nishida, N.; Tamotsu, S.; Nagata, N.; Saito, C.; Sakai, A. Allelopathic effects of volatile monoterpenoids produced by Salvia leucophylla: Inhibition of cell proliferation and DNA synthesis in the root apical meristem of Brassica campestris seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 1187–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chengxu, W.; Mingxing, Z.; Xuhui, C.; Bo, Q. Review on allelopathy of exotic invasive plants. Procedia Eng. 2011, 18, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hierro, J.L.; Callaway, R.M. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant. Soil 2003, 256, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bubble map visualizing items from articles included in the review.
Figure 1. Bubble map visualizing items from articles included in the review.
Molecules 27 00895 g001
Figure 2. Methods used for the extraction of active principles from D. graveolens.
Figure 2. Methods used for the extraction of active principles from D. graveolens.
Molecules 27 00895 g002
Figure 3. Graphical representation of D. graveolens biological activities. Red marks indicate the blocking of ROS formation, inhibition of tyrosinase (TYR) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and protection against bacteria and fungi by D. graveolens.
Figure 3. Graphical representation of D. graveolens biological activities. Red marks indicate the blocking of ROS formation, inhibition of tyrosinase (TYR) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and protection against bacteria and fungi by D. graveolens.
Molecules 27 00895 g003
Figure 4. Selected articles divided per argument.
Figure 4. Selected articles divided per argument.
Molecules 27 00895 g004
Table 1. Bioactive metabolites present in D. graveolens L.
Table 1. Bioactive metabolites present in D. graveolens L.
Bioactive Compounds
CompoundFormulaStructureAnalyzed
Sample
Extraction MethodChemical
Composition Analysis
QuantitativeOrigin of PlantReference
Eugenol (9) C10H12O2 Molecules 27 00895 i001Essential oilSteam-distilledGC-MSTraceFrance[16,22]
Aromadendrin, 7-O-methyl (18)C16H14O6 Molecules 27 00895 i002Air-dried and powdered aerial partsMaceration with petrol-
Et2O-MeOH (1:1:1), then with MeOH
Sephadex LH-20 columns, prep. TLC, EIMS, NMR470 mg/32 g of the residue of extract treated with MeOH/1 Kg of initial aerial partsAydos Dag (Istanbul)[17]
Quercetin (28) C15H10O7 Molecules 27 00895 i003Aqueous residue of dried leaves and flowers hydrodistillationHydrodistillationHPLC UV-vis4 mg/g of extractMonastir (Tunisia)[11]
Dried leaves Maceration with with MeOHUHPLC-MS/MS118 ± 8 μg/kg extractBingol (Turkey)[32]
Borneol (40) C10H18O Molecules 27 00895 i004Essential oilHydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS5.44%Shush (Khuzestan Province, Iran)[10]
Vapour distillation of aerial partsGC-MS7.6%Ajaccio (Corsica)[19]
Hydrodistillation of fresh aerial partsGC-MS2.74–12.40%Bekaa and Sannine (Lebanon)[23]
Hydrodistillation of dried aerial partsGC-MS11.34%Tokat Turkey Provence[24]
Steam distillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS60.7%Gorgan province (Iran)[27]
Hydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS12.8%Attiki County (Greece)[29]
Steam distillation of fresh plantGC-MS23.65–37.29%Chebba (Mahdia, Tunisia)[30]
Steam hydrodistillation of dried leavesGC-MS21.04%Tizi-Ouzou province (Algeria)[21]
Steam-distilledGC-MS20 ± 0.35%France[22]
Hydrodistillation of dried aerial partsGC-MS18.7%Stara planina mountain (Serbia)[26]
Hydrodistillation of dried flowering aerial partsGC-MS and GC-FID43.6%Village
Vladimirovci (Montenegro)
[28]
Hydrodistillation of the fresh aerial partsGC-MS18.3%Constantine
(North Easter Algerian)
[20]
Bornyl acetate (41) C12H20O2 Molecules 27 00895 i005Essential oilHydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS0.24%Shush (Khuzestan Province, Iran)[10]
Vapour distillation of aerial partsGC-MS56.8%Ajaccio (Corsica)[19]
Hydrodistillation of fresh aerial partsGC-MS70.64–72.31%Bekaa and Sannine (Lebanon)[23]
Hydrodistillation of dried aerial partsGC-MS60.43%Tokat Turkey Provence[24]
Steam distillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS6.8%Gorgan province (Iran)[27]
Hydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS25.4%Attiki County (Greece)[29]
Steam distillation of fresh plantGC-MS40.16–45.34%Chebba (Mahdia, Tunisia)[30]
Steam hydrodistillation of dried leavesGC-MS40.85%Tizi-Ouzou province (Algeria)[21]
Steam-distilledGC-MS54 ± 2.0%France[22]
Hydrodistillation of dried aerial partsGC-MS21.7%Stara planina mountain (Serbia)[26]
Hydrodistillation of dried flowering aerial partsGC-MS and GC-FID38.3%Village
Vladimirovci (Montenegro)
[28]
DistillationNMR57.4%-[18]
Cineole, 1,8 (syn. Eucalyptol) (55)C10H18O Molecules 27 00895 i006Essential oilHydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS54.89%Shush (Khuzestan Province, Iran)[10]
Steam distillation of fresh plantGC-MSTrace—0.22%Chebba (Mahdia, Tunisia)[30]
Steam hydrodistillation of dried leavesGC-MS2.41%Tizi-Ouzou province (Algeria)[21]
Hydrodistillation of the fresh aerial partsGC-MS0.9%Constantine (North Easter Algerian)[20]
Steam-distilledGC-MSTraceFrance[16,22]
Supercritical fluid extractSupercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of air-dried aerial partsGC-MSTraceMonserrato (southern Sardinia)[25]
p-Mentha-1(7),2-dien-8-ol (β-phellandren-8-ol) (76) C10H16O Molecules 27 00895 i007Essential oilVapour distillation of aerial partsGC-MS0.3%Ajaccio (Corsica)[19]
α-Pinene (86) C10H16 Molecules 27 00895 i008Essential oilHydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS3.21%Shush (Khuzestan Province, Iran)[10]
Vapour distillation of aerial partsGC-MS0.3%Ajaccio (Corsica)[19]
Hydrodistillation of fresh aerial partsGC-MS0.02–0.03%Bekaa and Sannine (Lebanon)[23]
Hydrodistillation of dried aerial partsGC-MS0.16%Tokat Turkey Provence[24]
Steam distillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS0.2%Gorgan province (Iran)[27]
Hydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MSTraceAttiki County (Greece)[29]
Steam distillation of fresh plantGC-MSTrace–0.85%Chebba (Mahdia, Tunisia)[30]
Steam-distilledGC-MS0.21 ± 0.0050%France[22]
Hydrodistillation of dried aerial partsGC-MS1.2%Stara planina mountain (Serbia)[26]
Hydrodistillation of dried flowering aerial partsGC-MS and GC-FIDTraceVillage Vladimirovci (Montenegro)[28]
α-Terpineol (95) C10H18O Molecules 27 00895 i009Essential oilHydrodistillation of air-dried aerial partsGC-MS1.31%Shush (Khuzestan Province, Iran)[10]
Vapour distillation of aerial partsGC-MS0.4%Ajaccio (Corsica)[19]
Steam distillation of fresh plantGC-MSTrace–0.85%Chebba (Mahdia, Tunisia)[30]
Steam hydrodistillation of dried leavesGC-MS1.52%Tizi-Ouzou province (Algeria)[21]
Steam-distilledGC-MS1.6 ± 0.062%France[16,22]
Hydrodistillation of dried flowering aerial partsGC-MS and GC-FIDTraceVillage Vladimirovci (Montenegro)[28]
Carabrone (122) C15H20O3 Molecules 27 00895 i010Air-dried and powdered aerial partsMaceration with petrol-
Et2O-MeOH (1:1:1), then with MeOH
Sephadex LH-20 columns, prep. TLC, EIMS, NMR18 mg/32 g of residue of extract treated with MeOH/1 Kg of initial aerial partsAydos Dag (Istanbul)[17]
Eudesma, 12-carboxy,3,11(13)-diene (148)C15H22O2 Molecules 27 00895 i011Fresh leaves Maceration with Me2CO, then partition with different solventsLC-MS and NMR340 mg/1.3 g of petrol extractMediterranean
area
[14]
Ilicic acid (169)C15H24O3 Molecules 27 00895 i012Air-dried and powdered aerial partsMaceration with petrol-
Et2O-MeOH (1:1:1), then with MeOH
Sephadex LH-20 columns, prep. TLC, EIMS, NMR4800 mg/32 g of the residue of extract treated with MeOH/1 Kg of initial aerial partsAydos Dag (Istanbul)[17]
Air-dried epigeal parts extractsExhaustive maceration with CH2Cl2/MeOH followed by 80% MeOHNMR0.33%Coastal regions of north-western Egypt[13]
Fresh leaves Maceration with Me2CO, then partition with different solventsLC-MS and NMR Mediterranean
area
[14]
Ivalin (177)C15H20O3 Molecules 27 00895 i013Air-dried aerial partsMaceration with petrol-Et2O-MeOHNMR Aydos Mountain (Istanbul)[33]
Ivalin, acetate (syn. Acetylivalin) (178)C17H22O4 Molecules 27 00895 i014Aerial parts Maceration with petrol-Et2O-MeOHNMR Aydos Mountain (Istanbul)[33]
Electron Ionization Mass Spectroscopy (EIMS).
Table 2. Biological activity of D. graveolens.
Table 2. Biological activity of D. graveolens.
SampleTest/ModelConcentration/Dosage TestedEffectReference
Essential oil from aerial partsDPPH
ABTS
BCB
500; 250; 125; 60.25; 30.125 µg/mLAntioxidant activity[30]
S. aureus
M. luteus
C. albicans
Antimicrobial activity[10,30,45]
C. jejuni32 μL/mL to 0.3125 μL/mLAntimicrobial activity[21]
Enzymatic assay1 mg/mL to 0.0048 mg/mLAcetylcholinesterase inhibition
Tyrosinase inhibition
[22,30]
HeLa, HT29, A549, MCF-7 cancer cells0 μg/mL to 200 μg/mLAntitumoral activity[24]
Essential oil from leaves and flowersDPPH
ORAC
0 mg/mL to 0.12 mg/mL
0.01 mg/mL to 0.06 mg/mL
Antioxidant activity[11]
V. alginolyticus,
V. parahaemolyticus S. epidermidis
10 mg/mLAntibacterial activity[11,47]
E. faecalis10 μL
Swiss mice5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kgAnti-inflammatory activity[11]
Flowers essential oilS. aureus
B.s subtilis
10 mgAntibacterial activity[28]
Aerial parts extractDPPH Antioxidant activity[31]
B. subtilis
E. faecalis
S. typhi
E. aerogenes
1.25 mgAntibacterial activity[31]
B. cereus
S. brevicaulis
200 μg/mLAntibacterial activity[13]
Fibroblasts’ (rat dermal) cell line5 wt.% of extract inserted on a scaffold made with polycaprolactone (PCL)Cell proliferation promotion[41]
Male albino rats1 mL/100 g body weightAnti-inflammatory and antipyretic activity[13]
Whole plant extractBCB
Reducing power
Ferrous ion chelating ability
Superoxide radical scavenging activity
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity
0 mg/mL to 20 mg/mLAntioxidant activity[37,38]
B. subtilis, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp.10 mg/mLNo Antimicrobial activity[38]
S. aureus62.5 μg/mL; 125 μg/mL; 250 μg/mL; 500 μg/mL; 1 mg/mL; 2 mg/mLAntibacterial activity[46]
Leaf extractDPPH30 μg/mLAntioxidant activity[32]
Flowers extractMCF7 cell line0.1 μg/mL to 100 μg/mLAntiproliferative activity[12]
Isolated compoundsP-338, KB-3, KB-V1 cell line5 different concentrations not specifiedCytotoxic activity[33]
S. epidermidis
B. subtilis
Antimicrobial activity
Abbreviation: DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; ORAC: quenching peroxyl radicals; BCB: β-carotene bleaching tests; HeLa: human cervix carcinoma; HT29: human colon carcinoma; A549: human lung carcinoma; MCF7: human breast adenocarcinoma; P-388: murine lymphocytic leukemia; KB-3: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; KB-Vl: vinblastine resistant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ponticelli, M.; Lela, L.; Russo, D.; Faraone, I.; Sinisgalli, C.; Mustapha, M.B.; Esposito, G.; Jannet, H.B.; Costantino, V.; Milella, L. Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter, a Rapidly Spreading Invasive Plant: Chemistry and Bioactivity. Molecules 2022, 27, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030895

AMA Style

Ponticelli M, Lela L, Russo D, Faraone I, Sinisgalli C, Mustapha MB, Esposito G, Jannet HB, Costantino V, Milella L. Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter, a Rapidly Spreading Invasive Plant: Chemistry and Bioactivity. Molecules. 2022; 27(3):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ponticelli, Maria, Ludovica Lela, Daniela Russo, Immacolata Faraone, Chiara Sinisgalli, Mayssa Ben Mustapha, Germana Esposito, Hichem Ben Jannet, Valeria Costantino, and Luigi Milella. 2022. "Dittrichia graveolens (L.) Greuter, a Rapidly Spreading Invasive Plant: Chemistry and Bioactivity" Molecules 27, no. 3: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030895

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop