Next Article in Journal
Directed Evolution of a Nonheme Diiron N-oxygenase AzoC for Improving Its Catalytic Efficiency toward Nitrogen Heterocycle Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, and Thin-Film Transistor Response of Benzo[i]pentahelicene-3,6-dione
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Behavior of Rotation Transmission Nano-System in Helium Environment: A Molecular Dynamics Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigating the Crystallization Process of Boron-Bearing Silicate-Phosphate Glasses by Thermal and Spectroscopic Methods

by
Magdalena Szumera
1,*,
Barbara Łagowska
1,
Justyna Sułowska
1,
Piotr Jeleń
1,
Zbigniew Olejniczak
2,
Radosław Lach
1,
Anna Berezicka
1 and
Agnieszka Kijo-Kleczkowska
3
1
Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
2
The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Science, Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342 Krakow, Poland
3
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 21, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(3), 867; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030867
Submission received: 30 December 2021 / Revised: 20 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published: 27 January 2022

Abstract

:
Glasses and devitrificates from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–CaO–MgO system with constant contents of SiO2 and P2O5 network formers, modified by the addition of B2O3, were analyzed. All materials were synthesized by the traditional melt-quenching technique. The glass stability (GS) parameters (Krg, ∆T, KW, KH) were determined. The effect of the addition of B2O3 on the GS, liquation phenomenon, crystallization process, and the type of crystallizing phases were examined using SEM-EDS, DSC, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy imaging methods. It was observed that the addition of B2O3 increased the tendency of the glass to crystallize. Both phosphates (e.g., Ca9MgK(PO4)7, Mg3Ca3(PO4)4), and silicates (e.g., K2Mg5(Si12O30), CaMg(Si2O6), MgSiO3) crystallized in the studied system. The Raman spectrum for the orthophosphate Mg3Ca3(PO4)4 stanfieldite type was obtained. Boron ions were introduced into the structures of crystalline compounds at high crystallization temperatures. The type of crystallizing phases was found to be related to the phenomenon of liquation, and the order of their occurrence was dependent on the Gibbs free enthalpy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

It is known that crystallization processes, such as the crystallization of a glass, consist of three fundamental steps: the attainment of metastability, the formation of nuclei, and crystal growth [1]. When a liquid is cooled below its melting point, crystal nucleation can occur homogeneously or heterogeneously in the body of the liquid or on the surface. A typical glass-forming silicate melt is unique among solutions due to its ability to dissolve nearly all chemical elements. Such a melt is, therefore, a solution of oxides present in a thermodynamic equilibrium. Another unusual property of a glass-forming melt is its enormous change in viscosity with temperature. The viscosity of the material increases with cooling, but at certain temperatures, the mobility of molecules may still be great enough for a crystalline phase to form [2].
Liquation is considered a precrystallization ordering process [3]. Glasslike regions may form with the composition of the future crystals without simultaneous crystallization of these regions. Therefore, crystallization is preceded by a certain independent effect of primary precrystallizational demixing accompanied by a gain in thermodynamic potential. Separation of the precrystallizational phase (demixing) occurs by way of forming critically sized amorphous nuclei that are capable of further growth [4]. Precrystallization microphase separation is analogous to the usual metastable phase separation of the liquid type, except that, first, in usual liquid metastable phase separation, the composition of the glasses deposited may differ greatly from the composition of the possible crystals and, second, it may appear and disappear reversibly without crystallization, depending on the temperature. Moreover, metastable phase separation occurs only in certain glasses in a definite composition region, whereas crystallization of glasses is possible with any composition and is irreversible below the solidus temperature. If metastable liquation were a purely precrystallization effect, it could not disappear with a rise in temperature once it had occurred, culminating in crystallization below the solidus [4]
The crystallization of multicomponent glasses consisting of two glass formers, i.e., SiO2 and P2O5, SiO2 and B2O2, or P2O5 and B2O3, is particularly complex. According to the literature, the crystallization process occurs in several stages, beginning with the formation of simple compounds built from chemical elements that are weakly bound to the glass structure and, therefore, are most mobile at a given temperature [5,6]. They play the role of nucleating agents. Compounds with more complex structures are formed in the next stages depending on the chemical composition of the glass.
In ternary system glasses, in which the matrix is formed by SiO2 and B2O3 and one modifying component, the crystallization process generally has a single-stage or multi-stage character. The products of crystallization are usually borates (β-BaB2O4 [7], Ba2Zn(BO3)2 [8], Mg2B2O5 [9], CaB2O4 [10]) and silicates (Ba5Si8O21 [7], BaZnSiO4 [8], CaSiO3, Ba4Si6O16 [10]) in lower and higher temperature ranges, respectively. In the case of glasses containing P2O5 and B2O3 as matrix formers, the crystallization has a multistage character and the main products, at both lower and higher temperatures, are phosphates, e.g., Zn2P2O7 [11], Li3Fe2(PO4)3, LiFeP2O7 [12], BaP2O5, BaBPO5, and BPO4 [11,13]. It is worth noting that the presence of boron ions in the structure of crystallizing phases is observed mainly at higher temperatures (above 590 °C) and at the minimum B2O3 content of 6 mol.% [11,13]. Lopes et al. [7] linked the type of crystallizing phase with the activation energy for crystallization. The authors of the publication concluded that the formation of the barium borate crystalline phase requires a lower activation energy, as it is generated in a loose borate-rich glass network structure, while the barium silicate crystalline phase has to be formed in a more interlocked silicate glass network structure. A similar approach to the study of glass crystallization was adopted by Kržmanc et al. [9], Liu [12], and Kalenda [13], while Zhu et al. [10] also considered the influence of the size of ions building the glass matrix on the type of crystallizing phase. Both Zhu et al. [10] and Hu et al. [14] agreed that the larger a cation’s size, the lower its mobility, and thus the smaller the possibility of its occurrence in the crystallizing phases.
It is known that B2O3 is a strong glass networker; its presence in minor amounts possibly decreases the number of bridging oxygen atoms in silicate-based networks; thus, it may decrease the viscosity of the glass. Such behavior, which increases the mobility, is expected to promote devitrification at lower temperatures. This feature was exploited by Gou et al. [15], who modified 45Si5S glass (Hench glass) with B2O3 (0–6 mol.%) to decrease the heat treatment temperature of glass–ceramic analogues. The research shows that B2O3, apart from significantly decreasing the heat treatment of B2O3 containing 45S5 analogous, causes the desired phase of Na2Ca2Si3O9 to crystallize.
Fabert at al. [16] studied the partial to full substitution of SiO2 with B2O3 in order to develop bioactive glasses with optimum thermal processing windows. Typical silicate bioactive glasses, such as S53P4 and 45S5, are known to be prone to crystallization upon heating. It has been shown that while borate glasses are unsuitable due to their limited hot forming domain, borosilicate glasses possess not only a wide hot forming domain but also a low activation energy for viscous flow. The crystallization rate of these borosilicate glasses was found to be lower than those of their borate and silicate counterparts.
In this work, we present a crystallization study of the multicomponent glasses from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO system where the glass modifiers MgO and CaO are replaced in stages by B2O3. Such a study has not previously been reported in the literature. The studied materials have an interesting application as glassy fertilizers that introduce into the soil environment, among others, boron and important microelements [17,18]. However, detailed knowledge of their structure and stability is required to optimize their properties. For this reason, the effects of the B2O3 content and glass modifiers, such as MgO, CaO, and K2O, on the type of crystallizing phase was studied. The results of thermal tests were analyzed with structural studies (X-ray diffraction method) and microscopic observations (SEM-EDS analysis), including Raman spectroscopic imaging (RSI).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–CaO–MgO Glasses

Silicate–borate–phosphate glasses of SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO composition were obtained by conventional melting of the respective chemically pure reagents (SiO2, (NH4)2HPO4, K2CO3, MgO, CaCO3, and H3BO3) in platinum crucibles in the 1400–1450 °C temperature range. Glasses were quenched by immersing the crucibles in water. The choice of chemical composition of the tested glasses was based on previous studies of silicate–phosphate glasses used for agricultural applications [18,19]. The SiO2 (41 mol.%), P2O5 (6 mol.%), and K2O (6 mol.%) contents were kept constant in all glasses, whereas the amount of B2O3 (2–28 mol.%) increased at the cost of MgO and CaO, with the MgO/CaO ratio kept constant. The chemical composition of examined glasses is presented in Table 1. The amorphous character of the samples was confirmed by the X-ray diffraction method, which indicated that a fully amorphous material could only be obtained when the content of B2O3 did not exceed 25 mol.% [19].

2.2. Characterization

The FEI Nova NanoSEM 200 scanning electron microscope was used for SEM-EDS examinations of both glasses and their devitrificates. The observations were carried out under high vacuum conditions with a back scatter electron detector (BSE) and an accelerated voltage equal to 18 kV.
The thermal behavior of samples was studied with the STA 449 F3 Jupiter (NETZSCH) operating in DSC mode. Fifty milligram samples were ground to a grain size of 0.1–0.3 mm and placed in open Pt crucibles. The DSC measurements were carried out at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under the flowing air atmosphere (40 mL min−1). Al2O3 was used as the reference material.
The glass stability (GS) [20] of studied glasses was determined by DSC analysis. The parameters describing the glass stability can be derived from the characteristic glass heating process temperatures Tg, Tx, Tc, and Tm, which correspond to the glass transition onset and the onset of and maximum crystallization peak, and the melting temperature, respectively. The most widely used are the Hruby [21], Weinberg [22], Lu and Liu [23], and Kosidis–Petrovic [20] parameters, which are defined by the following equations:
KH = (Tx − Tg)/(Tm − Tx)
KW = (Tc − Tg)/Tm
Krg = Tg/Tm.
Since the difference between Tx (or Tc) and Tg is another indicator of GS, it was also included in the analysis:
ΔT = Tx − Tg
The DSC curves were evaluated with Proteus software (NETZSCH).
Once the crystallization temperatures of the selected samples were determined by DSC, the phase composition of the devitrificates was identified by XRD. For that purpose, the fraction containing the 0.1–0.3 mm particles was separated from the sample and heated isothermally for 12 h at the designated crystallization temperature. The phase compositions of the samples were identified via the X-ray diffraction analysis, based on the ICDD databases. XRD measurements were performed using a Empyrean diffractometer (Panalytical). The number of phases was determined through the Rietveld quantitative phase analysis using the High Score Plus software. The phase composition of the samples was quantified by Rietveld refinement and X-ray diffraction. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained with a continuous scan. Empyrean (Malvern Panalytical) diffractometer fitted with a Cu tube operating at 45 kV, 30 mA was used to obtain data for the Rietveld refinement over the 5–90° 2θ with a step size of 0.08. The total measurement time was four hours. The content of the amorphous phase was found by applying the internal Al2O3 standard.
Raman imaging studies were carried out using a WITec Alpha 300 M+ spectrometer equipped with a 488 nm diode laser (laser spot was approx. 650 nm), 1800 grating, and a 100× ZEISS Epiplan Neofluar objective. Imaging was conducted in a 20 × 30 µm area and the scan parameters were as follows: 80 lines with 120 points per line and 120 lines with 80 points per line for the 2B and 20B samples, respectively. The single accumulation time was set to 1 s. All mathematical corrections were done using WITec Project Five 5.2 Plus software. In order to determine the chemical composition of the measured surface, a true component analysis was done. As a result, images as well as spectra of component distributions were obtained. The reference spectra were taken from the Horiba JY Raman Library (July 2008).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of the Analyzed Glasses

Glasses containing B2O3 in their composition may demonstrate the phenomenon of phase separation. In the case of multi-component silicate–borate–phosphate glasses, it was determined that liquation in the examined system occurs when the B2O3 content is ≥8 mol.%. A further increase in B2O3 relative to the composition of the studied glasses, at the expense of MgO and CaO, intensifies this process until the glass is completely opaque. This phenomenon was confirmed by microscopic observations (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). The results of SEM-EDS observations showed that both separated phases contained components, i.e., silicon, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and calcium, introduced to the glass structure. However, it is worth noting that the semiquantitative EDS analysis showed different amounts of them in different areas of the examined samples. It turned out that one of the phases—later called phosphate—was enriched in P, Ca, and Mg (Figure 2b and Figure 3b), while the other—later called silicate—contained increased amounts of Si and K (Figure 2a and Figure 3a). This observation is crucial for the present study of the crystallization phenomenon, because it allowed the authors to demonstrate that the phenomenon of phase separation has a direct impact on the types of phases formed in the process of crystallization of their amorphous forms.

3.2. Glass Stability vs. Phase Separation Phenomenon

The starting point for all of the presented studies was differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which allowed us to observe transitions typical for the vitreous state, such as the glass transition (Tg range), crystallization (Tc range), and melting (Tm range). All obtained thermal curves are presented in Figure 4, and the values of selected thermal parameters determined from them (Section 2.2) are presented in Table 2. The thermal investigations conducted allowed us to determine the effect of increasing the amount of B2O3 introduced to the glass composition while diminishing the amounts of MgO and CaO on glass stability, the ability to crystallize, and the course, as well as to identify the types of crystallizing phases. On the basis of the obtained DSC curves, it was found that all of the studied glasses showed the ability to undergo multistage crystallization, the character of which depended on the B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ratio (Table 1).
At the lowest value of the above parameter (≤0.042), the crystallization had a two-stage character and occurred in the highest temperature ranges (above 800 °C). As its value increased (≥0.085), the position of the first crystallization effect shifted towards lower temperatures and the character of the crystallization of the studied glasses changed from two-stage to three-stage. From that moment on, in the studied system, we were dealing with three-stage crystallization, which occurred until the value of B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO exceeded 0.319. Then, the crystallization effect became a single, clearly visible, asymmetrical, exothermic effect.
The parameters determined from thermal curves (Krg, ΔT, KW, KH), which prove the glass stability (GS) of the studied system, are also presented in Table 2. It was found that in the case of glasses that did not exhibit the phase separation phenomenon, for which B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ≤ 0.170, the ΔT parameter (as an indicator of GS) displayed gradually decreasing values, which indicates that the ability of the glasses to crystallize was gradually growing at the same time. In the case of liquation glasses ( B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ≥ 0.212), for which a double effect of glass state transformation was successfully registered on DSC curves, two different tendencies related to their thermal stability were obtained. An analysis of the values indicated in Table 2 showed that, in the case of ΔT(1st) (ΔT(1st) = Tx – (1st)Tg), the determined values gradually increased, while for ΔT(2nd) (ΔT(2nd) = Tx – (2nd)Tg), they decreased. The direction of change in parameter ΔT(2nd) was similar to that found for glasses that did not exhibit phase separation (2B, 4B, and 8B). It seems to the authors of the present study that this two-way behavior may signify that the thermal stability of the analyzed glasses depends, to some extent, on the transformation temperature Tg and the character of the separated phases, i.e., the amorphous silicate phase and phosphate phase, formed during the liquation process. This issue is discussed in detail in [24]. The determined for the ΔT parameter may prove that the amorphous phosphate phase, in comparison with the silicate phase, is associated with higher glass stability with respect to devitrification.
Furthermore, it is known that higher values for the Krg, KW, and KH parameters (Table 2) imply greater resistance to the initiation of the amorphous phase of the crystallization process [2,5,25].
Therefore, the authors of the present study put forward the suggestion that the introduction of increasing amounts of B2O3 at the expense of MgO and CaO to the composition of glasses from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO system increases their tendency to undergo crystallization but also contributes to the decreased ease of glass formation.

3.3. Crystallization Process

To analyze the phenomenon of crystallization, it was necessary to subject the tested multi-component silicate–borate–phosphate glasses to an isothermal heating process, which was carried out in accordance with the procedure given in Section 2.2. This was related to their significant thermal stability (ΔT), presented in Table 2, and is discussed in more detail in Section 3.2.
The XRD analysis for the obtained devitrificates together with Rietveld refinement showed—despite many hours of heating samples—a relatively small degree of crystallization (Table 3). The amorphous phase represented 55% (for samples heated at higher temperatures, above 800 °C) to 72% (for samples heated in lower temperatures, below 800 °C).

3.3.1. X-ray Diffraction Analysis in the Study of Crystallization Products

The types of crystallization phases determined using the XRD method are shown in Table 3. XRD diffractograms of selected devitrificates are presented in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.
The obtained results clearly indicate the crystallization of two types of phase: complex phosphates and silicates. First of all, for B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO < 0.212, a single Ca9MgK(PO4)7-type whitlockite phosphate was crystallized. It is worth noting that this phase was also identified in the sample that was not modified with B2O3 [24]. However, when the value of B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ≥ 0.212 was reached, the phosphate phase Mg3Ca3(PO4)4-type stanfieldite was a new product of crystallization in addition to the phosphate mentioned above. At the same time, by performing the Rietveld analysis, we managed to show that with an increase in the B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO value, the share of the Mg3Ca3(PO4)4 phase gradually increased at the expense of the Ca9MgK(PO4)7 phase. Its share increased from about 20% for B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO = 0.212 to about 72% for B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ≥ 0.425 and, finally, up to 100% for B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO = 0.531. The results of the XRD analysis showed that in higher temperature ranges (above 800 °C), there were more crystallization products and these were more diversified, because apart from the phosphate phases, we also found the presence of silicate phases. Thus, at B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ≤ 0.212 in the temperature range from 800 to 910 °C, the presence of the K2Mg5(Si12O30)-merrihueite type silicate phase was confirmed next to Ca9MgK(PO4)7. Rietveld’s analysis confirmed that its share, regardless of the B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO -ratio value, did not exceed 16%. In cases where crystallization effects were found at even higher temperatures—exceeding 980 °C—apart from permanently crystallizing phosphate (whitlockite type), silicates with a lower degree of polymerization, i.e., MgSiO3-enstatite type, Mg2SiO4-forsterite type, and CaMgSi2O6-diopside type were present.
Next, the presence of boron ions in the resulting crystallization products was analyzed. Boron ions were found in both phosphates and silicates. The crystallizing phases were co-created generally in the higher temperature range (800–900 °C), which was at values of 0.085 ≥ B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + MgO + CaO ≥ 0.252. In the case of phosphates, the same non-stichiometric compound, Ca9.5+0.5x((PO4)6-x(BO3))(BO2)1-xOx), was always present. In the case of silicates, boron ions were initially present in the silicate K(Bsi2O6), and then with an increase in the B2O3 content and decreases in MgO and CaO, its presence was found in the K(Bsi3O8) silicate.
Considering the above, it is worth mentioning that the results for the type of crystallization phase are in accordance with the results of SEM-EDS analysis (Figure 2 and Figure 3), which are mentioned in point 3.1. It is assumed that the observed phenomenon of liquation in the studied system affects the types of phases formed in the process of crystallization of their amorphous forms. On the basis of the SEM-EDS analysis, we found that the so-called phosphate phase was enriched with phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium (Figure 2b and Figure 3b), while the silicate phase contained increased amounts of silicon and potassium or silicon, magnesium, and potassium (Figure 1a,b, Figure 2a and Figure 3a). Taking this into account and comparing the type of crystallizing phases (Table 3), we can see a significant convergence for the results obtained.

3.3.2. Spectroscopic Methods in the Study of Crystallization Products

The phase identification results (XRD analysis) were correlated with RSI (Raman spectroscopy imaging) studies. This method gave us the opportunity to generate detailed chemical images based on the Raman spectra of the sample (Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11). Two devitrificates, nos. 2B_1007 and 20B_710, were selected for the above analysis. They differed significantly in B2O3 content (Table 1) and phase crystallization type (Table 3). The Raman images obtained are presented in Figure 8, while the collected data from the designated areas are presented in Figure 9 for sample 2B_1007 and Figure 10 for sample 20B_710. Taking into account the information obtained from XRD studies, the identification process for the obtained spectra was related to the Raman spectra of standard substances. These spectra are presented in Figure 11 and they correspond to phosphate Ca9MgK(PO4)7 and two silicates: Mg2SiO4-forsterite type and CaMgSi2O6-diopside type.
In the case of the 20B_710 devitrificate, the situation is slightly more complicated. In this case, the glassy matrix (Component 3), marked in Figure 10 with red, was also visible. In this case, similarly to 2B_1007, the observed bands corresponded to the presence of structural units typical for a silicate–phosphate matrix, as described in [19], which also confirmed the presence of boron ions in the glassy matrix. It was demonstrated, among others, the presence of atoms in both triangular (780–800, 147–01470 cm−1) and tetraedrical (760–770 cm−1) coordination as well as the formation of P–O–B (600–640, 1140–1150 cm−1) and B–O–Si (~480 cm−1) connections. At the same time, two further components of different structures—Component 1 (blue) and Component 2 (green)—were identified. Based on the Raman spectra obtained (Figure 10), Component 1 (blue) was identified as a phase with a complex phosphate Ca9MgK(PO4)7-whitlockite structure type. Unfortunately, the amount of published data on the Raman spectra of mineral phosphates is still limited, and we could not find a standard Raman spectrum for the phosphate Mg3Ca3(PO4)4-stanfieldite type. However, taking into account our detailed and systematic XRD analysis of the series of devitrificates with a gradually changing chemical composition formed on the basis of glasses from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO system, it seems to be a reasonable proposal that Component’s 2 Raman spectrum (green), presented in Figure 10, comes from the phosphate Mg3Ca3(PO4)4-stanfieldite type. Considering phosphate [26,27,28,29], it seems very likely that the green Raman spectra of phosphate oxyanions shows a symmetric stretching mode (ν1) at about 992 and 963 cm−1, the antisymmetric stretching mode (ν3) at about 1012 and 1031 cm−1, and the symmetric bending mode (ν4) at about 625 and 584 cm−1, while bands at about 470 to 398 cm−1 could be assigned to the ν2 bending mode.
The results presented in Section 3.3.1 and Section 3.3.2 are consistent and complement each other. They confirm that, depending on the temperature, boron ions either create or do not form crystalline phases and then remain in the vitreous matrix. Interestingly, the presence of boron ions in the vitreous matrix was not affected by the amount of B2O3 introduced into the glass composition but primarily by the crystallization temperature (Tc)—below or above 800 °C. Only in higher temperature ranges have boron ions been identified in both phosphates and silicates.

3.4. Chemical Affinity as a Factor Determining the Type of Crystallizing Phase

An attempt to explain the cause of crystallization of identified crystalline phases turned out to be of particular interest. For this purpose, we used the enthalpy values for the formation of phosphates and silicates from oxides (ΔG) at different temperatures [29], which are presented in Table 4.
It was shown that, in this case, free enthalpy of crystallized compound formation is a factor that determines the type of crystallizing phases. It is known that the phase with the lowest negative ΔG value is the most likely to occur [29]. Thus, the crystallization of phosphates proceeds at the first stage of glass crystallization, while the crystallization of silicates occurs in the higher temperature range. This also applies to the phases containing boron ions. This also applies to the phases containing boron ions, case of which also first crystallize phosphates and then complex silicates (Table 5).

4. Conclusions

The main objective of this work was to study the influences of various B2O3 contents on the structure and crystallization processes of multicomponent glasses from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO system. Complex multistage crystallization processes induced by the thermal treatment were characterized by SEM-EDS, DSC, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy mapping. It was found that the glass forming ability is limited to the amount of B2O3 (≤25 mol.%) present, and the phase separation phenomenon occurs with B2O3 ≥ 8 mol.%. Based on the obtained results, it was possible to link the phenomenon of liquation with the type of crystallizing phase. Simultaneously, it turned out that the increase in the content of B2O3 introduced while decreasing the contents of MgO and CaO in the silicate–phosphate network diminished the feasibility of undergoing glass formation and increased the ability of the glasses to crystallize. It was also found that the main phases crystallizing in the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–CaO–MgO system were complex phosphates and silicates. The sequence of the appearance of crystallization products is governed by the free Gibbs enthalpy of phases formed from oxides; thus, phosphates first crystallize and then silicates. Boron ions appear in both types of crystalline phase but always at higher temperatures (above 800 °C); at lower temperatures, the phenomenon occurs in a vitreous network.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and B.Ł.; methodology, M.S. and J.S.; validation, M.S., Z.O., R.L. and P.J.; formal analysis, M.S. and A.B.; investigation, M.S.; data curation, M.S. and B.Ł.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, Z.O., A.K.-K. and J.S.; visualization, M.S., Z.O., R.L. and P.J.; funding acquisition, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was performed within the framework of funding for statutory activities of AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics (16.16.160.557). Research project partly supported by program “Excellence initiative—research university” for the AGH University of Science and Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to privacy restrictions. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Barbara Trybalska for SEM-EDS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Duke, D.A. Glass: Theory of crystallization. In Mineralogy. Encyclopedia of Earth Science; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Richardson, M.J. The Glass Transition Region. In Calorimetry and Thermal Analysis of Polymers; Method, V.B.F., Ed.; Hanser Publishers: Liberty Township, OH, USA, 1994; pp. 169–188. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lebedeva, G.A. Formation of a Liquation structure in titanium-containing aluminosilicate glass. Glass Ceram. 2008, 65, 316–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Uvarov, E.B. Catalyzed Crystallization of Glass. In The Structure of Glass; book series (SOG); Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1964; Volume 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stoch, L. Thermochemistry of Solids with Flexible Structures. J. Therm. Anal. 1998, 54, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stoch, L. Thermal analysis and thermochemistry of vitreous into crystalline state transition. J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 2004, 77, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lopes, A.A.S.; Soares, R.S.; Lima, M.M.A.; Monteiro, R.C.C. Glass transition and crystallization kinetics of a barium borosilicate glass by a non-isothermal method. J. App. Phys. 2014, 115, 043516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Saisuk, Y.; Ayawanna, J.; Laorodphan, N. Crystallisation of BaO-ZnO-SiO2-B2O3 Glasses: Effect of ZnO content, nucleation temperature and time. In Proceedings of the 34th MST Annual Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 31 May–2 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kržmanc, M.M.; Došler, U.; Suvorov, D. The nucleation and crystallization of MgO–B2O3–SiO2 glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 31, 2211–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhua, H.; Fu, R.; Agathopoulos, S.; Fang, J.; Li, G.; He, Q. Crystallization behaviour and properties of BaO-CaO-B2O3-SiO2 glasses and glass-ceramics for LTCC applications. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 10147–10153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mošner, P.; Vosejpková, K.; Koudelka, L.; Benes, L. Thermal studies of ZnO–B2O3–P2O5–TeO2 glasses. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 107, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, S.; Yang, R.; Wang, Y. Effects of the substitution of P2O5 with B2O3 on the structure, iron valence, thermal and crystallization behavior of lithium-iron-phosphate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2016, 453, 158–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kalenda, P.; Koudelka, L.; Mošner, P.; Benes, L. Thermal behavior and the properties of BaO–B2O3–P2O5 glasses. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2016, 124, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, Y.; Tsai, H.-T. The effect of BaO on the crystallization behaviour of a cordierite-type glass. Mat. Chem. Phys. 1998, 52, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xie, K.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, G.; Zhang, L.; Shao, H.; He, Y.; Fu, J.; Gou, Z. Preparation and Characterization of Low Temperature Heat-Treated 45S5 Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Analogues. Biomed. Glasses 2015, 1, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fabert, M.; Ojha, N.; Erasmus, E.; Hannula, M.; Hokka, M.; Hyttinen, J.; Rocherulle’, J.; Sigalascd, I.; Massera, J. Crystallization and sintering of borosilicate bioactive glasses for application in tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4514–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wacławska, I.; Szumera, M. Reactivity of silicate-phosphate glasses in soil environment. J. Alloy. Comp. 2009, 468, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Szumera, M.; Wacławska, I.; Olejniczak, Z. Influence of B2O3 on the structure and crystallization of soil active glasses. J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 2010, 99, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Łagowska, B.; Wacławska, I.; Sitarz, M.; Szumera, M. Spectroscopic studies of structural interactions in silicate-boratephosphate glass. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1171, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kozmidis-Petrovic, A.F. Theoretical analysis of relative changes of the Hruby, Weinberg, and Lu–Liu glass stability parameters with application on some oxide and chalcogenide glasses. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 499, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hrubỷ, A. Evaluation of glass-forming tendency by means of DTA. Czech. J. Phys. B 1972, 22, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weinberg, M.C. An assessment of glass stability criteria. Phys. Chem. Glasses 1994, 35, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu, Z.P.; Liu, C.T. Glass Formation Criterion for Various Glass-Forming Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 115505-1–115505-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Łagowska, B.; Wacławska, I.; Sułowska, J.; Olejniczak, Z.; Sulikowski, B.; Szumera, M. Glass transition effect in liquation silicate–borate–phosphate glasses. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 138, 2251–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Vogel, W. Crystallization of Glasses. In Glass Chemistry; Vogel, W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1994; pp. 280–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brown, W.E.; Dickens, B. Tschermaks Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen, by Geologische Bundesanstalt (Austria). Jahrbuch. Supplement. SpringerLink (Online service). 1882, pp. 79–104. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433069063000 (accessed on 22 December 2021).
  27. Frost, L.R.; Wills, R.A.; Martens, W.N. A Raman spectroscopic study of synthetic giniite. Spectrochim. Acta A 2007, 66, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lehr, J.R.; Brown, E.H.; Frazier, A.W.; Smith, J.P.; Thrasher, D. Crystallographic Properties of Fertilizer Compounds; Tennessee Valley Authority, National Fertilizer Development Center: Knoxville, TN, USA, 1967; p. 6. Available online: https://books.google.pl/books?id=C9ikyAEACAAJ (accessed on 22 December 2021).
  29. Barin, I.; Knacke, O.; Kubaschewski, O. Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1973; ISBN ISBN 978-3-662-02293-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM microphotograph of 4B glass. (10,000×): (a) EDS analysis of 4B glass (p.1); (b) EDS analysis of 4B glass (p.2).
Figure 1. SEM microphotograph of 4B glass. (10,000×): (a) EDS analysis of 4B glass (p.1); (b) EDS analysis of 4B glass (p.2).
Molecules 27 00867 g001
Figure 2. SEM microphotograph of 8B glass. (5000×) (a) EDS analysis of 8B glass (p.1); (b) EDS analysis of 8B glass (p.2).
Figure 2. SEM microphotograph of 8B glass. (5000×) (a) EDS analysis of 8B glass (p.1); (b) EDS analysis of 8B glass (p.2).
Molecules 27 00867 g002
Figure 3. SEM microphotograph of 15B glass. (5000×) (a) EDS analysis of 15B glass (p.1); (b) EDS analysis of 15B glass (p.2).
Figure 3. SEM microphotograph of 15B glass. (5000×) (a) EDS analysis of 15B glass (p.1); (b) EDS analysis of 15B glass (p.2).
Molecules 27 00867 g003
Figure 4. DSC curves of analyzed silicate–borate–phosphate glasses.
Figure 4. DSC curves of analyzed silicate–borate–phosphate glasses.
Molecules 27 00867 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of 2B devitrificate obtained after isothermal heating at 1007 °C (no 2B_1007).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of 2B devitrificate obtained after isothermal heating at 1007 °C (no 2B_1007).
Molecules 27 00867 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of 10B devitrificate obtained after isothermal heating at 798 °C (no 10B_798).
Figure 6. XRD patterns of 10B devitrificate obtained after isothermal heating at 798 °C (no 10B_798).
Molecules 27 00867 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of 25B devitrificate obtained after isothermal heating at 708 °C (no 25B_708).
Figure 7. XRD patterns of 25B devitrificate obtained after isothermal heating at 708 °C (no 25B_708).
Molecules 27 00867 g007
Figure 8. Microscopic images with overlaid Raman images of (a) 2B_1007 and (b) 20B_710 samples.
Figure 8. Microscopic images with overlaid Raman images of (a) 2B_1007 and (b) 20B_710 samples.
Molecules 27 00867 g008
Figure 9. Raman measurements of sample 2B_1007. (a) Raman images obtained from the cluster analysis and (b) average Raman spectra from corresponding clusters: Component 1—Ca9MgK(PO4)7-whitlockite structure type, Component 2—Mg2SiO4-forsterite type, Component 3—CaMgSi2O6-diopside type, Component 4—glass matrix.
Figure 9. Raman measurements of sample 2B_1007. (a) Raman images obtained from the cluster analysis and (b) average Raman spectra from corresponding clusters: Component 1—Ca9MgK(PO4)7-whitlockite structure type, Component 2—Mg2SiO4-forsterite type, Component 3—CaMgSi2O6-diopside type, Component 4—glass matrix.
Molecules 27 00867 g009aMolecules 27 00867 g009b
Figure 10. Raman measurements of sample 20B_710. (a) Raman images obtained from cluster analysis and (b) average Raman spectra from corresponding clusters: Component 1—Ca9MgK(PO4)7-whitlockite structure type, Component 2—Mg3Ca3(PO4)4-stanfieldite type, Component 3—glass matrix.
Figure 10. Raman measurements of sample 20B_710. (a) Raman images obtained from cluster analysis and (b) average Raman spectra from corresponding clusters: Component 1—Ca9MgK(PO4)7-whitlockite structure type, Component 2—Mg3Ca3(PO4)4-stanfieldite type, Component 3—glass matrix.
Molecules 27 00867 g010aMolecules 27 00867 g010b
Figure 11. Raman spectra of standard substances.
Figure 11. Raman spectra of standard substances.
Molecules 27 00867 g011
Table 1. Nominal compositions of the analyzed glasses from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO system [mol%].
Table 1. Nominal compositions of the analyzed glasses from the SiO2–B2O3–P2O5–K2O–MgO–CaO system [mol%].
Name of SampleSiO2P2O5B2O3K2OMgOCaO B 2 O 3 B 2 O 3 + M g O + C a O
2B4162627.018.00.042
4B4164625.817.20.085
8B4168623.415.60.170
10B41610622.214.80.212
12B41612621.014.00.255
14B41614619.813.20.297
15B41615619.212.80.319
20B41620616.210.80.425
25B41625613.28.80.531
Table 2. Thermal characteristics of the analyzed glasses.
Table 2. Thermal characteristics of the analyzed glasses.
Glass Transition RangeCrystallization RangeMelting RangeThe Glass Stability Parameters (GS)
Maximum Crystallization PeaksOnset of Crystallization Peaks
SampleTg/°CTc1/°CTc2/°CTc3/°CTx1/°CTx2/°CTx3/°CTm/°CΔT/°CKWKHKrg
0B6P [24]679844896 836 n.o.157n.o.n.o.n.o.
2B6608581007 814975 n.o.154n.o.n.o.n.o.
4B65177288698875685895210681050.1130.3370.610
8B631749808847726785829983950.1200.3700.642
10B1st Tg626724 708 988820.0990.2930.634
2nd Tg648724798835708785818988600.0770.2140.656
12B81st Tg614722 708 958940.1130.3760.641
2nd Tg642722775819708n.o.787958660.0840.2640.670
15B1st Tg606714 699 956930.1130.3620.634
2nd Tg634714 699 956650.0840.2530.663
20B1st Tg556710 696 9841400.1570.4860.565
2nd Tg629710720 * 696 984670.0820.2330.639
25B1st Tg502708 672 10311700.2000.4740.487
2nd Tg628708683 * 672 1031440.0780.1230.609
* The inflection point of the exothermal effect.
Table 3. The kind of crystallizing phases identified in the analyzed devitrificates. Refined evaluation parameters used for the analysis are also reported.
Table 3. The kind of crystallizing phases identified in the analyzed devitrificates. Refined evaluation parameters used for the analysis are also reported.
No.Crystallization Temperature (Tc) (°C)Crystalline PhasesReference CodeFraction (%)RwpPpχ2
0B6P [18]844Ca9MgK(PO4)7n.o.
896Ca9MgK(PO4)7n.o.
2B858Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510977.913.6611.081.263
K2Mg5(Si12O30)98-007-713121.1
1007Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510980.510.799.40.854
Mg2SiO498-020-237017.1
CaMgSi2O698-001-02242.4
4B772Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-51091009.47.741.29
886Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510979.912.9410.171.223
K2Mg5(Si12O30)98-007-713112.2
Ca9.5+0.5x((PO4)6-x(BO3))(BO2)1-xOx)98-006-83367.9
988Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510979.910.498.840.72
MgSiO398-003-089315.8
CaMg(Si2O6)98-008-98563
K(BSi2O6)98-026-17151.3
8B749Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510910010.739.390.629
808Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-51098510.89.150.681
K2Mg5(Si12O30)98-007-713115
847Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510981.810.18.40.747
K2Mg5(Si12O30)98-007-71317.5
Ca9.5+0.5x((PO4)6-x(BO3))(BO2)1-xOx)98-006-83368.4
K(BSi2O6)98-026-17152.3
10B724Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510975.210.989.480.634
Mg3Ca3(PO4)498-002-364224.8
798Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-51098410.779.120.606
K2Mg5(Si12O30)98-007-713116
835Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510981.910.918.960.718
K2Mg5(Si12O30)98-007-27177.9
Ca9.5+0.5x((PO4)6-x(BO3))(BO2)1-xOx)98-006-83366.3
K(Bsi2O6)98-026-17154
12B722Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510980.610.649.310.581
Mg3Ca3(PO4)498-002-364219.4
819Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510945.111.8710.220.807
Mg3Ca3(PO4)498-002-364241.9
K(Bsi3O8)98-006-94458.2
Ca9.5+0.5x((PO4)6-x(BO3))(BO2)1-xOx)98-006-83364.7
15B714Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-510937.911.199.590.643
Mg3Ca3(PO4)498-002-364262.1
20B710Ca9MgK(PO4)798-008-5109814.0411.90.931
Mg3Ca3(PO4)498-002-364272
25B708Mg3Ca3(PO4)498-002-364210014.6312.270.938
Table 4. Values of ΔG for the formation of silicates and phosphates crystallizing in the analyzed glasses.
Table 4. Values of ΔG for the formation of silicates and phosphates crystallizing in the analyzed glasses.
CompoundsΔG [kJ/mol]
900 K1000 K1100 K
Ca9MgK(PO4)79CaO·MgO·0.5K2O·3.5P2O5–18,846.6–19,196.9–19,563.9
K2Mg5(Si12O30)K2O·5 MgO·12 SiO2–15,336.6–15,534.0–15,743.5
Mg3Ca3(PO4)43MgO·3CaO·2P2O5–10,716.1–10,909.2–11,111.5
CaMg(Si2O6)CaO·MgO·2SiO2–3271.4–3311.9–3354.8
Mg2SiO42MgO·SiO2–2255.3–2282.7–2311.8
MgSiO3MgO·SiO2–1612.6–1632.0–1652.7
Table 5. Values of ΔG for the formation of silicates and phosphates containing boron crystallizing in the analyzed glasses.
Table 5. Values of ΔG for the formation of silicates and phosphates containing boron crystallizing in the analyzed glasses.
CompoundsΔG [kJ/mol]
900 K1000 K1100 K
Ca9.93(P5.84B0.16O24)B0.67O1.799.93CaO·2.92 P2O5·0.415B2O3–17,217.4–17,526.0–17,849.5
K(BSi2O6)0.5K2O·0.5B2O3·2SiO2–2861.4–2904.3–2949.9
K(BSi3O8)0.5K2O·0.5B2O3·3SiO2–3831.3–3885.7–3943.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szumera, M.; Łagowska, B.; Sułowska, J.; Jeleń, P.; Olejniczak, Z.; Lach, R.; Berezicka, A.; Kijo-Kleczkowska, A. Investigating the Crystallization Process of Boron-Bearing Silicate-Phosphate Glasses by Thermal and Spectroscopic Methods. Molecules 2022, 27, 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030867

AMA Style

Szumera M, Łagowska B, Sułowska J, Jeleń P, Olejniczak Z, Lach R, Berezicka A, Kijo-Kleczkowska A. Investigating the Crystallization Process of Boron-Bearing Silicate-Phosphate Glasses by Thermal and Spectroscopic Methods. Molecules. 2022; 27(3):867. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szumera, Magdalena, Barbara Łagowska, Justyna Sułowska, Piotr Jeleń, Zbigniew Olejniczak, Radosław Lach, Anna Berezicka, and Agnieszka Kijo-Kleczkowska. 2022. "Investigating the Crystallization Process of Boron-Bearing Silicate-Phosphate Glasses by Thermal and Spectroscopic Methods" Molecules 27, no. 3: 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030867

APA Style

Szumera, M., Łagowska, B., Sułowska, J., Jeleń, P., Olejniczak, Z., Lach, R., Berezicka, A., & Kijo-Kleczkowska, A. (2022). Investigating the Crystallization Process of Boron-Bearing Silicate-Phosphate Glasses by Thermal and Spectroscopic Methods. Molecules, 27(3), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030867

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop