Next Article in Journal
HPLC with Fluorescence and Photodiode Array Detection for Quantifying Capmatinib in Biological Samples: Application to In Vivo and In Vitro Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Polymeric Nanoparticles with Embedded Eu(III) Complexes as Molecular Probes for Temperature Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation for Quantification of 7-Nitroso Impurity in Sitagliptin by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography with Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study of Cellulose Ethers as Thermotropic Materials for Self-Tracking Solar Concentrators
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 23
10.3390/molecules27238566
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of a New Chiral Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and Its Application in Organolithium Chemistry

by
Achille Antenucci
1,2,*,
Matteo Bonomo
1,3,*,
Simone Ghinato
1,
Marco Blangetti
1 and
Stefano Dughera
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy
2
Centro Ricerche per la Chimica Fine s.r.l. for Silvateam s.p.a., Via Torre 7, 12080 San Michele Mondovì, Italy
3
NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Gioacchino Quarello 15/a, 10125 Torino, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8566; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238566
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Applied Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A chiral glycerol derivative, namely 3-amino-1,2-propanediol, was employed for as the hydrogen bond donor (HBD) in the design of a new deep eutectic solvent (DES) with choline chloride acting as the hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA). The novel mixture was characterized and unambiguously classified as a DES. Furthermore, its synthetic usefulness was demonstrated in the room-temperature n-butyllithium-addition under air to carbonyl compounds and benzyl chloride. In some cases, pure products (100% conversion) were obtained by a simple extractive work-up in up to 72% isolated yield, thus suggesting the potential practical usefulness of this procedure as a green alternative to the classical Schenk procedure in volatile organic solvents for the synthesis of tertiary alcohols. The chirality of the HBD, bearing an interesting basic primary amino group, is an intriguing feature currently under investigation for further exploitation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Starting from the end of the 20th century, the growing attention towards environmental sustainability and the health and safety of laboratory operators has started to inspire different branches of chemistry, including synthetic organic chemistry. In particular, one among the 12 principles of green chemistry highlights the necessity of developing greener alternatives to classic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), still nowadays routinely employed both as reaction media and nonaqueous solvents for several work-up procedures [1,2,3]. Since their first appearance in 2003 [4], deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as a suitable alternative to VOCs [5,6,7,8] for diverse practical applications including, among others, drug delivery [9,10,11], electrochemistry [12,13,14,15], material design [16], extractions [17] and, of course, organic reactions [18], alone or together with other sustainable reaction-media [19,20]. In the context of organic synthesis, desirable features of DESs include (i) low vapor-pressure [21], (ii) chemical stability, (iii) ease of design and preparation in the absence of any VOC, and (iv) handy separation of the reaction crude by simple precipitation or aqueous work-up [22]. Last but not least, the handiness of organic compounds and even their reactivity in DESs have often been found to be surprising, offering food for thought from a mechanistic point of view [23,24,25,26].
Differently from ionic liquids, in which electrostatic interactions play a major role, molecular interactions involved in the formation of DESs mainly entail the establishment of a robust hydrogen-bond network, besides electrostatic and Van der Waals interactions. Consequently, DESs are commonly prepared by mixing and/or heating a proper hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and a suitable hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) [6]. However, the unambiguous classification of such kind of mixture as a true DES is anything but obvious [26], unless two room-temperature solid components lead to a room-temperature liquid mixture. Following on from our previous studies, we managed to design, prepare and characterize a new DES by introducing an unexplored HBD, namely 3-amino-1,2-propanediol (Figure 1), herein referred to as aminoglycerol (AGly). With respect to glycerol, an HBD commonly found as a DES constituent, the replacement of a primary hydroxyl group with an amino group could likely introduce both basic properties and chirality in the eutectic mixture. With this purpose, it must be stressed that a systematic study of asymmetric induction by chiral DESs as reaction media, and therefore their exploitation as a general strategy in asymmetric synthesis, are still missing. These two possibly desirable features open new and intriguing scenarios in the reactivity of organic substrates in DESs, which are under investigation in ongoing studies.
Herein, the preparation and physico-chemical characterization of the eutectic mixture, AGly/choline chloride 3:1, is presented, along with its synthetic usefulness as a reaction medium. Recently, our research group has contributed to growing the chemical portfolio of air- and moisture-compatible highly polar s-block organometallic reactions, refusing the historical paradigm that organolithium chemistry should always be performed under strict, tedious and energy-consuming Schlenk-type reaction conditions [23]. In particular, ChCl-based DESs have shown promise as environmentally sustainable reaction media to promote chemo- and regioselective metalations and nucleophilic-acyl-substitution reactions, using highly reactive alkyl-lithiums, working at room temperature and under air, with an unprecedented high level of chemocontrol, compared with the classical methodology [24,25,26]. Thus, our new synthesized DES AGly/choline chloride 3:1 is used as a reaction medium to promote the environmental-beneficial addition of n-BuLi (as a model organolithium compound) to several carbonyl compounds including benzyl chloride, whose unusual reactivity in the nucleophilic substitution reaction with organolithium reagents had never been successfully performed in protic media (among which are DESs), until now.

2. Results and Discussion

Despite a multitude of DESs having been designed and employed in a plethora of different applications, general criteria for an unambiguous classification of DESs, and thus for their design by default, are still lacking. This is also due to the fact that a thorough knowledge of DES structure (i.e., the chemical and physical reason behind the formation of a eutectic mixture), is still far from being reached [27]. Consequently, many of the mixtures employed as reaction media in organic synthesis cannot be strictly defined as DESs, but rather as low-melting-temperature mixtures (LMTMs) or, more generally, unconventional solvents [6]. In order to provide a solid starting point for the design of a novel DES, we chose the system glycerol/choline chloride (Gly/ChCl) as a model system, and then slightly modified the structure of the HBD. Indeed, it has been previously demonstrated that both a 2:1 and 3:1 ratio of glycerol/choline chloride afford the establishment of a complete coordination shell of hydroxyl groups around the chloride anion, either belonging to the sole HBD (3:1 ratio) or belonging both to the HBD and the choline moiety (2:1 ratio), with the former showing a lower melting-temperature and thus claiming the role of a pure eutectic mixture [28]. Glycerol is a prochiral molecule, and the replacement of a primary hydroxyl with an amino group introduces chirality as an intriguing and exploitable feature for synthetic chemistry, without completely removing a hydrogen-bond-donor site, as it would instead result from the introduction of an aprotic substituent. Nevertheless, in as far as the amino group might potentially contribute to the establishment of a (different) hydrogen-bond network, its behavior with respect to a hydroxyl group could not be predicted a priori. Therefore, four mixtures of AGly/ChCl are prepared by mixing (353 K, 30 to 60 min) the racemic form of the HBD with the HBA in 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1 ratios.
As a matter of fact, the behavior of the mixtures is quite different: indeed, a 1:1 ratio leads to a solid system, even if the temperature is set well above 353 K. Conversely, when the amount of AGly is increased, the mixtures become homogenous liquids after gentle heating. Unfortunately, once cooled down to RT, the 2:1 mixture forms a considerable amount of precipitate (likely ChCl crystals) within a few hours, discouraging us to further investigate it as a solvent (vide infra). Both the 3:1 and 4:1 ratios allow the formation of a homogeneous liquid mixture at RT. Yet, by simple inspection of the obtained liquid mixture, the identification of the real eutectic composition is far from straightforward, especially considering that one of the precursors (i.e., AGly, racemic) is liquid at RT (Tm = 252 K). With this purpose, the obtainment of a liquid mixture starting from (R)-AGly (solid) can, however, be considered rough evidence of the obtainment of an eutectic mixture. A valuable aid is given by the discussion of Tm values of the obtained mixture. The latter is usually extracted from DSC (differential scanning calorimetry), yet it is well known [29] that glycerol-like systems behave like glass, showing a nearly zero enthalpy melting/crystallization. In our case, we are able to measure a glass transition (in the heating cycle) in both the 3:1 and 4:1 systems (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Material), and we firstly ascribe it to the Tm values of the mixtures (i.e., 241 K and 246 K, respectively). To further confirm these data, we resolved to manually measure the Tm (Table 1), as described in our previous paper [30]; the value for racemic AGly was also measured and found to be in excellent agreement with the literature data (±2 K). These data allow us to draft an experimental phase-diagram of the AGly and ChCl mixtures (Figure 2), proving the 3:1 mixture as the DES.
Screening the literature [6], the formation of ChCl-based DESs is conventionally ascribed to the stabilization of the Cl− anion by the instauration of a hydrogen-bond network with the HBD moieties, e.g., hydroxyl, aminic). Such stabilization will lead to a modification of some critical physico-chemical properties of the mixtures such as viscosity (η) and molar conductivity (Λ). Yet, these modifications are difficult to predict, being strongly dependent on the nature of both the HBD and the HBA [31]. Thus, to further prove the formation of a non-conventional mixture, we measured both η and Λ of all the systems, except AGly:ChCl 1:1 (being solid). Experimental results highlight the fact that whereas η follows a monotonic trend, i.e., it decreases with the increase of the HBD amount, Λ shows a peculiar trend, characterized by a minimum for AGly:ChCl 3:1 (22 mS cm−1 M−1, Table 1). Even more interestingly, both AGly:ChCl 2:1 and AGly:ChCl 4:1 have an almost identical value of Λ (Figure 3), proving that the charge carriers (i.e., Cl− anions) experiment a similar chemical environment (i.e., hydrogen-bond network). Thus, the lower molar-conductivity of AGly:ChCl 3:1 could be easily rationalized with a more extended HB-network, typical of a DES, which limits the mobility of the chloride. This could be considered as valuable information toward the application of this DES as a solvent in Li-promoted organic reactions: indeed, a hydroxyl moiety strongly involved in a hydrogen bond will be quite refractive toward the (unwanted) reaction with the catalyst, leading to a safer and more controllable reaction.
The higher molar-conductivity and the lower viscosity (not shown) of the reference DES based on glycerol (i.e., Gly:ChCl 3:1) is critical evidence for postulating that the amino moieties of aminoglycerol play only a limited role in the stabilization of the Cl− (as expected from their low acidity).
Strong evidence of the formation of a real eutectic is given by the obtainment of a room-temperature-liquid DES also by mixing, in a 1:3 ratio, ChCl (solid) with enantiopure (R)-AGly that, being different from its racemic form and the (S)-enantiomer (colorless viscous liquids), is a crystalline white solid with a melting point of 328 K [32].
In order to demonstrate the synthetic usefulness of this novel DES, we decided to test its ability to promote the chemoselective addition of n-BuLi to highly reactive carbonyl compounds. This reaction was very well known as the first use of protic DES as reaction media in the chemistry of highly reactive s-block organometallic species [23]. Thus, in a preliminary experiment, 2′-methoxyacetophenone 1a (1 mmol) was suspended, both in the Gly/ChCl 2:1 (1 g) eutectic mixture (Table 2, entry 1) and in AGly/ChCl 3:1 (Table 2, entry 2); it was then reacted at room temperature under air, with a commercial 2.5 M hexanes solution of n-BuLi (2 equiv.) under continuous stirring. To our delight, the yields of the desired tertiary alcohol 2a obtained after work-up using these two different DESs, were comparable (Table 2, entries 1–2). Moreover, an important yield-increase could be observed when increasing the amount of organolithium reagent from 2.0 to 3.0 equivalents (Table 2, entry 3). It must be stressed that the possible deprotonation of the NH2 group by n-BuLi did not occur, as no nucleophilic-addition product was ever detected. Interestingly, in the reaction carried out in pure AGly (Table 2; entry 4) the conversion was not total, as 33% of unreacted 1a remained, in contrast with what is observed if the reactions are performed in DES (Table 2; entry 3).
Encouraged by this finding, we assessed the reactivity of some different classes of carbonyl compounds in such a medium (Scheme 1). An exemplary series of aromatic ketones, namely acetophenones 1a–d and benzophenones 1e–1g, bearing both EDG 1a, 1g, EWG 1c, 1f and the neutral functional-group 1b, 1d, 1e, were reacted with three equivalents of n-BuLi in AGly:ChCl 3:1, giving the desired tertiary alcohol 2 in good to quantitative yields (up to 92%). Notably, in all cases the reaction maintained an elevated level of selectivity and no traces of lithiation byproducts were observed, corroborating our previous observation [24] about the attitude of the eutectic mixture to exalt, probably via ammonium salt (ChCl) coordination [23], the nucleophilic behavior of n-BuLi under these bench-type reaction conditions. Furthermore, in all cases, only a small amount of a secondary alcohol 3 was observed as a byproduct arising from an n-BuLi-promoted carbonyl reduction event. Finally, in the case of product 2g, no yield improvement was observed by increasing the organolithium amount from 2.0 to 3.0 equivalents and, due to the low conversion, only traces of the undesired byproduct 3g could be observed in the 1H NMR spectrum.
At this stage, the protocol was extended to a series of aliphatic ketones 1h–k (Scheme 2) that are notoriously challenging substrates, due to their sensitivity to the enolization. In this case, conversion values were generally higher (up to 100%) with respect to aromatic ketones, but at the same time the yields were systematically lower, a trend exclusively due to the volatility of the involved species (see Supplementary Materials). Notably, the elevated steric hindrance of all the employed n-BuLi aliphatic substrates 1h, 1i, 1k did not limit the successful outcome of the nucleophilic addition of the organolithium. A lower amount of n-BuLi (2.0 equiv.) was sufficient to reach the optimum, and no yield increase was observed upon increasing the excess of the organolithium reagent for tertiary alcohols 2h and 2i. Notably, product 2i could be isolated in pure form by means of a simple extractive work-up in 72% yield. On the other hand, the conversion of open-chain 2-decanone 1j and sterically hindered 2-adamantanone 1k benefited from a higher amount (3.0 molar equivalents) of n-BuLi (Scheme 2). As mentioned before, the reaction showed an appreciable level of selectivity, and only a small amount of secondary alcohol was observed as a byproduct when 2-adamantanone 1k was used as substrate, while no enolization byproducts were observed using enolisable ketones 1i and 1j, confirming the promising attitude of n-BuLi as a nucleophilic species under this thermodynamic reaction condition [22].
To our delight, in addition to these results, we also found out that the reaction of esters and acyl chlorides with 4.0 molar equivalents of n-BuLi in DES AGly:ChCl 3:1 afforded the corresponding tertiary alcohols (resulting from a double nucleophilic attack of the organolithium reagent upon the collapse of the in situ generated tetrahedral intermediate) in pure form. It must be stressed that, to the best of our knowledge, the reactivity of acyl chlorides had not been previously assessed in DESs, while that of esters has only recently been explored by Capriati and co-workers [33]. Pure 5-phenyl-5-nonanol 2l could be isolated in 65% yield from propyl benzoate 1l and in 49% yield from benzoyl chloride 1m, while the n-BuLi double addition to ethyl acetate 1n and acetyl chloride 1o afforded pure 5-methyl-5-nonanol 2m in 62% and 10% yield, respectively. Finally, the unconventional reactivity of nucleophilic addition-resistant sterically hindered carboxylic acid amides recently shown by Ghinato et al. towards organolithium reagents [26] was s confirmed also in AGly:ChCl 3:1. Indeed, the treatment of N,N-diisopropylbenzamide 1p with 2.0 equivalents of n-BuLi afforded tertiary alcohol 2l only in 11% yield, while the major product was ketone 2n, whose yield was 44% (Scheme 3), due to the higher stability of the amide-derived tetrahedral intermediate, compared with the same obtained from esters and acyl chlorides. This result confirms the excellence of bench-stable and easy-to-handle carboxylic acid amides as an acylation agent of organolithiums reagents, to access functionalized ketones in a chemoselective manner.
The transfer of chirality from the reaction medium to the products is still a major challenge in the case of DESs; good to excellent results were afforded only in isolated cases [34,35], and lacking a general mechanism which could make this a general strategy in asymmetric synthesis. Therefore, with a novel optically active DES in our hands, we managed to perform the model reaction of substrate 1a in optically active DES (R)-AGly:ChCl 3:1 (reaction conditions described in Scheme 1). Unfortunately, no enantiomeric excess was observed by HPLC in the chiral stationary phase. We speculate that the reaction of the organolithium reagents is too fast to allow the amino group of the HBD to coordinate the lithiated species, providing the basis for chirality transfer.
Encouraged by these results, we decided to approach aliphatic nucleophilic substitution with organolithium reagents in this newly designed DES, at room temperature. It is well known that nucleophilic substitutions occur in aprotic solvents (either non-polar or polar), and that highly basic organometallic reagents do not act as good nucleophiles towards alkyl halides. However, some examples of unconventional nucleophilic reactivity of organometallic compounds towards benzyl halides and other aliphatic halides have been reported in the literature, including the reactivity of n-BuLi [36] and 9-phenanthrylmagnesium bromide [37] towards benzyl chloride, the reactivity of Grignard reagents towards sulfur mustards [38], the reactivity of n-BuLi towards 1-bromo-2-phenethylbenzene [39], and the reactivity of t-BuLi towards benzyl chloride [40,41]. These transformations, classifiable as examples of the Wurtz reaction [42,43], were performed in apolar (hexanes, benzene, toluene) or low polar (Et2O, THF) aprotic solvents, at low temperatures (−100 to 0 °C).
We decide to explore the reactivity of benzyl chloride 4 with n-BuLi in different DESs (Table 2), including the eutectic mixture Gly:KF 6:1 (Table 2, entry 4), recently designed and exploited by some of us [44,45,46].
Excluding the water-based mixture H2O:ChCl 2:1 (Table 3, entry 7), in which no conversion was observed, due to the rapid n-BuLi protonation, the reaction occurred in all of the tested reaction media. The best results (85% yield) were observed when AGly:ChCl 3:1 was used as the reaction medium (Table 3, entry 4). Despite the possible formation of in situ AGly lithium amide and relative nucleophilic displacement on 4, only traces of the corresponding reaction byproduct 3-(benzylamino)propane-1,2-diol 7 could be observed. It must be stressed that the reaction carried out in AGly/ChCl had a noteworthy yield increase with respect to the corresponding Gly-containing eutectic mixture (Table 3, entries 1-2,6) and to other HBD-based-DESs, such as urea (Table 3, entry 3), lactic acid (Table 3, entry 5) and ethylene glycol (Table 3, entry 8). For all these reactions, the only byproduct was 1,2-diphenylethane 6, deriving from the n-BuLi-promoted homocoupling of two equivalent to 4. Therefore, we can state that the best results refer to the engineered DESs, whose design and rigorous chemico-physical characterization was performed by us, corroborating the importance of DES design.
Furthermore, it must be stressed that this is also, to the best of our knowledge, the first example of aliphatic nucleophilic substitution promoted by an organometallic reagent in protic reaction-media under sustainable reaction conditions DES [47,48,49], which will be more deeply investigated as the subject of a forthcoming paper.

3. Materials and Methods

General. All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources (Sigma Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, TCI, Fluorochem) at the highest-available purity grade, and used without further purification, upon checking their purity by NMR, TLC or GC-MS. n-Butyllithium was purchased from Sigma Aldrich in hexanes solution (rated concentration 2.5 M) and titrated with diphenylacetic acid in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran. Preliminary trials of addition to carbonyl compounds were performed in duplicate with different batches of this organolithium reagent. Thin layer chromatography was performed on Merck silica gel TLC plates GF 254 on aluminum support. All the reactions were carried out in open air glassware and monitored by GC-FID, GC-MS and NMR. Mass spectra were recorded on an HP 5989B mass selective detector connected to an HP 5890 GC with a methyl silicone capillary column. GC-FID analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer AutoSystem XL GC with a methylsilicone capillary column. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 (solvent residual peak at δ = 7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.16 ppm 13C NMR) or in CD3OD (solvent residual peak at δ = 3.31 ppm for 1H NMR and 49.00 ppm for 13C NMR) on a Jeol ECZR spectrometer at 600 and 150 MHz, respectively, and using diazomethane as an internal standard for the calculation of the NMR yields. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm and referred to solvent residual peaks. HPLC analyses on the chiral stationary phase were performed using a Waters 1525 HPLC pump provided with a Waters 2998 UV-VIS spectrofotometer with photodiode array (PDA) detector on a Daicel CHIRALPAK® IC column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), using mixtures of hexanes and 2-propanol.
Viscosity measurements were performed on an Anton Paar DV-1 P viscometer at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
Conductivity measurements were carried out using a conductivity electrode (5072 from Crison, K = 10 cm−1) with platinum plates constituting both the working and the counter electrodes. The electrode was coupled to an Autolab potentiostat/galvanostat Model PGSTAT12® from Metrohm, remotely controlled by the computer using ECLab software (v11.20). An electrochemical impedance (EIS) scan was employed to measure the A.C. resistance of each solution, from which the relative conductivity was calculated. In the EIS experiments the amplitude of the potential perturbation was set to 50 mV. Impedance spectra were recorded within the frequency ranges 103−107 Hz.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were conducted through a DSC Q200 (from TA Instrument) equipped with a cooling flange. A drop (ca. 20 mg) of each mixture was sealed in an aluminum pan and cooled from RT to 190 K. After being at that temperature for 20 min, they were heated up to 303 K with a heating ramp of 2 K/min and then cooled back at 190 K, with the same ramp. A homemade set-up (i.e., a vial containing the mixture capped with a thermometer) was also employed to confirm the DSC data. The set-up was stored in a fridge at 188 K for 24 h. At this stage, the mixture was solidified around the thermometer tip. Once taken out of the fridge, the system was kept at 298 ± 1 K and the melting temperature was estimated as the one at which the thermometer could be extracted from the vial. Each measurement was repeated three times, with a standard deviation lower than 1.5 K. When available, the comparison between the Tm values calculated using these three methods led to a difference lower than 2 K.
All the mixtures employed in the present study were prepared by mixing the quaternary ammonium salt choline chloride (ChCl) with the proper amount of the corresponding hydrogen bond donor (glycerol (Gly) or aminoglycerol (AGly). Deep eutectic solvents based on glycerol and choline chloride were prepared according to the literature and used without further purification.
Synthesis of DES AGly:ChCl 3:1. To a round-bottom flask, 37.88 mmol (5.29 g) of choline chloride (ChCl, white solid) and 113.60 mmol (10.35 g) of aminoglycerol (AGly), colorless viscous liquid in the racemic form or in the enantiopure form (S), white crystalline solid in the enantiopure form (R)) were added. The resultant mixture was heated up to 80 °C for 30 min, to yield a clear solution. The obtained DES AGly:ChCl 3:1 was used without further purifications.
General procedure for the addition of n-butyllithium to carbonyl compounds in DESs. Reactions were performed at room temperature and under air, unless otherwise specified. In a glass tube, the appropriate carbonyl compound (1 mmol) was dissolved in the corresponding deep eutectic solvent (DES, 1 g) under air, followed by stirring for 5 min in order to obtain a homogeneous mixture. In the case of the solid substrates, the mixture was heated to 50 °C for 5 min under stirring, to obtain a homogenous mixture. The selected amount of n-butyllithium (1 to 4 mmol, 2.5 M in hexanes) was then added at room temperature and under vigorous stirring, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 min. The addition of water (20 mL) to the reaction crude, followed by extraction with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL) and drying of the organic phase over Na2SO4 and then evaporation under vacuum, allowed the isolation of the crude product. The identity of the tertiary alcohols 2a [50], 2b [51], 2d [52] 2e [53], 2g [54], 2h [55] and 2m [56], as well as those of ketone 2n [26], phenylpentane 5 [57], bibenzyl 6 [58] and the byproduct 3-(benzylamino)propane-1,2-diol 7 [58] were assessed by a comparison of their 1H spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature. In some cases (see manuscript) 1H NMR analysis of the reaction crude showed that the competing reduction had occurred, besides the expected 1,2-nucleophilic addition.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, an innovative approach to DES design was used in order to synthesize a novel mixture, namely AGly:ChCl 3:1, whose physico-chemical characterization confirms the possibility of unambiguously classifying it as a deep eutectic solvent. The synthetic usefulness of this DES was demonstrated as the reaction medium in the room-temperature addition of n-BuLi to carbonyl compounds under air, affording tertiary alcohols in up to 72% isolated yield. The substrate scope includes acyl chlorides, as yet unexplored in DESs, from which pure tertiary-alcohol products were isolated, together with benzyl chloride, in the first example of an organolithium-promoted aliphatic nucleophilic substitution in a protic medium, under air at room temperature. Chirality transfer from the medium to the chiral products was not observed, but the optical activity of the novel DES offers room for improvement in pursuing this challenging aim.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27238566/s1, 1. DSC profile for AGly:ChCl mixtures in 3:1 and 4:1 ratio. Figure S1. 2. Addition of n-butyllithium to carbonyl compounds in DESs; 1a. Comparison between DESs Gly:ChCl 2:1 and AGly:ChCl 3:1. Figures S2–S5; 1b. Substrate scope: aromatic ketones. Figures S6–S16; 1c. Substrate scope: aliphatic ketones. Figures S16–S22; 1d. Substrate scope: carboxylic acid derivatives (esters, acyl chlorides, amides). Figures S23–S28; 2. Addition of n-butyllithium to benzyl chloride in DESs. Figures S29–S36.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; methodology, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; software, A.A. and M.B. (Matteo Bonomo); validation, A.A., M.B., S.D., S.G. and M.B. (Marco Blangetti); formal analysis, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; investigation, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; resources, M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; data curation, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A. and M.B. (Matteo Bonomo); writing—review and editing, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo), S.D., S.G. and M.B. (Marco Blangetti); visualization, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo), S.D., S.G. and M.B. (Marco Blangetti); supervision, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D.; project administration, A.A., M.B. (Matteo Bonomo), and S.D.; funding acquisition, M.B. (Matteo Bonomo) and S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data reported in this article can be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds 2 are available from the authors.

References

  1. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anastas, P.; Eghbali, N. Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/technical-overview-volatile-organic-compounds (accessed on 24 September 2022).
  4. Abbott, A.P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K.; Tambyrajah, V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem. Commun. 2003, 39, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Abbott, A.P.; Boothby, D.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K. Deep Eutectic Solvents Formed between Choline Chloride and Carboxylic Acids: Versatile Alternatives to Ionic Liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9142–9147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Marcus, Y. Deep Eutectic Solvents; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hansen, B.B.; Spittle, S.; Chen, B.; Poe, D.; Zhang, Y.; Klein, J.M.; Horton, A.; Adhikari, L.; Zelovich, T.; Doherty, B.W.; et al. Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review of Fundamentals and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 121, 1232–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smith, E.L.; Abbott, A.P.; Ryder, K.S. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11060–11082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zainal-Abidin, M.H.; Hayyan, M.; Ngoh, G.C.; Wong, W.F.; Looi, C.Y. Emerging frontiers of deep eutectic solvents in drug discovery and drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2019, 316, 168–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Emami, S.; Shayanfar, A. Deep eutectic solvents for pharmaceutical formulation and drug delivery applications. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2020, 25, 779–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Trombino, S.; Siciliano, C.; Procopio, D.; Curcio, F.; Laganà, A.S.; Di Gioia, M.L.; Cassano, R. Deep Eutectic Solvents for Improving the Solubilization and Delivery of Dapsone. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nkuku, C.A.; LeSuer, R.J. Electrochemistry in Deep Eutectic Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 13271–13277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brett, C.M.A. Deep eutectic solvents and applications in electrochemical sensing. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 10, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Q.; Jiang, J.; Li, G.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, X.; Mu, T. The electrochemical stability of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents. Sci. China Ser. B Chem. 2016, 59, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fuchs, D.; Bayer, B.; Gupta, T.; Szabo, G.L.; Wilhelm, R.A.; Eder, D.; Meyer, J.; Steiner, S.; Gollas, B. The Electrochemical Behavior of Graphene in a Deep Eutectic Solvent. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 40937–40948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tomé, L.I.N.; Baião, V.; da Silva, W.; Brett, C.M.A. Deep eutectic solvents for the production and application of new materials. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 10, 30–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cunha, S.C.; Fernandes, J.O. Extraction techniques with deep eutectic solvents. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alonso, D.A.; Baeza, A.; Chinchilla, R.; Guillena, G.; Pastor, I.M.; Ramón, D.J. Deep Eutectic Solvents: The Organic Reaction Medium of the Century. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016, 612–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ghinato, S.; De Nardi, F.; Bolzoni, P.; Antenucci, A.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C. Chemo- and Regioselective Anionic Fries Rearrangement Promoted by Lithium Amides under Aerobic Conditions in Sustainable Reaction Media. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2022, 2, e202201154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Körner, S.; Albert, J.; Held, C. Catalytic Low-Temperature Dehydration of Fructose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Using Acidic Deep Eutectic Solvents and Polyoxometalate Catalysts. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lima, F.; Dietz, C.H.J.T.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Branco, L.C.; Lopes, J.C.; Gallucci, F.; Shimizu, K.; Held, C.; Marrucho, I.M. Vapor Pressure Assessment of Sulfolane-Based Eutectic Solvents: Experimental, PC-SAFT, and Molecular Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 10386–10397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Verevkin, S.P.; Sazonova, A.Y.; Frolkova, A.K.; Zaitsau, D.; Prikhodko, I.; Held, C. Separation Performance of BioRenewable Deep Eutectic Solvents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 3498–3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vidal, C.; García-Álvarez, J.; Hernán-Gómez, A.; Kennedy, A.R.; Hevia, E. Introducing Deep Eutectic Solvents to Polar Organometallic Chemistry: Chemoselective Addition of Organolithium and Grignard Reagents to Ketones in Air. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5969–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghinato, S.; Dilauro, G.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C. Directed ortho-metalation–nucleophilic acyl substitution strategies in deep eutectic solvents: The organolithium base dictates the chemoselectivity. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 7741–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arnodo, D.; Ghinato, S.; Nejrotti, S.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C. Lateral lithiation in deep eutectic solvents: Regioselective functionalization of substituted toluene derivatives. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 2391–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ghinato, S.; Territo, D.; Maranzana, A.; Capriati, V.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C. A Fast and General Route to Ketones from Amides and Organolithium Compounds under Aerobic Conditions: Synthetic and Mechanistic Aspects. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2020, 27, 2868–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gontrani, L.; Plechkova, N.V.; Bonomo, M. In-Depth Physico-Chemical and Structural Investigation of a Dicarboxylic Acid/Choline Chloride Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent (NADES): A Spotlight on the Importance of a Rigorous Preparation Procedure. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12536–12543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bonomo, M.; Gontrani, L.; Capocefalo, A.; Sarra, A.; Nucara, A.; Carbone, M.; Postorino, P.; Dini, D. A combined electrochemical, infrared and EDXD tool to disclose Deep Eutectic Solvents formation when one precursor is liquid: Glyceline as case study. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 319, 114292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Claudy, P.; Commerçon, J.; Lètoffé, J. Quasi-static study of the glass transition of glycerol by DSC. Thermochim. Acta 1988, 128, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cappelluti, F.; Mariani, A.; Bonomo, M.; Damin, A.; Bencivenni, L.; Passerini, S.; Carbone, M.; Gontrani, L. Stepping away from serendipity in Deep Eutectic Solvent formation: Prediction from precursors ratio. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 367, 120443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. AlOmar, M.K.; Hayyan, M.; Alsaadi, M.A.; Akib, S.; Hayyan, A.; Hashim, M.A. Glycerol-based deep eutectic solvents: Physical properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 215, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pitrè, D.; Fedeli, F. Optical Resolution of 1-Amino-2,3-Propanediol. Arch. Pharm. 1986, 319, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Quivelli, A.F.; D’Addato, G.; Vitale, P.; García-Álvarez, J.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Expeditious and practical synthesis of tertiary alcohols from esters enabled by highly polarized organometallic compounds under aerobic conditions in Deep Eutectic Solvents or bulk water. Tetrahedron 2021, 81, 131898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Palomba, T.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Del Giacco, T.; Germani, R.; Ianni, F.; Tiecco, M. Deep Eutectic Solvents formed by chiral components as chiral reaction media and studies of their structural properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 262, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tiecco, M.; Alonso, D.A.; Ñíguez, D.R.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J.; Bonillo, A.A.; Germani, R. Assessment of the organocatalytic activity of chiral l-Proline-based Deep Eutectic Solvents based on their structural features. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 313, 113573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gilman, H.; Haubein, A.H. The Quantitative Analysis of Alkyllithium Compounds1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1515–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bachmann, W.E. Syntheses of Phenanthrene Derivatives. I. Reactions of 9-Phenanthrylmagnesium Bromide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 1363–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Converso, A.; Saaidi, P.-L.; Sharpless, A.K.B.; Finn, M.G. Nucleophilic Substitution by Grignard Reagents on Sulfur Mustards. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7336–7339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kupracz, L.; Kirschning, A. Multiple Organolithium Generation in the Continuous Flow Synthesis of Amitriptyline. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 3375–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bassindale, A.R.; Eaborn, C.; Walton, D.R.M. A novel synthesis of neopentylbenzenes. J. Chem. Soc. C Org. 1969, 19, 2505–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pryor, W.A.; Tang, F.Y.; Tang, R.H.; Church, D.F. Chemistry of the tert-butyl radical: Polar character, .rho. value for reaction with toluenes, and the effect of radical polarity on the ratio of benzylic hydrogen abstraction to addition to aromatic rings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2885–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wurtz, A. Sur une nouvelle classe de radicaux organiques. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1855, 44, 275–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wurtz, A. Ueber eine neue Klasse organischer Radicale. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1855, 96, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Antenucci, A.; Bonomo, M.; Ghigo, G.; Gontrani, L.; Barolo, C.; Dughera, S. How do arenediazonium salts behave in deep eutectic solvents? A combined experimental and computational approach. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 339, 116743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghigo, G.; Bonomo, M.; Antenucci, A.; Reviglio, C.; Dughera, S. Copper-Free Halodediazoniation of Arenediazonium Tetrafluoroborates in Deep Eutectic Solvents-like Mixtures. Molecules 2022, 27, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ghigo, G.; Bonomo, M.; Antenucci, A.; Damin, A.; Dughera, S. Ullmann homocoupling of arenediazonium salts in a deep eutectic solvent. Synthetic and mechanistic aspects. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 26640–26647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, Z.; Zhu, W.; Zheng, Z.; Zou, X. One-pot α-nucleophilic fluorination of acetophenones in a deep eutectic solvent. J. Fluor. Chem. 2010, 131, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Di Carmine, G.; Abbott, A.P.; D’Agostino, C. Deep eutectic solvents: Alternative reaction media for organic oxidation reactions. React. Chem. Eng. 2021, 6, 582–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vitale, P.; Cicco, L.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Introducing deep eutectic solvents in enolate chemistry: Synthesis of 1-arylpropan-2-ones under aerobic conditions. React. Chem. Eng. 2021, 6, 1796–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saito, Y.; Yamanoue, K.; Segawa, Y.; Itami, K. Selective Transformation of Strychnine and 1,2-Disubstituted Benzenes by C–H Borylation. Chem 2020, 6, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maekawa, T.; Sekizawa, H.; Itami, K. Controlled Alcohol-Carbonyl Interconversion by Nickel Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7022–7026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Condon, F.E.; West, D.L. Cyclization-rearrangement of alkylstyrenes. 1. A. 1-Phenyl-1-pentene and homologs. B. A short synthesis of calamenene. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2006–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ardiansah, B.; Tanimoto, H.; Tomohiro, T.; Morimoto, T.; Kakiuchi, K. Sulfonium ion-promoted traceless Schmidt reaction of alkyl azides. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 8738–8741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Matsui, M.; Tsuge, M.; Shibata, K.; Muramatsu, H. Photochromism of 1,1-Diaryl-1-alkanols. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994, 67, 1753–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Napolitano, E.; Giovani, E.; Ceccarelli, N.; Pelosi, P. Tertiary Alcohols with Earthy Odor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 2806–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, F.; Deng, X.-J.; Tang, Y.; Tang, J.-P.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.-M. A simple and efficient copper oxide-catalyzed Barbier–Grignard reaction of unactivated aryl or alkyl bromides with ester. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 880–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Le Bailly, B.A.F.; Greenhalgh, M.D.; Thomas, S.P. Iron-catalysed, hydride-mediated reductive cross-coupling of vinyl halides and Grignard reagents. Chem. Commun. 2011, 48, 1580–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Maeda, H.; Kikui, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Okahara, M. Synthesis of aminomethyl crown ethers. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 5167–5171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 08566 g001 550
Figure 1. 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and its chemico-physical properties as an HBD for the novel DES.
Figure 1. 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and its chemico-physical properties as an HBD for the novel DES.
Molecules 27 08566 g001
Molecules 27 08566 g002 550
Figure 2. Experimental phase-diagram of AGly and ChCl mixtures built up by using the Tm values of the precursor available in the literature (confirmed in our labs) and the experimental Tm values of the mixtures as an average of the values obtained from the different approaches reported in the experimental section. The error bar is lower than 2 K for all the mixtures.
Figure 2. Experimental phase-diagram of AGly and ChCl mixtures built up by using the Tm values of the precursor available in the literature (confirmed in our labs) and the experimental Tm values of the mixtures as an average of the values obtained from the different approaches reported in the experimental section. The error bar is lower than 2 K for all the mixtures.
Molecules 27 08566 g002
Molecules 27 08566 g003 550
Figure 3. Molar conductivity of the mixtures AGly:ChCl 2:1 (red square), 3:1 (green circle) and 4:1 (blue diamond) at RT. The value of a DES based on Glycerol and ChCl (3:1) is reported as a comparison (black star).
Figure 3. Molar conductivity of the mixtures AGly:ChCl 2:1 (red square), 3:1 (green circle) and 4:1 (blue diamond) at RT. The value of a DES based on Glycerol and ChCl (3:1) is reported as a comparison (black star).
Molecules 27 08566 g003
Molecules 27 08566 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Substrate scope of the reactions of aromatic ketones with n-BuLi. 1 Reaction conditions: 1a–g (1 mmol), n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 3 mmol), DES (1.0 g), under air at room temperature. The yields of products 2 and 3 reported are determined by 1H NMR, using CH3NO2 as the internal standard. 2 2.0 equiv. of n-BuLi.
Scheme 1. Substrate scope of the reactions of aromatic ketones with n-BuLi. 1 Reaction conditions: 1a–g (1 mmol), n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 3 mmol), DES (1.0 g), under air at room temperature. The yields of products 2 and 3 reported are determined by 1H NMR, using CH3NO2 as the internal standard. 2 2.0 equiv. of n-BuLi.
Molecules 27 08566 sch001
Molecules 27 08566 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of the reactions of aliphatic ketones with n-BuLi. 1 Isolated yields. 2 NMR yields confirmed by GC. 3 3.0 eq. of n-BuLi.
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of the reactions of aliphatic ketones with n-BuLi. 1 Isolated yields. 2 NMR yields confirmed by GC. 3 3.0 eq. of n-BuLi.
Molecules 27 08566 sch002
Molecules 27 08566 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Substrate scope of the reaction of carboxylic-acid derivatives (esters, acyl chlorides, amides) with n-BuLi. 1 Reaction conditions: 1l–o (1 mmol), n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 4 mmol), DES (1.0 g), under air, room temperature. The yields reported are for products isolated after flash column chromatography on silica gel. Conversions were 100%. 2 Reaction conditions: 1p (1 mmol), n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 2 mmol), DES (5.0 g), CPME (1 mL), under air, 0 °C. 11% of tertiary alcohol was detected. Conversion was 100%.
Scheme 3. Substrate scope of the reaction of carboxylic-acid derivatives (esters, acyl chlorides, amides) with n-BuLi. 1 Reaction conditions: 1l–o (1 mmol), n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 4 mmol), DES (1.0 g), under air, room temperature. The yields reported are for products isolated after flash column chromatography on silica gel. Conversions were 100%. 2 Reaction conditions: 1p (1 mmol), n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 2 mmol), DES (5.0 g), CPME (1 mL), under air, 0 °C. 11% of tertiary alcohol was detected. Conversion was 100%.
Molecules 27 08566 sch003
Table
Table 1. Physical and chemical data of AGly:ChCl mixtures.
Table 1. Physical and chemical data of AGly:ChCl mixtures.
AGly:ChCl
Ratio		AGly (g)ChCl (g)Physical State at RTTm (K) 1h/PL (mS cm−1 M−1)
1:16.2269.526Solid>353 n.m.n.m.
2:16.0084.600Unstable liquidn.d. (250)315.4171 ± 5
3:16.1443.138Liquid241 (243) 93.5122 ± 3
4:16.9392.660Liquid246 (248)11.2777 ± 7
1 The value within the parenthesis is manually measured; n.m. = not measurable; n.d. = not detectable.
Table
Table 2. Screening of the reaction conditions for the n-BuLi addition to model substrate 1a.
Table 2. Screening of the reaction conditions for the n-BuLi addition to model substrate 1a.
Molecules 27 08566 i001
EntryDESn-BuLi eq.Yield 2a (%)
1Gly:ChCl 2:12.067
2AGly:ChCl 3:12.067
3AGly:ChCl 3:13.083
4AGly3.048 1
1 33% of unreacted 1a was detected.
Table
Table 3. Screening of different DESs as reaction media for the nucleophilic substitution of n-BuLi on benzyl chloride 4.
Table 3. Screening of different DESs as reaction media for the nucleophilic substitution of n-BuLi on benzyl chloride 4.
Molecules 27 08566 i002
EntryDESYield 5 (%) 1Yield 6 (%) 1
1Gly:ChCl 2:1283
2Gly:ChCl 3:17012
3Urea:ChCl 2:1617
4AGly:ChCl 3:18511
5LA:ChCl 2:1322
6Gly:KF 6:1747
7H2O:ChCl 2:1--
8EG:ChCl 2:1343
1 NMR yield.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antenucci, A.; Bonomo, M.; Ghinato, S.; Blangetti, M.; Dughera, S. Design of a New Chiral Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and Its Application in Organolithium Chemistry. Molecules 2022, 27, 8566. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238566

AMA Style

Antenucci A, Bonomo M, Ghinato S, Blangetti M, Dughera S. Design of a New Chiral Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and Its Application in Organolithium Chemistry. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8566. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antenucci, Achille, Matteo Bonomo, Simone Ghinato, Marco Blangetti, and Stefano Dughera. 2022. "Design of a New Chiral Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and Its Application in Organolithium Chemistry" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8566. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238566

APA Style

Antenucci, A., Bonomo, M., Ghinato, S., Blangetti, M., & Dughera, S. (2022). Design of a New Chiral Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol and Its Application in Organolithium Chemistry. Molecules, 27(23), 8566. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238566

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop