Next Article in Journal
Metabolite Profiling of Alocasia gigantea Leaf Extract and Its Potential Anticancer Effect through Autophagy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Anti-Influenza H1N1 and Anti-Dengue Activity of A-Ring Modified Oleanonic Acid Polyamine Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Phosphoramidite Reagents for the Synthesis of Base-Labile Oligonucleotides Modified with a Linear Aminoalkyl and Amino-PEG Linker at the 3′-End

1
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 1-6, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
2
Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 1-3, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
3
National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, 7-6-8 Saito-Asagi, Osaka 567-0085, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8501; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238501
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 30 November 2022 / Published: 3 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Bioorganic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Oligonucleotides with an amino linker at the 3′-end are useful for the preparation of conjugated oligonucleotides. However, chemically modified nucleosides, which are unstable under basic conditions, cannot be incorporated into oligonucleotides using the conventional method entailing the preparation of oligonucleotides bearing a 3′-amino linker. Therefore, we designed Fmoc-protected phosphoramidites for the synthesis of base-labile oligonucleotides modified with a 3′-amino linker. The resultant phosphoramidites were then successfully incorporated into oligonucleotides bearing a 3′-amino linker. Various basic solutions were investigated for protecting group removal. All the protecting groups were removed by treating the oligonucleotides with 40% aqueous methylamine at room temperature for 2 h. Thus, the deprotection time and temperature were significantly reduced compared to the conventional conditions (28% NH3 aq., 55 °C, 17 h). In addition, the oligonucleotide protecting groups could be removed using a mild base (e.g., 50 mM potassium carbonate methanol solution). Furthermore, base-labile oligonucleotides bearing an amino linker at the 3′-end were successfully synthesized using the developed phosphoramidite reagents, highlighting the utility of our strategy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Oligonucleotides conjugated with diverse molecules have attracted substantial research interest in several fields, including oligonucleotide medicine [1,2,3,4], DNA-encoded libraries [5,6], and DNA-based nanotechnology [7,8,9]. Various chemical reactions have been applied for the preparation of conjugated oligonucleotides, including amide bond formation [10,11], thiol Michael addition [12,13,14], copper-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC) [15,16,17,18], the Diels-Alder reaction [19], Staudinger ligation [20], and oxime ligation [21]. For amide bond formation, conjugated oligonucleotides can generally be obtained using oligonucleotides with linear amino linkers, carboxylic acids, and suitable condensing agents. Structurally diverse oligonucleotides are readily accessible owing to the availability of a large variety of carboxylic acids. In addition, most conjugations are performed at either the 3′- or 5′-end of oligonucleotides. In particular, 3′-modification is advantageous because oligonucleotides with an amino linker at the 3′-end show high nuclease resistance [22].
Oligonucleotides modified with linear 3′-alkylamino linkers are generally synthesized using controlled pore glass (CPG)-immobilized phthalimide-based linkers (Figure 1A) [23,24]. In this method, phthalimide is removed to yield amines after treatment with aqueous ammonia for the deprotection of phosphate and nucleobase moieties. This conventional method can be used to synthesize most of the oligonucleotides with linear 3′-amino linkers. However, as phthalimide ring-opening by aqueous ammonia requires prolonged heating (55 °C, 17 h), this method is not suitable for the synthesis of oligonucleotides with chemically modified nucleosides, which are unstable under basic conditions. As another approach, oligonucleotides bearing linear 3′-aminoalkyl linkers can also be obtained utilizing CPG relying on cleavage by UV irradiation based on o-nitrobenzyl chemistry [25]. While this method presumably allows for the introduction of base-labile nucleosides into oligonucleotides, the exposure of oligonucleotides to UV light leads to undesired reactions, such as photocycloaddition of pyrimidines and photo-oxidation of guanine [26,27]. Therefore, we considered that the development of a synthetic method via which both the modification of a base-labile nucleoside and the introduction of an amino linker at the 3′-end can be achieved, would be valuable for accessing oligonucleotide conjugates.
The Fmoc group is a commonly used amine protecting group, especially in peptide synthesis, and it is readily removable by treatment with a weak base, such as 20% piperidine in DMF [28,29,30]. Moreover, phosphoramidites bearing an Fmoc-protected amino group have been used for oligonucleotide synthesis [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Therefore, we designed Fmoc-based phosphoramidite reagents (Figure 1B) and applied them to oligonucleotide synthesis. By introducing these reagents into oligonucleotides, we considered that the protective group of the terminal amine could be removed under mild basic conditions to provide base-labile oligonucleotides with linear 3′-amino linkers. The amidite reagents were envisaged to be accessed from aminoalcohol A and 9-fluorenylmethanol derivative B, which can be derived from 4-hydroxymethylbenzaldehyde C and fluorene D, respectively (Scheme 1). Herein, we report the syntheses of phosphoramidites 6ac and oligonucleotides modified with various 3′-amino linkers as well as base-labile nucleosides.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthiesis of Phosphoramidite Reagents

In this study, phosphoramidite reagents 6ac, which can be applied to incorporate an aminopropyl linker, aminohexyl linker, or amino-PEG2 linker at the 3′-end of oligonucleotides, respectively, were prepared. The syntheses of phosphoramidites 6ac are summarized in Scheme 2. The TBS-protected 4-hydroxymethylbenzaldehyde 1 [39] was treated with the 9-fluorenyl anion generated in situ from fluorene and n-butyl lithium, to afford 9-fluorenylmethanol derivative 2 in 84% yield. Using 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate and amino alcohols 3ac, the obtained alcohol 2 was converted to the corresponding carbamates 4ac. The primary alcohols in 4ac were protected by the DMTr group, followed by the removal of the TBS group by treatment with triethylamine trihydrofluoride complex (3HF·Et3N) to yield benzyl alcohols 5ac in a high yield. Finally, phosphoramidites 6ac were synthesized via phosphitylation of 5ac.

2.2. Optimum Deprotection Conditions for Oligonucleotides Modified with the Developed Phosphoramidite Reagents

Oligonucleotides were synthesized using the designed phosphoramidites and the deprotection efficiency of various base-treatment conditions was investigated. In this experiment, phosphoramidite 6a and thymidine-immobilized CPG were used and the C10-mer was selected as the model sequence (Scheme 3). In addition, because N4-benzoylcytidine is known to undergo replacement at the 4-position upon treatment with a base other than aqueous ammonia, such as aqueous methylamine or 50% ethylenediamine in EtOH [40,41], N4-acetylcytidine was used, as it is less susceptible to such side reactions [40]. The application of common oligonucleotide synthetic procedures resulted in good stepwise coupling yields (>95%), as estimated based on trityl monitoring. The synthesized oligonucleotide was treated with various basic solutions to remove the protecting groups (Table 1) and the obtained crude oligonucleotide was analyzed using LC/MS (Figure S11).
Initially, the synthesized oligonucleotide was subjected to general deprotection conditions for nucleobase protecting groups, namely treatment with aqueous ammonia at 55 °C for 17 h. This resulted in the complete removal of all protecting groups (Table 1, entry 1). Therefore, the reaction temperature was lowered from 55 °C to room temperature and the reaction time required to remove the protecting group of the 3′-aminopropyl linker was investigated. When the reaction time was 2 h, approximately 20% of the 11-mer oligonucleotide with the Fmoc-protecting group intact remained (Table 1, entry 2 and Figure S11). On the other hand, the protecting group of the aminopropyl linker was completely removed after 8 h (Table 1, entry 3 and Figure S11). To increase the deprotection efficiency, an aqueous solution of methylamine, which is a primary amine generally used for the deprotection of synthesized oligonucleotides [41,42], was used (Table 1, entry 4). The deprotection proceeded at the same temperature and time as described in entry 2. Thus, the reaction time was significantly reduced compared to the conventional conditions (28% NH3 aq., 55 °C, 17 h) [23,24].
To enable the application of phosphoramidites 6ac in the synthesis of oligonucleotides modified with 3′-amino linkers and base-labile nucleosides, deprotection conditions using weak basic solutions relative to aqueous methylamine were investigated (Table 1, entries 5–8). The use of a 50 mM potassium carbonate methanol solution, which is a general mild deprotection reagent for synthetic oligonucleotides, resulted in the complete removal of the protecting groups after 24 h at room temperature (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). All the oligonucleotide protecting groups were removed using 0.4 M sodium hydroxide solution in methanol and water (4:1) after 4 h at room temperature (Table 1, entry 7). Moreover, this condition allowed for the deprotection of nucleobase and phosphate groups, as well as carboxylate hydrolysis [43]. In addition, because thioamides cannot be cleaved under the deprotection conditions described in entry 7, this enables the introduction of thioAmNA, developed by us, into oligonucleotides, as cleavage of the thioamide bridge moiety would be avoided [44]. Moreover, a mixed system comprising t-BuNH2/MeOH/H2O (1:1:2), used for deprotecting TAMRA-T-modified oligonucleotides, which are known to decompose upon treatment with aqueous ammonia [45], was also capable of removing all the oligonucleotide protecting groups (entry 8).
Aminopropyl, hexylamino, and PEG2-amino linkers were incorporated at the 3′-end of 13-mer DNA containing all four nucleobases (A, G, C, and T) using phosphoramidites 6ac (Scheme 4). The treatment of the synthesized oligonucleotides with 40% aqueous methylamine solution (Table 1, entry 4) resulted in the removal of the nucleobase, phosphate, and amino linker protecting groups (Figures S12–S14). In addition, 0.4 M sodium hydroxide solution, which is applicable for the removal of the oligonucleotide amino linker protecting group (Table 1, entry 7), could also be applied for the deprotection of 13-mer DNA containing the three 3′-amino linkers (Figures S12–S14).

2.3. Synthesis of Oligonucleotides Modified with 3′-Amino Linkers and Base-Labile Nucleosides

Under the optimized conditions, oligonucleotides modified with 3′-amino linkers and base-labile nucleosides were synthesized. 5-Iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (IdU) [46], 2′,4′-amido-bridged nucleic acid (AmNA) [47,48], and TAMRA-T [45] were chosen as chemically modified nucleosides in these experiments. The nucleosides with a pyrimidine nucleobase substituted with an iodo or bromo group at the 5-position can be converted to 5-aminopyrimidine by heating in aqueous ammonia. The amido-bridge moieties in AmNA undergo cleavage under strongly basic conditions and rhodamine analogs such as TAMRA-T are insufficiently stable under the same. IdU, AmNA, and TAMRA-T were incorporated into the 13-mer DNA modified with an amino linker at the 3′-end. The conditions for oligonucleotide deprotection are summarized in Table 2. The IdU-modified oligonucleotides were treated with 28% aqueous ammonia at room temperature for 8 h to afford the desired oligonucleotides in high yields without the decomposition of 5-iodouracil nucleobase (entries 1–3 in Table 2, Figures S15 and S18). After treatment with 50 mM potassium carbonate in methanol, all the protecting groups in the AmNA-modified oligonucleotide were removed without cleavage of the amide bond (entries 4–6 in Table 2, Figures S16 and S19). A mixed solution of t-BuNH2/MeOH/H2O (1:1:2), which can be used for the deprotection of TAMRA-T-modified oligonucleotides (entry 8 in Table 1), was applied for the deprotection of oligonucleotides bearing 3′-amino linkers as well as TAMRA-T (entries 7–9 in Table 2, Figures S17 and S20). Thus, the use of phosphoramidite reagents 6ac enabled the isolation of the desired modified oligonucleotides in moderate yields (Table 2).
Furthermore, crude 13-mer DNAs modified with IdU, AmNA, and TAMRA-T synthesized via the conventional method, using commercially available phthalimide-modified CPG, and via our strategy, using phosphoramidite 6a, were analyzed for comparison employing HPLC. The HPLC and LC/MS plots of the crude DNAs are shown in Figure 2 and Figures S15–S17. In the conventional method, treatment with aqueous ammonia at 55 °C for 17 h for phthalimide removal leads to the formation of side products due to the reactivity of the chemically modified nucleic acid [23,24]. In particular, the yield of the TAMRA-T-modified oligonucleotide was significantly lower than that obtained via the developed method, being <10% based on the peak area in the HPLC chart (Figure 2C). Furthermore, AmNA was completely converted to 4′-carbamoyl-2′-methylaminothymidine via ammonolysis of the amide bridge moiety (Figure 2B). In contrast, as the protecting groups of the 13-mer DNA synthesized using phosphoramidite 6a were removable with mild base treatment, no conspicuous side reactions were observed. These results demonstrated the utility of the synthetic method developed in this study.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

All moisture-sensitive reactions were conducted in well-dried glassware under N2 atmosphere. The analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was applied to monitor reaction progress using pre-coated glass sheets (Silica gel 60 F254, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). For column chromatography, silica gel PSQ-100B and DIOL MB-40/75 (Fuji Silysia Chemical, Aichi, Japan) were used. The infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a FT/IR-4200 spectrometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR spectra were recorded using a JNM-ECA500 spectrometer(JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to internal tetramethylsilane (δ = 0.00 ppm) and residual CHCl3 (δ = 7.26 ppm) for 1H NMR. For 13C NMR, the chemical shifts were reported in ppm relative to chloroform-d1 (δ = 77.0 ppm). For 31P NMR, the chemical shifts were reported in ppm relative to 5% H3PO4 (δ = 0.0 ppm) as the external standard. The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectra of all new compounds were recorded on a SpiralTOF JMS-S3000 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) instrument. The oligonucleotides were synthesized on a 0.2-μmol scale using an automated DNA synthesizer (nS-8, Gene Design, Osaka, Japan). For analytical HPLC CBM-20A (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), DGU-20A3R (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), LC-20AD (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), CTO-20A (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), SPD-20A (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan), and SIL-20A (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan) were used. For LC/MS analyses, a Xevo G2-XS QTOF (Waters, Milfold, MA, USA) was utilized.

3.2. Synthesis of Phosphoramidite Reagents 6ac

Compound 2: Under N2 atmosphere, n-butyl lithium in n-hexane (1.6 M, 10 mL, 16 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of fluorene (2.66 g, 16 mmol) in dry THF (100 mL) at −78 °C. After stirring for 1 h, compound 1 [39] (4.0 g, 16 mmol) dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) was added dropwise to the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h. After quenching with 1% aqueous HCl at −78 °C, the resulting mixture was diluted with EtOAc. The solution was washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (6.60 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 120 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 5:1) to yield 2 as a white powder (5.60 g, 84%). IR (KBr): νmax 3560, 3379, 3065, 3038, 2953, 2927, 2883, 2856, 1513, 1471, 1462, 1447, 1421, 1389, 1374, 1362, 1298, 1255, and 1212 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.96 (d, J = 3.5 Hz 1H), 4.37 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (s, 2.1H), 5.01 (dd, J = 3.5, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.02–7.04 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.34 (m, 9H), and 7.68–7.71 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: −5.2, 18.4, 26.0, 54.7, 64.8, 76.2, 119.7, 119.8, 125.6, 125.8, 126.3, 126.6, 126.6, 126.7, 127.5, 127.6, 140.8, 141.1, 141.7, 141.8, 143.3, and 143.7. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C27H32NaO2Si [MNa+] 439.2069, found 439.2064.
Compound 4a: Under N2 atmosphere, pyridine (1.7 mL, 21.2 mmol) and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate (1.57 g, 6.69 mmol) were added to a solution of 2 (2.95 g, 7.08 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (70 mL) at room temperature. After stirring for 1 h, 3-amino-1-propanol 3a (1.2 mL, 15.6 mmol) was added to the solution and stirring was continued at room temperature for 48 h. The resulting mixture was diluted with CHCl3 and the solution was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq., water, and brine. The collected organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (5.28 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 100 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 4:1 to 2:1) to yield 4a as a colorless oil (2.85 g, 78%). IR (KBr): νmax 3329, 3064, 3037, 2953, 2883, 2856, 1700, 1611, 1516, 1471, 1448, 1427, 1377, 1361, 1336, and 1256 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.07 (s, 6H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 1.60–1.63 (m, 2H), 2.63 (s, 1H), 3.22–3.31 (m, 2H), 3.52–3.53 (m, 2H), 4.47 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (s, 2H), 5.09 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.07–7.39 (m, 10H), and 7.64–7.66 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: −5.2, 18.4, 25.9, 32.6, 37.4, 52.4, 59.2, 64.7, 77.8, 119.7, 119.8, 123.8, 125.6, 125.8, 125.9, 126.5, 126.7, 127.0, 127.5, 127.6, 136.1, 137.0, 141.1, 141.6, 141.8, 142.5, 143.3, 149.8, and 156.6. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C31H39NNaO4Si [MNa+] 540.2546, found 540.2543.
Compound 4b: Under N2 atmosphere, pyridine (1.4 mL, 17.0 mmol) and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate (1.26 g, 6.23 mmol) were added to a solution of 2 (2.36 g, 5.66 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (60 mL) at room temperature. After stirring for 1 h, 6-amino-1-hexanol 3b (1.46 g, 12.5 mmol) was added to the solution and stirring was continued at room temperature for 48 h. The resulting mixture was diluted with CHCl3 and the solution was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq., water, and brine. The collected organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (4.28 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 100 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 4:1 to 2:1) to yield 4b as a colorless oil (2.15 g, 68%). IR (KBr): νmax 3417, 3341, 3066, 2929, 2858, 2738, 1705, 1608, 1520, 1462, 1448, 1404, 1376, 1361, 1336, and 1254 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.06 (s, 6H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 1.24–1.53 (m, 8H), 3.08–3.13 (m, 2H), 3.54–3.55 (m, 2H), 4.46 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (s, 2H), 4.89 (s, 1H), 6.04 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), and 7.06–7.65 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: −5.2, 18.4, 25.2, 25.9, 26.2, 29.8, 32.5, 40.7, 52.4, 62.5, 64.7, 77.5, 119.6, 119.7, 125.5, 125.8, 126.0, 126.4, 126.7, 127.1, 127.5, 127.5, 137.1, 141.0, 141.5, 141.8, 142.6, 143.5, and 155.6. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C34H45NNaO4Si [MNa+] 582.3016, found 582.3011.
Compound 4c: Under N2 atmosphere, pyridine (0.35 mL, 4.3 mmol) and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate (319 mg, 1.58 mmol) were added to a solution of 2 (600 mg, 1.44 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (15 mL) at room temperature. After stirring for 1 h, amino-PEG2 3c (473 mg, 3.17 mmol) was added to the solution and stirring was continued at room temperature for 48 h. The resulting mixture was diluted with CHCl3 and the solution was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq., water, and brine. The collected organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (1.18 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 20 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 4:1 to 1:1) to yield 4c as a colorless oil (540 mg, 63%). IR (KBr): νmax 3419, 3328, 3064, 2951, 2928, 2857, 1707, 1533, 1471, 1462, 1449, 1423, 1389, 1376, 1361, 1350, and 1254 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.06 (s, 6H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 2.37 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.31–3.34 (m, 2H), 3.51–3.73 (m, 10H), 4.48 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (s, 2H), 5.50 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.09–7.45 (m, 10H), and 7.65–7.66 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: −5.2, 18.4, 25.9, 40.1, 52.4, 61.8, 64.7, 70.1, 70.4, 72.5, 77.7, 119.6, 119.8, 125.6, 125.8, 126.0, 126.5, 126.7, 127.1, 127.5, 137.1, 141.0, 141.6, 142.6, 143.5, and 155.6. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C34H45NNaO6Si [MNa+] 614.2914, found 614.2908.
Compound 5a: Under N2 atmosphere, 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl chloride (1.98 g, 5.84 mmol) was added to a solution of 4a (2.75 g, 5.31 mmol) in dry pyridine (50 mL) at room temperature and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h. After quenching with MeOH, the resulting mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate. The solution was washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (6.25 g) was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) under N2 atmosphere, followed by the addition of 3HF·Et3N (2.6 mL, 16 mmol) at room temperature and stirring for 24 h. The resulting mixture was diluted with EtOAc and the solution was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq., water, and brine. The collected organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (5.22 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 100 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 10:1 to 5:1) to yield 5a as white foam (3.60 g, 96% for 2 steps). IR (KBr): νmax 3416, 3061, 3006, 2931, 2874, 2836, 1708, 1607, 1579, 1508, 1447, 1337, 1300, and 1251 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.71–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.86 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.26 (m, 4H), 3.72–3.75 (m, 7H), 4.45 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 5.27 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.80–6.82 (m, 4H), and 7.02–7.62 (m, 21H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 25.6, 29.3, 39.5, 52.4, 55.2, 61.9, 65.0, 68.0, 77.4, 86.3, 113.2, 115.5, 119.6, 119.8, 125.8, 126.2, 126.3, 126.4, 126.8, 126.8, 127.5, 127.6, 127.9, 128.1, 129.4, 130.0, 136.2, 137.7, 140.3, 141.5, 141.8, 142.5, 143.4, 145.0, 155.4, and 158.4. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C46H43NNaO6 [MNa+] 728.2988, found 728.2986.
Compound 5b: Under N2 atmosphere, 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl chloride (1.36 g, 4.03 mmol) was added to a solution of 4b (2.05 g, 3.66 mmol) in dry pyridine (30 mL) at room temperature, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h. After quenching with MeOH, the resulting mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate. The solution was washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (4.18 g) was dissolved in dry THF (30 mL) under N2 atmosphere, followed by the addition of 3HF·Et3N (1.8 mL, 11 mmol) at room temperature and stirring for 24 h. The resulting mixture was diluted with EtOAc, and the solution was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq., water, and brine. The collected organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (3.85 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 60 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 10:1 to 5:1) to yield 5b as yellow foam (2.14 g, 78% over 2 steps). IR (KBr): νmax 3403, 3064, 3006, 2933, 2862, 2837, 1706, 1607, 1580, 1509, 1447, 1417, 1337, 1299, and 1250 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.21–1.44 (m, 5H), 1.57–1.61 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.83–1.86 (m, 1H), 3.00–3.12 (m, 4H), 3.73–3.77 (m, 7H), 4.48 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 4.78–4.79 (m, 1H), 6.12 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.80–6.82 (m, 4H), 7.08–7.44 (m, 19H), and 7.61–7.64 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 25.6, 26.0, 26.6, 29.8, 30.0, 41.0, 52.3, 55.2, 63.3, 65.0, 68.0, 85.6, 112.9, 119.7, 119.8, 125.7, 126.0, 126.3, 126.5, 126.6, 126.7, 127.3, 127.6, 127.7, 128.2, 130.0, 136.7, 137.7, 140.3, 141.5, 141.8, 142.6, 143.3, 145.4, 155.5, and 158.2. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C49H49NNaO6 [MNa+] 770.3458, found 770.3454.
Compound 5c: Under N2 atmosphere, 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl chloride (327 mg, 0.97 mmol) was added to a solution of 4c (520 mg, 0.88 mmol) in dry pyridine (10 mL) at room temperature and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h. After quenching with MeOH, the resulting mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate. The solution was washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (1.05 g) was dissolved in dry THF (10 mL) under a N2 atmosphere, followed by the addition of 3HF·Et3N (0.42 mL, 2.6 mmol) and stirring at room temperature for 24 h. The resulting mixture was diluted with EtOAc and the solution was washed with saturated NaHCO3 aq., water, and brine. The collected organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (928 mg) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 20 g, CHCl3:EtOAc = 4:1 to 2:1) to yield 5c as white foam (600 g, 88% for 2 steps). IR (KBr): νmax 3427, 3370, 3061, 3034, 3006, 2934, 2975, 2837, 1720, 1607, 1580, 1508, 1448, 1420, 1351, 1300, and 1252 cm−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.62 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.25–3.27 (m, 2H), 3.33–3.35 (m, 2H), 3.53–3.69 (m, 8H), 3.75 (s, 6H), 4.45 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 5.37 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.79–6.81 (m, 4H), 7.06–7.35 (m, 16H), 7.46–7.50 (m, 3H), and 7.62–7.63 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 55.2, 63.1, 65.1, 70.1, 70.7, 70.8, 77.7, 86.0, 113.0, 119.6, 119.8, 125.7, 126.3, 126.7, 126.8, 127.5, 127.6, 127.8, 128.2, 130.1, 136.3, 140.3, 142.5, 143.3, 145.0, and 158.4. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C49H49NNaO8 [MNa+] 802.3356, found 802.3368.
Compound 6a: Under an Ar atmosphere, N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.5 mL, 3.0 mmol) and i-Pr2NP(Cl)O(CH2)2CN (0.33 mL, 1.5 mmol) were added to a solution of compound 5a (706 mg, 1.0 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 1 h. After quenching with saturated NaHCO3 aq., the resulting mixture was extracted with CHCl3. The combined organic layers were washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (1.10 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 40 g, n-hexane: EtOAc = 3:1) to yield compound 6a as a white foam (790 mg, 87%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.14–1.17 (m, 12H), 1.72–1.74 (m, 2H), 2.57–2.59 (m, 2H), 3.17–3.26 (m, 4H), 3.60–3.63 (m, 2H), 3.80–3.82 (m, 8H), 4.43–4.45 (m, 1H), 4.55–4.59 (m, 1H), 4.65–4.70 (m, 1H), 5.21–5.23 (m, 1H), 6.02–6.03 (m, 1H), 6.81–6.84 (m, 4H), 7.01–7.46 (m, 19H), and 7.58–7.64 (m, 2H). 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.1 and 149.1. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C55H60N3NaO7P [MNa+] 928.4067, found 928.4044.
Compound 6b: Under Ar atmosphere, N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.51 mL, 3.0 mmol) and i-Pr2NP(Cl)O(CH2)2CN (0.33 mL, 1.5 mmol) were added to a solution of compound 5b (748 mg, 1.0 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 1 h. After quenching with saturated NaHCO3 aq., the resulting mixture was extracted with CHCl3. The combined organic layers were washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (1.05 g) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 40 g, n-hexane: EtOAc = 3:1) to yield compound 6b as a white foam (780 mg, 82%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.13–1.25 (m, 14H), 1.23–1.43 (m, 4H), 1.58–1.61 (m, 1H), 1.84–1.87 (m, 1H), 2.57–2.59 (m, 2H), 3.01–3.22 (m, 4H), 3.61–3.63 (m, 2H), 3.73–3.82 (m, 8H), 4.47–4.49 (m, 1H), 4.57–4.59 (m, 1H), 4.66–4.68 (m, 1H), 4.76–4.77 (m, 1H), 6.10–6.11 (m, 1H), 6.81–6.83 (m, 4H), 7.08–7.44 (m, 19H), and 7.62–7.65 (m, 2H). 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.1 and 149.1. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C58H66N3NaO7P [MNa+] 970.4536, found 970.4525.
Compound 6c: Under Ar atmosphere, N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.51 mL, 3.0 mmol) and i-Pr2NP(Cl)O(CH2)2CN (0.33 mL, 1.5 mmol) were added to a solution of compound 5c (780 mg, 1.0 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 1 h. After quenching with saturated NaHCO3 aq., the resulting mixture was extracted with CHCl3. The combined organic layers were washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue (988 mg) was purified using column chromatography (silica gel 40 g, n-hexane: EtOAc = 2:1) to yield compound 6c as a white foam (600 mg, 61%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.13–1.20 (m, 12H), 2.56–2.59 (m, 2H), 3.25–3.84 (m, 22H), 4.44–4.70 (m, 3H), 5.32–5.35 (m, 1H), 6.04–6.05 (m, 1H), 6.80–6.81 (m, 4H), 7.06–7.48 (m, 19H), and 7.62–7.63 (m, 2H). 31P NMR (202 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.1 and 149.1. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C58H66N3NaO9P [MNa+] 1002.4434, found 1002.4429.

3.3. Synthesis of Oligonucleotides

Phosphoramidites 6ac, dT-phosphoramidite (Sigma), Ac-dC-phosphoramidite (Sigma), Pac-dA-phosphoramidite (Gren Research), iPrPac-dG-phosphoramidite (Gren Research), IdU-phosphoramidite (Gren Research), and AmNA-phosphoramidite [47] were dissolved in anhydrous MeCN into a final concentration of 0.1 M. TAMRA-T-phosphoramidite (Gren Research) was dissolved in anhydrous THF/MeCN (1:9) into a final concentration of 0.1 M. Oligonucleotide synthesis was performed on a 0.2-μmol scale using an automated DNA synthesizer (Gene Design nS-8) and 0.25 M 5-(ethylthio)-1H-tetrazole in MeCN (Sigma) as an activator, 3% trichloroacetic acid in CH2Cl2 (Wako) as a deblocking reagent, 0.02 M iodine in THF/pyridine/H2O (Sigma) as an oxidizing reagent, and a combination of 5% phenoxyacetic anhydride (Pac2O) in THF (Sigma) and 16% 1-methylimidazole in THF (Sigma) as a capping reagent. The oligonucleotides synthesized in trityl-on mode were cleaved from the CPG resin and all the protecting groups were removed by treatment with basic solutions, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The oligonucleotides were purified using Sep-Pak® Plus C18 cartridges (Waters) and the 5′-DMTr group was removed during purification using 1% (v/v) aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The separated crude oligonucleotides were analyzed using reversed-phase HPLC (Waters XBridge® MS C18 Column 2.5 μm, 4.6 × 50 mm) and a mixture of 0.1 M TEAA aq. as eluent A and MeCN as eluent B. A linear gradient from 5% to 30% MeCN (over 25 min) was applied at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a temperature of 50 °C and the process was monitored employing UV visualization at 260 nm. The oligonucleotides were further analyzed using reversed-phase LC/MS (Waters BEH C18 Column 1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm) and a mixture of H2O/HFIP/Et3N (100/1/0.1) as eluent A and MeOH as eluent B. A linear gradient from 5% to 40% MeOH (over 10 min) was used at 50 °C at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and the process was monitored employing UV visualization at 260 nm. The separated oligonucleotides were further purified using reversed-phase HPLC (Waters XBridge® OST C18 column 2.5 μm, 10 × 50 mm) and 0.1 M TEAA buffer (pH = 7.0) as eluent A and MeCN as eluent B. A linear gradient from 5% to 30% MeCN (over 25 min) was used at 50 °C at a flow rate of 3 mL/min, and the process was monitored employing UV visualization at 260 nm. The oligonucleotide yield was calculated from the peak values recorded at 260 nm using a NanoDrop instrument (DeNovix DS-11).

4. Conclusions

In this study, Fmoc group-based phosphoramidite reagents 6ac were developed to enable the incorporation of various amino linkers at the 3′-end of oligonucleotides. Phosphoramidite reagents 6ac were synthesized from aminoalcohols 3ac and 9-fluorenylmethanol derivative 2, which was prepared from fluorene and TBS-protected 4-hydroxymethylbenzaldehyde 1. The reagents were successfully introduced into oligonucleotides and the amino linker protecting group was removed via mild base treatment. The significantly milder reaction conditions compared to those of the conventional method enabled the introduction of base-labile nucleosides as well as various amino linkers at the 3′ end, demonstrating the utility of our method.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27238501/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 2; Figure S2: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 4a; Figure S3: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 4b; Figure S4: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 4c; Figure S5: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 5a; Figure S6: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 5b; Figure S7: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of compound 5c; Figure S8: 1H NMR and 31P NMR spectra of compound 6a; FigureS9: 1H NMR and 31P NMR spectra of compound 6b; Figure S10: 1H NMR and 31P NMR spectra of compound 6c; Figure S11: LC/MS charts of crude C10-mer oligonucleotides; Figure S12: LC/MS charts of crude 13-mer oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminopropyl linker; Figure S13: LC/MS charts of crude 13-mer oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminohexyl linker; Figure S14: LC/MS charts of crude 13-mer oligonucleotides with a 3′-amino-PEG2 linker; Figure S15: LC/MS charts of crude IdU-modified oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminopropyl linker; Figure S16: LC/MS charts of crude AmNA-modified oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminopropyl linker; Figure S17: LC/MS charts of crude TAMRA-T-modified oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminopropyl linker; Figure S18: LC/MS charts of crude IdU-modified oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminohexyl and amino-PEG2 linker; Figure S19: LC/MS charts of crude AmNA-modified oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminohexyl and amino-PEG2 linker; Figure S20: LC/MS charts of crude TAMRA-T-modified oligonucleotides with a 3′-aminohexyl and amino-PEG2 linker.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.O.; methodology, T.O. and Q.R.; writing—original draft preparation, T.O. and Q.R.; writing—review and editing, S.O.; funding acquisition, S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) Grant Numbers JP19am0401003, JP21ae0121022, JP21ae0121023 and JP21ae0121024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cui, H.; Zhu, X.; Li, S.; Wang, P.; Fang, J. Liver-targeted delivery of oligonucleotides with N-acetylgalactosamine conjugation. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 16259–16265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oyama, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamayoshi, A. Recent advances in the delivery carriers and chemical conjugation strategies for nucleic acid drugs. Cancers 2021, 13, 3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Roberts, T.C.; Langer, R.; Wood, M.J.A. Advances in oligonucleotide drug derively. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 673–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Benizri, S.; Fissot, A.; Martin, A.; Vialet, B.; Grinstaff, M.W.; Bartrhelemy, P. Bioconjugated oligonucleotides: Recent developments and therapeutic applications. Bioconjug. Chem. 2019, 30, 366–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shi, Y.; Wu, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhuang, C. DNA-encoded libraries (DELs): A review of on-DNA chemistries and their output. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 2359–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gironda-Martínez, A.; Donckele, E.J.; Samain, F.; Neri, D. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: A comprehensive review with successful stories and future challenges. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2021, 4, 1265–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.; Sun, P.; Su, J.; Zhang, N.; Gu, H.; Zhao, Y. DNA nanotechnology-facilitated ligand manipulation for targeted therapeutics and diagnostics. J. Contr. Rel. 2021, 340, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, Z.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, T.; Tan, W. Integrating DNA nanotechnology with aptamers for biological and biomedical applications. Matter 2021, 4, 461–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whitfield, C.J.; Zhang, M.; Winterwerber, P.; Ng, D.Y.W.; Weil, T. Functional DNA-polymer conjugates. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 11030–11084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Østergaard, M.E.; Yu, J.; Kinberger, G.A.; Wan, W.B.; Migawa, M.T.; Vasquez, G.; Schmidt, K.; Gaus, H.J.; Murray, H.M.; Low, A.; et al. Efficient synthesis and biological evaluation of 5′-GalNAc conjugated antisense oligonucleotides. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 1451–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Gabriele, E.; Samain, F.; Favalli, N.; Sladojevich, F.; Scheuermann, J.; Neri, D. Optimized reaction conditions for amide bond formation in DNA-encoded combinatorial libraries. ACS Comb. Sci. 2016, 18, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sanchez, A.; Pedroso, E.; Grandas, A. Conjugation reactions involving maleimides and phosphorothioate oligonucleotides. Bioconjug. Chem. 2012, 23, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sanchez, A.; Pedroso, E.; Grandas, A. Easy introduction of maleimides at different positions of oligonucleotide chains for conjugation purposes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 8478–8483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Meyer, A.; Vasseur, J.J.; Morvan, F. Synthesis of monoconjugated and multiply conjugated oligonucleotides by “click thiol” thiol-Michael-type additions and by combination with CuAAC “click Huisgen”. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bouillon, C.; Meyer, A.; Vidal, S.; Jochum, A.; Chevolot, Y.; Cloarec, J.P.; Praly, J.P.; Vasseur, J.J.; Morvan, F. Microwave assisted ′′click′′ chemistry for the synthesis of multiple labeled- carbohydrate oligonucleotides on solid support. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4700–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gramlich, P.M.E.; Wirges, C.T.; Manetto, A.; Carell, T. Postsynthetic DNA modification through the copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8350–8358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pourceau, G.; Meyer, A.; Vasseur, J.J.; Morvan, F. Azide solid support for 3′-conjugation of oligonucleotides and their circularization by click chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6837–6842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pourceau, G.; Meyer, A.; Vasseur, J.J.; Morvan, F. Synthesis of mannose and galactose oligonucleotide conjugates by bi-click chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1218–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Busskamp, H.; Batroff, E.; Niederwieser, A.; Abdel-Rahman, O.S.; Winter, R.F.; Wittmann, V.; Marx, A. Efficient labelling of enzymatically synthesized vinyl-modified DNA by an inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10827–10829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Weisbrod, S.H.; Marx, A. A nucleoside triphosphate for site-specific labelling of DNA by the Staudinger ligation. Chem. Commun. 2007, 18, 1828–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Noël, M.; Clément-Blanc, C.; Meyer, A.; Vasseur, J.; Morvan, F. Solid support for the synthesis of 3′-aminooxy deoxy- or ribo-oligonucleotides and their 3′-conjugation by oxime ligation. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 14853–14860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gamper, H.B.; Reed, M.W.; Cox, T.; Virosco, J.S.; Adams, A.D.; Gall, A.A.; Scholler, J.K.; Meyer Jr, R.B. Facile preparation of nuclease resistant 3′ modified oligodeoxynucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Petrie, C.R.; Reed, M.W.; Adams, A.D.; Meyer, R.B., Jr. An improved CPG support for the synthesis of 3′-amine-tailed oligonucleotides. Bioconjug. Chem. 1992, 3, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lyttle, M.H.; Adams, H.; Hudson, D.; Cook, R.M. Versatile linker chemistry for synthesis of 3′-modified DNA. Bioconjug. Chem. 1997, 8, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McMinn, D.; Greenberg, M.M. Postsynthetic conjugation of protected oligonucleotides containing 3′-alkylamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3289–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pourshahian, S. Therapeutic oligonucleotides, impurities, degradations, and their characterization by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2021, 40, 75–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Capaldi, D.C. Stress testing of oligonucleotides. In Pharmaceutical Stress Testing: Predicting Drug Degradation, 2nd ed.; Baertschi, S.W., Alsante, K.M., Reed, R.A., Eds.; Informa Healthcare: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; pp. 391–425. [Google Scholar]
  28. Isidro-Llobet, A.; Alvarez, M.; Albericio, F. Amino acid-protecting groups. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2455–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Carpino, L.A.; Han, G.Y. The 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl function, a new base-sensitive amino-protecting group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5748–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carpino, L.A.; Han, G.Y. The 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino-protecting group. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 3404–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smith, L.M.; Fung, S.; Hunkapiller, M.W.; Hood, L.E. The synthesis of oligonucleotides containing an aliphatic amino group at the 5′ terminus: Synthesis of fluorescent DNA primers for use in DNA sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13, 2399–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nelson, P.S.; Kent, M.; Muthini, S. Oligonucleotide labeling methods 3. Direct labeling of oligonucleotides employing a novel, non-nucleosidic, 2-aminobutyl-1,3-propanediol backbone. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 6253–6259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhou, Y.; Chládek, S.; Romano, L.J. Synthesis of oligonucleotides containing site-specific carcinogen adducts. Preparation of the 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite of N-(2′-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-(acetylamino)fluorene with Fmoc as the base-protecting group. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Johannsen, M.W.; Crispino, L.; Wamberg, M.C.; Kalra, N.; Wengel, J. Amino acids attached to 2′-amino-LNA: Synthesis and excellent duplex stability. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lou, C.; Vester, B.; Wengel, J. Oligonucleotides containing a piperazino-modified 2′-amino-LNA monomer exhibit very high duplex stability and remarkable nuclease resistance. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4024–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lou, C.; Samuelsen, S.V.; Christensen, N.J.; Vester, B.; Wengel, J. Oligonucleotides containing aminated 2′-amino-LNA nucleotides: Synthesis and strong binding to complementary DNA and RNA. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 1214–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Danielsen, M.B.; Christensen, N.J.; Jørgensen, P.T.; Jensen, K.J.; Wengel, J.; Lou, C. Polyamine-functionalized 2′-amino-LNA in oligonucleotides: Facile synthesis of new monomers and high-affinity binding towards ssDNA and dsDNA. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 1416–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rydzik, A.M.; Balk, R.; Koegler, M.; Steinle, T.; Riether, D.; Gottschling, D. Access to-1′-amino carbocyclic phosphoramidite to enable postsynthetic functionalization of oligonucleotides. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 6735–6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Panduwawala, T.D.; Iqbal, S.; Thompson, A.L.; Genov, M.; Pretsch, A.; Pretsch, D.; Liu, S.; Ebright, R.H.; Howells, A.; Maxwell, A.; et al. Functionalized bicyclic tetramates derived from cysteine as antibacterial agents. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 5615–5632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Reddy, M.P.; Hanna, N.B.; Farooqui, F. Fast cleavage and deprotection of oligonucleotides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 4311–4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miller, P.S.; Reddy, M.P.; Murakami, A.; Blake, K.R.; Lin, S.; Agris, C.H. Solid-phase synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotide methylphosphonates. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 5092–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reddy, M.P.; Farooqui, F.; Hanna, N.B. Methylamine deprotection provides increased yield of oligoribonucleotides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 8929–8932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lebedev, A.V.; Combs, D.; Hogrefe, R.I. Preactivated carboxyl linker for the rapid conjugation of alkylamines to oligonucleotides on solid support. Bioconjug. Chem. 2007, 18, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Habuchi, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Obika, S. Thioamide-bridged nucleic acid(thioAmNA) containing thymine or 2-thiothymine: Duplex-forming ability, base discrimination, and enzymatic stability. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mullah, B.; Andrus, A. Automated synthesis of double dye-labeled oligonucleotides using tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA) solid supports. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5751–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ferrer, E.; Wiersma, M.; Kazimierczak, B.; Müller, C.W.; Eritja, R. Preparation and properties of oligonucleotides containing 5-iodouracil and 5-bromo- and 5-iodocytosine. Bioconjug. Chem. 1997, 8, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yahara, A.; Shrestha, A.R.; Yamamoto, T.; Hari, Y.; Osawa, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Nishida, M.; Kodama, T.; Obika, S. Amido-bridged nucleic acids (AmNAs): Synthesis, duplex stability, nuclease resistance, and in vitro antisense potency. ChemBioChem 2012, 12, 2513–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yamamoto, T.; Yahara, A.; Waki, R.; Yasuhara, H.; Wada, F.; Harada-Shiba, M.; Obika, S. Amido-bridged nucleic acids with small hydrophobic residues enhance hepatic tropism of antisense oligonucleotides in vivo. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 3757–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Synthesis of oligonucleotides with an amino linker at the 3′-end.
Figure 1. Synthesis of oligonucleotides with an amino linker at the 3′-end.
Molecules 27 08501 g001
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic analysis of the designed phosphoramidite reagents.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic analysis of the designed phosphoramidite reagents.
Molecules 27 08501 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of phosphoramidite reagents 6ac.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of phosphoramidite reagents 6ac.
Molecules 27 08501 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of C10-mer oligonucleotide bearing a 3′-aminopropyl linker using 6a.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of C10-mer oligonucleotide bearing a 3′-aminopropyl linker using 6a.
Molecules 27 08501 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 13-mer DNA modified with three different 3′-amino linkers using 6ac.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 13-mer DNA modified with three different 3′-amino linkers using 6ac.
Molecules 27 08501 sch004
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of crude oligonucleotides modified with a 3′-aminoprpoyl linker and base-labile nucleosides synthesized via the developed method and via the conventional method using phthalimide-modified CPG. HPLC analytical conditions: C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm); detection at 260 nm; eluents, A/B = 95/5 to 70/30 ((A): 0.1 M TEAA aq.; (B): MeCN) in linear gradient over 25 min.
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of crude oligonucleotides modified with a 3′-aminoprpoyl linker and base-labile nucleosides synthesized via the developed method and via the conventional method using phthalimide-modified CPG. HPLC analytical conditions: C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm); detection at 260 nm; eluents, A/B = 95/5 to 70/30 ((A): 0.1 M TEAA aq.; (B): MeCN) in linear gradient over 25 min.
Molecules 27 08501 g002
Table 1. Reaction conditions for the deprotection of synthesized oligonucleotides.
Table 1. Reaction conditions for the deprotection of synthesized oligonucleotides.
EntryReagentsTemp.TimeDeprotection Efficiency 1
128% NH3 aq.55 °C17 h100%
228% NH3 aq.rt2 h78%
328% NH3 aq.rt8 h100%
440% MeNH2 aq.rt2 h100%
550 mM K2CO3 in MeOHrt4 h55%
650 mM K2CO3 in MeOHrt24 h100%
70.4 M NaOH in MeOH/H2O (4:1)rt4 h100%
8t-BuNH2/MeOH/H2O (1:1:2)65 °C3 h100%
1 Deprotection efficiency was determined by a comparison of UV areas in LC/MS charts (Figure S11).
Table 2. Deprotection of oligonucleotides modified with 3′-amino linkers and base-labile nucleosides.
Table 2. Deprotection of oligonucleotides modified with 3′-amino linkers and base-labile nucleosides.
Molecules 27 08501 i001
EntryXYReagentsTemp.Time Yield 1
1CH2IdU28% NH3 aq.rt8 h33%
2(CH2)4IdU28% NH3 aq.rt8 h23%
3(CH2OCH2)2IdU28% NH3 aq.rt8 h31%
4CH2AmNA50 mM K2CO3 in MeOHrt24 h16%
5(CH2)4AmNA50 mM K2CO3 in MeOHrt24 h12%
6(CH2OCH2)2AmNA50 mM K2CO3 in MeOHrt24 h20%
7CH2TAMRA-Tt-BuNH2/MeOH/H2O (1:1:2)65 °C3 h17%
8(CH2)4TAMRA-Tt-BuNH2/MeOH/H2O (1:1:2)65 °C3 h12%
9(CH2OCH2)2TAMRA-Tt-BuNH2/MeOH/H2O (1:1:2)65 °C3 h10%
1 Isolated yield after HPLC purification.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osawa, T.; Ren, Q.; Obika, S. Development of Phosphoramidite Reagents for the Synthesis of Base-Labile Oligonucleotides Modified with a Linear Aminoalkyl and Amino-PEG Linker at the 3′-End. Molecules 2022, 27, 8501. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238501

AMA Style

Osawa T, Ren Q, Obika S. Development of Phosphoramidite Reagents for the Synthesis of Base-Labile Oligonucleotides Modified with a Linear Aminoalkyl and Amino-PEG Linker at the 3′-End. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8501. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osawa, Takashi, Qin Ren, and Satoshi Obika. 2022. "Development of Phosphoramidite Reagents for the Synthesis of Base-Labile Oligonucleotides Modified with a Linear Aminoalkyl and Amino-PEG Linker at the 3′-End" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8501. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238501

APA Style

Osawa, T., Ren, Q., & Obika, S. (2022). Development of Phosphoramidite Reagents for the Synthesis of Base-Labile Oligonucleotides Modified with a Linear Aminoalkyl and Amino-PEG Linker at the 3′-End. Molecules, 27(23), 8501. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238501

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop