Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Profiles, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Hydrodistillation Wastewaters from Five Lamiaceae Species
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidative, and Nitric Oxide-Scavenging Activities of a Quercetin Nanosuspension with Polyethylene Glycol in LPS-Induced RAW 264.7 Macrophages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sensitive and Facile HCOOH Fluorescence Sensor Based on Highly Active Ir Complexes’ Catalytic Transfer Hydrogen Reaction

1
School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7431; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217431
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 23 October 2022 / Accepted: 24 October 2022 / Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Analytical Chemistry)

Abstract

:
With several major polarity and weak optical properties, the sensitive detection of HCOOH remains a major challenge. Given the special role of HCOOH in assisting in the catalytic hydrogenation process of Ir complexes, HCOOH (as a hydrogen source) could rapidly activate Ir complexes as catalysts and further reduce the substrates. This work developed a facile and sensitive HCOOH fluorescence sensor utilizing an optimal catalytic fluorescence generation system, which consists of the phenyl-pyrazole-type Ir-complex PP-Ir-Cl and the coumarin-type fluorescence probe P-coumarin. The sensor demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity for HCOOH and formates; the limits of detection for HCOOH, HCOONa, and HCOOEt3N were tested to be 50.6 ppb, 68.0 ppb, and 146.0 ppb, respectively. Compared to previous methods, the proposed sensor exhibits good detection accuracy and excellent sensitivity. Therefore, the proposed HCOOH sensor could be used as a new detection method for HCOOH and could provide a new design path for other sensors.

1. Introduction

With global warming, carbon dioxide (CO2) fixation and utilization have become global hot research topics [1,2,3]. Catalytic technologies (including chemical catalytic technology, electrocatalytic technology, and photocatalytic technology) have attracted more and more attention since they could successfully convert carbon dioxide to formic acid (HCOOH), methanol (MeOH), and other chemicals [4,5,6,7]. Among these manufactured chemicals, HCOOH and formate have been widely used in oil exploitation; leather, textile, and oxalic acid production; and other fields [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In addition, HCOOH is an important liquid hydrogen storage material [14,15,16,17], which could be used as a potential feedstock for fuel cells. In the bioanalysis field, HCOOH in urine is also used as an important biomarker of human exposure to formaldehyde [18]. Based on these important performances, the analysis of HCOOH has attracted much attention. However, the sensitive detection of HCOOH still faces many challenges due to its severely high polarity, strong acidity, and weak optical property, which must be aided by the expensive high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques, and some titrimetric analyses.
Currently, the main industrial analytical method of HCOOH is the potassium permanganate (KMnO4) oxidation indirect iodine quantity method, which can only analyze high concentrations of HCOOH [19]. This method mainly benefits from the good reducibility of HCOOH. HCOOH could be rapidly oxidized into carbonic acid by KMnO4, and the excess KMnO4 quantitatively oxidizes potassium iodide (KI) into iodine (I2). The concentration of HCOOH could be obtained by titrating the generated I2 with sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3). The analysis of trace amounts of HCOOH is currently performed using expensive instruments, such as HPLC [20]. The detection limits can usually be reached between 0.1 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL. Even so, when HCOOH is detected using HPLC, specialized organic acid analysis columns (such as Aminex HPX-87H Ion Exclusion Column) are necessary due to the severely high polarity. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop more sensitive and convenient HCOOH detection methods.
In various catalytic hydrogenation processes, HCOOH/HCOONa is often used as an important hydrogen source, which has many advantages, such as low cost, nontoxicity, stability, and good water solubility [21,22]. In particular, some metal iridium complexes have shown excellent catalytic hydrogenation performance for various important oxidation molecules (such as quinone derivatives and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) in the presence of HCOOH [23]. In previous work, we have successfully developed an ultra-highly active [N^N¯] iridium complex [Cp*Ir(pba)Cl] (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadiene, pba = 4-(picolinamido)benzoic acid), which exhibits the highest hydrogenation activity for NAD+ in the physiological condition (turnover frequency (TOF) is 7825 h−1 at 37 °C) when HCOONa is used as a hydrogen source [24]. Based on the excellent hydrogen donor capacity of HCOOH and the development of highly active Ir-complex catalysis, we aimed to build a sensitive and convenient HCOOH fluorescence sensor based on highly active Ir-complexes’ catalytic transfer hydrogen reactions.
Here, a novel HCOOH fluorescence sensor was developed based on highly active catalytic hydrogenation reactions, which consists of highly active and stable phenyl pyrazole Ir-complex catalysis and a sensitive quinone hydrogenation fluorescence turn-on probe. For a complete catalytic hydrogenation system, the hydrogen sources (such as HCOOH and H2) are also essential, besides the catalysts and substrates. As shown in Scheme 1, in the absence of HCOOH, the substrates of the quinone fluorescence probe cannot be reduced by an Ir complex and hardly any fluorescence signals are detected due to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) effect. However, in the presence of HCOOH, the quinone in the probe molecules could be quickly reduced to hydroquinone and removed from the probe structure. Thus, the hydroxyl group of coumarin fluorochrome is free again, which will produce a strong fluorescence signal. The optimal hydrogenation fluorescence response system was obtained by studying the interaction between the catalysts and the probes. A super-active catalyst could easily lead to fluorescence decrease in fluorochrome due to the over-reduction effect. However, a less active catalyst may struggle to fully reduce the quinone of the probe molecules to hydroquinone, and the obtained fluorescence signals were also very weak. Furthermore, the optimal hydrogenation fluorescence response system demonstrated excellent sensitivity and selectivity for HCOOH and formates (HCOONa and HCOOEt3N). Compared to NMR analytical methods, the proposed sensor exhibits good detection accuracy and higher sensitivity, which could be used as a potential sensitive detection method for trace HCOOH analysis and could provide a new design path for more sensors.

2. Results

2.1. Detection Principle of the Ir-Complex Catalytic Fluorescence Sensor for HCOO

As an important hydrogen source, HCOOH has been widely applied in various hydrogenation catalytic reactions. In previous work, we have systematically studied the fluorescence response performance of several main iridium complexes for redox-type fluorescence probes in the presence of HCOONa. The previous studies’ results demonstrated that C^N-type phenyl pyrazole Ir complex PP-Ir-Cl could best catalyze the fluorescence probe P-coumarin to convert it into coumarin dye, which leads to a higher fluorescence signal and a better formic acid detection performance. Therefore, in order to establish the optimal HCOOH-sensor-based catalytic hydrogenation reaction, PP-Ir-Cl and P-coumarin were selected as the hydrogenation catalyst and the fluorescence probe, respectively.

2.2. Optimization of Experimental Parameters

In order to obtain the optimal conditions, we investigated the effects of various experimental parameters, including the pH of the reaction solution, the reaction solvents, temperature, the amount of the catalyst PP-Ir-Cl, and the reaction time, on the fluorescence response performance of the HCOOH sensor. As shown in Figure 1A, the fluorescence intensity of the probe increases with an increase in pH from 2.0 to 8.0, regardless of whether HCOONa is present or not, which could be attributed to the coefficient of the unstable fluorescence probe P-coumarin at a higher pH condition and the self-fluorescence pH response performance of the probe substrate 7-hydroxycoumarin. In order to obtain an optimal detection performance, the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of different pH conditions were compared. The optimal SNR was found to be 34 at pH = 4.0, which means 4.0 was the optimal pH for the probe P-coumarin. Furthermore, the effects of different organic solvents on the fluorescence response of the HCOOH sensor were studied under the optimal pH condition (Figure 1B). The results showed that protic solvents, such as methanol and ethanol, could ensure both a high fluorescence signal with HCOONa and a low background noise without HCOONa. Therefore, 10 v/v% of methanol was used in subsequent experiments to obtain a high fluorescence signal and a stable SNR. In a catalytic hydrogenation reaction, the temperature usually has a significant influence on the reaction efficiency. Thus, the reaction temperature of the HCOOH sensor was also investigated in the range from 20 to 80 °C under a pH = 4.0 condition and in the presence of 1 mM of HCOONa and 10 v/v% of methanol (Figure 1C). We found that the fluorescence intensity of the sensor increased with an increase in temperature when it was below 60 °C due to the influence of reaction thermodynamics, and slightly decreased at 80 °C, which might be attributed to the over-reduction of the catalyst PP-Ir-Cl for the probe substrate 7-hydroxycoumarin. A temperature of 60 °C was demonstrated to possess the highest fluorescence signal and, thus, could be used as the optimal reaction temperature in subsequent experiments. In order to obtain a better detection performance, the effects of three different amounts of the catalyst PP-Ir-Cl (1.0 µM, 5.0 µM, and 10.0 µM) on the fluorescence signals of the sensor were also investigated in an HAc-NaAc buffer (0.2 M, pH = 4.0) containing 1.0 mM of HCOONa, 100 µM of P-coumarin, and 10 v/v% of methanol at 60 °C for 30 min (Figure 1D). The best fluorescence signal and SNR (34) were obtained at 5.0 µM of the catalyst amount, which could be attributed to the appropriate reduction degree of the 5.0 µM of PP-Ir-Cl for the P-coumarin. Under the abovementioned optimal conditions, we further studied the variation in the fluorescence intensity of the sensor with reaction time in the presence of 1.0 mM of HCOONa (Figure 1E). The fluorescence intensity of the sensor increased with an increase in reaction time from 0 to 30 min and reached the highest value at 30 min. Finally, in order to evaluate the fluorescence stability of the hydrogenation product 7-hydroxycoumarin under the optimal reaction conditions, three different concentrations of 7-hydroxycoumarin (20 µM, 50 µM, and 100 µM) in an HAc-NaAc buffer (0.2 M, pH = 4.0) containing 1.0 mM of HCOONa, 10 v/v% of methanol, and three different concentrations of PP-Ir-Cl (0 µM, 1.0 µM, and 10 µM) were incubated at 60 °C for 30 min, and then, the fluorescence intensity was tested. As shown in Figure 1F, the fluorescence intensity of the dye 7-hydroxycoumarin is almost unaffected by the catalyst and the reaction environment, which shows the extreme stability of 7-hydroxycoumarin in the proposed sensor environment.

2.3. Ir-Complex Catalytic Fluorescence Sensor for the Detection of HCOOH and Formates (HCOONa and HCOOEt3N)

Under the optimal experimental conditions, the analytical performance of the developed Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor was first investigated by detecting various concentrations of HCOOH. As shown in Figure 2A, the fluorescence intensity increases with an increase in HCOOH concentration in the range from 3.9 µM to 2.0 mM, indicating that more HCOOH could provide more protons and could catalyze the probe to produce more fluorescence substance 7-hydroxycoumain. The recovery values of the fluorescence intensity are in a linear relationship with the logarithm of the HCOOH concentration in the range from 7.8 µM to 0.5 mM, and the limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 1.1 µM (50.6 ppb) according to the 3σ/s. Figure 2B demonstrates that the linear equation is I = 410.6logCHCOOH − 136.53 with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.9871, where I is the recovery intensity value of fluorescence. Compared to other proposed methods of HCOOH detection, the HCOOH fluorescence sensor exhibits a lower LOD and a satisfactory linear range (Table 1).
Moreover, the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor was used to detect two important formates: HCOONa and HCOOEt3N. As shown in Figure 3A, the fluorescence intensity increases with an increase in HCOONa concentration in the range from 0.1 µM to 1.0 mM, which indicates that more HCOONa could help catalyze the probe to produce more of the fluorescence substance 7-hydroxycoumain. The recovery values of the fluorescence intensity are in a linear relationship with the logarithm of the HCOONa concentration in the range from 0.1 µM to 50 µM, and the limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 1.0 µM (68 ppb) according to the 3σ/s. Figure 3B demonstrates that the linear equation is I = 667.1logCHCOONa − 1392.5 with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.9980, where I is the recovery intensity value of fluorescence. Figure 3C shows that the fluorescence intensity increases with an increase in HCOOEt3N concentration in the range from 0.5 µM to 1.25 mM, which indicates that more HCOOEt3N could also help catalyze the probe to produce more fluorescence substance 7-hydroxycoumain. The recovery values of the fluorescence intensity are in a linear relationship with the logarithm of the HCOOEt3N concentration in the range from 10 µM to 500 µM, and the limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 1.0 µM (146 ppb) according to the 3σ/s. Figure 3D demonstrates that the linear equation is I = 1950.5logCHCOOEt3N − 1449.2 with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.9902, where I is the recovery intensity value of fluorescence.

2.4. The Selectivity and Repeatability of the Ir-Complex Catalytic Fluorescence Sensor

As an important organic acid, the detection of HCOOH is easily disturbed by other organic acids, especially ethanoic acid and propanoic acid, due to similar physical and chemical properties. Thus, the specificity of the HCOOH sensor was also evaluated using various interfering substances (5.0 mM), instead of HCOOH or formate (1.0 mM), under the same experimental conditions. Various inorganic and organic salts, and organic acids, including methanol MeOH, ethanol EtOH, tert-Butanol, NADH, oxalic acid, sodium sulfate, 2-bromopropionic acid, 4-bromobutyric acid, mandelic acid, NH2(CH2)5COOH, glucose, KCl, acetic acid HAc, NaAc, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, sodium citrate, and NaCl, were used as the interfering agents because they are common in the environment. As shown in Figure 4A, compared to HCOOH and formate, the fluorescence intensity of the interfering agents is negligible except for NADH and sodium citrate. The stronger fluorescence intensity from NADH and sodium citrate might be attributed to their stronger reducibility. These results indicate that the developed HCOOH sensor has a strong anti-interference ability and can accurately detect HCOOH in complex samples. For a sensitive sensor, its repeatability is also very important. In order to investigate the repeatability of the sensor, we carried out five repeated experiments under the same experimental conditions. As shown in Figure 4B, the fluorescence signals of the five repeated experiments are almost consistent, which demonstrate that the established HCOOH sensor is stable.

2.5. Detection of Actual Samples

To investigate the practicability of the developed HCOOH sensor, the sensor was applied to detect HCOOH in triethylamine solution, which is usually used as the reaction solution in CO2 chemocatalysis and electrocatalysis systems. Three parallel samples were obtained and underwent the standard recovery test. The results are shown in Table 2. The recovery of HCOOH ranged from 94.77% to 107.73%, and the RSD was from 0.2% to 4.9%, demonstrating that the fluorescence sensor possesses practicability with promise for future applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Apparatus

HCOOH, HCOONa, HCOOEt3N, methanol, ethanol, tert-butanol, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide disodium salt (NADH), oxalic acid, sodium sulfate, glucose, KCl, acetic acid HAc, sodium acetate NaAc, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, sodium citrate, and NaCl were purchased from the Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co. (Shanghai, China). 2-Bromopropionic acid, 4-bromobutyric acid, mandelic acid, and aminocaproic acid NH2(CH2)5COOH were acquired from the MACKLIN reagent (Shanghai, China). The Ir-complex PP-Ir-Cl and the fluorescence probe P-coumarin were synthesized according to our previous work [23,24]. The UHQ II system (Elga) was used to purify water to a resistivity of 18 MΩ·cm for the preparation of all solutions. Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) was prepared using Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4. HAc-NaAc buffer solution was prepared using HAc and NaAc. Fluorescence spectra were collected using an F-4700 fluorescence spectrophotometer (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan).

3.2. Detection Protocol and Spectrophotometric Analysis

In a typical detection experiment, 990 µL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer with different pH or an HAc-NaAc buffer containing 10 v/v% of different organic solvents, 100 uM of the fluorescence probe P-coumarin, and different amounts of the Ir-complex PP-Ir-Cl was added to different concentrations of HCOOH or formate solution and incubated for 1 h at 60 °C. The fluorescence intensity of each sample was then tested. Finally, a standard curve line was constructed between various concentrations of HCOOH or formates and the recovery values of fluorescence intensity. In addition, the fluorescence probe selectivity was studied under the optimal conditions using various interfering substances instead of HCOOH or formates.

3.3. Detection of Actual Samples

The fluorescence sensor had excellent specificity for HCOO. To study the performance of the sensor in a CO2 hydrogenation reaction, the sensor was applied to detect the produced HCOOH in a triethylamine environment. Briefly, 1.0 mL of triethylamine solution containing various concentrations of HCOOH (50 µM, 100 µM, 150 µM, 200 µM, and 300 µM) was first removed of free triethylamine using a vacuum distillation, and then 1.0 mL of HAc-NaAc buffer (0.2 M, pH = 4.0) containing 10 v/v% of methanol, 100 uM of the fluorescence probe P-coumarin, and 5.0 uM of the Ir-complex PP-Ir-Cl was added and incubated for 1.0 h at 60 °C. Finally, the fluorescence spectroscopy of each sample was tested. Three experiments were performed in parallel, and the RSD was calculated.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a facile and rapid fluorescence sensor for HCOOH based on highly active Ir-complexes’ catalytic transfer hydrogen fluorescence turn-on reaction and using HCOOH or formates as the hydrogen source. The excellent HCOOH-assisted catalytic fluorescence response system was obtained by optimizing various experimental conditions, including pH, reaction solvents, temperature, catalyst amount, and reaction time. The proposed HCOOH sensor shows good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of HCOOH, HCOONa, and HCOOEt3N, with a satisfactory linear range and a low LOD (50.6 ppb), and it can achieve an accurate determination of HCOOH samples in a CO2 catalytic hydrogenation system. Therefore, the HCOOH sensor could be used as a new detection method for HCOOH and can provide a new design path for other sensors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z., Y.W. and W.Z.; methodology, L.Z.; software, B.P.; validation, W.S., C.T. and F.L.; formal analysis, X.Z.; investigation, C.Z.; data curation, C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.S.; visualization, L.Z.; supervision, X.Z.; project administration, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21904131).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We also thank the Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for partial support for compounds characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not available.

References

  1. Li, L.; Zhao, N.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. A review of research progress on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 2013, 108, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rahman, F.A.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Saidur, R.; Bakar, W.A.W.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Putrajaya, R.; Hassan, N.A. Pollution to solution: Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, M.; Zhao, B.; Chen, F.; Liu, C.; Lu, S.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, B. Thermally-assisted photocatalytic CO2 reduction to fuels. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ganesh, I. Conversion of carbon dioxide into methanol—A potential liquid fuel: Fundamental challenges and opportunities (a review). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 221–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, L.; Guo, Z.; Wei, X.G.; Gallenkamp, C.; Bonin, J.; Anxolabehere-Mallart, E.; Lau, K.C.; Lau, T.C.; Robert, M. Molecular Catalysis of the Electrochemical and Photochemical Reduction of CO2 with Earth-Abundant Metal Complexes. Selective Production of CO vs. HCOOH by Switching of the Metal Center. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10918–10921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gong, Q.; Ding, P.; Xu, M.; Zhu, X.; Wang, M.; Deng, J.; Ma, Q.; Han, N.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, J.; et al. Structural defects on converted bismuth oxide nanotubes enable highly active electrocatalysis of carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chatterjee, S.; Dutta, I.; Lum, Y.; Lai, Z.; Huang, K.-W. Enabling storage and utilization of low-carbon electricity: Power to formic acid. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 1194–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hao, L.; Benxian, S.; Xiaolong, Z. An Improved Desulfurization Process Based on H2O2 /Formic Acid Oxidation and Liquid-Liquid Extraction 2. FCC Diesel Oil Feedstocks. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2006, 24, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernandes, I.P.; Amaral, J.S.; Pinto, V.; Ferreira, M.J.; Barreiro, M.F. Development of chitosan-based antimicrobial leather coatings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seabra, I.J.; Chim, R.B.; Salgueiro, P.; Braga, M.E.M.; de Sousa, H.C. Influence of solvent additives on the aqueous extraction of tannins from pine bark: Potential extracts for leather tanning. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 1169–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Bian, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Ma, J.; Ma, G.; Sui, H.; He, L. Recovery of extra-heavy oil and minerals from carbonate asphalt rocks by reactive extraction. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 14372–14381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sahoo, P.K.; Zhang, T.; Das, S. Oxidative Transformation of Biomass into Formic Acid. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 2021, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Garai, P.; Banerjee, P.; Sharma, P.; Chatterjee, A.; Bhattacharya, R.; Saha, N.C. Mechanistic insights to lactic and formic acid toxicity on benthic oligochaete worm Tubifex tubifex. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mori, K.; Dojo, M.; Yamashita, H. Pd and Pd–Ag Nanoparticles within a Macroreticular Basic Resin: An Efficient Catalyst for Hydrogen Production from Formic Acid Decomposition. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1114–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gilkey, M.J.; Xu, B. Heterogeneous Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation as an Effective Pathway in Biomass Upgrading. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1420–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Xu, Q. Metal-Nanoparticle-Catalyzed Hydrogen Generation from Formic Acid. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 1449–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Preuster, P.; Albert, J. Biogenic Formic Acid as a Green Hydrogen Carrier. Energy Technol. 2018, 6, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Landmesser, A.; Scherer, G.; Pluym, N.; Niessner, R.; Scherer, M. A novel quantification method for sulfur-containing biomarkers of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure in human urine and plasma samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 7535–7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maeda, T.; Wood, T. Formate detection by potassium permanganate for enhanced hydrogen production in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 2409–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Batista, E.A.; Malpass, G.R.P.; Motheo, A.J.; Iwasita, T. New mechanistic aspects of methanol oxidation. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 571, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, Z.; Tan, S.; Mi, R.; Li, X.; Bai, J.; Guo, X.; Hu, G.; Hang, P.; Li, J.; Li, D.; et al. Formic Acid or Formate Derivatives as the In Situ Hydrogen Source in Au-Catalyzed Reduction of para-Chloronitrobenzene. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 2850–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pérez-Zúñiga, C.; Negrete-Vergara, C.; Guerchais, V.; Le Bozec, H.; Moya, S.A.; Aguirre, P. Hydrogenation of N-benzylideneaniline by palladium (II) catalysts with phosphorus-nitrogen ligands using formic acid as a renewable hydrogen source. Mol. Catal. 2019, 462, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, L.-J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Shi, Y.; Xia, L.; Zhang, W.; Peng, B.; Jin, X.; Tian, C.; Luan, F.; et al. Iridium-Complex-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles for Fluorescent Detection of Mercapto Drugs. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 12920–12925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, L.J.; Yin, Z.Q.; Shi, Y.S.; Sun, W.; Sun, L.B.; Su, H.J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, W.L.; Xia, L.Y.; Qi, C.X. A highly active Cp*Ir complex with an anionic N,N-donor chelate ligand catalyzes the robust regeneration of NADH under physiological conditions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 7982–7991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kage, S.; Kudo, K.; Ikeda, H.; Ikeda, N. Simultaneous determination of formate and acetate in whole blood and urine from humans using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2004, 805, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kuban, P.; Foret, F.; Bocek, R. Capillary electrophoresis with contactless conductometric detection for rapid screening of formate in blood serum after methanol intoxication. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1281, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, Z.; Yang, C.; Gao, H.; Qin, W.; Meng, F. High Response Formic Acid Gas Sensor Based on MoS2 Nanosheets. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2021, 20, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Gu, S. Determination of formic acid and propionic acid contents in feed acidifer by high performance liquid chromatography. Acta Agric. Shanghai 2010, 26, 64–66. [Google Scholar]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence turn-on system for HCOO detection.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence turn-on system for HCOO detection.
Molecules 27 07431 sch001
Figure 1. The effects of pH (A), organic solvent (B), reaction temperature (C), catalyst amount (D), and reaction time (E) on the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor. (F) The fluorescence stability test of the dye 7-hydroxycoumain, which is the hydrogenation product of the probe. Conditions: 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution containing 10 v/v% of MeOH (A,C,DF), 10 μM of Ir complex (AC), pH = 4.0 (BF), reaction time of 60 min (AD,F), and reaction temperature of 60 °C (A,B,DF).
Figure 1. The effects of pH (A), organic solvent (B), reaction temperature (C), catalyst amount (D), and reaction time (E) on the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor. (F) The fluorescence stability test of the dye 7-hydroxycoumain, which is the hydrogenation product of the probe. Conditions: 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution containing 10 v/v% of MeOH (A,C,DF), 10 μM of Ir complex (AC), pH = 4.0 (BF), reaction time of 60 min (AD,F), and reaction temperature of 60 °C (A,B,DF).
Molecules 27 07431 g001
Figure 2. (A) Fluorescence spectra of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor in a series of concentrations of HCOOH (from a to h: 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 62.5, 125.0, 500, 1000, and 2000 μM, respectively). (B) Calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity versus the concentration of HCOOH; The inset indicates that the curve is linear in the range from 7.8 to 500 μM, I = 410.6logCHCOOH − 136.53, R2 = 0.9871.
Figure 2. (A) Fluorescence spectra of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor in a series of concentrations of HCOOH (from a to h: 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 62.5, 125.0, 500, 1000, and 2000 μM, respectively). (B) Calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity versus the concentration of HCOOH; The inset indicates that the curve is linear in the range from 7.8 to 500 μM, I = 410.6logCHCOOH − 136.53, R2 = 0.9871.
Molecules 27 07431 g002
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence spectra of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor in a series of concentrations of HCOONa (from a to h: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0, 100.0, 500.0, and 1000.0 μM, respectively). (B) Calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity versus the concentration of HCOONa; The inset indicates that the curve is linear in the range from 0.1 to 50 μM, I = 667.1logCHCOONa − 1392.5, R2 = 0.9980. (C) Fluorescence spectra of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor in a series of concentrations of HCOOEt3N (from a to j: 0.5, 1.0, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, 100.0, 250.0, 500.0, 1000.0, and 1250.0 μM, respectively). (D) Calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity versus the concentration of HCOOEt3N; The inset indicates that the curve is linear in the range from 10 to 500 μM, I = 1950.5logCHCOOEt3N − 1449.2, R2 = 0.9902.
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence spectra of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor in a series of concentrations of HCOONa (from a to h: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0, 100.0, 500.0, and 1000.0 μM, respectively). (B) Calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity versus the concentration of HCOONa; The inset indicates that the curve is linear in the range from 0.1 to 50 μM, I = 667.1logCHCOONa − 1392.5, R2 = 0.9980. (C) Fluorescence spectra of the Ir-complex catalytic fluorescence sensor in a series of concentrations of HCOOEt3N (from a to j: 0.5, 1.0, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, 100.0, 250.0, 500.0, 1000.0, and 1250.0 μM, respectively). (D) Calibration curves of the fluorescence intensity versus the concentration of HCOOEt3N; The inset indicates that the curve is linear in the range from 10 to 500 μM, I = 1950.5logCHCOOEt3N − 1449.2, R2 = 0.9902.
Molecules 27 07431 g003
Figure 4. (A) The interference of various organic acids and ions on the developed HCOOH fluorescence sensor. The concentrations of the HCOOH and HCOONa are 1.0 mM, and the concentrations of the other interfering substances are 5.0 mM. (B) Reproducibility of sensor response to HCOOH fluorescence. Experimental conditions: 1.0 mM HCOOH, 0.1 M PBS solution containing 10 v/v% of MeOH, pH = 4.0, 5.0 μM of Ir complex, reaction time of 30 min, and reaction temperature of 60 °C.
Figure 4. (A) The interference of various organic acids and ions on the developed HCOOH fluorescence sensor. The concentrations of the HCOOH and HCOONa are 1.0 mM, and the concentrations of the other interfering substances are 5.0 mM. (B) Reproducibility of sensor response to HCOOH fluorescence. Experimental conditions: 1.0 mM HCOOH, 0.1 M PBS solution containing 10 v/v% of MeOH, pH = 4.0, 5.0 μM of Ir complex, reaction time of 30 min, and reaction temperature of 60 °C.
Molecules 27 07431 g004
Table 1. Comparison of several different methods for HCOOH detection.
Table 1. Comparison of several different methods for HCOOH detection.
MethodsLinear Range (ppm)Detection Limit (ppm)Ref.
GC-MS2.3–2300.92[25]
CE0.23–9.20.10[26]
Resistance10–10010.00[27]
HPLC100–20005.00[28]
Fluorescence0.078–5.0000.05This work
GC-MS is gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; CE is capillary electrophoresis; and HPLC is high-performance liquid chromatography.
Table 2. Recoveries when detecting HCOOH in actual samples (n = 3).
Table 2. Recoveries when detecting HCOOH in actual samples (n = 3).
SampleAdded (μM)Found (μM)Recovery (%)RDS (%)
15049.9699.920.4
210094.7794.770.2
3150149.9599.974.9
4200215.45107.732.7
5300311.14103.724.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Y.; Peng, B.; Tian, C.; Luan, F.; Sun, W.; Zhuang, X.; Zhao, L. Sensitive and Facile HCOOH Fluorescence Sensor Based on Highly Active Ir Complexes’ Catalytic Transfer Hydrogen Reaction. Molecules 2022, 27, 7431. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217431

AMA Style

Zhang C, Zhang W, Wu Y, Peng B, Tian C, Luan F, Sun W, Zhuang X, Zhao L. Sensitive and Facile HCOOH Fluorescence Sensor Based on Highly Active Ir Complexes’ Catalytic Transfer Hydrogen Reaction. Molecules. 2022; 27(21):7431. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Caimei, Wenjuan Zhang, Yiran Wu, Bo Peng, Chunyuan Tian, Feng Luan, Wen Sun, Xuming Zhuang, and Lijun Zhao. 2022. "Sensitive and Facile HCOOH Fluorescence Sensor Based on Highly Active Ir Complexes’ Catalytic Transfer Hydrogen Reaction" Molecules 27, no. 21: 7431. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217431

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop