Next Article in Journal
The Antiviral Activity of Caprylic Monoglyceride against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus In Vitro and In Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acids of Ten Commonly Consumed Pulses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ent-Abietane Diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana and Their Cytotoxic Activities

School of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Dongqing Road, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7258; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217258
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 20 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022

Abstract

:
The roots of Euphorbia fischeriana have been used as a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of tuberculosis and ringworm. In the current study, diterpenoids from the ethyl acetate extract of the roots E. fischeriana and their cytotoxic effects against five cancer lines were investigated. Two new ent-abietane diterpenoids, euphonoids H and I (12), as well as their two analogues (34) were first isolated from this source. The structures of the two new compounds were elucidated on the basis of spectroscopic data and quantum chemical calculation. Their absolute configurations were assigned via ECD spectrum calculation. The isolated compounds were evaluated for their antiproliferative activities against five cancer cell lines. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited significant inhibitory effects against human prostate cancers C4-2B and C4-2B/ENZR cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 4.16 ± 0.42 to 5.74 ± 0.45 μM.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Natural products are promising sources for the discovery of novel agents/active templates for the development of effective agents against a variety of human diseases [1]. Due to their great structural diversity and wide range of bioactivities [2], diterpenoids have been a constant focus of drug discovery. Among the naturally occurring cyclic diterpenoids (e.g., abietane, labdane and clerodane diterpenoids), tricyclic abietane diterpenoids are of particular significance. These diterpenoids were reported to be present in species of Lamiaceae, Cupressaceae, Pinaceae and Euphorbiaceae as well as in several higher plants [3,4] and were shown to possess antitumor, antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects [5]. Sugiol, an abietane diterpenoid previously isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Cupressaceae), has been developed as an advanced multimodal anti-inflammatory disease targeting tool [6]; Euphelionolides A, D, I and L, four ent-abietane diterpenoids isolated from Euphorbia helioscopia (Euphorbiaceae), were demonstrated to be effective free-radical scavengers acting via various reaction pathways [7]; 6-hydroxy-5,6-dehydrosugiol, a derivative of sugiol isolated from the stem bark of Cryptomeria japonica, was shown to be a potent androgen receptor antagonist in PCa cells [8].
The roots of Euphorbia fischeriana Steud have been used as a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of lymphoid tuberculosis and ringworm [9]. Previous phytochemical studies showed that polycyclic diterpenoids including ent-abietanes, ent-atisanes, ent-kauranes, ent-isopimaranes and ent-pimaranes possessing a common 6/6/6-tricyclic ring are the major constituents of E. fischeriana [10,11]. In our earlier study, a series of ent-abietane diterpenoids with significant cytotoxicity have been isolated from this plant [12]. As part of our continuing efforts toward novel antitumor diterpenoids, the chemical constituents of the roots of E. fischeriana were reinvestigated. As a result, two previously undescribed ent-abietanes and two known analogues were isolated from the roots of E. fischeriana. The new compounds showed significant cytotoxicity against human prostate cancer C4-2B and C4-2B/ENZR cell lines. Herein, the details of isolation, structure elucidation and cytotoxicity of these compounds are described.

2. Results and Discussion

The dry roots of E. fischeriana were repeatedly extracted with 95% EtOH at room temperature and the extract was successively partitioned with petroleum ether, ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and n-butanol. The EtOAc fraction was subjected repeatedly to column chromatography over silica gel, ODS gel, Sephadex LH-20 and semipreparative HPLC to yield two previously undescribed ent-abietane diterpenoids (12). In addition to the above new compounds, two known diterpenoids (Figure 1) were also obtained: raserranes A (3) and B (4). The structures of all compounds were well-characterized by NMR analysis and quantum chemical calculation.

2.1. Structure Elucidation of Compounds 1 and 2

Euphonoid H (1) was obtained as a colorless oil and was shown to possess a molecular formula of C23H34O7 based on its HRESIMS ion at 445.2213 [M + Na]+ (calcd 445.2197). The 1H spectrum (Supplementary Material) showed signals for an olefinic hydrogen (δH 6.71, H-14), one methoxyl (δH 3.68, 16-OCH3) and four methyl groups (δH 2.02, 0.91, 0.79 and 0.69). The 13C and HSQC NMR showed resonances assignable to one ketone (δC 196.0), two ester (δC 170.8 and 171.1), two olefinic carbons (δC 133.7 and 154.2), four methyl (δC 34.0, 22.1, 17.8 and 21.0), one methoxyl group (δC 34.0), three oxygenated carbons (δC 72.0, 69.5 and 62.5) and ten additional sp3 carbons (δC between 18.5 and 60.4). Comprehensive analysis of the 1D and 2D-NMR data (Table 1) revealed that compound 1 possessed, except for an acetoxyl group and a methoxy group, an abietane diterpene skeleton similar to that of methyl-8β,11β-dihydroxy-12-oxo-ent-abietadi-13,15(17)-ene-16-oate previously isolated from this plant [13]. However, the 13C NMR data for the Δ15(17)C 137.3 for C-15 and 128.8 for C-17) of the latter were replaced by signals for a methine (δC 45.1, C-15) and an oxymethylene (δC 62.5, C-17). These observations implied that compound 1 was a hydrogenated derivative of the known compound.
Detailed 2D-NMR (1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY) data analysis further confirmed the above deduction and fulfilled the structural assignment. The 1H-1H COSY revealed four spin systems, CH2-1/CH2-2/CH2-3, H-5/CH2-6/CH2-7, H-9/H-11 and H-15/CH2-17 (Figure 2). HMBC correlations from H3-20 (to C-1 and C-10), H2-1 (to C-9), H3-18 (to C-3, C-4 and C-5), H2-6 (to C-4 and C-10), H-11 (to C-8 and C-13) and H-14 (to C-7, C-9 and C-12) to their corresponding carbons not only connected the former three fragments, but suggested that compound 2 shared the same ABC rings with methyl-8β,11β-dihydroxy-12-oxo-ent-abietadi-13,15(17)-ene-16-oate. In addition, HMBC correlations from H-15 to C-12, C-13 and C-14 and from H2-17 to C-13 located the Δ15(17) double bond at C-13. HMBC correlations from the methoxyl group to C-16 suggested the presence of a methoxyformyl group, while the HMBC correlation from H2-17 to C-16 revealed its position at C-15. The acetoxyl group was connected to the abietane skeleton at C-17 by the key HMBC cross-peaks from H2-17 and H3-2′ to C-1′. Thus, the gross structure of 1 was established as depicted.
The NOESY correlations (Figure 3) of H-5/H-9 indicated that these protons were cofacial and were arbitrarily assigned to be β-oriented, while the NOESY correlation of H3-20/H-11 indicated that these protons were α-oriented. However, the NOESY spectrum did not give useful signals to determine the relative configuration of C-8 and C-15. To establish the relative configuration, the chemical shifts of four conformers were predicted at the B3LYP/6-311+G (d, p) level in chloroform (Figure 4). The results showed that the calculated chemical shifts of conformer 1b was in the best agreement with the experimental values among those predicted for 1a, 1b, 1c and 1d. Further DP4+ analyses verified that conformer 1b was assigned with a 99.99% probability among all the conformers (Figure 4). These results suggested that compound 1 had the structure of conformer 1b with the relative stereochemistry of 5R*, 8R*, 9R*, 10R*, 11R*, 15S*.
The absolute configuration of 1 was established by comparing its experimental ECD spectrum with those calculated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level in acetonitrile. As shown in Figure 5, the experimental ECD curve of 1 showed first negative and second positive Cotton effects around 250 and 213 nm, respectively, which matched well the calculated ECD spectrum of 5R, 8R, 9R, 10R, 11R, 15S-1 (Figure 5a). Thus, compound 1, as an ent-abietane diterpenoid, was established as depicted and named euphonoid H.
The molecular formula of 2 was determined to be C20H24O5 by the HRESIMS ion peak at m/z 343.1550 ([M − H], calcd 343.1551). The 1H NMR data (Table 1) of 2 indicated the presence of three methyls [δH 0.98 (3H, Me-18), 0.85 (3H, Me-19), 0.80 (3H, Me-20)] and one aldehyde [δH 9.97 (s, H-17)]. The 13C NMR (Table 1) and HSQC data of 2 revealed the presence of three methyls, five methylenes, five methines (including two oxygenated ones at δC 64.8 and 55.3 and seven quaternary carbons (including two olefinic ones at δC 166.2 and 127.5). The above NMR characteristic features of 2 resembled those of jolkinolide B [14], the major differences being the replacement of the 17-CH3 group in jolkinolide B by an aldehyde group (δC 185.0) in 2. HMBC correlations from H-17 (δH 9.97, s) to C-13 (δC 166.2) and C-15 (δC 127.5) further confirmed the above deduction. The NOESY correlation H-5/H-9 suggested that H-5 and H-9 were β-oriented, whereas the NOESY correlations H3-20/H-11 and H3-20/H-14 indicated that H-11, H-14 and CH3-20 were α-oriented. Subsequently, quantum chemical calculation of NMR chemical shifts was run on the proposed structure of 2. As indicated by R2 (13C: 0.9979), CMAD (13C: 1.88 ppm) and CLAD (13C: 4.79 ppm) good consistency was observed between the theoretically predicted and experimental chemical shifts, which validated the proposed structure for 2 (Figure 6). Subsequently, ECD calculation (Figure 5b) of the two enantiomers of 2 enabled the establishment of the absolute configuration of 2 to be 5S, 8S, 9R, 10R, 11R, 12R, 14R. The structure of 2 was therefore established as depicted and named euphonoid I.
The other two known diterpenoids (34) were identified to be ent-abietane diterpenoids raserranes A (3) and B (4) by comparison of their NMR data with those reported in the literature, these four diterpenoids were discovered for the first time from this species [15].

2.2. Biological Activity of Isolated Compounds

The anticancer effects of the isolates 14 were evaluated against human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231, human colon cancer cells HCT-15 and RKO and human prostate cancer cells C4-2B and C4-2B/ENZR (enzalutamide-resistant C4-2B cells). The IC50 values (Table 2) indicated that the two new compounds exhibited varying degrees of growth inhibition against the five cancer cell lines. Compound 1 showed significant inhibitory activities against C4-2B and C4-2B/ENZR cell lines with IC50 values of 5.52 ± 0.65 µM and 4.16 ± 0.42 µM, respectively. Compound 2 exhibited marked inhibitory activity towards the five human cancer cell lines (IC50 values ranging from 4.49 ± 0.78 to 12.45 ± 3.24 µM) and was particularly active against C4-2B and C4-2B/ENZR cell lines (IC50 values: 4.49 ± 0.78 and 5.74 ± 0.45, respectively).
Macrocyclic and polycyclic diterpenes were usually encountered in the genus of Euphorbia and macrocyclic diterpenes were characteristic components of Euphorbia plants, while polycyclic diterpenes were nonspecific in this genus. Although polycyclic diterpenes were not the characteristic components of Euphorbia plants, some polycyclic diterpenes showed great potential in the development of anticancer drugs [16,17,18]. Jolkinolide B, a typical ent-abietane diterpene first isolated from Euphorbia jolkini, induced apoptosis and sensitized bladder cancer to mTOR inhibitors [19,20]; 17-hydroxy-jolkinolide B, a potent inhibitor of JAK/STAT3 signaling, is a promising anticancer drug candidate [21]. In this study, compounds 12 sharing the same abietane diterpene skeleton (6/6/6 carbon ring system) were shown to be promising anti-prostate cancer candidates. Among the four compounds isolated, compound 2 that possessed an α,β-unsaturated γ-lactone ring at C-12 and C-13, was very active against almost the test cancer cells. This observation was consistent with our previous discovery that such an α,β-unsaturated γ-lactone ring was beneficial for the anticancer activity of this type of diterpenoids [12]. Despite the fact that several antitumor abietane diterpenoids were reported in recent years, the pharmacophores and structure-activity relationship of abietane diterpenoids as anticancer agents were rarely investigated. Thus, synthesis of these diterpenoids and study of their structure–activity relationship and potential molecular mechanisms were of great significance for the design and development of anticancer agents.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were carried out on a Rudolph Autopol I automatic polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, Hackettstown, NJ, USA). The UV spectra were measured at a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). IR spectra were determined on a Bruker Tensor 37 infrared spectrophotometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) with KBr disk. ECD spectra were measured on an Applied Photophysics Chirascan spectrometer (Applied Photophysics Ltd., England). NMR spectra were measured on Bruker AM-400 spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. HR-ESIMS data were determined using a Waters Micromass Q-TOF spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The semi-preparative HPLC was performed on an Essentia LC-16 (Shimadzu, Suzhou, China). Column chromatography (CC) was used using silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Factory, Qingdao, China).

3.2. Plant Material

The roots of E. fischeriana were collected in August 2015 from Tie ling city, Liaoning Province, P. R. China and identified by Prof. Qing-De Long (Guizhou Medical University). The specimens were deposited in School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University (specimen no. 20150805).

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The dried roots (10 kg) of E. fischeriana were crushed, extracted with 95% ethanol (50 L) at room temperature for three times (each for 24 h), the solvent was recovered under reduced pressure to obtain the crude extract. The crude extract was suspended in water (3 L) and then partitioned sequentially with petroleum ether, EtOAc and n-BuOH (saturated with water) and dried under reduced pressure to give their corresponding extracts (178.36, 220.82 and 205.43 g, respectively). The EtOAc fraction was subjected to CC (chromatographic column) on silica gel (1.3 kg, 100–200 mesh) using petroleum ether-CH2Cl2 (1:0 to 0:1) and CH2Cl2-MeOH (200:1 to 10:1) as eluents to give fractions 1–3 and 4–10, respectively. Fr. 5 (12.15 g) showed obvious brick-red spots in the TLC and was subjected to ODS CC eluted with MeOH-H2O (40–100%) to obtain 6 fractions (Fr. 5A to Fr. 5F). Fr. 5C (2.42 g) was subsequently loaded on a Sephadex LH-20 column using CH2Cl2-MeOH (1:1) as eluent to obtain 3 fractions (Fr. 5C-a to Fr. 5C-c). Fr. 5C-a (0.69 g) was purified by semipreparative HPLC (ACN-H2O, 87%, 3 mL/min) to obtain compound 3 (6.8 mg, tR = 12.0 min). Compound 1 (4.3 mg, tR = 18.5 min) was isolated from Fr. 5C-b (0.75 g) by preparative HPLC (ACN-H2O, 85%, 3 mL/min). Fr. 5D (1.87 g) was firstly separated by silica gel CC (PE/EtOAc, 5:1) and then by semi-HPLC (ACN-H2O, 90%, 3 mL/min) to afford 2 (3.5 mg, tR = 13.2 min) and 4 (7.2 mg, tR = 16.7 min), respectively.
Euphonoid H (1): colorless oil; [ α ] D 20 −43.2 (c 0.10, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 230 (3.68) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3400, 2932, 1738, 1217, 1033 cm−1; HRESIMS m/z 445.2213 (calcd. for C23H34O7Na+ [M + Na]+, 445.2197); 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 1.
Euphonoid I (2): colorless oil; [ α ] D 20 + 2.8 (c 0.37, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 266 (4.39) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 2938, 1788, 1636, 1256, 968 cm−1; HRESIMS m/z 343.1550 (calcd. for C20H23O5- [M − H], 343.1551); 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 1.
Raserrane A (3): colorless oil; [ α ] D 20 −42.8 (c 0.10, CHCl3); HRESIMS m/z 339.2291 (calcd. for C21H32O2Na+ [M + Na]+, 339.2295).
Raserrane B (4): colorless oil; [ α ] D 20 −133.4 (c 0.25, CHCl3); HRESIMS m/z 287.2362 (calcd. for C20H31O+ [M + H]+, 287.2369).

3.4. Quantum Chemical NMR and ECD Calculations of Compound 12

The random conformational searches were performed by SYBYL X 2.1.1 program using MMFF94s molecular force field. The obtained conformers were subsequently optimized by using Gaussion09 software at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level in gas phase. The optimized stable conformers were selected for further NMR calculations at the mPW1PW91/6-311 + G(d,p) level in chloroform and ECD calculations at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31 + G(d) level in acetonitrile. The overall theoretical NMR data were analyzed by using linear regression and DP4+ probability. The overall ECD data were weighted by Boltzmann distribution and produced by SpecDis version 1.70.1 software (T. Bruhn; A. Schaumlöffel; Y. Hemberger; G. Pescitelli, Berlin, Germany).

3.5. Cell Culture

Five cancer cell lines, including human prostate cancer cells (C4-2B), enzalutamide-resistant C4-2B cells (C4-2B/ENZR), human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) and human colon cancer cells (HCT-15 and RKO) used in this study were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Service Centre at Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 g/mL streptomycin). These cells were incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

3.6. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cells in logarithmic growth phase were seeded a in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well for 24 h. Then, cells were treated with different concentrations of the compounds for an additional 48 h. Subsequently, 10 μL MTT (5 mg/mL) (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were added to each well. After incubation in the incubator for 4 h, the suspension was discarded and the dark blue crystals were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The absorbance of the solution was detected by a multifunction micro-plate reader (Molecular Devices, Flex Station 3, Molecular Devices, San Francisco, USA) at 450 nm. IC50 value was used to express the cytotoxic effect on the tested compounds.

4. Conclusions

In summary, two new highly oxygenated ent-abietane diterpenoids euphonoids H and I (12), together with two known analogues raserranes A (3) and B (4) were separated and identified from the EtOAc-soluble partition of the roots of E. fischeriana. Their structures were elucidated by comprehensive spectroscopic analysis, quantum chemical calculation and ECD calculations. All the compounds were isolated from E. fischerian for the first time. The two new compounds exhibited strong antiproliferative potency against the human prostate cancer cells C4-2B and C4-2B/ENZR, with IC50 values less than 10 μM. This study not only enriches the chemical diversity of ent-abietane diterpenoids in the Euphorbia species but also forms a basis for the discovery of bioactive natural products from Euphorbiaceae herbs.
The current results, together with others’ previous discoveries, suggested that ent-abietane diterpenoids with certain structural motifs might possess very strong anticancer activity against prostate cancer cell lines and this type of diterpenoids provided a promising skeleton for the development of anti-cancer agents for the treatment of prostate cancers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded online: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27217258/s1, Figures S1–S6: The 1D and 2D NMR (400 MHz) spectra of compound 1 in CDCl3, Figure S7: The HRESIMS spectrum of compound 1, Figure S8: The IR spectrum of compound 1, Figures S9–S14: The 1D and 2D NMR (400 MHz) spectra of compound 2 in CDCl3, Figure S15: The HRESIMS spectrum of compound 2, Figure S16: The IR spectrum of compound 2, Figures S17 and S18 and Tables S1–S9: NMR and ECD calculation method of compound 1, Figures S19–S21 and Tables S10–S12: NMR and ECD calculation method of compound 2, Figures S22–S25: 1H NMR and HRESIMS spectra of compound 12, Table S13: NMR Data for compounds 12 in CDCl3.

Author Contributions

Original draft preparation, Q.-F.Z. and G.-B.X.; performing the experiments, Q.-F.Z. and X.-L.Y.; data analysis, G.-B.X.; review and editing, S.-G.L.; supervision, S.-G.L. and X.-L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the New-shoot Talents Project of Guizhou Medical University (19NSP077), the Scientific Research Foundation for Innovative Talent of Guizhou Province ([2020]6011), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22167009) and the Project of Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province ([2020]5006, ZK [2021]554).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available in the Supporting Information of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors as the material has been used up for bioassays.

References

  1. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hanson, J.R. Diterpenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 1156–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jian, B.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. Structural diversity and biological activities of diterpenoids derived from Euphorbia fischeriana steud. Molecules 2018, 23, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wu, Y.-B.; Ni, Z.-Y.; Shi, Q.-W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y.-C.; Cong, B. Constituents from Salvia species and their biological activities. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5967–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, H.; Sun, L.; Kong, C.; Mei, W.; Dai, H.; Xu, F.; Huang, S. Phytochemical and pharmacological review of diterpenoids from the genus Euphorbia Linn (2012–2021). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 298, 115574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bajpai, V.K.; Sonwal, S.; Hwang, S.-K.; Shukla, S.; Khan, I.; Dey, D.K.; Chen, L.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Xiao, J.; Huh, Y.S.; et al. Sugiol, a diterpenoid: Therapeutic actions and molecular pathways involved. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 163, 105313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ngo, T.C.; Dao, D.Q.; Mai, T.V.T.; Nguyen, T.L.A.; Huynh, L.K. On the radical scavenging and DNA repairing activities by natural oxygenated diterpenoids: Theoretical insights. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2022, 62, 2365–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lin, F.-M.; Tsai, C.-H.; Yang, Y.-C.; Tu, W.-C.; Chen, L.-R.; Liang, Y.-S.; Wang, S.-Y.; Shyur, L.-F.; Chien, S.-C.; Cha, T.-L.; et al. A novel diterpene suppresses CWR22Rv1 tumor growth in vivo through antiproliferation and proapoptosis. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 6634–6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China; China Medical Science Press: Beijing, China, 2020; Volume 1, p. 298. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shi, Q.-W.; Su, X.-H.; Kiyota, H. Chemical and pharmacological research of the plants in genus Euphorbia. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 4295–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vasas, A.; Hohmann, J. Euphorbia diterpenes: Isolation, structure, biological activity, and synthesis (2008–2012). Chem. Rev. 2014, 112, 5967–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yan, X.-L.; Zhang, J.-S.; Huang, J.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.-Q.; Tang, G.-H.; Yin, S. Euphonoids A−G, cytotoxic diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana. Phytochemistry 2019, 166, 112064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morgenstern, T.; Bittner, M.; Silva, M.; Aqueveque, P.; Jakupovic, J. Diterpenes and phloracetophenones from Euphorbia portulacoides. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 1149–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uemura, D.; Hirata, Y. Two new diterpenoids, jolkinolides A and B, obtained from Euphorbia jolkini boiss. (Euphorbiaceae). Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 1387–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, G.-L.; Xu, W.; Liu, X.-J.; Yan, X.-L.; Chen, J. Two new abietane diterpenoids from the leaves of Rabdosia serra. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 22, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jian, B.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Han, C.-C.; Liu, J.-C. Anti-cancer activities of diterpenoids derived from Euphorbia fischeriana Steud. Molecules 2018, 23, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Rosaria, A.; Giuseppe, A.M.; Monica, R.L.; Xiao, J.-B.; Simone, B.; Rosa, T. Advances on natural abietane, labdane and clerodane diterpenes as anti-cancer agents: Sources and mechanisms of action. Molecules 2022, 27, 4791. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yan, X.-L.; Zou, M.-F.; Chen, B.-L.; Yuan, F.-Y.; Zhu, Q.-F.; Zhang, X.; Lin, Y.; Long, Q.-D.; Liu, W.-L.; Liao, S.-G. Euphorane C, an unusual C17-norabietane diterpenoid from Euphorbia dracunculoides induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human leukemia K562 cells. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sang, J.; Li, W.; Diao, H.-J.; Fan, R.-Z.; Huang, J.-L.; Gan, L.; Zou, M.-F.; Tang, G.-H.; Yin, S. Jolkinolide B targets thioredoxin and glutathione systems to induce ROS-mediated paraptosis and apoptosis in bladder cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2021, 509, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sang, J.; Gan, L.; Zou, M.-F.; Lin, Z.-J.; Fan, R.-Z.; Huang, J.-L.; Li, W.; Tang, G.-H.; Yin, S. Jolkinolide B sensitizes bladder cancer to mTOR inhibitors via dual inhibition of Akt signaling and autophagy. Cancer Lett. 2022, 526, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Y.; Ma, X.-Q.; Yan, S.-S.; Shen, S.-S.; Zhu, H.-L.; Gu, Y.; Wang, H.-B.; Qin, G.-W.; Yu, Q. 17-hydroxy-jolkinolide B inhibits signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 signaling by covalently cross-linking Janus kinases and induces apoptosis of human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 7302–7310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The structures of compounds 14.
Figure 1. The structures of compounds 14.
Molecules 27 07258 g001
Figure 2. Key 1H-1H COSY (Molecules 27 07258 i001) and HMBC (Molecules 27 07258 i002) correlations of 1 and 2.
Figure 2. Key 1H-1H COSY (Molecules 27 07258 i001) and HMBC (Molecules 27 07258 i002) correlations of 1 and 2.
Molecules 27 07258 g002
Figure 3. Key NOE correlations (Molecules 27 07258 i003) of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 3. Key NOE correlations (Molecules 27 07258 i003) of compounds 1 and 2.
Molecules 27 07258 g003
Figure 4. 13C NMR calculation results of compound 1 at the mPW1PW91/6-311+G(d,p) level. (a) Structures of conformer 1a1d. (b) Key parameters of the calculated chemical shifts of conformers 1a1d.
Figure 4. 13C NMR calculation results of compound 1 at the mPW1PW91/6-311+G(d,p) level. (a) Structures of conformer 1a1d. (b) Key parameters of the calculated chemical shifts of conformers 1a1d.
Molecules 27 07258 g004
Figure 5. (a) Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 1; (b) Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 2.
Figure 5. (a) Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 1; (b) Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of 2.
Molecules 27 07258 g005
Figure 6. Linear correlation plots of predicted versus experimental 13C NMR chemical shifts.
Figure 6. Linear correlation plots of predicted versus experimental 13C NMR chemical shifts.
Molecules 27 07258 g006
Table 1. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data for 1 and 2 in CDCl3.
Table 1. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data for 1 and 2 in CDCl3.
Position12
δH (J in Hz)δC, TypeδH (J in Hz)Δc, Type
11.88 (1H, d, J = 13.0 Hz)
1.21–1.16 (1H, m)
39.7, CH21.92 (1H, d, J = 12.5 Hz)
1.37–1.29 (1H, m)
39.2, CH2
21.55 (1H, d, J = 13.5 Hz)
1.51–1.45 (1H, m)
18.5, CH21.63–1.55 (1H, m)
1.56–1.51 (1H, m)
18.5, CH2
31.43 (1H, d, J = 12.7 Hz)
1.26–1.19 (1H, m)
41.6, CH21.47–1.43 (1H, m)
1.29–1.20 (1H, m)
41.4, CH2
4 33.3, C 33.6, C
51.08 (1H, dd, J = 12.9, 2.6 Hz)54.4, CH1.12 (1H, dd, J = 12.3, 2.5 Hz)53.6, CH
61.71–1.65 (1H, m)
1.16–1.12 (1H, m)
19.2, CH21.88–1.80 (1H, m)
1.56–1.51 (1H, m), overlapped
20.9, CH2
72.13–2.03(1H, m)
1.74–1.72 (1H, m)
41.4, CH22.08–1.97 (1H, m)
1.51–1.48 (1H, m), overlapped
35.8, CH2
8 69.5, C 71.7, C
92.13–2.03(1H, s)60.4, CH2.33 (1H, s)48.1, CH
10 37.7, C 39.4, C
114.23 (1H, s)72.0, CH4.15 (1H, s)64.8, CH
12 196.0, C 85.4, C
13 133.7, C 166.2, C
146.71 (1H, s)154.2, CH4.48 (1H, s)55.3, CH
153.77 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz)45.7, CH 127.5, C
16 170.8, C 165.8, C
174.41 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz)62.5, CH29.97 (1H, s)185.0, CH
180.91 (3H, s)34.0, CH30.94 (3H, s)33.6, CH3
190.79 (3H, s)22.1, CH30.85 (3H, s)22.0, CH3
200.69 (3H, s)17.8, CH30.80 (3H, s)15.6, CH3
16-OCH33.68 (3H, s)52.4, CH3
1′ 171.1, C
2′2.02 (3H, s)21.0, CH3
Table 2. IC50 data of compounds 14 for the indicated cell lines.
Table 2. IC50 data of compounds 14 for the indicated cell lines.
CompoundIC50 1 (µM)
MDA-MB-231HCT-15RKOC4-2BC4-2B/ENZR
121.80 ± 2.3528.57 ± 1.1620.46 ± 1.435.52 ± 0.654.16 ± 0.42
27.95 ± 0.8212.45 ± 3.248.78 ± 2.454.49 ± 0.785.74 ± 0.45
3>50>50>5034.09 ± 7.78>50
4>50>50>5023.34 ± 2.1836.98 ± 6.18
DOX 20.34 ± 0.160.72 ± 0.090.59 ± 0.290.11 ± 0.080.22 ± 0.18
1 Each IC50 value was the mean ± standard deviation from three experiments; 2 Positive control: doxorubicin.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, Q.-F.; Xu, G.-B.; Liao, S.-G.; Yan, X.-L. Ent-Abietane Diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana and Their Cytotoxic Activities. Molecules 2022, 27, 7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217258

AMA Style

Zhu Q-F, Xu G-B, Liao S-G, Yan X-L. Ent-Abietane Diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana and Their Cytotoxic Activities. Molecules. 2022; 27(21):7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Qin-Feng, Guo-Bo Xu, Shang-Gao Liao, and Xue-Long Yan. 2022. "Ent-Abietane Diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana and Their Cytotoxic Activities" Molecules 27, no. 21: 7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217258

APA Style

Zhu, Q. -F., Xu, G. -B., Liao, S. -G., & Yan, X. -L. (2022). Ent-Abietane Diterpenoids from Euphorbia fischeriana and Their Cytotoxic Activities. Molecules, 27(21), 7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217258

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop