Next Article in Journal
Sensory-Guided Identification and Characterization of Kokumi-Tasting Compounds in Green Tea (Camellia sinensis L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Certain Topological Indices of Non-Commuting Graphs for Finite Non-Abelian Groups
Previous Article in Journal
Nutraceutical Difference between Two Popular Thai Namwa Cultivars Used for Sun Dried Banana Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enumeration of the Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index in the Random Polygonal Chains

School of Mathematics and Big Data, Anhui University of Science & Technology, Huainan 232000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(17), 5669; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175669
Submission received: 11 July 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study of Molecules in the Light of Spectral Graph Theory)

Abstract

:
Multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index is a very interesting topological index. In this article, we compute analytical expression for the expected value of the Multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index in a random polygonal. Based on the result above, we also get the Multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of all polygonal chains with extremal values and average values.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we only consider simple and finite connected graphs. The topological index is a mathematical descriptor of molecular structure, which is obtained by performing some numerical operation on the matrix representing the molecular graph. It is an invariant graph, directly generated from the molecular structure, and used to reflect the size, shape, branch and other structural features of the molecule, so as to realize the numerical value of molecular structure information. Molecular topological indices are widely used because of their simplicity, objectivity and freedom from experience and experiment. More than 200 different types of topological indices have been proposed.
It is well known that the emergence and development of graph theory is closely related to the study of chemical molecular graphs. Using topological indices, physicochemical properties and activity parameters of compounds to construct QSPR/QSAR models and to evaluate and predict their properties has become one of the most active fields in chemistry research. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the development of chemical workers. A graphical representation of a compound contains atoms as nodes and bonds as edges. For more detailed information, we can refer to [1,2,3,4].
Topological indices can be used to describe chemical structures and are related to the physical properties, thermodynamic parameters, chemical properties, biological activities and carcinogenicity of compounds. A graph is an ordered two-tuples G = ( V ( G ) , E ( G ) ) , where V ( G ) is a nonempty set and E ( G ) is a set disjoint from V ( G ) . V ( G ) and E ( G ) are the vertex set and edge set of G. The number of edges incident at v in G is called the degree of the vertex v in G and is denoted by d G ( v ) . If u and v are in the same component of G, we define d ( u , v ) to be the length of a shortest u v path in G [5,6,7].
In 1993, Klein and Randi c ´ , academicians of the International Academy of Mathematical Chemists, discussed the application of effective resistance in chemistry and named the effective resistance of a graph as the resistance distance of a graph. This was the first time the concept of resistance distance was put forward in the world, and its proposers pointed out that the resistance distance has more advantages than the shortest distance in the study of molecular communication distance and other aspects [8].
The Kirchhoff index is defined as
K f ( G ) = { x , y } V G r ( x , y ) .
In 2007, the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index was defined as [9]
K f * ( G ) = { x , y } V G d ( x ) d ( y ) r ( x , y ) .
A random polygonal chain G n with n polygons is composed of a polygonal chain G n 1 with n 1 polygons, where a new terminal polygon H n is adjacent to a cut edge, see Figure 1. For n 3 , the terminal polygon H n can be connected in m ways, which can describe as a permutation of G n 1 , G n 2 , G n 3 ,…, G n m . see Figure 2. A random polygon chain G n ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , , p m 1 ) is the polygonal chain obtained by successively adding terminal polygons. In each addition m ( = 3 , 4 , , n ) can randomly select one of the m connection modes:
  • G m 1 G 2 m 1 with probability p 1 ,
  • G m 1 G 2 m 2 with probability p 2 ,
  • G m 1 G 2 m 3 with probability p 3 ,
  • ⋮          ⋮                          ⋮
  • G m 1 G 2 m m 1 with probability p m 1 ,
  • G m 1 G 2 m m with probability p m = 1 p 1 p 2 p 3 p m 1 ,
where the probabilities p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , …, p m 1 are constants, independent of the parameter m.
Let G n be a polygonal chain with n polygons H 1 , H 2 , …, H n . u t ω t links H t and H t + 1 with u t V H t in G n , ω t V H t + 1 for t = 1 , 2 , , n 1 . Evidently, both ω t and u t + 1 are the vertices in H t + 1 and d ( ω t , u t + 1 ) { 1 , 2 , 3 , , n } . In particular, G n is the meta-chain M n ( p m = 1 ) , the ortho-chain O n 1 , O n 2 , …, O n m 2 ( p i + 1 = 1 , 1 i m 2 ) and the para-chain L n ( p m = 1 ) if d ( ω t , u t + 1 ) = 1 (i.e., p 1 = 1 ), d ( ω t , u t + 1 ) = 2 (i.e., p 2 = 1 ), d ( ω t , u t + 1 ) = 3 (i.e., p 3 = 1 ), …, d ( ω t , u t + 1 ) = m(i.e., p m = 1 ) for all t { 1 , 2 , , n 2 } , respectively.
Huang, Kuang and Deng [10] calculated the random polyphenyl and spiro chains, while Zhang and Li et al. [11] calculated the random polyphenylene chain expected values of the multiplicative Kirchhoff index. For more information, we can refer to [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. We compute analytical expression for the expected value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index in a random polygonal. We also obtain the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index with extremal values and average values of all polygonal chains. These results will play a positive role in the study of chemical and physical properties of compounds, drug design and environmental pollution prediction [31,32].

2. The Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index in a Random Polygonal Chain

In this part, in random polygonal chain we will compute the expected value of Multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index. For a random polygonal chain G n , the Multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index is a random variable. Actually, G n + 1 is G n connected by an edge to a new terminal polygonal H n + 1 , here H n + 1 is composed of vertices x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ,…, x 2 m , and the new edge is u n x 1 ; see Figure 1. For all v V G n ,
r ( x 1 , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 , r ( x 2 , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 1 · ( 2 m 1 ) 1 + ( 2 m 1 ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 2 m 1 2 m , r ( x 3 , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 2 · ( 2 m 2 ) 2 + ( 2 m 2 ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 4 m 4 2 m , r ( x m , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( m 1 ) · ( m + 1 ) ( m 1 ) + ( m + 1 ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + m 2 1 2 m , r ( x m + 1 , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + m · m m + m = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + m 2 2 m , r ( x m + 2 , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( m + 1 ) · ( m 1 ) ( m + 1 ) + ( m 1 ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + m 2 1 2 m , r ( x 2 m 1 , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( 2 m 2 ) · 2 ( 2 m 2 ) + 2 = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 4 m 4 2 m , r ( x 2 m , v ) = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( 2 m 1 ) · 1 ( 2 m 1 ) + 1 = r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 2 m 1 2 m .
v V G n d G n + 1 ( v ) = [ ( 2 m 2 ) · 2 + 2 · 3 ] n 1 = ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 .
And,
i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x 1 , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 = 8 m 3 2 m 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x 2 , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + 1 · ( 2 m 1 ) 2 m = 8 m 3 + 4 m 3 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x 3 , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + 2 · ( 2 m 2 ) 2 m = 8 m 3 + 10 m 12 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x m , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m 1 ) · ( m + 1 ) 2 m = 8 m 3 + 3 m 2 2 m 3 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x m + 1 , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + m · m 2 m = 8 m 2 + 3 m 2 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x m + 2 , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m + 1 ) · ( m 1 ) 2 m = 8 m 3 + 3 m 2 2 m 3 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x 2 m 1 , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + ( 2 m 2 ) · 2 2 m = 8 m 3 + 10 m 12 6 m , i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) r ( x 2 m , x i ) = 4 m 2 1 3 + ( 2 m 1 ) · 1 2 m = 8 m 3 + 4 m 3 6 m .
Theorem 1.
The E ( K f * ( G n ) ) ( n 1 ) of the random polygonal chain G n is
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = { ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 3 3 + { 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 + ( 2 m + 1 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 2 { ( 8 m 2 8 m 9 ) + 2 ( 2 m + 1 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 3 1 .
Proof. 
The random polygonal chain G n + 1 is obtained by successively adding a new terminal polygon H n + 1 to G n by an edge, here H n + 1 is composed of vertices x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ,…, x 2 m , and the new edge is u n x 1 ; see Figure 1. Through (2), one has
K f * ( G n + 1 ) = { u , v } V G n d ( u ) d ( v ) r ( u , v ) + v V G n x i V H n + 1 d ( v ) d ( x i ) r ( v , x i ) + { x i x j } V H n + 1 d ( x i ) d ( x j ) r ( x i , x j ) .
Note that
{ u , v } V G n d ( u ) d ( v ) r ( u , v ) = { u , v } V G n { u n } d ( u ) d ( v ) r ( u , v ) + v V G n { u n } d G n + 1 ( u n ) d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) = { u , v } V G n { u n } d ( u ) d ( v ) r ( u , v ) + v V G n { u n } ( d G n ( u n ) + 1 ) d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) = K f * ( G n ) + v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) .
Recall that d ( x 1 ) = 3 and d ( x i ) = 2 for i { 2 , 3 , 4 , , 2 m } . From (3) and (4), We have
v V G n x i V H n + 1 d ( v ) d ( x i ) r ( v , x i ) = v V G n d ( v ) [ 3 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 ) + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 1 · ( 2 m 1 ) 2 m ) + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 2 · ( 2 m 2 ) 2 m ) + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + 3 · ( 2 m 3 ) 2 m ) + + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( m 1 ) · ( m + 1 ) 2 m ) + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + m · m 2 m ) + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( m + 1 ) · ( m 1 ) 2 m ) + + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( 2 m 2 ) · 2 2 m ) + 2 ( r ( u n , v ) + 1 + ( 2 m 1 ) · 1 2 m ) ] = v V G n d ( v ) [ ( 4 m + 1 ) r ( u n , v ) + 4 m 2 + 12 m + 2 3 ] = ( 4 m + 1 ) v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) + 4 m 2 + 12 m + 2 3 [ ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ] .
From (5), one has,
{ x i x j } V H n + 1 d ( x i ) d ( x j ) r ( x i , x j ) = 1 2 i = 1 2 m d ( x i ) ( j = 1 2 m d ( x j ) r ( x i , x j ) ) = 1 2 [ 3 × 4 m 2 1 3 + 2 × ( 4 m 2 1 3 + 1 · ( 2 m 1 ) 2 m ) + 2 × ( 4 m 2 1 3 + 2 · ( 2 m 2 ) 2 m ) + + 2 × ( 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m 1 ) · ( m + 1 ) 2 m ) + 2 × ( 4 m 2 1 3 + m · m 2 m ) + 2 × ( 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m + 1 ) · ( m 1 ) 2 m ) + + 2 × ( 4 m 2 1 3 + ( 2 m 1 ) · 1 2 m ) ] = 8 m 3 + 4 m 2 2 m 1 3 .
Then
K f * ( G n + 1 ) = K f * ( G n ) + ( 4 m + 2 ) v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) + 4 m 2 + 12 m + 2 3 [ ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ] + 8 m 3 + 4 m 2 2 m 1 3 .
For a random polygonal chain G n , the expected value of the number v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is a random variable. We can represent it
R n : = E ( v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) ) .
Substituting R n into (6), we can get the recurrence formula of E ( K f * ( G n ) )
E ( K f * ( G n + 1 ) ) = E ( K f * ( G n ) ) + ( 4 m + 2 ) R n + 16 m 3 + 56 m 2 + 32 m + 4 3 n + 8 m 3 14 m 3 3 .
We continue to consider the following m possibilities.
  • Way 1. G n G n + 1 1 . In this way, u n gives the same result with the vertex x 2 or x 2 m . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 2 , v ) or v V G n r ( v ) d ( x 2 m , v ) with probability p 1 .
  • Way 2. G n G n + 1 2 . In this way, u n gives the same result with the vertex x 3 or x 2 m 1 . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 3 , v ) or v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 2 m 1 , v ) with probability p 2 .
  • Way 3. G n G n + 1 3 . In this way, u n gives the same result with the vertex x 4 or x 2 m 2 . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 4 , v ) or v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 2 m 2 , v ) with probability p 3 .
  • ⋮      ⋮                        ⋮
  • Way m-3. G n G n + 1 m 3 . In this way, u n gives the same result with the vertex x m 2 or x m + 4 . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m 2 , v ) or v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m + 4 , v ) with probability p m 3 .
  • Way m-2. G n G n + 1 m 2 . In this way, u n gives the same result with the vertex x m 1 or x m + 3 . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m 1 , v ) or v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m + 3 , v ) with probability p m 2 .
  • Way m-1. G n G n + 1 m 1 . In this way, u n gives the same result with the vertex x m or x m + 2 . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m , v ) or v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m + 2 , v ) with probability p m 1 .
  • Way m. G n G n + 1 m , then u n is the vertex x m + 1 . Then, v V G n d ( v ) r ( u n , v ) is described as v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m + 1 , v ) with probability 1 p 1 p 2 p 3 p m 3 p m 2 p m 1 .
According to the above discussion, we obtain
R n = p 1 v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 2 , v ) + p 2 v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 3 , v ) + p 3 v V G n d ( v ) r ( x 4 , v ) + + p m 3 v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m 2 , v ) + p m 2 v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m 1 , v ) + p m 1 v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m , v ) + ( 1 p 1 p 2 p 3 P m 3 P m 2 p m 1 ) v V G n d ( v ) r ( x m + 1 , v ) = p 1 [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + 1 · ( 2 m 1 ) 2 m ) ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + 1 · ( 2 m 1 ) 2 m ) ] + p 2 [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + 2 · ( 2 m 2 ) 2 m ) ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + 2 · ( 2 m 2 ) 2 m ) ] + p 3 [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + 3 · ( 2 m 3 ) 2 m ) ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + 3 · ( 2 m 3 ) 2 m ) ] + + p m 3 [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + ( m 3 ) · ( m + 3 ) 2 m ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m 3 ) · ( m + 3 ) 2 m ) ] + p m 2 [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + ( m 2 ) · ( m + 2 ) 2 m ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m 2 ) · ( m + 2 ) 2 m ) ] + p m 1 [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + ( m 1 ) · ( m + 1 ) 2 m ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + ( m 1 ) · ( m + 1 ) 2 m ) ] + ( 1 p 1 p 2 p m 1 ) [ v V G n 1 d ( v ) r ( u n 1 , v ) + ( 1 + m · m 2 m ) ( ( 4 m + 2 ) n 1 ) + ( 4 m 2 1 3 + m · m 2 m ) ] .
Substitute the expectation for the above equation, E ( R n ) = R n , we obtain
R n = R n 1 + { ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i · ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n + i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i · ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i 2 m 2 + 15 m + 10 3 .
Let
V = i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i · ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i .
W i = ( 2 m + 1 ) [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i · ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] .
Hence,
R n = R n 1 + [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) V ] n + V 2 m 2 + 15 m + 10 3 .
By the calculation
R 1 = E ( v V G n d ( v ) r ( u 1 , v ) ) = 4 m 2 1 3 .
Based on the above results, we have
R n = { ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 1 2 i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i · ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 2 + { 1 2 i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i · ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i + 2 m 2 15 m 14 6 } n + 1 .
Thus,
R n = [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 1 2 V ] n 2 + [ 1 2 V + 2 m 2 15 m 14 6 ] n + 1 .
Substituting R n into (6), we have
E ( K f * ( G n + 1 ) ) = E ( K f * ( G n ) ) + ( 4 m + 2 ) R n + 16 m 3 + 56 m 2 + 32 m + 4 3 n + 8 m 3 14 m 3 3 = E ( K f * ( G n ) ) + ( 4 m + 2 ) { [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 1 2 V ] n 2 + [ 1 2 V + 2 m 2 15 m 14 6 ] n + 1 } + 16 m 3 + 56 m 2 + 32 m + 4 3 n + 8 m 3 14 m 3 3 .
By these calculations, E ( K f * ( G 1 ) ) = 8 m 3 2 m 3 .
Finally, we obtain the expected value formula
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = { ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 3 3 + { 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 + ( 2 m + 1 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 2 { ( 8 m 2 8 m 9 ) + 2 ( 2 m + 1 ) i = 1 m 1 [ ( 2 m 2 + 5 m + 2 ) 2 m + i ( 2 m i ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ] p i } n 3 1 .
Thus,
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = [ ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) V ] n 3 3 + [ 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 + ( 2 m + 1 ) V ] n 2 [ ( 8 m 2 8 m 9 ) + 2 ( 2 m + 1 ) V ] n 3 1 .
as desired.
In particular, if we let ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , , p m 1 , p m ) = ( 1 , 0 , 0 , , 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 , 0 , , 0 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 0 , 1 , , 0 , 0 ) , …, ( 0 , 0 , 0 , , 1 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 0 , 0 , , 0 , 1 ) or ( 0 , 0 , 0 , , 0 , 0 ) , by Theorem 1, we can obtain the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of the polygonal meta-chain M n ( p 1 = 1 ) ,the polygonal ortho-chain O n 1 , O n 2 , O n 3 , …, O n m 2 ( p i + 1 = 1 , 1 i m 2 ) , the polygonal para-chain L n ( p m = 1 ) , as
K f * ( M n ) = 16 m 3 + 12 m 2 1 3 m n 3 + 16 m 4 16 m 3 28 m 2 2 m + 3 3 m n 2 8 m 4 14 m 2 5 m + 2 3 m n 1 , K f * ( O n 1 ) = 24 m 3 + 8 m 2 10 m 4 3 m n 3 + 16 m 4 40 m 3 16 m 2 + 28 m + 12 3 m n 2 8 m 4 16 m 3 6 m 2 + 15 m + 8 3 m n 1 , K f * ( O n 2 ) = 32 m 3 4 m 2 28 m 9 3 m n 3 + 16 m 4 64 m 3 + 20 m 2 + 82 m + 27 3 m n 2 8 m 4 32 m 3 + 18 m 2 + 51 m + 18 3 m n 1 , K f * ( O n m 3 ) = 4 m 4 + 12 m 3 7 m 2 14 m 4 3 m n 3 + 4 m 4 4 m 3 + 29 m 2 + 40 m + 12 3 m n 2 8 m 3 + 24 m 2 + 23 m + 8 3 m n 1 , K f * ( O n m 2 ) = 4 m 4 + 12 m 3 + 5 m 2 2 m 1 3 m n 3 + 4 m 4 4 m 3 7 m 2 + 4 m + 3 3 m n 2 8 m 3 m + 2 3 m n 1 , K f * ( L n ) = 4 m 4 + 12 m 3 + 9 m 2 + 2 m 3 m n 3 + 4 m 4 4 m 3 19 m 2 8 m 3 m n 2 8 m 3 8 m 2 9 m 3 m n 1 .
K f * ( O n i ) = [ ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) W i + 1 ] n 3 3 + [ 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 + W i + 1 ] n 2 [ ( 8 m 2 8 m 9 ) + 2 W i + 1 ] n 3 1 ,
Obviously,
K f * ( M n ) + K f * ( L n ) = K f * ( O n 1 ) + K f * ( O n 2 ) + + K f * ( O n m 2 ) .
Corollary 1.
For a random polygonal chain G n ( n 3 ) , the para-chain L n reaches the maximum and the meta-chain M n reaches the minimum of E ( k f * ( G n ) ) .
Proof. 
Though Theorem 1, we have
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = i = 1 m 1 ( W i n 3 3 + W i n 2 2 W i n 3 ) p i + ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) n 3 3 + 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 n 2 8 m 2 8 m 9 3 n 1 .
When n 3 , by taking the partial derivative of E ( K f * ( G n ) ) , one has
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p i = W i n 3 3 + W i n 2 2 3 W i n < 0 . E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p 1 = 4 m 4 4 m 3 3 m 2 + 2 m + 1 m n 3 3 + 4 m 4 4 m 3 3 m 2 + 2 m + 1 m n 2 2 3 · 4 m 4 4 m 3 3 m 2 + 2 m + 1 m n < 0 , E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p 2 = 4 m 4 12 m 3 + m 2 + 12 m + 4 m n 3 3 + 4 m 4 12 m 3 + m 2 + 12 m + 4 m n 2 2 3 · 4 m 4 12 m 3 + m 2 + 12 m + 4 m n < 0 , E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p 3 = 4 m 4 20 m 3 + 13 m 2 + 30 m + 9 m n 3 3 + 4 m 4 20 m 3 + 13 m 2 + 30 m + 9 m n 2 2 3 · 4 m 4 20 m 3 + 13 m 2 + 30 m + 9 m n < 0 , E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p m 1 = 4 m 2 + 4 m + 1 m n 3 3 + 4 m 2 + 4 m + 1 m n 2 2 3 · 4 m 2 + 4 m + 1 m n < 0 .
When ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , , p m 1 , p m ) = ( 0 , 0 , 0 , , 0 , 1 ) (i.e., p m = 1 ), the para-chain L n reaches the maximum of E ( K f * ( G n ) ) , (i.e., G n L n ). If p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + + p m 1 = 1 , let p m 1 = 1 p 1 p 2 p m 2 ( 0 p 1 1 , 0 p 2 1 , , 0 p m 2 1 ) , Then
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = i = 1 m 2 ( W i n 3 3 + W i n 2 2 W i n 3 ) p i + ( W m 1 n 3 3 + W m 1 n 2 2 W m 1 n 3 ) ( 1 p 1 p 2 p m 2 ) + ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) n 3 3 + 4 m 4 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 n 2 8 m 2 8 m 9 3 n 1 .
Therefore,
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p i = ( W i W m 1 ) n 3 3 + ( W i W m 1 ) n 2 2 3 ( W i W m 1 ) n < 0 . E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p 1 = ( 4 m 3 4 m 2 7 m 2 ) n 3 3 + ( 4 m 3 4 m 2 7 m 2 ) n 2 2 3 · ( 4 m 3 4 m 2 7 m 2 ) n < 0 , E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p 2 = 4 m 4 12 m 3 3 m 2 + 8 m + 3 m n 3 3 + 4 m 4 12 m 3 3 m 2 + 8 m + 3 m n 2 2 3 · 4 m 4 12 m 3 3 m 2 + 8 m + 3 m n < 0 , E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p m 2 = 12 m 2 + 12 m + 3 m n 3 3 + 12 m 2 + 12 m + 3 m n 2 2 3 · 12 m 2 + 12 m + 3 m n < 0 .
Thus, ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , , p m 1 , p m ) = ( 0 , 0 , 0 , , 1 , 0 ) (i.e., p m 1 = 1 ), E ( K f * ( G n ) ) cannot be minimized. As above, If p 1 + p 2 + p 3 + + p i = 1 , let p i = 1 p 1 p 2 p i 1 ( 0 p 1 1 , 0 p 2 1 , , 0 p i 1 1 ) , ( i 3 ) ; then, we have
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = i = 1 m 3 ( W i n 3 3 + W i n 2 2 W i n 3 ) p i + ( W m 2 n 3 3 + W m 2 n 2 2 W m 2 n 3 ) ( 1 p 1 p 2 p m 3 ) + ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) n 3 3 + 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 n 2 8 m 2 8 m 9 3 n 1 .
Therefore,
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) p i = ( W i W m 2 ) n 3 3 + ( W i W m 2 ) n 2 2 3 ( W i W m 2 ) n < 0 , ( m 3 3 ) .
The minimum value can only be reached if p 1 + p 2 = 1 . Then let p 1 = 1 p 2 ( 0 p 2 1 )
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = ( W 1 n 3 3 + W 1 n 2 2 W 1 n 3 ) ( 1 p 2 ) + ( W 2 n 3 3 + W 2 n 2 2 W 2 n 3 ) p 2 + ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) n 3 3 + 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 n 2 8 m 2 8 m 9 3 n 1 .
Thus,
E ( G ( K f n * ) ) p 2 = ( W 1 W 2 ) n 3 3 ( W 1 W 2 ) n 2 + 2 3 ( W 1 W 2 ) n > 0 .
Therefore, E ( K f * ( G n ) ) reaches its minimum value when p 2 = 0 (i.e., p 1 = 1 ) ; that is G n M n .

3. The Average Values for the Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index

Let Θ n be the set of all polygonal chains with n polygons. Here, we calculate the average value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index.
K f a v r * ( Θ n ) = 1 | Θ n | G Θ n K f * ( G ) .
In order to obtain the average value K f a v r * ( Θ n ) , we let p 1 = p 2 = = p m = 1 m in the random polygonal chain of E ( K f * ( G n ) ) . According to Theorem 1, we have
Theorem 2.
The K f a v r * ( Θ n ) ( n 1 ) for the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of the random chain G n is
E ( K f * ( G n ) ) = [ ( 4 m 3 + 12 m 2 + 9 m + 2 ) 1 k i = 1 m 1 W i ] n 3 3 + [ 4 m 3 4 m 2 19 m 8 3 + 1 m i = 1 m 1 W i ] n 2 [ ( 8 m 2 8 m 9 ) + 2 m i = 1 m 1 W i ] n 3 1 .
After calculation, we obtain the equations
K f a v r * ( Θ n ) = 1 m K f * ( M n ) + 1 m K f * ( O n 1 ) + 1 m K f * ( O n 2 ) + + 1 m K f * ( O n m 2 ) + 1 m K f * ( L n ) .

4. Concluding Remarks

In this paper, we compute an expression for the expected value of the multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index of a random polygonal chain. We also calculate the extremal value and average value of this index. Polygonal chemicals have various molecular structures, and their physicochemical properties are becoming increasingly important; refer to [33,34,35]. These studies have important applications for us to solve some chemical problems related to life and production, as well as for us to predict the physical and chemical properties of molecules and synthesize new compounds and new drugs.
Nowadays, computational chemists can identify the various physical, chemical and pharmaceutical properties of molecules by statistical methods using a large amount of data. Topological indices based on the distance between vertices of graphs play an important role in characterizing molecular graphs and establishing the relationship between molecular structures and features and are used to predict the physicochemical properties and biological activities of compounds. With the rapid development of science and technology, the demand for new materials and drugs in the manufacturing and pharmaceutical fields is increasing day by day. In order to purposefully and quickly synthesize new substances, the topological index has once again become a research hotspot [36,37].

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12171190), the Graduate Innovation Fund Project of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 149), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (Grant No. 2008085MA01) and the Research Foundation of the Institute of Environment-friendly Materials and Occupational Health (Wuhu), Anhui University of Science and Technology (Grant No. ALW2021YF09).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Bondy, J.; Murty, U. Graph Theory Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; p. 244. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chung, F.R.; Graham, F.C. Spectral Graph Theory; American Mathematical Society Providence: Providence, RI, USA, 1997; Volume 92. [Google Scholar]
  3. Estrada, E.; Bonchev, D. Chemical Graph Theory. In Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2013; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Flower, D.R. On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buckley, F.; Harary, F. Distance in Graphs. In Structural Analysis of Complex Networks; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  6. Entringer, R.C.; Jackson, D.E.; Snyder, D. Distance in graphs. Czechoslov. Math. J. 1976, 26, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Klein, D.J.; Randić, M. Resistance distance. J. Math. Chem. 1993, 12, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gutman, I.; Feng, L.; Yu, G. Degree resistance distance of unicyclic graphs. Trans. Comb. 2012, 1, 27–40. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, G.; Kuang, M.; Deng, H. The expected values of Kirchhoff indices in the random polyphenyl and spiro chains. Ars Math. Contemp. 2014, 9, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, L.; Li, Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, M. The expected values for the Schultz index, Gutman index, multiplicative degree-Kirchhoff index and additive degree-Kirchhoff index of a random polyphenylene chain. Discret. Appl. Math. 2020, 282, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, G.; Kuang, M.; Deng, H. The expected values of Hosoya index and Merrifield—Simmons index in a random polyphenylene chain. J. Comb. Optim. 2016, 32, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, H.; Zhang, F. Resistance distance and the normalized Laplacian spectrum. Discret. Appl. Math. 2007, 155, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bai, Y.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, P. Extremal Merrifield-Simmons index and Hosoya index of polyphenyl chains. Match Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2009, 62, 649–656. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, A.; Zhang, F. Wiener index and perfect matchings in random phenylene chains. Match Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2009, 61, 623–630. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, S.; Shiu, W.C. Enumeration of Wiener indices in random polygonal chains. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2019, 469, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, Q.; Wang, L.; Lu, Y. Wiener index and Harary index on Hamilton-connected graphs with large minimum degree. Discret. Appl. Math. 2018, 247, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wiener, H. Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. He, F.; Zhu, Z. Cacti with maximum eccentricity resistance-distance sum. Discret. Appl. Math. 2017, 219, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, S.; Zhou, J.; Bu, C. Some results on Kirchhoff index and degree-Kirchhoff index. Match Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2016, 75, 207–222. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, J.-B.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Lin, W. The Kirchhoff index and spanning trees of Möbius/cylinder octagonal chain. Discret. Appl. Math. 2022, 307, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qi, J.; Fang, M.; Geng, X. The Expected Value for the Wiener Index in the Random Spiro Chains. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2022, 2022, 2038218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heydari, A. On the modified Schultz index of C4C8(S) nanotubes and nanotorus. Digest. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2010, 5, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, Y.; Klein, D.J. A note on the Kirchhoff and additive degree-Kirchhoff indices of graphs. Z. Naturforsch. A 2015, 70, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, J.B.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Wei, B. Zagreb indices and multiplicative zagreb indices of eulerian graphs. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2019, 42, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.B.; Zhao, J.; Min, J.; Cao, J. The Hosoya index of graphs formed by a fractal graph. Fractals 2019, 27, 1950135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Person, W.B.; Pimentel, G.C.; Pitzer, K.S. The Structure of Cyclooctatetraene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3437–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mukwembi, S.; Munyira, S. Degree distance and minimum degree. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2013, 87, 255–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, M.; Priebe, C.E. Limit theorems for eigenvectors of the normalized Laplacian for random graphs. Ann. Stat. 2018, 46, 2360–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.B.; Zhao, J.; He, H.; Shao, Z. Valency-based topological descriptors and structural property of the generalized sierpiński networks. J. Stat. Phys. 2019, 177, 1131–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Georgakopoulos, A. Uniqueness of electrical currents in a network of finite total resistance. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2010, 82, 256–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gupta, S.; Singh, M.; Madan, A. Eccentric distance sum: A novel graph invariant for predicting biological and physical properties. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 275, 386–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Evans, W.C.; Evans, D. Hydrocarbons and derivatives. In Trease and Evans’ Pharmacognosy; Birkhäuser: London, UK, 2009; pp. 173–193. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cinkir, Z. Deletion and contraction identities for the resistance values and the Kirchhoff index. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2011, 111, 4030–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Somodi, M. On the Ihara zeta function and resistance distance-based indices. Linear Algebra Appl. 2016, 513, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, S.; Wei, W. Some edge-grafting transformations on the eccentricity resistance-distance sum and their applications. Discret. Appl. Math. 2016, 211, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luthe, G.; Jacobus, J.A.; Robertson, L.W. Receptor interactions by polybrominated diphenyl ethers versus polychlorinated biphenyls: A theoretical structure–activity assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 25, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pavlyuchko, A.; Vasiliev, E.; Gribov, L. Quantum chemical estimation of the overtone contribution to the IR spectra of hydrocarbon halogen derivatives. J. Struct. Chem. 2010, 51, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A polygonal chain G n with n polygons.
Figure 1. A polygonal chain G n with n polygons.
Molecules 27 05669 g001
Figure 2. m types of local arrangements in a polygonal chain.
Figure 2. m types of local arrangements in a polygonal chain.
Molecules 27 05669 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, W.; Geng, X. Enumeration of the Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index in the Random Polygonal Chains. Molecules 2022, 27, 5669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175669

AMA Style

Zhu W, Geng X. Enumeration of the Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index in the Random Polygonal Chains. Molecules. 2022; 27(17):5669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Wanlin, and Xianya Geng. 2022. "Enumeration of the Multiplicative Degree-Kirchhoff Index in the Random Polygonal Chains" Molecules 27, no. 17: 5669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175669

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop