Next Article in Journal
Extracting Total Anthocyanin from Purple Sweet Potato Using an Effective Ultrasound-Assisted Compound Enzymatic Extraction Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Curcumol Synergizes with Cisplatin in Osteosarcoma by Inhibiting M2-like Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules27144346
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intensification of Double Kinetic Resolution of Chiral Amines and Alcohols via Chemoselective Formation of a Carbonate–Enzyme Intermediate

by
Jan Samsonowicz-Górski
,
Anna Brodzka
,
Ryszard Ostaszewski
and
Dominik Koszelewski
*
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(14), 4346; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144346
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 5 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chiral amines and alcohols are synthons of numerous pharmaceutically-relevant compounds. The previously developed enzymatic kinetic resolution approaches utilize a chiral racemic molecule and achiral acyl donor (or acyl acceptor). Thus, only one enantiodivergent step of the catalytic cycle is engaged, which does not fully exploit the enzyme’s abilities. The first carbonate-mediated example of simultaneous double chemoselective kinetic resolution of chiral amines and alcohols is described. Herein, we established a biocatalytic approach towards four optically-pure compounds (>99% ee, Enantioselectivity: E > 200) via double enzymatic kinetic resolution, engaging chiral organic carbonates as acyl donors. High enantioselectivity was ensured by extraordinary chemoselectivity in lipase-catalyzed formation of unsymmetrical organic carbonates and engaged in a process applicable for the synthesis of enantiopure organic precursors of valuable compounds. This study focused not only on preparative synthesis, but additionally the catalytic mechanism was discussed and the clear impact of this rarely observed carbonate-derived acyl enzyme was shown. The presented protocol is characterized by atom efficiency, acyl donor sustainability, easy acyl group removal, mild reaction conditions, and biocatalyst recyclability, which significantly decreases the cost of the reported process.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the foundations of pharmaceutically-relevant molecules often lays a chiral, small-molecular scaffold, which is required to be in enantiopure form. Every stereoisomer of a drug candidate must be studied separately, for the biological activity and potential pharmaceutical application of opposite enantiomers may vary significantly. For instance, (R)-1-phenylethylamine is used for the synthesis of Etomidate (an intravenous anesthetic agent), [1] while a (S)-1-phenylethylamine substructure can be found in the (S)-Rivastigmine utilized in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [2]. Thus, it is crucial to have access to both enantiomers of chiral compounds. Nevertheless, the predominant method of accessing enantiomerically pure compounds is the kinetic resolution (KR) of racemates promoted by enantioselective enzymes such as lipases, which are able to catalyze acyl transfer reactions [3,4,5,6,7]. To increase reaction yields, DKR (dynamic kinetic resolution) was developed; however, the product configuration is limited by the selectivity of the enzyme. Furthermore, the utilization of a metal-containing racemization catalyst may cause problems with final product contaminations. The classical KR utilized in industry and laboratory synthesis engages only half of the enzyme catalytic potential. Therefore, the full possible use of an enzyme is not obtained. The reactions catalyzed by lipases engage enantiomer differentiation in the first part of the catalytic cycle (KR by hydrolysis) [8] or the second (alcoholysis or aminolysis) [9]. Thus, reactions were enantio-differentiation takes place twice in the catalytic cycle are promising in enantioselective synthesis by KR. Such an approach can double the turnover number (TON) of the process, and increase the reaction yield and atom economy (Scheme 1).
Every catalytic cycle consists of acyl-enzyme intermediate formation, followed by reaction with a nucleophile. The combination of these two steps in one process will result in the double use of the enzyme, increasing the catalytic efficiency and atom economy. Nowadays, emphasis is put on the development of protocols giving access to a set of synthetically-relevant products in one-pot processes with great atom efficiency. Therefore, in the course of our studies on the intensification of enantioselective reactions [10,11], we decided to study if it was possible to combine two enantiodivergent steps in one process and to optimize it for preparative purposes.
An approach that fulfils the mentioned requirements is double enzymatic kinetic resolution (DEKR), enabling the simultaneous resolution of two racemates in one-pot, by enantioselective acyl transfer from a chiral acyl donor to a chiral acyl acceptor. A previously published method utilizes double dynamic kinetic resolution (DDKR) [12] and is limited by the selectivity of the enzymes, which may hamper access to the opposite enantiomer of the acyl acceptor. Additionally, the negative impact of the acyl donor in previous protocols was neglected. Reaction of methoxyacetates and propionates results in the formation of esters and amides, whose hydrolysis requires harsh conditions. Alternatively, carbonates are sustainable acyl donors containing two groups, with the possibility of being exchanged. Therefore, one molecule of carbonate can act twice as an acyl donor, increasing the atom economy. Additionally, hydrolysis of carbonates or carbamates takes place under mild conditions [13,14]. The published protocols used vinyl carbonates, which led to the release of toxic acetaldehyde [13,15,16,17,18], and the observed enantioselectivity was moderate in most cases. Moreover, the catalytic cycle and the role of the acyl-enzyme intermediate structure were neglected. Due to the advantages of carbonates as acyl donors, we decided to examine their performance with various methods, with potential synthetic utilization for the stereoselective synthesis of carbonates, carbamates, alcohols, and amines.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemo- and Enantioselectivity Studies on Carbonate EKR

Initially, the screening of sixteen enzymes (including hydrolases used in numerous biocatalytic procedures) was performed, finding Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB, Novozym 435) as the only biocatalyst with the ability to catalyze the substitution of the alkoxy group of carbonate. In order to determine if the alkoxy groups of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) or diethyl carbonate (DEC) can be substituted with alcohol enantioselectively, alkoxy-group transfer reactions were performed with a high excess of alcohol on model substrates: DMC as acyl donor and 1-phenylethanol (1a) (Supplementary Materials, Table S1). Asymmetric carbonate was obtained exclusively, despite a ratio of 1:10 DMC to alcohol, indicating that only one alkoxy group of the carbonate can be exchanged in a lipase-catalyzed process. Thus, we concluded that the carbonate-derived acyl-enzyme intermediate was formed chemoselectively. The analysis of model reaction products showed that the enzyme is not only chemoselective towards mixed carbonate, but also highly enantioselective. Among the previously published protocols regarding enzymatic synthesis of mixed carbonates, enantioselectivity was neither analyzed nor optimized [19]. To fill this gap, the optimization of reaction conditions was performed (Supplementary Materials, Section: Enzymatic kinetic resolution of alcohols). MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether) was found to be the most suitable solvent (providing higher conversions than those obtained under neat conditions), and room temperature (22–25 °C) was optimal, with a molar 1:5 ratio of alcohol to carbonate. Under the optimized conditions, (R)-methyl 1-phenylethyl carbonate (29% yield, ee > 99%) and (R)-methyl 1-phenylethyl carbonate (14% yield, ee > 99%) were obtained. A higher conversion rate was obtained when DMC was used as acyl donor (Supplementary Materials, Table S4); therefore, it was chosen for the scope and limitation studies (Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Enzymatic enantioselective acylation of alcohols with DMC 1.
Table 1. Enzymatic enantioselective acylation of alcohols with DMC 1.
Entryrac-1 2Conv. (%)(S)-1 ee (%)(R)-2 ee (%)E 3
11a3140>99>200
21b32>99>200
31c1314>99>200
41d60641
51e1416>99>200
61f3752>99>200
71g4445555
81h4884>99>200
91i3567>99>200
101j4581>99>200
111k2331>99>200
121l55871
131m87rac (+/−)rac (+/−)nd
141n93ndndnd
1 Reaction conditions: 1a–n (0.26 mmol), DMC (1.3 mmol, 5 equiv.), and MTBE (1 mL), r.t. 24 h., shaker 200 rpm, 2 According to the description in Scheme 2 and Figure 1. 3 Enantioselectivity calculated on equation: E = ln[(1 − ees)/(1 + ees/eep)]/ln[(1 + ees)/(1 + ees/eep)].
Molecules 27 04346 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of studied compounds: 1a-o: R=H; 2o-a: R=C(O)OCH3; 3a-o: R=C(O)OC2H5.
Figure 1. Structures of studied compounds: 1a-o: R=H; 2o-a: R=C(O)OCH3; 3a-o: R=C(O)OC2H5.
Molecules 27 04346 g001
Subsequent scope and limitation studies using the selected secondary and primary alcohols (Figure 1 and Table 1) showed that (R)-carbonate esters of secondary alcohols can be obtained with high enantioselectivity (E > 200), while the hydroxyl group was placed between the small group (such as methyl) and medium or large group (n-butyl or phenyl). EKR of primary alcohols with a hydroxyl group on the alpha position resulted in the synthesis of carbonate with low enantioselectivity (E = 1), which can be explained by the greater distance between the catalytic center and stereogenic center. Notably, β-citronellyl methyl carbonate was obtained with a 87% yield; however, the product was racemic. Therefore, when the stereogenic center is placed on position 3 (beta position), the reaction is not selective, due to the greater distance from the catalytic triad. The observed synthesis of asymmetric carbonates can be explained by the high chemoselectivity exhibited by the used enzyme [20,21]. An analogous reaction, performed with a chemical catalyst, resulted in the mixture of symmetrical disubstituted and asymmetric carbonates. Racemization studies indicated that Novozym 435 is enantiospecific, since secondary (S)-alcohols were not accepted by the enzyme and carbonate products were optically pure (>99% ee), despite a long incubation with the enzyme. Thus, the developed method provides access to enantiopure 2-hexanol (an after product of carbonate hydrolysis), which is hard to obtain using the previously published protocols [22]. In a situation where the enzyme is not enantiospecific but enantioselective, racemization can be observed when equilibrium reactions (such as reversible acyl transfer) are used in biocatalysis (Supplementary Materials, Section: Enantiospecificity studies).
The observed results of alcoholysis with racemic alcohols acknowledge the utilization of enzymes as efficient catalysts for the synthesis of enantiopure unsymmetrical carbonates (and alcohols, after carbonate group removal). Organic carbonates are employed for synthesis of pharmaceuticals [23], ester oils [24], or the intermediates of fine chemicals [25,26]. The successful optimization of enzyme-catalyzed carbonate synthesis enables replacing reactions between chloroformate (unstable and harmful) and the desired alcohol, which require carcinogenic pyridine [27,28] or energy consuming chemical catalytic processes, suffering from a lack of enantioselectivity [26,29,30,31,32]. The presented protocol functions in one enantiodivergent step per catalytic cycle.

2.2. Carbonate-Mediated DEKR of Alcohols

The observed chemo- and enantioselectivity encouraged us to examine the alcoholysis of asymmetric racemic carbonates with racemic chiral alcohols. Due to the fact that the selected enzyme accepts only (R)-enantiomers of substrates, alcoholysis of racemic carbonate is prone to providing (S)-carbonate and (R)-alcohol. As a result, double enzymatic kinetic resolution of alcohols and carbonates was performed, with methyl 1-phenylethyl carbonate (2a) and 2-hexanol (1h) as model substrates. Solvent screening showed MTBE to be the solvent providing the highest conversion; however, its enantioselectivity was poor. Toluene at 50 °C was found to be optimal for the DEKR procedure, and Novozym 435 was found to be the only enzyme able to catalyze the process efficiently (Supplementary Materials, Tables S5 and S6). Model carbonates methyl 1-phenylethyl and ethyl 1-phenylethyl were used as acyl donors and compared. For most alcohols the reaction was enantioselective, and depending on the alcohol-acyl acceptor, the enantioselectivity of acyl removal from the carbonate substrate differed. The results are presented in Table 2.
Differences in the enantioselectivity of the first step proved that the catalytic cycle steps depend on one another and that the acyl acceptor impacts on the enantioselectivity of acyl group removal 2/3a. Notably, when 2a was used as acyl donor, the enantioselectivity of first step of DEKR was lower than the second. When 3a was used, the situation was reversed (2-hexanol was an exception). Thus, we presume that the formation of an enzyme-methyl carbonate intermediate is responsible for the enantioselectivity enhancement or reduction in the second step. The obtained results indicated that the intensification of the kinetic resolution efficiency was successful for most alcohols, and the studied reactions were enantioselective. The formation of mixed carbonate with two chiral alkoxy groups was not observed. To obtain a deeper insight into the catalytic cycle of the studied process, we decided to examine the alcoholysis of model carbonates with ethanol and methanol in 1-molar equivalents (Table 2, Entry 14, 15). An exchange of a less sterically-hindered group was observed, which indicates the presence of different acyl intermediates in an equilibrium driven process. A productive process depends not only on the enzyme selectivity, but also on the nucleophile structure. The small alkoxy group (methoxy or ethoxy) of carbonate is only exchanged by another small alcohol (i.e., methyl is exclusively exchanged with ethyl). More sterically-hindered alkoxy groups (such as 1-phenylethoxy) are substituted by high molecular weight alcohols (such as 2-hexanol or 1-phenylpropanol) enantioselectively. However, no enantiospecific process of alcoholysis was observed, and every reaction led to racemization products when the reaction time was longer than the optimal 96 h.

2.3. Carbonate-Mediated DEKR of Alcohols and Amines

To determine if DEKR with chiral carbonates can be used for the resolution of amines, we decided to study the scope of aminolysis of carbonates. According to the published literature concerning the utilization of carbonates in stereoselective procedures, symmetric carbonates (DMC and DEC) [18] and mixed vinyl carbonates were utilized as acyl donors in enantioselective synthesis of carbamate with a chiral alkoxy group [14,15]. The products were obtained by satisfying ee; however, the reaction lacked enantiospecificity, and toxic acetaldehyde was formed as a byproduct.
By combining enantioselective acyl transfer from model carbonates with acylation of chiral amine, a double enzymatic kinetic resolution was established. Model studies of the established process were performed on 1-phenylethyl amine (1o) and methyl 1-phenylethyl carbonate (2a). The optimization of reaction conditions revealed toluene at 50 °C to be most suitable and Novozym 435 (CALB) as the only efficient enzyme catalyzing reaction studied (Supplementary Materials, Tables S7–S9). To our great delight, (R)-methyl (1-phenylethyl) carbamate was obtained enantiospecifically, with a 45% yield of isolated product under optimized conditions. Moreover, (R)-1-phenylethanol was obtained with 90% ee and (S)-methyl 1-phenylethyl carbonate with 89% ee.
The possibility of reusing the enzyme notably reduces the cost of the process. Therefore, the recyclability of Novozym 435 was examined. The enzyme recyclability in the fifth run gave 56% of the initial activity, without loss of enantioselectivity (Figure 2 and Table S9). Notably, during runs 1–3, the activity decreased only slightly; therefore, the catalyst can be used three times for this process. Further recycling resulted in a decrease of reaction yield. However, the high enantioselectivity (whose decrease was not observed during recycling) indicates the possibility of the utilization of enzyme recycled more than two times. With the optimal conditions in hand and the catalyst characterized, we performed further enantioselectivity studies to obtain a deeper insight into the DEKR process. Under optimal conditions, a dependence of the ee values on the conversion was recorded for the model reaction (Figure 3).
The model reaction stopped near a conversion of 50%, which shows enantio-specificity towards (R)-1-phenylethylamine. Moreover, product formation was not observed when (S)-methyl 1-phenylethyl carbonate was used as a substrate. Analogously, when (S)-1-phenylethylamine was used as substrate, its conversion was not observed, despite a long incubation time. Having in hand general and efficient conditions for the one-pot synthesis of four compounds with high enantioselectivity, we examined the potential for optimized reaction on various alcohol derivatives and two model amines (Table 3).
To investigate the impact of a small molecular group of asymmetric carbonates on enzyme enantioselectivity (E), ethyl and methyl carbonates of 1-phenylethanol (2/3a) and 1-phenylpropanol (2/3b) were examined (Table 3, Entry 1–4). The obtained results indicated that methyl serving as smaller molecularly-unchangeable group is preferred by the enzyme, enhancing not only the enantioselectivity but also the conversion, similarly to DEKR by carbonate alcoholysis. In the case of a reaction between 1-phenylethylamine (1o) and a 2/3a-b derivatives ethyl group, negative impacts on reaction selectivity and velocity were found (reaction between 1p and 2b was three-fold slower than the model reaction). Notably, (R)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1c) was obtained with a higher yield. Since a double bond is known to be shorter than a single, 2c fits better in the catalytic center of the enzyme. Thus, the developed method enabled enantioselectively obtaining (R)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol, whose structural motif can be found in Reboxetine (an important antidepressant sold as drug Edronax®). Further studies on the scope and limitations showed that high enantioselectivities (E > 200) toward (R)-alcohols were obtained for secondary alcohols with a hydroxyl group near the chirality center. However, enantioselectivity towards aminolysis of (S)-carbonate was observed when the hydroxyl group was placed on the alpha of the stereogenic center. Therefore, when methyl 2-phenylprop-1-yl carbonate (2d) was used, (S)-alcohol was obtained (Table 3, Entry 6). The presented approach enabled synthesizing precursors of biologically active substances, such as novel glucokinase activators ((R)-1k; (R)-1-phenylpropan-2-ol) [33], potassium channel blockers ((R)-1j; (R)-4-phenylbutan-2-ol) [34]; or chiral cyclopropane derivatives’ precursor ((R)-1i; (R)-4-phenylbut-3-en-2-ol) [35]. All these compounds were obtained with a high enantiomeric excess and in a form easy to separate and use for further syntheses, after carbonate group removal under mild conditions. The easiness and efficiency of the separation of the product states allowed for high recovery yields, with a range 92–98% for all products (for a conversion of 50%) (Supplementary Materials, Table S11). To investigate the mentioned impact of carbonate chirality on the reaction enantioselectivity, n-hexyl methyl carbonate (2n) was used as an acyl donor. The reaction remained enantiospecific toward (R)-1-phenylethylamine; thus, we presume that the enantio-specificity of amine acylation comes from the carbonate asymmetry and carbonate–enzyme intermediate structure. To explore the enantioselectivity of developed method, the scope of DEKR of carbonates was evaluated with 4-phenylbutan-2-amine (precursor of the compounds used for treatment of hemangiomas or vascular malformations) [36] as acyl acceptor. Racemization of the products (2a and 3a in case of EKR, 2o and 2p in case of DEKR) was not observed, and the ee remained high, despite the long reaction time (see Supplementary Materials).
After scope limitation studies and a thorough analysis of the reaction outcomes, the impact of carbonate as an acyl donor on the reaction course was discussed. The proposed four-step catalytic cycle shows two chemoselective and two enantioselective steps (Scheme 3). The results of our studies indicated that the steps responsible for the binding of the acyl donor in the catalytic pocket (I) and alcohol release (II) have an enantioselectivity lower than the second step where the acyl group is transferred onto the amine (III). Thus, we presume that the binding of the C(=O)OCH3 group in the catalytic center is responsible for this enantioselectivity enhancement. Moreover, the enantioselectivity of C(=O)OCH3 moiety removal was enhanced by carbonate asymmetry, as shown by the results obtained for 1-hexyl methyl carbonate (2n). Thus, a clear impact of enzyme–carbonate acyl intermediate (C) on the reaction selectivity was demonstrated. During the first step, when the intermediate C is formed, its structure depends on the structure of the compound responsible for the nucleophilic attack in the third step. This was proven by the alcoholysis of the model carbonates with ethanol and methanol. In earlier works on carbonate double enantioselective reactions, an acyl–enzyme intermediate was formed selectively due to the irreversible tautomerization of vinyl alcohol. Thus, the more sterically-hindered intermediate was productive instead of the methyl/ethyl, which was not formed due to the utilization of vinyl-derived substrates. Thus, we proved that two types of intermediate can be formed in equilibrium driven processes. In the studied processes, only one form was productive, in contrast to chemically-catalyzed processes. The productivity of the intermediate depends not only on the enzyme selectivity, but also on the structure of nucleophile acting as an acyl acceptor in the second enantio-divergent reaction (III,IV).
Due to the enzyme selectivity and substrate nucleophilicity, the used biocatalyst forces the attack of the more sterically-hindered nucleophile when a low molecular weight intermediate is formed. Enzyme chemoselectivity results in an increase of enantioselectivity (sometimes resulting in enantio-specificity). Therefore, we showed that with careful substrate engineering, the enantioselectivity can be efficiently increased and two kinetic resolutions can be performed in a one-pot process. The presented protocol shows a clear correlation between chemoselectivity and enantioselectivity, which has been not discussed previously concerning the catalytic cycle. Previously, the utilization of vinyl carbonates forced the reaction equilibrium towards more sterically-hindered products, which resulted in a lower stereoselectivity. Our method is an example of substrate engineering leading to a notable increase of enantioselectivity through engagement of chemoselectivity.

2.4. Upscale Studies

Following the scope and limitation studies, the upscaling of the selected reactions was examined. Studies performed at 10 mmol scale clearly indicate that the developed protocols of EKR and double enzymatic kinetic resolution can be utilized for synthetic purposes (Supplementary Materials). The former provides a useful access to enantiopure (R)-carbonates (i.e., (R)-2h 47% conversion, 44% yield, >99% ee) and S-alcohols, the latter results in obtaining various compounds with high enantioselectivity. Notably, after upscaling, the enantioselectivities of the studied reactions remained as high as they were at analytical scale. In the case of the aminolysis of compounds 2f,h–j, the reactions were highly enantioselective towards both R-amine and R-carbonate after upscaling to 10 mmol. Notably, alcohol (R)-1h was synthesized with a high yield and >99% ee, which is very difficult to obtain using acyl donors such as vinyl acetate [22]. The compound 1h was recognized as a synthon of substances such as δ-lactones [37], inhibitors of soluble epoxide hydrolase [38], and FICA (novel derivatives used for determining the absolute configuration of secondary alcohols using 19F and 1H NMR spectroscopy) [39].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Instrumentation

All the chemicals were obtained from commercial sources, and the solvents and GC gases were of analytical grade. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 solution using a Bruker Oxford 400 NMR spectrometer (400 MHz) (Oxford Instruments, Bristol, England). Chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million using TMS as an internal standard. MS spectra were recorded on an API 365 mass spectrometer (SCIEX) (A B Sciex, Alderley, England). Conversion studies were performed on a Gas Chromatograph PerkinElmer Clarus 680 instrument (PerkinElmer Ltd., Beaconsfield, England), which was also used for enantiomeric excess determination; nitrogen as carrier gas, with temperature gradient variants provided in Section 3.6, split 40:1, flow 1 mL/min, column: CP 7502 CP-Chiralsil DexCB 25 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm. Enantiomeric excesses were determined using a HPLC system by SCION instruments: Series 6000 CO-6310 (SCION Instruments, Goes, The Netherlands), with a diode array detector DA-6430 (chromatograms recorded at λ1 = 220 nm) at temperature 20 °C (or 15 °C as mentioned) on Chiralcel OD-H column or Reprosil Chiral-OM column; with hexane: isopropanol serving as eluent (flow: 1 mL/min) with a PU-6100 pump. Determination of conversion when benzylamine was used as an acyl acceptor was performed using a Gas Chromatograph PerkinElmer Clarus 680 (PerkinElmer Ltd., Beaconsfield, England), using a column VF1701ms (Agilent Technologies, Cheadle, England), 30 m length, 0.25 mm cross-section, equipped with FID detector, nitrogen as carrier gas, flow 1 mL/min, split 40:1, with a temperature gradient 70–140 °C (rate 10 °C/min), hold of 140 °C for 3 min, 140–200 °C (rate 10 °C/min), and hold of 200 °C for 2 min at the end of the run (method 3). Structural and chromatographic data are attached in the Supplementary Materials. Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter at 25 °C, λ = 589 nm, with chloroform as solvent and cuvette 39.35/PX/50, Borofloat (Dunmow, England), path length 50 Starna scientific Ltd. For incubation a Thermo scientific MaxQ4450 shaker (Warsaw, Poland), was used. Enzymes used for screening: Novozym 435 CALB (Candida antarctica lipase B, activity: 10,000 PLU/g) were purchased from Novo Nordisk. PPL (crude lipase type II), wheat germ lipase, Amano PS, Amano AK, Acylase from Aspergillus meleus, Lipozyme, crude Lipase from Candida antarctica, lipase from Rhizopus arrizus, and lipase from Candida cylindracea were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Immobilized enzymes: Tl imino (Thermomyces lanuginosa lipase), PS imino (Pseudomonas cepacia lipase), CalA imino (Candida antarctica lipase A), CR imino (Candida rugosa lipase), and RM imino (Rhizomucor miehei lipase) were purchased from Purolite® Life Sciences (Llantrisant, England). The native enzymes set: Chiral Enzyme Spectrum “Amano” Ver. 2 was obtained from Amano.

3.2. Carbonate Synthesis

A total of 10 mmols of the corresponding alcohol was put in a round bottom flask and dissolved in 30 mL of DCM. Then, 11 mmol of pyridine was added and the flask was stirred in dry ice–acetone bath for 10 min. Subsequently, 17 mmol of chloroformate was added dropwise. After completion of chloroformate addition, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture was washed with 30 mL 1 M HCl. Then water phase was extracted with DCM (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous MgSO4. Then, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate), to obtain pure carbonate [27]. Solvents were carefully removed on a rotary evaporator at room temperature, as carbonates are likely to evaporate in vacuo.

3.3. Enzymatic Kinetic Resolution of Alcohols

A total of 3 mL vial alcohol (0.26 mmol) and dimethyl carbonate (1.25 mmol) were dissolved in 1 mL of MTBE, the enzyme was added (50 mg), and the reaction was placed on a shaker (200 rpm, rt.). Conversions were calculated using GC measurements (sample preparation: 50 µL of reaction mixture dissolved in 1 mL of ethyl acetate).

3.4. Double Enzymatic Kinetic Resolution of Alcohols

In a 3-mL glass vial of carbonate (0.26 mmol) 1-phenyletylamine (0.26 mmol) was dissolved 1 mL of toluene, and Novozym 435® CALB (50 mg) was added. The vial was closed and put on shaker (200 rpm, 50 °C) for three days. Then, 50 µL of reaction mixture was dissolved in 1 mL of ethyl acetate for GC studies. The remaining mixture was purified by column chromatography (hexane: ethyl acetate) (Table S8). For all reactions, two E-values for the two steps of kinetic resolution were calculated using the general calculation method [22]. According to the limitations of method accuracy, E-values above 200 were stated as “>200”. The optical purity of amines was calculated with optical rotation or upon derivation with an acetyl group.

3.5. Upscale Procedures

In a glass vial were placed Novozym 435® CALB (100 mg), carbonate (2 mmol), and 1-phenylethylamine (2 mmol), and 3 mL of toluene was added. The vial was closed and put on a shaker (200 rpm, 50 °C) for three days. Then, 50 µL of reaction mixture was dissolved in 1 mL of ethyl acetate for the GC studies. The remaining mixture was purified by column chromatography (hexane:ethyl acetate). Similarly, when the model reaction was performed on the model substrates at a scale of 10 mmol of carbonate and 10 mmol of amine, the enantioselectivity remained the same as obtained in the scope studies.

3.6. Enantioselectivity Determination

The enantioselectivities of the reactions were determined using GC-FID with a column CP7502 CP-Chirasil Dex CB 25 m 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm (Agilent Technologies), with a temperature gradient from 60 °C to 200 °C, and with a rate of 5 °C/min, with a hold of 200 °C for 3 min at the end of the run (method 1) or rate 3 °C/min with hold of 200 °C for 3 min at the end of the run (method 2) (general method profile is presented in Materials and Instrumentation section). In the case of compounds that could not be separated on the abovementioned column, chiral HPLC or optical rotation was used (columns OD-H or OM). Optical rotation measurements was also used to determine the R/S configuration of the alcohols obtained in the double enzymatic kinetic resolution reaction in cases where the standard HPLC or GC was used or where chromatographic separation was unsuccessful.

4. Conclusions

In summary, highly efficient protocols for double enzymatic kinetic resolution, leading to four enantiopure compounds (>99% ee), were successfully established. The aim of engaging chemo- and stereoselectivity in the development of a sustainable method for the synthesis of four enantiopure compounds in a one-pot process was successfully achieved. The developed method, by engaging complementary reactions, enables the versatile and enantioselective synthesis of amines and alcohols in a one-pot process. Additionally, the reaction time and amount of reagents required for the efficient separation of enantiomers were significantly decreased. In the course of our studies, we showed that only one alkoxy group of methyl- or ethyl carbonate derivatives is exchanged chemoselectively. The obtained results indicate that careful substrate engineering is crucial for the course and mechanism of the biocatalytic process. By substitution of vinyl carbonates with methyl- or ethyl carbonates, not only was toxic acetaldehyde release eliminated, but additionally the enantioselectivity was dramatically increased, giving access to all enantiomers of secondary amines and secondary alcohols with a hydroxyl group on the chiral center [13,14,15]. The presented protocol demonstrates that the utilization of chiral racemic mixed carbonates as acyl donors was responsible for the notable enantioselectivity improvement. The synthetic potential of the established protocol was shown on a group of alcohols and amines. The E-values of acyl transfer are higher for a kinetic resolution of acyl acceptor, which suggests that the second step of the DEKR process is enhanced by a low-molecular weight carbonate group being bound in the catalytic center. By combining the chemoselectivity towards a more sterically-hindered group of mixed carbonate with the enantioselectivity of enzyme-catalyzed acyl transfer, the enantioselectivity of the whole process was efficiently increased. Moreover, the enzyme–carbonate intermediate was responsible for the enantioselectivity increase in the acyl-removal part of the catalytic cycle. Thus, the enantioselectivity of acylation by carbonates and the second part of DEKR were improved. Moreover, the atypical tendency for exchanging an carbonate alkoxy group more structurally similar to the nucleophile was observed. An explanation was found by analysis of catalytic cycle studies and the chemical equilibrium. Our studies and previously published papers suggested that asymmetric carbonate forms two acyl–enzyme intermediates (by exchanging one of two possible alcoxy groups). The presented studies proved that through nucleophile choice one of these two intermediates can be productive. Thus, with selection of substrates, the composition of the final reaction mixture can be modified.
The presented approach combines two complementary reactions in a one-pot process, thus providing easy access to all enantiomers of pharmaceutically relevant products, with great atom economy. The deprotection of the obtained carbamates and carbonates under mild conditions eliminates possible racemization and increases the sustainability of the proposed process. The catalyst can be recycled and reused up to five times, without loss of enantioselectivity. The successful upscaling and utilization of environmentally sustainable carbonates provides the possibility of implementing the developed protocol in industrial applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27144346/s1, General procedures; 1H- and 13CNMR spectra of the obtained products, carbonates and carbamates, GC and HPLC traces of the obtained products; Table S1: Optimal carbonate to alcohol ratio for EKR of alcohols performed on model substrates in MTBE; Table S2: Solvent screening for EKR of alcohols for model substrates; Table S3: Enantioselectivity studies of EKR of alcohols using carbonates; Table S4: E-values for scope limitation reactions; Table S5: Solvent screening for DEKR by carbonate alcoholysis; Table S6: Temperature optimization for DEKR by carbonate alcoholysis; Table S7: Solvent screening for DEKR by carbonate aminolysis; Table S8: Temperature optimization for DEKR by carbonate aminolysis; Table S9: Enzyme recyclability studies; Table S10: E-values for scope limitation reactions of DEKR, with 1o serving as acyl acceptor; Table S11: Recovery yield studies for model DEKR reaction, Table S12: E-values for scope limitation reactions of DEKR, with 1p serving as acyl acceptor; Table S13: Upscale studies for selected reactions; Table S14: Upscale studies for selected DEKR reactions by carbonate aminolysis, Figure S1: Time course for model reaction of carbonate synthesis; Figure S2: Enzyme amount optimization for DEKR by carbonate alcoholysis; Figure S3: Time course of model DEKR by carbonate alcoholysis under optimized conditions Figure S4: Temperature optimization for model DEKR by aminolysis; Figure S5: Enzyme amount optimization for DEKR by aminolysis; Figure S6: Time course of model reaction in optimized conditions for DEKR by aminolysis. References [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K. and R.O.; methodology, D.K. and J.S.-G.; investigation, J.S.-G. and D.K.; resources, R.O.; data curation, D.K. and R.O.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.-G., A.B. and D.K.; writing—review and editing, J.S.-G., D.K., R.O. and A.B.; supervision, D.K. and R.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported from the National Science Centre, Poland project OPUS No. 2019/33/B/ST4/01118.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

On request by those interested.

Acknowledgments

The authors also would like to thank Zofia Samsonowicz-Górska for her invaluable help in the preparation of graphics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors upon request.

References

  1. Forman, S.A.; Warner, D.S. Clinical and Molecular Pharmacology of Etomidate. Anesthesiology 2011, 114, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Farlow, M.R.; Cummings, J.L. Effective Pharmacologic Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. Am. J. Med. 2007, 120, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. José, C.; Toledi, M.V.; Briand, L.E. Enzymatic kinetic resolution of racemic ibuprofen: Past, present and future. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Seddigi, Z.S.; Malik, M.S.; Ahmed, S.A.; Babalghith, A.O.; Kamal, A. Lipases in asymmetric transformations: Recent advances in classical kinetic resolution and lipase–metal combinations for dynamic processes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 348, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Skrobiszewski, A.; Gładkowski, W.; Maciejewska, G.; Wawrzeńczyk, C. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of trans-β-Aryl-δ-hydroxy-γ-lactones and Enzymatic Kinetic Resolution of Their Racemic Mixtures. Molecules 2016, 21, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Xing, X.; Jia, J.-Q.; Zhang, J.-F.; Zhou, Z.-W.; Li, J.; Wang, N.; Yu, X.-Q. CALB Immobilized onto Magnetic Nanoparticles for Efficient Kinetic Resolution of Racemic Secondary Alcohols: Long-Term Stability and Reusability. Molecules 2019, 24, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zdun, B.; Cieśla, P.; Kutner, J.; Borowiecki, P. Expanding Access to Optically Active Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs via Lipase-Catalyzed KR of Racemic Acids Using Trialkyl Orthoesters as Irreversible Alkoxy Group Donors. Catalysts 2022, 12, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leśniarek, A.; Chojnacka, A.; Gładkowski, W. Application of Lecitase® Ultra-Catalyzed Hydrolysis to the Kinetic Resolution of (E)-4-phenylbut-3-en-2-yl Esters. Catalysts 2018, 8, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Puchl’ová, E.; Szolcsányi, P. Scalable Green Approach Toward Fragrant Acetates. Molecules 2020, 25, 3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koszelewski, D.; Brodzka, A.; Madej, A.; Trzepizur, D.; Ostaszewski, R. Evaluation of gem-Diacetates as Alternative Reagents for Enzymatic Regio- and Stereoselective Acylation of Alcohols. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 6331–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wilk, M.; Brodzka, A.; Koszelewski, D.; Samsonowicz-Górski, J.; Ostaszewski, R. Model Studies on the Enzyme-Regulated Stereodivergent Cascade Passerini Reaction. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 29, 4161–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xia, B.; Cheng, G.; Lin, X.; Wu, Q. Dynamic Double Kinetic Resolution of Amines and Alcohols under the Cocatalysis of Raney Nickel/Candida antarctica Lipase B: From Concept to Application. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 14, 2917–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pozo, M.; Pulido, R.; Gotor, V. Vinyl carbonates as novel alkoxycarbonylation reagents in enzymatic synthesis of carbonates. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6477–6484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hoben, C.E.; Kanupp, L.; Bäckvall, J.-E. Practical chemoenzymatic dynamic kinetic resolution of primary amines via transfer of a readily removable benzyloxycarbonyl group. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 977–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pozo, M.; Gotor, V. Double enantioselective enzymic synthesis of carbonates and urethanes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2797–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pozo, M.; Gotor, V. Kinetic resolution of vinyl carbonates through a lipase-mediated synthesis of their carbonate and carbamate derivatives. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 10725–10732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paravidino, M.; Hanefeld, U. Enzymatic acylation: Assessing the greenness of different acyl donors. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2651–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Faber, K.; Riva, S. Enzyme-catalyzed irreversible acyl transfer. Synthesis 1992, 10, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Y.; Jin, Q.; Gao, Z.; Guo, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X. Asymmetric organic carbonate synthesis catalyzed by an enzyme with dimethyl carbonate: A fruitful sustainable alliance. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 7013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koszelewski, D.; Ostaszewski, R. The studies on chemoselective promiscuous activity of hydrolases on acylals transformations. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 93, 102825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hedfors, C.; Hult, K.; Martinelle, M. Lipase chemoselectivity towards alcohol and thiol acyl acceptors in a transacylation reaction. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2010, 66, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y. Kinetic resolution of rac-alkyl alcohols via lipase-catalyzed enantioselective acylation using succinic anhydride as acylating agent. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2009, 56, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Parrish, J.P.; Salvatore, R.N.; Jung, K.W. Perspectives on Alkyl Carbonates in Organic Synthesis. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8207–8237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gryglewicz, S.; Oko, F.A.; Gryglewicz, G. Synthesis of Modern Synthetic Oils Based on Dialkyl Carbonates. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 5007–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ono, Y. Catalysis in the production and reactions of dimethyl carbonate, an environmentally benign building block. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1997, 155, 133–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kantam, M.L.; Pal, U.; Sreedhar, B.; Choudary, B.M. An Efficient Synthesis of Organic Carbonates using Nanocrystalline Magnesium Oxide. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1671–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ohkoshi, M.; Michinishi, J.; Hara, S.; Senboku, H. Electrochemical carboxylation of benzylic carbonates: Alternative method for efficient synthesis of arylacetic acids. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7732–7737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, X.; Xiao, Y.; Wan, X.; Zhang, X. Copper-Catalyzed Highly Stereoselective Trifluoromethylation and Difluoroalkylation of Secondary Propargyl Sulfonates. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 3187–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Whiteoak, C.J.; Kielland, N.; Laserna, V.; Escudero-Adán, E.C.; Martin, E.; Kleij, A.W. A Powerful Aluminum Catalyst for the Synthesis of Highly Functional Organic Carbonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anastasiadou, D.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Figueiredo, M.C. Electrocatalytic synthesis of organic carbonates. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 13082–13092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tundo, P.; Musolino, M.; Aricò, F. The reactions of dimethyl carbonate and its derivatives. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 28–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bobbink, F.D.; Gruszka, W.; Hulla, M.; Das, S.; Dyson, P.J. Synthesis of cyclic carbonates from diols and CO2 catalyzed by carbenes. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10787–10790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ryono, D.E.; Cheng, P.T.W.; Bolton, S.A.; Chen, S.; Shi, Y.; Meng, W.; Tino, J.A.; Sulsky, R.B. Novel Glucokinase Activators and Methods of Using Same. U.S. Patent 2008009465A1, 10 January 2008. [Google Scholar]
  34. Flynn, B.L.; Baell, J.B.; Harvey, A.J.; Chaplin, J.H.; Paul, D.; Mould, J. Novel Benzofuran Potassium Channel Blockers and Uses Thereof. WO2008040057A1, 10 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  35. Molander, G.A.; Harring, L.S. Samarium-promoted cyclopropanation of allylic alcohols. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3525–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Lin, X.; Li, J. Substituted Aryl Amine Alcohol Compound and Its Preparation Method and Application. CN108299279A, 20 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsunoi, S.; Ryu, I.; Okuda, T.; Tanaka, M.; Komatsu, M.; Sonoda, N. New Strategies in Carbonylation Chemistry: The Synthesis of δ-Lactones from Saturated Alcohols and CO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8692–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, I.-H.; Nishi, K.; Kasagami, T.; Morisseau, C.; Liu, J.-Y.; Tsai, H.-J.; Hammock, B.D. Biologically active ester derivatives as potent inhibitors of the soluble epoxide hydrolase. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 5889–5892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Takahashi, T.; Kameda, H.; Kamei, T.; Koyanagi, J.; Pichierri, F.; Omata, K.; Ishizaki, M.; Nakamura, H. FICA, a new chiral derivatizing agent for determining the absolute configuration of secondary alcohols by 19F and 1H NMR spectroscopies. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2013, 24, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wiles, C.; Watts, P.; Haswell, S.J. Clean and selective oxidation of aromatic alcohols using silica-supported Jones’ reagent in a pressure-driven flow reactor. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5261–5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nakamura, T.; Tateishi, K.; Tsukagoshi, S.; Hashimoto, S.; Watanabe, S.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Aceña, J.L.; Kitagawa, O. Self-disproportionation of enantiomers of non-racemic chiral amine derivatives through achiral chromatography. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 4013–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 7th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  43. Koszelewski, D.; Grischek, B.; Glueck, S.M.; Kroutil, W.; Faber, K. Enzymatic Racemization of Amines Catalyzed by Enantiocomplementary ω-Transaminases. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gu, W.; Martinez, S.; Singh, A.K.; Nguyen, H.; Rozenski, J.; Schols, D.; Hederwijn, P.; Das, K.; De Jonghe, S. Exploring the dNTP -binding site of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase for inhibitor design. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 225, 113785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Plank, T.N.; Drake, J.L.; Kim, D.K.; Funk, T.W. Air-Stable, Nitrile-Ligated (Cyclopentadienone)iron Dicarbonyl Compounds as Transfer Reduction and Oxidation Catalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Varjosaari, S.E.; Skrypai, V.; Suating, P.; Hurley, J.J.M.; Gilbert, T.M.; Adler, M.J. 1-Hydrosilatrane: A Locomotive for Efficient Ketone Reductions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Margalef, J.; Slagbrand, T.; Tinnis, F.; Adolfsson, H.; Diégueza, M.; Pàmies, O. Third-Generation Amino Acid Furanoside-Based Ligands from d-Mannose for the Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones: Catalysts with an Exceptionally Wide Substrate Scope. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 4006–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tang, S.; Zhang, X.; Tu, H.; You, S. Regio- and Enantioselective Rhodium-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation of Racemic Allylic Alcohols with 1,3-Diketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7737–7742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, C.; Yamamoto, H. Tungsten-Catalyzed Asymmetric Epoxidation of Allylic and Homoallylic Alcohols with Hydrogen Peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1222–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bettoni, L.; Gaillard, S.; Renaud, J.-L. Iron-Catalyzed β-Alkylation of Alcohols. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 8404–8408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, J.; Yang, S.; Tang, W.; Yang, Z.; Xu, J. Iridium-catalyzed efficient reduction of ketones in water with formic acid as a hydride donor at low catalyst loading. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2118–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kanchanadevi, A.; Ramesh, R.; Semeril, D. Efficient and recyclable Ru(II) arene thioamide catalysts for transfer hydrogenation of ketones: Influence of substituent on catalytic outcome. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 808, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Amberchan, G.; Snelling, R.A.; Moya, E.; Landi, M.; Lutz, K.; Gatihi, R.; Singaram, B. Reaction of Diisobutylaluminum Borohydride, a Binary Hydride, with Selected Organic Compounds Containing Representative Functional Groups. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 6207–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chciuk, T.V.; Anderson, W.R.; Flowers, R.A. Interplay between Substrate and Proton Donor Coordination in Reductions of Carbonyls by SmI2–Water Through Proton-Coupled Electron-Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15342–15352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mizoguchi, H.; Uchida, T.; Katsuki, T. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Oxidative Kinetic Resolution of Unactivated and Activated Secondary Alcohols with Air as the Hydrogen Acceptor at Room Temperature. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 3242–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huy, P.H.; Motsch, S.; Kappler, S.M. Formamides as Lewis Base Catalysts in SN Reactions—Efficient Transformation of Alcohols into Chlorides, Amines, and Ethers. Angew. Chem. 2016, 55, 10145–10149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Houvman, J.A.; Knaus, T.; Costa, M.; Mutti, F.G. Efficient synthesis of enantiopure amines from alcohols using resting E. coli cells and ammonia. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 3846–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Gao, B.; Feng, X.; Meng, W.; Du, H. Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Ketones and Enones with Chiral Lewis Base Derived Frustrated Lewis Pairs. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 4498–4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kaithal, A.; van Bonn, P.; Hölscher, M.; Leitner, W. Manganese(I)-Catalyzed β-Methylation of Alcohols Using Methanol as C1 Source. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Eleftheriadis, N.; Thee, S.; Biesebeek, J.; der Wouden, P.; Baas, B.-J.; Dekker, F.J. Identification of 6-benzyloxysalicylates as a novel class of inhibitors of 15-lipoxygenase-1. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 94, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pacherille, A.; Tuga, B.; Hallooman, D.; Dos Reis, I.; Vermette, M.; Issack, B.B.; Rhyman, L.; Ramasami, P.; Sunasee, R. BiCl3-Facilitated removal of methoxymethyl-ether/ester derivatives and DFT study of –O–C–O– bond cleavage. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 7109–7116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Osumah, A.; Magolan, J.; Waynant, K.V. One-pot carbonyl reduction and carbonate formation using sodium borohydride in dialkyl carbonate solvents. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 151203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, L.; Tian, S. Immobilization of 1,5,7-Triazabicyclo [4.4.0]dec-5-ene on Magnetic γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles: A Highly Recyclable and Efficient Nanocatalyst for the Synthesis of Organic Carbonates. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 12, 2080–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Takizawa, K.; Sekino, T.; Sato, S.; Yoshino, T.; Kojima, M.; Matsunaga, S. Cobalt-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation Enabled by Organophotoredox Catalysis. Angew. Chem. 2019, 58, 9199–9203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jin, S.; Hunt, A.J.; Clark, J.H.; McElroy, C.R. Acid-catalysed carboxymethylation, methylation and dehydration of alcohols and phenols with dimethyl carbonate under mild conditions. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 5839–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Chevella, D.; Macharla, A.K.; Banothu, R.; Sai Gajula, K.; Amrutham, V.; Boosa, M.; Nama, N. Synthesis of non-symmetrical alkyl carbonates from alcohols and DMC over the nanocrystalline ZSM-5 zeolite. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 2938–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mutlu, H.; Ruiz, J.; Solleder, S.C.; Meier, M.A.R. TBD catalysis with dimethyl carbonate: A fruitful and sustainable alliance. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1728–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumara, S.; Jain, S.L. Non-symmetrical dialkyl carbonate synthesis promoted by 1-(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)-3-methylimidazolium chloride. New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 3057–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gu, Q.; Fang, J.; Xu, Z.; Ni, W.; Kong, K.; Hou, Z. CO2 promoted synthesis of unsymmetrical organic carbonate using switchable agents based on DBU and alcohols. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 13054–13064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hooker, J.M.; Reibel, A.T.; Hill, S.M.; Schueller, M.J.; Fowler, J.S. One-Pot, Direct Incorporation of [11C]CO2 into Carbamates. Angew. Chem. 2009, 48, 3482–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Zeng, R.; Bao, L.; Sheng, H.; Sun, L.; Chen, M.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, M. Heterobimetallic dinuclear lanthanide alkoxide complexes as acid–base bifunctional catalysts for synthesis of carbamates under solvent-free conditions. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 78576–78584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Leathen, M.L.; Peterson, E.A. Facile preparation of protected benzylic and heteroarylmethyl amines via room temperature Curtius rearrangement. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2888–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Di Nicola, A.; Arcadi, A.; Rossi, L. BMIm HCO3: An ionic liquid with carboxylating properties. Synthesis of carbamate esters from amines. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 9895–9898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ji, P.; Manna, K.; Lin, Z.; Feng, X.; Urban, A.; Song, Y.; Lin, W. Single-Site Cobalt Catalysts at New Zr12(μ3-O)8(μ3-OH)8(μ2-OH)6 Metal–Organic Framework Nodes for Highly Active Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes, Nitriles, and Isocyanides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7004–7011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gomm, A.; Lewis, W.; Green, A.P.; O’Reilly, E. A New Generation of Smart Amine Donors for Transaminase-Mediated Biotransformations. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12692–12695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Martín-Matute, B.; Edin, M.; Bogár, K.; Bäckvall, J.-E. Highly Compatible Metal and Enzyme Catalysts for Efficient Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Alcohols at Ambient Temperature. Angew. Chem. 2004, 43, 6535–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 04346 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Enzymatic kinetic resolution: classical, and enhanced by a carbonate-derived acyl-enzyme intermediate.
Scheme 1. Enzymatic kinetic resolution: classical, and enhanced by a carbonate-derived acyl-enzyme intermediate.
Molecules 27 04346 sch001
Molecules 27 04346 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Carbonate-mediated enzymatic kinetic resolution.
Scheme 2. Carbonate-mediated enzymatic kinetic resolution.
Molecules 27 04346 sch002
Molecules 27 04346 g002 550
Figure 2. Enzyme recyclability in model reaction (yield of isolated (R)-methyl (1-phenylethyl) carbamate.
Figure 2. Enzyme recyclability in model reaction (yield of isolated (R)-methyl (1-phenylethyl) carbamate.
Molecules 27 04346 g002
Molecules 27 04346 g003 550
Figure 3. Dependence of the enantiomeric excesses on the conversion of model reaction.
Figure 3. Dependence of the enantiomeric excesses on the conversion of model reaction.
Molecules 27 04346 g003
Molecules 27 04346 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Catalytic cycle with four intermediates (A–D) and two enantio-divergent steps.
Scheme 3. Catalytic cycle with four intermediates (A–D) and two enantio-divergent steps.
Molecules 27 04346 sch003
Table
Table 2. Carbonate-mediated double enzymatic kinetic resolution with alcohols as acyl acceptors; reaction enhanced using an acyl-enzyme intermediate 1.
Table 2. Carbonate-mediated double enzymatic kinetic resolution with alcohols as acyl acceptors; reaction enhanced using an acyl-enzyme intermediate 1.
Molecules 27 04346 i001
Entryrac-1 2Acyl Donors:
Molecules 27 04346 i002 Molecules 27 04346 i003
Conv1 3 (%)(S)-2a 5 ee (%)(R)-1a 5 ee (%) (E1)Conv2 4 (%)(S)-1 5 ee (%)(R)-2 5 ee (%) (E2)Conv1 3 (%)(S)-3a 5 ee (%)(R)-1a 5 ee (%) (E1)Conv2 4 (%)(S)-1 5 ee (%)(R)-3 5 ee (%) (E2)
11b111487 (14)1112>99 (>200)<1ndnd<1ndnd
21c264596 (76)274199 (>200)<1ndnd<1ndnd
31d *478795 (111)462631 (2)161681 (11)17420 (2)
41e101197 (58)910>99 (>200)10872 (7)12967 (6)
51f387595 (86)3656>99 (>200)181148 (3)181358 (4)
61g427290 (41)424765 (7)385285 (21)363461 (6)
71h457493 (61)4478>99 (>200)11868 (6)1214>99 (>200)
81i441115 (1)436583 (21)<1ndnd<1ndnd
91j8492 (25)101098 (72)<1ndnd<1ndnd
101k111198 (55)101197 (73)181881 (11)19521 (2)
111l488894 (94)474854 (5)293889 (25)30racrac
121m385183 (18)37racrac272978 (11)29racrac
131n314396 (75)ndndnd322351 (4)31ndnd
14MeOHndndndndndnd79nd8nd96 (63)
15EtOH129nd13nd86 (15)ndndndndndnd
1 Reaction conditions: 1b-n, MeOH or EtOH (0.26 mmol), 2/3a (0.26 mmol, 1 equiv.) and 1 mL toluene, 50 °C, 96 h, shaker 200 rpm. 2 According to description in Figure 1. 3 GC conversion calculated on carbonate 2/3a. 4 GC conversion calculated on alcohol 1b-n. 5 Enantiomeric excess of obtained compounds (E1—calculated on ee of 2/3a and 1a, E2—calculated on ee of 1b-n and 2b-n). * Reaction was S-selective. Nd—not determined.
Table
Table 3. Carbonate-mediated double enzymatic kinetic resolution with amines as acyl acceptors; reaction enhanced using an acyl-enzyme intermediate 1.
Table 3. Carbonate-mediated double enzymatic kinetic resolution with amines as acyl acceptors; reaction enhanced using an acyl-enzyme intermediate 1.
Molecules 27 04346 i004
Entryrac-2/3 2Acyl Acceptors:
Molecules 27 04346 i005 Molecules 27 04346 i006
Conv1 (%) 3(S)-2/3a-n ee (%)(R) 1a-n ee (%) (E1) 5Conv2 (%) 4(S)-1o ee (%)(R)-2/3o ee (%) (E2)5Conv1 (%) 3(S)-2/3a-n ee (%)(R) 1a-n ee (%) (E1) 5Conv2 (%) 4(S)-1p ee (%)(R)-2/3p ee (%) (E2) 5
12a498790 (54)4789>99 (>200)51>9971 (30)519592 (93)
23a273482 (14)283685 (18)203685 (15)212152 (4)
32b141576 (8)1315>99 (>200)292865 (6)304298 (150)
43b242062 (5)231033 (2)<1ndnd<1ndnd
52c283689 (25)2940>99 (>200)273489 (23)2630>99 (>200)
62d * 492425 (2) *4891>99 (>200)411522 (2) *396598 (195)
72e363567 (7)3656>99 (>200)424957 (6)406293 (52)
82f498989 (51)4789>99 (>200)478788 (44)477791 (49)
92g464656 (8)4485>99 (>200)423754 (5)416289 (32)
102h478798 (>200)4892>99 (>200)4992>99 (>200)478597 (183)
112i428598 (>200)4376>99 (>200)49>99>99 (>200)499297 (>200)
122j469498 (>200)4586>99 (>200)3655>99 (>200)3551>99 (112)
132k212283 (13)2143>99 (>200)314087 (21)324499 (>200)
142l442944 (3)4581>99 (>200)322245 (3)3045>99 (>200)
152m52racrac4995>99 (>200)45racrac468398 (>200)
162n48ndnd4994>99 (>200)45ndnd447899 (>200)
1 Reaction conditions: 2/3a-n (0.26 mmol), 1o-p (0.26 mmol, 1 equiv) and 1mL toluene, 50 °C, 64 h, shaker 200 rpm. 2 According to the description in Figure 1. 3 GC conversion calculated on carbonate. 4 GC conversion calculated on amine. 5 Enantiomeric excess of obtained compounds (E1—calculated on ee of 2/3a-n and 1a-n, E2—calculated on ee of 1o-p and 2/3o-p). * Reaction was S-selective.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samsonowicz-Górski, J.; Brodzka, A.; Ostaszewski, R.; Koszelewski, D. Intensification of Double Kinetic Resolution of Chiral Amines and Alcohols via Chemoselective Formation of a Carbonate–Enzyme Intermediate. Molecules 2022, 27, 4346. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144346

AMA Style

Samsonowicz-Górski J, Brodzka A, Ostaszewski R, Koszelewski D. Intensification of Double Kinetic Resolution of Chiral Amines and Alcohols via Chemoselective Formation of a Carbonate–Enzyme Intermediate. Molecules. 2022; 27(14):4346. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samsonowicz-Górski, Jan, Anna Brodzka, Ryszard Ostaszewski, and Dominik Koszelewski. 2022. "Intensification of Double Kinetic Resolution of Chiral Amines and Alcohols via Chemoselective Formation of a Carbonate–Enzyme Intermediate" Molecules 27, no. 14: 4346. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144346

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop