Next Article in Journal
One-Pot Multicomponent Synthesis of Methoxybenzo[h]quinoline-3-carbonitrile Derivatives; Anti-Chagas, X-ray, and In Silico ADME/Tox Profiling Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
MHD Stagnation Point on Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer of Carbon Nanotube over a Shrinking Surface with Heat Sink Effect
Previous Article in Journal
Kinetics and Energetics of Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Single-Point Labeled TUPS-Cytochrome c Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adsorption of Mussel Protein on Polymer Antifouling Membranes: A Molecular Dynamics Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Computational Investigations of a pH-Induced Structural Transition in a CTAB Solution with Toluic Acid

Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6978; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226978
by Tingyi Wang 1, Hui Yan 2,*, Li Lv 3, Yingbiao Xu 1, Lingyu Zhang 1 and Han Jia 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6978; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226978
Submission received: 31 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 19 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Simulation in Interface and Surfactant)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript entitled “Computational Investigations of a pH-Induced Structural Transition in CTAB Solution with Toluic Acid” written by Wang et al. treats about molecular dynamics calculations of structural reorganization for Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)/p-toluic acid (PTA) solution induced by pH changes. As the examined system is a surfactant, the micellar architectures in solution were analysed. With neutral PTA (acidic solution) spherical micelles were produced while with anionic PTA (pH=7) the rodlike ones were obtained. The mechanism governed these shape changes were thoroughly evaluated by MD methods. This work brings interesting results into the field of surfactant chemistry and is technically correct, well-written with clear, coherent style. Therefore, I recommend to publish this material nearly as it stands with minor comments from my side:

  1. In Table 1 why the number of CTA+ molecules differs between two approaches? 180 (at pH=2) and 108 (at pH=7)?
  2. At the end of conclusion section, a short perspective should be given on the potential of using the Authors’ results in practical application.
  3. Is it possible to visualize even one or couple electrostatic interaction in systems discussed? I mean, is it possible to show exemplary direct bonding path between the atoms engaged?
  4. Some references require reformatting, like unification of the font (bolding or unbolding year; volumin numbers in italics or not, e.g. ref. 7-9, 27, 28, etc.)

Author Response

Please see the attachment file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is a very interesting application of the MD simulation in the description of the intermolecular forces between surfactant molecules, that form spherical and/or cylindrical micells in accord to the pH.

The MD simulation were done properly and the obtained data sound solids, also their analysis were properly done.

The conclusion is appropiate.

I suggest the author the following few modifications:

  1. Please, update figure 2 showing both the initial (t =0) and final configuration (t= 20 ns) of these systems at pH 2 and 7.
  2. Please, check carefully the use of abbreviations in both the abstract and the text. Sometime the ionized p-toluic acid is wrongly indicated PTA+ (lines: 19, 178, 215, 243)
  3. Please, check carefully the English of the manuscript, several mistakes are evident ( lines: 58, 61, 74, 76, 78, 85,144)
  4. Please, check for not properly written sentences (137-138, 140, 173-174, 179, 252)
  5. Line 239, please, replace 'Figure 6c' with 'Figure 7'

Author Response

Please kindly check the file attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop